arxiv: v1 [math.kt] 2 Dec 2012

Transcription

1 CONNECTVE ALGEBRAC K-THEORY ariv: v1 [math.kt] 2 Dec 2012 SHOUN DA AND MARC LEVNE Abstract. We examine the theory of connective algebraic K-theory, CK, defined by taking the -1 connective cover of algebraic K-theory with respect to Voevodsky s slice tower in the motivic stable homotopy category. We extend CK to a bi-graded oriented duality theory (CK,,CK, ) in case the base scheme is the spectrum of a field k of characteristic zero. The homology theory CK, may be viewed as connective algebraic G-theory. We identify CK 2n,n () for a finite type k-scheme with the image of K 0(M (n) ()) in K 0 (M (n+1) ()), where M (n) () is the abelian category of coherent sheaves on with support in dimension at most n; this agrees with the (2n,n) part of the theory of connective algebraic K-theory defined by Cai. We also show that the classifying map from algebraic cobordism identifies CK 2, with the universal oriented Borel-Morel homology theory Ω CK := Ω L Z[β] having formal group law u + v βuv with coefficient ring Z[β]. As an application, we show that every pure dimension d finite type k scheme has a well-defined fundamental class [] CK in Ω CK d (), and this fundamental class is functorial with respect to pull-back for lci morphisms. Furthermore, the fundamental class [] CK maps to the usual fundamental classes [] Chow, reap. [] K under the natural maps Ω CK K 0 [β,β 1 ]; Ω CK given by inverting β, resp. moding out by β. Contents CH ntroduction 2 1. K-theory and connective K-theory 3 2. An explicit model 6 3. Oriented duality theories Algebraic cobordism and oriented duality theories K-theory The comparison map Lci pull-backs and fundamental classes 26 References Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14C25, 19E15; Secondary 19E08 14F42, 55P42. Key words and phrases. Algebraic cobordism. The author M.L. thanks the Humboldt Foundation for support through the Humboldt Professorship. The author S.D. warmly thanks continuous support and encouragement of M. Levine throughout the years and expresses his gratitude to. Sun for support in many ways. He is indebted to A. Merkurjev for inspirational communications. 1

2 2 SHOUN DA AND MARC LEVNE ntroduction n topology, the theory of connective K-theory is represented by the -1 connected coverku of the topological K-theory spectrum KU. n the setting of motivic stable homotopy theory over a base-scheme S, Voevodsky [29] has constructed the algebraic analog of KU, namely the algebraic K-theory spectrum K S, which represents Quillen s algebraic K-theory on the category of smooth S-schemes, assuming that S itself is a regular scheme (see also [21]), in that there are natural isomorphisms K a,b S () = K 2b a () for a smooth finite type S-scheme. There are a number of possible notions of connectivity in the motivic stable homotopy category over S, SH(S), but one that has proved quite useful is given by using T-connectivity (T = A 1 /A 1 \{0}), in the sense of the tower of localizing subcategories Σ n+1 T SH eff (S) Σ n TSH eff (S)... SH(S), where SH eff (S) is the localizing subcategory of SH(S) generated by the T-suspension spectra of smooth S-schemes. The associated truncation functors give rise to Voevodsky s slice tower f n+1 E f n E E for each E SH(S), with f n E E the universal morphism from an object in Σ n T SHeff (S) to E; one could call this the T-(n 1)-connected cover of E. t is thus natural to define connective algebraic K-theory as the bi-graded cohomology theory represented by f 0 K S. n this paper we study connective algebraic K-theory, CK, and its associated oriented homology theory, CK,, this latter for S = Speck, k a characteristic zero field (see however remark 5.7). The oriented homology theory CK, is the connective analog of G-theory, that is, the K-theory of coherent sheaves rather than vector bundles. The canonical map CK, K, induces the map CK, G, (where G a,b () := G a 2b ()) and we elucidate here how the connective versions refine the non-connective ones. Cai [1] has defined a bi-graded oriented Borel-Moore homology theory, which he calls connective algebraic K-theory, by using the Quillen-Gersten spectral sequence. Concretely, he defines the group CK a,b () as the image of K 2b a (M (a) ()) in K 2b a (M (a 1) ()), where M (a) () is the category of coherent sheaves on supported in codimension at least a (this is for smooth or at least equi-dimensional over a field k; in the general case, one indexes using dimension giving the theory CK, ). Cai verifies the properties of an oriented Borel-Moore homology theory for CK,. t turns out this Cai s theory does not in general agree with the one given by motivic homotopy theory, but it does agree in the portion corresponding to K 0 or G 0 (see theorem 5.4 and remark 5.6). Besides comparison results of this type and other structural properties of connective K-theory, our main result is a comparison with algebraic cobordism. There is a canonical natural transformation Ω () L Z[β] CK 2, () which, in the case of characteristic zero, is an isomorphism for all quasi-projective k- schemes (see theorem 6.3). This allows us to use the natural fundamental classes in G-theory, namely, the class of the structure sheaf, to define a fundamental class

3 CONNECTVE ALGEBRAC K-THEORY 3 [] Ω d () L Z[β] for of pure dimension d over k, which is functorial with respect to pull-back by l. c. i. morphisms. Note that such fundamental classes in Ω d () do not exist in general [12]. We let Spc and Spc denote the categories of simplicial sets and pointed simplicial sets, respectively, with homotopy categories H and H. Spt the category of spectra (for the usual suspension operator Σ := ( ) S 1 ) and SH the stable homotopy category. For a scheme S, Sch/S will denote the category of quasi-projective schemes over S, Sm/S the full subcategory of smooth quasi-projective schemes over S. Spc(S), and Spc (S) the categories of pre sheaves on Sm/S with values in Spc, Spc, Spt S 1(S) the category of S 1 -spectra over S, this being the category of presheaves of spectra on Sm/S. We let Spt T (S) denote the category of T-spectra in Spc (S), with T := A 1 /A 1 \{0}, and Spt Σ T (S) the categoryof symmetric T-spectra. We have as well the category of S 1 G m bi-spectra objects in Spc (S), denoted Spt s,g (S). The categories Spc(S), Spc (S), Spt S 1(S), Spt T (S), Spt s,g (S) and Spt Σ T(S) all have so-called motivic model structures (the original source for the unstable theory is [18], see also [3, 4] for a compact description. For the stable theory, we refer the reader to [8]), with homotopy categories denoted H(S), H (S), SH S 1(S), SH(S), SH s,g (S) and SH Σ (S), respectively. The categories SH(S), SH s,g (S) and SH Σ (S) are equivalent triangulated tensor categories; the tensor structure is inducedbyasymmetricmonodicalstructureonspt Σ T (S). Thereisalsoasymmetric spectra version of Spt S 1(S) making SH S 1(S) a tensor triangulated category. We denote byg m the pointed S-scheme(A 1 S 0 S,1 S ). P 1 will denotethe pointed S-scheme P 1 S, with base-point 1 S. Ord is the category of finite ordered sets, we let [n] Ord denote the set {0,...,n} with the standard ordering. We let L denote the Lazard ring, that is, the coefficient ring of the universal rank one commutative formal group law F L L[[u,v]]. We let L denote Lwith the gradingdetermined bydega ij = 1 i j if F L (u,v) = u+v+ i,j 1 a iju i v j and let L denote L with the opposite grading L n := L n. 1. K-theory and connective K-theory We work in the motivic stable homotopy category SH(S) over a regular basescheme S; we will rather quickly pass to the case S = Speck for a field k. We have the Tate-Postnikov tower... f n+1 f n... id of endofunctors of SH(S) associated to the inclusions of full localizing subcategories Σ n+1 T SH eff (S) Σ n TSH eff (S) SH(S). withσ n T SHeff (S) the fulllocalizingsubcategoryofsh(s)generatedbythe objects Σ m T + for Sm/S, m n. Letting i n : Σ n T SHeff (S) SH(S) be the inclusion, i n admits the right adjoint r n : SH(S) Σ n T SHeff (S) and f n is by definition the composition i n r n ; the natural transformation f n id is the counit of the adjunction. There are functors s n, n Z which give a distinguished trianglef n+1 f n s n f n+1 [1]; onecanshowthatthesedistinguishedtriangles are unique up to unique natural isomorphism. n addition, we have the canonical

4 4 SHOUN DA AND MARC LEVNE isomorphism f n+1 Σ T = ΣT f n. For details, we refer the reader to [9, 26, 27]. Remark 1.1. By [5, proposition 5.3], if E is given a lifting to an E ring object in Spt Σ T(S), then f 0 E has a canonical lifting to an E ring object in Spt Σ T(S). n particular, f 0 E is itself a commutative unital monoid in SH(S) and thus defines a bi-graded cohomology theory on Sm/S in the sense of Panin [19, definition 2.0.1]. Following[25, lemma 2.5, theorem 4.1] we have a commutative unital monoid object K S ofspt Σ T(S) representingalgebraick-theoryin SH(S), in the sensethat, for each Sm/S andopensubschemeu,thereisanisomorphismhom(σ T /U,K S) = K( on \U) in SH, natural in pairs (,U). Here Hom(, ) is the Spt-valued enriched Hom and K( on \U) is the algebraic K-theory spectrum of the category of perfect complexes on with support on \U. Here we use our standing assumption that S is regular; for general S, K S represents homotopy invariant K-theory KH. To fix the conventions, the image of K S in SH(S) under the forgetful functor is isomorphic in SH(S) to a T-spectrum of the form ( K S, K S,...), with K S a commutative unital monoid in H (S) representing K-theory on Sm/S. The structure map K S T K S is isomorphic in H (S) to the composition K S T id σ K S P 1 id γ K S K S µ KS whereµisthe multiplication, ρ : T P 1 isthe standardisomorphismandγ : P1 K S represents the class [O] [O( 1)] in K 0 (P 1 ). This agrees with the convention in [25], and is the negative of the convention used in [21]. We will often write K S for the image of K S in SH(S), with the context determining the meaning. Remark The fact that the shift operatorleavesthe T-spectrum( K S, K S,...) unchanged gives us the Bott periodicity isomorphism Σ T K S = KS in SH(S). We note that the map γ : P 1 K S thus gives rise to an element [γ] K 2,1 (P 1 ) which corresponds to the unit 1 K 0,0 (S) under the suspension isomorphism K 2,1 (P 1 ) = K 0,0 (S). 2. Let t K K 1,1 S (G m) be the element corresponding to 1 K 0,0 (S) under the suspension isomorphism K 1,1 (G m ) = K 0,0 (S). Thus Σ S 1t K = [γ]. Under the isomorphismsk 1 (G m ) = K 1,1 (G m ), K 0 (P 1 ) = K 2,1 (P 1 ), the isomorphismk1,1 (G m ) = K 2,1 (Σ S 1G m ) = K 2,1 (P 1 ) is identified with the boundarymap in the Mayer-Vietoris sequence K 1 (A 1 ) K 1 (A 1 ) K 1 (A 1 \{0}) K 0 (P 1 ) Let [t] K 1 (A 1 \ {0}) be the image of the canonical coordinate t on A 1 \ {0} = SpecO S [t,t 1 ]. Then [t] = 1 [O( 1)] (at least up to a universal sign, see [24, 7, lemma 5.16]), and hence t K = [t ±1 ]. Definition 1.3. Let CK S be the object f 0 K S of SH(S), with canonical map ρ : CK S K S. Connective algebraic K-theory over S is the bi-graded cohomology theory on Sm/S represented by CK S. We call CK S the connective algebraic K- theory T-spectrum (over S).

5 CONNECTVE ALGEBRAC K-THEORY 5 Remark 1.4. The fact that CK S lifts to an E -ring object in Spt Σ T (S) is noted in [5, 6.2]. Lemma 1.5. Suppose s 0 K S satisfies (s 0 K S ) a,0 () = 0 for a 0 and for all Sm/S. For Sm/S, consider the natural map ρ a,1 () : CK a,1 S () Ka,1 S (). Then ρ 2,1 is injective, ρ 3,1 is surjective and ρ a,1 is an isomorphism for a 2,3. Proof. ByBottperiodicity,wehaveΣ T f 0 K S = f 1 Σ T K S = f 1 K S. ThusCK a,1 () = (f 1 K) a 2,0 (). Since Σ T + is in SH eff (S), we have K,0 () = (f 0 K S ),0 (), and we thus have a long exact sequence... (s 0 K S ) a 3,0 () CK a,1 () ρ K a,1 () (s 0 K S ) a 2,0 ()... Our assumption (s 0 K S ) a,0 () = 0 for a 0 yields the desired result. Remark 1.6. For S = Speck, k a perfect field, we know by [28, theorem 6.6] [9, theorem ] that s 0 K S is isomorphic in SH(k) to the T-spectrum representing motivic cohomology, HZ. We also know that HZ a,0 () = H a ( Zar,Z) for Sm/k, hence the assumption in lemma 1.5 is satisfied. n addition, the map K 2,1 k () = K 0() HZ 0,0 () is just the rank homomorphism, hence surjective. As K a,1 S () = K 2 a() = 0 for a > 2, we see that CK a,1 () = 0 for a > 2 as well. The functors f n and s n are compatible with pull-back by smooth morphisms [23, theorem 2.12, remark 2.13], and for f : T S smooth, we have f K S = KT. Thus (s 0 K S ) a,0 () = H a ( Zar,Z) for Sm/S if S is smooth over a perfect field. Thus, for S smooth over a perfect field, the map CK a,1 S is an isomorphism for a < 2, an injection for a = 2 and CK a,1 S () Ka,1 S () = K 2 a() () = 0 for a > 2. Remark 1.7. For n 1, let P n denote the S-scheme Pn S, pointed by (1 : 1 : 0... : 0) and let P denote the colimit (in Spc (S)) of the P n under the linear embeddings (x 0 :... : x n ) (x 0 :... : x n : 0). Recall from [20, definition 1.2] that an orientation on a commutative ring spectrum E in SH(S) is given by an element c E 2,1 (P ) such that the restriction c P 1 E 2,1 (P 1 ) = E 2,1 (T) is Σ T (1) (we use the opposite sign convention from loc. cit.). Consider the sequence of elements 1 [O P n( 1)] K 2,1 S (Pn ) = K 0 (P n S ), which are clearly compatible with respect to restriction via the hyperplane embeddings P n P n+1. As the sequence n K 1,1 S (Pn S ) = K 1(P n S ) satisfies the Mittag-Leffler condition (all the restriction maps are surjective), this defines a unique element c K K 2,1 S (P ), giving the standard orientation for K S ; the fact that c K is an orientation follows from remark 1.2. Remark 1.8. The algebraic cobordism spectrum MGL has been studied in [20]. MGL is the T-spectrum (MGL 0,MGL 1,...) with MGL n the Thom space Th(E n ), with E n BGL n the universal n-plane bundle. MGL S is a commutative ring spectrum object (i.e. a commutative unital monoid) in SH(S) with an orientation c MGL MGL 2,1 (P ) given by the diagram E 1 Th(E 1 ) = MGL 1 P noting that E 1 BGL 1 = P is an isomorphism in H(S). The main result, theorem 1.1, of [20] is the universality of (MGL,c MGL ) in case S = Speck: For

6 6 SHOUN DA AND MARC LEVNE E a commutative unital monoid in SH(k), sending a unital monoid morphism ϕ : MGL E to ϕ(c MGL ) gives a bijection of the set of unital monoid maps ϕ with the set of orientations c E E 2,1 (P ). Lemma 1.9. Suppose that S satisfies the hypothesis of lemma 1.5. Suppose in addition that the map K 0,0 S (Pn S ) (s 0K S ) 0,0 (P n S ) is the rank homomorphism K 0(P n S ) H 0 (S,Z) (up to sign). Then there is a unique element c CK CK 2,1 (P ) mapping to c K under the canonical map CK 2,1 (P ) K 2,1 (P ). Furthermore, c CK CK 2,1 (P ) defines an orientation for CK. Proof. By our assumptions on S, we have the exact sequence 0 CK 2,1 S (Pn S ) K 0(P n S ) rnk H 0 (S,Z) 0 Thus CK 2,1 S (Pn ) K2,1 S (Pn ) is an isomorphism. Furthermore, the canonical map CK 1,1 S (Pn S ) K1,1 S (Pn ) = K 1 (P n S ) is an isomorphism. By the projective bundle formula, the projective system of groups n K 1 (P n S ) satisfies the Mittag-Leffler condition. Thus, passing to the limit over n gives us the isomorphism CK 2,1 S (P S ) = K 2,1 S (P S ) and the orientation c K = (1 [O P n S ( 1)]) n K 2,1 S (P ) gives us the element c CK CK 2,1 (P ). The fact that Σ P 1(1 KS ) = c K P 1 implies Σ P 1(1 CKS ) = c CK P 1, hence c CK is an orientation. Remark Byremark1.6, ifs issmoothoveraperfectfield, then the hypotheses of lemma 1.9 are fulfilled and hence CK S has a unique orientation mapping to the standard orientation of K S. 2. An explicit model WetakeS = Speck, k aperfectfield. Let bethecosimplicialschemen n k, with n k := Speck[t 0,...,t n ]/ t i 1. i The morphism (g) : n m associated to g : [n] [m] is given by g (t i ) = j g 1 (i) where as usual the sum over the empty index set is 0. A face of m is a closed subset F defined by equations of the form t i1 =...t ir = 0. We briefly recall the construction of the homotopy coniveau tower associated to a presheaf of S 1 -spectra on Sm/k. For Sm/k and n,m 0 integers, let S n (m) denote the set of closed subsets W of m such that t j codim F W F n for all faces F of m. For E Spt S 1(k), we let E (n) (,m) := hocolim W S n (m)ew ( m ). This gives us the simplicial spectrum m E (n) (,m), and the associated total spectrum E (n) (). This construction is contraviarantly functorial in for equidimensional morphisms. Letting Sm//k Sm/k denote the subcategory of Sm/k with the same objects, and with morphisms the smooth morphisms, sending to

7 CONNECTVE ALGEBRAC K-THEORY 7 E (n) () defines a presheaf of spectra on Sm//k.. t was shown in [9, theorem 4.1.1] that there are models Ẽ(n) () for E (n) () so that Ẽ(n) () extends to a presheaf of spectra Ẽ(n) on Sm/k, isomorphic to E (n) () on Sm//k. The main result of [9] is: Theorem 2.1 ([9, theorem 7.1.1]). Let E Spt S 1(k) be quasi-fibrant. There is a natural isomorphism in SH S 1(k) f n E = Ẽ(n). Here quasi-fibrant means that a fibrant replacement E E fib gives a weak equivalence E() E fib () for all Sm/k. For a category C, we let C be C with a final object adjoined. Let be a finite category and : Sm//k an -diagram in Sm//k, that is, a functor. For a presheaf of spectra E on Sm//k, define E() as E() := holim op E op, where E( ) is defined to be the initial object in Spt. For an -diagram : Sm//k, we have the -diagram Σ T + : Spt T (k) defined by Σ T +(i) := Σ T (i) + if (i) is in Sm/k, and setting Σ T + equal to the final T-spectrum (pt,pt,...). We similarly define Σ s + : Spt S 1(k). Example 2.2. Let be in Sm/k and j : U an open immersion with closed complement Z. Let be the category 0 a 1 and let /U : Sm//k be the diagram 0 U, 1,, a j. Then for E a presheaf of spectra on Sm//k, E(/U) is just the homotopy fiber of j : E() E(U). Similarly, if is the one-point category 0 and is the functor : 0 Sm//k with (0) =, we have a canonical isomorphism E() = E() in SH. Lemma 2.3. Let : Sm//k be a finite diagram of smooth k-schemes (possibly with (i) = for some values i ) and take E SH(k). Let E Spt S 1(k) be a fibrant model for Ω T E SH S 1(k). Then Hom(hocolim Σ T +,f n E) SH is represented by the spectrum E (n) (). Proof. The adjunction gives the isomorphism in SH Hom(hocolim Σ T : SH S 1(k) SH(k) : Ω T Σ T +,f n E) = Hom(hocolimΣ s +,Ω T f ne). t follows from [9, theorem 7.1.1, theorem 9.0.3] that we have the isomorphism in SH S 1(k) Ω T f n E = f n Ω T E = f n E.

8 8 SHOUN DA AND MARC LEVNE We thus have the isomorphisms in SH Hom(hocolimΣ s +,Ω T f n E) = Hom(hocolimΣ s +,f n E) = holimhom(σ s +,f n E) = holimf n E op. We give the category of -diagrams in Spt the projective model structure, with weak equivalences the pointwise ones, and let Ho(Spt ) denote the homotopy category. By [9, theorem 7.1.1], we have the isomorphism in Ho(Spt ) giving the isomorphism in SH Hom(hocolim f n E op = E (n) op, Σ s +,Ω T f ne) = holime (n) op = E (n) (). We let K Spt S 1(k) be the presheaf of spectra given by sending to the Quillen-Waldhausen spectrum K() representing the algebraic K-theory of. We note that K is a quasi-fibrant object of Spt S 1(k). Proposition 2.4. Let : Sm//k be a finite diagram of smooth k-schemes as in lemma 2.3. Take in Sm/k. There is a canonical isomorphism natural in. CK p,q () = π 2q p K (q) (),p,q Z, Proof. We make π 2q p K (q) () a functor in by using the functorial model K (q) for K (q) and the canonical isomorphism π K (q) () = π K(q) (). Using lemma 2.3 and a variety of adjunctions and definitions, we have the sequence of isomorphisms CK p,q () = Hom SH(k) (hocolimσ T +,Σ p,q CK) = Hom SH(k) (hocolimσ T +,Σ p,q f 0 K) = Hom SH(k) (hocolimσ T +,Σ p 2q S Σ q 1 T f 0K) = Hom SH(k) (hocolimσ T +,Σ p 2q S f 1 q Σ q T K) = Hom SH(k) (Σ T Σ2q p S 1 = Hom SHS 1(k)(Σ 2q p S 1 = Hom SHS 1(k)(Σ 2q p S 1 hocolimσ s +,f q K) hocolimσ s,ω T f q K) hocolimσ s,f qk) = Hom SH (S 2q p,hom(hocolimσ T +,f q K)) = π 2q p K (q) (). Corollary 2.5. Let be smooth over k. Then CK 2n,n () is equal to K 0 () for n 0. For n > 0, CK 2n,n () is determined by the exact sequence K (n) 0 (,1) δ 1 δ 0 K 0 (M (n) ) CK2n,n () 0.

9 CONNECTVE ALGEBRAC K-THEORY 9 n particular, CK 2n,n (k) K 2n,n (k) = K 0 (k) = Z is an isomorphism for n 0; for n > 0, CK 2n,n (k) = 0. Proof. Viewing as the one-point diagram, it follows from proposition 2.4 that we have a canonical isomorphism CK 2n,n () = π 0 (K (n) ()). For n 0, K (n) () is weakly equivalent to K(). For n > 0, K (n) (,m) is -1 connected, since K W (Y) is so for all closed W Y, Y Sm/k. This gives the presentation for CK 2n,n () = π 0 (K (n) ()). For Sm/k with generic point η we define CK a,b (η) as the stalk at η of the presheaf on Zar, U CK a,b (U). Corollary 2.6. Let η be a generic point of some Sch/k. Then CK p,q (η) = 0 for p > q. Proof. By proposition 2.4, CK p,q (η) = π 2q p K (q) (η). But K (q) (η) is the total spectrum of the simplicial spectrum m K (q) (η,m), with K (q) (η,m) := hocolim W S n (m)kw (η m ). Asη m = m k(η), itfollowsthateachclosedsubsetw ofη m hascodimw m, and hence K (q) (η,m) is the 0-spectrum if m < q. Furthermore, the K-theory presheaf is a presheaf of -1 connected spectra and for each open immersion j : U V in Sm/k, the restriction map j K 0 (V) K 0 (U) is surjective. Thus K W (η m ) is a -1 connected spectrum for each m. Using the strongly convergent spectral sequence E 1 a,b = π b K (q) (η,a) = π a+b K (q) (η), we see that π n K (q) (η) = 0 for n < q, hence CK p,q (η) = π 2q p K (q) (η) = 0 for p > q. We conclude this section with a discussion of the functor CK 2q 1,q. Let E SH(S) represent a bi-graded cohomology theory. Let t E E 1,1 (G m ) be the element corresponding to the unit 1 E 0,0 (S) under the suspension isomorphism. By functoriality, t E gives a map of pointed sets t E () : O () E1,1 (); if E admits an orientation c E E 2,1 (P ) (which we will from now on assume), then t E () is a group homomorphism. 1 Using the E, (S)-module structure on E, (), t E () extends to a map of E, (S)-modules t E () : E 2, (S) Z O () E2 +1, +1 (). 1 Letting S denote the sphere spectrum and writing [a] := ts (a), this follows from the identity [ab] = [a]+[b]+h[a][b] (H : S G m S the stable Hopf map) and the fact that H goes to zero in any oriented theory E. Both these facts are proven by Morel in [17, 6].

10 10 SHOUN DA AND MARC LEVNE Lemma 2.7. Suppose S = Speck. Let η be a generic point of some Sm/k. 1. Take E = K. Then K 2, (k) = Z[β,β 1 ], degβ = 1 and t K (η) : K 2, (k) Z k(η) K 2 +1, +1 (η) is an isomorphism. 2. Take E = CK. Then CK 2, (k) = Z[β], degβ = 1 and t CK (η) : CK 2, (k) Z k(η) CK 2 +1, +1 (η) is an isomorphism. 3. Take E = MGL and suppose k has characteristic zero. Then MGL 2, (k) is canonically isomorphic to the Lazard ring L, t MGL (η) : k(η) MGL 1,1 (η) is an isomorphism and t MGL (η) : MGL 2, (k) Z k(η) MGL 2 +1, +1 (η) is surjective. Proof. We havealreadyseenin remark1.2that under the isomorphismk 1,1 (G m ) = K 1 (G m ), t K goesto theclassofthe canonicalunit t(orpossiblyt 1 ). Byfunctoriality, the mapt K : k(η) K 1 (η) = K 1,1 (η) isthe usualisomorphismk(η) = K 1 (η) sending x k(η) to the class of the automorphism x ǫ : k(η) k(η), where ǫ = ±1 is universal choice of sign (independent of k or η). The isomorphism K 2, (k) = Z[β,β 1 ] follows from the Bott periodicity isomorphism K 2n,n (k) = K 0 (k) = Z. Since β is invertible, the fact that t K : k(η) K 1,1 (η) is an isomorphism implies that t K (η) : K 2, (k) Z k(η) K 2 +1, +1 (η) is an isomorphism. For (2), it follows from the universal property of f 0 id that CK a,b () K a,b () is an isomorphism for all b 0, a Z, Sm/k. n particular, CK 2b 1,b () = K 2b 1,b () = K 1 () for b 0. For b > 1, CK 2b 1,b (η) = 0 by corollary2.6, and CK 1,1 () K 1,1 () is an isomorphism by lemma 1.5. Similarly, the map CK 2n,n () K 2n,n () = Zβ n is an isomorphism for n 0 and by corollary 2.6, CK 2n,n (η) = 0 for n > 0. Thus the map CK 2, (k) K 2, (k) identifies CK 2, (k) with the subring Z[β] of K 2, (k) = Z[β,β 1 ]. Putting this all together, (1) implies (2). For (3), the orientation c K gives the canonical morphism of oriented ring T- spectra ϑ K : MGL K [20, theorem1.1], inducing the commutative diagram O () tmgl MGL 1,1 () t K ϑ K K 1,1 (). Ast K : k(η) K 1,1 (η) = K 1 (η) isanisomorphism,itfollowsthatt MGL : k(η) MGL 1,1 (η) is injective. The isomorphism L MGL 2, (k) and the surjectivity of t MGL : L k(η) MGL 2 +1, +1 (k(η)) follow from the Hopkins-Morel spectral sequence [6, 7]. 3. Oriented duality theories Recall from [10, 1] the category SP/k of smooth pairs over k, with objects (M,), M Sm/k and M a closed subset; a morphism f : (M,) (N,Y) is a morphism f : M N in Sm/k such that f 1 (Y). We let Sch/k denote the category of quasi-projective k-schemes; for a full subcategory V of Sch/k, let V be the subcategory of V with the same objects and morphisms the projective morphisms.

11 CONNECTVE ALGEBRAC K-THEORY 11 Building on work of Mocanasu [16] and Panin [19], we have defined in [10, definition 3.1] the notion of a bi-graded oriented duality theory (H,A) on Sch/k. Here A is a bi-graded oriented cohomology theory on SP/k, (M,) A, (M), and H is a functor from Sch /k to bi-graded abelian groups. The oriented cohomology theory A satisfies the axioms listed in [10, definitions 1.2, 1.5]. n particular, (M,) A, (M) admits a long exact sequence... A, (M) A, (M) A, (M \) A +1, (M)... whereforinstancea, (M) := A, M (M)andtheboundarymap ispartofthedata. n addition, there is an excision property and a homotopy invariance property. The ring structure is given by external products and pull-back by the diagonal. The orientation is given by a collection of isomorphisms Th E : A (M) A (E), for (M,) SP/k and E M a vector bundle, satisfying the axioms of [19, def ]. We extend some of the results of [19] in [10, theorem 1.12, corollary 1.13] to show that the data of an orientation is equivalent to giving well-behaved pushforwardmaps f : A (M) A Y (N) for (M,),(N,Y) SP/k, with the meaning of well-behaved detailed in [10, 1]. The homology theory H comes with restriction maps j : H, () H, (U) for each open immersion j : U in Sch/k, external products : H, () H, (Y) H, ( Y), boundary maps,y : H, (\Y) H 1, (Y) for each closed subset Y,, isomorphisms α M, : H, () A 2m,m (M) for each (M,) SP/k, m = dim k M, and finally cap product maps f ( ) : A a,b (M) H, (Y) H a, b (Y f 1 () for (M,) SP/k, f : Y a morphism in Sch/k. These satisfy a number of axioms and compatibilities (see [10, 3] for details), which essentially say that a structure for A, (M) is compatible with the corresponding structure for H, () via the isomorphism α M,. Roughly speaking, this is saying that a particular structurefora, (M) depends onlyon and notthe choiceofembedding M. Remark 3.1. Let L Y be a line bundle on some Y Sm/k with 0-section 0 : Y L. For an oriented cohomology theory A one has the element c A 1 (L) := 0 (0 (1 A Y)), where 1 A Y A0 (Y) is the unit element. As pointed out in [19, corollary 3.3.8], or as noted in [10, remark 1.17], for line bundles L, M on some Y Sm/k, the elements c 1 (L),c 1 (M) A 1 (Y) are nilpotent, and commute with one another, hence for each power series F(u,v) A (k)[[u,v]] the evaluation F(c 1 (L),c 1 (M)) gives a well-defined element of A (Y). n addition, the cohomology theory A has a unique associated formal group law F A (u,v) A (k)[[u,v]] with F A (c 1 (L),c 1 (M)) = c 1 (L M) for all line bundles L, M on Y Sm/k. For an Sch/k with line bundle L, the quasi-projectivity of implies that admits a closed immersion i : M for some M Sm/k such that L extends to a line bundle L M. One can then define via the product c 1 (L) : H () H 1 () ( ) c 1 (L) : A (M) A +1 (M)

12 12 SHOUN DA AND MARC LEVNE and the isomorphisms H () = A dm (M). One shows that this is independent of the choice of (M,L), giving the well-defined operator c 1 (L). The main example of oriented duality theory (H,A) is given by an oriented T- ring spectrum E in SH(k), assuming k is a field admitting resolution of singularities (e.g., characteristic zero), defined by taking E a,b (M) := Hom SH(k)(Σ T (M/M \),Σ a,b E), i.e., the usual bi-graded cohomology with supports. For each Sch/k, choose a closed immersion of into a smooth M and set E a,b () := E2m a,m b (M), where m = dim k M. The fact that (M,) E, (M) defines an oriented bi-graded ring cohomology theory is proved just as in the case of E = MGL, which was discussed in [10, 4]; the main point is Panin s theorem [19, theorem 3.7.4], which says that an orientation for E (in the sense of remark 1.7) defines an orientation in the sense of ring cohomology theories for the bi-graded E-cohomology with supports. The fact that the formula given above for the homology theory E, is welldefined and extends to make (E, ( ),E, ( )) a bi-graded oriented duality theory is [10, theorem 3.4]. The essential point is to show that the cohomology with support E 2d,d (M), for M a closed immersion of some in a smooth M of dimension d, depends (up to canonical isomorphism) only on, and similarly, given a projective morphism f : Y in Sch/k, there are smooth pairs (M,), (N,Y), an extension of F to a morphism F : N M and the map F : E 2dN,dN Y (N) E 2dM,dM (M) is independent (via the canonical isomorphismse, (Y) = E 2dN,dN Y (N), E, () = E 2dM,dM (M))ofthechoices. The other structures for E, ( ) are defined similarly via the E-cohomology with supports, and one has the corresponding independence of any choices. t follows directly from the construction of E that the assignment (E,c E ) (E,E) is functorial in the oriented cohomology theory (E,c E ). n particular, let ch : MGL E be a morphism of oriented cohomology theories, that is, ch is a morphism in SH(k), compatible with the ring-object structures of MGL and E, and compatible with 1st Chern classes. Then we have an extension of ch to a natural transformation of oriented duality theories (ch,ch) : (MGL,MGL) (E,E) Remark 3.2. As shown in lemma 2.7, the coefficient rings for K and CK are K 2, (k) = Z[β,β 1 ] and CK 2, (k) = Z[β], respectively, with β having degree 1. For K, the orientation c K restricted to P n is given by the class of 1 [O( 1)] K 0 (P n ) = K 2,1 (P n ). t follows (by functoriality and Jouanoulou s trick) that for a line bundle L on some Sm/k, the 1st Chern class is given by c K 1 (L) = β 1 (1 [L 1 ]) (where we consider 1,[L 1 ] K 0,0 () = K 0 ()). A direct calculation gives the formal group law for (K 2,,K2, ) as (F K (u,v) = u + v β uv,z[β,β 1 ]). Since the orientation for K lifts to that of CK, it follows that the formal group law for (CK 2,,CK2, ) is (u+v β uv,z[β]). 4. Algebraic cobordism and oriented duality theories We recall the theory of algebraic cobordism Ω (), Sch/k. For each Sch/k, Ω n () is an abelian group with generators (f : Y ), Y Sm/k irreducible of dimension n over k and f : Y a projective morphism. Ω is the

13 CONNECTVE ALGEBRAC K-THEORY 13 universal oriented Borel-Moore homology theory on Sch/k; this consists of the data of a functor from Sch/k to graded abelian groups, external products, first Chern class operators c 1 (L) : Ω () Ω 1 () for L a line bundle, and pullback maps g : Ω () Ω +d (Y) for each l.c.i.morphism g : Y of relative dimension d. These of course satisfy a number of compatibilities and additional axioms. For an oriented duality theory (H,A) on Sch/k and Y in Sm/k of dimension d over k, the fundamental class [Y] H,A H d (Y) is the image of the unit 1 Y A 0 (Y) under the inverse of the isomorphism α Y : H d (Y) A 0 (Y). For an oriented Borel-Moore homology theory B on Sch/k, we similarly have the fundamental class [Y] B B d (Y) defined by [Y] B := p (1), where 1 B 0 (Speck) is the unit and p : Y Speck the structure morphism. We recall the following result from [10]: Proposition 4.1 ([10, propositions 4.2, 4.4, 4.5]). Let k be a field admitting resolution of singularities and let (H, A) be a Z-graded oriented duality theory on Sch/k. 1. There is a unique natural transformation ϑ H : Ω H of functors Sch/k GrAb, such that ϑ H (Y) is compatible with fundamental classes for Y Sm/k. n addition, ϑ H is compatible with pull-back maps for open immersions in Sch/k, with 1st Chern class operators, with external products and with cap products. 2. For Y Sm/k, the map ϑ A (Y) : Ω (Y) A (Y) induced by ϑ H, the identity Ω (Y) = Ω dimy (Y) and the isomorphism α Y : H dimy (Y) A (Y) is a ring homomorphism and is compatible with pull-back maps for arbitrary morphisms in Sm/k. Finally, one has ϑ A (Y)(c Ω 1(L)) = c A 1 (L) for each line bundle L Y. Remark 4.2. We have already noted that one has a formal group law F A (u,v) A (k)[[u,v]] associated to the oriented cohomology theory A. Similarly, for each oriented Borel-Moore homology theory B on Sch/k, there is an associated formal grouplawf B (u,v) B (k)[[u,v]], characterisedbytheidentityf B (c 1 (L),c 1 (M)) = c 1 (L M) for each pair of line bundles L,M on some Y Sm/k (this follows from [15, corollary4.1.8, proposition5.2.1, proposition5.2.6]). Letting ϕ A : L A (k), ϕ B : L B (k) denote the classifying maps associated to F A, F B, respectively, suppose that A extends to an oriented duality theory (H,A). Then (4.1) ϑ A (F Ω ) = F A. ndeed, F A is characterised by identity F A (c A 1 (L),c A 1 (M)) = c A 1 (L M) for each pair of line bundles L,M on some Y Sm/k, and since ϑ A (c Ω 1 (N)) = ca 1 (N) for each line bundle N Z, Z Sm/k, the fact that F Ω (c Ω 1 (L),cΩ 1 (M)) = cω 1 (L M) combined with proposition 4.1(2) yields the identity (4.1). Via the universal property of the Lazard ring, the relation (4.1) is equivalent to the identity (4.2) ϑ A ϕ Ω = ϕ A. Finally, we recall that the classifying map ϕ Ω : L Ω (k) is an isomorphism [15, theorem 1.2.7].

14 14 SHOUN DA AND MARC LEVNE Corollary 4.3. Let (E,c E ) be pair consisting of a commutative unital monoid object E SH(k) with orientation c E, and let (E,,E, ) be the corresponding bi-graded oriented duality theory. There is a unique natural transformation ϑ (E,cE) : Ω E 2, of functors Sch/k GrAb, such that ϑ (E,cE)(Y) is compatible with fundamental classes for Y Sm/k. n addition, ϑ (E,cE) is compatible with pull-back maps for open immersions in Sch/k, 1st Chern class operators, external products and cap products. For Y Sm/k, the map ϑ E (Y) : Ω (Y) E 2, (Y) induced by ϑ (E,cE) is a ring homomorphism and is compatible with pull-back maps for arbitrary morphisms in Sm/k, and satisfies for each line bundle L Y. ϑ (E,cE)(Y)(c Ω 1(L)) = c E 1(L) Remark 4.4. By [15, lemma ], Ω () is generated as an abelian group by the cobordism cycles (f : Y ), Y Sm/k irreducible, f : Y a projective morphism. Furthermore, the identity (f : Y ) = f ([Y] Ω ) holds in Ω dimy (). Thus ϑ (E,cE) is characterized by the formula ϑ (E,cE)(f : Y ) := f E ([Y] E,E). We may apply corollary 4.3 in the universal case: E = MGL with its canonical orientation. This gives us the natural transformation (4.3) ϑ MGL : Ω MGL 2,. Theorem 4.5 ( [11, theorem 3.1]). Assume that k is a field of characteristic zero. Then the natural transformation (4.3) is an isomorphism. Remark 4.6. This result relies on the Hopkins-Morel spectral sequence, see [6, 7]. n the course of the proof, we proved another result which we will be using here. Let be in Sch/k and let d = d := max dim k, as runs over the irreducible components of. We define MGL (1) 2, () by MGL (1) 2, () := limmgl 2, (W) W as W runs over all (reduced) closed subschemes of which contain no dimension d generic point of ; Ω (1) () is defined similarly. The natural transformation ϑ MGL gives rise to the commutative diagram (4.4) Ω (1) () i Ω () j η (d) Ω (k(η)) 0 ϑ (1) MGL (1) 2, () i ϑ() MGL 2, () ϑ j η (d) MGL 2, (k(η)) 0 with exact rows and with all vertical arrows isomorphisms. As (MGL,MGL) is an oriented duality theory, the bottom line extends to the long exact sequence... η (d) MGL 2 +1, (k(η)) MGL (1) 2, () i MGL 2, () j η (d) MGL 2, (k(η)) 0.

15 CONNECTVE ALGEBRAC K-THEORY 15 Furthermore, the Hopkins-Morel spectral sequence [6, 7] E p,q 2 := L q H p q (Y,Z(n+q)) = MGL p+q,n (Y) gives a surjection for each η (d) t MGL (η) : L d+1 k(η) MGL 2 +1, (k(η)) (see lemma 2.7). We have constructed in [11, 6] a group homomorphism Div : L d+1 η (d) Z[k(η) ] Ω (1) () with ϑ (1) Div = η t MGL (η). Since the maps ϑ (1) and ϑ() are isomorphisms, the map Div factors through the surjection we have the exact sequence L d+1 η (d) Z[k(η) ] L d+1 η (d) k(η), (4.5) η (d) L d+1 k(η) Div Ω (1) () i Ω () j η (d) Ω (k(η)) 0 and the extension of diagram (4.4) to the commutative diagram (4.6) η L d+1 k(η) Div Ω (1) () ϑ (1) i Ω () ϑ() η L d+1 k(η) MGL (1) div 2, () MGL MGL i 2, () j j η Ω (k(η)) 0 ϑ η MGL 2, (k(η)) 0 with exact rows and vertical arrows isomorphisms. Here div MGL := η t MGL (η). 5. K-theory We apply the machinery described in 3 to K-theory and connective K-theory, with the orientations given by remark 1.7 (for K-theory) and lemma 1.9 (for connective K-theory). This gives us the oriented duality theories (K,,K, ) and (CK,,CK, ); thecanonicalmorphismck K iscompatiblewiththeorientations and thus gives the map of oriented duality theories (CK,,CK, ) (K,,K, ). We can in fact describe CK a,b () more explicitly, with the help of the models K (n) for f n K and Quillen s localization theorem. ndeed, for a smooth pair (M, ), Quillen s localization theorem gives us the natural homotopy fiber sequence G() K(M) K(M \), where G() is the Quillen-Waldhausen K-theory spectrum of the abelian category of coherent sheaves on. This, together with algebraic Bott-periodicity gives us the canonical identifications K a,b () = K 2b a () K a,b () = G b 2a (); K a,b (M) = K 2b a (M) where K (M) is as usual the homotopy fiber of the restriction map K(M) K(M \). The construction of the simplicial spectrum m K (n) (,m) can be carried through replacing K-theory with G-theory, that is, the K-theory of the category

16 16 SHOUN DA AND MARC LEVNE of coherent sheaves. For details, we refer the reader to [13, 8.4] and [14]; for the reader s convenience, we give a brief sketch of the construction here. We denote the category of coherent sheaves on a scheme Y by M Y. Let be a finite type k-scheme. There is a technical problem in the construction of the simplicial spectrum m G (n) (,m), due to the fact that, for g : p m an inclusion of a face of m, the corresponding restriction map (id g) : M m M p is not exact, hence does not lead to a functor on the corresponding K-theory spectra. To get around this problem, one replaces M m with the full subcategory M m, of coherentsheaveswhich are Tor-independent with respect to the inclusions of faces; for U m an open subset, we let M U, be the similarly defined full subcategory of M U. Letting G(,m) be the correspondingk-theory spectrum of the exact category M m,, we have the simplicial spectrum m G(,m). Since we are not assuming that is equi-dimensional over k, it is more convenient to index by dimension rather than codimension. Let Sn (m) denote the set of closed subsets W of m such that for all faces F = p of m, and let dimw F n+p G (n) (,m) := hocolim W S n (m) G W (,m) where G W (,m) is by definition the homotopy fiber of the restriction map K(M m, ) K(M m \W, ). Thisgivesusthesimplicialspectrumm G (n) (,m)withtotalspectrumg (n) (), and the corresponding tower of spectra... G (n) () G (n+1) ()... G (dim) () = G (dim+1) (,m) =... The identification of G() := K(M ) with the 0-simplices in G (dim) () gives us the map of spectra G() G (dim) (), which, using the homotopy invariance property of G-theory, is easily seen to be a weak equivalence. t is easy to see that G (n) () is contravariantly functorial with respect to flat maps of finite type k-schemes. As for the usual G-theory construction, there is a canonical push-forward functor i : G (n) (W) G (n) () for i : W a closed immersion; this extends to a push forward map for arbitrary projective morphisms, but only in the homotopy category SH as one needs to replace the various categories of coherent sheaves with the corresponding subcategories which have no higher direct images with respect to the given projective morphism (see [14, 4] for details). The localization theorem for the spectra G (n) from [13, corollary 8.12] is Theorem 5.1. Let j : U be an open immersion of finite type k-schemes with closed complement i : W. Then the sequence G (n) (W) i G (n) () j G (n) (U)

17 CONNECTVE ALGEBRAC K-THEORY 17 is a homotopy fiber sequence. Corollary 5.2. Let be in Sch/k. 1. There is a canonical isomorphism a a,b : CK a,b () π a 2b(G (b) ()) compatible with push-forward for projective morphisms and pull-back for open immersions. n particular, we have isomorphisms a 2b,b : CK 2b,b () = π 0 (G (b) ()) for all b Z, compatible with push-forward for projective morphisms and pull-back for open immersions. 2. For Sm/k of dimension d, the isomorphism a a,b isomorphism of proposition 2.4 via the weak equivalence G (b) ()) K (d b) ()) is compatible with the and the isomorphism α : CK 2d a,d b () CK a,b (). Proof. For each q, let K (q) (M) denote the homotopy fiber of the restriction map j : K (q) (M) K (q) (M \). Using example 2.2 and proposition 2.4 for the diagram M \ M gives us the canonical isomorphism CK a,b αm, () CK 2m a,m b (M) = π a 2b (K (m b) (M)). By the localization theorem, we have the canonical weak equivalence β,m : G (b) () fib(g (b) (M) G (b) (M \)) induced by the functors (i id) : M n M M n and the canonical isomorphism of (j M\ id) (i id) with the 0-functor. The resolution theorem gives a canonical weak equivalence K (m b) (M) = fib(k (m b) (M) K (m b) (M \)) γ,m fib(g(b) (M) G (b) (M \)). This defines the isomorphism in SH δ,m := β 1,M γ,m : K (m b) (M) G (b) (). Both γ,m and β,m are compatible with pull-back by flat maps f : M M (with := f 1 ()), hence δ is compatible with pull-back by open immersions.

18 18 SHOUN DA AND MARC LEVNE Suppose we have a closed immersion i :. We use the same ambient smooth scheme M, giving the map of pairs id M : (,M) (,M). The pushforwardbyionk (m b) (M) isbydefinition the maponthehomotopyfibersinduced by the commutative diagram K (m b) (M) u K (m b) (M \ )) id K (m b) (M) w v K (m b) (M \ )) where u,v,w are the evident open immersions. t is not hard to check that the diagram G (b) ( ) i G (b) (M) i G (b) () id i G (b) (M) u v G (b) (M \ )) w G (b) (M \)) commutes up to canonical homotopy. From this it follows that i G δ,m = δ,m i K. For both K-theory and G-theory, the push-forward for a projection p : Y P n Y is compatible with the projection onto the factor [O Y P n] in the respective projectivebundle formulaswith bases[o( i)], i = 0,...,n. From this it is not hard to show that δ,m is compatible with p, and hence compatible with push-forward by an arbitrary projective morphism, completing the proof of (1). The assertion (2) follows directly from the construction of δ,m. Remark 5.3. Of course, Quillen s localization theorem tells us that the homology theory K, associated to K-theory is just G-theory. t follows from corollary 5.2 that the canonical natural transformation CK a,b K a,b is given by the map π a 2b G (b) () π a 2b G() = G a 2b () induced by the canonical map G (b) () G (dim) () G(). Our main interest is in the geometric portion CK 2, of the theory CK,. For a finite type k-scheme, and integer b 0, we have the full subcategory M (b) () of M with objects the coherent sheaves F on with dim k suppf b. The following result improves upon corollary 2.5: Theorem 5.4. Let be a finite type k-scheme. There is a canonical isomorphism a n : CK 2n,n () im(k 0(M (n) () M (n+1) ()), compatible with pull-back by open immersions and push-forward by projective morphisms. Furthermore CK a,b () = 0 for a < 2b. Proof. By corollary 5.2, we have CK a,b() = π a 2b (G (b) ()). Moreover, G (b) () is the simplicial spectrum m G (b) (,m) and G (b) (,m) = hocolim W S (b) (m) G W (M( m, )).

19 CONNECTVE ALGEBRAC K-THEORY 19 We showed in [13, lemma 8.7] that for all open U m, the inclusion M(U, ) M U induces a weak equivalence on the K-theory spectra. Thus G W (M( m, )) is weakly equivalent to the homotopy fiber of the restriction map j : G( m ) G( m \W) which by Quillen s localization theorem is in turn weakly equivalent to G(W). n particular, this shows that G (b) (,m) is -1 connected and we have a strongly convergent spectral sequence E 1 p,q = π p+qg (b) (,p) = π p+q G (b) (). As Ep,q 1 = 0 for p+q < 0, this shows that CK a,b () = 0 for a < 2b, as claimed. For the assertion on CK 2n,n (), the spectral sequence gives the right exact sequence π 0 (G (n) (,1)) π 0 (G (n) (,0)) CK 2n,n () 0. By definition, G (n) (,0)) = K(M (n) ()), so we need to show that the image M of π 0 (G (n) (,1)) under is the same as the kernel N of the map K 0 (M (n) ()) K 0 (M (n+1) ()). WenotethatM (n) ()isaserresubcategoryoftheabeliancategorym (n+1) (); let M (n+1/n) () denote the quotient category. By Quillen s localization theorem, we have the exact sequence... K 1 (M (n+1/n) ()) K 0 (M (n) ()) K 0 (M (n+1) ())... Furthermore, by devissage, we have K 1 (M (n+1/n) ()) = x (n) K 1 (k(x)) = x (n) k(x) where (n) is the set of dimension n points of. Finally, the boundary map K 1 (M (n+1/n) ()) K 0 (M (n) ()) can be described as follows: Take y (n+1) and let Y be the reduced closure of y. Take f k(y) and let Y Y P 1 be the reduced closure of the graph of f. For t P 1 (k), let O Y (t) := O Y OP 1 k(t). Then (f k(y) ) = p 1 ([O Y (0)] [O Y ( )]). Noting that O Y (t) is an O t -module, we can consider p 1 ([O Y (0)]) as simply [O Y (0)] via the isomorphism p 1 : 0, and similarly for [O Y ( )]. Finally, as f is in k(y) and Y has dimension n + 1, it follows that O Y (0) and O Y ( ) have support of dimension at most n. Given such a Y and f k(y), we mayidentify 1 with the open subscheme (P 1 \{1}) of P 1 via the open immersion j : 1 P 1 defined by j(t 0,t 1 ) := t 1 /t 0. Then (id j) 1 (O Y ) is a coherent sheaf in M (n) ( 1, ) and ([(id j) 1 (O Y )]) = ± (f k(y) ). Thus, M N. For the reverse inclusion, take F M (n) ( 1, ), let Z be the support of F, let Y be the closure of p 1 (Z) and let W 1 be p 1 1 (Y); let i : Z W be the inclusion. By devissage, we may assume that F is an O Z -module. But

20 20 SHOUN DA AND MARC LEVNE W = Y A 1, so by the homotopy property for G-theory, there is a class η G 0 (Y) with i ([F]) = p 1(η). Letting i 0,i 1 : Y Y 1 = W be the inclusions t 0 = 0, t 1 = 0, respectively, this shows that i 0 (i ([F])) i 1 (i ([F])) = 0 in G 0 (Y). As Y has dimension n + 1, this shows that the image of ([F]) in G 0 (M (n+1) ()) is zero, and hence M N. Corollary 5.5. Take Sch/k and let d be an integer with dim k d. Then the natural map γ n : CK 2n,n() K 2n,n() = G 0 () is an isomorphism for n d and is injective for n = d 1. Proof. TheidentityK 2n,n() = G 0 ()followsfromthefactthatthet-spectrumk represents Quillen K-theory on Sm/k and Quillen s localization theorem identifies the homotopy fiber of K(M) K(M \) with the G-theory spectrum G(), for M Sm/k and i : M a closed immersion. For n d 1, theorem 5.4 gives the identification π 0 (G (n) ()) = CK 2n,n () = im(k 0 (M (n) ()) G 0 ()), the first isomorphism being induced by the localization fiber sequence G (n) ()) K (n) (M)) j K (n) (M \) for a given closed immersion i : M, M Sm/k, and the second isomorphism the computation of CK 2n,n() given in theorem 5.4. We need only check that via this second isomorphism and the identity K 2n,n () = G 0(), the canonical map ρ : CK 2n,n() K 2n,n() transforms to the evident map im(k 0 (M (n) ()) G 0 ()) G 0 (), which is clearly injective for all n, and an isomorphism for n d. We have the commutative square K (n) (M)) j K (n) (M \) K (d )(M) j K (d )(M \) where d is any integer with d n, d dim k M. We have as well canonical weak equivalencesk(m) K (d )(M), K(M\) K (d )(M\), induced by the identificationof K(M) with the 0-spectrum in the simplicial spectrum m K (d )(M,m), and similarly for M \. This shows that the natural map CK 2n,n () K 2n,n () is given by the canonical map π 0 (G (n) ()) π 0 (G (d )()) = G 0 (). Via the computation of theorem 5.4, this is just the evident map as desired. im(k 0 (M (n) ()) G 0 ()) G 0 (),

21 CONNECTVE ALGEBRAC K-THEORY 21 Remarks For smooth of dimension d, we may take the identity closed immersion to define CK (), so that CK a,b () = CK2d a,d b () n particular, letting M (b) () M be the full subcategory of coherent sheaves on with support in codimension at least b, theorem 5.4 shows that CK 2n,n () = im(k 0 (M (n) () K 0 (M (n 1) ()). n fact, the argument for theorem 5.4 works to show this identity for k an arbitrary perfect field, we do not need resolution of singularities here. 2. Cai [1] has defined a theory of connective higher K-theory as a bi-graded oriented cohomology theory on Sm/k. Denoting this theory as CK a,b, Cai defines CK a,b as CK a,b () := im(k 2b a (M (b) () M (b 1) ()) Thus we have CK 2n,n () = CK 2n,n () for Sm/k. We conclude this section with a description of the 1st Chern class operators on CK 2n,n(). Let L be a line bundle on, and let i : M be a closed immersion with M Sm/k such that L extends to a line bundle L on M. We note that the 1st Chern class operator c 1 (L) on CK 2n,n() is given by the product with c 1 (L) CK 2,1 (M) on CK 2, (M). As CK2,1 (M) K 2,1 (M) = K 0 (M) is injective (corollary 5.5), it follows that the operators c 1 (L) satisfy the multiplicative formal group law: c 1 (L L ) = c 1 (L)+ c 1 (L ) β c 1 (L) c 1 (L ) where β CK 2,1(k) is the Bott element, i.e., the element corresponding to 1 Z under the sequence of isomorphisms CK 2,1 (k) = CK 2, 1 (k) K 2, 1 (k) = K 0 (k) dim k Z. Thus, we need only describe c 1 (L) for L which is very ample on. Let α be in CK 2n,n () for some n. f n dim k+1, then both CK 2n,n () and CK 2n 2,n 1()areequaltoG 0 ()viathecanonicalmapck 2, () K 2, () = G 0 (), so c 1 (L) is given by the 1st Chern class operator on K 2, () = G 0(). This in turn is given by multiplication by the K-theory 1st Chern class via the K 0 ()-module structure on G 0 (), that is, n general, we have our description c G0 1 (L)(α) = (1 L 1 ) α. CK 2n,n () = im(k 0 (M (n) ()) K 0 (M (n+1) ())), compatible with projective push-forward. Thus, for each α CK 2n,n (), there is a closed immersion i : in Sch/k, with dim k n, and an element α CK 2n,n ( ) with i (α ) = α. Since c 1 (L)(i α ) = i ( c 1 (i L)(α )), we reduce to the case n dim k ; similarly, we may assume is irreducible. By our above computation, the only remaining case is n = dim k.