ON THE BIRATIONALITY OF TORIC DOUBLE MIRRORS
|
|
- Merry Wilson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ON THE BIRATIONALITY OF TORIC DOUBLE MIRRORS by ZHAN LI A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Mathematics Written under the direction of Lev A. Borisov And approved by New Brunswick, New Jersey May, 2014
2 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION On the birationality of toric double mirrors By ZHAN LI Dissertation Director: Lev A. Borisov We prove that generic complete intersections associated to double mirror nef-partitions are all birational. This result solves a conjecture of Batyrev and Nill in [6] under some mild assumptions. This dissertation is based on my paper [18]. ii
3 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to my advisor, Professor Lev A. Borisov, for his encouragement, immense knowledge, and constant guidance: in our weekly meetings, he never shows impatience when I stick to trivial questions, instead, he explains to me every details on blackboard or even writes down every tiny things on piece of papers for my record; he is never too busy to talk with; and he is always willing to reply my long s consisting of math questions. I always appreciate his generosity of sharing ideas and even proofs with me. Without his supervision, this dissertation would have never been written. I would like to thank Professor Anders S. Buch who taught me commutative algebra and first course of algebraic geometry. It is his encouragement and kindness that make algebraic geometry less formidable. I would like to thank Professor Xiaojun Huang who has been helping me from my first day at Rutgers. He is guiding me on academics as well as on my life. To Professor Chris Woodward, it is always my pleasure to observe him together with Lev shooting questions to seminar speakers; To Professor Jerrold B. Tunnell for his crystal clear lectures and enlightening seminars; To Professor Simon Thomas for helps on many occasions during my early years. I would like to thank the faculty and staff of Mathematics Department at Rutgers, especially Professor Stephen Miller, Professor Michael Saks, Professor Zhengchao Han, Ms. Lynn Braun, Ms. Demetria Carpenter and Ms. Katie Guarino, for their patience, help and support. I would like to thank Rutgers University for providing excellent academic environment and financial support; to the organizers of the conferences, workshops and seminars I spoke on and attended. To Howard Nuer for many helpful discussions and constant help. iii
4 Many thanks go to my friends: Dr. Jin Wang, Zhuo Feng, Simão Herdade, Edward Chien, Ming Xiao, John Miller, Mo Wang, Hanlong Fang, Liming Sun, Dr. Knight Fu, Sjuvon Chung, Dr. Tian Yang, Xu Dong, Dr. Jingang Xiong, Dr. Jinwei Yang, Professor Yuan Yuan, Yuxiang Qin, Fanxing Hu, Hongbin Wang, Dr. Kaige Zhu... And to many many people I don t know their names, it is their kindness that survives me from those difficult days. To my girlfriend Bai Yixiu for her patient waiting... To my relatives, especially my grandmother Ms. Fu Zhe for her unwavering confidence in me. Finally, I would give all my gratitude to my parents for raising me up, supporting me, understanding me and trusting me. Without them, any math is meaningless. iv
5 Dedication To My Parents. v
6 Table of Contents Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii Dedication v 1. Introduction Background Gorenstein cones and Nef-partitions Relationship between nef-partitions and reflexive Gorenstein cones The main question The main question and its motivation Example The main theorem Results on the decomposition of lattices Construction of the determinantal variety Proof of the main theorem Open questions: D-equivalence and K-equivalence Appendix: -regularity, singularities and Calabi-Yau varieties vi
7 1 Chapter 1 Introduction Mirror symmetry was first discovered in string theory as a duality between families of 3-dimensional Calabi-Yau manifolds. Since its discovery more than twenty years ago, it has drawn much attention from physicists and mathematicians. Batyrev [2] used -regular hypersurfaces in toric varieties associated to reflexive polytopes as a way to construct a large set of mirror pairs. In this case, the mirror pair consists of the family of -regular hypersurfaces associated to a reflexive polytope and the family of - regular hypersurfaces associated to its dual polytope. Borisov [7] generalized Batyrev s construction by considering nef-partitions of reflexive polytopes. A nef-partition of a reflexive polytope corresponds to a decomposition of the boundary divisor into nef divisors. In this case, the mirror pairs are constructed as the family of complete intersections associated to a nef-partition and the family of complete intersections associated to its dual nef-partition. These complete intersections are Calabi-Yau varieties, and their string-theoretic Hodge numbers behave as predicted by mirror symmetry [4]. Compared to hypersurfaces, complete intersections associated to nef-partitions are more complicated. In particular, they may exhibit nontrivial double mirror phenomenon, i.e. two Calabi-Yau varieties X, X may have the same mirror Y. If this is the case, the homological mirror symmetry conjecture [17] implies that the derived categories of coherent sheaves on X, X are equivalent. Indeed, according to the conjecture, the derived categories of X, X are expected to be equivalent to the Fukaya categories of their mirrors, which in this case are the same because X, X are double mirrors. Instead of derived equivalence, Batyrev and Nill [6] asked whether toric double mirrors are birational. We give an affirmative answer to this question in Theorem under some mild assumptions:
8 2 Theorem. Let X, X be toric double mirrors, then there exists a variety D, called the determinantal variety, with morphism X X D such that if X, X and D are all irreducible with dim D = dim X = dim X, then X, X are birational. Now, we describe briefly the content of each chapter: In Chapter 2, we fix the notations used throughout the paper. We give relevant background information on reflexive Gorenstein cones and nef-partitions. At the end of the chapter, we prove Proposition which connects the notions of nef-partitions and reflexive Gorenstein cones. This will be used to reformulate Batyrev and Nill s original question in the language of Gorenstein cones. We also give a constructive proof of the converse of Proposition in Proposition In Chapter 3, we reformulate the question of Batyrev and Nill using reflexive Gorenstein cones. We also discuss the motivation of this question and give an example which motivates our proof. In Chapter 4, we give a proof for the main result Theorem We also discuss the necessity of its assumptions. In Chapter 5, we present some open questions related to the subject. In the appendix, we give the definition of -regularity and discuss its properties. We show that the singularities of -regular intersections are inherited from the ambient toric variety. In particular, the complete intersections considered in the paper are Calabi-Yau varieties with canonical, Gorenstein singularities. This fact is used in the proof of the main theorem.
9 3 Chapter 2 Background 2.1 Gorenstein cones and Nef-partitions We fix the following notations throughout the paper. Let M = Z d be a lattice of rank d, and N = Hom Z (M, Z) be its dual lattice with pairing, : M N Z. Let M R := M Z R, and N R := N Z R be the R-linear extensions. The pairing between M, N can be extended to, : M R N R R. Let M = Z s M be the lattice extended from M, and N = Z s N be its dual lattice with pairing: M N Z (a 1,, a s ; m) (b 1,, b s ; n) a i b i + m, n, where the integer s should be obvious from the context. The purpose of introducing notations M, N will become clear in a moment: if a nefpartition lives in M (or N), then the corresponding reflexive Gorenstein cone will live in M (or N). Sometimes we also use lattice M 1 and its dual lattice N 1. The convention is as follows: we always use M (or N) to denote the lattice where polytopes live, if the cones come from nef-partitions, we use M (or N) to denote the lattice where they live. However, when talking about general cones which do not come from nef-partitions, we use M 1 (or N 1 ) to denote the lattice where they live. Let S M R be a set, we use Conv(S) to denote its convex hull. If M R with the origin 0 in the interior is a lattice polytope (i.e. the convex hull of a finite set of lattice points), then := {y N R x, y 1, x } is its dual polytope. We use Vert( ) to denote the set of vertices of a lattice polytope, and l( ) to denote the set of its lattice points, i.e. l( ) = M.
10 4 Definition Let be a lattice polytope with the origin 0 as an interior point. If the dual polytope is also a lattice polytope, then is called reflexive polytope. Definition (See [5]) A d-dimensional rational polyhedral cone K (M 1 ) R is called a Gorenstein cone, if it is generated by lattice points which are contained in an affine hyperplane {x (M 1 ) R x, n = 1} for some n N 1. This n is uniquely determined if dim K = rank M 1, and this is the only case considered in the paper. We denote this unique element by deg, and call it the degree element. By definition, deg must live in K N 1, where K := {y (N 1 ) R x, y 0, x K} is the dual cone of K. In general, K is a Gorenstein cone does not imply K is a Gorenstein cone. However, if this is the case, we arrive at the notion of reflexive Gorenstein cone. Definition (See [5]) A Gorenstein cone K is called reflexive Gorenstein cone if K is also a Gorenstein cone. Let deg K, deg K be the degree elements in K, K respectively, then deg, deg is called the index of this pair of dual reflexive Gorenstein cones. We will see in a moment how reflexive Gorenstein cones relate to nef-partitions. Before doing this we should briefly recall the notion of nef-partition. In the projective toric variety defined by a reflexive polytope, a nef-partition is equivalent to a decomposition of the boundary divisor into a summation of nef divisors. On the other hand, there exists a purely combinatorial definition of nef-partition without invoking toric variety constructions. For simplicity, we use this combinatorial definition here. The readers can find its equivalent form and its motivation in Borisov s original paper [7]. Definition If the Minkowski sum of s lattice polytopes s i is a reflexive polytope, and the origin 0 i (0 may not be an interior point) for each i, then { i i = 1,..., s} is called a length s nef-partition of the convex hull Conv( s i). Nef-partitions arise in pairs [7]: if we fixed a nef-partition { i i = 1,..., s} with i M R, then there exists a dual nef-partition { i i = 1,..., s} with i N R. The
11 5 relations between them are ( i ) = Conv( s i ) ( i ) = Conv( s i ). Furthermore, they satisfy the property min i, j δ ij, and w j Vert( j ) {0}, the minimum value can be achieved, that is min x, w j = δ ij. x i 2.2 Relationship between nef-partitions and reflexive Gorenstein cones From a nef-partition, one can construct a reflexive Gorenstein cone [5]. On the other hand, from a reflexive Gorenstein cone associated to a nef-partition, if we have a decomposition of the degree element deg, we can construct another nef-partition. Now we will give a precise statement of the above relations, which appeared in a slightly different form in [6]. In fact, we will prove a general result. Let K, K be full dimensional reflexive Gorenstein cones in (M 1 ) R, (N 1 ) R, with degree elements deg, deg in K, K respectively. Suppose the index is deg, deg = s and with e i N 1 K, e i 0. deg = e i, Let S = {x K x, deg = 1} S i = {x K x, e i = 1, x, e j = 0, j i} T = {y K deg, y = 1}. Because K is a Gorenstein cone, any vertex v of S is a lattice point. Thus v, e i are nonnegative integers which add up to 1. Hence, there exists precisely one e i such that
12 6 v, e i = 1. On the other hand, for any e j, because e j 0 and K is a full dimensional cone, there exists at least one vertex w of S such that w, e j = 1. Using these facts, one can show that {e 1,..., e s } must be part of a Z-basis of N 1. Let Ann(e 1,..., e s ) := {m M 1 m, e i = 0, i, 1 i s} be a sublattice of M 1 (we also use Ann(e) for simplicity if no confusion arises), and Span Z {e 1,..., e s } := Ze i be a sublattice of N 1. From the fact that {e 1,..., e s } is part of a Z basis, it follows that the pairing between M and N induces a pairing Ann(e 1,..., e s ) (N 1 / Span Z {e 1,..., e s }) Z, which identifies Ann(e 1,..., e s ) and N 1 / Span Z {e 1,..., e s }. Proposition Under the above notations, the lattice polytope is a reflexive polytope. S i deg Ann(e 1,..., e s ) R Proof. We will show that the dual polytope of s S i deg is exactly T (N 1 / Span Z {e 1,..., e s }) R, where T is the image of T under the projection (N 1 ) R (N 1 / Span Z {e 1,..., e s }) R. First, we show that T has 0 as an interior point. Because deg is in the interior of K, 1 s deg is also in the interior of K, and thus in the interior of T. This property is kept under the projection map T T. The image of 1 s deg is 0 in (N 1 / Span Z {e 1,..., e s }) R, and thus 0 is in the interior of T. Second, we show 0 s S i deg is an interior point. Let deg = i I λ iv i, where λ i R and v i Vert(S) be vertices of S. We have 1 = deg, e 1 = i I λ i v i, e 1 = i I 1 λ i,
13 7 where I 1 = {i I v i, e 1 = 1}. This implies i I 1 λ i v i S 1. By continuing this procedure, one can show deg s S i. If w Vert(T ) is a vertex of T, then s S i, w cannot always be zero. Indeed otherwise, all the S i would be contained in a facet of K, which is impossible. Thus, for any w Vert(T ), there exists v s S i such that v deg, w 0. If s S i deg did not have 0 as an interior point, then R 0 ( s S i deg) (M 1 ) R. We have already showed that T had 0 as an interior point, so R 0 T = (N 1 / Span Z (e 1,..., e s )) R. In particular, there exists a vertex w of T, and thus a vertex w T, such that s S i deg, w < 0, a contradiction. Next, we show that s S i deg Ann(e 1,..., e s ) R is a reflexive polytope with dual T (N 1 / Span Z (e 1,..., e s )) R. Because min S i deg, T = min S i deg, T = min S i, T deg, T 0 1 = 1, we have T ( s S i deg). We only need to show the other inclusion T ( s S i deg). Let y ( s S i deg) such that there exists x s i S i deg with x, y = 1 (this y corresponding to some boundary point of the dual polytope of s i S i deg). We will show for this y, y T. Then it follows for arbitrary y ( s S i deg), y T. Let θ i = min x Si x, y and set y = y s θ ie i. We claim y K. Indeed, K = s t is i with t i 0, and we have min K, y = min = t i S i, y min t i ( S i, y ) θ i e i = S i, θ j e j = j=1 min t i S i, y θ i e i (t i (min S i, y θ i )) 0. Finally, we will show y T and this will imply y T. By the assumption on y, we have min s S i deg, y 1, and there exists x s S i deg, such that x, y = 1. Let x = s x i deg with x i S i, then we must have x i, y = θ i. Indeed, otherwise there exists k such that x k, y > θ k, and all the others satisfy x i, y θ i.
14 8 Thus ( ) 1 = min S i deg, y = min S i, y deg, y ( ) ( ) = θ i deg, y = x i, y deg, y, a contradiction. We have deg, y = deg, y and this implies y T. θ i e i = deg, y θ i = 1 The converse is proved in [6] Theorem 2.6. We will give a direct proof by constructing the dual cone K explicitly. Proposition Let 1,..., s M R be lattice polytopes such that the Minkowski sum s i has dimension dim(m R ) and s i m be a reflexive polytope for some m M. Let M = Z s M, then the associated cone in M R K = {(a 1,..., a s ; a i i ) a i 0} is a reflexive Gorenstein cone of index deg, deg = s. Proof. Let = ( s i m), and for any vertex w j Vert( ), we set m ij = min x i x, w j. Then we claim K N R is generated by the lattice points {(m 1j, m 2j,..., m sj ; w j ) N w j Vert( )} { (0,..., 1,... 0 ; 0) N 1 i s}. }{{} 1 at the i-th position Suppose these lattice points generate a cone C, then it is straightforward to check C K. The difficult part is to show K C. Let (a 1,..., a r ; t) K, then we must have a i + min i, t 0 for all i. Subtracting a non-negative combination of the (0,..., 1,..., 0; 0) if necessary, we have a i +min i, t = 0 for all i. In this case, if one can show (a 1,..., a s; t) C, then adding
15 9 back those non-negative combination of the (0,..., 1,..., 0; 0), we have (a 1,..., a s ; t) C. By the above argument, we can assume without loss of generality, a i +min i, t = 0 for all i. Moreover, if t = 0, then we are done. If t 0, then one can multiply t by a positive real number λ, such that λt lands on the boundary of. In this case, we still have λa i + min i, λt = 0, and if one can show (λa 1,..., λa s ; λt) C, then certainly (a 1,..., a s ; t) C. Thus, we can reduce to the case when t is on the boundary of, particularly, it is on some facet F v. Here, v is a vertex of s i m such that v, F v = 1, where we have used the 1 1 correspondence between vertices and facets in dual reflexive polytopes. Let v = s v i m, with v i a vertex of i, and t = j λ jt j, λ j 0, j λ j = 1, with t j vertices of F v. Then because 1 + m, t = min i, t = min i, t = v i, t, we have min i, t = v i, t = j λ j v i, t j = j λ j min i, t j. The last equation uses the fact that t j F v, and because ( ) 1 = min i m, t j = min i, t j m t j = ( ) v i m, t j = v i, t j m, t j, we must have i, t j = v i, t j. Putting everything together, we have ( min 1, t,..., min s, t, t) = j λ i ( min 1, t j,..., min 1, t j ; t j ). This proves the claim K C. In order to show K is also a Gorenstein cone, let deg = (1, 1,..., 1; m). By using the property min s i m, v j = 1, it is straightforward to show that for the vertex v j of, deg, (m 1j, m 2j,..., m rj ; v j ) = 1
16 10 and deg, ( 0,..., 1,..., 0 ; 0) = 1. }{{} 1 at the i-th position Thus we finish the argument K is a reflexive Gorenstein cone. Because deg = (1, 1,..., 1; 0), the index is deg, deg = s. The above theorem can be applied to the case of nef-partitions, where s i itself is a reflexive polytope with dual polytope ( s i) = Conv( s i). Because 0 i, and min i, j = δ ij, we can write the reflexive Gorenstein cones associated to this pair of nef-partitions in a symmetric way K = {(a 1,..., a s ; a i i ) (M) R a i 0} K = {(b 1,..., b s ; b i i ) (N) R b i 0}. This result can also be proved directly as in [5]. The following is our key construction which is used to reformulate the question from polytopes to reflexive cones. Now we start off with a nef-partition { i 1 i s}, and let K be the reflexive Gorenstein cone associated to it as above with the degree element deg K. If deg = s ẽi, with ẽ i 0, ẽ i K N, then we can similarly define S i as in Proposition ( s In this case, S i deg) is a reflexive polytope in Ann(ẽ 1,..., ẽ s ). Without loss of generality, we can assume ẽ i = ( 0,..., 1,..., 0 ; p }{{} i ) Z s N. 1 at the i-th position We claim that there exists a lattice isomorphism φ : Ann(ẽ 1,..., ẽ s ) M defined by restricting to the projection p : Z s M M. In fact, if φ(x) = 0, then x = (a 1,..., a s ; 0), but x Ann(ẽ 1,..., ẽ s ) implies that i, a i = 0, thus φ is injective.
17 11 The surjectivity comes from the fact that for m M, if we let a i = m, p i, then (a 1,..., a s ; m) Ann(ẽ 1,..., ẽ s ) maps to m under φ. Under this isomorphism, we can identify Ann(ẽ 1,..., ẽ s ) with M. Let i = p( S i ), one can verify directly that s s Conv( i ) = Conv( i ). Moreover, since φ(deg) = 0, and by Proposition 2.2.1, ( s S i deg) is a reflexive polytope in Ann(e 1,..., e s ) R. Hence, ( s i ) is a reflexive polytope in M. Because ( 0,..., 1,..., 0 ; 0) }{{} S i, we have 0 i, and this implies { i 1 i s} is another 1 at the i-th position nef-partition of Conv( s i) (see Definition 2.1.1). Remark One cannot exhaust all the nef-partitions of length s of Conv( s i) using the above construction (i.e. first construct reflexive Gorenstein cone K, K, then decompose deg = s ẽi, and finally construct i ). For example, any subsets of the vertices of an octahedron will give a nef-partition, but some subsets cannot be obtained from the above construction. However, the above process will give exactly the combinatorial data for toric double mirrors (details see Theorem 3.1.3). Next, we give the geometry meaning of this construction. Let X(Σ) be the toric variety defined by the fan Σ := {0} {R 0 θ θ Conv( i i ) is a face}, and L i = D ρ, Li = ρ Vert( i )\{0} ρ Vert( i )\{0} D ρ be the nef divisors corresponding to { i }, { i } respectively, where D ρ is the torus invariant divisor associated to the primitive element ρ. The following result gives a characterization of the nef-partitions obtained from reflexive Gorenstein cones as above. Proposition The nef-partition { i 1 i s} of Conv ( s i) is obtained from the same reflexive Gorenstein cone if and only if the corresponding divisors { L i 1 i s} and {L i 1 i s} are pairwise linearly equivalent.
18 12 Proof. Suppose deg = s ẽi = s e i. Without loss of generality, we can assume ẽ i e i = p i N. Then one can check that L i L i is exactly the principle divisor (X p i ) on X(Σ). On the other hand, suppose L i, L i are linearly equivalent divisors for each i, then there exists p i N such that L i L i = (X p i ). one can check that ẽ i = e i + (0; p i ) satisfies the requirement. One may ask what is the relation between associated Gorenstein cones of these double mirror nef-partitions. As one can imagine, they are all isomorphic. In fact, let ẽ i Z s M as before, then η i = ( 0,..., 1,..., 0 ; 0) Z }{{} s M must be in 1 at the i-th position S i by definition. Let S i = S i η i, then we have (1) 0 S i Ann(ẽ 1,, ẽ s ); (2) s S i is reflexive; (3) S i has the same image as S i under the aforementioned projection. Also, because Ann(ẽ 1,, ẽ s ) is isomorphic to M under the same projection, we can identify { S i } with the nef-partition i. Hence we only need to show the claim for { S i } in lattice Ann(ẽ 1,, ẽ s ). This is straightforward to check, because Zη i + Ann(ẽ 1,, ẽ s ) = Z s M, and the reflexive Gorenstein cone associated to S i is K = r i (η i + S i ) = r i S i = K, r i 0. We will prove the birationality for the -regular complete intersections associated to nef-partitions (i.e. double mirror nef-partition) which are obtained from above.
19 13 Chapter 3 The main question 3.1 The main question and its motivation After establishing the relation between reflexive Gorenstein cones and nef-partitions, we are ready to state the question asked in [6] more explicitly. Let us repeat the construction in the last part of Section 2 in order to extract the main ingredients. Let M be a reflexive polytope, Conv( s i) =, and { i i = 1,..., s} be a nef-partition of. Let M = Z s M, N = Z s N, and K M R be the reflexive Gorenstein cone associated to this nef-partition. The dual cone of K is K N R and deg K is the degree element. Then deg = s e i with e i = ( 0,..., 1,..., 0 ; 0) gives back the original nef-partition { }{{} i }. If there exists 1 at the i-th position another decomposition deg = s ẽi with ẽ i 0, ẽ i K N, then we can associate to it { i } which gives another nef-partition of. Whenever one has a polytope, there is a family of Laurent polynomials associated to it. Let l( i ) be the set of lattice points in i, then the family of Laurent polynomials associated to i is f i = v l( i ) c v X v C[M], where c v is a complex coefficient only depends on the vertex v. Here we abuse notations, using v to represent the lattice point as well as its coordinate in M. For example, if v = (a 1,..., a n ) M, then X v = x a 1 1 xan n C[M]. In the same fashion, j produces a family of Laurent polynomials f j = v l( j ) c v X v C[M].
20 14 Remark We should emphasize that for the same vertex v, v 0, the coefficient c v is the same in all Laurent polynomials. However, the coefficient of the origin, c 0 (i.e. the constant term) might be different in different Laurent polynomials. We abuse notations to avoid writing c 0,j in place of c 0. We can take the zero locus of all f i in (C ) d = Spec(C[M]), and denote this variety by X ( i ). To be precise X ( i ) (C ) d is defined by: X ( i ) : f 1 = f 2 = = f s = 0, and similarly, X ( i ) (C ) d is defined by X ( i ) : f1 = f 2 = = f s = 0. Remark From toric variety point of view, this construction can be stated as follows. Let X := X(Σ( )) be the projective toric variety associated to the polytope s i, T X be the big torus. Let L i be the line bundle associated to the dual nef-partition { i 1 i s}. Generic global sections in H 0 (X, L i ) can be identified with Laurent polynomials with Newton polytopes i. In particular, for 1 i s, f i = v l( i ) c vx v H 0 (X, L i ). Let (f i ) 0 be the zero locus of f i, then X ( i ) = T (f 1 ) 0 (f s ) 0. We will return to this point of view in the appendix. The following question was asked by Batyrev and Nill in [6] Question 5.2: (Nef-partition version) Are the Calabi-Yau complete intersections X ( i ) and X ( i ) birational to each other? We can reformulate this question in terms of reflexive Gorenstein cones as follows. Let S = {x K x, deg = 1}, S i = {v K v, deg = v, ẽ i = 1}. Because deg = s ẽi, for each lattice point v in S, that is v l( S), there exists a unique
21 15 i, such that v, ẽ i = 1. We have a disjoint union l( S) = s l( S i ). One can define a Laurent polynomial in C[M] by setting: g i = v l( S i ) c v X v. For any lattice point w i such that w i, ẽ i = 1, w i, ẽ j = 0, i j, X wi g i is a Laurent polynomial in C[Ann(ẽ 1,..., ẽ r )]. We can similarly define an intersection X (ẽi ) (C ) d = Spec(C[Ann(ẽ 1,..., ẽ s )]) by X (ẽi ) : X w1 g 1 = X w2 g 2 = = X ws g s = 0 This intersection does not depend on the choice of w i, because any other choice will differ by a factor X w, w C[Ann(ẽ 1,..., ẽ s )] and this will not affect the zero loci defined in (C ) d. Similarly, we can construct S i and g i associated to the decomposition deg = r e i, and an intersection X (ei ) (C ) d = Spec(C[Ann(e 1,..., e s )]) by X (ei ) : X w 1 g1 = X w 2 g2 = = X w s g s = 0. We can compare the equations defined by these intersections with the equations defined the intersections above by nef-partitions. Because the lattice isomorphism φ : Ann(ẽ 1,..., ẽ r ) M sends S i deg to i, we can identify g i C[Ann(ẽ 1,..., ẽ r )] with f i C[M] up to a factor X v i, v i C[M]. Hence, X (ẽi ) and X ( i ) are isomorphic varieties. The same thing is true for X (ei ) and X ( i ) as well. The importance of the above construction is explained in the following theorem. Theorem The complete intersections X (ẽi ) and X (ei ) are toric double mirror in the sense that they both mirror to the same family. We abuse the notations: X (ẽi ) here means the family parameterized by the coefficients c v, and the same for X (ei ).
22 16 Proof. By the toric mirror construction in [2] [3], the mirror of X (ẽi ) is a family of generic complete intersections defined by divisors { L i 1 i s} in the toric variety X(Σ) (see the notations above Proposition 2.2.4). Likewise, the mirror of X (ei ) is a family of generic complete intersections defined by divisors {L i 1 i s} in X(Σ). By Proposition 2.2.4, { L i 1 i s}, {L i 1 i s} consist of pairwise linearly equivalent divisors and hence they defined the same family of complete intersections which is the mirror of both X (ẽi ) and X (ei ). Viewing the original question from this perspective, we can ask: (Reflexive Gorenstein cone version) Are the toric double mirror X (ei ), X (ẽi ) birational? We give an affirmative answer to this question in Theorem under some technical assumptions. 3.2 Example In this section, we will illustrate the basic idea of the proof by an explicit example. Let {u 1,..., u 15 } be a basis of Z 15, and we consider a sublattice M Z 15 which is defined by M := { 15 l i u i Z 15 5 l i = The rank of M is 13, it contains a cone K = Z 15 0 M which is defined by nonnegativity 10 i=6 l i = 15 1 of all l i. The 125 generators of rays of K are given by u i1 + u i2 + u i3 l i }. with 5j 4 i j 5j, and let c ijk C denote coefficients. Suppose {v 1,..., v 15 } is the dual basis of {u 1,..., u 15 }, then the dual lattice M is the quotient of Z 15 : M = Z 15 / Span Z { 5 10 v i v i, i=6 5 v i The dual cone K is the image of Z 15 0 in M, and its rays are generated by v i, 1 i The degree elements deg, deg are given by 15 u i and 5 v i respectively. 1 v i }.
23 17 in K : There are three different ways of decomposing deg as a summation of lattice points deg = 5 10 v i, deg = v i, deg = This gives three different complete intersections in P 4 P 4. i=6 15 For deg = 5 v i, the equations of this decomposition can be expressed as 1 j,k 5 1 j,k 5 1 j,k 5 c 1jk x 1 y j z k = 0 c 2jk x 2 y j z k = 0 c 5jk x 5 y j z k = 0. Here [x 1,, x 5 ] are homogenous coordinates of P 4, and similarly for y j, z k. As explained before, we can multiply each equation a factor in order to make it well defined in M Ann(v 1,..., v 5 ). Hence, let f i (y, z) = x 1 i 1 j,k 5 c ijk x i y j z k =. 1 j,k 5 1 v i. c ijk y j z k = 0, 1 i 5. This can be viewed as five bidegree (1, 1) equations in P 4 P 4. Similarly, for deg = 10 i=6 v i and deg = 15 1 v i we have defining equations: g j (x, z) = h k (x, y) = 1 i,k 5 1 i,j 5 c ijk x i z k = 0, 1 j 5, c ijk x i y j = 0, 1 k 5. Our question thus becomes whether these three complete intersections are birational for generic choice of c ijk. Let X 1 be the variety defined by f i = 0, 1 i 5. Let A 1 (z) be 5 5 matrix ( 5 ) A 1 (z) = c ijk z k k=1 ij, 1 i, j 5,
24 18 then f i = 0, 1 i 5 can be written as a matrix equation A 1 (z) y 1. y 5 = 0. Notice that ([y 1,..., y 5 ], [z 1,..., z 5 ]) P 4 P 4 satisfy f i = 0, 1 i 5 if and only if det(a 1 (z)) = 0 in P 4. Let D 1 denote the variety defined by det(a 1 (z)) = 0. For generic coefficients, one can show X 1 and D 1 are birational. Similarly, the variety X 2 defined by g j = 0, 1 j 5 can be written as (x 1,, x 5 ) A 2 (z) = 0 where ( 5 ) A 2 (z) = c ijk z k, 1 i, j 5. k=1 ij Let D 2 be the variety defined be det(a 2 (z)) = 0. The same argument as above shows that X 2 is birational to D 2. On the other hand, D 1 and D 2 are the same varieties, and hence X 1, X 2 are birational. We notice that despite drastically different defining equations, the three complete intersections are all birational. This example suggests us to look at the determinantal variety defined by a common matrix of different nef-partitions. However, it is not very clear how to construct this common matrix at present stage. Besides that, there are following more pressing issues: (1) the dimension of Span R {ẽ 1 e 1,..., ẽ s e s } might be smaller than s 1 which leads to considering the intersection of several determinantal varieties; (2) nonsaturatedness might occur, which forces us to work in auxiliary lattices; (3) in order to show the birationality, we have to take into account of the singularities of the complete intersection. This leads us to consider -regular intersections.
25 19 Chapter 4 The main theorem 4.1 Results on the decomposition of lattices Let be a reflexive polytope, { i 1 i s} be a nef-partition of, and { i 1 i s} be its dual nef-partition. In the following, we assume dim = dim M R. Because i, we have dim( s i) = dim M R. We use Span R {p 1,..., p s } to denote the vector space spanned by p i N R, 1 i s. The following lemma is crucial for our argument. Lemma Let p i i. If s p i = 0, and dim(span R {p 1,..., p s }) = s r, then there exist disjoint sets I k {1,..., s}, 1 k r, such that r k=1 I k = {1,..., s} and for each k, we have i I k p i = 0. Proof. Suppose l is the maximum number such that there exist l nonempty disjoint sets I j, 1 j l satisfying I 1 Il = {1,, s} and j, i I j p i = 0. Because these l equations are linearly independent, we have s r = dim(span R {p 1,..., p s }) s l, and hence l r. All we need to show is l = r. Otherwise, suppose l < r, then there must exist at least one equation 1 i s a ip i = 0, which is not a linear combination of i I j p i = 0. Hence, there must exist an index
26 20 j, such that for i I j, a i are not identically the same. Suppose a m is a minimal element in {a i i I j }. After reindexing the set, we can assume j = 1 and m = 1. Let C be a sufficiently large number, then 0 = a i p i a 1 b i p i 1 i s 2 i s i I 1 p i + C i I 2 I l p i = satisfies b i > 0 when i I 2 I l, and b i 0 when i I 1. Moreover, there exists at least one element t I 1 such that b t > 0 (because a i are not identically the same for i I 1 ). Let S = {i b i 0} be the index set corresponding to nonzero coefficients. Set P = i S p i = i S (1 cb i)p i with c sufficiently big such that i, (1 cb i ) < 0. When k / S, we have k, p i 0 i S k, i S(1 cb i )p i 0. Hence k, P = 0 for k / S. In the following, we will show P = 0. Otherwise, there exists v M R such that v, P > 0. Because M R = s R 0 i, we can chose v = 1 i s v i with v i i. Then we have v, P = v i + v i, P = v i, p j + i, P. i S i/ S i S j / S i/ S v We use the assumption s j=1 p j = 0, and thus P = j / S p j in the second equation. However, i S v i, j / S p j 0, and i/ S v i, P = 0 because k, P = 0 for k / S. This contradiction implies P = i S p i = 0. Because I 1 S and I 1 S, the index set I 1 := I 1 S must satisfy I 1 I 1. Since I 2 I l S, we have p j = P j I 1 i I 2 I l p i = 0. But this implies p j = p j = 0 j I 1 j I 1 \I 1
27 21 which gives a further decomposition of I 1. This is a contradiction to the maximality of l. Remark Under the notation of Lemma 4.1.1, we observe that for each k, dim(span R {p i i I k }) = #(I k ) 1. Let M = Z s M, and K M R be the reflexive Gorenstein cone associated to a nef-partition { 1,..., s } in M R as it is in Proposition This nef-partition corresponds to deg = s e i K, where e i = ( 0,..., 1,..., 0 ; 0). If deg }{{} = 1 at the i-th position s ẽi with ẽ i 0, ẽ i N K, then we can assume without loss of generality that Note that ẽ i = ( 0,..., 1,..., 0 }{{} ; p i ), p i N i. 1 at the i-th position dim(span R {e 1,..., e s, ẽ 1,..., ẽ s }) = s + dim(span R {p 1,..., p s }), hence, if dim(span R {p 1,..., p s }) = s r, by Lemma there exists disjoint index sets I k, 1 k r, such that r k=1 I k = {1,..., s}. For each k, we have i I k p i = 0, with dim(span R {p i i I k }) = #(I k ) 1. Let n k = #(I k ) from now on, and let Ann(e) := Ann(e 1,..., e s ) = {m M m, e i = 0, 1 i s}. If rank M = d, then Ann(e) is a sublattice of M with rank d, and Ann(e, ẽ) : = Ann(e 1,..., e s, ẽ 1,..., ẽ s ) = {m M m, e i = m, ẽ i = 0, 1 i s} a sublattice of M with rank d + r s. For our convenience, we use {(k1), (k2),..., (kn k )} as the index set of I k, and reindex the corresponding elements. For example p i = 0 i I k
28 22 becomes under the new indexing. n k p ki = 0 Because dim(span R {p k1,..., p knk }) = n k 1, we can choose {p 12,..., p 1n1,..., p r2,..., p rnr } as a R-linearly independent set. Another important fact of {p i 1 i s} is that they form a saturated sublattice in N, that is, the abelian group N/ ( s k=1 Zp i) is torsion free. The following combinatorial proof is due to Borisov. Lemma The sublattice s Zp i N is saturated. Proof. Suppose otherwise, there exists n = s a ip i with a i Q such that n N but n s Zp i. Furthermore, we can assume i, 0 a i < 1. Recall that i, p i i, hence a i p i i. By the property of nef-partition, we have n s i = ( i ). i If n 0, then there exists a lattice m s i i such that 1 n, m < 0. Because n is a lattice, we have n, m = 1. On the other hand, the set {m s i i n, m = 1} must contain some vertices of s i i and hence some vertices of i due to nef-partition, without loss of generality, i we can assume m k. Then use the property that min i, j δ ij (see the discussion after Definition 2.1.4), we have this is a contradiction. n s Zp i. 1 = n, m = a i p i, m a k > 1, Thus n = 0, but this contradicts our initial assumption on Using the above two lemmas, we can decompose the lattice to fulfil our purpose.
29 23 Lemma The lattice Ann(e) M can be decomposed as follows: Ann(e) = Ann(e, ẽ) Z[w 12 ] Z[w 1n1 ] Z[w r2 ] Z[w rnr ]. Where w ki M satisfies the following requirements (where by our indexing, w ki starts from w k2 ): 1. w ki, ẽ k1 = 1, w ki, ẽ ki = 1 for i w ki, ẽ lj = 0 for all ẽ lj ẽ k1, ẽ ki. 3. w ki, e lj = 0 for all e lj. Proof. First, if we already have w ki satisfying the given properties, then by definition, we have Ann(e, ẽ) Z[w 12 ] Z[w 1n1 ] Z[w r2 ] Z[w rnr ] Ann(e) as a sublattice. On the other hand, m Ann(e), we set m k m, ẽ ki w ki, ki i 2 then by definition, one can check m k m, ẽ ki w ki ki i 2 Ann(e) Ann(ẽ 12,, ẽ 1n1,, ẽ r2,, ẽ rnr ). Using the fact that k, t I k e t = t I k ẽ t, we have m k m, ẽ ki w ki Ann(e, ẽ). ki i 2 Thus, we only need to show the existence of w ki. Let lattice map θ : M Z s r
30 24 be defined by m ( m, p 12,..., m, p 1n1,..., m, p r2,..., m, p rnr ). We claim that θ is a surjective lattice map. Because of the saturatedness (Lemma 4.1.3), {p 12,..., p 1n1,..., p r2,..., p rnr } forms part of Z-basis of N. It follows that θ is surjective. We can choose m such that m, p ij = 0 j 2 except m, p ki = 1, and set w ki = (0, 0,..., 0; m) M, then w ki satisfies the required properties. Now let L = Span Z {w 12,, w 1n1,, w r2,, w rnr } M we have Ann(e) = Ann(e, ẽ) L. Because of the above decomposition of lattices, we have a corresponding decomposition of toric varieties: Spec(C[Ann(e)]) = Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]) Spec(C[L]). For any closed point in Spec(C[Ann(e)]) with coordinate x, we will write x = (y, ω) with y Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]), ω Spec(C[L]) respectively. 4.2 Construction of the determinantal variety The main ingredient in the proof of Theorem is a determinantal variety D which serves as a bridge to connect two complete intersections. We will show how to construct this variety in Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]) which heavily relies on Lemma Now, let S i,j = {v K v, deg = 1, v, e i = v, ẽ j = 1}
31 25 be a polytope, and g i,j = c v X v v l(s i,j ) be the Laurent polynomial associated to S i,j with coefficients c v C. Let u ki M satisfy: 1. u ki, e ki = u ki, ẽ k1 = 1 2. u ki, e lj = 0 for all e lj e ki 3. u ki, ẽ lj = 0 for all ẽ lj ẽ k1. We point out that unlike those w ki constructed before, u ki starts from u k1 for each k. The existence of u ki follows from the similarly reason as in Lemma 4.1.4, and we do not repeat it here. Next, we proceed to the construction of the determinantal variety D. Let A k (y) be the n k n k matrix with entries in C[M], A k (y) X u k1g k1,k1 X u k1 w k2 g k1,k2 X u k1 w knk g k1,knk X u k2g k2,k1 X u k2 w k2 g k2,k2 X u k2 w knk g k2,knk =... X u kn k g knk,k1 X u kn k w k2 g knk,k2 X u kn k w knk g knk,kn k Notice that the first column is not constructed identically as the rest. The reason for writing the matrix A k (y) as a function of y is that every entry of this matrix is in C[Ann(e, ẽ)], as one can verify. Thus, according to the above decomposition Spec(C[Ann(e)]) = Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]) Spec(C[L]), we use y to represent the corresponding coordinates in Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]). Next, we define n k 1 matrix w k = (1, X w k2,, X w kn k ) t, where t means the transpose of a matrix. And also define the 1 n k matrix u k = (X u k1, X u k2,..., X u kn k ).
32 26 We claim that the condition A k (y) w k = 0 is exactly the same as X u k1g k1. X u kn k g knk = 0. Indeed, recall (Section 3) by definition, we have g ki = c v X v v l(s ki ) where S ki = {v K v, deg = 1, v, e ki = 1} (Notice: this is not the same as S k,i defined before). Because of the relation i I k e i = i I k ẽ i, for any v l(s ki ), v, i I k e i = 1 implies v, i I k ẽ i = 1, thus there exists kj, such that v l( S kj ), where S kj = {v K v, deg = 1, v, ẽ kj = 1}. This means v l(s ki,kj ), and in particular, we have a disjoint union l(s ki ) = l(s ki,kj ). kj I k Hence, g ki = kj I k g ki,kj, and this justifies the claim. On the other hand, u k A k (y) = 0 is exactly the same as ( X w k1 g k1,, X w kn k g knk ) = 0, where g kj = v l( S kj ) c vx v = ki I k g ki,kj because of the disjoint union l( S ki ) = l( S ki,kj ). ki I k Let D k := {det A k (y) = 0}
33 27 in Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]). Let r D = k=1 with its reduced induced subscheme structure. This D will serve as a bridge to prove the birationality of two complete intersections. D k Remark We have det A k (y) 0 for generic coefficients because we always have ( 0,..., 1,..., 0 ; 0) S }{{} i,i. 1 at the i-th position Thus by the definition of determinant, after choosing generic coefficients, these elements will give a nonzero summand in det A k (y), hence, D k is a hypersurface in Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]), and dim D k = d + r s 1, with d = rank M. We need the following lemma about the degree of a morphism and points in the generic fibres. This proof below is indebted from the discussion with Professor Qing Liu. Lemma Let f : X Y be a dominant morphism of varieties over C. Suppose [K(X) : K(Y )] = n. Then there exists a dense open subset U of Y such that f 1 (y) consists of n (distinct) points for all y U. In particular, if f is a dominant, injective morphism, then [K(X) : K(Y )] = 1, so X, Y are birational. Proof. First we can reduce it to the case when f is a finite morphism. In fact, the problem is local in Y, hence we can assume Y = Spec(A) to be affine. Let X X be a non empty open affine subset, it suffice to prove the result for X Y. This is because [K(X) : K(Y )] <, then Y \ f(x\x ), hence the open set f 1 (Y \ f(x\x )) X. Now we assume X = Spec(B). The dominant morphism f corresponds to an injective homomorphism A B. Write k(b) = k(a)[t] where k(b), k(a) are quotient fields of B, A and t annihilates a polynomial P (T ) k(a)[t ] of degree n (theorem of primitive element). Replacing A by a localization A a with a A such that the element t becomes integral over A (also
34 28 localizing B correspondingly). As B is a finitely generated algebra over A, localizing further A, we can suppose A B A[t] (because each element of B belong to some A a [t], it is enough to inverse a common denominator for a system of generators of B over A). As B and A[t] have the same field of fractions and B is finite over A, localizing A again, we have B = A[t] = A[T ]/(P (T )). The discriminant of P (T ) belongs to A (we may need to localize A for this) and is non-zero because P (T ) is separable in k(a)[t ]. Let U be the principal open subset D( ) Y. Then for any y Y, the fiber f 1 (y) is given by the algebra k(y)[t ]/( P (T )) where k(y) = C denotes the residue field at y and P (T ) k(y)[t ] is the canonical image of P (T ). Its discriminant is (y) 0, so it has n (distinct) roots. 4.3 Proof of the main theorem In this section, we will show that X (ei ) and X (ẽi ) are both birational to the determinantal variety D. In fact, we will show that the morphism X (ei ) to D induced by the projection from Spec(C[Ann(e)]) to Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]) gives the birational morphism, and similarly for X (ẽi ) to D. We recall our setup first: Let M, N be rank d lattices, and let K, K be reflexive Gorenstein cones associated to a length s nef-partition. Let deg = s e i = s ẽi where e i, ẽ i K N, e i, ẽ i 0 as before. Again, without loss of generality, we assume 1 i s, e i = ( 0,..., 1,..., 0 }{{} ; 0), ẽ i = ( 0,..., 1,..., 0 }{{} ; p i ) N. 1 at the i-th position 1 at the i-th position By Lemma 4.1.1, we have a decomposition of {p 1,..., p s } into subsets I k = {p k1,..., p knk }, for each 1 k r. We define the intersections X (ei ), X (ẽi ) as in Section 3. With this notation, we have the following birationality result: Theorem For generic coefficients, if X (ei ), X (ẽi ), D are irreducible with dim D = dim X (ei ) = dim X (ẽi ), then the complete intersections X (ei ) and X (ẽi ) are birational.
35 29 Proof. When s = 1, then X (ei ) = X (ẽi ), so nothing needs to be proved. Now we assume s 2. From the discussion after Lemma 4.1.4, we have Ann(e) = Ann(e, ẽ) L M. For any closed point x X (ei ), we can write x = (y, ω) Spec(C[Ann(e)]) with y Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]), and ω Spec(C[L]) respectively. We claim that there exists a morphism π: π : X (ei ) D defined by x y. Indeed, by Lemma 4.1.4, we have a lattice decomposition of Ann(e) in M Ann(e) = Ann(e, ẽ) Z[w 12 ] Z[w 1n1 ] Z[w r2 ] Z[w rnr ]. By the construction of A k (y), the following matrix equation A 1 (y) A 2 (y)... w 1 w 2 = 0. A r (y) gives the variety X (ei ), where w k = (1, X w k2,, X w kn k ) t. w r Hence, for a closed point (y, ω) X (ei ) with y Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]) and ω Spec(C[L]), we have for all k, A k (y)w k = 0. Because w k 0, we must have det(a k (y)) = 0. Hence, for all k, y lives in D k, and thus y D = r k=1 D k. This shows that the natural projection Spec(C[Ann(e)]) Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]) maps X (ei ) to D. We denote this morphism by π. Next, we show that π is generically injective, that is, π is injective on a nonempty open subset of X (ei ). Roughly speaking, the proof rests on the fact that a Calabi-Yau variety cannot be uniruled. We show that if π is not generically injective, then X (ei ) is
36 30 a uniruled variety. However, we can construct a compactification X (ei ) of X (ei ) which is a projective, Calabi-Yau variety with canonical, Gorenstein singularities. Put these facts together, and we get a contradiction. The details are given in the follows: Suppose π is not generically injective. By a theorem of Chevalley ([10] Chapter II Ex.3.22(e)), there exists a nonempty open set V π(x (ei )) such that over V, the fibres have the same dimension h. Let y V, and let (X (ei )) y be the fibre over y. We claim that there exists a birational morphism θ y : (X (ei )) y P h. In fact, let Ω y = {ω Spec(C[L]) (y, ω) (X (ei )) y }, and let W y = { λ i ω i ω i Ω y, λ i C} i I,#(I)< be the affine subspace of Spec(C[L]) generated by Ω y, where I is some finite index set. We claim that Ω y W y is a dense open subvariety. To see this, notice by the matrix equation A 1 (y) A 2 (y)... w 1 w 2 = 0,. A r (y) w r if λ i 0 and λ i ω i Spec(C[L]), i I,#(I)< i I,#(I)< then we have (y, λ i ω i ) (X (ei )) y. i I,#(I)< However, the closed points in W y which satisfy i I,#(I)< λ i 0 and i I,#(I)< λ i ω i (C ) s r form an open variety, and this justifies the claim.
37 31 Now, dim Ω y = h implies dim W y = h, and the natural morphism θ y : (X (ei )) y W y P h is a birational morphism. Moreover, if π is not generically injective, then h 1, i.e. the general fibres of π are positive dimensional (one might need to pass to some small open subvariety of V in order to make the fibre contains distinct closed points). Then we can construct a birational morphism π 1 (V ) V P h (y, ω) (y, θ y (ω)). This shows that X (ei ) is a ruled variety and, in particular, a uniruled variety. In the appendix (cf. Remark , Proposition ), we construct a compactification X (ei ) of X (ei ), such that X (ei ) is a projective, Calabi-Yau variety with canonical, Gorenstein singularities. Let X (ei ) be a desingularization of X (ei ). It is also a uniruled variety. Because X (ei ) is a Calabi-Yau variety with canonical singularities, the canonical divisor K (ei ) of X (ei ) is K (ei ) = c j E j, c j 0, where E j are the exceptional divisors. Hence, H 0 ( X (ei ), O(K (ei ))) 0. However, because X (ei ) is a smooth, proper uniruled variety over C, we have H 0 ( X (ei ), O(K (ei ))) = 0 ( [15] IV Corollary 1.11). This is a contradiction, and hence π is generically injective. Let U X (ei ) be an open set where π U is injective. Because for generic coefficients, X (ei ) is smooth of dimension d s (Proposition ), π(u) is a constructible subset of D with dimension d s. This is the same dimension as D by assumption. Thus π is dominant as well. By Lemma 4.2.2, X (ei ) is birational to D. A similar argument can be used to show that X (ẽi ) is birational to D as well. We sketch the argument below:
38 32 First, by the proof of Lemma 4.1.4, one has a decomposition of lattices Ann(ẽ) = Ann(e, ẽ) Z[u 12 u 11 ] Z[u 1n1 u 11 ] Z[u r2 u r1 ] Z[u rnr u r1 ]. where u ki is as defined in Section 4. We can view u ki u k1 as w ki when i 2 because it satisfies the required relation of Lemma (with e ki, ẽ ki switched), and this is enough for the existence of the decomposition. Correspondingly, we have a decomposition of the torus: Spec(C[Ann(ẽ)]) = Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]) (C ) s r. We can similarly define X (ẽi ) D as before, and for the same reason, this is a birational morphism. Hence X (ei ) and X (ẽi ) are both birational to D, and this completes the proof. Remark It is necessary in our argument for D to be irreducible. When we consider the case s = 2, with S 2,1 =, we see that D is a union of zero loci of g 1,1 and g 2,2, where g i,i = v l(s i,i ) c vx v, i = 1, 2. By the proof of the theorem, we see that X (ei ) is birational to the zero locus of g 2,2, but X (ẽi ) is birational to the zero locus of g 1,1. A priori, one cannot expect that the two loci be birational. There is a result due to Batyrev and Borisov ([3] Theorem 3.3) which asserts that X (ei ) is irreducible if the nef-partition is 2-independent. This means there exists no integer n > 0 nor any subset of the nef-partition { k1,..., kn } { 1,..., s } such that dim( k1 + + kn ) n. Remark It is reasonable to require that dim D = dim X (ei ) = d s. Indeed D = r D i is a variety in Spec(C[Ann(e, ẽ)]) = (C ) d (s r) defined by the intersection of r hypersurfaces. Thus D is expected to have dimension d s for generic choice of coefficients.
Toric Varieties and the Secondary Fan
Toric Varieties and the Secondary Fan Emily Clader Fall 2011 1 Motivation The Batyrev mirror symmetry construction for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces goes roughly as follows: Start with an n-dimensional reflexive
More informationTORIC WEAK FANO VARIETIES ASSOCIATED TO BUILDING SETS
TORIC WEAK FANO VARIETIES ASSOCIATED TO BUILDING SETS YUSUKE SUYAMA Abstract. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for the nonsingular projective toric variety associated to a building set to be
More informationLecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics
Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics Taras Panov Lomonosov Moscow State University Summer School Current Developments in Geometry Novosibirsk, 27 August1 September 2018 Taras Panov (Moscow University) Lecture
More informationAffine Geometry and Discrete Legendre Transform
Affine Geometry and Discrete Legendre Transform Andrey Novoseltsev April 24, 2008 Abstract The combinatorial duality used in Gross-Siebert approach to mirror symmetry is the discrete Legendre transform
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #17 11/05/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #17 11/05/2013 Throughout this lecture k denotes an algebraically closed field. 17.1 Tangent spaces and hypersurfaces For any polynomial f k[x
More informationThe geometry of Landau-Ginzburg models
Motivation Toric degeneration Hodge theory CY3s The Geometry of Landau-Ginzburg Models January 19, 2016 Motivation Toric degeneration Hodge theory CY3s Plan of talk 1. Landau-Ginzburg models and mirror
More informationAffine Geometry and the Discrete Legendre Transfrom
Affine Geometry and the Discrete Legendre Transfrom Andrey Novoseltsev Department of Mathematics University of Washington April 25, 2008 Andrey Novoseltsev (UW) Affine Geometry April 25, 2008 1 / 24 Outline
More informationVector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo. 1. The notion of vector bundle
Vector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo Notes(* prepared for the First Summer School on Complex Geometry (Villarrica, Chile 7-9 December 2010 1 The notion of vector bundle In affine geometry,
More informationLECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL
LECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL In this lecture we discuss a criterion for non-stable-rationality based on the decomposition of the diagonal in the Chow group. This criterion
More information9. Birational Maps and Blowing Up
72 Andreas Gathmann 9. Birational Maps and Blowing Up In the course of this class we have already seen many examples of varieties that are almost the same in the sense that they contain isomorphic dense
More informationCrash Course on Toric Geometry
Crash Course on Toric Geometry Emily Clader RTG Workshop on Mirror Symmetry February 2012 The Kähler cone If X Σ is a simplicial projective toric variety, then A n 1 (X Σ ) R = H 2 (X Σ ; R), so H 1,1
More informationwhere m is the maximal ideal of O X,p. Note that m/m 2 is a vector space. Suppose that we are given a morphism
8. Smoothness and the Zariski tangent space We want to give an algebraic notion of the tangent space. In differential geometry, tangent vectors are equivalence classes of maps of intervals in R into the
More informationDIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES
DIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN We now begin a closer study of the behavior of projective nonsingular curves, and morphisms between them, as well as to projective space. To this end, we introduce
More informationMath 210C. The representation ring
Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let
More informationk k would be reducible. But the zero locus of f in A n+1
Math 145. Bezout s Theorem Let be an algebraically closed field. The purpose of this handout is to prove Bezout s Theorem and some related facts of general interest in projective geometry that arise along
More informationHomogeneous Coordinate Ring
Students: Kaiserslautern University Algebraic Group June 14, 2013 Outline Quotients in Algebraic Geometry 1 Quotients in Algebraic Geometry 2 3 4 Outline Quotients in Algebraic Geometry 1 Quotients in
More informationAPPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS
APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS We review in this appendix some basic definitions and results that we need about Chow groups. For details and proofs we refer to [Ful98]. In particular, we discuss
More informationMath 530 Lecture Notes. Xi Chen
Math 530 Lecture Notes Xi Chen 632 Central Academic Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G1, CANADA E-mail address: xichen@math.ualberta.ca 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary
More information3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions
24 Andreas Gathmann 3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions After having defined affine varieties, our next goal must be to say what kind of maps between them we want to consider as morphisms, i. e. as nice
More informationChapter 1. Preliminaries
Introduction This dissertation is a reading of chapter 4 in part I of the book : Integer and Combinatorial Optimization by George L. Nemhauser & Laurence A. Wolsey. The chapter elaborates links between
More information10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann
82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It
More informationLECTURES ON SINGULARITIES AND ADJOINT LINEAR SYSTEMS
LECTURES ON SINGULARITIES AND ADJOINT LINEAR SYSTEMS LAWRENCE EIN Abstract. 1. Singularities of Surfaces Let (X, o) be an isolated normal surfaces singularity. The basic philosophy is to replace the singularity
More informationLECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES
LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES IVAN LOSEV Introduction In this lecture we continue to study the category O 0 and explain some ideas towards the proof of the Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture. We start by introducing
More informationHomological mirror symmetry via families of Lagrangians
Homological mirror symmetry via families of Lagrangians String-Math 2018 Mohammed Abouzaid Columbia University June 17, 2018 Mirror symmetry Three facets of mirror symmetry: 1 Enumerative: GW invariants
More information(1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections
7. Linear systems First a word about the base scheme. We would lie to wor in enough generality to cover the general case. On the other hand, it taes some wor to state properly the general results if one
More informationON THE NUMBER AND BOUNDEDNESS OF LOG MINIMAL MODELS OF GENERAL TYPE
ON THE NUMBER AND BOUNDEDNESS OF LOG MINIMAL MODELS OF GENERAL TYPE DILETTA MARTINELLI, STEFAN SCHREIEDER, AND LUCA TASIN Abstract. We show that the number of marked minimal models of an n-dimensional
More information12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem
12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem 95 12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem After our study of smooth cubic surfaces in the last chapter, let us now come back to the general theory of
More informationVanishing theorems for toric polyhedra
RIMS Kôkyûroku Bessatsu 4x (200x), 000 000 Vanishing theorems for toric polyhedra By Osamu Fujino Abstract A toric polyhedron is a reduced closed subscheme of a toric variety that are partial unions of
More informationMULTIPLICITIES OF MONOMIAL IDEALS
MULTIPLICITIES OF MONOMIAL IDEALS JÜRGEN HERZOG AND HEMA SRINIVASAN Introduction Let S = K[x 1 x n ] be a polynomial ring over a field K with standard grading, I S a graded ideal. The multiplicity of S/I
More information1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties
0. Brief overview Cycles and bundles are intrinsic invariants of algebraic varieties Close connections going back to Grothendieck Work with quasi-projective varieties over a field k Affine Varieties 1.
More informationSPACES OF RATIONAL CURVES IN COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
SPACES OF RATIONAL CURVES IN COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS ROYA BEHESHTI AND N. MOHAN KUMAR Abstract. We prove that the space of smooth rational curves of degree e in a general complete intersection of multidegree
More informationThe Grothendieck Ring of Varieties
The Grothendieck Ring of Varieties Ziwen Zhu University of Utah October 25, 2016 These are supposed to be the notes for a talk of the student seminar in algebraic geometry. In the talk, We will first define
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013 As usual, all the rings we consider are commutative rings with an identity element. 18.1 Regular local rings Consider a local
More informationON THE NUMBER AND BOUNDEDNESS OF LOG MINIMAL MODELS OF GENERAL TYPE
ON THE NUMBER AND BOUNDEDNESS OF LOG MINIMAL MODELS OF GENERAL TYPE DILETTA MARTINELLI, STEFAN SCHREIEDER, AND LUCA TASIN Abstract. We show that the number of marked minimal models of an n-dimensional
More informationON A THEOREM OF CAMPANA AND PĂUN
ON A THEOREM OF CAMPANA AND PĂUN CHRISTIAN SCHNELL Abstract. Let X be a smooth projective variety over the complex numbers, and X a reduced divisor with normal crossings. We present a slightly simplified
More informationProblems on Minkowski sums of convex lattice polytopes
arxiv:08121418v1 [mathag] 8 Dec 2008 Problems on Minkowski sums of convex lattice polytopes Tadao Oda odatadao@mathtohokuacjp Abstract submitted at the Oberwolfach Conference Combinatorial Convexity and
More informationNUMERICAL MACAULIFICATION
NUMERICAL MACAULIFICATION JUAN MIGLIORE AND UWE NAGEL Abstract. An unpublished example due to Joe Harris from 1983 (or earlier) gave two smooth space curves with the same Hilbert function, but one of the
More informationA finite universal SAGBI basis for the kernel of a derivation. Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 41(4) P.759-P.792
Title Author(s) A finite universal SAGBI basis for the kernel of a derivation Kuroda, Shigeru Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 4(4) P.759-P.792 Issue Date 2004-2 Text Version publisher URL https://doi.org/0.890/838
More informationMath 676. A compactness theorem for the idele group. and by the product formula it lies in the kernel (A K )1 of the continuous idelic norm
Math 676. A compactness theorem for the idele group 1. Introduction Let K be a global field, so K is naturally a discrete subgroup of the idele group A K and by the product formula it lies in the kernel
More informationIf F is a divisor class on the blowing up X of P 2 at n 8 general points p 1,..., p n P 2,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 124, 727--733 (1996) Rational Surfaces with K 2 > 0 Brian Harbourne Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588-0323 email: bharbourne@unl.edu
More information4. Images of Varieties Given a morphism f : X Y of quasi-projective varieties, a basic question might be to ask what is the image of a closed subset
4. Images of Varieties Given a morphism f : X Y of quasi-projective varieties, a basic question might be to ask what is the image of a closed subset Z X. Replacing X by Z we might as well assume that Z
More informationMODULES OVER A PID. induces an isomorphism
MODULES OVER A PID A module over a PID is an abelian group that also carries multiplication by a particularly convenient ring of scalars. Indeed, when the scalar ring is the integers, the module is precisely
More informationOn Mordell-Lang in Algebraic Groups of Unipotent Rank 1
On Mordell-Lang in Algebraic Groups of Unipotent Rank 1 Paul Vojta University of California, Berkeley and ICERM (work in progress) Abstract. In the previous ICERM workshop, Tom Scanlon raised the question
More informationNef line bundles on M 0,n from GIT
Nef line bundles on M 0,n from GIT David Swinarski Department of Mathematics University of Georgia November 13, 2009 Many of the results here are joint work with Valery Alexeev. We have a preprint: arxiv:0812.0778
More informationSPACES OF RATIONAL CURVES ON COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
SPACES OF RATIONAL CURVES ON COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS ROYA BEHESHTI AND N. MOHAN KUMAR Abstract. We prove that the space of smooth rational curves of degree e on a general complete intersection of multidegree
More informationDirect Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013
Direct Limits Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 In this note we define direct limits and prove their basic properties. This notion is important in various places in algebra. In particular, in algebraic geometry
More informationMATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12
MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y -scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f
More informationarxiv:math/ v3 [math.ag] 1 Mar 2006
arxiv:math/0506132v3 [math.ag] 1 Mar 2006 A NOTE ON THE PROJECTIVE VARIETIES OF ALMOST GENERAL TYPE SHIGETAKA FUKUDA Abstract. A Q-Cartier divisor D on a projective variety M is almost nup, if (D, C) >
More informationSummer Algebraic Geometry Seminar
Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar Lectures by Bart Snapp About This Document These lectures are based on Chapters 1 and 2 of An Invitation to Algebraic Geometry by Karen Smith et al. 1 Affine Varieties
More informationNONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN
NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN The primary goal of this note is to prove that every abstract nonsingular curve can be realized as an open subset of a (unique) nonsingular projective curve. Note that
More informationProjective Varieties. Chapter Projective Space and Algebraic Sets
Chapter 1 Projective Varieties 1.1 Projective Space and Algebraic Sets 1.1.1 Definition. Consider A n+1 = A n+1 (k). The set of all lines in A n+1 passing through the origin 0 = (0,..., 0) is called the
More informationNormal Fans of Polyhedral Convex Sets
Set-Valued Analysis manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Normal Fans of Polyhedral Convex Sets Structures and Connections Shu Lu Stephen M. Robinson Received: date / Accepted: date Dedicated
More informationMath 121 Homework 4: Notes on Selected Problems
Math 121 Homework 4: Notes on Selected Problems 11.2.9. If W is a subspace of the vector space V stable under the linear transformation (i.e., (W ) W ), show that induces linear transformations W on W
More informationMA 206 notes: introduction to resolution of singularities
MA 206 notes: introduction to resolution of singularities Dan Abramovich Brown University March 4, 2018 Abramovich Introduction to resolution of singularities 1 / 31 Resolution of singularities Let k be
More informationBoolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices
Boolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices Stan Gudder Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver CO 80208 Frédéric Latrémolière Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver
More informationHolomorphic line bundles
Chapter 2 Holomorphic line bundles In the absence of non-constant holomorphic functions X! C on a compact complex manifold, we turn to the next best thing, holomorphic sections of line bundles (i.e., rank
More informationFANO MANIFOLDS AND BLOW-UPS OF LOW-DIMENSIONAL SUBVARIETIES. 1. Introduction
FANO MANIFOLDS AND BLOW-UPS OF LOW-DIMENSIONAL SUBVARIETIES ELENA CHIERICI AND GIANLUCA OCCHETTA Abstract. We study Fano manifolds of pseudoindex greater than one and dimension greater than five, which
More informationMath 797W Homework 4
Math 797W Homework 4 Paul Hacking December 5, 2016 We work over an algebraically closed field k. (1) Let F be a sheaf of abelian groups on a topological space X, and p X a point. Recall the definition
More informationTORIC REDUCTION AND TROPICAL GEOMETRY A.
Mathematisches Institut, Seminars, (Y. Tschinkel, ed.), p. 109 115 Universität Göttingen, 2004-05 TORIC REDUCTION AND TROPICAL GEOMETRY A. Szenes ME Institute of Mathematics, Geometry Department, Egry
More informationADJUNCTION AND INVERSION OF ADJUNCTION
ADJUNCTION AND INVERSION OF ADJUNCTION STEFANO FILIPAZZI Abstract. These notes are meant to be a handout for the student seminar in algebraic geometry at the University of Utah. They are a short introduction
More informationMAKSYM FEDORCHUK. n ) = z1 d 1 zn d 1.
DIRECT SUM DECOMPOSABILITY OF SMOOTH POLYNOMIALS AND FACTORIZATION OF ASSOCIATED FORMS MAKSYM FEDORCHUK Abstract. We prove an if-and-only-if criterion for direct sum decomposability of a smooth homogeneous
More informationALGEBRAIC HYPERBOLICITY OF THE VERY GENERAL QUINTIC SURFACE IN P 3
ALGEBRAIC HYPERBOLICITY OF THE VERY GENERAL QUINTIC SURFACE IN P 3 IZZET COSKUN AND ERIC RIEDL Abstract. We prove that a curve of degree dk on a very general surface of degree d 5 in P 3 has geometric
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ag] 14 Mar 2019
ASYMPTOTIC CONSTRUCTIONS AND INVARIANTS OF GRADED LINEAR SERIES ariv:1903.05967v1 [math.ag] 14 Mar 2019 CHIH-WEI CHANG AND SHIN-YAO JOW Abstract. Let be a complete variety of dimension n over an algebraically
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 43
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 43 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Facts we ll soon know about curves 1 1. FACTS WE LL SOON KNOW ABOUT CURVES We almost know enough to say a lot of interesting things about
More informationCombinatorial Commutative Algebra and D-Branes
Combinatorial Commutative Algebra and D-Branes Chirag Lakhani May 13, 2009 Abstract This is a survey paper written for Professor Ezra Miller s Combinatorial Commutative Algebra course in the Spring of
More informationLINKED ALTERNATING FORMS AND LINKED SYMPLECTIC GRASSMANNIANS
LINKED ALTERNATING FORMS AND LINKED SYMPLECTIC GRASSMANNIANS BRIAN OSSERMAN AND MONTSERRAT TEIXIDOR I BIGAS Abstract. Motivated by applications to higher-rank Brill-Noether theory and the Bertram-Feinberg-Mukai
More informationSection Blowing Up
Section 2.7.1 - Blowing Up Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 Now we come to the generalised notion of blowing up. In (I, 4) we defined the blowing up of a variety with respect to a point. Now we will define
More informationmult V f, where the sum ranges over prime divisor V X. We say that two divisors D 1 and D 2 are linearly equivalent, denoted by sending
2. The canonical divisor In this section we will introduce one of the most important invariants in the birational classification of varieties. Definition 2.1. Let X be a normal quasi-projective variety
More informationClassifying Hilbert functions of fat point subschemes in P 2
Collect. Math. 60, 2 (2009), 159 192 c 2009 Universitat de Barcelona Classifying Hilbert functions of fat point subschemes in P 2 A.V. Geramita Department of Mathematics, Queen s University, Kingston Ontario
More informationSpherical varieties and arc spaces
Spherical varieties and arc spaces Victor Batyrev, ESI, Vienna 19, 20 January 2017 1 Lecture 1 This is a joint work with Anne Moreau. Let us begin with a few notations. We consider G a reductive connected
More informationARITHMETICALLY COHEN-MACAULAY BUNDLES ON HYPERSURFACES
ARITHMETICALLY COHEN-MACAULAY BUNDLES ON HYPERSURFACES N. MOHAN KUMAR, A. P. RAO, AND G. V. RAVINDRA Abstract. We prove that any rank two arithmetically Cohen- Macaulay vector bundle on a general hypersurface
More informationPROJECTIVIZED RANK TWO TORIC VECTOR BUNDLES ARE MORI DREAM SPACES
PROJECTIVIZED RANK TWO TORIC VECTOR BUNDLES ARE MORI DREAM SPACES JOSÉ LUIS GONZÁLEZ Abstract. We prove that the Cox ring of the projectivization PE of a rank two toric vector bundle E, over a toric variety
More informationToroidal Embeddings and Desingularization
California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations Office of Graduate Studies 6-2018 Toroidal Embeddings and Desingularization LEON NGUYEN 003663425@coyote.csusb.edu
More informationlocus such that Γ + F = 0. Then (Y, Γ = Γ + F ) is kawamata log terminal, and K Y + Γ = π (K X + ) + E + F. Pick H ample such that K Y + Γ + H is nef
17. The MMP Using the cone (16.6) and contraction theorem (16.3), one can define the MMP in all dimensions: (1) Start with a kawamata log terminal pair (X, ). (2) Is K X + nef? Is yes, then stop. (3) Otherwise
More informationQuivers, Cones and Polytopes
Quivers, Cones and Polytopes Lutz Hille Dedicated to Idun Reiten on the occasion of her sixtieth birthday Abstract Let Q be a quiver without oriented cycles. We consider the polytope of flows (θ) in Q
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ag] 11 Apr 2003 James McKernan and Yuri Prokhorov
THREEFOLD THRESHOLDS arxiv:math/0304152v1 [math.ag] 11 Apr 2003 James McKernan and Yuri Prokhorov Abstract. We prove that the set of accumulation points of thresholds in dimension three is equal to the
More informationV (v i + W i ) (v i + W i ) is path-connected and hence is connected.
Math 396. Connectedness of hyperplane complements Note that the complement of a point in R is disconnected and the complement of a (translated) line in R 2 is disconnected. Quite generally, we claim that
More informationThe generalized Hodge and Bloch conjectures are equivalent for general complete intersections
The generalized Hodge and Bloch conjectures are equivalent for general complete intersections Claire Voisin CNRS, Institut de mathématiques de Jussieu 0 Introduction Recall first that a weight k Hodge
More informationRepresentations and Linear Actions
Representations and Linear Actions Definition 0.1. Let G be an S-group. A representation of G is a morphism of S-groups φ G GL(n, S) for some n. We say φ is faithful if it is a monomorphism (in the category
More informationSEPARABLE RATIONAL CONNECTEDNESS AND STABILITY
SEPARABLE RATIONAL CONNECTEDNESS AND STABILIT ZHIU TIAN Abstract. In this short note we prove that in many cases the failure of a variety to be separably rationally connected is caused by the instability
More informationMonomial equivariant embeddings of quasitoric manifolds and the problem of existence of invariant almost complex structures.
Monomial equivariant embeddings of quasitoric manifolds and the problem of existence of invariant almost complex structures. Andrey Kustarev joint work with V. M. Buchstaber, Steklov Mathematical Institute
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 25 Jun 2014
THE NON-PURE VERSION OF THE SIMPLEX AND THE BOUNDARY OF THE SIMPLEX NICOLÁS A. CAPITELLI arxiv:1406.6434v1 [math.co] 25 Jun 2014 Abstract. We introduce the non-pure versions of simplicial balls and spheres
More informationRational Curves On K3 Surfaces
Rational Curves On K3 Surfaces Jun Li Department of Mathematics Stanford University Conference in honor of Peter Li Overview of the talk The problem: existence of rational curves on a K3 surface The conjecture:
More informationThe cocycle lattice of binary matroids
Published in: Europ. J. Comb. 14 (1993), 241 250. The cocycle lattice of binary matroids László Lovász Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary, H-1088 Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 Ákos Seress*
More informationAlgebraic Geometry. Andreas Gathmann. Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014
Algebraic Geometry Andreas Gathmann Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014 Contents 0. Introduction......................... 3 1. Affine Varieties........................ 9 2. The Zariski Topology......................
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 19 Jan 2010
A toric varieties approach to geometrical structure of multipartite states Hoshang Heydari Physics Department, Stockholm university 10691 Stockholm Sweden arxiv:1001.3245v1 [quant-ph] 19 Jan 2010 Email:
More informationMath 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems
Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems 12.1.2. Let M be a module over the integral domain R. (a) Assume that M has rank n and that x 1,..., x n is any maximal set of linearly independent elements
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I, FALL 2016.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I, FALL 2016. DIVISORS. 1. Weil and Cartier divisors Let X be an algebraic variety. Define a Weil divisor on X as a formal (finite) linear combination of irreducible subvarieties of
More informationWe simply compute: for v = x i e i, bilinearity of B implies that Q B (v) = B(v, v) is given by xi x j B(e i, e j ) =
Math 395. Quadratic spaces over R 1. Algebraic preliminaries Let V be a vector space over a field F. Recall that a quadratic form on V is a map Q : V F such that Q(cv) = c 2 Q(v) for all v V and c F, and
More informationON MAXIMAL ALBANESE DIMENSIONAL VARIETIES. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 1 3. Main results 3 References 6
ON MAXIMAL ALBANESE DIMENSIONAL VARIETIES OSAMU FUJINO Abstract. We prove that any smooth projective variety with maximal Albanese dimension has a good minimal model. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries
More informationAN EXPOSITION OF THE RIEMANN ROCH THEOREM FOR CURVES
AN EXPOSITION OF THE RIEMANN ROCH THEOREM FOR CURVES DOMINIC L. WYNTER Abstract. We introduce the concepts of divisors on nonsingular irreducible projective algebraic curves, the genus of such a curve,
More informationHodge theory for combinatorial geometries
Hodge theory for combinatorial geometries June Huh with Karim Adiprasito and Eric Katz June Huh 1 / 48 Three fundamental ideas: June Huh 2 / 48 Three fundamental ideas: The idea of Bernd Sturmfels that
More informationAFFINE PUSHFORWARD AND SMOOTH PULLBACK FOR PERVERSE SHEAVES
AFFINE PUSHFORWARD AND SMOOTH PULLBACK FOR PERVERSE SHEAVES YEHAO ZHOU Conventions In this lecture note, a variety means a separated algebraic variety over complex numbers, and sheaves are C-linear. 1.
More information(1.) For any subset P S we denote by L(P ) the abelian group of integral relations between elements of P, i.e. L(P ) := ker Z P! span Z P S S : For ea
Torsion of dierentials on toric varieties Klaus Altmann Institut fur reine Mathematik, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin Ziegelstr. 13a, D-10099 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: altmann@mathematik.hu-berlin.de Abstract
More informationA NOTE ON RETRACTS AND LATTICES (AFTER D. J. SALTMAN)
A NOTE ON RETRACTS AND LATTICES (AFTER D. J. SALTMAN) Z. REICHSTEIN Abstract. This is an expository note based on the work of D. J. Saltman. We discuss the notions of retract rationality and retract equivalence
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 12
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 12 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Rational equivalence on bundles 1 1.1. Intersecting with the zero-section of a vector bundle 2 2. Cones and Segre classes of subvarieties 3 2.1. Introduction
More informationTHE TATE MODULE. Seminar: Elliptic curves and the Weil conjecture. Yassin Mousa. Z p
THE TATE MODULE Seminar: Elliptic curves and the Weil conjecture Yassin Mousa Abstract This paper refers to the 10th talk in the seminar Elliptic curves and the Weil conjecture supervised by Prof. Dr.
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 6
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 6 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Divisors 2 1.1. Crash course in Cartier divisors and invertible sheaves (aka line bundles) 3 1.2. Pseudo-divisors 3 2. Intersecting with divisors 4 2.1.
More informationThe Cone Theorem. Stefano Filipazzi. February 10, 2016
The Cone Theorem Stefano Filipazzi February 10, 2016 These notes are supposed to be a handout for the student seminar in algebraic geometry at the University of Utah. In this seminar, we will give an overview
More informationThe Canonical Sheaf. Stefano Filipazzi. September 14, 2015
The Canonical Sheaf Stefano Filipazzi September 14, 015 These notes are supposed to be a handout for the student seminar in algebraic geometry at the University of Utah. In this seminar, we will go over
More information