MCDR INSPECTION REPORT

Transcription

1 MCDR INSPECTION REPORT General S. N. Particulars Details 1 Name of the Mine Matia Limestone Mine 2 Total Lease Area (Ha) with breakup of Non-forest and forest ha.,non forest land land 3 Mine code 38CHG IBM Registration Number under rule 45 of MCDR, 1988 IBM reg Name of the lessee, Address, phone, and fax number Shri Gangaram Sharma,C/O Shri Gopaldas Ptitwani,E-5,Sect-2,Devendra Nagar,P.O.& Distt.-Raipur(C.G.) 6 Village Matia 7 Taluka/Mandal Raipur 8 District Raipur 9 Pincode 10 State Chhattisgarh 11 Post office Raipur 12 Nearest police station Raipur 13 Nearest Railway station Raipur 14 Date of Grant of Mining Lease Date of Execution Date of opening of Mine Date of first Renewal, if applicable and its period & expiry 18 Date of second Renewal, if applicable and its period & expiry 19 Date of submission of renewal application if Mining Operations are continuing under deemed extension 20 Name of the Nominated Owner with Address, phone, , fax number and date of appointment Shri Gangaram Sharma,C/O Shri Gopaldas Ptitwani,E-5,Sect-2,Devendra Nagar,P.O.& Distt.-Raipur(C.G.),Phone No Name of the Mine Agent with Address, phone, , fax number and date of appointment 1

2 22 Name of the Mines Manager with Address, phone, , fax number and date of appointment in mines 23 Name of the Mining Engineer, Qualification and total experience with Address, phone, , fax number and date of appointment in mine 24 Whether Geologist and Mining Engineer appointed in mines satisfy the rule 42 & carrying out their duties as per rule 43 & Date of Approval of Mining Plan/Modified Mining Plan with five-year period and specific condition in approval letter, if any. 26 Date of Approval of Scheme of Mining/Modified Scheme of Mining with five-year period and specific condition in approval letter, if any. 27 Mineral(s) granted in lease and proved for mining Limestone 28 Method of Mining(Opencast, Underground) Opencast 29 Category (Fully Mechanised, Others or Manual) Manual 30 Captive/Non Captive Non Captive No Geologist and Mining Engineer appointed in mines and mine is non working and mine is under suspension from to and still not started working. Rap/LST/MPLN-603/NGP dated for period to nd scheme dated for period to Scientific Mining: Compliance of proposals of approved mining plan/scheme of mining. (Duplication of information in existing TMIS data sheets and draft write up has been avoided.) Exploration 1a Backlog of previous year No proposal in b Exploration over lease area for Geological axis 1 or 2. almost the lease area is exposed due to mining pit 1c Exploration Agency & Expenditure Mine is nonworking and mine is under suspension from to and still not started working. 2

3 1d in lakh Rupees during the year Balance area to be explored to bring Geological axis in 1 or 2 1e Balance reserves as on f General remarks of inspecting officer on geology, exploration etc. Depthwise exploration required but no proposal in The ML is mostly exposed due to existing mining pit but below exposed area exploration is required to delineate the ore body. Development 2a Location of development w.r.t. lease NE direction of ML area 2b Separate benches in topsoil, No top soil and no OB overburden and mineral (Rule 15) 2c Stripping ratio or ore to OB ratio 2d Quantity of topsoil generation in m 3 2e Quantity of overburden generation in m 3 2f General remarks of inspecting officer on development of pit w.r.t. type of deposit etc. As mentioned above the mine is non-working. Exploitation 3a Number of pits proposed for production one 3b Quantity of ROM mineral production proposed MT 3c Recovery of salable/usable mineral from ROM production 95% 3d Quantity of mineral reject generation 1283 MT 3e Grade of mineral reject generation and Not mentioned threshold value declared specifically 3f Quantity of sub-grade mineral generation 3g Grade of sub-grade mineral generation 3h Manual / Mechanised method adopted for segregating from ROM 3i Any analysis or beneficiation study None proposed & carried out for sub-grade mineral and reject 3j Provision of drilling & blasting in mineral benches Jack hammer drilling with 34 mm jackhammer operated by compressed air. 3

4 3k 3l 3m 3n 3o 3p 3q Provision of mining machineries in mineral benches Whether height of benches in overburden and mineral suitable for method of mining proposed in MP/SOM Total area covered under excavation/pits Ore to OB ratio for the pit/mine during the year Total area put in use under different heads at the end of year Production of ROM mineral during last five-year period, as applicable General remarks of inspecting officer on method of mining etc. No proposal for heavy machinery. No OB as mentioned and in ore bench height is proposed 3 meter ha. No working ha No proposal MT MT MT MT No working As there is no mining activity going on therefore no observation. 4

5 Solid Waste Management-Dumping 4a Separate dumping of topsoil, OB & Separate dump for mineral reject (Rule 32, 33) waste 4b Location of topsoil, OB & mineral SW of ML reject dumps 4c Number of dumps within lease area One dump proposed and outside lease area and one old dump 4d Location of dumps w.r.t. ultimate SW of ML pit limit (Rule 16) 4e Number of active & alive dumps one 4f Number of dead dumps one 4g Number of dumps stabilished 4h Whether Retaining wall or garland drain all along dumps are there 4i Length of Retaining wall or garland drain all along dump 4j Number of settling ponds 4k Specific comments of inspecting officer on waste dump management No dump management work done. Solid Waste Management-Backfilling 5a Status on part or full extraction of mineral from mined out area before starting backfilling 5b Area under backfilling of mined out area 5c Concurrent use of topsoil for No top soil restoration or rehabilitation of mined out area (Rule 32) generation 5d Total area fully reclaimed & rehabilitated 5e General remarks of inspecting officer on backfilling, reclamation etc No backfilling done in ML area also not matured for backfilling Progressive Mine Closure Plan 6a Whether Annual report on PMCP submitted on time and correctly - Rule 23E(2). Details should be given in the format as given in Annexure b Management of worked/mined out benches i) Area available for rehabilitation (ha) ii) Afforestation done (ha) 5

6 6c 6d 6e 6f iii) No. of saplings planted during the year iv) Cumulative no. of plants v) Any other specific method of rehabilitation vi) Cost incurred on watch & care during the year Compliance on reclamation and rehabilitation by backfilling i) Voids available for backfilling (L *B * D) ii) Void filled by waste/tailings iii) Afforestation on the backfilled area iv) Rehabilitation by making water reservoir v) Any other specific means Compliance of Rehabilitation of waste land within lease i) Afforestation ii) Area rehabilitated (ha) iii) Method of rehabilitation Compliance of Environmental monitoring (core zone & buffer zone) General remarks of inspecting officer on PMCP compliance & progressive closure operations i) i) i) i) Mine is nonworking Mineral Conservation 7a ROM Mineral dispatch or grade-wise sorting within lease area 7b Method of grade-wise mineral sorting Grade-wise sorting i.e. manual or mechanical not proposed. 7c Different grade of mineral sorted out at mines 7d Any beneficiation process at mines No 7e General remarks of inspecting officer on Mineral conservation & beneficiation issues Mine is non-working and no beneficiation activity done within ML. Environment 8a Separate removal and utilization of topsoil (Rule 32) 8b Concurrent use or storage of topsoil 8c Separate dumps for overburden, Mineral reject dump waste rock, rejects and fines (Rule separately proposed 33) 8d Use of overburden, waste rock, rejects and fines dumps for restoring the land to its original use 6

7 8e 8f Phased restoration, reclamation and rehabilitation of lands affected by mining operations (Pits, dumps etc) Baseline information on existence of plantation & additional plantation done (Rule 41) 50 nos plants/year proposed 8g Survival rate 70% 8h Water sprinkling on roads to control 3 to 4 times water airborne dust spraying proposal on haul road daily to control dust. 8i General remarks of inspecting officer on aesthetic beauty in and around mines area Compliance of Rule 45 As mentioned above the mine is none working therefore no adverse impact on aesthetic beauty in and around mines area observed. S.N. Item COMMENTS Remarks 9a Status of submission of Monthly Not submitted and Annual returns S.N. Item Details GIVEN in Observation of Remarks A.R. I/Officer 9b Scrutiny of Annual return for information on Mining Engineer, Geologist and Manager 9c Scrutiny of Annual return on land use pattern for area under pits, reclaimed area, dumps etc. 9d Scrutiny of Annual return on afforestation 9e Scrutiny of Annual return on mineral reject generation (Grade & quantity) 9f Scrutiny of Annual return on ROM stock and/or graded ore 9g Scrutiny of Annual return on sale value, Ex. Mine price & production cost 9i Scrutiny of Annual return on fixed assets 9k Scrutiny of Annual return on mining machineries Details of violations observed during current inspection and compliance position of earlier violation pointed out:- Rule Nature of Violation observed 12(3) The scheme of mining ought to have been submitted to the competent authority at least one hundred twenty days before the expiry of the five years period, for which it was approved on the last occasion. The Scheme of Mining for the Mine was approved on for a period of to The proposed period of approved Mining 7

8 Plan expired and no Scheme of Mining/ Review of Mining Plan was submitted to the competent authority for the subsequent periods. 13(1) Rule 45(5)(a)(viii) Mining operations should have been undertaken in accordance with the approved Mining Plan/Scheme of Mining. Since you have no approved Scheme of Mining for your above mentioned Mine, it is evident that the mining operations are not being carried out in accordance with the approved Scheme of Mining. Monthly returns since april-2016 of mine has not been submitted to the Regional Controller of Mines, IBM, Hyderabad, which ought to have been Submitted in Form F-8 before 10 th of every month in respect of preceding month. Rule 45(5)(b)(viii) Annual returns for of the mine has not been submitted to the Regional Controller of Mines, IBM, Hyderabad, which ought to have been Submitted in Form H-8 before 1 st July each year for the preceding Year. (Name of inspecting officer with designation and date) Rajesh Kumar Das, Senior Assistant Controller of Mines, Date of inspection