Pyrus calleryana North
|
|
- Alyson Davidson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Assessment date 26 June 208 Pyrus calleryana North Answer Score.0 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown?.03 Does the species have weedy races? 2.0 Species suited to Florida's USDA climate zones (0-low; -intermediate; 2-high) 2 North Zone: suited to Zones 8, 9 Central Zone: suited to Zones 9, 0 South Zone: suited to Zone Quality of climate match data (0-low; -intermediate; 2-high) Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) n Native or naturalized in habitats with periodic inundation y North Zone: mean annual precipitation inches Central Zone: mean annual precipitation inches South Zone: mean annual precipitation inches 2.05 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y 3.0 Naturalized beyond native range y Garden/amenity/disturbance weed y Weed of agriculture n Environmental weed y Congeneric weed n Produces spines, thorns or burrs y 4.02 Allelopathic n Parasitic n Unpalatable to grazing animals 4.05 Toxic to animals y 4.06 Host for recognised pests and pathogens unk Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans n Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems unk Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle n Grows on infertile soils (oligotrophic, limerock, or excessively draining soils). North y & Central Zones: infertile soils; South Zone: shallow limerock or Histisols. 4. Climbing or smothering growth habit n Forms dense thickets y 5.0 Aquatic n Grass n Nitrogen fixing woody plant n 0
2 5.04 Geophyte n Evidence of substantial reproductive failure in native habitat n Produces viable seed y 6.03 Hybridizes naturally y 6.04 Self-compatible or apomictic n Requires specialist pollinators n Reproduction by vegetative propagation y 6.07 Minimum generative time (years) Propagules likely to be dispersed unintentionally (plants growing in heavily unk trafficked areas) Propagules dispersed intentionally by people y 7.03 Propagules likely to disperse as a produce contaminant unk Propagules adapted to wind dispersal unk Propagules water dispersed unk Propagules bird dispersed y 7.07 Propagules dispersed by other animals (externally) n Propagules dispersed by other animals (internally) y 8.0 Prolific seed production 8.02 Evidence that a persistent propagule bank is formed (> yr) y 8.03 Well controlled by herbicides y Tolerates, or benefits from, mutilation or cultivation unk ? Total Score Implemented Pacific Second Screening Risk Assessment Results 2 no High section A B C total # questions answered satisfy minimum? yes 9 yes 7 yes 37 yes
3 Assessment date 26 June 208 Pyrus calleryana CENTRAL Answer Score.0 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown?.03 Does the species have weedy races? 2.0 Species suited to Florida's USDA climate zones (0-low; -intermediate; 2-high) North Zone: suited to Zones 8, 9 Central Zone: suited to Zones 9, 0 South Zone: suited to Zone Quality of climate match data (0-low; -intermediate; 2-high) Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) n Native or naturalized in habitats with periodic inundation y North Zone: mean annual precipitation inches Central Zone: mean annual precipitation inches South Zone: mean annual precipitation inches 2.05 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y 3.0 Naturalized beyond native range y Garden/amenity/disturbance weed y Weed of agriculture n Environmental weed y Congeneric weed n Produces spines, thorns or burrs y 4.02 Allelopathic n Parasitic n Unpalatable to grazing animals 4.05 Toxic to animals y 4.06 Host for recognised pests and pathogens unk Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans n Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems unk Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle n Grows on infertile soils (oligotrophic, limerock, or excessively draining soils). North y & Central Zones: infertile soils; South Zone: shallow limerock or Histisols. 4. Climbing or smothering growth habit n Forms dense thickets y 5.0 Aquatic n Grass n Nitrogen fixing woody plant n 0
4 5.04 Geophyte n Evidence of substantial reproductive failure in native habitat n Produces viable seed y 6.03 Hybridizes naturally y 6.04 Self-compatible or apomictic n Requires specialist pollinators n Reproduction by vegetative propagation y 6.07 Minimum generative time (years) Propagules likely to be dispersed unintentionally (plants growing in heavily unk trafficked areas) Propagules dispersed intentionally by people y 7.03 Propagules likely to disperse as a produce contaminant unk Propagules adapted to wind dispersal unk Propagules water dispersed unk Propagules bird dispersed y 7.07 Propagules dispersed by other animals (externally) n Propagules dispersed by other animals (internally) y 8.0 Prolific seed production 8.02 Evidence that a persistent propagule bank is formed (> yr) y 8.03 Well controlled by herbicides y Tolerates, or benefits from, mutilation or cultivation unk ? Total Score Implemented Pacific Second Screening Risk Assessment Results 8 no High section A B C total # questions answered satisfy minimum? yes 9 yes 7 yes 37 yes
5 Assessment date 26 June 208 Pyrus calleryana South Answer Score.0 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown?.03 Does the species have weedy races? 2.0 Species suited to Florida's USDA climate zones (0-low; -intermediate; 2-high) 0 North Zone: suited to Zones 8, 9 Central Zone: suited to Zones 9, 0 South Zone: suited to Zone Quality of climate match data (0-low; -intermediate; 2-high) Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) n Native or naturalized in habitats with periodic inundation y North Zone: mean annual precipitation inches Central Zone: mean annual precipitation inches South Zone: mean annual precipitation inches 2.05 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y 3.0 Naturalized beyond native range y 3.02 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed y 3.03 Weed of agriculture n Environmental weed y 3.05 Congeneric weed n Produces spines, thorns or burrs y 4.02 Allelopathic n Parasitic n Unpalatable to grazing animals 4.05 Toxic to animals y 4.06 Host for recognised pests and pathogens unk Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans n Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems unk Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle n Grows on infertile soils (oligotrophic, limerock, or excessively draining soils). North y & Central Zones: infertile soils; South Zone: shallow limerock or Histisols. 4. Climbing or smothering growth habit n Forms dense thickets y 5.0 Aquatic n Grass n Nitrogen fixing woody plant n 0
6 5.04 Geophyte n Evidence of substantial reproductive failure in native habitat n Produces viable seed y 6.03 Hybridizes naturally y 6.04 Self-compatible or apomictic n Requires specialist pollinators n Reproduction by vegetative propagation y 6.07 Minimum generative time (years) Propagules likely to be dispersed unintentionally (plants growing in heavily unk trafficked areas) Propagules dispersed intentionally by people y 7.03 Propagules likely to disperse as a produce contaminant unk Propagules adapted to wind dispersal unk Propagules water dispersed unk Propagules bird dispersed y 7.07 Propagules dispersed by other animals (externally) n Propagules dispersed by other animals (internally) y 8.0 Prolific seed production 8.02 Evidence that a persistent propagule bank is formed (> yr) y 8.03 Well controlled by herbicides y Tolerates, or benefits from, mutilation or cultivation unk ? Total Score Implemented Pacific Second Screening Risk Assessment Results 7 no High section A B C total # questions answered satisfy minimum? yes 9 yes 7 yes 37 yes
7 Reference Source data.0 Cultivated, but no evidence of selection for reduced invasive traits..02 Skip to Skip to Gilman EF,Watson DG.994.Pyruscalleryana Bradford : Bradford Callery Pear. Gainesville: Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extensive Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Fact Sheet ST USDA Agriculural Research Service ( [assessed 26 Oct 207]) 3. USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. Germplasm Resources Information Network - (GRIN) [Online Database]. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland. [assessed 27 Oct 207] 4.Cuizhi G, Spongberg SA Pyrus. Flora of China 9: No computer analysis was performed.. Found in USDA hardiness zones 5A through 9A. 2. North Florida USDA Hardiness zones are 8a, 8b, 9a, amd 9b. 3. Native to ASIA-TEMPERATE China: China - Anhui, - Fujian, - Guangdong, - Guangxi, - Henan, - Hubei, - Hunan, - Jiangsu, - Jiangxi, - Shaanxi, - Shandong, - Zhejiang, Eastern Asia: Korea; Taiwan, ASIA-TROPICAL Indo- China: Vietnam 4.Native to China, Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam, and Japan No computer analysis was performed. Native range is well known; refer to 2.0 source data Köppen-Geiger climate map ( [accessed 26 Oct 207]). 2. Global Biodiversit Information Facility ( [assessed 26 Oct 207]). See source data for World Climate Maps ( Climate-Maps.htm [assessed 2 Oct 207]) 2. Global Biodiveristy Information Facility ( [assessed 2 Oct 207]) National Park Service [assessed 24 Oct 207]) 2. Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The Beginning of a New Invasive Plant: A History of the Ornamental Callery Pear in the United States. BioScience, 57(), Distribution in native and cultivated ranges occurs two climate zones. (Cfa, Cfb). The Native range includes precipitation averages from 30 inches to 00 inches.. First introduced to the Arnold Arboretum in 909. Soon after the U.S. Department of Agriculture introduced Pyrus calleryana in 96 to comabt fire blight. In the 950's the species became even more popular in the United States due to its ornamental value and hardiness. 2. In the early 900's Frank Myer, a USDA plant explorer, traveled to China to collect 00 pounds of Pyrus calleryana seed. The seed was used to help develop a fire blight resistant strain of the common pear. Meyer made his last trip to China in 96 to 98 and shipped the seeds he found back to the United States. In 952 seeds from Meyers previous collection was used to create an ornamental tree by grafting cuttings on to Pyrus calleryana. This cultivar is known as the Bradford tree. In 962 this tree became avaiable commercially and was used primarily in urban landscapes USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. Germplasm Resources Information Network - (GRIN) [Online Database]. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland. See 2.0 for native distribution range.. Naturalized in North America.
8 3.02. Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The 57(), Texas Invasives ( mbol=pyca80 [assessed 7 Nov 207]) 3.03 No evidence Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The 57(), National Park Service [assessed 24 Oct 207]) 3.05 No evidence Vincent, M. A., (2005 March). On the Spread and Current Distribution of Pyrus calleryana in the United States. Castanea, 70(), Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The Beginning of a New Invasive Plant: A History of the Ornamental Callery Pear in the United States. BioScience, 57(), No evidence No evidence No evidence.. New saplings are found speading in urban residential areas where the ornamental trees were orginally planted. 2. After being planted in residential and commercial areas Pyrus calleryana is known to escape into natural areas.. Potential environmental weed in Austrailia. Prefers high light environments and competes with native species. It has the potential to to disrupt the installation of other species in the area. 2. Froms dense thickets that outcompetes native speciesfor water, space and sun..known to form dense thorny thickets. "Thornless cultivars appear to retain genes for thorniness that may be expressed as genes recombine in their progeny." 2. Thorns are common along the branches and stems of wild Pyrus calleryana in Asia. In other species of Pyrus with the same phenoype, thorns are lost in mature shoots. Thorns on wild Pyrus calleryana reduce herbivory Safe and Poisonous Garden Plants University of Califonia, Davis ( f [assessed 7 Nov 207]). The Pyrus spp. has a toxicity rating of. This means the seeds of the species could cause death or illness if injested by an animal. In this case we are specifically refering to cats and dogs No evidence Garden Guides ( bradford-pear-trees-cyanide.html [assessed 2 Nov 207]) Gilman EF,Watson DG.994.Pyruscalleryana Bradford : Bradford Callery Pear. Gainesville: Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extensive Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Fact Sheet ST National Park Service [assessed 24 Oct 207]). The seeds of the Pyrus calleryana are poisonous if consumed in large amounts. It would take approximately cup (6 oz) of seeds to poison a human adult. The fruits of Pyrus calleryana are generally not consumed by humans because they are small and hard. It is very unlikely that a human would consume a cup of the seeds.. Requires full sun. 2. Tolernant of limited shade, but prefers full sun Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The 57(), Gilman EF,Watson DG.994.Pyruscalleryana Bradford : Bradford Callery Pear. Gainesville: Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extensive Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Fact Sheet ST Adapted to a variety of soils including clay. Tolerates variable ph, drought, heat, root zones, and pollution. 2. Ability to grow in most soil conditions including wet or dry, compact, polluted, clay or alkaline.
9 4. Due to growth habit of the species it is not known to climb or smother other plants Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The 57(), National Park Service [assessed 24 Oct 207]) 5.0 Flora of China ( [assessed 26 Oct 207]) 5.02 Flora of China ( [assessed 26 Oct 207]) 5.03 Flora of China ( [assessed 26 Oct 207]) 5.04 Flora of China ( [assessed 26 Oct 207]).Assembles large dense thickets that are impenetrable to humans do to the thorns and thickness. These thickets provide shelter and a habitat for birds and other animals. 2. Forms dense thickets that out compete surrounding plants for resources. Family: Rosaceae Family: Rosaceae Family: Rosaceae Family: Rosaceae 6.0 No evidence Master Gardener Program University of Wisconsin-Extension ( [assessed 3 Oct 207]) Hardiman N. A., Culley T. M. ( 28 October 2008) The role of intraspecific hybridization in the evolution of invasiveness: a case study of the ornamental pear tree Pyrus calleryana. Biological Invasions. (5), Vincent, M. A., (2005 March). On the Spread and Current Distribution of Pyrus calleryana in the United States. Castanea, 70(), Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The 57(), National Park Service [assessed 24 Oct 207]) Farkas Á, Orosz-Kovács Z, Szabo LG Insect attraction of flowers in pear cultivars. Pages in Janick J, Sansavini S, Tagliavini M, Sugar D, Webster AD, eds. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Pear, Ferrara (Italy): International Society for Horticultural Science. Acta Horticulturae Encyclopedia of Life ( n [assessed 3 Oct 207]). Does not produce viable seed through self pollination or when cross pollinated with a tree of the same cultivar. Viable seed is only produced when cross pollinated with a different cultivar.. Intraspecific hybridizaion between cultivars could be the cuase of the rapid spread of the species across the United States. 2. Produces fertile offspring through cross pollination with other plants species.. Pyrus calleryana is self incompatible and cannot reproduce through self pollination. Self-incaptibilty promotes out-bredding resulting in inceased genetic variation amoung populations. Pyrus calleryana experiences gametophytic self-incompatibilty which occurs when haploid pollen grains possess the same self-compatibiltiy allele as the diploid maternal tissue. In order for for a vaiable fruit to be produce the haploid pollen and the diploid maternal tissue cannot both posssess the same selfincompatibily allele. 2. Specific genotypes are selfincompatible. These species rely on cross-pollination from other genotypes.. Malodiferous flowers pollinated by honeybees (Apis mellifera L. ), bumblebees (Bombus terrestris L.) and hoverflies (Syrphidae). 2. Long-tounged (Anthophoridae) and shorttounged (Andreninae) bees are common pollinators.
10 6.06. National Park Service [assessed 24 Oct 207]) 2.Missouri Department of Conservation ( asive.pdf [assessed 7 Nov 207]) Vincent, M. A., (2005 March). On the Spread and Current Distribution of Pyrus calleryana in the United States. Castanea, 70(), Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The Beginning of a New Invasive Plant: A History of the Ornamental Callery Pear in the United States. BioScience, 57(), Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The 57(), Global Invasive Species Database ( ts=&lang=en [assessed 7 Nov 207]) 2. Tree Seeds ( [assessed 7 Nov 207]) 3. Sheffield's Seed Company ( [assessed 7 Nov 207]) Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The 57(), Perry, E. and A. Lagarbo Ethephon sprays eliminate the messy, hazardous fruits of flowering pear and liquidambar. California Agriculture 48: Encyclopedia of Life ( n [assessed 3 Oct 207]). Reproduces by vegeative means to produce large patches of biomass over a period of several years. 2. Spreads by vegetative means.. "Callery pears are precocious, having a very short juvenile period, and flower as early as 3 years old." 2. Begins flowering at three years of age.. Large numbers of Pyrus calleryana are planted in urban areas across the United States. A variey of species are planted in close proximity to one another, which allows cross pollintation and the spread of Pyrus calleryana. Seeds can be purchased online or from nurseries..seeds consumed and dispersed by a multitude of animals including European starlings and American robins. 2. Fruits attract cedar waxings, robins, and other birds. The trees are known to be full of mistletoe as the pear fruits attract variety of birds carrying mistletoe. 3. Fruit is eaten and distributed by Robins, Starlings, Cardinals, amd Northern Songbirds Seed has no adaptations for attachment National Park Service [assessed 24 Oct 207]) 2. Accessed 6/26/ s=&lang=en accessed 6/26/ Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The 57(), National Park Service [assessed 24 Oct 207]) 3. Missouri Department of Conservation ( asive.pdf [assessed 7 Nov 207]). Seeds dispersed by birds and small mammals. 2. Spreads by prolific bird- and animal-dispersed seeds. 3. seed that is dispersed by birds and possibly small mammals Likely:. Each flower produces a maximum of 0 seeds; however, usually there are 2 to 6 seed per flower. 2. Produces "copious amunts of seed that is dispersed by birds and possibly small mammals." 3. Produces large amounts of seeds.
11 8.02. Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The 57(), Missouri Department of Conservation ( asive.pdf [assessed 7 Nov 207]) 2. Global Invasive Species Database ( ts=&lang=en [assessed 2 Nov 207]) Culley, T. M., Hardiman N. A. (2007 December). The 57(), Perry, E. and A. Lagarbo Ethephon sprays eliminate the messy, hazardous fruits of flowering pear and liquidambar. California Agriculture 48: Vincent, M. A., (2005 March). On the Spread and Current Distribution of Pyrus calleryana in the United States. Castanea, 70(), A seed bank allows the species to continue to populate an area even after the mature plants have been removed. 2. "persistent seed bank". Species can be managed by cutting down the trunk and branches of the tree, then immdiately applying an herbicide containing concentrated glyphosate or triclopyr to the remains. The most effective management is the complete removal of the tree form the surrounding environment. 2. Fruit production can be prevented by spraying tree with ethephon during full bloom.. Few to no natural controls.
Trachelospermum jasminoides (confederate jasmine)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationFicus pumila (climbing fig)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationPassiflora coriacea (bat-leafed passion flower)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationMalvaviscus penduliflorus (mazapan) Has the species become naturalised where grown? y
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationBambusa bambos (syn. Bambusa arundinacea)giant thorny bamboo, Indian thorny bamboo ALL ZONES
Assessment date 12 February 2015 Bambusa bambos (syn. Bambusa arundinacea)giant thorny bamboo, Indian thorny bamboo ALL ZONES Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species
More informationCupaniopsis anacardioides (carrotwood)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationGynura aurantiaca (purple velvet plant)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationBambusa beecheyana (Beechey's bamboo, silk4ball bamboo) ALL ZONES
Assessment date 12 February 2015 Bambusa beecheyana (Beechey's bamboo, silk4ball bamboo) ALL ZONES Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where
More informationCarissa bispinosa (hedgethorn)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationPilea nummulariifolia (creeping Charlie)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationTricyrtis affinis Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationPassiflora biflora (twin-flowered passion vine)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationTecoma guarume Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationAustralia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States.
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationEuphorbia pulcherrima (poinsettia) Has the species become naturalised where grown? n Does the species have weedy races?
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in Florida
More informationCicerbita prenanthoides Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationDianthus imereticus Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationCarex ciliatomarginata Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationGironniera parvifolia Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationAlpinia zerumbet (shellplant)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationRanunculus parviflorus (smallflower buttercup)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationBambusa lako Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, DR and CA Gantz 2008 Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening new plants
More informationChorisia speciosa (floss-silk tree)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in Florida
More informationPhilodendron scandens (heart-leaf philodendron)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationAustralia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida.
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 2008. Predicting Invasive Plants
More informationThelypteris beddomei Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationAustralia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida.
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 2008. Predicting Invasive Plants
More informationSynadenium grantii (African milkbush)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationLonicera x heckrottii (goldflame honeysuckle)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationBauhinia natalensis Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationScaevola sericea (beach naupaka)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationVulpia myuros (rattail fescue)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationColubrina asiatica (Asiatic colubrina)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationArachis glabrata (perennial peanut) Has the species become naturalised where grown? n Does the species have weedy races?
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationAustralia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States.
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationScleranthus annuus (German knotgrass)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationMyrcia dichasialis Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationHibiscus tiliaceus (mahoe)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationArdisia nigrescens. Y Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationRichardia scabra (Florida pusley)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationAgave americana (century plant)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationPhoenix reclinata (Senegal date palm)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in Florida
More informationPulsatilla violacea Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationCladochaeta candidissima Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationDelonix decaryi Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationArnebia pulchra. Y Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationDianthus cretaceus Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationRondeletia leucophylla Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationSapium sebiferum (Chinese tallow)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationEugenia uniflora (Surinam cherry)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in Florida
More informationRumex crispus (curly dock)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationEucalyptus platypus (Round-Leaf Moort, Moort) -- FLORIDA
Eucalyptus platypus (Round-Leaf Moort, Moort) -- FLORIDA Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does the species have weedy
More informationBauhinia purpurea (purple orchid tree)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationCyperus esculentus (yellow nutsedge)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationLivistona concinna Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationMomordica charantia (balsam pear)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationSaccharum officinarum (sugarcane) Has the species become naturalised where grown? y
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationIndigofera hirsuta (hairy indigo)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationMyriophyllum spicatum (Eurasian water-milfoil)
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 28. Predicting Invasive Plants in
More informationTulipa karabachensis Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationTabernaemontana sananho Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationAustralia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida.
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., D.A. Onderdonk, A.M. Fox, R.K. Stocker, and C. Gantz. 2008. Predicting Invasive Plants
More informationCombretum ovalifolium Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationBerberis iberica Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationIris caucasica Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationTAXON: Calathea burle-marxii SCORE: 0.0 RATING: Low Risk
Taxon: Calathea burle-marxii Family: Marantaceae Common Name(s): calathea 'ice blue' ice-blue calathea Synonym(s): Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 8 Dec 2015 WRA Score: 0.0
More informationAntigonon leptopus All Zones
Assessment date 11 January August 2016 Antigonon leptopus All Zones Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does the species
More informationHedera pastuchovii Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationAcer pseudosieboldianum x palmatum 'IslAJ' Arctic Jade -- Minnesota
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Acer pseudosieboldianum x palmatum 'IslAJ' Arctic Jade -- Minnesota 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 2 -- Accept (low risk of invasiveness) Confidence:
More informationEucalyptus erythrocorys (Bookara, Illyarrie, Helmet Nut Gum, Red- Cap Gum) -- FLORIDA
Eucalyptus erythrocorys (Bookara, Illyarrie, Helmet Nut Gum, Red- Cap Gum) -- FLORIDA Answer 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does
More informationColubrina asiatica ALL ZONES
Assessment date 31 March 2016 Colubrina asiatica ALL ZONES Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does the species have weedy
More informationDioscorea polystachya ALL ZONES
Assessment date 8 Aug 2017 Dioscorea polystachya ALL ZONES Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does the species have weedy
More informationAllium sativum -- Texas
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Allium sativum -- Texas 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 7 -- Accept (low risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 81 / 100 Questions answered: 20 of 20 -- Valid
More informationLilium szovitsianum -- Illinois
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Lilium szovitsianum -- Illinois 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 6 -- Accept (low risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 49 / 100 Questions answered: 20 of
More informationEucalyptus smithii (Blackbutt peppermint, Gully gum, Gully peppermint, Gully-ash) -- FLORIDA
Eucalyptus smithii (Blackbutt peppermint, Gully gum, Gully peppermint, Gully-ash) -- FLORIDA Answer 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03
More informationAsclepias curassavica -- Texas
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Asclepias curassavica -- Texas 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 12 -- Accept (low risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 80 / 100 Questions answered: 20 of
More informationPollinators. Pam Brown University of Florida/IFAS Extension, Retired
Pollinators Pam Brown University of Florida/IFAS Extension, Retired What is Pollination Pollination is the transfer of pollen from male anther to female stigma resulting in fertilization. Pollination results
More informationPapaver oreophilum Question number Question Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0
Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for United States. Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R. and C.A. Gantz. 2008. Potential impacts on the horticultural industry of screening
More informationPassiflora edulis South ZONES
Assessment date 2016 Passiflora edulis South ZONES Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does the species have weedy races?
More informationLeymus arenarius 'Blue Dune' -- Minnesota
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Leymus arenarius 'Blue Dune' -- Minnesota 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 17 -- Reject (high risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 77 / 100 Questions answered:
More informationViburnum lantana 'Mohican' -- Minnesota
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Viburnum lantana 'Mohican' -- Minnesota 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 10 -- Accept (low risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 70 / 100 Questions answered:
More informationEucalyptus cloeziana (Cloeziana Gum, Dead-Finish, Gympie Messmate, Queensland Messmate, Yellow Messmate) -- FLORIDA
Eucalyptus cloeziana (Cloeziana Gum, Dead-Finish, Gympie Messmate, Queensland Messmate, Yellow Messmate) -- FLORIDA Answer 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised
More informationInvasive Species Management Plans for Florida
Invasive Species Management Plans for Florida Calico Flower or Calico Vine Aristolochia littoralis syn. A. elegans (Parodi) Aristolochiaceae INTRODUCTION Aristolochia littoralis or calico flower is a cultivated
More informationInvasive Species Management Plans for Florida
Invasive Species Management Plans for Florida Air Potato Dioscorea bulbifera (L.) Dioscoreaceae INTRODUCTION A native to tropical Asia, air potato, Dioscorea bulbifera, was first introduced to the Americas
More informationLuziola subintegra Central And South
Assessment date 2 May 2017 Luziola subintegra Central And South Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? unk 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does the species have
More informationSpiraea japonica 'Gold Mound' -- Georgia
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Spiraea japonica 'Gold Mound' -- Georgia 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 11 -- Accept (low risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 61 / 100 Questions answered:
More informationLonicera fragrantissima -- Georgia
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Lonicera fragrantissima -- Georgia 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 15 -- Evaluate this plant further Confidence: 65 / 100 Questions answered: 19 of 20
More informationContinue 59 Invasive. Yes. Place on invasive plant list, no further investigation needed. STOP. No. Continue on to question 2.
Ohio Plant Assessment Protocol Posted Date: 7/2/ Step II Outcome: Directions: Place an "" in the Score column next to the selected answer to each of the four questions.. Is this plant known to occur in
More informationLantana montevidensis (Trailing shrubverbena, Creeping lantana, Trailing lantana, Weeping lantana)
Lantana montevidensis (Trailing shrubverbena, Creeping lantana, Trailing lantana, Weeping lantana) Answer 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown?
More informationWisteria sinensis 'Jako' -- Texas
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Wisteria sinensis 'Jako' -- Texas 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 21 -- Reject (high risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 65 / 100 Questions answered: 20
More informationCamelina sativa (Gold-of-pleasure, False flax)
Camelina sativa (Gold-of-pleasure, False flax) Answer Score 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does the species have weedy races? 2.01
More informationBuddleja davidii 'Black Knight' -- Illinois
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Buddleja davidii 'Black Knight' -- Illinois 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 16 -- Reject (high risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 70 / 100 Questions answered:
More informationGymnosperms. Section 22-4
Gymnosperms Section 22-4 Seeds can be found everywhere! Gymnosperms - bear their seeds directly in the surfaces of cones conifers such as pines and spruces cycads which are palmlike plants ginkgoes gnetophytes
More informationEucalyptus sideroxylon (Black Ironbark, Mugga Ironbark, Red Ironbark, Three-Fruit Red Ironbark) -- FLORIDA
Eucalyptus sideroxylon (Black Ironbark, Mugga Ironbark, Red Ironbark, Three-Fruit Red Ironbark) -- FLORIDA Answer 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where
More informationC1 Weeds in North Queensland
C1 Weeds in North Queensland Introduction This presentation covered Siam weed (Chromolaena odorata), the Four Tropical Weeds (Miconia spp., Mikania macrantha, Clidemia hirta, Limnocharis flava), and Mimosa
More informationAustralia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida. Saccharum officinarum -- Florida test
/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida Data used for analysis published in: Gordon, D.R., K.J. Tancig, D.A. Onderdonk and C.A. Gantz. In press. Assessing the invasive potential of biofuel
More informationAnnie S. White, PhD, ASLA. How Native Cultivars Affect Plant/Pollinator Interactions
Annie S. White, PhD, ASLA How Native Cultivars Affect Plant/Pollinator Interactions Prairie Restoration, Prairie Haven, Wisconsin Prairie Restoration at Earth Source, Fort Wayne, Indiana Tradescantia Red
More informationFlorida Friendly Landscapes?
Florida Friendly Landscapes? Backyards as Habitats Ecology Concepts Ecosystem interacting network of living and non-living components Community association of different species living and interacting in
More informationLythrum virgatum 'Morden Gleam' -- Illinois
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Lythrum virgatum 'Morden Gleam' -- Illinois 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 19 -- Reject (high risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 72 / 100 Questions answered:
More informationWisteria sinensis -- Texas
Plant Risk Evaluator -- PRE Evaluation Report Wisteria sinensis -- Texas 2017 Farm Bill PRE Project PRE Score: 21 -- Reject (high risk of invasiveness) Confidence: 78 / 100 Questions answered: 20 of 20
More information