Approximation-Free Prescribed Performance Control
|
|
- Richard McDowell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Preprints of the 8th IFAC World Congress Milano Italy August 28 - September 2 2 Approximation-Free Prescribed Performance Control Charalampos P. Bechlioulis and George A. Rovithakis Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki 5424 Greece chmpechl@auth.gr and robi@eng.auth.gr. Abstract: A universal controller is designed for strict feedback systems with unknown nonlinearities capable of guaranteeing for any a priori known initial state condition bounded signals in the closed loop as well as prescribed performance for the output tracking error. By prescribed performance we mean that the output tracking error converges to a predefined arbitrarily small residual set with convergence rate no less than a certain prespecified value exhibiting maximum overshoot less than some sufficiently small preassigned constant. The proposed control scheme is of low complexity and requires reduced levels of a priori system knowledge. A comparative simulation study verifies the superiority of the proposed control scheme against the well known backstepping technique which has been the main tool for designing controllers for the class of systems considered. Keywords: Prescribed performance control backstepping strict feedback systems.. INTRODUCTION Consider an n-th order strict feedback system described as follows: ẋ i = f i x i +g i x i x i+ i =...n ẋ n = f n x n +g n x n u y = x where x i R i =...n are the states which are available for measurement with initial conditions x i i =...n while x i = [x x i ] T. Moreover u R is the control input y R is the output and the functions f i : R i R g i : R i R i =...n are smooth. The functions g i i =...n which are referred to as control coefficients are also either strictly positive or strictly negative. Such a property guarantees that system is uniformly strongly controllable. The control objective is to design a control input u such that the output y tracks a desired trajectory y d t which is a smooth bounded function of time with bounded derivatives. At the early 9s a recursive design procedure called backstepping Krstic et al. 995 emerged in an attempt to provide a control solution for the tracking problem of system. With this powerful methodology the construction of both feedback control laws and associated Lyapunov functions became systematic. Strong properties of global stability and tracking were built onto the nonlinear system the system nonlinearities were considered completely known in a number of steps equal to the system order. Yet the true potential of backstepping was discovered only when this approach was developed for strict feedback systems with uncertainties. Adaptive This work was supported in part by the Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation under Grant G ZD 45 / backstepping Krstic et al. 995 achieved the control objective in the presence of unknown parameters while robust neuro/fuzzy adaptive backstepping Spooner et al. 22 Ge et al. 22 Farrell and Polycarpou 26 dealt with model uncertainties. The structured way in which the backstepping approach dealt unknown parameters and model uncertainties contributed to its instant popularity and rapid acceptance. However although the backstepping technique has been well established in the current literature certain issues still remain open. An inherent drawback of backstepping is its complexity owing to the coupling between the design steps. The problem becomes harder as the system order increases thus making implementation difficult. Another central issue encountered when system possesses uncertainties is the so called loss of controllability problem. Although the actual system is assumed controllable that is g i x i > i =...n the estimation model may lose its controllability at some points in time when at least one of the estimations ĝ i x i ˆθ i =...n owing to parameter ˆθ adaptation. Moreover in case of model uncertainties where approximation structures i.e. neural networks fuzzy systems etc. are utilized it is well known that the results are valid only inside a compact set where the approximation holds. However determining a priori the aforementioned compact set and ensuring that systemtrajectoriesareconfinedwithinitaretwoopenand challenging problems. Typically this problem is bypassed when initializing from a subset of the aforementioned set with sufficiently small initial estimate errors and for an appropriate selection of the control gains. However although the existence of such initialization/selection process is assured no construction methodology is provided other than a trial and error procedure. Another important Copyright by the International Federation of Automatic Control IFAC 26
2 Preprints of the 8th IFAC World Congress Milano Italy August 28 - September 2 2 issue associated with the tracking problem of system concerns tracking error performance. When the system nonlinearities are completely known or involve parametric uncertainties backstepping achieves asymptotic tracking. The presence of model uncertainties increases significantly the complexity of the problem. Convergence of the tracking error to a residual set whose size depends on some control gains and bounded though unknown terms can be achieved. However no systematic procedure exists to accurately compute the required upper bounds thus making the a priori selection of the aforementioned control gains to satisfy certain steady state behavior practically impossible. Moreover performance issues on transient behavior such as convergence rate and maximum overshoot are difficult to be established analytically even for the case of known nonlinearities. Recently Bechlioulis and Rovithakis 29 have proposed a neuro adaptive controller for system capable of guaranteeing prescribed performance on the tracking error yt y d t. By prescribed performance it is meant that the tracking error converges to a predefined arbitrarily small residual set with convergence rate no less than a certain prespecified value exhibiting maximum overshoot less than some sufficiently small preassigned constant. However the aforementioned inherent restrictions related to design complexity and utilizing approximation based techniques where not overcome. In this paper we establish a general framework referred to as Prescribed Performance Control PPC that systematically converts the prescribed performance tracking problem for into a robust stabilization problem for anothersystemwhichretainsthecontrollabilityofand involves both the nonlinearities of the original system as wellasthedesiredperformancecharacteristics.itisproven that only the boundedness of the aforementioned system s states is sufficient to solve the prescribed performance trackingproblemfortheoriginalsystem.consequently an approximation free controller is designed to guarantee the required boundedness properties. The main contributions of this work can be summarized as follows: PPC achieves global results in the sense that given any a priori known initial state x n and any output performance requirements prescribed performance tracking is achieved. Apart from a sufficient controllability condition for no extra assumptions are made and no extra information is required concerning its nonlinearities. Furthermore only the desired trajectory y d t and none of its higher order derivatives is utilized. The proposed controller is approximation-free and significantly less complex compared to the backstepping approach which is the main tool for designing controllers for. Moreover contrary to what is the common practice in the relevant literature system performance is isolated from control gains selection thus leading to further simplification of the control design procedure.. Definitions and Preliminaries At this point we recall some definitions and preliminary results which are necessary in the subsequent analysis. Definition. Ge et al. 24 A smooth function N ζ is called Nussbaum function if it is equipped with the following properties: lim t sup t lim t inf t t t N ζdζ = + N ζdζ =. Physically it can be visualized as a function of infinite gain and infinite switching frequency. An even Nussbaum function is N ζ = exp aζ 2 coswζ where aw >. Lemma. Ge et al. 24 Let Vt and ζt be some smooth functions defined on [t f with V t t [t f and N ζ be an even Nussbaum-type function. If the following inequality holds: V t e c t t gxτn ζ+ ζe c τ dτ +c where c c are some positive constants and gxτ is a function taking values in the compact set L = [l l + ] with / L then V t and ζt are bounded on [t f. Definition 2. Bechlioulis and Rovithakis 28 A smooth bounded function ρ : R + R + will be called a performance function if ρt is decreasing and lim t ρt = ρ >. As it is stated in Bechlioulis and Rovithakis 28 and Bechlioulis and Rovithakis 29 prescribed transient and steady state bounds for the output tracking error e t = yt y d t can be satisfied by guaranteeing: Mρ t < e t < ρ t in case e 2 ρ t < e t < Mρ t in case e for all t where M and ρ t a performance function see Definition 2 associated with e t. As 2 implies we employ only one set of the performance bounds and specifically the one associated with the sign of e. The aforementioned statements are clearly illustrated in Fig. for an exponentially decaying performance function of the form ρ t = ρ ρ exp lt + ρ. The constant ρ represents the maximum allowable size of the tracking error e t at the steady state which can be set arbitrarily small to a value reflecting the resolution of the measurement device thus achieving practical convergence of e t to zero. Furthermore the decreasing rate of ρ t introduces a lower bound on the required speed of convergence of e t while the maximum overshoot is prescribed less than Mρ which may even become zero by setting M =. Thus the appropriate selection of the performance function ρ t as well as of the design constant M imposes specific performance bounds on the system output trajectory. 2. PRESCRIBED PERFORMANCE CONTROL In this section we shall first derive a sufficient condition for the solution of the prescribed performance tracking problem of system. Specifically we shall demonstrate thatachievingboundednessofthestatesofanovelsystem involving both the nonlinearities of as well as the desiredperformancecharacteristicsviasmoothandbounded control signals is sufficient to solve the stated problem. 27
3 Preprints of the 8th IFAC World Congress Milano Italy August 28 - September 2 2 e t ρ ρ e t ρ t Mρ t Mρ t ρ t a b tsec Fig..Graphicalrepresentationof2incaseae and in case b e. Consequently a significantly less complex controller when compared to the backstepping design will be presented. 2. A Sufficient Condition Let us consider system and any a priori known initial condition x n. For the output tracking error e t = x t y d t we associate a performance function ρ t and a constant M to guarantee: a the successful prescription of the output error performance requirements see subsection. and b the satisfaction of ρ > e. We further define the state errors e i t = x i t a i t i = 2...n where a i t i =...n are some continuously differentiable intermediate control signals to be designed and ρ i t i = 2...n are some designer specified performance functions satisfying ρ i > e i i = 2...n. Moreover let S i i =...n be some smooth strictly increasing functions defining onto mappings: S : MM 3 S i : i = 2...n. where: MM = { M in case e M in case e. For example candidate functions could be S M exp +M exp exp +exp and S i = tanh i = 2...n. The following theorem provides a sufficient condition for the solution of the prescribed performance tracking problem for system. Theorem. Consider the system: ε i = f ρ i t ds i i v i +g i v i a i t dε ε i i +g i v i ρ i+ ts i+ ε i+ ȧ i t ρ i ts i ε i i =...n 4 ε n = f ρ nt ds n n v dεn εn n +g n v n u ȧ n t ρ n ts n ε n where ε i R i =...n are the states with initial conditions ε i = S i i =...n and v i ei ρ i [v v i ] T where v i = ρ i ts i ε i +a i t i =...n 5 witha t = y d t.ifthecontrolsignalsa i ti =...n with a n t = ut are designed such that ε i t a i t L i =...n then the prescribed performance tracking problem for is solved. Proof. Notice that the initial conditions of 4 i.e. ε i i =...n are finite owing to 3 as well as to ρ i > e i i =...n.moreoversupposethatε i t a i t L i =...n for some appropriately selected control signals a i t i =...n with a n t = ut. Consequently ρ i t ds i ε i > i =...n for all t. Thus 4 yields: ρ i t ds i ε i ε i + ρ i ts i ε i +ȧ i t = f i v i +g i v i ρ i+ ts i+ ε i+ +a i t i =...n ρ n t dsn dε n ε n ε n + ρ n ts n ε n +ȧ n t = f n v n +g n v n u. Differentiating 5 with respect to time we obtain: v i = ρ i t ds i ε i ε i + ρ i ts i ε i +ȧ i t i =...n. Hence 6 becomes: v i = f i v i +g i v i v i+ i =...n v n = f n v n +g n v n u. 7 The initial conditions of 4 satisfy ε i = S i ei ρ i i =...n which together with 5 at t = lead to v i = x i i =...n. Therefore by comparing and 7 we conclude v i t = x i t i =...n for all t. Furthermore owing to 3 5 and the fact that ε i t L i =...n we arrive at: Mρ t < e t < ρ t in case e ρ t < e t < Mρ t in case e t 8 e i t < ρ i t i = 2...n t. 9 Accordingto Subsection.8 isthemathematical interpretation of prescribed performance for e t. Moreover owing to 8 9 and the boundedness of y d t a i t i =...n we conclude the boundedness of x n which completes the proof. Remark. System 4 retains the controllability of the original system owing to the fact that i = ρ it ds i dε ε i i...n are strictly positive by construction. As a consequence for this class of systems any set of prescribed performance bounds for the output tracking error can be achieved. Notice also that system 4 is used only for analysis. It cannot be implemented as it involves the unknown nonlinear functions f i g i i =...n. However the signals ε i t i =...n which will be utilized in a i t i =...n can be calculated owing to 5 and the fact that v i t = x i t i =...n for all t via: ε i t = S i 2.2 PPC Design xi t a i t ρ i t i =...n t. 6 Following Theorem to solve the prescribed performance tracking problem for we present in this subsection an 28
4 Preprints of the 8th IFAC World Congress Milano Italy August 28 - September 2 2 approximation-free design methodology based on system 4 that leads to a low-complexity controller capable of guaranteeing the boundedness of ε i t i =...n as well as of all other signals in the closed loop. Theorem 2. Consider system a smooth bounded desired trajectory y d t the output performance requirements introduced via M ρ t and the performance functions ρ i t i = 2...n. The control signals: a i = N ζ i η i ε i η i ζ i = ρ i t ds i ε i η i = k i ρ i t dsi ε i +ρ it ds i ε i ε i i =...n with N an even Nussbaum function k i > ρ i > x i a i i =...n and ut = a n t where ε i t i =...n are given by: ε i t = S i xi t a i t ρ i t i =...n for some smooth strictly increasing functions S i i =...n satisfying 3 solve the prescribed performance tracking problem for. Proof. The proof is divided into n-steps. Step : Consider the first state of 4: ε = ρ t ds dε ε f v +g v a t +g v ρ 2 ts 2 ε 2 ȧ t ρ ts ε. 2 Let us also consider the positive definite and radially unbounded function V = 2 ε2 whose time derivative along 2 is given by: ε V = f ρ t ds dε ε v +g v a t +g v ρ 2 ts 2 ε 2 ȧ t ρ ts ε. 3 Substituting for i = into 3 and after adding and subtracting ζ we obtain: V = k ε 2 +g v N ζ + ζ where k ε ρ t ds dε ε 2 + ε ρ t ds dε ε F ε ε 2 v t F ε ε 2 v t = f v +g v ρ 2 ts 2 ε 2 ȧ t ρ ts ε. Notice that v as defined in 5 is bounded by construction for all ε R and t i.e. there exists a positive constant v such that v v t. Owing to the smoothness of f and g as well as to v v t applying the Extreme Value Theorem we conclude the existence of some positive constants f ḡ such that f v f and g v ḡ t. Moreover ρ 2 ts 2 ε 2 ρ ts ε as well as ȧ t = ẏ d t are also bounded for all ε R ε 2 R and t. Thus there exists a positive constant F such that F ε ε 2 v t F t. Hence completing the squares we get: V k ε 2 +g v N ζ + ζ + F 2 4k. 4 Multiplying 4 by e 2kt and integrating we arrive at: V t e 2k t t g v N ζ + ζ e 2kτ dτ +V + F 2. 8k 2 5 Invoking the fact that g is bounded away from zero a sufficient controllability condition we also obtain that < g g v ḡ t for a positive constant g. Thus applying Lemma we conclude the boundedness of V t ζ t and consequently the boundedness of ε t η t a t ε t and ζ t for all t [t f. Moreover according to Ryan 99 the continuity of the right hand side of 2 together with the boundedness of its solution for all t [t f guarantee that t f =. Finally differentiating a with respect to time yields: ȧ = dn ζ η ζ η +N ζ ε + η dζ ε t from which owing to the smoothness of the Nussbaum function N as well as of η we also conclude that ȧ t L. Step i 2 i n: We have proven in Step that a t L. Similarly to Step it is straightforward to show that for the second state of 4 there exist positive constants f 2 g 2 ḡ 2 such that f 2 v 2 f 2 and < g 2 g 2 v 2 ḡ 2 t. Following the line of proof of the first step with the positivedefiniteandradiallyunboundedfunctionv 2 = 2 ε2 2 and selecting the intermediate control signal a 2 as in for i = 2 we obtain: V 2 t e 2k 2t t g 2 v 2 N ζ 2 + ζ 2 e 2k 2τ dτ +V 2 + F 2 2 8k 2 2 where the positive constant F 2 satisfies: f 2 v 2 +g 2 v 2 ρ 3 ts 3 ε 3 ȧ t ρ 2 ts 2 ε 2 F 2 for all t owing to the boundedness of f 2 v 2 g 2 v 2 ρ 3 ts 3 ε 3 ȧ t and ρ 2 ts 2 ε 2. Thus we conclude that ε 2 t a 2 t ȧ 2 t L. Applying recursively for all the remaining steps the control signals for i = 3...n we conclude that ε i t a i t L i =...n. Hence according to Theorem we have solved the prescribed performance tracking problem for system. Remark 2. The controller summarized in Theorem 2 achieves global prescribed performance results i.e. given any a priori known initial state x n and any performance requirements for the output the control objective is satisfied without requesting knowledge of system nonlinearities. Further no approximation based schemes i.e. neural networks fuzzy systems etc. have been employed to acquire such knowledge. Moreover compared with the backstepping approach which is the main tool for designing controllers for the proposed methodology proves significantly less complex. The aforementioned attributes are mainly owing to: a at each state of system 4 the unknown nonlinearities involved appear bounded and b we only seek for the boundedness of the states of 4 as Theorem dictates. Moreover since at each step the control coefficients of 4 i.e. g i x i i =...n are bounded Lemma can be easily applied. Remark 3. At each design step the derivative of the intermediate control signal is proven bounded. Hence there is no need for compensation in the subsequent step. In 29
5 Preprints of the 8th IFAC World Congress Milano Italy August 28 - September 2 2 thatrespectthedesignstepsoftheproposedmethodology appear decoupled the coupling issue is the main source of complexity in the backstepping design procedure. Furthermore the proposed scheme is also independent of the timederivativesofy d.certainlythefirstintermediatecontrol signal a depends on y d. However ȧ which involves ẏ d is proven bounded and therefore we do not compensate for ȧ when designing the second intermediate control signal a 2. Through repetition the same holds for all a i i = 3...n thus isolating the appearance of ẏ d or higher order derivatives of y d to subsequent steps. Remark 4. To solve the prescribed performance tracking problem for despite the presence of uncertainties it is sufficient to seek for the boundedness of the states of 4. In addition the actual output tracking error performance is solely determined by ρ t and M. Therefore and contrary to what is the common practice in the relevant literature the selection of the control design parameters k i i =...n is significantly simplified to adopting those values that lead to reasonable control effort. The same reasoning applies to the selection of ρ i t i = 2...n for which according to Theorem the only constraint is the satisfaction of ρ i > e i i = 2...n. Remark 5. In case the signs of g i i =...n are known it can be easily verified that the PPC scheme is further simplified to: a i = signg i η i η i = k i +ρ ρ it ds i it ds i dε ε i i ε i ε i 3. SIMULATION RESULTS i =...n. In this section we shall present a comparative simulation study between the backstepping technique and the PPC method. The simulations will be conducted on the following 3rd order strict feedback system: ẋ = f x +g x x 2 x =.2 ẋ 2 = f 2 x 2 +g 2 x 2 x 3 x 2 =.5 ẋ 3 = f 3 x 3 +g 3 x 3 u x 3 =.5 y = x 6 where f x = x sinx g x =.2 + x 2 f 2 x 2 = x 2 e.5x g 2 x 2 = +x 2 2 f 3 x 3 = x x 2 x 3 g 3 x 3 = 2+ cosx x 2. It can be easily verified that g i x i > i = 23. Further the desired trajectory is selected as y d t = sint. First we shall design a backstepping controller following Krstic et al. 995 considering the system nonlinearities completely known. In that respect we select the control signals as: e = x y d a = g x f x ẏ d +k e e 2 = x 2 a a 2 = g 2 x 2 f 2 x 2 ȧ +g x e +k 2 e 2 e 3 = x 3 a 2 u = g 3 x 3 f 3 x 3 ȧ 2 +g 2 x 2 e 2 +k 3 e 3 7 et x tsec Fig. 2. Tracking error response. The black solid line indicates the tracking error response of the PPC scheme. The grey solid line indicates the tracking error response of the backstepping approach. The black dashed lines indicate the performance bounds. The subplot gives details at the steady state. Notice that both ȧ and ȧ 2 which also involves ä are required to formulate the control input 7. The derivation of the aforementioned signals is very arduous as they involve the system nonlinearities. Therefore as the system order increases their analytic determination becomes harder. Additionally the time derivatives of the desired trajectory up to 3rd order are also required. To continue following the PPC design we arrive at: ε = S x y d ρ t ζ ε η = ρ t ds dε ε η = k ρ t ds dε ε +ρ t ds ε ε dε a = N ζ η ε 2 = S2 x2 a ρ 2 t ζ ε 2 η 2 2 = ρ 2 t ds 2 dε 2 ε 2 η 2 = k 2 ρ 2 t ds2 dε 2 ε 2 +ρ 2t ds 2 ε 2 ε 2 dε 2 a 2 = N ζ 2 η 2 ε 3 = S3 x3 a 2 ρ 3 t ζ ε 3 η 3 3 = ρ 3 t ds 3 dε 3 ε 3 η 3 = k 3 ρ 3 t ds 3 dε 3 ε 3 +ρ 3t ds 3 ε 3 ε 3 dε 3 u = N ζ 3 η 3 8 where N ζ = e.ζ2 cos π 4 ζ S ε = exp2ε exp2ε + S 2 ε 2 = tanhε 2 S 3 ε 3 = tanhε 3 ρ t = 2 e 3 exp 5t + 3 ρ 2 t = 2 e 2. exp 5t +. ρ 3 t = 2 e 3.exp 5t +. the property e i < ρ i i = 23 is satisfied. Notice that no information regarding the system nonlinearities is utilized in 8. Moreover comparing to the backstepping case all signals required to produce 8 can 3
6 Preprints of the 8th IFAC World Congress Milano Italy August 28 - September 2 2 ut In this paper we established a general framework to handle the prescribed performance tracking problem for strict feedback systems. After obtaining a novel system that involves both the nonlinearities of the original system as well as the performance requirements we proved that the boundedness of its states is sufficient to solve the prescribed performance tracking problem for the original system. Consequently a state feedback controller was designed to achieve boundedness of its states. The resulted PPC scheme yields global results in the sense that given any a priori known initial state condition and any output performance requirements regarding the steady state error the speed of convergence and the overshoot the problem is solved. Apart from a sufficient controllability condition for the original system no extra assumptions were made and no extra information was required concerning its nonlinearities. Additionally only the desired trajectory y d t and none of its higher order derivatives was needed. Furthermore the proposed controller is approximationfree and significantly less complex compared with the backstepping approach which has been the main tool for designing controllers for the considered class of nonlinear systems. Finally a comparative simulation study on a third order system verified that the proposed PPC scheme outperforms backstepping in both output performance and required control effort even though in backstepping system nonlinearities were considered known tsec Fig. 3. The required control inputs. The black solid line indicates the control effort of the PPC scheme. The grey solid line indicates the control effort of the backstepping approach. The subplot gives details at the transient. be straightforwardly calculated whereas only the desired trajectory is needed. The selection of the performance function ρ t guarantees a priori that the maximum steady state error will be less than 3 and the speed of convergence of the tracking error will be greater than the exponentialexp 5t.Finallytheselectionofthefunction S ε leads to a nonovershooting response i.e. M =. We simulated both controllers and the results are pictured in Figs The control gains of the backstepping design procedure were selected as k = k 2 = 5 k 3 = such that the response of the tracking error was similar to the exponential e 5t with reasonable control effort. Although asymptotic tracking was achieved see Fig. 2 the appearance of an overshoot was inevitable. Further overshoot reduction can be succeeded by increasing the control gains k i i = 23 leading however to high control input values. On the contrary in PPC the control gains were selected as k = k 2 = k 3 = 2 resulting in a control effort see Fig. 3 whose maximum magnitude appears reduced by half compared to what backstepping requires. Concurrently prescribed performance requirements are achieved see Fig. 2 irrespectively of the fact that the system is considered completely unknown. REFERENCES Bechlioulis C.P. and Rovithakis G.A. 28. Robust adaptive control of feedback linearizable MIMO nonlinear systems with prescribed performance. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control Bechlioulis C.P. and Rovithakis G.A. 29. Adaptive control with guaranteed transient and steady state tracking error bounds for strict feedback systems. Automatica Farrell J.A. and Polycarpou M.M. 26. Adaptive Approximation Based Control: Unifying Neural Fuzzy and Traditional Adaptive Approximation Approaches. Wiley New York NY. GeS.S.HangC.C.LeeT.H.andZhangT.22. Stable Adaptive Neural Network Control. Kluwer Boston MA. Ge S.S. Hong F. and Lee T.H. 24. Adaptive neural control of nonlinear time-delay systems with unknown virtual control coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B: Cybernetics Krstic M. Kanellakopoulos I. and Kokotovic P.V Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. Wiley New York. Ryan E.P. 99. A universal adaptive stabilizer for a class of nonlinear systems. Systems and Control Letters Spooner J.T. Maggiore M. Ordonez R. and Passino K.M. 22. Stable Adaptive Control and Estimation for Nonlinear Systems-Neural and Fuzzy Approximator Techniques. Wiley New York. 4. CONCLUSIONS 3
Output Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form
Output Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form Charalampos P. Bechlioulis, Achilles Theodorakopoulos 2 and George A. Rovithakis 2 Abstract The
More informationRobust Model Free Control of Robotic Manipulators with Prescribed Transient and Steady State Performance
Robust Model Free Control of Robotic Manipulators with Prescribed Transient and Steady State Performance Charalampos P. Bechlioulis, Minas V. Liarokapis and Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos Abstract In this paper,
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationPrescribed Performance Output Feedback Adaptive Control of Uncertain Strict Feedback Nonlinear Systems
Milano (Italy August 8 - September, 11 Prescribed Performance Output Feedback Adaptive Control of Uncertain Strict Feedback Nonlinear Systems Artemis K. Kostarigka, George A. Rovithakis Dept. of Electrical
More informationSLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED PERFORMANCE. Jicheng Gao, Qikun Shen, Pengfei Yang and Jianye Gong
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 27 ISSN 349-498 Volume 3, Number 2, April 27 pp. 687 694 SLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED
More informationADAPTIVE FUZZY TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS WITH UNKNOWN DISTRIBUTED TIME-VARYING DELAYS AND UNKNOWN CONTROL DIRECTIONS
Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems Vol. 11, No. 1, 14 pp. 1-5 1 ADAPTIVE FUZZY TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS WITH UNKNOWN DISTRIBUTED TIME-VARYING DELAYS AND UNKNOWN CONTROL DIRECTIONS
More informationDynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems
Dynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems ZHANG Sheng *, QIAN Wei-qi (7.6) Computational Aerodynamics Institution, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang, 6,
More informationOutput Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More informationUDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances
16 American Control Conference ACC) Boston Marriott Copley Place July 6-8, 16. Boston, MA, USA UDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances Jiguo Dai, Beibei
More informationContraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 WeB4.5 Contraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems B. B. Sharma and I. N. Kar, Member IEEE Abstract
More informationPosture regulation for unicycle-like robots with. prescribed performance guarantees
Posture regulation for unicycle-like robots with prescribed performance guarantees Martina Zambelli, Yiannis Karayiannidis 2 and Dimos V. Dimarogonas ACCESS Linnaeus Center and Centre for Autonomous Systems,
More informationAn Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems
,,, 323 E-mail: mxsun@zjut.edu.cn :, Lyapunov( ),,.,,,.,,. :,,, An Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems Mingxuan Sun, Chaonan Jiang, Yanwei Li College of Information Engineering,
More informationNEURAL NETWORKS (NNs) play an important role in
1630 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 34, NO 4, AUGUST 2004 Adaptive Neural Network Control for a Class of MIMO Nonlinear Systems With Disturbances in Discrete-Time
More informationΜια προσπαθεια για την επιτευξη ανθρωπινης επιδοσης σε ρομποτικές εργασίες με νέες μεθόδους ελέγχου
Μια προσπαθεια για την επιτευξη ανθρωπινης επιδοσης σε ρομποτικές εργασίες με νέες μεθόδους ελέγχου Towards Achieving Human like Robotic Tasks via Novel Control Methods Zoe Doulgeri doulgeri@eng.auth.gr
More informationNavigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop
Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop Jan Maximilian Montenbruck, Mathias Bürger, Frank Allgöwer Abstract We study backstepping controllers
More informationAutomatica. Control of nonlinear systems with time-varying output constraints
Automatica 47 (20) 25 256 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Automatica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/automatica Brief paper Control of nonlinear systems with time-varying output
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 1 Uncertainty and Lyapunov Redesign Consider the system [1]
More informationDesign of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone
International Journal of Automation and Computing 8), May, -8 DOI:.7/s633--574-4 Design of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone Xue-Li
More informationAdaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Bounded Disturbance
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering 2018, 8(2): 31-35 DOI: 10.5923/j.control.20180802.01 Adaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Saeed Kashefi *, Majid Hajatipor Faculty of
More informationSELF-REPAIRING PI/PID CONTROL AGAINST SENSOR FAILURES. Masanori Takahashi. Received May 2015; revised October 2015
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2016 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 12, Number 1, February 2016 pp. 193 202 SELF-REPAIRING PI/PID CONTROL AGAINST SENSOR
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More informationEvent-based Stabilization of Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Event-based Stabilization of Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems Sylvain Durand Nicolas Marchand J. Fermi Guerrero-Castellanos
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial. Miroslav Krstić
Adaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial Miroslav Krstić University of California, San Diego Backstepping Tuning Functions Design Modular Design Output Feedback Extensions A Stochastic Example Applications
More informationNonlinear Control Systems
Nonlinear Control Systems António Pedro Aguiar pedro@isr.ist.utl.pt 3. Fundamental properties IST-DEEC PhD Course http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/%7epedro/ncs2012/ 2012 1 Example Consider the system ẋ = f
More informationUNCERTAIN CHAOTIC SYSTEM CONTROL VIA ADAPTIVE NEURAL DESIGN
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol., No. 5 (00) 097 09 c World Scientific Publishing Company UNCERTAIN CHAOTIC SYSTEM CONTROL VIA ADAPTIVE NEURAL DESIGN S. S. GE and C. WANG Department
More informationIMECE NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM PHASE LINEAR SYSTEMS
Proceedings of IMECE 27 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition November -5, 27, Seattle, Washington,USA, USA IMECE27-42237 NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM
More informationIndirect Model Reference Adaptive Control System Based on Dynamic Certainty Equivalence Principle and Recursive Identifier Scheme
Indirect Model Reference Adaptive Control System Based on Dynamic Certainty Equivalence Principle and Recursive Identifier Scheme Itamiya, K. *1, Sawada, M. 2 1 Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Eng.,
More informationSet-based adaptive estimation for a class of nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters
Preprints of the 8th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes The International Federation of Automatic Control Furama Riverfront, Singapore, July -3, Set-based adaptive estimation for
More informationPassivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets
Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets Mohamed I. El-Hawwary and Manfredi Maggiore Abstract We investigate the stabilization of closed sets for passive nonlinear systems which are contained
More informationTTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2
TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2 Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology Fall 2003 Solution 1 Thesystemisgivenby φ = R (φ) ω and J 1 ω 1
More informationL -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems
L -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems Shoudong Huang M.R. James Z.P. Jiang August 19, 2004 Accepted by Systems & Control Letters Abstract In this paper, we consider the L -bounded robust
More informationRESEARCH ON TRACKING AND SYNCHRONIZATION OF UNCERTAIN CHAOTIC SYSTEMS
Computing and Informatics, Vol. 3, 13, 193 1311 RESEARCH ON TRACKING AND SYNCHRONIZATION OF UNCERTAIN CHAOTIC SYSTEMS Junwei Lei, Hongchao Zhao, Jinyong Yu Zuoe Fan, Heng Li, Kehua Li Naval Aeronautical
More informationA Generalization of Barbalat s Lemma with Applications to Robust Model Predictive Control
A Generalization of Barbalat s Lemma with Applications to Robust Model Predictive Control Fernando A. C. C. Fontes 1 and Lalo Magni 2 1 Officina Mathematica, Departamento de Matemática para a Ciência e
More information1 The Observability Canonical Form
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS AND SEPARATION PRINCIPLE 1 The Observability Canonical Form In this Chapter we discuss the design of observers for nonlinear systems modelled by equations of the form ẋ = f(x, u) (1)
More informationUDE-based Robust Control for Nonlinear Systems with Mismatched Uncertainties and Input Saturation
UDEbased Robust Control for Nonlinear Systems with Mismatched Uncertainties and Input Saturation DAI Jiguo, REN Beibei, ZHONG QingChang. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock,
More informationNeural adaptive control for uncertain nonlinear system with input saturation Gao, Shigen; Dong, Hairong; Ning, Bin; Chen, Lei
Neural adaptive control for uncertain nonlinear system with input saturation Gao, Shigen; Dong, Hairong; Ning, Bin; Chen, Lei DOI:.6/j.neucom.5.. License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document
More informationLecture 4. Chapter 4: Lyapunov Stability. Eugenio Schuster. Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University.
Lecture 4 Chapter 4: Lyapunov Stability Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 4 p. 1/86 Autonomous Systems Consider the autonomous system ẋ
More informationExponential Tracking Control of Nonlinear Systems with Actuator Nonlinearity
Preprints of the 9th Worl Congress The International Feeration of Automatic Control Cape Town, South Africa. August -9, Exponential Tracking Control of Nonlinear Systems with Actuator Nonlinearity Zhengqiang
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationEvent-sampled direct adaptive neural network control of uncertain strict-feedback system with application to quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle
Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Research & Creative Works Fall 2016 Event-sampled direct adaptive neural network control of uncertain strict-feedback system with application to quadrotor unmanned
More informationCooperative Manipulation Exploiting only Implicit Communication
Cooperative Manipulation Exploiting only Implicit Communication Anastasios Tsiamis, Christos K. Verginis, Charalampos P. Bechlioulis and Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos Abstract This paper addresses the problem
More informationRobust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 28 WeC15.1 Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers Shahid
More informationAdaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinearly Parameterized Fuzzy Approximators
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL. 9, NO. 2, APRIL 2001 315 Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinearly Parameterized Fuzzy Approximators Hugang Han, Chun-Yi Su, Yury Stepanenko
More informationADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 12, No. 7 (2002) 1599 1604 c World Scientific Publishing Company ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT KEVIN BARONE and SAHJENDRA
More informationAsignificant problem that arises in adaptive control of
742 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 44, NO. 4, APRIL 1999 A Switching Adaptive Controller for Feedback Linearizable Systems Elias B. Kosmatopoulos Petros A. Ioannou, Fellow, IEEE Abstract
More informationNONLINEAR SAMPLED DATA CONTROLLER REDESIGN VIA LYAPUNOV FUNCTIONS 1
NONLINEAR SAMPLED DAA CONROLLER REDESIGN VIA LYAPUNOV FUNCIONS 1 Lars Grüne Dragan Nešić Mathematical Institute, University of Bayreuth, 9544 Bayreuth, Germany, lars.gruene@uni-bayreuth.de Department of
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More informationL 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 11-13, 27 WeB1.1 L 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown Dimension
More informationState-norm estimators for switched nonlinear systems under average dwell-time
49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2010 Hilton Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, GA, USA State-norm estimators for switched nonlinear systems under average dwell-time Matthias A. Müller
More informationA framework for stabilization of nonlinear sampled-data systems based on their approximate discrete-time models
1 A framework for stabilization of nonlinear sampled-data systems based on their approximate discrete-time models D.Nešić and A.R.Teel Abstract A unified framework for design of stabilizing controllers
More informationAFAULT diagnosis procedure is typically divided into three
576 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 47, NO. 4, APRIL 2002 A Robust Detection and Isolation Scheme for Abrupt and Incipient Faults in Nonlinear Systems Xiaodong Zhang, Marios M. Polycarpou,
More informationAn introduction to Mathematical Theory of Control
An introduction to Mathematical Theory of Control Vasile Staicu University of Aveiro UNICA, May 2018 Vasile Staicu (University of Aveiro) An introduction to Mathematical Theory of Control UNICA, May 2018
More informationNONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD
NONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD Ponesit Santhanapipatkul Watcharapong Khovidhungij Abstract: We present a controller design based on
More informationResearch Article Neural Network L 1 Adaptive Control of MIMO Systems with Nonlinear Uncertainty
e Scientific World Journal, Article ID 94294, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/.55/24/94294 Research Article Neural Network L Adaptive Control of MIMO Systems with Nonlinear Uncertainty Hong-tao Zhen, Xiao-hui
More informationAn asymptotic ratio characterization of input-to-state stability
1 An asymptotic ratio characterization of input-to-state stability Daniel Liberzon and Hyungbo Shim Abstract For continuous-time nonlinear systems with inputs, we introduce the notion of an asymptotic
More informationAdaptive Control of Nonlinearly Parameterized Systems: The Smooth Feedback Case
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 47, NO 8, AUGUST 2002 1249 Adaptive Control of Nonlinearly Parameterized Systems: The Smooth Feedback Case Wei Lin, Senior Member, IEEE, and Chunjiang Qian,
More informationConvergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems
Convergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems Philippe JOUAN and Saïd NACIRI arxiv:1511.01737v1 [math.oc] 5 Nov 2015 January 23, 2018 Abstract This paper is concerned with the convergence rate of the
More informationRobust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States
obust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States John A Akpobi, Member, IAENG and Aloagbaye I Momodu Abstract Compressors for jet engines in operation experience
More informationEvent-based control of input-output linearizable systems
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Event-based control of input-output linearizable systems Christian Stöcker Jan Lunze Institute of Automation and Computer Control, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstr.
More informationThe Bang-Bang Funnel Controller
49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2010 Hilton Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, GA, USA The Bang-Bang Funnel Controller Daniel Liberzon and Stephan Trenn Abstract A bang-bang controller
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationAverage Consensus with Prescribed Performance Guarantees for Multi-agent Double-Integrator Systems
Average Consensus with Prescribed Performance Guarantees for Multi-agent Double-Integrator Systems LUCA MACELLARI Master s Degree Project Stockholm, Sweden February, 25 XR-EE-RT 25:2 Average Consensus
More informationRobustness of the nonlinear PI control method to ignored actuator dynamics
arxiv:148.3229v1 [cs.sy] 14 Aug 214 Robustness of the nonlinear PI control method to ignored actuator dynamics Haris E. Psillakis Hellenic Electricity Network Operator S.A. psilakish@hotmail.com Abstract
More informationIntroduction. 1.1 Historical Overview. Chapter 1
Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Historical Overview Research in adaptive control was motivated by the design of autopilots for highly agile aircraft that need to operate at a wide range of speeds and altitudes,
More informationDynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Dynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties Qudrat Khan*, Aamer Iqbal Bhatti,* Qadeer
More informationObserver design for a general class of triangular systems
1st International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems July 7-11, 014. Observer design for a general class of triangular systems Dimitris Boskos 1 John Tsinias Abstract The paper deals
More informationPrediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate
www.scichina.com info.scichina.com www.springerlin.com Prediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate WEI Chen & CHEN ZongJi School of Automation
More informationUnifying Behavior-Based Control Design and Hybrid Stability Theory
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront St. Louis MO USA June - 9 ThC.6 Unifying Behavior-Based Control Design and Hybrid Stability Theory Vladimir Djapic 3 Jay Farrell 3 and Wenjie Dong
More informationNONLINEAR SAMPLED-DATA OBSERVER DESIGN VIA APPROXIMATE DISCRETE-TIME MODELS AND EMULATION
NONLINEAR SAMPLED-DAA OBSERVER DESIGN VIA APPROXIMAE DISCREE-IME MODELS AND EMULAION Murat Arcak Dragan Nešić Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
More informationLocally optimal controllers and application to orbital transfer (long version)
9th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems Toulouse, France, September 4-6, 13 FrA1.4 Locally optimal controllers and application to orbital transfer (long version) S. Benachour V. Andrieu Université
More informationA ROBUST ITERATIVE LEARNING OBSERVER BASED FAULT DIAGNOSIS OF TIME DELAY NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A ROBUST ITERATIVE LEARNING OBSERVER BASED FAULT DIAGNOSIS OF TIME DELAY NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Wen Chen, Mehrdad Saif 1 School of Engineering
More informationFINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES. Danlei Chu, Tongwen Chen, Horacio J. Marquez
FINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES Danlei Chu Tongwen Chen Horacio J Marquez Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton
More informationNonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems. p. 1/1
Nonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems p. 1/1 p. 2/1 Converse Lyapunov Theorem Exponential Stability Let x = 0 be an exponentially stable equilibrium
More informationL 1 Adaptive Controller for a Class of Systems with Unknown
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June -3, 28 FrA4.2 L Adaptive Controller for a Class of Systems with Unknown Nonlinearities: Part I Chengyu Cao and Naira Hovakimyan
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Suboptimality and Stability Guarantees
Adaptive Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Suboptimality and Stability Guarantees Pontus Giselsson Department of Automatic Control LTH Lund University Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden pontusg@control.lth.se
More informationThe Rationale for Second Level Adaptation
The Rationale for Second Level Adaptation Kumpati S. Narendra, Yu Wang and Wei Chen Center for Systems Science, Yale University arxiv:1510.04989v1 [cs.sy] 16 Oct 2015 Abstract Recently, a new approach
More informationRobust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 26 American Control Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 14-16, 26 FrB3.2 Robust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Bo Xie and Bin
More informationA Novel Finite Time Sliding Mode Control for Robotic Manipulators
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Cape Town, South Africa. August 24-29, 214 A Novel Finite Time Sliding Mode Control for Robotic Manipulators Yao ZHAO
More informationAS A POPULAR approach for compensating external
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 1, JANUARY 2008 137 A Novel Robust Nonlinear Motion Controller With Disturbance Observer Zi-Jiang Yang, Hiroshi Tsubakihara, Shunshoku Kanae,
More informationResearch Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
Applied Mathematics Volume 202, Article ID 689820, 3 pages doi:0.55/202/689820 Research Article Convex Polyhedron Method to Stability of Continuous Systems with Two Additive Time-Varying Delay Components
More informationAdaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 308-322, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 Adaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties M.R.Soltanpour, M.M.Fateh
More informationState and Parameter Estimation Based on Filtered Transformation for a Class of Second-Order Systems
State and Parameter Estimation Based on Filtered Transformation for a Class of Second-Order Systems Mehdi Tavan, Kamel Sabahi, and Saeid Hoseinzadeh Abstract This paper addresses the problem of state and
More informationTowards Quantitative Time Domain Design Tradeoffs in Nonlinear Control
Towards Quantitative Time Domain Design Tradeoffs in Nonlinear Control Rick H. Middleton Julio H. Braslavsky Ingeniería en Automatización y Control Industrial Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología Universidad
More informationSmall Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability
Small Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability Zhong-Ping Jiang Yuan Wang. Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY 11201, U.S.A. zjiang@control.poly.edu Dept. of
More informationAdaptive backstepping for trajectory tracking of nonlinearly parameterized class of nonlinear systems
Adaptive backstepping for trajectory tracking of nonlinearly parameterized class of nonlinear systems Hakim Bouadi, Felix Antonio Claudio Mora-Camino To cite this version: Hakim Bouadi, Felix Antonio Claudio
More informationarxiv: v3 [math.ds] 22 Feb 2012
Stability of interconnected impulsive systems with and without time-delays using Lyapunov methods arxiv:1011.2865v3 [math.ds] 22 Feb 2012 Sergey Dashkovskiy a, Michael Kosmykov b, Andrii Mironchenko b,
More informationIntroduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems
p. 1/5 Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems p. 2/5 Time-varying Systems ẋ = f(t, x) f(t, x) is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in x for all t
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 1 Introduction & Stabilization High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 1Introduction & Stabilization p. 1/4 Brief History Linear
More informationIN recent years, controller design for systems having complex
818 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 29, NO 6, DECEMBER 1999 Adaptive Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Systems by State and Output Feedback S S Ge, Member,
More informationTracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique
International Journal of Automation and Computing (3), June 24, 38-32 DOI: 7/s633-4-793-6 Tracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique Lei-Po Liu Zhu-Mu Fu Xiao-Na
More informationLYAPUNOV theory plays a major role in stability analysis.
1090 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 49, NO. 7, JULY 2004 Satisficing: A New Approach to Constructive Nonlinear Control J. Willard Curtis, Member, IEEE, and Randal W. Beard, Senior Member,
More informationRobust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering ; (): -7 DOI:.59/j.control.. Robust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems M. M. Share Pasandand *, H. D. Taghirad Department
More informationL 2 -induced Gains of Switched Systems and Classes of Switching Signals
L 2 -induced Gains of Switched Systems and Classes of Switching Signals Kenji Hirata and João P. Hespanha Abstract This paper addresses the L 2-induced gain analysis for switched linear systems. We exploit
More informationSINCE the 1959 publication of Otto J. M. Smith s Smith
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL 287 Input Delay Compensation for Forward Complete and Strict-Feedforward Nonlinear Systems Miroslav Krstic, Fellow, IEEE Abstract We present an approach for compensating
More informationAdaptive estimation in nonlinearly parameterized nonlinear dynamical systems
2 American Control Conference on O'Farrell Street, San Francisco, CA, USA June 29 - July, 2 Adaptive estimation in nonlinearly parameterized nonlinear dynamical systems Veronica Adetola, Devon Lehrer and
More informationADAPTIVE EXTREMUM SEEKING CONTROL OF CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK BIOREACTORS 1
ADAPTIVE EXTREMUM SEEKING CONTROL OF CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK BIOREACTORS M. Guay, D. Dochain M. Perrier Department of Chemical Engineering, Queen s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 CESAME,
More informationTHE nonholonomic systems, that is Lagrange systems
Finite-Time Control Design for Nonholonomic Mobile Robots Subject to Spatial Constraint Yanling Shang, Jiacai Huang, Hongsheng Li and Xiulan Wen Abstract This paper studies the problem of finite-time stabilizing
More informationGlobal output regulation through singularities
Global output regulation through singularities Yuh Yamashita Nara Institute of Science and Techbology Graduate School of Information Science Takayama 8916-5, Ikoma, Nara 63-11, JAPAN yamas@isaist-naraacjp
More informationA Systematic Approach to Extremum Seeking Based on Parameter Estimation
49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 21 Hilton Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, GA, USA A Systematic Approach to Extremum Seeking Based on Parameter Estimation Dragan Nešić, Alireza Mohammadi
More information