Global output regulation through singularities
|
|
- Hubert Stanley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Global output regulation through singularities Yuh Yamashita Nara Institute of Science and Techbology Graduate School of Information Science Takayama , Ikoma, Nara 63-11, JAPAN Alberto Isidori Washington University Department of Systems Science and Mathematics One Brookings Drive, St Louis, MO 6313, USA Abstract In this paper, global output regulation problem using state-feedback for nonlinear systems with no relative degree is concidered We introduce an invariant manifold on which tracking error tends to zero, and through which we derive a coordinate transformation of state By means of the forwarding design method, it is shown that a simple feedback on the new coordinate attains the global output regulation through singularities 1 Introduction In this paper, we present a new method of the global output regulation through singularities Tracking control for nonlinear systems that have no relative degree has been addressed by the approximating method[1] and the switching method, but the exact tracking problem for such systems has been a very difficult problem On the other hand, these systems may be stabilized to an equilibrium point using forwarding[, 5, 6] or backstepping In this work, we convert the tracking problem to a stabilization problem, in the framework of output regulation Output regulation of nonlinear systems has been studied actively in recent years The reference signals to be tracked are generated by a stable autonomous system, so called exo-system The first paper[7] to examine the nonlinear output-regulation problem considers local stability alone Global or semi-global stability for minimum-phase systems was considered in following papers[8, 9, 1] These studies assumed the system is minimum-phase, thus needing a relative degree We extend the target systems of global output regulation using state feedback to the system with no relative degree We introduce new sort of PDE that defines an invariant manifold on which tracking error tends to zero Using linear-growth conditions and some assumptions, it is proven that a use of feedback such that the state tends to the manifold attains the global output regulation for such a system, by means of the forwarding method 2 Problem statements We consider a tracking problem in a single-input singleoutput affine system in the following form: ẋ 1 = x 2 ẋ ρ = x ρ+1 + φ x, ξu ẋ ρ+1 = ψx, ξ+φ 1 x, ξu ξ = ηx, ξ 1 y = hx =x 1 2 x 1,,x ρ+1,ξ T T R n denotes a state vector, u Ran input, and y Ran output The system has an equilibrium point x =,ξ = such that ψ, = and η, = Note that we do not assume that φ x, ξ is nonzero for all x, ξ, which means the relative degree of the system may not exist We rewrite the system 1 shortly as d x = fx, ξ+gx, ξu 3 dt ξ The reference signal is generated by an exo-system ẇ = sw y d = γw 5 The exo-system has an equilibrium point w = which satisfies s = and γ = The exo-system is assumed to be Lyapunov stable, ie there exists Uw such that Uw > w, U = Uw w γw 6 The purpose of control is to find a controller with which tracking error e = y y d converges to zero, and all state variables of 1 are bounded The state may pass through the point such that φ x, ξ =, therefore we address an output regulation problem through singularities
2 3 Transformation of system We make the following assumption that is one of the solvability conditions for a local version of the tracking problem Assumption 1 There exist functions πw R n and cw which satisfy fπw + gπwcw = πw sw 7 w π 1 w =γw 8 Let π A w denote π 1 w,,π ρ w T, π B w = π ρ+1 w, and π C w =π ρ+2 w,,π n w T Moreover, we assume the existence of another invariant manifold x ρ+1 = π x 1,,x ρ,ξ,w including x T,ξ T T = πw Assumption 2 There exist functions π x, ξ, w R and c x, ξ, w Rsuch that ψ x, π x, ξ, w,ξ+φ 1 x, π x, ξ, w,ξc x, ξ, w ρ 1 π = x i+1 + π {π x, ξ, w x i=1 i x ρ + φ x, π x, ξ, w,ξc x, ξ, w} + π ξ η x, π x, ξ, w,ξ+ π w sw π x, ξ, w+φ x, π x, ξ, w,ξc x, ξ, w π ρ w sw+ x 1 π 1 w+ + ρ 1 x ρ π ρ w = 9 1 c π A w,π C w,w=cw 11 π π A w,π C w,w=π B w 12 φ 1 x, z, ξ π φ x, z, ξ x ρ 13 x denotes x 1,,x ρ T, and s are constants such that polynomial is Hurwitz s ρ + ρ 1 s ρ s + 1 Equations 9,1 mean that x ρ+1 π x, ξ, w =is an invariant manifold under the input u = c x, ξ, w, and on the manifold the error dynamics become d ρ e dt ρ + d ρ 1 e ρ 1 dt ρ ė + e = 15 Under these assumptions, the system 1 can be transformed to x 1 = x 2 x ρ 1 = x ρ x ρ = x 1 ρ 1 x ρ + z + φ x, z, ξ, wũ + c x, ξ,w φ x,, ξ, w c x, ξ,w ż = ψ x, z, ξ, w ψ x,, ξ,w + φ 1 x, z, ξ, wũ + c x, ξ,w φ 1 x,, ξ, w c x, ξ,w π {z + x φ x, z, ξ,wũ + c x, ξ,w 16 ρ φ x,, ξ, w c x, ξ,w} π ξ { η x, z, ξ, w η x,, ξ,w} ξ = η x, z, ξ, w η,,,w x = x π A w 17 ξ = ξ π C w 18 π x, ξ,w =π x + π A w, ξ + π C w,w 19 z = x ρ+1 π x, ξ,w 2 φ x, z, ξ,w = φ x + π A w,z+ π x, ξ,w, ξ 21 + π C w φ 1 x, z, ξ,w = φ 1 x + π A w,z+ π x, ξ,w, ξ 22 + π C w ψ x, z, ξ, w = ψ x + π A w,z+ π x, ξ,w, ξ 23 + π C w η x, z, ξ, w = η x + π A w,z+ π x, ξ,w, ξ 2 + π C w c x, ξ,w =c x + π A w, ξ + π C w,w 25 ũ = u c x, ξ,w 26 By expanding φ, φ 1, ψ, and η as φ x, z, ξ, w = φ x,, ξ,w+p x, z, ξ,wz 27 φ 1 x, z, ξ, w = φ 1 x,, ξ,w+p 1 x, z, ξ,wz 28 ψ x, z, ξ, w = ψ x,, ξ, w+p 2 x, z, ξ, wz 29 η x, z, ξ, w = η,,,w+e 1 ξ,w ξ + E 2 x, ξ,w x + E 3 x, z, ξ, 3 wz, the system 16 becomes x 1 = x 2 x ρ 1 = x ρ x ρ = { x 1 ρ 1 x ρ } + z + φ x, z, ξ,wũ + c x, ξ,wp 31 x, z, ξ,wz
3 ż = θ x, z, ξ, wz { + φ 1 x, z, ξ, w π } φ x, z, x ξ, w ũ ρ ξ = E 1 ξ,w ξ + E 2 x, ξ,w x + E 3 x, z, ξ, wz, θ x, z, ξ, w =P 2 x, z, ξ, w π π x ρ ξ E 3 x, z, ξ, w { + c x, ξ,w P 1 x, z, ξ,w π } P x, z, x ξ, w ρ 32 If one can stabilize 31 globally, then global output regulation problem for system 1,2 is solvable By applying a feedback ũ = θ x, z, ξ, wz + v φ 1 x, z, ξ, w π x ρ φ x, z, ξ, w the system 31 is converted to 33 ξ = E 1 ξ,w ξ + E 2 x, ξ,w x + E 3 x, z, ξ, wz 3 1 x = 1 x ρ v δ x, z, ξ,wz ζ x, z, ξ, w ż = v 36 ζ x, z, ξ, w = φ x, z, ξ, w φ 1 x, z, ξ, w π x ρ φ x, z, ξ, w δ x, z, ξ, w =1+ c x, ξ,wp x, z, ξ,w ζ x, z, ξ, wθ x, z, ξ, w The system 3,35,36 is not a feedforward system because ξ is included in equation 35 However, the terms including ξ vanish in 35 when z = and v = Therefore, a method similar to forwarding design can be applied to this system Global output regulation with state feedback In this section, global stabilization of the system 3, 35,36 will be discussed, after we prove the following lemma: Lemma 3 Consider the system ẋ = fx, w+gx, z, wz ż = qz ẇ = sw 39 ẇ = sw is stable in the definition of Lyapunpov, ẋ = fx, w is globally asymptotically stable with a radially unbounded Lyapunov function W x, w which satisfies W x, w > x, W,w=, fx, w+ sw < x, 1 x w x x Kw W x, w, 2 Kw >, for x M>, and ż = qz is globally asymptotically stable and locally exponentially stable with a radially unbounded Lyapunov function Uz Moreover, gx, z, w satisfies linear-growth condition with respect to x Then, x T,z T T converges to the origin Proof: First of all, boundedness of x will be shown Because gx, z, w satisfies linear-growth condition with respect to x, there exist G z,w and G 1 z,w such that gx, z, w G z,w+g 1 z,w x 3 By evaluating the value of W Ẇ = {fx, w+gx, z, wz} + x w sw gx, z, wz x x {G z,w z + G 1 z,w x z } W x, wkwg z,w+g 1 z,w z, x max1,m is obtained Because of the exponential stability of ż = qz and the stability of ẇ = sw, there exist functions γ x,w >, γ 1 x,w >, K max w > and a positive constant such that Kw K max w 5 G z,w z γ z,w exp t 6 G 1 z,w z γ 1 z,w exp t 7 Therefore, Ẇ γ 2 z,w exp tw = K max w{γ z,w + γ 1 z,w} exp tw, x max1,m 8
4 is obtained, which derives W x, w exp γ 2 z,w exp τdτ W x,w { } γ2 z,w = exp 1 exp t W x,w γ2 z,w exp W x,w 9 This equation shows that W xt,wt is bounded The value of xt is also bounded because the function W is radially unbounded Secondly, consider the following integral: Ψx,z,w = xτ,wτ gxτ,zτ,wτzτ dτ 5 xτ The existence of Ψ can be proved by the boundedness of xt, wt and exponential stability of ż = qz Indeed, there exists γ 3 x,z,w such that x gx, z, w z 51 γ 3 x,z,w exp t, and thus the integral can be evaluated as Ψx,z,w γ 3 x,z,w = γ 3x,z,w exp τ dτ 52 We will show that the function Ψ belongs to C -class Let x t,z t,w t denote the trajectory of system 39 for an initial state X =x T,z T,w T T For given ɛ>, there exists T such that gx, z, wz T x dt < ɛ, 53 x T,z T,z T T X < 1 because the trajectories satisfy 51 Moreover, from the continuity of the trajectory with respect to the initial state, we can show the existence of <d 1 such that T x gx, z, wz x,w gx,z,w z x < ɛ 2, xt,z T,z T T X <d dt 5 Hence, for given ɛ there exists d such that x gx, z, wz x,w gx,z,w z x dt <ɛ, x T,z T,z T T X <d, 55 which means the continuity of the function Ψ Adding the function Ψ to the Lyapunov functions W and U makes a candidate of the Lyapunov function for the system 39 V x, z, w =W x, w+uz+ψx, z, w 56 The identical equation W xs,xs = W xt,wt + s t Ẇ xτ,zτ,wτ dτ 57 implies { W x, w+ψx, z, w = lim W xs,ws s s } fxτ,wτ + t x w swτ dτ 58 This equation shows that V x, z, w Because 58 holds, V x, z, w = means Uz =andw x, w + Ψx, z, w = Hence, V x, z, w = implies z = and x = by the definition of Ψ Therefore, V x, z, w is positive definite with respect to x and z Let us prove V x, z, w is radially unbound with respect to x and z It is obvious from 58 that V tends to infinity when z tends to infinity So, we only have to show that W +Ψ x The derivative of the right-hand side of 58 can be evaluated as follows: Ẇ fx, w sw = gx, z, wz x w x x G x, z, w z + G 1 x, z, w x z x γ z,w + γ 1 z,w x exp t = x [{γ z,w + γ 1 z,w} x +1 x γ z,w] exp t [ γ z,w + γ 1 z,w x x ] + γ z,w max x 1 x exp t 59
5 The above inequality becomes Ẇ fx, w x w sw [γ z,ww + γ 5 z,w] exp t when x M [γ 6 z,w + γ 5 z,w] exp t when x <M 6 γ x,z = 61 γ z,w + γ 1 z,wk max w γ 5 x,z = γ z,w max x <1 x 62 γ 6 x,z = γ z,w + γ 1 z,w sup x M x x 63 Therefore, W x,w + Ψx,z,w exp γ W x,w γ 5 γ 6 67 is established, which means that W +Ψ tends to infinity when x tends to infinity Hence, V x, z, w is radially unbounded with respect to x and z Finally, by construction V = U z qz+ x fx, w+ sw 68 w holds, so the system is globally asymptotically stable with respect to x and z The simple version of this lemma without w is a wellknown theorem We apply this lemma to the global stabilization problem for 3,35,36, with several assumptions We can integrate 6 as W exp γ 1 expt W x,w + exp γ expτ expt γ 5 exp τ+ x fxτ,wτ exp + + w swτ dτ W x,w γ 5 fxτ,wτ + x w swτdτ when xτ M τ t, γ W W x,w + γ 5 + γ 6 exp τ + fxτ,wτ + x w swτ dτ W x,w γ 5 γ 6 + fxτ,wτ + x w swτdτ when xτ <M τ t Combining 6 and 65 generates an inequality W fxτ,wτ + x w swτdτ exp γ W x,w γ 5 γ The system dynamics restricted on x =,z = is written as ξ = E 1 ξ,w ξ 69 The above dynamics correspond to the zero-error dynamics of I/O-linearizable systems φ = Assumption The system 69 is globally asymptotically stable with a Lyapunov function W ξ,w, ie there exists a Lyapunov function W ξ,w such that W,w = 7 W ξ,w >, ξ 71 ξ E 1 ξ,w ξ + w sw <, ξ 72 Moreover, there exists a positive function K w and a positive constant M such that ξ ξ <K ww, ξ M 73 Let us consider the stability of the dynamics restricted on z ξ = E 1 ξ,w ξ + E 2 x, ξ,w x 1 x = 1 x = A x 7 ρ 1 To guarantee the stability of the system 7, we assume the following linear-growth condition:
6 Assumption 5 The cross term E 2 x, ξ,w x satisfies linear-growth condition with respect to ξ, ie there exist positive functions b x, w, b 1 x, w such that E 2 x, ξ,w b 1 x, w ξ + b x, w 75 Under these assumptions the following theorem is established Theorem 6 Under assumptions 1, 2,, and 5, the system 7 is globally asymptotically stable Proof: The proof is straightforward from lemma 3 The Lyapunov function of 7 is V x, ξ,w =W ξ,w E 2 x + ξ E 1 ξ,w ξdτ xt P x 76 P is a matrix satisfying PA+ A T P = I 77 To stabilize the dynamics of z, we adopt a feedback v = kz k is a positive constant Further assumptions are required for global stability Assumption 7 There exist M 1 and K 1 w such that the Lyapunov function V satisfies V x, ξ x ξ K 1 wv x, ξ,w, 78 x, ξ M 1 References [1] J Hauser, S Sastry, and P Kokotović: Nonlinear control via approximate input-output linearization: The ball and beam example, IEEE Trans on Autom Cont, AC-37, pp , 1992 [2] C J Tomlin and S S Sastry: Switching through Singularities, Proc of the 36th IEEE CDC San Diego, pp 1 6, 1997 [3] R Hirschorn and J Davis: Output tracking for nonlinear systems with singular points, SIAM J of Cont and Optim, Vol25, No3, pp , 1987 [] A R Teel: A nonlinear small gain theorem for the analysis of control systems with saturation, IEEE Trans on Autom Cont, AC-1, pp , 1996 [5] F Mazenc and L Praly: Adding integrations, saturated controls, and stabilization for feedforward systems, IEEE Trans on Autom Contr, AC-1, pp , 1996 [6] R Sepulchre, M Janković, and P Kokotović: Constructive Nonlinear Control, Springer, London, 1997 [7] A Isidori and C I Byrnes: Output regulation of nonlinear systems, IEEE Trans on Autom Cont, AC- 35, pp 131 1, 199 [8] H K Khalil: Robust servomechanism output feedback controllers for feedback linearizable systems, Automatica, Vol3, pp , 199 [9] A Isidori: A remark on the problem of semiglobal nonlinear output regulation, IEEE Trans on Autom Cont, AC-2, pp , 1997 [1] A Serrani and A Isidori: Global output regulation for a class of nonlinear systems, Proc of the 38th IEEE CDC Phoenix, pp , 1999 Assumption 8 The functions ζ, δ and E 3 linear-growth condition with respect to x and ξ satisfy Now, the main theorem is obtained Theorem 9 Under the assumptions 1, 2,, 5, 7, and 8, the global output regulation problem is solved by a feedback v = kz k is a positive constant Proof: Under the feedback, z tends to zero exponentially Therefore, global stability is obvious from lemma 3 5 Conclusion We presented a method for global output regulation for nonlinear systems that have no relative degree Future work will extend this method to error feedback case
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More informationSemi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback
2005 American Control Conference June 8-10, 2005. Portland, OR, USA FrC17.5 Semi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback Weiyao Lan, Zhiyong Chen and Jie
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More informationOutput feedback stabilization and restricted tracking for cascaded systems with bounded control
Output feedback stabilization and restricted tracking for cascaded systems with bounded control Georgia Kaliora, Zhong-Ping Jiang and Alessandro Astolfi Abstract In this note we discuss the problems of
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 1 Introduction & Stabilization High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 1Introduction & Stabilization p. 1/4 Brief History Linear
More informationTrajectory Tracking Control of Bimodal Piecewise Affine Systems
25 American Control Conference June 8-1, 25. Portland, OR, USA ThB17.4 Trajectory Tracking Control of Bimodal Piecewise Affine Systems Kazunori Sakurama, Toshiharu Sugie and Kazushi Nakano Abstract This
More informationRobust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form
Robust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio
More informationPassivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets
Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets Mohamed I. El-Hawwary and Manfredi Maggiore Abstract We investigate the stabilization of closed sets for passive nonlinear systems which are contained
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationOUTPUT FEEDBACK STABILIZATION FOR COMPLETELY UNIFORMLY OBSERVABLE NONLINEAR SYSTEMS. H. Shim, J. Jin, J. S. Lee and Jin H. Seo
OUTPUT FEEDBACK STABILIZATION FOR COMPLETELY UNIFORMLY OBSERVABLE NONLINEAR SYSTEMS H. Shim, J. Jin, J. S. Lee and Jin H. Seo School of Electrical Engineering, Seoul National University San 56-, Shilim-Dong,
More informationc 2002 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
SIAM J. CONTROL OPTIM. Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 888 94 c 22 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics A UNIFYING INTEGRAL ISS FRAMEWORK FOR STABILITY OF NONLINEAR CASCADES MURAT ARCAK, DAVID ANGELI, AND
More informationRobust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 28 WeC15.1 Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers Shahid
More informationLecture 8. Chapter 5: Input-Output Stability Chapter 6: Passivity Chapter 14: Passivity-Based Control. Eugenio Schuster.
Lecture 8 Chapter 5: Input-Output Stability Chapter 6: Passivity Chapter 14: Passivity-Based Control Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 3 Regulation
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 3 Regulation High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 3Regulation p. 1/5 Internal Model Principle d r Servo- Stabilizing u y
More informationTHE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM
THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan 1 1 Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University
More informationIntroduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems
p. 1/5 Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems p. 2/5 Time-varying Systems ẋ = f(t, x) f(t, x) is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in x for all t
More informationNonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems. p. 1/1
Nonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems p. 1/1 p. 2/1 Converse Lyapunov Theorem Exponential Stability Let x = 0 be an exponentially stable equilibrium
More informationLyapunov Stability Theory
Lyapunov Stability Theory Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey March 16, 2015 1 Introduction In this lecture we consider the stability of equilibrium points of autonomous nonlinear systems, both in continuous
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS, AND AUTOMATION - Vol. XIII - Nonlinear Output Regulation - Alberto Isidoro and Claudio De Persis
NONLINEAR OUTPUT REGULATION Alberto Isidori Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Università di Roma La Sapienza" and Department of Systems Science and Mathematics, Washington University in St. Louis,
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture # 14 Tracking & Regulation. Nonlinear Control
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 14 Tracking & Regulation Normal form: η = f 0 (η,ξ) ξ i = ξ i+1, for 1 i ρ 1 ξ ρ = a(η,ξ)+b(η,ξ)u y = ξ 1 η D η R n ρ, ξ = col(ξ 1,...,ξ ρ ) D ξ R ρ Tracking Problem: Design
More informationAn homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted pendulum
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 FrA.5 An homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted
More information1 The Observability Canonical Form
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS AND SEPARATION PRINCIPLE 1 The Observability Canonical Form In this Chapter we discuss the design of observers for nonlinear systems modelled by equations of the form ẋ = f(x, u) (1)
More informationTTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2
TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2 Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology Fall 2003 Solution 1 Thesystemisgivenby φ = R (φ) ω and J 1 ω 1
More informationStabilization and Passivity-Based Control
DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems, 2010 1 Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control Lecture 8 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 10, plus handout from R. Sepulchre, Constructive
More informationMinimum-Phase Property of Nonlinear Systems in Terms of a Dissipation Inequality
Minimum-Phase Property of Nonlinear Systems in Terms of a Dissipation Inequality Christian Ebenbauer Institute for Systems Theory in Engineering, University of Stuttgart, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany ce@ist.uni-stuttgart.de
More informationBackstepping Design for Time-Delay Nonlinear Systems
Backstepping Design for Time-Delay Nonlinear Systems Frédéric Mazenc, Projet MERE INRIA-INRA, UMR Analyse des Systèmes et Biométrie, INRA, pl. Viala, 346 Montpellier, France, e-mail: mazenc@helios.ensam.inra.fr
More informationA LaSalle version of Matrosov theorem
5th IEEE Conference on Decision Control European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlo, FL, USA, December -5, A LaSalle version of Matrosov theorem Alessro Astolfi Laurent Praly Abstract A weak version of
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM
OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600 06, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
More informationIMECE NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM PHASE LINEAR SYSTEMS
Proceedings of IMECE 27 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition November -5, 27, Seattle, Washington,USA, USA IMECE27-42237 NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM
More informationL -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems
L -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems Shoudong Huang M.R. James Z.P. Jiang August 19, 2004 Accepted by Systems & Control Letters Abstract In this paper, we consider the L -bounded robust
More informationNonuniform in time state estimation of dynamic systems
Systems & Control Letters 57 28 714 725 www.elsevier.com/locate/sysconle Nonuniform in time state estimation of dynamic systems Iasson Karafyllis a,, Costas Kravaris b a Department of Environmental Engineering,
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL
International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology (IJFCST),Vol., No., March 01 OUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture 5: Stability Analysis II
Nonlinear Control Lecture 5: Stability Analysis II Farzaneh Abdollahi Department of Electrical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Fall 2010 Farzaneh Abdollahi Nonlinear Control Lecture 5 1/41
More informationGlobal Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 2005 Seville, Spain, December 2-5, 2005 ThB09.4 Global Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear
More informationLyapunov-based methods in control
Dr. Alexander Schaum Lyapunov-based methods in control Selected topics of control engineering Seminar Notes Stand: Summer term 2018 c Lehrstuhl für Regelungstechnik Christian Albrechts Universität zu Kiel
More informationNavigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop
Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop Jan Maximilian Montenbruck, Mathias Bürger, Frank Allgöwer Abstract We study backstepping controllers
More informationNONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD
NONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD Ponesit Santhanapipatkul Watcharapong Khovidhungij Abstract: We present a controller design based on
More informationASTATISM IN NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATION TO ROBOTICS
dx dt DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS AND CONTROL PROCESSES N 1, 1997 Electronic Journal, reg. N P23275 at 07.03.97 http://www.neva.ru/journal e-mail: diff@osipenko.stu.neva.ru Control problems in nonlinear systems
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationAutonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective
Autonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio State University
More informationHao Lei Wei Lin,1. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
UNIVERSA OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTRO OF NONINEAR SYSTEMS WITH UNKNOWN GROWTH RATE Hao ei Wei in, Dept of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 446, USA
More informationNonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 25 State Feedback Stabilization
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 25 State Feedback Stabilization Backstepping η = f a (η)+g a (η)ξ ξ = f b (η,ξ)+g b (η,ξ)u, g b 0, η R n, ξ, u R Stabilize the origin using state feedback View ξ as virtual
More informationRobust Nonlinear Regulation: Continuous-time Internal Models and Hybrid Identifiers
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA Robust Nonlinear Regulation: Continuous-time Internal Models and Hybrid Identifiers Francesco Forte, Lorenzo
More informationOutput Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems
International Journal of Automation and Computing 3 2006 25-22 Output Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Keylan Alimhan, Hiroshi Inaba Department of Information Sciences, Tokyo Denki University,
More informationA Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Seyed Hossein Mousavi 1,
More informationACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE WANG-CHEN-YUAN SYSTEM
ACTIVE CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE WANG-CHEN-YUAN SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600
More informationSLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED PERFORMANCE. Jicheng Gao, Qikun Shen, Pengfei Yang and Jianye Gong
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 27 ISSN 349-498 Volume 3, Number 2, April 27 pp. 687 694 SLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 2 Separation Principle
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 2 Separation Principle High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 2Separation Principle p. 1/4 The Class of Systems ẋ = Ax + Bφ(x,
More informationIterative methods to compute center and center-stable manifolds with application to the optimal output regulation problem
Iterative methods to compute center and center-stable manifolds with application to the optimal output regulation problem Noboru Sakamoto, Branislav Rehak N.S.: Nagoya University, Department of Aerospace
More informationConvergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems
Convergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems Philippe JOUAN and Saïd NACIRI arxiv:1511.01737v1 [math.oc] 5 Nov 2015 January 23, 2018 Abstract This paper is concerned with the convergence rate of the
More informationLMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control
LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 15: Nonlinear Systems and Lyapunov Functions Overview Our next goal is to extend LMI s and optimization to nonlinear
More informationFeedback Linearizability of Strict Feedforward Systems
Proceedings o the 47th IEEE Conerence on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec 9-11, 28 WeB11 Feedback Linearizability o Strict Feedorward Systems Witold Respondek and Issa Amadou Tall Abstract For
More informationChapter III. Stability of Linear Systems
1 Chapter III Stability of Linear Systems 1. Stability and state transition matrix 2. Time-varying (non-autonomous) systems 3. Time-invariant systems 1 STABILITY AND STATE TRANSITION MATRIX 2 In this chapter,
More informationWE propose the tracking trajectory control of a tricycle
Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 7 Vol I, IMECS 7, March - 7, 7, Hong Kong Trajectory Tracking Controller Design for A Tricycle Robot Using Piecewise
More informationNonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Stability of Equilibrium Points
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Stability of Equilibrium Points The Invariance Principle Definitions Let x(t) be a solution of ẋ = f(x) A point p is a positive limit point of x(t) if there is a sequence
More informationSmall Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability
Small Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability Zhong-Ping Jiang Yuan Wang. Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY 11201, U.S.A. zjiang@control.poly.edu Dept. of
More informationGeneralized Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems via the Robust Control Approach
Generalized Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems via the Robust Control Approach L. E. RAMOS-VELASCO, S. CELIKOVSKÝ, V. LÓPEZ-MORALES AND V. KU CERA Centro de Investigación en Tecnologías
More informationConstructive Invariant Manifolds to Stabilize Pendulum like systems Via Immersion and Invariance
Constructive Invariant Manifolds to Stabilize Pendulum like systems Via Immersion and Invariance J.Á. Acosta, R. Ortega, A. Astolfi, and I. Sarras Dept. de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática, Escuela
More informationOutput Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form
Output Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form Charalampos P. Bechlioulis, Achilles Theodorakopoulos 2 and George A. Rovithakis 2 Abstract The
More informationLyapunov-Based Controller for the Inverted Pendulum Cart System
Nonlinear Dynamics (2005) 40: 367 374 c Springer 2005 Lyapunov-Based Controller for the Inverted Pendulum Cart System CARLOS AGUILAR IBAÑEZ,O.GUTIÉRREZ FRIAS, and M. SUÁREZ CASTAÑÓN Centro de Investigación
More informationOutput Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System
Vol. 0, No. 05, 00, 60-608 Output Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan R & D Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi-Alamathi Road, Avadi, Chennai-600
More informationOutput Regulation of the Tigan System
Output Regulation of the Tigan System Dr. V. Sundarapandian Professor (Systems & Control Eng.), Research and Development Centre Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-6 6, Tamil Nadu,
More informationSINCE the 1959 publication of Otto J. M. Smith s Smith
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL 287 Input Delay Compensation for Forward Complete and Strict-Feedforward Nonlinear Systems Miroslav Krstic, Fellow, IEEE Abstract We present an approach for compensating
More informationSet-based adaptive estimation for a class of nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters
Preprints of the 8th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes The International Federation of Automatic Control Furama Riverfront, Singapore, July -3, Set-based adaptive estimation for
More informationOn Convergence of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection for SISO Systems
On Convergence of Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection for SISO Systems Bao-Zhu Guo 1, Zhi-Liang Zhao 2, 1 Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Academia Sinica, Beijing, 100190, China E-mail:
More informationA Universal Control Approach for a Family of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 5 Seville, Spain, December -5, 5 A Universal Control Approach for a Family of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems
More informationProf. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE281A Homework set 1 Linearization & phase portrait
Prof. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE28A Homework set Linearization & phase portrait. For each of the following systems, find all equilibrium points and determine the type of each isolated equilibrium. Use
More informationContraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 WeB4.5 Contraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems B. B. Sharma and I. N. Kar, Member IEEE Abstract
More informationAlberto Bressan. Department of Mathematics, Penn State University
Non-cooperative Differential Games A Homotopy Approach Alberto Bressan Department of Mathematics, Penn State University 1 Differential Games d dt x(t) = G(x(t), u 1(t), u 2 (t)), x(0) = y, u i (t) U i
More informationMCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems
MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability - I Hanz Richter Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University Definition of Stability - Lyapunov Sense Lyapunov
More informationEvent-based Stabilization of Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Event-based Stabilization of Nonlinear Time-Delay Systems Sylvain Durand Nicolas Marchand J. Fermi Guerrero-Castellanos
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 1 Uncertainty and Lyapunov Redesign Consider the system [1]
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial. Miroslav Krstić
Adaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial Miroslav Krstić University of California, San Diego Backstepping Tuning Functions Design Modular Design Output Feedback Extensions A Stochastic Example Applications
More informationControl design with guaranteed ultimate bound for feedback linearizable systems
Control design with guaranteed ultimate bound for feedback linearizable systems Ernesto Kofman, Fernando Fontenla Hernan Haimovich María M. Seron CONICET; Depto. de Electrónica, Fac. de Cs. Exactas, Ing.
More informationOn transverse exponential stability and its use in incremental stability, observer and synchronization
5nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 10-13, 013. Florence, Italy On transverse exponential stability and its use in incremental stability, observer and synchronization Vincent Andrieu,
More informationEnergy-based Swing-up of the Acrobot and Time-optimal Motion
Energy-based Swing-up of the Acrobot and Time-optimal Motion Ravi N. Banavar Systems and Control Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Mumbai-476, India Email: banavar@ee.iitb.ac.in Telephone:(91)-(22)
More informationADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 12, No. 7 (2002) 1599 1604 c World Scientific Publishing Company ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT KEVIN BARONE and SAHJENDRA
More informationIN THIS paper, we study the problem of asymptotic stabilization
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 49, NO 11, NOVEMBER 2004 1975 Nonlinear Control of Feedforward Systems With Bounded Signals Georgia Kaliora and Alessandro Astolfi Abstract The stabilization
More informationAnti-synchronization of a new hyperchaotic system via small-gain theorem
Anti-synchronization of a new hyperchaotic system via small-gain theorem Xiao Jian( ) College of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China (Received 8 February 2010; revised
More informationRobust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 26 American Control Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 14-16, 26 FrB3.2 Robust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Bo Xie and Bin
More informationIntroduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 4 Passivity
p. 1/6 Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 4 Passivity È p. 2/6 Memoryless Functions ¹ y È Ý Ù È È È È u (b) µ power inflow = uy Resistor is passive if uy 0 p. 3/6 y y y u u u (a) (b) (c) Passive
More informationDelay-independent stability via a reset loop
Delay-independent stability via a reset loop S. Tarbouriech & L. Zaccarian (LAAS-CNRS) Joint work with F. Perez Rubio & A. Banos (Universidad de Murcia) L2S Paris, 20-22 November 2012 L2S Paris, 20-22
More informationLyapunov Stability Analysis of a Twisting Based Control Algorithm for Systems with Unmatched Perturbations
5th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, December -5, Lyapunov Stability Analysis of a Twisting Based Control Algorithm for Systems with Unmatched
More informationConvergent systems: analysis and synthesis
Convergent systems: analysis and synthesis Alexey Pavlov, Nathan van de Wouw, and Henk Nijmeijer Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, P.O.Box. 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven,
More informationFeedback linearization control of systems with singularities: a ball-beam revisit
Chapter 1 Feedback linearization control o systems with singularities: a ball-beam revisit Fu Zhang The Mathworks, Inc zhang@mathworks.com Benito Fernndez-Rodriguez Department o Mechanical Engineering,
More information1 Relative degree and local normal forms
THE ZERO DYNAMICS OF A NONLINEAR SYSTEM 1 Relative degree and local normal orms The purpose o this Section is to show how single-input single-output nonlinear systems can be locally given, by means o a
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationNonlinear Control Systems
Nonlinear Control Systems António Pedro Aguiar pedro@isr.ist.utl.pt 7. Feedback Linearization IST-DEEC PhD Course http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/%7epedro/ncs1/ 1 1 Feedback Linearization Given a nonlinear
More informationL 2 -induced Gains of Switched Systems and Classes of Switching Signals
L 2 -induced Gains of Switched Systems and Classes of Switching Signals Kenji Hirata and João P. Hespanha Abstract This paper addresses the L 2-induced gain analysis for switched linear systems. We exploit
More informationClosed-Loop Impulse Control of Oscillating Systems
Closed-Loop Impulse Control of Oscillating Systems A. N. Daryin and A. B. Kurzhanski Moscow State (Lomonosov) University Faculty of Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics Periodic Control Systems, 2007
More informationIterative Learning Control Analysis and Design I
Iterative Learning Control Analysis and Design I Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK etar@ecs.soton.ac.uk http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ Contents Basics Representations
More informationModel Predictive Regulation
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Model Predictive Regulation Cesar O. Aguilar Arthur J. Krener California State University, Bakersfield, CA, 93311,
More informationFurther Results on Adaptive Robust Periodic Regulation
Proceedings of the 7 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City USA July -3 7 ThA5 Further Results on Adaptive Robust Periodic Regulation Zhen Zhang Andrea Serrani
More informationOn Characterizations of Input-to-State Stability with Respect to Compact Sets
On Characterizations of Input-to-State Stability with Respect to Compact Sets Eduardo D. Sontag and Yuan Wang Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA Department of Mathematics,
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 0.1 Model prerequisites Consider ẋ = f(t, x). We will make the following basic assumptions
More informationTracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique
International Journal of Automation and Computing (3), June 24, 38-32 DOI: 7/s633-4-793-6 Tracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique Lei-Po Liu Zhu-Mu Fu Xiao-Na
More informationOutput Regulation of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High-Gain Observers
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Output Regulation of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High-Gain Observers Shahid Nazrulla Hassan K Khalil Electrical & Computer Engineering,
More informationLyapunov Based Control
Lyapunov Based Control Control Lyapunov Functions Consider the system: x = f(x, u), x R n f(0,0) = 0 Idea: Construct a stabilizing controller in steps: 1. Choose a differentiable function V: R n R, such
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture 9: Feedback Linearization
Nonlinear Control Lecture 9: Feedback Linearization Farzaneh Abdollahi Department of Electrical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Fall 2011 Farzaneh Abdollahi Nonlinear Control Lecture 9 1/75
More information