Prescribed Performance Output Feedback Adaptive Control of Uncertain Strict Feedback Nonlinear Systems
|
|
- Clyde Blair
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Milano (Italy August 8 - September, 11 Prescribed Performance Output Feedback Adaptive Control of Uncertain Strict Feedback Nonlinear Systems Artemis K. Kostarigka, George A. Rovithakis Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 5414, Thessaloniki, Greece akost@auth.gr, robi@eng.auth.gr Abstract: An output feedback prescribed performance control design is presented for a class of strict feedback uncertain nonlinear systems. To overcome state unavailability an estimator-like system is introduced, which generates rough estimates of the unknown signals, thus avoiding the demanding task of constructing asymptotically convergent observers. Moreover this control approachavoidsposingsevererestrictionsontheunknownsystemnonlinearitiesotherthantheir continuity. To effectively avoid possible division by zero, the designed output feedback controller is of switching type. However, its continuity is guaranteed, thus alleviating any problems related to the existence and uniqueness of solutions. Simulations on a single-link manipulator actuated by a brush dc motor benchmark example illustrate the approach. 1. INTRODUCTION Output feedback control of uncertain nonlinear systems is a challenging task that has gained a lot of attention over the past decades. Giventhat the so-called separation principle is not directly applicable, combined observercontroller approaches were developed, incorporating different kinds of observers for each individual class of nonlinear systems. Available output feedback results refer to: systems in normal form (Ge and Zhang (3; Kim and Calise (7; Freidovich and Khalil (7; Marconi and Praly (8; Andrieu and Praly (8; Du and Chen (9, nonlinear systems with output dependent nonlinearities (Krishnamurthy et al. (; Krishnamurthy and Khorrami (3; Karagiannis et al. (5; Fu (9 and nonlinear systems with state dependent nonlinearities which are either globally Lipschitz or satisfy certain growth conditions (Kaliora et al. (6; Gong and Qian (7; Lei and Lin (7; Andrieu et al. (9b,a. Distinctive cases also exist where specially designed nonlinear observers apply (Maggiore and Passino (5; Abdollahi et al. (6; Stepanyan and Hovakimyan (7; Ding(9.Themaindifficultyofobserver-basedcontrol methodologies is the requirement of achieving convergence to zero of the observation error, a task which gets even more challenging with increased system complexity. Additionally, guaranteeing specific performance characteristics on system response utilizing output feedback, is a highly interesting issue. Under the assumption of full state measurement a novel design procedure, called prescribed performance control (PPC was recently developed (Bechlioulis and Rovithakis (8, 9, 1 to introduce prescribed performance measures both on transient and steady state behavior of system output. Specifically, the output is guaranteed to converge to a predefined arbitrarily small residual set, with rate no less than a prespecified value, exhibiting a maximum overshoot less than a sufficiently small preassigned constant. First results on output feedback PPC were obtained in Kostarigka and Rovithakis (1, assuming strict feedback passivity. In this paper we overcome the restrictions originated from the strict output feedback passivity assumption and present an output feedback PPC design, applicable to uncertain strict feedback nonlinear systems. Besides guaranteeing prescribed performance attributes on the system output, additional novel aspects of this work include a no severe restrictions on the unknown system nonlinearities other than their continuity are posed and b the construction of an asymptotically convergent observer is not required to establish system performance. Alternatively, any partial system knowledge is incorporated to design a state estimator-like system provided that the nominal system formulated in this way constitutes a stabilizable system. A key property of the state estimator system is the generation of only rough estimates of the unavailable states, thus substantially reducing the complexity of the overall design. All the uncertain terms appearing in our analysis are modeled with the use of neural network approximators, which have been proven very efficient in nonlinear systems identification and control (Narendra and Parthasarathy (199; Sanner and Slotine (199; Chen and Liu (1994; Chen and Khalil (1995; Jaganathan and Lewis (1996; Ge and Hang (1996; Liu and Chen (1993; Yesildirek and Lewis (1995; Polycarpou and Ioannou (199; Polycarpou (1996; Rovithakis and Christodoulou (1994, ; Rovithakis (1, 4; Kostarigka and Rovithakis (9. Copyright by the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC 65
2 Milano (Italy August 8 - September, 11 To avoid possible division by zero, the proposed controller is of switching type. However, efforts have been devoted to guaranteeing its continuity, thus alleviating problems connectedtoexistenceofsolutionsandchatteringphenomena. The paper is organized as follows: The Prescribed Performance Output Feedback Control (PPOFC problem is statedinsection,whilesection3isfocusedonthedesign of an adaptive output feedback neural network controller, capable of guaranteeing prescribed performance of the output tracking error, as well as the boundedness of all other closed loop signals. Simulation results on a singlelink manipulator actuated by a brush dc (BDC motor benchmark example are provided in Section 4. Finally, we conclude in Section 5.. PROBLEM STATEMENT Let us consider the SISO system (Σ: ẋ i =(f i ( x i +δf i ( x i +(g i ( x i +δg i ( x i x i+1,i=1,...,n 1 ẋ n =(f n ( x n +δf n ( x n +(g n ( x n +δg n ( x n u y=x 1 where x i := [x 1... x i ] R i,i = 1,...,n is the state, y R is the measured output, u(t R is the control input, f i ( x i, g i ( x i, i = 1,,...,n, are locally Lipschitz, known functions, while δf i ( x i,δg i ( x i, i = 1,,...,n, are uncertain terms denoting the lack of the exact system knowledge.thestatex = x n isassumednottobeavailable for measurement. System (Σ can be written in compact form as ẋ = Ax+f(x+ f(x+(g(x+ g(xu y = Cx wheref(x = f (x Ax,withf (x = [f 1 ( x 1 +g 1 ( x 1 x,..., f n ( x n ] and A R n n a constant matrix. Moreover f(x = [δf 1 ( x 1,..., δf n ( x n ],g(x = [...1] g n ( x n R n, g(x = [...1] δg n ( x n R n, C = [1...] R n. Assumption 1. The nominal system (Σ n of (1, with f(x = g(x =, is state feedback stabilizable and the pair (A,C is observable. Our goal is to design a controller utilizing only measurable signals, capable of regulating the output tracking error e(t = y(t y r (t to a neighborhood of zero with prescribed performance, while guaranteeing the uniform boundedness of all other signals in the closed loop. For the desired output trajectory y r (t we assume that it is bounded with bounded first order time derivatives. To overcome the unavailability of x(t a state estimatorlike system is constructed incorporating the nominal system knowledge. Specifically we define: ˆx = Aˆx+f(ˆx+g(ˆxu+K(y ˆx 1 ( with K R n a constant gain vector. Since (A,C is an observable pair, there exists a constant gain K to guarantee that Ā = A KC is a Hurwitz matrix. Moreover, since (Σ n is stabilizable, the existence of a CLF Vˆx (ˆx and a continuous control law u (ˆx is concluded, such that Vˆx (ˆx [Aˆx+f(ˆx+g(ˆxu (ˆx] (3 ˆx (1 As it will be clarified in the next section, ˆx as produced from ( is not required to accurately estimate the unknown x. Instead only a very rough estimation suffices. This is why ( is defined as a state estimator-like system. The Prescribed Performance Output Feedback Control (PPOFC problem 1 for (Σ is solvable if there exist a possibly parameterized output feedback control law to render the states x(t,ˆx(t of (1, ( bounded and the output tracking error e(t to satisfy λ l ρ(t e(t λ u ρ(t, t (4 for some constants λ l,λ u satisfying M < λ l < λ u < 1,in case e( (5 1 < λ l < λ u < M,in case e( (6 wherem isaconstantdefinedinbechlioulisandrovithakis (8. To proceed let us define x = x ˆx and the corresponding error system x=ā x+f(x f(ˆx+ f(x+(g(x g(ˆxu+ g(xu (7 To achieve prescribed performance we consider the error transformationε(t = T (BechlioulisandRovithakis ( e(t ρ(t (8 and differentiate it with respect to time to obtain ε=r((f 1 ( x 1 +δf 1 ( x 1 +(g 1 ( x 1 +δg 1 ( x 1 x ν (8 where r = ( T ρ 1 e ρ and ν = ẏ r + e ρ ρ. Lets consider the augmented system (Σ a that consists of (, (7 and (8. Following the arguments originally stated in Bechlioulis and Rovithakis (8, the following theorem introduces necessary and sufficient conditions for the PPOFC problem. Theorem 1. Consider system (1 with a stabilizable nominal system (Σ n and its corresponding, well defined, augmented system (Σ a. The PPOFC problem for (1 admits a solution if and only if there exists a continuous output feedback control law such that all closed loop signals of (Σ a are uniformly bounded. The proof of Theorem 1 is omitted, but can be easily obtained using the same steps as in Theorem of Bechlioulis and Rovithakis (8. 3. MAIN RESULTS Let s consider the following Lyapunov candidate function for the augmented system (Σ a. V( x,ˆx,ε = 1 x P x+vˆx (ˆx+ 1 ε (9 wherep isapositivedefinitematrixandvˆx (ˆxisaCLFfor (. Differentiating V( x,ˆx,ε along the solutions of (Σ a yields: V( x,ˆx,ε= 1 x Q x+ x P f(x f(ˆx+ f(x+g(xu g(ˆxu+ g(xu+ Vˆx ˆx [Aˆx+f(ˆx+g(ˆxu+K(y ˆx 1] +εr(f 1 ( x 1 +δf 1 ( x 1 +(g 1 ( x 1 +δg 1 ( x 1 x ν (1 where Q is a positive definite matrix satisfying Ā P + PĀ = Q. 1 Due to page limitation prescribed performance preliminaries are omitted. However, detailed description can be found in Bechlioulis and Rovithakis (1. 651
3 Milano (Italy August 8 - September, 11 Thetermεr(f 1 ( x 1 +δf 1 ( x 1 +(g 1 ( x 1 +δg 1 ( x 1 x ν can be trivially decomposed as follows: εr(f 1 ( x 1 +δf 1 ( x 1 +(g 1 ( x 1 +δg 1 ( x 1 x ν = f k (x 1,ˆx,ε+ ( κ 1 +κ x + k (x 1 (11 where f k (x 1,ˆx,ε = εr(f 1 ( x 1 +g 1 ( x 1 ˆx ν + ˆx + 1 (εr 4 + (εr 8κ (1+ g1( x1 is a term containing known κ 1 quantitiesofmeasurablearguments, k (x 1 = ( 1 δf1 (x 1 + δg 1 (x δg 4κ 1 (x 1 4 is an uncertain term and κ 1,κ are positive design constants. Using (11 and defining fg (x,ˆx,u = f(x f(ˆx + f(x + (g(x g(ˆxu + g(xu, V becomes: V( x,ˆx,ε q x + x P fg (x,ˆx,u+ Vˆx ˆx [Aˆx +f(ˆx+g(ˆxu+k(y ˆx 1 ]+f k (x 1,ˆx,ε+ k (x 1 (1 where q = q κ 1 κ, with q the minimum eigenvalue of Q. From this moment on, in order to simplify its notation, we will drop the arguments of fg (x,ˆx,u. Like this, using the identity x P fg κ 3 x + 1 P 4κ fg and defining 3 q = q κ 3, (1 becomes: V( x,ˆx,ε q x + 1 4κ P fg +f k (x 1,ˆx,ε 3 + Vˆx ˆx [Aˆx+f(ˆx+g(ˆxu+K(y ˆx 1]+ k (x 1 Adding and subtracting the term Vˆx ˆx g(ˆx u (ˆx, where u is the controller defined via (3, we obtain V( x,ˆx,ε q x +F(ˆx,y,ε+G(ˆxu+H(ˆx,y+ P fg 4κ 3 where F(ˆx,y,ε = Vˆx ˆx [K(y ˆx 1 g(ˆxu ] + k (x 1 +f k (x 1,ˆx,ε, G(ˆx = Vˆx ˆx g(ˆx and H(ˆx,y = Vˆx ˆx [Aˆx +f(ˆx+g(ˆxu ]arecontinuousscalarfunctions.however, owing to (3 H(ˆx,y. Therefore, V becomes V( x,ˆx,ε q x +F(ˆx,y,ε+G(ˆxu+ P fg 4κ 3 (13 SinceF(ˆx,y,ε,G(ˆxcontainunknownterms,theideaisto approximate them by suitable neural network structures. Applying the neural network Density Property (Cybenko (1989weconcludetheexistenceofconstantbutunknown weightvectorswf RL 1,WG RL,continuousregressor terms Z F (ˆx,y,ε,Z G (ˆx and ω F (ˆx,y,ε,ω G (ˆx denoting the approximation errors such that: F(ˆx,y,ε = WF Z F (ˆx,y,ε+ω F (ˆx,y,ε G(ˆx = WG (14 Z G (ˆx+ω G (ˆx (ˆx,y,ε Ω ac Ωˆx Ω x Ω ε R n R n R where Ωˆx,Ω x,ω ε are some arbitrary compact sets. Such a substitution is possible owing to the smoothness and the boundedness of F(ˆx,y,ε, G(ˆx, (ˆx,y,ε Ω ac. Moreover, on the generic compact set Ω ac the approximation errors can be suitably bounded as ω F (ˆx,y,ε ω F, ω G (ˆx ω G, where ω F, ω G are some unknown bounds. 3.1 Controller design Consider the following controller u(t = u σ (t, with u σ (t= b (ˆx,ŴG a(ˆx,y,ε,ŵf +η( ε, ˆx +δ u d σ (15 which switches according to a switching strategy σ(t, taking values in I,II with d I = b(ˆx,ŵg,d II = δb. In (15 a(ˆx,y,ε,ŵf = Ŵ F Z F(ˆx,y,ε R, b(ˆx,ŵg = ŴG Z G(ˆx R, while η( is a K function and δ u,δ b > are design constants. Furthermore, Ŵ F,ŴG are estimates of WF,W G defined in (14 which are generated through the update laws: Ŵ F = (ŴF +ϕ F (j +Z F (ˆx,y,ε (16 Ŵ G = ŴG +Z G (ˆxu (17 In (16 ϕ F (j is a strictly increasing sequence satisfying lim j ϕ F (j, with the index j =,1,,..., denoting the number of times the following equality is satisfied: H = a(ˆx,y,ε,ŵf+η( ε, ˆx + δ u c j+1 b(ˆx,ŵg a(ˆx,y,ε,ŵf +η( ε, ˆx +δ u δb = (18 while σ(t = II with c > 1. Moreover, ϕ F (j = when σ(t = I. Before we proceed and analyze the proposed control law let us first present the switching strategy σ(t. Switching Strategy.WedefinethesetsR 1 = b(ˆx,ŵg δ b and R = (ˆx,ŴG : (ˆx,ŴG : b(ˆx,ŵg > δ b. We initiate at (ˆx(,ŴG( R and allocate σ(t = I whenever (ˆx,ŴG R. The switching variable σ(t remains in that state until (ˆx,ŴG R 1, at which time σ(t = II. Consequently, σ(t remains unaltered until (ˆx,ŴG R. Summarizing, the switching strategy is defined as follows: I, if (ˆx, Ŵ σ(t = G R (19 II, if (ˆx,ŴG R 1 Lemma. The controller (15-(19 with strictly positive and bounded regressors Z F (ˆx,y,ε >, guarantee (ˆx,y,ε Ω ac, where Ω ac is some compact set: 1 H whenever u = u II ; the sequence ϕ F (j = c j with c > 1 is bounded. Remark: Lemma proves that H whenever u = u II and that j is finite, thus eliminating any issues related to the existence and uniqueness of the solution of (16 that may be caused owing to its discontinuous right-hand side (Polycarpou and Ioannou (199. Moreover,j is piecewise continuouswithrespecttotime.hence,thesolutionof(16 exists and is continuous, which together with the fact that u I = u II at b(ˆx,ŵg = δ b, lead to the continuity of u. Lemma 3. Thecontinuouscontroller(15-(19guarantees, (ˆx,y,ε Ω ac, that ŴF,ŴG,u(t L. Both lemmas can be proved following the analysis presentedinkostarigkaandrovithakis(9.therefore,the actual proofs are omitted. 3. Output feedback stabilization analysis Let us consider the Lyapunov like function L( x,ˆx,ε, W F, W G = V( x,ˆx,ε+ 1 W F + 1 W G ( 65
4 Milano (Italy August 8 - September, 11 where V( x,ˆx,ε is defined in (9 and W F, W G are parameter errors defined as W F = ŴF W F, W G = ŴG W G. The following proposition is necessary. Proposition 4. Whenever x Ω x R n with Ω x an arbitrarily large compact set and (ˆx,y,ε Ω ac, the term fg (x,ˆx,u is upper bounded as follows fg (x,ˆx,u b where b > is an unknown, not necessarily small constant. Proof. Since f(,g(,δf(,δg( are continuous functions, they will be bounded for bounded arguments. Moreover, owing to Lemma 3, u L (ˆx,y,ε Ω ac. Thus, whenever x Ω x, (ˆx,y,ε Ω ac : fg (x,ˆx,u f(x + f(ˆx + f(x +( g(x + g(ˆx u + g(x u b (1 where b is an unknown, not necessarily small constant. The properties of the proposed controller are summarized in the next theorem. Theorem 5. Consider (1 with (Σ n satisfying Assumption 1 and the corresponding augmented system (Σ a. Whenever x Ω x and (ˆx,y,ε Ω ac, the continuous output feedback controller (15-(19 solves the PPOFC problem for (Σ. Proof. According to Theorem 1 we need to establish the boundedness of ( x,ˆx,ε. In that respect wedistinguish two cases. Case1(σ(t = I : Differentiating(alongthesolutions of (Σ a and using (13,(14,(1 we obtain: L q x +WF Z F (ˆx,y,ε+WG Z G (ˆxu +ω(ˆx,y,ε,u+ W F W F + W G W G where ω(ˆx,y,ε,u = ωf (ˆx,y,ε + ω G (ˆxu + 1 P κ 3 b. UsingLemma3andemployingthe neuralnetworkdensity Property we conclude that ω(ˆx,y,ε,u W, (ˆx,y,ε Ω ac, where W is an unknown constant. To continue, after adding and subtracting the term Ŵ F Z F(ˆx,y,ε+Ŵ G Z G(ˆxu, L becomes: L q x +Ŵ F Z F (ˆx,y,ε+Ŵ GZ G (ˆxu+W + W F WF Z F (ˆx,y,ε + W G WG Z G (ˆxu Employing the update laws (16-(17 with ϕ F (j = and using the identity W Ŵ = 1 W + 1 Ŵ 1 W, we obtain: L q x +Ŵ F Z F (ˆx,y,ε+Ŵ GZ G (ˆxu+µ I 1 W F 1 ŴF 1 W G 1 ŴG where µ I = W + 1 W F + 1 W G. Using the definitions of a(ˆx,y,ε,ŵf,b(ˆx,ŵg, L becomes: ( L q x + a(ˆx,y,ε,ŵf +b(ˆx,ŵgu W FG +µ I where W ( FG = W F, W. G Applying u(t = ui (t, with u I as defined in (15 with d I, and dropping the negative term δ u, L yields: L q x η( ε, ˆx 1 W FG +µ I ( Hence, L whenever either ( ˆx(t, ε(t > η 1 (µ I or x(t > q 1 (µ I, from which we conclude the boundedness of ( x,ˆx,ε. Case (σ(t = II : Using the weight update laws (16, (17 with ϕ F (j = c j, c > 1 and following similar steps as in Case 1, we arrive at: L q x + ( a(ˆx,y,ε,ŵf+b(ˆx,ŵgu W FG +µ II wherenowµ II = W+ 1 W F + 1 W G + W F ϕ F (N.Inthe expressionofµ II,theconstant W F representstheunknown bound of W F which exists owing to Lemma 3, while N is the maximum j index value which is bounded according to Lemma. If we apply u(t = u II (t, with u II as defined in (15 with d II, we obtain: L q x + a(ˆx,y,ε,ŵf b(ˆx,ŵg a(ˆx,y,ε,ŵf [ ] b(ˆx,ŵg η( ε, ˆx +δu δb W FG +µ II To proceed, notice from Lemma that H. Hence L becomes: L q x η( ε, ˆx 1 W FG +µ II (3 from which we conclude, as in Case 1, the boundedness of ( x,ˆx,ε. Additionally, using (, (3 we arrive at L q x η( ε, ˆx 1 W FG +µ (4 where µ = max(µ I,µ II, from which we conclude that x(t,ˆx(t,ε(t as well as the parameter errors WF, W G, are uniformly ultimately bounded with respect to the sets: E x = x R n : x(t q 1 (µ, Eˆx = ˆx R n : ˆx(t η 1 (µ, E ε = ε R : ε(t η 1 (µ and E W = ( WF, W G ( R L 1 R L : W F, W G µ respectively, thus establishing the uniform boundedness of ( x,ˆx,ε. The results presented are valid x Ω x and (ˆx,y,ε Ω ac, where Ω ac is the compact set in which the approximation capabilities of the linear-in-the-weights neural networks hold and Ω x R n is an arbitrarily large compact set. Such a result can be readily obtained following similar steps an in Bechlioulis and Rovithakis (1. The proof is omitted. 4. SIMULATION RESULTS To illustrate the proposed control scheme, we consider the single-link manipulator actuated by a brush dc (BDC motor benchmark example, whose dynamics is expressed as follows: M m q +C m q +N m sin(q = I (5 L I = RI K B q +V where q R is the link angular position, q R its velocity and q R its acceleration, while I,V R are the motor current and input control voltage respectively. Moreover for the system parameters we consider M m = 1,C m = 1,N m = 1,L =.5,R =.5 and K B = 1. δ b 653
5 Milano (Italy August 8 - September, x q(t (rad / qr(t (rad e(t (rad V (Volt time (sec time (sec time (sec (a (b (c Fig. 1. Performance of the adaptive PPOFC scheme: (a Link angular position (solid line along with desired trajectory (dashed line, (b Output tracking error (solid line along with performance bounds (dashed lines and (c Control effort. Let the system s input and output be the motor voltage V and link angular position q respectively. Using the state variables x 1 = q,x = q and x 3 = I, system (5 can be expressed in the strict feedback form (1 with y = Cx = [1 ]x. We assume that the known parts of the considered system are f(x = [ ] and g(x = [ 1], while the uncertain terms are f(x = [, C M x N M sin(x 1, R L x 3 K B L x ], g(x = [,, 1 L 1] All the known system parts are included in the following linear state estimator-like system: where A = ˆx = Aˆx+Bu+K(x 1 ˆx 1 (6 ], B = [ 1], K = [K 1 K K 3]. [ 1 1 It is not difficult to verify that (A,B is a controllable pair, while (A,C is an observable pair. Therefore, the nominal system (Σ n is both stabilizable and observable and Assumption 1 is satisfied. Moreover, the gain matrix K is chosen as K = [1 1.1], in order to guarantee that Ā = A KC is Hurwitz. We initiate the system at x 1 ( =.,x ( = π,x 3 ( = with initial observer states ˆx 1 ( =.,ˆx ( = π,ˆx 3 ( =. Our purpose is to force the output y = q to track the bounded trajectory y r = π sin(t using only measurable signals. Moreover, for the output tracking error e = y y r we require a steady state of no more than 5 1 3, minimum speed of convergence as obtained by the exponential e 3t and no overshoot. The aforementioned transient and steady state error bounds are prescribed via the performance function ρ(t = ( e 3t and M =. Furthermore, since e( =. ( >, e the output error transformation is chosen ε = T ρ = ln. The control and update laws proposed in ( M+ e ρ 1 e ρ Theorem 5 were implemented using High Order Neural Networks HONNs (Rovithakis (a, whose structure was selected according to a trial and error procedure. The initial values of the weight vectors W F (t R,W G (t R 1, were randomly initialized in [,1]. Furthermore we have selected κ 1 = κ = κ 3 = 1, c =,c = and η( = 1(1 e 1(. Finally, concerning the switching procedure, the following constants have been used: δ u = 1,δ b =. The performance of the proposed adaptive output feedback control scheme is demonstrated in Figures 1(a-1(c. Figure 1(a shows the link angular position along with its reference. The output error satisfies the prescribed performance specifications as Figure 1(b clearly illustrates. Finally the demanded control effort (input control voltage is pictured in Figure 1(c. 5. CONCLUSIONS An output feedback controller for uncertain strict feedback nonlinear systems with continuous state dependent nonlinearities has been presented, capable of guaranteeing prescribed performance bounds on both the transient and the steady state response of the system output. Instead of designing an asymptotically convergent observer, any partial system knowledge was incorporated to design a state estimator-like system, which was used to provide rough estimates of the unavailable states, thus substantially reducing the complexity of the overall design. Under a stabilizability assumption for the nominal part of the system, the proposed adaptive output feedback control architecture established prescribed performance guarantees on the system output, as well as boundedness of all other closed loop signals. To effectively avoid possible division by zero, the designed output feedback controller is of switching type. However, its continuity is guaranteed, thus alleviating any problems related to the existence and uniqueness of solutions. Simulations on a single-link manipulator actuated by a brush dc motor benchmark example illustrated the approach. REFERENCES Abdollahi, F., Talebi, H., and Patel, R. (6. A stable neural network-based observer with application to flexible-joint manipulators. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 17(1, Andrieu, V. and Praly, L. (8. Global asymptotic stabilization for nonminimum phase nonlinear systems admitting a strict normal form. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 53(5, Andrieu,V.,Praly,L.,andAstolfi,A.(9a. Asymptotic tracking of a reference trajectory by output-feedback for aclassofnonlinearsystems. Systems & Control Letters, 58(9, Andrieu, V., Praly, L., and Astolfi, A. (9b. High gain observers with updated gain and homogeneous correction terms. Automatica, 45(, Bechlioulis, C.P. and Rovithakis, G.A. (9. Adaptive control with guaranteed transient and steady state 654
6 Milano (Italy August 8 - September, 11 tracking error bounds for strict feedback systems. Automatica, 45(, Bechlioulis,C.andRovithakis,G.(8. Robustadaptive control of feedback linearizable mimo nonlinear systems with prescribed performance. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 53(9, Bechlioulis, C. and Rovithakis, G. (1. Prescribed performance adaptive control for multi-input multioutput affine in the control nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55(5, Chen, F.C. and Khalil, H.K. (1995. Adaptive control of a class of nonlinear discrete time systems using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,4, Chen, F.C. and Liu, C.C. (1994. Adaptively controlling nonlinearcontinuous-timesystemsusingmultilayerneural networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39, Cybenko, G. (1989. Approximations by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems,, Ding, Z. (9. Global output feedback stabilization of nonlinear systems with nonlinearity of unmeasured states. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 54(5, Du, H. and Chen, X. (9. Nn-based output feedback adaptive variable structure control for a class of nonaffine nonlinear systems: A nonseparation principle design. Neurocomputing, 7(7-9, Freidovich, L.B. and Khalil, H.K. (7. Lyapunov-based switching control of nonlinear systems using high-gain observers. Automatica, 43(1, Fu, J. (9. Extended backstepping approach for a class of non-linear systems in generalised output feedback canonical form. Control Theory Applications, IET, 3(8, Ge, S.S. and Hang, C.C. (1996. Direct adaptive neural networkcontrolofrobots. Int. J. Syst. Sci.,7, Ge, S. and Zhang, J. (3. Neural-network control of nonaffine nonlinear system with zero dynamics by state and output feedback. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 14(4, Gong, Q. and Qian, C. (7. Global practical tracking of a class of nonlinear systems by output feedback. Automatica, 43(1, Jaganathan, S. and Lewis, F.L. (1996. Multilayer discrete-time neural net controller with guaranteed tracking performance. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 7, Kaliora, G., Astolfi, A., and Praly, L. (6. Norm estimators and global output feedback stabilization of nonlinear systems withiss inverse dynamics. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 51(3, Karagiannis, D., Jiang, Z., Ortega, R., and Astolfi, A. (5. Output-feedback stabilization of a class of uncertain non-minimum-phase nonlinear systems. Automatica, 41(9, Kim, N. and Calise, A. (7. Several extensions in methods for adaptive output feedback control. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 18(, Kostarigka,A. and Rovithakis,G. (9. Adaptiveneural network tracking control with disturbance attenuation for multiple-input nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, (, Kostarigka, A. and Rovithakis, G. (1. Prescribed performance output feedback control: An approximate passivation approach. In Proc. 18th Mediterranean Conference on Control Automation (MED, Krishnamurthy,P.andKhorrami,F.(3. Decentralized control and disturbance attenuation for large-scale nonlinear systems in generalized output-feedback canonical form. Automatica, 39(11, Krishnamurthy, P., Khorrami, F., and Jiang, Z. (. Globaloutputfeedbacktrackingfornonlinearsystemsin generalized output-feedback canonical form. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 47(5, Lei, H. and Lin, W. (7. Adaptive regulation of uncertain nonlinear systems by output feedback: A universal control approach. Systems & Control Letters, 56(7-8, Liu, C.C. and Chen, F.C. (1993. Adaptive control of nonlinear continuous time systems using neural networks: General relative degree and MIMO cases. International Journal of Control, 58, Maggiore, M. and Passino, K. (5. Output feedback tracking: a separation principle approach. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 5(1, Marconi, L. and Praly, L. (8. Uniform practical nonlinear output regulation. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 53(5, Narendra, K.S. and Parthasarathy, K. (199. Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1, 4 7. Polycarpou, M.M. (1996. Stable adaptive neural control scheme for nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41, Polycarpou, M.M. and Ioannou, P.A. (199. Modelling, identification and stable adaptive control of continuoustime nonlinear dynamical systems using neural networks. Proceedings of ACC 9, Rovithakis,G.A.(a. Adaptive Control with Recurrent High-Order Neural Networks. Springer, London. Rovithakis, G.A. (1. Stable adaptive neuro control design via Lyapunov function derivative estimation. Automatica, 37, Rovithakis, G.A. (4. Robust redesign of a neural network controller in the presence of unmodeled dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 15, Rovithakis, G.A. and Christodoulou, M.A. (1994. Adaptive control of unknown plants using dynamical neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 4, Rovithakis, G.A. and Christodoulou, M.A. (. Adaptive Control with Recurrent High-Order Neural Networks. Springer-Verlag, New York. Sanner, R.M. and Slotine, J.J. (199. Gaussian networks for direct adaptive control. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 3, Stepanyan, V. and Hovakimyan, N. (7. Robust adaptive observer design for uncertain systems with bounded disturbances. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 18(5, Yesildirek, A. and Lewis, F.L. (1995. Feedback linearization using neural networks. Automatica, 31,
Approximation-Free Prescribed Performance Control
Preprints of the 8th IFAC World Congress Milano Italy August 28 - September 2 2 Approximation-Free Prescribed Performance Control Charalampos P. Bechlioulis and George A. Rovithakis Department of Electrical
More informationOutput Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form
Output Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form Charalampos P. Bechlioulis, Achilles Theodorakopoulos 2 and George A. Rovithakis 2 Abstract The
More informationSLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED PERFORMANCE. Jicheng Gao, Qikun Shen, Pengfei Yang and Jianye Gong
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 27 ISSN 349-498 Volume 3, Number 2, April 27 pp. 687 694 SLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED
More informationSeveral Extensions in Methods for Adaptive Output Feedback Control
Several Extensions in Methods for Adaptive Output Feedback Control Nakwan Kim Postdoctoral Fellow School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 333 5 Anthony J. Calise Professor
More informationIN recent years, controller design for systems having complex
818 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 29, NO 6, DECEMBER 1999 Adaptive Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Systems by State and Output Feedback S S Ge, Member,
More informationResearch Article Neural Network L 1 Adaptive Control of MIMO Systems with Nonlinear Uncertainty
e Scientific World Journal, Article ID 94294, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/.55/24/94294 Research Article Neural Network L Adaptive Control of MIMO Systems with Nonlinear Uncertainty Hong-tao Zhen, Xiao-hui
More informationAdaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Bounded Disturbance
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering 2018, 8(2): 31-35 DOI: 10.5923/j.control.20180802.01 Adaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Saeed Kashefi *, Majid Hajatipor Faculty of
More informationRobust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 28 WeC15.1 Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers Shahid
More informationState and Parameter Estimation Based on Filtered Transformation for a Class of Second-Order Systems
State and Parameter Estimation Based on Filtered Transformation for a Class of Second-Order Systems Mehdi Tavan, Kamel Sabahi, and Saeid Hoseinzadeh Abstract This paper addresses the problem of state and
More informationNEURAL NETWORKS (NNs) play an important role in
1630 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 34, NO 4, AUGUST 2004 Adaptive Neural Network Control for a Class of MIMO Nonlinear Systems With Disturbances in Discrete-Time
More informationNeural Networks Lecture 10: Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI) Using Neural Networks
Neural Networks Lecture 10: Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI) Using Neural Networks H.A. Talebi Farzaneh Abdollahi Department of Electrical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Winter 2011.
More informationUNCERTAIN CHAOTIC SYSTEM CONTROL VIA ADAPTIVE NEURAL DESIGN
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol., No. 5 (00) 097 09 c World Scientific Publishing Company UNCERTAIN CHAOTIC SYSTEM CONTROL VIA ADAPTIVE NEURAL DESIGN S. S. GE and C. WANG Department
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 2 Separation Principle
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 2 Separation Principle High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 2Separation Principle p. 1/4 The Class of Systems ẋ = Ax + Bφ(x,
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationAdaptive Elevation Control of a Three Degrees-of-Freedom Model Helicopter Using Neural Networks by State and Output Feedback
ABCM Symposium Series in Mechatronics - Vol. 3 - pp.106-113 Copyright c 2008 by ABCM Adaptive Elevation Control of a Three Degrees-of-Freedom Model Helicopter Using Neural Networks by State and Output
More informationNeural adaptive control for uncertain nonlinear system with input saturation Gao, Shigen; Dong, Hairong; Ning, Bin; Chen, Lei
Neural adaptive control for uncertain nonlinear system with input saturation Gao, Shigen; Dong, Hairong; Ning, Bin; Chen, Lei DOI:.6/j.neucom.5.. License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document
More informationRobust Model Free Control of Robotic Manipulators with Prescribed Transient and Steady State Performance
Robust Model Free Control of Robotic Manipulators with Prescribed Transient and Steady State Performance Charalampos P. Bechlioulis, Minas V. Liarokapis and Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos Abstract In this paper,
More informationNEURAL NETWORK-BASED MRAC CONTROL OF DYNAMIC NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 6 Vol 6 No 9 NEURAL NETWORK-BASED MRAC CONTROL OF DYNAMIC NONLINEAR SYSTEMS GHANIA DEBBACHE ABDELHAK BENNIA NOUREDDINE GOLÉA Electrical Engineering Institute Oum El-Bouaghi University
More informationL 1 Adaptive Controller for a Class of Systems with Unknown
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June -3, 28 FrA4.2 L Adaptive Controller for a Class of Systems with Unknown Nonlinearities: Part I Chengyu Cao and Naira Hovakimyan
More informationDynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems
Dynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems ZHANG Sheng *, QIAN Wei-qi (7.6) Computational Aerodynamics Institution, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang, 6,
More informationEvent-Triggered Decentralized Dynamic Output Feedback Control for LTI Systems
Event-Triggered Decentralized Dynamic Output Feedback Control for LTI Systems Pavankumar Tallapragada Nikhil Chopra Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 2742 MD,
More informationObserver-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Observer-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems Daniel Liberzon Coordinated Science Laboratory,
More informationObserver design for a general class of triangular systems
1st International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems July 7-11, 014. Observer design for a general class of triangular systems Dimitris Boskos 1 John Tsinias Abstract The paper deals
More informationPosture regulation for unicycle-like robots with. prescribed performance guarantees
Posture regulation for unicycle-like robots with prescribed performance guarantees Martina Zambelli, Yiannis Karayiannidis 2 and Dimos V. Dimarogonas ACCESS Linnaeus Center and Centre for Autonomous Systems,
More information1 The Observability Canonical Form
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS AND SEPARATION PRINCIPLE 1 The Observability Canonical Form In this Chapter we discuss the design of observers for nonlinear systems modelled by equations of the form ẋ = f(x, u) (1)
More informationQuasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
Joint 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conference Shanghai, P.R. China, December 16-18, 2009 FrA11.5 Quasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
More informationPassivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets
Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets Mohamed I. El-Hawwary and Manfredi Maggiore Abstract We investigate the stabilization of closed sets for passive nonlinear systems which are contained
More informationOVER THE past 20 years, the control of mobile robots has
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 18, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2010 1199 A Simple Adaptive Control Approach for Trajectory Tracking of Electrically Driven Nonholonomic Mobile Robots Bong Seok
More informationGlobal Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 2005 Seville, Spain, December 2-5, 2005 ThB09.4 Global Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear
More informationOutput Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More informationTHE nonholonomic systems, that is Lagrange systems
Finite-Time Control Design for Nonholonomic Mobile Robots Subject to Spatial Constraint Yanling Shang, Jiacai Huang, Hongsheng Li and Xiulan Wen Abstract This paper studies the problem of finite-time stabilizing
More informationRobustness of the nonlinear PI control method to ignored actuator dynamics
arxiv:148.3229v1 [cs.sy] 14 Aug 214 Robustness of the nonlinear PI control method to ignored actuator dynamics Haris E. Psillakis Hellenic Electricity Network Operator S.A. psilakish@hotmail.com Abstract
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5-0590-00) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More informationAdaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinearly Parameterized Fuzzy Approximators
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL. 9, NO. 2, APRIL 2001 315 Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinearly Parameterized Fuzzy Approximators Hugang Han, Chun-Yi Su, Yury Stepanenko
More informationNONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD
NONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD Ponesit Santhanapipatkul Watcharapong Khovidhungij Abstract: We present a controller design based on
More informationAdaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 308-322, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 Adaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties M.R.Soltanpour, M.M.Fateh
More informationIN THIS paper, we study the problem of asymptotic stabilization
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 49, NO 11, NOVEMBER 2004 1975 Nonlinear Control of Feedforward Systems With Bounded Signals Georgia Kaliora and Alessandro Astolfi Abstract The stabilization
More informationΜια προσπαθεια για την επιτευξη ανθρωπινης επιδοσης σε ρομποτικές εργασίες με νέες μεθόδους ελέγχου
Μια προσπαθεια για την επιτευξη ανθρωπινης επιδοσης σε ρομποτικές εργασίες με νέες μεθόδους ελέγχου Towards Achieving Human like Robotic Tasks via Novel Control Methods Zoe Doulgeri doulgeri@eng.auth.gr
More informationDesign of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone
International Journal of Automation and Computing 8), May, -8 DOI:.7/s633--574-4 Design of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone Xue-Li
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial. Miroslav Krstić
Adaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial Miroslav Krstić University of California, San Diego Backstepping Tuning Functions Design Modular Design Output Feedback Extensions A Stochastic Example Applications
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationH 2 Adaptive Control. Tansel Yucelen, Anthony J. Calise, and Rajeev Chandramohan. WeA03.4
1 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July, 1 WeA3. H Adaptive Control Tansel Yucelen, Anthony J. Calise, and Rajeev Chandramohan Abstract Model reference adaptive
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More information1348 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL. 34, NO. 3, JUNE 2004
1348 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 34, NO 3, JUNE 2004 Direct Adaptive Iterative Learning Control of Nonlinear Systems Using an Output-Recurrent Fuzzy Neural
More informationSet-based adaptive estimation for a class of nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters
Preprints of the 8th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes The International Federation of Automatic Control Furama Riverfront, Singapore, July -3, Set-based adaptive estimation for
More informationA Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Seyed Hossein Mousavi 1,
More informationOutput-feedback Dynamic Surface Control for a Class of Nonlinear Non-minimum Phase Systems
96 IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL. 3, NO., JANUARY 06 Output-feedback Dynamic Surface Control for a Class of Nonlinear Non-minimum Phase Systems Shanwei Su Abstract In this paper, an output-feedback
More informationA ROBUST ITERATIVE LEARNING OBSERVER BASED FAULT DIAGNOSIS OF TIME DELAY NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A ROBUST ITERATIVE LEARNING OBSERVER BASED FAULT DIAGNOSIS OF TIME DELAY NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Wen Chen, Mehrdad Saif 1 School of Engineering
More informationDynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Dynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties Qudrat Khan*, Aamer Iqbal Bhatti,* Qadeer
More informationLecture Note 7: Switching Stabilization via Control-Lyapunov Function
ECE7850: Hybrid Systems:Theory and Applications Lecture Note 7: Switching Stabilization via Control-Lyapunov Function Wei Zhang Assistant Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ohio
More informationNONLINEAR SAMPLED-DATA OBSERVER DESIGN VIA APPROXIMATE DISCRETE-TIME MODELS AND EMULATION
NONLINEAR SAMPLED-DAA OBSERVER DESIGN VIA APPROXIMAE DISCREE-IME MODELS AND EMULAION Murat Arcak Dragan Nešić Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
More informationContraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 WeB4.5 Contraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems B. B. Sharma and I. N. Kar, Member IEEE Abstract
More informationState-norm estimators for switched nonlinear systems under average dwell-time
49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2010 Hilton Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, GA, USA State-norm estimators for switched nonlinear systems under average dwell-time Matthias A. Müller
More informationIndirect Model Reference Adaptive Control System Based on Dynamic Certainty Equivalence Principle and Recursive Identifier Scheme
Indirect Model Reference Adaptive Control System Based on Dynamic Certainty Equivalence Principle and Recursive Identifier Scheme Itamiya, K. *1, Sawada, M. 2 1 Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Eng.,
More informationRobust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 26 American Control Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 14-16, 26 FrB3.2 Robust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Bo Xie and Bin
More informationRobust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form
Robust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio
More informationFUZZY CONTROL OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS WITH INPUT SATURATION USING MULTIPLE MODEL STRUCTURE. Min Zhang and Shousong Hu
ICIC Express Letters ICIC International c 2008 ISSN 1881-803X Volume 2, Number 2, June 2008 pp. 131 136 FUZZY CONTROL OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS WITH INPUT SATURATION USING MULTIPLE MODEL STRUCTURE Min Zhang
More informationOutput Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems
International Journal of Automation and Computing 3 2006 25-22 Output Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Keylan Alimhan, Hiroshi Inaba Department of Information Sciences, Tokyo Denki University,
More informationAdaptive Control with a Nested Saturation Reference Model
Adaptive Control with a Nested Saturation Reference Model Suresh K Kannan and Eric N Johnson School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 3332 This paper introduces a neural
More informationL 1 Adaptive Controller for Multi Input Multi Output Systems in the Presence of Unmatched Disturbances
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June -3, 28 FrA4.4 L Adaptive Controller for Multi Input Multi Output Systems in the Presence of Unmatched Disturbances Chengyu
More informationUDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances
16 American Control Conference ACC) Boston Marriott Copley Place July 6-8, 16. Boston, MA, USA UDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances Jiguo Dai, Beibei
More informationNetworked Control Systems, Event-Triggering, Small-Gain Theorem, Nonlinear
EVENT-TRIGGERING OF LARGE-SCALE SYSTEMS WITHOUT ZENO BEHAVIOR C. DE PERSIS, R. SAILER, AND F. WIRTH Abstract. We present a Lyapunov based approach to event-triggering for large-scale systems using a small
More informationOutput Regulation of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High-Gain Observers
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Output Regulation of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High-Gain Observers Shahid Nazrulla Hassan K Khalil Electrical & Computer Engineering,
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 1 Uncertainty and Lyapunov Redesign Consider the system [1]
More informationNeural network based robust hybrid control for robotic system: an H approach
Nonlinear Dyn (211) 65:421 431 DOI 117/s1171-1-992-4 ORIGINAL PAPER Neural network based robust hybrid control for robotic system: an H approach Jinzhu Peng Jie Wang Yaonan Wang Received: 22 February 21
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationPeaking Attenuation of High-Gain Observers Using Adaptive Techniques: State Estimation and Feedback Control
Peaking Attenuation of High-Gain Observers Using Adaptive Techniques: State Estimation and Feedback Control Mehran Shakarami, Kasra Esfandiari, Amir Abolfazl Suratgar, and Heidar Ali Talebi Abstract A
More informationOutput feedback stabilization and restricted tracking for cascaded systems with bounded control
Output feedback stabilization and restricted tracking for cascaded systems with bounded control Georgia Kaliora, Zhong-Ping Jiang and Alessandro Astolfi Abstract In this note we discuss the problems of
More informationL -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems
L -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems Shoudong Huang M.R. James Z.P. Jiang August 19, 2004 Accepted by Systems & Control Letters Abstract In this paper, we consider the L -bounded robust
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 1 Introduction & Stabilization High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 1Introduction & Stabilization p. 1/4 Brief History Linear
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More informationTracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique
International Journal of Automation and Computing (3), June 24, 38-32 DOI: 7/s633-4-793-6 Tracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique Lei-Po Liu Zhu-Mu Fu Xiao-Na
More informationAdaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 48, NO. 0, OCTOBER 003 87 Adaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization Zhihua Qu Abstract Two classes of partially known
More informationarxiv: v2 [cs.sy] 7 Apr 2017
arxiv:6.58v [cs.sy] 7 Apr 7 Observer design for piecewise smooth and switched systems via contraction theory Davide Fiore Marco Coraggio Mario di Bernardo, Department of Electrical Engineering and Information
More informationA Discrete Robust Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Control Direction
Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 16 Vol I, IMECS 16, March 16-18, 16, Hong Kong A Discrete Robust Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for a Class of
More informationUSING DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORKS TO GENERATE CHAOS: AN INVERSE OPTIMAL CONTROL APPROACH
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 11, No. 3 (2001) 857 863 c World Scientific Publishing Company USING DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORKS TO GENERATE CHAOS: AN INVERSE OPTIMAL CONTROL APPROACH
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM
OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600 06, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
More informationGramians based model reduction for hybrid switched systems
Gramians based model reduction for hybrid switched systems Y. Chahlaoui Younes.Chahlaoui@manchester.ac.uk Centre for Interdisciplinary Computational and Dynamical Analysis (CICADA) School of Mathematics
More informationSmall Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability
Small Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability Zhong-Ping Jiang Yuan Wang. Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY 11201, U.S.A. zjiang@control.poly.edu Dept. of
More information458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 3, MAY 2008
458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL 16, NO 3, MAY 2008 Brief Papers Adaptive Control for Nonlinearly Parameterized Uncertainties in Robot Manipulators N V Q Hung, Member, IEEE, H D
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationUDE-based Robust Control for Nonlinear Systems with Mismatched Uncertainties and Input Saturation
UDEbased Robust Control for Nonlinear Systems with Mismatched Uncertainties and Input Saturation DAI Jiguo, REN Beibei, ZHONG QingChang. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock,
More informationOn Sontag s Formula for the Input-to-State Practical Stabilization of Retarded Control-Affine Systems
On Sontag s Formula for the Input-to-State Practical Stabilization of Retarded Control-Affine Systems arxiv:1206.4240v1 [math.oc] 19 Jun 2012 P. Pepe Abstract In this paper input-to-state practically stabilizing
More informationAn homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted pendulum
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 FrA.5 An homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted
More informationNeural Network-Based Adaptive Control of Robotic Manipulator: Application to a Three Links Cylindrical Robot
Vol.3 No., 27 مجلد 3 العدد 27 Neural Network-Based Adaptive Control of Robotic Manipulator: Application to a Three Links Cylindrical Robot Abdul-Basset A. AL-Hussein Electrical Engineering Department Basrah
More informationSemi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback
2005 American Control Conference June 8-10, 2005. Portland, OR, USA FrC17.5 Semi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback Weiyao Lan, Zhiyong Chen and Jie
More informationObserver-based sampled-data controller of linear system for the wave energy converter
International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, vol. 11, no. 4, December 211, pp. 275-279 http://dx.doi.org/1.5391/ijfis.211.11.4.275 Observer-based sampled-data controller of linear system
More information2.5. x x 4. x x 2. x time(s) time (s)
Global regulation and local robust stabilization of chained systems E Valtolina* and A Astolfi* Π *Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione Politecnico di Milano Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 3 33 Milano,
More informationDYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORK-BASED ROBUST CONTROL METHODS FOR UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORK-BASED ROBUST CONTROL METHODS FOR UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS By HUYEN T. DINH A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 3 Regulation
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 3 Regulation High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 3Regulation p. 1/5 Internal Model Principle d r Servo- Stabilizing u y
More informationA Hybrid Systems Approach to Trajectory Tracking Control for Juggling Systems
A Hybrid Systems Approach to Trajectory Tracking Control for Juggling Systems Ricardo G Sanfelice, Andrew R Teel, and Rodolphe Sepulchre Abstract From a hybrid systems point of view, we provide a modeling
More informationConvergent systems: analysis and synthesis
Convergent systems: analysis and synthesis Alexey Pavlov, Nathan van de Wouw, and Henk Nijmeijer Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, P.O.Box. 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven,
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture # 14 Tracking & Regulation. Nonlinear Control
Nonlinear Control Lecture # 14 Tracking & Regulation Normal form: η = f 0 (η,ξ) ξ i = ξ i+1, for 1 i ρ 1 ξ ρ = a(η,ξ)+b(η,ξ)u y = ξ 1 η D η R n ρ, ξ = col(ξ 1,...,ξ ρ ) D ξ R ρ Tracking Problem: Design
More information1 Introduction Almost every physical system is subject to certain degrees of model uncertainties, which makes the design of high performance control a
Observer Based Adaptive Robust Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Dynamic Uncertainties Λ Bin Yao + Li Xu School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA + Tel:
More informationEvent-based control of input-output linearizable systems
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Event-based control of input-output linearizable systems Christian Stöcker Jan Lunze Institute of Automation and Computer Control, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstr.
More informationTHE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM
THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THE OUTPUT REGULATION OF LIU-LIU-LIU-SU CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan 1 1 Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University
More informationL 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 11-13, 27 WeB1.1 L 1 Adaptive Output Feedback Controller to Systems of Unknown Dimension
More informationCHATTERING-FREE SMC WITH UNIDIRECTIONAL AUXILIARY SURFACES FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEM WITH STATE CONSTRAINTS. Jian Fu, Qing-Xian Wu and Ze-Hui Mao
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2013 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 9, Number 12, December 2013 pp. 4793 4809 CHATTERING-FREE SMC WITH UNIDIRECTIONAL
More informationAdaptive fuzzy observer and robust controller for a 2-DOF robot arm
Adaptive fuzzy observer and robust controller for a -DOF robot arm S. Bindiganavile Nagesh, Zs. Lendek, A.A. Khalate, R. Babuška Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg, 8 CD Delft, The Netherlands (email:
More informationDISCRETE-TIME TIME-VARYING ROBUST STABILIZATION FOR SYSTEMS IN POWER FORM. Dina Shona Laila and Alessandro Astolfi
DISCRETE-TIME TIME-VARYING ROBUST STABILIZATION FOR SYSTEMS IN POWER FORM Dina Shona Laila and Alessandro Astolfi Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department Imperial College, Exhibition Road, London
More information