The Vertical Structure of a Tornado near Happy, Texas, on 5 May 2002: High-Resolution, Mobile, W-band, Doppler Radar Observations
|
|
- Audrey Woods
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2325 The Vertical Structure of a Tornado near Happy, Texas, on 5 May 2002: High-Resolution, Mobile, W-band, Doppler Radar Observations HOWARD B. BLUESTEIN * AND CHRISTOPHER C. WEISS School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma ANDREW L. PAZMANY Microwave Remote Sensing Laboratory, Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts (Manuscript received 18 November 2003, in final form 19 April 2004) ABSTRACT A mobile, W-band Doppler radar scanned, at close range, portions of a tornado near Happy, Texas, on 5 May Simultaneous boresighted video images were also recorded, which facilitated correlating the radar-observed features of the tornado with its visual features. Range height indicators (RHIs) of radar reflectivity and Doppler velocity were collected that detail, with high spatial resolution, aspects of the vertical structure of the tornado near the ground. Most of the RHIs showed a column of a weak-echo hole from about 60 m above the ground up to the top of the domain at m above the ground; the hole was roughly 40% broader about 100 m above the ground as it was above, resulting in a characteristic pear-shaped vertical cross section of reflectivity. In this tornado, the condensation funnel was much narrower than the width of the weak-echo hole; the visible debris cloud near the ground was approximately just as wide as the hole above 150 m. The mean depth of the debris cloud was around 200 m. The vertical structure of the Doppler-velocity field exhibited a narrow band of high wind speeds about m above the ground, consistent with airflow inward toward and cyclonically about the tornado. Possible reasons for the observed structure of the tornado are offered. 1. Introduction The vertical variation of wind near the ground in a tornado is of great interest to theoreticians and structural engineers. Since wind-induced forces are generally proportional to the square of the wind speed (e.g., Liu 1993), even relatively small variations in wind speed could result in significant variations in damage potential. It is known from experiments with laboratory models and numerical simulations of laboratory models (Church et al. 1979; Rotunno 1979) and, more recently, from numerical simulations of tornado-like vortices using a large eddy simulation model (Lewellen and Lewellen 1997; Lewellen et al. 2000) that the depth of the bound- * Additional affiliation: Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado. The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. Corresponding author address: Prof. Howard B. Bluestein, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 100 E. Boyd, Rm. 1310, Norman, OK hblue@ou.edu ary layer and corner regions (where most of the surface inflow and the strongest rising motion are expected to be found) and the character of the wind field in a tornado depend to a large extent on the swirl ratio. The swirl ratio S rm/2q 0 0 /w, (1) pertains to a laboratory vortex simulator in which Q is the volume rate of flow of an updraft that is forced through a hole of radius r 0, 0 is the azimuthal wind component at the outer edge of the updraft hole, M 0 r 0, so that 2 M is the circulation at the outer edge of the updraft, and w is the mean vertical velocity through the updraft hole (Davies-Jones et al. 2001). The swirl ratio is a measure of the relative amount of ambient vorticity compared to the amount of ambient convergence. In a vortex embedded in a flow having a low swirl ratio, for example, there is one circulation cell in the vertical plane cutting through the center, and the depth of the surface inflow layer is only a small fraction of the core radius (Fig. 1). The depth of the surface inflow layer may be only around m for most tornadoes embedded in a flow characterized by a low swirl ratio, and the height of maximum wind speeds may be above or near the top of many dwellings and 2004 American Meteorological Society
2 2326 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 132 FIG. 1. Instantaneous vertical cross section of a simulated tornado embedded in a flow having a low swirl ratio, using a large-eddy simulation model. Normalized absolute azimuthal velocity (grayscale) and speed of the wind vector in the r z plane (arrows are interpolated onto a uniform grid for clarity; maximum length corresponds to a ratio of the wind speed in the r z plane to the core speed of 3.8); V c and r c denote the wind speed and radius of the core; x in Lewellen et al. (2000) is denoted as r in this paper. From Fig. 5 in Lewellen et al. (2000). vegetation. Winds measured near the ground or inferred from damage may not represent the highest winds in the tornado. Measurements of the wind field near the surface in tornadoes with accompanying visual documentation are relatively few. Attempts to determine the wind field near the ground by photographically analyzing debris movies or videos are hampered by the difficulty in acquiring them and the impossibility of seeing inside opaque debris clouds. The heights above ground of the maximum wind speeds in tornadoes based on photogrammetric analysis of debris movies range from 15 to 200 m; most of the estimates of maximum wind are at altitudes under 100 m (Bluestein and Golden 1993). Perhaps the most characteristic feature of a tornado as seen by radar is the weak-echo hole, which appears somewhat like a small-scale analog to the radar eye in a hurricane. A weak-echo hole was first noted in the refereed literature by Fujita (1981) in images from a National Weather Service Weather Surveillance Radar (WSR-57) located about 6 km from a tornado on 3 June 1980, near Grand Island, Nebraska. Wakimoto and Martner (1992), using two fixed-site X-band Doppler radars whose antennas had a half-power beamwidth
3 2327 of 0.8, produced, from volume sector scans at constant elevation angle, vertical cross sections of radar reflectivity and Doppler velocity through a nonsupercell tornado in Colorado; this tornado was probed from a range of just over 20 km, on 2 July 1987 during the Convection Initiation and Downburst Experiment (CINDE) (Wilson et al. 1988). Simultaneous photographs were taken from the site of one of the radars, thus permitting an examination of the structural relationship among the reflectivity, Doppler wind, and visual features associated with the tornado. A weak-echo hole was noted in this tornado also. Wakimoto et al. (1996), using data collected by an airborne Doppler radar [Electra Doppler Radar (EL- DORA)], identified a weak-echo hole coincident with a tornado, at a range of 25 km, near Friona, Texas, on 2 June 1995 and also at a range of approximately 25 km, near Kellerville, Texas, on 8 June during the Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX) (Rasmussen et al. 1994). These weak-echo holes extended up to near the top of the storms. Portable and mobile Doppler radars have been used to probe the wind field of tornadoes near the ground at very close range, often well within 5 10 km (Bluestein et al. 1993; Wurman et al. 1996; Bluestein and Pazmany 2000; Wurman and Gill 2000; Wurman 2002; Bluestein et al. 2003a,b). Simultaneous photographic and boresighted video documentation were available for some of the datasets collected. Measurements made with the radars in many tornadoes indicate that the center of a tornado is almost always characterized by a weak-echo hole. However, the existence of a weak-echo hole does not necessarily mean that there is tornado. Wurman and Gill (2000) showed vertical cross sections of radar reflectivity and Doppler velocity, constructed from volume sector scans at constant elevation angle, through a tornado, at about 3-km range, near Dimmitt, Texas, on 2 June 1995 during VORTEX. They used data from the Doppler on Wheels (DOW), an X- band mobile radar whose antenna at the time had a halfpower beamwidth of 1.2. The weak-echo hole seen in the cross sections did not make it all the way down to the ground, but terminated about m above the ground. Resolving the radar reflectivity and Doppler-velocity fields as close as possible to the ground requires a very narrow radar beam and a relatively weak sidelobe pattern. To achieve even higher spatial resolution than afforded by the existing fixed-site radars and mobile X- band radars, a truck-mounted W-band (3-mm wavelength, 95-GHz frequency) mobile radar has been used to probe tornadoes (and dust devils) in the southern plains (Bluestein and Pazmany 2000; Bluestein et al. 2003a,b; Bluestein et al. 2004). The main advantage of this radar is that its half-power beamwidth is only 0.18, so that very high resolution is achieved for tornadoes at close range. Its disadvantage is that attenuation is extreme in heavy precipitation, so that the useful range is often severely restricted. On 5 May 2002, a crew from the University of Oklahoma (OU) and the University of Massachusetts (UMass), using the W-band radar, collected data in a tornado near Happy, Texas, at ranges of km. The dataset is noteworthy because there were some scans in vertical planes [range height indicators (RHIs) at ranges of km] cutting through the tornado near the ground and below cloud base (the first ever made with the W-band radar), thus affording perhaps the highest resolution possible to date in the vertical of the reflectivity and Doppler wind fields in a tornado near the ground. (When volume sector scans are taken, data have to be interpolated to synthesize a vertical cross section, and some resolution is therefore lost.) Furthermore, the tornado passed over a relatively flat surface with low vegetation, so that it was possible for the radar to scan very close to the ground. For the first time, boresighted simultaneous video documentation was available to correlate precisely radar-observed features with visual features. The alignment of the boresighted video camera was marked by locating the top of a chimney tower 2 km away from the radar and then marking its location on the video monitor. The main purposes of this paper are to describe the vertical variation of radar reflectivity and Doppler velocity in the Happy, Texas, tornado and to correlate the radar data with visual features. 2. Data collection and processing a. Description of the radar The characteristics of the W-band radar, which was designed and built at UMass, are detailed in Bluestein and Pazmany (2000). The pulses, whose lengths were 30 m, were gated every 15 m, so that through this oversampling mode of data collection, data in overlapping pulse volumes every 15 m were collected. [It was possible to have used the shorter pulse length of 15 m as in Bluestein et al. (2003a,b), but since only 250 range gates could be processed for each beam, a 3.75-km window would have had to have been imposed. In real time, as the tornado was approaching, it was not possible to select the correct window to view the entire tornado quickly enough. As will be shown soon, attenuation was significant, so that the choice of a longer pulse length fortuitously increased the sensitivity.] At the range of the tornado when RHIs were collected, the azimuthal resolution varied from 10 to 20 m; the pulse volume (width height depth) when RHIs were collected was therefore approximately 15 m 15 m 30 m. Doppler velocity data were available both from a standard pulse-pair algorithm and from polarization diversity pulse-pair processing (PDPP) (Pazmany et al. 1999). The advantage of the latter is that the maximum unambiguous Doppler velocity is 79 m s 1, which is sufficiently high so that wind data are not usually aliased
4 2328 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 132 FIG. 3. Photograph of the Happy, Texas, tornado at approximately 1847 CDT, 5 May 2002, from a vantage point 7.2 km east of Happy, Texas. The view is to the west along farm-to-market road (FM) The W-band radar and the first author are visible near the bottom, center. Photograph copyright by M. Kramar. FIG. 2. Approximate path of the Happy, Texas, tornado (estimated from locations of Doppler-vortex signatures and storm reports) superimposed on a road map; the location of the W-band radar is indicated by the dot. The approximate times (CDT) of the tornado are indicated at locations along its track. (in the standard pulse-pair mode the maximum unambiguous velocity was only 8 ms 1 ). The disadvantages of the PDPP technique are that it is noisier than ordinary pulse-pair processing and does not work at ranges closer than about 1.5 km. PDPP does not work at close range, as a result of the finite polarization isolation of the switch network and antenna. b. Data collection Data were collected beginning when the tornado was mature (Golden and Purcell 1978) and passing through and east of Happy, Texas, located 7.2 km to the westsouthwest of the radar. The tornado inflicted extensive damage ( as it moved through the town at about 1945 central daylight time (CDT; all times given in CDT) and it continued to move east-northeastward, in the general direction of the radar (Fig. 2). Damage reported included several homes destroyed and a roof blown off a church; three people were killed and four were injured. Before it struck Happy, Texas, the tornado appeared to be wider and more intense (T. Marshall 2002, personal communication) than it appeared to be later when it was being probed by the W-band radar (Fig. 3). The spatial limits of scans in azimuth and elevation were set electronically by the radar operator, who used boresighted video images as a guide. Eight low-elevation sector scans at approximately constant elevation angle, just above the ground, were collected first when the tornado was km away. A series of eight RHIs were then collected just to the right of, left of, and through the center of the condensation funnel, when the tornado was km away. Finally, four more low-elevation-angle sector scans were collected as the tornado got as close as 1.1 km away and was dissipating, after it had crossed the road the first two authors were on (Figs. 2 and 3). The tornado disappeared on the right side of the road (north of the road), while its parent circulation at cloud base continued to move to the eastnortheast. Because the visible horizon in the boresighted video was tilted, it was determined that the radar truck was not leveled, so that constant elevation scans were not exactly parallel to the ground and RHIs were not exactly in the vertical plane: The radar platform was tilted approximately 5 to the right, or to the north, with height when the radar was looking approximately to the west. It was fortunate that the RHIs were collected at km range. Beyond about 4 km in range, severe attenuation from heavy precipitation limited the areal coverage around the tornado; within 1.6-km range, it was not possible to use the PDPP technique to compute Doppler velocities and it was not possible to unfold the severely aliased standard pulse-pair velocity data. The most significant problem that occurred while data were collected was that elevation angles (for the RHIs) and relative azimuth angles (for the sector scans) were not recorded as a result of a software malfunction. Consequently, the known (constant) scan rate of the antenna and the simultaneous boresighted video documentation were used to deduce the elevation and relative azimuth angles of each beam. Rays collected when the antenna was not scanning or when it was pointed into the ground were, for the most part, discarded. Owing to small uncertainties in the pointing direction, the data collected during RHIs could be shifted slightly upward or down-
5 2329 FIG. 4. Schematic depicting the sector scan of the W-band radar at 1846:38 CDT, 5 May 2002, through the Happy, Texas, tornado, from the location noted in Figs. 2 and 3. The view along the road depicted is to the west. ward; it was generally obvious when this was the case because the bottom of the tornado appeared to be shifted in the vertical with respect to the bottom seen in other scans. c. Data processing Data were processed at UMass and inspected at OU using SOLO software (Oye et al. 1995), which was developed at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). The boresighted video documentation and mediumformat (70 mm) color transparencies taken by the first author were used to estimate the dimensions of the funnel cloud, debris cloud, etc. (cf. Fig. 3) using photogrammetric analysis. The distance to the tornado was estimated from the documentation of the times of each image and the known range to the tornado based on the radar data, along with the corresponding time of each radar scan. 3. Discussion of the data analyses a. Sector scans at approximately constant elevation angle Sector scans cut through the top of the visible debris cloud about m above the ground when it was km away (Fig. 4). At these and longer ranges, the data collected were severely attenuated by precipitation (Fig. 5, top left); the far side of the radar echoes exhibited, for the most part, a characteristic monotonic drop-off in reflectivity with range, and heavy precipitation was experienced soon at the radar truck. The sector-scan data are still useful, however, because they provide some information on the diameter of the tornado s features in the reflectivity field (such as its weak-echo eye) and wind field (such as its core diameter; the core is the area of approximate solid-body rotation, characterized by nearly uniform vertical vorticity and marked approximately by the area lying just inside the dipole in Doppler-velocity extrema of its cyclonic vortex signature) relative to the diameter of its debris cloud and condensation funnel, which will be useful later in interpreting the RHIs. The center of the tornado was marked by a m-wide, elliptically shaped hole (the former width is that of the minor axis, which was normal to the radar beam). Since the width of the hole normal to the radar beam was slightly wider than the width of the visible debris cloud (260 m), which extended up to about 190 m above the ground (Fig. 4), the ring of higher reflectivity around the tornado most likely was not associated with the visible debris cloud itself. It is possible, however, that the width of the radar-echo hole was exaggerated slightly, owing to attenuation. A cyclonic vortex signature (Brown and Wood 1991; red/yellow-coded receding Doppler velocities on the right, green/blue approaching Doppler velocities on the left) was found near the inner edge of the ring of higher reflectivity around the tornado (Fig. 5, top right). As a result of the intense attenuation, PDPP velocity data beyond about 4.6-km range were dominated by noise. Since the ordinary pulse-pair processed data were much less noisy (Pazmany et al. 1999) and exhibited an obviously aliased, but coherent cyclonic vortex signature (Fig. 5, bottom left), they were unfolded using the PDPP velocity data as boundary constraints (Fig. 5, lower right). Another cyclonic vortex signature, which was weaker (yellow-coded receding velocities on the right, green approaching velocities on the left), was seen to the left of the tornado (Fig. 5, lower right; marked by an arrow). In analyses of data for other tornado cases, the coexistence of a tornado with weaker vortices, along the rear-flank gust front, have also been noted (e.g., Bluestein et al. 2003b). Highest approaching Doppler velocities were around 40ms 1 ; highest receding velocities were around 10 ms 1. From the series of sector scans, it was estimated that the component of motion of the tornado along the line of sight of the radar was 13 m s 1, toward the radar, or from west-southwest to east-northeast. Therefore subtracting the radial component of tornado motion yields an estimate of peak azimuthal wind speeds in the tornado vortex itself of 27 and 23 m s 1, respectively. (It was not possible to determine the component of motion of the tornado normal to the line of sight because the azimuth positions in each scan are known only in a relative sense. In a qualitative sense, the tornado motion normal to the line of sight was to the north and less in magnitude than the along-the-line-sight component.) It is possible that even higher Doppler velocities were undetected, owing to attenuation; the width of the vortex signature in Doppler velocity (450 m) was therefore probably an overestimate. However, since azimuthal
6 2330 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 132 FIG. 5. Portion of the sector scan at 1846:38 CDT (time given here and henceforth for the beginning of each scan), 5 May Range markings are shown every 500 m. Color-coded scales for reflectivity (dbz) and Doppler velocity (m s 1 ) are shown below each panel; positive (negative) Doppler velocities denote motion away from (toward) the radar; (top left) radar reflectivity; (top right) PDPP Doppler velocity; (lower left) ordinary pulse-pair processed Doppler velocity; (lower right) unfolded ordinary pulse-pair processed Doppler velocity. The arrow in the lower-right panel points to a weak cyclonic vortex signature, to the left of the tornado. The tornado was located to the west-southwest of the radar. wind velocities in tornadoes typically fall off rapidly just outside the core (e.g., Bluestein and Pazmany 2000; Wurman and Gill 2000; Wurman 2002; Bluestein et al. 2003a), the core diameter was probably not too much less than m. Although we cannot be certain, then, in relating the core diameter to the diameter of the debris cloud, we can conclude with much higher certainty that the width of the condensation funnel (about 70 m or less) was much less than the width of the core of the tornado. Such a conclusion is significant, because the scanning procedure used to collect RHIs made use of the location of the visible condensation funnel: Scans taken just to the left and right of the condensation funnel therefore were likely inside the core of the tornado and missed the highest possible azimuthal and Doppler wind speeds. It is noted, however, that at 1848:44 CDT (all times given are for the beginning of the scan), the core of the tornado was sampled inadvertently while the antenna was being repositioned between successive RHI scans. In this scan, the antenna motion was intermittent, thus precluding the reconstruction of a true sector-scan image. However, as the radar beam cut across the tornado near the ground, maximum Doppler velocities of 60 (20) ms 1 in the approaching (receeding) direction, to the left (right) side of the tornado, were noted. b. Vertical cross sections through the tornado The high-resolution RHIs cutting through the tornado are the unique aspect of the Happy, Texas, dataset. Since the tornado condensation was often tilted and the radar platform was always tilted slightly, the RHIs do not make perfectly vertical cross sections. In many instances the RHI tilts half the distance across the condensation funnel from the bottom to the top of the RHI (Fig. 6); most of the RHIs during these scans extended from one of the vertical edges of the condensation funnel to the
7 2331 FIG. 6. Schematics depicting the RHI scans (thick solid lines) of the W-band radar on 5 May 2002, through the Happy, Texas, tornado, from the location noted in Figs. 2 and 3, at the times (a) 1848:29, 1849:53, and 1850:12; (b) 1848:52; (c) 1849:18; and (d) 1848:15, 1849:02, and 1849:35 CDT. In (a), (b), and (c), the scans at low-elevation angle passed through the left edge and to the left of the left edge, right edge, and center of the tornado condensation funnel, respectively; in (d) the scans tilled from an edge of the condensation funnel into the middle. Arrows indicate direction of scan; condensation funnel is outlined. The view is to the west-southwest of the radar. center. From Fig. 4, it can be seen that since the radar platform is tilted from the vertical by 5, a beam at the left edge of the condensation funnel near the ground, which is scanned vertically, could end up, at cloud base, about 45 m to the right of the left edge of the funnel, which is a considerable fraction of its 70-m width at cloud base. In those RHIs that appear to cut vertically through the condensation funnel, it is possible that the tornado is tilted in the plane of the RHI itself. In some RHIs the scan did not extend all the way to the ground. None of the RHIs exhibited very high velocities (Figs. 7 10), most likely because none of the vertical cross sections cut across the core, which was farther from the center of the condensation funnel. Figures 7 (1848:29, 1849:53, and 1850:12 CDT), 8 (1848:52 CDT), and 9 (1849:18 CDT) show examples of scans that at low elevation cut through the left edge, right edge, and center, respectively (cf. Fig. 6), of the tornado condensation funnel. In Fig. 10 the rest of the RHIs, which tilted from an edge of the condensation funnel into the middle (1848:15, 1849:02, and 1849:35 CDT), are displayed. The RHIs of radar reflectivity all show evidence of attenuation; that is, the tornado appears to be embedded within a region in which the reflectivity decreases with range. We now highlight and summarize features seen in the reflectivity and Doppler-velocity cross sections (Figs. 7 10). The center of the tornado was coincident with a column of echo-free hole, that, above about 150-m altitude was approximately 250 m in diameter (Fig. 11). The width of the hole was defined subjectively on the basis of both the reflectivity field and Doppler-velocity field. The width of the hole was determined by mea-
8 2332 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 132 FIG. 7. Vertical cross sections of radar reflectivity (dbz) and ground-relative Doppler velocity (m s 1 ) from the W-band Doppler radar (the radar is located to the far left in this figure) at the locations noted in Figs. 2 and 3, on 5 May 2002, for the scans depicted in Fig. 6. The cross section cuts from the east-northeast (left-hand side) to the west-southwest (right-hand side), through the left edge and to the left of the left edge of the tornado condensation funnel. Color-coded scales for reflectivity and Doppler velocity are shown below each panel. In this and subsequent figures depicting vertical cross sections of Doppler velocity, positive (negative) velocities denote approaching (receding) motion, unlike in Fig. 5, where the opposite convention is used. (There were signal processing errors that reversed the sign of the Doppler velocity.) Times are (top left) 1848:29, (top right) 1849:53, and (bottom) 1850:12 CDT. The arrow points to a region of relatively high Doppler velocity away from the radar. suring the diameter of the region in which the reflectivity was speckled, was low compared the surrounding reflectivity, was inside a zone of strong reflectivity gradient, and was too low to compute Doppler velocity (this region displayed speckled velocities). The width of the hole was greatest for the scan that cut through the center of the tornado, as would be expected from geometrical considerations. The hole was pear shaped in overall appearance; it was approximately 40% wider at 100 m above the ground as it was above. Since the depth and width of the visible debris cloud were about 190 and 260 m, respectively, it is seen that the width of the debris cloud was approximately the same as that of the hole within the tornado. In a few of the cross sections [1848:52 (Fig. 8) and 1849:18 CDT (Fig. 9)], the echo hole closed up near the ground, so that there was a very thin layer of significant reflectivity. The cross section taken through the tornado at 1849:18 CDT (Fig. 9) is the cleanest one in that much of the scan was oriented parallel to the edges of, and through the center of, the condensation funnel, so that the Doppler velocities represent the radial wind component, if the vortex were perfectly axisymmetric. There is some tilt of the vortex with height toward the radar. However, since the radar antenna was scanning upward, it is likely that much of the tilt was an artifact of the motion of the tornado; in the time it took the radar to complete the RHI ( 10 s or less), the top of the tornado had moved on the order of 10 m closer. At 1849:02 (Fig. 10), on the other hand, when the radar antenna was scanning downward, the tornado appeared to tilt with height away from the radar. In all the vertical cross sections except the last two (1849:52 and 1850:10 CDT), there was a region of much
9 2333 FIG. 8. As in Fig. 7, but at time 1848:52 CDT, through the right edge of the tornado condensation funnel. Solid black line in the bottom, Doppler-velocity panel is the approximate horizon line. higher Doppler wind velocity, pointing in the direction of the tornado about m above the ground. This apparent jet (marked by arrows in the figures) of air flowing inward toward the tornado was as strong as 35 40ms 1, especially at 1848:52 and 1849:02, when the vertical cross sections cut through the right side of the condensation funnel [(Figs. 6, 8, and 10 (top right)]. At 1849:18, when the radar scanned through the center of the tornado (Figs. 6 and 9), a small region of relatively low values of ground-relative Doppler velocity (white yellow region) was found just above and radially outward from the apparent elevated jet (arrow; blue purple region). This small relative minimum in Doppler velocities might indicate frictional return flow. In Fig. 1, it is seen that above the surface inflow layer there are horizontal rolls at the edge of the simulated vortex. It is also possible that the vortex couplet seen in Fig. 9 might be a result of one such roll circulation. In Fig. 9, there is also a region of enhanced inflow in the lowest few elevation scans about 500 m east of the center of the tornado. It is possible that this might actually represent surface inflow. At 1848:52 and 1849:02 only, when the vertical cross sections cut across the right side of the center of the condensation funnel [cf. Fig. 6 and Figs. 8 and 10 (top right)], the scans showed an elevated jet cutting completely across the weak-echo hole. The Doppler velocity fields depicted in the vertical cross sections are therefore consistent with an elevated jet spiraling into and cyclonically around the tornado. 4. Summary and conclusions The Happy, Texas, tornado was the first tornado in which RHI scans were collected by the W-band radar. The vertical reflectivity structure of the tornado was similar to that found by Wurman and Gill (2000). However, the weak-echo hole in the Happy, Texas, tornado was in general broader just above the ground, at the height of the midlevel of the visible debris cloud. We offer the following two possible explanations for this finding: (a) the broadening is a result of centrifuging of scatterers radially outward near or just within the tornado core, or (b) the broadening is a result of the sec-
10 2334 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 132 FIG. 9. As in Fig. 7, but at time 1849:18 CDT, through the center of the tornado condensation funnel. Solid black line in the bottom, Doppler-velocity panel is the approximate horizon line. ondary circulation of the tornado, in which there is radial outflow above the surface friction layer advecting scatterers radially outward. The hole narrows below, probably owing to the inward transport of scatterers in the surface inflow layer. These hypotheses could be tested by numerical simulation experiments in which tornado-like vortices representing a broad range of swirl ratios would have particles of various sizes and size distributions injected into them (e.g., Snow 1984; Dowell 2000; Dowell et al. 2001). Such a study, which is beyond the scope of this paper, could explain quantitatively the observed shape of the echo-free eye s reflectivity profile. To estimate the particle sizes in the tornado, it might be possible to use the dual-frequency approach described by Pazmany et al. (2001). To implement this scheme, it will be necessary to scan the same volumes that the W-band radar scans with an X-band mobile Doppler (e.g., Pazmany et al. 2003). The inflow jet at m above the ground was not anticipated. Instead, it was thought that an inflow jet might be found at much lower altitudes, as in Golden and Purcell (1977) and Lewellen et al. (2000). Several possible explanations for an elevated boundary layer jet are as follows: First, evaporatively cooled air was advected around the tornado near the ground, as the tornado was beginning to dissipate. Air flowing into the tornado as a surface-boundary-layer jet was therefore lifted up over the surface cold pool. At the time the W-band radar data were collected, rain was falling around the tornado, but there were no in situ temperature measurements made to confirm the presence of a cold pool. There is some radar evidence, though, that this may have been the case. At 1848:29 (Fig. 7) and 1849: 02 (Fig. 10) there were arclike reflectivity structures ahead (to the left in the figures) of the tornado at low levels; the corresponding Doppler-velocity images show a relative maximum in rear-to-front (i.e., from the right to the left) flow near the ground, behind the arc, which is suggestive of the wind pattern seen behind some thunderstorm gust fronts (e.g., Wakimoto 1982). Another possibility is that there was a surface-boundary-layer jet, but it was asymmetrically distributed about the tornado (Golden and Purcell 1977); the viewing an-
11 2335 FIG. 10. As in Fig. 7, but at times (top left) 1848:15, (top right) 1849:02, and (bottom) 1849:35 CDT, through both the edge of the condensation funnel and the middle of the condensation funnel, depending on the height above the ground. gle of the radar may have been normal to the jet. Movies and videos of tornadoes (viewed at conferences and on television) sometimes show bands of dust feeding into the tornado near the ground from only one direction. The ground surrounding the tornado was relatively wet from precipitation, so that the wind field associated with a boundary-layer jet might not have been visualized. A third possibility is that the surface inflow layer was so shallow that the motion of scatterers in it was not detected by the radar. Even if the second or third hypotheses are true, then the elevated nature of the jet that was detected still needs to be explained. A final possibility is that the elevated jet was really associated with a wave along the edge of the tornado vortex, which would be manifest as a horizontal roll in a vertical cross section (cf. Fig. 1). More datasets need to be collected that provide detailed information on the vertical structure of the reflectivity and wind fields in tornadoes near the ground. To ensure accurate interpretation of the radar scans, the azimuth angles must be recorded properly along with the boresighted video. In the case of the Happy, Texas, tornado, the motion of the tornado had a significant component along the line of sight of the radar. It would be better for data collection if a tornado moved mainly across the line of sight, so that RHIs could be taken at one azimuth from a fixed location; then, as the tornado translates across the plane scanned in the RHI, the spatial resolution across the tornado would be maximized. If the core of a tornado lies outside the edge of its condensation funnel (if it has one) or outside the edge of its debris cloud, then RHIs through the tornado must extend well to the left and right of the visible condensation funnel to ensure that the core of the tornado is sampled. Efforts to minimize the effects of tilting of the RHI plane should be undertaken by more carefully leveling the radar platform. Knowledge of the diameter of the tornado core being sampled is essential. If attenuation is so severe that it is difficult or impossible to determine the core diameter from sector scans, then it may be necessary to increase the length of the radar pulses to enhance the radar s sensitivity at the expense of the along-the-line-of-sight spatial resolution.
12 2336 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 132 FIG. 11. Schematic of the composite radar reflectivity field below cloud base, associated with the Happy, TX, tornado, as viewed in the vertical plane. Acknowledgments. This work was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) Grants ATM and ATM at OU and ATM at UMass. Pat Waukau, Kris Conrad, and Morris Weisman provided computer-related and graphics-related assistance at NCAR. Mark Laufersweiler provided computer support at OU. During field operations, the second author operated the radar, and Brendan Fennell from UMass drove the radar truck. We are indebted to Lou Wicker and to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. REFERENCES Bluestein, H. B., and J. H. Golden, 1993: Tornadoes and tornadic storms. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, , and A. L. Pazmany, 2000: Observations of tornadoes and other convective phenomena with a mobile, 3-mm wavelength, Doppler radar: The spring 1999 field experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, , W. P. Unruh, J. LaDue, H. Stein, and D. Speheger, 1993: Doppler-radar wind spectra of supercell tornadoes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, , W.-C. Lee, M. Bell, C. C. Weiss, and A. L. Pazmany, 2003a: Mobile Doppler radar observations of a tornado in a supercell near Bassett, Nebraska, on 5 June Part II: Tornado-vortex structure. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, , C. C. Weiss, and A. L. Pazmany, 2003b: Mobile Doppler radar observations of a tornado in a supercell near Bassett, Nebraska, on 5 June Part I: Tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, , C. C. Weiss, and A. L. Pazmany, 2004: Doppler radar observations of dust devils in Texas. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, Brown, R. A., and V. T. Wood, 1991: On the interpretation of single- Doppler velocity patterns within severe thunderstorms. Wea. Forecasting, 6, Church, C. R., J. T. Snow, G. L. Baker, and E. M. Agee, 1979: Characteristics of tornado-like vortices as a function of swirl ratio: A laboratory investigation. J. Atmos. Sci., 36, Davies-Jones, R. P., R. J. Trapp, and H. B. Bluestein, 2001: Tornadoes and tornadic storms. Severe Convective Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 50, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Dowell, D. C., 2000: A pseudo-dual-doppler analysis of cyclic tornadogenesis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oklahoma, 227 pp., J. Wurman, and L. J. Wicker, 2001: Centrifuging of scatterers in tornadoes. Preprints, 30th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Munich, Germany, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Fujita, T. T., 1981: Tornadoes and downbursts in the context of generalized planetary scales. J. Atmos. Sci., 38, Golden, J. H., and D. Purcell, 1978: Life cycle of the Union City, Oklahoma tornado and comparison with waterspouts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 106, 3 11., and, 1977: Photogrammetric velocities for the Great Bend, Kansas, tornado of 30 August 1974: Accelerations and asymmetries. Mon. Wea. Rev., 105, Lewellen, D. C., W. S. Lewellen, and J. Xia, 2000: The influence of a local swirl ratio on tornado intensification near the surface. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, Lewellen, W. S., and D. C. Lewellen, 1997: Large-eddy simulation of a tornado s interaction with the surface. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, Liu, H., 1993: Calculation of wind speeds required to damage or destroy buildings. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, Oye, R., C. K. Mueller, and S. Smith, 1995: Software for radar translation, visualization, editing, and interpolation. Preprints, 27th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Vail, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Pazmany, A. L., J. C. Galloway, J. B. Mead, I. Popstefanija, R. E. McIntosh, and H. B. Bluestein, 1999: Polarization diversity pulse pair technique for millimeter-wave Doppler radar measurements of severe-storm features. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16, , J. B. Mead, S. M. Sekelsky, D. J. McLaughlin, and H. Bluestein, 2001: Multi-frequency radar estimation of cloud and precipitation properties using an artificial neural network. Preprints, 30th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Munich, Germany, Amer. Meteor. Soc., , F. J. Lopez, H. B. Bluestein, and M. Kramar, 2003: Quantitative rain measurements with a mobile, X-band, polarimetric Doppler radar. Preprints, 31st Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Rasmussen, E. N., R. Davies-Jones, C. A. Doswell, F. H. Carr, M. D. Eilts, D. R. MacGorman, and J. M. Straka, 1994: Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment: VORTEX. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 75, Rotunno, R., 1979: A study in tornado-like vortex dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 36, Snow, J. T., 1984: On the formation of particle sheaths in columnar vortices. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, Wakimoto, R. M., 1982: The life cycle of thunderstorm gust fronts as viewed with Doppler radar and rawinsonde data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, , and B. E. Martner, 1992: Observations of a Colorado tornado. Part II: Combined photogrammetric and Doppler radar analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, , W.-C. Lee, H. B. Bluestein, C. H. Liu, and P. H. Hildebrand,
13 : ELDORA observations during VORTEX-95. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, Wilson, J. W., J. A. Moore, G. B. Foote, B. Martner, A. R. Rodi, T. Uttal, and J. M. Wilczak, 1988: Convection initiation and downburst experiment (CINDE). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 69, Wurman, J., 2002: The multiple-vortex structure of a tornado. Wea. Forecasting, 17, , and S. Gill, 2000: Finescale radar observations of the Dimmitt, Texas (2 June 1995), tornado. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, , J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 1996: Fine-scale Doppler radar observations of tornadoes. Science, 272,
10R.1 DUAL-POLARIZATION OBSERVATIONS OF TORNADOES AT CLOSE RANGE MADE WITH A MOBILE X-BAND DOPPLER RADAR
10R.1 DUAL-POLARIZATION OBSERVATIONS OF TORNADOES AT CLOSE RANGE MADE WITH A MOBILE X-BAND DOPPLER RADAR Howard B. Bluestein *, and Michael M. French Stephen Frasier, Kery Hardwick, Francesc Junyent, and
More informationRecent observations of tornadoes using a mobile, rapid-scan, polarimetric, X-band, Doppler radar
Recent observations of tornadoes using a mobile, rapid-scan, polarimetric, X-band, Doppler radar Howard B. Bluestein 1, Jeffrey C. Snyder 2, Kyle J. Thiem 1, Zachary B. Wienhoff 1, Jana B. Houser 3, and
More informationMobile, phased-array, X-band Doppler radar observations of tornadogenesis in the central U. S.
Mobile, phased-array, X-band Doppler radar observations of tornadogenesis in the central U. S. Howard B. Bluestein 1, Michael M. French 2, Ivan PopStefanija 3 and Robert T. Bluth 4 Howard (Howie Cb ) B.
More informationP11.7 DUAL-POLARIZATION, MOBILE, X-BAND, DOPPLER-RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF HOOK ECHOES IN SUPERCELLS
P11.7 DUAL-POLARIZATION, MOBILE, X-BAND, DOPPLER-RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF HOOK ECHOES IN SUPERCELLS Francesc Junyent Lopez 1, A. Pazmany 1, H. Bluestein 2, M. R. Kramar 2, M. French 2, C. Weiss 2 and S. Frasier
More information5B.1 OBSERVATIONS OF TORNADOGENESIS USING A MOBILE, PHASED-ARRAY, DOPPLER RADAR
5B.1 OBSERVATIONS OF TORNADOGENESIS USING A MOBILE, PHASED-ARRAY, DOPPLER RADAR Howard B. Bluestein * and Michael French University of Oklahoma, Norman Ivan Popstefanija ProSensing, Inc., Amherst, Massachusetts
More informationP10.1 TORNADOGENESIS IN A SIMULATED HP SUPERCELL
Preprints, 21 st Conference on Severe Local Storms 12-16 August 2002, San Antonio, Texas P10.1 TORNADOGENESIS IN A SIMULATED HP SUPERCELL 1. INTRODUCTION Catherine A. Finley * Department of Earth Sciences
More informationMET Lecture 26 Tornadoes I
MET 4300 Lecture 26 Tornadoes I A Large Tornado approaches Lyndon, Kansas, on May 8, 2003 Outline Definition, life cycle Tornado formation within supercells Tornado formation within nonsupercell thunderstorms
More informationTHE DETECTABILITY OF TORNADIC SIGNATURES WITH DOPPLER RADAR: A RADAR EMULATOR STUDY
P15R.1 THE DETECTABILITY OF TORNADIC SIGNATURES WITH DOPPLER RADAR: A RADAR EMULATOR STUDY Ryan M. May *, Michael I. Biggerstaff and Ming Xue University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 1. INTRODUCTION The
More informationThe LaGrange Tornado during VORTEX2. Part I: Photogrammetric Analysis of the Tornado Combined with Single-Doppler Radar Data
JULY 2011 W A K I M O T O E T A L. 2233 The LaGrange Tornado during VORTEX2. Part I: Photogrammetric Analysis of the Tornado Combined with Single-Doppler Radar Data ROGER M. WAKIMOTO National Center for
More informationNOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE. An Example of the Use of Mobile, Doppler Radar Data for Tornado Verification
884 W E A T H E R A N D F O R E C A S T I N G VOLUME 24 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE An Example of the Use of Mobile, Doppler Radar Data for Tornado Verification MICHAEL M. FRENCH AND HOWARD B. BLUESTEIN School
More informationP PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE 10 JUNE 2010 SUPERCELLS INTERCEPTED BY VORTEX2 NEAR LAST CHANCE, COLORADO
P12.164 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE 10 JUNE 2010 SUPERCELLS INTERCEPTED BY VORTEX2 NEAR LAST CHANCE, COLORADO 1. INTRODUCTION An outstanding question in the field of severe storms research is why some
More information1. Introduction. Figure 1: TTUKa-1 and TTUKa-2 at Reese Technology Center near Lubbock, TX
P302 TTUKa Single-Doppler Radar Analysis of Low-Level Tornado Structure Timothy R. Cermak, Christopher C. Weiss, Anthony E. Reinhart, Patrick S. Skinner Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 1. Introduction
More informationP165 Mobile, X-band, polarimetric Doppler radar observations of the 23 May 2016 Woodward, Oklahoma tornadoes
P165 Mobile, X-band, polarimetric Doppler radar observations of the 23 May 2016 Woodward, Oklahoma tornadoes Robin L. Tanamachi*, Matthew O. Seedorf, Alexandra N. Marmo Purdue University, Department of
More informationTornadogenesis in Supercells: The Three Main Ingredients. Ted Funk
Tornadogenesis in Supercells: The Three Main Ingredients Ted Funk NWS Louisville, KY Spring 2002 Environmental Parameters Supercells occur within environments exhibiting several wellknown characteristics
More informationChapter 3 Convective Dynamics 3.4. Bright Bands, Bow Echoes and Mesoscale Convective Complexes
Chapter 3 Convective Dynamics 3.4. Bright Bands, Bow Echoes and Mesoscale Convective Complexes Photographs Todd Lindley Bright band associated with stratiform precipitation in a squall line system 1 Bright
More informationObservations of Tornadoes and Other Convective Phenomena with a Mobile, 3-mm Wavelength, Doppler Radar: The Spring 1999 Field Experiment
Observations of Tornadoes and Other Convective Phenomena with a Mobile, 3-mm Wavelength, Doppler Radar: The Spring 1999 Field Experiment Howard B. Bluestein* and Andrew L. Pazmany + ABSTRACT In the spring
More informationTornadoes. tornado: a violently rotating column of air
Tornadoes tornado: a violently rotating column of air Tornadoes What is the typical size of a tornado? What are typical wind speeds for a tornado? Five-stage life cycle of a tornado Dust Swirl Stage Tornado
More information24 TH CONFERENCE ON SEVERE LOCAL STORMS, OCTOBER 2008, SAVANNAH, GEORGIA
P9.13 SUPER-RESOLUTION POLARIMETRIC OBSERVATIONS OF A CYCLIC TORNADIC SUPERCELL MATTHEW R. KUMJIAN*, ALEXANDER V. RYZHKOV, AND VALERY M. MELNIKOV Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies,
More informationDoppler Radar Observations of Dust Devils in Texas
JANUARY 2004 BLUESTEIN ET AL. 209 Doppler Radar Observations of Dust Devils in Texas HOWARD B. BLUESTEIN AND CHRISTOPHER C. WEISS School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma ANDREW
More informationTornado Dynamics. Readings:
Tornado Dynamics Readings: Klemp (1987) Dynamics of Tornadic Thunderstorms (handout) Bluestein Vol II. Section 3.4.8. Rotunno, R., 1986: Tornadoes and tornadogenesis. In: P. Ray (Editor), Mesoscale Meteorology
More informationNOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE. Central Illinois Cold Air Funnel Outbreak
2815 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE Central Illinois Cold Air Funnel Outbreak ROBERT M. RAUBER Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois ROBERT W. SCOTT
More informationP13A.7 Multi-pass objective analyses of radar data: Preliminary results
P13A.7 Multi-pass objective analyses of radar data: Preliminary results MARIO MAJCEN, PAUL MARKOWSKI, AND YVETTE RICHARDSON Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
More informationGBVTD-retrieved near-surface vortex structure in a tornado and tornado-like vortices observed by a W- band radar during VORTEX2
GBVTD-retrieved near-surface vortex structure in a tornado and tornado-like vortices observed by a W- band radar during VORTEX2 Robin L. Tanamachi 1, Mingjun Wang 1, Ming Xue 1, Howard B. Bluestein 2,
More information826 High-Resolution TDWR Evolution of the Newcastle-Moore, Oklahoma Tornado of 20 May 2013
Extended Abstract, The Special Symposium on Severe Local Storms: The Current State of the Science and Understanding Impacts, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 5 February 2014, Atlanta, GA 826 High-Resolution TDWR Evolution
More informationP59 High-frequency Dual-Doppler Analysis of a Retrograding Dryline/Baroclinic Boundary Intersection
P59 High-frequency Dual-Doppler Analysis of a Retrograding Dryline/Baroclinic Boundary Intersection Anthony E. Reinhart 1*, Christopher C. Weiss 1, and David C. Dowell 2 1 Atmospheric Science Group, Department
More informationMeteorology Lecture 18
Meteorology Lecture 18 Robert Fovell rfovell@albany.edu 1 Important notes These slides show some figures and videos prepared by Robert G. Fovell (RGF) for his Meteorology course, published by The Great
More informationMeteorological Data Results from the Atmospheric Imaging Radar
Meteorological Data Results from the Atmospheric Imaging Radar James M. Kurdzo, Robert D. Palmer, Feng Nai, David J. Bodine and Boon Leng Cheong Advanced Radar Research Center, The University of Oklahoma,
More informationImproved Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer Wind Retrievals. From Airborne Doppler Radar
Improved Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer Wind Retrievals From Airborne Doppler Radar Shannon L. McElhinney and Michael M. Bell University of Hawaii at Manoa Recent studies have highlighted the importance
More informationThe 8 June 1995 McLean, Texas, Storm. Part I: Observations of Cyclic Tornadogenesis
2626 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW The 8 June 1995 McLean, Texas, Storm. Part I: Observations of Cyclic Tornadogenesis DAVID C. DOWELL* NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory and Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale
More informationComparison of polarimetric radar signatures in hailstorms simultaneously observed by C-band and S-band radars.
Comparison of polarimetric radar signatures in hailstorms simultaneously observed by C-band and S-band radars. R. Kaltenboeck 1 and A. Ryzhkov 2 1 Austrocontrol - Aviation Weather Service, Vienna and Institute
More informationNumerical Prediction of 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Supercell Tornado with ARPS and Radar Data Assimilation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Numerical Prediction of 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Supercell Tornado with ARPS and Radar Data Assimilation
More informationThe Three-Dimensional Structure and Evolution of a Tornado Boundary Layer
1552 W E A T H E R A N D F O R E C A S T I N G VOLUME 28 The Three-Dimensional Structure and Evolution of a Tornado Boundary Layer KAREN A. KOSIBA AND JOSHUA WURMAN Center for Severe Weather Research,
More information14.1 GBVTD-RETRIEVED NEAR-SURFACE AXISYMMETRIC VORTEX STRUCTURE IN A TORNADO AND IN TORNADO-LIKE VORTICES OBSERVED BY A W-BAND RADAR DURING VORTEX2
14.1 GBVTD-RETRIEVED NEAR-SURFACE AXISYMMETRIC VORTEX STRUCTURE IN A TORNADO AND IN TORNADO-LIKE VORTICES OBSERVED BY A W-BAND RADAR DURING VORTEX2 Robin L. Tanamachi 1,2, * Howard B. Bluestein 1 Ming
More information16.4 SENSITIVITY OF TORNADOGENESIS IN VERY-HIGH RESOLUTION NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS TO VARIATIONS IN MODEL MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERS
1. SENSITIVITY OF TORNADOGENESIS IN VERY-HIGH RESOLUTION NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS TO VARIATIONS IN MODEL MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERS Nathan A. Snook* and Ming Xue University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 1.
More informationP1.25 COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL MODEL AND LABORATORY SIMULATOR TORNADO WIND FIELDS WITH RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF THE SPENCER, SOUTH DAKOTA TORNADO
P1.25 COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL MODEL AND LABORATORY SIMULATOR TORNADO WIND FIELDS WITH RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF THE SPENCER, SOUTH DAKOTA TORNADO William A. Gallus, Jr.*, Fred Haan*, Partha P. Sarkar*, Kuai
More informationRobin L. Tanamachi* Howard B. Bluestein School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
14.4a INFRARED THERMAL IMAGERY OF CLOUD BASE IN TORNADIC SUPERCELLS Robin L. Tanamachi* Howard B. Bluestein School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma Stephen S. Moore Intrinsic Energies
More informationRODGER A. BROWN NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK
Preprints, 25th Intern. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., January 2009 9B.3 Progress Report on the Evolutionary Characteristics of a Tornadic Supercell
More information10/21/2012. Chapter 10 Thunderstorms. Part II. Growth and Development of ordinary Cell Thunderstorms Thunderstorm Electrification.
Chapter 10 Thunderstorms Part I Growth and Development of ordinary Cell Thunderstorms Thunderstorm Electrification Tornadoes Part II Simplified model depicting the life cycle of an ordinary thunderstorm
More information1st Tornado Photograph
Lecture 26 Part II Tornados Environment Storm Structure Life Cycle Source of Spin Forecasting Climatology Damage Marilee Thomas of Beaver City, NE took this photograph of her daughter Audra about two miles
More informationDOPPLER RADAR AND STORM ENVIRONMENT OBSERVATIONS OF A MARITIME TORNADIC SUPERCELL IN SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA
155 DOPPLER RADAR AND STORM ENVIRONMENT OBSERVATIONS OF A MARITIME TORNADIC SUPERCELL IN SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA Harald Richter *, Alain Protat Research and Development Branch, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne,
More informationExamination #3 Wednesday, 28 November 2001
Name & Signature Dr. Droegemeier Student ID Meteorology 1004 Introduction to Meteorology Fall, 2001 Examination #3 Wednesday, 28 November 2001 BEFORE YOU BEGIN!! Please be sure to read each question CAREFULLY
More informationComparison of Mobile-Radar Measurements of Tornado Intensity with Corresponding WSR-88D Measurements
418 W E A T H E R A N D F O R E C A S T I N G VOLUME 28 Comparison of Mobile-Radar Measurements of Tornado Intensity with Corresponding Measurements M. TOTH AND R. J. TRAPP Department of Earth, Atmospheric,
More informationModule 11: Meteorology Topic 6 Content: Severe Weather Notes
Severe weather can pose a risk to you and your property. Meteorologists monitor extreme weather to inform the public about dangerous atmospheric conditions. Thunderstorms, hurricanes, and tornadoes are
More informationThe Kellerville Tornado during VORTEX: Damage Survey and Doppler Radar Analyses
VOLUME 131 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW OCTOBER 2003 The Kellerville Tornado during VORTEX: Damage Survey and Doppler Radar Analyses ROGER M. WAKIMOTO AND HANNE V. MURPHEY Department of Atmospheric Sciences,
More informationVelocity Measurements in a Laboratory Tornado Simulator and their comparison with Numerical and Full-Scale Data
Velocity Measurements in a Laboratory Tornado Simulator and their comparison with Numerical and Full-Scale Data by Partha Sarkar 1, Fred Haan 1, William Gallus, Jr. 2, Kuai Le 2 and Joshua Wurman 3 ABSTRACT
More informationP12.7 MESOCYCLONE AND RFD INDUCED DAMAGING WINDS OBSERVED IN THE 27 MAY 2004 SOUTHWEST OHIO SUPERCELL
P12.7 MESOCYCLONE AND RFD INDUCED DAMAGING WINDS OBSERVED IN THE 27 MAY 2004 SOUTHWEST OHIO SUPERCELL John T. DiStefano* National Weather Service Office, Wilmington, Ohio 1. INTRODUCTION During the early
More informationP6.18 THE IMPACTS OF THUNDERSTORM GEOMETRY AND WSR-88D BEAM CHARACTERISTICS ON DIAGNOSING SUPERCELL TORNADOES
P6.18 THE IMPACTS OF THUNDERSTORM GEOMETRY AND WSR-88D BEAM CHARACTERISTICS ON DIAGNOSING SUPERCELL TORNADOES Steven F. Piltz* National Weather Service, Tulsa, Oklahoma Donald W. Burgess Cooperative Institute
More informationSolutions to Comprehensive Final Examination Given on Thursday, 13 December 2001
Name & Signature Dr. Droegemeier Student ID Meteorology 1004 Introduction to Meteorology Fall, 2001 Solutions to Comprehensive Final Examination Given on Thursday, 13 December 2001 BEFORE YOU BEGIN!! Please
More informationThunderstorm Downburst Prediction: An Integrated Remote Sensing Approach. Ken Pryor Center for Satellite Applications and Research (NOAA/NESDIS)
Thunderstorm Downburst Prediction: An Integrated Remote Sensing Approach Ken Pryor Center for Satellite Applications and Research (NOAA/NESDIS) Topics of Discussion Thunderstorm Life Cycle Thunderstorm
More informationPreprint, 18 th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction American Meteorological Society, Park City, UT
Preprint, 1 th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction American Meteorological Society, Park City, UT 1B.4 Analysis and Prediction of May 3 Oklahoma City Tornadic Thunderstorm and Embedded Tornado using
More informationDual-Doppler and Single-Doppler Analysis of a Tornadic Storm Undergoing Mergers and Repeated Tornadogenesis
736 M O N T H L Y W E A T H E R R E V I E W VOLUME 135 Dual-Doppler and Single-Doppler Analysis of a Tornadic Storm Undergoing Mergers and Repeated Tornadogenesis JOSHUA WURMAN Center for Severe Weather
More informationP3.17 THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLE LOW-LEVEL MESOCYCLONES WITHIN A SUPERCELL. Joshua M. Boustead *1 NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Topeka, KS
P3.17 THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLE LOW-LEVEL MESOCYCLONES WITHIN A SUPERCELL Joshua M. Boustead *1 NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Topeka, KS Philip N. Schumacher NOAA/NWS Weather Forecaster Office, Sioux
More informationCHAPTER 11 THUNDERSTORMS AND TORNADOES MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
CHAPTER 11 THUNDERSTORMS AND TORNADOES MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS 1. A thunderstorm is considered to be a weather system. a. synoptic-scale b. micro-scale c. meso-scale 2. By convention, the mature stage
More informationTornadoes forecasting, dynamics and genesis. Mteor 417 Iowa State University Week 12 Bill Gallus
Tornadoes forecasting, dynamics and genesis Mteor 417 Iowa State University Week 12 Bill Gallus Tools to diagnose severe weather risks Definition of tornado: A vortex (rapidly rotating column of air) associated
More informationIs Spectral Processing Important for Future WSR-88D Radar?
Is Spectral Processing Important for Future WSR-88D Radar? Carlos A. Rodríguez Rivera University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus Mentor: Dr. Robert Palmer University of Oklahoma Abstract: Processing speed
More informationGenesis mechanism and structure of a supercell tornado in a fine-resolution numerical simulation
Genesis mechanism and structure of a supercell tornado in a fine-resolution numerical simulation Akira T. Noda a, Hiroshi Niino b a Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 1-15-1 Minamidai,
More informationTornadoes forecasting, dynamics and genesis. Mteor 417 Iowa State University Week 12 Bill Gallus
Tornadoes forecasting, dynamics and genesis Mteor 417 Iowa State University Week 12 Bill Gallus Tools to diagnose severe weather risks Definition of tornado: A vortex (rapidly rotating column of air) associated
More informationMeteorology 311. RADAR Fall 2016
Meteorology 311 RADAR Fall 2016 What is it? RADAR RAdio Detection And Ranging Transmits electromagnetic pulses toward target. Tranmission rate is around 100 s pulses per second (318-1304 Hz). Short silent
More information9D.3 THE INFLUENCE OF VERTICAL WIND SHEAR ON DEEP CONVECTION IN THE TROPICS
9D.3 THE INFLUENCE OF VERTICAL WIND SHEAR ON DEEP CONVECTION IN THE TROPICS Ulrike Wissmeier, Robert Goler University of Munich, Germany 1 Introduction One does not associate severe storms with the tropics
More information7 AN ADAPTIVE PEDESTAL CONTROL ALGORITHM FOR THE NATIONAL WEATHER RADAR TESTBED PHASED ARRAY RADAR
7 AN ADAPTIVE PEDESTAL CONTROL ALGORITHM FOR THE NATIONAL WEATHER RADAR TESTBED PHASED ARRAY RADAR David Priegnitz 1, S. M. Torres 1 and P. L. Heinselman 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological
More information11A.2 Forecasting Short Term Convective Mode And Evolution For Severe Storms Initiated Along Synoptic Boundaries
11A.2 Forecasting Short Term Convective Mode And Evolution For Severe Storms Initiated Along Synoptic Boundaries Greg L. Dial and Jonathan P. Racy Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma 1. Introduction
More informationMobile, Phased-Array, Doppler Radar Observations of Tornadoes at X Band
1010 M O N T H L Y W E A T H E R R E V I E W VOLUME 142 Mobile, Phased-Array, Doppler Radar Observations of Tornadoes at X Band MICHAEL M. FRENCH* AND HOWARD B. BLUESTEIN School of Meteorology, University
More informationSupercells. Base lecture and Graphics created by The COMET Program May University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Supercells Base lecture and Graphics created by The COMET Program May 2002 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Objective To be able to forecast and better recognize supercell storms in all
More informationP13.1 MULTIPLE-DOPPLER RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF VERTICAL WIND PROFILE HETEROGENEITY IN CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYERS
P13.1 MULTIPLE-DOPPLER RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF VERTICAL WIND PROFILE HETEROGENEITY IN CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY LAYERS Paul Markowski and Yvette Richardson Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University,
More informationOn the Use of Doppler Radar Derived Wind Fields to Diagnose the Secondary Circulations of Tornadoes
1160 J O U R N A L O F T H E A T M O S P H E R I C S C I E N C E S VOLUME 70 On the Use of Doppler Radar Derived Wind Fields to Diagnose the Secondary Circulations of Tornadoes DAVID S. NOLAN Rosenstiel
More informationTornadoes. Tornadoes. When do tornadoes occur? Tornado Alley
Tornadoes Tornadoes Dr. Christopher M. Godfrey University of North Carolina at Asheville Photo: D. Zaras, NOAA A tornado is a violently rotating column of air in contact with the ground Tornadogenesis
More informationP4.10. Kenichi Kusunoki 1 * and Wataru Mashiko 1 1. Meteorological Research Institute, Japan
P4. DOPPLER RADAR INVESTIGATIONS OF THE INNER CORE OF TYPHOON SONGDA (24) Polygonal / elliptical eyewalls, eye contraction, and small-scale spiral bands. Kenichi Kusunoki * and Wataru Mashiko Meteorological
More informationP10.5 TAXONOMY AND ANALYSIS OF SIMULATED TORNADO SURFACE MARKS
P10.5 TAXONOMY AND ANALYSIS OF SIMULATED TORNADO SURFACE MARKS Michael I. Zimmerman and David C. Lewellen West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 1. INTRODUCTION The tornado vortex is highly sensitive
More informationMature Tornado. Tornado funnel and debris cloud. Mature Tornado
Mature Tornado Tornado funnel and debris cloud 43 Mature Tornado 44 Tornado in Final Rope Stage 45 Source of Spin 46 Source of Spin Updraft Stretches Rotating Column 47 Simulation of Tornado Formation
More informationTORNADO AND TORNADOGENESIS EVENTS SEEN BY THE NOXP, X-BAND, DUAL- POLARIZATION RADAR DURING VORTEX2 2010
5.2 TORNADO AND TORNADOGENESIS EVENTS SEEN BY THE NOXP, X-BAND, DUAL- POLARIZATION RADAR DURING VORTEX2 2010 Donald W. Burgess * Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, The University
More informationDual-Wavelength Polarimetric Radar Analysis of the May 20th 2013 Moore, OK, Tornado
Dual-Wavelength Polarimetric Radar Analysis of the May 20th 2013 Moore, OK, Tornado Alexandra Fraire Borunda California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA Casey B. Griffin and David J. Bodine Advanced
More informationPOLARIMETRIC RADAR OBSERVATION OF A TORNADO AT C-BAND
P2.21 POLARIMETRIC RADAR OBSERVATION OF A TORNADO AT C-BAND Raquel Evaristo, Teresa Bals-Elsholz, Adam Stepanek, Bart Wolf, Kevin Goebbert, Anthony Lyza, Travis Elless Valparaiso University, Valparaiso,
More informationBaiyun Gong, D. C. Lewellen, and W. S. Lewellen West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
P10.3 EFFECTS OF FINE-SCALE DEBRIS ON DIFFERENT TORNADO CORNER FLOWS Baiyun Gong, D. C. Lewellen, and W. S. Lewellen West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV. 1 INTRODUCTION Studying tornado debris clouds
More information14.5 EFFECT OF THE LOWER BOUNDARY CONDITION ON TORNADO INTENSITY IN AN AXISYMMETRIC, CONSTANT-VISCOSITY, CLOSED MODEL OF TORNADOGENESIS
14.5 EFFECT OF THE LOWER BOUNDARY CONDITION ON TORNADO INTENSITY IN AN AXISYMMETRIC, CONSTANT-VISCOSITY, CLOSED MODEL OF TORNADOGENESIS Robert Davies-Jones* National Severe Storms Laboratory, NOAA Norman,
More informationChapter 3 Convective Dynamics Part V ñ Bright Bands, Bow Echoes and MCCs. Bright band associated with stratiform precipitation in a squall line system
Chapter 3 Convective Dynamics Part V ñ Bright Bands, Bow Echoes and MCCs Photographs Todd Lindley (This part contains materials taken from UCAR MCS training module) Bright band associated with stratiform
More informationP15.13 DETECTION OF HAZARDOUS WEATHER PHENOMENA USING DATA ASSIMILATION TECHNIQUES
P15.13 DETECTION OF HAZARDOUS WEATHER PHENOMENA USING DATA ASSIMILATION TECHNIQUES 1. INTRODUCTION Robert Fritchie*, Kelvin Droegemeier, Ming Xue, Mingjing Tong, Elaine Godfrey School of Meteorology and
More informationP5.5 WSR-88D MANIFESTATIONS OF THE OWL HORN SIGNATURE. Matthew R. Kramar National Weather Service WFO Amarillo, TX
P5.5 WSR-88D MANIFESTATIONS OF THE OWL HORN SIGNATURE Matthew R. Kramar National Weather Service WFO Amarillo, TX 1. INTRODUCTION In prior conference forums, the Owl Horn Signature (OHS) was presented
More informationThunderstorms. Ordinary Cell Thunderstorms. Ordinary Cell Thunderstorms. Ordinary Cell Thunderstorms 5/2/11
A storm containing lightning and thunder; convective storms Chapter 14 Severe thunderstorms: At least one: large hail wind gusts greater than or equal to 50 kt Tornado 1 2 Ordinary Cell Ordinary Cell AKA
More informationP13.6 Rapid-Scan DOW 3D GBVTD and Traditional Analysis of Tornadogenesis
P13.6 Rapid-Scan DOW 3D GBVTD and Traditional Analysis of Tornadogenesis Joshua Wurman, Paul Robinson, Curtis Alexander, and Karen Kosiba, Center for Severe Weather Research, Boulder, CO, jwurman@cswr.org,
More information(Preliminary) Observations of Tropical Storm Fay Dustin W Phillips Kevin Knupp, & Tim Coleman. 34th Conference on Radar Meteorology October 8, 2009
(Preliminary) Observations of Tropical Storm Fay Dustin W Phillips Kevin Knupp, & Tim Coleman 34th Conference on Radar Meteorology October 8, 2009 Outline I. Research Equipment MIPS, MAX, KJAX (WSR-88D)
More informationΔV /D where D is the distance SIMULATED DOPPLER VELOCITY SIGNATURES OF EVOLVING TORNADO-LIKE VORTICES
P15R.8 SIMULATED DOPPLER VELOCITY SIGNATURES OF EVOLVING TORNADO-LIKE VORTICES Robert Davies-Jones* and Vincent T. Wood National Severe Storms Laboratory, NOAA Norman, Oklahoma 1. INTRODUCTION Azimuthal
More informationTornado Structure and Risk. Center for Severe Weather Research. The DOW Perspective
Photo by Herb Stein Tornado Structure and Risk Center for Severe Weather Research The DOW Perspective Photo by Herb Stein Stationary Radars are too far away to resolve tornado structure Blurry Image By
More informationP1.36 IMPACT OF MESOSCALE DATA, CLOUD ANALYSIS ON THE EXPLICIT PREDICTION OF AN MCS DURING IHOP Daniel T. Dawson II and Ming Xue*
P1.36 IMPACT OF MESOSCALE DATA, CLOUD ANALYSIS ON THE EXPLICIT PREDICTION OF AN MCS DURING IHOP 2002 Daniel T. Dawson II and Ming Xue* School of Meteorology and Center for the Analysis and Prediction of
More informationTornadoes. Tornadoes. When do tornadoes occur? Tornado Alley
Tornadoes Tornadoes Dr. Christopher M. Godfrey University of North Carolina at Asheville Photo: D. Zaras, NOAA A tornado is a violently rotating column of air in contact with the ground Tornadogenesis
More informationEvolution and Maintenance of the June 2003 Nocturnal Convection
Evolution and Maintenance of the 22-23 June 2003 Nocturnal Convection Jerilyn Billings NOAA/NWS Wichita, KS August 6 th, 2011 Work Completed at North Carolina State University for MS Thesis During the
More informationPICTURE OF THE MONTH. Some Frequently Overlooked Severe Thunderstorm Characteristics Observed on GOES Imagery: A Topic for Future Research
1529 PICTURE OF THE MONTH Some Frequently Overlooked Severe Thunderstorm Characteristics Observed on GOES Imagery: A Topic for Future Research JOHN F. WEAVER AND DAN LINDSEY NOAA/NESDIS/RAMM Team, Cooperative
More informationTornado Occurrences. Tornadoes. Tornado Life Cycle 4/12/17
Chapter 19 Tornadoes Tornado Violently rotating column of air that extends from the base of a thunderstorm to the ground Tornado Statistics Over (100, 1000, 10000) tornadoes reported in the U.S. every
More information11.3 Z DR COLUMNS AS A PREDICTIVE TOOL FOR HAIL GROWTH AND STORM EVOLUTION 1. INTRODUCTION
11.3 Z DR COLUMNS AS A PREDICTIVE TOOL FOR HAIL GROWTH AND STORM EVOLUTION JOSEPH C. PICCA*, MATTHEW KUMJIAN, AND ALEXANDER V. RYZHKOV Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University
More information10.2 TORNADIC MINI-SUPERCELLS IN NORTHERN CANADA
10.2 TORNADIC MINI-SUPERCELLS IN NORTHERN CANADA Patrick J. McCarthy*, Sandra Massey Prairie and Arctic Storm Prediction Centre Meteorological Service of Canada Dave Patrick Hydrometeorological and Arctic
More informationAN ANALYSIS OF A SHALLOW COLD FRONT AND WAVE INTERACTIONS FROM THE PLOWS FIELD CAMPAIGN
AN ANALYSIS OF A SHALLOW COLD FRONT AND WAVE INTERACTIONS FROM THE PLOWS FIELD CAMPAIGN P.105 Carter Hulsey and Kevin Knupp Severe Weather Institute and Radar & Lightning Laboratories, University of Alabama
More information12.2 MESOVORTICES FORMED WITHIN BOW ECHOES: THEIR GENESIS AND SENSITIVITY TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND SYSTEM COLD POOL
12.2 MESOVORTICES FORMED WITHIN BOW ECHOES: THEIR GENESIS AND SENSITIVITY TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND SYSTEM COLD POOL Nolan T. Atkins and Mike St. Laurent Lyndon State College, Lyndonville, Vermont 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationTHUNDERSTORMS. Convective heavy rain accompanied by lightning and thunder. Ahrens
THUNDERSTORMS Convective heavy rain accompanied by lightning and thunder Ahrens Thunderstorms About 1,800 T-storms occur around the world at any instant Where do they occur the most? National Lightning
More informationRemote Sensing in Meteorology: Satellites and Radar. AT 351 Lab 10 April 2, Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Meteorology: Satellites and Radar AT 351 Lab 10 April 2, 2008 Remote Sensing Remote sensing is gathering information about something without being in physical contact with it typically
More informationP5.4 WSR-88D REFLECTIVITY QUALITY CONTROL USING HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL REFLECTIVITY STRUCTURE
P5.4 WSR-88D REFLECTIVITY QUALITY CONTROL USING HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL REFLECTIVITY STRUCTURE Jian Zhang 1, Shunxin Wang 1, and Beth Clarke 1 1 Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies,
More informationInvestigating the Environment of the Indiana and Ohio Tornado Outbreak of 24 August 2016 Using a WRF Model Simulation 1.
Investigating the Environment of the Indiana and Ohio Tornado Outbreak of 24 August 2016 Using a WRF Model Simulation Kevin Gray and Jeffrey Frame Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois
More informationP3.13 THERMODYNAMIC AND KINEMATIC ANALYSIS NEAR AND WITHIN THE TIPTON, KS TORNADO ON MAY 29 DURING TWISTEX 2008
P3.13 THERMODYNAMIC AND KINEMATIC ANALYSIS NEAR AND WITHIN THE TIPTON, KS TORNADO ON MAY 29 DURING TWISTEX 2008 Bruce D. Lee and Catherine A. Finley WindLogics, Inc. Grand Rapids, Minnesota Tim M. Samaras
More informationNOAA S National Weather Service
NOAA S National Weather Service Night Spotting Advanced Concepts of Severe Storm Spotting 2012 Rusty Kapela Milwaukee/Sullivan Weather.gov/milwaukee Problems Spotters Encounter Spotters can only see a
More informationHAZARDOUS WEATHER 1. Dr. Julie Laity Geography 266
HAZARDOUS WEATHER 1 Dr. Julie Laity Geography 266 Violent Weather Thunderstorms Atmospheric turbulence Lightning and thunder Hail Derechos Tornadoes Tornado measurement and science Tropical Cyclones Hurricanes
More informationMyung-Sook Park, Russell L. Elsberry and Michael M. Bell. Department of Meteorology, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, USA
Latent heating rate profiles at different tropical cyclone stages during 2008 Tropical Cyclone Structure experiment: Comparison of ELDORA and TRMM PR retrievals Myung-Sook Park, Russell L. Elsberry and
More informationERAD Enhancement of precipitation by liquid carbon dioxide seeding. Proceedings of ERAD (2002): c Copernicus GmbH 2002
Proceedings of ERAD (2002): 150 154 c Copernicus GmbH 2002 ERAD 2002 Enhancement of precipitation by liquid carbon dioxide seeding K. Nishiyama 1, K. Wakimizu 2, Y. Suzuki 2, H. Yoshikoshi 2, and N. Fukuta
More information