arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 6 Sep 2017

Transcription

1 DRAFT VERSION NOVEMBER 10, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX stye emuateapj v. 12/16/11 TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGING OF THE FERMI-LAT γ-ray SKY THROUGH CROSS-CORRELATIONS: A WIDER AND DEEPER LOOK arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 6 Sep 2017 ALESSANDRO CUOCO 2, MACIEJ BILICKI 3,4,5, JUN-QING XIA 1, AND ENZO BRANCHINI 6,7,8 1 Department of Astronomy, Beijing Norma University, Beijing , P. R. China 2 Institute for Theoretica Partice Physics and Cosmoogy, RWTH Aachen University, Otto-Bumentha-Strasse, 52057, Aachen, Germany 3 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherands 4 Nationa Center for Nucear Research, Astrophysics Division, P.O.Box 447, Łódź, Poand 5 Janusz Gi Institute of Astronomy, University of Zieona Góra, u. Lubuska 2, Zieona Góra, Poand 6 Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università degi Studi Roma Tre, via dea Vasca Navae 84, I Roma, Itay 7 INFN, Sezione di Roma Tre, via dea Vasca Navae 84, I Roma, Itay and 8 INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Monte Porzio Catone, Itay Draft version November 10, 2018 ABSTRACT We investigate the nature of the extragaactic unresoved γ-ray background (UGRB) by cross-correating severa gaaxy cataogs with sky-maps of the UGRB buit from 78 months of Pass 8 Fermi-Large Area Teescope data. This study updates and improves simiar previous anayses in severa aspects. Firsty, the use of a arger γ-ray dataset aows us to investigate the energy dependence of the cross-correation in more detai, using up to 8 energy bins over a wide energy range of [ ] GeV. Secondy, we consider arger and deeper cataogs (2MASS Photometric-Redshift cataog, 2MPZ; WISE SuperCOSMOS, WI SC; and SDSS-DR12 photometric-redshift dataset) in addition to the ones empoyed in the previous studies (NVSS and SDSS-QSOs). Thirdy, we expoit the redshift information avaiabe for the above cataogs to divide them into redshift bins and perform the cross-correation separatey in each of them. Our resuts confirm, with higher statistica significance, the detection of cross-correation signa between the UGRB maps and a the cataogs considered, on anguar scaes smaer than 1. Significances range from 16.3 σ for NVSS, 7 σ for SDSS-DR12 and WI SC, 5 σ for 2MPZ and 4 σ for SDSS-QSOs. Furthermore, incuding redshift tomography, the significance of the SDSS-DR12 signa strikingy rises up to 12 σ and the one of WI SC to 10.6 σ. We offer a simpe interpretation of the signa in the framework of the hao-mode. The precise redshift and energy information aows us to ceary detect a change over redshift in the spectra and custering behavior of the γ-ray sources contributing to the UGRB. Subject headings: cosmoogy: theory cosmoogy: observations cosmoogy: arge scae structure of the universe gamma rays: diffuse backgrounds 1. INTRODUCTION The extragaactic γ-ray background (EGB) is the gammaray emission observed at high gaactic atitudes after subtraction of the diffuse emission from our Gaaxy. It is mainy contributed by various casses of astrophysica sources, ike common star-forming gaaxies (SFGs) and active gaactic nucei (AGNs) such as bazars. Contributions from purey diffuse processes, for exampe cascades from utra-high-energy cosmic-rays, are aso possibe, as we as exotic scenarios ike γ-rays from dark matter (DM) annihiation or decay (see Fornasa & Sanchez-Conde 2015 for a review). In the era of the Fermi Large Area Teescope (LAT, Atwood et a. 2009), with its strong sensitivity to point sources, a sizabe fraction of the EGB has been resoved into sources. Indeed, the third Fermi γ-ray cataog of sources (3FGL, Acero et a. 2015) contains 3000 sources. The resoved sources constitute typicay 10-20% of the EGB for energies beow 10 GeV, whie above this energy the fraction rises up to 50% or more (Ackermann et a. 2015, 2016). This arge number of detected sources has been fundamenta to study in detai the different popuations of emitters, and to infer their properties in the so-far unresoved regime (Ackermann et a. 2011; Inoue 2011; Ackermann et a. 2012; Ajeo et a. 2012, 2014; Di Mauro et a. cuoco@physik.rwth-aachen.de, biicki@strw.eidenuniv.n, xiajq@bnu.edu.cn, branchin@fis.uniroma3.it 2014a,c). The sti-unresoved EGB emission is typicay indicated with the name of unresoved (or isotropic) gamma-ray background (UGRB, Ackermann et a. 2015) and is the subject of the present anaysis. Together with popuation studies of resoved sources, in recent years a number of different and compementary techniques have been deveoped to study the UGRB in a more direct way, expoiting the information contained in the spatia as we as in the energy properties of the UGRB maps. Among these we can ist anisotropy anayses (Ando & Komatsu 2006, 2013; Ando 2009; Ackermann et a. 2012; Cuoco et a. 2012; Harding & Abazajian 2012; Fornasa et a. 2013; Di Mauro et a. 2014b; Ando et a. 2017; Fornasa et a. 2016), pixe statistic anayses (Dodeson et a. 2009; Mayshev & Hogg 2011; Feyereisen et a. 2015; Lisanti et a. 2016; Zechin et a. 2016b,a), and cross-correations with tracers of the arge-scae structure of the Universe (Ando 2014; Ando et a. 2014; Fornengo & Regis 2014; Shirasaki et a. 2014; Camera et a. 2015; Cuoco et a. 2015; Fornengo et a. 2015; Regis et a. 2015; Xia et a. 2015; Feng et a. 2017; Shirasaki et a. 2016; Tröster et a. 2017), which we wi investigate in the foowing. In Xia et a. (2015) (herafter X15), Cuoco et a. (2015) and Regis et a. (2015) 5-years γ-ray maps of the UGRB from Fermi-LAT were cross-correated with different cataogs of gaaxies, i.e., SDSS-DR6 quasars (Richards et a. 2009),

2 2 Cuoco et a. SDSS-DR8 Luminous Red Gaaxies (Abdaa et a. 2011), NVSS radiogaaxies (Condon et a. 1998), 2MASS gaaxies (Jarrett et a. 2000), and SDSS DR8 main sampe gaaxies (Aihara et a. 2011). Significant correation (at the eve of 3-5 σ) was observed at sma anguar scaes, 1, for a the cataogs except the Luminous Red Gaaxies, and the resuts interpreted in terms of constraints on the composition of the UGRB. This work updates these anayses in severa aspects : i) we use a arger amount of Fermi data, amost 7 years compared to the 5 years. In doing so, we empoy the new Fermi-LAT Pass 8 data seection (Atwood et a. 2013), based on improved event reconstruction agorithm, and providing a 30% arger effective area. The fu Pass 8 dataset is roughy two times arger than the 5 years Pass 7 dataset. With such arge dataset, we can perform our cross-correation anaysis in more energy bins. We now consider up to eight energy bins instead of the three ones used in X15. ii) we use updated versions of the origina gaaxy cataogs. For exampe, we now use the 2MPZ cataog instead of 2MASS. 2MPZ extends the 2MASS dataset by adding precise photometric redshifts which were not avaiabe before (but see Jarrett 2004). Thanks to this we can perform cross-correation anaysis subdividing the sampe into a number of different z-bins. Simiary, instead of the SDSS main sampe gaaxies, we now consider the atest SDSS DR12 photometric gaaxy cataog. As for the NVSS cataog and the QSO sampe we consider the same datasets used in the previous anayses. iii) we consider a new dataset: the WISE SuperCOSMOS photometric redshift cataog (WI SC, Biicki et a. 2016). This is a natura extension of 2MPZ providing coverage of 75% of sky and reaching in redshift up to amost z 0.5. In our anaysis, we wi use the same methodoogy as in X15 and estimate the anguar two-point cross-correation function (CCF) and the cross-anguar power spectrum (CAPS) of the UGRB maps and discrete objects cataogs. The rationae for computing two quantities, CCF and CAPS, which contain the same information is that they are argey compementary since their estimates are affected by different types of biases and, which is probaby more important, the properties of the error covariance are different in the two cases. The ayout of the paper is as foows: in Section 2 we present the Fermi-LAT maps, their accompanying masks and discuss the procedure adopted to remove potentia spurious contributions to the extragaactic signa. In Section 3 we present the cataogs of different types of extragaactic sources that we cross-correate with the Fermi UGRB maps. In Section 4 we briefy describe the CCF and CAPS estimators and their uncertainties. In Section 5 we propose a simpe, yet physicay motivated mode for the cross-correation signa and introduce the χ 2 anaysis used to perform the comparison with the data. The resuts of the cross-correation anaysis are described in Section 6 and discussed in Section 7 in which we aso summarize our main concusions. An extended discussion of the systematic errors is presented in Appendix A, where we describe the resuts of a series of tests to assess the robustness of our resuts. Appendix B contains additiona pots that show resuts of the cross correation anaysis not incuded in the main text. To mode the expected anguar cross-correations we assume a fat Cod Dark Matter mode with a cosmoogica constant (ΛCDM) with cosmoogica parameters Ω b h 2 = , Ω c h 2 = , τ = , h = , n10 10 A s = at k 0 = 0.05 Mpc 1, and n s = , in accordance with the most recent Panck resuts (Panck Coaboration et a. 2016). The data fies containing the resuts of our cross correation anaysis are pubicy avaiabe at stanford.edu/pub_data/. 2. FERMI-LAT MAPS In this section we describe the EGB maps obtained from 7 years of Fermi-LAT observations and the masks and procedures used to subtract contributions from i) γ ray resoved sources, ii) Gaactic diffuse emission due to interaction of cosmic rays with the interstear medium and iii) additiona Gaactic emission ocated high above the Gaactic pane in prominent structures such as the Fermi Bubbes (Su et a. 2010) and Loop I (Casandjian et a. 2009). Fermi-LAT is a pair-conversion teescope onboard the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Teescope (Atwood et a. 2009). It covers the energy range between 20 MeV and 1 TeV, most of which wi be used in our anaysis (E= [0.25,500] GeV), and has an exceent anguar resoution ( 0.1 ) above 10 GeV over a arge fied of view ( 2.4 sr). For our study we have used 78 months of data from August 4, 2008 to January 31, 2015 (Fermi Mission Eapsed Time s s), considering the Pass 8 event seection (Atwood et a. 2013) and excuding photons detected with measured zenith ange arger than 100 to reduce the contamination from the bright Earth imb emission. We used both back-converting and front-converting events. The corresponding exposure maps were produced using the standard routines from the LAT Science Toos 1 version , and the P8R2_CLEAN_V6 instrument response functions (IRFs). We have aso used for a cross-check the P8R2_ULTRACLEANVETO_V6 IRFs, which provide a data seection where residua contamination of the γ-ray sampe from charged cosmic rays is substantiay reduced, at the price of a decrease in effective area of 30%. To pixeize the photon counts we have used the GaRDiAn package (Ackermann et a. 2009; Ackermann et a. 2012). The count maps were generated in HEALPix 2 format (Górski et a. 2005) containing N pix = 12,582,912 pixes with mean spacing of 0.06 corresponding to the HEALPix resoution parameter N side = Thanks to the arge event statistics we consider eight bins with energy edges E = 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 50, 200, 500 GeV. In severa cases we have grouped the events in three wider intervas in order to have better statistics and higher signa-tonoise: 0.5 < E < 1 GeV, 1 < E < 10 GeV, and 10 < E < 200 GeV. The masking, the ceaning procedure and the tests aimed at assessing our abiity to remove contributions from the Gaactic foreground and resoved sources have been described in detai in Xia et a. (2011) and in X15. Here we summarize the main steps. i) The geometry mask excudes the Gaactic Pane b < 30, the region associated with the Fermi Bubbes and the Loop I structure, and two circes of 5 and 3 radius at the position of the Large and Sma Mageanic Couds, respectivey. The 500 brightest point sources (in terms of the integrated photon fux in the GeV energy range) from 1 documentation/cicerone/ 2

3 Tomographic imaging of the γ-ray sky 3 the 3FGL cataog are masked with a disk of radius 2, and the remaining ones with a disk of 1 radius. We notice that in severa of the cross-correation anayses (in particuar the ones invoving SDSS-reated cataogs) presented beow, the mask of the cataog argey overaps and sometimes incudes the Fermi one so that the effective geometry mask used is more conservative than the one described here. ii) The Gaactic diffuse emission in the unmasked region has been removed by subtracting the mode g_iem_v05_rev1.fit 3 (Acero et a. 2016) from the observed emission. More precisey, in the unmasked region we performed, separatey in each energy bin, a twocomponent fit incuding the Gaactic emission from the mode above and a purey isotropic emission. Convoution of the two tempate maps with the IRFs and subsequent fit to the observed counts were then performed with GaRDiAn. The best-fit isotropic pus Gaactic emission, in count units, was then subtracted off from the γ-ray count maps, and finay divided by the exposure map in the considered energy range to obtain the residua fux maps used for the anaysis. The robustness of this ceaning procedure has been tested against a different Gaactic diffuse emission mode, ring_2year_p76_v0.fits 3. We have found that the two modes are very simiar in our region of interest. As a resut, their residuas agree at the percent eve. We stress, nonetheess, that the Gaactic foregrounds are not expected to correate with extragaactic structures, and thus it is not crucia to achieve a perfect ceaning. Indeed, in X15, we did show that even without foreground remova the recovered cross-correations were unbiased, whie the main impact of foreground remova was to suppress the background and thus to reduce the size of the random errors. Simiar concusions were reached in the recent cross-correation anaysis of weak ensing cataogs with Fermi-LAT performed by Tröster et a. (2017). Anaogous considerations appy to the point sources. Especiay at ow energies, some eakage of the point sources outside the mask is expected, since the point-spread function of the instrument becomes arge and the tais ie outside the mask. Nonetheess, bright point sources shoud not correate with extragaactic sources, so the eakage is expected to increase the random noise but not to introduce biases. In Appendix A, we test the vaidity of this assumption estimating the correation using different point source masks and find that the resuts is insensitive to the choice of the mask. iii) An imperfect ceaning procedure may induce spurious features in the diffuse γ-ray signa on arge anguar scaes. These shoud not significanty affect our cross-correation anaysis since they are not expected to correate with the sources responsibe for the UGRB. Nevertheess, to minimize the chance that spurious arge-scae correation power may eak into the genuine signa, we performed an additiona ceaning step (dubbed 10 ceaning) and removed contributions up to mutipoes = 10, incuding the monopoe and dipoe, from a the maps, using standard HEALPix toos. This ceaning procedure was aso adopted in Xia et a. (2011). Exampe maps are shown in Fig. 1 for the energy range 1-10 GeV, with and without the fiducia mask, and after the foreground subtraction and 10 ceaning. In the bottom pane, the residuas are shown without the Bubbes/Loop I mask in order to show that the ceaning works we nonetheess aso in this region. 3 BackgroundModes.htm FIG. 1. A-sky Moweide projections of Fermi-LAT tota fux maps in the energy range 1-10 GeV. Upper pane: Fux map without mask. Midde pane: Fux map together with the fiducia mask, covering 3FGL point sources and the Gaactic b < 30 region. The two further visibe ines encose the region covering the Fermi Bubbes and the Loop I area. Lower pane: residua fux maps after Gaactic foreground subtraction and 10 ceaning. For better visuaization the upper two maps have been smoothed with a Gaussian beam of FWHM = 0.5, and the ower one with FWHM = CATALOGS OF DISCRETE SOURCES In this work we use five different cataogs of extragaactic objects for the cross-correation anaysis. They span wide, overapping redshift ranges, contain different types of objects (gaaxies, quasars) detected at severa waveengths (UV, optica, near- and mid-ir, radio) whose distances, when avaiabe, are inferred from photometric redshifts. They a share two

4 4 Cuoco et a. NVSS gaaxies emitting in gamma rays. Radio sources in the NVSS cataog do not come with an estimate of their redshift. We use the redshift distribution determined by Brookes et a. (2008). Their sampe, contained 110 sources with S > 10 mjy, of which 78(i.e. 71 % of the tota) had spectroscopic redshifts, 23 had redshift estimates from the K z reation for radio sources, and 9 were not detected in the K-band and therefore had a ower imit to z. We adopt the smooth parametrization of this distribution given in de Zotti et a. (2010), shown in Fig. 2 with the magenta ine. FIG. 2. Redshift distributions of the five datasets used in our anaysis. The curves show their normaized dn/dz distributions, based on photometric redshifts of the sources. An exception is the NVSS where no redshift estimates are avaiabe, hence the anaytica approximation described in the text was assumed. source sky number mean surface cataog coverage of sources density [deg 2 ] NVSS 25.5% 177, MPZ 28.8% 293, WISE SCOS 28.7% 7,544, SDSS DR % 15,194, SDSS DR6 QSO 11.7% 340, TABLE 1 STATISTICS OF THE SOURCE CATALOGS USED FOR THE CROSS-CORRELATION. THE SKY COVERAGE INDICATES THE AREA EFFECTIVELY USED IN THE ANALYSIS, I.E., AFTER APPLYING BOTH THE CATALOG AND γ-ray MASKS. THE NUMBERS REFER TO THE OBJECTS CONTAINED IN THE SELECTED REGIONS. important characteristics: arge anguar coverage to maximize the number of Fourier modes avaiabe to the cross-correation anaysis, and a arge number of objects to minimize shot noise errors. The redshift distributions of the sources in the various cataogs are shown in Fig. 2. Overa, they span an extended range of redshift, from z = 0 out to z 5. Such a wide redshift coverage is of paramount importance to identify the nature of the UGRB that coud be generated both by nearby (star forming gaaxies and DM annihiation processes in haos) and high redshift sources (e.g. bazars). In Tabe 1 we summarise the basic properties of the source cataogs used in our anaysis, such as their sky coverage, source number and mean surface density of the objects in the region of sky effectivey used for the anaysis, i.e., after appying both the cataog and γ-ray masks. In the foowing sections, instead, when describing a given cataog, we wi report numbers referred to the nomina mask of the cataog itsef NVSS The NRAO VLA cataog (NVSS, Condon et a. 1998) is the argest cataog of radio sources currenty avaiabe. The sampe considered in our anaysis contains objects with a fux > 10 mjy, ocated at decinations δ 40 and outside a reativey narrow Zone of Avoidance ( b > 5 ). The mean surface density of sources is 16.9 deg 2. This is the same NVSS dataset used in the cross-correation anaysis of X15. The map showing the sky coverage and anguar positions of the objects can be found in (Xia et a. 2011, fig. 9). The main reason for repeating the cross-correation anaysis using the new Pass-8 Fermi data is to check the robustness of the strong correation signa at sma anguar separation found by X15 and interpreted as contributed by the same 3.2. SDSS DR6 QSO In recent years severa quasar cataogs have been obtained based on the SDSS dataset, compemented in some cases with additiona information, most notaby from the Wide-fied Infrared Survey Exporer (WISE). They a are meant to supersede the SDSS DR6 QSO cataog (Richards et a. 2009, hereafter DR6-QSO) used in the previous cross-correation anayses by Xia et a. (2011, 2015). We checked the adequacy of these new sampes using two criteria: the surface number density of objects, that has to be arge to minimize the shot noise error, and the uniformity in the seection function of the cataog across the sky to ensure a uniform caibration of the cataog. Our tests have shown that none of the newer datasets satisfy these requirements better than the origina DR6-QSO one since in a the new sampes we detected arge variations in the number density of sources across the sky. Neither aggressive ceaning procedures nor geometry cuts were abe to guarantee anguar homogeneity without heaviy compromising the surface density of sources. For these reasons, we decided to rey on the origina DR6- QSO cataog. We appied the same preseection procedures as in Xia et a. (2011, 2015). In particuar, we considered ony the sources with an UV excess fag uvxts = 1, since this criterion provides a uniform seection. There are about sources in the sampe seected this way, covering 25% of the sky, with photometric redshifts 0 < z < 5.75 ( z 1.5) of typica accuracy σ z Fig. 2 shows smoothed dn/dz of this dataset (back ine). We note however that the origina histogram as derived from the Richards et a. (2009) data is very non-uniform, exhibiting mutipe peaks (see, e.g., fig. 1 in Xia et a. 2009), probaby an artifact of the photoz assignment method. Nevertheess, this is of minor importance for the present paper, as for the cross-correation we use very broad redshift shes. In particuar, we spit the DR6- QSO dataset into three bins of z [0.0,1.0], [1.0,2.0], and [2.0,4.0], seected in a way to have simiar number of objects in each bin. Usage of redshift shes is, together with the updated Fermi data and binning in energy, a nove eement of the QSO γ-ray cross-correation anaysis in comparison to Xia et a. (2011, 2015), where the same quasar sampe was considered as one broad bin encompassing a the data. Fig. 3 shows a-sky projections of the three redshift shes of the DR6-QSO cataog in HEALPix format. We have excuded from the anaysis the three narrow stripes present in the south Gaactic sky and use ony the northern region MPZ The 2MASS Photometric Redshift cataog (2MPZ, Biicki et a. 2014) is a dataset of gaaxies with measured photometric redshifts constructed by cross-matching three a-sky datasets covering different energy bands: 2MASS-XSC (near-infrared, Jarrett et a. 2000), WISE (mid-infrared, Wright et a. 2010)

5 Tomographic imaging of the γ-ray sky 5 DR QSO z DR QSO z DR QSO z counts per pixe counts per pixe counts per pixe FIG. 3. A-sky projections of the SDSS DR6 QSO distribution in the three redshift shes adopted in the anaysis. The maps have HEALPix resoution N side = 128 and incude additiona Gaussian smoothing of FWHM = 1 for better visuaization. MPZ z MPZ z MPZ z counts per pixe counts per pixe counts per pixe FIG. 4. A-sky projections of the 2MPZ gaaxy distribution in the three redshift shes adopted in the anaysis. The maps have HEALPix resoution N side = 128 and incude additiona Gaussian smoothing of FWHM = 1 for better visuaization. and SuperCOSMOS scans of UKST/POSS-II photographic pates (optica, Peacock et a. 2016). 2MPZ is fux imited at K s < 13.9 and contains 935,000 gaaxies over most of the sky. However, since the strip at b < 10 is undersamped, in our anaysis we masked out this region as we as other incompeteness areas, using a mask simiar to the one shown in Aonso et a. (2015). The 2MPZ photo-zs are generay unbiased ( δz 0). Their random errors are amost distance-independent, their distribution has an rms scatter σ z = with 1% of outiers beyond 3σ z. The redshift distribution of 2MPZ gaaxies is shown in Fig. 2 (red ine). It peaks at z 0.06 and has z The surface density of objects is 30 sources per square degree. 2MPZ is the ony wide cataog that comprehensivey probes the nearby Universe (z 0.2) a-sky and has reiabe redshift estimates. This feature and the possibiity of dividing the sampe in different redshift shes are crucia to constrain the composition of the UGRB. For our anaysis we spit the cataog in three redshift bins: z [0.00, 0.06], [0.06, 0.12] and [0.12, 0.40]. The binning was designed to bracket the mean redshift in the second bin and to guarantee a reasonaby arge number of objects in the two other bins. Moreover, this binning has a good overap with that adopted to sice the SDSS-DR12 sampe (Section 3.5). In Section 6.3 we sha aso use the fu 2MPZ sampe for the crosscorreation anaysis (the case dubbed ZA ) so that the resuts can be directy compared with those of X15, obtained using the 2MASS cataog. The a-sky distribution of 2MPZ gaaxies in each of the three redshift bins is shown in Fig WISE SuperCOSMOS The WISE SuperCOSMOS photometric redshift cataog (Biicki et a. 2016), hereafter WI SC, is the resut of cross-matching the two widest gaaxy photometric cataogs currenty avaiabe: the mid-infrared WISE and optica SuperCOSMOS datasets. Information from GAMA-II (Liske et a. 2015) and SDSS-DR12 (Aam et a. 2015) was used to excude stars and quasars, to obtain a sampe of 20 miion gaaxies with a mean surface density above 650 sources per square degree. The resuting cataog is 95% pure at high Gaactic atitudes of b > 30 and highy compete over 70% of the sky, outside the Zone of Avoidance ( b < 10 pus the area around the Gaactic buge) and other confusion regions. Photometric redshifts for a gaaxies, caibrated on GAMA-II, were estimated with a systematic error δ z 10 3 and a random error σ z with 3% of outiers beyond 3σ z. The redshift distribution of WI SC gaaxies has a mean z = 0.2 and is characterized by a broad peak extending from z 0.1 to z 0.3 and a prominent high-z tai reaching up to z > 0.4, as shown in Fig. 2 (bue curve). After masking we are eft with about 18.5 miion gaaxies that we divided into four redshift bins: z [0.00, 0.09], [0.09, 0.21], [0.21, 0.30], and [0.30, 0.50]. As in the 2MPZ case, the binning was chosen to guarantee a significant overap with the other source cataogs used in our anaysis. The first bin, Z1, encompasses the first two redshift bins of the 2MPZ sampe, as we as the first redshift bin of the SDSS- DR12 one. Because of the bright cut used to buid the cataog, WI SC probes an intrinsicay faint popuation and has very few sources in common with 2MPZ and SDSS-DR12 at z 0.09 (for more detais see Biicki et a. 2016). The two bins at z > 0.21, which contain an approximatey equa number of WI SC gaaxies, overap with SDSS-DR12 bins Z3 (i.e. the third redshift bin) and Z4+Z5. The sky maps of the WI SC sources in the four bins are shown in Fig. 5. The probematic areas near the Gaaxy and the Mageanic Couds, that feature prominenty especiay in the first bin have been masked out and excuded from the cross-correation anaysis. A residua over-density of sources aong the Gaactic Pane, which is visibe in the first and ast redshift bin and is ikey due to stear contamination, survives the masking procedure. We decided to remove it by appying

6 6 Cuoco et a. WISExSuperCOSMOS z WISExSuperCOSMOS z WISExSuperCOSMOS z counts per pixe counts per pixe counts per pixe WISExSuperCOSMOS z WISExSuperCOSMOS z ceaned WISExSuperCOSMOS z ceaned counts per pixe counts per pixe counts per pixe FIG. 5. A-sky projections of the WISE SuperCOSMOS gaaxy distribution in the four redshift shes adopted in the anaysis. The maps have HEALPix resoution N side = 256 and incude additiona Gaussian smoothing of FWHM = 1 for better visuaization. The two bottom-right panes show the first and the ast redshift bins after the 10 ceaning procedure, and appying the cataog mask and the fiducia Gaactic pane mask of b < 30. the same 10 ceaning procedure as adopted for the γ-ray map. This conservative procedure has itte impact on the crosscorreation anaysis since these probematic areas are argey excuded by the Fermi Gaactic pane mask ( b < 30 ) which we appy in each cross-correation (see, e.g., the bottom-right panes of Fig. 5) SDSS DR12 photometric This cataog is a revised version of the one used in Xia et a. (2011, 2015). It has been derived from the SDSS photometric redshift cataog of Beck et a. (2016), which incudes over 200 miion sources cassified by SDSS as gaaxies, and provides photometric redshifts for a arge part of them. Foowing authors recommendations 4, we considered ony the sources with a photometric error cass 1, 1, 2, or 3, whose rms redshift error is σ z (Beck et a. 2016). This dataset was further purified to obtain uniform depth over the observed area. For that reason we considered ony gaaxies with extinction-corrected r band magnitudes in the range 13 < r < 21 outside the Zone of Avoidance 10 < b < 15, as we as areas of r-band extinction A r < After appying these seection criteria, we are eft with 32 miion sources with a mean redshift z = 0.34 and mosty within z < 0.6. The sky coverage is 27% and the mean surface density is 2900 deg 2. As shown in Fig. 2 (green ine), their redshift distribution features a main peak at z 0.38 and a secondary one at z 0.19, possiby indicating some issue with the photo-z assignment. Given the very arge density of objects, we can spit the sampe into severa redshift bins, keeping ow shotnoise in each she. In our anaysis we divided the dataset into seven redshift bins: six of width z = 0.1, starting from z = 0 to z = 0.6, and the seventh encompassing the wider range 0.6 < z < 1 (to compensate the source fa-off in the redshift distribution). These shes are iustrated in a-sky maps of Fig. 6. It can be seen that the SDSS gaaxies are distributed into two disconnected regions in the Gaactic south and north, with most of the area in the north part. Furthermore, as shown 4 See aso photo-z/. in the Figure, the southern region has quite uneven samping. For this reason we have excuded this region from the anaysis and use ony the northern part. 4. CROSS-CORRELATION ANALYSIS In the previous section we have presented the cataogs of extragaactic objects that we use in the anaysis. Their format is that of a 2D pixeized map of object counts n(ˆω i ), where ˆΩ i specifies the anguar coordinate of the i-th pixe. For the cross-correation anaysis we consider maps of normaized counts n(ˆω i )/ n, where n is the mean object density in the unmasked area, and the Fermi-LAT residua fux sky-maps, aso pixeized with a matching anguar resoution. In our anaysis we compute both the anguar 2-point crosscorreation function, CCF, w (γc) (θ), and its harmonic transform, the anguar power spectrum C (γc), CAPS. In particuar, we sha use the CCF for visuaization purposes but we restrict the quantitative anaysis to the CAPS ony. The reason for this is choice is that the CAPS has the advantage that the different mutipoes are amost uncorreated, especiay after binning. Their covariance matrix is therefore cose to diagona, which simpifies the comparison between modes and data. Furthermore, it is easier to subtract off instrumenta effects ike the point-spread function (PSF) smearing, since a convoution in configuration space is just a mutipicative factor in harmonic space. On the other hand, its interpretation is not so intuitive since the CAPS signa typicay extends over a broad range of mutipoes. The CCF offers the advantage of a signa concentrated within a few degrees that can be intuitivey associated to the anguar size of the γ-ray emitting region. The quantitative anaysis of the CCF is, instead, more chaenging because the cross-correation signas in different anguar bins are highy correated and the PSF convoution effect is more difficut to account for. Foowing X15, we use the PoSpice 5 statistica tookit (Szapudi et a. 2001; Chon et a. 2004; Efstathiou 2004a; 5 See PoSpice/.

7 Tomographic imaging of the γ-ray sky 7 SDSS DR photometric z SDSS DR photometric z SDSS DR photometric z counts per pixe counts per pixe counts per pixe SDSS DR photometric z SDSS DR photometric z SDSS DR photometric z counts per pixe counts per pixe counts per pixe SDSS DR photometric z counts per pixe FIG. 6. A-sky projections of the SDSS DR12 photometric gaaxy distribution in the seven redshift shes adopted in the anaysis. The maps have HEALPix resoution N side = 256 and incude additiona Gaussian smoothing of FWHM = 1 for better visuaization. Chainor & Chon 2005) to estimate both CCF and CAPS. PoSpice automaticay corrects for the effect of the mask. In this respect, we point out that the effective geometry of the mask used for the correation anaysis is obtained by combining that of the LAT maps with those of each cataog of astrophysica objects. The accuracy of the PoSpice estimator has been assessed in X15 by comparing the measured CCF with the one computed using the popuar Landy-Szaay method (Landy & Szaay 1993). The two were found to be in very good agreement. PoSpice aso provides the covariance matrix for the anguar power spectrum, V (Efstathiou 2004b). The instrument PSF and the map pixeization affect the estimate of the CAPS. To remove these effects we proceed as associated to the LAT PSF, and the pixe window function W pixe associated to the map pixeization. Since the LAT PSF varies in X15: we first derive the beam window function W B significanty with energy, we derive W B on a grid of 100 energy vaues from 100 MeV to 1 TeV. This is then used to derive the average W B in the specific energy bin anayzed. The procedure is described in detai in X15. Then we expoit the fact that convoution in configuration space is a mutipication in harmonic space and estimate the deconvoved CAPS C (γc) from the measured one C (γc) as C (γc) = (W ) 1 C (γc), where ( ) 2 is the goba window function. The win- W = W B dow function W has two contributions, from the LAT and W pixe cross-correating cataog: it is the doube product of the beam window W B pixe and the pixeization window function W from each cataog. However, we negect a factor of W B reated to the cataog maps since the typica anguar resoution of the cataogs (< 10 ) is much smaer than the pixe size, so that the associated W B pixe 1. The square in the W term takes into account the pixe window functions of both maps. Its effect is minor since, as shown in Fig.3 in Fornasa et a. 2016, its vaue is cose to unity up to = 2000, which is the maximum mutipoe considered in our anaysis. The covariance matrix for the deconvoved C (γc) is then expressed as V = V W 2W 2. Finay, to reduce the correation in nearby mutipoes induced by the anguar mask, we bin the measured CAPS into 12 equay spaced ogarithmic intervas in the range [10,2000]. We choose ogarithmic bins to account for the rapid oss of power at high induced by the PSF. We indicate the binned CAPS with the same symbo as the unbinned one C (γc). It shoud be cear from the context which one is used. The C (γc) in each bin is given by the simpe unweighted average of the C (γc) within the bin. For the binned C (γc) we buid the corresponding covariance matrix as a bock average of the unbinned covariance matrix, i.e., V / /, where, are the widths of the two mutipoe bins, and, run over the mutipoes of the first and the second bin. The binning procedure is very efficient in removing correation among nearby mutipoes, resuting in a bock covariance matrix that is, to a good approximation, diagona 6 For this reason we wi negect the off-diagona terms in our anaysis and ony use the diagona 6 Note that, in the case of non-gaussian fuctuations, ike the one considered here, the non vanishing trispectrum coud induce, possiby, extra correa-

8 8 Cuoco et a. ones ( C ) 2 = V / 2. The CCF covariance matrix can be computed from the CAPS covariance as (Panck Coaboration et a. 2014) C PS θθ = π π P (cosθ)p (cosθ ) V. (1) An average over the anguar separations θ and θ within each bin can be performed to obtain a binned covariance matrix. In the foowing, we wi compute the w (γc) (θ) in the range θ [0.1,100 ] binned into 10 ogarithmicay spaced bins. Since, as aready mentioned, we imit our quantitative anaysis to CAPS, we sha not use the CCF covariance matrix nor we make any attempt to deconvove the measured w (γc) (θ) to account for the effects of the PSF and pixeization. We do, however, show the measured CCF and its errors in our pots. The errorbars there correspond to the diagona eement of the binned CCF covariance matrix. Error covariance is therefore not represented in the pots. 5. CAPS MODELS AND χ 2 ANALYSIS In this section we iustrate our modes for the CAPS and the CCF and how we compare them with the measurements. We consider a simpe, phenomenoogica CAPS mode, inspired by the hao mode, (Cooray & Sheth 2002) in which the anguar spectrum in each energy bin is a sum of two terms Ĉ γc = + A 2h C 2h, (2) named 1-hao and 2-hao terms, respectivey. The hao mode assumes that a matter in the universe is contained in DM haos popuated by baryonic objects, ike gaaxies, AGNs, and, in particuar, γ-ray sources. In this framework, quantifies the spatia correation within a singe hao i.e., γ-ray sources and extragaactic objects that reside in the same DM hao. The specia case in which the γ-ray and the extragaactic sources are the same object detected at different waveengths is, sometimes, treated differenty, since it formay corresponds to a Dirac-deta correation in rea space. Nonetheess, since haos are typicay smaer than the avaiabe anguar resoution of Fermi-LAT, it is, in practice, hard to distinguish the degenerate case from the case of two separate objects Thus, for simpicity, we incude both into a singe term which contribute to the the 1-hao correation. The C 2h term describes the haohao custering. If non zero it indicates that both γ-ray sources and extragaactic objects trace the same arge scae structure. The Fourier transform of the 1-hao term, is therefore made of two components. The first one, which comes from the Dirac-deta, is a constant term in the -space. The second one, which is the Fourier transform of the hao profie, does depend on the mutipoe. In practice, however, its dependence is very weak because DM haos are amost pointike at the resoution set by the LAT PSF. Therefore we mode the tota as a constant and ignore any mutipoe dependence. We beieve that this is a fair hypothesis for a anayses performed in this study except, perhaps, the cross correation with the 2MPZ cataogue since some of the hao hosts are tion among the mutipoes (Komatsu & Sejak 2002; Ando et a. 2017). These terms are not considered in the covariance matrix computed by PoSpice, that we use in our anaysis. The importance of these terms for our anaysis is uncertain, athough we have found that errors computed using the PoSpice covariance matrix are compatibe to those computed using Jackknife resamping techniques (X15). A dedicated anaysis woud be required to propery quantify the impact of these terms, which is beyond the scope of this work. cose enough to us to appear wider than the LAT PSF. In this case the modeing of is probaby inaccurate at the highest. Nonetheess, this inconsistency shoud have a negigibe impact on our anaysis because of the arge errors on the C measured at arge mutipoes which reduce substantiay the sensitivity to the shape of the at high vaues. A 2h is the second free parameter of the mode which sets the ampitude of the 2-hao term, C 2h, that accounts for the correation among haos. Its dependence refects the anguar correation properties of the DM hao distribution. To first approximation it can be expressed as C 2h = 2 π k 2 P(k)[G γ (k)][gc (k)]dk, (3) where P(k) is the power spectrum of matter density fuctuations. We take the inear prediction of P(k) from the camb code (Lewis et a. 2000) for the Panck Coaboration et a. (2016) cosmoogica parameters specified in Sec. 1, and appy a non-inear correction using haofit (Smith et a. 2003; Takahashi et a. 2012). The functions G(k) specify the contribution of each fied to the cross-correation signa. More specificay, the contribution from the fied of number density fuctuations in a popuation of discrete objects is given by dn G c (k) = dz b c(z)d(z) j [kχ(z)]dz, (4) where dn/dz is the redshift distribution of the objects, j are spherica Besse functions, D(z) is the inear growth factor of density fuctuations, b c is the inear bias parameter of the objects, and χ(z) is the comoving distance to redshift z. The anaogous quantity for the diffuse UGRB fied is G γ (k) = ρ γ (z)b γ (z)d(z) j [kχ(z)]dz, (5) where b γ (z) is the inear bias of the γ-ray emitters, and ρ γ (z) is their average fux density. When the cross-correation is computed for the whoe cataog of sources, we consider the fu dn/dz shown in Fig. 2. When, instead, the cross-correation is computed in a specific redshift bin, then we set the dn/dz equa to zero outside the redshift bin and equa to the origina dn/dz inside the bin. The ampitude of the corresponding dn/dz is normaized to unity. For the distribution of the γ-ray emitters, ρ γ (z), the situation is more compicated, since we do not observe ρ γ (z) directy. In principe, the aim of the cross-correation anaysis is, indeed, to constrain this quantity, i.e., to assume a mode ρ γ (z), predict the expected cross correation and compare it with the observed one. This wi be pursued in a foowup anaysis in which we sha consider physicay motivated ρ γ (z) modes. Instead, here, where we aim at an iustrative, mode-independent approach, we choose to have the average ρ γ (z) in a given redshift bin as a free parameter. In this way, the absoute normaization of ρ γ (z) is absorbed in the parameter A 2h. More precisey, when cross-correating the UGRB with a cataog in a given redshift bin, the measured A 2h wi be the product of three quantities. The first two are the average bias factors b c (z) and b γ (z) in the redshift range of the bin, and the third wi be the average ρ γ (z) in that bin. We stress that this simpe mode tries to capture the anguar correation features of the expected cross-correation signa without assuming any specific mode for the sources of the UGRB. Its main goa is to separate the signa into 1-hao

9 Tomographic imaging of the γ-ray sky 9 and 2-hao components, and study their energy dependence. In a foow up paper, we sha consider a physicay motivated mode, simiar to that of Cuoco et a. (2015), incuding the contribution from a potentia unresoved γ-ray sources (bazars, misaigned AGNs, star forming gaaxies, decaying or annihiating non-baryonic matter). Within this framework, it wi be possibe to expicity specify the bias of the sources, their number density as a function of redshift, ρ γ (z), as we as their custering. Eq. (2) modes the CAPS for a singe energy bin. However, since in this work we compute the cross-correation signa in severa energy bins, we can aso use a CAPS mode which incudes an expicit energy dependence. For this purpose we have considered three different modes specified beow: Singe Power Law [SPL]: (E) = E ( + A 2h C 2h ) (E/E0 ) α, (6) Ĉ γc where, E is the width of the energy bin considered in the cross-correation anaysis, α is the sope and E 0 = 1 GeV is a normaization energy scae. Doube Power Law [DPL]: Ĉ γc (E) = E C1h (E/E 0 ) α1h + E A 2h C 2h (E/E 0 ) β2h, (7) Ĉ γc where the 1-hao and 2-hao terms are aowed to have two different power aws with sopes α and β. Broken Power Law [BPL]: (E) = E ( { + A 2h C 2h ) (E/Eb ) α, E > E b (E/E b ) β, (8), E < E b characterized by a broken power aw with sopes α and β respectivey above and beow the break energy E b. To compare the data and modes we use standard χ 2 statistics for which we consider two impementations. When we focus on a singe energy range and thus we ignore energy dependence, then we use χ 2 χ 2 (E,z,c) = bins (Ĉ γc C γc )2 ( C γc, (9) )2 where Ĉ γc and C γc represent the mode and the measured CAPS, the sum is over a bins and the tripet (E,z,c) identifies the energy range, redshift bin and object cataog considered in the anaysis. The best-fitting and A 2h parameters are found by the minimization of the χ 2 function. Note that in the foowing, together with we sha ist the normaized vaue A 2h C=80 2h that has the same dimension as C1h. This choice is motivated by the fact that the fit constrains the product A 2h C 2h, rather than the singe terms separatey. The rationae for setting = 80 is twofod. First of a, random errors are sma at = 80. Second, C 2h peaks at 100 and then steadiy decines and becomes sub-dominant with respect to the 1-hao term (see the reevant pots in X15 and Branchini et a. 2017). Considering 80 thus aows us to reasonaby compare both the 1-hao and 2-hao terms. Note aso that in the product A 2h C=80 2h the second term is the mode C2h =80. As a resut, the errors in A 2h C=80 2h are propagated from the A2h term ony. When we consider different energy bins and expicity account for the CAPS energy dependence, then we use χ 2 e χ 2 e(z,c) = bins E bins (Ĉ γc (E i) C γc (E i)) 2 ( C γc (E, (10) i)) 2 where the sum is over both and energy bins, whie the pair (z, c) identifies the redshift bin and object cataog considered in the anaysis and the abe e characterizes the mode energy dependence of the CAPS, i.e., e = SPL, DPL or BPL. In this case the number of fitting parameters varies depending on e, i.e., 3 parameters for SPL, 4 for DPL and 5 for BPL. To quantify the significance of a measurement we use as test-statistic the quantity TS = χ 2 (0) χ 2 min, (11) where χ 2 min is the minimum χ2, and χ 2 (0) is the χ 2 of the nu hypothesis, i.e. of the case = A 2h = 0. TS is expected to behave asymptoticay as a χ 2 distribution with a number of degrees of freedom equa to the number of fitted parameters, aowing us to derive the significance eve of a measurement based on the measured TS. Note that in Eq. (2) Ĉ γc, C1h, and A 2h C 2h a have units of (cm 2 s 1 sr 1 )sr, since they refer to CAPS of γ-ray fux maps integrated over the given energy bin. Instead, in Eqs. (6-8) and A 2h C 2h have units of (cm 2 s 1 sr 1 GeV 1 )sr so that Ĉ γc (E) sti has units of (cm 2 s 1 sr 1 )sr. The resuts obtained in the two impementations described above, i.e. for the singe and combined energy bins are shown in Tabe 2 and in Tabe 3, respectivey. Each sampe in the Tabes is identified by the foowing abe: CCCC ZX EY, where CCCC indicates the cataogs of extragaactic objects used in the cross-correation (e.g. NVSS, 2MPZ etc.), ZX identifies the redshift bin (e.g. Z1 for the first z bin, Z2 for the second... and ZA for the fu redshift range) and EY identifies the energy bin (e.g. E1 for the first E bin, E2 for the second etc.). In Tabe 2 we ist the best-fit vaues of the parameters and their 1 σ errors, whereas ony the best fit vaues are shown in Tabe 3. To perform the fit we have assumed a frequentist approach. To derive the errors we buid for each parameter its 1-d profie χ 2 minimizing the χ 2 with respect to the other parameters, and cacuate the 1 σ errors from the condition χ 2 =1. In our anaysis we assume that CAPS is a positive quantity. Therefore, in the fit we impose that both the 1-hao and 2-hao terms are non-negative. For this reason, when 1 σ is not imited from beow we just quote the 1 σ upper imit. In principe, cross-correations can be negative. However, in our mode, the cross-correation between γ-ray sources and extragaactic objects is induced by the fact that both trace the same arge scae structure in some reativey compact redshift range. In this case the cross-correation function is not expected to be negative, motivating our constrain. Nonetheess, for the sake of competeness, we did perform the same fit after reaxing this constraint. We found that the 2-hao component can be negative when cross-correating some cataogs with ow (< 1 GeV) energy URGB maps. However, the preference for this fit over the non-negative one is typicay beow 1 σ and just in very few cases sighty above 1 σ. 6. RESULTS In this section we show the resuts of our cross-correation anaysis of the ceaned Fermi-LAT UGRB maps with the

10 10 Cuoco et a. TABLE 2 BEST FIT TO CAPS. COL. 1: SUBSAMPLE NAME. COL. 2: MINIMUM χ 2 VALUE. COLS. 3 AND 4: VALUES OF THE TEST STATISTIC TS = χ 2 (0) χ 2 min AND CORRESPONDING STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE. COLS. 5 AND 6: 68% C.L. CONSTRAINTS ON THE ONE-HALO TERM AND ON THE TWO-HALO TERM A 2h C =80 BOTH EXPRESSED IN UNITS OF (CM 2 S 1 SR 1 ) SR. THE FIT IN EACH ROW IS PERFORMED USING 12 DATA POINTS AND 2 FIT PARAMETERS, FOR A TOTAL OF 10 DEGREES OF FREEDOM. Sampe χ 2 min TS σ A 2h C 80 NVSS ZA E < 15.7 NVSS ZA E < 4.95 NVSS ZA E < QSO ZA E < 29.9 < 23.8 QSO ZA E < 5.18 QSO ZA E < MPZ Z1 E < 90.7 < MPZ Z1 E < 24.9 < MPZ Z1 E < < MPZ Z2 E < 62.7 < MPZ Z2 E < 12.5 < MPZ Z2 E < < MPZ Z3 E < 94.9 < MPZ Z3 E < MPZ Z3 E < MPZ ZA E < 59.8 < MPZ ZA E < MPZ ZA E < 1.63 WIxSC ZA E < 5.95 WIxSC ZA E < 11.4 WIxSC ZA E MG12 ZA E < 31.4 MG12 ZA E MG12 ZA E < FIG. 7. Anguar CCF (eft pane) and CAPS (right pane) for NVSS gaaxies. Different symbos indicate the three energy bins: [0.5,1], [1,10] and [10,500] GeV. Error bars represent the square root of the diagona eements of the covariance matrix (which, for the CAPS, is to a good approximation diagona). Furthermore, the CAPS have been deconvoved by the PSF and pixe effects. Dashed ines in the right pots show the best-fit vaues of the 1-hao term from Tabe 2. anguar distributions of objects in the various cataogs presented in Section 3. As aready mentioned, we sha pot the CCFs, whose visua interpretation in the framework of the hao mode is more transparent. However, the statistica anayses and the resuts isted in the Tabes are obtained from the measured CAPS, after deconvoution from pixe and PSF effects. For each cataog we show three sets of resuts. The first one incudes the resuts of the CAPS χ 2 anaysis (Eq. 9) restricted to we defined, reativey wide energy bins E = [0.5,1] GeV, E = [1,10] GeV and E = [10,500] GeV. The resuts of this anaysis are isted in Tabes 2 and 4. The first one contains the resuts of the pots that are shown in the main text. This subset incudes a anayses of the fu sampe cataogs (ZA case) and, for the 2MPZ case ony, aso the anayses of the individua redshift bins. The atter serves to iustrate the advantage of performing a tomographic approach with respect to that of considering the fu redshift range, as X15 did using the whoe 2MASS sampe. The second tabe, ocated in Appendix B, contains a resuts from the subsampes considered