arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 21 Oct 2018

Transcription

1 DRAFT VERSION OCTOBER 23, 28 Preprint typeset using LATEX stye emuateapj v. /23/5 AN APPLICATION OF GLOBAL ILC ALGORITHM OVER LARGE ANGULAR SCALES TO ESTIMATE CMB POSTERIOR USING GIBBS SAMPLING VIPIN SUDEVAN, RAJIB SAHA Draft version October 23, 28 arxiv:8.8872v [astro-ph.co] 2 Oct 28 ABSTRACT In this work, we formaize a new technique to investigate joint posterior density of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) signa and its theoretica anguar power spectrum given the observed data, using the goba interna-inear-combination (ILC) method first proposed by Sudevan & Saha (27). We impement the method on ow resoution CMB maps observed by WMAP and Panck sateite missions, using Gibbs samping, assuming that the detector noise is negigibe on arge anguar scaes of the sky. The main products of our anaysis are best fit CMB ceaned map and its theoretica anguar power spectrum aong with their error estimates. We vaidate the methodoogy by performing Monte Caro simuations that incudes reaistic foreground modes and noise eves consistent with WMAP and Panck observations. Our method has an unique advantage that the posterior density is obtained without any need to expicity mode foreground components. Secondy, the power spectrum resuts with the error estimates can be directy used for cosmoogica parameter estimations. Subject headings: cosmic background radiation cosmoogy: observations diffuse radiation, Gibbs Samping. INTRODUCTION Since the discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) (Penzias & Wison 965) rapid advancements in the fied of its observation made it possibe to map the primordia signa over the entire sky with increasingy higher resoution (Smoot et a. 99; Bennett et a. 23; Panck Coaboration et a. 28b). Accurate measurement of temperature (and poarization) anisotropy of CMB, which arguaby forms one of the cornerstones of the precision era of modern precision cosmoogy, provides us with a weath of knowedge regarding the geometry, composition and the origin of the Universe (e.g., see Panck Coaboration et a. (28a) and references therein). However, the observed CMB signa in the microwave region is strongy contaminated due to foreground emissions due to different astrophysica sources present within and outside our gaaxy. Hence the chaenge is to accuratey recover the CMB signa for cosmoogica anaysis, by minimizing contributions from various foregrounds emissions. For reiabe estimation of cosmoogica parameters, a desirabe property of a CMB reconstruction method is that it produces both, the best guesses for the signa and its anguar power spectrum aong with their corresponding error (and bias, if any) estimates. Eriksen et a. (24b, 27, 28a,b); Panck Coaboration et a. (26a,c) propose and impement a Gibbs samping (Geman & Geman 984) approach to jointy estimate the CMB map, its anguar power spectrum and a foreground components aong with their error estimates using WMAP (Hinshaw et a. 23) and Panck (Panck Coaboration et a. 28b) observations. Eriksen et a. (26); God et a. (2) use a maximum ikeihood approach to reconstruct simutaneousy CMB and foreground components using prior information about CMB and detector noise covariance matrices and foreground modes. Athough, these methods are extremey usefu for simutaneous reconstruction of CMB and a foreground components, an aterna- Physics Department, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopa, Bhopa, M.P, 46223, India. tive approach for CMB reconstruction aone, is the so-caed interna-inear-combination (ILC) method (Tegmark & Efstathiou 996; Tegmark et a. 23; Bennett et a. 23; Eriksen et a. 24a; Saha et a. 26) which does not rey upon any expicit mode of foreground spectrum. In recent years the method has been investigated extensivey. Saha et a. (26) use this method to estimate CMB cross-power spectra by removing detector noise bias using WMAP maps. These authors aso report presence of a possibe negative bias at the ow mutipoes. Saha et a. (28), for the first time, perform a rigorous anaytica study of negative bias at the ow mutipoes for a singe iteration ILC foreground remova procedure in harmonic space. Later Sudevan et a. (27) find and correct a foreground eakage in iterative ILC agorithm in harmonic space by appying their technique on high resoution Panck and WMAP observations. Sudevan & Saha (27) propose a goba ILC method in pixe space by taking into account prior information of CMB covariance matrix under the assumption that detector noise can be ignored over the arge anguar scaes of the sky. The method consideraby improves the usua ILC method at ow resoution, where no prior information about the CMB covariance is used. In spite of these progresses, a joint anaysis of CMB signa and its anguar power spectrum posterior density in a foreground mode independent manner has not yet been expored in the iteratures. The current artice is aimed to provide a mechanism exacty to sove this probem. By estimating the posterior density of CMB signa and CMB theoretica anguar power spectrum given the observed data over the arge anguar scaes of the sky using the ILC method simiar to Sudevan & Saha (27), we provide the best fit estimates of both, CMB map and theoretica anguar power spectrum aong with their confidence interva regions. In the current artice, we repace the CMB signa reconstruction technique by a faster harmonic domain agorithm than the pixe-space agorithm of Sudevan & Saha (27). We use Gibbs samping method (Geman & Rubin 992) to draw sampes from the joint conditiona density. There are two important advantages of our method. First, the theoretica power spectrum resuts can directy be integrated to cosmoogica

2 2 parameter estimation process. Second, the CMB posterior estimation can be achieved without any need to expicity mode the foreground components. The resuts, therefore, can not be sensitive to, foreground modeing uncertainties. The eary work of CMB component reconstruction is performed by Bennett et a. (992) using a variant of ILC agorithm where prior information of free-free spectra index is used. Bunn et a. (994); Bouchet et a. (999) deveoped a Weiner fiter approach. Basak & Deabrouie (22, 23) propose an ILC agorithm in needet space, which can take into account oca variation of foreground spectra properties both in the pixe and needet space. Saha & Auri (26) use the ILC method to jointy reconstruct CMB Stokes Q poarization signa and other foreground components in presence of spatiay varying spectra properties of poarized synchrotron emission using simuated observations of WMAP. In an interesting appication of ILC method Saha (2) and Purkayastha & Saha (27) reconstruct CMB maps using Gaussian nature of CMB and non-gaussian nature of astrophysica foregrounds. In Section 2 we discuss the basic formaism. We describe the posterior estimation method in Section 3. In Section 4 we present the resuts of anaysis of WMAP and Panck frequency maps at ow resoution. We discuss convergence tests of the Gibbs chains in Section 5. We vaidate the posterior density estimation method by performing detaied Monte Caro simuations using reaistic foreground and detector noise mode consistent with WMAP and Panck observations in Section 6. Finay, we concude in Section FORMALISM 2.. Data Mode Let us assume that, we have observations of foreground contaminated CMB maps at n different frequencies. Without sacrificing any generaity, we assume that, each of these maps has the same beam (and pixe) resoutions 2. The observed data set, D, can be represented as D = {X,X 2,...,X n }, where X i, i {,2,...,n}, is an N coumn vector denoting the input foreground contaminated CMB map (in thermodynamic temperature unit) at a frequency ν i. N represents the number of pixes in each input frequency map and D is an N n matrix. Assuming detector noise is negigibe 3 we have X i = S + F i, () where S is an N coumn vector, representing the CMB signa 4 and F i denotes a map of same size representing net foreground contamination at the frequency ν i CMB Posterior and Gibbs Samping The CMB posterior density is denoted as P(S,C D), the joint density of CMB map, S, and theoretica CMB anguar power spectrum, C, given the observed data, D. 5 A convenient way to estabish the posterior density, without any 2 In genera, different frequency maps have different beam resoutions. One can aways bring these maps to a common beam resoution, as aowed by the experiment, by smoothing by an appropriate kerne (e.g., Sudevan et a. (27)). Same appies for the pixe resoution. 3 We can safey assume this for WMAP and Panck temperature observations on the arge anguar scaes of the sky. 4 CMB signa at any given direction on the sky is independent on frequency in thermodynamic temperature unit, since the former foows a backbody spectrum to a very good accuracy. 5 Since a X i and hence S inevitaby contain some beam and pixe smoothing effects, we assume that, the theoretica anguar power spectrum C aso contain the same smoothing effects. need to evauate it, is by drawing sampes from the distribution itsef. An usefu samping method in this context is the so caed Gibbs samping approach (Geman & Rubin 992), which states that the posterior joint density under consideration conditioned on data can be estabished by foowing few steps.. Draw a sampe, S i+, from from conditiona density of CMB signa S given both, the data D and some chosen CMB theoretica anguar power spectrum, C i. Symboicay, S i+ P (S D,C i ). (2) 2. Now draw a sampe of C i+ from the conditiona density of C given both, D and S i+, which was obtained in the first step above. In symbos, C i+ P 2 (C D,S i ). (3) At this stage one has a pair of sampes S i+,c i+. 3. Repeat above two basic steps for i = to N, where N is a arge number, by repacing first C i by Ci+ in step above, and then repacing S i+ in Eqn. 3 by the one obtained in Eqn. 2. After some initia pair of sampes of signa and theoretica power spectrum are discarded (i.e., after initia burn-in period has competed) they represent the desired sampes drawn from the posterior density, P(S,C D), under consideration Density of pure CMB signa The probabiity density function of pure CMB signa S given a theoretica CMB anguar power spectrum C is given by, [ P 3 (S C ) = exp ] 2r λ λ 2...λ r 2 ST C S, (4) where C denotes the N N pixe-pixe CMB covariance matrix of S at the chosen beam and pixe resoution. As discussed in Sudevan & Saha (27), and as is the case in current artice, rank r of C is ess than its size N, impying C is a singuar matrix. C, therefore, represents the Moore-Penrose generaized inverse (Moore 92; Penrose 955) of C. The eement of C can be computed from the knowedge of the CMB theoretica anguar power spectrum using Eqn. 6 of Sudevan & Saha (27), by assuming that CMB map is statisticay isotropic. The set of λ k,k {,2,...,r} in the denominator of Eqn. 4 represent the non-zero eigen vaues of C Drawing Sampes of S How do we draw sampes of S given D and C? We must do this without knowing or samping the foreground components, to keep our method foreground mode independent. This wi be possibe if we coud somehow remove a foregrounds without using their mode, given D and C. The ceaned map obtained by using the goba ILC method described in Sudevan & Saha (27) can be used exacty for this purpose, if we assume that, the detector noise is negigibe and one has sufficient number of input frequency maps to remove a foreground components, as discussed in the current section. Let us consider the ceaned map, Y, obtained by using

3 CMB posterior using goba ILC and Gibbs samping 3 pixe pixe pixe 5 pixe 25 pixe FIG.. The normaized probabiity density of CMB pixe temperatures for some seected pixes are shown in red. The normaization for each density is such that the peak corresponds to a vaue of unity. The horizonta axes represent pixe temperatures in the unit of µk (thermodynamic). The positions of mean temperatures are shown by the bue vertica ines. inear combination of n frequency maps {X i }, n Y = w i X i, (5) i= where w i represents the weight corresponding to the i th input frequency map. Ceary, we can negect any detector noise contribution in Y since X i themseves are assumed to contain negigibe detector noise (e.g., see Eqn. ). Since CMB foows backbody distribution, to preserve the CMB signa in the ceaned map, the weights for a frequency maps are constrained to add to unity, i.e, w +w 2 +w w n =. Minimizing the CMB covariance weighted variance σ 2 = Y T C Y of the ceaned map Y, subject to the above constraint on weights, as in Sudevan & Saha (27), we obtain, W =  e e T  e, (6) where W is an n coumn vector with the i th eement given by the weight factor w i. e denotes an n coumn vector with a entries equa to unity, representing the frequency shape vector of the CMB component. Finay, the (i, j) eement of matrix  can be computed in pixe-domain foowing,  i j = X T i C X j. (7) However, computing above in pixe-space is a numericay expensive process. One can consideraby simpy Eqn. 7 in harmonic space. As shown in Appendix A, Eqn. 7 can convenienty be expressed in the mutipoe space foowing, max  i j = (2 + ) ˆσi j C, (8) =2 where, C represents the beam and pixe smoothed CMB theoretica power spectrum, C = C B 2 P2, B and P being the beam and pixe window functions respectivey, and ˆσ i j represents the cross anguar power spectrum between frequency maps X i and X 6 j. We assume that, there are n f different foreground components, each with a constant spectra index a over the sky 7. We denote the shape vector of k th foreground component by f k 6 Eqn. 8 becomes very usefu when  i j needs to be cacuated repeatedy, such as, in the case of a Markhov chain. 7 The assumption of constant spectra index of a component a over the sky is not necessariy a oss of generaity, since as proposed by Bouchet & Gispert (999) a foreground component with varying spectra index can be modeed in terms more than one components each having different but constant spectra indices a over the sky. Aso see Saha & Auri (26) for impementation of this concept using simuated observations of CMB Stokes Q parameter. In our case, n f represents tota number of a such components. (with k {,2,...,n f }), each one of which is an n coumn vector. Using Eqns. and 6 in Eqn. 5 we obtain, [ n f Y = S + W T f k ]F k, (9) where F k is an N coumn vector representing an appropriatey chosen tempate for the k foreground component. Eqn. 9 shows that the ceaned maps contains the pure CMB signa pus some foreground residua given by the second term. To find these residuas, introducing matrix notation, we first write Eqn. 8 as max  = =2 k= (2 + ) ˆΣ C, () where n n data covariance matrix, ˆΣ, in the harmonic space can be written in terms of CMB anguar power spectrum, Ĉ, of the particuar random reaization under consideration and the foreground covariance matrix C f, as, ˆΣ = [ ee T Ĉ + C f ] B 2 P 2. () Using Eqn. and in Eqn. 6 and foowing a procedure simiar to Saha & Auri (26) we obtain, ( ) I C f C f e W = e (I ), (2) T C f C f e where I denotes the n n identity matrix and max C f = =2 (2 + ) C C f, (3) The product C f C f represents the projector on the coumn space, C(C f ), of C f. If we assume that n f < n, which may be achieved by using sufficienty arge number of input frequency maps, the nu space of C f is an non-empty set and I C f C f is a projector on this nu space. Since, the shape vector, f k of each foreground components with constant spectra indices competey ies on C(C f ) we must have, W T f k =, for a k. Therefore, from Eqn. 9 one finds that the foreground contamination in the fina ceaned map at each pixe due to a foreground components disappears. Hence Y = S. Based upon preceding discussions, to sampe S from P (S C,D) we use Eqn. 5. The ceaned map in this case has the probabiity density as given by Eqn. 4 with the same covariance structure mentioned therein.

4 4 FIG. 2. Top pane shows the best-fit CMB map obtained by our method. The midde and bottom panes show the difference of our map from the Commander and NILC ceaned maps respectivey. There is a noticeabe simiarity between the best-fit and NILC ceaned maps as seen from the bottom pane Drawing Sampes of C As discussed in Appendix B the conditiona density P 2 (C S,D) can be written as, P 2 ( C Ĉ ) ( ) (2+)/2 exp[ C Ĉ (2 + ) 2C ], (4) where the variabe z = Ĉ (2 + )/C foows a χ 2 distribution of 2 degree of freedom. To draw sampes of C from Eqn. 4 we first draw z from the χ 2 distribution of 2 degrees of freedom, which is achieved by drawing 2 independent standard norma deviates and forming the sum of their squares. Given the vaue of Ĉ estimated from the map, we then find C foowing C = Ĉ (2 + )/z. 3. METHODOLOGY We use WMAP nine-year difference assemby (DA) maps and seven Panck 25 maps, three of the ater are at LFI frequencies (3, 4 and 7 GHz) and the rest at four HFI frequencies (, 43, 27 and 353 GHz). The processing of input maps remains identica to Sudevan & Saha (27) and resuts in a tota of 2 input maps, five at WMAP and seven at Panck frequencies. We note that, since we are interested in FIG. 3. Top pane shows the mean CMB map estimated by using a the ceaned maps obtained from the Gibbs sampes. The mean map matches very we with the best-fit map shown in the top pane of Fig. 2. The midde pane show the difference between the best fit and the mean CMB maps. The bottom pane shows the standard deviation map obtained by using a the ceaned maps. anaysis over arge anguar scaes of the sky, where detector noise can be ignored, we chose a ow pixe resoution defined by HEALPix 8 parameter N side = 6 and a Gaussian beam smoothing of 9 FWHM for each input map. We remove both monopoe and dipoe from a the fu sky input maps before the anaysis. To sampe the posterior density P(S,C D) we simuate a tota of Gibbs chains, each containing 5 joint sampes of ceaned maps and theoretica power spectrum, foowing the three samping steps described in Section 2. At any given chain and at any given iteration, to sampe S we use Eqn. 5, where the weights are described by the vector W defined by Eqn. 6. The eements of matrix A that appears in 6 are computed foowing Eqn. 8 using the ast samped C vaues. After samping S we estimate its fu sky power spectrum, Ĉ, which we use to obtain a new sampe of C using the method described in Section 2.5. We emphasize that both Ĉ and C contain beam and pixe smoothing effects absorbed in them. We note in passing, that the weights as given 8 Hierarchica Equa Area isolatitude Pixeization of the sky, a freey avaiabe software package for anaysis of CMB maps, e.g., see Górski et a. (25).

5 CMB posterior using goba ILC and Gibbs samping 5 =2 =3 =5 = = =4 =7 = =23 =26 =29 = FIG. 4. Normaized densities of the CMB theoretica anguar power spectrum obtained by Gibbs samping for different mutipoes. The horizonta axis for each sub pot represents ( + )C /(2π) in the unit µk 2. The region within the two vertica ines represent σ confidence interva for the theoretica anguar power spectrum. by Eqn. 6 are however insensitive to such smoothing since in Eqn. 8, both C and ˆσ i j contain same smoothing effects. The initia choice of C for each chain is made by drawing them uniformy within ±3 C around the Panck best-fit theoretica power spectrum (Panck Coaboration et a. 26d), where C denotes error due to cosmic variance aone. A chains generates a tota of 5 joint sampes of ceaned map and theoretica CMB power spectrum. The burn in phase in each chain is very brief. Visuay, this phase does not appear to contain more than a few Gibbs iterations. We, however, remove 5 initia Gibbs iterations from each chain as a conservative estimate of burn-in period. After the burn-in rejection we have a tota of 495 sampes from a chains. 4. RESULTS 4.. Ceaned Maps Using a sampes after burn in rejection we estimate the marginaized probabiity density of CMB temperature at each pixe given the observed data. The normaized probabiity densities obtained by division by the corresponding mode of the marginaized density function for some seected pixes over the sky are shown in Fig.. These density functions are approximatey symmetric with some visibe asymmetry near the tais. The positions of mean temperatures are shown by the bue vertica ines for each pixe of this pot. We estimate the best-fit CMB ceaned map by taking the pixe temperatures corresponding to the ocation of mode of density for each pixe at N side = 6. We show the best-fit map at the top pane of Fig. 2. We compare the best-fit map with other CMB ceaned maps which are obtained by using different methods by other science groups. We show the differences of best fit map from Panck Commander and NILC (needet space ILC) ceaned maps (Panck Coaboration et a. 26b) respectivey at the midde and bottom panes of the same figure at 9 Gaussian beam resoution. Ceary, our best-fit map matches we with the Commander ceaned map with some minor differences aong the gaactic pane, which is expected to contain some foreground residuas in any foreground remova method. It is worth to emphasize the striking simiarity between the best-fit and NILC CMB map. Interestingy, the best-fit map contains somewhat ower pixe temperatures at isoated ocations aong the gaactic pane than the Commander or NILC map. From Fig. we see that the mean and marginaized posterior maximum of CMB temperature at different pixes agree cosey with each other. We estimate the mean CMB map using a 495 sampes for each pixe and show this at the top pane of Fig. 3. The mean map matches very we with the best-fit CMB map shown in top pane of the Fig. 2. We have potted the difference between the best fit and mean map in the bottom pane of Fig. 3. Both the maps agree with each other within an absoute difference of µk. In order to quantify the reconstruction error in the ceaned CMB map obtained after each iteration of Gibbs samping, we generate a standard deviation map using a 495 ceaned maps. We show this map at the bottom pane of Fig. 3. From this pane we see that the reconstruction error is very sma a over the sky. The maximum reconstruction error is visibe aong the gaactic pane and towards the center of our gaaxy where the input frequency maps contain strong foreground contaminations Anguar Power Spectrum We estimate the marginaized probabiity density of CMB theoretica anguar power spectrum and show the resuts in Fig. 4 for different mutipoes. Like the density functions of the pixe temperatures as discussed in Section 4., we normaize these densities to a vaue of unity at their peaks. The horizonta axis of each pot of this figure represents ( + )C /(2π) in the unit of µk 2. The density functions show ong asymmetric tais for ow mutipoes (e.g., = 2,3,5). For arge mutipoes ( 2) the asymmetry of the densities become graduay reduced. The region within the two vertica ines in each pot show σ (68.27%) con-

6 6 ( + )C/(2π), [µk 2 ] Panck 25 Best fit Commander NILC ( + ) C/(2π), [µk 2 ] Mutipoe, Best fit - NILC Best fit - Commander FIG. 5. Top pane shows the best-fit CMB theoretica anguar power spectrum aong with the asymmetric error bars indicating 68.27% confidence intervas obtained from the Gibbs sampes in brown ine. The sky bue points represent the anguar power spectrum estimated from NILC CMB map. The deep bue points represent the same estimated from the Commander CMB maps. (For visua purpose, both these spectra are shifted aong the horizonta axis sighty from the actua positions of the integer mutipoes.) The back ine shows the Panck 25 theoretica power spectrum as a guide to eye. The bottom pane shows a zoomed in version of the differences of Commander and NILC anguar power spectra respectivey from the best-fit anguar power spectrum of top pane. fidence interva for the CMB theoretica power spectrum for the corresponding mutipoe. In top pane of Fig. 5 we show the best-fit theoretica CMB anguar power spectrum in brown coor, defined by the positions of peaks of marginaized anguar power spectrum density functions (e.g., Fig 4). The asymmetric error bars at each show the σ confidence interva for the theoretica anguar power spectrum. The back ine shows the theoretica power spectrum consistent with Panck 25 resuts (Panck Coaboration et a. 26d). The best-fit theoretica anguar power spectrum agree we with the spectra estimated from Commander and NILC ceaned maps, which are shown by green and bue points respectivey.in the bottom pane of Fig. 5 we show the difference of the best fit and Commander (or NILC) power spectrum. Our best fit theoretica power spectrum agrees very we with the spectrum estimated from the NILC CMB map. 5. CONVERGENCE TESTS Each of the Gibbs samping chains for the estimation of CMB signa and its theoretica anguar power spectrum joint posterior consists of 495 samping after rejection of burn-in phase. A diagnosis is necessary to be certain that these sampes have converged to the actua targeted CMB posterior - a condition when satisfied inference drawn about any parameter by using the chains, does not depend upon the initia point where the chain starts. Geman & Rubin (992) propose that ack of any such convergence is better diagnosed if we simuate a set of parae chains than a singe chain. Using a the Gibbs chains we, therefore, check for convergence by using the Geman-Rubin statistic Geman & Rubin (992). Detaied description of the statistic is given in Geman & Rubin (992); Brooks & Geman (998), however, for competeness we define the statistic beow. Let us assume that we have generated M number of different chains and et L be the number of steps in each chain after rejection of sampes during the burn-in period 9. For a mode parameter θ, et us assume that the sampe posterior mean is given by θ m for m th chain using a L sampes. Let corresponding sampe posterior variance is σ 2 m. Then the between-chain (B/L) and within-chain variances (W) are respectivey given by, B = W = M L M M ( θm θ ) 2 m= (5) M σ m 2, (6) m= 9 L can be different for different chains, however, if L is same for a chains simpifies cacuations.

7 CMB posterior using goba ILC and Gibbs samping Geman-Rubin statistic, R Mutipoe, FIG. 6. Top pane shows Geman-Rubin statistic, R estimated for a the mutipoes of this work. The bottom pane shows map of R for a pixes. Cose vaues of R to unity in both cases indicate convergence is achieved in a the Gibbs chains. where θ is the overa posterior mean of the sampes estimated from a M chains and is given by θ = M M m= θ m. We define the pooed posterior variance foowing, ˆV = L L W + M + B, (7) ML which can be used to compute the Geman-Rubin statistic R as foows, ˆV R = W. (8) Foowing Geman & Rubin (992); Brooks & Geman (998) a vaue of R cose to unity impies that each of M Gibbs chains have converged to the target posterior density. We have potted the Geman-Rubin statistic, R, for the theoretica anguar power spectrum sampes for the mutipoe range 2 32 in top pane of Fig. 6. The vaue of R ies we within.9999 and.3 impying convergence. In the bottom pane of Fig. 6 we show the map of R a over the sky. R ies with in and.2 for a the pixes impying again convergence of the Gibbs chains. 6. MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS We generate a set of input maps at the 2 different WMAP and Panck frequencies at a Gaussian beam resoution 9 and N side = 6 foowing the same procedure as described in Sudevan & Saha (27). We do not reproduce the methodoogy in the artice and refer to the above artice for a description about the input frequency maps. We note that, in the current work, we need to simuate ony one random reaization of the 2 in- FIG. 7. Top pane shows the best-fit ceaned CMB map obtained from Monte Caro simuations. The second pane shows the difference between the best-fit and the input CMB map used in the simuation. The third pane shows the difference between the best-fit and mean CMB map. The ast pane shows the standard deviation map. put frequency maps. The random CMB reaization used in the input frequency maps is generated using the CMB theoretica anguar power spectrum consistent with Panck 25 resuts. As is the case for our anaysis on the Panck and WMAP observations, we remove both monopoe and dipoe from a the simuated input maps before samping from the posterior density P(S,C D). We simuate a tota of Gibbs chains. To draw the first ceaned map sampe we initiaize the theoreti-

8 8 ( + )C/(2π), [µk 2 ] ÈÐ Ò ¾¼½ Ø Ø ÁÒÔÙØ Å ÅÙÐØ ÔÓÐ FIG. 8. Figure showing the best-fit estimate of theoretica CMB anguar power spectrum (in brown) with 68.27% confidence intervas for different mutipoes aong with the CMB anguar power spectrum (in bue) estimated from the specific CMB reaization used in the Monte Caro simuations. The back ine indicates the theoretica anguar power spectrum from which the specific CMB reaization under consideration is generated. ca CMB power spectrum uniformy within ±3 of the true theoretica spectrum, where represents cosmic variance induced error. As in the case of anaysis of WMAP and Pank observed maps, for simuations aso we find that the burn-in period ends very rapidy. In particuar, from the trace pots of pixe temperature of the ceaned maps we see that burn-in phase competes within a few sampes. As a conservative approach, however, we reject initia 5 sampes from each Gibbs chain. After, burn-in rejection we have a set of 495 joint sampes of ceaned map and theoretica anguar power spectrum from each Gibbs chain. Using a ceaned map sampes from a chains after burn-in rejection we form a marginaized density of the CMB temperature at each N side = 6 pixe. A CMB map formed from the pixe temperatures corresponding to the modes of these density functions define the best fit CMB ceaned map obtained from the simuation. We show the best-fit ceaned map in top pane of Fig. 7. The difference of the best-fit and input CMB reaization is shown in the second pane of the same figure. Ceary, the best-fit CMB map matches very we with the CMB reaization used in the simuation. The maximum difference (5.5 µk) between the two maps is observed aong the gaactic pane. This shows that our method removes foreground reiaby. The third pane of Fig. 7 shows the difference of best-fit and mean CMB maps obtained from a Gibbs sampes. Both these maps agree very we with each other. The ast pane of Fig. 7 shows the standard deviation map computed from the Gibbs sampes. The maximum error of 4.2 µk is observed at the gaactic center. In summary, using the Monte-Caro simuations of our method, we see that the best-fit and mean CMB maps agree very we with the input CMB map indicating a reiabe foreground minimization can be achieved by our method. We show the best-fit estimate of underying CMB theoretica anguar power spectrum from Monte Caro simuations in Fig. 8 in brown ine. The asymmetric error-imits shown on this power spectrum indicate the 68.27% confidence intervas. The anguar power spectrum for the input CMB map used in the simuation is shown in bue. The best-fit estimate agrees nicey with the input anguar power spectrum. The back ine of this figure represents the underying theoretica anguar power spectrum that is used to generate the input CMB reaization for the simuation. We test the Gibbs sequences obtained from the simuations for convergence as in Section 5 using the Geman-Rubin statistic, R. The maximum and minimum vaues of R for the samped CMB maps over a pixes are respectivey,.7 and The corresponding vaues for the samped anguar power spectra are respectivey,.27 and Such vaues of R cose to unity indicate convergence of the Gibbs sequences in Monte Caro simuations. 7. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS In this artice, we have presented a new method to estimate the CMB posterior density over the arge anguar scaes of the sky, given the Panck and WMAP observations by using a goba ILC method (Sudevan & Saha 27) and Gibbs samping (Geman & Rubin 992) as the basic toos. Our main resuts are joint estimates of best-fit CMB signa and its theoretica anguar power spectrum aong with the appropriate confidence intervas which can be directy used for cosmoogica parameter estimation. Therefore, our work, for the first time effectivey extends the ILC method for such purposes. We sampe the CMB signa at each Gibbs iteration conditioning on a set of CMB theoretica anguar power spectrum obtained in the previous Gibbs iteration. The CMB reconstruction step is independent on any expicit mode of foreground components - which is a characteristic of the usua ILC method. However, considering the samping of both CMB signa and its theoretica anguar power spectrum, the new method extends the mode independent nature of CMB reconstruction of ILC method to the entire posterior density estimation at ow resoution. Thus our method serves as a compementary route to the CMB posterior estimation where detaied mode of foregrounds are taken into account. We have impemented the CMB reconstruction method in the harmonic space which reduces computationa time significanty unike the pixe-space approach of Sudevan & Saha (27). There are some aspects of the method which one needs to address in future investigations. In the current work we have assumed that the detector noise can be competey ignored which is a vaid assumption on the arge anguar scaes for experiments ike WMAP and Panck. A genera framework wi be to formaize the method in the presence of detector noise. In the presence of detector noise the bind foreground remova procedure wi eave some foreground residuas on the ceaned maps. It woud be interesting to see whether these residuas can be taken care of using a foreground mode independent manner. In the current method where detector noise is assumed to be negigibe residua foregrounds wi be present in the ceaned maps if effective number of foreground components n f present in the input frequency maps become arger than or equa to number of input frequency maps (n) avaiabe. For arge anguar scae anaysis ike the one of this paper, n f < n is a reasonabe assumption outside the gaactic pane. Aong the pane, where the foreground spectra properties are expected show a arger variation than the outside pane, the effect of such residuas are mitigated by the smoothing of the input sky maps over the arge anguar scaes. By performing detaied Monte Caro simuations we see that the method eaves a sma residua aong the gaactic pane. By comparing our ceaned map and anguar power spectrum resuts with those obtained by other science groups we show that the eve of such foreground residuas are sma and of comparabe magni-

9 CMB posterior using goba ILC and Gibbs samping 9 tudes of those present in CMB maps obtained by other methods. We thank an anonymous referee of an earier pubication by the authors (Sudevan & Saha 27) for suggestions of integrating the work with Gibbs samping. Our work is based on observations obtained with Panck ( an ESA science mission with instruments and contributions directy funded by ESA Member States, NASA, and Canada. We use pubicy avaiabe HEALPix Górski et a. (25) package ( for some of the anaysis of this work. We acknowedge the use of Panck Legacy Archive (PLA) and the Legacy Archive for Microwave Background Data Anaysis (LAMBDA). LAMBDA is a part of the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Center (HEASARC). HEASARC/LAMBDA is supported by the Astrophysics Science Division at the NASA Goddard Space Fight Center. APPENDIX A: ELEMENTS OF MATRIX A IN HARMONIC SPACE Let us assume that, S(p) denotes a random simuation of a pixeized CMB map (p denotes pixe index) at some beam and pixe resoutions. Using the spherica harmonic decomposition S(p) =,m a,my m (p), the (p,q) eement, C pq of the pixe-pixe CMB covariance matrix, C can be written as C pq = S(p)S(q) = a m a m Y m(p)y m (q), (A) m m where... represents ensembe average and we assume that the beam and pixe smoothing effects are impicity contained in spherica harmonic coefficients a m. Using statistica isotropy of CMB, namey, a m a m = C δ δ mm, where C = C B 2 P2, (B and P being respectivey beam and pixe window functions) we obtain, In matrix notation we write Eqn. A2 as C pq = m C Y m (p)y m(q). (A2) C = m C D m, (A3) where eements of matrix D m are given by D pq m = Y m(p)y m (q). We can write, D m = Z m Z c m, where, Z m is an N coumn vector with eements Z m (p) = Y m (p), and the superscript c represents the Hermitian conjugate. It is worth emphasizing that, the right hand side of above equation represents a inear combination of D m matrices with the scaar ampitudes given by C. Ceary, therefore, C = m D m C. (A4) Using the definition of Moore-Penrose generaized inverse, x of a vector x, x = x c / x 2 where... 2 represent squared norm of the vector, one obtains, D m = Z mz c m Z m 4. Using orthogonaity of spherica harmonics over discrete HEALPix pixes N Y m (p)ym(p) 4π N =, p= (A5) (A6) it is easy to find Z m 4 = ( N/(4π) ) 2. Using this resut and Eqn. A5 in Eqn. A4 we obtain eement wise, C pq = m C Y m (p)y m (q) ( N 4π ) 2, (A7) where we have used C = /C. Expanding the input frequency maps X i in spherica harmonic space, X i (p) = m a i,m Y m (p), using Eqn. A7 and the orthogonaity condition of spherica harmonics as mentioned in Eqn. A6, after some agebra, we obtain, Â i j = X T i C X j = (2 + ) ˆσi j C, (A8) where ˆσ i j = m= a i ma j m /(2 + ). (A9)

10 B: CONDITIONAL DENSITY OF CMB THEORETICAL ANGULAR POWER SPECTRUM We note that, if x, x 2,..., x µ are identicay distributed and independent Gaussian random variabe with zero mean and unit variance, the new variabe x = µ k= x2 k is distributed as a χ2 random variabe with µ degrees of freedom, with the probabiity density given by, [ P(x) = 2 ν Γ(ν) xν exp x ], (B) 2 where ν = µ/2. With this definition, the variabe x (2 + ) Ĉ C is distributed as Eqn. B, where Ĉ and C respectivey denote reaization specific and theoretica CMB anguar power spectrum. To find the density function of Ĉ we first note using Eqn. B that, the density function Q(y) for the transformed variabe y = βx (β = constant) foows, Q(y) = P(x)dx/dy, where in the right hand side x must be repaced by y using the inverse transformation x = y/β, so that one gets a function of y as required. Using this concept and defining y Ĉ = C x/(2 + ), so that, β = C /(2 + ), we find, [ ( )] ( ) [ ] (2+)/2Ĉ(2+)/ Q(Ĉ ) = 2 (2+)/2 (2 + ) Γ exp 2 C Ĉ (B2) 2C ) Assuming C as a random variabe Eqn. B2 represents the conditiona probabiity density Q (Ĉ C. Using Bayes theorem and an uniform prior on C upto some irreevant constant, probabiity density of C given some Ĉ can be obtained as, ) ( ) ] (2+)/2 (2 + ) R (C Ĉ exp[ C Ĉ 2C Now defining a new variabe z = Ĉ (2 + )/C and noting that the exponent of /C in Eqn. B3 can be written as (2 + )/2 = (2 )/2 + we can write Eqn. B3 as, ) [ R (z Ĉ z (2 )/2 exp z ], (B4) 2 where we have omitted some irreevant constants. Comparing Eqn. B4 with Eqn. B we readiy identify Eqn. B4 as a χ 2 distribution of 2 degrees of freedom in variabe z. Basak, S., & Deabrouie, J. 22, MNRAS, 49, , MNRAS, 435, 8 Bennett, C. L., Smoot, G. F., Hinshaw, G., et a. 992, ApJ, 396, L7 Bennett, C. L., Hi, R. S., Hinshaw, G., et a. 23, ApJS, 48, 97 Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiand, J. L., et a. 23, ApJS, 28, 2 Bouchet, F. R., & Gispert, R. 999, New A, 4, 443 Bouchet, F. R., Prunet, S., & Sethi, S. K. 999, MNRAS, 32, 663 Brooks, S. P., & Geman, A. 998, Journa of Computationa and Graphica Statistics, 7, 434 Bunn, E. F., Fisher, K. B., Hoffman, Y., et a. 994, ApJ, 432, L75 Eriksen, H. K., Banday, A. J., Górski, K. M., & Lije, P. B. 24a, ApJ, 62, 633 Eriksen, H. K., Dickinson, C., Jewe, J. B., et a. 28a, ApJ, 672, L87 Eriksen, H. K., Jewe, J. B., Dickinson, C., et a. 28b, ApJ, 676, Eriksen, H. K., O Dwyer, I. J., Jewe, J. B., et a. 24b, ApJS, 55, 227 Eriksen, H. K., Dickinson, C., Lawrence, C. R., et a. 26, ApJ, 64, 665 Eriksen, H. K., Huey, G., Saha, R., et a. 27, ApJ, 656, 64 Geman, A., & Rubin, D. 992, Statistica Science,, 457 Geman, S., & Geman, D. 984, IEEE Trans. Pattern Ana. Mach. Inte., 6, 72 God, B., Odegard, N., Weiand, J. L., et a. 2, ApJS, 92, 5 Górski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et a. 25, ApJ, 622, 759 Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., et a. 23, ApJS, 28, 9 Moore, E. H. 92, Bu. Am. Math. Soc., 26, 394, unpubished address. Avaiabe at /S pdf. REFERENCES (B3) Penrose, R. 955, Mathematica Proceedings of the Cambridge Phiosophica Society, 5, 46 Penzias, A. A., & Wison, R. W. 965, ApJ, 42, 49 Panck Coaboration, Adam, R., Ade, P. A. R., et a. 26a, A&A, 594, A9. 26b, A&A, 594, A9. 26c, A&A, 594, A Panck Coaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et a. 26d, A&A, 594, A3 Panck Coaboration, Akrami, Y., Arroja, F., et a. 28a, ArXiv e-prints, arxiv: Panck Coaboration, Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., et a. 28b, ArXiv e-prints, arxiv: Purkayastha, U., & Saha, R. 27, ArXiv e-prints, arxiv:77.28 Saha, R. 2, ApJ, 739, L56 Saha, R., & Auri, P. K. 26, ApJ, 829, 3 Saha, R., Jain, P., & Souradeep, T. 26, ApJ, 645, L89 Saha, R., Prunet, S., Jain, P., & Souradeep, T. 28, Phys. Rev. D, 78, 233 Smoot, G. F., Bennett, C. L., Kogut, A., et a. 99, ApJ, 37, L Sudevan, V., Auri, P. K., Yadav, S. K., Saha, R., & Souradeep, T. 27, ApJ, 842, 62 Sudevan, V., & Saha, R. 27, ArXiv e-prints, arxiv: Tegmark, M., de Oiveira-Costa, A., & Hamiton, A. J. 23, Phys. Rev. D, 68, Tegmark, M., & Efstathiou, G. 996, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 28, 297