Rotation group R (3) Ling-Fong Li. (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 1 / 46

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Rotation group R (3) Ling-Fong Li. (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 1 / 46"

Transcription

1 Rotation group R (3) Ling-Fong Li (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) / 46

2 In nite group : group with in nite number of elements. Label group elements by real parameters (group parameters) A (α, α 2, α n ), α, α 2, α n group parameters Continuous group : group parameters continuous Compact group: group parameters vary over compact domain. For example, 3-dim rotational group is compact because angles of rotation, varies over compact interval [, 2π] Lorentz group is not compact because, β = v varies over non-compact interval, [, ). c Example: SO (2), 2 2 real orthogonal matrices with det = is an one-parameter continuous group. Choose parameter to be the angle of rotation φ, φ 2π.and is a compact group. Denote group element by, R (φ) The group multiplication is R (φ ) R (φ 2 ) = R (φ + φ 2 ) Visualize group elements as points on the unit circle and are labeled by the angle. This is called group parameter space. Group Integration Group invariant measure In nite group, rearrangement theorem, n j= f (A j ) = n j= f (A j B ) = n j= f (BA j ), B, A j 2 G (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 2 / 46

3 plays essential role in representation theory. For continuous group, sum over group elements =) integration in group parameter space, Z Z da W (α, α n ) d α d α n where W (α, α n ) is a measure (or weight function). De ne group integration (or choose a measure W ) such that rearrangement theorem holds. This is called the group invariant integration (measure). The measure W (α, α n ) should be chosen such that Z Z u (A) da = Z u (AB ) da = u (BA) da where Z Z u (A) da u (α, α n ) W (α, α n ) d α d α n and u (A) is some arbitray function of group elements. Use notation,!α!β A = A (α, α n ) = A, B = A (β, β n ) = A Then!β!α!γ BA = A A = A (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 3 / 46

4 where! γ =! γ!β,! α are some functions determined by the group multiplication. Write the integrations as, da = W d (BA) = W!α d n α = W (α, α n ) d α d α n!γ d n γ = W (γ, γ n ) d γ d γ n Thus group invariant measure should have the property da = d (BA), or W!α!γ d n α = W d n γ Note that left (or right) multiplication by a xed group element, say B, is a - mapping of G onto itself. Thus giving a set of group elements in some region V of the parameter space, under the left (or right) multiplication by B, these elements will move to other region V. Since the total number of element in V is the same as those in V, we get, ρv = ρ V, (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 4 / 46

5 where ρ (ρ ) is the density of elements at V (V ). Thus if we take the measure W (α, α n ) to be the density of the group elements at! α, then W!α!γ d n α = W d n γ, where! γ =!!β,! γ α!α i.e. W is a group invariant measure.!α To get the density of elements W consider an in nitesmal volume element V = d α d α n in the neighborhood of the origin(identity) i.e. I = A (). Under left multiplication by B, they move to V, W!α!γ V = W V Or!α W!γ = V W V Thus ratio of weight functions are ratio of the volume elements. We will normalize the density! such that W =, i.e. density is at origin. Setting! α =!, we get W!α!!γ!β = W =, and W = W (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 5 / 46

6 Then!β W = V V!β Recall that the change in volume elements under the transformation induced by B = A is given by the Jacobian of the change of the variables! α!!!β,! γ α. Thus we get V = d α d α n = (α, α n ) (γ, γ n )!α d γ! d γ n = (α, α n ) = (γ, γ n )!α V! = Thus the invariant group measure is given by W!β = (γ, γ n ) (α, α n )!α! = Thus to nd the group invariant measure, need to know the change of group parameters under the multiplication of group element. (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 6 / 46

7 SO (2) group. The group multiplication is given by R (α) R (β) = R (γ), with γ = α + β where α, β, γ are angles of rotations. The group invariant measure is W (β) = γ = α i.e.group elements of SO (2) are uniformly populated along the unit circle =) the points per unit length is same everywhere. This explains the feature W (β) = in this case. The group integration is Z 2π d α Since this is an Abelian group, all irreps are -dimensional and of the form e imα, m = integer The great orthogonality theorem is of the form, Z 2π d α e imα e im α = δmm 2π If we had chosen any other measure f (α) 6= constant, then we would not have the great orthogonality theorem. (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 7 / 46

8 SU (2) group- 2 2 unitary matrice with determinant=, UU = U U =, det U = Write unitary matrix U as a U = c b d then The conditions imply that U = det U d b c a, U a c = b d U = U, and det U = a = d, c = b, jaj 2 + jbj 2 = Most general 2 2 unitary matrix is Parametrize a and b in terms of real variables, a b U = b a, with jaj 2 + jbj 2 = a = u + iu 2, b = u 3 + iu 4, u i real (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 8 / 46

9 then we have u 2 + u u u 2 4 = Thus group elements of SU (2) are now on the surface of a sphere in 4-dimensional space. This suggests the invariant measure as Z Z dr = du du 4 δ u 2 + u u u 2 4 It is intuitively clear that multiplication by an SU (2) element corresponds to a rotation on the surface of sphere and this measure is invariant. To show this, we need to prove that Z Z dr f (R ) = drf (R ), where R = SR and f is some arbitrary function. Using the parametrizations, R = R = we get from the relation R = SR, u + iu2 u3 iu4 s + is u3 iu4 u iu2, S = 2 s 3 is 4, s 3 is 4 s is 2 u + iu 2 u 3 iu 4, u 3 iu 4 u iu 2 8 >< >: u = s u s 2 u 2 s 3 u 3 s 4 u 4 u 2 = s 2u + s u 2 s 4 u 3 + s 3 u 4 u 3 = s 3u + s 4 u 2 + s u 3 s 2 u 4 u 4 = s 4u s 3 u 2 + s 2 u 3 + s u 4 (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 9 / 46

10 The Jacobian of the transformation is then J = (u, u 2, u 3, u 4 ) (u, u 2, u 3, u 4 ) = s s 2 s 3 s 4 s 2 s s 4 s 3 s 3 s 4 s s 2 s 4 s 3 s 2 s It is easy to see that J = because it is the determinant of an orthogonal matrix using the fact that s 2 + s s s 4 2 =. Then we have du du4δ u 2 + u2 2 + u3 2 + u4 2 = (u, u 2, u 3, u 4 ) (u, u 2, u 3, u 4 ) du du 4 δ u 2 + u2 2 + u3 2 + u4 2 = du du 4 δ u 2 + u2 2 + u3 2 + u4 2 (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) / 46

11 Rotation Group O (3) Homomorphism to SU (2) Group Elements of rotation group O (3) will be denoted by P! n (θ), the operator which rotates the system by angle θ about the axis! n. Write P! n (θ) = i θ! J! n h A then! J will be called the generator of rotation. we can also parametrize the rotation operator in terms of the familiar Euler rotations, R (α, β, γ) = P z (α) P y (β) P z (γ) = exp ijz h α exp ijy h β exp ijz h γ, where α, γ 2π, β π. We will now show that O (3) is homomorphic to SU (2) group. For any vector! r = (x, y, z) de ne a 2 2 hermitian matrix by h =! σ! r = z x iy x + iy z where! σ are the Pauli matrices. It is easy to see that h has the properties Tr (h) =, det h = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = r 2 (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) / 46

12 Let U any 2 2 unitary matrix U and de ne a new matrix h by h = UhU () Then h is also hermitan, traceless and has the same determinant as h, h = h, Tr h =, det h = det h If we expand h in terms of Pauli matrices, h =! σ! r then the relation between! r and! r is just a 3-dimensional rotation becuse of the determinants, det h = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = det h = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 i.e. relation between! r and! r is a linear transformation and can be written as r i = R ij r j where R is an orthogonal matrix. This establishes the correspondence between SU (2) matrix and 3-dimensional rotation. Note that from Eq() we see that U and U, give the same h and hence the same rotation. So the correspondence U! R is a homomorphism rather than isomorphism. (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 2 / 46

13 Rotation about z-axis Suppose U is diagonal. Then the general form is given by, e i α/2 U = e i α/2 and h = z x iy x + iy z = UhU = z (x iy ) e i α (x + iy ) e i α z This gives the relation 8 < : x = cos αx + sin αy y = sin αx + cos αy z = z which is clearly a rotation around z z-axis. axis. Thus a diagonal U corresponds to rotation about (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 3 / 46

14 Rotation about y-axis If U is real B U cos β 2 sin β 2 C A sin β 2 cos β 2 Then h = = cos β 2 sin β 2 C A z x iy x + iy z sin β cos β 2 2 z cos β + x sin β x cos β iy z sin β iy + x cos β z sin β z cos β x sin β cos β 2 sin β 2 sin β 2 cos β 2 C A and 8 < x = cos βx sin βz y = y : z = sin βx + cos βz i.e. a rotation about y axis. Rotation in terms of Euler angles The 2 2 unitary matrix corresponding to rotation by Euler angles, is then (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 4 / 46

15 U (α, β, γ) = P z (α) P y (β) P z (γ) (2) e i α/2 B cos β sin β = e i 2 2 C e i γ/2 sin β cos β A e i γ/2 (3) 2 2 B e i(α+γ)/2 cos β e i(α γ)/2 sin β 2 2 C a b e i(α+γ)/2 sin β e i(α+γ)/2 cos β A = b a, 2 2 where a = e i(α+γ)/2 cos β 2 write b = e i(α γ)/2 sin β 2 a = u + iu 2 = e i(α+γ)/2 cos β 2, b = u 3 + iu 4 = e i(α γ)/2 sin β 2 the group invariant integration can be converted to the integration over Euler angles by computing the Jacobian. Z Z du du 2 du 3 = d αd βd γj (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 5 / 46

16 First write Z dr = = Z Z du du 4 δ u 2 + u u u 2 4 du du 2 du 3 2 ju 4 j [δ (u 4 a) + δ (u 4 + a)] where q a = u 2 + u2 2 + u2 3 The Jacobian is then of the form J = (u, u 2, u 3 ) (α, β, δ) 2 3 = sin (α + γ) /2 cos β/2 cos (γ + γ) /2 sin β/2 sin (α + γ) /2 cos β/2 4 cos (α + γ) /2 cos β/2 sin (α + γ) /2 sin β/2 cos (α + γ) /2 cos β/2 5 8 sin (α γ) /2 sin β/2 cos (α γ) /2 cos β/2 sin (α γ) /2 sin β/2 = 8 2 sin (α γ) /2 cos β/2 sin 2 β/2 The integration measure in terms of Euler angles is of the form, Z Z dr = du du 4 δ u 2 + u2 2 + u3 2 + u4 2 = Z 2π Z π Z 2π d α sin βd β d γ 6 The factor is an overall normalization factor and is usually neglected for conveience. 6 (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 6 / 46

17 Irreducible Representation of SU (2) The 2 2 matrice of SU (2) can be viewed as a rotations in the complex 2 dimensional space C 2. We can use the induced transformation on functions of these 2 dimensional coordinates to generate other representations. ξ,η basis vector for 2 2 matrice of SU (2) a b P U (ξ, η) = (ξ, η) U = (ξ, η) b a = (aξ + b η, bξ + a η) i.e. ξ = P U ξ = aξ + b η η = P U η = bξ + a η Consider the action of P U on the mononomial ξ λ η µ, with λ + µ = 2j, where j is an integer or half integer. As an example, take j =. There are 3 di erent monomials, Then under the induced transformation ξ 2, ξη, η 2 ξ 2 = (aξ + b η) 2 = a 2 ξ 2 + 2ab ξη + b 2 η 2 ξ η = (aξ + b η) ( bξ + a η) = abξ 2 + (aa bb ) ξη + a b η 2 (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 7 / 46

18 η 2 = ( bξ + a η) 2 = b 2 ξ 2 2a bξη + a 2 η 2 Write this in matrix notation ξ 2 p 2 ξ η η 2 p 2 C A p a 2 2ab p b 2 2ab (aa bb p p ) 2a b b 2 2a b a 2 A ξ 2 p 2 ξη η 2 p 2 C A We have inserted the factor of α, β, γ p 2 in order to get a unitary matrix. In terms of Euler angles D () B 2 ( + cos β) e i(α+γ) p sin βe i α 2 2 ( cos β) e i(α γ) p sin βe i γ cos β p2 sin βe i γ 2 2 ( cos β) e i(α γ) p sin βe i α 2 2 ( + cos β) e i(α+γ) C A As discussed before these matrice for di erent values of a, b will form the representation matrices of the SU (2) group. For case β = γ =, we have rotation about z axis, D () (α) e i α e i α A (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 8 / 46

19 However, in Cartesian coordinates the rotation around x y z A cos α sin α sin α cos α axis is, x y z A Rotation matrix D () (α) corresponding to basis (x + iy, z, x Cartesian coordinates by a unitary transformation, Generalize this to arbitrary x + iy z A i x y A x iy i z φ j m = n jm (ξ) j+m (η) j m, m = j, j +,, j iy ), spherical basis, related to the (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 9 / 46

20 where n jm is a normalization factor to be determined later. Since the transformation from (ξ, η) to ξ, η is linear and homogeneous the transform of φ j m will have same j but di erent m. More explicitly, P U φ j m = = n jm (aξ + b η) j+m ( bξ + a η) j m n jm j m j+m s= r = (j + m)! r! (j + m r )! (j m)! s! (j m s)! ( b) s (a ) j m s a r (b ) j+m r ξ r ξ s (η) j+m r (η) j m s De ne m by Then P U φ j m = r,m s = j + m r, j m j njm n jm " (j + m)! (j m)! ( ) j+m r r! (j + m r )! (j + m r )! (r m m )! # a r (b ) j+m r (b) j+m r (a ) r m m φ j m In terms of Euler angles, a = e i(α+γ)/2 cos β 2, b = e i(α γ)/2 sin β 2 (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 2 / 46

21 and we can write where P U φ j m = φ j m m D j m (α, β, γ) m D j m m (α, β, γ) = e imα d j m m (β) e imγ (4) with d j m m (β) = (j + m)! (j m)!n jm ( ) n jm j+m k k! k (j + m k)! (j + m k)! (k m m )! cos β 2k m m sin β 2j 2k+m+m 2 2 (5) Note that sum over k covers all thos values for which the argument of the factorial functions are positive. (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 2 / 46

22 Properties of D j m (α, β, γ) m D j m (α, β, γ) s form (2j + ) dim rep of SU (2), because group induced transformation m always generates a representation of the group as discussed in Note 2. 2 D j m m (,, ) = δ mm, the identiy matrix. To see this we set β = in Eq(5) and the non-zero term is where 2k = 2j + m + m. This implies that j + m k = 2 m m, j + m k = 2 m m and the positivity of the arguments of the factorial functions gives m = m and d j m m () = δ mm. 3 For matrix D j m (α, β, γ) to be unitary, we require m D j m m (α, β, γ) = D j m m ( γ, β, α) ) d j m m ( β) = d j mm (β) It is straightforward to show that this xes the constant n jm to be q n jm = (j + m)! (j m)! (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 22 / 46

23 and the d nction is then d j m m (β) = ( ) k p (j + m)! (j m)! (j + m )! (j m )! k! k (j + m k)! (j + m k)! (k m m )! cos β 2k m m sin β 2j 2k+m+m 2 2 (6) (7) 4 For each j, the rep D j m (α, β, γ) is irreducible. This can seen as follows. Suppose 9 a m matrix M such that MD j (α, β, γ) = D j (α, β, γ) M (8) Consider following cases: α 6=, β = γ = From Eq(6), only non-zero term is 2j 2k + m + m = which gives Then d j m m () = δ mm D j m m (α,, ) = e imα δ mm (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 23 / 46

24 and Eq(8) implies that e imα e im α M mm = Thus M mm = if m 6= m, i.e. M is diagonal. 2 α 6=, β 6=, γ 6= Since M is diagonal, Eq(8) gives M mm D j m m = Dj m m M m m (no sum) But for arbitrary (α, β, γ), D j m m is not zero. Thus M mm = M m m, or M is a multiple of identity. Schur s lemma implies that D j m m (α, β, γ) is irreducible. 5 If we replace β by β + 2π, we see that from Eq(2) that the 2 2 matrix U has the property, U! U For the representation matrice this implies that d j (β + 2π) = ( ) 2j d j (β), or D j ( U ) = ( ) 2j D j (U ) Thus for j =integer D j ( U ) = D j (U ) single valued representation j = half integer D j ( U ) = D j (U ) double valued representation (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 24 / 46

25 6 Representation of generators J i, i =, 2, 3 Recall that ijz R (α, β, γ) = exp h α exp Take β = γ =, α, we get R (α, β, γ) ' ijy h β exp ij z h α ijz h γ From we get D j m m (α,, ) ' im α δ mm D j m m (J z ) = hmδ mm Similarly, take α = γ = π 2, and β small, we can get D (J x ) α = γ = and β small, we can get D (J y ) In particular, for j = /2, we have D /2 (j x ) = h 2, D /2 (j y ) = h i 2 i, D /2 (j z ) = h 2 which are the Pauli matrices up to h 2. (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 25 / 46

26 7 Great Orthogonality Theorem reads Z 2π Z π Z R π 2π d α sin βd β d γd j k m (α, β, γ) D m n n (α, β, γ) = δ jk δ mn δ m n d α R π sin βd β R π d γ (2j + ) Using D j m (α, β, γ) given in Eq(4) we can integrate over angles α and β to reduce the m integral to orthogonality relation on d j m m (β), Z π sin β d βd j m m (β) d k m m (β) = 2δ jk (2j + ) 8 Characters of irreps Since all rotations of same angle are in the same class, choose rotation about z-axis to compute the trace χ (j) (θ) = Tr hd i h i j! n, θ = Tr D j (θ,, ) = j e imθ = m= j sin j + θ 2 sin θ 2 Note that χ (j) (θ) χ (j ) (θ) = 2 cos jθ (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 26 / 46

27 Theorem: There are no irreps of SU (2) group other than D j (α, β, γ). Proof: Suppose D is another irrep with characterχ (θ), not contained in D j. Then χ (θ) = χ ( θ) since they are in the same class. Then from orhogonality theorem χ (θ)? χ (j) (θ) for all j. =) h i χ (θ)? χ (j) (θ) χ (j ) (θ) = 2 cos jθ From the property of Fourier series, cos jθ, 2j =, 2, 3, form a complete set of even functions in the range < θ < π. Thus χ (θ) =. for all θ. Basis Functions Suppose we de ne for j = l =integer r D (l) 4π m (α, β, γ) = 2l + Y l m (β, γ) then we have D (l) m (α, β, γ) = ( )m r 4π 2l + Y m l (β, α) (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 27 / 46

28 Suppose we have the relation for multiplication of group elements R (α 2, β 2, γ 2 ) R (α, β, γ ) = R (α, β, γ) The corresponding representation matrices will satisfy Setting m =, the relation is Dm l m (α, β, γ) = Dm l m" (α 2, β 2, γ 2 ) Dm"m l (α, β, γ ) m" Y m l (β, γ) = Yl m" (β 2, γ 2 ) Dm"m l (α, β, γ ) m" Thus functions fyl m (β, γ)g form the basis for irrep D l (α, β, γ). We can rewrite this in a more familiar spherical angles notation as, P R Yl m (θ, φ) = Yl m θ, φ = Yl m" (θ, φ) Dm"m l (α, β, γ) (9) m" where cos θ = cos θ cos β + sin θ sin φ cos (φ γ) Example : (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 28 / 46

29 l = Y (θ, φ) = Y (θ, φ) = r 3 8π sin θe i φ = r 3 8π cos θ = r 3 z 8π r, r 3 8π (x + iy ), r 2 l = 2 Y (θ, φ) = r 3 8π sin θe i φ = r 3 (x iy ) 8π r Y2 2 (θ, φ) = r 5 4 2π sin2 θe 2i φ x 2 y 2 + 2ixy r 2 (x + iy )2 r 2 r 5 2π sin θ cos θe i φ z (x + iy ) r 2 Y2 (θ, φ) = 2 Y2 (θ, φ) = r 5 4 2π 3 cos2 θ 2z 2 x 2 y 2 r 2 2z 2 (x + iy ) (x iy ) r 2 Y2 (θ, φ) = r 5 2 2π sin θ cos θe i φ z (x iy ) r 2 Y2 2 (θ, φ) = r 5 4 2π sin2 θe 2i φ x 2 y 2 2ixy r 2 (x iy )2 r 2 (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 29 / 46

30 3 For the special case of m = we have and from Eq(9) we get the addition theorem, r 2l + Yl (θ, φ) = 4π P l (cos θ) P l cos θ 4π = 2l + m Yl m (θ, φ) Yl m (β, γ) where cos θ = cos θ cos β + sin θ sin β cos (φ γ) (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 3 / 46

31 Product Representations Addition of Angular Momentum Suppose D (j ) and D (j 2) are 2 irreps of SU (2). How to reduce the product representation D (j ) D (j 2) D (j j 2 ), i.e. write D (j j 2 ) as sum of irreps?. Using the characters of irreps (take j > j 2 ), χ (j j 2 ) (θ) = χ (j) (θ) χ (j2) (θ) sin j + 2 = = = 8 < sin 2 θ : 2 sin θ 2 sin θ sin j 2 + θ 2 = cos (j j 2 ) θ cos (j + j 2 + ) θ sin 2 θ 2 sin 2 θ 2 [cos (j j 2 ) θ cos (j j 2 + ) θ] + [cos (j j 2 + ) θ cos (j j 2 + 2) θ] + [cos (j + j 2 ) θ cos (j + j 2 + ) θ] j j θ + sin j j = ; θ + sin (j + j 2 ) θ the character of D (j ) D (j 2) has the decomposition, χ (j j 2 ) (θ) = j +j 2 J=jj j 2 j χ (J) (θ) (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 3 / 46

32 which implies the reduction, D (j j 2 ) = D (j ) D (j 2) = j +j 2 J=jj j 2 j D (J) () We can relate this to the addition of angular momenta. Let f m j (ˆr ) be the basis for D (j) irrep and f m 2 j 2 (ˆr ) be the basis for D (j2). Then the product f m j (ˆr ) f m 2 j 2 (ˆr ) are the basis for D (j) D (j2), i.e. i h P R hf m j f m 2 j 2 = P R f m j i h P R f m 2 i j 2 m f m j D (j ) For in nitesmal rotation around, say z-axis, (setting h = ) m m P R = e i αjz ' ( i αj z ), α m 2 f m 2 j 2 D (j 2) m 2 m 2 A Let! J acting on f m j and leaving f m 2 j 2 alone and! J 2 acting on f m 2 j 2 and leaving f m j alone. Then we can write i P R hf m j f m 2 j 2 = h ( i αj z ) f m j i h = ( i αj z ) f m j f m 2 j 2 ( i αj z ) f m 2 j 2 i ' [ i α (J z + J 2z )] f m j f m 2 j 2 (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 32 / 46

33 where J z = J z + J 2z We can extend this to other components to write! J =! J +! J 2 which is just the total angular momentum. =) in nitesmal rotation of product of the basis can be written in terms of total angular momenta. From Eq() we see that decomposition of the product of irreps is related to the additon of angular momenta. (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 33 / 46

34 Clebsch-Gordon Coe cients In the decomposition of product representations D (j j 2 ) = D (j ) D (j 2) = D (jj j 2 j) + D (jj j 2 j+) + + D (j +j 2 ) =)representation matrices D (j j 2 ) can be changed into a direct sum of irreps D j. In terms of matrix elements we have D (j j 2 ) m m 2 ;m = D (j ) m 2 m m D (j 2) m 2 m2 On the other hand, D (jj j 2 j) D J = B D (jj j 2 j+)... D (j +j 2 ) C A J M ;JM = δ JJ DMM J where J, J label the boxes and M, M labels the row and colums within each box. Let A be the unitary matrix which transform D (j ) D (j 2) into, Writing out in terms of matrix elements, D (j ) D (j 2) = A A (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 34 / 46

35 h D (j j 2 ) m m 2 ;m = A i m 2 m m 2 ;J M J M ;JM [A] JM ;m m 2 () New notation for the matrix elements of the similarity transformation, [A] JM ;m m 2 hjm jj m j 2 m 2 i These are called Clebsch-Gordon coe cients. Since A is unitary, AA : =, and A A = we have j mj 2 m2jj M J M jj m j 2 m 2 = δm m δ m 2 m 2 J M m m 2 hjm jj m j 2 m 2 i j m j 2 m 2 jj M = δ JJ δ MM Note that unitary matrix A is not uniquely de ned. Let B be a unitary matrix which commutes with, B = B, or = B B Then D = A A = (BA) BA Thus if A block diagonalizes D, so does A = BA. Since is of the form D (J ) = D (J 2) (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 35 / D C A

36 A JM ;m m 2 = e i θ J [A] JM ;m m 2 From Schur s lemma, B must be of the form, B = c I c 2 I 2... I C A, where c i = e i θr Or B JM ;J M = δ JJ δ MM e i θ j and Thus similarity transformation is de ned up to J dependent phases. Condon-Shortly convention : Choose hjjjj j j 2 J j i to be real and positive, then it turns out that all Clebsch-Gordon coe cients are real. In terms of Clebsch-Gordon coe cients Eq ) becomes D (j ) m m D (j 2) m 2 m2 = D J M M JM jj mj 2 m 2 hjm jj m j 2 m 2 i J,M,M (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 36 / 46

37 Theorem: Let ψ m j (ˆr ) be the basis for D (j) irrep and ψ m 2 j 2 (ˆr ) be the basis for D (j2). Then are basisi for D J. Proof: P R φ J M = hjm jj m j 2 m 2 i m m 2 = hjm jj m j 2 m 2 i m m 2 = M "m m 2 D J M "M φ J M = hjm jj m j 2 m 2 i ψ m j ψ m 2 j 2 m m 2 P R ψ m j J,M,M D J JM "jj m j 2 m 2 P R ψ m 2 j 2 = hjm jj m j 2 m 2 i D (j ) m m D (j 2) m m m 2 m ψ m j 2 ψ m 2 j 2 2 M M " J M jj mj 2 m2 J M m jj m j 2 m 2 ψ ψ m j ψ m 2 j 2 Thus φ J M does transform according to the representation D J. As a consequence if! j 3 =! j +! j 2 then ψ m j ψ m 2 j 2 ψ m 3 j 3 hj m j 2 m 2 jj 3, m 3 i hj 3, m 3 j 3 m 3 ji m m 2 m 3 is invariant under SU (2) transformations. j ψ m 2 j 2 (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 37 / 46

38 Rotation group and Quantum Mechanics In quantum mechanics, implement symmetry transformations by unitary operator U on the states jψi jψi! ψ = U jψi, for all states so that φ jψ = hφjψi At the same time the operators change as A! A = UAU so that φ ja jψ = hφjajψi If A = A, or [U, A] =, we say that A is invariant under the transformation U. In particular, if Hamiltonian H is invariant under the symmetry transformation U [U, H ] = (2) Suppose, then [U, H ] =, [U 2, H ] = [U U 2, H ] = [U, H ] U 2 + U [U 2, H ] = (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 38 / 46

39 Collection of all such operators form a group. Suppose jψi is an eigenstate of H with energy E, Then from Eq(??) we see that H jψi = E jψi HU jψi = UH jψi = E (U jψi) which means that U jψi is also an eigenstate of H with same energy E. If we run the operator U through the whole group G, we get U jψi, U 2 jψi, U 3 jψi, If we select a linear independent set out of these, then we have degeneracy of energy levels.on the other hands, if we consider the eigenfunction ψ (x ) of time independent Schrodinger equation, H ψ (x ) = E ψ (x ) we can use induced tranformation on this eignefunctions to get P R ψ (x ) = ψ R x, P R2 ψ (x ) = ψ R 2 x, As discussed before, if we select a linearly independent set out of these transformed functions, they will form a basis of irrep. Since they are also eigenfunctions of Hamiltonian with same E, we get the result, degenercy = dim of irrep (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 39 / 46

40 !x For example, if choose ψ = z, then the basis for the transformed functions will be, x, y, z. and they form the basis of l = irrep of rotational group. In the case of hydrogen atom, the Hamiltonian is of the form H = p2 2m e 2 4πεr and is invariant under rotation [R (α, β, γ), H ] = where R is an arbitrary 3-dimensional rotation. As a consequence, the degeneracy of the energy levels is 2l +. Another important result is that for matrix elements between states belong to di erent irrep are zero, D φ m j jφm j E δ jj δ mm This follows from the great orthogonal theorem as follows. We can perform a rotation on this matrix element to get D φ m j jφm j E D = P R φ m j jp R φ m j E D E = D j l,l l m (R ) D j lm (R ) φ l j jφl j, In order to use great orthogonality theorem we sum over all group elements, D φ m j jφm j E Z Z dr = D dr P R φ m j jp R φ m j E Z = l,l, D E dr D j l m (R ) D j lm (R ) φ l j jφl j (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 4 / 46

41 Then from we get the result Z drd j l m (R ) D j lm (R ) δ jj δ mm δ ll D φ m j jφm j E δ jj δ mm (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 4 / 46

42 Wigner-Eckart Theorem In quantum mechanics, need to compute matrix elements of certain operators. We can use the representation theory to simplify the computations. The strategy is to write the operator and wave functions in terms of irrep of group and use the rep theory. Tensor operators Suppose D (α) is an irrep of group G and dimension of D (α) is d α. A set of operators T (α) i, i =, 2, d α, transforming under the symmetry group G as P R T (α) i P R = j T (α) j D (α) ji (R ) is said to be irreducible tensor operators corresponding to D (α) irreps. For the case of SO (3) (or SU (2) group), if the operators Tj m, m = j, j +, j satisfy the relation, P R (α, β, γ) Ti m PR (α, β, γ) = Ti m D j m m (α, β, γ) m then we say T m j are tensor operators of rank. Remarks : are irreducible tensors of rank j in SO (3). For example, T () x + iy, T () z, T () x iy (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 42 / 46

43 If T m j are irreducible tensor of rank j and T m 2 j 2 are irreducible tensor of rank j 2 then hjmjj m j 2 m 2 i T m j T m 2 j 2 m,m 2 are irreducible tensor of rank j. In particular, since hjjmj mi = ( )j m p 2j + we see that the combination Tj m Sj m ( ) m m is an invariant operator under rotations. Here S m j is another tensor operator of rank j. 2 If T m j are irreducible tensor operator of rank j, so is This follows from the fact that h i Sj m = ( ) m Tj m D j m m (α, β, γ) = ( )m m D j m (α, β, γ), m (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 43 / 46

44 3 Combining remarks () and (2) we get that Tj m m Tj m is a SO (3) invariant operator. Theorem (Wigner Eckart) If φ m j are basis for D j, φ m j are basis for D j and T q k are irreducible tensor operator of rank k, then E D E Dφ φ m j jt q k jφm j = j m jkqjm j jjt k jjφ j p 2j + E where Dφ j jjt k jjφ j are the reduced matrix elements and are independent of m, m, q. Proof: Since T q k D φ m j are irreducible tensor operator, we can write jt q k jφm j E D = P R φ m j jp R T q k P R jp R φ m j = D D j l m (R ) D j lm (R ) l,l q, E φ l q j jtk jφl j E D k q q (R ) = D j l m (R ) DM J M (R ) JM jkq jl hjm jkqjmi J,M,M l,l q, D E φ l q j jtk jφl j (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 44 / 46

45 Summing over all group elements in SU (2), we get Z D E dr φ m j jt q k jφm j = = D Z φ m j dr jt q k jφm j E Z J,M,M l,l q, dr D j l m (R ) D J M M (R ) JM jkq jl hjm jkqjmi D E we have used the fact φ m j jt q k jφm j is independent of R. Using great orthogonality theorem Z Z drd j l m (R ) DM J M (R ) = δ Jj δ l M δ m M dr D E φ l q j jtk jφl j we get D φ m j jt q k jφm j E = j m jkqjm j l jkq jl D l,l q E Dφ = j m jkqjm j jjt k jjφ j p 2j + φ l q j jtk jφl j E where Dφ j jjt k jjφ j E = p 2j + l,l q j l jkq jl D is the reduced matrix element and is independent of m, m, q. Remarks: φ l q j jtk jφl j (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 45 / 46 E

46 D E The m, m, q dependence in the matrix element φ m j jt q k jφm j are all contained in hj m jkqjmi which are universal and independent of details of φ m j, φ m j and T q k. Then in the ratios of matrix elements we have D E φ m 2 j jt q k jφm j D E = hj m 2 jkqjm i φ m 4 j jt q k jφm 3 hj m 4 jkqjm 3 i j Thus, we can calculate only one such matrix element explicitly and use Clebsch-Gordon coe cients to obatin other matrix elements with same j, j and k. 2 Since Clebsch-Gordon coe cients hj m jkqjmi has the property that it vanishes unless,jk jj j j + k, and m = q + m, the matrix elements will satify the same selection rules independent of the nature of the wavefunctions φ m j, φ m j or the operator T q k. D Example: Dipole matrix elements combinations, r + = φ m j j! r jφ m j E,! r = (x, y, z). Note that the linear p 2 (x + iy ), r = z, r = p 2 (x iy ) are the basis for the irrep D mm. Thus we have the selection rules: matrix elements vanish unless j = j, but if j = then j = and m = m or m (Institute) Continuous Group & SU (2) 46 / 46

Implications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics

Implications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics Physics 215 Winter 2018 Implications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics 1. The time reversal operator is antiunitary In quantum mechanics, the time reversal operator Θ acting on a state produces

More information

Tensor Operators and the Wigner Eckart Theorem

Tensor Operators and the Wigner Eckart Theorem November 11, 2009 Tensor Operators and the Wigner Eckart Theorem Vector operator The ket α transforms under rotation to α D(R) α. The expectation value of a vector operator in the rotated system is related

More information

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta Physics 1A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta In these notes we will discuss the problem of the coupling or addition of angular momenta. It is assumed that you have all had experience with

More information

Quantum Field Theory III

Quantum Field Theory III Quantum Field Theory III Prof. Erick Weinberg January 19, 2011 1 Lecture 1 1.1 Structure We will start with a bit of group theory, and we will talk about spontaneous symmetry broken. Then we will talk

More information

Matrices of Dirac Characters within an irrep

Matrices of Dirac Characters within an irrep Matrices of Dirac Characters within an irrep irrep E : 1 0 c s 2 c s D( E) D( C ) D( C ) 3 3 0 1 s c s c 1 0 c s c s D( ) D( ) D( ) a c b 0 1 s c s c 2 1 2 3 c cos( ), s sin( ) 3 2 3 2 E C C 2 3 3 2 3

More information

Symmetry and degeneracy

Symmetry and degeneracy Symmetry and degeneracy Let m= degeneracy (=number of basis functions) of irrep i: From ( irrep) 1 one can obtain all the m irrep j by acting with off-diagonal R and orthogonalization. For instance in

More information

Angular momentum. Quantum mechanics. Orbital angular momentum

Angular momentum. Quantum mechanics. Orbital angular momentum Angular momentum 1 Orbital angular momentum Consider a particle described by the Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z r and their conjugate momenta (p x, p y, p z p. The classical definition of the orbital angular

More information

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Justin Campbell August 3, 2017 1 Representations of SU 2 and SO 3 (R) 1.1 The following observation is long overdue. Proposition

More information

Rotations in Quantum Mechanics

Rotations in Quantum Mechanics Rotations in Quantum Mechanics We have seen that physical transformations are represented in quantum mechanics by unitary operators acting on the Hilbert space. In this section, we ll think about the specific

More information

26 Group Theory Basics

26 Group Theory Basics 26 Group Theory Basics 1. Reference: Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics by Michael Tinkham. 2. We said earlier that we will go looking for the set of operators that commute with the molecular Hamiltonian.

More information

Addition of Angular Momenta

Addition of Angular Momenta Addition of Angular Momenta What we have so far considered to be an exact solution for the many electron problem, should really be called exact non-relativistic solution. A relativistic treatment is needed

More information

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws Chapter Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws The dynamical properties and interactions of a system of particles and fields are derived from the principle of least action, where the action is a 4-dimensional

More information

Group Representations

Group Representations Group Representations Alex Alemi November 5, 2012 Group Theory You ve been using it this whole time. Things I hope to cover And Introduction to Groups Representation theory Crystallagraphic Groups Continuous

More information

Introduction to Group Theory

Introduction to Group Theory Chapter 10 Introduction to Group Theory Since symmetries described by groups play such an important role in modern physics, we will take a little time to introduce the basic structure (as seen by a physicist)

More information

9 Electron orbits in atoms

9 Electron orbits in atoms Physics 129b Lecture 15 Caltech, 02/22/18 Reference: Wu-Ki-Tung, Group Theory in physics, Chapter 7. 9 Electron orbits in atoms Now let s see how our understanding of the irreps of SO(3) (SU(2)) can help

More information

MAT265 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU(2)

MAT265 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU(2) MAT65 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU() (Notes for MAT80 taken by Shannon Starr, October 000) There are many references for representation theory in general, and

More information

The groups SO(3) and SU(2) and their representations

The groups SO(3) and SU(2) and their representations CHAPTER VI The groups SO(3) and SU() and their representations Two continuous groups of transformations that play an important role in physics are the special orthogonal group of order 3, SO(3), and the

More information

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory Department of Mathematics University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX USA Febuary, 2016 Recall Einstein s famous equation, E 2 = (Mc 2 ) 2 + (c p) 2, where c is the speed of light, M is the classical

More information

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation Chapter 6 The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation 6.1 Angular Momentum To study how angular momentum is represented in quantum mechanics we start by reviewing the classical vector of orbital angular momentum

More information

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics We now consider the spatial degrees of freedom of a particle moving in 3-dimensional space, which of course is an important

More information

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles Theorems Based on lectures by N. Dorey Notes taken by Dexter Chua Michaelmas 2016 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often

More information

Particles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights

Particles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights Particles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights Kfir Blum June, 008 Comments/corrections regarding these notes will be appreciated. My Email address is: kf ir.blum@weizmann.ac.il Contents 1

More information

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Lecture 0: A (Brief) Introduction to Group heory (See Chapter 3.3 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Having gained some new experience with matrices, which provide us with representations of groups, and because symmetries

More information

QM and Angular Momentum

QM and Angular Momentum Chapter 5 QM and Angular Momentum 5. Angular Momentum Operators In your Introductory Quantum Mechanics (QM) course you learned about the basic properties of low spin systems. Here we want to review that

More information

Group Theory and Its Applications in Physics

Group Theory and Its Applications in Physics T. Inui Y Tanabe Y. Onodera Group Theory and Its Applications in Physics With 72 Figures Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona Contents Sections marked with

More information

In this lecture we will go through the method of coupling of angular momentum.

In this lecture we will go through the method of coupling of angular momentum. Lecture 3 : Title : Coupling of angular momentum Page-0 In this lecture we will go through the method of coupling of angular momentum. We will start with the need for this coupling and then develop the

More information

Continuous symmetries and conserved currents

Continuous symmetries and conserved currents Continuous symmetries and conserved currents based on S-22 Consider a set of scalar fields, and a lagrangian density let s make an infinitesimal change: variation of the action: setting we would get equations

More information

ECEN 5005 Crystals, Nanocrystals and Device Applications Class 20 Group Theory For Crystals

ECEN 5005 Crystals, Nanocrystals and Device Applications Class 20 Group Theory For Crystals ECEN 5005 Crystals, Nanocrystals and Device Applications Class 20 Group Theory For Crystals Laporte Selection Rule Polarization Dependence Spin Selection Rule 1 Laporte Selection Rule We first apply this

More information

The rotation group and quantum mechanics 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 30 January 2012

The rotation group and quantum mechanics 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 30 January 2012 The rotation group and quantum mechanics 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 30 January 2012 I offer here some background for Chapter 3 of J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics. 1 The rotation group

More information

Two and Three-Dimensional Systems

Two and Three-Dimensional Systems 0 Two and Three-Dimensional Systems Separation of variables; degeneracy theorem; group of invariance of the two-dimensional isotropic oscillator. 0. Consider the Hamiltonian of a two-dimensional anisotropic

More information

Lecture 11 Spin, orbital, and total angular momentum Mechanics. 1 Very brief background. 2 General properties of angular momentum operators

Lecture 11 Spin, orbital, and total angular momentum Mechanics. 1 Very brief background. 2 General properties of angular momentum operators Lecture Spin, orbital, and total angular momentum 70.00 Mechanics Very brief background MATH-GA In 9, a famous experiment conducted by Otto Stern and Walther Gerlach, involving particles subject to a nonuniform

More information

GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS

GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS Wu-Ki Tung World Scientific Philadelphia Singapore CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 PREFACE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Particle on a One-Dimensional Lattice 1.2 Representations

More information

Physics 557 Lecture 5

Physics 557 Lecture 5 Physics 557 Lecture 5 Group heory: Since symmetries and the use of group theory is so much a part of recent progress in particle physics we will take a small detour to introduce the basic structure (as

More information

The AKLT Model. Lecture 5. Amanda Young. Mathematics, UC Davis. MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/31/11

The AKLT Model. Lecture 5. Amanda Young. Mathematics, UC Davis. MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/31/11 1 The AKLT Model Lecture 5 Amanda Young Mathematics, UC Davis MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/31/11 This talk will follow pg. 26-29 of Lieb-Robinson Bounds in Quantum Many-Body Physics by B. Nachtergaele

More information

Introduction to Group Theory

Introduction to Group Theory Introduction to Group Theory Ling-Fong Li (Institute) Group 1 / 6 INTRODUCTION Group theory : framework for studying symmetry. The representation theory of the group simpli es the physical solutions. For

More information

Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Chapter Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. The Lorentz Transformation of the Dirac Bispinor We will provide in the following a new formulation of the Dirac equation in the chiral representation

More information

Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1.

Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1. Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1. 1. O(n) consists of n n real matrices M satisfying M T M = I. Check that O(n) is a group. U(n) consists of n n complex matrices U satisfying U U = I. Check

More information

Chapter 3. Representations

Chapter 3. Representations Chapter 3 Representations 1 CHAPTER 3. REPRESENTATIONS 2 3.1 Basic definitions The main ingredients that are necessary to develop representation theory are introduced in this section. Some basic theorems

More information

Unitary rotations. October 28, 2014

Unitary rotations. October 28, 2014 Unitary rotations October 8, 04 The special unitary group in dimensions It turns out that all orthogonal groups SO n), rotations in n real dimensions) may be written as special cases of rotations in a

More information

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION, Part 2. Solutions. Problem 1: Quantum Mechanics I

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION, Part 2. Solutions. Problem 1: Quantum Mechanics I QUALIFYING EXAMINATION, Part Solutions Problem 1: Quantum Mechanics I (a) We may decompose the Hamiltonian into two parts: H = H 1 + H, ( ) where H j = 1 m p j + 1 mω x j = ω a j a j + 1/ with eigenenergies

More information

(Ref: Schensted Part II) If we have an arbitrary tensor with k indices W i 1,,i k. we can act on it 1 2 k with a permutation P = = w ia,i b,,i l

(Ref: Schensted Part II) If we have an arbitrary tensor with k indices W i 1,,i k. we can act on it 1 2 k with a permutation P = = w ia,i b,,i l Chapter S k and Tensor Representations Ref: Schensted art II) If we have an arbitrary tensor with k indices W i,,i k ) we can act on it k with a permutation = so a b l w) i,i,,i k = w ia,i b,,i l. Consider

More information

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of L k and S n A character of an irreducible representation of L k is a polynomial function constant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable

More information

G : Quantum Mechanics II

G : Quantum Mechanics II G5.666: Quantum Mechanics II Notes for Lecture 7 I. A SIMPLE EXAMPLE OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM ADDITION Given two spin-/ angular momenta, S and S, we define S S S The problem is to find the eigenstates of the

More information

Elementary linear algebra

Elementary linear algebra Chapter 1 Elementary linear algebra 1.1 Vector spaces Vector spaces owe their importance to the fact that so many models arising in the solutions of specific problems turn out to be vector spaces. The

More information

A group G is a set of discrete elements a, b, x alongwith a group operator 1, which we will denote by, with the following properties:

A group G is a set of discrete elements a, b, x alongwith a group operator 1, which we will denote by, with the following properties: 1 Why Should We Study Group Theory? Group theory can be developed, and was developed, as an abstract mathematical topic. However, we are not mathematicians. We plan to use group theory only as much as

More information

Little Orthogonality Theorem (LOT)

Little Orthogonality Theorem (LOT) Little Orthogonality Theorem (LOT) Take diagonal elements of D matrices in RG * D R D R i j G ij mi N * D R D R N i j G G ij ij RG mi mi ( ) By definition, D j j j R TrD R ( R). Sum GOT over β: * * ( )

More information

1. Rotations in 3D, so(3), and su(2). * version 2.0 *

1. Rotations in 3D, so(3), and su(2). * version 2.0 * 1. Rotations in 3D, so(3, and su(2. * version 2.0 * Matthew Foster September 5, 2016 Contents 1.1 Rotation groups in 3D 1 1.1.1 SO(2 U(1........................................................ 1 1.1.2

More information

ΑΜ Α and ΒΜ Β angular momentum basis states to form coupled ΑΒCΜ C basis states RWF Lecture #4. The Wigner-Eckart Theorem

ΑΜ Α and ΒΜ Β angular momentum basis states to form coupled ΑΒCΜ C basis states RWF Lecture #4. The Wigner-Eckart Theorem MIT Department of Chemistry 5.74, Spring 2004: Introductory Quantum Mechanics II Instructor: Prof. Robert Field 5.74 RWF Lecture #4 4 The Wigner-Ecart Theorem It is always possible to evaluate the angular

More information

Non-Abelian Symmetries in the Numerical Renormalization Group

Non-Abelian Symmetries in the Numerical Renormalization Group Diploma Thesis Non-Abelian Symmetries in the Numerical Renormalization Group Arne Alex October 12, 2009 Faculty of Physics Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München I declare the thesis I am submitting is

More information

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations

More information

Consider a s ystem with 2 parts with well defined transformation properties

Consider a s ystem with 2 parts with well defined transformation properties Direct Product of Representations Further important developments of the theory of symmetry are needed for systems that consist of parts (e.g. two electrons, spin and orbit of an electron, one electron

More information

Group Theory and the Quark Model

Group Theory and the Quark Model Version 1 Group Theory and the Quark Model Milind V Purohit (U of South Carolina) Abstract Contents 1 Introduction Symmetries and Conservation Laws Introduction Finite Groups 4 1 Subgroups, Cosets, Classes

More information

5.4 Given the basis e 1, e 2 write the matrices that represent the unitary transformations corresponding to the following changes of basis:

5.4 Given the basis e 1, e 2 write the matrices that represent the unitary transformations corresponding to the following changes of basis: 5 Representations 5.3 Given a three-dimensional Hilbert space, consider the two observables ξ and η that, with respect to the basis 1, 2, 3, arerepresentedby the matrices: ξ ξ 1 0 0 0 ξ 1 0 0 0 ξ 3, ξ

More information

Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction

Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction Lecture 5 Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction WS0/3: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics,, Part I I. Angular Momentum Operator Rotation R(θ): in polar coordinates the

More information

Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers

Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers kets ϕ> and complex numbers α with two operations Addition of two kets ϕ 1 >+ ϕ 2 > is also a ket ϕ 3 > Multiplication with complex numbers α ϕ 1 >

More information

Graduate Quantum Mechanics I: Prelims and Solutions (Fall 2015)

Graduate Quantum Mechanics I: Prelims and Solutions (Fall 2015) Graduate Quantum Mechanics I: Prelims and Solutions (Fall 015 Problem 1 (0 points Suppose A and B are two two-level systems represented by the Pauli-matrices σx A,B σ x = ( 0 1 ;σ 1 0 y = ( ( 0 i 1 0 ;σ

More information

G : Quantum Mechanics II

G : Quantum Mechanics II G5.666: Quantum Mechanics II Notes for Lecture 5 I. REPRESENTING STATES IN THE FULL HILBERT SPACE Given a representation of the states that span the spin Hilbert space, we now need to consider the problem

More information

Physics 70007, Fall 2009 Answers to Final Exam

Physics 70007, Fall 2009 Answers to Final Exam Physics 70007, Fall 009 Answers to Final Exam December 17, 009 1. Quantum mechanical pictures a Demonstrate that if the commutation relation [A, B] ic is valid in any of the three Schrodinger, Heisenberg,

More information

b c a Permutations of Group elements are the basis of the regular representation of any Group. E C C C C E C E C E C C C E C C C E

b c a Permutations of Group elements are the basis of the regular representation of any Group. E C C C C E C E C E C C C E C C C E Permutation Group S(N) and Young diagrams S(N) : order= N! huge representations but allows general analysis, with many applications. Example S()= C v In Cv reflections transpositions. E C C a b c a, b,

More information

The following definition is fundamental.

The following definition is fundamental. 1. Some Basics from Linear Algebra With these notes, I will try and clarify certain topics that I only quickly mention in class. First and foremost, I will assume that you are familiar with many basic

More information

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points) Problem 1: Spin 1 particles 1 points 1 Consider a system made up of spin 1/ particles. If one measures the spin of the particles, one can only measure spin up or spin down. The general spin state of a

More information

Isotropic harmonic oscillator

Isotropic harmonic oscillator Isotropic harmonic oscillator 1 Isotropic harmonic oscillator The hamiltonian of the isotropic harmonic oscillator is H = h m + 1 mω r (1) = [ h d m dρ + 1 ] m ω ρ, () ρ=x,y,z a sum of three one-dimensional

More information

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen Physics 4 Lecture 7 Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen Lecture 7 Physics 4 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, April th, 008 We have the Hydrogen Hamiltonian for central potential φ(r), we can write: H r = p

More information

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 30A, Spring 007, Hitoshi Murayama 1 Poincaré Symmetry In order to understand the number of degrees of freedom we need

More information

Representation Theory

Representation Theory Representation Theory Representations Let G be a group and V a vector space over a field k. A representation of G on V is a group homomorphism ρ : G Aut(V ). The degree (or dimension) of ρ is just dim

More information

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. D(g 1 g 2 ) = D(g 1 )D(g 2 ), g 1, g 2 G. and, as a consequence, (2) (3)

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. D(g 1 g 2 ) = D(g 1 )D(g 2 ), g 1, g 2 G. and, as a consequence, (2) (3) GROUP THEORY PRIMER New terms: representation, irreducible representation, completely reducible representation, unitary representation, Mashke s theorem, character, Schur s lemma, orthogonality theorem,

More information

Chapter 6: SYMMETRY IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

Chapter 6: SYMMETRY IN QUANTUM MECHANICS Chapter 6: SYMMETRY IN QUANTUM MECHANICS Since the beginning of physics, symmetry considerations have provided us with an extremely powerful and useful tool in o ur effort in understanding nature. Gradually

More information

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Rigid Body Motion Introduction + Math Review

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Rigid Body Motion Introduction + Math Review 1 PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics Rigid Body Motion Introduction + Math Review 2 How to describe a rigid body? Rigid Body - a system of point particles fixed in space i r ij j subject to a holonomic constraint:

More information

Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem

Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem 1 Fourier Analysis, a review We ll begin with a short review of simple facts about Fourier analysis, before going on to interpret

More information

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics I Assignment 8

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics I Assignment 8 Physics 15 Quantum Mechanics I Assignment 8 Logan A. Morrison March, 016 Problem 1 Let J be an angular momentum operator. Part (a) Using the usual angular momentum commutation relations, prove that J =

More information

1. Matrix multiplication and Pauli Matrices: Pauli matrices are the 2 2 matrices. 1 0 i 0. 0 i

1. Matrix multiplication and Pauli Matrices: Pauli matrices are the 2 2 matrices. 1 0 i 0. 0 i Problems in basic linear algebra Science Academies Lecture Workshop at PSGRK College Coimbatore, June 22-24, 2016 Govind S. Krishnaswami, Chennai Mathematical Institute http://www.cmi.ac.in/~govind/teaching,

More information

Angular Momentum. Andreas Wacker Mathematical Physics Lund University

Angular Momentum. Andreas Wacker Mathematical Physics Lund University Angular Momentum Andreas Wacker Mathematical Physics Lund University Commutation relations of (orbital) angular momentum Angular momentum in analogy with classical case L= r p satisfies commutation relations

More information

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS Introduction Quantum theory of angular momentum Quantum theory of a particle in a central potential - Hydrogen atom - Three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator (a model of

More information

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

BRST and Dirac Cohomology BRST and Dirac Cohomology Peter Woit Columbia University Dartmouth Math Dept., October 23, 2008 Peter Woit (Columbia University) BRST and Dirac Cohomology October 2008 1 / 23 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Representation

More information

Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 18 Coupling of Ket Spaces and the Addition of Angular Momenta

Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 18 Coupling of Ket Spaces and the Addition of Angular Momenta Copyright c 018 by Robert G. Littlejohn Physics 1A Fall 017 Notes 18 Coupling of Ket Spaces and the Addition of Angular Momenta 1. Introduction In these notes we discuss the coupling of ket spaces of systems

More information

1 Linear Algebra Problems

1 Linear Algebra Problems Linear Algebra Problems. Let A be the conjugate transpose of the complex matrix A; i.e., A = A t : A is said to be Hermitian if A = A; real symmetric if A is real and A t = A; skew-hermitian if A = A and

More information

Group Theory - QMII 2017

Group Theory - QMII 2017 Group Theory - QMII 017 Reminder Last time we said that a group element of a matrix lie group can be written as an exponent: U = e iαaxa, a = 1,..., N. We called X a the generators, we have N of them,

More information

Landau & Lifshits, Quantum Mechanics, Ch. 12. Tinkham, Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics

Landau & Lifshits, Quantum Mechanics, Ch. 12. Tinkham, Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics Suggested reading: Landau & Lifshits, Quantum Mechanics, Ch. 2 Tinkham, Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics Dresselhaus, Dresselhaus, Jorio, Group Theory: Applications to the Physics of Condensed Matter

More information

E 2 = p 2 + m 2. [J i, J j ] = iɛ ijk J k

E 2 = p 2 + m 2. [J i, J j ] = iɛ ijk J k 3.1. KLEIN GORDON April 17, 2015 Lecture XXXI Relativsitic Quantum Mechanics 3.1 Klein Gordon Before we get to the Dirac equation, let s consider the most straightforward derivation of a relativistically

More information

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra Quantum Computing Lecture 2 Review of Linear Algebra Maris Ozols Linear algebra States of a quantum system form a vector space and their transformations are described by linear operators Vector spaces

More information

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i. Quantum Mechanics Solutions 1. (a) If H has an orthonormal basis consisting of the eigenvectors { v i } of A with eigenvalues λ i C, then A can be written in terms of its spectral decomposition as A =

More information

Lecture 8 Nature of ensemble: Role of symmetry, interactions and other system conditions: Part II

Lecture 8 Nature of ensemble: Role of symmetry, interactions and other system conditions: Part II Lecture 8 Nature of ensemble: Role of symmetry, interactions and other system conditions: Part II We continue our discussion of symmetries and their role in matrix representation in this lecture. An example

More information

Quantum Physics and the Representation Theory of SU(2)

Quantum Physics and the Representation Theory of SU(2) Quantum Physics and the Representation Theory of SU(2 David Urbanik University of Waterloo Abstract. Over the past several decades, developments in Quantum Physics have provided motivation for research

More information

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet Physics 58, Fall Semester 018 Professor Eduardo Fradkin Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 018, 5:00 pm 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet In this

More information

FORMULA SHEET FOR QUIZ 2 Exam Date: November 8, 2017

FORMULA SHEET FOR QUIZ 2 Exam Date: November 8, 2017 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Physics 8.07: Electromagnetism II November 5, 207 Prof. Alan Guth FORMULA SHEET FOR QUIZ 2 Exam Date: November 8, 207 A few items below are marked

More information

Multi-Electron Atoms II

Multi-Electron Atoms II Multi-Electron Atoms II LS Coupling The basic idea of LS coupling or Russell-Saunders coupling is to assume that spin-orbit effects are small, and can be neglected to a first approximation. If there is

More information

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule GROUP THEORY PRIMER New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule 1. Tensor methods for su(n) To study some aspects of representations of a

More information

Lecture notes for Mathematical Physics. Joseph A. Minahan 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy Box 516, SE Uppsala, Sweden

Lecture notes for Mathematical Physics. Joseph A. Minahan 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy Box 516, SE Uppsala, Sweden Lecture notes for Mathematical Physics Joseph A. Minahan 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy Box 516, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden 1 E-mail: joseph.minahan@fysast.uu.se 1 1 Introduction This is a course

More information

Selection rules - electric dipole

Selection rules - electric dipole Selection rules - electric dipole As an example, lets take electric dipole transitions; when is j, m z j 2, m 2 nonzero so that j 1 = 1 and m 1 = 0. The answer is equivalent to the question when can j

More information

QUANTUM MECHANIC S. Symmetries

QUANTUM MECHANIC S. Symmetries Walter Greiner Berndt Müller QUANTUM MECHANIC S Symmetries 1. Symmetries in Quantum Mechanics 1 1.1 Symmetries in Classical Physics 1 1.2 Spatial Translations in Quantum Mechanics 1 9 1.3 The Unitary

More information

5.5. Representations. Phys520.nb Definition N is called the dimensions of the representations The trivial presentation

5.5. Representations. Phys520.nb Definition N is called the dimensions of the representations The trivial presentation Phys50.nb 37 The rhombohedral and hexagonal lattice systems are not fully compatible with point group symmetries. Knowing the point group doesn t uniquely determine the lattice systems. Sometimes we can

More information

Chapter 2 The Group U(1) and its Representations

Chapter 2 The Group U(1) and its Representations Chapter 2 The Group U(1) and its Representations The simplest example of a Lie group is the group of rotations of the plane, with elements parametrized by a single number, the angle of rotation θ. It is

More information

Little Orthogonality Theorem (LOT)

Little Orthogonality Theorem (LOT) Little Orthogonality Theorem (LOT) Take diagonal elements of D matrices in R G i * j G αµ βν = δδ ij µνδαβ mi D R D R N N i * j G G Dµµ R Dββ R = δijδ µ β δ µβ = δijδµβ R G mi mi j j ( j) By definition,

More information

Representation Theory

Representation Theory Frank Porter Ph 129b February 10, 2009 Chapter 3 Representation Theory 3.1 Exercises Solutions to Problems 1. For the Poincare group L, show that any element Λ(M,z) can be written as a product of a pure

More information

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1 Solutions to exam 6--6: FA35 Quantum Mechanics hp Problem (4 p): (a) Define the concept of unitary operator and show that the operator e ipa/ is unitary (p is the momentum operator in one dimension) (b)

More information

Algebra I Fall 2007

Algebra I Fall 2007 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.701 Algebra I Fall 007 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.701 007 Geometry of the Special Unitary

More information

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle Chapter 1 Identical particles 1.1 Distinguishable particles The Hilbert space of N has to be a subspace H = N n=1h n. Observables Ân of the n-th particle are self-adjoint operators of the form 1 1 1 1

More information

The Bloch Sphere. Ian Glendinning. February 16, QIA Meeting, TechGate 1 Ian Glendinning / February 16, 2005

The Bloch Sphere. Ian Glendinning. February 16, QIA Meeting, TechGate 1 Ian Glendinning / February 16, 2005 The Bloch Sphere Ian Glendinning February 16, 2005 QIA Meeting, TechGate 1 Ian Glendinning / February 16, 2005 Outline Introduction Definition of the Bloch sphere Derivation of the Bloch sphere Properties

More information

Group Theory Essentials Robert B. Griffiths Version of 25 January 2011

Group Theory Essentials Robert B. Griffiths Version of 25 January 2011 qmc151.tex. Group Theory Essentials Robert B. Griffiths Version of 25 January 2011 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Definitions 1 3 Symmetry Group D 3 of the Equilateral Triangle 3 4 Representations 5 4.1 Basic

More information

Physics 115C Homework 2

Physics 115C Homework 2 Physics 5C Homework Problem Our full Hamiltonian is H = p m + mω x +βx 4 = H +H where the unperturbed Hamiltonian is our usual and the perturbation is H = p m + mω x H = βx 4 Assuming β is small, the perturbation

More information