Physics 70007, Fall 2009 Answers to Final Exam


 Buddy Ford
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Physics 70007, Fall 009 Answers to Final Exam December 17, Quantum mechanical pictures a Demonstrate that if the commutation relation [A, B] ic is valid in any of the three Schrodinger, Heisenberg, interaction/dirac pictures, then it is valid in all pictures. Consider the three statements [A S, B S ] ic S, [A H, B H ] ic H, [A I, B I ] ic I 1 where the subscript S, H, I on the operators indicates the Schrodinger, Heisenberg, or interaction picture respectively. We need to show that any one of these statements implies the other two. One standard way of doing this, which ensures that we don't do any unnecessary work, is to show that the rst statement implies the second, the second implies the third, and the third implies the rst. This is the strategy we will pursue. We need the relations between operators in the various pictures. The Heisenbergpicture operators are given in terms of the Schrodingerpicture operators as A H e iht/ A S e iht/ with analogous relations for B and C. We have taken the initial time t 0 equal to zero without any loss of generality. Next we relate the Schrodinger and interaction pictures: A I e ih0t/ A S e ih0t/ 3 We dene the interaction picture as usual, by splitting up the full Hamiltonian H into a solvable part H 0 plus a perturbation V. Let us invert this relation to nd A S in terms of A I : A S e ih0t/ A I e ih0t/ 4 Finally we relate the Heisenberg and interaction pictures: we invert to solve for A S, and then substitute the result into 3. The result is A I e ih0t/ e iht/ A H e iht/ e ih0t/ 5 With these preliminaries done, we can proceed to our proofs. First we assume that [A S, B S ] ic S ; then we use : [A H, B H ] A H B H B H A H e iht/ A S e iht/ e iht/ B S e iht/ e iht/ B S e iht/ e iht/ A S e iht/ e iht/ A S B S e iht/ e iht/ B S A S e iht/ e iht/ [A S, B S ] e iht/ e iht/ ic S e iht/ ic H. 1
2 Next we assume [A H, B H ] ic H and use 5: [A I, B I ] A I B I B I A I e ih0t/ e iht/ A H e iht/ e ih0t/ e ih0t/ e iht/ B H e iht/ e ih0t/ e ih0t/ e iht/ B H e iht/ e ih0t/ e ih0t/ e iht/ A H e iht/ e ih0t/ e ih0t/ e iht/ A H B H e iht/ e ih0t/ e ih0t/ e iht/ B H A H e iht/ e ih0t/ e ih0t/ e iht/ [A H, B H ] e iht/ e ih0t/ e ih0t/ e iht/ ic H e iht/ e ih0t/ ic I. Finally we assume [A I, B I ] ic I and use 4: [A S, B S ] A S B S B S A S e ih0t/ A I e ih0t/ e ih0t/ B I e ih0t/ e ih0t/ B I e ih0t/ e ih0t/ A I e ih0t/ e ih0t/ A I B I e ih0t/ e ih0t/ B I A I e ih0t/ e ih0t/ [A I, B I ] e ih0t/ e ih0t/ ic I e ih0t/ ic S. b Calculate the time dependence of the position operator x H t of a free particle in the Heisenberg picture. We need to solve the Heisenberg equation of motion for x H t: d dt x H t 1 i [x, H] H 6 where operators without a subscript are in the Schrodinger picture, and the Hamiltonian is H p /m for a free particle. The needed commutator is ] [x, H] [x, p 1 [ x, p ] 1 m m m i p i p m using a known result from previous homework Sakurai problem 1.9 to evaluate the commutator. The equation of motion becomes d dt x H t 1 m p H t 7 and we see that we need to know the time evolution of p H. Its equation of motion is d dt p H t 1 i [p, H] H 1 i [p, p m since p commutes with any function of itself. Thus p H is just a constant in time: ] H 0 p H t p H 0 p 0 8 The initial condition for a Heisenbergpicture operator is that it equals the Schrodinger operator at the initial time t 0, which we took equal to zero. Using 8, we can trivially integrate the dierential equation 7 and apply the initial condition x H 0 x 0, to nd x H t x 0 + p 0 m t
3 which is our desired result.. Particle in onedimensional potential a Show that the energy eigenstates of a simple harmonic oscillator obey the following property under the x x parity transformation: x n 1 n x n The parity operator P takes x to x, and is dened in such a way that P 1 and that P is Hermitian see Sakurai for details; thus x x P 9 Now we take as given that the ground state of the simple harmonic oscillator has even parity: P we saw this from our explicit solution for the energy wavefunctions. The higher eigenstates are found from the ground state by n 1 n! a n 0 11 where a is the usual raising operator: a mω x ip mω How does this operator behave under parity? Since position and momentum both invert: P xp x P pp p then clearly a inverts as well: P a P a, or equivalently P a a P 1 That is, P anticommutes with a. Now we put together our results 9,10,11,1: 1 x n x a n 0 n! 1 x P a n 0 n! 1n x a n 0 P n! 1n x a n 0 n! 1 n x n b Use the above result to obtain the energy spectrum and eigenstates of a quantum mechanical particle trapped in the following potential: V x if x < 0 and V x 1 mω x if x > 0. 3
4 In the region x > 0, the particle experiences a harmonic oscillator potential, so its wavefunction will be a linear combination of simple harmonic oscillator energy eigenfunctions. In particular, any eigenfunction for our problem must be an eigenfunction of the ordinary SHO. However, since the potential is innity for x < 0, the particle is absolutely forbidden to be there: the wavefunction is forced to be zero. And since ψ must be continuous even where the potential changes by an innite amount, it must be the case that ψ 0 + lim x 0 + ψ x 0 which acts as a boundary condition which the wavefunction in the x > 0 region must satisfy. What does this condition do? For the evenparity SHO eigenfunctions, there is nothing forcing ψ 0 to be zero, and in fact it can be shown from the exact form of the wavefunction given in Appendix A.4 of Sakurai that it will always be nonzero. Therefore, the evenparity solutions do not satisfy the boundary conditions and can be eliminated. But, the oddparity solutions satisfy ψ x ψ x; in particular, letting x 0, we nd that ψ 0 0. These solutions do satisfy the boundary condition, and hence are allowed to be eigenfunctions of our current potential. There is a small adjustment we have to make to the normalization of these eigenfunctions: as is, they are normalized so that ˆ dx ψ 1 where the integral goes over the full range of x, from to. But now ψ is set to zero for negative values of x; so the eective range of integration shrinks to 0 x <, and over this range we have ˆ 0 dx ψ 1 To restore normalization, we have to scale up ψ by a factor of. What, then, happens to the energy of the oddparity functions, as given by ˆ dx ψ Hψ E ˆ dx ψ ψ E ˆ 0 dx ψ On the one hand, ψ is scaled up by a factor of, but on the other hand the range of integration shrinks to half of the original. These factors cancel each other, with the consequence that the total energy of the state remains the same. So let us dene n p + 1, where p 0, 1,,... and thus n is odd. Then the eigenfunctions for our potential are given by 0, x 0 ψ p x x n, x 0 where n is an eigenstate of the original simple harmonic oscillator. The energy of the state ψ p x is ω n + 1 ω p Angular momentum operators: general properties. [ ˆ a Show that L, ˆL ] i 0. Here i x, y, z}. I will omit the hats from the operators, and show all sums explicitly rather than using the Einstein summation convention. 4
5 First let us establish a general relation for any operators A, B, C, which we will use throughout this entire problem: [A, BC] ABC BCA ABC BAC + BAC BCA [A, B] C + B [A, C] So, since L k L kl k, we have [ L, L i ] k [L k L k, L i ] k [L i, L k L k ] k [L i, L k ] L k + L k [L i, L k ] Next we use the fundamental property satised by angular momenta, namely [L i, L k ] l iɛ ikll l : [ ] L, L i i ɛ ikl L l L k + L k L l k l Now notice that we are summing over indices k and l, and what we are summing is a product of one factor which is antisymmetric in k, l and a second factor which is symmetric in k, l. We can instantly conclude that the sums give zero, the reason being that the summands with k l cancel in pairs for example, the term with k, l 1, cancels k, l, 1, since ɛ i1 ɛ i1 while L 1 L + L L 1 L L 1 + L 1 L, while the terms with k l are zero all by themselves e.g. ɛ i11 0. This is another technique we will be using repeatedly in this problem. [ ] So L, L i 0: we are done. b Demonstrate that [L i, x k ] iɛ ikl x l. First we use the denition of orbital angular momentum, L x p, to write L i ɛ ijl x j p l j notice how we avoid using the index k which is already being used in the problem statement. Improperly reusing an index is a frequent source of error in this type of computation. Then [L i, x k ] ɛ ijl [x j p l, x k ] ɛ ijl [x k, x j p l ] j l j l ɛ ijl [x k, x j ] p l + x j [x k, p l ] j l ɛ ijl 0 + x j i δ kl j l l i j ɛ ijk x j i j i l ɛ ikj x j ɛ ikl x l. c Similarly, show that [L i, p k ] i ɛ ijl p l. 5
6 The method of proof is very similar to that of part b: [L i, p k ] ɛ ijl [x j p l, p k ] ɛ ijl [p k, x j p l ] j l j l ɛ ijl [p k, x j ] p l + x j [p k, p l ] j l ɛ ijl i δ kj p l + 0 j i ɛ ikl p l. l l d Finally, show that [ L i, x ] 0 and that [ L i, p ] 0. Proceeding directly: [ Li, x ] [L i, x k x k ] k [L i, x k ] x k + x k [L i, x k ] k Use the result of part b: [ Li, x ] i ɛ ikl x l x k + x k x l k l As in part a, we are summing over the product of antisymmetric and symmetric; thus [ L i, x ] 0. Similarly using part c: [ Li, p ] [L i, p k p k ] k [L i, p k ] p k + p k [L i, p k ] k i ɛ ikl p l p k + p k p l k l Angular momentum operators in spherical coordinates. Start from the expression for the gradient operator in spherical coordinates r, θ, φ: er r + e θr θ + e φ r φwhere e α is the unit vector in direction α, and calculate the following operators all results should be given in spherical coordinates : a the angular momentum operator L: We use the denition L r p r i ; then we write r e r r, and use the given expression for and the fact that e r, e θ, e φ form an orthogonal triad with e r e θ e φ, e θ e φ e r, e φ e r e θ 6
7 so L i e r r e r r + e θ i e φ θ e θ φ r θ + e φ r φ [I will do part c before part b] c all Cartesian components L α α x, y, z} of L: The Cartesian components are given by e.g. L x e x L, so we need to be able to express the Cartesian unit vectors in terms of spherical coordinates and spherical unit vectors. To do this, we recall what the unit vector for a given coordinate means: it is a vector of length 1, in the direction of greatest increase for that coordinate i.e. in the direction of the gradient of that coordinate: so x e x x For reference, we write out the transformation between spherical and Cartesian: x r cos φ y r sin φ z r cos θ So we calculate: x e r r + e θ r θ + e φ r φ r cos φ e r cos φ + e θ cos θ cos φ e φ sin φ It is easy to check that this vector already has length 1; so this is also e x. Therefore, L x e x L i e r cos φ + e θ cos θ cos φ e φ sin φ i cos θ cos φ φ sin φ θ e φ θ We repeat this for the next component: y e r r + e θ r θ + e φ r φ r sin φ This vector has length 1, and so equals e y. So L y e y L e r sin φ + e θ cos θ sin φ + e φ cos φ i e r sin φ + e θ cos θ sin φ + e φ cos φ i cos θ sin φ φ + cos φ θ e φ θ e θ φ e θ φ 7
8 Finally we work through z: z e r r + e θ r θ + e φ r φ r cos θ e r cos θ e θ Again this is unit and so equals e z. Then L z e z L i e r cos θ e θ i φ. e φ θ e θ φ b the angular momentum squared operator L : We know that L L x + L y + L z; so now that we have expressed the individual components of L as dierential operators in spherical coordinates, our strategy will be to apply L to a generic function f r, θ, φ: L f L xf + L yf + L zf First we calculate a useful derivative: d cos θ cos θ cos θ dθ sin 1 θ sin θ With this done, we compute each term in turn: L xf i cos θ cos φ φ sin φ θ cos θ f f cos φ sin φ φ θ i cos θ cos φ sin φ f f cos φ sin φ f sin θ φ sin θ + cos θ cos φ sin φ φ + cos θ cos φ sin θ φ + cos θ cos φ } f φ θ + sin φ f θ L yf i cos θ sin φ φ + cos φ θ cos θ f f sin φ + cos φ φ θ i cos θ cos φ sin φ f sin θ φ + cos θ sin φ sin θ + cos φ sin φ f sin θ φ cos θ cos φ sin φ f φ + cos θ sin φ } f φ θ + cos φ f θ L zf i f φ Adding these, we nd L f i 0 f cos φ + θ cos sin φ + sin φ + 1 f θ } +0 f φ θ + cos φ + sin φ f θ i 1 f sin θ φ + cos θ f i 1 f sin θ φ + 1 } θ + f θ f } θ θ 8 f θ φ + cos θ f θ + cos θ cos φ sin φ cos θ cos φ sin φ cos φ + sin φ f θ f φ θ f φ θ
9 so we conclude that L i 1 sin θ φ + 1 }. θ θ d the raising and lowering operators L ±. We calculate directly from the denition of L ± : L ± L x ± il y i cos θ cos φ φ sin φ θ ± i cos θ } sin φ φ + cos φ θ i cos θ } cos φ ± i sin φ φ ± i cos φ ± i sin φ θ i cos θ } e±iφ φ ± ie ±iφ θ i e ±iφ cos θ } φ ± i θ. 5. The rotation group. Rotations R in three dimensions form a noncommutative threeparameter three dimensional group. Show that rotations around a single axis form a commutative, oneparameter group: a Give the rotation matrix R z φ that corresponds to a rotation around the z axis with angle φ. If we consider active rotations i.e. rotations of the object rather than the axes, then the rotation matrix is given by [ cos φ ] sin φ sin φ cos φ Working this problem in terms of passive rotations is OK as well just switch the odiagonal terms of the matrix, throughout the entire problem. b Calculate the generator A z lim φ 0 φ R z φ. The derivative of R z φ is given by sin φ cos φ cos φ sin φ As φ 0, we have cos φ 1 and sin φ 0, so the generator is 0 1 A z. 1 0 c Show that R z φ exp [φa z ]. First we show that A z I: A z
10 So now, let n be an even number; then we can write n p where p is an integer, and so A n z A p z I p 1 p I We can obtain a corresponding result for odd n p + 1, by multiplying through by A z : A p+1 z 1 p A z Then we compute directly: exp [φa z ] I n0 p0 p0 1 n! φa z n φ p p! Ap z + p0 1 p φ p p! + A z φ p+1 p + 1! Ap+1 z p0 1 p φ p+1 p + 1! I cos φ + A z sin φ cos φ 0 0 sin φ + 0 cos φ sin φ 0 cos φ sin φ sin φ cos φ R z φ. d Show all group properties of rotations around the z axis: d.1 existence of the identity element 1 z ; We take the binary operation of the group to be ordinary matrix multiplication. Then as we know, the identity element for matrix multiplication is the identity matrix And if we let φ 0, then R z φ 0 is exactly the identity matrix. Thus the group does possess an identity element, as required. Actually φ πn where n is any integer, will also work; if we are concerned with the uniqueness of the identity element, we should restrict the allowed range for the group parameter to e.g. 0 φ < π. d. closure: R z φ 1 R z φ is also a rotation around z; Calculating directly: R z φ 1 R z φ cos φ1 sin φ 1 cos φ sin φ sin φ 1 cos φ 1 sin φ cos φ cos φ1 cos φ sin φ 1 sin φ cos φ 1 sin φ sin φ 1 cos φ sin φ 1 cos φ + cos φ 1 sin φ sin φ 1 sin φ + cos φ 1 cos φ cos φ1 + φ sin φ 1 + φ sin φ 1 + φ cos φ 1 + φ R z φ 1 + φ where we have used the standard angle addition formulas for sin and cos. This shows explicitly that R z φ 1 R z φ is also a rotation around the zaxis, and so the group is closed with respect to the group operation. 10
11 If we restrict the range of φ to 0 φ < π as in the previous part, then R z φ 1 + φ is altered to R z φ 1 + φ mod π, which is completely equivalent since cos α + πn cos α and sin α + πn sin α for any α and integer n. d.3 associativity: R z φ 1 R z φ R z φ 3 R z φ 1 R z φ R z φ 3, Using the closure property demonstrated above, showing associativity for group multiplication becomes easy: we have and R z φ 1 R z φ R z φ 3 R z φ 1 + φ R z φ 3 R z φ 1 + φ + φ 3 R z φ 1 R z φ R z φ 3 R z φ 1 R z φ + φ 3 R z φ 1 + φ + φ 3 which are manifestly equal. Essentially, associativity for the group elements reduces to associativity of addition of ordinary numbers. d.4 commutativity: R z φ 1 R z φ R z φ R z φ 1. In particular, show that R z φ 1 R z φ R z φ 1 + φ. We have already shown the lemma in d., demonstrating closure. Using the lemma, we have and R z φ 1 R z φ R z φ 1 + φ R z φ R z φ 1 R z φ + φ 1 R z φ 1 + φ so the group operation is commutative: that is, the group is Abelian. We see that commutativity of the group operation reduces to commutativity of addition of ordinary numbers. 6. Representations of the rotation group. a The rotation operator around the z axis is dened by the equation ˆD z α φ φ + α. Assume that all derivatives of the ket φ with respect to the angle variable φ exist. ˆD z α exp α φ exp i αl z where Lz i φ. Show that To express φ + α as the result of some operator upon φ, we simply expand φ + α in a Taylor series around φ: φ + α φ + α d α d φ + dφ! dφ φ +... note: we are committing a very common abuse of notation by using φ to represent both the general variable and the particular value of the variable at which we are evaluating the ket and derivatives of the ket. At any rate, we can then write φ + α I + α d dφ + α d! dφ +... φ exp α φ φ 11
12 so we can identify ˆD z α exp α φ. Then remembering that L z i φ i φ which we derived in problem 4c, we have also ˆD z α exp i αl z. b The rotation operator with angle φ around an arbitrary axis ˆn is given by [ ij ˆD nφ exp ] nφ. Show that J ˆD nφ jm j j + 1 ˆD nφ jm. In other words, this means that ˆD nφ jm is still an eigenket of J. Hint: the commutation rules you proved between J and J α in [problem 3a] will be very useful here. [ ] We showed in problem 3a that J, J α 0 for any given component α of J; then, by linearity, [ J, J n] 0 for any constant vector n as well. So J will also commute with any function of J n, in particular with ˆD nφ. So J ˆD nφ jm ˆD nφ J jm ˆD nφ j j + 1 jm j j + 1 ˆD nφ jm. Thus ˆD nφ jm is an eigenket of J with eigenvalue j j + 1, and so is itself a state with denite j. c The matrix elements of the rotation operator with angle φ around the axis n, i.e. the n + 1 dimensional representation of the rotation group are D j j m m nφ j m jm ˆD nφ. Use the results obtained in the previous part of this problem to argue that D j j m m is diagonal in j: D j j m m nφ δ j,j Dj m m nφ. We saw in the previous part that ˆD nφ jm has denite j; then we can write this state as m c m jm : i.e. a linear combination of states with dierent m but the same j. So then, D j j m m nφ j m jm ˆD nφ m c m j m jm But the various states jm are orthonormal, so for any overlap matrix element j m jm to be nonzero, we must have j j. Thus the whole sum will also be zero unless j j, and so we are done. d Show that for small rotation angles ɛ D j m m nɛ δ m,m iɛ x + ɛ y j m j + m + 1δm,m+1 iɛ x ɛ y j + m j m + 1δm,m 1 iɛ z mδ m,m. 1
13 We write nɛ ɛ x e x + ɛ y e y + ɛ z e z ; then for ɛ x, ɛ y, ɛ z 1 we can write ˆD nɛ [ ] i ɛx J x + ɛ y J y + ɛ z J z exp 1 i ɛ xj x + ɛ y J y + ɛ z J z Since J ± J x ± ij y, we have J x 1 / J + + J and J y 1 /i J + J i / J + J, so we rewrite the above as ˆD nɛ 1 i ɛx J + + J iɛ y J + J + ɛ z J z 1 1 iɛx + ɛ y J + + iɛ x ɛ y J + iɛ z J z Then so using D j j m m nɛ j m 1 1 iɛx + ɛ y J + + iɛ x ɛ y J + iɛ z J z jm J + jm j m j + m + 1 j, m + 1 J jm j + m j m + 1 j, m 1 J z jm m jm we nd D j j m m nɛ δ j jδ m m iɛ x + ɛ y j m j + m + 1δj jδ m,m+1 iɛ x ɛ y j + m j m + 1δj jδ m,m 1 iɛ z mδ j jδ m m δ j jd j m m nɛ Thus, factoring out δ j j from the righthand side, we obtain the desired expression for D j m m nɛ. 13
Angular Momentum Algebra
Angular Momentum Algebra Chris Clark August 1, 2006 1 Input We will be going through the derivation of the angular momentum operator algebra. The only inputs to this mathematical formalism are the basic
More informationPhysics 342 Lecture 26. Angular Momentum. Lecture 26. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I
Physics 342 Lecture 26 Angular Momentum Lecture 26 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, April 2nd, 2010 We know how to obtain the energy of Hydrogen using the Hamiltonian operator but given a particular
More informationAngular momentum. Quantum mechanics. Orbital angular momentum
Angular momentum 1 Orbital angular momentum Consider a particle described by the Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z r and their conjugate momenta (p x, p y, p z p. The classical definition of the orbital angular
More informationLecture 19 (Nov. 15, 2017)
Lecture 19 8.31 Quantum Theory I, Fall 017 8 Lecture 19 Nov. 15, 017) 19.1 Rotations Recall that rotations are transformations of the form x i R ij x j using Einstein summation notation), where R is an
More informationMassachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department Physics 8.32 Fall 2006 Quantum Theory I October 9, 2006 Assignment 6 Due October 20, 2006 Announcements There will be a makeup lecture on Friday,
More informationSample Quantum Chemistry Exam 2 Solutions
Chemistry 46 Fall 7 Dr. Jean M. Standard Name SAMPE EXAM Sample Quantum Chemistry Exam Solutions.) ( points) Answer the following questions by selecting the correct answer from the choices provided. a.)
More informationAddition of Angular Momenta
Addition of Angular Momenta What we have so far considered to be an exact solution for the many electron problem, should really be called exact nonrelativistic solution. A relativistic treatment is needed
More informationTotal Angular Momentum for Hydrogen
Physics 4 Lecture 7 Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen Lecture 7 Physics 4 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, April th, 008 We have the Hydrogen Hamiltonian for central potential φ(r), we can write: H r = p
More information8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 2011 FINAL EXAM Thursday December 22, 9:00 am 12:00 You have 3 hours.
8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 0 FINAL EXAM Thursday December, 9:00 am :00 You have 3 hours. Answer all problems in the white books provided. Write YOUR NAME and YOUR SECTION on your white books. There
More informationQM and Angular Momentum
Chapter 5 QM and Angular Momentum 5. Angular Momentum Operators In your Introductory Quantum Mechanics (QM) course you learned about the basic properties of low spin systems. Here we want to review that
More informationThe 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation
Chapter 6 The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation 6.1 Angular Momentum To study how angular momentum is represented in quantum mechanics we start by reviewing the classical vector of orbital angular momentum
More informationThe Simple Harmonic Oscillator
The Simple Harmonic Oscillator Asaf Pe er 1 November 4, 215 This part of the course is based on Refs [1] [3] 1 Introduction We return now to the study of a 1d stationary problem: that of the simple harmonic
More information9 Angular Momentum I. Classical analogy, take. 9.1 Orbital Angular Momentum
9 Angular Momentum I So far we haven t examined QM s biggest success atomic structure and the explanation of atomic spectra in detail. To do this need better understanding of angular momentum. In brief:
More informationChemistry 432 Problem Set 4 Spring 2018 Solutions
Chemistry 4 Problem Set 4 Spring 18 Solutions 1. V I II III a b c A onedimensional particle of mass m is confined to move under the influence of the potential x a V V (x) = a < x b b x c elsewhere and
More informationin terms of the classical frequency, ω = , puts the classical Hamiltonian in the form H = p2 2m + mω2 x 2
One of the most important problems in quantum mechanics is the simple harmonic oscillator, in part because its properties are directly applicable to field theory. The treatment in Dirac notation is particularly
More informationPhysics 606, Quantum Mechanics, Final Exam NAME ( ) ( ) + V ( x). ( ) and p( t) be the corresponding operators in ( ) and x( t) : ( ) / dt =...
Physics 606, Quantum Mechanics, Final Exam NAME Please show all your work. (You are graded on your work, with partial credit where it is deserved.) All problems are, of course, nonrelativistic. 1. Consider
More informationCh 125a Problem Set 1
Ch 5a Problem Set Due Monday, Oct 5, 05, am Problem : Braket notation (Dirac notation) Braket notation is a standard and convenient way to describe quantum state vectors For example, φ is an abstract
More information8.04 Spring 2013 March 12, 2013 Problem 1. (10 points) The Probability Current
Prolem Set 5 Solutions 8.04 Spring 03 March, 03 Prolem. (0 points) The Proaility Current We wish to prove that dp a = J(a, t) J(, t). () dt Since P a (t) is the proaility of finding the particle in the
More informationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland. PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II August 23, 208 9:00 a.m. :00 p.m. Do any four problems. Each problem is worth 25 points.
More informationSummary: angular momentum derivation
Summary: angular momentum derivation L = r p L x = yp z zp y, etc. [x, p y ] = 0, etc. () () (3) Angular momentum commutation relations [L x, L y ] = i hl z (4) [L i, L j ] = i hɛ ijk L k (5) LeviCivita
More information= a. a = Let us now study what is a? c ( a A a )
7636S ADVANCED QUANTUM MECHANICS Solutions 1 Spring 010 1 Warm up a Show that the eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator A are real and that the eigenkets of A corresponding to dierent eigenvalues are orthogonal
More informationChemistry 532 Practice Final Exam Fall 2012 Solutions
Chemistry 53 Practice Final Exam Fall Solutions x e ax dx π a 3/ ; π sin 3 xdx 4 3 π cos nx dx π; sin θ cos θ + K x n e ax dx n! a n+ ; r r r r ˆL h r ˆL z h i φ ˆL x i hsin φ + cot θ cos φ θ φ ) ˆLy i
More informationPage 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19
Page 404 Lecture : Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 008/11/19 Date Revised: 008/11/19 Coordinate Basis Section 6. The OneDimensional Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Coordinate Basis Page
More informationQMI PRELIM Problem 1. All problems have the same point value. If a problem is divided in parts, each part has equal value. Show all your work.
QMI PRELIM 013 All problems have the same point value. If a problem is divided in parts, each part has equal value. Show all your work. Problem 1 L = r p, p = i h ( ) (a) Show that L z = i h y x ; (cyclic
More informationProb (solution by Michael Fisher) 1
Prob 975 (solution by Michael Fisher) We begin by expressing the initial state in a basis of the spherical harmonics, which will allow us to apply the operators ˆL and ˆL z θ, φ φ() = 4π sin θ sin φ =
More informationPhysics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta
Physics 1A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta In these notes we will discuss the problem of the coupling or addition of angular momenta. It is assumed that you have all had experience with
More informationRotations in Quantum Mechanics
Rotations in Quantum Mechanics We have seen that physical transformations are represented in quantum mechanics by unitary operators acting on the Hilbert space. In this section, we ll think about the specific
More information( ) in the interaction picture arises only
Physics 606, Quantum Mechanics, Final Exam NAME 1 Atomic transitions due to timedependent electric field Consider a hydrogen atom which is in its ground state for t < 0 For t > 0 it is subjected to a
More informationPHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Final Exam SOLUTIONS December 17, 2004, 7:30 a.m. 9:30 a.m.
PHY464 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 4 Final Eam SOLUTIONS December 7, 4, 7:3 a.m. 9:3 a.m. No other materials allowed. If you can t do one part of a problem, solve subsequent parts in terms
More informationPHYS 508 (20151) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday.
PHYS 508 (20151) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday. Q1. Scattering with identical particles The quantum statistics have some interesting consequences for the scattering of identical particles. This is
More informationPhysics 137A Quantum Mechanics Fall 2012 Midterm II  Solutions
Physics 37A Quantum Mechanics Fall 0 Midterm II  Solutions These are the solutions to the exam given to Lecture Problem [5 points] Consider a particle with mass m charge q in a simple harmonic oscillator
More informationReading: Mathchapters F and G, MQ  Ch. 78, Lecture notes on hydrogen atom.
Chemistry 356 017: Problem set No. 6; Reading: Mathchapters F and G, MQ  Ch. 78, Lecture notes on hydrogen atom. The H atom involves spherical coordinates and angular momentum, which leads to the shapes
More informationd 1 µ 2 Θ = 0. (4.1) consider first the case of m = 0 where there is no azimuthal dependence on the angle φ.
4 Legendre Functions In order to investigate the solutions of Legendre s differential equation d ( µ ) dθ ] ] + l(l + ) m dµ dµ µ Θ = 0. (4.) consider first the case of m = 0 where there is no azimuthal
More informationPhysics 215 Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment 5
Physics 15 Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment 5 Logan A. Morrison February 10, 016 Problem 1 A particle of mass m is confined to a onedimensional region 0 x a. At t 0 its normalized wave function is 8 πx
More informationPhysics 505 Homework No. 8 Solutions S Spinor rotations. Somewhat based on a problem in Schwabl.
Physics 505 Homework No 8 s S8 Spinor rotations Somewhat based on a problem in Schwabl a) Suppose n is a unit vector We are interested in n σ Show that n σ) = I where I is the identity matrix We will
More information1. Matrix multiplication and Pauli Matrices: Pauli matrices are the 2 2 matrices. 1 0 i 0. 0 i
Problems in basic linear algebra Science Academies Lecture Workshop at PSGRK College Coimbatore, June 2224, 2016 Govind S. Krishnaswami, Chennai Mathematical Institute http://www.cmi.ac.in/~govind/teaching,
More informationQuantum Dynamics. March 10, 2017
Quantum Dynamics March 0, 07 As in classical mechanics, time is a parameter in quantum mechanics. It is distinct from space in the sense that, while we have Hermitian operators, X, for position and therefore
More informationB. Physical Observables Physical observables are represented by linear, hermitian operators that act on the vectors of the Hilbert space. If A is such
G25.2651: Statistical Mechanics Notes for Lecture 12 I. THE FUNDAMENTAL POSTULATES OF QUANTUM MECHANICS The fundamental postulates of quantum mechanics concern the following questions: 1. How is the physical
More informationLecture 45: The Eigenvalue Problem of L z and L 2 in Three Dimensions, ct d: Operator Method Date Revised: 2009/02/17 Date Given: 2009/02/11
Page 757 Lecture 45: The Eigenvalue Problem of L z and L 2 in Three Dimensions, ct d: Operator Method Date Revised: 2009/02/17 Date Given: 2009/02/11 The EigenvectorEigenvalue Problem of L z and L 2 Section
More informationSecond quantization: where quantization and particles come from?
110 Phys460.nb 7 Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from? 7.1. Lagrangian mechanics and canonical quantization Q: How do we quantize a general system? 7.1.1.Lagrangian Lagrangian
More informationAngular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics.
Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics. R. C. Johnson March 10, 2015 1 Brief review of the language and concepts of Quantum Mechanics. We begin with a review of the basic concepts involved in the quantum
More information26 Group Theory Basics
26 Group Theory Basics 1. Reference: Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics by Michael Tinkham. 2. We said earlier that we will go looking for the set of operators that commute with the molecular Hamiltonian.
More informationProblem 1: A 3D Spherical Well(10 Points)
Problem : A 3D Spherical Well( Points) For this problem, consider a particle of mass m in a threedimensional spherical potential well, V (r), given as, V = r a/2 V = W r > a/2. with W >. All of the following
More information( ) = 9φ 1, ( ) = 4φ 2.
Chemistry 46 Dr Jean M Standard Homework Problem Set 6 Solutions The Hermitian operator A ˆ is associated with the physical observable A Two of the eigenfunctions of A ˆ are and These eigenfunctions are
More informationComputational Spectroscopy III. Spectroscopic Hamiltonians
Computational Spectroscopy III. Spectroscopic Hamiltonians (e) Elementary operators for the harmonic oscillator (f) Elementary operators for the asymmetric rotor (g) Implementation of complex Hamiltonians
More informationQuantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.
Quantum Mechanics Solutions 1. (a) If H has an orthonormal basis consisting of the eigenvectors { v i } of A with eigenvalues λ i C, then A can be written in terms of its spectral decomposition as A =
More informationAngular Momentum  set 1
Angular Momentum  set PH0  QM II August 6, 07 First of all, let us practise evaluating commutators. Consider these as warm up problems. Problem : Show the following commutation relations ˆx, ˆL x ] =
More information3 Angular Momentum and Spin
In this chapter we review the notions surrounding the different forms of angular momenta in quantum mechanics, including the spin angular momentum, which is entirely quantum mechanical in nature. Some
More informationC/CS/Phys C191 Particleinabox, Spin 10/02/08 Fall 2008 Lecture 11
C/CS/Phys C191 Particleinabox, Spin 10/0/08 Fall 008 Lecture 11 Last time we saw that the time dependent Schr. eqn. can be decomposed into two equations, one in time (t) and one in space (x): space
More informationLectureXXVI. TimeIndependent Schrodinger Equation
LectureXXVI TimeIndependent Schrodinger Equation Time Independent Schrodinger Equation: The timedependent Schrodinger equation: Assume that V is independent of time t. In that case the Schrodinger equation
More informationLecture 12. The harmonic oscillator
Lecture 12 The harmonic oscillator 107 108 LECTURE 12. THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR 12.1 Introduction In this chapter, we are going to find explicitly the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues for the timeindependent
More informationAppendix: SU(2) spin angular momentum and single spin dynamics
Phys 7 Topics in Particles & Fields Spring 03 Lecture v0 Appendix: SU spin angular momentum and single spin dynamics Jeffrey Yepez Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Hawai i at Manoa Watanabe
More informationQuantum MechanicsI Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture  21 SquareIntegrable Functions
Quantum MechanicsI Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture  21 SquareIntegrable Functions (Refer Slide Time: 00:06) (Refer Slide Time: 00:14) We
More informationG : Quantum Mechanics II
G5.666: Quantum Mechanics II Notes for Lecture 5 I. REPRESENTING STATES IN THE FULL HILBERT SPACE Given a representation of the states that span the spin Hilbert space, we now need to consider the problem
More informationImplications of TimeReversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics
Physics 215 Winter 2018 Implications of TimeReversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics 1. The time reversal operator is antiunitary In quantum mechanics, the time reversal operator Θ acting on a state produces
More information2 Canonical quantization
Phys540.nb 7 Canonical quantization.1. Lagrangian mechanics and canonical quantization Q: How do we quantize a general system?.1.1.lagrangian Lagrangian mechanics is a reformulation of classical mechanics.
More informationQUALIFYING EXAMINATION, Part 2. Solutions. Problem 1: Quantum Mechanics I
QUALIFYING EXAMINATION, Part Solutions Problem 1: Quantum Mechanics I (a) We may decompose the Hamiltonian into two parts: H = H 1 + H, ( ) where H j = 1 m p j + 1 mω x j = ω a j a j + 1/ with eigenenergies
More informationSolutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1
Solutions to exam 66: FA35 Quantum Mechanics hp Problem (4 p): (a) Define the concept of unitary operator and show that the operator e ipa/ is unitary (p is the momentum operator in one dimension) (b)
More informationPhysics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics
Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics We now consider the spatial degrees of freedom of a particle moving in 3dimensional space, which of course is an important
More informationPhysics 342 Lecture 27. Spin. Lecture 27. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I
Physics 342 Lecture 27 Spin Lecture 27 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Monday, April 5th, 2010 There is an intrinsic characteristic of point particles that has an analogue in but no direct derivation from
More informationStatistical Interpretation
Physics 342 Lecture 15 Statistical Interpretation Lecture 15 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, February 29th, 2008 Quantum mechanics is a theory of probability densities given that we now have an
More informationThe Sommerfeld Polynomial Method: Harmonic Oscillator Example
Chemistry 460 Fall 2017 Dr. Jean M. Standard October 2, 2017 The Sommerfeld Polynomial Method: Harmonic Oscillator Example Scaling the Harmonic Oscillator Equation Recall the basic definitions of the harmonic
More informationAngular Momentum  set 1
Angular Momentum  set PH0  QM II August 6, 07 First of all, let us practise evaluating commutators. Consider these as warm up problems. Problem : Show the following commutation relations ˆx, ˆL x = 0,
More informationSpin Dynamics Basic Theory Operators. Richard Green SBD Research Group Department of Chemistry
Spin Dynamics Basic Theory Operators Richard Green SBD Research Group Department of Chemistry Objective of this session Introduce you to operators used in quantum mechanics Achieve this by looking at:
More informationPhysics 505 Homework No. 1 Solutions S11
Physics 505 Homework No s S Some Preliminaries Assume A and B are Hermitian operators (a) Show that (AB) B A dx φ ABψ dx (A φ) Bψ dx (B (A φ)) ψ dx (B A φ) ψ End (b) Show that AB [A, B]/2+{A, B}/2 where
More informationGenerators for Continuous Coordinate Transformations
Page 636 Lecture 37: Coordinate Transformations: Continuous Passive Coordinate Transformations Active Coordinate Transformations Date Revised: 2009/01/28 Date Given: 2009/01/26 Generators for Continuous
More informationPhysics 741 Graduate Quantum Mechanics 1 Solutions to Midterm Exam, Fall x i x dx i x i x x i x dx
Physics 74 Graduate Quantum Mechanics Solutions to Midterm Exam, Fall 4. [ points] Consider the wave function x Nexp x ix (a) [6] What is the correct normaliation N? The normaliation condition is. exp,
More informationECEN 5005 Crystals, Nanocrystals and Device Applications Class 20 Group Theory For Crystals
ECEN 5005 Crystals, Nanocrystals and Device Applications Class 20 Group Theory For Crystals Laporte Selection Rule Polarization Dependence Spin Selection Rule 1 Laporte Selection Rule We first apply this
More informationFor a system with more than one electron, we can t solve the Schrödinger Eq. exactly. We must develop methods of approximation, such as
VARIATIO METHOD For a system with more than one electron, we can t solve the Schrödinger Eq. exactly. We must develop methods of approximation, such as Variation Method Perturbation Theory Combination
More informationP3317 HW from Lecture and Recitation 7
P3317 HW from Lecture 1+13 and Recitation 7 Due Oct 16, 018 Problem 1. Separation of variables Suppose we have two masses that can move in 1D. They are attached by a spring, yielding a Hamiltonian where
More informationQuantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2006 Solution Set 4
Quantum Physics III 8.6 Spring 6 Solution Set 4 March 3, 6 1. Landau Levels: numerics 4 points When B = 1 tesla, then the energy spacing ω L is given by ω L = ceb mc = 197 1 7 evcm3 1 5 ev/cm 511 kev =
More informationPHY 407 QUANTUM MECHANICS Fall 05 Problem set 1 Due Sep
Problem set 1 Due Sep 15 2005 1. Let V be the set of all complex valued functions of a real variable θ, that are periodic with period 2π. That is u(θ + 2π) = u(θ), for all u V. (1) (i) Show that this V
More informationRotational motion of a rigid body spinning around a rotational axis ˆn;
Physics 106a, Caltech 15 November, 2018 Lecture 14: Rotations The motion of solid bodies So far, we have been studying the motion of point particles, which are essentially just translational. Bodies with
More information8.04: Quantum Mechanics Professor Allan Adams Massachusetts Institute of Technology Wednesday April Exam 2
8.04: Quantum Mechanics Professor Allan Adams Massachusetts Institute of Technology Wednesday April 18 2012 Exam 2 Last Name: First Name: Check Recitation Instructor Time R01 Barton Zwiebach 10:00 R02
More informationHarmonic Oscillator with raising and lowering operators. We write the Schrödinger equation for the harmonic oscillator in one dimension as follows:
We write the Schrödinger equation for the harmonic oscillator in one dimension as follows: H ˆ! = "!2 d 2! + 1 2µ dx 2 2 kx 2! = E! T ˆ = "! 2 2µ d 2 dx 2 V ˆ = 1 2 kx 2 H ˆ = ˆ T + ˆ V (1) where µ is
More informationarxiv:quantph/ v1 29 Mar 2003
FiniteDimensional PT Symmetric Hamiltonians arxiv:quantph/0303174v1 29 Mar 2003 Carl M. Bender, Peter N. Meisinger, and Qinghai Wang Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130,
More informationPage 712. Lecture 42: Rotations and Orbital Angular Momentum in Two Dimensions Date Revised: 2009/02/04 Date Given: 2009/02/04
Page 71 Lecture 4: Rotations and Orbital Angular Momentum in Two Dimensions Date Revised: 009/0/04 Date Given: 009/0/04 Plan of Attack Section 14.1 Rotations and Orbital Angular Momentum: Plan of Attack
More informationMATH325  QUANTUM MECHANICS  SOLUTION SHEET 11
MATH35  QUANTUM MECHANICS  SOLUTION SHEET. The Hamiltonian for a particle of mass m moving in three dimensions under the influence of a threedimensional harmonic oscillator potential is Ĥ = h m + mω
More information1 Commutators (10 pts)
Final Exam Solutions 37A Fall 0 I. Siddiqi / E. Dodds Commutators 0 pts) ) Consider the operator Â = Ĵx Ĵ y + ĴyĴx where J i represents the total angular momentum in the ith direction. a) Express both
More informationAn operator is a transformation that takes a function as an input and produces another function (usually).
Formalism of Quantum Mechanics Operators Engel 3.2 An operator is a transformation that takes a function as an input and produces another function (usually). Example: In QM, most operators are linear:
More informationPHYS Quantum Mechanics I  Fall 2011 Problem Set 7 Solutions
PHYS 657  Fall PHYS 657  Quantum Mechanics I  Fall Problem Set 7 Solutions Joe P Chen / joepchen@gmailcom For our reference, here are some useful identities invoked frequentl on this problem set: J
More informationCHAPTER 8 The Quantum Theory of Motion
I. Translational motion. CHAPTER 8 The Quantum Theory of Motion A. Single particle in free space, 1D. 1. Schrodinger eqn H ψ = Eψ! 2 2m d 2 dx 2 ψ = Eψ ; no boundary conditions 2. General solution: ψ
More informationQuantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions
Physics 342 Lecture 21 Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions Lecture 21 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Monday, March 22nd, 21 We are used to the temporal separation that gives, for example, the timeindependent
More information16.1. PROBLEM SET I 197
6.. PROBLEM SET I 97 Answers: Problem set I. a In one dimension, the current operator is specified by ĵ = m ψ ˆpψ + ψˆpψ. Applied to the left hand side of the system outside the region of the potential,
More informationQuantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2004 Assignment 3
Quantum Physics II (8.5) Fall 24 Assignment 3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department Due September 3, 24 September 23, 24 7:pm This week we continue to study the basic principles of quantum
More informationAngular momentum & spin
Angular momentum & spin January 8, 2002 1 Angular momentum Angular momentum appears as a very important aspect of almost any quantum mechanical system, so we need to briefly review some basic properties
More informationCoherent states of the harmonic oscillator
Coherent states of the harmonic oscillator In these notes I will assume knowlege about the operator metho for the harmonic oscillator corresponing to sect..3 i Moern Quantum Mechanics by J.J. Sakurai.
More information129 Lecture Notes More on Dirac Equation
19 Lecture Notes More on Dirac Equation 1 Ultrarelativistic Limit We have solved the Diraction in the Lecture Notes on Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, and saw that the upper lower two components are large
More informationQuantum Mechanics II Lecture 11 (www.sp.phy.cam.ac.uk/~dar11/pdf) David Ritchie
Quantum Mechanics II Lecture (www.sp.phy.cam.ac.u/~dar/pdf) David Ritchie Michaelmas. So far we have found solutions to Section 4:Transitions Ĥ ψ Eψ Solutions stationary states time dependence with time
More informationSommerfeld (1920) noted energy levels of Li deduced from spectroscopy looked like H, with slight adjustment of principal quantum number:
Spin. Historical Spectroscopy of Alkali atoms First expt. to suggest need for electron spin: observation of splitting of expected spectral lines for alkali atoms: i.e. expect one line based on analogy
More informationWaves and the Schroedinger Equation
Waves and the Schroedinger Equation 5 april 010 1 The Wave Equation We have seen from previous discussions that the waveparticle duality of matter requires we describe entities through some waveform
More informationHilbert Space Problems
Hilbert Space Problems Prescribed books for problems. ) Hilbert Spaces, Wavelets, Generalized Functions and Modern Quantum Mechanics by WilliHans Steeb Kluwer Academic Publishers, 998 ISBN 79235239
More informationPHYS851 Quantum Mechanics I, Fall 2009 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 10: Solutions
PHYS851 Quantum Mechanics I, Fall 009 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 10: Solutions Topics Covered: Tensor product spaces, change of coordinate system, general theory of angular momentum Some Key Concepts: Angular
More informationψ( ) k (r) which take the asymtotic form far away from the scattering center: k (r) = E kψ (±) φ k (r) = e ikr
Scattering Theory Consider scattering of two particles in the center of mass frame, or equivalently scattering of a single particle from a potential V (r), which becomes zero suciently fast as r. The initial
More informationAngular Momentum. Classical. J r p. radius vector from origin. linear momentum. determinant form of cross product iˆ xˆ J J J J J J
Angular Momentum Classical r p p radius vector from origin linear momentum r iˆ ˆj kˆ x y p p p x y determinant form of cross product iˆ xˆ ˆj yˆ kˆ ˆ y p p x y p x p y x x p y p y x x y Copyright Michael
More information( ). Expanding the square and keeping in mind that
Oneelectron atom in a Magnetic Field When the atom is in a magnetic field the magnetic moment of the electron due to its orbital motion and its spin interacts with the field and the Schrodinger Hamiltonian
More informationWKB Approximation in 3D
1 WKB Approximation in 3D We see solutions ψr of the stationary Schrodinger equations for a spinless particle of energy E: 2 2m 2 ψ + V rψ = Eψ At rst, we just rewrite the Schrodinger equation in the following
More informationd 3 r d 3 vf( r, v) = N (2) = CV C = n where n N/V is the total number of molecules per unit volume. Hence e βmv2 /2 d 3 rd 3 v (5)
LECTURE 12 Maxwell Velocity Distribution Suppose we have a dilute gas of molecules, each with mass m. If the gas is dilute enough, we can ignore the interactions between the molecules and the energy will
More informationLecture 4: Equations of motion and canonical quantization Read Sakurai Chapter 1.6 and 1.7
Lecture 4: Equations of motion and canonical quantization Read Sakurai Chapter 1.6 and 1.7 In Lecture 1 and 2, we have discussed how to represent the state of a quantum mechanical system based the superposition
More informationTensor Operators and the Wigner Eckart Theorem
November 11, 2009 Tensor Operators and the Wigner Eckart Theorem Vector operator The ket α transforms under rotation to α D(R) α. The expectation value of a vector operator in the rotated system is related
More information