Banach -algebra: Banach algebra with an involution ( 2 = id), which is isometric ( a = a ) anti-isomorphism (antilinear and (ab) = b a ).

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Banach -algebra: Banach algebra with an involution ( 2 = id), which is isometric ( a = a ) anti-isomorphism (antilinear and (ab) = b a )."

Transcription

1 Introduction Banach algebra: algebra over C; Banach space structures are compatible: a + b a + b, λa = λ a ; ab a b. Banach -algebra: Banach algebra with an involution ( 2 = id), which is isometric ( a = a ) anti-isomorphism (antilinear and (ab) = b a ). C -property: a a = a 2. C -algebra is a Banach -algebra satisfying the C -property. Problem: In a C -algebra, 1 + a a is invertible for any a.

2 Examples: C -algebras algebra C(X) of all continuous complex-valued functions on a locally compact Hausdorff space X; algebra B(H) of all bounded operators on a Hilbert space H; Not C -algebras algebra C 1 [0, 1] of functions with continuous derivative; algebra C(0, 1) of continuous functions; algebra l 1 (G) for a countable discrete group G (multiplication is given by the convolution).

3 Unitalization We do not assume C -algebras to have a unit element, but if they have it then 1 = 1 and 1 = 1. Theorem Any non-unital C -algebra A is contained in a unital C -algebra A + as a maximal ideal of codimension 1. Set A + = A C; (a, λ)(bµ) = (ab + λb + µa, λµ); (a, λ) = (a, λ), (a, λ) = sup b 1 ab + λb. Unit: (0, 1). Involution: (a, λ) = (a, λ) (check that is isometry on A + ). Norm is the operator norm. Let B(A) be the algebra of bounded operators on A, L a : A A given by L a (b) = ab. Then A + = {L a + λ 1 : a A, λ C} (the norm on A + is taken from that on B(A); check that a = L a ).

4 C -property for A + : (a, λ) 2 = sup b 1 ab + λb 2 = sup b 1 b a ab + λb a b + λb ab + λ 2 b b sup b 1 a ab + λa b + λab + λ 2 b = (a a + λa + λa, λ 2 ) = (a, λ) (a, λ). The opposite inequality is easier: (a, λ) (a, λ) (a, λ) (a, λ) = (a, λ) 2.

5 Spectrum Let A be a unital Banach algebra, a A. Spectrum: Sp(a) = {λ C : λ 1 a is not invertible}. Resolvent set: Res(a) = C \ Sp(a). Resolvent function: R a (λ) = (λ 1 a) 1 Theorem. Sp(a) ; Sp(a) is a compact set; if λ Sp(a) then λ a ; R a is analytic on Res(a); if p is a polynomial then Sp(p(a)) = p(sp(a)).

6 Let a A. Define its spectral radius by r(a) = sup λ Sp(a) λ. Theorem. r(a) = lim n a n 1/n a ; R a is analytic on {λ C : λ > r(a)}. Theorem. If A is a simple unital abelian Banach algebra then A = C. Proof. Let a A, a λ 1, α Sp(a). Then I = (a α 1)A is a (possibly non-closed) ideal. Any x I is of the form x = (a α 1)b, b A, and cannot be invertible, since a α 1 is not invertible. If 1 x < 1 then x is invertible (use x 1 = 1 + (1 x) + (1 x) ). So, if x I then 1 / I. Moreover, if x I then dist(1, I) 1, hence 1 / I, so I A contradiction with simplicity.

7 For a commutative Banach algebra A we write M A for the set of all non-zero multiplicative linear functionals (characters) of A. Theorem. If ϕ M A then ϕ is continuous of norm 1. Proof. Suppose there exists a A such that a < 1, ϕ(a) = 1. Multiplying by λ, λ = 1, we may assume that ϕ(a) = 1. The series b = n 0 an converges, and a + ab = b. Then 1 + ϕ(b) = ϕ(b) + ϕ(a)ϕ(b) = ϕ(b) contradiction. Hence ϕ 1. But ϕ(1) = 1. Theorem. There is a one-to-one correspondence between M A and the set of maximal ideals of A given by ϕ Ker ϕ. Injectivity: ϕ is determined by its kernel, which has codimension 1, and by ϕ(1) = 1. Surjectivity: If M A is a maximal ideal then dist(1, M) 1, hence 1 / M, so M A, hence M = M. The quotient A/M is a simple unital abelian Banach algebra, hence A/M = C. The quotient homomorphism is a character.

8 M A identified with the set of maximal ideal can be topologized. Let A be the dual Banach space for A, B 1 9A ) its unit ball. Then M A B 1 (A ). The weak topology on B 1 (A ) is determined by the pre-base U aε (ϕ) = {ψ B 1 (A ) : (ψ(a) ϕ(a)) < ε}, a A, ε (0, 2]. M A is obviously Hausdorff: if ψ ϕ then there exists a A such that ψ(a) ϕ(a). By Banach Alaoglu Theorem, B 1 (A ) is compact. If ϕ α ϕ, ϕ α M A, then ϕ is also multiplicative, hence M A is a closed subset of a compact space. For a unital Banach algebra A, M A is a compact Hausdorff space.

9 Non-unital case: If A is a non-unital commutative Banach algebra then A is a maximal ideal in its unitalization A + corresponding to the character ϕ 0 given by ϕ 0 (a + λ 1) = λ. For any other maximal ideal M A + the set M A is an ideal of A of codimension 1. Then the quotient map ϕ : A A/M A is a character, and ϕ(a + λ 1) = ϕ(a) + λ gives a character on A +, which is a unique extension of ϕ. Then there is a one-to-one correspondence between M A and M A + \ {ϕ 0 }, hence M A is locally compact, and M A + is its one-point compactification.

10 Gelfand Transform For a commutative Banach algebra A, a A, ϕ M A, the formula â(ϕ) = ϕ(a) defines a continuous function on M A. Set Γ(a) = â. This gives a Gelfand transform Γ : A C 0 (M A ). Theorem. (1) Γ is a contractive algebra homomorphism; (2) its image separates points in M A. Note that if A is not unital then â(ϕ 0 ) = ϕ 0 (a) = 0 for any a A hence â C 0 (M A ). Proof. (1) Γ(a) = â = sup ϕ MA ϕ(a) ϕ a a. (2) If ψ ϕ then there exists a A such that ψ(a) ϕ(a).

11 Corollary. Let A be a unital commutative Banach algebra, a A. Then TFAE: a is invertible; â is invertible; â(ϕ) 0 for any ϕ M A. Thus Sp(a) = Sp(â) = {ϕ(a) : ϕ M A }, and â = r(a). Proof. If a is invertible then Γ(a) is invertible, and Γ(a) 1 = Γ(a 1 ). If a is not invertible then consider the ideal I = aa. It consists of non-invertibles (with distance from 1 bounded from below by 1), so I A. Hence there exists a maximal ideal M such that I M A. Let ϕ M A be the corresponding character. Then M = Ker ϕ, so â(ϕ) = ϕ(a) = 0, hence â is not invertible. As the range of â = Sp(a), so â = r(a).

12 Now let A be a unital C -algebra (not necessarily commutative). Lemma. Let ϕ be a multiplicative functional on A. Then ϕ(a ) = ϕ(a). (ita) n n=0 Proof. First, let a = a. The series u t = n! and ut = ( ita) n n=0 n! converge, and ut = u 1 t for any t R. By the C -property, u t 2 = ut u t = 1 = 1. Then ϕ(u t ) 1. But ϕ(u t ) = (itϕ(a)) n n=0 n! = e itϕ(a). Hence e t Im ϕ(a) = e itϕ(a) 1 for any t R. So Im ϕ(a) = 0. Now let a be arbitrary. It decomposes as a = b + ic, where b, c are selfadjoint, and a = b ic. As ϕ(b), ϕ(c) are real, the conclusion follows.

13 Theorem. Let A be a commutative C -algebra. Then Γ is an isometric -isomorphism A C 0 (M A ). Proof. If a = a then a 2 = a 2, hence Γ(a) = â = r(a) = lim n a 2n 1/2n = lim n ( a 2n ) 1/2n = a. If a is arbitrary, then a 2 = a a = Γ(a a) = Γ(a) 2. Surjectivity of Γ follows from the Stone Weierstrass Theorem (Γ(A) separates points in M A ).

14 Continuous functional calculus for normals Let A be a C -algebra, a A normal, i.e. a a = aa, and let C (a) A be the C -algebra generated by a (equivalently, the minimal C -subalgebra containing a). Corollary. If C (a) is unital then the Gelfand transform C (a) C(Sp(a)) is an isometric -isomorphism. If C (a) is not unital then the image of the Gelfand transform is C 0 (Sp(a) \ {0}). Indeed, C (a) is commutative, so C (a) = C(X) for some X (with necessary corrections in the non-unital case). Any its character ϕ is determined by ϕ(a) = λ. λ can be the value of ϕ iff λ lies in the range of the function â, which is Sp(a).

15 Continuous functional calculus for normals Let f C(Sp(a)). Then f (a) := Γ 1 (f ) C (a) (or C (a) +, if the latter was not unital; if 0 Sp(a) and f (0) = 0 then f (a) C (a)). As Gelfand transform is an isometry, so if f = lim n p n, where p n = p n (a, a ) are polynomials, then f (a) = lim n p n (a, a ). If a A is normal then (1) Sp(f (a)) = f (Sp(a)); (2) g(f (a)) = (g f )(a) for any function g continuous on f (Sp(a)). Proof: approximation by polynomials. Corollary. In a C -algebra A one has if a A is normal then a = r(a); if a = a then Sp(a) R C; if a a = aa = 1 then Sp(a) S 1 C.

16 Positivity Definition. An element a of a C -algebra is positive if a = a and Sp(a) [0, ). Notation: a 0. Lemma. For any positive a A there exists a unique positive b A such that b 2 = a. Proof: The function f (t) = t is continuous on [0, ), so put b = f (a). If c 2 = a then c = f (c 2 ) = f (a) = b. Lemma. Let a = a. There exist a +, a 0 such that a = a + a and a + a = 0. { { t, if t 0 0, if t 0 Proof: Let f + (t) = 0, if t 0, f (t) = t, if t 0, a ± = f ± (a).

17 Positivity Lemma. Let a = a. TFAE: 1 a 0; 2 a = b 2 for some selfadjoint b; 3 λ 1 a λ for any λ a ; 4 λ 1 a λ for some λ a. Proof. 1 2 was already done, 3 4 is trivial. Remaining implications 2 3 and 4 1 can be checked inside C (a) = C(Sp(a)), where a corresponds to the function f (t) = t (hence λ 1 a corresponds to the function λ t on Sp(a)), positivity for a function f means that f takes only non-negative values, and the norm is the sup-norm. In particular, if sup t Sp(a) λ t λ for some λ > a then Sp(a) [0, ).

18 Corollary. If a, b 0 then a + b 0. Proof: Let λ a, µ b, then λ + µ a + b, and (λ + µ)1 (a + b) λ 1 a + µ 1 b λ + µ. Thus the set of positive elements in a C -algebra is a cone. Theorem. In a C -algebra, a a 0 for any a. Proof uses the following algebraic lemma: Lemma. Let R be a ring, a, b R. 1 ab is invertible iff 1 ba is invertible. Proof: if c = (1 ab) 1 then d = (1 ba) 1, where d = 1 + bca. Corollary. Sp(ab) {0} = Sp(ba) {0}. Proof: If λ 1 ab is (not) invertible and if λ 0 then 1 1 λab is (not) invertible.

19 Positivity Proof of the Theorem. Set b = a a (it is patently selfadjoint) and decompose it as b = b + b, where b +, b 0, b + b = 0. Set c = b 1/2, t = ac. As the square root function is a limit of polynomials that vanish at 0, so b + b = 0 implies cb + = 0. Then t t = ca ac = c(b + b )c = cb c = b, 2 hence t t = b 2 0. Let t = x + iy with x, y selfadjoint. Then t t + tt = (x + iy) (x + iy) + (x + iy)(x + iy) = 2(x 2 + y 2 ) 0. As both t t and t t + tt are positive, their sum is positive: tt 0. Thus, Sp(tt ) [0, ), and Sp(t t) (, 0], so Sp(t t) = {0}. Finally, b 2 = t t = r(t t) = 0, so b = 0.

20 Let a, b be selfadjoints. We write a b if b a 0. Lemma. If a b then x ax x bx for any x. Proof: Let c 0, c 2 = b a. Then x (b a)x = x c 2 x = (cx) (cx) 0. Lemma. Let 0 a b, and let a be invertible. Then b is invertible and b 1 a 1. Invertibility of a means that there exists ε > 0 such that Sp(a) [ε, ). Then b enjoys the same property, hence is invertible. Then 1 b 1/2 ab 1/2 = b 1/2 (b a)b 1/2 0, which means that (a 1/2 b 1/2 ) (a 1/2 b 1/2 ) 1. As Sp(xy) and Sp(yx) coinside up to {0}, we have a 1/2 b 1 a 1/2 = (a 1/2 b 1/2 )(a 1/2 b 1/2 ) 1. Multiplying by a 1/2 both from the left and from the right, we get b 1 a 1.

21 In general, one has to be careful with the partial order. Compare: Theorem. If 0 a b implies that 0 a 2 b 2 for any positive a, b A then A is commutative. Theorem. If 0 a b then a 1/2 b 1/2.

22 Approximate unit Let A be a C -algebra. A set {e λ : λ Λ} A is an approximate unit if Λ is a directed set; e λ 0 and e λ 1 for any λ Λ; e λ e µ if λ µ; lim λ Λ ae λ = lim λ Λ e λ a = a. If A is unital then Λ can contain one element, and 1 can be taken as e λ. Example 1. Let A = C 0 (0, 1] and let Λ = [1, ). Let f λ (t) = { λ t, if t (0, 1 λ ; 1, if t [ 1 λ, 1]. Then {f λ } is an approximate unit. Example 2. Let K(H) be the algebra of compact operators on a separable Hilbert space H, with a fixed orthonormal basis {x n } n N, and let p n K(H) denote the projection onto the linear span of x 1,..., x n. Then {p n } is an approximate unit.

23 Approximate unit Theorem. Any C -algebra A has an approximate unit. If A is separable then it has a countable approximate unit. Proof. Set Λ = {a A : a 0, a < 1} ordered by. We have to show that for any a, b Λ we can find c Λ such that a c, b c. c = a + b is not a right choice. The idea is to re-scale spectra of a and b from [0, 1] to [0, ), then add the rescaled elements together, and then re-scale the sum back. For t 1 t re-scaling forward, we use f (t) =, and for re-scaling backward, we use g(t) = t 1+t = t, g(f (t)) = t. Set x = f (a), y = f (b), z = x + y, c = g(c). As Sp(z) [0, N] for some N R, so c = sup t Sp(z) g(t) < 1, hence N N+1 c Λ. As 1 + x 1 + z, so we have (1 + x) 1 (1 + z) 1, and a = g(c) = 1 (1 + x) 1 1 (1 + z) 1 = c. Symmetrically, b c.

24 Approximate unit Proof (continued). Also, if a, b Λ, a b, then d bd 2 = d (1 b) 2 d d (1 b)d d (1 a)d for any d A. Take d A, d 0. Set a n = g(nd) Λ, h n (t) = t 2 (1 g(nt)) = t2 1+nt t n. Then d a nd = h n (d), hence d a n d = h n Sp(d) 0 as n. Then lim b Λ d bd 2 lim n (sup b Λ;b an d bd 2 ) lim n d(1 a n )d = 0. If d is arbitrary, then d bd 2 = (1 b)d d(1 b) d d bd d 0. Similarly, d db 0 as b Λ. The standard argument shows that if A is separable then one can find a subsequence in Λ with the required properties.

25 Ideals Unless the converse is stated, by an ideal in a C -algebra we always mean a closed, two-sided ideal. Lemma. If J A is an ideal then J = J. Proof. Set B = J J. Then B is a C -algebra, and JJ B. Let {e λ } λ Λ be an approximate unit for B, and let j J. Then lim λ Λ j j e λ 2 = lim λ Λ jj jj e λ e λ (jj jj e λ ) 2 lim λ Λ jj jj e λ = 0. As J is closed and j e λ J then j J. Unlike general rings, for C -algebras one has Lemma. Let J A be an ideal in A, and let I J be an ideal in J. Then I is an ideal in A. Let i I, a A. We need to show that ia I. Assume first that i is positive. Then i = (i 1/2 ) 2, hence i 1/2 a J and i 1/2 i 1/2 a I. The case of arbitrary i I can be done by decomposing i as a linear combination of 4 positive elements.

26 Quotients Let J A be an ideal. Then (J is closed) the quotient Banach algebra A/J is well defined with the norm given by ȧ = inf j J a j, where ȧ = a + J A/J. As J is symmetric, so ȧ = ȧ. Theorem. A/J is a C -algebra. Proof. We need to check the C -property. First, we claim that ȧ = lim λ Λ a ae λ for any approximate unit {e λ } in J. As ae λ J, so we obviously have ȧ a ae λ. For any ε > 0 there exists j J such that a j < ȧ + ε. Then lim λ Λ a ae λ lim λ Λ (a j)(1 e λ ) + j je λ a j < ȧ + ε. As ε is arbitrary, the claim is proved. ȧ ȧ ȧ ȧ = ȧ 2, so itremains to check the opposite inequality: ȧ 2 = lim λ Λ a(1 e λ ) 2 = lim λ Λ (1 e λ )a a(1 e λ ) lim λ Λ a a(1 e λ ) = ȧ ȧ.

27 -homomorphisms Theorem. Let A, B be C -algebras, π : A B a non-zero -homomorphism. Then π = 1 and π(a) is a C -subalgebra in B. If π is injective then π is an isometry. In general, π factorizes as π = π q, where q : A A/ Ker π, and π induced by π is an isometric -isomorphism of A/ Ker π onto π(a). Proof. We prove this for the case when A, B are unital, and π(1) = 1. (The general proof is slightly more technical.) If a A is invertible then π(a) is invertible, hence Sp B (π(a)) Sp A (a) for any a A, therefore, r(π(a)) r(a). Then π(a) 2 = π(a a) = r(π(a a)) r(a a) = a a = a 2, hence π 1. As π(1) = 1, π = 1. Therefore, π is continuous, Ker π is a closed ideal in A, and π factorizes through A/ Ker π with π injective.

28 -homomorphisms Proof (continued). Suppose that π is not an isometry. Then there exists a A such that π(a) < a. Let r = π(a a) < a a = s, and let f C[0, s] be the function such that f (t) = 0 for t [0, r], and f (s) = 1. Then π(f (a a)) = f ( π(a a)) = 0, but as f 0 on Sp(a a), so f (a a) 0 a contradiction with injectivity of π. So, π is an isometry, and π(a) is closed. Corollary. If 1 and 2 are two norms on A, both making A a C -algebra, then 1 = 2. Remark. It is hidden here that A is closed with respect to both norms. If not, there may be many C -norms on a -algebra

29 States A linear functional ϕ : A C is called positive if ϕ(a) 0 for any positive a A. A positive linear functional ϕ is called a state if ϕ = 1. Example 1. Let A = C(X) for a compact Hausdorff X, and let x 0 X. The evaluation map ϕ(f ) = f (x 0 ), f C(X), is a state. Example 2. Let B(H) be the algebra of linear operators on a Hilbert space H, and let ξ H. Then the map ϕ(a) = aξ, ξ, a B(H), is a positive linear functional. It is a state iff ξ = 1. If ϕ is a positive linear functional then the formula a, b = ϕ(b a)defines a positive semi-definite sesquilinear form on A. An immediate corollary is the Cauchy Schwarz inequality ϕ(b a) 2 ϕ(a a)ϕ(b b).

30 Lemma. Let ϕ be a positive linear functional on a C -algebra A. Then ϕ = lim λ Λ ϕ(e λ ) for any approximate unit {e λ } in A. In particular, if A is unital then ϕ = ϕ(1). Proof. We prove this Lemma under the additional assumption that ϕ is bounded. Under this assumption, the set ϕ(e λ ) is increasing and bounded, hence converges to some M = lim λ Λ ϕ(e λ ). Obviously, ϕ M. To prove the opposite inequality, take ε > 0 and find a A such that a 1 and ϕ(a) > ϕ ε. Then ϕ(a) 2 = lim λ Λ ϕ(e λ a) 2 lim λ Λ ϕ(e 2 λ )ϕ(a a) M ϕ (we used here e 2 λ e λ). Thus we have ( ϕ ε) 2 M ϕ. As ε is arbitrary, so ϕ 2 M ϕ, ϕ M. The unital case follows.

31 GNS construction Gelfand Naimark Segal construction Theorem. Let ϕ be a positive linear functional on a C -algebra A. Then there exist a Hilbert space H ϕ, a representation π ϕ of A on H ϕ, and a vector ξ ϕ H ϕ, cyclic for π ϕ, such that ξ ϕ 2 = ϕ and ϕ(a) = π ϕ (a)ξ ϕ, ξ ϕ, a A. Proof. Set N = {a A : ϕ(a a) = 0}, N = {a A : ϕ(b a) = 0 b A}. Both are closed. Due to the Cauchy Schwarz inequality ϕ(b a) 2 ϕ(a a)ϕ(b b), N = N, hence N is a linear subspace in A. Moreover, N is a left ideal: if n N, a, b A then ϕ(b (an)) = ϕ((a b) n) = 0, hence an N. Then we can pass to the quotient Banach space A/N and define a positive definite sesquilinear form ẋ, ẏ = ϕ(y x), where ẋ denotes the class x + N A/N of x A. (It is well-defined and if ẋ, ẋ = 0 then ẋ = 0.)

32 Proof (continued). The inner product ẋ, ẏ defines a norm on A/N. Let H ϕ denote the closure of A/N with respect to this norm. To define π ϕ, let us first define a representation π 0 of A on A/N by π 0 (a)ẋ = (ax) (well-defined because N is a left ideal). π 0 is obviously linear and π 0 (ab) = π 0 (a)π 0 (b) for any a, b A. It is also symmetric: π 0 (a ) ẋ, ẏ = ẋ, π 0 (a )ẏ = ẋ, (a y) = ϕ((a y) x) = ϕ(y ax) = π o (a)ẋ, ẏ, hence π 0 (a ) = π 0 (a). Continuity of π 0 follows from the estimate π 0 (a) 2 = sup ẋ 1 π 0 (a)ẋ 2 = sup ẋ 1 ϕ(x a ax) sup ẋ 1 ϕ(x x) a a = sup ẋ 1 ẋ 2 a 2 (we use here a a a a 1). By continuity, π 0 extends to a representation π ϕ on the completion H ϕ of A/N. If A is unital then set ξ ϕ = 1. It is cyclic: π ϕ (A)ξ ϕ = A/N is dense in H ϕ. Also ϕ = ϕ(1) = ξ ϕ 2. Finally, π ϕ (a)ξ ϕ, ξ ϕ = ϕ(1 a1) = ϕ(a). If A is not unital then the proof is more technical: one has to prove that, for an approximate unit {e λ } the limit lim λ Λ ė λ exists, and then set ξ ϕ = lim λ Λ ė λ. We skip the details.

33 Lemma. Let ϕ be a linear functional on a C -algebra A such that ϕ = 1 = lim λ Λ ϕ(e λ ) for some approximate unit {e λ }. Then ϕ is a state. Proof. First, we reduct this to the unital case. Let ϕ : A + C be a Hahn Banach extension of ϕ to A +, and let ϕ(1) = α C. As ϕ = ϕ = 1, so α 1. As 2e λ 1 1, so ϕ(2e λ 1) 1. Passing to the limit, we get 2 α 1. Hence α = 1. Now we may assume that A is unital, and that ϕ = 1 = ϕ(1). Claim. If a A is selfadjoint then ϕ(a) R. The proof follows from the claim. Let 0 a 1. Then 2a 1 1, hence ϕ(2a 1) 1. As ϕ(a) is real, so we get 1 2ϕ(a) 1 1, hence ϕ(a) 0. Positivity is proved (modulo the Claim).

34 Proof of the Claim. Let a = a, a = 1. Take n N. a + in1 2 = (a in1)(a + in1) = a 2 + n 2 1 = n Similarly, a in1 2 = n Then ϕ(a ± in1) = ϕ(a) ± in n As this holds for any n N, so ϕ(a) [ 1, 1], hence it is real. Lemma. Let B A be a unital C -subalgebra of a unital C -algebra A (with common unit), ϕ a state on B. Then there exists a state ϕ on A, that extends ϕ. Proof. Let ϕ be a Hahn Banach extension of ϕ. As ϕ = 1 = ϕ(1), so ϕ is a state. Corollary. Let a A be selfadjoint. Then there exists a state ϕ on A such that ϕ(a) = a. Proof. If A is unital then set B = C (a) + A. Either r(a) or r(a) belongs to Sp(a), and one of the two formulas ϕ(f ) = f (±r(a)), f C(Sp(a)), gives a required state.

35 Theorem (Gelfand Naimark). Any C -algebra A is isometrically -isomorphic to a closed -subalgebra of B(H) for some Hilbert space H. If A is separable then H can be taken separable. Proof. Let S(A) denote the set of all states on A. For any ϕ S(A), apply the GNS construction. Then π = ϕ S(A) π ϕ is a representation of A on the Hilbert space ϕ S(A) H ϕ. Take a A. Let ϕ S(A) satisfy ϕ(a a) = a a. Then π(a) 2 π ϕ (a) 2 π ϕ (a)ξ ϕ 2 = π ϕ (a a)ξ ϕ, ξ ϕ = ϕ(a a) = a a. On the other hand, π is a -homomorphism, hence π = 1, therefore π(a) = a for any a A. If A is separable then one can use a dense sequence {a n } in A, and the corresponding sequence {ϕ n } of states such that ϕ n (a na n ) = a n 2. Set π = n N π ϕn.

36 Let A be a C -algebra, H a Hilbert space, π : A B(H) a representation. π : A B(H) is algebraically irreducible if is has no proper invariant subspace. It is topologically irreducible if it has no proper closed invariant subspace. For a set S B(A) we denote by A! its commutant in B(H), i.e. S! = {a B(H) : as = sa s S}. TFAE: π(a)! = C 1; π is algebraically irreducible; π is topologically irreducible. Proof requires Borel functional calculus in B(H), the weak topology on B(H), and is based on Kaplansky density Theorem. Representation π is non-degenerate if π(a)h = {π(a)ξ : a A, ξ H} is dense in H. Irreducible non-degenerate: if π(a)h differs from H then it is an invariant subspace.

37 Let J A be an ideal, π : J B(H) a non-degenerate representation. Then π uniquely extends to a representation π of A on H. π is irreducible iff π is irreducible. Proof. For a A, j J, ξ H, set π(a)(π(j)ξ) := π(aj)ξ. It may happen that π(j 1 )ξ 1 = π(a 2 )ξ 2. Let {e λ } be an approximate unit in J. Then π(aj 1 )ξ 1 = lim λ Λ π(ae λ j 1 )ξ 1 = lim λ Λ π(ae λ )π(j 1 )ξ 1 = lim λ Λ π(ae λ )π(j 2 )ξ 2 = π(aj 2 )ξ 2, so π is well defined (and uniquely defined) on the dense set π(a)h. It remains to extend it by continuity to H, and the estimate π(a)(π(j)ξ) = lim λ Λ π(ae λ ) π(j)ξ a π(j)ξ shows that π is continuous. If π has an invariant subspace then π has it as well. Let us check the opposite. Let L H be a closed invariant subspace for π. Then π(a)l = π(a)π(j)l = π(j)l L.

38 Let π : A B(H) be an irreducible representation, J A an ideal. Then π J is irreducible. Proof. Suppose the contrary: there exists a closed subspace L H invariant under π(j), i.e. π(j)l L. Then π(a)π(j)l L. Finitedimensional C -algebras Let A be a finitedimensional C -algebra. Then it is unital. Proof. As A is finitedimensional, so the approximate unit has an accumulation point. Obviously, this is the unit element.

39 Finitedimensional C -algebras First, let us specify the Gelfand Naimark Theorem. For a finitedimensional C -algebra A there exists a faithful representation π : A B(H) on a finitedimensional Hilbert space H. Proof. To show injectivity of π = π ϕ, we don t need the exact equality π ϕ (a) = a. It suffices to have the estimate π ϕ (a) > 1/2 a. For each a A find an open set U a S(A) of states satisfying this estimate. As A is finitedimensional, so S(A) is compact, hence we can find a finite cover by the sets of the form U a. Pick one state in each U a and take a direct sum of GNS representations with these states. Now it is easy to decompose a faithful finitedimensional representation into a direct sum of irreducible ones. Let π be one of those, and let H be the corresponding finitedimensional Hilbert space.

40 Lemma. If π is irreducible and H finitedimensional then π(a) contains a minimal projection of rank 1. By projections we mean selfadjoint projections. Proof. As 1 π(1) is a projection, so one can find a minimal non-zero projection p = π(a) in π(a) (minimal with respect to the patial order ). Consider the set pπ(a)p B(H). Suppose there is b A such that pπ(b)p = π(aba) is not a scalar, i.e. has at least two eigenvalues, λ 1 and λ 2. Let f C(Sp(aba)) satisfy f (λ 1 ) = 1, f (λ) = 0 for all other eigenvalues λ, and let g = 1 f. Then π(f (aba)) = f (π(aba)) and π(g(aba)) = g(π(aba)) are projections with π(f (aba)) + π(g(aba)) = π(a) = p, both non-trivial. This contradicts to minimality of p. Thus, pπ(a)p consists only of scalars. Suppose that rk p > 1. Take two orthonormal vectors ξ, η Im p. Then π(c)ξ, η = pπ(c)pξ, η = λ ξ, η = 0 for any c A, where λ is some scalar, hence π(a)ξ is an invariant space contradiction with irreducibility.

41 Lemma. If π is irreducible and H finitedimensional then π(a) = B(H). Proof. Let ξ H. Irreducibility implies that for any η H there exists c A such that π(c)ξ = η (otherwise the linear subspace π(a)ξ would be proper). Now let p = π(a) be a minimal projection of rank 1 in π(a), and let ξ be a unit vector in the image of p. Then pω = ω, ξ ξ. If π(c)ξ = η then π(ca)ω = ω, ξ η. For ζ H let b A satisfy π(b)ζ = ξ. Then π(cab)ω = ω, ζ η. The operators of this form span B(H). Corollary. If A is a finitedimensional C -algebra then there exists a surjective -homomorphism ρ : A M n, where M n is the matrix algebra B(H) of operators on an n-dimensional Hilbert space H.

42 Theorem. A finitedimensional C -algebra A is isometrically -isomorphic to M n1 M nk. Proof. Let ρ : A M n for some n a surjective -homomorphism, and let e B = Ker ρ be the unit of the ideal B. If a A then a = eae + (1 e)ae + ea(1 e) + (1 e)a(1 e), with the first 3 summands being from B (where 1 is the unit of A). Note that as e is the unit of B, so ea(1 e) = (1 e)ae = 0 for any a A. Thus A = eae (1 e)a(1 e) (the sum is obviously a direct sum), where eae = B. Define a -homomorphism ϕ : A B M n by ϕ(a) = (eae, ρ(a)). As dim(1 e)a(1 e) = dim M n, so it suffices to check injectivity of ϕ. If ρ(a) = 0 then a B, hence a = eae, which is zero.

43 Any two non-zero -homomorphisms ϕ, ψ : M n M n are unitarily equivalent, i.e. ψ = Ad U ϕ for some unitary U M n. If m < n then any -homomorphism M n M m is a zero map. If n < m < 2n then there is no unital -homomorphisms from M n to M m, but there is exactly one (up to unitary equivalence) -homomorphism. If m = 2n then there are exactly two non-trivial -homomorphisms M n M m : one is non-unital and takes rank 1 projections to rank 1 projections; another is unital and takes rank 1 projections to rank 2 projections. If kn m < (k + 1)n then there are exactly k non-trivial -homomorphisms M n M m, taking rank 1 projections to rank k projections. Thus any non-trivial -homomorphism M n M m is characterized by a single positive integer: the rank of the image of rank 1 projections. If it is trivial then the corresponding integer iz zero.

44 Let A = M n1 M nk, B = M m1 M ml be two finitedimensional C -algebras, ϕ : A B a -homomorphism. Let α i : M ni A and β j : B M mj be the obvious inclusion and projection maps respectively. Then β j ϕ α i : M ni M mj is characterized by an integer N ij, and ϕ is characterized by the set of these numbers. This can be represented as a picture, where A is depicted by k points labeled by the dimensions n 1,..., n k, B is depicted by l points labeled by the dimensions m 1,..., m l, and each point labeled by n i is connected to the point labeled by m j by N ij arrows. A C -algebra A is an AF algebra if it has C -subalgebras A 1 A 2 A such that n=1 A n is dense in A. Drawing each inclusion A n A n+1 by points and arrows allows to characterize AF algebras by diagrams, called Bratteli diagrams.

45 The algebra K = K(H) of compact operators on a separable Hilbert space H is the closure of the union of matrix algebras M n = p n Kp n, n N, where p n denotes the projection onto the linear span of the first n vectors of a fixed orthonormal basis of H, with the inclusion M n M n+1 as the upper left corner. This corresponds to the Bratteli diagram Its unitalization K + is the closure of n=1 A n, where A n = Cp n + p + nk + p n = C Mn with the Bratteli diagram

46 Let K be the Cantor set, K = n=0 X n, where X n is the union of 2 n intervals of length 1/3 n. Let A n C(K ) consists of functions that are locally constant on X n. Then A n = C 2 n, and n=0 A n is dense in C(K ). Here is the corresponding diagram:

47 CAR algebra Let H be a separable Hilbert space with a fixed decomposition H = H 1 H 2 with H 1 = H2. Let each of these two Hilbet subspaces is also a direct sum H i = H i,1 H i,2, etc. Let A 1 consist of scalar operators on H, A 2 consist of 2 2 matrices with scalar entries with respect to the decomposition H 1 H 2, etc. Then A n = M2 n 1. The inclusion A n A n+1 is given by a ( ) a 0 0 a. The closure of n=1 A n is a C -algebra called the CAR algebra with the Bratteli diagram Lemma. If two AF algebras A and B have the same Bratteli diagrams then they are -isomorphic.

48 Lemma. Linear combinations of projections are dense in any AF algebra. Proof. Any element of a matrix algebra (hence, of a finitedimensional C -algebra) is a linear combination of projections. Corollary. C[0, 1] is not an AF algebra. Caution: C -subalgebras of AF algebras need not be AF. Let X be a compact metric space, then there exists a continuous surjection K X, which induces an injective -homomorphism C(X) C(K ).

49 Instead of matrix algebras, one may use other C -algebras as building blocks. Let C([0, 1]; M m ) be the C -algebra of all continuous functions on [0, 1] taking values in M m. Even such C -algebras may have non-trivial subalgebras. Example: Dimension-drop algebras. Set D m = {f C([0, 1]; M m ) : f (0) = 0, f (1) is diagonal}. This is a C -algebra. If time allows, later we shall see that its K -groups are torsion. A C -algebra is called an AI algebra if it contains C -subalgebras A 1 A 2... A such that each A n is a C -subalgebra of C([0, 1]; M m ) for some m, and if n=1 A n is dense in A.

50 For a C -algebra A, let M n (A) be the set of all n n matrices with entries from A. Let π : A B(H) be a faithful -representation on a Hilbert space H. Set H = H H (n times). Then there is a canonical -isomorphism M n (B(H)) = B( H). Define π : M n (A) B( H) by π((a ij ) n i,j=1 ) = (π(a ij)) n i,j=1. Then π is a faithful -representation of M n (A). Set (a ij ) n i,j=1 = π((a ij) n i,j=1 ). Then M n(a) can be considered as a norm-closed -subalgebra of B( H), hence it is a C -algebra. As all C -norms on a C -algebra are the same, the norm on M n (A) doesn t depend on choice of π (provided it is faithful). Similarly, For a (locally) compact Hausdorff X, the set of all continuous A-valued functions on X (vanishing at infinity) is a C -algebra C(X; A) with the norm f = sup x X f (x). This starts the theory of tensor products of C -algebras a very interesting topic, which is beyond our short course. A good reference is the book by N. Brown and N. Ozawa.

51 Toeplitz algebra Let L 2 (S) be the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions on the unit circle S C, with the basis {e n } n Z, e n = z n, z C. Let H 2 (S) L 2 (S) be the subspace spanned by e 0, e 1, e 2,..., and let L (S) be the C -algebra of essentially bounded measurable functions. For g L (S), set M g (f ) = gf, f L 2 (S). M g = g. Define an operator T g on H 2 (S) by T g h = PM g h, where P denotes the projection onto H 2 (S). In particular, T z e n = e n+1, so T z is the right shift on H 2 (S). For an operator T on a Hilbert space H define its essential norm T ess as its distance to the set K(H) of compact operators (which is the norm on the quotient C -algebra B(H)/K(H)). Lemma. Let g L (S). Then T g = T g, and T g = T g ess = g.

52 Proof. The first statement is trivial. As regards the norms, one has, trivially, T g ess T g M g = g. To prove the opposite estimate, take ε > 0 and find p = N k= N a kz k L 2 (S) such that p 2 = 1 and gp 2 > g ε (here 2 is the Hilbert space norm on L 2 (S)). Note that z n p H 2 (S) for n > N. Let gp = k= b ke e. Then T g (z n p) = P(z n gp) = k= n b ke k, and there exists N 0 > N such that T g (z n p) 2 > gp 2 ε for any n N 0. Thus, for n > N 0 one has T g (z n p) > g 2ε. Let ξ i = z 3Ni p H 2 (S). These vectors have length 1 and are orthogonal to each other. Let k K(H). Then T g k sup i (T g k)ξ i = lim sup i T g ξ i g 2ε, hence T g ess g.

53 Let H (S) = H 2 (S) L (S). Lemma. Let g L (S), h H (S). Then H 2 (S) isinvariant for M h, and T g T h = T gh, T h T g = T hg. Proof. If f H 2 (S) then T h f = P(hf ) = hf H 2 (S) (as both are series in z n for n 0). T g T h (f ) = T g (hf ) = P(ghf ) = T gh (f ); T h T g = (T g T h ) = T gh = T hg. Lemma. If g L (S) then T z T g T g T z has rank 1. Proof. T z T g T g T z = (PM z PM g PM z M g ) H 2 S = (PM zp )M g H 2 S, and PM z P has rank 1. Corollary. If g L (S), f C(S) then T f T g T fg and T g T f T fg are compact operators.

54 Toeplitz algebra Set T = {T f + k : f C(S), k K(H 2 (S))}. Lemma. T is a C -algebra. Proof. T is closed under the operations of a -algebra, e.g. (T f1 + k 1 )(T f2 + k 2 ) = T f1 f 2 + k for some compact operator k, so it remains to check that it is norm-closed. Let {T fn + k n } n N be a Cauchy sequence. Then f n f m = T fn T fm ess (T fn + k n ) (T fm + k m ), hence the sequence {f n } is a Cauchy sequence as well, thus it has a limit f = lim n f n C(S). Then lim n T fn = T f, and therefore the sequence {k n } is also a Cauchy sequence. As compact operators are norm-closed, so it also has a limit k = lim n k n. Thus lim n T fn + k n = T f + k T. Another way to define the Toeplitz algebra is to take the minimal unital C -subalgebra of B(H 2 (S)) containing T z. Then it is an excercise to check that all compact operators lie in it.

55 The subset K = K(H 2 (S)) T is an ideal. Lemma. The quotient T /K is -isomorphic to C(S). Proof. Note that the quotient is commutative, hence it is C(X) for some X to be determined. There is a map q : T C(S) given by q(t f + k) = f. It is obviously a -homomorphism. As T f = T f ess = f, so Ker q = K. It remains to check surjectivity of q. Note that there is a map s : C(S) T, given by s(f ) = T f. This map is not a -homomorphism, but it is continuous, and q s = id C(S). Recall that an operator is Fredholm if it is invertible modulo the compact operators. If f C(S) never equals 0 then the winding number wind f is well-defined as that of the curve f (S) around 0. T f is Fredholm iff 0 is not in the range of f. In this case, ind T f = wind f. Proof. Homotopy invariance of both ind and wind show that it suffices to check this equality for f (z) = z n, where it is easy.

56 Lemma. There is no -homomorphism C(S) T right-inverse to q. Proof. Suppose σ : C(S) T is a -homomorphism. Commutativity implies that σ(f ) is normal for any f C(S), hence ind σ(f ) = 0. But if q σ = id C(S) then ind σ(f ) = wind f. The ideal K, the quotient C(S) and the Toeplitz algebra can be organized into a short exact sequence 0 K T C(S) 0. Short exact sequences are often called extensions of the quotient by the ideal. The extension given by the Toeplitz algebra plays an important role in the index theory and in the K -theory of C -algebras.

57 Group C -algebras Let G be a countable discrete group, and let π : G U(H) be its unitary representation on a Hilbert space H. It can be extended to a -representation of the group ring C[G] on H. Then a π = π(a), a C[G], defines a semi-norm on C[G], which becomes a norm after we pass to the quotient C[G]/ Ker π. This norm is obviously a C -norm. The completion of C[G]/ Ker π with respect to π gives a C -algebra C π(g) of G determined by π. Example. Let θ be the trivial representation, which sends all group elements to 1. Then C θ (G) = C is just scalars.

58 The reduced group C -algebra Example. Let λ be the (left) regular representation of G on H = l 2 (G) given by λ(g)( h G β h δ h ) = h G β gδ gh, where δ h l 2 (G) are delta functions (orthonormal basis), and β h C are coefficients. The corresponding C -algebra Cλ (G) is called the reduced group C -algebra (sometimes denoted by Cr (G)). Note that λ( g G α g g) λ( g G α g g)δ e 2 = g G α g δ g = g G α g 2, where e G denotes the neutral element, hence Ker λ = {0} and the reduced group C -algebra is a completion of the group ring without taking quotients. The full group C -algebra If {π γ } γ Γ is a family of unitary representations of G (labeled by elements of a set Γ) then one can take π = γ Γ π γ. Then π = sup γ Γ πγ. If we take all representations of G we get the universal, or full group C -algebra C (G).

59 Example. If G is finite then there is no need to complete, so C (G) = C r (G) = C[G]. Example. Let G = Z with a generating element a Z. Let x = n Z α na n C[Z]. Any unitary representation of Z decomposes as a direct integral of irreducible representations, all of which are known: all irreducible representations of Z are one-dimensional, and are determined by π t (a) = e 2πit, t [0, 1]. Therefore, x u = sup t [0,1] π t (x) = n Z α ne 2πint. Hence the map ϕ : C (Z) C(S) given by ϕ(x)(t) = n Z α ne 2πint is an isometry (that s why it is well defined not only on C[Z], but also on C (Z)). An appropriate choice of vectors in l 2 (Z) shows that x λ = sup t [0,1] π t (x).

60 Sometimes the universal norm u coincides with the reduced (or regular) norm λ, but in general u λ. The identity map on C[G] extends to a continuous map C (G) C r (G), which is always surjective, but in general this map can have a non-trivial kernel, and the algebras C (G) and C r (G) may be very different. In particular, if G = F 2 is the free group on two generators then C (F 2 ) has infinitely many ideals of finite codimension, while C r (F 2 ) is simple. Theorem. The surjective -homomorphism C (G) C r (G) is a -isomorphism iff G is an amenable group. Proof: difficult. Cf. book by N. Brown and N. Ozawa.

61 Let A be a C -algebra, G a countable discrete group acting on A by automorphisms due to a homomorphism α : G Aut(A). The triple (A, G, α) is called a C -dynamical system. A covariant representation of (A, G, α) is a pair (π, u), where π : A B(H) is a -representation of A and u : G U(H) is a unitary representation of G on the same Hilbert space H, such that u g π(a)u g = π(α g (a)) for any a A, g G. Similarly to group rings, let A[G] be the algebra of all finite sums a = g G a gg, where a g A. Multiplication on A[G] is defined using the twisted convolution. If b = g G b gg then ab = g,h G a ggb h h = g,h G a g(gb h g 1 )gh = g,h G a gα g (b h )gh = γ G ( g G a gα g (b g 1 γ ))γ. Also a = g G (a gg) = g G α 1 g (a g)g 1. A covariant representation of (A, G, α) yields a -representation of A[G], and, conversely, a -representation of A[G], when restricted on A and on G (if A is unital), gives a covariant representation of (A, G, α).

62 Crossed product C -algebras Let π : A B(H) be a -representation of A, and let λ be the left regular representation of G. Form the Hilbert space l 2 (G; H) of all H-valued square-summable functions x on G with the norm x 2 2 = g G x(g) 2 and define a covariant representation ( π, u) of (A, G, α) on this Hilbert space by ( π(a)x)(g) = π(αg 1 (a))(x(g)); (u g x)(h) = x(g 1 h), g, h G. Define a norm on A[G] by a = sup σ σ(a), where the supremum is taken over all covariant representations of the C -dynamical system (A, G, α). This is correct, as a g G a g <. The (full) crossed product C -algebra A α G is defined as the completion of A[G] with respect to this norm.

63 Example. C α G = C (G). Example. If α is trivial then C(X) α G = C(X; C (G)). In particular, if X = S, G = Z then C(S) α Z = C(T 2 ), where T 2 is a two-dimensional torus. Irrational rotation algebras Let the action α of Z on C(S) be defined by α n (f )(z) = f (e 2πiθn z), n Z, where θ [0, 1] is irrational. (This action is induced by the action by irrational rotation on the circle.) Then A α Z = A θ is called an irrational rotation algebra, or a noncommutative torus. It can be described in terms of generating elements and relations as follows: Let u C(S) denote the identity function u(z) = z, z S, and let v denote a generator of Z. They can be considered as unitary elements of C(S) α Z, and they satisfy the relation vu = e 2πiθ uv. Two unitaries with this relation determine A θ as a certain universal C -algebra, like two commuting unitaries determine C(T 2 ). A θ is simple. (Difficult. Cf. the book by K. Davidson.)

64 By a projection in a C -algebra A we always mean a selfadjoint idempotent (p = p = p 2 ). Two projections, p, q A, are Murray von Neumann equivalent (p MN q) if there exists v A such that p = v v, q = vv ; unitarily equivalent (p u q) if there exists a unitary u A + such that p = u qu; homotopy equivalent (p h q) if there exists a continuous path of projections that connects p and q. There may be several other notions of equivalence, but they usually reduce to these. For example: Lemma. If q = zpz 1 for some z A + then p u q. Proof. It follows from zp = qz and z q = pz that pz z = z qz = z zp, and as p commutes with z z, so it commutes with (z z) 1/2. Set u = z(z z) 1/2. Then u is unitary and upu = z(z z) 1/2 p(z z) 1/2 z = zp(z z) 1 z = qz(z z) 1 z = q.

65 Lemma. Let v v = p and vv = q be projections. Then v = vv v and v = v vv. Proof. v vv v 2 = v(1 p) 2 = (1 p)v v(1 p) = (1 p)p(1 p) = 0. Lemma. If p MN q and 1 p MN 1 q then p u q. Proof. By assumption, there exist v and w such that v v = p, vv = q, w w = 1 p, ww = 1 q. Note that v w = v q(1 q)w = 0, similarly, w v = 0, hence (v + w) (v + w) = v v + w w = p + 1 p = 1. Similarly, (v + w)(v + w) = 1. Thus u = v + w is unitary, and upu = (v + w)v v(v + w) = vv vv = q 2 = q. Let v be the right shift on l 2. Then v v = 1, vv = 1 e 1, where e 1 is the projection onto the first coordinate. This shows that the Murray von Neumann equivalence doesn t imply unitary equivalence.

66 Lemma. Let p A be a projection, and let V = {q A : q is a projection and p q < 1}. There exists a continuous map q u q from V to the unitary group of A + such that u p = 1 and u q pu q = q. Proof. Set v p = 2p 1, v q = 2q 1, z q = v q v p + 1. Then qz q = q(2q 1)(2p 1)+q = 2qp = (2q 1)(2p 1)p+p = z q p. It remains to check invertibility of z q, which follows from the estimate zq 2 1 = 1 2 v qv p + 1 = 1 2 v q(v p v q ) 1 2 v p v q = p q < 1. Corollary. If p q < 1 then p h q. Proof. As u p = 1, so u q lies in the path connected component of 1 in the unitary group, and there is a path u(t) connecting 1 with u q. Then p(t) = u(t)pu(t) gives a required path of projections.

67 Lemma. If p h q then p u q. Proof. Divide the homotopy path connecting p with q by intermediate points p = p 0, p 1, p 2,..., p n = q such that p i+1 p i < 1. All projections p i are unitarily equivalent. Lemma. (1) If p MN q then ) (2) If p u q then ( p ( p h ( q ) ). u ( q ( Proof. (1) If p = v v, q = vv, then set u = v 1 q 1 p v ). An easy calculation shows that u is unitary in M 2 (A) and that u ( p ) u = ( q ). (2) Let q = upu with u A + unitary. The unitary group of a C -algebra need not to be path-connected, but elements of the form ( ) u 0 0 u lie in the connected component of 1M2 (A + ) = ( ) The required path of unitaries is given by w t = ( ) ( u 0 cos t sin t ) ( 1 0 ) ( cos t sin t 0 1 sin t cos t 0 u sin t cos t ). ). Then wt ( p the path connecting the projections. ) w t is

68 Idea: consider projections not in A, but in matrices of arbitrary size over A. Advantages: All equivalences for projections become the same; One can take direct sums of projections. Set M (A) = n N M n (A), and let V (A) denote the set of equivalence classes of projections )] in M (A). Addition [p] + [q] := is well-defined and makes V (A) [( p 0 0 q an abelian semigroup with the trivial element [0]. Example. If A is C, M n or K then the equivalence class of a projection in M k (A) is determined by its rank, hence V (A) = {0, 1, 2...}. Example. If A = B(H) with H infinitedimensional then, besides projections of finite rank, there is one more equivalence class consisting of infinite rank projections, so V (A) = {0, 1, 2,..., }. Example. If A = C(X) then V (A) can be identified with isomorphism classes of locally trivial vector bundles over X.

69 Stable equivalence: Two projections, p, q M (A) are stably equivalent if there exists a projection r such that [p + r] = [q + r]. Consider all pairs ([p], [q]), [p], [q] V (A). Two such pairs, ([p], [q]) and ([p ], [q ]) are equivalent if p + q and p + q are stably equivalent. The set of equivalence classes of such pairs becomes an abelian group with ([p], [q]) + ([p ] + [q ]) = ([p] + [p ], [q] + [q ]), ([p], [q]) = ([q], [p]), and with the neutral element ([p], [p]). If a C -algebra A is unital then define K 0 (A) as the group of equivalence classes of pairs of projections. If ϕ : A B is a -homomorphism of C -algebras then it extends to a -homomorphism ϕ : M n (A) M n (B), and ϕ(p) is a projection in M n (B), hence K 0 is a covariant functor (even for non-unital -homomorphisms). We write ϕ : K 0 (A) K 0 (B).

70 K 0 (C) = K 0 (M n ) = Z; K 0 (B(H)) = 0. Non-unital C -algebras may have no non-trivial projections at all (cf. C 0 (R 2 )). If A is not unital then there is a quotient map θ : A + C with the kernel A. Set K 0 (A) = Ker θ. If B is non-unital, ϕ : A B a -homomorphism, then the ϕ composition K 0 (A) K 0 (B + θ ) K 0 (C) is zero map, hence ϕ (K 0 (A)) K 0 (B), and K 0 is a functor for non-unital C -algebras as well.

71 Continuity of K 0 Lemma. Let A 1 A 2 A with n N A n dense in A. Then K 0 (A) = lim K 0 (A n ). Idea of proof. If p is a projection in A (or in M k (A + )) then, for any ε > 0 there exists some selfadjoint x in A n (or in M k (A + )) for some k, such that p x < ε. This x is not a projection, but x x 2 < 3ε, hence Sp x consists of two distinct pieces one close to 0, and another one close to 1. Applying a function f which equals 0 on (, 1/2) and 1 on (1/2, ) (which is continuous on Sp x), we obtain a projection f (x), which is also close to p (up to 4ε). As this procedure is continuous, it can be applied to homotopies of projections as well.

5 Banach Algebras. 5.1 Invertibility and the Spectrum. Robert Oeckl FA NOTES 5 19/05/2010 1

5 Banach Algebras. 5.1 Invertibility and the Spectrum. Robert Oeckl FA NOTES 5 19/05/2010 1 Robert Oeckl FA NOTES 5 19/05/2010 1 5 Banach Algebras 5.1 Invertibility and the Spectrum Suppose X is a Banach space. Then we are often interested in (continuous) operators on this space, i.e, elements

More information

Peter Hochs. Strings JC, 11 June, C -algebras and K-theory. Peter Hochs. Introduction. C -algebras. Group. C -algebras.

Peter Hochs. Strings JC, 11 June, C -algebras and K-theory. Peter Hochs. Introduction. C -algebras. Group. C -algebras. and of and Strings JC, 11 June, 2013 and of 1 2 3 4 5 of and of and Idea of 1 Study locally compact Hausdorff topological spaces through their algebras of continuous functions. The product on this algebra

More information

The second dual of a C*-algebra

The second dual of a C*-algebra The second dual of a C*-algebra The main goal is to expose a short proof of the result of Z Takeda, [Proc Japan Acad 30, (1954), 90 95], that the second dual of a C*-algebra is, in effect, the von Neumann

More information

Elliott s program and descriptive set theory I

Elliott s program and descriptive set theory I Elliott s program and descriptive set theory I Ilijas Farah LC 2012, Manchester, July 12 a, a, a, a, the, the, the, the. I shall need this exercise later, someone please solve it Exercise If A = limna

More information

K theory of C algebras

K theory of C algebras K theory of C algebras S.Sundar Institute of Mathematical Sciences,Chennai December 1, 2008 S.Sundar Institute of Mathematical Sciences,Chennai ()K theory of C algebras December 1, 2008 1 / 30 outline

More information

A Brief Introduction to Functional Analysis

A Brief Introduction to Functional Analysis A Brief Introduction to Functional Analysis Sungwook Lee Department of Mathematics University of Southern Mississippi sunglee@usm.edu July 5, 2007 Definition 1. An algebra A is a vector space over C with

More information

MATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES SPECTRAL THEOREM

MATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES SPECTRAL THEOREM MATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES SPECTRAL THEOREM We present the material in a slightly different order than it is usually done (such as e.g. in the course book). Here we prefer to start out with

More information

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis Introduction to Index Theory Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis Basics Background In analysis and pde, you want to solve equations. In good cases: Linearize, end up with Au = f, where A L(E, F ) is a

More information

Preliminaries on von Neumann algebras and operator spaces. Magdalena Musat University of Copenhagen. Copenhagen, January 25, 2010

Preliminaries on von Neumann algebras and operator spaces. Magdalena Musat University of Copenhagen. Copenhagen, January 25, 2010 Preliminaries on von Neumann algebras and operator spaces Magdalena Musat University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, January 25, 2010 1 Von Neumann algebras were introduced by John von Neumann in 1929-1930 as

More information

C* ALGEBRAS AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS

C* ALGEBRAS AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS C* ALGEBRAS AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS ILIJAS FARAH The original version of this note was based on two talks given by Efren Ruiz at the Toronto Set Theory seminar in November 2005. This very tentative note

More information

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations

More information

Commutative Banach algebras 79

Commutative Banach algebras 79 8. Commutative Banach algebras In this chapter, we analyze commutative Banach algebras in greater detail. So we always assume that xy = yx for all x, y A here. Definition 8.1. Let A be a (commutative)

More information

Functional Analysis HW #1

Functional Analysis HW #1 Functional Analysis HW #1 Sangchul Lee October 9, 2015 1 Solutions Solution of #1.1. Suppose that X

More information

Lecture Notes on Operator Algebras. John M. Erdman Portland State University. Version March 12, 2011

Lecture Notes on Operator Algebras. John M. Erdman Portland State University. Version March 12, 2011 Lecture Notes on Operator Algebras John M. Erdman Portland State University Version March 12, 2011 c 2010 John M. Erdman E-mail address: erdman@pdx.edu Contents Chapter 1. LINEAR ALGEBRA AND THE SPECTRAL

More information

Elementary linear algebra

Elementary linear algebra Chapter 1 Elementary linear algebra 1.1 Vector spaces Vector spaces owe their importance to the fact that so many models arising in the solutions of specific problems turn out to be vector spaces. The

More information

Math 123 Homework Assignment #2 Due Monday, April 21, 2008

Math 123 Homework Assignment #2 Due Monday, April 21, 2008 Math 123 Homework Assignment #2 Due Monday, April 21, 2008 Part I: 1. Suppose that A is a C -algebra. (a) Suppose that e A satisfies xe = x for all x A. Show that e = e and that e = 1. Conclude that e

More information

Stone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces

Stone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces The Stone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto June 27, 2014 1 Completely regular spaces and Tychonoff spaces A topological

More information

Two-sided multiplications and phantom line bundles

Two-sided multiplications and phantom line bundles Two-sided multiplications and phantom line bundles Ilja Gogić Department of Mathematics University of Zagreb 19th Geometrical Seminar Zlatibor, Serbia August 28 September 4, 2016 joint work with Richard

More information

TOEPLITZ OPERATORS. Toeplitz studied infinite matrices with NW-SE diagonals constant. f e C :

TOEPLITZ OPERATORS. Toeplitz studied infinite matrices with NW-SE diagonals constant. f e C : TOEPLITZ OPERATORS EFTON PARK 1. Introduction to Toeplitz Operators Otto Toeplitz lived from 1881-1940 in Goettingen, and it was pretty rough there, so he eventually went to Palestine and eventually contracted

More information

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms (February 24, 2017) 08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2016-17/08a-ops

More information

Functional Analysis II held by Prof. Dr. Moritz Weber in summer 18

Functional Analysis II held by Prof. Dr. Moritz Weber in summer 18 Functional Analysis II held by Prof. Dr. Moritz Weber in summer 18 General information on organisation Tutorials and admission for the final exam To take part in the final exam of this course, 50 % of

More information

Analysis Preliminary Exam Workshop: Hilbert Spaces

Analysis Preliminary Exam Workshop: Hilbert Spaces Analysis Preliminary Exam Workshop: Hilbert Spaces 1. Hilbert spaces A Hilbert space H is a complete real or complex inner product space. Consider complex Hilbert spaces for definiteness. If (, ) : H H

More information

CHAPTER X THE SPECTRAL THEOREM OF GELFAND

CHAPTER X THE SPECTRAL THEOREM OF GELFAND CHAPTER X THE SPECTRAL THEOREM OF GELFAND DEFINITION A Banach algebra is a complex Banach space A on which there is defined an associative multiplication for which: (1) x (y + z) = x y + x z and (y + z)

More information

CHAPTER VIII HILBERT SPACES

CHAPTER VIII HILBERT SPACES CHAPTER VIII HILBERT SPACES DEFINITION Let X and Y be two complex vector spaces. A map T : X Y is called a conjugate-linear transformation if it is a reallinear transformation from X into Y, and if T (λx)

More information

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of L k and S n A character of an irreducible representation of L k is a polynomial function constant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable

More information

Finite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product

Finite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product Chapter 4 Hilbert Spaces 4.1 Inner Product Spaces Inner Product Space. A complex vector space E is called an inner product space (or a pre-hilbert space, or a unitary space) if there is a mapping (, )

More information

Operator Algebras and Unbounded Self-Adjoint Operators

Operator Algebras and Unbounded Self-Adjoint Operators Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen Faculty of Science Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics Master Thesis Operator Algebras and Unbounded Self-Adjoint Operators Author: Christian Budde

More information

von Neumann algebras, II 1 factors, and their subfactors V.S. Sunder (IMSc, Chennai)

von Neumann algebras, II 1 factors, and their subfactors V.S. Sunder (IMSc, Chennai) von Neumann algebras, II 1 factors, and their subfactors V.S. Sunder (IMSc, Chennai) Lecture 3 at IIT Mumbai, April 24th, 2007 Finite-dimensional C -algebras: Recall: Definition: A linear functional tr

More information

NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS

NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction to finite fields 2 2. Definition and constructions of fields 3 2.1. The definition of a field 3 2.2. Constructing field extensions by adjoining

More information

LINEAR PRESERVER PROBLEMS: generalized inverse

LINEAR PRESERVER PROBLEMS: generalized inverse LINEAR PRESERVER PROBLEMS: generalized inverse Université Lille 1, France Banach Algebras 2011, Waterloo August 3-10, 2011 I. Introduction Linear preserver problems is an active research area in Matrix,

More information

CHAPTER 3. Hilbert spaces

CHAPTER 3. Hilbert spaces CHAPTER 3 Hilbert spaces There are really three types of Hilbert spaces (over C). The finite dimensional ones, essentially just C n, for different integer values of n, with which you are pretty familiar,

More information

Lecture 1 Operator spaces and their duality. David Blecher, University of Houston

Lecture 1 Operator spaces and their duality. David Blecher, University of Houston Lecture 1 Operator spaces and their duality David Blecher, University of Houston July 28, 2006 1 I. Introduction. In noncommutative analysis we replace scalar valued functions by operators. functions operators

More information

Finite-dimensional representations of free product C*-algebras

Finite-dimensional representations of free product C*-algebras Finite-dimensional representations of free product C*-algebras Ruy Exel Terry A. Loring October 28, 2008 preliminary version Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of New Mexico Albuquerque,

More information

Lecture Notes on C -algebras. Ian F. Putnam

Lecture Notes on C -algebras. Ian F. Putnam Lecture Notes on C -algebras Ian F. Putnam July 28, 2016 2 Contents 1 Basics of C -algebras 5 1.1 Definition............................. 5 1.2 Examples............................. 7 1.3 Spectrum.............................

More information

Lecture 1: Crossed Products of C*-Algebras by Finite Groups. General motivation. A rough outline of all three lectures

Lecture 1: Crossed Products of C*-Algebras by Finite Groups. General motivation. A rough outline of all three lectures Winter School on Operator Algebras Lecture 1: Crossed Products of C*-Algebras by Finite Groups RIMS, Kyoto University, Japan N Christopher Phillips 7 16 December 2011 University of Oregon Research Institute

More information

Notes on operator algebras. Jesse Peterson

Notes on operator algebras. Jesse Peterson Notes on operator algebras Jesse Peterson April 6, 2015 2 Contents 1 Spectral theory 7 1.1 Banach and C -algebras..................... 8 1.1.1 Examples......................... 13 1.2 The Gelfand transform......................

More information

MATH 113 SPRING 2015

MATH 113 SPRING 2015 MATH 113 SPRING 2015 DIARY Effective syllabus I. Metric spaces - 6 Lectures and 2 problem sessions I.1. Definitions and examples I.2. Metric topology I.3. Complete spaces I.4. The Ascoli-Arzelà Theorem

More information

ON THE SIMILARITY OF CENTERED OPERATORS TO CONTRACTIONS. Srdjan Petrović

ON THE SIMILARITY OF CENTERED OPERATORS TO CONTRACTIONS. Srdjan Petrović ON THE SIMILARITY OF CENTERED OPERATORS TO CONTRACTIONS Srdjan Petrović Abstract. In this paper we show that every power bounded operator weighted shift with commuting normal weights is similar to a contraction.

More information

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability... Functional Analysis Franck Sueur 2018-2019 Contents 1 Metric spaces 1 1.1 Definitions........................................ 1 1.2 Completeness...................................... 3 1.3 Compactness......................................

More information

INTRODUCTION TO C*-ALGEBRAS. Introduction Good references for the contents (and way beyond) are [Mur90, Ped79].

INTRODUCTION TO C*-ALGEBRAS. Introduction Good references for the contents (and way beyond) are [Mur90, Ped79]. INTRODUCTION TO C*-ALGEBRAS TRON OMLAND AND NICOLAI STAMMEIER Abstract. These are lectures notes for an introductory course on C -algebras held in Autumn 2016 at the University of Oslo. Introduction Good

More information

Fredholmness of Some Toeplitz Operators

Fredholmness of Some Toeplitz Operators Fredholmness of Some Toeplitz Operators Beyaz Başak Koca Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey IWOTA, 2017 Preliminaries Definition (Fredholm operator) Let H be a Hilbert space and let T B(H). T is said

More information

Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem

Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem 1 Fourier Analysis, a review We ll begin with a short review of simple facts about Fourier analysis, before going on to interpret

More information

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI 1. Maximal Tori By a torus we mean a compact connected abelian Lie group, so a torus is a Lie group that is isomorphic to T n = R n /Z n. Definition 1.1.

More information

ISOMORPHISMS OF C*-ALGEBRAS AFTER TENSORING

ISOMORPHISMS OF C*-ALGEBRAS AFTER TENSORING ISOMORPHISMS OF C*-ALGEBRAS AFTER TENSORING YUTAKA KATABAMI Abstract. J. Plastiras exhibited C*-algebras which are not isomorphic but, after tensoring by M 2, isomorphic. On proof of nonisomorphism of

More information

SPECTRAL THEORY EVAN JENKINS

SPECTRAL THEORY EVAN JENKINS SPECTRAL THEORY EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from two lectures given in MATH 27200, Basic Functional Analysis, at the University of Chicago in March 2010. The proof of the spectral theorem for

More information

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero. Math 210C. The remarkable SU(2) Let G be a non-commutative connected compact Lie group, and assume that its rank (i.e., dimension of maximal tori) is 1; equivalently, G is a compact connected Lie group

More information

Chapter 8 Integral Operators

Chapter 8 Integral Operators Chapter 8 Integral Operators In our development of metrics, norms, inner products, and operator theory in Chapters 1 7 we only tangentially considered topics that involved the use of Lebesgue measure,

More information

1 Definition and Basic Properties of Compa Operator

1 Definition and Basic Properties of Compa Operator 1 Definition and Basic Properties of Compa Operator 1.1 Let X be a infinite dimensional Banach space. Show that if A C(X ), A does not have bounded inverse. Proof. Denote the unit ball of X by B and the

More information

1 Functional Analysis

1 Functional Analysis 1 Functional Analysis 1 1.1 Banach spaces Remark 1.1. In classical mechanics, the state of some physical system is characterized as a point x in phase space (generalized position and momentum coordinates).

More information

Factorization of unitary representations of adele groups Paul Garrett garrett/

Factorization of unitary representations of adele groups Paul Garrett   garrett/ (February 19, 2005) Factorization of unitary representations of adele groups Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ The result sketched here is of fundamental importance in

More information

C*-algebras generated by non-unitary group representations

C*-algebras generated by non-unitary group representations C*-algebras generated by non-unitary group representations University of Florida April 13, 2006 When groups appear in the thoery of operator algebras, they nearly always appear in the guise of unitary

More information

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS G. RAMESH Contents Introduction 1 1. Bounded Operators 1 1.3. Examples 3 2. Compact Operators 5 2.1. Properties 6 3. The Spectral Theorem 9 3.3. Self-adjoint

More information

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal semigroup rings and formal power series rings We next want to explore the notion of a (formal) power series ring in finitely

More information

Crossed products of irrational rotation algebras by finite subgroups of SL 2 (Z) are AF

Crossed products of irrational rotation algebras by finite subgroups of SL 2 (Z) are AF Crossed products of irrational rotation algebras by finite subgroups of SL 2 (Z) are AF N. Christopher Phillips 7 May 2008 N. Christopher Phillips () C (Z k, A θ ) is AF 7 May 2008 1 / 36 The Sixth Annual

More information

THE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS

THE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS THE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS The noncommutative torus as a twisted convolution An ordinary two-torus T 2 with coordinate functions given by where x 1, x 2 [0, 1]. U 1 = e 2πix 1, U 2 = e 2πix 2, (1) By Fourier

More information

2 Garrett: `A Good Spectral Theorem' 1. von Neumann algebras, density theorem The commutant of a subring S of a ring R is S 0 = fr 2 R : rs = sr; 8s 2

2 Garrett: `A Good Spectral Theorem' 1. von Neumann algebras, density theorem The commutant of a subring S of a ring R is S 0 = fr 2 R : rs = sr; 8s 2 1 A Good Spectral Theorem c1996, Paul Garrett, garrett@math.umn.edu version February 12, 1996 1 Measurable Hilbert bundles Measurable Banach bundles Direct integrals of Hilbert spaces Trivializing Hilbert

More information

OPERATOR THEORY ON HILBERT SPACE. Class notes. John Petrovic

OPERATOR THEORY ON HILBERT SPACE. Class notes. John Petrovic OPERATOR THEORY ON HILBERT SPACE Class notes John Petrovic Contents Chapter 1. Hilbert space 1 1.1. Definition and Properties 1 1.2. Orthogonality 3 1.3. Subspaces 7 1.4. Weak topology 9 Chapter 2. Operators

More information

Purely infinite C -algebras of real rank zero

Purely infinite C -algebras of real rank zero Purely infinite C -algebras of real rank zero Cornel Pasnicu and Mikael Rørdam Abstract We show that a separable purely infinite C -algebra is of real rank zero if and only if its primitive ideal space

More information

Functional Analysis Zhejiang University

Functional Analysis Zhejiang University Functional Analysis Zhejiang University Contents 1 Elementary Spectral Theory 4 1.1 Banach Algebras.......................... 4 1.2 The Spectrum and the Spectral Radius.............. 10 1.3 The Gelfand

More information

Optimization Theory. A Concise Introduction. Jiongmin Yong

Optimization Theory. A Concise Introduction. Jiongmin Yong October 11, 017 16:5 ws-book9x6 Book Title Optimization Theory 017-08-Lecture Notes page 1 1 Optimization Theory A Concise Introduction Jiongmin Yong Optimization Theory 017-08-Lecture Notes page Optimization

More information

C.6 Adjoints for Operators on Hilbert Spaces

C.6 Adjoints for Operators on Hilbert Spaces C.6 Adjoints for Operators on Hilbert Spaces 317 Additional Problems C.11. Let E R be measurable. Given 1 p and a measurable weight function w: E (0, ), the weighted L p space L p s (R) consists of all

More information

Embedding C -algebras into O 2

Embedding C -algebras into O 2 Embedding C -algebras into O 2 Master thesis by Katharina Jeglin revised version December 15, 2005 Supervisor: Professor Mikael Rørdam Contents 1 Toolbox 3 1.1 C -algebra theory..................................

More information

Spectral theory for compact operators on Banach spaces

Spectral theory for compact operators on Banach spaces 68 Chapter 9 Spectral theory for compact operators on Banach spaces Recall that a subset S of a metric space X is precompact if its closure is compact, or equivalently every sequence contains a Cauchy

More information

HARTSHORNE EXERCISES

HARTSHORNE EXERCISES HARTSHORNE EXERCISES J. WARNER Hartshorne, Exercise I.5.6. Blowing Up Curve Singularities (a) Let Y be the cusp x 3 = y 2 + x 4 + y 4 or the node xy = x 6 + y 6. Show that the curve Ỹ obtained by blowing

More information

Spectral Theory, with an Introduction to Operator Means. William L. Green

Spectral Theory, with an Introduction to Operator Means. William L. Green Spectral Theory, with an Introduction to Operator Means William L. Green January 30, 2008 Contents Introduction............................... 1 Hilbert Space.............................. 4 Linear Maps

More information

120A LECTURE OUTLINES

120A LECTURE OUTLINES 120A LECTURE OUTLINES RUI WANG CONTENTS 1. Lecture 1. Introduction 1 2 1.1. An algebraic object to study 2 1.2. Group 2 1.3. Isomorphic binary operations 2 2. Lecture 2. Introduction 2 3 2.1. The multiplication

More information

are Banach algebras. f(x)g(x) max Example 7.4. Similarly, A = L and A = l with the pointwise multiplication

are Banach algebras. f(x)g(x) max Example 7.4. Similarly, A = L and A = l with the pointwise multiplication 7. Banach algebras Definition 7.1. A is called a Banach algebra (with unit) if: (1) A is a Banach space; (2) There is a multiplication A A A that has the following properties: (xy)z = x(yz), (x + y)z =

More information

REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS

REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS IVAN LOSEV Introduction The aim of this lecture is to recall some standard basic things about the representation theory of finite dimensional algebras and finite

More information

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12 MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y -scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f

More information

I teach myself... Hilbert spaces

I teach myself... Hilbert spaces I teach myself... Hilbert spaces by F.J.Sayas, for MATH 806 November 4, 2015 This document will be growing with the semester. Every in red is for you to justify. Even if we start with the basic definition

More information

Classical stuff - title to be changed later

Classical stuff - title to be changed later CHAPTER 1 Classical stuff - title to be changed later 1. Positive Definite Kernels To start with something simple and elegant, we choose positive definite kernels which appear at every corner in functional

More information

REAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS

REAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS REAL AND COMPLE ANALYSIS Third Edition Walter Rudin Professor of Mathematics University of Wisconsin, Madison Version 1.1 No rights reserved. Any part of this work can be reproduced or transmitted in any

More information

POSITIVE MAP AS DIFFERENCE OF TWO COMPLETELY POSITIVE OR SUPER-POSITIVE MAPS

POSITIVE MAP AS DIFFERENCE OF TWO COMPLETELY POSITIVE OR SUPER-POSITIVE MAPS Adv. Oper. Theory 3 (2018), no. 1, 53 60 http://doi.org/10.22034/aot.1702-1129 ISSN: 2538-225X (electronic) http://aot-math.org POSITIVE MAP AS DIFFERENCE OF TWO COMPLETELY POSITIVE OR SUPER-POSITIVE MAPS

More information

Functional Analysis Exercise Class

Functional Analysis Exercise Class Functional Analysis Exercise Class Week: January 18 Deadline to hand in the homework: your exercise class on week January 5 9. Exercises with solutions (1) a) Show that for every unitary operators U, V,

More information

Functional Analysis I

Functional Analysis I Functional Analysis I Course Notes by Stefan Richter Transcribed and Annotated by Gregory Zitelli Polar Decomposition Definition. An operator W B(H) is called a partial isometry if W x = X for all x (ker

More information

Math Solutions to homework 5

Math Solutions to homework 5 Math 75 - Solutions to homework 5 Cédric De Groote November 9, 207 Problem (7. in the book): Let {e n } be a complete orthonormal sequence in a Hilbert space H and let λ n C for n N. Show that there is

More information

A note on the σ-algebra of cylinder sets and all that

A note on the σ-algebra of cylinder sets and all that A note on the σ-algebra of cylinder sets and all that José Luis Silva CCM, Univ. da Madeira, P-9000 Funchal Madeira BiBoS, Univ. of Bielefeld, Germany (luis@dragoeiro.uma.pt) September 1999 Abstract In

More information

CHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups

CHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups CHAPTER 6 Representations of compact groups Throughout this chapter, denotes a compact group. 6.1. Examples of compact groups A standard theorem in elementary analysis says that a subset of C m (m a positive

More information

THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515

THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515 THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515 Proposition 1 (=comment on page 17). If A is an algebra, then any finite union or finite intersection of sets in A is also in A. Proposition 2 (=Proposition 1.1). For every

More information

10.1. The spectrum of an operator. Lemma If A < 1 then I A is invertible with bounded inverse

10.1. The spectrum of an operator. Lemma If A < 1 then I A is invertible with bounded inverse 10. Spectral theory For operators on finite dimensional vectors spaces, we can often find a basis of eigenvectors (which we use to diagonalize the matrix). If the operator is symmetric, this is always

More information

Chapter 2 Linear Transformations

Chapter 2 Linear Transformations Chapter 2 Linear Transformations Linear Transformations Loosely speaking, a linear transformation is a function from one vector space to another that preserves the vector space operations. Let us be more

More information

3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?

3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure? MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due ). Show that the open disk x 2 + y 2 < 1 is a countable union of planar elementary sets. Show that the closed disk x 2 + y 2 1 is a countable

More information

(1) A frac = b : a, b A, b 0. We can define addition and multiplication of fractions as we normally would. a b + c d

(1) A frac = b : a, b A, b 0. We can define addition and multiplication of fractions as we normally would. a b + c d The Algebraic Method 0.1. Integral Domains. Emmy Noether and others quickly realized that the classical algebraic number theory of Dedekind could be abstracted completely. In particular, rings of integers

More information

Representation Theory

Representation Theory Representation Theory Representations Let G be a group and V a vector space over a field k. A representation of G on V is a group homomorphism ρ : G Aut(V ). The degree (or dimension) of ρ is just dim

More information

Extensions of pure states

Extensions of pure states Extensions of pure M. Anoussis 07/ 2016 1 C algebras 2 3 4 5 C -algebras Definition Let A be a Banach algebra. An involution on A is a map a a on A s.t. (a + b) = a + b (λa) = λa, λ C a = a (ab) = b a

More information

Solutions to Problem Set 1

Solutions to Problem Set 1 Solutions to Problem Set 1 18.904 Spring 2011 Problem 1 Statement. Let n 1 be an integer. Let CP n denote the set of all lines in C n+1 passing through the origin. There is a natural map π : C n+1 \ {0}

More information

A non-commutative notion of separate continuity

A non-commutative notion of separate continuity A non-commutative notion of separate continuity Matthew Daws Leeds November 2014 Matthew Daws (Leeds) Separate continuity November 2014 1 / 22 Locally compact spaces Let X be a locally compact (Hausdorff)

More information

SCHURIAN ALGEBRAS AND SPECTRAL ADDITIVITY

SCHURIAN ALGEBRAS AND SPECTRAL ADDITIVITY SCHURIAN ALGEBRAS AND SPECTRAL ADDITIVITY Lawrence A. Harris Department of Mathematics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0027 and Richard V. Kadison Department of Mathematics, University of

More information

The following definition is fundamental.

The following definition is fundamental. 1. Some Basics from Linear Algebra With these notes, I will try and clarify certain topics that I only quickly mention in class. First and foremost, I will assume that you are familiar with many basic

More information

Almost periodic functionals

Almost periodic functionals Almost periodic functionals Matthew Daws Leeds Warsaw, July 2013 Matthew Daws (Leeds) Almost periodic functionals Warsaw, July 2013 1 / 22 Dual Banach algebras; personal history A Banach algebra A Banach

More information

Compression, Matrix Range and Completely Positive Map

Compression, Matrix Range and Completely Positive Map Compression, Matrix Range and Completely Positive Map Iowa State University Iowa-Nebraska Functional Analysis Seminar November 5, 2016 Definitions and notations H, K : Hilbert space. If dim H = n

More information

1 MONOTONE COMPLETE C*-ALGEBRAS AND GENERIC DYNAMICS

1 MONOTONE COMPLETE C*-ALGEBRAS AND GENERIC DYNAMICS 1 MONOTONE COMPLETE C*-ALGEBRAS AND GENERIC DYNAMICS JDM Wright (University of Aberdeen) This talk is on joint work with Kazuyuki SAITÔ. I shall begin by talking about Monotone Complete C*-algebras. Then

More information

Overview of normed linear spaces

Overview of normed linear spaces 20 Chapter 2 Overview of normed linear spaces Starting from this chapter, we begin examining linear spaces with at least one extra structure (topology or geometry). We assume linearity; this is a natural

More information

Notes on Banach Algebras and Functional Calculus

Notes on Banach Algebras and Functional Calculus Notes on Banach Algebras and Functional Calculus April 23, 2014 1 The Gelfand-Naimark theorem (proved on Feb 7) Theorem 1. If A is a commutative C -algebra and M is the maximal ideal space, of A then the

More information

N. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS

N. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS OPERATOR ALGEBRAS ON L p SPACES WHICH LOOK LIKE C*-ALGEBRAS N. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS 1. Introduction This talk is a survey of operator algebras on L p spaces which look like C*- algebras. Its aim is to

More information

ON CONNES AMENABILITY OF UPPER TRIANGULAR MATRIX ALGEBRAS

ON CONNES AMENABILITY OF UPPER TRIANGULAR MATRIX ALGEBRAS U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series A, Vol. 80, Iss. 2, 2018 ISSN 1223-7027 ON CONNES AMENABILITY OF UPPER TRIANGULAR MATRIX ALGEBRAS S. F. Shariati 1, A. Pourabbas 2, A. Sahami 3 In this paper, we study the notion

More information

Gaussian automorphisms whose ergodic self-joinings are Gaussian

Gaussian automorphisms whose ergodic self-joinings are Gaussian F U N D A M E N T A MATHEMATICAE 164 (2000) Gaussian automorphisms whose ergodic self-joinings are Gaussian by M. L e m a ńc z y k (Toruń), F. P a r r e a u (Paris) and J.-P. T h o u v e n o t (Paris)

More information

The complexity of classification problem of nuclear C*-algebras

The complexity of classification problem of nuclear C*-algebras The complexity of classification problem of nuclear C*-algebras Ilijas Farah (joint work with Andrew Toms and Asger Törnquist) Nottingham, September 6, 2010 C*-algebras H: a complex Hilbert space (B(H),

More information

REFLEXIVITY OF THE SPACE OF MODULE HOMOMORPHISMS

REFLEXIVITY OF THE SPACE OF MODULE HOMOMORPHISMS REFLEXIVITY OF THE SPACE OF MODULE HOMOMORPHISMS JANKO BRAČIČ Abstract. Let B be a unital Banach algebra and X, Y be left Banach B-modules. We give a sufficient condition for reflexivity of the space of

More information

COMPACT OPERATORS. 1. Definitions

COMPACT OPERATORS. 1. Definitions COMPACT OPERATORS. Definitions S:defi An operator M : X Y, X, Y Banach, is compact if M(B X (0, )) is relatively compact, i.e. it has compact closure. We denote { E:kk (.) K(X, Y ) = M L(X, Y ), M compact

More information