Spectral theory for compact operators on Banach spaces

Transcription

1 68

2 Chapter 9 Spectral theory for compact operators on Banach spaces Recall that a subset S of a metric space X is precompact if its closure is compact, or equivalently every sequence contains a Cauchy subsequence. Another characterization is that S is totally bounded, namely for any ɛ > 0 one could cover S by finitely many ɛ-balls. If X is a normed linear space we can add/multiply, and we have the following basic properties: (i) If S is precompact then so is αs for any α scalar. (ii) If S 1 and S 2 are precompact then S 1 +S 2 := {s 1 +s 2, s 1 S 1, s 2 S 2 } is precompact. (iii) If S is precompact then so is the convex hull of S. (iv) Let T : X Y where X and Y are say normed linear spaces. If S X is precompact then so is T S Y. 9.1 Compact operators Let T : X Y a bounded linear map between Banach spaces X and Y. Let B 1 be the unit ball in X. We say that T is pre-compact if T B 1 is a precompact subset of Y. Properties: (i) A finite rank operator (namely the range of the operator is finite dimensional) is compact. (ii) If T 1 : X Y and T 1 : X Y are compact operators then α 1 T 1 + α 2 T 2 is also compact for any scalar α 1, α 2. (iii) If T : X Y is compact and M : U X and N : Y V are bounded linear maps between Banach spaces then NT M : U V is compact. (iv) If T : X Y is compact then it maps a weakly convergent sequence in X to a strongly convergent sequence in Y. Such operator is called completely continuous, so we could say that compactness implies complete continuity. 1 1 If T : X X is completely continuous and X is reflexive then T is compact, this is left as an exercise. 69

3 70 CHAPTER 9. COMPACT OPERATORS To see property (iv), first note that T x n converges weakly to T x. To see this, let l X, then l(t x n ) = (T l)x n converges to T lx which is the same as l(t x). It then follows that any strongly convergent subsequence of T x n has to converge to T x. Now since x n converges weakly to x in X it follows that x n is a family of bounded operator on X that is uniformly bounded pointwise, consequently by the principle of uniform boundedness sup n x n <, thus (T x n ) is precompact, so any subsequent contains a Cauchy subsequence; thus by a routine argument it follows that T x n is convergent to T x. (v) If T n is a sequence of compact operators from X to Y and T n T 0 as n for some T : X Y bounded linear, then T is compact. To see property (v), note that for any ɛ > 0 one could choose N large such that T N T < ɛ/2. Now, we could use finitely many ɛ/2 balls to cover T N B 1. The ɛ balls with the same centers will then cover T B 1. (Recall that B 1 is the unit ball in X.) As a corollary, we have Corollary 3. If T : X Y is the limit of a sequence of finite rank operators in the norm topology then T is compact. The converse direction of this corollary is not true in general (for Banach spaces X and Y ), the first construction of counter examples is due to P. Enflo ( 73). However, if Y is a Hilbert space then the converse is true. Theorem 32. Any compact operator T : X Y where X is Banach and Y is Hilbert can be approximated by a sequence of finite rank operators. Proof. We sketch the main ideas of the proof. For every n the set T B 1 is covered by Mn k=1 B Y (y k, 1 n ). We may assume that M n is an increasing sequence. Let P n be the projection onto the span of y 1,..., y Mn, which is clearly a finite rank operator, thus P n T is also finite rank. It remains to show that T P n T = O( 1 n ). We observe that P ny y k y y k for every 1 k M n and every y Y, since projection are contractions. It follows that P n T y T y P n T y y k + T y y k 2 T y y k and clearly given any y B 1 there is a k such that T y y k 1/n, therefore P n T y T y 2 n for every y B 1, thus P n T T 2/n as desired. Theorem 33 (Schauder). Let T : X Y be a bounded linear operator between Banach spaces X and Y. Then T is compact if any only if T : Y X is compact. Proof. It suffices to show the forward direction, namely if T is compact then T is also compact. For the other direction, apply the forward direction it follows that T is compact from Y to X, and by restricting T to X we obtain T therefore T is also compact. Now, assume that T is compact. Given any sequence l n X with l n 1 we will show that (T l n ) has a Cauchy subsequence T l nj, in other words given any ɛ > 0 we have sup l nj (T x) l nk (T x) ɛ x 1

4 9.2. COMPACTNESS OF INTEGRAL OPERATORS 71 if j and k are large enough. Let B be the unit ball in X and let K = T B which is a compact subset of X. Then the above estimate is a consequence of sup y K l nj y l nk y ɛ. We may view l n as a sequence of continuous funcitons on K, which are uniformly bounded pointwise and equicontinuous on K: sup l n y y n sup l n y 1 l n y 2 y 1 y 2 n Thus by the Arzela Ascoli theorem the sequence l n has an uniformly convergent subsequence, as desired. 9.2 Compactness of integral operators We now discuss compactness of the integral operator T T f(y) = K(x, y)f(x)dµ(x), U y V where U and V are say compact metric spaces, viewing T as operator on different function spaces. Viewing T as a map from L 2 (U, dµ) to L 2 (V, dν) for some measure ν (note that both spaces are separable Hilbert spaces), we know that one sufficient condition that guarantee boundedness of T is U V K 2 dµdν <. It turns out that this would also imply compactness of T. To see this, for each x we expand K(x, y) into the (countable) orthogonal basis of L 2 (Y, dν), which we may denote by φ 1, φ 2,... K(x, y) = K j (x)φ j (y) j=1 note that for almost every x X the function K(x.y) is L 2 (Y, dν) integrable in y and so K(x, y) 2 dµ(x)dν(y) = j K j (x) 2 dµ(x) thus we may approximate T with the finite rank operator T n f(y) = K j (x)f(x)dµ(x)u j (y) j n X so T is compact.

5 72 CHAPTER 9. COMPACT OPERATORS 9.3 Spectral properties of compact operators Riesz s theorem One of the main results about compact operators is the following fact: if T : X X is a compact operator on a Banach space X and 1 T is injective, then 1 T is boundedly invertible. Note that it is possible for T to be large, so the basic theory about small perturbation of 1 does not applies here. The key to showing this fact is the following theorem of Riesz. Theorem 34 (Riesz). Let T : X X be a compact operator on a Banach space X. Then range of 1 T is a closed subspace of X and furthermore dim(ker(1 T )) and codim(1 T ) are finite and equal to each other. Part of the proof of this theorem is the following lemma. Lemma 7. Let T : X X be a compact operator on a Banach space X. Then (i) ker(1 T ) is finite dimensional. (ii) There exists some k 1 such that ker((1 T ) m ) = ker((1 T ) m+1 ) for every m k. (iii) range(1 T ) is a closed subspace of X. Proof of Lemma 7. (i) If y ker(1 T ) then T y = y. Assume towards a contradiction that ker(1 T ) is infinite dimensional. Then by another result of Riesz we could find an infinite sequence (y n ) in this kernel such that y n = 1 and y n y m 1/2 for all m n. This implies the set {T y n, n 1} is not precompact, contradiction. (ii) Note that ker([1 T ] k ) ker([1 T ] k+1 ) for all k. Now, if ker([1 T ] k ) = ker([1 T ] k+1 ) then ker([1 T ] m ) = ker([1 T ] m+1 ) for all m k. Assume towards a contradiction that we have the strict inclusion ker([1 T ] k ) ker([1 T ] k+1 ) for all k 1. Since ker([1 T ] k ) are closed, by Riesz lemma we may find x n ker([1 T ] n ) such that x n = 1 and dist(x n, ker([1 T ] n 1 )) 1/2. We will show that T x n T x m 1/2 for all m n, which will contradict compactness of T. Now, without loss of generality assume that m < n, then T x n T x m = x n (1 T )x n T x m and (1 T )x n ker([1 T ] n 1 ) and T x m ker([1 T ] n 1 ) (since T commutes with (1 T ) n 1 ). Therefore by choice of x n we obtain T x n T x m dist(x n, ker([1 T ] n 1 ) 1/2 (iii) Assume that y k = (1 T )x k is a sequence in range(1 T ) that converges to some y Y, we will show that for some x X we have y = T x. Certainly if x k has a convergent subsequence we could simply take x to be the corresponding limit. Now, x k = y k + T x k so it suffices to obtain convergence of some subsequence of T x k, and using compactness of T this would follow if x k is uniformly bounded. Unfortunately it is possible for x k to be unbounded, but we could correct this by modifying x k by an appropriate term in ker(1 T ) to make it

6 9.3. SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF COMPACT OPERATORS 73 bounded. Note that this correction does not change y k and hence does not change the goal of this part. Let d k = dist(x k, ker(1 T )) By modifying x k by an amount inside ker(1 T ) we may assume that d k x k 2d k. Thus it suffices to show that sup d k < k Assume towards a contradiction that some subsequence of d k conveges to. Without loss of generality we may assume lim d k =. We then have y k d k = (1 T )( x k d k ) now y k /d k 0 and x k /d k is uniformly bounded, so using compactness of T it follows that some subsequence of T (x k /d k ) converges, which in turn implies that some subsequence of x k /d k converges to some x X. We obtain 0 = (1 T )x so x ker(1 T ), on the other hand it is clear that dist(x k /d k, ker(1 T )) 1, contradiction. We now prove Riesz s theorem using the lemma. It remains to show that ker(1 T ) has the same dimension as the codimension of 1 T. We first reduce the proof to the case when ker(1 T ) is trivial. Let k be the index given by part (ii) of the lemma and let Y = ker[(1 T ) k+1 ] a closed subspace of X. Since (1 T )Y ker[(1 T ) k ] = Y by choice of k, it follows that T Y Y, thus T induces an operator T Z on Z := X/Y, which is a Banach space with the induced norm. It follows immediately that T Z is compact on Z, and 1 T Z is also injective on Z. Now, the dimension of ker(1 T ) is the same as the dimension of the kernel of 1 T viewing as an operator on Y, which by standard linear algebra is the same as the codimension of the range of 1 T viewing as an operator on Y. Thus it remains to show that the codimension of 1 T on Z is 0. One could see that we have reduced the proof to the case of the compact operator T Z on the Banach space Z which is also injective. Now, if (1 T Z )Z is a strict subspace of Z it follows that (1 T Z ) n Z is a strictly decreasing sequence of closed subspaces of Z, and again we may find z n (1 T Z ) n Z such that z n = 1 and dist(z n, (1 T Z ) n+1 Z) 1/2. Then for n < m we have T Z z n T Z z m = z n (1 T Z )z n T Z z m dist(z n, (1 T Z ) n+1 Z) 1/2, violating the compactness of T Z. It follows that the codimension of 1 T Z is 0 as desired Spectral properties Theorem 35. Let T be a compact operator on a Banach space X. Then (i) its spectrum σ(t ) consists of at most countably many elements, all of them are eigenvalues with finite dimensional eiegenspace. (ii) 0 is the only possible accumulation point for the elements of σ(t ) if such an accumulation point exists, and 0 will belong to σ(t ) if the dimension of X is infinite. Note that if X is a (separable) Hilbert space then we could furthermore diagonalize T using the eigenvectors.

7 74 CHAPTER 9. COMPACT OPERATORS We now prove Theorem 35. First, given any λ σ(t ) such that λ 0 we show that it is an eigenvalue with finite dimensional eigenspace. Clearly 1 T is compact. Thus, if ker(1 1 T ) λ λ is trivial then by Riesz s theorem it is also onto, therefore by the open mapping theorem 1 1 T is boundedly invertible and therefore λ σ(t ). Thus ker(1 1 T ) is nontrivial and λ λ also finite dimensional by Riesz theorem, and so λ is an eigenvalue with finite dim eigen space. Now, we will show that 0 is the only possible accumulation point, which also implies that σ(t ) is at most countable. It suffices to show that given any ɛ > 0 there is some C = C(T, ɛ) finite such that at most C(T, ɛ) elements of σ(t ) would be outside [ ɛ, ɛ]. Let λ 1,..., λ m be a finite collection of distinct elements of σ(t ) with λ j > ɛ, it suffices to show that m < O T,ɛ (1). The idea is to let Y n be the eigenspace associated with λ n and observe that for any n it holds that Y n span{y m, m < n} is trivial. Let Y <n = span{y m, m < n} which is now a strictly nested sequence. Then by Riesz s lemma one could choose y n Y n such that y n = 1 and dist(y n, Y <n ) 1/2. We will show that T y n T y m ɛ/2 for any n m. Indeed, without loss of generality assume n > m, then using the fact that y n Y n and the fact that T leaves Y m invariant we have T y n T y m = T y m = λ n y n T y m λ n dist(y n, Y <n ) λ n /2 ɛ/2 Consequently, m is bounded above by the maximum number of points in T B where B is the unit ball inside X that are ɛ/2 apart. Since T B is precompact this is finite and depends only on T and ɛ (and certainly X), and independent of the sequence (λ k ).