The non-perturbative N/D method and the 1 S 0 NN partial wave
|
|
- Rodger Simon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HADRONet p. 1 The non-perturbative N/D method and the 1 S NN partial wave 2nd Spanish Hadron Network Days Madrid, September 216 D.R. Entem, J.A. Oller University of Salamanca
2 HADRONet p. 2 Summary The framework: Chiral EFT Singular interactions Substractive renormalization The N/D method The non-pertubative (A) Results: LO, NLO and NNLO
3 HADRONet p. 3 Chiral EFT Effective degrees of freedom nucleons Chiral symmetry breaking pions Simetries: non linear realization of chiral symmetry Lagrangian: L = L ππ +L πn +L NN +... = all terms consistent with the symmetries Non renormalizable theory Power counting ν = 4 N +2(L C)+ i V i i i = d i + n i 2 2 Low energy expansion Contact terms.
4 HADRONet p. 4 Chiral EFT Order ν = V 1π ( p, p) = g2 A σ 1 q σ 2 q 4fπ 2 τ 1 τ 2 q 2 +m 2 π V () ct ( p, p) = C S +C T σ 1 σ 2
5 HADRONet p. 5 2π contributions One loop contributions ν = 2L+ i i Q 2 (NLO) Q 3 2 (N LO)
6 HADRONet p. 6 The perturbative amplitude All amplitudes are evaluated using dimensional regularization and MS. The ampitude is organize as V LO = V () ct +V () 1π V NLO = V LO +V (2) ct +V (2) 1π +V(2) 2π V NNLO = V NLO +V (3) 1π +V(3) 2π V N 3 LO = V NNLO +V (4) ct +V (4) 1π +V(4) 2π +V(4) 3π Contacts exactly absorb the infinities due to loop diagrams
7 HADRONet p. 7 Weinberg s proposal Evidences of non-perturbative nature: large scattering lengths and a bound state in NN Iterative diagrams breaks the Chiral expansion (non-perturbative) m N d 3 q (2π) 3V(p,q) k 2 q 2 +iǫ V(q,p) If V(p,p) = C d 3 q m N (2π) 3C k 2 q 2 +iǫ C = ic 2 m N k 4π Compute the potential using Chiral EFT and include it in a Lippmann-Schwinger Equation to account for the non-perturbative contribution The infinities are polynomial in the external momenta naive dimensional power counting (needed for renormalization of the irreducible terms)
8 HADRONet p. 8 Singular potentials Higher orders in the Chiral expansion produces singular potentials More singular than 1/r 2 when r. Divergent when q. The Lippman-Schwinger Eq. has to be regularized V(p,p) f(p,p;λ)v(p,p) In order to obtain regularization independence contacts are needed and we add (at zero order) V c (p,p) = C f(p,p;λ) C is fixed to some low energy data In order to obtain regularization independence there are two points of view Use Λ Λ χ Lepage plots point of view, use Λ between the low energy and the high energy scales so Λ < Λ χ. The tensor part of the LO potential is already singular Pavón-Valderrama and Ruiz-Arriola in coordinate space Nogga, Timmermans and van Kolck in momentum space
9 HADRONet p. 9 Singular tensor force δ Λ (MeV) T lab =6 MeV T lab =2 MeV T lab =3 MeV 3 D 2 LO Tensor goes as 1 r 3
10 HADRONet p. 1 Singular tensor force δ T lab =6 MeV T lab =2 MeV T lab =3 MeV Λ (MeV) 3 F 3 LO Tensor goes as 1 r 3
11 HADRONet p. 11 Substractive Renormalization T. Frederico, V.S. Timoteo, L. Tomio, Nucl. Phys. A 653 C.-J. Yang, Ch. Elster, D.R. Phillips, arxiv:nucl-th/ Zero Energy T Λ (p,;) = V(p,)+C + 2 Λ ( V(p π M dp p 2,p ) )+C T Λ (p,;) T Λ (,;) = V(,)+C + 2 π M Λ p 2 dp p 2 ( V(,p )+C p 2 ) T Λ (p,;) T Λ (,;) = T(,;) = a M T Λ (p,;) = V(p,)+ a M + 2 π M Λ ( V(p dp p 2,p ) V(,p ) ) p 2 T Λ (p,;)
12 HADRONet p. 11 Substractive Renormalization T. Frederico, V.S. Timoteo, L. Tomio, Nucl. Phys. A 653 C.-J. Yang, Ch. Elster, D.R. Phillips, arxiv:nucl-th/ Zero Energy T Λ (p,p;) = V(p,p)+C + 2 Λ ( V(p π M dp p 2,p ) )+C T Λ (p,p;) T Λ (,p;) = V(,p)+C + 2 π M Λ p 2 dp p 2 ( V(,p )+C p 2 ) T Λ (p,p;) T Λ (,;) = T(,;) = a M T Λ (p,;) = V(p,)+ a M + 2 π M Λ ( V(p dp p 2,p ) V(,p ) ) p 2 T Λ (p,;)
13 HADRONet p. 11 Substractive Renormalization T. Frederico, V.S. Timoteo, L. Tomio, Nucl. Phys. A 653 C.-J. Yang, Ch. Elster, D.R. Phillips, arxiv:nucl-th/ Zero Energy T Λ (p,p;) = V(p,p)+C + 2 Λ ( V(p π M dp p 2,p ) )+C T Λ (p,p;) T Λ (,p;) = V(,p)+C + 2 π M Λ p 2 dp p 2 ( V(,p )+C p 2 ) T Λ (p,p;) T Λ (,;) = T(,;) = a M T Λ (p,;) = V(p,)+ a M + 2 π M Λ T Λ (p,;) = T Λ (,p;) ( V(p dp p 2,p ) V(,p ) ) p 2 T Λ (p,;) T Λ (p,p;) T Λ (,p;) = V(p,p) V(,p) + 2 π M Λ dp p 2 ( V(p,p ) V(,p ) p 2 ) T Λ (p,p;)
14 HADRONet p. 12 Substractive Renormalization T. Frederico, V.S. Timoteo, L. Tomio, Nucl. Phys. A 653 C.-J. Yang, Ch. Elster, D.R. Phillips, arxiv:nucl-th/ Non-zero energy T Λ () = (V +C)+T Λ ()G Λ ()(V +C) (V +C) = T Λ ()(1+T Λ ()G Λ ()) 1 T Λ (E) = (V +C)+(V +C)G Λ (E)T Λ (E) (V +C) = T Λ (E)(1+G Λ (E)T Λ (E)) 1 T Λ (E) = T Λ ()+T Λ ()(G Λ (E) G Λ ())T Λ (E) Half off-shell T-Matrix at E = Full off-shell T-Matrix at E = Full off-shell T-Matrix at E The value of T(,;) is fixed
15 HADRONet p. 13 Half-offshell R-matrix 1e-5 5e-6 R(p,p) (MeV -2 ) -5e-6-1e-5-1.5e-5-2e-5-2.5e p (MeV) N 3 LO NNLO NLO OPE Sharp cutoff (Λ = 4GeV ) T lab = 5MeV
16 HADRONet p. 13 Half-offshell R-matrix 1e-5 5e-6 R(p,p) (MeV -2 ) -5e-6-1e-5-1.5e-5-2e-5-2.5e p (MeV) N 3 LO NNLO NLO OPE S N 3 LO S NNLO S NLO S OPE Sharp cutoff (Λ = 4GeV ) T lab = 5MeV
17 HADRONet p. 13 Half-offshell R-matrix 1e-5 5e-6 R(p,p) (MeV -2 ) -5e-6-1e-5-1.5e-5-2e-5-2.5e p (MeV) N 3 LO NNLO NLO OPE Sharp cutoff (Λ = 4GeV ) T lab = 5MeV
18 HADRONet p. 13 Half-offshell R-matrix 1e-5 5e-6 R(p,p) (MeV -2 ) -5e-6-1e-5-1.5e-5-2e-5-2.5e p (MeV) N 3 LO NNLO NLO OPE S N 3 LO S NNLO S NLO S OPE Sharp cutoff (Λ = 4GeV ) T lab = 5MeV
19 HADRONet p. 14 Half-offshell R-matrix 8e-6 6e-6 4e-6 R(p,p) (MeV -2 ) 2e-6-2e-6-4e-6-6e-6-8e-6-1e p (MeV) N 3 LO NNLO NLO Sharp cutoff (Λ = 4GeV ) T lab = 5MeV
20 HADRONet p. 14 Half-offshell R-matrix 8e-6 6e-6 4e-6 R(p,p) (MeV -2 ) 2e-6-2e-6-4e-6-6e-6-8e-6-1e-5 N 3 LO NNLO NLO S N 3 LO Λ=2 GeV S NNLO Λ=2 GeV S NLO Λ=2 GeV p (MeV) Sharp cutoff (Λ = 4GeV ) T lab = 5MeV
21 HADRONet p. 15 The N/D method We write the T matrix as T(A) = N(A) D(A) with A = k 2 (k the on-shell momentum) and so N(A) has a left hand cut (LHC) (for us A < m2 π 4 L) D(A) has a right hand cut (RHC) (A > ) The general Equations with 2n substractions and a substraction point C given in Z.-H. Guo, J.A. Oller and G. Ríos, Phys. Rev. C 89, 142 (214) D(A) = N(A) = n i=1 n i=1 δ i (A C) n i (A C)n π ν i (A C) n i (A C)n π L dω R ρ(ω R )N(ω R ) (ω R A)(ω R C) n dω L (ω L )D(ω L ) (ω L A)(ω R C) n
22 HADRONet p. 16 The N/D method Unitarity and Analitycal properties are used to get the equations and, if necessary, substractions We need as input the LHC discontinuity 2i (A) Usually this is computed perturbatively using χpt The contact terms does not give any contribution to (A) so the infinite contribution of loop diagrams does not contribute Contacts are taken into account through substraction constants In principle any number of substractions can be used, however for singular interactions not always a solution exists. To solve the Equations Including the Eq. for N in D one gets an integral Eq. only for D Once D is known in the LHC, D, N and T are known in all the complex plane
23 HADRONet p. 17 The N/D 1 We use the N/D equations with one substraction in D Always needed due to the invariance N αn and D αd Results for non-singular interactions should be the same as the result of Lippman-Schwinger Equation The usual prescription is D() = 1 The Equations are D(A) = 1 A π N(A) = 1 π L dω R ρ(ω R )N(ω R ) (ω R A)ω R dω L D(ω L ) (ω L ) (ω L A) where ρ(a) = M N A 4π T -matrix. is the phase space and 2i (A) is the LHC discontinuity of the
24 HADRONet p. 18 The N/D 11 We perform an additional substraction in N D(A) = 1 A π N(A) = ν 1 + A C π ρ(ω R )N(ω R ) dω R (ω R A)ω R L dω L D(ω L ) (ω L ) (ω L A)(ω L C) We use the Effective range expansion to fix the substraction constant and the substraction point kcotδ = 1 a rk2 + i=2 v i k 2i We get the Equations D(A) = 1+ia A+i M N 4π 2 N(A) = 4πa M N + A π L L dω L D(ω L ) (ω L ) ω L dω L D(ω L ) (ω L ) (ω L A)ω L They are independent of the substraction constant and point A A+ ωl
25 HADRONet p. 19 The N/D 12 We perform an additional substraction now in D We fix now the Effective Range parameter r We get the Equations D(A) = 1+ia A ar 2 A im NA 4π 2 [ A ( ω L + A) i ω L aω L N(A) = 4πa M N + A π L L ] dω L D(ω L ) (ω L ) (ω L A)ω L They are independent of the substraction constant and point dω L D(ω L ) (ω L ) ω L
26 HADRONet p. 2 The N/D 22 We perform an additional substraction now in N We fix now the next coefficient v 2 We get the Equations D(A) = (1 2v 2 r A)(1+ia A) ar 2 A L +i M N 4π 2 A D(ω L ) (ω L ) dω L ωl 2 [ A 2 +i A+ ωl ra 2 (1+ia ω L )(1+ia ] A) ω L L N(A) = 4πa +A 8πav 2 M N M N r + A D(ω L ) (ω L ) dω L π ωl 2 [ A (ω L A) + 2 (1+ia ] ω L ) raω L They are independent of the substraction constant and point
27 HADRONet p. 21 Leading Order - LO The potential is V( q) = g2 A 4f 2 π σ 1 q σ 2 q q 2 +m 2 τ 1 τ 2 +C S +C T σ 1 σ 2 π for the singlet 1 S partial wave The LHC discontinuity is g2 A m 2 π V(p,p) = 4fπ 2 2p p Q (z)+c Q (z) = 1 ( ) z +1 2 log z 1 z = p 2 +p 2 +m 2 π 2p p 1π (A) = θ(l A) g2 A 4f 2 π πm 2 π 4A
28 Iterative diagrams 2π exchange 2π (A) = θ(4l A) ( g 2 A m 2 π 16f 2 π ) 2 ( M N 2 A A A log m π ) 1 3π exchange 3π (A) = θ(9l A) 4π exchange θ(µ 1 2m π ) 4π (A) = θ(16l A) θ(µ 1 3m π ) θ(µ 2 2m π ) ( g 2 A m 2 π 4fπ 2 µ1 m π ) 3(MN 4π ) 2 π 4A 2 A mπ m π dµ 2 1 µ 2 (2 A µ 2 ) ( g 2 A m 2 π 4fπ 2 µ1 m π ) 4(MN 4π ) 3 π 4A 2m π dµ 1 1 µ 1 (2 A µ 1 ) 2 A mπ 1 dµ 2 2m π µ 2 (2 A µ 2 ) µ2 m π 3m π dµ 1 1 µ 1 (2 A µ 1 ) m π dµ 3 1 µ 3 (2 A µ 3 ). HADRONet p. 22
29 HADRONet p. 23 Iterative diagrams nπ exchange (with µ 2 A) ( ) g nπ (A) = θ(n 2 2 L A) A m 2 n(mn π 4π 4f 2 π ) n 1 π 4A n 1 j=1 θ(µ j 1 (n+1 j)m π ) µj 1 m π (n j)m π dµ j 1 µ j (2 A µ j ) This is the formal solution of the integral equation (with (A) = (A,2 A)) ( ) MN A (A, µ) = 1π (A)+ θ( µ 2m π ) π 2 µ mπ m π dµ 1π(A) (A,µ) µ(2 A µ) When A m π (A) = λπ 2 ( M N A e 2λ arctanh 1 m ) π A A λ = g2 A m2 π 4f 2 π M N 4π
30 HADRONet p. 24 General Case The general Equation is T(ν,k) = V(ν,k) θ(k m π )θ(k ν 2m π ) M N π 2 V(ν 1,ν) T(ν 1,k) k mπ ν+m π dν 1 ν 2 1 k 2 ν 2 1 with 2 T(ν, k) lím ǫ lím δ ImT(iν +ǫ δ,ik +ǫ) ImT(iν +ǫ+δ,ik +ǫ) 2 V(ν 1,ν) lím ǫ lím δ {ImV(iν +ǫ,iν 1 +ǫ+δ) ImV(iν +ǫ,iν 1 +ǫ δ)} = lím ǫ lím δ {ImV(iν 1 +ǫ δ,iν +ǫ) ImV(iν 1 +ǫ+δ,iν +ǫ)} and for OPE in the 1 S partial wave V(ν 1,ν) = π g2 A m2 π 16f 2 π 1 ν 1 ν sign(ν 1 ν)θ[ ν 1 ν m π ])
31 HADRONet p. 25 General Case Or if we define we get ˆT(ν 1,ν 2 ) = ν 1+l 1 ν 1+l 2 T(ν 1,ν 2 ) ˆV(ν 1,ν 2 ) = ν 1+l 1 ν 1+l 2 V(ν 1,ν 2 ) ˆT(ν,k) = ˆV(ν,k) M Nθ(k m π )θ(k ν 2m π ) π 2 k mπ We get the previous Equation with ν+m π dν 1 1 k 2 ν ν 2l 1 For OPE in the 1 S partial wave V(ν 1,ν) = 1π (A) Making the change µ = k ν Identifying (A,µ) = k 2 ˆT(ν = k µ,k) ˆV(ν,ν 1 ) ˆT(ν 1,k)
32 HADRONet p. 26 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A 1.1 (A) ( L -1 ) e-5 1e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
33 HADRONet p. 26 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A 1.1 (A) ( L -1 ) e-5 1e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
34 HADRONet p. 26 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A 1.1 (A) ( L -1 ) e-5 1e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
35 HADRONet p. 26 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A 1.1 (A) ( L -1 ) e-5 1e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
36 HADRONet p. 26 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A 1.1 (A) ( L -1 ) e-5 1e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
37 HADRONet p. 26 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A 1.1 (A) ( L -1 ) e-5 1e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
38 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 27
39 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 27
40 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 27
41 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 27
42 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 27
43 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 27
44 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 28
45 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 28
46 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 28
47 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 28
48 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 28
49 Regular case At LO only OPE is present which is a non-singular interaction Results for the physical g A δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 28
50 HADRONet p. 29 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative (A) ( L -1 ) e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
51 HADRONet p. 29 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative (A) ( L -1 ) e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
52 HADRONet p. 29 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative (A) ( L -1 ) e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
53 HADRONet p. 29 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative (A) ( L -1 ) e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
54 HADRONet p. 29 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative (A) ( L -1 ) e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
55 HADRONet p. 29 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative (A) ( L -1 ) e e+6 A ( L ) 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π
56 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 3
57 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 3
58 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 3
59 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 3
60 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 3
61 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 1 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 3
62 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative but it looks perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 31
63 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative but it looks perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 31
64 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative but it looks perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 31
65 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative but it looks perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 31
66 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative but it looks perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 31
67 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 Now the problem is non-perturbative but it looks perturbative δ1 S k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11 1π (A) 2π (A) 3π (A) 4π (A) (A) (A) (for A m π HADRONet p. 31
68 HADRONet p. 32 Regular case Results for the unphysical g A = 6,8 N/D 1 as (fm) r (fm) v 2 (fm 3 ) v 3 (fm 5 ) v 4 (fm 7 ) v 5 (fm 9 ) v 6 (fm 11 ) 1π π π π Non Perturbative N/D 11 1π π π π Non-perturbative
69 HADRONet p. 33 Regular case We encrease g A = 7,45 to have a near threshold bound state N/D 1 N/D 11 Schrödinger 1π 2.2 2π π π Non-perturbative
70 HADRONet p. 34 Regular case Results for the physical g A LO N/D 11 compare with other renormalization procedures δ1 S k (MeV)
71 HADRONet p. 35 Regular case LO N/D 11 comparison with other renormalization procedures Renormalization with a counter term with different regulators Monopole form factor (same analytical properties as LO) V 1 (p,p) = C 1 Λ 2 2p p Q (z Λ ) Q (z Λ ) = 1 2 log ( zλ +1 z Λ 1 z Λ = p 2 +p 2 +Λ 2 2p p Gaussian type form factor (different analytical properties of LO) ) ( V 2 (p,p) = Ce 2 p ) 4 Λ ( p Λ )4 V 3 (p,p) = C 3 e ( p Λ Substractive renormalization with a sharp cutoff. ) 6 ( p Λ )6
72 HADRONet p. 36 Regular case LO N/D 11 comparison with other renormalization procedures δ1 S (k=4 MeV) /Λ (MeV -1 )
73 HADRONet p. 36 Regular case LO N/D 11 comparison with other renormalization procedures δ1 S (k=4 MeV) /Λ (MeV -1 ) V 1 (monopole) V 2 (G4) V 3 (G6)
74 HADRONet p. 36 Regular case LO N/D 11 comparison with other renormalization procedures δ1 S (k=4 MeV) /Λ (MeV -1 ) V 1 (monopole) V 2 (G4) V 3 (G6)
75 HADRONet p. 36 Regular case LO N/D 11 comparison with other renormalization procedures δ1 S (k=4 MeV) /Λ (MeV -1 ) V 1 (monopole) V 2 (G4) V 3 (G6)
76 HADRONet p. 37 Regular case - more substractions LO N/D 11 comparison with other renormalization procedures δ1 S k (MeV) N/D 11 N/D 12 N/D 22
77 HADRONet p. 37 Regular case - more substractions LO N/D 11 comparison with other renormalization procedures δ1 S k (MeV) N/D 11 N/D 12 N/D 22
78 HADRONet p. 37 Regular case - more substractions LO N/D 11 comparison with other renormalization procedures δ1 S k (MeV) N/D 11 N/D 12 N/D 22
79 HADRONet p. 38 Singular atractive case - NLO Now 1 1 V(ν 1,ν 2 ) = θ( ν 1 ν 2 µ )sign(ν 1 ν 2 ) ν 1 ν πfπ 4 { ν 12 ˆω(ν 12 ) (1+52gA 2 158g4 A )m4 π (197g4 A 46g2 A 7)m2 π ν } 4 (59g4 A 1g2 A 1)ν (5gA 4 +2g2 A +1)m4 πˆl(ν 12 ) with ν 12 = ν 1 ν 2 and ˆω(ν 12 ) ν12 2 4m2 π ˆL(ν 12 ) ˆω(ν ( ) 12) ν12 + ˆω(ν 12 ) log ν 12 2m π
80 HADRONet p. 39 Singular atractive case - NLO N/D 12 does not converge δ1 S k (MeV) N/D 11 N/D 22
81 HADRONet p. 39 Singular atractive case - NLO N/D 12 does not converge δ1 S k (MeV) N/D 11 N/D 22
82 HADRONet p. 39 Singular atractive case - NLO N/D 12 does not converge δ1 S k (MeV) N/D 11 N/D 22
83 HADRONet p. 4 Singular atractive case - NNLO Now 1 V(ν 1,ν 2 ) = θ( ν 1 ν 2 µ )sign(ν 1 ν 2 ) ν 1 ν 2 g 2 A 384fπ 4 ( {( 48c 1 336c 3 128c g2 A M N 4M N 72c 1 +36c 3 3 M N + 3g2 A M N ( 12c 1 12c 3 +4c ( 18c 3 6c 4 3 M N + 45g2 A 4M N ) m 4 πν 12 95g2 A M N 2M N ) } ν12 5 ) m 2 πν 3 12 ) m 5 π Dependent on the c i LECS
84 HADRONet p. 41 Singular atractive case - NNLO N/D 12 does not converge δ1 S k (MeV) N/D 11 N/D 22
85 HADRONet p. 41 Singular atractive case - NNLO N/D 12 does not converge δ1 S k (MeV) N/D 11 N/D 22
86 HADRONet p. 41 Singular atractive case - NNLO N/D 12 does not converge δ1 S k (MeV) N/D 11 N/D 22
87 HADRONet p. 42 NNLO Different values for the c i LECS Analysis c 1 c 2 c 3 RS GW-HBChPT KH-HBChPT GW-EOMS KH-EOMS GW-UChPT KH-UChPT
88 HADRONet p. 43 Singular atractive case - NNLO δ1 S RS KH-EOMS Granada k (MeV) Solution of N/D 11
89 HADRONet p. 44 Singular atractive case - NNLO δ1 S RS KH-EOMS Granada k (MeV) Solution of N/D 22 The same a, r and v 2 has been used This is probably an upper limit of the discrepancies
90 HADRONet p. 45 The antibound state Once you have (A) yo have the T matrix in the whole complex plane But you also have the second Riemmann sheet For Im[ A] > T 1 II D II N II = T 1 I +2iρ(A) = D I +2iρ(A)N I N I The 1 S partial wave has an untibound state (pole on the Imaginary axis of the second Riemmann sheet and so zero of D II ). We obtain for N/D 11 LO E =,7 MeV NLO E =,67 MeV NNLO E =,66 MeV With N/D 22 we get E =,66 MeV in all cases
91 HADRONet p. 46 Summary The N/D method with a non-perturbative (A) has been developed and study for the 1 S NN partial wave χpt is used to organize the finite range contributions of the potential The diagrams generates a perturbative (A) which is finite For LO the interaction is regular and the N/D method agrees with the solution of the LS Equation In the regular case any number of substractions can be taken For the NLO and NNLO the interactions are singular atractive and the N/D 11 is needed The solution of N/D 11 agrees with the renormalization with one counter term, substractive renormalization and so with renormalization with boundary conditions The N/D method can take additional substractions Taking more substractions in the N/D method allows to make a non-perturbative case to look perturbative No regularization is needed even for singular interactions
arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 4 Oct 2016
The N/D method with non-perturbative left-hand-cut discontinuity and the S NN partial wave D.R. Entem Grupo de Física Nuclear and IUFFyM, Universidad de Salamanca, E-378 Salamanca, Spain J.A. Oller Departamento
More informationS-matrix solution of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation for regular and singular potentials
S-matrix solution of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation for regular and singular potentials J. A. Oller Departamento de Física Universidad de Murcia 1 in collaboration with D. R. Entem [I] arxiv:1609, next
More informationThe NN system: why and how we iterate
The NN system: why and how we iterate Daniel Phillips Ohio University Research supported by the US department of energy Plan Why we iterate I: contact interactions Why we iterate II: pion exchange How
More informationTHE THREE NUCLEON SYSTEM AT LEADING ORDER OF CHIRAL EFFECTIVE THEORY
THE THREE NUCLEON SYSTEM AT LEADING ORDER OF CHIRAL EFFECTIVE THEORY Young-Ho Song(RISP, Institute for Basic Science) Collaboration with R. Lazauskas( IPHC, IN2P3-CNRS) U. van Kolck (Orsay, IPN & Arizona
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 31 Oct 2013
Renormalization Group Invariance in the Subtractive Renormalization Approach to the NN Interactions S. Szpigel and V. S. Timóteo arxiv:1311.61v1 [nucl-th] 31 Oct 13 Faculdade de Computação e Informática,
More informationPOWER COUNTING WHAT? WHERE?
POWER COUNTING WHAT? WHERE? U. van Kolck Institut de Physique Nucléaire d Orsay and University of Arizona Supported by CNRS and US DOE 1 Outline Meeting the elephant What? Where? Walking out of McDonald
More informationThe chiral representation of the πn scattering amplitude and the pion-nucleon σ-term
The chiral representation of the πn scattering amplitude and the pion-nucleon σ-term J. Martin Camalich University of Sussex, UK in collaboration with J.M. Alarcon and J.A. Oller September 20, 2011 The
More informationRenormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems
Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems Lecture 2 S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) 2011 National Nuclear Physics Summer School University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lecture 2 outline
More informationThe nucleon-nucleon system in chiral effective theory
The nucleon-nucleon system in chiral effective theory Daniel Phillips Ohio University Research supported by the US Department of Energy Plan χet for nuclear forces: the proposal Leading order for S waves
More informationModern Theory of Nuclear Forces
Evgeny Epelbaum, FZ Jülich & University Bonn Lacanau, 28.09.2009 Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces Lecture 1: Lecture 2: Introduction & first look into ChPT EFTs for two nucleons Chiral Perturbation Theory
More informationAbstract. 1 r 2n+m (1)
MENU 27 11th International Conference on Meson-Nucleon Physics and the Structure of the Nucleon September1-14, 27 IKP, Forschungzentrum Jülich, Germany RENORMALIZING THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION FOR NN SCATTERING
More informationarxiv:nucl-th/ v1 22 Sep 2000
1 arxiv:nucl-th/967v1 22 Sep 2 Chiral Dynamics in Few Nucleon Systems E. Epelbaum a, H. Kamada a,b, A. Nogga b, H. Wita la c, W. Glöckle b, and Ulf-G. Meißner a a Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institut für
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 23 Feb 2016
September 12, 2018 Threshold pion production in proton-proton collisions at NNLO in chiral EFT arxiv:1602.07333v1 [nucl-th] 23 Feb 2016 V. Baru, 1, 2 E. Epelbaum, 1 A. A. Filin, 1 C. Hanhart, 3 H. Krebs,
More informationModern Theory of Nuclear Forces
Evgeny Epelbaum, FZ Jülich & University Bonn Lacanau, 29.09.2009 Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces Lecture 1: Lecture 2: Lecture 3: Introduction & first look into ChPT EFTs for two nucleons Nuclear forces
More informationFew-nucleon contributions to π-nucleus scattering
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Few-nucleon contributions to π-nucleus scattering Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich INT Program on Simulations and Symmetries: Cold Atoms, QCD, and Few-hadron
More informationRenormalization and power counting of chiral nuclear forces. 龙炳蔚 (Bingwei Long) in collaboration with Chieh-Jen Jerry Yang (U.
Renormalization and power counting of chiral nuclear forces 龙炳蔚 (Bingwei Long) in collaboration with Chieh-Jen Jerry Yang (U. Arizona) What are we really doing? Correcting Weinberg's scheme about NN contact
More informationCoupled-channel Bethe-Salpeter
Coupled-channel Bethe-Salpeter approach to pion-nucleon scattering Maxim Mai 01/11/2012 ChPT vs. uchpt + chiral symmetry + crossing symmetry + counterterm renormalization low-energy (ρ, ) perturbative
More informationPion-nucleon scattering around the delta-isobar resonance
Pion-nucleon scattering around the delta-isobar resonance Bingwei Long (ECT*) In collaboration with U. van Kolck (U. Arizona) What do we really do Fettes & Meissner 2001... Standard ChPT Isospin 3/2 What
More informationTritium β decay in pionless EFT
Ohio University June 0, 207 Recipe for EFT(/π) For momenta p < m π pions can be integrated out as degrees of freedom and only nucleons and external currents are left. Write down all possible terms of nucleons
More informationA Padé-Aided Analysis of Nonperturbative NN Scattering in 1 S 0 Channel
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 47 (2007) pp. 699 704 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 47, No. 4, April 15, 2007 A Padé-Aided Analysis of Nonperturbative NN Scattering in 1 S 0 Channel YANG
More informationEvgeny Epelbaum. Forschungszentrum Jülich & Universität Bonn
Evgeny Epelbaum KHuK Jahrestagung, GSI, 25.10.2007 Evgeny Epelbaum Forschungszentrum Jülich & Universität Bonn Outline Motivation & Introduction Few nucleons in chiral EFT: where do we stand Work in progress:
More informationEffective Field Theories in Nuclear and Hadron Physics
Effective Field Theories in Nuclear and Hadron Physics Vadim Lensky Theoretical Physics Group, The University of Manchester January 11, 2013 V. Lensky EFTs in Hadron and Nuclear Physics 1 Outline Introduction
More informationWilsonian Renormalization Group and the Lippmann-Schwinger Equation with a Multitude of Cutoff Parameters
Commun. Theor. Phys. 69 (208) 303 307 Vol. 69, No. 3, March, 208 Wilsonian Renormalization Group and the Lippmann-Schwinger Equation with a Multitude of Cutoff Parameters E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, 2,3 and
More informationChiral Nuclear Effective Field Theory
Chiral uclear Effective Field Theory U. van Kolck University of Arizona Supported in part by US DOE and Sloan Foundation Background by S. Hossenfelder In emoriam Vijay Pandharipande See talks by Carlson,
More informationN and (1232) masses and the γn transition. Marc Vanderhaeghen College of William & Mary / Jefferson Lab
N and (1232) masses and the γn transition Marc Vanderhaeghen College of William & Mary / Jefferson Lab Hadron Structure using lattice QCD, INT, April 4, 2006 Outline 1) N and masses : relativistic chiral
More informationA high-accuracy extraction of the isoscalar πn scattering length from pionic deuterium data
A high-accuracy extraction of the isoscalar πn scattering length from pionic deuterium data Daniel Phillips Ohio University and Universität Bonn with V. Baru, C. Hanhart, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, A. Nogga
More informationIntroduction to chiral perturbation theory II Higher orders, loops, applications
Introduction to chiral perturbation theory II Higher orders, loops, applications Gilberto Colangelo Zuoz 18. July 06 Outline Introduction Why loops? Loops and unitarity Renormalization of loops Applications
More informationBayesian Fitting in Effective Field Theory
Bayesian Fitting in Effective Field Theory Department of Physics Ohio State University February, 26 Collaborators: D. Phillips (Ohio U.), U. van Kolck (Arizona), R.G.E. Timmermans (Groningen, Nijmegen)
More informationπn scattering in relativistic BChPT revisited
πn scattering in relativistic BChPT revisited Jose Manuel Alarcón jmas1@um.es Universidad de Murcia In colaboration with J. Martin Camalich, J. A. Oller and L. Alvarez-Ruso arxiv:1102.1537 [nucl-th] To
More informationThe Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction
Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 34, no. 3A, September, 2004 845 The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction J. Haidenbauer Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institut für Kernphysik, D-52425 Jülich, Germany Received on
More informationNucleon-nucleon interaction in covariant chiral effective field theory
Guilin, China The Seventh Asia-Pacific Conference on Few-Body Problems in Physics Nucleon-nucleon interaction in covariant chiral effective field theory Xiu-Lei Ren School of Physics, Peking University
More informationHeavy Hidden-Flavour Molecules in a Finite Volume
Heavy Hidden-Flavour Molecules in a Finite Volume Carlos Hidalgo-Duque (IFIC, CSIC Universitat de València) M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, E. Oset XVI International Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy Marriott
More informationFinite volume effects for masses and decay constants
Finite volume effects for masses and decay constants Christoph Haefeli University of Bern Exploration of Hadron Structure and Spectroscopy using Lattice QCD Seattle, March 27th, 2006 Introduction/Motivation
More informationBRIDGING OVER p-wave π-production AND WEAK PROCESSES IN FEW-NUCLEON SYSTEMS WITH CHIRAL PERTURBATION THEORY
MENU 2007 11th International Conference on Meson-Nucleon Physics and the Structure of the Nucleon September10-14, 2007 IKP, Forschungzentrum Jülich, Germany BRIDGING OVER p-wave π-production AND WEAK PROCESSES
More informationEFT as the bridge between Lattice QCD and Nuclear Physics
EFT as the bridge between Lattice QCD and Nuclear Physics David B. Kaplan QCHSVII Ponta Delgada, Açores, September 2006 National Institute for Nuclear Theory Nuclear physics from lattice QCD? Not yet,
More informationBaroion CHIRAL DYNAMICS
Baroion CHIRAL DYNAMICS Baryons 2002 @ JLab Thomas Becher, SLAC Feb. 2002 Overview Chiral dynamics with nucleons Higher, faster, stronger, Formulation of the effective Theory Full one loop results: O(q
More informationOverview of low energy NN interaction and few nucleon systems
1 Overview of low energy NN interaction and few nucleon systems Renato Higa Theory Group, Jefferson Lab Cebaf Center, A3 (ext6363) higa@jlaborg Lecture II Basics on chiral EFT π EFT Chiral effective field
More informationPROGRESS IN NN NNπ. 1 Introduction. V. Baru,1, J. Haidenbauer %, C. Hanhart %, A. Kudryavtsev, V. Lensky,% and U.-G. Meißner %,#
MENU 2007 11th International Conference on Meson-Nucleon Physics and the Structure of the Nucleon September10-14, 2007 IKP, Forschungzentrum Jülich, Germany PROGRESS IN NN NNπ V. Baru,1, J. Haidenbauer
More informationLight hypernuclei based on chiral and phenomenological interactions
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Light hypernuclei based on chiral and phenomenological interactions Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle
More informationPion production in nucleon-nucleon collisions at low energies: status and perspectives
Pion production in nucleon-nucleon collisions at low energies: status and perspectives Vadim Baru Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institut für Kenphysik (Theorie), D-545 Jülich, Germany ITEP, B. Cheremushkinskaya
More informationResonance properties from finite volume energy spectrum
Resonance properties from finite volume energy spectrum Akaki Rusetsky Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik Abteilung Theorie, Universität Bonn, Germany NPB 788 (2008) 1 JHEP 0808 (2008) 024
More informationPion production in nucleon-nucleon collisions near threshold: complete NNLO calculation in chiral EFT
Pion production in nucleon-nucleon collisions near threshold: complete NNLO calculation in chiral EFT a, V. Baru ab, E. Epelbaum a, C. Hanhart c, H. Krebs a, and F. Myhrer d a Institut für Theoretische
More informationThe theory of nuclear forces: Is the never-ending ending story coming to an end? R. Machleidt University of Idaho
The theory of nuclear forces: Is the never-ending ending story coming to an end? University of Idaho What s left to say? Put the recent progress into a wider perspective. Fill in some missing details.
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v2 24 Sep 1996
NUC MINN 96/11 T A New Approach to Chiral Perturbation Theory with Matter Fields Hua-Bin Tang arxiv:hep-ph/9607436v 4 Sep 1996 School of Physics and Astronomy University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
More informationRG & EFT for nuclear forces
RG & EFT for nuclear forces Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich ECT* school, Feb/March 2006 Low momentum interactions: Using the RG to simplify the nuclear force for many-body calculations. Application
More informationLocal chiral NN potentials and the structure of light nuclei
Local chiral NN potentials and the structure of light nuclei Maria Piarulli @ELBA XIV WORKSHOP June 7-July 1 16, Marciana Marina, Isola d Elba PHYSICAL REVIEW C 91, 43(15) Minimally nonlocal nucleon-nucleon
More informationManifestations of Neutron Spin Polarizabilities in Compton Scattering on d and He-3
Manifestations of Neutron Spin Polarizabilities in Compton Scattering on d and He- Deepshikha Choudhury (Collaborators: D. Phillips,. Nogga, R. Hildebrandt) Supported by US-DOE Focus Neutron Spin Polarizabilities
More informationPoS(Confinement8)147. Universality in QCD and Halo Nuclei
Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik (Theorie) and Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics, University of Bonn, Germany E-mail: hammer@itkp.uni-bonn.de Effective Field Theory (EFT) provides a powerful
More informationU. van Kolck. Institut de Physique Nucléaire d Orsay. and University of Arizona. Supported in part by CNRS, Université Paris Sud, and US DOE
THE NON-PC STORY A SERMON OF ABOUT CHIRAL PC EFT U. van Kolck Institut de Physique Nucléaire d Orsay and University of Arizona Supported in part by CNRS, Université Paris Sud, and US DOE 1 Why? Chiral
More informationCompositeness of the Δ(1232) resonance in πn scatterings
Compositeness of the Δ(1232) resonance in πn scatterings Takayasu SEKIHARA (RCNP, Osaka Univ.) in collaboration with Takashi ARAI (KEK), Junko YAMAGATA-SEKIHARA (Oshima National Coll. of Maritime Tech.)
More informationElectroweak Probes of Three-Nucleon Systems
Stetson University July 3, 08 Brief Outline Form factors of three-nucleon systems Hadronic parity-violation in three-nucleon systems Pionless Effective Field Theory Ideally suited for momenta p < m π since
More informationGeneralized Parton Distributions in PT
Generalized Parton Distributions in PT Nikolai Kivel in collaboration with M. Polyakov & A. Vladimirov Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering e e * A DVCS Q 2 large >> 1/R N Q 2 /s =x Bj fixed Δ 2 ~ 1/R N
More informationEffective Field Theory for light nuclear systems
Effective Field Theory for light nuclear systems Jimmy Rotureau Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden B. Barrett, University of Arizona, Tucson I. Stetcu, University of Washington, Seattle
More informationDepartment of Physics, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA; Tel.:
S S symmetry Article Chiral Symmetry and the Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction Ruprecht Machleidt Department of Physics, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA; machleid@uidaho.edu; Tel.: +1-28-885-638 Academic
More informationChiral dynamics and NN potential
Chiral dynamics and NN potential Department of Physics University of Bologna 40126 Bologna (Italy) paolo.finelli@bo.infn.it Otranto Summer School 1935 Yukawa: Meson Theory The Pion Theories 1950 s One-Pion
More informationNational Nuclear Physics Summer School Lectures on Effective Field Theory. Brian Tiburzi. RIKEN BNL Research Center
2014 National Nuclear Physics Summer School Lectures on Effective Field Theory I. Removing heavy particles II. Removing large scales III. Describing Goldstone bosons IV. Interacting with Goldstone bosons
More informationarxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 2 Jan 2008
Renormalization of chiral two-pion exchange NN interactions. Momentum vs. coordinate space. D. R. Entem, 1, E. Ruiz Arriola, 2, M. Pavón Valderrama, 3, and R. Machleidt 4 1 Grupo de Física Nuclear, IUFFyM,
More informationarxiv:nucl-th/ v2 12 May 2003
EPJ manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Improving the convergence of the chiral expansion for nuclear forces I: Peripheral phases arxiv:nucl-th/7v May E. Epelbaum a, W. Glöckle b, and Ulf-G.
More informationAnalyticity and crossing symmetry in the K-matrix formalism.
Analyticity and crossing symmetry in the K-matrix formalism. KVI, Groningen 7-11 September, 21 Overview Motivation Symmetries in scattering formalism K-matrix formalism (K S ) (K A ) Pions and photons
More informationRoy Steiner-equation analysis of pion nucleon scattering
Roy Steiner-equation analysis of pion nucleon scattering Jacobo Ruiz de Elvira 1 Martin Hoferichter 2 1 HISKP and Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics, Universität Bonn 2 Institute for Nuclear Theory,
More informationMICROSCOPIC OPTICAL POTENTIAL FROM NN CHIRAL POTENTIALS. Carlotta Giusti Università and INFN, Pavia. Matteo Vorabbi (TRIUMF) Paolo Finelli (Bologna)
MICROSCOPIC OPTICAL POTENTIAL FROM NN CHIRAL POTENTIALS Carlotta Giusti Università and INFN, Pavia Matteo Vorabbi (TRIUMF) Paolo Finelli (Bologna) Nuclear ab initio Theories and Neutrino Physics: INT Seattle
More informationRG & EFT for nuclear forces
RG & EFT for nuclear forces Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich ECT* school, Feb/March 2006 Low momentum interactions: Using the RG to simplify the nuclear force for many-body calculations. Application
More informationNuclear forces and their impact on structure, reactions and astrophysics
Nuclear forces and their impact on structure, reactions and astrophysics Lectures for Week 2 Dick Furnstahl Ohio State University July, 213 M. Chiral EFT 1 (as); χ-symmetry in NN scattering, QCD 2 (rjf)
More informationPhoton-fusion reactions in a dispersive effective field theory from the chiral Lagrangian with vector-meson fields
Photon-fusion reactions in a dispersive effective field theory from the chiral Lagrangian with vector-meson fields Igor Danilkin (collaborators: Matthias F. M. Lutz, Stefan Leupold, Carla Terschlüsen,
More informationWave functions and compositeness for hadron resonances from the scattering amplitude
Wave functions and compositeness for hadron resonances from the scattering amplitude Takayasu SEKIHARA (RCNP, Osaka Univ.) 1. Introduction 2. Two-body wave functions and compositeness 3. Applications:
More informationTWO-PION-EXCHANGE EFFECTS IN
MENU 2007 11th International Conference on Meson-Nucleon Physics and the Structure of the Nucleon September10-14, 2007 IKP, Forschungzentrum Jülich, Germany TWO-PION-EXCHANGE EFFECTS IN pp ppπ 0 REACTION
More informationChiral Dynamics with Pions, Nucleons, and Deltas. Daniel Phillips Ohio University
Chiral Dynamics with Pions, Nucleons, and Deltas Daniel Phillips Ohio University Connecting lattice and laboratory EFT Picture credits: C. Davies, Jefferson Lab. What is an Effective Field Theory? M=f(p/Λ)
More informationTheory toolbox. Chapter Chiral effective field theories
Chapter 3 Theory toolbox 3.1 Chiral effective field theories The near chiral symmetry of the QCD Lagrangian and its spontaneous breaking can be exploited to construct low-energy effective theories of QCD
More informationEffective Field Theory for Cold Atoms I
Effective Field Theory for Cold Atoms I H.-W. Hammer Institut für Kernphysik, TU Darmstadt and Extreme Matter Institute EMMI School on Effective Field Theory across Length Scales, ICTP-SAIFR, Sao Paulo,
More informationSimplifying the Nuclear Many-Body Problem with Low-Momentum Interactions
Simplifying the Nuclear Many-Body Problem with Low-Momentum Interactions Scott Bogner September 2005 Collaborators: Dick Furnstahl, Achim Schwenk, and Andreas Nogga The Conventional Nuclear Many-Body Problem
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 1 Jun 1995
CHIRAL PREDICTION FOR THE πn S WAVE SCATTERING LENGTH a TO ORDER O(M 4 π ) V. Bernard a#1#2, N. Kaiser b#3, Ulf-G. Meißner c#4 arxiv:hep-ph/9506204v1 1 Jun 1995 a Centre de Recherches Nucléaires, Physique
More informationINTRODUCTION TO EFFECTIVE FIELD THEORIES OF QCD
INTRODUCTION TO EFFECTIVE FIELD THEORIES OF QCD U. van Kolck Institut de Physique Nucléaire d Orsay and University of Arizona Supported in part by CNRS, Université Paris Sud, and US DOE Outline Effective
More informationarxiv:nucl-th/ v1 22 Nov 1994
A dynamical model for correlated two-pion-exchange in the pion-nucleon interaction C. Schütz, K. Holinde and J. Speth Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D 52425 Jülich, Germany arxiv:nucl-th/9411022v1
More informationCharming Nuclear Physics
Charming Nuclear Physics Masaoki Kusunoki Univ. of Arizona (with Sean Fleming, Tom Mehen, Bira van Kolck) Outline Charming Nuclear Physics Introduction (Nuclear EFT) X(3872) as shallow DD* bound state
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 5 Jan 2013
Scalar susceptibilities and four-quark condensates in the meson gas within Chiral Perturbation Theory A. Gómez Nicola, J.R. Peláez, and J. Ruiz de Elvira Departamento de Física Teórica II. Universidad
More informationFew Body Methods in Nuclear Physics - Lecture I
Few Body Methods in Nuclear Physics - Lecture I Nir Barnea The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Sept. 2010 Course Outline 1 Introduction - Few-Body Nuclear Physics 2 Gaussian Expansion - The Stochastic
More informationTowards a model-independent low momentum nucleon-nucleon interaction
Towards a model-independent low momentum nucleon-nucleon interaction S.K. Bogner a, T.T.S. Kuo a 2, A. Schwenk a 3, D.R. Entem b and R. Machleidt b arxiv:nucl-th/84v3 22 Oct 23 Abstract a Department of
More informationLEADING LOGARITHMS FOR THE NUCLEON MASS
/9 LEADING LOGARITHMS FOR THE NUCLEON MASS O(N + ) Lund University bijnens@thep.lu.se http://thep.lu.se/ bijnens http://thep.lu.se/ bijnens/chpt/ QNP5 - Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María UTFSMXI
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 29 Nov 2012
The p(γ, K + )Λ reaction: consistent high-spin interactions and Bayesian inference of its resonance content T. Vrancx, L. De Cruz, J. Ryckebusch, and P. Vancraeyveld Department of Physics and Astronomy,
More informationOn the quark mass dependence of nucleon nucleon S wave scattering lengths
On the quark mass dependence of nucleon nucleon S wave scattering lengths arxiv:111.446v [nucl-th] 8 May 01 Joan Soto and Jaume Tarrús Departament d Estructura i Constituents de la Matèria and Institut
More informationarxiv:nucl-th/ v1 28 Aug 2001
A meson exchange model for the Y N interaction J. Haidenbauer, W. Melnitchouk and J. Speth arxiv:nucl-th/1862 v1 28 Aug 1 Forschungszentrum Jülich, IKP, D-52425 Jülich, Germany Jefferson Lab, 1 Jefferson
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 1 Aug 2013
Origin and properties of strong inter-nucleon interactions 1 R. Machleidt Department of Physics, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844, USA arxiv:138.13v1 [nucl-th] 1 Aug 213 Abstract I start with a
More informationDonoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6
1 Week 7: Non linear sigma models and pion lagrangians Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter 9.3 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6 Weinberg, Chap. 19 1 Goldstone boson lagrangians
More informationLow-energy aspects of amplitude analysis: chiral perturbation theory and dispersion relations
Low-energy aspects of amplitude analysis: chiral perturbation theory and dispersion relations Bastian Kubis Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik (Theorie) Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics
More informationHow far can you go? Surprises & pitfalls in three-flavour chiral extrapolations
How far can you go? Surprises & pitfalls in three-flavour chiral extrapolations Sébastien Descotes-Genon Laboratoire de Physique Théorique CNRS & Université Paris-Sud 11, 91405 Orsay, France July 31 2007
More informationEffective Field Theory
Effective Field Theory Iain Stewart MIT The 19 th Taiwan Spring School on Particles and Fields April, 2006 Physics compartmentalized Quantum Field Theory String Theory? General Relativity short distance
More informationPION PHYSICS FROM LATTICE QCD
MENU 2007 11th International Conference on Meson-Nucleon Physics and the Structure of the Nucleon September10-14, 2007 IKP, Forschungzentrum Jülich, Germany PION PHYSICS FROM LATTICE QCD Jie Hu,1, Fu-Jiun
More informationChiral EFT for nuclear forces with Delta isobar degrees of freedom
with Delta isobar degrees of freedom Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik (Theorie) and Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics, Universität Bonn, Nußallee 4-6, D-535 Bonn, Germany E-mail: hkrebs@itkp.uni-bonn.de
More informationCoulomb effects in pionless effective field theory
Coulomb effects in pionless effective field theory Sebastian König in collaboration with Hans-Werner Hammer Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik (Theorie) and Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics,
More informationLow lying axial-vector mesons as dynamically generated resonances
Low lying axial-vector mesons as dynamically generated resonances arxiv:hep-ph/5373v 9 Jun 5 L. Roca, E. Oset and J. Singh Departamento de Física Teórica and IFIC, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia-CSIC,
More information8 September Dear Paul...
EXA 2011 Vienna PK Symposium 8 September 2011 Dear Paul... DEEPLY BOUND STATES of PIONIC ATOMS Experiment (GSI): K. Suzuki et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 072302 Theory: Energy Dependent Pion-Nucleus
More informationApplications of Renormalization Group Methods in Nuclear Physics 2
Applications of Renormalization Group Methods in Nuclear Physics 2 Dick Furnstahl Department of Physics Ohio State University HUGS 2014 Outline: Lecture 2 Lecture 2: SRG in practice Recap from lecture
More informationChiral Extrapolation of the Nucleon-Nucleon S-wave scattering lengths
Chiral Extrapolation of the Nucleon-Nucleon S-wave scattering lengths Jaume Tarrús Castellà Departament d Estructura i Constituents de la Matèria and Institut de Ciències del Cosmos Universitat de Barcelona
More informationEFT Approaches to αα and Nα Systems
1 EFT Approaches to αα and Nα Systems Renato Higa Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut University of Groningen Simulations and Symmetries, INT Program, Mar. 30, 2010 2 EFT Approaches to αα and Nα Systems Outline
More informationAt the end of Section 4, a summary of basic principles for low-energy effective theories was given, which we recap here.
Nuclear Forces 2 (last revised: September 30, 2014) 6 1 6. Nuclear Forces 2 a. Recap: Principles of low-energy effective theories Figure 1: Left: high-resolution, with wavelength of probe short compared
More informationLattice Simulations with Chiral Nuclear Forces
Lattice Simulations with Chiral Nuclear Forces Hermann Krebs FZ Jülich & Universität Bonn July 23, 2008, XQCD 2008, NCSU In collaboration with B. Borasoy, E. Epelbaum, D. Lee, U. Meißner Outline EFT and
More informationPion-nucleon sigma-term - a review
Pion-nucleon sigma-term - a review M.E. Sainio Helsinki Institute of Physics, and Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki, Finland (Received: December 5, 2001) A brief
More informationStructure of near-threshold s-wave resonances
Structure of near-threshold s-wave resonances Tetsuo Hyodo Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto 203, Sep. 0th Introduction Structure of hadron excited states Various excitations of baryons M
More informationarxiv:nucl-th/ v1 18 Feb 1999
FZJ-IKP(TH)-1999-04 arxiv:nucl-th/9902042v1 18 Feb 1999 Charge independence breaking and charge symmetry breaking in the nucleon nucleon interaction from effective field theory E. Epelbaum, a,b#1 Ulf-G.
More informationarxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 9 Jan 2013
Reduced regulator dependence of neutron-matter predictions with perturbative chiral interactions arxiv:9.5537v [nucl-th] 9 Jan 3 L. Coraggio, J. W. Holt,, 3 N. Itaco,, R. Machleidt, 5 and F. Sammarruca
More information