Applications of Renormalization Group Methods in Nuclear Physics 2
|
|
- John Brooks
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Applications of Renormalization Group Methods in Nuclear Physics 2 Dick Furnstahl Department of Physics Ohio State University HUGS 2014
2 Outline: Lecture 2 Lecture 2: SRG in practice Recap from lecture 1: decoupling Implementing the similarity renormalization group (SRG) Block diagonal ( V low,k ) generator Computational aspects Quantitative measure of perturbativeness
3 Outline: Lecture 2 Lecture 2: SRG in practice Recap from lecture 1: decoupling Implementing the similarity renormalization group (SRG) Block diagonal ( V low,k ) generator Computational aspects Quantitative measure of perturbativeness
4 Why did our low-pass filter fail? Basic problem: low k and high k are coupled (mismatched dof s!) E.g., perturbation theory for (tangent of) phase shift: k V k + k k V k k V k (k 2 k 2 )/m + Solution: Unitary transformation of the H matrix = decouple! E n = Ψ n H Ψ n U U = 1 = ( Ψ n U )UHU (U Ψ n ) = Ψ n H Ψ n Here: Decouple using RG E lab (MeV) phase shift (degrees) S0 AV18 phase shifts after low-pass filter k = 2 fm 1
5 Why did our low-pass filter fail? Basic problem: low k and high k are coupled (mismatched dof s!) E.g., perturbation theory for (tangent of) phase shift: k V k + k k V k k V k (k 2 k 2 )/m + Solution: Unitary transformation of the H matrix = decouple! E n = Ψ n H Ψ n U U = 1 = ( Ψ n U )UHU (U Ψ n ) = Ψ n H Ψ n Here: Decouple using RG E lab (MeV) phase shift (degrees) S0 AV18 phase shifts after low-pass filter k = 2 fm 1
6 Aside: Unitary transformations of matrices Recall that a unitary transformation can be realized as unitary matrices with U αu α = I (where α is just a label) Often used to simplify nuclear many-body problems, e.g., by making them more perturbative If I have a Hamiltonian H with eigenstates ψ n and an operator O, then the new Hamiltonian, operator, and eigenstates are H = UHU Õ = UOU ψ n = U ψ n The energy is unchanged: ψ n H ψ n = ψ n H ψ n = E n Furthermore, matrix elements of O are unchanged: O mn ψ m Ô ψ n = ( ψ m U ) UÔU ( U ψ n ) = ψ m Õ ψ n Õmn If asymptotic (long distance) properties are unchanged, H and H are equally acceptable physically = not measurable! Consistency: use O with H and ψ n s but Õ with H and ψ n s One form may be better for intuition or for calculations Scheme-dependent observables (come back to this later)
7 Outline: Lecture 2 Lecture 2: SRG in practice Recap from lecture 1: decoupling Implementing the similarity renormalization group (SRG) Block diagonal ( V low,k ) generator Computational aspects Quantitative measure of perturbativeness
8 S. Weinberg on the Renormalization Group (RG) From Why the RG is a good thing [for Francis Low Festschrift] The method in its most general form can I think be understood as a way to arrange in various theories that the degrees of freedom that you re talking about are the relevant degrees of freedom for the problem at hand.
9 S. Weinberg on the Renormalization Group (RG) From Why the RG is a good thing [for Francis Low Festschrift] The method in its most general form can I think be understood as a way to arrange in various theories that the degrees of freedom that you re talking about are the relevant degrees of freedom for the problem at hand. Improving perturbation theory; e.g., in QCD calculations Mismatch of energy scales can generate large logarithms RG: shift between couplings and loop integrals to reduce logs Nuclear: decouple high- and low-momentum modes Identifying universality in critical phenomena RG: filter out short-distance degrees of freedom Nuclear: evolve toward universal interactions
10 S. Weinberg on the Renormalization Group (RG) From Why the RG is a good thing [for Francis Low Festschrift] The method in its most general form can I think be understood as a way to arrange in various theories that the degrees of freedom that you re talking about are the relevant degrees of freedom for the problem at hand. Improving perturbation theory; e.g., in QCD calculations Mismatch of energy scales can generate large logarithms RG: shift between couplings and loop integrals to reduce logs Nuclear: decouple high- and low-momentum modes Identifying universality in critical phenomena RG: filter out short-distance degrees of freedom Nuclear: evolve toward universal interactions Nuclear: simplifying calculations of structure/reactions Make nuclear physics look more like quantum chemistry! RG gains can violate conservation of difficulty! Use RG scale (resolution) dependence as a probe or tool
11 Two ways to use RG equations to decouple Hamiltonians k V low k k Similarity RG k k Λ 2 Λ 1 Λ 0 Lower a cutoff Λ i in k, k, e.g., demand dt (k, k ; k 2 )/dλ = 0 λ 0 λ 1 λ 2 Drive the Hamiltonian toward diagonal with flow equation [Wegner; Glazek/Wilson (1990 s)] = Both tend toward universal low-momentum interactions!
12 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
13 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
14 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
15 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
16 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
17 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
18 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
19 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
20 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
21 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
22 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
23 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
24 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
25 Flow equations in action: NN only In each partial wave with ɛ k = 2 k 2 /M and λ 2 = 1/ s dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k ) + q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k )
26 Decoupling and phase shifts: Low-pass filters work! Unevolved AV18 phase shifts (black solid line) Cutoff AV18 potential at k = 2.2 fm 1 (dotted blue) = fails for all but F wave Uncut evolved potential agrees perfectly for all energies Cutoff evolved potential agrees up to cutoff energy F-wave is already soft (π s) = already decoupled
27 Low-pass filters work! [Jurgenson et al. (2008)] NN phase shifts in different channels: no filter Uncut evolved potential agrees perfectly for all energies
28 Low-pass filters work! [Jurgenson et al. (2008)] NN phase shifts in different channels: filter full potential All fail except F-wave (D?) = already soft (π s) = already decoupled
29 Low-pass filters work! [Jurgenson et al. (2008)] NN phase shifts in different channels: filtered SRG works! Cutoff evolved potential agrees up to cutoff energy
30 Consequences of a repulsive core revisited uncorrelated correlated S1 deuteron probability density ψ(r) 2 [fm 3 ] V(r) [MeV] ψ(r) 2 [fm 3 ] Argonne v r [fm] r [fm] Probability at short separations suppressed = correlations Short-distance structure high-momentum components Greatly complicates expansion of many-body wave functions
31 Consequences of a repulsive core revisited uncorrelated correlated S1 deuteron probability density softened ψ(r) 2 [fm 3 ] V(r) [MeV] ψ(r) 2 [fm 3 ] Argonne v 18 λ = 4.0 fm -1 λ = 3.0 fm -1 λ = 2.0 fm r [fm] 100 original r [fm] Transformed potential = no short-range correlations in wf! Potential is now non-local: V (r)ψ(r) d 3 r V (r, r )ψ(r ) A problem for Green s Function Monte Carlo approach Not a problem for many-body methods using HO matrix elements
32 Consequences of a repulsive core revisited r 2 ψ(r) 2 [fm 1 ] uncorrelated correlated r [fm] V(r) [MeV] r 2 ψ(r) 2 [fm 1 ] S1 deuteron probability density Argonne v 18 λ = 4.0 fm -1 λ = 3.0 fm -1 λ = 2.0 fm r [fm] Transformed potential = no short-range correlations in wf! Potential is now non-local: V (r)ψ(r) d 3 r V (r, r )ψ(r ) A problem for Green s Function Monte Carlo approach Not a problem for many-body methods using HO matrix elements
33 HO matrix elements with SRG flow We ve seen that high and low momentum states decouple Does this help for harmonic oscilator matrix elements? Consider the SRG evolution from R. Roth et al.: Yes! We have decoupling of high-energy from low-energy states
34 Revisit the convergence with matrix size (N max ) Harmonic oscillator basis with N max shells for excitations Ground State Energy [MeV] Softened with SRG Helium-4 ground-state energy Jurgenson et al. (2009) V NN = N 3 LO (500 MeV) V NNN = N 2 LO Original expt Matrix Size [N max ] Ground-State Energy [MeV] Lithium-6 8 ground-state energy 4 V 0 NN = N 3 LO (500 MeV) V 4 NNN = N 2 LO 8 h- Ω = 20 MeV Original Softened with SRG 24 λ = 2.0 fm 1 28 λ = 1.5 fm 1 32 expt Matrix Size [N max ] Graphs show that convergence for soft chiral EFT potential is accelerated for evolved SRG potentials Rapid growth of basis still a problem; what else can we do? importance sampling of matrix elements e.g., use symmetry: work in a symplectic basis
35 Visualizing the softening of NN interactions Project non-local NN potential: V λ (r) = d 3 r V λ (r, r ) Roughly gives action of potential on long-wavelength nucleons Central part (S-wave) [Note: The V λ s are all phase equivalent!] Tensor part (S-D mixing) [graphs from K. Wendt et al., PRC (2012)] = Flow to universal potentials!
36 Basics: SRG flow equations [e.g., see arxiv: ] Transform an initial hamiltonian, H = T + V, with U s : H s = U s HU s T + V s, where s is the flow parameter. Differentiating wrt s: dh s ds = [η s, H s ] with η s du s ds U s = η s. η s is specified by the commutator with Hermitian G s : η s = [G s, H s ], which yields the unitary flow equation (T held fixed), dh s ds = dv s ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ]. Very simple to implement as matrix equation (e.g., MATLAB) G s determines flow = many choices (T, H D, H BD,... )
37 SRG flow of H = T + V in momentum basis Takes H H s = U s HU s in small steps labeled by s or λ dh s ds = dv s ds = [[T rel, V s ], H s ] with T rel k = ɛ k k and λ 2 = 1/ s For NN, project on relative momentum states k, but generic dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k )+ q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k ) V λ=3.0 (k, k ) 1st term 2nd term V λ=2.5 (k, k ) First term drives 1 S 0 V λ toward diagonal: V λ (k, k ) = V λ= (k, k ) e [(ɛ k ɛ k )/λ 2 ] 2 +
38 SRG flow of H = T + V in momentum basis Takes H H s = U s HU s in small steps labeled by s or λ dh s ds = dv s ds = [[T rel, V s ], H s ] with T rel k = ɛ k k and λ 2 = 1/ s For NN, project on relative momentum states k, but generic dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k )+ q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k ) V λ=2.5 (k, k ) 1st term 2nd term V λ=2.0 (k, k ) First term drives 1 S 0 V λ toward diagonal: V λ (k, k ) = V λ= (k, k ) e [(ɛ k ɛ k )/λ 2 ] 2 +
39 SRG flow of H = T + V in momentum basis Takes H H s = U s HU s in small steps labeled by s or λ dh s ds = dv s ds = [[T rel, V s ], H s ] with T rel k = ɛ k k and λ 2 = 1/ s For NN, project on relative momentum states k, but generic dv λ dλ (k, k ) (ɛ k ɛ k ) 2 V λ (k, k )+ q (ɛ k + ɛ k 2ɛ q )V λ (k, q)v λ (q, k ) V λ=2.0 (k, k ) 1st term 2nd term V λ=1.5 (k, k ) First term drives 1 S 0 V λ toward diagonal: V λ (k, k ) = V λ= (k, k ) e [(ɛ k ɛ k )/λ 2 ] 2 +
40 Outline: Lecture 2 Lecture 2: SRG in practice Recap from lecture 1: decoupling Implementing the similarity renormalization group (SRG) Block diagonal ( V low,k ) generator Computational aspects Quantitative measure of perturbativeness
41 Two ways to use RG equations to decouple Hamiltonians General form of the flow equation: dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] V low k SRG ( T generator) General rule: Choose G s to match the desired final pattern
42 Two ways to use RG equations to decouple Hamiltonians General form of the flow equation: dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] SRG ( BD generator) SRG ( T generator) General rule: Choose G s to match the desired final pattern
43 Block diagonalization via SRG [G s = H BD ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q ) What are the best generators for nuclear applications?
44 Block diagonalization via SRG [G s = H BD ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q ) What are the best generators for nuclear applications?
45 Block diagonalization via SRG [G s = H BD ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q ) What are the best generators for nuclear applications?
46 Block diagonalization via SRG [G s = H BD ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q ) What are the best generators for nuclear applications?
47 Block diagonalization via SRG [G s = H BD ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q ) What are the best generators for nuclear applications?
48 Block diagonalization via SRG [G s = H BD ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q ) What are the best generators for nuclear applications?
49 Block diagonalization via SRG [G s = H BD ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q ) What are the best generators for nuclear applications?
50 Block diagonalization via SRG [G s = H BD ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q ) What are the best generators for nuclear applications?
51 Block diagonalization via SRG [G s = H BD ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q ) What are the best generators for nuclear applications?
52 Block diagonalization via SRG [G s = H BD ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q ) What are the best generators for nuclear applications?
53 Block diagonalization via SRG [G s = H BD ] Can we get a Λ = 2 fm 1 V low k -like potential with SRG? ( Yes! Use dhs ds = [[G PHs P 0 s, H s ], H s ] with G s = 0 QH s Q ) What are the best generators for nuclear applications?
54 Custom potentials via the SRG Can we tailor the potential to other shapes with the SRG? Consider dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] in the 1 P 1 partial wave with a strange choice for G s
55 Custom potentials via the SRG Can we tailor the potential to other shapes with the SRG? Consider dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] in the 1 P 1 partial wave with a strange choice for G s
56 Custom potentials via the SRG Can we tailor the potential to other shapes with the SRG? Consider dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] in the 1 P 1 partial wave with a strange choice for G s
57 Custom potentials via the SRG Can we tailor the potential to other shapes with the SRG? Consider dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] in the 1 P 1 partial wave with a strange choice for G s
58 Custom potentials via the SRG Can we tailor the potential to other shapes with the SRG? Consider dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] in the 1 P 1 partial wave with a strange choice for G s
59 Custom potentials via the SRG Can we tailor the potential to other shapes with the SRG? Consider dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] in the 1 P 1 partial wave with a strange choice for G s
60 Custom potentials via the SRG Can we tailor the potential to other shapes with the SRG? Consider dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] in the 1 P 1 partial wave with a strange choice for G s
61 Custom potentials via the SRG Can we tailor the potential to other shapes with the SRG? Consider dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] in the 1 P 1 partial wave with a strange choice for G s
62 Custom potentials via the SRG Can we tailor the potential to other shapes with the SRG? Consider dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] in the 1 P 1 partial wave with a strange choice for G s
63 Custom potentials via the SRG Can we tailor the potential to other shapes with the SRG? Consider dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] in the 1 P 1 partial wave with a strange choice for G s
64 Custom potentials via the SRG Can we tailor the potential to other shapes with the SRG? Consider dhs ds = [[G s, H s ], H s ] in the 1 P 1 partial wave with a strange choice for G s
65 Outline: Lecture 2 Lecture 2: SRG in practice Recap from lecture 1: decoupling Implementing the similarity renormalization group (SRG) Block diagonal ( V low,k ) generator Computational aspects Quantitative measure of perturbativeness
66 S-wave NN potential as momentum-space matrix k V L=0 k = d 3 r j 0 (kr) V (r) j 0 (k r) = V kk matrix Momentum units ( = c = 1): typical relative momentum in large nucleus 1 fm MeV What would the kinetic energy look like on right?
67 Comments on computational aspects Although momentum is continuous in principle, in practice represented as discrete (gaussian quadrature) grid: = Calculations become just matrix multiplications! E.g., k V k + k k V k k V k (k 2 k 2 )/m + = V ii+ j V ij V ji 1 (k 2 i k 2 j )/m resolution is sufficient for two-body potential
68 Discretization of integrals = matrices! Momentum-space flow equations have integrals like: I(p, q) dk k 2 V (p, k)v (k, q) Introduce gaussian nodes and weights {k n, w n } (n = 1, N) = dk f (k) w n f (k n ) n Then I(p, q) I ij, where p = k i and q = k j, and I ij = n k 2 n w n V in V nj n Ṽ in Ṽ nj where Ṽ ij = w i k i V ij k j wj Lets us solve SRG equations, integral equation for phase shift, Schrödinger equation in momentum representation,... In practice, N=100 gauss points more than enough for accurate nucleon-nucleon partial waves
69 MATLAB Code for SRG is a direct translation! The flow equation d ds V s = [[T, H s ], H s ] is solved by discretizing, so it is just matrix multiplication. If the matrix V s is converted to a vector by reshaping, it can be fed to a differential equation solver, with the right side: % V_s is a vector of the current potential; convert to square matrix V_s_matrix = reshape(v_s, tot_pts, tot_pts); H_s_matrix = T_matrix + V_s_matrix; % form the Hamiltontian % Matrix for the right side of the SRG differential equation if (strcmp(evolution, T )) rhs_matrix = my_commutator( my_commutator(t_matrix, H_s_matrix),... H_s_matrix ); elseif (strcmp(evolution, Wegner )) rhs_matrix = my_commutator( my_commutator(diag(diag(h_s_matrix)),... H_s_matrix), H_s_matrix ); [etc.] % convert the right side matrix to a vector to be returned dvds = reshape(rhs_matrix, tot_pts*tot_pts, 1);
70 Pseudocode for SRG evolution 1 Set up basis (e.g., momentum grid with gaussian quadrature or HO wave functions with N max ) 2 Calculate (or input) the initial Hamiltonian and G s matrix elements (including any weight factors) 3 Reshape the right side [[G s, H s ], H s ] to a vector and pass it to a coupled differential equation solver 4 Integrate V s to desired s (or λ = s 1/4 ) 5 Diagonalize H s with standard symmetric eigensolver = energies and eigenvectors 6 Form U = i ψ(i) s ψ (i) s=0 from the eigenvectors 7 Output or plot or calculate observables
71 Many versions of SRG codes are in use Mathematica, MATLAB, Python, C++, Fortran-90 Instructive computational project for undergraduates! Once there are discretized matrices, the solver is the same with any size basis in any number of dimensions! Still the same solution code for a many-particle basis Any basis can be used For 3NF, harmonic oscillators, discretized partial-wave momentum, and hyperspherical harmonics are available An accurate 3NF evolution in HO basis takes 20 million matrix elements = that many differential equations
72 Outline: Lecture 2 Lecture 2: SRG in practice Recap from lecture 1: decoupling Implementing the similarity renormalization group (SRG) Block diagonal ( V low,k ) generator Computational aspects Quantitative measure of perturbativeness
73 S. Weinberg on the Renormalization Group (RG) From Why the RG is a good thing [for Francis Low Festschrift] The method in its most general form can I think be understood as a way to arrange in various theories that the degrees of freedom that you re talking about are the relevant degrees of freedom for the problem at hand. Improving perturbation theory; e.g., in QCD calculations Mismatch of energy scales can generate large logarithms RG: shift between couplings and loop integrals to reduce logs Nuclear: decouple high- and low-momentum modes Identifying universality in critical phenomena RG: filter out short-distance degrees of freedom Nuclear: evolve toward universal interactions Nuclear: simplifying calculations of structure/reactions Make nuclear physics look more like quantum chemistry! RG gains can violate conservation of difficulty! Use RG scale (resolution) dependence as a probe or tool
74 Flow of different N 3 LO chiral EFT potentials 1 S 0 from N 3 LO (500 MeV) of Entem/Machleidt 1 S 0 from N 3 LO (550/600 MeV) of Epelbaum et al. Decoupling = perturbation theory is more effective k V k + k k V k k V k (k 2 k 2 )/m + = V ii+ j V ij V ji 1 (k 2 i k 2 j )/m +
75 Flow of different N 3 LO chiral EFT potentials 3 S 1 from N 3 LO (500 MeV) of Entem/Machleidt 3 S 1 from N 3 LO (550/600 MeV) of Epelbaum et al. Decoupling = perturbation theory is more effective k V k + k k V k k V k (k 2 k 2 )/m + = V ii+ j V ij V ji 1 (k 2 i k 2 j )/m +
76 Convergence of the Born series for scattering Consider whether the Born series converges for given z T (z) = V + V 1 z H 0 V + V 1 z H 0 V 1 z H 0 V + If bound state b, series must diverge at z = E b, where (H 0 + V ) b = E b b = V b = (E b H 0 ) b
77 Convergence of the Born series for scattering Consider whether the Born series converges for given z T (z) = V + V 1 z H 0 V + V 1 z H 0 V 1 z H 0 V + If bound state b, series must diverge at z = E b, where (H 0 + V ) b = E b b = V b = (E b H 0 ) b For fixed E, generalize to find eigenvalue η ν [Weinberg] 1 E b H 0 V b = b = 1 E H 0 V Γ ν = η ν Γ ν From T applied to eigenstate, divergence for η ν (E) 1: T (E) Γ ν = V Γ ν (1 + η ν + η 2 ν + ) = T (E) diverges if bound state at E for V /η ν with η ν 1
78 Weinberg eigenvalues as function of cutoff Λ/λ Consider η ν (E = 2.22 MeV) Deuteron = attractive eigenvalue η ν = 1 Λ = unchanged η ν S1 (E cm = MeV) free space, η > Λ [fm -1 ]
79 Weinberg eigenvalues as function of cutoff Λ/λ Consider η ν (E = 2.22 MeV) Deuteron = attractive eigenvalue η ν = 1 Λ = unchanged But η ν can be negative, so V /η ν = flip potential
80 Weinberg eigenvalues as function of cutoff Λ/λ Consider η ν (E = 2.22 MeV) Deuteron = attractive eigenvalue η ν = 1 Λ = unchanged But η ν can be negative, so V /η ν = flip potential
81 Weinberg eigenvalues as function of cutoff Λ/λ Consider η ν (E = 2.22 MeV) Deuteron = attractive eigenvalue η ν = 1 Λ = unchanged But η ν can be negative, so V /η ν = flip potential Hard core = repulsive eigenvalue η ν Λ = reduced η ν S1 (E cm = MeV) free space, η > 0 free space, η < Λ [fm -1 ]
82 Weinberg eigenvalues as function of cutoff Λ/λ Consider η ν (E = 2.22 MeV) Deuteron = attractive eigenvalue η ν = 1 Λ = unchanged But η ν can be negative, so V /η ν = flip potential Hard core = repulsive eigenvalue η ν Λ = reduced In medium: both reduced η ν 1 for Λ 2 fm 1 = perturbative (at least for particle-particle channel) η ν S1 (E cm = MeV) free space, η > 0 free space, η < 0 k f = 1.35 fm -1, η > 0 k f = 1.35 fm -1, η < Λ [fm -1 ]
83 Weinberg eigenvalue analysis of convergence Born Series: T (E) = V + V V + V V V + E H 0 E H 0 E H 0 For fixed E, find (complex) eigenvalues η ν (E) [Weinberg] 1 E H 0 V Γ ν = η ν Γ ν = T (E) Γ ν = V Γ ν (1+η ν +η 2 ν + ) = T diverges if any η ν (E) 1 [nucl-th/ ] Im η Im η 1 S0 3 S1 3 D Re η Re η AV18 CD-Bonn N 3 LO (500 MeV) 1 2 AV18 CD-Bonn N 3 LO
84 Lowering the cutoff increases perturbativeness Weinberg eigenvalue analysis (repulsive) [nucl-th/ ] Im η 1 S S Re η Λ = 10 fm -1 Λ = 7 fm -1 Λ = 5 fm -1 Λ = 4 fm -1 Λ = 3 fm -1 Λ = 2 fm -1 N 3 LO η ν (E=0) Argonne v 18 N 2 LO-550/600 [19] N 3 LO-550/600 [14] N 3 LO [13] Λ (fm -1 )
85 Lowering the cutoff increases perturbativeness Weinberg eigenvalue analysis (repulsive) [nucl-th/ ] Im η 3 S1 3 D S1 3 D Re η Λ = 10 fm -1 Λ = 7 fm -1 Λ = 5 fm -1 Λ = 4 fm -1 Λ = 3 fm -1 Λ = 2 fm -1 N 3 LO η ν (E=0) Argonne v 18 N 2 LO-550/600 N 3 LO-550/600 N 3 LO [Entem] Λ (fm -1 )
86 Lowering the cutoff increases perturbativeness Weinberg eigenvalue analysis (η ν at 2.22 MeV vs. density) 1 3 S1 with Pauli blocking η ν (B d ) Λ = 4.0 fm -1 Λ = 3.0 fm -1 Λ = 2.0 fm k F [fm -1 ] Pauli blocking in nuclear matter increases it even more! at Fermi surface, pairing revealed by η ν > 1
Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems
Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems Lecture 1 S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) 2011 National Nuclear Physics Summer School University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Useful readings
More informationRenormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems
Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems Lecture 1 S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) 2011 National Nuclear Physics Summer School University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Useful readings
More informationNuclear Forces / DFT for Nuclei III
Nuclear Forces / DFT for Nuclei III Department of Physics Ohio State University August, 2008 I. Overview of EFT/RG. II. Chiral effective field theory. III. RG for nuclear forces. EFT for many-body systems.
More informationNuclear Observables at Low Resolution
Nuclear Observables at Low Resolution Eric R. Anderson Department of Physics The Ohio State University September 13, 2011 In Collaboration with: S.K Bogner, R.J. Furnstahl, K. Hebeler, E.D. Jurgenson,
More informationAtomic Nuclei at Low Resolution
Atomic Department of Physics Ohio State University November, 29 Collaborators: E. Anderson, S. Bogner, S. Glazek, E. Jurgenson, R. Perry, S. Ramanan, A. Schwenk + UNEDF collaboration Overview DOFs EFT
More informationSimilarity Renormalization Groups (SRG) for nuclear forces Nuclear structure and nuclear astrophysics
Similarity Renormalization Groups (SRG) for nuclear forces Nuclear structure and nuclear astrophysics Philipp Dijkstal 12.05.2016 1 Introduction The talk on Similarity Renormalization Groups (SRG) from
More informationSimilarity renormalization group for nucleon-nucleon interactions
PHYSICAL REVIEW C 75, 0600(R) (2007) Similarity renormalization group for nucleon-nucleon interactions S. K. Bogner, * R. J. Furnstahl, and R. J. Perry Department of Physics, The Ohio State University,
More informationSimilarity RG and Many-Body Operators
Similarity RG and Many-Body Operators Department of Physics Ohio State University February, 2010 Collaborators: E. Anderson, S. Bogner, S. Glazek, E. Jurgenson, P. Navratil, R. Perry, L. Platter, A. Schwenk,
More informationSimplifying the Nuclear Many-Body Problem with Low-Momentum Interactions
Simplifying the Nuclear Many-Body Problem with Low-Momentum Interactions Scott Bogner September 2005 Collaborators: Dick Furnstahl, Achim Schwenk, and Andreas Nogga The Conventional Nuclear Many-Body Problem
More informationApplications of Renormalization Group Methods in Nuclear Physics 1
Applications of Renormalization Group Methods in Nuclear Physics 1 Dick Furnstahl Department of Physics Ohio State University HUGS 2014 Outline: Lecture 1 Lecture 1: Overview Preview: Running couplings/potentials
More informationThe Renormalization Group in Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplement (211) 1 37 Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplement The Renormalization Group in Nuclear Physics R. J. Furnstahl Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus,
More informationRG & EFT for nuclear forces
RG & EFT for nuclear forces Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich ECT* school, Feb/March 2006 Low momentum interactions: Using the RG to simplify the nuclear force for many-body calculations. Application
More informationarxiv:nucl-th/ v1 5 Jan 2007
Are low-energy nuclear observables sensitive to high-energy phase shifts? S.K. Bogner 1, R.J. Furnstahl 1, R.J. Perry 1, A. Schwenk 2 arxiv:nucl-th/711v1 5 Jan 27 1 Department of Physics, The Ohio State
More informationPart III: The Nuclear Many-Body Problem
Part III: The Nuclear Many-Body Problem To understand the properties of complex nuclei from first principles Microscopic Valence- Space Interactions Model spaces Many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) Calculating
More informationStatus report and plans from OSU and MSU
Status report and plans from OSU and MSU Validated(Nuclear( Interac/ons( +(MSU,(ORNL,UT,ANL,ORNL( fusion( Stellar(burning( Structure(and(Reac/ons:( Light(and(Medium(Nuclei( Ab-ini/o' RGM' CI' Chiral'EFT'
More informationCoupled-cluster theory for nuclei
Coupled-cluster theory for nuclei Thomas Papenbrock and G. Hagen D. J. Dean M. Hjorth-Jensen B. Velamur Asokan INT workshop Weakly-bound systems in atomic and nuclear physics Seattle, March 8-12, 2010
More informationIn-medium Similarity Renormalization Group for nuclear many-body systems
In-medium Similarity Renormalization Group for nuclear many-body systems Koshiroh Tsukiyama (CNS/ U. Tokyo) Dec. 3-5 2011 HPCI project Large-scale quantum many-body calculations for nuclear property and
More informationLight hypernuclei based on chiral and phenomenological interactions
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Light hypernuclei based on chiral and phenomenological interactions Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle
More informationRenormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems
Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems Lecture 2 S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) 2011 National Nuclear Physics Summer School University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lecture 2 outline
More informationTime dependent coupled-cluster method
Time dependent coupled-cluster method Thomas Papenbrock and G. Hagen & H. A. Nam (ORNL), David Pigg (Vanderbilt) 7 th ANL/INT/JINA/MSU annual FRIB workshop August 8-12, 2011 Interfaces Between Nuclear
More informationAb Initio Nuclear Structure Theory
Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory Lecture 1: Hamiltonian Robert Roth Overview Lecture 1: Hamiltonian Prelude Many-Body Quantum Mechanics Nuclear Hamiltonian Matrix Elements Lecture 2: Correlations Two-Body
More informationMicroscopically Based Energy Functionals. S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU)
Microscopically Based Energy Functionals S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) Dream Scenario: From QCD to Nuclei 2 SciDAC 2 Project Building a Universal Nuclear Energy Density Functional See http://undef.org for details
More informationFrontiers in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory. Robert Roth
Frontiers in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory Robert Roth New Era of Nuclear Structure Theory QCD at low energies improved understanding through effective field theories & lattice simulations New Era
More informationNuclear few- and many-body systems in a discrete variable representation basis
Nuclear few- and many-body systems in a discrete variable representation basis Jeremy W. Holt* Department of Physics University of Washington *with A. Bulgac, M. M. Forbes L. Coraggio, N. Itaco, R. Machleidt,
More informationCoupled-cluster theory for medium-mass nuclei
Coupled-cluster theory for medium-mass nuclei Thomas Papenbrock and G. Hagen (ORNL) D. J. Dean (ORNL) M. Hjorth-Jensen (Oslo) A. Nogga (Juelich) A. Schwenk (TRIUMF) P. Piecuch (MSU) M. Wloch (MSU) Seattle,
More informationNon-empirical energy functionals from low-momentum interactions
Introduction Conclusions Bibliography Non-empirical energy functionals from low-momentum interactions II. from renormalization group methods T. Duguet 1,2 1 DSM/Irfu/SPhN, CEA Saclay, France 2 National
More informationFew Body Methods in Nuclear Physics - Lecture I
Few Body Methods in Nuclear Physics - Lecture I Nir Barnea The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Sept. 2010 Course Outline 1 Introduction - Few-Body Nuclear Physics 2 Gaussian Expansion - The Stochastic
More informationRenormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems
Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems Lecture 3 S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) 2011 National Nuclear Physics Summer School University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lecture 2 outline
More informationNuclei as Bound States
Nuclei as Bound States Lecture 1: Hamiltonian Robert Roth Overview Lecture 1: Hamiltonian Prelude Nuclear Hamiltonian Matrix Elements Two-Body Problem Correlations & Unitary Transformations Lecture 2:
More informationNuclear structure I: Introduction and nuclear interactions
Nuclear structure I: Introduction and nuclear interactions Stefano Gandolfi Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) National Nuclear Physics Summer School Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) July
More informationNew Horizons in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory. Robert Roth
New Horizons in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory Robert Roth New Era of Nuclear Structure Theory QCD at low energies improved understanding through effective field theories & lattice simulations quantum
More informationFew-nucleon contributions to π-nucleus scattering
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Few-nucleon contributions to π-nucleus scattering Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich INT Program on Simulations and Symmetries: Cold Atoms, QCD, and Few-hadron
More informationNew Frontiers in Nuclear Structure Theory
New Frontiers in Nuclear Structure Theory From Realistic Interactions to the Nuclear Chart Robert Roth Institut für Kernphysik Technical University Darmstadt Overview Motivation Nucleon-Nucleon Interactions
More informationEffective Field Theory for light nuclear systems
Effective Field Theory for light nuclear systems Jimmy Rotureau Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden B. Barrett, University of Arizona, Tucson I. Stetcu, University of Washington, Seattle
More informationCan the shell model be truly ab initio? and other questions
Canada s national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics and accelerator-based science Can the shell model be truly ab initio? and other questions Ragnar Stroberg TRIUMF The tower of effective field
More informationThree-nucleon potentials in nuclear matter. Alessandro Lovato
Three-nucleon potentials in nuclear matter Alessandro Lovato PRC 83, 054003 (2011) arxiv:1109.5489 Outline Ab initio many body method Nuclear Hamiltonian: 2- and 3- body potentials Density dependent potential
More informationReview of lattice EFT methods and connections to lattice QCD
Review of lattice EFT methods and connections to lattice QCD Dean Lee Michigan State University uclear Lattice EFT Collaboration Multi-Hadron Systems from Lattice QCD Institute for uclear Theory Feburary
More informationQuantum Monte Carlo calculations of neutron and nuclear matter
Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of neutron and nuclear matter Stefano Gandolfi Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Advances and perspectives in computational nuclear physics, Hilton Waikoloa Village,
More informationEffective operators from wave function factorization
Effective operators from wave function factorization Scott Bogner NSCL/FRIB Laboratory & Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University Some motivating questions Can we understand the general
More informationWeakly-Bound Systems in Atomic and Nuclear Physics March 2010
Electroweak properties of Weakly- Bound Light Nuclei Weakly-Bound Systems in Atomic and Nuclear Physics March 2010 INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR THEORY Collaborators Sonia Bacca Winfried Leidemann, Giuseppina
More informationThree-Body Bound State Calculations by Using Three-Dimensional Low Momentum Interaction V low k
Preprint number: 6.668 Three-Body Bound State Calculations by Using Three-Dimensional Low Momentum Interaction V low k arxiv:6.668v [nucl-th Feb M. R. Hadizadeh, Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics,
More informationRG & EFT for nuclear forces
RG & EFT for nuclear forces Andreas Nogga, Forschungszentrum Jülich ECT* school, Feb/March 2006 Low momentum interactions: Using the RG to simplify the nuclear force for many-body calculations. Application
More informationAb Initio Nuclear Structure Theory with Chiral NN+3N Interactions. Robert Roth
Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory with Chiral NN+3N Interactions Robert Roth From QCD to Nuclear Structure Nuclear Structure Low-Energy QCD From QCD to Nuclear Structure Nuclear Structure NN+3N Interaction
More informationRenormalization and power counting of chiral nuclear forces. 龙炳蔚 (Bingwei Long) in collaboration with Chieh-Jen Jerry Yang (U.
Renormalization and power counting of chiral nuclear forces 龙炳蔚 (Bingwei Long) in collaboration with Chieh-Jen Jerry Yang (U. Arizona) What are we really doing? Correcting Weinberg's scheme about NN contact
More informationNuclear Structure and Reactions using Lattice Effective Field Theory
Nuclear Structure and Reactions using Lattice Effective Field Theory Dean Lee North Carolina State University Nuclear Lattice EFT Collaboration Frontiers of Nuclear Physics Kavli Institute for Theoretical
More informationModern Theory of Nuclear Forces
Evgeny Epelbaum, FZ Jülich & University Bonn Lacanau, 29.09.2009 Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces Lecture 1: Lecture 2: Lecture 3: Introduction & first look into ChPT EFTs for two nucleons Nuclear forces
More informationNew Horizons in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory. Robert Roth
New Horizons in Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory Robert Roth New Era of Low-Energy Nuclear Physics Experiment new facilities and experiments to produce nuclei far-off stability and study a range of observables
More informationElectromagnetic reactions from few to many-body systems Giuseppina Orlandini
Electromagnetic reactions from few to many-body systems Giuseppina Orlandini ECT* Workshop on Recent advances and challenges in the description of nuclear reactions at the limit of stability, March 5-9,
More informationToward a unified description of equilibrium and dynamics of neutron star matter
Toward a unified description of equilibrium and dynamics of neutron star matter Omar Benhar INFN and Department of Physics Sapienza Università di Roma I-00185 Roma, Italy Based on work done in collaboration
More informationAt the end of Section 4, a summary of basic principles for low-energy effective theories was given, which we recap here.
Nuclear Forces 2 (last revised: September 30, 2014) 6 1 6. Nuclear Forces 2 a. Recap: Principles of low-energy effective theories Figure 1: Left: high-resolution, with wavelength of probe short compared
More informationAb Initio Electromagnetic Transitions with the IMSRG
Ab Initio Electromagnetic Transitions with the IMSRG Nathan Parzuchowski Michigan State University March, 017 1 / 1 Outline IMSRG IMSRG rotates the Hamiltonian into a coordinate system where simple methods
More informationPetaApps award lead PI: Jerry Draayer (L. lead PI: James P Vary (I NERSC
Emer Effective Operators in Two-Nucleon Systems: Quenching and Enhancement Effects James P. Vary, Iowa State University in light nucl DOE Topical Collaboration Annual Meeting University of North Carolina,
More informationThree-cluster dynamics within an ab initio framework
Three-cluster dynamics within an ab initio framework Universality in Few-Body Systems: Theoretical Challenges and New Directions INT 14-1, March 26, 2014 S. Quaglioni Collaborators: C. Romero-Redondo (TRIUMF)
More informationLight Nuclei from chiral EFT interactions
Light Nuclei from chiral EFT interactions Petr Navratil Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory* Collaborators: V. G. Gueorguiev (UCM), J. P. Vary (ISU), W. E. Ormand (LLNL), A. Nogga (Julich), S. Quaglioni
More informationNuclear structure III: Nuclear and neutron matter. National Nuclear Physics Summer School Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) July 18-29, 2016
Nuclear structure III: Nuclear and neutron matter Stefano Gandolfi Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) National Nuclear Physics Summer School Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) July 18-29, 2016
More informationLattice Simulations with Chiral Nuclear Forces
Lattice Simulations with Chiral Nuclear Forces Hermann Krebs FZ Jülich & Universität Bonn July 23, 2008, XQCD 2008, NCSU In collaboration with B. Borasoy, E. Epelbaum, D. Lee, U. Meißner Outline EFT and
More informationThe No-Core Shell Model
The No-Core Shell Model New Perspectives on P-shell Nuclei - The Shell Model and Beyond Erich Ormand Petr Navratil Christian Forssen Vesselin Gueorguiev Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Collaborators:
More information1 Introduction. 2 The hadronic many body problem
Models Lecture 18 1 Introduction In the next series of lectures we discuss various models, in particluar models that are used to describe strong interaction problems. We introduce this by discussing the
More informationRenormalization Group Methods for the Nuclear Many-Body Problem
Renormalization Group Methods for the Nuclear Many-Body Problem A. Schwenk a,b.friman b and G.E. Brown c a Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 41 b Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung,
More informationBayesian Fitting in Effective Field Theory
Bayesian Fitting in Effective Field Theory Department of Physics Ohio State University February, 26 Collaborators: D. Phillips (Ohio U.), U. van Kolck (Arizona), R.G.E. Timmermans (Groningen, Nijmegen)
More informationNuclear structure from chiral-perturbation-theory two- plus three-nucleon interactions
Nuclear structure from chiral-perturbation-theory two- plus three-nucleon interactions Petr Navratil Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory* Collaborators: W. E. Ormand (LLNL), J. P. Vary (ISU), E. Caurier
More informationTowards a model-independent low momentum nucleon-nucleon interaction
Towards a model-independent low momentum nucleon-nucleon interaction S.K. Bogner a, T.T.S. Kuo a 2, A. Schwenk a 3, D.R. Entem b and R. Machleidt b arxiv:nucl-th/84v3 22 Oct 23 Abstract a Department of
More informationThe UNEDF Project. Dick Furnstahl. October, Collaborators: UNEDF ( Department of Physics Ohio State University
Department of Physics Ohio State University October, 2007 Collaborators: UNEDF (http://unedf.org) Topics Overview DFT RG 3NF DME Appendix Possible Topics Overview of the UNEDF Project Density Functional
More informationQuantitative understanding nuclear structure and scattering processes, based on underlying NN interactions.
Microscopic descriptions of nuclear scattering and reaction processes on the basis of chiral EFT M. Kohno Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka, Japan Quantitative understanding nuclear structure
More informationPhysics 795 Nuclear Theory at OSU
Physics 795 Nuclear Theory at OSU Department of Physics Ohio State University October, 2006 Nuclear Theory Group Bunny Clark Ulrich Heinz Sabine Jeschonnek Yuri Kovchegov Robert Perry Current Students/Postdocs
More informationShort-Ranged Central and Tensor Correlations. Nuclear Many-Body Systems. Reaction Theory for Nuclei far from INT Seattle
Short-Ranged Central and Tensor Correlations in Nuclear Many-Body Systems Reaction Theory for Nuclei far from Stability @ INT Seattle September 6-, Hans Feldmeier, Thomas Neff, Robert Roth Contents Motivation
More informationQuantum Monte Carlo calculations of medium mass nuclei
Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of medium mass nuclei Diego Lonardoni FRIB Theory Fellow In collaboration with: J. Carlson, LANL S. Gandolfi, LANL X. Wang, Huzhou University, China A. Lovato, ANL & UniTN
More informationQuantum Monte Carlo calculations of two neutrons in finite volume
Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of two neutrons in finite volume Philipp Klos with J. E. Lynn, I. Tews, S. Gandolfi, A. Gezerlis, H.-W. Hammer, M. Hoferichter, and A. Schwenk Nuclear Physics from Lattice
More informationUnitary-model-operator approach to nuclear many-body problems
Unitary-model-operator approach to nuclear many-body problems in collaboration with Structure calc. for many-nucleon systems Kenji Suzuki (Kyushu Inst. of Tech.) Ryoji kamoto (Kyushu Inst. of Tech.) V
More informationCoupled-cluster computations of weak decays in nuclei
Coupled-cluster computations of weak decays in nuclei Gaute Hagen Oak Ridge National Laboratory Nuclear ab initio Theories and Neutrino Physics INT, March 6th, 2018 Trend in realistic ab-initio calculations
More informationRenormalization Group: non perturbative aspects and applications in statistical and solid state physics.
Renormalization Group: non perturbative aspects and applications in statistical and solid state physics. Bertrand Delamotte Saclay, march 3, 2009 Introduction Field theory: - infinitely many degrees of
More information1 Mathematical preliminaries
1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical
More informationModeling the Atomic Nucleus. Theoretical bag of tricks
Modeling the Atomic Nucleus Theoretical bag of tricks The nuclear many-body problem The Nuclear Many-Body Problem H ˆ = T ˆ + V ˆ ˆ T = A 2 p ˆ " i, V ˆ = 2m i i=1 one-body H ˆ " = E" " V ˆ 2b (i, j) +
More informationAb Initio Nuclear Structure Theory
Ab Initio Nuclear Structure Theory Lecture 3: Light Nuclei Robert Roth Overview Lecture 1: Hamiltonian Prelude Many-ody Quantum Mechanics Nuclear Hamiltonian Matrix Elements Lecture 2: orrelations Two-ody
More informationAb Initio Calculations of Charge Symmetry Breaking in Light Hypernuclei
Ab Initio Calculations of Charge Symmetry Breaking in Light Hypernuclei Daniel Gazda Nuclear Physics Institute Prague, Czech Republic Together with: A. Gal (HU Jerusalem) Outline Introduction Charge symmetry
More informationEffective Field Theory for Density Functional Theory I
Effective Field Theory for Density Functional Theory I Department of Physics Ohio State University February, 26 I. Overview of EFT, RG, DFT for fermion many-body systems II. EFT/DFT for dilute Fermi systems
More informationLecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Lecture 5 Hartree-Fock Theory WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Particle-number representation: General formalism The simplest starting point for a many-body state is a system of
More informationPerspectives in Low-Energy Nuclear Physics. Robert Roth
Perspectives in Low-Energy Nuclear Physics Robert Roth A Kind Request... Dear Robert, David and I would like to ask you if you are willing to give a colloquium at TRIUMF on February 19th 2016. This is
More informationShell evolution and pairing in calcium isotopes with two- and three-body forces
Shell evolution and pairing in calcium isotopes with two- and three-body forces Javier Menéndez Institut für Kernphysik, TU Darmstadt ExtreMe Matter Institute (EMMI) with Jason D. Holt, Achim Schwenk and
More informationContinuum States in Drip-line Oxygen isotopes
Continuum States in Drip-line Oxygen isotopes EFES-NSCL WORKSHOP, Feb. 4-6, 2010 @ MSU Department of Physics The University of Tokyo Koshiroh Tsukiyama *Collaborators : Takaharu Otsuka (Tokyo), Rintaro
More informationFermion Many-Body Systems II
Outline Atoms Stars Answer RG Department of Physics Ohio State University June, 2004 Outline Outline Atoms Stars Answer RG Universality (Un)like Overview of Cold Atoms Overview of Neutron Stars Answer:
More informationEffective Field Theory
Effective Field Theory Iain Stewart MIT The 19 th Taiwan Spring School on Particles and Fields April, 2006 Physics compartmentalized Quantum Field Theory String Theory? General Relativity short distance
More informationThe nucleon-nucleon system in chiral effective theory
The nucleon-nucleon system in chiral effective theory Daniel Phillips Ohio University Research supported by the US Department of Energy Plan χet for nuclear forces: the proposal Leading order for S waves
More informationTHE THREE NUCLEON SYSTEM AT LEADING ORDER OF CHIRAL EFFECTIVE THEORY
THE THREE NUCLEON SYSTEM AT LEADING ORDER OF CHIRAL EFFECTIVE THEORY Young-Ho Song(RISP, Institute for Basic Science) Collaboration with R. Lazauskas( IPHC, IN2P3-CNRS) U. van Kolck (Orsay, IPN & Arizona
More informationSciDAC project NUCLE lead PI: Joe Carlson (LA PetaApps award lead PI: Jerry Draayer (L. lead PI: James P Vary (I NERSC
Emer in light nucl NCSM and neutrinoless double beta decay James P. Vary, Iowa State University INT/Topical Collaboration Workshop Seattle, Washington, June 20-21, 2017 Neutrinos and Fundamental Symmetries
More informationThree-nucleon forces and shell structure of neutron-rich Ca isotopes
Three-nucleon forces and shell structure of neutron-rich Ca isotopes Javier Menéndez Institut für Kernphysik (TU Darmstadt) and ExtreMe Matter Institute (EMMI) NUSTAR Week 3, Helsinki, 9 October 13 Outline
More informationThe NN system: why and how we iterate
The NN system: why and how we iterate Daniel Phillips Ohio University Research supported by the US department of energy Plan Why we iterate I: contact interactions Why we iterate II: pion exchange How
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 31 Oct 2013
Renormalization Group Invariance in the Subtractive Renormalization Approach to the NN Interactions S. Szpigel and V. S. Timóteo arxiv:1311.61v1 [nucl-th] 31 Oct 13 Faculdade de Computação e Informática,
More informationThe Lorentz Integral Transform (LIT) method and its connections with other approaches
The Lorentz Integral Transform (LIT) method and its connections with other approaches First proposed in V. D. Efros, W. Leidemann and G. Orlandini, Phys. Lett. B338, 130 (1994) Recent Topical Review: V.
More informationEvgeny Epelbaum. Forschungszentrum Jülich & Universität Bonn
Evgeny Epelbaum KHuK Jahrestagung, GSI, 25.10.2007 Evgeny Epelbaum Forschungszentrum Jülich & Universität Bonn Outline Motivation & Introduction Few nucleons in chiral EFT: where do we stand Work in progress:
More informationMatrix Elements and Few-Body Calculations within the Unitary Correlation Operator Method
Matrix Elements and Few-Body Calculations within the Unitary Correlation Operator Method R Roth, H Hergert, and P Papakonstantinou Institut für Kernphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt,
More informationCONTINUUM STATES IN THE SHELL MODEL
CONTINUUM STATES IN THE SHELL MODEL Andrey Shirokov Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics Lomonosov Moscow State University Collaborators: J. Vary, P. Maris (Iowa State University) A. Mazur, I. Mazur
More informationFrom EFTs to Nuclei. Thomas Papenbrock. and. CANHP 2015 Research partly funded by the US Department of Energy
From EFTs to Nuclei Thomas Papenbrock and CANHP 2015 Research partly funded by the US Department of Energy Collaborators @ ORNL / UTK: T. Coello, A. Ekström, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, K. Wendt @ ORNL/MSU:
More informationarxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 7 Mar 2014
Few-Body Systems (EFB22) manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) E. Ruiz Arriola S. Szpigel V. S. Timóteo Fixed points of the Similarity Renormalization Group and the Nuclear Many-Body Problem
More informationNeutron-rich matter and neutrino-matter interactions based on chiral effective field theory
Neutron-rich matter and neutrino-matter interactions based on chiral effective field theory Achim Schwenk Astrophysical Transients: Multi-Messenger Probes of Nuclear Physics INT, July 29, 2011 Outline
More informationRecent results in lattice EFT for nuclei
Recent results in lattice EFT for nuclei Dean Lee (NC State) Nuclear Lattice EFT Collaboration Centro de Ciencias de Benasque Pedro Pascua Bound states and resonances in EFT and Lattice QCD calculations
More informationQuantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Phys. 540
Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Phys. 540 Questions about organization Second quantization Questions about last class? Comments? Similar strategy N-particles Consider Two-body operators in Fock
More informationEffective Field Theory for Many-Body Systems
Outline Systems EFT Dilute DFT Future Effective Field Theory for Many-Body Systems Department of Physics Ohio State University February 19, 2004 Outline Systems EFT Dilute DFT Future Principles of Effective
More informationMean-field concept. (Ref: Isotope Science Facility at Michigan State University, MSUCL-1345, p. 41, Nov. 2006) 1/5/16 Volker Oberacker, Vanderbilt 1
Mean-field concept (Ref: Isotope Science Facility at Michigan State University, MSUCL-1345, p. 41, Nov. 2006) 1/5/16 Volker Oberacker, Vanderbilt 1 Static Hartree-Fock (HF) theory Fundamental puzzle: The
More informationEffective Field Theory for Cold Atoms I
Effective Field Theory for Cold Atoms I H.-W. Hammer Institut für Kernphysik, TU Darmstadt and Extreme Matter Institute EMMI School on Effective Field Theory across Length Scales, ICTP-SAIFR, Sao Paulo,
More information