Phil 2B03 (McMaster University Final Examination) Page 1 of 4

Denote John by j and Smith by s, is a bachelor by predicate letter B. The statements (1) and (2) may be written as B(j) and B(s).

PREDICATE CALCULUS Predicates Statement function Variables Free and bound variables Quantifiers Universe of discourse Logical equivalences and implications for quantified statements Theory of inference

Predicate Logic. 1 Predicate Logic Symbolization

1 Predicate Logic Symbolization innovation of predicate logic: analysis of simple statements into two parts: the subject and the predicate. E.g. 1: John is a giant. subject = John predicate =... is a giant

Formal Logic: Quantifiers, Predicates, and Validity. CS 130 Discrete Structures

Formal Logic: Quantifiers, Predicates, and Validity CS 130 Discrete Structures Variables and Statements Variables: A variable is a symbol that stands for an individual in a collection or set. For example,

2. Use quantifiers to express the associative law for multiplication of real numbers.

1. Define statement function of one variable. When it will become a statement? Statement function is an expression containing symbols and an individual variable. It becomes a statement when the variable

Predicate Logic combines the distinctive features of syllogistic and propositional logic.

Predicate Logic combines the distinctive features of syllogistic and propositional logic. The fundamental component in predicate logic is the predicate, which is always symbolized with upper case letters.

Predicate Logic. Example. Statements in Predicate Logic. Some statements cannot be expressed in propositional logic, such as: Predicate Logic

Predicate Logic Predicate Logic (Rosen, Chapter 1.4-1.6) TOPICS Predicate Logic Quantifiers Logical Equivalence Predicate Proofs Some statements cannot be expressed in propositional logic, such as: All

RULES OF UNIVERSAL INSTANTIATION AND GENERALIZATION, EXISTENTIAL INSTANTIATION AND GENERALIZATION, AND RULES OF QUANTIFIER EQUIVALENCE

1 UNIT 2 RULES OF UNIVERSAL INSTANTIATION AND GENERALIZATION, EXISTENTIAL INSTANTIATION AND GENERALIZATION, AND RULES OF QUANTIFIER EQUIVALENCE Contents 2.0 Objectives 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Rules of Quantification

SYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES

SYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES Singular Sentences name Paris is beautiful (monadic) predicate (monadic) predicate letter Bp individual constant Singular Sentences Bp These are our new simple

INSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA CHEATHARLACH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW PREDICATE LOGIC

1 CHAPTER 7. PREDICATE LOGIC 1 INSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA CHEATHARLACH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW PREDICATE LOGIC 1 Predicate Logic 1.1 Introduction There are various arguments which cannot be dealt

All psychiatrists are doctors All doctors are college graduates All psychiatrists are college graduates

Predicate Logic In what we ve discussed thus far, we haven t addressed other kinds of valid inferences: those involving quantification and predication. For example: All philosophers are wise Socrates is

DERIVATIONS IN SYMBOLIC LOGIC I

DERIVATIONS IN SYMBOLIC LOGIC I Tomoya Sato Department of Philosophy University of California, San Diego Phil120: Symbolic Logic Summer 2014 TOMOYA SATO LECTURE 5: DERIVATIONS IN SYMBOLIC LOGIC I 1 / 40

Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus

Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus Lila Kari University of Waterloo Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 42 Formal deducibility for predicate

Introduction to Predicate Logic Part 1. Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1)

Introduction to Predicate Logic Part 1 Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1) Introduction Lecture Notes (1) and (2) provide an OVERVIEW of a standard intuitive formalization and introduction to

Symbolising Quantified Arguments

Symbolising Quantified Arguments 1. (i) Symbolise the following argument, given the universe of discourse is U = set of all animals. Animals are either male or female. Not all Cats are male, Therefore,

DO NOT FORGET!!! WRITE YOUR NAME HERE. Philosophy 109 Final Exam, Spring 2007 (80 points total) ~ ( x)

Page 1 of 13 DO NOT FORGET!!! WRITE YOUR NAME HERE Philosophy 109 Final Exam, Spring 2007 (80 points total) ~ ( x) Part I: Symbolization into RL: Provide symbolizations of the following sentences, using

Section 8.3 Higher-Order Logic A logic is higher-order if it allows predicate names or function names to be quantified or to be arguments of a

Section 8.3 Higher-Order Logic A logic is higher-order if it allows predicate names or function names to be quantified or to be arguments of a predicate. Example. The sentence, There is a function with

PHIL 50 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC 1 FREE AND BOUND VARIABLES MARCELLO DI BELLO STANFORD UNIVERSITY DERIVATIONS IN PREDICATE LOGIC WEEK #8

PHIL 50 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC MARCELLO DI BELLO STANFORD UNIVERSITY DERIVATIONS IN PREDICATE LOGIC WEEK #8 1 FREE AND BOUND VARIABLES Before discussing the derivation rules for predicate logic, we should

6. COMPLEX PREDICATES

318 Hardegree, Symbolic Logic (1) x... y...rxy (1a) x(sx & y(py Rxy)) (1b) x(px & y(sy Rxy)) (2) x... y...ryx (2a) x(sx & y(py Ryx)) (2b) x(px & y(sy Ryx)) (3) x... y...rxy (3a) x(sx y(py & Rxy)) (3b)

Handout #7 Predicate Logic Trees

Handout #7 Predicate Logic Trees Predicate trees: Decomposition Rules Negated Existential Decomposition ( D) ( x)p ( x) P Existential Decomposition ( D) ( x)p P(a/x) where a is an individual constant (name)

Section 1.1 Propositions

Set Theory & Logic Section 1.1 Propositions Fall, 2009 Section 1.1 Propositions In Chapter 1, our main goals are to prove sentences about numbers, equations or functions and to write the proofs. Definition.

4 Quantifiers and Quantified Arguments 4.1 Quantifiers

4 Quantifiers and Quantified Arguments 4.1 Quantifiers Recall from Chapter 3 the definition of a predicate as an assertion containing one or more variables such that, if the variables are replaced by objects

Discrete Mathematics Basic Proof Methods

Discrete Mathematics 1-2. Basic Proof Methods Nature & Importance of Proofs In mathematics, a proof is: a correct(well-reasoned, logically valid) and complete (clear, detailed) argument that rigorously

06 From Propositional to Predicate Logic

Martin Henz February 19, 2014 Generated on Wednesday 19 th February, 2014, 09:48 1 Syntax of Predicate Logic 2 3 4 5 6 Need for Richer Language Predicates Variables Functions 1 Syntax of Predicate Logic

Rules Build Arguments Rules Building Arguments

Section 1.6 1 Section Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Using Rules of Inference to Build Arguments Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements Building Arguments for Quantified

Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2014

Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2014 Class #23 - Translation into Predicate Logic II ( 3.2) Only as a Quantifier P Only Ps are Qs is logically equivalent to all Qs are

Outline. Rules of Inferences Discrete Mathematics I MATH/COSC 1056E. Example: Existence of Superman. Outline

Outline s Discrete Mathematics I MATH/COSC 1056E Julien Dompierre Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Laurentian University Sudbury, August 6, 2008 Using to Build Arguments and Quantifiers Outline

Quantifiers Here is a (true) statement about real numbers: Every real number is either rational or irrational.

Quantifiers 1-17-2008 Here is a (true) statement about real numbers: Every real number is either rational or irrational. I could try to translate the statement as follows: Let P = x is a real number Q

2/2/2018. CS 103 Discrete Structures. Chapter 1. Propositional Logic. Chapter 1.1. Propositional Logic

CS 103 Discrete Structures Chapter 1 Propositional Logic Chapter 1.1 Propositional Logic 1 1.1 Propositional Logic Definition: A proposition :is a declarative sentence (that is, a sentence that declares

7 Classical Quantified Logic

7 Classical Quantified Logic efore examining quantified modal logic, we review a bare-bones system for first-order predicate or quantificational logic, i.e., that involving the quantifiers x... and x...,

PL: Truth Trees. Handout Truth Trees: The Setup

Handout 4 PL: Truth Trees Truth tables provide a mechanical method for determining whether a proposition, set of propositions, or argument has a particular logical property. For example, we can show that

Full file at

Transparencies to accompany Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications Introduction Chapter 1 - Introduction Applications of discrete mathematics: Formal Languages (computer languages) Compiler Design

Predicate Logic Quantifier Rules

Predicate Logic Quantifier Rules CS251 at CCUT, Spring 2017 David Lu May 8 th, 2017 Contents 1. Universal Instantiation (UI) 2. Existential Generalization (EG) 3. Universal Generalization (UG) 4. Existential

ADDITIONAL SOLUTIONS for exercises in Introductory Symbolic Logic Without Formal Proofs

1 ADDITIONAL SOLUTIONS for exercises in Introductory Symbolic Logic Without Formal Proofs P. 32 2. P v ~J 3. ~P ~J 4. ~P (~A ~J) 5. ~(J v A) 6. [J v (~A ~J)] 7. J A 8. J (A P) 9. J (A v P) 11. P v (A J)

Predicate Logic - Introduction

Outline Motivation Predicate Logic - Introduction Predicates & Functions Quantifiers, Coming to Terms with Formulas Quantifier Scope & Bound Variables Free Variables & Sentences c 2001 M. Lawford 1 Motivation:

(Refer Slide Time: 02:20)

Discrete Mathematical Structures Dr. Kamala Krithivasan Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture - 5 Logical Inference In the last class we saw about

Introduction to Sets and Logic (MATH 1190)

Introduction to Sets Logic () Instructor: Email: shenlili@yorku.ca Department of Mathematics Statistics York University Sept 18, 2014 Outline 1 2 Tautologies Definition A tautology is a compound proposition

The Language. Elementary Logic. Outline. Well-Formed Formulae (wff s)

The Language Elementary Logic Bow-Yaw Wang Institute of Information Science Academia Sinica, Taiwan July 1, 2009 The following symbols are used in sentential logic Symbol Name Remark ( left parenthesis

Mat 243 Exam 1 Review

OBJECTIVES (Review problems: on next page) 1.1 Distinguish between propositions and non-propositions. Know the truth tables (i.e., the definitions) of the logical operators,,,, and Write truth tables for

Mathematical Logic. Reasoning in First Order Logic. Chiara Ghidini. FBK-IRST, Trento, Italy

Reasoning in First Order Logic FBK-IRST, Trento, Italy April 12, 2013 Reasoning tasks in FOL Model checking Question: Is φ true in the interpretation I with the assignment a? Answer: Yes if I = φ[a]. No

3/29/2017. Logic. Propositions and logical operations. Main concepts: propositions truth values propositional variables logical operations

Logic Propositions and logical operations Main concepts: propositions truth values propositional variables logical operations 1 Propositions and logical operations A proposition is the most basic element

Mathacle. PSet ---- Algebra, Logic. Level Number Name: Date: I. BASICS OF PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC

I. BASICS OF PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC George Boole (1815-1864) developed logic as an abstract mathematical system consisting of propositions, operations (conjunction, disjunction, and negation), and rules for

Collins' notes on Lemmon's Logic

Collins' notes on Lemmon's Logic (i) Rule of ssumption () Insert any formula at any stage into a proof. The assumed formula rests upon the assumption of itself. (ii) Double Negation (DN) a. b. ( Two negations

Foundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes

Foundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes These notes form a brief summary of what has been covered during the lectures. All the definitions must be memorized and understood. Statements

CS 214 Introduction to Discrete Structures. Chapter 1 Formal Logic. Mikel D. Petty, Ph.D.

CS 214 Introduction to Discrete Structures Chapter 1 Formal Logic Mikel D. Petty, Ph.D. Center for Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis CS 214 Formal Logic 1.2 Chapter sections and objectives 1.1 Statements,

i.e. The conclusion to the following argument says If you had an A, then you d have a ~(B v Z).

7.5 Conditional Proof (CP): Conditional Proof is a different way to do proofs. Using CP will always get you a horseshoe statement, so the best time to use it is when your conclusion is either a horseshoe

Review. Propositions, propositional operators, truth tables. Logical Equivalences. Tautologies & contradictions

Review Propositions, propositional operators, truth tables Logical Equivalences. Tautologies & contradictions Some common logical equivalences Predicates & quantifiers Some logical equivalences involving

1. From Lewis Carroll: extract a pair of premises and finish the conclusion.

Math 2200 2. Treibergs σιι First Midterm Exam Name: Sample January 26, 2011 Sample First Midterm Questions. Sept. 17, 2008 and Sept. 16, 2009. Some questions from Math 3210 Midterms of 1. From Lewis Carroll:

CS1021. Why logic? Logic about inference or argument. Start from assumptions or axioms. Make deductions according to rules of reasoning.

3: Logic Why logic? Logic about inference or argument Start from assumptions or axioms Make deductions according to rules of reasoning Logic 3-1 Why logic? (continued) If I don t buy a lottery ticket on

A Little Deductive Logic

A Little Deductive Logic In propositional or sentential deductive logic, we begin by specifying that we will use capital letters (like A, B, C, D, and so on) to stand in for sentences, and we assume that

Přednáška 12. Důkazové kalkuly Kalkul Hilbertova typu. 11/29/2006 Hilbertův kalkul 1

Přednáška 12 Důkazové kalkuly Kalkul Hilbertova typu 11/29/2006 Hilbertův kalkul 1 Formal systems, Proof calculi A proof calculus (of a theory) is given by: A. a language B. a set of axioms C. a set of

Natural Deduction is a method for deriving the conclusion of valid arguments expressed in the symbolism of propositional logic.

Natural Deduction is a method for deriving the conclusion of valid arguments expressed in the symbolism of propositional logic. The method consists of using sets of Rules of Inference (valid argument forms)

Introduction to first-order logic:

Introduction to first-order logic: First-order structures and languages. Terms and formulae in first-order logic. Interpretations, truth, validity, and satisfaction. Valentin Goranko DTU Informatics September

In this chapter, we specify a deductive apparatus for PL.

Handout 5 PL Derivations In this chapter, we specify a deductive apparatus for PL Definition deductive apparatus A deductive apparatus for PL is a set of rules of inference (or derivation rules) that determine

Topic DPL: Answers. Exercise 1.1a Explain why the rule &E for MPL is a sound rule.

Topic DPL: Answers Exercise 1.1a Explain why the rule &E for MPL is a sound rule. In MPL, if (φ&ψ) is true under some interpretation then φ and ψ are true under that interpretation too. Thus, if (φ&ψ)

MATH 501: Discrete Mathematics

November 20, 203 MATH 50: Fall 203 Midterm exam Model Solutions Instructions. Please read carefully before proceeding. (a) The duration of this exam is 20 minutes. (b) Non-programmable calculators are

A Little Deductive Logic

A Little Deductive Logic In propositional or sentential deductive logic, we begin by specifying that we will use capital letters (like A, B, C, D, and so on) to stand in for sentences, and we assume that

Discrete Structures Proofwriting Checklist

CS103 Winter 2019 Discrete Structures Proofwriting Checklist Cynthia Lee Keith Schwarz Now that we re transitioning to writing proofs about discrete structures like binary relations, functions, and graphs,

CSCI-2200 FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

1 CSCI-2200 FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE Spring 2015 February 5, 2015 2 Announcements Homework 1 is due now. Homework 2 will be posted on the web site today. It is due Thursday, Feb. 12 at 10am in class.

Predicate Logic. Andreas Klappenecker

Predicate Logic Andreas Klappenecker Predicates A function P from a set D to the set Prop of propositions is called a predicate. The set D is called the domain of P. Example Let D=Z be the set of integers.

3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017

3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary Aaron Tan 28 31 August 2017 1 3. The Logic of Quantified Statements 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I Predicate; domain; truth set Universal quantifier,

CSE Discrete Structures

CSE 2315 - Discrete Structures Homework 2- Fall 2010 Due Date: Oct. 7 2010, 3:30 pm Proofs using Predicate Logic For all your predicate logic proofs you can use only the rules given in the following tables.

Predicate Logic & Quantification

Predicate Logic & Quantification Things you should do Homework 1 due today at 3pm Via gradescope. Directions posted on the website. Group homework 1 posted, due Tuesday. Groups of 1-3. We suggest 3. In

Learning Goals of CS245 Logic and Computation

Learning Goals of CS245 Logic and Computation Alice Gao April 27, 2018 Contents 1 Propositional Logic 2 2 Predicate Logic 4 3 Program Verification 6 4 Undecidability 7 1 1 Propositional Logic Introduction

Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus

Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus Lila Kari University of Waterloo Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 22 Predicate calculus - Logical consequence

Lecture 10 CS 1813 Discrete Mathematics. Quantify What? Reasoning with Predicates

Lecture 10 CS 1813 Discrete Mathematics Quantify What? Reasoning with Predicates 1 More Examples with Forall the Universal Quantifier L predicate about qsort L(n) length(qsort[a 1, a 2,, a n ] ) = n Universe

CSE Discrete Structures

CSE 2315 - Discrete Structures Homework 1- Fall 2010 Due Date: Sept. 16 2010, 3:30 pm Statements, Truth Values, and Tautologies 1. Which of the following are statements? a) 3 + 7 = 10 b) All cars are blue.

! Predicates! Variables! Quantifiers. ! Universal Quantifier! Existential Quantifier. ! Negating Quantifiers. ! De Morgan s Laws for Quantifiers

Sec$on Summary (K. Rosen notes for Ch. 1.4, 1.5 corrected and extended by A.Borgida)! Predicates! Variables! Quantifiers! Universal Quantifier! Existential Quantifier! Negating Quantifiers! De Morgan s

Why Learning Logic? Logic. Propositional Logic. Compound Propositions

Logic Objectives Propositions and compound propositions Negation, conjunction, disjunction, and exclusive or Implication and biconditional Logic equivalence and satisfiability Application of propositional

Full file at Chapter 1

Chapter 1 Use the following to answer questions 1-5: In the questions below determine whether the proposition is TRUE or FALSE 1. 1 + 1 = 3 if and only if 2 + 2 = 3. 2. If it is raining, then it is raining.

https://vu5.sfc.keio.ac.jp/slide/

1 FUNDAMENTALS OF LOGIC NO.7 PREDICATE LOGIC Tatsuya Hagino hagino@sfc.keio.ac.jp lecture URL https://vu5.sfc.keio.ac.jp/slide/ 2 So Far Propositional Logic Logical Connectives (,,, ) Truth Table Tautology

1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs

1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs 1.1 Propositional Logic Propositions( 명제 ) a declarative sentence that is either true or false, but not both nor neither letters denoting propositions p, q, r, s, T:

Foundations of Mathematics Worksheet 2

Foundations of Mathematics Worksheet 2 L. Pedro Poitevin June 24, 2007 1. What are the atomic truth assignments on {a 1,..., a n } that satisfy: (a) The proposition p = ((a 1 a 2 ) (a 2 a 3 ) (a n 1 a

Test 1 Solutions(COT3100) (1) Prove that the following Absorption Law is correct. I.e, prove this is a tautology:

Test 1 Solutions(COT3100) Sitharam (1) Prove that the following Absorption Law is correct. I.e, prove this is a tautology: ( q (p q) (r p)) r Solution. This is Modus Tollens applied twice, with transitivity

Predicate Logic: Sematics Part 1

Predicate Logic: Sematics Part 1 CS402, Spring 2018 Shin Yoo Predicate Calculus Propositional logic is also called sentential logic, i.e. a logical system that deals with whole sentences connected with

Predicate Calculus - Syntax

Predicate Calculus - Syntax Lila Kari University of Waterloo Predicate Calculus - Syntax CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 26 The language L pred of Predicate Calculus - Syntax L pred, the formal language

Automated Reasoning Lecture 5: First-Order Logic

Automated Reasoning Lecture 5: First-Order Logic Jacques Fleuriot jdf@inf.ac.uk Recap Over the last three lectures, we have looked at: Propositional logic, semantics and proof systems Doing propositional

A1 Logic (25 points) Using resolution or another proof technique of your stated choice, establish each of the following.

A1 Logic (25 points) Using resolution or another proof technique of your stated choice, establish each of the following. = ( x)( y)p (x, y, f(x, y)) ( x)( y)( z)p (x, y, z)). b. (6.25 points) Γ = ( x)p

*EXAM 1* EECS 203 Spring 2016

*EXAM 1* EECS 203 Spring 2016 Name (Print): uniqname (Print): Instructions. You have 110 minutes to complete this exam. You may have one page of notes (8.5x11.5 two-sided) but may not use any other sources

1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs

1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs 1.1 Propositional Logic Propositions( ) a declarative sentence that is either true or false, but not both nor neither letters denoting propostions p, q, r, s, T: true

2/18/14. What is logic? Proposi0onal Logic. Logic? Propositional Logic, Truth Tables, and Predicate Logic (Rosen, Sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.

Logic? Propositional Logic, Truth Tables, and Predicate Logic (Rosen, Sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.3) TOPICS Propositional Logic Logical Operations Equivalences Predicate Logic CS160 - Spring Semester 2014 2 What

MATH 1090 Problem Set #3 Solutions March York University

York University Faculties of Science and Engineering, Arts, Atkinson MATH 1090. Problem Set #3 Solutions Section M 1. Use Resolution (possibly in combination with the Deduction Theorem, Implication as

First-Order Logic (FOL)

First-Order Logic (FOL) Also called Predicate Logic or Predicate Calculus 2. First-Order Logic (FOL) FOL Syntax variables x, y, z, constants a, b, c, functions f, g, h, terms variables, constants or n-ary

Logic: First Order Logic

Logic: First Order Logic Raffaella Bernardi bernardi@inf.unibz.it P.zza Domenicani 3, Room 2.28 Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen http://www.inf.unibz.it/~bernardi/courses/logic06

Modal logics: an introduction

Modal logics: an introduction Valentin Goranko DTU Informatics October 2010 Outline Non-classical logics in AI. Variety of modal logics. Brief historical remarks. Basic generic modal logic: syntax and

Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, Predicate logic

Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, 2018 Predicate logic 1. Why propositional logic is not enough? Discussion: (i) Does (1a) contradict (1b)? [Two sentences are contradictory

VO Grundzüge der Artificial Intelligence SS Hans Tompits Institut für Informationssysteme Arbeitsbereich Wissensbasierte Systeme

VO Grundzüge der Artificial Intelligence SS 2009 Hans Tompits Institut für Informationssysteme Arbeitsbereich Wissensbasierte Systeme Knowledge Representation Folien adaptiert nach Vorlagen von Stuart

1 Introduction to Predicate Resolution

1 Introduction to Predicate Resolution The resolution proof system for Predicate Logic operates, as in propositional case on sets of clauses and uses a resolution rule as the only rule of inference. The

Philosophy 240: Symbolic Logic

Philosophy 240: Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2015 Class #41 - Second-Order Quantification Marcus, Symbolic Logic, Slide 1 Second-Order Inferences P Consider a red apple and a red

Class 29 - November 3 Semantics for Predicate Logic

Philosophy 240: Symbolic Logic Fall 2010 Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays: 9am - 9:50am Hamilton College Russell Marcus rmarcus1@hamilton.edu Class 29 - November 3 Semantics for Predicate Logic I. Proof Theory

Inference and Proofs (1.6 & 1.7)

EECS 203 Spring 2016 Lecture 4 Page 1 of 9 Introductory problem: Inference and Proofs (1.6 & 1.7) As is commonly the case in mathematics, it is often best to start with some definitions. An argument for

Notes on Propositional and First-Order Logic (CPSC 229 Class Notes, January )

Notes on Propositional and First-Order Logic (CPSC 229 Class Notes, January 23 30 2017) John Lasseter Revised February 14, 2017 The following notes are a record of the class sessions we ve devoted to the

Sets, Logic, Relations, and Functions

Sets, Logic, Relations, and Functions Andrew Kay September 28, 2014 Abstract This is an introductory text, not a comprehensive study; these notes contain mainly definitions, basic results, and examples.

Quantifiers. P. Danziger

- 2 Quantifiers P. Danziger 1 Elementary Quantifiers (2.1) We wish to be able to use variables, such as x or n in logical statements. We do this by using the two quantifiers: 1. - There Exists 2. - For

The Importance of Being Formal. Martin Henz. February 5, Propositional Logic

The Importance of Being Formal Martin Henz February 5, 2014 Propositional Logic 1 Motivation In traditional logic, terms represent sets, and therefore, propositions are limited to stating facts on sets

First Order Logic (1A) Young W. Lim 11/18/13

Copyright (c) 2013. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software

Chapter 1. Logic and Proof

Chapter 1. Logic and Proof 1.1 Remark: A little over 100 years ago, it was found that some mathematical proofs contained paradoxes, and these paradoxes could be used to prove statements that were known

Symbolic Logic 3. For an inference to be deductively valid it is impossible for the conclusion to be false if the premises are true.

Symbolic Logic 3 Testing deductive validity with truth tables For an inference to be deductively valid it is impossible for the conclusion to be false if the premises are true. So, given that truth tables

Seminaar Abstrakte Wiskunde Seminar in Abstract Mathematics Lecture notes in progress (27 March 2010)

http://math.sun.ac.za/amsc/sam Seminaar Abstrakte Wiskunde Seminar in Abstract Mathematics 2009-2010 Lecture notes in progress (27 March 2010) Contents 2009 Semester I: Elements 5 1. Cartesian product

1 FUNDAMENTALS OF LOGIC NO.8 SEMANTICS OF PREDICATE LOGIC Tatsuya Hagino hagino@sfc.keio.ac.jp lecture URL https://vu5.sfc.keio.ac.jp/slide/ 2 So Far Propositional Logic Logical connectives (,,, ) Truth

2 nd Assignment Answer Key Phil 210 Fall 2013

2 nd Assignment Answer Key Phil 210 Fall 2013 1a. Show that, if Q is a tautological consequence of P 1,..., P n, P, then P Q is a tautological consequence of P 1,..., P n. Proof: Suppose, for conditional