arxiv: v1 [physics.gen-ph] 18 Aug 2018

Transcription

1 Path integal and Sommefeld quantization axiv: v1 [physics.gen-ph] 18 Aug 018 Mikoto Matsuda 1, and Takehisa Fujita, 1 Japan Health and Medical technological college, Tokyo, Japan College of Science and Technology, Nihon Univesity, Tokyo, Japan (Dated: Septembe 13, 018) The path integal fomulation can epoduce the ight enegy spectum of the hamonic oscillato potential, but it cannot esolve the Coulomb potential poblem. This is because the path integal cannot popely take into account the bounday condition, which is due to the pesence of the scatteing states in the Coulomb potential system. On the othe hand, the Sommefeld quantization can epoduce the ight enegy spectum of both hamonic oscillato and Coulomb potential cases since the bounday condition is effectively taken into account in this semiclassical teatment. The basic diffeence between the two schemes should be that no constaint is imposed on the wave function in the path integal while the Sommefeld quantization ule is deived by equiing that the state vecto should be a single-valued function. The limitation of the semiclassical method is also claified in tems of the squae well and δ(x) function potential models. PACS numbes: w,5.85.Ec I. INTRODUCTION Quantum field theoy is the basis of moden theoetical physics and it is well established by now [1 4]. If the kinematics is non-elativistic, then one obtains the equation of quantum mechanics which is the Schödinge equation. In this espect, if one solves the Schödinge equation, then one can popely obtain the enegy eigenvalue of the coesponding potential model. Histoically, howeve, the enegy eigenvalue is obtained without solving the Schödinge equation, and the most inteesting method is known as the Sommefeld quantization ule which is the semiclassical method [5 8]. In this case, the Sommefeld quantization ule is to fist assume pd = nh (1.1) whee n denotes an intege and h is the Planck constant. This method can be applied to the Coulomb potential poblemofv() = Ze. Infact, it canbesolvedexactlybythesommefeldquantization. Hee, themomentum p is elated to the enegy E as E = p m Ze whee m denotes the mass of electon which is bound in the Coulomb potential. In this case, eq. (1.1) can be witten as pd = 0 0 m E d = nh (1.3) 0 whee 0 = Ze E is intoduced. Afte the integation of eq.(1.3), we obtain the enegy eigenvalue E as (1.) E = m(ze ) h n (1.4) Electonic addess: mmatsuda@niken.jp Electonic addess: fffujita@phys.cst.nihon-u.ac.jp

2 which is a coect expession. The advantage of this method is clea in that it does not equie the solution of the diffeential equation. Instead, one should make an integation of the space coodinates ove the limited ange of space. The simila type of advantage is also known in the path integal fomulation, and indeed the path integal method is fomulated so that the spectum can be obtained by the infinitely many dimensional integation ove the discetized space coodinates. Howeve, the path integal method can be successfully applied only to the hamonic oscillato potential case. The eason of the successful desciption of the hamonic oscillato potential is clea because thee is no scatteing state in the hamonic oscillato potential system. On the othe hand, the path integal cannot epoduce the enegy spectum of the Coulomb potential case. This is elated to the fact that the Coulomb case contains scatteing states, and thus the value of ψ(x) dx is not necessaily unity. Theefoe, the bounday condition cannot be popely taken into account in the path integal method, which should be an intinsic defect aising fom the fomulation itself. In addition, we discuss the Sommefeld quantization ule [5 7] and claify why it is successful fo obtaining the enegy spectum of both the Coulomb and the hamonic oscillato potential systems. As we see below, the integation of the Sommefeld quantization ule ove coodinate space can be limited to the finite ange of space. Theefoe, the bounday condition is effectively taken into account in this teatment. Howeve, the scatteing poblem cannot be teated in this semiclassical method, and the scatteing states can be obtained by the WKB method which is the semiclassical appoximation fo the Schödinge wave function. This WKB method is, howeve, not exact and only valid fo the limited ange of applications. The exact calculation of the scatteing poblem should be possible only when one solves the Schödinge equation. II. BOUNDARY CONDITION IN PATH INTEGRAL FORMULATION Hee, we discuss the poblem of the bounday condition how we can conside the physics of the bounday condition into the path integal expession. In fact, thee is no way to include the bounday condition in the path integal fomulation since the path integal does not make use of any infomation on the wave function. This is the basic eason why one cannot solve the Coulomb potential poblem in the path integal calculation since the Coulomb case contains the scatteing states in which the bounday condition in the scatteing state is completely diffeent fom the bound state poblem. In this section, we take the epesentation of h = 1. A. Path integal in quantum mechanics Hee, we biefly descibe the path integal fomulation in quantum mechanics [9 11]. Fist, we define the tansition amplitude K(x,x : t) as K(x,x : t) = x e iht x = n ψ n(x )ψ n (x)e ient (.1) whee Hamiltonian H is defined as H = ˆp h +V(x) = m m and ψ n (x) is an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian H +V(x) (.) x Hψ n (x) = E n ψ n (x). (.3) In this case, the path integal fomulation is witten as { n ( K(x m(xi x i 1 ) ) },x : t) = Dx exp i t ( t) V(x i ) (.4) i=1

3 3 whee many dimensional integation Dx is intoduced as ( m ) n Dx lim n iπ t dx 1 dx n 1 (.5) which is a symbolic notation in the path integal fomulation. Theefoe, the tansition amplitude can be witten in tems of the path integal fomulation as ( t ) K(x,x : t) = x e iht x = Dx exp i L(x, ẋ)dt (.6) whee L(x,ẋ) is defined as which is the Lagangian of the coesponding classical system. 0 L(x,ẋ) = 1 mẋ V(x) (.7) B. Bounday condition in path integal fomulation Now a question may aise as to whethe we may take into account the bounday condition fo the wave function ψ(x) in ode to solve a bound state poblem. That is, we must take into account the condition ψ(± ) = 0 (.8) in the path integal expession of eq.(.1) and eq.(.6) in some way o the othe. Howeve, one sees that the bounday condition cannot be taken into account in the path integal fomulation in which any condition on the wave function neve appeas in this fomulation. This will be shown below moe in detail. C. Bounday condition in the hamonic oscillato potential system Thee is one example which is solved exactly in tems of the path integal fomulation, that is, the hamonic oscillato potential system. Why is it that the hamonic oscillato potential system can be successfully solved? The eason is, of couse, simple in that the hamonic oscillato potential system does not contain any scatteing states, and in fact, all the states ae bound. Theefoe, it is clea that ψ n (x) dx = 1 (.9) is always guaanteed. Thus, we obtain fom eq.(.1) K(x,x : t)dx = x e iht x dx = dx n ψ n (x) e ient = n e ient. (.10) In fact, we obtain the K(x,x : t) fo the hamonic oscillato potential system as { mω K(x,x : t) = iπsinωt exp i mω [ ]} (x +x )cotωt x x sinωt (.11) and theefoe K(x,x : t)dx = mω dx iπsinωt e imωx tan ωt 1 = isin ωt = e ient. (.1) n=0

4 4 Hee, we make use of the following equation 1 isin ωt 1 e iωt = e iωt(n+1 ) (.13) = e i ωt n=0 and thus find ( E n = ω n+ 1 ) (.14) which is a coect enegy fo the hamonic oscillato potential system. D. Bounday condition with scatteing states The hamonic oscillato potential is a vey special and exceptional case in quantum mechanics, and it is, of couse, unealistic and cannot be applied to the desciption of natue. The eason why we often find the hamonic oscillato potential is simple. If we teat many body systems and make some appoximations to obtain an effective one body potential, then we always obtain the hamonic oscillato potential nea the minimum point. Namely, if we teat it in tems of the small vibation aound the minimum point x = x 0 of the complicated potential, then we find V(x) = V(x 0 )+ 1 V (x 0 )(x x 0 ) +. (.15) and hee the fist tem is a constant and the second tem is just the hamonic oscillato potential. Howeve, it is clea that this is only valid fo the small vibations. The complicated ealistic potential should contain the scatteing states since the potential V(x) should vanish at the lage value of x. Fo any systems with scatteing states ψ s (x), the condition ψ s (x) dx < (.16) is not necessaily satisfied. Theefoe, eq.(.10) cannot be used, and thus thee is no way to obtain the enegy eigenvalues of the coesponding system fom the path integal method. This indicates that eq.(.1) should nomally contain some infinity in the integations of the left hand side. III. SOMMERFELD QUANTIZATION AND BOUNDARY CONDITION As we see in the Intoduction, the Sommefeld quantization scheme is quite successful fo obtaining the enegy eigenvalue in some of the potential poblems. Hee, we biefly eview the deivation of the Sommefeld quantization ule fom the Schödinge equation in tems of the semiclassical appoximation. A. Sommefeld quantization ule We stat fom the Schödinge equation in one dimension [ h ] m x +V(x) ψ(x) = Eψ(x). (3.1) Now we assume the wave function in the following shape ψ(x) = Ae is h (3.)

5 and expand the S in tems of h as S = S 0 + hs 1 +. By inseting the S into the Schödinge equation, we obtain the S 0 to the lowest ode of h ds 0 (x) dx Theefoe, the wave function ψ(x) becomes ψ(x) = Ae ± ī h = ± m(e V(x)). (3.3) m(e V(x))dx. (3.4) At this point, we equie that the wave function should be a single-valued function, and theefoe obtain the following constaint equation m(e pdx V(x))dx = π hn, (n : intege o half intege) (3.5) which is just the Sommefeld quantization ule. 5 B. Bounday condition in the Sommefeld quantization The constaint equation of eq.(3.5) is obtained fom the equiement that the wave function should be a single-valued function. This should not necessaily coespond to a bounday condition at infinity, but should be an impotant physical imposition on the state vecto, and theefoe we can obtain the enegy spectum fom this condition. Howeve, it should be noted that the Sommefeld quantization scheme can epoduce the ight desciption of the enegy eigenvalue only if the system has some semiclassical natue like the Coulomb potential system. The bounday condition at lage x should eflect the quantum effect in the wave function of the coesponding paticle. This can be viewed fom the uncetainty law that the lage x coesponds nomally to the small momentum egions in which the quantum effect becomes most impotant. Coulomb potential (V() = Ze ) : In the Coulomb potential, the stong pat should be found in the small egion, and theefoe the lage momentum egion is most impotant, and thus it can be consideed to be almost semiclassical. Indeed, the Sommefeld quantization scheme can give the ight answe fo the enegy spectum of the Coulomb potential system. We show the calculated esult which is given in Intoduction pd = Ze E m E 0 Ze E d = nh = E = m(ze ) h n. (3.6) The bounday condition of eq.(.8) is effectively included in the above equation. This can be seen since the integation is limited to the finite egion of space coodinate which is physically acceptable aea of space. Hamonic oscillato potential (V(x) = 1 mω x ) : pdx m(e V(x))dx = mω E mω E mω E mω x dx = mω E n mω = π hn. (3.7) Thus, by consideing the fact that the value of n in eq.(3.5) can be an intege as well as a half intege, we obtain the enegy E ( E = hω n+ 1 ), (n = 0,1,, ). (3.8) Squae well potential (V(x) = V 0 fo x < a, othewise V(x) = 0) : m(e pdx V(x))dx = m(e +V0 )a = π hn. (3.9)

6 6 Thus, we obtain E = V 0 + h ( πn ) ma. (3.10) This can be compaed with the esult obtained fom the quantum mechanics calculation fo the squae well potential model. This enegy cannot be given in tems of the analytical expession. Instead, one should solve the following equation fo E m(e +V 0 )a α = h, β = mea h (3.11) β = αtanα. (3.1) Appoximate solutions can be found when α π n which should be expected fom tanα 0. In this case, we can immediately obtain the enegy E as E V 0 + h ( πn ) ma (3.13) which is just the same as the semiclassical esult of eq.(3.10). In this case, howeve, eq.(3.1) is not necessaily satisfied, and thus the esult of the bound state enegy should be fa fom eliable. δ function potential (V(x) = V δ δ(x)) : The limitation of the Sommefeld quantization ule can be well exhibited if one solves the enegy spectum of the δ function potential with the semiclassical method. The answeis that thee is no way to expess the enegy E in tems ofv δ. This is patly because of the mathematical difficulty due to the genealized function of δ(x) in the squae oot, but mainly because of the limitation of the Sommefeld quantization ule itself. This difficulty is bette undestood if we calculate the enegy spectum of the δ function potential fom the squae well potential esult. In this case, we stat fom eq.(3.1) mea h = m(e +V 0 )a h tan m(e +V 0 )a h. (3.14) Hee, we make a 0, V 0, but keep V δ = av 0 finite. Theefoe, eq.(3.14) can be witten to a good appoximation as which leads to the enegy E me h mvδ h mvδ h (3.15) E = mv δ h (3.16) and this is indeed a coect enegy eigenvalue of the δ function potential in quantum mechanics poblem. As we note above, the enegy of the squae well potential fom the Sommefeld quantization ule is obtained without making use of eq.(3.1) while the enegy of the δ function potential is obtained only if we make use of eq.(3.1). Fom this discussion, we see that the Sommefeld quantization ule cannot be applied to the δ function potential. IV. SUMMARY We have claified the similaity and diffeence between the path integal fomulation and the Sommefeld quantization ule. The similaity of the two methods is concened with the classical mechanics since both appoaches stat fom the equations of classical mechanics.

7 On the othe hand, thee is a significant diffeence between them. The Sommefeld quantization ule can popely take into account the bounday condition which is cucial fo solving the bound state poblem. On the othe hand, the path integal method cannot include any of the wave function infomation, and theefoe it cannot conside the bounday condition at infinity. Theefoe, the path integal method can only solve the hamonic oscillato potential poblem in which thee is no need of the bounday condition. The investigation of the pesent pape may not contain any new physics except that the limitation of the path integal method is made clea fo the fist time. In this espect, it should pesent an impotant step fo eades to ealize that any numeical calculations based on the path integal fomulation cannot give the ight enegy spectum of physically inteesting potential models. In addition, it is shown that the Sommefeld quantization ule can be quite useful fo calculating the spectum of some quantum mechanics models, but at the same time, we explicitly pesent the limitation of the semiclassical pictue in tems of the squae well potential calculation. 7 [1] J.D. Bjoken and S.D. Dell, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, (McGaw-Hill Book Company,1964) [] J.J. Sakuai, Advanced Quantum Mechanics, (addison-wesley,1967) [3] K. Nishijima, Fields and Paticles, (W.A. Benjamin, INC, 1969) [4] T. Fujita and N. Kanda, Fundamental Poblems in Quantum Field Theoy (Bentham Publishes, 013) [5] A. Sommefeld, Ann. Physik 8, 665 (1909) [6] A. Sommefeld, Ann. d. phys. 51, 1 (1916) [7] A. Sommefeld, Ann. Physik 6, 95 (190) [8] A. Sommefeld, Ann. Physik 81, 1135 (196) [9] R.P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 76, 749 (1949) [10] R.P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 76, 769 (1949) [11] R.P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 80, 440 (1950)