arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 26 Aug 2006

Transcription

1 hep-ph/688 arxiv:hep-ph/688v 6 Aug 6 Axion and PVLAS data in a Little Higgs model Takeshi Fukuyama a, 1 and Tatsuru Kikuchi b, a Department o Physics, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, , Japan b Theory Division, KEK, Oho 1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 35-81, Japan Abstract Little Higgs models may provide a solution to the gauge hierarchy problem in the mass o the Higgs boson. In this ramework the Higgs boson is arisen as the pseudo- Nambu-Goldstone (PNG) boson. We show that the lepton triplet introduced in a little Higgs model explains a small mass parameter in the double see-saw mechanism or neutrino masses, and it can also gives an explanation or the axion like particle recently reported by PVLAS collaboration. 1 ukuyama@se.ritsumei.ac.jp tatsuru@post.kek.jp

2 Despite a lot o phenomenological successes in the standard model (SM), it has a undamental problem associated with the Higgs mass parameter. The Higgs mass squared parameter receives radiative corrections o order the cuto scale squared, implying the existence o some new physics at a scale not much larger than the scale o electroweak symmetry breaking. On the other hand, since experiments have not ound any convincing sign o such physics so ar, it has been stimulated a lot o models o the electroweak symmetry breaking. Little Higgs models [1] represent a new attempt to solve the gauge hierarchy problem in the mass o the Higgs boson responsible or the electroweak symmetry breaking. This approach treats the Higgs boson as part o an assortment o the pseudo-nambu-goldstone (PNG) bosons, arising rom a spontaneously broken global symmetry at a cuto scale Λ, typically on the order o several TeV. On the other hand, one and the most likely solution to the strong CP problem, Peccei- Quinn (PQ) solution gives us another interesting inormation to the physics beyond the SM [] that also predicts the existence o a PNG, the so called axion. Axion particle φ has an interaction with photon as L = 1 4 g φγγφf µν F µν = g φγγ φ E B. (1) The Primakov-like process allows φ γ conversion process to occur in the external B-ield background. The conversion rate or φ γ ater traveling a distance L is given by P(φ γ) = 1 4 g φγγ B L. () The converted axion is reconverted to the photons when it go across an optical barrier. The detection rate or such photons in a second magnetic ield is given by [3] ( ) P R = P ǫ, (3) ω where P is the laser power, ω is the photon energy and ǫ is the eiciency or the detector. This setup would be used in inding out the axion signal at laser experiments. The direct search or the production process e + e γ φγ is given by the LEP experiment. The total cross section or such process is and the decay rate or φ γγ is given by The LEP data shows the ollowing constraint: α(s m σ = gφγγ φ ) (4) 4s Γ(φ γγ) = 1 64π g φγγ m3 φ. (5) M φ = g 1 φγγ 15 GeV. (6) 1

3 In the usual PQ solution to the strong CP problem, we assume an invisible axion with a decay constant a that is severely constrained rom astrophysics to be 1 9±1 [GeV] a 1 1±1 [GeV]. (7) Note the similarity o this scale and the right-handed neutrino mass scale in the standard see-saw mechanism has been studied in [4]. Recently, PVLAS collabolation [5] reported the ollowing range o parameters or the axion-like particle, that is completely dierent rom the above range o parameters or the axion: GeV < M φ < GeV,.7 mev < m φ < mev. (8) Note that the PVLAS data corresponds to the scale o symmetry breaking o order m φ M φ 1 kev unlike the QCD axion case: m a a Λ QCD m π π 1 MeV. In this letter, we propose a little Higgs model, which can it with the PVLAS axion-like event though there have already been several attempts to explain this data [6] and there is a study on pseudo-axion properties in the little Higgs models in detail [7]. The key ingredient or explaining the scale o U(1) PQ, which is ound to be o order 1 kev, is to relate the scale with a mass parameter or the singlet in the double see-saw mechanism [8] or the type-iii see-saw mechanism [9] that gives an explanation or the smallness o neutrino masses. We consider the simplest little Higgs model [1] and extend the model to include the Peccei-Quinn symmetry. The model is constructed to have Yukawa couplings and gauge interactions without introducing quadratic divergences. It can be achieved by using the idea o collective symmetry breaking. In order to realize this idea, we introduce SU(3) SU(3) global symmetry which are spontaneously broken to SU() SU() by vacuum expectation values or two scalar triplets Φ 1 and Φ. Φ 1 = 1, Φ = 1. (9) For the collective symmetry breaking, the diagonal subgroup SU(3) V = SU(3) SU(3) SU(3) SU(3) is gauged and the subgroup SU() SU(3) V will become the weak gauge symmetry. Using the residual SU(3) A SU(3) V symmetry, Φ 1 and Φ are parametrized as Φ 1 = 1 [ i exp { ( h η + h Φ = 1 [ { ( i h exp η + h )}] )}],. (1)

4 In the little Higgs models, the Higgs mass parameters are protected by global symmetries which include the Standard Model electroweak gauge symmetry. The tree level Lagrangian or the Higgs ields are only given by the gauge interaction: L = ( µ + iga a µ λa )Φ 1 + ( µ + iga a µ λa )Φ, (11) where λ a (a = 1,, 8) is the Gell-Mann matrix. Ater developing the VEVs or Φ 1,, there appear extra gauge bosons W and Z whose masses are given by M W = g g, M Z =. (1) 3 tan θ W The lower bound on is estimated to be 4.5 TeV [11]. The leading mass term or the Higgs boson is irstly generated at the one-loop level ( ) MHiggs g4 Λ 16π log g4 8π log (4π), (13) where we have used a relation Λ 4π. This M Higgs is o the right order o magnitude to generate the correct electroweak scale or 1 TeV and an order one quartic coupling g is generated. The Yukawa interactions or the matter multiplets should also be extended in the little Higgs models. Here ( we ) consider the lepton sector. The lepton doublet L is enlarged to a L triplet 3 Ψ = by introducing a singlet S, and we also introduce a singlet 1 N S under any SU(3) symmetries, which is necessary to have a Yukawa coupling or L and a triplet Higgs scalar Φ 1 [1]: L Y = y ν NΨΦ 1 + h.c. = iy ν NLh + y ν NS ( ) h h + h.c. (14) Under this Lagrangian, we can assign the PQ charges as listed in the Table below. ields PQ charges Φ 1 +1 Φ 1 Ψ 1 N Since S is a complete singlet under the SM, we can write down the Majorana mass term or it: L mass = µ s S T C 1 S. (15) 3

5 This term explicitly breaks PQ symmetry. Then the total mass terms in the model can be written in a matrix orm in the base with {ν, N, S} as ollows: m M = m M. (16) M µ s Here the mass parameter m and M are given by ( ) m = iy ν v, M = y ν v with v = 174 GeV represents the weak scale. Hence, we obtain the light Majorana neutrino mass as ( m ) ( ) v m ν = µ s µs. (18) M For m ν 1 ev and 1 TeV, we have µ s 1 kev. In summary, we have shown in this letter that the double see-saw mechanism has its natural setup in the simplest little Higgs model. The little Higgs model indicates a Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking around 1 kev. It is very suggestive that this scale is the same order as that o the scale or the axion-like particle recently reported by the PVLAS collaboration. Acknowledgments This work is supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid or Scientiic Research rom the Ministry o Education, Science and Culture o Japan (#165469). We thank to the Theory Division at KEK or hospitality. We are grateul to N. Gaur or his useul comments and discussions and grateul to J. Reuter or his useul comments on pseudo-axions in little Higgs models. Reerences [1] N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen and H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 513, 3 (1) [arxiv:hep-ph/1539]; N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, E. Katz and A. E. Nelson, JHEP 7, 34 () [arxiv:hep-ph/61]; N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, E. Katz, A. E. Nelson, T. Gregoire and J. G. Wacker, JHEP 8, 1 () [arxiv:hep-ph/6]; T. Gregoire and J. G. Wacker, JHEP 8, 19 () [arxiv:hep-ph/63]; I. Low, W. Skiba and D. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 66, 71 () [arxiv:hep-ph/743]; D. E. Kaplan and M. Schmaltz, JHEP 31, 39 (3) [arxiv:hep-ph/349]; S. Chang and J. G. Wacker, Phys. Rev. D 69, 35 (4) [arxiv:hep-ph/331]; W. Skiba and J. Terning, Phys. Rev. D 68, 751 (3) [arxiv:hep-ph/353]; S. Chang, JHEP 31, 57 (3) [arxiv:hep-ph/3634]; H. C. Cheng and I. Low, JHEP 39, 51 (3) [arxiv:hep-ph/38199]; JHEP 48, 61 (4) [arxiv:hep-ph/4543]; M. Schmaltz, JHEP 48, 56 (4) [arxiv:hepph/47143]. 4 (17)

6 [] R. D. Peccei, H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 144 (1977); Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977). [3] K. Van Bibber, N. R. Dagdeviren, S. E. Koonin, A. Kerman and H. N. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 759 (1987); G. Ruoso et al., Z. Phys. C 56, 55 (199); R. Cameron et al., Phys. Rev. D 47, 377 (1993). [4] T. Fukuyama and T. Kikuchi, JHEP 55, 17 (5) [arxiv:hep-ph/41373]. [5] E. Zavattini et al. [PVLAS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 1146 (6) [arxiv:hep-ex/5717]. [6] E. Masso and J. Redondo, JCAP 59, 15 (5) [arxiv:hep-ph/54]; M. Kleban and R. Rabadan, arxiv:hep-ph/51183; A. Ringwald, J. Phys. Con. Ser. 39, 197 (6) [arxiv:hep-ph/511184]; E. Gabrielli, K. Huitu and S. Roy, arxiv:hepph/64143; I. Antoniadis, A. Boyarsky and O. Ruchayskiy, arxiv:hep-ph/6636; C. Biggio, E. Masso and J. Redondo, arxiv:hep-ph/646; J. Jaeckel, E. Masso, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald and F. Takahashi, arxiv:hep-ph/65313; E. Masso and J. Redondo, arxiv:hep-ph/66163; arxiv:hep-ph/66164; J. P. Conlon, arxiv:hepph/67138; E. Masso, arxiv:hep-ph/6715. [7] W. Kilian, D. Rainwater and J. Reuter, Phys. Rev. D 71, 158 (5) [arxiv:hepph/41113]. [8] R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 561; R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 34, 164 (1986); T. Fukuyama, A. Ilakovac, T. Kikuchi and K. Matsuda, JHEP 56, 16 (5) [arxiv:hep-ph/53114]. [9] S. M. Barr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 1161 (4) [arxiv:hep-ph/3915]. [1] M. Schmaltz, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 117, 4 (3) [arxiv:hep-ph/1415]; D. E. Kaplan and M. Schmaltz, JHEP 31, 39 (3) [arxiv:hep-ph/349]. [11] W. Kilian and J. Reuter, Phys. Rev. D 7, 154 (4) [arxiv:hep-ph/31195]; J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa and I. Hidalgo, JHEP 53, 38 (5) [arxiv:hepph/566]; G. Marandella, C. Schappacher and A. Strumia, Phys. Rev. D 7, 3514 (5) [arxiv:hep-ph/596]; Z. Han and W. Skiba, Phys. Rev. D 7, 355 (5) [arxiv:hep-ph/566]. [1] F. del Aguila, M. Masip and J. L. Padilla, Phys. Lett. B 67, 131 (5) [arxiv:hepph/5663]; A. Abada, G. Bhattacharyya and M. Losada, Phys. Rev. D 73, 336 (6) [arxiv:hep-ph/51175]. 5