Radiative corrections to the Higgs potential in the Littlest Higgs model
|
|
- Leonard Turner
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Little. results a Little. Radiative corrections to the potential in the Littlest model Cheluci In collaboration with Dr. Antonio Dobado González and Dra. Siannah Peñaranda Rivas Departamento de Física Teórica I Universidad Complutense de Madrid
2 Little. results a Outline Little. 1 2 Little
3 Little. results a Outline Little. 1 2 Little
4 Little. results a Little In the Standard Model (SM) the fundamental scalar suffer from radiative correction instability in their masses.. Problem: Little hierarchy problem The electroweak precision data require Λ 10 TeV BUT Large fine-tuning m H = m tree + Λ 2 loops However, if Λ 2 TeV no large fine-tuning New physics at this scale.
5 Little. results a Little In the Standard Model (SM) the fundamental scalar suffer from radiative correction instability in their masses.. Problem: Little hierarchy problem The electroweak precision data require Λ 10 TeV BUT Large fine-tuning m H = m tree + Λ 2 loops However, if Λ 2 TeV no large fine-tuning New physics at this scale.
6 Little. results a Little In the Standard Model (SM) the fundamental scalar suffer from radiative correction instability in their masses.. Problem: Little hierarchy problem The electroweak precision data require Λ 10 TeV BUT Large fine-tuning m H = m tree + Λ 2 loops However, if Λ 2 TeV no large fine-tuning New physics at this scale.
7 Little. results a Outline Little. 1 2 Little
8 Little. results a Little. Little The is interpreted as a pseudo-nambu-goldstone boson (GB) corresponding to a spontaneously broken global symmetry G to a subset H via a vev f. Three different scales: Λ: UV physics f: new O(TeV) v: EWSB and SM
9 Little. results a Main characteristics Little. The low energy dynamics of the GB is described by a G/H non-linear sigma model (NLSM). The mass is protected by new approximate global symmetries and by the collective symmetry breaking of these global symmetries by gauge and Yukawa interactions. New states at the TeV scale.
10 Little. results a Main characteristics Little. The low energy dynamics of the GB is described by a G/H non-linear sigma model (NLSM). The mass is protected by new approximate global symmetries and by the collective symmetry breaking of these global symmetries by gauge and Yukawa interactions. New states at the TeV scale.
11 Little. results a Main characteristics Little. The low energy dynamics of the GB is described by a G/H non-linear sigma model (NLSM). The mass is protected by new approximate global symmetries and by the collective symmetry breaking of these global symmetries by gauge and Yukawa interactions. New states at the TeV scale.
12 Little. results a Main characteristics Little. The low energy dynamics of the GB is described by a G/H non-linear sigma model (NLSM). The mass is protected by new approximate global symmetries and by the collective symmetry breaking of these global symmetries by gauge and Yukawa interactions. New states at the TeV scale.
13 Little. results a Little. Littlest model The Littlest model (LH), which is a NLSM based on SU(5)/SO(5), is one of the most economical and attractive. N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen, E. Katz and A. Nelson, JHEP 07, 034(2002). SU(5) SO(5) Can be parameterised as: (14 Goldstone bosons) where Λ 10 TeV and f 1 TeV Σ = e iπ/f Σ 0 e iπt /f = e 2iΠ/f Σ 0, the Π matrix represents the fluctuations around the vacuum: 0 14X Π = π a X a = a=1 ξ i 2 H 0 φ i 2 H φ i H T 2 i 2 H ξ T 1 C A η diag(1, 1, 4, 1, 1), The doublet: H = (H 0, H + ), The complex tripet: φ = φ0 1 2 φ φ + φ ++ 1 A.
14 Little. results a Gauge sector: The Lagrangian. L 0 = f 2 8 tr[(d µσ)(d µ Σ) ] Little Model I (SU(2) U(1)) 2 (SU(2) U(1)) SM Model II SU(2) 2 U(1) (SU(2) U(1)) SM. When the symmetry is spontaneously broken W a = s ψ W a 1 c ψw a 2, M2 W = f 2 g 2 W a = c ψ W a 1 + s ψw a 2, m2 W = 0 4c 2 ψ s2 ψ B = s ψ B 1 c ψ B 2, M 2 B = f 2 g 2 20c 2 ψ s2 ψ B, m B = c ψ B 1 + s ψ B 2, mb 2 B 2 = 0 = 0 q c ψ = g/g 1, s ψ = g/g 2 are the mixing angles and g = g 1 g 2 / g g2, idem for U(1) group 2
15 Little. results a Gauge sector: Collective symmetry breaking Little. The model possesses two SU(3) global symmetries. Part of the SU(5) is gauged, for example by (SU(2) U(1)) 2 groups The gauge generators are embedded in the SU(5) in such a way that any given generator commutes with an SU(3) subgroup but breaks the other SU(3) symmetry. If one of the gauge couplings are off then the SU(3) global symmetry is recovered and it will break down to an SU(2) subgroup by the v.e.v Σ 0, becoming the doublet an exact GB. Any quantum contribution to the mass must be proportional to the product of all gauge coupling constants.
16 Little. results a Little. Fermion sector: The Lagrangian and Collective symmetry breaking. L Yuk = λ 1 2 f u R ɛ mn ɛ ijk Σ im Σ jn χ Lk λ 2 f U R U L + h.c. where m, n = 4, 5, i, j = 1, 2, 3, and χ L = (u, b, U) L Collective symmetry breaking If the coupling λ 1 is set to zero the is completely decoupled. If λ 2 = 0 the SU(3) 1 is unbroken and the is an exact GB. When the symmetry is spontaneously broken t R = c θ u R 0 s θ U R T R = s θ u R + c θ U R χ L u 1 0 b A U L t b T 1 A L m t = m b = 0 m 2 T = f 2 (λ λ2 2 ) λ being c θ = q 2 λ 2, s θ = 1 +λ2 2 λ q 1 λ 2 1 +λ2 2
17 Little. results a Little. Summary. Lagrangian and Spectrum The is given by: L 0 + L Yuk New : New gauge bosons One top T All of them are massive and their masses TeV. s fields Their masses are not protected by any symmetry. SM : Four gauge bosons related to the electroweak symmetry The quarks top and bottom All of them are massless. The doublet Protected by collective symmetry breaking. Would be GB : η and ξ Eaten by the new gauge bosons
18 Little. results a Outline Little. 1 2 Little
19 Little. results a Little. One loop We compute the fermionic, gauge boson and the GB radiative to the potential V at one loop level V = µ 2 HH +λ H 4(HH ) 2 +λ φ 2f 2 tr(φφ )+iλ H 2 φf (Hφ H T H φh ) where M 2 φ = f 2 λ φ 2. Integrating out the fields Γ eff [H, φ]. Taking into account that we are computing the effective potential Γ eff H/φ=const = R d x 4 V eff (H, φ) µh = µφ = 0. The divergent integrals are regularized by the NLSM scale ultraviolet Λ.
20 Little. results a Little. Fermionic radiative The Lagrangian for the quarks: L χ = χ R (i / M + Î)χ L + h.c. with M =diag(0, 0, m T ), χ L/R = (t, b, T ) T L/R and Î the interaction matrix. Integrating out the quarks...
21 Little. results a Little. Gauge boson radiative Working in the Landau gauge, then the Lagrangian for the gauge bosons are L Ω = 1 2 Ωµ (( + M 2 Ω )g µν µ ν + 2Ĩ g µν)ω ν with Model I: M Ω = (M W 1 3 3, 0 3 3, M B, 0), Ω µ = (W µa, W µa, B µ, B µ ). Model II: without B. And Ĩ is the interaction matrix. Integrating out the gauge bosons...
22 Little. results a Results I: for µ 2 f µ 2 f = N c m 2 T λ2 t 4π 2 ( ) log 1 + Λ2 mt 2 λ t = q λ 1 λ 2 λ 2 and λ T = q 1. λ 2 1 +λ2 2 λ 2 1 +λ2 2 Little Observe The three diagrams which contribute to this parameter. The µ 2 f log(λ 2 /M 2 ). Relationship: λ 2 t + λ 2 T = m T λ T f µ 2 f > 0. The cancellations occur between with same statistic M.Peresltein, M.Peskin and A.Pierce. Phys. Rev. D69, (2004).
23 Little. results a Little Results II: for µ 2 g Model I: µ I 2 g " 3 64π 2 3g 2 M 2 W log 1 + Λ2 M 2!# W +g 2 M 2 B log 1 + Λ2 M 2 B! or Model II: µ II 2 g 3 64π 2 3g 2 M 2 W log 1 + Λ2 M 2 W!! + g 2 Λ 2. Observe The two diagrams which contribute to this parameter are: The µ I 2 g log(λ 2 /M 2 ). But µ II 2 g Λ 2 + log(λ 2 /M 2 ). µ 2 g < 0. The cancellations occur between with same statistic. M.Peresltein. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 58, (2007).
24 Little. results a Little. Results for λ H 4, λ φ 2, λ H2 φ For the radiative In generic ( ) λ = A Λ2 + B m2 log 1 + Λ (4π f ) 2 (4π f ) 2 m 2 They depend on the mixing angles λ T, c ψ ( ), f, the cutoff Λ and the couplings of the SM. Relationship: RC λ Λ2 H 4 = 1 4 λλ2 φ 2. In the Model II these relations are not exact The terms related to the U(1) gauge group do not satisfy this relationship. A.Dobado, L., S.Peñaranda. Phys. Rev. D75, (2007). A.Dobado, L., S.Peñaranda. Eur.Phys.J. C58, (2008).
25 Little. results a GB Little. To start with we will turn off the gauge interaction... L 0 = f 2 8 tr [ ( µ Σ)( µ Σ) ] L 0 = 1 2 g αβ µ π α µ π β where π α (GB) are the Gaussian coordinates on K The metric on the coset space K g αβ tr Σ Σ π = δ α π β αβ + (π 2 ) + O(π 4 ) Classical Lagrangian NLSM based on the coset K = G/H
26 Little. results a GB Little. To start with we will turn off the gauge interaction... L 0 = f 2 8 tr [ ( µ Σ)( µ Σ) ] L 0 = 1 2 g αβ µ π α µ π β where π α (GB) are the Gaussian coordinates on K The metric on the coset space K g αβ tr Σ Σ π = δ α π β αβ + (π 2 ) + O(π 4 ) Classical Lagrangian NLSM based on the coset K = G/H
27 Little. results a Little. We have to take into account the geometrical nature of the NSLM. e iγ[π] = [dπ g] e is[π,π] Finally, we obtain: Conclusion e iγ[π] = [dπ] e i(s[π,π]+ Γ[π,π]) The measure factor can be exponential Γ eff [π] + Γ[π] = 0 The GB do not contribute to the effective potential V in any NSLM at one loop level and in particular for the SU(5)/SO(5). A.Dobado, L., S.Peñaranda. Phys. Rev. D75, (2007).
28 Little. results a Little. We have to take into account the geometrical nature of the NSLM. e iγ[π] = [dπ g] e is[π,π] Finally, we obtain: Conclusion e iγ[π] = [dπ] e i(s[π,π]+ Γ[π,π]) The measure factor can be exponential Γ eff [π] + Γ[π] = 0 The GB do not contribute to the effective potential V in any NSLM at one loop level and in particular for the SU(5)/SO(5). A.Dobado, L., S.Peñaranda. Phys. Rev. D75, (2007).
29 Little. results a Little. We have to take into account the geometrical nature of the NSLM. e iγ[π] = [dπ g] e is[π,π] Finally, we obtain: Conclusion e iγ[π] = [dπ] e i(s[π,π]+ Γ[π,π]) The measure factor can be exponential Γ eff [π] + Γ[π] = 0 The GB do not contribute to the effective potential V in any NSLM at one loop level and in particular for the SU(5)/SO(5). A.Dobado, L., S.Peñaranda. Phys. Rev. D75, (2007).
30 Little. results a The theory also receives from additional operators coming from the ultraviolet (UV) completion of the. Little. The lowest order operators are: O f = a 1 4 λ2 1 f 4 ɛ wx ɛ yz ɛ ijk ɛ kmn Σ iw Σ jx Σ my Σ nz, where i, j, k, m, n run over 1,2,3 and w, x, y, z run over 4,5. Model I: O gb = 1 2 af 4 n g 2 j Model II: O gb = 1 2 af 4 n g 2 j P 3a=1 Tr h(qj a Σ)(Qj a Σ) i + g h 2 j Tr (Y j Σ)(Y j Σ) io, P 3a=1 Tr h(q a j Σ)(Q a j Σ) i + g 2 Tr ˆ(Y Σ)(Y Σ) o, with j = 1, 2 and Qj a and Y j being the generators of the SU(2) j and U(1) j groups, respectively. Where a and a are two unknown coefficients O(1) sensitive to the cutoff Λ. These oparators contribute to the potential. λ EO H 4 = 1 4 λeo φ 2. T.Han, H.E.Logan, B.McElrath and L.T.Wang. Phys. Rev. D67, (2003).
31 Little. results a Summary The one-loop potential Little. V (H, φ) = µ 2 HH + λ H 4 (HH ) 2 + λ φ 2 f 2 tr(φφ ) + iλ H 2 φ f (Hφ H T H φh ) The λ s coefficients, λ H 4, λ φ 2 and λ H 2 φ, are the sum of the effective operators and the fermionic and gauge bosons radiative. The GB do not contribute to the effective potential V in any NSLM at one loop level and in particular for the SU(5)/SO(5). The µ 2 parameter, in principle, receives one-loop coming from the fermionic and gauge boson sectors. µ 2 = µ 2 f + µ 2 I(II) g (+µ 2EO ) The fermionic and gauge boson have the opposite sign. Then, µ 2 f > µ2 g µ2 > 0 If λ H 4 > 0 and λ φ 2 > 0, we recover the EWSB sector: Minimum condition HH = v 2 /2 v 2 = µ 2 ; φφ = v 2 v λ = H 2 λ H 4 λ2 H 2 φ /λ φ v 2 φ 2 2λφ f 2
32 Little. results a Outline Little. 1 2 Little
33 Little. results a Little. EWSB has taken place: Four sectors: scalar sector(ss) (Up to order v 2 /f 2 ) HH = v 2 /2 and φφ = v 2. H, m 2 H = 2 µ2 Φ 0, m 2 Φ 0 M 2 φ pseudoscalar sector(ps) G 0, m 2 G 0 = 0 Φ P, m 2 Φ P M2 φ double charged sector Φ++, m 2 Φ ++ M2 φ charged sector (cs) G +, m 2 G + = 0, Φ +, m 2 Φ + M2 φ H identified with the particle. G + and G 0 are the Goldstone bosons corresponding to the SM W and Z gauge fields. The doubly charged sector remains uncoupled.
34 Little. results a Little. L GB (H, G s, Φ s) = f 2 8 tr [( µσ) ( µ Σ)] V eff (H, G s, Φ s) In order to compute the radiative, we split the field as H = H + H The kinectic terms are not properly normalized: L Kin = H2 f 2 «( µ H)( µ H) H2 2f 2 «( µφ 0 )( µ Φ 0 ) +... We write the fields in terms of a new set of properly normalized fields up to order 1/f 2. For example: ««H = 1 H2 f 2 H, Φ 0 = 1 H2 4f 2 Φ 0 Consequence 1 2 M2 φ Φ2 0 1 λ 2 M2 φ Φ2 0 + φ 2 4 H 2 Φ 2 0 This last term describes a new interaction which comes from the new normalization of the fields and the fact that M 2 φ O(f 2 ). These interactions play a decisive role in canceling the quadratic divergences that come from the GB loops.
35 Little. results a Little. L GB (H, G s, Φ s) = f 2 8 tr [( µσ) ( µ Σ)] V eff (H, G s, Φ s) In order to compute the radiative, we split the field as H = H + H The kinectic terms are not properly normalized: L Kin = H2 f 2 «( µ H)( µ H) H2 2f 2 «( µφ 0 )( µ Φ 0 ) +... We write the fields in terms of a new set of properly normalized fields up to order 1/f 2. For example: ««H = 1 H2 f 2 H, Φ 0 = 1 H2 4f 2 Φ 0 Consequence 1 2 M2 φ Φ2 0 1 λ 2 M2 φ Φ2 0 + φ 2 4 H 2 Φ 2 0 This last term describes a new interaction which comes from the new normalization of the fields and the fact that M 2 φ O(f 2 ). These interactions play a decisive role in canceling the quadratic divergences that come from the GB loops.
36 Little. results a Little. L GB (H, G s, Φ s) = f 2 8 tr [( µσ) ( µ Σ)] V eff (H, G s, Φ s) In order to compute the radiative, we split the field as H = H + H The kinectic terms are not properly normalized: L Kin = H2 f 2 «( µ H)( µ H) H2 2f 2 «( µφ 0 )( µ Φ 0 ) +... We write the fields in terms of a new set of properly normalized fields up to order 1/f 2. For example: ««H = 1 H2 f 2 H, Φ 0 = 1 H2 4f 2 Φ 0 Consequence 1 2 M2 φ Φ2 0 1 λ 2 M2 φ Φ2 0 + φ 2 4 H 2 Φ 2 0 This last term describes a new interaction which comes from the new normalization of the fields and the fact that M 2 φ O(f 2 ). These interactions play a decisive role in canceling the quadratic divergences that come from the GB loops.
37 Little. results a Little Finally... L GB = 1 2 m2 H H2 λ H 4 4 H4 + L Kin V ss eff V ps eff V cs eff +... Integrating out the scalar :. Γ L = H, G 0 or G ± and Γ H = Φ 0, ΦP or Φ ±. The last figure corresponds to the contribution to the quartic coupling from the Φ 0 propagator. Here we have expanded the Φ 0 propagator in powers of k 2 /m 2 Φ 0 and kept just the first term.
38 Little. results a Little. Results 8! < mgb 2 = 3 λ (4π) 2 : φ 2 + λ 4 H 4!) 2 1 λ H 4 mh 2 log 1 + Λ2 m H 2 λ GB = Λ 2 + λ φ 2 4 λ 2 H 2 φ λ φ 2 1 contribution to the mass λ 2 H 2 φ contribution to the quartic coupling λ φ 2 The diagrams which contribute to the mass A M 2 φ log 1 + Λ2 M 2 φ! Remember: λ Λ2 H 4 = 1 4 λλ2 φ 2, Model I: m 2 GB O(Λ2 log(λ 2 /M 2 ). λeo H 4 = 1 4 λeo φ 2. Model II: we have O(Λ 4 ) and O(Λ 2 ).
39 Little. results a Little. Summary. mass and quartic coupling We have considered all sectors: fermionic, gauge boson and scalar ones. All dangerous diagrams to the mass have been cancelled. The effective potential for the boson is given by: where V H = 1 2 m2 H H λ H H4 mass m 2 H = 2(µ2 m 2 GB ) quartic coupling λ H = λ H 4 λ GB A.Dobado, L., S.Peñaranda (2009), arxiv: Eur. Phys. J. Accepted.
40 Little. results a Outline Little. 1 2 Little
41 Little. results a Little. Conditions and Constraints Set of new parameters (λ T, c ψ, c ψ, f, Λ, a, a ) Conditions Constraints µ 2 > < c ψ < 0.9 µ 2 = v 2 (λ H 4 λ 2 H 2 φ /λ φ 2 ) 114 GeV < m H < 200 GeV The top-quark mass is known and m T 2 TeV 0.5 λ T 2 and f 1 TeV Λ 4π f < 1 10 TeV Λ 12 TeV 0.8 TeV f 1 TeV a and a O(1) Model I: The existence of a B gauge boson leads to large corrections and some problems with the direct observational bounds on Z boson from Tevatron. C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, G.D. Kribs, P. Meade, and J. Ternin, Phys. ReV. D67, (2003) and Phys. ReV. D68, (2003)
42 Little. results a Results Little. In the RC we have solutions only for Λ < 6 TeV. For Λ 6 TeV m 2 GB > µ2!!! In RC+EO case, the a parameter can take values which help to compensate the big effect for the GB radiative thus allowing larger cutoff values. For EO both parameters, a and a are positive.
43 Little. results a Results Masses of the new Little. When the model includes only radiative corrections the M Φ is about 2 TeV. In the other two cases it is 5 TeV. m T < 2 TeV and M W > 0.6 TeV
44 Little. results a Results Little. The lowest values for the mass found for the three cases: RC, RC+EO and EO. Parameters RC RC+EO EO m H GeV GeV GeV µ GeV GeV GeV mgb GeV GeV GeV λ H f 0.86 TeV 0.91 TeV 0.80 TeV Λ 5 TeV TeV TeV λ T c ψ a a
45 Little. results a Outline Little. 1 2 Little
46 Little. results a Little. Analytically All dangerous diagrams to the mass have been cancelled. We have computed the radiative corrections to the potential by integrating out fermion, gauge boson and GB at one-level. The effective potential has the right symmetry to reproduce the EWSB sector of the SM. We have also demostrated that the GB do not contribute to the effective potential V in any NSLM at one loop level and in particular for the SU(5)/SO(5) LH model.
47 Little. results a Little. ly Model I is not phenomenologically viable. Analysis done for Model II We have imposed: ESSB v 2 µ = 2 λ H 4 λ2 H 2 φ /λ φ GeV < m H < 200 GeV Results: RC results only for Λ < 6 TeV incompatibility with the precision electroweak test. However, this situation change when the RC+EO and EO cases are analyzed. The range of the masses for the new obtained are: 1.15 TeV m T 1.5 TeV 0.6 TeV M W 2 TeV 2 TeV M φ 6 TeV The lowest numerical result obtained corresponds to RC+EO case: m H GeV
48 Little. results a Little. Summarizing, we have arrived to the conclusion that the SU(5)/SO(5) Little model with gauge group [SU(2) 2 U(1)] is phenomenologically viable through some tuning in the parameter space, assuming a careful inclusion of fermions, gauge bosons, scalar loops and effective operators. In any case it will be the LHC, whose main goal is to disentangle the mechanism of the electroweak symmetry breaking, which will decide if Little are appropriated for describing this mechanism or not.
49 Little. results a Little. Thanks for your attention!
50 Little. results a λ s. Fermion sector Little. λ s!! λ H 4 = 2Nc f (4πf ) 2 (λ 2 t + λ 2 T )Λ2 + mt 2 53 λ 2 t + λ 2 T log Λ 2 m T !! λ φ 2 = 2Nc f (4πf ) 2 4(λ 2 t + λ 2 T )Λ2 (λ 2 t + λ 2 T )m2 T log Λ 2 m T 2 + 1!! λ H 2 φf = 4Nc (4πf ) 2 (λ 2 t + λ 2 T )Λ2 λ 2 T m2 T log Λ 2 m T 2 + 1
51 Little. results a λ s. Gauge sector Little. λ s: Model I 0 0 λ I H 4 = 3 g (4πf ) g2 4 c ψ 2 s2 ψ 0 1 c A Λ 2 g ψ s 2 c 2 ψ ψ s2 ψ! 1 + g 2 g c 2 A M 2 ψ s2 ψ B log 1 + Λ2 M 2 B 00 1 λ I φ 2 g = 3 4(4πf ) 2 g 2 M 2 B log Λ 2 M 2 B + 1 λ I H 2 φ g = 3 8(4πf ) g2 c ψ 2 + g 2 s2 c ψ 2 A Λ 2 g 2 M 2 ψ s2 ψ W log Λ 2 M W! 1 (s 2 ψ c2 ψ )2 c 2 A ψ s2 ψ g 2 s 2 ψ c2 ψ c ψ 2 s2 ψ!!!! Λ 2 M 2 W log Λ 2 M W M 2 W log 1 + Λ2 M 2 W! (s ψ 2! c2 ψ )2 c ψ 2 4 s2 ψ!! 1 +g 2 s2 ψ c2 ψ c 2 Λ 2 M 2 ψ s2 ψ B log Λ 2 M A B
52 Little. results a λ s. Gauge sector Little. λ s: Model II λ II H 4 g = 3 4(4πf ) 2 λ II φ 2 g " 1 g 2 4 c ψ 2 s2 ψ! = 3 g 2 4(4πf ) 2 c ψ 2 Λ 2 g 2 M 2 s2 W log Λ 2 M ψ W λ II H 2 = 3g2 s 2 ψ c2 ψ φ g 8(4πf ) 2 c ψ 2 s2 ψ! Λ g 2 Λ 2 g 2 M 2 W log Λ 2 M W!! Λ 2 M 2 W log Λ 2 M W (s ψ 2 c2 φ )2 c ψ 2 4 s2 ψ c ψ 2 s2 ψ!!! +... # + 3g 2 (4πf ) 2 Λ2,
53 Little. results a Effective operators Little. O f = a 1 4 λ2 1 f 4 ɛ wx ɛ yz ɛ ijk ɛ kmn Σ iw Σ jx Σ my Σ nz, where i, j, k, m, n run over 1,2,3 and w, x, y, z run over 4,5. Model I O gb = 1 2 af 4 {g 2 j 3 a=1 Tr [(Q a j Σ)(Q a j Σ) ] + g 2 j Tr [ (Y j Σ)(Y j Σ) ]}, with j = 1, 2 and Qj a and Y j being the generators of the SU(2) j and U(1) j groups, respectively. Model II O gb = 1 2 cf 4 {g 2 j ] } 3 a=1 [(Q Tr j a Σ)(Qj a Σ) + g 2 Tr [(Y Σ)(Y Σ) ], where j = 1, 2 and Y is the generator of the unique U(1) group.
54 Little. results a λ s. Effective operators Little. The coefficients of the potential coming from the effective operators are: 0 Model I 1 Model II! λ EO H 4 g2 g 8 s ψ c2 s ψ 2 ψ c ψ 2 A + a (λ λ2 2 ) a g 2 8 s ψ 2 a c2 6 g 2 + a (λ λ2 2 ) ψ 0 1! λ EO φ 2 g2 2 s ψ 2 + g 2 c2 s ψ 2 A + 4a (λ 2 ψ c2 ψ 1 + λ2 2 ) a g 2 2 s ψ 2 + 2ag 2 + 4a (λ 2 c2 1 + λ2 2 ) ψ 0 1 λ EO φh 2 a 4 µ 2 2 c2 ψ s2 ψ s 2 ψ c2 ψ + g 2 c2 ψ s2 ψ s 2 ψ c2 ψ A 2a (λ λ2 2 ) a 4 g 2 c2 ψ s2 ψ s 2 ψ c2 ψ af 2 g 2 2a (λ λ2 2 )
55 Little. results a Little. SSB and mass eigenstates SSB has taken place: HH = v 2 /2 and φφ = v 2 0 H = (w +, 2 1 (v + h + iw 0 )) and φ v + 1 (ξ + iρ) 2 1 φ φ + φ ++ A 2 The new fields describe the fluctuations alround the vacuum. Four sectors: the scalar (h, ξ), the pseudoscalar (ρ, ω 0 ), the charged (φ +, ω + ) and the doubly charged (φ ++ ). By diagonalizing the corresponding matrices we obtain the mass eigenstates in each sector: scalar sector(ss) h = c 0 H + s 0 Φ 0, m 2 H = 2 µ2 ξ = c 0 Φ 0 s 0 H, m 2 Φ 0 M 2 φ charged sector (cs) pseudoscalar sector(ps) w + = c +G + + s +Φ +, m 2 G + = 0, w 0 = c P G 0 + s P Φ P, m 2 G 0 = 0 φ + = c +Φ + + s +G +, m 2 Φ + M2 φ where c 0,p,+ 1 + O(v 2 /f 2 ) and s 0,p,+ O(v 2 /f 2 ). ρ = c P Φ P s P G 0, m 2 Φ P M2 φ The doubly charged sector remains unchanged with a mass M φ and uncoupled. The notation introduced for the mass eigenstates is the following: H and Φ 0 are the neutral scalars; being the first one identified with the particle, Φ P is a neutral pseudoscalar, Φ + and Φ ++ are the charged and doubly charged scalars, and G + and G 0 are the Goldstone bosons corresponding to the SM W and Z gauge fields.
56 Little. results a Masses m T and M W In order to avoid a large fine-tuning: m T 2 TeV 0.5 λ T 2 and f 1 TeV Little m T = f λ2 t +λ2 T λ T.
57 Little. results a Little Masses m T and M W From the W mass and taking into account the previous constraint on f M W = g f 2c ψ s ψ > 0.6 TeV 0.1 < c ψ < 0.5 and 0.8 < c ψ < 0.9.
58 Little. results a Little Discussion The results depend strongly on the fermionic For λ T > 1 it is very hard to satisfy the minimum condition of the potential. Low values of c ψ are preferred. Then low µ values are obtained
59 Little. results a Phenomelogical results at one-loop level Strongly dependent on a but not on a Contours of the viable regions in λ T c ψ plane Little. Some numerical results The minimum possible values are found for f = 0.8 TeV and Λ = 10 TeV µ m H λ T c ψ a a M φ RC 390 GeV 552 GeV TeV
Little Higgs Models Theory & Phenomenology
Little Higgs Models Theory Phenomenology Wolfgang Kilian (Karlsruhe) Karlsruhe January 2003 How to make a light Higgs (without SUSY) Minimal models The Littlest Higgs and the Minimal Moose Phenomenology
More information+ µ 2 ) H (m 2 H 2
I. THE HIGGS POTENTIAL AND THE LIGHT HIGGS BOSON In the previous chapter, it was demonstrated that a negative mass squared in the Higgs potential is generated radiatively for a large range of boundary
More informationHiggs effective potential in the littlest Higgs model at the one-loop level
PYSICAL REVIEW D 75, 8357 (7) iggs effective potential in the littlest iggs model at the one-loop level Antonio Dobado and Lourdes Tabares-Cheluci Departamento de Física Teórica, Universidad Complutense
More informationSolutions to gauge hierarchy problem. SS 10, Uli Haisch
Solutions to gauge hierarchy problem SS 10, Uli Haisch 1 Quantum instability of Higgs mass So far we considered only at RGE of Higgs quartic coupling (dimensionless parameter). Higgs mass has a totally
More informationS 3 Symmetry as the Origin of CKM Matrix
S 3 Symmetry as the Origin of CKM Matrix Ujjal Kumar Dey Physical Research Laboratory October 25, 2015 Based on: PRD 89, 095025 and arxiv:1507.06509 Collaborators: D. Das and P. B. Pal 1 / 25 Outline 1
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 3 Aug 2016
ACFI-T-19 The Radiative Z Breaking Twin Higgs arxiv:.131v1 hep-ph 3 Aug Jiang-Hao Yu 1 1 Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions, Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst,
More informationGauge-Higgs Unification on Flat Space Revised
Outline Gauge-Higgs Unification on Flat Space Revised Giuliano Panico ISAS-SISSA Trieste, Italy The 14th International Conference on Supersymmetry and the Unification of Fundamental Interactions Irvine,
More informationNew Phenomenology of Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity
New Phenomenology of Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity Alexander Belyaev Michigan State University A.B., C.-R. Chen, K. Tobe, C.-P. Yuan hep-ph/0609179 A.B., A. Pukhov, C.-P. Yuan hep-ph/07xxxxx UW-Madison,
More informationHiggs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I
iggs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I Laura Reina TASI 2011, CU-Boulder, June 2011 Outline of Lecture I Understanding the Electroweak Symmetry Breaking as a first step towards a more fundamental theory of
More informationThe bestest little Higgs
The bestest little Higgs The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation As Published Publisher Schmaltz, Martin, Daniel
More informationThe Higgs discovery - a portal to new physics
The Higgs discovery - a portal to new physics Department of astronomy and theoretical physics, 2012-10-17 1 / 1 The Higgs discovery 2 / 1 July 4th 2012 - a historic day in many ways... 3 / 1 July 4th 2012
More informationLittlest Higgs model and associated ZH production at high energy e + e collider
Littlest Higgs model and associated ZH production at high energy e + e collider Chongxing Yue a, Shunzhi Wang b, Dongqi Yu a arxiv:hep-ph/0309113v 17 Oct 003 a Department of Physics, Liaoning Normal University,
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v2 3 Oct 2005
Double Higgs Production and Quadratic Divergence Cancellation in Little Higgs Models with T-Parity Claudio O. Dib Department of Physics, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile Rogerio
More informationT -Parity in Little Higgs Models a
T -Parity in Little Higgs Models a David Krohn a Based on arxiv:0803.4202 [hep-ph] with Itay Yavin, and work in progress with I.Y., Lian-Tao Wang, and Hsin-Chia Cheng Outline Review of little Higgs models
More informationA model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:
I. THE STANDARD MODEL A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:. The symmetries of the Lagrangian; 2. The representations of fermions
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 20 Feb 2014
Prepared for submission to JHEP DESY 13-123 Littlest Higgs with T-parity: Status and Prospects arxiv:1310.2918v2 [hep-ph] 20 Feb 2014 Jürgen Reuter, Marco Tonini, Maikel de Vries DESY Theory Group Notkestr.
More informationThe Super-little Higgs
The Super-little Higgs Csaba Csaki (Cornell) with Guido Marandella (UC Davis) Yuri Shirman (Los Alamos) Alessandro Strumia (Pisa) hep-ph/0510294, Phys.Rev.D73:035006,2006 Padua University, July 4, 2006
More informationTwin Higgs Theories. Z. Chacko, University of Arizona. H.S Goh & R. Harnik; Y. Nomura, M. Papucci & G. Perez
Twin Higgs Theories Z. Chacko, University of Arizona H.S Goh & R. Harnik; Y. Nomura, M. Papucci & G. Perez Precision electroweak data are in excellent agreement with the Standard Model with a Higgs mass
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 16 Mar 2017
Flavon-induced lepton flavour violation arxiv:1703.05579v1 hep-ph] 16 Mar 017 Venus Keus Department of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki,
More informationReφ = 1 2. h ff λ. = λ f
I. THE FINE-TUNING PROBLEM A. Quadratic divergence We illustrate the problem of the quadratic divergence in the Higgs sector of the SM through an explicit calculation. The example studied is that of the
More informationTop Seesaw, Custodial Symmetry and the 126 GeV (Composite) Higgs
Top Seesaw, Custodial Symmetry and the 126 GeV (Composite) Higgs IAS Program on the Future of High Energy Physics Jan 21, 2015 based on arxiv:1311.5928, Hsin-Chia Cheng, Bogdan A. Dobrescu, JG JHEP 1408
More informationHiggs couplings in the Composite Higgs Models
Higgs couplings in the Composite Higgs Models Aleksandr Azatov Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma La Sapienza and INFN Sezione di Roma University of Padova 6/12/2012 Composite Higgs setup Models
More informationHigher dimensional operators. in supersymmetry
I. Antoniadis CERN Higher dimensional operators in supersymmetry with E. Dudas, D. Ghilencea, P. Tziveloglou Planck 2008, Barcelona Outline Effective operators from new physics integrating out heavy states
More informationModification of Higgs Couplings in Minimal Composite Models
Modification of Higgs Couplings in Minimal Composite Models Da Liu Argonne National Laboratory With Ian Low, Carlos E. M. Wagner, arxiv:173.xxxx Motivation LHC data prefer κ t > κ g! Composite Higgs model
More informationAxions. Kerstin Helfrich. Seminar on Theoretical Particle Physics, / 31
1 / 31 Axions Kerstin Helfrich Seminar on Theoretical Particle Physics, 06.07.06 2 / 31 Structure 1 Introduction 2 Repetition: Instantons Formulae The θ-vacuum 3 The U(1) and the strong CP problem The
More informationConstraining New Models with Precision Electroweak Data
Constraining New Models with Precision Electroweak Data Tadas Krupovnickas, BNL in collaboration with Mu-Chun Chen and Sally Dawson LoopFest IV, Snowmass, 005 EW Sector of the Standard Model 3 parameters
More informationWhat Precision Electroweak Physics Says About the SU(6)/Sp(6) Little Higgs
HUTP-03/A022 MIT-CTP-3377 hep-ph/0305275 What Precision Electroweak Physics Says About the SU(6)/Sp(6) Little Higgs Thomas Gregoire (a), David R. Smith (b) and Jay G. Wacker (a) (a) Jefferson Physical
More informationGauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Mikhail Shaposhnikov
Gauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Mikhail Shaposhnikov March 9, 2017 Work with Georgios Karananas, 1703.02964 Heidelberg, March 9, 2017 p. 1 Outline Motivation Gauge coupling unification without
More informationBuried Higgs Csaba Csáki (Cornell) with Brando Bellazzini (Cornell) Adam Falkowski (Rutgers) Andi Weiler (CERN)
Buried Higgs Csaba Csáki (Cornell) with Brando Bellazzini (Cornell) Adam Falkowski (Rutgers) Andi Weiler (CERN) Rutgers University, December 8, 2009 Preview Found a SUSY model, where: Weird higgs decays
More informationGauge U(1) Dark Symmetry and Radiative Light Fermion Masses
UCRHEP-T565 April 2016 arxiv:1604.01148v1 [hep-ph] 5 Apr 2016 Gauge U(1) Dark Symmetry and Radiative Light Fermion Masses Corey Kownacki 1 and Ernest Ma 1,2,3 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University
More informationperturbativity Pankaj Sharma Based on : arxiv: st September, 2012 Higgs-electroweak precision, vacuum stability and perturbativity
21st September, 2012 PLAN Type II Seesaw Particle Spectrum Vacuum Stabilty and. RG evolution of couplings Electroweak precision data (EWPD). enhancement. Conclusion. A 125 GeV Higgs has been discovered
More informationSkyrmions in Composite Higgs Models
Skyrmions in Composite Higgs Models Marc Gillioz Particle Physics & Cosmology December 4, 2012 based on arxiv:1012.5288, 1103.5990, 1111.2047 in collaboration with A. von Manteuffel, P. Schwaller and D.
More informationTriplet Higgs Scenarios
Triplet Higgs Scenarios Jack Gunion U.C. Davis Grenoble Higgs Workshop, March 2, 203 Higgs-like LHC Signal Fits with MVA CMS suggest we are heading towards the SM, but it could simply be a decoupling limit
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 10 Oct 1995
UCL-IPT-95-16 Symmetry breaking induced by top quark loops from a model without scalar mass. arxiv:hep-ph/9510266v1 10 Oct 1995 T. Hambye Institut de Physique Théorique UCL B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
More informationThe Higgs Mechanism and the Higgs Particle
The Higgs Mechanism and the Higgs Particle Heavy-Ion Seminar... or the Anderson-Higgs-Brout-Englert-Guralnik-Hagen-Kibble Mechanism Philip W. Anderson Peter W. Higgs Tom W. B. Gerald Carl R. François Robert
More informationHidden two-higgs doublet model
Hidden two-higgs doublet model C, Uppsala and Lund University SUSY10, Bonn, 2010-08-26 1 Two Higgs doublet models () 2 3 4 Phenomenological consequences 5 Two Higgs doublet models () Work together with
More information12.2 Problem Set 2 Solutions
78 CHAPTER. PROBLEM SET SOLUTIONS. Problem Set Solutions. I will use a basis m, which ψ C = iγ ψ = Cγ ψ (.47) We can define left (light) handed Majorana fields as, so that ω = ψ L + (ψ L ) C (.48) χ =
More informationHunting New Physics in the Higgs Sector
HS Hunting New Physics in the Higgs Sector SM Higgs Sector - Test of the Higgs Mechanism Oleg Kaikov KIT, Seminar WS 2015/16 Prof. Dr. M. Margarete Mühlleitner, Dr. Roger Wolf, Dr. Hendrik Mantler Advisor:
More informationThe Big Deal with the Little Higgs
The Big Deal with the Little Higgs Jürgen Reuter DESY Theory Group, Hamburg Seminar Dresden, 16.Dec.2005 Outline Hierarchy Problem, Goldstone-Bosons and Little Higgs Higgs as Pseudo-Goldstone Boson Nambu-Goldstone
More informationPhysics at TeV Energy Scale
Physics at TeV Energy Scale Yu-Ping Kuang (Tsinghua University) HEP Society Conference, April 26, 2008, Nanjing I. Why TeV Scale Is Specially Important? SM is SU(3) c SU(2) U(1) gauge theory. M g, M γ
More informationLittle Higgs at the LHC: Status and Prospects
Little Higgs at the LHC: Status and Prospects Marco Tonini DESY Theory Group (Hamburg) based on: Reuter/MT, JHEP 1302, 077 (2013) Reuter/MT/de Vries, hep-ph/1307.5010 Reuter/MT/de Vries, DESY-13-123 (in
More informationElectroweak-scale Right-handed Neutrino Model And 126 GeV Higgs-like Particle
Electroweak-scale Right-handed Neutrino Model And 126 GeV Higgs-like Particle Ajinkya S. Kamat ask4db@virginia.edu http://people.virginia.edu/ ask4db With Prof. P. Q. Hung and Vinh Van Hoang (paper in
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 26 Aug 2016
Vacuum alignment without elementary scalars Tommi Alanne Helene Gertov Aurora Meroni and Francesco Sannino CP 3 -Origins & the Danish Institute for Advanced Study Danish IAS University of Southern Denmark
More informationSupersymmetry Breaking
Supersymmetry Breaking LHC Search of SUSY: Part II Kai Wang Phenomenology Institute Department of Physics University of Wisconsin Madison Collider Phemonology Gauge Hierarchy and Low Energy SUSY Gauge
More informationLecture 6 The Super-Higgs Mechanism
Lecture 6 The Super-Higgs Mechanism Introduction: moduli space. Outline Explicit computation of moduli space for SUSY QCD with F < N and F N. The Higgs mechanism. The super-higgs mechanism. Reading: Terning
More informationNon-Abelian SU(2) H and Two-Higgs Doublets
Non-Abelian SU(2) H and Two-Higgs Doublets Technische Universität Dortmund Wei- Chih Huang 25 Sept 2015 Kavli IPMU arxiv:1510.xxxx(?) with Yue-Lin Sming Tsai, Tzu-Chiang Yuan Plea Please do not take any
More information125 GeV Higgs Boson and Gauge Higgs Unification
125 GeV Higgs Boson and Gauge Higgs Unification Nobuchika Okada The University of Alabama Miami 2013, Fort Lauderdale, Dec. 12 18, 2013 Discovery of Higgs boson at LHC! 7/04/2012 Standard Model Higgs boson
More informationThe Dilaton/Radion and the 125 GeV Resonance
The Dilaton/Radion and the 125 GeV Resonance Zackaria Chacko University of Maryland, College Park Introduction The discovery of a new Higgs-like particle with mass close to 125 GeV is a watershed in high
More informationThe Phases of QCD. Thomas Schaefer. North Carolina State University
The Phases of QCD Thomas Schaefer North Carolina State University 1 Motivation Different phases of QCD occur in the universe Neutron Stars, Big Bang Exploring the phase diagram is important to understanding
More informationHiggs Boson Physics, Part II
Higgs Boson Physics, Part II Laura Reina TASI 004, Boulder Outline of Part II What do we know about the Standard Model Higgs boson? indirect bounds on M H from the theoretical consistency of the Standard
More informationDouble Higgs production via gluon fusion (gg hh) in composite models
Double Higgs production via gluon fusion (gg hh) in composite models Ennio Salvioni CERN and University of Padova based on work in collaboration with C.Grojean (CERN), M.Gillioz (Zürich), R.Gröber and
More informationGeneral Composite Higgs Models
General Composite Higgs Models Marco Serone, SISSA, Trieste In collaboration with David Marzocca and Jing Shu, based on 1205.0770 1 The Higgs hunt at the LHC is quickly coming to an end A SM Higgs is ruled
More informationTop quark effects in composite vector pair production at the LHC
Top quark effects in composite vector pair production at the LHC Antonio Enrique Cárcamo Hernández. Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria. SILAFAE 01, 10th-14th of December of 01. Based on: A. E. Cárcamo
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 99890701 Allowed tools: mathematical tables Some formulas can be found on p.2. 1. Concepts.
More informationSpontaneous CP violation and Higgs spectra
PROCEEDINGS Spontaneous CP violation and Higgs spectra CERN-TH, CH-111 Geneva 3 E-mail: ulrich.nierste@cern.ch Abstract: A general theorem relating Higgs spectra to spontaneous CP phases is presented.
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 12 Feb 2001
WM-01-115 April 5, 2008 Extra neutral gauge bosons and Higgs bosons in an E 6 -based model Shuquan Nie 1 and Marc Sher 2 arxiv:hep-ph/0102139v1 12 Feb 2001 Nuclear and Particle Theory Group Physics Department
More informationLeptons and SU(2) U(1)
Leptons and SU() U(1) Contents I. Defining the Leptonic Standard Model 1 II. L kin and the gauge symmetry 3 III. L mψ = 0 4 IV. L φ and spontaneous symmetry breaking 4 V. Back to L kin (φ): The vector
More informationE 6 inspired composite Higgs model and 750 GeV diphoton excess
E 6 inspired composite Higgs model and 750 GeV diphoton excess Roman Nevzorov 1,2, and Anthony Thomas 1 1 ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale and CSSM, Department of Physics,
More informationMirror World and Improved Naturalness
Mirror World and Improved Naturalness Thomas Grégoire Boston University Based on hep-ph/0509242 R. Barbieri, T.G., L. Hall Mirror Worlds Motivations Originally introduced to restore parity Dark Matter
More informationEW Naturalness in Light of the LHC Data. Maxim Perelstein, Cornell U. ACP Winter Conference, March
EW Naturalness in Light of the LHC Data Maxim Perelstein, Cornell U. ACP Winter Conference, March 3 SM Higgs: Lagrangian and Physical Parameters The SM Higgs potential has two terms two parameters: Higgs
More informationIntroduction to Supersymmetry
Introduction to Supersymmetry I. Antoniadis Albert Einstein Center - ITP Lecture 5 Grand Unification I. Antoniadis (Supersymmetry) 1 / 22 Grand Unification Standard Model: remnant of a larger gauge symmetry
More informationUV Completions of Composite Higgs Models with Partial Compositeness
UV Completions of Composite Higgs Models with Partial Compositeness Marco Serone, SISSA, Trieste Based on 1211.7290, in collaboration with Francesco Caracciolo and Alberto Parolini and work in progress
More informationComposite Higgs/ Extra Dimensions
Composite Higgs/ Extra Dimensions Eduardo Pontón Instituto de Física Teórica -UNESP & ICTP-SAIFR Snowmass on the Pacific, KITP May 30, 2013 Fundamental Question raised by the SM How and why is the Electroweak
More informationCosmic Positron Signature from Dark Matter in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity
Cosmic Positron Signature from Dark Matter in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity Masaki Asano The Graduate University for Advanced Studies Collaborated with Shigeki Matsumoto Nobuchika Okada Yasuhiro
More informationStrongly coupled gauge theories: What can lattice calculations teach us?
Strongly coupled gauge theories: What can lattice calculations teach us? Anna Hasenfratz University of Colorado Boulder Rencontres de Moriond, March 21 216 Higgs era of particle physics The 212 discovery
More informationSM, EWSB & Higgs. MITP Summer School 2017 Joint Challenges for Cosmology and Colliders. Homework & Exercises
SM, EWSB & Higgs MITP Summer School 017 Joint Challenges for Cosmology and Colliders Homework & Exercises Ch!"ophe Grojean Ch!"ophe Grojean DESY (Hamburg) Humboldt University (Berlin) ( christophe.grojean@desy.de
More informationDiscovery potential of toppartners in a realistic composite Higgs model with early LHC data
Discovery potential of toppartners in a realistic composite Higgs model with early LHC data Günther Dissertori, Elisabetta Furlan, Filip Moortgat, JHEP09(20)019 Kick-off Meeting Of The LHCPhenoNet Initial
More informationFirst steps toward an asymptotically safe model of electroweak interactions
First steps toward an asymptotically safe model of electroweak interactions (with M. Fabbrichesi, R. Percacci, F. Bazzocchi, L. Vecchi and O. Zanusso) Alberto Tonero SISSA Trieste - Asymptotic Safety Seminar
More informationMagnetic moment (g 2) µ and new physics
Dresden Lepton Moments, July 2010 Introduction A 3σ deviation for a exp µ a SM µ has been established! Currently: a exp µ a SM µ = (255 ± 63 ± 49) 10 11 Expected with new Fermilab exp. (and th. progress):
More informationDynamical supersymmetry breaking, with Flavor
Dynamical supersymmetry breaking, with Flavor Cornell University, November 2009 Based on arxiv: 0911.2467 [Craig, Essig, Franco, Kachru, GT] and arxiv: 0812.3213 [Essig, Fortin, Sinha, GT, Strassler] Flavor
More informationIntroduction to the SM (5)
Y. Grossman The SM (5) TES-HEP, July 12, 2015 p. 1 Introduction to the SM (5) Yuval Grossman Cornell Y. Grossman The SM (5) TES-HEP, July 12, 2015 p. 2 Yesterday... Yesterday: Symmetries Today SSB the
More informationWho is afraid of quadratic divergences? (Hierarchy problem) & Why is the Higgs mass 125 GeV? (Stability of Higgs potential)
Who is afraid of quadratic divergences? (Hierarchy problem) & Why is the Higgs mass 125 GeV? (Stability of Higgs potential) Satoshi Iso (KEK, Sokendai) Based on collaborations with H.Aoki (Saga) arxiv:1201.0857
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v2 17 Jun 2002
Preprint typeset in JHEP style. - HYPER VERSION BUHEP-02-24 UW/PT-01/09 HUTP-02/A016 The Minimal Moose for a Little Higgs arxiv:hep-ph/0206020v2 17 Jun 2002 N. Arkani-Hamed Jefferson Laboratory of Physics,
More informationComposite Higgs Overview
Composite Higgs Overview Tony Gherghetta Fundamental Composite Dynamics, IBS CTPU, Daejeon, Korea, December 6, 2017 1 IBS Daejeon - 6 December 2017 Composite Higgs New strong force with coupling, g s g
More informationThe Minimal Lee-Wick Standard Model
The Minimal Lee-Wick Standard Model Richard Lebed West Coast LHC Theory Meeting UCLA, November 2008 Work performed with Chris Carone, College of William & Mary Physics Letters B668, 221 (2008) Outline
More informationUniversal Extra Dimensions
Universal Extra Dimensions Add compact dimension(s) of radius R ~ ant crawling on tube Kaluza-Klein tower of partners to SM particles due to curled-up extra dimensions of radius R n = quantum number for
More informationModels of Neutrino Masses
Models of Neutrino Masses Fernando Romero López 13.05.2016 1 Introduction and Motivation 3 2 Dirac and Majorana Spinors 4 3 SU(2) L U(1) Y Extensions 11 4 Neutrino masses in R-Parity Violating Supersymmetry
More informationLow Scale Flavor Gauge Symmetries
Low Scale Flavor Gauge Symmetries Michele Redi CERN in collaboration with Benjamin Grinstein and Giovanni Villadoro arxiv:1009.2049[hep-ph] Padova, 20 October Outline Flavor Problem Gauging the Flavor
More informationMaria Dimou In collaboration with: C. Hagedorn, S.F. King, C. Luhn. Tuesday group seminar 17/03/15 University of Liverpool
Maria Dimou In collaboration with: C. Hagedorn, S.F. King, C. Luhn Tuesday group seminar 17/03/15 University of Liverpool 1 Introduction Outline The SM & SUSY Flavour Problem. Solving it by imposing a
More informationIntroduction to Supersymmetry
Introduction to Supersymmetry 1: Formalism of SUSY M. E. Peskin Maria Laach Herbstschule September, 2004 Among models of electroweak symmetry breaking and physics beyond the Standard Model Supersymmetry
More informationPHYSICS BEYOND SM AND LHC. (Corfu 2010)
PHYSICS BEYOND SM AND LHC (Corfu 2010) We all expect physics beyond SM Fantastic success of SM (LEP!) But it has its limits reflected by the following questions: What is the origin of electroweak symmetry
More informationLecture III: Higgs Mechanism
ecture III: Higgs Mechanism Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking The Higgs Mechanism Mass Generation for eptons Quark Masses & Mixing III.1 Symmetry Breaking One example is the infinite ferromagnet the nearest
More informationElectroweak and Higgs Physics
Electroweak and Higgs Physics Lecture 2 : Higgs Mechanism in the Standard and Supersymmetric Models Alexei Raspereza DESY Summer Student Program Hamburg August 2017 Standard Model (Summary) Building blocks
More informationWeek 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books
Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter Weiberg, Chapter 5 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 1, 1 Free field Lagrangians
More informationElectroweak resonances in HEFT
E-mail: fllanes@fis.ucm.es arxiv:1709.10491v1 [hep-ph] 29 Sep 2017 Rafael L. Delgado and Antonio Dobado Departamento de Fisica Teorica I, Plaza de las Ciencias 1, Fac. CC. Fisicas; Universidad Complutense
More informationThe mass of the Higgs boson
The mass of the Higgs boson LHC : Higgs particle observation CMS 2011/12 ATLAS 2011/12 a prediction Higgs boson found standard model Higgs boson T.Plehn, M.Rauch Spontaneous symmetry breaking confirmed
More informationWhat Shall We Learn from h^3 Measurement. Maxim Perelstein, Cornell Higgs Couplings Workshop, SLAC November 12, 2016
What Shall We Learn from h^3 Measurement Maxim Perelstein, Cornell Higgs Couplings Workshop, SLAC November 12, 2016 The Shape of Things to Come LHC: spin-0, elementary-looking Higgs field This field is
More informationT-parity, its problems and their solution
T-parity, its problems and their solution Duccio Pappadopulo a and Alessandro Vichi a a Institut de Théorie des Phénomènes Physiques, EPFL, CH 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland arxiv:1007.4807v1 [hep-ph] 7 Jul
More informationNovember 24, Scalar Dark Matter from Grand Unified Theories. T. Daniel Brennan. Standard Model. Dark Matter. GUTs. Babu- Mohapatra Model
Scalar from November 24, 2014 1 2 3 4 5 What is the? Gauge theory that explains strong weak, and electromagnetic forces SU(3) C SU(2) W U(1) Y Each generation (3) has 2 quark flavors (each comes in one
More informationDecoupling and Alignment in Light of the Higgs Data. Howard E. Haber Pi Day, 2014 Bay Area ParCcle Physics Seminar San Francisco State Univ.
Decoupling and Alignment in Light of the Higgs Data Howard E. Haber Pi Day, 2014 Bay Area ParCcle Physics Seminar San Francisco State Univ. Outline I. IntroducCon Ø Snapshot of the LHC Higgs data Ø SuggesCons
More informationElectroweak physics and the LHC an introduction to the Standard Model
Electroweak physics and the LHC an introduction to the Standard Model Paolo Gambino INFN Torino LHC School Martignano 12-18 June 2006 Outline Prologue on weak interactions Express review of gauge theories
More informationFuzzy extra dimensions and particle physics models
Fuzzy extra dimensions and particle physics models Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis Joint work with H.Steinacker and G.Zoupanos arxiv:1002.2606 [hep-th] Corfu, September 2010 Overview Motivation N = 4 SYM
More informationPati-Salam GUT-Flavour Models with Three Higgs Generations
Pati-Salam GUT-Flavour Models with Three Higgs Generations Florian Hartmann in collaboration with Wolfgang Kilian and Karsten Schnitter based on: JHEP 1405 (2014) 064 and arxiv:1405.1901 Universität Siegen
More informationCan the Hbb coupling be equal in magnitude to its Standard Model value but opposite in sign? Howard E. Haber July 22, 2014
Can the Hbb coupling be equal in magnitude to its Standard Model value but opposite in sign? Howard E. Haber July 22, 2014 Outline I. Higgs physics afer discovery Ø What is the current data telling us?
More informationAn extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model
An extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model Jochen Zahn Universität Wien based on arxiv:1401.2020 joint work with Harold Steinacker Bayrischzell, May 2014 Motivation The IKKT
More informationComposite Higgs, Quarks and Leptons, a contemporary view
Composite Higgs, Quarks and Leptons, a contemporary view 1 Thanks to Sid Drell Always be positive, curious, constructive Α others will think your questions are dumb 2 3 Brodsky-Drell anomalous magnetic
More informationProperties of the Higgs Boson, and its interpretation in Supersymmetry
Properties of the Higgs Boson, and its interpretation in Supersymmetry U. Ellwanger, LPT Orsay The quartic Higgs self coupling and Supersymmetry The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model Higgs
More informationDynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from Extra Dimensions
DPNU-03-07 TU-686 UT-ICEPP 03-03 March 2003 Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from Extra Dimensions Michio Hashimoto ICEPP, the University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
More informationEFFECTS OF NEW LEPTONS IN ELECTROWEAK PRECISION DATA
EFFECTS OF NEW LEPTONS IN ELECTROWEAK PRECISION DATA In collaboration with F. del Águila and M. Pérez-Victoria Phys. Rev. D78: 013010, 2008 Depto. de Física Teórica y del Cosmos Universidad de Granada
More informationTopics in Little Higgs Physics
Topics in Little Higgs Physics A thesis presented by Spencer Chang to The Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Physics
More information