arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gr] 24 Oct 2006

Transcription

1 arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gr] 24 Oct 2006 FAMILIES OF LINEAR SEMIGROUPS WITH INTERMEDIATE GROWTH MELVYN B. NATHANSON Abstract. Methods from additive number theory are applied to construct families of finitely generated linear semigroups with intermediate growth. 1. Growth functions of finitely generated semigroups Let S be a finitely generated semigroup let A be a set of generators for S. Every element x S can be written as a word with letters from the set A, that is, as a finite product of elements of A. The length of x with respect to A, denoted l A (x), is the number of letters in the shortest word that represents x. Note that l A (x) = 1 if only if x A. We shall assume that S contains an identity element 1 that 1 / A. We define l A (1) = 0. Let N = {1,2,3,...} denote the set of positive integers N 0 = N {0} the set of nonnegative integers. For every n N 0, let λ A (n) denote the number of elements of S of length exactly n. We define the growth function γ A (n) of S with respect to A by n γ A (n) = card({x S : l A (x) n}) = λ A (m). The function γ A (n) is an increasing function that counts the number of elements of S of length at most n. If card(a) = k, then, for all nonnegative integers n, γ A (n) λ A (n) k n { n+1 if k = 1 k n+1 1 k 1 if k > 1. The semigroup S has polynomial growth with respect to the generating set A if there exist positive numbers c d such that γ A (n) cn d for all sufficently large n. In this case, logc+dlogn so lim sup n logn <. m=0 Date: July 7, Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 20M05,20F69,20F65,11B75. Key words phrases. Semigroups, intermediate growth, semigroup growth, group growth, sumsets, Sidon sets, ˆBh -sequences, partition asymptotics, additive number theory. This work was supported in part by grants from the NSA Mathematical Sciences Program the PSC-CUNY Research Award Program. 1

2 2 MELVYN B. NATHANSON If S does not have polynomial growth, then lim sup n logn We say that S has superpolynomial growth if =. lim =. n logn The semigroup S has exponential growth with respect to the generating set A if there exists θ > 1 such that γ A (n) θ n for all sufficently large n. In this case, nlogθ so lim inf n n If S does not have exponential growth, then > 0. lim inf n n We say that the S has subexponential growth if lim = 0. n n The semigroup S has intermediate growth with respect to A if the growth of S is both superpolynomial subexponential. We review some stard facts about growth functions. Let A B be finite generating sets for S, let = 0. c A = max(l A (b) : b B) c B = max(l B (a) : a A). Then γ B (n) γ A (c A n) γ A (n) γ B (c B n). These inequalities imply that the growth function γ A (n) is polynomial, superpolynomial, subexponential, or exponential if only if the growth function γ B (n) is, respectively, polynomial, superpolynomial, subexponential, or exponential. Lemma 1. Let S T be finitely generated semigroups let f : S T be an injective semigroup homomorphism. If A is any finite generating set for S, then there is a finite generating set B for T such that γ (S) A (n) γ(t) B (n) for all n N 0. If the growth of T is polynomial or subexponential, then the growth of S is, respectively, polynomial or subexponential. If the growth of S is superpolynomial or exponential, then the growth of T is, respectively, superpolynomial or exponential. Proof. Let A be a finite generating set for S, let B be any finite generating set for T, let B = B f(a). If l A (s) = m, then s = a 1 a m for some a 1,...,a m A. Since f(s) = f(a 1 ) f(a m ), it follows that l B (f(s)) m. Since f is one-to-one, it follows that γ (S) A (n) γ(t) B (n). This inequality implies the statements about growth rates.

3 FAMILIES OF LINEAR SEMIGROUPS WITH INTERMEDIATE GROWTH 3 Lemma 2. Let S be a finitely generated subsemigroup of a finitely generated semigroup T. If the growth of T is polynomial or subexponential, then the growth of S is, respectively, polynomial or subexponential. If the growth of S is superpolynomial or exponential, then the growth of T is, respectively, superpolynomial or exponential. Proof. This follows immediately from Lemma 1. Lemma 3. Let S T be finitely generated semigroups let f : S T be a surjective semigroup homomorphism. If A is any finite generating set for S, then B = {f(a) : a A} is a finite generating set for T, γ (S) A (n) γ(t) B (n) for all n N 0. If the growth of S is polynomial or subexponential, then the growth of T is, respectively, polynomial or subexponential. If the growth of T is superpolynomial or exponential, then the growth of S is, respectively, superpolynomial or exponential. Proof. Lety T. Sincef isonto, thereexistsx S suchthatf(x) = y.ifl (S) A (x) = m, then there is a sequence a 1,...,a m A such that y = f(x) = f(a 1 ) f(a m ), so B = {f(a) : a A} is a generating set for T. Conversely, if y T l B (y) = m, then there exist a 1,...,a m A such that y = f(a 1 ) f(a m ). Let x = a 1 a m S. Then f(x) = y l A (x) m. This implies that γ (T) B (n) γ(s) A (n) for all n, the growth conditions follow directly from this inequality. The growth of a finitely generated abelian semigroup S is always polynomial. Indeed, if A is a set of generators for S with card(a) = k, then ( ) n+k 1 λ A (n) n k 1 k 1 ( ) n+k γ A (n) n k. k More precisely, Khovanskii [3, 4], Nathanson [8], Nathanson Ruzsa [10] proved that there is a polynomial f A (x) with integer coefficients such that λ A (n) = f A (n) for all sufficiently large integers n. It follows that there is a polynomial F A (x) with integer coefficients such that γ A (n) = F A (n) for all sufficiently large n. The growth of finitely generated free semigroups of rank at least two is always exponential. If S is the free semigroup generated by a set of k 2 elements, then λ A (n) = k n γ A (n) = (k n+1 1)/(k 1) > k n. By Lemma 2, a semigroup that contains a free subsemigroup on two generators has exponential growth. Semigroups of intermediate growth are more difficult to construct. Beljaev, Sesekin, Trofimov[1] proved that the free semigroup generated by two elements e g with the relations e 2 = e eg i eg j e = eg j eg i e for all nonnegative integers i j is a semigroup of intermediate growth. Okniǹski [11] constructed two examples of linear semigroups, that is, subsemigroups of the multiplicative semigroup M n (Z) of n n matrices. Let S 1 be the subsemigroup of M 2 (Z) generated by the set A = {( ) 1 1, 0 1 ( )}

4 4 MELVYN B. NATHANSON let T 1 be the subsemigroup of M 3 (Z) generated by the set A = , Both S 1 T 1 are homomorphic images of the Beljaev, Sesekin, Trofimov semigroup have intermediate growth. Nathanson [6] gave a simple numbertheoretical proof that S (1) has intermediate growth, Lavrik-Männlin [5] computed the growth function of S (1). Grigorchuk [2] Shneerson [12, 13, 14] have also investigated the growth of semigroups. In this paper we apply ideas from additive number theory to construct families of linear semigroups of intermediate growth that generalize Okniǹski s examples. 2. Partition functions of sets of positive integers Results about the intermediate growth of groups semigroups often use estimates for the asymptotics of partition functions in additive number theory. We review some of these results here. Let A be a set of positive integers let p A (n) denote the number of partitions of n into parts belonging to A. If A = N is the set of all positive integers, then p(n) = p N (n) is the classical partition function. If Ais anonempty finite set ofrelativelyprime positiveintegers card(a) = r, then ( ) 1 n r 1 p A (n) = a A a (r 1)! +O( n r 2) (Nathanson [9] [7, Theorem 15.2]). Let p r (n) denote the number of partitions of n into at most r parts, let ˆp r (n) denote the number of partitions of n into exactly r parts, let ˆq r (n) denote the number of partitions of n into exactly r distinct parts. Since the number of partitions of n into at most r parts is equal to the number of partitions of n into parts belonging to the set A = {1,2,...,r}, it follows that p r (n) = nr 1 r!(r 1)! +O( n r 2) (1) ˆp r (n) = p r (n) p r 1 (n) = nr 1 r!(r 1)! +O( n r 2). We note that p r (n) ˆp r (n) are increasing functions of n, n (2) p(n) = ˆp r (n). r=1 If n = a 1 + +a r is a partition of n into r distinct positive parts a 1 > > a r, then n r(r +1)/2 n r(r 1) 2 = (a 1 (r 1))+(a 2 (r 2))+ +(a 2 1)+a 1 is a partition of n r(r 1)/2 into r parts. This identity establishes a bijection between partitions into exactly r distinct parts partitions into exactly r parts,

5 FAMILIES OF LINEAR SEMIGROUPS WITH INTERMEDIATE GROWTH 5 so (3) ˆq r (n) = ˆp r (n r(r 1)/2) = nr 1 r!(r 1)! +O( n r 2). The set A has asymptotic density d(a) = α if 1 lim 1 = α. n n If d(a) = α > 0 gcd(a) = 1, then a A a n (4) logp A (n) c 0 αn where π 2 c 0 = 2 6. (An elementary proof of (4) is in Nathanson [7, Theorem 16.1].) In particular, if A = N, then α = 1 the partition function p(n) = p N (n) satisfies the Hardy- Ramanujan asymptotic estimate logp(n) c 0 n. If A is the set of odd positive integers, then α = 1/2 logp A (n) c 0 n/2. Let q(n) denote the number of partitions of n into distinct positive integers. Since the number of partitions of an integer into distinct parts is equal to the number of partitions into odd parts, it follows that logq(n) c 0 n/2. 3. A condition for subexponential growth Lemma 4. Let S be a semigroup generated by a set A = {e,g}, where e is an idempotent. The set S 0 = ese = {exe : x S} is a subsemigroup of S with identity e, is generated by the set {eg k e : k = 0,1,2,3,...}. Define g 0 = 1. Then S = {g i } i=0 g i S 0 g j. i,j=0 Suppose that, for all nonnegative integers i 1,j 1,i 2,j 2, (5) g i1 S 0 g j1 g i2 S 0 g j2 if only if (i 1,j 1 ) = (i 2,j 2 ). For all nonnegative integers i j, let let γ 0 (n) = γ 0,0 (n). Then γ i,j (n) = card{y g i S 0 g j : l A (y) n} γ i,j (n) γ 0 (n i j). Proof. Let x g i S 0 g j. By condition (5), every representation of x as a word in e g must be of the form x = g i y g j for some y S 0. Therefore, l A (x) = min{i+j +l A (y ) : y S 0 x = g i y g j } = i+j +l A (y) for some y S 0. If l A (x) = m, then l A (y) = m i j so γ i,j (n) γ 0 (n i j).

6 6 MELVYN B. NATHANSON Theorem 1. Let S be a semigroup generated by a set A = {e,g}, where e is an idempotent, let S 0 = ese. Suppose that (i) For all nonnegative integers k 1 k 2, eg k1 eg k2 e = eg k2 eg k1 e (ii) For all nonnegative integers i 1,j 1,i 2,j 2, g i1 S 0 g j1 g i2 S 0 g j2 if only if (i 1,j 1 ) = (i 2,j 2 ). Then the semigroup S has subexponential growth. Proof. If e = 1, then S = S 0 = {g i } i=0 condition (ii) is not satisfied. Thus, we can assume that e 1. If 1 S 0, then there exist positive integers k 1,...,k r such that eg k1 eg k2 e eg kr e = 1. Multiplying this identity by e, we obtain e = 1, which is absurd. Therefore, 1 / S 0. Let γ 0 (n) denote the number of elements y S 0 such that l A (y) n. If y S 0 l A (y) = m n, then conditions (i) (ii) imply that either y = e or there exist positive integers r k 1 k r such that y = eg k1 eg k2 e eg kr e l A (y) = k 1 +k 2 + +k r +r+1 = m. Thus, to every y S 0 with l A (y) = m there are associated a positive integer r a partition of m r 1 into exactly r parts, so the number of elements y S 0 of length exactly m is m m λ 0 (m) = γ 0 (m) γ 0 (m 1) ˆp r (m r 1) ˆp r (m) = p(m) by (2). Since 1 / S 0, we have γ 0 (n) = r=1 n λ 0 (m) m=1 r=1 n p(m) np(n). Let γ i,j (n) denote the growth function of the set g i S 0 g j with respect to the generating set A. By Lemma 4, m=1 γ i,j (n) γ 0 (n i j). By condition (ii), if g i = g j, then g i S 0 g i = g j S 0 g j so i = j. Therefore, for every n 0 there is exactly one element in the set {g i } i=0 of length n, n n γ A (n) γ i,j (n)+n+1 i=0 j=0 n i=0 j=0 n γ 0 (n i j)+n+1 (n+1) 2 γ 0 (n)+n+1 2(n+1) 3 p(n). From the asymptotic formula (4) for the partition function, we obtain log2(n+1) 3 +logp(n) n

7 FAMILIES OF LINEAR SEMIGROUPS WITH INTERMEDIATE GROWTH 7 so lim = 0. n n Thus, the growth function γ A (n) is subexponential. 4. Sequences with many partition products Let W = {w k } k=1 be a sequence of elements in a semigroup (X, ) such that w k1 w k2 = w k2 w k1 forallpositiveintegersk 1,k 2.Toeveryfinitesequenceofpositiveintegersk 1,k 2,...,k r we associate the element w k1 w k2 w kr X. For every integer r 1, let W r (n) denote the subset of X associated to partitions of positive integers not exceeding n into exactly r parts, that is, w W r (n) if only if there is a sequence of positive integers k 1 k 2 k r such that k 1 + k k r n w = w k1 w k2 w kr. We define Φ(r) = liminf n logcard(w r (n)). logn The sequence {w k } k=1 has many partition products in W if lim Φ(r) =. r Here are some examples of sequences with many partition products. Theorem 2. For every positive integer d, let U d be the multiplicative semigroup of all positive integers u such that u 1 (mod d). The sequence has many partition products. W = {dk +1} k=1 Proof. Let r 1 let k 1 k 2 k r be a sequence of positive integers with k 1 + k k r n. Associated to this sequence is the integer (dk 1 + 1)(dk 2 +1) (dk r +1) W r (n). Let K denote the set of positive integers k such that dk + 1 is prime, let K(t) count the number of elements k K with k t. If k 1 k 2 k r j 1 j 2 j r are distinct sequences of elements of K such that k 1 n/r j 1 n/r, then k 1 + k k r n j 1 + j j r n, hence (dk 1 + 1)(dk 2 + 1) (dk r + 1) W r (n) (dj 1 +1)(dj 2 +1) (dj r +1) W r (n). By the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, (dk 1 +1)(dk 2 +1) (dk r +1) (dj 1 +1)(dj 2 +1) (dj r +1), so ( ) K(n/r)+r 1 card(w r (n)) K(n/r)r. r r! Let π(x,d,1) denote the number of prime numbers p x such that p 1 (mod d). Let x = dn r +1. Then dk+1 x is prime if only if k n/r. By the prime number theorem for arithmetic progressions, for sufficiently large n we have K(n/r) = π(x,d,1) x logx n rlogn

8 8 MELVYN B. NATHANSON where the implied constants depend only on d. Therefore, so It follows that card(w r (n)) K(n/r)r r! n r r!r r (logn) r log(card(w r (n))) rlogn log(r!r r ) rloglogn Φ(r) = liminf n log(card(w r (n))) logn lim Φ(r) = r r. the sequence {dk + 1} k=1 has many partition products. This completes the proof. In additive number theory, a sequence {b k } k=k 0 contained in an additive abelian semigroup is called a ˆB r -sequence if sums of r distinct terms of the sequence are distinct, that is, if k 1 < k 2 < < k r j 1 < j 2 < < j r, if b k1 +b k2 + +b kr = b j1 +b j2 + +b jr then k i = j i for i = 1,...,r. The sequence is called a ˆB -sequence if all finite sums of distinct elements of the set are distinct, that is, if k 1 < k 2 < < k r j 1 < j 2 < < j s, if b k1 +b k2 + +b kr = b j1 +b j2 + +b js then r = s k i = j i for i = 1,...,r. If {b k } k=k 0 is a sequence of positive real numberssuchthat l 1 k=k 0 b k < b l foralll > k 0, thenthesequenceisa ˆB -sequence. In particular, a ˆB -sequence is a ˆB r -sequence for all r 1. Lemma 5. Let c,c 1,d, t be positive real numbers with t > 2, let {e k } k=1 be a sequence of real numbers such that e k c 1 k d for all k 1. There is an integer k 0 such that the sequence is a strictly increasing ˆB -sequence. {ct k +e k } k=k 0 Proof. Let b k = ct k +e k for k 1. Since t > 2 e k c 1 k d, there is an integer k 0 such that 0 < b k < b k+1 for all k k 0, also (6) c 1 (t 1)(k +1) d+1 c(d+1)(t 2) < t k for all k > k 0. Let l > k 0. Using (6) the inequality l k=1 k d < (l+1)d+1 d+1

9 FAMILIES OF LINEAR SEMIGROUPS WITH INTERMEDIATE GROWTH 9 we obtain This completes the proof. l 1 k=k 0 b k = c l 1 k=k 0 t k + < ctl t 1 +c 1 < ct l c 1 l d b l. l 1 k=k 0 e k l 1 k d k=k 0 Theorem 3. Let c,c 1 d, t be positive real numbers with t > 2, let {e k } k=1 be a sequence of real numbers such that e k c 1 k d for all k 1. Let k 0 be a positive integer such that sequence W = {ct k +e k } k=k 0 is a ˆB -sequence. Then W has many partial products. Proof. Let b k = ct k +e k for k 1. By Lemma 5, there is an integer k 0 such that W = {ct k +e k } k=k 0 is a strictly increasing ˆB r -sequence for every positive integer r. To every partition n = k 1 + +k r into exactly r distinct parts k 1 > k 2 > > k r, we associate the real number b k1+k 0 +b k2+k 0 + +b kr+k 0 W r (n+rk 0 ). Since W is a ˆB r -sequence, it follows that different partitions are associated to different real numbers, so, by the partition asymptotic (3), This completes the proof. card(w r (n+rk 0 )) ˆq r (n) n r 1 Φ(r) = liminf n logcard(w r (n)) logn r A condition for superpolynomial growth Theorem 4. Let S be a semigroup generated by a set A = {e,g}, where e is an idempotent. Let S 0 = ese = {exe : x S}. Suppose that, for all nonnegative integers k 1 k 2, eg k1 eg k2 e = eg k2 eg k1 e. Let ϕ be a semigroup homomorphism from S 0 into a semigroup (X, ) such that the sequence W = {ϕ(eg k e)} k=1 has many partition products in X. Then the semigroup S has superpolynomial growth. Proof. Let w k = ϕ(eg k e) for k = 1,2,... Then w k1 w k2 = ϕ(eg k1 e) ϕ(eg k2 e) = ϕ(eg k1 eg k2 e) = ϕ(eg k2 eg k1 e) = ϕ(eg k2 e) ϕ(eg k1 e) = w k2 w k1

10 10 MELVYN B. NATHANSON for all k 1,k 2 N 0. If y = eg k1 eg k2 e eg kr e S 0, then ϕ(y) = ϕ ( eg k1 e ) ϕ ( eg k2 e ) ϕ ( eg kr e ) = w k1 w k2 w kr. Let γ A (n) denote the growth function of S with respect to A, let γ 0 (n) denote the growth function of S 0 with respect to A. Fix a positive integer r. If w W r (n r 1), then there are positive integers k 1,k 2,...,k r such that Let Then w k1 w k2 w kr = w k 1 + +k r n r 1. y = eg k1 eg k2 e eg k h e S 0. ϕ(y) = w k1 w k2 w kr = w l A (y) k 1 +k 2 + +k r +r +1 n. Thus, to every element w W r (n r 1) there is at least one element y S 0 with ϕ(y) = w l A (y) n, so It follows that lim inf n logn liminf n γ 0 (n) card(w r (n r 1)). logγ 0 (n) logn liminf n logcard(w r (n r 1)) logn = Φ(r). Since this inequality is true for all positive integers r Φ(r) tends to infinity, it follows that γ A (n) lim n logn = so the growth function γ A (n) is superpolynomial. 6. The semigroups S (d) Theorem 5. Let d be a positive integer let S (d) be the subsemigroup of M 2 (Z) generated by the matrices ( ) 1 d g = 0 1 ( ) 1 0 e =. 1 0 The semigroup S (d) has intermediate growth. Proof. Multiplying matrices, we obtain eg k e = (dk +1)e eg k1 eg k2 e = (dk 1 +1)(dk 2 +1) = eg k2 eg k1 e for all nonnegative integers k 1,k 2. It follows that S (d) satisfies condition (i) of Theorem 1, S (d) 0 = es (d) e = {(dk +1)e : k = 0,1,2,...} = {ue : u U d }

11 FAMILIES OF LINEAR SEMIGROUPS WITH INTERMEDIATE GROWTH 11 where U d is the multiplicative semigroup of positive integers that are congruent to 1 modulo d. For all u U d all nonnegative integers i j, ( )( )( ) ( ) 1 di dj di+1 dj +d g i ueg j = u = u 2 ij dj Let u 1,u 2 U d i 1,i 2,j 1,j 2 N 0. Then g i1 u 1 eg j1 = g i2 u 2 eg j2 if only if u 1 = u 2 (i 1,j 1 ) = (i 2,j 2 ). Thus, the semigroup S (d) also satisfies condition (ii) of Theorem 1, so has subexponential growth. The function ϕ : S (d) 0 U d defined by ϕ(ue) = u is a semigroup homomorphism. Let w k = ϕ(eg k e) = ϕ((dk + 1)e) = dk + 1 W = {dk +1} k=1. By Theorem 2, the sequence W has many partition products. By Theorem 4, the semigroup S (d) has superpolynomial growth. This completes the proof. Problem 1. If d divides d, then S (d) is a subsemigroup of S (d ). In particular, for every positive integer d, the semigroup S (d) is a finitely generated subsemigroup of the Okniǹski semigroup S (1). Let S be finitely generated subsemigroup of a finitely generated semigroup S. How are the growth rates of S S related? 7. Subsemigroups of M 3 (R) For k 0 m 1, let F k (x 1,...,x m ) be the symmetric function of degree k in m variables defined by F k (x 1,...,x m ) = x i1 1 xim m. (i 1,...,i m) N m 0 i 1+i 2+ +i m=k Define F k (x 1,...,x m ) = 0 for k < 0. If k 1 m 2, then In particular, F k (x 1,...,x m ) = x 1 F k 1 (x 1,x 2,...,x m )+F k (x 2,...,x m ). (7) F k (x 1,x 2 ) = x 1 F k 1 (x 1,x 2 )+x k 2 (8) F k (x 1,x 2,x 3 ) = x 1 F k 1 (x 1,x 2,x 3 )+F k (x 2,x 3 ). Lemma 6. Consider the upper triangular matrices s v w g = 0 t u 0 0 r e =

12 12 MELVYN B. NATHANSON with coefficients in a ring. For all k 0, define Then u k = uf k 1 (r,t) v k = vf k 1 (s,t) w k = wf k 1 (r,s)+uvf k 2 (r,s,t). (9) e 2 = e s k v k w k (10) g k = 0 t k u k 0 0 r k (11) eg k e = sk 0 w k r k (12) eg k1 eg k2 e = For k 1,k 2 N 0, 0 s k1 w k2 +r k2 w k r k1+k2 sk1+k2 (13) eg k1 eg k2 e = eg k2 eg k1 e if only if (14) s k1 w k2 +r k2 w k1 = s k2 w k1 +r k1 w k2. If r = s = 1, then (13) holds for all k 1,k 2 N 0. Proof. Identity (10) holds for k = 0 k = 1. If the formula is true for some k 1, then (7) (8) imply that g k+1 = sk v k w k 0 t k u k s v w 0 t u 0 0 r k 0 0 r s k+1 s k v +v k t s k w+v k u+w k r = 0 t k+1 t k u+u k r 0 0 r k+1 = sk+1 v k+1 w k+1 0 t k+1 u k r k+1 identity (10) follows by induction on k. Identities(11) (12) follow by matrix multiplication, (13) (14) follow from inspection of (12). This completes the proof. Theorem 6. Let t,u,v,w be real numbers with t > 2. Let T be the subsemigroup of M 3 (R) generated by the matrices e =

13 FAMILIES OF LINEAR SEMIGROUPS WITH INTERMEDIATE GROWTH 13 g = 1 v w 0 t u The semigroup T has intermediate growth. Proof. For every k N, let t k = 1+t+t 2 + +t k 1 = tk 1 t 1 ( w k = uvtk (t 1) 2 + w uv ) k uv t 1 (t 1) 2. By Lemma 6, we have e 2 = e, 1 vt k w k g k = 0 t k ut k eg k e = 1 0 w k eg k1 eg k2 e = eg k2 eg k1 e for k 1,k 2 N 0. Let T 0 = et e. Then T 0 consists of all matrices of the form eg k1 eg k2 e eg kr e = 1 0 w k 1 +w k2 + +w kr where k 1,...,k r is a finite sequence of nonnegative integers. For i,j N 0, the set g i T 0 g j consists of all matrices of the form (15) g i eg k1 eg k2 e eg kr eg j = 1 vt j w i +w j +w k1 +w k2 + +w kr 0 0 ut i Since {t i } i=0 is a strictly increasing sequence of real numbers, formula (15) implies that for all i 1,i 2,j 1,j 2 N 0, g i1 T 0 g j1 g i2 T 0 g j2 if only if (i 1,j 1 ) = (i 2,j 2 ). Thus, the semigroup T satisfies conditions (i) (ii) of Theorem 1 so has subexponential growth. Define the function ϕ : T 0 R by ϕ(eg k e) = w k = ct k +e k where c = uv/(t 1) 2 e k = (w uv/(t 1))k c = O(k). Then ϕ is a homomorphism from T 0 into the additive group of real numbers. By Theorem 3, there is an integer k 0 such that the sequence W = {w k } k=k 0 has many partial products. By Theorem 4, the semigroup T has superpolynomial growth. This completes the proof.

14 14 MELVYN B. NATHANSON Acknowledgements. I wish to thank David Newman, Kevin O Bryant, Lev Shneerson for helpful discussions about this work. References [1] V. V. Beljaev, N. F. Sesekin, V. I. Trofimov, Growth functions of semigroups loops, Ural. Gos. Univ. Mat. Zap. 10 (1977), no. 3 Issled. po Sovremen. Algebre, 3 8, 215. MR MR (58 #933) [2] R. I. Grigorchuk, Semigroups with cancellations of degree growth, Mat. Zametki 43 (1988), no. 3, , 428. MR MR (89f:20065) [3] A. G. Khovanskiĭ, The Newton polytope, the Hilbert polynomial sums of finite sets, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 26 (1992), no. 4, 57 63, 96. MR MR (94e:14068) [4], Sums of finite sets, orbits of commutative semigroups Hilbert functions, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 29 (1995), no. 2, 36 50, 95. MR MR (96e:20091) [5] A. A. Lavrik-Männlin, On some semigroups of intermediate growth, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 11 (2001), no. 5, MR MR (2003f:20094) [6] M. B. Nathanson, Number theory semigroups of intermediate growth, Amer. Math. Monthly 106 (1999), no. 7, MR MR [7], Elementary methods in number theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 195, Springer-Verlag, New York, MR MR (2001j:11001) [8], Growth of sumsets in abelian semigroups, Semigroup Forum 61 (2000), no. 1, MR MR (2002c:11129) [9], Partitions with parts in a finite set, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (2000), no. 5, MR MR (2000j:11152) [10] M. B. Nathanson I. Z. Ruzsa, Polynomial growth of sumsets in abelian semigroups, J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux 14 (2002), no. 2, MR MR (2004k:11024) [11] J. Okniński, Semigroups of matrices, Series in Algebra, vol. 6, World Scientific Publishing Co. Inc., River Edge, NJ, MR MR (2001g:20076) [12] L. M. Shneerson, Relatively free semigroups of intermediate growth, J. Algebra 235 (2001), no. 2, MR MR (2002a:20068) [13], On semigroups of intermediate growth, Comm. Algebra 32 (2004), no. 5, MR MR (2005h:20131) [14], Types of growth identities of semigroups, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 15 (2005), no. 5-6, MR MR (2006j:20086) Lehman College (CUNY),Bronx, New York address: melvyn.nathanson@lehman.cuny.edu