Radiative Ω Q Ω Qγ and Ξ Q Ξ Qγ transitions in light cone QCD arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 5 Nov 2014

Transcription

1 Radiative Ω Q Ω Qγ and Ξ Q Ξ Qγ transitions in light cone QCD arxiv:9.777v [hep-ph] Nov T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, H. Sundu Department of Physics, Middle East Technical University, 3, Ankara, Turkey Department of Physics, Doğuş University, Acıadem-Kadıköy, 37 Istanul, Turkey Department of Physics, Kocaeli University, 38 Izmit, Turkey Astract We calculate the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments associated with the radiative Ω Q Ω Qγ and Ξ Q Ξ Qγ transitions with Q = or c in the framework of light cone QCD sum rules. It is found that the corresponding quadrupole moments are negligily small while the magnetic dipole moments are consideraly large. A comparison of the results on the considered multipole moments as well as corresponding decay widths with the predictions of the vector dominance model is performed. PACS:..Hx, 3..Em, 3..Gp, 3.3.Ce,..Lq,..Mr Permanent address: Institute of Physics, Baku, Azeraijan taliev@metu.edu.tr kazizi@dogus.edu.tr, kazem.azizi@cern.ch hayriye.sundu@kocaeli.edu.tr

2 Introduction In the recent years, there have een significant experimental progresses on hadron spectroscopy. Many new aryons containing heavy ottom and charm quarks as well as many new charmonium like states are oserved. Now, all heavy aryons with single heavy quark have een discovered in the experiments except the Ω aryon with spin 3/. In the case of douly heavy aryons only the douly charmed Ξ cc aryon has een discovered y SELEX Collaoration [, ] ut the experimental attempts on the identification of other memers of the douly aryons as well as triply heavy aryons predicted y quark model are continued. Considering these progresses and facilities of experiments specially at LHC, it would e possile to study the decay properties of heavy aryons in near future. Theoretical studies on electromagnetic, weak and strong decays of heavy aryons receive special attention in the light of the experimental results. In the present work we calculate the electromagnetic form factors of the radiative Ω Q Ω Q γ and Ξ Q Ξ Qγ transitions in the framework of the light cone QCD sum rules as one of the most applicale non-perturative tools to hadron physics. Here, aryons with correspond spin 3/ while those without are spin / aryons. Using the electromagnetic form factors at static limit (q = ), we otain the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments as well as decay widths of the considered radiative decays. We compare our results with the predictions of the vector meson dominance model (VDM) [3] which uses the values of the strong coupling constants etween spin 3/ and spin / heavy aryons with vector mesons [] to calculate the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments of the transitions under consideration. The electromagnetic multipole moments of heavy aryons can give valuale information on their internal structure as well as their geometric shapes. Note that other possile radiative transitions among heavy spin 3/ and spin / aryons with single heavy quark, namely Σ Q Σ Qγ, Ξ Q Ξ Qγ and Σ Q Λ Qγ have een investigated in [] using the same framework. Some of these radiative transitions have also een previously studied using chiral perturation theory [], heavy quark and chiral symmetries [7, 8], relativistic quark model [9] and light cone QCD sum rules at leading order in HQET in []. The outline of the paper is as follows. In next section, QCD sum rules for the electromagnetic form factors of the transitions under consideration are calculated. In last section, we numerically analyze the otained sum rules. This section also includes comparison of our

3 results with the predictions of VDM on the multipole moments as well as the corresponding decay widths. Theoretical framework The aim of this section is to otain light cone QCD sum rules (LCQSR) for the electromagnetic form factors defining the radiative Ω Q Ω Qγ and Ξ Q Ξ Qγ transitions. For this goal we use the following two-point correlation function in the presence of an external photon field: Π µ (p,q) = i d xe ip x T{η(x) η µ ()} γ, () where η and η µ are the interpolating currents of the heavy flavored aryons with spin / and 3/, respectively. The main task in the following is to calculate this correlation function once in terms of hadronic parameters called the hadronic side and in terms of photon distriution amplitudes (DAs) with increasing twist y the help of operator product expansion (OPE). By equating the coefficients of appropriate structures from hadronic to OPE side, we otain LCQSR for the transition form factors. To suppress the contriution of the higher states and continuum, we apply Borel transformations with respect to the momentum squared of the initial and final aryonic states. For further pushing down those contriutions, we also apply continuum sutraction to oth sides of the LCQSRs otained.. Hadronic side To otain the hadronic representation, we insert complete sets of intermediate states having the same quantum numers as the interpolating currents into the aove correlation function. As a result of which we get Π µ (p,q) = η (p,s ) (p,s (p + q,s) η µ ) (p+q,s) p m γ +..., () (p+q) m where the dots indicate the contriutions of the higher states and continuum and q is the photon s momentum. In the aove equation, (p + q,s) and (p,s ) denote the heavy spin 3/ and / states and m and m are their masses, respectively. To proceed, we need to know the matrix elements of the interpolating currents etween the vacuum and the aryonic states. They are defined in terms of spinors and residues as (p+q,s) η µ () = λ ū µ (p+q,s), η() (p,s ) = λ u(p,s ), (3)

4 where u µ (p,s) is the Rarita-Schwinger spinor; and λ and λ are the residues of the heavy aryons with spin 3/ and /, respectively which are calculated in []. The matrix element (p,s ) (p+q,s) γ is also defined as [, ] { (p,s ) (p+q,s) γ = eū(p,s ) G (q µ ε ε µ q) +G [(Pε)q µ (Pq)ε µ ]γ + G 3 [(qε)q µ q ε µ ]γ }u µ (p+q,s), where G i are electromagnetic form factors, ε µ is the photon s polarization vector and P = p+(p+q). Intheaove equation, thetermproportionalto G 3 iszero forthereal photonwhich we consider inthepresent study. At q =, thetransitionmagneticdipole moment G M and the electric quadrupole moment G E are defined in terms of the remaining electromagnetic form factors as ] m [ G M = (3m +m ) G +(m m )G m 3, [ ] G m G E = (m m ) +G m 3. () Now, we use Eqs. () and (3) in Eq. () and perform summation over spins of the Dirac and Rarita-Schwinger spinors. In the case of spin 3/ this summation is written as u µ (p,s)ū ν (p,s) = ( p+m ) m { g µν + 3 γ µγ ν p µp ν 3m p µγ ν p ν γ µ }. () 3m s Using Eqs. (3-), in principle, one can straightforwardly calculate the hadronic side of the correlation function. But, here appear two unwanted prolems: there is pollution from spin / aryons, since the interpolating current η µ couples with spin / aryons also. All Lorentz structures are not independent. In order to solve the first prolem, let write the corresponding matrix element of the current η µ etween vacuum and J = / states, which can e parametrized as η µ (p+q,s) = [αγ µ +β(p+q) µ ]u(p+q,s). (7) Multiplying oth sides of this equation y γ µ and using γ µ η µ = as well as the Dirac equation we get η µ (p+q,s) = α[γ µ m (p+q) µ ]u(p+q,s). (8) () 3

5 from this expression it follows that contriutions of spin / states are either proportional to the γ µ at the end or (p+q) µ. Taking into account this fact, from Eq. () it follows that onlytermsproportionaltog µν containcontriutionscomingonlyfromspin 3/states. This oservation shows that how spin / states contriutions coupled to η µ can e removed. The second prolem can e solved if one orders the Dirac matrices in an appropriate way. In this work, we choose the ordering ε q pγ µ. After some calculations, for the hadronic side of the correlation function, we get [ Π µ = eλ λ p m (p+q) m ]{ [ε µ (pq) (εp)q µ G m G m m +G (p+q) [ ] } + G G (m m ) p+m G q G q p γ [ ]{ } + q µ ε ε µ q G (p +m m ) G (m +m ) p γ [ ] +G ε(pq) q(εp) q µ γ G ε q(m + p)q µ γ ] +other structures with γ µ at the end or which are proportional to (p+q) µ, where, we need two invariant structures to calculate the form factors G and G. In the present work, we select the structures ε pγ q µ and q pγ (εp)q µ for G and G, respectively. The advantage of these structures is that these terms do not receive contriutions from contact terms.. OPE Side On OPE side, the aforementioned correlation function is calculated in terms of QCD degrees of freedom and photon DAs. For this aim, we sustitute the explicit forms of the interpolating currents of the heavy aryons into the correlation function in Eq. () and use the Wick s theorem to otain the correlation in terms of quark propagators. The interpolating currents for spin 3/ aryons are taken as } η µ = Aǫ {(q ac Cγ a µ q)q c +(qcγ a µ Q )q c +(Q a Cγ µ q)q c, () where q and q stand for light quarks; a, and c are color indices and C is the charge conjugation operator. The normalization factor A and light quark content of heavy spin 3/ aryons are presented in tale : (9)

6 Heavy spin 3/ aryons A q q Ω () (c) Ξ (+) (c) Ξ () (c) / 3 s s /3 s u /3 s d Tale : The normalization factor A and light quark content of heavy spin 3/ aryons. The general form of the interpolating currents for the heavy spin / aryons under consideration can e written as (see for instance [3]) η = B {( ) ( ) ( ) ]} ǫ ac q at CQ γ q c +β q at Cγ Q q [(Q c at Cq )γ q c +β Q at Cγ q q c, where β is an aritrary parameter and β = corresponds to the Ioffe current. The constant B and quark fields q and q for the corresponding heavy spin / aryons are given in tale. Heavy spin 3/ aryons B q q Ω () (c) / s s Ξ (+) (c) s u Ξ () (c) s d () Tale : The constant B and light quark content of the heavy spin / aryons under consideration. The correlation function in OPE side receives three different contriutions: ) perturative contriutions, ) mixed contriutions at which the photon is radiated from short distances and at least one of the quarks forms a condensate and 3) non-perturative contriutions where photon is radiated at long distances. The last contriution is parameterized y the matrix element γ(q) q(x )Γq(x ) which is expanded in terms of photon DAs with { definite twists. Here Γ is the full set of Dirac matrices Γ j =, γ, γ α, iγ γ α, σ αβ / }. The perturative contriution at which the photon interacts with the quarks perturatively, is otained y replacing corresponding free quark propagator y S a αβ { } a d ys free (x y) AS free (y), () αβ

7 where the free light and heavy quark propagators are given as Sq free = i x π x m q π x, S free Q = m Q K (m Q x ) i m Q x π x π x K (m Q x ), (3) with K i eing the Bessel functions. The non-perturative contriutions are otained y replacing one of the light quark propagators that emits a photon y S a αβ qa Γ j q (Γ j ) αβ, () where sum over j is applied, and the remaining y full quark propagators involving the perturative as well as the non-perturative parts. The full heavy and light quark propagators which we use in the present work are (see [, ]) S Q (x) = S free Q (x) ig d k [ k +mq s dv (vx)σ (π) e ikx (m Q k ) Gµν µν ] + m Q kvx µg µν γ ν, ( i m q x ) x 9 m qq ( i m q x ) S q (x) = Sq free (x) m q π x qq [ x ig s du π x G µν(ux)σ µν ux µ G µν (ux)γ ν i π x i m ( ( q x 3π G µνσ µν Λ ln )+γ E )], () where Λ is the scale parameter and we choose it at factorization scale Λ = (. ) GeV []. In order to calculate the non-perturative contriutions, we need the matrix elements γ(q) qγ i q. These matrix elements are determined in terms of the photon DAs as [7] ( ) γ(q) q(x)σ µν q() = ie q qq(ε µ q ν ε ν q µ ) due iūqx χϕ γ (u)+ x A(u) i ( ( )] (qx) e εx εx q qq [x ν ε µ q µ ) x µ ε ν q ν due iūqx h γ (u), qx qx ( ) εx γ(q) q(x)γ µ q() = e q f 3γ ε µ q µ due iūqx ψ v (u), qx γ(q) q(x)γ µ γ q() = e qf 3γ ǫ µναβ ε ν q α x β due iūqx ψ a (u),

8 γ(q) q(x)g s G µν (vx)q() = ie q qq (ε µ q ν ε ν q µ ) Dα i e i(α q+vαg)qx S(α i ), γ(q) q(x)g s Gµν iγ (vx)q() = ie q qq (ε µ q ν ε ν q µ ) Dα i e i(α q+vαg)qx S(αi ), γ(q) q(x)g s Gµν (vx)γ α γ q() = e q f 3γ q α (ε µ q ν ε ν q µ ) Dα i e i(α q+vαg)qx A(α i ), γ(q) q(x)g s G µν (vx)iγ α q() = e q f 3γ q α (ε µ q ν ε ν q µ ) Dα i e i(α q+vαg)qx V(α i ), {[( )( εx γ(q) q(x)σ αβ g s G µν (vx)q() = e q qq ε µ q µ g αν ) qx qx (q αx ν +q ν x α ) q β ( )( εx ε µ q µ g βν ) qx qx (q βx ν +q ν x β ) q α ( )( εx ε ν q ν g αµ ) qx qx (q αx µ +q µ x α ) q β ( )( εx + ε ν q ν g βµ ] q.x qx (q βx µ +q µ x β ) )q α Dα i e i(α q+vαg)qx T (α i ) [( )( εx + ε α q α g µβ ) qx qx (q µx β +q β x µ ) q ν ( )( εx ε α q α g νβ ) qx qx (q νx β +q β x ν ) q µ ( )( εx ε β q β g µα ) qx qx (q µx α +q α x µ ) q ν ( )( εx + ε β q β g να ] qx qx (q νx α +q α x ν ) )q µ Dα i e i(α q+vαg)qx T (α i ) + qx (q µx ν q ν x µ )(ε α q β ε β q α ) Dα i e i(α q+vαg)qx T 3 (α i ) + } qx (q αx β q β x α )(ε µ q ν ε ν q µ ) Dα i e i(α q+vαg)qx T (α i ), () where ϕ γ (u) is the leading twist, ψ v (u), ψ a (u), A and V are the twist 3; and h γ (u), A and T i (i =,, 3, ) are the twist photon DAs [7]. Here χ is the magnetic susceptiility of the quarks. The measure Dα i is defined as Dα i = dα q dα q dα g δ( α q α q α g ). (7) In order to otain the sum rules for the form factors G and G, we equate the coefficients of the structures ε pγ q µ and q pγ (εp)q µ from oth hadronic and OPE representations of the same correlation function. We apply the Borel transformations with respect to the variales p and (p + q) as well as continuum sutraction to suppress the contriutions 7

9 of the higher states and continuum. Finally, we otain the following schematically written sum rules for the electromagnetic form factors G and G : m G = λ λ (m +m ) e G = e λ λ m m M e M M e where the functions Π i [Π i ] can e written as m M [ ] e q Π +e q Π (q q )+e Q Π [ ] e q Π +e q Π (q q )+e Q Π, (8) Π i [Π i] = s e s m Q M ρ i (s)[ρ i(s)]ds+e m Q M Γ i [Γ i], (9) where is the continuum threshold and we take M = M = M since the masses of the initial and final aryons are close to each other. The spectral densities ρ i (s)[ρ i (s)] and the functions Γ i [Γ i] are very lengthy, hence, we do not present their explicit expressions here. 3 Numerical results In this part, we numerically analyze the sum rules for the magnetic dipole G M and electric quadrupole G E otained in the previous section. For this aim, we use the input parameters ūu ( GeV) = dd ( GeV) = (.3) 3 GeV 3, ß( GeV) =.8 ūu ( GeV), m (GeV) = (.8±.)GeV [8]andf 3γ =.39GeV [7]. Thevalueofthemagnetic susceptiility are calculated in [9,, ]. Here we use the value χ( GeV) =. GeV [] for this quantity. The LCQSR for the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments also include the photon DAs [7] whose expressions are given as ( ) ϕ γ (u) = uū +ϕ (µ)c 3 (u ū), ψ v (u) = 3 ( 3(u ) ) + 3 ( )( w V γ wγ A 3 3(u ) +3(u ) ), ψ a (u) = ( (u ) )( (u ) ) ( + 9 wv γ 3 ) wa γ, ( ) A(α i ) = 3α q α q αg +wγ A (7α g 3), V(α i ) = w V γ (α q α q )α q α q α g, h γ (u) = ( +κ +) C (u ū), A(u) = u ū ( 3κ κ + + ) +8(ζ + 3ζ )[uū(+3uū) 8

10 + u 3 ( u+u )ln(u)+ū 3 ( ū+ū )ln(ū) ], T (α i ) = (3ζ +ζ + )(α q α q )α q α q α g, T (α i ) = 3αg (α q α q ) ( (κ κ + )+(ζ ζ + )( α g)+ζ (3 α g ) ), T 3 (α i ) = (3ζ ζ + )(α q α q )α q α q α g, T (α i ) = 3αg(α q α q ) ( (κ+κ + )+(ζ +ζ + )( α g )+ζ (3 α g ) ), S(α i ) = 3αg {(κ+κ+ )( α g )+(ζ +ζ + )( α g)( α g ) + ζ [3(α q α q ) α g ( α g )]}, S(α i ) = 3αg{(κ κ + )( α g )+(ζ ζ + )( α g )( α g ) + ζ [3(α q α q ) α g ( α g )]}, () where, the constants inside the DAs are given y ϕ ( GeV) =, wγ V = 3.8 ±.8, wa γ =.±., κ =., κ + =, ζ =., ζ =.3, ζ + = and ζ+ = [7]. The sum rules for the electromagnetic form factors contain three more auxiliary parameters: Borel mass parameter M, the continuum threshold and the aritrary parameter β entering the expressions of the interpolating currents of the heavy spin / aryons. Any physical quantities, like the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments, should e independent of these auxiliary parameters. Therefore, we try to find working regions for these auxiliary parameters such that in these regions the G M and G E are practically independent of these parameters. The upper and lower ands for M are found requiring that not only the contriutions of the higher states and continuum are less than the ground state contriution, ut also the contriutions of the higher twists are less compared to the leading twists. By these requirements, the working regions of Borel mass parameter are otained as GeV M 3 GeV and GeV M GeV for aryons containing and c quarks, respectively. The continuum threshold is the energy square which characterizes the eginning of the continuum. In we denote the ground state mass y m, the quantity m is the energy needed to excite the particle to its first excited state with the same quantum numers. The m is not well known for the aryons under consideration, ut it should lie etween.3 GeV and.8 GeV. The dependence of the magnetic dipole moment G M and electric quadrupole moment G E on the Borel mass parameter at different fixed values of the continuum threshold and general parameter β are depicted in figures - for the radiative transitions under consideration. Note that, in all figures, we plot the asolute values of the physical quantities under study since it is not 9

11 GM =. GeV, =-; =.7 GeV, =- =. GeV, =+; =.7 GeV, =+ =. GeV, =-3; =.7 GeV, =-3 =. GeV, =+3; =.7 GeV, =+3 =. GeV, =-; =.7 GeV, =- =. GeV, =+; =.7 GeV, =+ GE =. GeV, =-; =.7 GeV, =- =. GeV, =+; =.7 GeV, =+ =. GeV, =-3; =.7 GeV, =-3 =. GeV, =+3; =.7 GeV, =+3 =. GeV, =-; =.7 GeV, =- =. GeV, =+; =.7 GeV, = M (GeV ).. 3 M (GeV ) Figure : Left: The dependence of the magnetic dipole moment G M for Ω Ω γ transition on the Borel mass parameter M. Right: The dependence of the electric quadrupole moment G E for Ω Ω γ transition on the Borel mass parameter M. GM c c 8 3 =3. GeV, =-; =3.3 GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3.3 GeV, =+ =3. GeV, =-3; =3.3 GeV, =-3 =3. GeV, =+3; =3.3 GeV, =+3 =3. GeV, =-; =3.3 GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3.3 GeV, =+ 8 M (GeV ) 3 GE c c =3. GeV, =-; =3.3 GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3.3 GeV, =+ =3. GeV, =-3; =3.3 GeV, =-3 =3. GeV, =+3; =3.3 GeV, =+3 =3. GeV, =-; =3.3 GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3.3 GeV, =+.. 8 M (GeV ).3.. Figure : The same as Fig., ut for Ω c Ω c γ. GM =.3 GeV, =-; =. GeV, =- =.3 GeV, =+; =. GeV, =+ =.3 GeV, =-3; =. GeV, =-3 =.3 GeV, =+3; =. GeV, =+3 =.3 GeV, =-; =. GeV, =- =.3 GeV, =+; =. GeV, =+ 3 M (GeV ) GE =.3 GeV, =-; =. GeV, =- =.3 GeV, =+; =. GeV, =+ =.3 GeV, =-3; =. GeV, =-3 =.3 GeV, =+3; =. GeV, =+3 =.3 GeV, =-; =. GeV, =- =.3 GeV, =+; =. GeV, =+.. 3 M (GeV )...7. Figure 3: The same as Fig., ut for Ξ Ξ γ.

12 GM c c =3. GeV, =-; =3. GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3. GeV, =+ =3. GeV, =-3; =3. GeV, =-3 =3. GeV, =+3; =3. GeV, =+3 =3. GeV, =-; =3. GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3. GeV, =+ 8 M (GeV ) GE c c =3. GeV, =-; =3. GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3. GeV, =+ =3. GeV, =-3; =3. GeV, =-3 =3. GeV, =+3; =3. GeV, =+3 =3. GeV, =-; =3. GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3. GeV, =+.. 8 M (GeV ).... Figure : The same as Fig., ut for Ξ + c Ξ + c γ. GM =.3 GeV, =-; =. GeV, =- =.3 GeV, =+; =. GeV, =+ =.3 GeV, =-3; =. GeV, =-3 =.3 GeV, =+3; =. GeV, =+3 =.3 GeV, =-; =. GeV, =- =.3 GeV, =+; =. GeV, =+ 3 M (GeV ) 9 3 GE =.3 GeV, =-; =. GeV, =- =.3 GeV, =+; =. GeV, =+ =.3 GeV, =-3; =. GeV, =-3 =.3 GeV, =+3; =. GeV, =+3 =.3 GeV, =-; =. GeV, =- =.3 GeV, =+; =. GeV, =+.. 3 M (GeV ).... Figure : The same as Fig., ut for Ξ Ξ γ. GM c c 8 =3. GeV, =-; =3. GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3. GeV, =+ =3. GeV, =-3; =3. GeV, =-3 =3. GeV, =+3; =3. GeV, =+3 =3. GeV, =-; =3. GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3. GeV, =+ GE c c =3. GeV, =-; =3. GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3. GeV, =+ =3. GeV, =-3; =3. GeV, =-3 =3. GeV, =+3; =3. GeV, =+3 =3. GeV, =-; =3. GeV, =- =3. GeV, =+; =3. GeV, =+.. 8 M (GeV ).. 8 M (GeV ) Figure : The same as Fig., ut for Ξ c Ξ c γ. possile to predict the signs of the residues from the mass sum rules. From these figures, we see that the results weakly depend on the M and in their working regions.

13 To determine the working regions for the general parameter β at different radiative channels, we depict the dependence of the results on this parameter at different fixed values of the Borel mass parameter and continuum threshold in figures 7-. Note that instead of β we use θ, where β = tanθ. The interval θ corresponds to β etween to + which we shall consider in our calculations. The numerical results show that the values of G E are negligily small and therefore we consider only dependence of G M on β, in order to find its working region. GM M = GeV, =. GeV M = GeV, =.7 GeV M = GeV, =. GeV M = GeV, =.7 GeV GE M = GeV, =. GeV M = GeV, =.7 GeV M = GeV, =. GeV M = GeV, =.7 GeV Figure 7: Left: The dependence of the magnetic dipole moment G M for Ω Ω γ on θ. Right: The dependence of the electric quadrupole moment f G E for Ω Ω γ on θ. GM c c M =8 GeV, =3. GeV M =8 GeV, =3.3 GeV M = GeV, =3. GeV. M = GeV, =3.3 GeV... GE c c M =8 GeV, =3. GeV M =8 GeV, =3.3 GeV.3 M = GeV, =3. GeV.3 M = GeV, =3.3 GeV Figure 8: The same as Fig. 7, ut for Ω c Ω cγ. From figures 7-, we otain the region. θ. common for all radiative transitions under consideration, at which the dependence of the G M on θ is relatively weak. In most of the figures related to the magnetic dipole moment, the Ioffe current which corresponds to θ.7 remains out of the reliale region.

14 GM M = GeV, =.3 GeV M = GeV, =. GeV M = GeV, =.3 GeV M = GeV, =. GeV GE M = GeV, =.3 GeV. M = GeV, =. GeV M = GeV, =.3 GeV. M = GeV, =. GeV Figure 9: The same as Fig. 7, ut for Ξ Ξ γ. GM c c M =8 GeV, =3. GeV M =8 GeV, =3. GeV M = GeV, =3. GeV 3 M = GeV, =3. GeV GE c c M =8 GeV, =3. GeV M =8 GeV, =3. GeV M = GeV, =3. GeV. M = GeV, =3. GeV Figure : The same as Fig. 7, ut for Ξ + c Ξ + c γ. GM M = GeV, =.3 GeV M = GeV, =. GeV M = GeV, =.3 GeV M = GeV, =. GeV GE M = GeV, =.3 GeV M = GeV, =. GeV M = GeV, =.3 GeV. M = GeV, =. GeV Figure : The same as Fig. 7, ut for Ξ Ξ γ. Considering the working regions for the auxiliary parameters, photon DAs and other input parameters, we extract the values of the magnetic dipole moment G M and the electric 3

15 GM c c M =8 GeV, =3. GeV M =8 GeV, =3. GeV M = GeV, =3. GeV M = GeV, =3. GeV GE c c M =8 GeV, =3. GeV. M =8 GeV, =3. GeV. M = GeV, =3. GeV.3 M = GeV, =3. GeV Figure : The same as Fig. 7, ut for Ξ c Ξ c γ. quadrupole moment G E correspond to the considered radiative transitions as presented in tale 3. For comparison, we also present the predictions of VDM [3] on G M and G E in this tale. From this tale we see that, considering the errors in our results, our predictions are comparale with those of VDM on the magnetic dipole moment G M for all transitions except that Ω Ω γ which our result is consideraly small compared to that of VDM. In oth models, the values of G E are negligily small for all considered channels. G M (PW) G E (PW) G M (VDM) [3] G E (VDM) [3] Ω Ω γ.7± Ω c Ω cγ.337± Ξ Ξ γ.3± Ξ + c Ξ + c γ.88± Ξ Ξ γ 3.37± Ξ c Ξ c γ.9±..9.. Tale 3: The asolute values of the magnetic dipole moment G M and electric quadrupole moment G E for the corresponding radiative decays in units of natural magneton. PW means present work and VDM refers to the vector dominance model. At the end of this section we would like to present the decay width for the radiative transitions under consideration. Considering the transition matrix element in Eq. () and definitions of the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments in terms of form factors G and G, we get the following formula for the widths of the corresponding transitions: Γ = 3 α (m m ) 3 (G M 3 +3G E ). () m 3 m

16 Using the numerical values for the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments as well as the QCD sum rules predictions for the aryon masses, viz. Ω = (.7±.) GeV, Ω c = (.79±.9)GeV, Ξ = (.±.7)GeV, Ξ c = (.±.)GeV, Ω = (.±.)GeV, Ω c = (.7±.) GeV, Ξ = (.9±.7) GeV and Ξ c = (.±.) GeV [, 3], we get the values for the widths as presented in tale. For comparison, we also depict the existing predictions form the VDM in the same tale. Looking at this tale we see that our results are overall comparale in orders of magnitudes with the results of [3] except for Ω Ω γ channel at which our result is roughly one order of magnitude small compared to that of [3]. When we compare our results with those of [, ], we see considerale differences in orders of magnitudes etween two models predictions except for Ω c Ω c γ and Ξ + c Ξ + c γ channels that our predictions are in the same orders of magnitude with those of [, ]. The ig differences among our results, [3] and [, ] may e attriuted to the different aryon masses that are used since the width in Eq. (9) is very sensitive to the masses of the initial and final aryons. Γ (PW) Γ (VDM) [3] Γ (VDM) [, ] Ω Ω γ Ω c Ω cγ Ξ Ξ γ Ξ + c Ξ + c γ Ξ Ξ γ Ξ c Ξ c γ..37. Tale : Widths of the corresponding radiative transitions in KeV. In summary, we have calculated the transition magnetic dipole moment G M and electric quadrupole moment G E as well as decay width for the radiative Ω Q Ω Qγ and Ξ Q Ξ Q γ transitions within the light cone QCD sum rule approach and compared the results with the predictions of the VDM. Considering the recent progresses on the identification and spectroscopy of the heavy aryons, we hope it will e possile to study these radiative decay channels at the experiment in near future. Acknowledgment K. A. and H. S. would like to thank TUBITAK for their partial financial support through the project F8.

17 References [] M. Mattson et.al, SELEX Collaoration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, (). [] A. Ocherashvili et.al, SELEX Collaoration, Phys. Lett. B 8, 8 (). [3] T. M. Aliev, M. Savci, V. S. Zamiralov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 7, (). [] T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, M. Savci, V. S. Zamiralov, Phys. Rev.D 83, 7 (). [] T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, A. Ozpineci, Phys. Rev.D 79, (9). [] M. Banuls, A. Pich, I. Scimemi, Phys. Rev. D, 99 (). [7] H. Y. Cheng, et. al, Phys. Rev. D 7, 3 (993). [8] S. Tawfig, J. G. Koerner, P. J.O Donnel, Phys. Rev. D 3, 3 (). [9] M. A. Ivanov, et. al, Phys. Rev. D, 9 (999). [] S. L. Zhu, Y. B. Dai, Phys. Rev. D 9, (999). [] H. F. Joens, M. D. Scadron, Ann. Phys. 8, (973). [] R. C. E. Devenish, T.S. Eisenschitz and J. G. Korner, Phys. Rev. D, 33 (97). [3] E. Bagan, M. Chaa, H. G. Dosch and S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B 78, 39 (99). [] I. I. Balitsky, V. M. Braun, Nucl. Phys. B 3, (989). [] V. M. Braun, I. E. Filyanov, Z. Phys. C 8, 39 (99). [] K. G. Chetyrkin, A. Khodjamirian, A. A. Pivovarov, Phys. Lett. B, (8); I. I. Balitsky, V. M. Braun, A. V. Kolesnichenko, Nucl. Phys. B 3, 9 (989). [7] P. Ball, V. M. Braun, N. Kivel, Nucl. Phys. B 9, 3 (3). [8] V. M. Belyaev, B. L. Ioffe, JETP, 93 (98). [9] J. Rohrwild, JHEP 79, 73 (7). [] I. I. Balitsky, A. V. Kolesnichenko, A. V. Yung, Yad. Fiz., 8 (98). [] V. M. Belyaev, I. I. Kogan, Yad. Fiz., 3 (98).

18 [] Zhi-Gang Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 8, 9 (). [3] Zhi-Gang Wang, Phys. Lett. B 8, 9 (). [] Zhi-Gang Wang, Eur. Phys. J. A, (). [] Zhi-Gang Wang, Phys. Rev. D 8, 3 (). 7