aa + bb ---> cc + dd

Transcription

1 17 Chemical Equilibria Consider the following reaction: aa + bb ---> cc + dd As written is suggests that reactants A + B will be used up in forming products C + D. However, what we learned in the section on thermodynamics is that a reaction might not occur to completion to leave only C + D. Instead it can form any proportion of A and B to C and D, including remaining primarily as the products. 17-1

2 Consider a system in which every compound is present: A better way of considering the reaction is to recognize that from a starting point with A and B placed in a closed thermodynamic system, a reaction proceeds to the point in time at which four compounds, A, B, C and D come to exist simultaneously. This is shown in the next graph. 17-2

3 17-3

4 Extracting kinetics from the plot: This plot provides us with enormous information about both the kinetics and the thermodynamics of the reaction. From a kinetic perspectives we know that the reaction proceeds at a rate determined by - 1 d[a] 1 d[c] rate = = a dt c dt It changes rapidly at first and then levels off later in time. 17-4

5 Kinetics when nothing seems to be happening: What is of greater interest in this chapter is the rate of reaction at the point where there appears to be no change in concentration of reactants and products. In fact, at that point, we can consider two reactions to be occurring, a forward reaction aa + bb ----> c C + dd and a reverse reaction cc + dd ----> aa + bb 17-5

6 Deriving the Equilibrium Constant, K eq, from Rate Constant, k. To simplify things, consider reactions following simple one step bimolecular mechanisms. Then we have rate laws of the following form: and Rate = k f [A][B] Rate = k r [C][D] forward reaction reverse reaction 17-6

7 A little bit of math and presto: K eq Obviously from the plot, at the point where all of the curves flatten out, the rates at which A, B, C and D are formed are the same. Thus we can equate the two rate laws k f [A][B] = k r [C][D] k f [C][D] and rearranging K c = = k r [A][B] 17-7

8 The constant we will use the rest of the semester. The ratio, K c, is a very important value know as the equilibrium constant. How important is it? Coming to understand and apply this constant will be the primary focus of THE REST OF THE COURSE. We will come to learn that though K c is derived from the kinetics of the reaction, it is an important thermodynamic constant which is directly related to the most important of thermodynamic state functions, the Gibbs free energy, G o. 17-8

9 Generalizing the equilibrium constant, K c. It can be shown that no matter what the mechanistic pathway of a reaction, the equilibrium constant, K c, is defined as aa + bb cc + dd [C] c [D] d K c = [A] a [B] b for any reactants and products AT EQUILIBRIUM. 17-9

10 Example. What is the equilibrium expression for the following reaction: H 2 (g) + I 2 (g) 2HI (g) [HI] 2 K c = [H 2 ][I 2 ] 17-10

11 A new way to describe all chemical reactions, the equilibrium expression: Note that every reaction ultimately arrives at an equilibrium; i.e., the point at which the forward and reverse reactions have equal rates so that there is no change in the overall concentration of species present in the system. Thus every reaction has an equilibrium constant, K c. A few hundred equilibrium constants for the work we will do in Chapters are found in Appendixes F, H and I of Davis

12 The magnitude of K eq values Equilibrium constants can vary enormously in magnitude. Very large and very small numbers are possible: Cu ++ + S = CuS K c = 1.1 x HPO 4-2 H + + PO 4-3 K c = 3.5 x Note that we can rewrite an equilibrium expression as the reverse reaction and the new K c is calculated simply as the reciprocal of K c

13 Example. The equilibrium expression for the formation of CuS is written below: [CuS] Cu ++ + S = CuS(s) K f = 1.1 x = [Cu ++ ] [S = ] From this information, determine the equilibrium constant for the dissociation of CuS. The dissociation of CuS is written as [Cu ++ ] [S = ] CuS (s) Cu ++ + S = K d = = 1/K f = 9 x [CuS] 17-13

14 A few points to make about K c : 1. Temperature dependence. The value is obtained for a specific temperature. This is not surprising since K is a thermodynamic constant and all thermodynamic constants are strongly dependent upon T. Once again, a standard temperature has to be selected for recording values in the Appendix. The typical temperature used is 25 o C. Later we will learn to use the van t Hoff equation to convert between K c values at different temperatures

15 2. In performing equilibrium calculations: i. Pure solids and pure liquids are assigned an activity of 1 ii. For ideal solutions, the activity of samples dissolved in solution is given in molarity iii. For ideal gases, the activity of samples is given as partial pressures in atm

16 3. Equilibrium constants are dimensionless 17-16

17 . 4. Looking at K to determine reaction spontaneity. If the value for K>1, the formation of products is favored over reactants. If the value for K<1, the formation of reactants over products is favored

18 Example. Calculation of equilibrium constant. One liter of an equilibrium mixture is found to contain moles of PCl 3, moles of chlorine and moles of PCl 5. Calculate K c for the reaction. PCl 5 PCl 3 + Cl 2 [PCl 3 ][Cl 2 ] (0.172mole/1l)(0.086mole/1l) K c = = = 0.53 [PCl 5 ] (0.028mole/1l) 17-18

19 Example. Calculation of equilibrium constant. The decomposition of PCl 5 at a different temperature involves introduction of one mole of PCl 5 to an evacuated 1 liter container. At equilibrium, 0.6 moles of PCl 3 is present in the container. Calculate K c. PCl 5 PCl 3 + Cl 2 initial 1M 0M 0M change -0.6M +.6M +.6M equilibrium 0.4M 0.6M 0.6M (0.6M)(0.6M) K c = = 0.9 (0.4M) 17-19

20 Example. Calculation of equilibrium constant. In an evacuated 1 liter container, 0.8 moles of N 2 and 0.9 moles of H 2 are placed. At equilibrium, 0.2 mole of NH 3 is present. Calculate K c. N 2 + 3H 2 2NH 3 initial 0.8M 0.9M 0 change -0.1M -0.3M +0.2M equilibrium 0.7M 0.6M 0.2M (0.2M) 2 K c = = 0.26 (0.7M)(0.6M)

21 Relating the Reaction Quotient, Q, to K c. The calculation of K c is accomplished by ratioing the equilibrium concentration of products to reactant. However, nothing stops us from making a calculation of the ratio of products to reactants at any non-equilibrium position along the reaction path. The ratio of products to reactants is generally called the mass action equation, Q, or in Davis, the reaction quotient. Q [C] c [D] d = [A] a [B] b Recall that at equilibrium, Q > K 17-21

22 Some rules for relating Q to K We can calculate the value of Q anywhere along the course of the reaction. Note that in the reaction of A and B forming C and D, the value of Q starts off very small (reactants in denominator) compared to the final K value. Q increases until the point that the forward and reverse reaction rates are equal, and the system is at equilibrium; then K c can be calculated. We can establish the following rules for describing where the reaction is relative to equilibrium by comparing the value of Q to K. Q < K Q = K Q > K forward reaction dominates (example above) system at equilibrium reverse reaction dominates 17-22

23 17-23

24 Example. Calculating Q. The equilibrium constant for the following reaction, K c, is 49 at 450 o C. If 0.22 mole of H 2, 0.22 mole of I 2 and mole of HI were put into an evacuated container, would the system be at equilibrium? If not, in what direction must the reaction proceed to reach equilibrium? H 2 + I 2 2HI (assume one liter) [HI] 2 (0.666M) 2 Q = = = 9.2 [H 2 ][I 2 ] (0.22M)(0.22M) Q<K rxn proceeds to right to form more [HI] 17-24

25 Example. The equilibrium constant, K c, is for the reaction below. If 0.6 mole of SO 2 and 0.2 mole NO 2 are placed into an evacuated 2.0 liter container and allowed to reach equilibrium, what will be the concentration of each compound at equilibrium? SO 2 + NO 2 SO 3 + NO Initial 0.3M 0.1M 0M 0M Change -xm -xm +xm +xm Equilibrium (0.3-x)M (0.1-x)M xm xm x 2 x 2 K c = 71 = = (0.3-x)(0.1-x) x+x 2 0 = 70x x+2.13 [NO2]=0.0007M solve quadratic to get [SO 2 ] = 0.2M x =.0993 [NO] = [SO3] = 0.1M 17-25

26 Example. The equilibrium constant is 49 for the reaction below. If 1.00 mole of HI is placed into a 1.0 liter container and allowed to reach equilibrium, what will be the equilibrium concentration of each compound? H 2 + I 2 2HI Initial 0M 0M 1M Change +xm +xm -2xM Equilibrium xm xm (1-2x)M (1-2x) 2 use quadratic equation [H 2 ] = 0.11M K c = = 49 x = 0.11 [I 2 ] = 0.11M x 2 [HI] = 0.78M 17-26

27 Stress and LeChatlier s Principle: Stress is a big deal, in real life and in chemical equilibria. What do we do in life when things change? We do what we can to relieve the stress by moving away from it. We apply the same notion to chemical equilibria. In a system at equilibrium, when a change occurs a stress is imposed on the system. The system then responds by adopting new equilibrium conditions that relieve the stress. This is the definition of LeChatlier s Principle: If a change in conditions occurs to a system at equilibrium, the system responds to relieve the stress and reach a new state of equilibrium. What are some of the ways stress is introduced to a system? 1. Changes in concentration of system components. 2. Change in system temperature. 3. Change in volume or pressure (in gaseous systems.) 17-27

28 Case 1. LeChatlier s Principle: Changes in Concentration Consider the general reaction: A + B C + D Suppose we add additional reactant A or B to the system. This means we have more reactant than is necessary to establish equilibrium and the system shifts to reduce the amount of A and B. This results in an increase in the amount of C and D. The counter to this is also true. If the system changes by adding C and D to the system, the equilibrium shifts to the left forming more A and B. Looking at the equilibrium constant equation gives us a mathematical justification for the direction of the change. [C] [D] K c = [A] [B] Note for example that if we increase the amount of A, then to maintain the equality, the equilibrium must shift so that the amount of C and D go up as well. What happens to the amount of B? It must go down

29 Some General Rules for LeChatelier and Concentration Changes. From a chemical perspective, we have an equilibrium system with relative concentrations of compounds defined by K c. We impose a stress on the system by changing a concentration and create a nonequilibrium Q value for the system. However, because of the nonzero free energy now in the system, Q will in time return to K as G ---> 0. We can make a little table telling us how equilibrium concentrations adjust to compensate for changes in concentration. A + B C + D case 1: Add A B decreases C increases D increases case 2: A decreases Add B C increases D increases case 3: A increases B increases Add C D decreases case 4: A increases B increases C decreases Add D 17-29

30 Example: concentration. LeChatlier s Principle applied to a change in A 2 liter vessel contains an equilibrium mixture of 1.2 mole of COCl 2, 0.6 mole of CO and 0.2 mole of Cl 2. First calculate the equilibrium constant for the reaction: CO + Cl 2 COCl 2 initial equilibrium: 0.3M 0.1M 0.6M [COCl 2 ] K c = = 20 [CO] [Cl 2 ] 17-30

31 An additional 0.8 mole of Cl 2 is added to the vessel. Calculate the molar concentration of CO, Cl 2 and COCl 2 when the new equilibrium is established. CO + Cl 2 COCl 2 Original equilibrium 0.3M 0.1M 0.6M Stress added 0M +0.4M 0M New initial conc. 0.3M 0.5M 0.6M Change (0.3-x)M (0.5-x)M (0.6+x)M New equilibrium 0.121M 0.321M 0.779M (0.6) 1) After stress Q = = 4 (0.3)(0.5) Q<K so rxn proceeds forward (0.6+x)(0.6+x) 2) K = 20 = = (0.3-x)(0.5-x) x+x 2 solve quadratic, 0 = 20x 2-17x + 2.4, to get x =

32 Case 2. LeChatelier s Principle: Changes in Temperature. Consider the following exothermic reaction. A + B C + D + heat ( H is -) This means that heat is being generated by the reaction. If we add additional heat to the system, the stress of the increased temperature will make the system respond to try and to cool things down. This means the system reaction will shift to the left to reduce the heat generated by the exothermic process

33 We can use similar sorts of reasoning to establish the following rules: exothermic rxn exothermic rxn endothermic rxn endothermic rxn temperature increases temperature decreases temperature increases temperature decreases reaction shifts left reaction shifts right reaction shifts right reaction shifts left 17-33

34 Examples: How will an increase in temperature affect each of the following reactions? 2NO 2 (g) N 2 O 4 + heat Exothermic reaction so equilibrium shifts to the left to reduce the temp. of the system. H 2 (g) + Cl 2 (g) 2HCl (g) +92 kj Exothermic reaction so equilibrium shifts to the left to reduce the temp. of the system. H 2 (g) + I 2 (g) 2HI H = +25kJ Endothermic reaction so equilibrium shifts to the right to reduce the temp. of the system

35 Case 3. LeChatlier s Principle: Changes in Volume and Pressure (application to reactions involving gases) First note from the ideal gas law that P and V are inversely related. If we reduce the volume of a system, this has the affect of increasing the concentration of a gas in the system. The system will thus respond by shifting the reaction in the direction to reduce the concentration of gases in the system. This means the reaction shifts toward the side that has the fewest moles of gas at equilibrium Similarly reasoning yields the following: V decreases (P, [ ] increase) V increases (P, [ ] decrease) shift reaction toward side with smaller number of moles of gas shift reaction toward side with larger number of moles of gas Note that if we assume an ideal gas, then if there are an equal number of moles of gas on either side of the reaction, then pressure or volume changes have no affect on the equilibrium

36 Examples. How will an increase in pressure (concentration) resulting from a decrease in volume affect the following equilibria? H 2 (g) + I 2 (g) 2HI (g) n = 2-2 = 0 therefore, no change in equilibrium 4NH 3 (g) + 5O 2 (g) 4NO (g) + 6H 2 O (g) n = 10-9 = 1, therefore, shifts to the left to reduce moles of gas. PCl 3 (g) + Cl 2 (g) PCl 5 (g) n = 1-2 = -1, therefore, shifts to the right to reduce moles of gas 2H 2 (g) + O 2 (g) 2H 2 O (g) n = -1 therefore, shifts to the right to reduce moles of gas 17-36

37 Equilibrium Constant, K p, Expressed for Gases: Taking a look at the ideal gas law: PV = nrt The equation suggests a way to relate partial pressure, P, of a gas in the system to concentration, [ ] by [ ] = n/v = P/RT Substituting this relationship into the general equilibrium equation yields: aa (g) + bb(g) cc (g) + dd (g) (P C ) c (P D ) d K p = (P A ) a (P B ) b The relationship between K c and K p follows from the ideal gas law: K p = K c (RT) n where n =(n gas prod - n gas react ) 17-37

38 Example: For the reaction below with a K c = 20 at 25 o C, what is K p? CO + Cl 2 COCl 2 n = 1-2 = -1 K p = K c (RT) n = 20[(0.082atml/molK)(298K)] -1 =

39 Example: A calculation interchanging K c and K p K c is 49 for the following reaction. If 1.0 mole H 2 and 1 mole I 2 are allowed to reach equilibrium in a 3 liter vessel, how many moles of I 2 are unreacted at equilibrium? H 2 (g) + I 2 (g) 2HI (g) initial 0.33M 0.33M 0M change 0.33-xM 0.33-xM +2xM equilibrium 0.073M 0.073M 0.514M [HI] 2 4x 2 45x x+5.34 = 0 K c = 49 = = solve quadratic [H 2 ][I 2 ] x+x 2 x = (0.257) = moles of reacted I

40 Now what are the equilibrium pressures of H 2, I 2 and HI? n = 0, therefore, K c = K p [HI] 2 P HI 2 moles I 2 = moles of H 2, therefore, = [I 2 ][H 2 ] P I2 P H2 (2.2(P I2) ) (P I2 2 ) = P HI 2 (0.0053) 49 = P I2 2 So And P I2 = = P H2 2.2(P I2 ) = P HI so P HI =

41 Relating K c to Thermodynamic Quantities through G o : Recall that in the last chapter we introduced the idea of the free energy of the system, G o, under standard conditions. G o describes the free energy change in the system that accompanies the conversion of all reactants in their standard states (1M, 1 atm) to products in their standard states (1M, 1 atm). We now define the free energy, G, which is the free energy of a reaction at concentrations other than 1M or 1 atm. It is found from G o by correcting for non-standard conditions using the reaction quotient, Q: G = G o + RT ln Q 17-41

42 The special case of thermodynamics at equilibrium. Remember that at equilibrium, G = 0 and Q = K. This means the above equation reduces to: G o = -RT ln K (at equilibrium) Among other things this relationship tells us that we can calculate the equilibrium constant, K c, from the thermodynamic constants in Appendix K

43 Examples: Converting between K c and G o Case 1. 2C graphite + 3H 2 (g) O 2 (g) C 2 H 5 OH G f o = kkj mol K c = exp ( G o RT ) K c = exp ( 168.6x103 ( 8.3)(298K ) ) K c = 3.5 x So a spontaneous reaction has a K >

44 Case 2. N 2(g) 2N (g) G f o = 456 kkj mol K c = exp ( 456x103 (8.3)(298) ) K c = 8.6 x So a non-spontaneous reaction has K < 1. Reaction is spontaneous in opposite direction

45 What generalization can be made about G o and K c? If G o < 0 then K>1 products favored over reactant If G o > 0 then K< 1 reactants favored over products Isn t it exciting to see that chemical equilibrium is another model for describing thermodynamics? In this case we don t measure the change in energy, instead we measure the equilibrium concentrations

46 End-of chapter equations and the Famouns Scientists who invented them: It is the end of the chapter and it is time to throw a hard equation at you. Just to let you know that this is a pretty common occurrence, consider: end of chapter equation name if we know this: then for the following change: we get a new physical constant Clausius- H vap T P(vapor pressure) Clapeyron Arrhenius E a T rate constant van t Hoff H T equilibrium constant 17-46

47 The van t Hoff Equation: Finding a new K c at a new T: Of interest in Chapter 17 is the bottom equation: the van t Hoff equation that allows us to determine K c for a chemical system at any temperature we desire. K T2 H o 1 1 ln =. - K T1 R T 1 T 2 Notice that this is the quantitative way to look at LeChatelier s principle applied to changes in temperature

48 Example: Using the van t Hoff equation to find a new K. For the reaction below, 2NO 2 2NO + O 2 H o = 114 kj/mole and K p = 4.3 x at 25 o C. So what is K p at 250 o C? Insert T 2 = 523K, R = J/mol K. H o = 114 kj/mole and K p = 4.3 x at 25 o C. K T2 = K T1 [exp ( H R ( 1 T 1 1 T 2 ))] exp (1n ( KT 2 KT 1 )) = exp [ H R ( 1 T 1-1 T 2 ) ] K T2 = (4.3 x ) exp ( 114x ( )) So at 250 o C, K T2 = 1.7 x 10-4 Is this consistent with what you know from LeChatelier? 17-48