arxiv: v1 [physics.soc-ph] 5 Jun 2011

Transcription

1 el draft Phase transition in the Sznajd odel with indeendence. K. Sznajd-Weron, M. Tabiszewski, A. M. Tianaro 2 arxiv:6.934v [hysics.soc-h] 5 Jun 2 Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wroc law 2 Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo PACS s Social systes PACS 75..Pq Sin chain odels PACS Da Scaling henoena in colex systes Abstract. - We roose a odel of oinion dynaics which describes two ajor tyes of social influence - confority and indeendence. Confority in our odel is described by the so called outflow dynaics (known as Sznajd odel). According to sociologists suggestions, we introduce also a second tye of social influence, known in social sychology as indeendence. Various social exerients have shown that the level of confority deends on the society. We introduce this level as a araeter of the odel and show that there is a continuous hase transition between confority and indeendence. Introduction. Oinion dynaics is one of the ost studied subjects in the field of sociohysics. Aong a nuber of odels that have been roosed (for a recent review see[]), sile odels based on Ising sin variables are articularly interesting. In all these odels, fro the voter odel [2], ajority rule [3,4] to the Sznajd odel [5], oinions are described by discrete variables S = ±. The ferroagnetic state is an attractor for all three odels in one and two diensions, as well as in the case of colete grahs[]. Obviously, in real social systes colete unaniity is never reached. Moreover, in real systes the ublic oinion does not reach any fixed oint and eranently changes. To ake odels of oinion dynaics ore realistic, Gala has roosed two odifications: Contrarian behavior [6] with a certain robability an agent adots the choice oosite to the revailing choice of the others, whatever this choice is. Inflexibles [7] inflexible agents kee their oinion always unchanged. As shown by Gala, for a low concentration of contrarians anew ixed hase is stabilized, with a coexistenceofboth oinions, i.e. inority ersists. Moreover, there is a hase transition into a new disordered hase with no doinating oinion. In the case of the Sznajd odel, contrarian behavior has been studied for the first tie by de la Laa et al. [8] and the sae results have been obtained. As suggested by Gala [6], these results ay be ut in arallel with hung elections in Aerica (2) and Gerany (22). In the field of social sychology, contrarian behavior, introduced by Gala in [6], is nothing ore than anticonfority a articular tye of nonconfority[9]. There are two widely recognized tyes of nonconfority: anticonfority and indeendence. Fro a social oint of view, it is very iortant to distinguish between indeendence and anti-confority []. The ter indeendence ilying the failure of atteted grou influence. Indeendent individuals evaluate situations indeendently of the grou nor. On the contrary, anti-conforists are siilar to conforers in the sense that both take cognizance of the grou nor conforers agree with the nor, anticonforers disagree. As noticed in []: This behaviour is a bit of a aradox, because in order to be vigilant about not doing what is exected, one ust always be aware of what is exected. In contrast, truly indeendent eole are oblivious to what is exected. Nuerous studies have shown that the level of confority/anti-confority deends on the society (culture, age, etc.) [, ]. In this aer we exaine the influence of indeendence on the Sznajd odel in one and two diensions, as well as on a colete grah. We show that contrarians are not needed in order to obtain hase transitions as in [6,8] and siilar results can be observed in the resence of indeendent behavior. Below a certain critical indeendence value c, the inority oinion coexists with the ajority and above c there is no ajority in the society, the syste is in the so called staleate state. -

2 K. Sznajd-Weron et al. To generalize our odel and ake it ore realistic fro a social oint of view. we introduce also a flexibility factor f, which describes what is the robability of an oinion change in the case of indeendent behavior. We show, both analytically (for colete grahs) and using Monte Carlo siulations, that the critical threshold of indeendence c decays with the flexibility factor f. This eans that in an inflexible (conservative) society the critical indeendence factor is high. This result ilicates that in conservative societies, even if the level of indeendence is high, there is always a ajority in the syste in the case of deocratic voting, one of the two otions wins. On the contrary, in highly flexible societies the staleate situation is highly robable. Our result is one of the ossible exlanations why in odern societies (in which tradition is not as valuable as in old days), status quo situations haen ore and ore often. Model. We consider a set of N individuals, which aredescribedbythe binaryvariables: S = ( ) ors = ( ). At each eleentary tie ste, a grou of eole is chosen randoly and it influences its surrounding individuals. In the original odel [5] only one tye of social influence (confority) was considered:. On a colete grah, two individuals are chosen at rando and they influence a third randoly chosen individual [2]. 2. In one diension(d), a air of neighboring individuals S i S i+ is chosen and it influences two neighboring sites S i,s i+2. In this aer, to be consistent with the case of a colete grah, we will use the odified versionin which only oneofthe two(left S i orright S i+2 ), chosen randoly, will be changed. This kind of odification has been introduced for the first tie by Slanina [3]. 3. Several ossibilities of generalization to the square lattice were roosed by Stauffer et al [4]. Here we use robably the ost oular rule - a 2 2 anel of four neighbors is chosen randoly and influences its surroundings. In this aer we use a odified version to be consistent with the rules above only one fro the 8 neighbors of the anel is randoly chosen to be changed. In real social systes, confority is one of the ost recognized tyes of social resonse. There are any factors that affect the likelihood of confority, aong the culture is one of the ost iortant. For exale, the level of confority (and siultaneously anti-confority) is uch higher in Jaan than in Aerica []. The well known Aerican slogan Do your own thing reflects a tendency to indeendent behavior. Therefore, in this aer we introduce a second tye of social resonse, known as indeendence. With robability, an individual S k chosen to be changed will not follow the grou, but act indeendently withrobabilityf itwillfli, i.e. S k S k and with robability f stay unchanged, i.e S k S k. The araeter f is called flexibility, since it describes how often an individual will change its oinion in case of indeendent behavior. With robability the individual will follow the usual Sznajd confority rules, described above. Model on a Colete Grah. We consider a set of N Ising sins S i = ±, i =,...,N on a colete grah. In each eleentary tie ste t two sins S i and S j are chosen randoly. They will influence a third randoly chosen sin S k in the following way: confority(original Sznajd rule), with robability : S k (t+dt) = S i (t) if S i (t) = S j (t), otherwise S k (t+ dt) = S k (t), indeendence, with robability : S k (t + dt) = S k (t), with robability f or S k (t+dt) = S k (t), with robability f. Tie t t + after N eleentary tie stes, i.e. dt = /N. In the case of a colete grah, the state of the syste is coletely described by the agnetization (or ublic oinion fro a social oint of view) defined as: (t) = N N S i (t). () i= Let us denote by N the nuber of sins u and by N the nuber of sins down : N +N = N N N = N. (2) Fro the equations above we can easily derive the forula for the robability of choosing randoly a sin S = +: P + (t) = N N = +(t). (3) 2 The evolution of the syste is described by the following equation: P + P + = fp fp + +( )P 2 + P ( )P 2 P +, (4) where we use the notation P + P + (t + dt) and P + P + (t) and the robability of choosing a down sin is P = P +. We look for fixed oints of the above transforation: P + P + = ( 2P + ) [ ( )P+ 2 ( )P + +f ] = (5). The equation above has the following solutions: P + P,2 + = ± ( ) 2( ) = /2 for [,] for < +4f, (6) -2

3 Phase transition in the Sznajd odel with indeendence. siulations: f=.5 siulations: f=5 analytical: f=.5 analytical: f=5 a sequence of states, whose statistical roerties deend only on the initial conditions and on the ratio between the robabilities of following rule I and II: r = f. (7) So if two odels have araeters (,f) and (,f ) such that r = r, then they would both generate statistically siilar sequences, given the sae initial conditions. In order to coare both odels, we need to find the ean tie for a change τ (easured in iterations) as a function of and f. We follow either rule I or rule II with robability = +f, so: Fig. : Stationary value of agnetization for two values of the flexibilityfactor, f =.5 (solid line) andf = 5 (dottedline), fro analytical calculations and fro Monte Carlo siulations for the syste size N = 3. Averaging was done over 3 sales. where = ( )( 4f). Fixedointsfortheagnetization can be easily calculated fro relation (3) and are resented in Figure. There is a continuous hase transition at c = /( + 4f) for < c inority coexists with ajority and for > c there is a staleate (statusquo) situation. To confir our analytical results, we have rovided Monte Carlo siulations on a colete grah, for several lattice sizes. Initially the syste has been ferroagnetically ordered (() = ) and then evolved according to the algorith described in this section. These results are resented in Figure and agree with the analytical rediction. Scaling. Although the odel considered in this aer has 2 araeters, indeendence and flexibility f, it can be shown that in fact results deend on the ratio f/( +f) (see Figure 2). To show this scaling let us first su u the rules of the odel as: Rule I the usual Sznajd rule, Rule II a site is flied (S i S i ), Rule III nothing haens. At each iteration, we choose a grou of sites that will attet to convince one of their neighbours, chosen at rando, then one of the 3 rules above is chosen at rando to be followed by this chosen neighbour, with the rules I, II and III being followed with robability, f and ( f) resectively. Firstly, we note that rule III doesn t change the state of the syste (the oinions of each of the sites) and that the araeters and f are not iortant in a given iteration, once the rule to be followed is chosen. Suose now that we kee records of the state of the syste after the iterations where either rule I or rule II was followed. These records would for τ = +2 ( )+3 ( ) Therefore: = ((+( )+( ) ) + (( )+( ) 2 +( ) )+...) ( ( )) = ( ) k ( ) q =. (8) k= τ(,f) = q= +f. (9) To coare the odels with araeters (,f) and (,f ) we ust look at tie instants t and t, such that t τ(,f) = t τ(,f ). () Finally, we are interested in the behavior of the agnetization (t,,f) of the odel with araeters (,f) at the tie instant t. Fro { t( +f) = t ( + f ) () follows: f/( ) = f /( ) (t,,f) = (t,,f ). (2) If we ick f =, then { t = t( +f) = f /( +f) So defining M(t,) (t,,) it follows that ( (t,,f) = M t( +f), and for each value of t, lotting. (3) f +f ), (4) ( t /( +f),,f) f /( +f) (5) should collase the curves, as ( ) t +f,,f = M ( t, ) f. (6) +f -3

4 K. Sznajd-Weron et al. siulations: f=.5 siulations: f=5 analytical: f=.5 analytical: f=5 f= f=/2 f=/4 f=/8 f=/6..3 f/( +f) Fig. 2: Rescaled results fro Fig.. We haveused the scaling givenby Eq. (3) and indeed the data collases in the case of a colete grah (see Fig.2). In the next sections we will see that the scaling derived here is valid also in the case of one- and two-diensional lattices. In figure 2 we can see a hase transition between the situation where a ajority exists and the staleate situation. This transition haens for a value of indeendence c, that deends on the flexibility value f. We can aly this scaling to find that this deendence ust be of the for c = +αf, (7) where, if P c is the critical indeendence for f =, then α is given by f= f=/2 f=/4 f=/8 f=/ f/( +f) Fig. 3: Deendence between the agnetization and the indeendence factor for several values of the flexibility factor f, for a one diensional syste of size N = 4 (uer anel). The syste evolved ( teralized ) fro an initially ordered state, () =. Teralization tie was τ = 5MCS and averaging was done over 3 sales. The scaling found in the case of a colete grah still works (botto anel). α = P c. (8) This eans that if there is a hase transition, then the critical value of indeendence decreases with increasing flexibility. We will give soe interretations for this further on, when the odel in a two-diensional lattice is analyzed. Model on a one-diensional lattice. We consider a chain of length N with eriodic boundary conditions. Each site i =,...,N of the chain is occuied by an Ising sin S i = ±. At each tie ste we choose randoly a sin S i and side s (s = for right, s = for left.) The udated state is: confority(original Sznajd rule), with robability : S i (t+dt) = S i+s (t) if S i+s (t) = S i+2s (t), otherwise S i (t+dt) = S i (t), indeendence, with robability: S i (t+dt) = S i (t), with robability f or S i (t+dt) = S i (t), with robability f. Tie t t + after N eleentary tie stes, i.e. dt = /N. We have chosen as an initial condition, ferroagnetic order (() = ). We ade Monte Carlo siulations for several lattice sizes N = 4 2,9 2,64 2, 4,4 4, but here we resent results for only one selected lattice size, N = 4. We have easured the agnetization of the syste after various teralization ties τ [, 4 ]. The averaging has been done over 3 sales. First of all, we notice that the scaling found in the revious section and given by Eq. (3) is still valid for one diensional systes see Fig. 3. TheresultsresentedinFig. 3suggesttheexistenceofa hase transition, which is unexected for one-diensional systes with short-range interactions. However, one should reeber that the initial state in our siulations was ordered (() = ). Starting fro this ordered state, the syste evolves toward a stationary state that deends on the ratio f/( +f). After a short teralization tie, like in Fig. 3, the syste ight be still ordered but -4

5 Phase transition in the Sznajd odel with indeendence. τ= τ=5 τ= τ=2 τ=3 τ=5 τ=8 τ= of the eight nearest neighbors S i, changing its orientation in the direction of the sins in the box. If one of the sins in the box has the oosite orientation to the other three sins, then the neighbor changes its orientation to the orientation of the ajority, with robability 3/4. In the case when there is no ajority, i.e., two sins in the anel are u and two are down, nothing changes, i.e. S i (t+dt) = S i (t). Fig. 4: Deendence between the agnetization and the indeendence factor, for a flexibility factor f =.5, several teralization ties, τ, and an one diensional syste of size N = 4. The syste evolved ( teralized ) fro an initially ordered state, =. Averaging was done over 3 sales. With an increasing τ, the critical value c is decreasing, suggesting the lack of the hase transition in one diension. finally it will reach its real steady state, which is exected to be disordered. To check the validity of our exectations let us now resent the deendence between the agnetization and the indeendence factor, for several teralization ties τ and a given value of flexibility f = /2. It hasbeenseenthatwithanincreasingτ thethresholdvalue, below which the syste is ordered, decreases, suggesting the lack of the hase transition in one diension. For the infinite syste, N and τ, order is resent in the syste only for f/( + f) =. This is an exected result, because only short range interactions are resent in the odel and the indeendence f/( +f) lays the role of a teerature. Model on a square lattice. In this section we consider a square lattice L L with eriodic boundary conditions. Each lattice site is occuied by an individual, characterized by a binary oinion S i = + (in favor) or S i = (against). In each eleentary tie ste t, a 2 2 box of four neighboring sins is chosen randoly and influences one of the 8 neighboring sites of the box, denoted as S i : In this aer, we use a odified version of the twodiensional odel introduced to study duooly arkets in [5], therefore we udate the state in the following way: confority, with robability : If all four sins in the box have the sae value, they will convince one indeendence, with robability: S i (t+dt) = S i (t), with robability f or S i (t+dt) = S i (t), with robability f. We easure again the agnetization as a function of the indeendence factor for several values of the flexibility factorf (see Fig. 5). In the caseofthe squarelattice there is no doubt that there is a well defined continuous hase transition (see Fig. 6) at = c. As in the other cases, scaling (given by eq. (3)) is valid and the critical value c of indeendence increases with decreasing flexibility f. This eans that in the case of high f (non-conservative societies) consensus is ossible only in the case of low indeendence (high confority). For exale (see Fig. 5), for a relatively conservative society with f = /6 the critical indeendence is c. This eans that for a level of indeendence u to 4/5 there is a ajority in the society. If the society is less conservative, e.g. f = /4 then the critical value of indeendence is c.5. This eans that if the level of indeendence were, for exale, =.7 there would be no ajority in the syste (statusquo), while for the sae value of in the case of f = /6 consensus would be ossible. This result could be one of the ossible exlanations for why the status-quo situation is ore and ore coon in odern societies. Another exlanation, connected with the ublic debate, has been roosed several years ago by Gala [6]. Suary. In this aer we have introduced a odified version of the original Sznajd odel, in which two tyes of social influence were considered indeendence (with robability ) and confority (with robability ). Confority in our odel has been odeled analogously to the Sznajd odel, i.e. in the case of conforal behavior, individuals have followed the grou nor. Of course, this tye of social influence could be odeled also by the voter or ajority odels. In the case of indeendent behavior individuals take actions (change oinion) indeendently on the grou nor. Of course, even in the case of indeendent behavior an individual can change oinion, but it does not deend on the social nor. Therefore, we have introduced a flexibility factor f, which denotes the robability of oinion changes in the case of indeendent behavior. For f =, individuals never change oinion in the case of indeendent behavior and for f =, the oinion is always changed. Fro this oint of view, varying f we can odel the level of conservatis in the society it decreases with increasing f. We have studied the odel in three cases: colete -5

6 K. Sznajd-Weron et al. f= f=/2 f=/4 f=/8 f=/6 τ= τ=2 τ=5 τ= τ=2 f= f=/2 f=/4 f=/8 f=/6 Fig. 6: Deendence between the agnetization and the indeendence factor, for a flexibility factor f =.5, several teralization ties, τ, and a square lattice,. The syste evolved ( teralized ) fro an initially ordered state, () =. Averaging was done over 3 sales f/( +f) Fig. 5: Deendence between the agnetization and the indeendence factor for several values of the flexibility factor f, in the case of a square lattice,. The syste evolved ( teralized ) fro an initially ordered state, () =. Teralization tie was τ = 5MCS and averaging was done over 3 sales. The critical value of indeendence c decays with flexibility f (uer anel). The scaling found in the case of a colete grah still works (botto anel). grahs, one-diensional systes and two-diensional squarelattices. We found that, in the case of the colete grah and of the two-diensional syste, there is hase transition for a critical value of indeendence c = +αf, where α is a constant that deends on the lattice. In the case of a colete grah it can be calculated analytically asα = 4. Below the criticalvalue ofindeendence, < c, the ajority coexists with the inority, i.e. the ublic oinion is. Therefore, in the case of a deocratic voting, one of the two otions wins. For high indeendence, > c, there is a staleate situation in the society, i.e. =. In our oinion the ost interesting result is the deendence between the critical value of indeendence and flexibility, c = +αf the critical value of indeendence decreasing with increasing flexibility f. This eans that in the case of high f (non-conservative societies) consensus is ossible only in the case of low indeendence (high confority). On the other hand, in con- servative societies, even in the case of high indeendence, consensus is ossible. In odern societies the value of tradition and hence the level of conservatis sees to be decreasing. This, according to our odel, could be one of the ossible exlanations for why the status-quo situation observed by Gala [6] is ore and ore encountered now days. REFERENCES [] C. Castellano, S. Fortunato and V. Loreto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 8 (29) 592 [2] R. Holley and T. Liggett, Ann. Probab. 3 (975) 643 [3] S. Gala, Eur. Phys. J. B 25 (22) 43 [4] P.L.Kraivsky and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9 (23) [5] K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C (2) 57 [6] S. Gala S, Physica A 333 (24) 453 [7] S. Gala and F. Jacobs, Physica A 38 (27) 366 [8] M.S. de la Laa, J.M. Loez and H.S. Wio, Eurohys. Lett. 72 (25) 85 [9] Nail P, MacDonald G, Levy D, Psychological Bulletin 26, 454 (2) [] M. R. Soloon, G. Baossy, S. Askegaard, M. K. Hogg, Consuer behavior, 3ed, Prentice Hall (26) [] D. G. Myers, Social Psychology, ed, McGraw-Hill (2) [2] F. Slanina and H. Lavicka, Eur. Phys. J. B 35, 279 (23) [3] F. Slanina, K. Sznajd-Weron and P. Przybya, EPL 82 (28) 86 [4] D. Stauffer, A.O. Sousa, M. De Oliveira, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, 239 (2) [5] K. Sznajd-Weron, R. Weron, Physica A 324, 437 (23) -6