The initial-boundary value problem for the 1D nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the half-line
|
|
- Francis Taylor
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The initial-boundary value problem for the 1D nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the half-line Justin Holmer Department of Mathematics, University of California Berkeley, CA Abstract We prove, by adapting the method of Colliander-Kenig [9], local wellposedness of the initial-boundary value problem for the one-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation i t u + xu 2 + λu u α 1 = 0 on the half-line under low boundary regularity assumptions. 1 AMS subject code: 35Q55 2 The content of this article appears as part of the author s Ph.D. thesis at the University of Chicago. 1
2 1 Introduction We consider the initial-boundary value problem on the right half-line for the one-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger (1D NLS) equation i t u + xu 2 + λu u α 1 = 0 for (x, t) (0, + ) (0, T ) u(0, t) = f(t) for t (0, T ) (1) u(x, 0) = φ(x) for x (0, + ) where λ C. On R, we define the homogeneous L 2 -based Sobolev spaces Ḣs = Ḣ(R) by the norm φ Ḣs = ξ s ˆφ(ξ) L 2 ξ and the L 2 -based inhomogeneous Sobolev spaces H s = H s (R) by the norm φ H s = ξ s ˆφ(ξ) L 2 ξ, where ξ = (1 + ξ 2 ) 1/2. In addition, we shall need L 2 -based inhomogeneous Sobolev spaces on the half-line R + = (0, + ), which we denote H s (R + ). These are defined, for s 0, as: φ H s (R + ) if φ H s (R) such that φ(x) = φ(x) for a.e. x > 0; in this case we set φ H s (R + ) = inf φ φ H s (R). We also similarly define, for s 0, φ H s (0, L) if φ H s (R) such that φ(x) = φ(x) a.e. on (0, L); in this case we set φ H s (0,L) = inf φ φ H s. The local smoothing inequality of [15] for the 1D Schrödinger group is e it 2 x φ L x Ḣ 2s+1 t c φ Ḣs This inequality is sharp in the sense that 2s+1 cannot be replaced by any higher number. We are thus motivated to consider initial-boundary data pairs (φ(x), f(t)) H s (R + x ) H 2s+1 (R + t ) and inclined to consider this configuration optimal in the scale of L 2 -based Sobolev spaces. Note that the trace map φ φ(0) is well-defined on H s (R + ) when s >
3 Thus, if s > 1 2s+1, then > 1 and both φ(0) and f(0) are well-defined quantities. 2 2 Since φ(0) and f(0) are both meant to represent u(0, 0), they must agree. Therefore, we consider (1) for 0 s < 3 2 in the setting φ H s (R + ), f H 2s+1 (R + ), and if 1 < s < 3, φ(0) = f(0) (2) 2 2 The solutions we construct shall have the following characteristics. Definition 1. u(x, t) will be called a distributional solution of (1), (2) on [0, T ) with strong traces if (a) u belongs to a space X with the property that u X implies u u α 1 is defined as a distribution. (b) u(x, t) satisfies the equation (1) in the sense of distributions on the set (x, t) (0, + ) (0, T ). (c) Space traces: T < T, we have u C([0, T ]; H s x) and u(, 0) = φ in H s (R + ). (d) Time traces: T < T, we have u C(R x ; H 2s+1 (0, T )) and u(0, ) = f in H 2s+1 (0, T ). For the purposes of uniqueness in the high regularity setting s > 1, we can 2 consider a weaker notion of solution. Definition 2. u(x, t) will be called a distributional solution of (1), (2) on [0, T ) with weak traces if it satisfies conditions (a), (b) of Definition 1 and (c) One-sided space traces: T < T, we have u C([0, T ]; H s (R + x )) and u(, 0) = φ in H s (R + ). 3
4 (d) Boundary values: T < T, we have lim x 0 u(x, ) f H 2s+1 (0,T ) = 0. So that we may, at a later time, properly address the matter of uniqueness in the low regularity s < 1 2 used by [1]. setting, we shall introduce the concept of mild solution Definition 3. u(x, t) is a mild solution of (1) on [0, T ) if T < T, a sequence {u n } in C([0, T ]; H 2 (R + x )) C 1 ([0, T ]; L 2 (R + x )) such that (a) u n (x, t) solves (1) in L 2 (R + x ) for 0 < t < T. (b) (c) lim u n u n + C([0,T ]; H s (R + x )) = 0. lim n + u n(0, ) f H 2s+1 (0,T ) = 0. [1] have announceed a method for proving uniqueness of mild solutions for the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation on the half-line (to be discussed further in [2]), and the techniques of this forthcoming paper may also apply here to resolve the uniqueness problem for 0 s < 1 2. We establish in 8 the following straightforward fact. Proposition 1. For s > 1, u is a distributional solution of (1), (2) with weak 2 traces if and only if it is a mild solution; in this case u is unique. Our main result is the following existence statement. Theorem 1. (a) Subcritical: Suppose 0 s < 1 5 2s, and 2 α < 2 1 2s
5 or 1 < s < 3, and 2 α < 2 2 Then T > 0 and u that is both a mild solution and a distributional solution with strong traces of (1),(2) on [0, T ). If T <, then lim t T u(, t) H s x =. Also, T < T, δ 0 = δ 0 (s, T, φ, f) > 0 such that if 0 < δ δ 0 and φ φ 1 H s (R + ) + f f 1 2s+1 < δ then there is a solution u H 1 (as (R + ) above) on [0, T ], corresponding to (φ 1, f 1 ), such that u u 1 C([0,T ]; H s x ) + u u 1 C(Rx; H 2s+1 cδ, with c = c(s, T, f, φ). (0,T )) (b) Critical: Suppose 0 s < 1 2 and α = 5 2s 1 2s. Then T > 0 maximal and u that is both a mild solution and a distributional solution with strong traces of (1),(2) on [0, T ). Also, T = T (s, φ, f) < T and δ 0 = δ 0 (s, φ, f) > 0 such that if 0 < δ δ 0 and φ φ 1 H s (R + ) + f f 1 H 2s+1 (R + ) < δ then there is a solution u 1 (as above) on [0, T ], corresponding to (φ 1, f 1 ), such that u u 1 C([0,T ]; H s x ) + u u 1 C(Rx; H 2s+1 cδ, with c = c(s, f, φ). (0,T )) Note that in (b), we may not have blow-up in the norm u(, t) as t T. The proof of Theorem 1 involves the introduction of a boundary forcing operator analogous to that introduced by [9] in their treatment of the generalized Korteweg de-vries equation (gkdv) on the half-line, and incorporates the techniques of the standard proof of local well-posedness of the corresponding initial-value problem based on the Strichartz estimates (see [7]). One could also consider the left half-line problem i t u + xu 2 + λu u α 1 = 0 for (x, t) (, 0) (0, T ) u(0, t) = f(t) for t (0, T ) u(x, 0) = φ(x) for x (, 0) 5
6 although this is actually identical to the right half-line problem (1) by the transformation u(x, t) u( x, t). We plan, in a future publication, to examine the initial-boundary value problem for the line-segment i t u + xu 2 + λu u α 1 = 0 for (x, t) (0, L) (0, T ) u(0, t) = f 1 (t) for t (0, T ) u(l, t) = f 2 (t) for t (0, T ) u(x, 0) = φ(x) for x (0, L) and consider global existence questions for the half-line and line-segment problems. We now briefly mention some earlier work and alternate perspectives on this problem and related problems. The main new feature of our work is the low regularity requirements for φ and f. Under higher regularity assumptions, more general results are already available. [18] considered a bounded or unbounded domain Ω R n with smooth boundary Ω, and proved global existence of solutions to i t u + u + λu u α 1 = 0 for (x, t) Ω (0, T ) u(x, t) = f(x, t) for x Ω (3) u(x, 0) = φ(x) for x Ω where f C 3 ( Ω) is compactly supported, φ H 1 (Ω), and λ < 0. This solution is obtained as a limit of solutions to approximate problems after several a priori identities have been established. Earlier, [6] and [5] had obtained solutions to (1) for α > 3, λ < 0 and α = 3, λ R for φ H 2 (R + ) and f C 2 (0, T ), using 6
7 semigroup techniques and a priori estimates. The problem (3) with f = 0 had been considered previously ([] [22] [20] [21] [23]). [10] in the integrable case α = 3, λ = ±2 with φ Schwartz and f sufficiently smooth, obtained a solution to (1) by reformulating the problem as a 2 2 matrix Riemann-Hilbert problem. In this setting, [3] obtain an explicit representation for x u(0, t). Outline: In 2, we discuss some notation, introduce function spaces and recall some needed properties of these function spaces. In 3, we review the definition and basic properties of the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral. In, 5, we state the needed estimates for the group and inhomogeneous solution operator. In 6, we define the boundary forcing operator, adapted from [9], and prove the needed estimates for it. In 7, we prove Theorem 1. In 8, we prove Prop Notations and some function space properties Let χ S denote the characteristic function for the set S. We shall write L q T to mean L q ([0, T ]). Set ˆφ(ξ) = x e ixξ φ(x) dx. Define (τ i0) α as the limit, in the sense of distributions, of (τ + iγ) α as γ 0. Let ξ s = (1 + ξ 2 ) s/2. Let D s f(ξ) = ξ s ˆf(ξ). The homogeneous L 2 -based Sobolev spaces are Ḣs (R) = ( 2 ) s/2 L 2 (R) and the inhomogeneous L 2 -based H s (R) = (1 2 ) s/2 L 2 (R). We also set, for 1 p, W s,p = (I 2 ) s/2 L p. We use the notation H s to mean H s (R) (and not H s (R + ) or H0(R s + )). The trace operator φ φ(0) is defined for φ H s (R) when s > 1. For s 0, define φ 2 Hs (R + ) if φ H s (R) 7
8 such that φ(x) = φ(x) for x > 0; in this case we set φ H s (R + ) = inf φ φ H s (R). For s 0, define φ H0(R s + ) if, when φ(x) is extended to φ(x) on R by setting φ(x) = 0 for x < 0, then φ H s (R); in this case we set φ H s 0 (R + ) = φ H s (R). Define φ C0 (R + ) if φ C (R) with supp φ [0, + ) (so that, in particular, φ and all of its derivatives vanish at 0), and C0,c(R + ) as those members of C0 (R + ) with compact support. We remark that C0,c(R + ) is dense in H0(R s + ) for all s R. We shall take a fixed θ Cc (R) such that θ(t) = 1 on [ 1, 1] and supp θ [ 2, 2]. Denote by θ T (t) = θ(tt 1 ). Lemma 1 ([9] Lemma 2.8). If 0 α < 1 2, then θ T h H α where c = c(α, θ). c T α h Ḣα, Lemma 2 ([13] Lemma 3.5). If 1 2 < α < 1 2, then χ (0,+ )f H α c f H α, where c = c(α). Lemma 3 ([9] Prop. 2., [13] Lemma 3.7, 3.8). If 1 2 < α < 3 2, then H α 0 (R + ) = {f H α (R + ) f(0) = 0} and if f H α (R + ) with f(0) = 0, then χ (0,+ ) f H α 0 (R + ) c f H α (R + ), where c = c(α). The following Gronwall-type inequality can be obtained by applying the Hölder inequality iteratively: Lemma. If 1 q 1 < q and t 0 ( t 0 1/q ( t ) 1/q1 g(s) ds) q cδ + c f(s) q 1 ds 0 then with γ defined by 2cγ 1 q 1 1 q = 1, we have t 0, ( t 1/q1 f(s) q 1 ds) (γt) γt δ 0 8
9 A version of the chain rule for fractional derivatives is Lemma 5 (Prop. 3.1 in [8]). Let 0 < s < 1, u : R R 2 and F : R 2 R 2, F C 1, so that F (u) is a 2 2 matrix. Then D s F (u) L r c F (u) L r 1 D s u L r 2 for 1 r = 1 r r 2 with 1 < r, r 1, r 2 <. The product rule for fractional derivatives is Lemma 6 (Prop. 3.3 in [8]). Let 0 < s < 1. If u, v : R R, then D s (uv) L r D s u L r 1 v L r 2 + u L r 3 D s v L r for 1 < r, r 1, r 2, r 3, r < and 1 r = 1 r r 2, 1 r = 1 r r. 3 The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral The tempered distribution tα 1 + Γ(α) Re α > 0, i.e. t α 1 + Γ(α), f = 1 Γ(α) is defined as a locally integrable function for + Integration by parts gives, for Re α > 0, that t α 1 + Γ(α) = k t 0 [ t α+k 1 ] + Γ(α + k) t α 1 f(t) dt for all k N. This formula can be used to extend the definition (in the sense of distributions) of tα 1 + Γ(α) to all α C. In particular, we obtain t α 1 + Γ(α) = δ 0 (t) α=0 9
10 A change of contour calculation shows that [ t α 1 + ] (τ) = e 1 2 πiα (τ i0) α Γ(α) where (τ i0) α is the distributional limit. If f C 0 (R + ), we define Thus, when Re α > 0, I α f(t) = 1 Γ(α) I α f = tα 1 + Γ(α) f t 0 (t s) α 1 f(s) ds and I 0 f = f, I 1 f(t) = t 0 f(s) ds, and I 1f = f. Also I α I β = I α+β, which follows from the Fourier transform formula. For further details on the distribution t α 1 +, see [11]. Γ(α) Lemma 7. If h C 0 (R + ), then I α h C 0 (R + ), for all α C. Lemma 8 ([12]). If 0 α < + and s R, then I α h H s 0 (R + ) c h H s+α 0 (R + ) Lemma 9 ([12]). If 0 α < +, s R, µ C 0 (R) where c = c(µ). µi α h H s 0 (R + ) c h H s α 0 (R + ) Estimates for the group Set 1 e it 2 x φ(x) = e ixξ e itξ2 ˆφ(ξ) dξ () 2π ξ 10
11 so that (i t + x)e 2 it 2 x φ = 0 e it 2 x φ(x) t=0 = φ(x) for (x, t) R R for x R Lemma 10. Let s R. If φ H s (R), then (a) Space traces: e it 2 x φ(x) C(Rt; H s x) c φ H s. (b) Time traces: θ T (t)e it 2 x φ(x) 2s+1 c T 1/ φ C(R x; H H s. t ) (c) Mixed-norm: If 2 q, r and = 1, then q 2r eit 2 x φ(x) L q t W x s,r c φ H s. Proof. (a) is clear from (). (b) was obtained in [15]. (c) was obtained by [19] (see also [1]). 5 Estimates for the Duhamel inhomogeneous solution operator Let Then Dw(x, t) = i t 0 e i(t t ) 2 x w(x, t ) dt (i t + x)dw(x, 2 t) = w(x, t) for (x, t) R R Dw(x, 0) = 0 for x R Lemma 11. Suppose 2 q, r and 1 q + 1 2r = 1, then (a) Space Traces: If s R, then Dw C(Rt;H s x) c w L q (b) Time Traces: If 3 2 < s < 1 2, then θ T (t)dw(x, t) 11 t W x s,r. 2s+1 C(R x; H t ) c T 1/ w L q t W x s,r.
12 (c) Mixed-norm: If s R, then Dw L q t W s,r x c w L q t W x s,r Proof. (a) and (c) are due to [19] (see also [1]). We now prove (b), following the techniques of Theorem 2.3 in [16]. We use the representation Dw(x, t) = i πi = I + II + and Term II can also be written τ (sgn t )e i(t t ) x 2 w(x, t ) dt [ ] e itτ 1 ixξ ŵ(ξ, τ) lim e ɛ 0 + 2π τ + ξ dξ dτ 2 τ+ξ 2 >ɛ II = 1 e itτ [m(, τ) ŵ t (, τ)](x) dτ 2π τ where ŵ t (, τ) denotes the Fourier transform of w(x, t) in the t-variable alone and m(x, τ) = 1 2 χ (0,+ )(τ) exp( x τ 1/2 ) + 1 τ 1/2 2 χ (,0)(τ) sin( x τ 1/2 ) τ 1/2 First we treat Term I for all s and all admissible pairs q, r. Pairing Term I with f(x, t) such that f L 1 xh 2s+1 t and 1, we are left to show that H (sgn t it 2 )e x w(x, t ) dt t s x H θ T (t)e it 2x f(x, t) dt t s x c w L q t W x s,r c f L 1 xh 2s+1 t The first of these follows from the proof of (a), while the second is obtained by duality and Lemma 10(b). We address Term II separately for r = 2, q = 1, and r = 1, q = ; the intermediate cases follow by interpolation. For the case 3 12.
13 r = 2, q = 1, we use the first representation of Term II with Lemma 1, the change of variable η = ξ 2, and L 2 -boundedness of the Hilbert transform on A 2 -weighted spaces, to obtain θ T (t)(term II) 2s+1 H t ( c c ( ξ ξ ) 1/2 ξ s ŵ(ξ, τ) 2 dξ ξ s ( t ŵ x (ξ, t) dt) 2 dξ ) 1/2 where ŵ x (ξ, t) denotes the Fourier transform in the x-variable alone. Complete the bound by applying Minkowskii s integral inequality and the Placherel theorem. The validity of this step is restricted to 3 2 < s < 1 2. We shall only prove the r = 1, q = 3 case for s = 0. Note that by the second representation for Term II, (Term II) L is x H 1/ t τ 1/2 m(x y, τ)ŵ t (y, τ) dy τ 1/2 m(x z, τ)ŵ t (z, τ) dz dτ τ y which is equivalent to where y,s,z,t K(y, s, z, t) = z K(y, s, z, t)w(y, s)w(z, t) dy ds dz dt τ τ 1/2 e i(s t)τ m(x y, τ)m(x z, τ) dτ From the definition of m, we see that K(y, s, z, t) c s t 1/2. We conclude by applying the theorem on fractional integration (see Theorem 1 of Chapter V in [17]). 13
14 6 Estimates for the Duhamel boundary forcing operator For f C 0 (R + ), define the boundary forcing operator t Lf(x, t) = 2e i 1 π e i(t t ) x 2 δ0 (x)i 1/2 f(t ) dt (5) 0 = 1 t ( ) ix (t t ) 1/2 2 exp I π (t t 1/2 f(t ) dt (6) ) 0 The equivalence of the two definitions is evident from the formula [ ( e i π sgn t 2 1 ix 2 exp )] (ξ) π t 1/2 = e itξ 2 t From these two definitions, we see that (i t + x)lf(x, 2 t) = 2e i 3 π δ 0 (x)i 1/2 f(t) Lf(x, 0) = 0 Lf(0, t) = f(t) for (x, t) R R for x R for t R We now establish some continuity properties of Lf(x, t) when f is suitably nice. Lemma 12. Let f C0,c(R + ). (a) For fixed t, Lf(x, t) is continuous in x for all x R and x Lf(x, t) is continuous in x for x 0 with lim x Lf(x, t) = e 1 πi I 1/2 f(t) x 0 lim x Lf(x, t) = e 1 πi I 1/2 f(t) x 0 (7) (b) k = 0, 1, 2,... and for fixed x, k t Lf(x, t) is continuous in t for all t R. 1
15 We also have the pointwise estimates, for k = 0, 1, 2,..., on [0, T ], k t Lf(x, t) + x Lf(x, t) c x N where c = c(f, N, k, T ). Proof. Let us denote integration by parts by IBP. It is clear from (6) and dominated convergence that, for fixed t, Lf(x, t) is continuous in x, and for fixed x, Lf(x, t) is continuous in t. Let h = 2e i 1 π I 1/2 f C 0 (R + ) (by Lemma 7) and φ(ξ, t) = t 0 e i(t t )ξ h(t ) dt. By IBP in t, k ξ φ(ξ, t) c ξ k 1, where c = c(h, k, T ), and thus k ξ φ(ξ 2, t) c ξ k 2 (8) We have Lf(x, t) = e ixξ φ(ξ 2, t) dξ (9) ξ and by IBP in ξ and (8), we have Lf(x, t) c x N. By t [e i(t t ) 2 x δ0 (x)] = t [e i(t t ) 2 x δ0 (x)] and IBP in t in (5), t Lf = L t f, and thus, for fixed x, k t Lf(x, t) is continuous in t and k t Lf(x, t) c x N. By 2 x[e i(t t ) 2 x δ0 (x)] = i t [e i(t t ) 2 x δ0 (x)] and IBP in t in (5), 2 xlf(x, t) = 2e i 3 π δ 0 (x)i 1/2 f(t) il( t f)(x, t). Hence x x Lf(x, t) = e i 3 π (sgn x)i 1/2 f(t) i L( t f)(x, t) dx + c(t) x =0 Since all terms except c(t) are odd in x, we must have c(t) = 0. From this we obtain (7), and the bound x Lf(x, t) c. From (9), IBP in ξ and (8), we obtain that x Lf(x, t) c x N. Combining the two previous bounds, we have x Lf(x, t) c x N. Now we provide an alternate representation of Lf(x, t). 15
16 Lemma 13. Suppose f C 0,c(R + ). Then where Lf(x, t) = 1 e itτ e x (τ i0)1/2 ˆf(τ) dτ (10) 2π τ (τ i0) 1 2 = χ(0,+ ) (τ) τ 1/2 iχ (,0) (τ) τ 1/2 Proof. It suffices to verify that (a) On [0, T ], Lf(x, t) + t Lf(x, t) c x N, with c = c(f, N, T ). (b) Lf(x, 0) = 0 (c) (i t + 2 x)lf(x, t) = 2δ 0 (x)e 3 πi I 1/2 f(t) (a) is integration by parts in τ in (10) using 2(τ i0) 1/2 x 1 τ [e x (τ i0)1/2 ] = e x (τ i0)1/2. To show (b), note that since f C 0,c(R + ), ˆf(τ) extends to an analytic function on Im τ < 0 satisfying ˆf(τ) c τ k with c = c(f, k), and thus Lf(x, 0) = 1 2π lim e x τ 1/2 ˆf(τ) dτ (11) γ 0 Im τ=γ Since e x τ 1/2 1 for Im τ < 0, by Cauchy s theorem, (11) = 0. (c) is a direct computation from (10). Denote the operator defined by (10) as L 2 f(x, t) and the one given by (5)-(6) as L 1 f(x, t). Setting w = L 1 f L 2 f, we have w(x, 0) = 0 and (i t + x)w 2 = 0. Compute t x w 2 dx = 0, which yields w = 0, to complete the proof. Lemma 1. Suppose q, r 2 and 1 q + 1 2r = 1. (a) Space traces: If 1 2 < s < 3 2, then θ T (t)lf(x, t) C(Rt;H s x) c T 1/ f 2s+1 H 0 (R + ). 16
17 (b) Time traces: If s R, then Lf C(R x;h 2s+1 0 (R + t )) c f H (c) Mixed norm: If 0 s 1, r, we have Lf L q t W s,r 2s+1 0 (R + ) x c f H Proof. By density, it suffices to establish these facts for f C 0,c(R + ). show But By pairing (a) with φ(x) such that φ H s t t =0. 2s+1 0 (R + ) 1, we see that it suffices to f(t )θ T (t)e i(t t ) 2 x φ x=0 dt c T 1/ f H 2s+1 LHS χ (,t) f(t ) 2s+1 θ H T (t)e i(t t ) 2 x φ(x) 2s 1 RHS t H t by Lemmas 10(b) and 2. To establish the continuity statement, write θ T (t 2 )Lf(x, t 2 ) θ T (t 1 )Lf(x, t 1 ) = t 2 t 1 t [θ(t)lf(x, t)] dt. By t L = L t and the bound just derived, we have θ T (t 2 )Lf(x, t 2 ) θ T (t 1 )Lf(x, t 1 ) c t 2 t 1 f 2s+5 H 0 (b) is immediate from Lemma 13, except that we should confirm that (under the assumption f C 0,c(R + ), that k t Lf(x, 0) = 0 for all k = 0, 1, 2,.... This, however, follows from t L = L t. The continuity statement follows by using Lf(x 2, t) Lf(x 1, t) = x 2 x 1 and thus x Lf(x, t) = e 1 πi (sgn x) 1 2π Lf(x 2, t) Lf(x 1, t) To prove (c), it suffices to establish x Lf(x, t) dx. From Lemma 13, we have e itτ e x (τ i0)1/2 [I 1/2 f] (τ) dτ τ 2s+1 H 0 (R + ) c x 2 x 1 f 2s+3 H 0 Lf(x, t) L t L c f x Ḣ1/ (12).. and x Lf(x, t) L t L c f x Ḣ3/ (13) 17
18 Indeed, the proof of (a) in the case s = 1 shows Lf(x, t) L t L 2 x c f Ḣ 1/ xlf(x, t) L t L 2 x c f Ḣ 3/ Interpolate (12) with the first inequality and (13) with the second inequality to obtain Lf(x, t) L q t Lr x c f Ḣ 1/ xlf(x, t) L q t Lr x c f Ḣ 3/ for admissible q, r. This implies Lf(x, t) L q t W x s,r c f 2s+1 H, r for s = 0 and s = 1. Now interpolate over s between these two endpoints to obtain the result as stated. By pairing LHS of (12) against w(x, t) L /3 t L 1 x, we see that it suffices to show e itτ e x (τ i0)1/2 w(x, t) dx dt Ḣ 1/ x t Writing out the L 2 τ norm, we see that it suffices to show K(x, t, y, s) w(x, t)w(y, s) dx dt dy ds c w /3 L t L 1 x where x,t,y,s K(x, t, y, s) = τ τ 1/2 e i(t s)τ e x (τ i0)1/2 e y (τ+i0)1/2 dτ By a change of contour calculation, it follows that K(x, y, t, s) c t s 1/2, and hence (12) follows by the theorem on fractional integration. For (13), the kernel is instead K(x, t, y, s) = (sgn x)(sgn y) and hence the estimation of K is identical. τ τ 1/2 e i(t s)τ e x (τ i0)1/2 e y (τ+i0)1/2 dτ 18
19 7 Existence: Proof of Theorem 1 First we prove the subcritical assertion (a) in the case 0 s < 1. Select an 2 extension φ H s of φ such that φ H s 2 φ H s (R + ). Set r = α+1 1+(α 1)s q = (α+1) 2. This is an admissible pair with r 2 and q 2( + 1). Set (α 1)(1 2s) 1 2s Z = C(R t ; Hx) s C(R x ; H 2s+1 t ) L q t Wx s,r Take w Z. By the chain rule (Lemma 5), for α 1 (see below for details) for some σ > 0. D s ( w α 1 w) L q T Lr x and ct σ w α L q T W r,s x (1) Note that by Lemmas 10(b), 11(b), 2, if w Z, then f(t) θ 2T (t)e it 2 x φ x=0 H 2s+1 0 (R + t ) and θ 2T (t)d(w w α 1 )(0, t) H 2s+1 0 (R + t ), and the evaluation at x = 0 in these statements is understood in the sense of C(R x ; H 2s+1 t ). Let Λw(t) = θ T (t)e it 2 x φ + θt (t)l(f θ 2T e i 2 x φ x=0 )(t) (15) λθ T (t)d(w w α 1 )(t) + λθ T (t)l(θ 2T D(w w α 1 ) x=0 )(t) so that, on [0, T ], (i t + 2 x)λw = λw w α 1 for x 0 in the sense of distributions. By Lemmas 10, 11, 1 and (1), Λw Z c φ H s (R + ) + c f H 2s+1 (R + ) + ct σ w α Z (16) In the sense of C(R t ; H s x), we have Λw ( x, 0) = φ(x) on R, and in the sense of C(R x ; H 2s+1 t ), we have Λw(0, t) = f(t) on [0, T ]. We therefore look to solve Λw = w for some selection of T. By the chain rule and product rule (see below for details), for α 2, Λw 1 Λw 2 Z ct σ ( w 1 α 1 Z T 19 + w 2 α 1 Z ) w 1 w 2 Z (17)
20 Now choose T small in terms of φ H s (R + ) and f 2s+1, so that, by (16) H (R + ) and (17), Λ is a contraction, which yields a unique fixed point u, which on [0, T ] solves the integral equation u(t) = e it 2 x φ + L(f e i 2 x φ x=0 ) (18) λd(u u α 1 ) + λl(d(u u α 1 ) x=0 ) Let S be the set of all times T > 0 for which (1) u Z such that u solves (18) on [0, T ] and (2) for each pair u 1, u 2 Z, such that u 1 solves (18) on [0, T 1 ] with T 1 T and u 2 solves (18) on [0, T 2 ] with T 2 T, we have u 1 = u 2 on [0, min(t 1, T 2 )]. We claim that T as given in the above contraction argument is in S. We need only show condition (2). But the integral equation (18) has a unique solution by the contraction argument in the space L q T m W s,r x, where T m = min(t 1, T 2 ), by Lemmas 10(c), 11(c), 1(c) and the fact that χ [0,Tm]Lg = χ [0,Tm]L(θ Tm g), χ [0,Tm]Dw = χ [0,Tm]Dχ [0,Tm]w. Let T = sup S. Define u on [0, T ) by setting, for t < T, u (t) = u(t) for some u Z whose existence is given by condition (1); this is well-defined by condition (2). Suppose T < and lim t T u(, t) H s (R + ). Then a and a sequence t n T such that u (t n ) H s (R + ) a. By the above existence argument applied at time t n for n sufficiently large, we obtain a contradiction, as follows. We shall select T = t n for n sufficiently large in a moment. We have, by assumption, u 1 Z solving the integral equation u 1 (t) = e it 2 x φ + L(f e i 2 x φ x=0 ) (19) λd(u 1 u 1 α 1 ) + λl(d(u 1 u 1 α 1 ) x=0 ) on [0, T ]. Apply the above existence argument to obtain u 2 Z solving, on 20
21 [T, T + δ], the integral equation u 2 (t) = e i(t T ) 2 x u(t ) + L T (f e i( T ) 2 x u(t ) x=0 ) (20) λd T (u 2 u 2 α 1 ) + λl T (D T (u 2 u 2 α 1 ) x=0 ) where L T g(t) = (g( + T ))(t T ) D T v(t) = D(v( + T ))(t T ) Since δ = δ(a, f 2s+1 ), we can select n sufficiently large so that T + δ = H (R + ) t n +δ > T. Now we show that we can concatenate these two integral equations. Define u(t) = u 1 (t) for < t T and u(t) = u 2 (t) for T t < +. Then clearly u L q t W r,s x C(R t ; H s x). Evaluate (19) at t = T, substitute into (20), and apply the two identities Lg(t) = e i(t T ) 2 x Lg(T ) L T (g e i( T ) 2 x Lg(T ) x=0 )(t) Dv(t) = e i(t T ) 2 x Dv(T ) + D T v(t) for t T for all t (21) with v(t) = λu u α 1 (t) and g(t) = f(t) e it 2 x φ x=0 Dv(0, t) on 0 t T +δ. This establishes that u solves, on [0, T + δ], the integral equation (18). Next, we show that u C(R x ; H 2s+1 ). Let ψ C such that ψ(t) = 0 for t 0, ψ(t) = 1 for T t T + δ, ψ(t) = 0 for t > T +δ. It is clear from the definition 2 2 of u that (1 ψ)u C(R x ; H 2s+1 t ). Since by (18) ψ(t)u(t) = ψ(t)e it 2 x φ + ψ(t)l(f θ2(t +δ) e i 2 x φ x=0 )(t) λψ(t)d(u u α 1 )(t) + λψ(t)l(θ 2(T +δ) D(u u α 1 ) x=0 ) by Lemmas 10(b), 11(b), and 1(b) we have ψu C(R x ; H 2s+1 t ). Next, we need to verify condition (2) in the definition of f. Now suppose u is a solution on [0, T u ] with T u T + δ, and v is a solution on [0, T v ] with 21
22 T v T + δ, and suppose min(t u, T v ) T. Then u(t) = v(t) for all t T (since T S). Then, again by (21), u solves (20) with u 2 replaced by u, and v solves (20) with u 2 replaced by v (u(t ) = v(t )). By uniqueness of the fixed point to (20) in L q [T,T +δ] W x s,r, we get that u(t) = v(t) on [T, T + δ]. We have thus established that sup S T + δ > T, which is a contradiction, so in fact lim t T u(, t) H s (R + ) = if T <. Now we move on the continuity claim. Suppose (φ, f) gives a solution u of (18) on [0, T ), and consider (φ 1, f 1 ) with φ φ 1 H s (R + ) + f f 1 H 2s+1 (R + ) < δ. Fix T < T. Let u 1 be the solution corresponding to (φ 1, f 1 ) on [0, T 1 ], where T 1 is the first time t such that u 1 L q [0,t] W x s,r = 2 u L q T W x s,r. We claim that T 1 > T provided we take δ sufficiently small. Indeed, taking the difference of the two integral equations, we find, for t min(t 1, T ) u u 1 L q [0,t] W x s,r cδ + c( u L q T W x s,r + u 1 L q T W s,r) u u q x 1 1 L 1 [0,t] Wx s,r where q 1 < q, and c depends only upon operator norms. This gives, by Lemma, u u 1 L q [0,t] W s,r x cδ (22) where now c depends on f, φ, and T. Now if T 1 < T, then take t = T 1 in (22) and δ sufficiently small to obtain a contradiction. The inequality (22) plus estimates on the difference of the integral equations for u and u 1 also shows u u 1 C([0,T ]; H s x ) + u u 1 C(Rx; H 2s+1 (0,T )) cδ Now we remark on the proof in the subcritical case (a) for 1 2 < s < 3 2. Let Z = C(R t ; Hx) s C(R x ; H 2s+1 t ) 22
23 Set r = 2, q = in the remainder of the argument above. Do note, however, that to show f(t) θ 2T (t)e it 2 x φ x=0 H 2s+1 (R + t ), we need to appeal to the compatibility condition f(0) = φ(0) and Lemma 3. Also, by Lemma 3, θ 2T (t)d(w w α 1 )(0, t) H 2s+1 0 (R + t ) q = Now we discuss the critical case (b). Let Z = L q t W s,r x with r = α+1 1+(α 1)s and (α+1). The integral equation is (α 1)(1 2s) Λw(t) = θ T (t)e it 2 x φ + θt (t)l(f θ 2T e i 2 x φ x=0 )(t) (23) λθ T (t)d(w w α 1 )(t) + λθ T (t)l(θ 2T D(w w α 1 ) x=0 )(t) Now, because q, θ T (t)e it 2 x φ L q t W x s,r 0 as T 0 and θ T (t)l(f θ 2T e i 2 x φ x=0 )(t) L q t W x r,s 0 as T 0. Therefore, T > 0 such that θ T (t)e it 2 x φ L q t W x s,r + θ T (t)l(f θ 2T e i 2 x φ x=0 )(t) L q t W x s,r < δ which gives Λw Z δ + c w α Z (2) For δ sufficiently small, there will be a fixed point in the space { w Z w Z < 2δ }. From Λu = u, (23) and Lemmas 10(a), 11(a), 1(a), we can recover the bounds in C(R t ; H s x), and by Lemmas 10(b), 11(b), 1(b), we can recover the bounds in C(R x ; H 2s+1 t ). Let T be the supremum of all existence times with a uniqueness stipulation, as before. We are not able to show the blowup statement in this case. Moreover, we also can only establish the continuity assertion for some T < T. 23
24 7.1 Notes on applying the chain and product rule We shall apply the chain rule (Lemma 5) with w : R C and F : C C given by F (w) = w α 1 w, for α 1. Then F (w) = (α 1) w α 3 (Re w) 2 + w α 1 (α 1) w α 3 (Re w)(im w) (α 1) w α 3 (Re w)(im w) (α 1) w α 3 (Im w) 2 + w α 1 and consequently each component of F (w) is bounded by w α 1. Thus where 1 r = 1 r 1 r = 1 2 r and 1 q so that 1 (α 1)r = 1 r s and 1 (α 1)q D s w α 1 w L r x cα w α 1 L r x Ds w L r x = 1 1 = 1 2. Since r, q have been selected q q q > 1, we have q D s w α 1 w L r x c Ds w α L r x To handle differences, for w 0, w 1 : R C, set w θ = θw 1 + (1 θ)w 0. Then w 1 α 1 w 1 w 0 α 1 w 0 = 1 θ=0 (α 1) w θ α 3 w θ (w θ (w 1 w 0 ))+ w θ α 1 (w 1 w 0 ) where z 1 z 2 = (Re z 1 )(Re z 2 ) + (Im z 1 )(Im z 2 ). To this, apply D s, and invoke the product rule (Lemma 6) and the chain rule (Lemma 5). 8 Uniqueness: Proof of Prop. 1 We shall begin by establishing uniqueness of a distributional solution with weak traces for the linear problem for s 0. Given two solutions u 1, u 2, consider the difference v = u 1 u 2. We are thus assuming v C([0, T ); L 2 (R + )) with v(x, 0) = 0 (25) 2
25 and lim v(x, ) x 0 + L 2 = 0 (26) (0,T ) Take T < T. Let θ(t) be a nonnegative smooth function supported on [ 2, 1] with θ = 1. Let θ δ (t) = δ 1 θ(δ 1 t). For δ, ɛ > 0, let v δ,ɛ (x, t) = v(y, s)θ δ (x y)θ ɛ (t s) dy ds (27) which defines, in the sense of distributions, v δ,ɛ (x, t) a smooth function on δ < x < +, ɛ < t < T 2ɛ. Owing to the assumption (25) we can write [ ] v δ,ɛ (x, t) = θ ɛ (t s) v(y, s)θ δ (x y) dy ds s where the integrals are defined in the usual sense. From this it follows that v δ,ɛ (, t) L 2 (R + x ) y sup v(, s) L 2 (R + x ) t+ɛ s t+2ɛ Owing to the assumption (26), L > 0 such that sup 0<x 2L v(x, ) L 2 (0,T ) 1. It follows that, for x + 2δ < 2L, (27) can be written [ ] v δ,ɛ (x, t) = θ δ (x y) v(y, s)θ ɛ (t s) ds dy s y where the integrals are understood in the usual sense, and we also have Let v δ,ɛ (x, ) L 2 (0,T ) sup v(y, ) L 2 (ɛ,t +2ɛ) (28) x+δ<y<x+2δ v ɛ (x, t) = θ ɛ (t s)v(x, s) ds s which is initially understood as defining, for each t, a distribution in x on (0, + ). It follows from (25) that it is also, for each t, a square integrable function in x with v ɛ (, t) L 2 (R + ) sup t+ɛ<s<t+2ɛ v(, s) L 2 (R + ) and lim v ɛ(, t) v(, t) L 2 ɛ 0 + (R + ) = 0 (29) 25
26 Now we proceed to the calculation. The identity is + 0 v δ,ɛ (x, T ) 2 dx = + x=0 v δ,ɛ (x, 0) 2 + 2Im T t=0 x v δ,ɛ (0, t)v δ,ɛ (0, t) dt (30) Now x 1 with 0 < x 1 < L such that x v δ,ɛ (x 1, t) = L 1 (v δ,ɛ (L, t) v δ,ɛ (0, t)), by the mean-value theorem. Again by the mean-value theorem, x 2 with 0 < x 2 < x 1 such that x v δ,ɛ (x 1, t) x v δ,ɛ (0, t) = x 1 2 xv δ,ɛ (x 2, t). Subtracting, x v δ,ɛ (0, ) L 2 (0,T ) L sup xv 2 δ,ɛ (y, ) L 2 (0,T ) + L 1 0 y L Bounding the terms on the right of this equation, we have sup 0 y L sup v δ,ɛ (x, ) L 2 (0,T ) sup v(x, ) L 2 (ɛ,t +2ɛ) 1 0<x<L δ<x<l+2δ v δ,ɛ (y, ) L 2 (0,T ) (31) We also have 2 xv δ,ɛ (x, t) = i t v δ,ɛ (x, t) = iɛ 1 θ δ (x y)(θ ) ɛ (t s)v(y, s) dy ds and thus sup 0<x<L 2 xv δ,ɛ (x, ) L 2 (0,T ) ɛ 1 sup δ<x<l+2δ v(x, ) L 2 (ɛ,t +2ɛ) ɛ 1 Hence, for fixed ɛ > 0 by Cauchy-Schwarz, bounding by (31) and (28), we have T Send δ 0 in (30) to get 0 + x=0 v δ,ɛ (0, t) x v δ,ɛ (0, t) dt 0 as δ 0 v ɛ (x, T ) 2 = and then send ɛ 0 and use (29). Now we prove Prop x=0 v ɛ (x, 0) 2 dx
27 Proof. Suppose u 1, u 2 are given as in the statement of the proposition, and additionally are smooth and have adequate decay. Let v = u 2 u 1 so that and v(x, 0) = 0, v(0, t) = 0. Then i t v + 2 xv + λ( u 2 α 1 u 2 u 1 α 1 u 1 ) + t v 2 dx = 2Re iλ and thus, for any t > 0, 0 + x=0 (u 2 u 2 α 1 u 1 u 1 α 1 ) v dx (32) t v(t) 2 L 2 x (R+ ) 2 λ ( u 1 α 1 L [0,t] L x (R + ) + u 1 α 1 L [0,t] L x (R+ ) ) 0 v(s) 2 L 2 x ds By the Sobolev imbedding H s (R + ) L (R + ) and Gronwall s inequality, v(t) = 0. To handle rough u 1, u 2, mollify v as was done above in the linear case to obtain v δ,ɛ so that t v δ,ɛ = i 2 xv δ,ɛ + iλ(u 2 u 2 α 1 u 1 u 1 α 1 ) δ,ɛ Now prove an identity analogous to (30), estimate as in (32), and pass to the limit to conclude v = 0. References [1] J. L. Bona, S. M. Sun, and B.-Y. Zhang, Conditional and unconditional well-posedness for nonlinear evolution equations, Advances in Differential Equations 9 (200), no. 3-. [2], Boundary smoothing and well-posedness of the Korteweg-de Vries equation in a quarter plane, in preparation. 27
28 [3] A. Boutet de Monvel, A. S. Fokas, and D. Shepelsky, Analysis of the global relation for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the half-line, Lett. Math. Phys. 65 (2003), no. 3, [] H. Brézis and T. Gallouet, Nonlinear Schrödinger evolution equations, Nonlinear Anal. (1980), no., [5] Q.-Y. Bu, The nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the semi-infinite line, Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. A 21 (2000), no., [6] R. Carroll and Q.-Y. Bu, Solution of the forced nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation using PDE techniques, Appl. Anal. 1 (1991), no. 1-, [7] T. Cazenave and F. B. Weissler, The Cauchy problem for the critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation in H s, Nonlinear Anal. 1 (1990), no. 10, [8] F. M. Christ and M. I. Weinstein, Dispersion of small amplitude solutions of the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation, J. Funct. Anal. 100 (1991), no. 1, [9] J. E. Colliander and C. E. Kenig, The generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation on the half line, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 27 (2002), no , [10] A. S. Fokas, Integrable nonlinear evolution equations on the half-line, Comm. Math. Phys. 230 (2002), no. 1, [11] F. G. Friedlander, Introduction to the theory of distributions, second ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, With additional material by M. Joshi. 28
29 [12] J. Holmer, The initial-boundary value problem for the Korteweg-de Vries equation, in preparation. [13] D. Jerison and C. E. Kenig, The inhomogeneous Dirichlet problem in Lipschitz domains, J. Funct. Anal. 130 (1995), no. 1, [1] M. Keel and T. Tao, Endpoint Strichartz estimates, Amer. J. Math. 120 (1998), no. 5, [15] C. E. Kenig, Gustavo Ponce, and Luis Vega, Oscillatory integrals and regularity of dispersive equations, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 0 (1991), no. 1, [16], Small solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 10 (1993), no. 3, [17] E. M. Stein, Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions, Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 30, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., [18] W. Strauss and C. Bu, An inhomogeneous boundary value problem for nonlinear Schrödinger equations, J. Differential Equations 173 (2001), no. 1, [19] R. S. Strichartz, Restrictions of Fourier transforms to quadratic surfaces and decay of solutions of wave equations, Duke Math. J. (1977), no. 3,
30 [20] M. Tsutsumi, On global solutions to the initial-boundary value problem for the nonlinear Schrödinger equations in exterior domains, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 16 (1991), no. 6-7, [21] M. Tsutsumi, On smooth solutions to the initial-boundary value problem for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation in two space dimensions, Nonlinear Anal. 13 (1989), no. 9, [22] Y. Tsutsumi, Global solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation in exterior domains, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 8 (1983), no. 12, [23] B. Wang, On the initial-boundary value problems for nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Adv. Math. (China) 29 (2000), no. 5,
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO UNIFORM ESTIMATES FOR THE ZAKHAROV SYSTEM AND THE INITIAL-BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM FOR THE KORTEWEG-DE VRIES
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO UNIFORM ESTIMATES FOR THE ZAKHAROV SYSTEM AND THE INITIAL-BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM FOR THE KORTEWEG-DE VRIES AND NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS ADISSERTATIONSUBMITTEDTO THE FACULTY
More informationPartial Differential Equations
Part II Partial Differential Equations Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2015 Paper 4, Section II 29E Partial Differential Equations 72 (a) Show that the Cauchy problem for u(x,
More informationDISPERSIVE EQUATIONS: A SURVEY
DISPERSIVE EQUATIONS: A SURVEY GIGLIOLA STAFFILANI 1. Introduction These notes were written as a guideline for a short talk; hence, the references and the statements of the theorems are often not given
More informationGlobal well-posedness for KdV in Sobolev spaces of negative index
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. (), No. 6, pp. 7. ISSN: 7-669. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu (login: ftp) Global well-posedness for
More informationCUTOFF RESOLVENT ESTIMATES AND THE SEMILINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
CUTOFF RESOLVENT ESTIMATES AND THE SEMILINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION HANS CHRISTIANSON Abstract. This paper shows how abstract resolvent estimates imply local smoothing for solutions to the Schrödinger equation.
More informationLOW REGULARITY GLOBAL WELL-POSEDNESS FOR THE ZAKHAROV AND KLEIN-GORDON-SCHRÖDINGER SYSTEMS
LOW REGULARITY GLOBAL WELL-POSEDNESS FOR THE ZAKHAROV AND KLEIN-GORDON-SCHRÖDINGER SYSTEMS JAMES COLLIANDER, JUSTIN HOLMER, AND NIKOLAOS TZIRAKIS Abstract We prove low-regularity global well-posedness
More informationBLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED
BLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED TAOUFIK HMIDI AND SAHBI KERAANI Abstract. In this note we prove a refined version of compactness lemma adapted to the blowup analysis
More informationNotes. 1 Fourier transform and L p spaces. March 9, For a function in f L 1 (R n ) define the Fourier transform. ˆf(ξ) = f(x)e 2πi x,ξ dx.
Notes March 9, 27 1 Fourier transform and L p spaces For a function in f L 1 (R n ) define the Fourier transform ˆf(ξ) = f(x)e 2πi x,ξ dx. Properties R n 1. f g = ˆfĝ 2. δλ (f)(ξ) = ˆf(λξ), where δ λ f(x)
More informationEnergy transfer model and large periodic boundary value problem for the quintic NLS
Energy transfer model and large periodic boundary value problem for the quintic NS Hideo Takaoka Department of Mathematics, Kobe University 1 ntroduction This note is based on a talk given at the conference
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.ap] 8 Jun 2006
LOW REGULARITY GLOBAL WELL-POSEDNESS FOR THE KLEIN-GORDON-SCHRÖDINGER SYSTEM WITH THE HIGHER ORDER YUKAWA COUPLING arxiv:math/0606079v [math.ap] 8 Jun 006 Changxing Miao Institute of Applied Physics and
More informationSMOOTHING ESTIMATES OF THE RADIAL SCHRÖDINGER PROPAGATOR IN DIMENSIONS n 2
Acta Mathematica Scientia 1,3B(6):13 19 http://actams.wipm.ac.cn SMOOTHING ESTIMATES OF THE RADIAL SCHRÖDINGER PROPAGATOR IN DIMENSIONS n Li Dong ( ) Department of Mathematics, University of Iowa, 14 MacLean
More informationSharp Well-posedness Results for the BBM Equation
Sharp Well-posedness Results for the BBM Equation J.L. Bona and N. zvetkov Abstract he regularized long-wave or BBM equation u t + u x + uu x u xxt = was derived as a model for the unidirectional propagation
More informationSOLUTIONS TO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 4
SOLUTIONS TO HOMEWOK ASSIGNMENT 4 Exercise. A criterion for the image under the Hilbert transform to belong to L Let φ S be given. Show that Hφ L if and only if φx dx = 0. Solution: Suppose first that
More informationSCATTERING FOR THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL NLS WITH EXPONENTIAL NONLINEARITY
SCATTERING FOR THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL NLS WITH EXPONENTIAL NONLINEARITY S. IBRAHIM, M. MAJDOUB, N. MASMOUDI, AND K. NAKANISHI Abstract. We investigate existence and asymptotic completeness of the wave operators
More informationSome lecture notes for Math 6050E: PDEs, Fall 2016
Some lecture notes for Math 65E: PDEs, Fall 216 Tianling Jin December 1, 216 1 Variational methods We discuss an example of the use of variational methods in obtaining existence of solutions. Theorem 1.1.
More informationA COUNTEREXAMPLE TO AN ENDPOINT BILINEAR STRICHARTZ INEQUALITY TERENCE TAO. t L x (R R2 ) f L 2 x (R2 )
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2006(2006), No. 5, pp. 6. ISSN: 072-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) A COUNTEREXAMPLE
More informationNonlinear aspects of Calderón-Zygmund theory
Ancona, June 7 2011 Overture: The standard CZ theory Consider the model case u = f in R n Overture: The standard CZ theory Consider the model case u = f in R n Then f L q implies D 2 u L q 1 < q < with
More informationBIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES
BIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES SEBASTIAN HERR, TOBIAS LAMM, AND ROLAND SCHNAUBELT Abstract. A global weak solution of the biharmonic wave map equation in the energy space for spherical targets is constructed.
More informationNONLINEAR PROPAGATION OF WAVE PACKETS. Ritsumeikan University, and 22
NONLINEAR PROPAGATION OF WAVE PACKETS CLOTILDE FERMANIAN KAMMERER Ritsumeikan University, 21-1 - 21 and 22 Our aim in this lecture is to explain the proof of a recent Theorem obtained in collaboration
More informationWell-posedness for the Fourth-order Schrödinger Equations with Quadratic Nonlinearity
Well-posedness for the Fourth-order Schrödinger Equations with Quadratic Nonlinearity Jiqiang Zheng The Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics P. O. Box 20, Beijing, China, 00088 (zhengjiqiang@gmail.com)
More informationTADAHIRO OH 0, 3 8 (T R), (1.5) The result in [2] is in fact stated for time-periodic functions: 0, 1 3 (T 2 ). (1.4)
PERIODIC L 4 -STRICHARTZ ESTIMATE FOR KDV TADAHIRO OH 1. Introduction In [], Bourgain proved global well-posedness of the periodic KdV in L T): u t + u xxx + uu x 0, x, t) T R. 1.1) The key ingredient
More informationGlobal unbounded solutions of the Fujita equation in the intermediate range
Global unbounded solutions of the Fujita equation in the intermediate range Peter Poláčik School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA Eiji Yanagida Department of Mathematics,
More informationSharp Sobolev Strichartz estimates for the free Schrödinger propagator
Sharp Sobolev Strichartz estimates for the free Schrödinger propagator Neal Bez, Chris Jeavons and Nikolaos Pattakos Abstract. We consider gaussian extremisability of sharp linear Sobolev Strichartz estimates
More informationLaplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas
Chapter 1 Laplace s Equation Let be an open set in R n. A function u C 2 () is called harmonic in if it satisfies Laplace s equation n (1.1) u := D ii u = 0 in. i=1 A function u C 2 () is called subharmonic
More informationExponential Energy Decay for the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (KP-II) equation
São Paulo Journal of Mathematical Sciences 5, (11), 135 148 Exponential Energy Decay for the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (KP-II) equation Diogo A. Gomes Department of Mathematics, CAMGSD, IST 149 1 Av. Rovisco
More informationBlow up of solutions for a 1D transport equation with nonlocal velocity and supercritical dissipation
Blow up of solutions for a 1D transport equation with nonlocal velocity and supercritical dissipation Dong Li a,1 a School of Mathematics, Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 854,
More informationOn the Cauchy problem of 3-D energy-critical Schrödinger equations with subcritical perturbations
J. Differential Equations 30 (006 4 445 www.elsevier.com/locate/jde On the Cauchy problem of 3-D energy-critical Schrödinger equations with subcritical perturbations Xiaoyi Zhang Academy of Mathematics
More informationScattering theory for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with inverse square potential
Scattering theory for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with inverse square potential Université Nice Sophia-Antipolis Based on joint work with: Changxing Miao (IAPCM) and Junyong Zhang (BIT) February -6,
More informationExistence of a ground state and blow-up problem for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with critical growth
Existence of a ground state and blow-up problem for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with critical growth Takafumi Akahori, Slim Ibrahim, Hiroaki Kikuchi and Hayato Nawa 1 Introduction In this paper, we
More informationSobolev Spaces. Chapter Hölder spaces
Chapter 2 Sobolev Spaces Sobolev spaces turn out often to be the proper setting in which to apply ideas of functional analysis to get information concerning partial differential equations. Here, we collect
More informationProperties of the Scattering Transform on the Real Line
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 58, 3 43 (001 doi:10.1006/jmaa.000.7375, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Properties of the Scattering Transform on the Real Line Michael
More informationDERIVATION OF THE CUBIC NLS AND GROSS-PITAEVSKII HIERARCHY FROM MANYBODY DYNAMICS IN d = 2, 3 BASED ON SPACETIME NORMS
DERIVATIO OF THE CUBIC LS AD GROSS-PITAEVSKII HIERARCHY FROM MAYBODY DYAMICS I d = 2, 3 BASED O SPACETIME ORMS THOMAS CHE AD ATAŠA PAVLOVIĆ Abstract. We derive the defocusing cubic Gross-Pitaevskii (GP)
More informationSEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH DEPENDENCE ON THE GRADIENT
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2012 (2012), No. 139, pp. 1 9. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC
More informationFRACTIONAL DIFFERENTIATION: LEIBNIZ MEETS HÖLDER
FRACTIONAL DIFFERENTIATION: LEIBNIZ MEETS HÖLDER LOUKAS GRAFAKOS Abstract. Abstract: We discuss how to estimate the fractional derivative of the product of two functions, not in the pointwise sense, but
More informationA LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE. 1.
A LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE THOMAS CHEN AND NATAŠA PAVLOVIĆ Abstract. We prove a Beale-Kato-Majda criterion
More informationPiecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation
Piecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation Alberto Bressan and Tianyou Zhang Department of Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park, Pa 68, USA e-mails: bressan@mathpsuedu, zhang
More informationA REMARK ON AN EQUATION OF WAVE MAPS TYPE WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS
A REMARK ON AN EQUATION OF WAVE MAPS TYPE WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS DAN-ANDREI GEBA Abstract. We obtain a sharp local well-posedness result for an equation of wave maps type with variable coefficients.
More informationALMOST CONSERVATION LAWS AND GLOBAL ROUGH SOLUTIONS TO A NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
ALMOST CONSERVATION LAWS AND GLOBAL ROUGH SOLUTIONS TO A NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION J. COLLIANDER, M. KEEL, G. STAFFILANI, H. TAKAOKA, AND T. TAO Abstract. We prove an almost conservation law to obtain
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 18 May 2017
Littlewood-Paley-Stein functions for Schrödinger operators arxiv:175.6794v1 [math.ap] 18 May 217 El Maati Ouhabaz Dedicated to the memory of Abdelghani Bellouquid (2/2/1966 8/31/215) Abstract We study
More informationOBSERVABILITY INEQUALITY AND DECAY RATE FOR WAVE EQUATIONS WITH NONLINEAR BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 27 (27, No. 6, pp. 2. ISSN: 72-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu OBSERVABILITY INEQUALITY AND DECAY RATE FOR WAVE EQUATIONS
More informationProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Inverse Problems in Engineering: Theory and Practice, Cambridge, UK, 11-15th July 2005
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Inverse Problems in Engineering: Theory and Practice, Cambridge, UK, 11-15th July 2005 SOME INVERSE SCATTERING PROBLEMS FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL SCHRÖDINGER
More informationPresenter: Noriyoshi Fukaya
Y. Martel, F. Merle, and T.-P. Tsai, Stability and Asymptotic Stability in the Energy Space of the Sum of N Solitons for Subcritical gkdv Equations, Comm. Math. Phys. 31 (00), 347-373. Presenter: Noriyoshi
More informationSobolev Spaces. Chapter 10
Chapter 1 Sobolev Spaces We now define spaces H 1,p (R n ), known as Sobolev spaces. For u to belong to H 1,p (R n ), we require that u L p (R n ) and that u have weak derivatives of first order in L p
More informationANALYTIC SMOOTHING EFFECT FOR NONLI TitleSCHRÖDINGER EQUATION IN TWO SPACE DIMENSIONS. Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics.
ANALYTIC SMOOTHING EFFECT FOR NONLI TitleSCHRÖDINGER EQUATION IN TWO SPACE DIMENSIONS Author(s) Hoshino, Gaku; Ozawa, Tohru Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 51(3) Issue 014-07 Date Text Version publisher
More informationWell-Posedness and Adiabatic Limit for Quantum Zakharov System
Well-Posedness and Adiabatic Limit for Quantum Zakharov System Yung-Fu Fang (joint work with Tsai-Jung Chen, Jun-Ichi Segata, Hsi-Wei Shih, Kuan-Hsiang Wang, Tsung-fang Wu) Department of Mathematics National
More informationVANISHING-CONCENTRATION-COMPACTNESS ALTERNATIVE FOR THE TRUDINGER-MOSER INEQUALITY IN R N
VAISHIG-COCETRATIO-COMPACTESS ALTERATIVE FOR THE TRUDIGER-MOSER IEQUALITY I R Abstract. Let 2, a > 0 0 < b. Our aim is to clarify the influence of the constraint S a,b = { u W 1, (R ) u a + u b = 1 } on
More informationA PROPERTY OF SOBOLEV SPACES ON COMPLETE RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2005(2005), No.??, pp. 1 10. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) A PROPERTY
More informationOn the local existence for an active scalar equation in critical regularity setting
On the local existence for an active scalar equation in critical regularity setting Walter Rusin Department of Mathematics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 7478 Fei Wang Department of Mathematics,
More informationGlobal well-posedness for semi-linear Wave and Schrödinger equations. Slim Ibrahim
Global well-posedness for semi-linear Wave and Schrödinger equations Slim Ibrahim McMaster University, Hamilton ON University of Calgary, April 27th, 2006 1 1 Introduction Nonlinear Wave equation: ( 2
More informationThe 2D Magnetohydrodynamic Equations with Partial Dissipation. Oklahoma State University
The 2D Magnetohydrodynamic Equations with Partial Dissipation Jiahong Wu Oklahoma State University IPAM Workshop Mathematical Analysis of Turbulence IPAM, UCLA, September 29-October 3, 2014 1 / 112 Outline
More informationGLOBAL REGULARITY RESULTS FOR THE CLIMATE MODEL WITH FRACTIONAL DISSIPATION
GOBA REGUARITY RESUTS FOR THE CIMATE MODE WITH FRACTIONA DISSIPATION BO-QING DONG 1, WENJUAN WANG 1, JIAHONG WU AND HUI ZHANG 3 Abstract. This paper studies the global well-posedness problem on a tropical
More informationGLOBAL WELL-POSEDNESS OF NLS-KDV SYSTEMS FOR PERIODIC FUNCTIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 66), o. 7, pp. 1. ISS: 17-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu login: ftp) GLOBAL WELL-POSEDESS
More informationASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF THE KORTEWEG-DE VRIES EQUATION POSED IN A QUARTER PLANE
ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF THE KORTEWEG-DE VRIES EQUATION POSED IN A QUARTER PLANE F. LINARES AND A. F. PAZOTO Abstract. The purpose of this work is to study the exponential stabilization of the Korteweg-de
More informationMATH 220: MIDTERM OCTOBER 29, 2015
MATH 22: MIDTERM OCTOBER 29, 25 This is a closed book, closed notes, no electronic devices exam. There are 5 problems. Solve Problems -3 and one of Problems 4 and 5. Write your solutions to problems and
More informationTwo dimensional exterior mixed problem for semilinear damped wave equations
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 31 (25) 366 377 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Two dimensional exterior mixed problem for semilinear damped wave equations Ryo Ikehata 1 Department of Mathematics, Graduate School of
More informationFourier Transform & Sobolev Spaces
Fourier Transform & Sobolev Spaces Michael Reiter, Arthur Schuster Summer Term 2008 Abstract We introduce the concept of weak derivative that allows us to define new interesting Hilbert spaces the Sobolev
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ap] 28 Oct 2005
arxiv:math/050643v [math.ap] 28 Oct 2005 A remark on asymptotic completeness for the critical nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation Hans Lindblad and Avy Soffer University of California at San Diego and Rutgers
More informationRANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER
RANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER. Quasilinear problems In general, one consider the following trichotomy for nonlinear PDEs: A semilinear problem is a problem where the highest-order terms appears linearly
More informationL p -boundedness of the Hilbert transform
L p -boundedness of the Hilbert transform Kunal Narayan Chaudhury Abstract The Hilbert transform is essentially the only singular operator in one dimension. This undoubtedly makes it one of the the most
More informationESTIMATES FOR ELLIPTIC HOMOGENIZATION PROBLEMS IN NONSMOOTH DOMAINS. Zhongwei Shen
W,p ESTIMATES FOR ELLIPTIC HOMOGENIZATION PROBLEMS IN NONSMOOTH DOMAINS Zhongwei Shen Abstract. Let L = div`a` x, > be a family of second order elliptic operators with real, symmetric coefficients on a
More informationA BILINEAR ESTIMATE WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE KdV EQUATION
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 9, Number 2, April 996 A BILINEAR ESTIMATE WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE KdV EQUATION CARLOS E. KENIG, GUSTAVO PONCE, AND LUIS VEGA. Introduction In this
More informationSHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES. 1. Introduction
SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES GILES AUCHMUTY Abstract. This paper describes sharp inequalities for the trace of Sobolev functions on the boundary of a bounded region R N. The inequalities bound (semi-)norms
More informationRemarks on the blow-up criterion of the 3D Euler equations
Remarks on the blow-up criterion of the 3D Euler equations Dongho Chae Department of Mathematics Sungkyunkwan University Suwon 44-746, Korea e-mail : chae@skku.edu Abstract In this note we prove that the
More informationSOLUTION OF THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH A VARIATIONAL METHOD. 1. Dirichlet integral
SOLUTION OF THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH A VARIATIONAL METHOD CRISTIAN E. GUTIÉRREZ FEBRUARY 3, 29. Dirichlet integral Let f C( ) with open and bounded. Let H = {u C ( ) : u = f on } and D(u) = Du(x) 2 dx.
More informationLECTURE NOTES : INTRODUCTION TO DISPERSIVE PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
LECTURE NOTES : INTRODUCTION TO DISPERSIVE PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS NIKOLAOS TZIRAKIS Abstract. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a short and accessible introduction to the modern theory of
More informationComplex geometrical optics solutions for Lipschitz conductivities
Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 19 (2003), 57 72 Complex geometrical optics solutions for Lipschitz conductivities Lassi Päivärinta, Alexander Panchenko and Gunther Uhlmann Abstract We prove the existence of
More informationOn stable inversion of the attenuated Radon transform with half data Jan Boman. We shall consider weighted Radon transforms of the form
On stable inversion of the attenuated Radon transform with half data Jan Boman We shall consider weighted Radon transforms of the form R ρ f(l) = f(x)ρ(x, L)ds, L where ρ is a given smooth, positive weight
More informationPartial Differential Equations, 2nd Edition, L.C.Evans The Calculus of Variations
Partial Differential Equations, 2nd Edition, L.C.Evans Chapter 8 The Calculus of Variations Yung-Hsiang Huang 2018.03.25 Notation: denotes a bounded smooth, open subset of R n. All given functions are
More informationMath 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan
Math 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan 15 Heat with a source So far we considered homogeneous wave and heat equations and the associated initial value problems on the whole line, as
More informationSharp blow-up criteria for the Davey-Stewartson system in R 3
Dynamics of PDE, Vol.8, No., 9-60, 011 Sharp blow-up criteria for the Davey-Stewartson system in R Jian Zhang Shihui Zhu Communicated by Y. Charles Li, received October 7, 010. Abstract. In this paper,
More informationFourier Series. 1. Review of Linear Algebra
Fourier Series In this section we give a short introduction to Fourier Analysis. If you are interested in Fourier analysis and would like to know more detail, I highly recommend the following book: Fourier
More informationA PHYSICAL SPACE PROOF OF THE BILINEAR STRICHARTZ AND LOCAL SMOOTHING ESTIMATES FOR THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
A PHYSICAL SPACE PROOF OF THE BILINEAR STRICHARTZ AND LOCAL SMOOTHING ESTIMATES FOR THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION TERENCE TAO Abstract. Let d 1, and let u, v : R R d C be Schwartz space solutions to the Schrödinger
More informationSCATTERING FOR THE NON-RADIAL 3D CUBIC NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
SCATTERING FOR THE NON-RADIAL 3D CUBIC NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION THOMAS DUYCKAERTS, JUSTIN HOLMER, AND SVETLANA ROUDENKO Abstract. Scattering of radial H 1 solutions to the 3D focusing cubic nonlinear
More informationPseudo-Poincaré Inequalities and Applications to Sobolev Inequalities
Pseudo-Poincaré Inequalities and Applications to Sobolev Inequalities Laurent Saloff-Coste Abstract Most smoothing procedures are via averaging. Pseudo-Poincaré inequalities give a basic L p -norm control
More information1-D cubic NLS with several Diracs as initial data and consequences
1-D cubic NLS with several Diracs as initial data and consequences Valeria Banica (Univ. Pierre et Marie Curie) joint work with Luis Vega (BCAM) Roma, September 2017 1/20 Plan of the talk The 1-D cubic
More informationTHE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n
THE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n BAISHENG YAN Abstract. We present an elementary L 2 -Hodge theory on whole R n based on the minimization principle of the calculus of variations and some
More informationDissipative quasi-geostrophic equations with L p data
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. (), No. 56, pp. 3. ISSN: 7-669. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu (login: ftp) Dissipative quasi-geostrophic
More informationJUHA KINNUNEN. Harmonic Analysis
JUHA KINNUNEN Harmonic Analysis Department of Mathematics and Systems Analysis, Aalto University 27 Contents Calderón-Zygmund decomposition. Dyadic subcubes of a cube.........................2 Dyadic cubes
More informationEXISTENCE OF THREE WEAK SOLUTIONS FOR A QUASILINEAR DIRICHLET PROBLEM. Saeid Shokooh and Ghasem A. Afrouzi. 1. Introduction
MATEMATIČKI VESNIK MATEMATIQKI VESNIK 69 4 (217 271 28 December 217 research paper originalni nauqni rad EXISTENCE OF THREE WEAK SOLUTIONS FOR A QUASILINEAR DIRICHLET PROBLEM Saeid Shokooh and Ghasem A.
More informationChapter One. The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity
Chapter One The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity Our story begins with a classical situation: convolution with homogeneous, Calderón- Zygmund ( kernels on R n. Let S n 1 R n denote the unit sphere
More informationPERSISTENCE PROPERTIES AND UNIQUE CONTINUATION OF SOLUTIONS OF THE CAMASSA-HOLM EQUATION
PERSISTENCE PROPERTIES AND UNIQUE CONTINUATION OF SOLUTIONS OF THE CAMASSA-HOLM EQUATION A. ALEXANDROU HIMONAS, GERARD MISIO LEK, GUSTAVO PONCE, AND YONG ZHOU Abstract. It is shown that a strong solution
More informationLecture Notes on PDEs
Lecture Notes on PDEs Alberto Bressan February 26, 2012 1 Elliptic equations Let IR n be a bounded open set Given measurable functions a ij, b i, c : IR, consider the linear, second order differential
More informationRegularity of Weak Solution to Parabolic Fractional p-laplacian
Regularity of Weak Solution to Parabolic Fractional p-laplacian Lan Tang at BCAM Seminar July 18th, 2012 Table of contents 1 1. Introduction 1.1. Background 1.2. Some Classical Results for Local Case 2
More informationUniqueness of ground state solutions of non-local equations in R N
Uniqueness of ground state solutions of non-local equations in R N Rupert L. Frank Department of Mathematics Princeton University Joint work with Enno Lenzmann and Luis Silvestre Uniqueness and non-degeneracy
More informationP(E t, Ω)dt, (2) 4t has an advantage with respect. to the compactly supported mollifiers, i.e., the function W (t)f satisfies a semigroup law:
Introduction Functions of bounded variation, usually denoted by BV, have had and have an important role in several problems of calculus of variations. The main features that make BV functions suitable
More informationNecessary Conditions and Sufficient Conditions for Global Existence in the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation
Necessary Conditions and Sufficient Conditions for Global Existence in the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation Pascal Bégout aboratoire Jacques-ouis ions Université Pierre et Marie Curie Boîte Courrier 187,
More informationOPTIMAL CONVERGENCE RATES FOR THE COMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS WITH POTENTIAL FORCES
OPTIMAL CONVERGENCE RATES FOR THE COMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS WITH POTENTIAL FORCES RENJUN DUAN Department of Mathematics, City University of Hong Kong 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong,
More informationDiffusion on the half-line. The Dirichlet problem
Diffusion on the half-line The Dirichlet problem Consider the initial boundary value problem (IBVP) on the half line (, ): v t kv xx = v(x, ) = φ(x) v(, t) =. The solution will be obtained by the reflection
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 11 Apr 2011
THE RADIAL DEFOCUSING ENERGY-SUPERCRITICAL CUBIC NONLINEAR WAVE EQUATION IN R +5 arxiv:04.2002v [math.ap] Apr 20 AYNUR BULUT Abstract. In this work, we consider the energy-supercritical defocusing cubic
More informationM ath. Res. Lett. 15 (2008), no. 6, c International Press 2008 SCATTERING FOR THE NON-RADIAL 3D CUBIC NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
M ath. Res. Lett. 15 (2008), no. 6, 1233 1250 c International Press 2008 SCATTERING FOR THE NON-RADIAL 3D CUBIC NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION Thomas Duyckaerts, Justin Holmer, and Svetlana Roudenko Abstract.
More informationOn the Asymptotic Behavior of Large Radial Data for a Focusing Non-Linear Schrödinger Equation
Dynamics of PDE, Vol.1, No.1, 1-47, 2004 On the Asymptotic Behavior of Large adial Data for a Focusing Non-Linear Schrödinger Equation Terence Tao Communicated by Charles Li, received December 15, 2003.
More informationPartial Differential Equations, 2nd Edition, L.C.Evans Chapter 5 Sobolev Spaces
Partial Differential Equations, nd Edition, L.C.Evans Chapter 5 Sobolev Spaces Shih-Hsin Chen, Yung-Hsiang Huang 7.8.3 Abstract In these exercises always denote an open set of with smooth boundary. As
More informationRegularity of the density for the stochastic heat equation
Regularity of the density for the stochastic heat equation Carl Mueller 1 Department of Mathematics University of Rochester Rochester, NY 15627 USA email: cmlr@math.rochester.edu David Nualart 2 Department
More informationThe Dirichlet s P rinciple. In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation:
Oct. 1 The Dirichlet s P rinciple In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation: 1. Dirichlet s Principle. u = in, u = g on. ( 1 ) If we multiply
More informationThe Navier Stokes Equations for Incompressible Flows: Solution Properties at Potential Blow Up Times
The Navier Stokes Equations for Incompressible Flows: Solution Properties at Potential Blow Up Times Jens Lorenz Department of Mathematics and Statistics, UNM, Albuquerque, NM 873 Paulo Zingano Dept. De
More informationAn Operator Theoretical Approach to Nonlocal Differential Equations
An Operator Theoretical Approach to Nonlocal Differential Equations Joshua Lee Padgett Department of Mathematics and Statistics Texas Tech University Analysis Seminar November 27, 2017 Joshua Lee Padgett
More informationOn some nonlinear parabolic equation involving variable exponents
On some nonlinear parabolic equation involving variable exponents Goro Akagi (Kobe University, Japan) Based on a joint work with Giulio Schimperna (Pavia Univ., Italy) Workshop DIMO-2013 Diffuse Interface
More informationVariational Theory of Solitons for a Higher Order Generalized Camassa-Holm Equation
International Journal of Mathematical Analysis Vol. 11, 2017, no. 21, 1007-1018 HIKAI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com https://doi.org/10.12988/ijma.2017.710141 Variational Theory of Solitons for a Higher Order Generalized
More informationTHE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS
THE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS OGNJEN MILATOVIC Abstract. We consider H V = M +V, where (M, g) is a Riemannian manifold (not necessarily
More informationRecent developments on the global behavior to critical nonlinear dispersive equations. Carlos E. Kenig
Recent developments on the global behavior to critical nonlinear dispersive equations Carlos E. Kenig In the last 25 years or so, there has been considerable interest in the study of non-linear partial
More information