q ENSDF analysis and utility codes II

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "q ENSDF analysis and utility codes II"

Felix Holt
6 years ago
Views:

1 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 q ENSDF analysis and utility codes II E transitions extension of BrIcc BrIccEmis T. Kibèdi (ANU)

2 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 Electric monopole (E) transitions electronpositron pairs g-rays internal conversion electrons L M K E transitions q J p J p q No transfer of angular momentum q No change in parity q Single photon emission is not allowed q For J E can be mixed with E2+M1 q Internal conversion electron emission q Internal pair emission (E>1.22 MeV) q Double photon emission (E1+E1; ~ Al18) E1 E

3 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 Electric monopole (E) transitions electronpositron pairs L M K g-rays Super-e (ANU) 2.1 Tesla solenoid Six Si(Li), 9 mm * 26 mm 2 internal conversion electrons Counts Fe 1153 E E2 148 E2 148 E2 Super-e (ANU) MeV (a) gamma-rays g-rays 2561 E 2882 E E E E E 2882 E E E2 (b) electrons electrons B=[.48 : 7.15] kg E E 2882 E E E E (c) pairs e + - e - pairs B=.63, 1.52, 1.8, 1.95, 2.7 kg 4291 E Transition energy K (Fe) [kev]

ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 Electric monopole (E) transitions electronpositron pairs L M K g-rays internal conversion electrons Counts 1 7 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 54 Fe 1153

4 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 Electric monopole (E) transitions electronpositron pairs L M K g-rays internal conversion electrons Counts Fe 1153 E E2 148 E2 148 E MeV 2561 E 2882 E E E E E 2882 E E E2 W PF /W K (a) gamma-rays g-rays (b) electrons electrons B=[.48 : 7.15] kg 4291 E E E 2882 E E E2 (c) pairs e + - e - pairs B=.63, 1.52, 1.8, 1.95, 2.7 kg 4291 E Transition energy K (Fe) [kev]

5 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 Electric monopole (E) transitions E2 E2 + E Absolute E λ E = 1 transition rate = λ τ )' E + λ )' E '( t = ρ, E Ω )' + Ω / Monopole matrix element (R=r o A 1/3 ) ρ E f M(E) i er, Reduced E transition probability B(E)= ρ, E e, R 8 How to extract r(e) and B(E)? Counts Fe 1153 E E2 148 E2 148 E MeV 2561 E 2882 E E E E E 2882 E E E2 W PF /W K (a) gamma-rays g-rays (b) electrons electrons B=[.48 : 7.15] kg E E 2882 E E E2 Transition energy K (Fe) [kev] 4291 E (c) pairs e + - e - pairs B=.63, 1.52, 1.8, 1.95, 2.7 kg 4291 E

6 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 Electric monopole (E) transitions E2 E2 + E Absolute E λ E = 1 transition rate = λ τ )' E + λ )' E '( ρ E t = ρ, E Ω )' + Ω / Monopole matrix element (R=r o A 1/3 ) f M(E) i er, Reduced E transition probability B(E)= ρ, E e, R 8 How to extract r(e) and B(E)? E/E2 Mixing ratio q :, E/E2 = I :(E) I : (E2) q 2 K(E/E2) can be determined from q CE and/or PF intensity, E2: Ig & a K q Use ICC and W(E) values K-shell intensities from other measurements q, : E/E2 = I /(E) I / (E2) Ω :(E) Ω / (E) α /(E2) α : (E2) X-factor - definition X E/E2 = B(E) B(E2) = ρ, E e, R 8 /B(E2) X-factor - experiment X E/E2 = G A 8/I q :, α : Ω : E J K (MeV) Experimental Monopole matrix element ρ, E = q :, E/E2 α :(E2) Ω : (E) λ J(E2)

7 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 Electric monopole (E) transitions E2 + t E2 E 1985Ze3 82KR 82RB B+ DECAY ( M) 1983ME8 3NDS KR L KR E KRS E EAV= $CK= $CL= $CM+= KR G ß Should be E2 82KR G 1488 E 6.2E-6 6 B 82KRS G K/K+L+=.76$ L/K+L+=.7 82KR CG CEK(1488)/CEK(1475)=.31 3; 82KR2CG CEK(1488)=4.7E-6 5 per 1 82RB (1.273 M) Ducas (1985Ze3).

8 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216

9 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 Electric monopole (E) transitions 25Ki2 82KR L ENSDF 82KR E KRS E EAV= $CK= $CL= $CM+= KR G E2 82KR G 1488 E 6.2E-6 6 B 82KRS G K/K+L+=.76$ L/K+L+=.7 82KR2 G MR2K(E/E2)=.87 8$ 82KR CG CEK(1488)/CEK(1475)=.31 3; 82KR2CG CEK(1488)=4.7E-6 5 per 1 82RB (1.273 M) decays (1985Ze3). 82KR CG MR2K(E/E2)$ from 1985Ze3 82KR CG X(E/E2)= (1985Ze3) 82KR CG RHO(E)= (1985Ze3)

10 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 Mixed E+E2+M1 transitions 2 + t As for pure E, but MR(E2/M1) also needed E2 E+E2+M1 Conversion coefficient for atomic shell/pf i α M (exp) = α M M1 + (1 + q M, )δ, α M E2 1 + δ, X-factor - experiment X E/E2 = G A 8/I q :, α : Ω : E J K (MeV) Experimental Monopole matrix element E/E2 Mixing ratio q :, E/E2 = I :(E) I : (E2) From a i (exp) using new BrIccMixing ρ, E = q :, E/E2 α :(E2) Ω : (E) λ J(E2)

ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 New W(E) tables W i (E) calculations: K, L1, L2, M1, M2, N1, N2 with G. Gosselin, V. Meot, M. Pascal (CEA, France) CATAR (Pauli and Raff (Comp. Phys.

11 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 New W(E) tables W i (E) calculations: K, L1, L2, M1, M2, N1, N2 with G. Gosselin, V. Meot, M. Pascal (CEA, France) CATAR (Pauli and Raff (Comp. Phys. Comm. 9 (1975) 392). Modified screening function reduces difference (A.E. Stuchbery, ANU) Pair Formation Total as well double differential for pair conversion measurements (T.K. Eriksen, ANU) R[Ω(E; Exp:Theor)] [%] LWM = -5.5(17)% 16O 649 K/IPF 1963Le6 4Ca 3353 K/IPF 1962Ne2 42Ca 1837 K/IPF 1961Be19 54Fe 2561 K/IPF 1986Pa19 6Ni 2285 K/IPF 1986Pa19 64Zn 191 K/IPF 1986Pa19 7Ge 237 K/IPF 1986Pa19 72Ge 69 K/LMNO 1962Ne2 72Ge 69 K/L 1974Dr2 72Se 937 K/L 1974Dr2 98Sr 215 K/L 198Sc13 9Zr 1761 K/LMNO 1962Ne2 9Zr 1761 K/IPF 1962Ne2 9Zr 1761 K/IPF 1986Pa19 98Zr 854 K/L 1975Kh5 98Mo 735 K/L 1975Kh5 1Mo 695 K/L 1975Kh5 12Pd 1593 K/L 1987Fa7 114Cd 1135 K/LM 1962Gr22 114Cd 136 K/L 1966Ba1 114Cd 136 K/LM 1962Gr22 124Te 1883 K/L 1986Su11 124Te 1883 K/M 1986Su11 138Ce 1477 K/LM 1971Af5 14Ce 194 K/L 1958Dz1 14Ce 194 K/L 1959Dz1 14Ce 194 K/L 1962Ba57 14Ce 194 K/L 1967Ka12 14Ce 194 K/L 1991Ch5 14Ce 194 L/M 1962Ba57 14Ce 194 K/LM 1964Hi3 14Ce 194 K/LMN 1968Ab17 14Ce 194 K/MN 1991Ch5 142Nd 2219 K/L 1969Ar24 146Gd 3639 K/L 1987Ya13 146Gd 3639 L/M 1987Ya13 152Gd 432 K/L 196Fr6 152Gd 432 K/L 1975Sc32 152Gd 615 K/L 1967Ma29 152Gd 615 K/L 1975Sc32 154Gd 681 K/L 1987Sa41 154Gd 681 M/NO 1987Sa41 156Gd 149 K/L 1964Pe17 156Gd 149 K/L 1974Sc3 172Hf 1335 K/L 1973Ca1 176Hf 1293 K/L 1971Be1 178Hf 1199 K/L 1971Oh3 178Hf 1199 K/L 1972Gi5 178Hf 1199 K/L 1974Ha63 178Hf 1444 K/L 1972Gi5 178Hf 1444 K/L 1974Ha63 178Hf 1444 K/M 1974Ha63 178W 1294 K/L 21Ki1 174Os 546 K/L 1994Ki1 176Os 61 K/L 1994Ki1 178Pt 421 K/L 1999Da18 182Pt 499 K/L 1974Ca28 182Pt 499 K/L 1999Da18 194Pt 1479 K/L 197Ag5 186Hg 523 K/L 1977Co21 188Hg 825 K/L 1984Co17 188Pb 591 K/L 1999Le61 188Pb 725 K/L 1999Le61 192Pb 769 K/L 1987Va9,199Tr1 194Pb 931 K/L 1987Va9,199Tr1 196Pb 1143 K/L 1987Va9,199Tr1 196Pb 1698 K/L 1987Va9,199Tr1 198Pb 1735 K/L 1987Va9,199T11 22Pb 1862 K/L 1986Ka7,199Tr1 22Pb 2159 K/L 1986Ka7,199Tr1 24Pb 1583 K/L 1986Ka7,199Tr1 26Pb 1166 K/L 1977Dr8 26Pb 1166 K/L 199Tr1 28Pb 487 K/L 1987Ju6,199Tr1 28Pb 487 K/L 1987Ju6,199Tr1 28Pb 5241 K/L 1987Ju6,199Tr1 28Po 1272 K/L 197Go9 28Po 1272 K/L 1985Ra21,199Tr1 214Po 1416 K/L 196Lu7 244Cm 985 K/L1 1984Ho2 244Cm 985 K/M1 1984Ho2 246Cm 1175 K/L 1976Mu3

12 ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 BrIcc V3. q Z extended to 126 q New W(E) tables for K, L1, L2, M1, M2 shells and PF for Z=6-1 q NS_Lib library to parse validate ENSDF records q Monte Carlo propagation of uncertainties Technical Meeting on Improvement of Codes used for Nuclear Structure and Decay Data Evaluations, IAEA, 1-13 June 214 and 5-8 October 215

The Auger effect Pierre Auger Lise Meitner P. Auger, C.R.A.S. 177 (1923) 169-171.

the electronic system of the excited atom. The drop of a more peripheral electron on that level is accompanied by the emission of a characteristic radiation quantum.

.. The repetition of that process must lead to the production of a fourth order ray; and I in-deed believe I have observed such rays in the case of [gaseous] iodine.

13 The Auger effect Pierre Auger Lise Meitner P. Auger, C.R.A.S. 177 (1923) : Pierre Victor Auger ( ) When the first [atomic] electron leaves [the atom, ejected by an incident X-ray], as a secondary b-ray, there is a vacancy left in the electronic system of the excited atom. The drop of a more peripheral electron on that level is accompanied by the emission of a characteristic radiation quantum. This quantum may be absorbed in the atom itself, and produce, at the expense of the peripheral levels [the outer electronic shells], a tertiary b-ray... The repetition of that process must lead to the production of a fourth order ray; and I in-deed believe I have observed such rays in the case of [gaseous] iodine. Lise Meitner ( ) Auger electrons and X-rays are part of the radiations emitted in nuclear decay! Not in ENSDF First multi-electron tracks from photoionization seen in a cloud chamber. P. Auger Journal de Physique et le Radium, 6 (1925) 25. ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216

to the DNA Which Isotope? q Number of electrons per decay q Ratio of X & g vs. e- & b q Physical vs.

14 The biological effect of Auger electrons Interaction of ionizing radiation: q Spectrum of energy loss q Generation of secondary electrons q Low energy electrons are the ideal tool q Auger electrons from radioisotopes decay at close proximity to the DNA Which Isotope? q Number of electrons per decay q Ratio of X & g vs. e- & b q Physical vs. effective half life q Suitable radiochemistry Physics input to dose calculations: q Energy loss q Radiation spectra ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216

15 BrIccEmis Initial vacancy creation L K Electron capture g-radiation to monitor location 1.48 ns 3/ M1+E d 5/ I Q EC = % 5.4 A X N + e = A X N+1 + n e Z Z-1 stable 1/ Te ENSDF - Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File g-ray Internal conversion L K 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

16 Electron capture L K Electron capture 1.48 ns 3/ M1+E d 5/ I Q EC = % 5.4 A X N + e = A X N+1 + n e Z Z-1 stable 1/ Te Electron capture rates P K +P L +P M +P N +P O =1 E. Schonfeld, PTB (1995) 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

Internal conversion Conversion coefficient = N(e - )/N(g) 1/2 7/2+.21 142.628 M4 2.1726 E3 1 14.511 M1+E2 142.6833 14.518 6.1 h.19 ns 9/2+ 99 43 Tc 2.

17 Internal conversion Conversion coefficient = N(e - )/N(g) 1/2 7/ M E M1+E h.19 ns 9/ Tc y g-ray Internal conversion e - q ICC ~1.3% accurate q Z=5-11; 1-6 kev; E, E1-E5, M1-M5 q All subshells L K T. Kibedi, et al, NIM Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A589 (28) Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

18 Propagation of the vacancies q X-ray or Auger electron emission to fill vacancy O 1,2,3 N 4,5 N 2,3 N 1 M 4,5 M 3 M 2 M 1 L 3 L 2 L 1 A A A A A A A X A A A A X A A q Multi step, stochastic process; Monte Carlo q Transition energies and transition probabilities are needed for every propagation step q Transition energies from Dirac-Fock atomic model v RAINE code (Band 22) No QED or Breit corrections q Transition rates from EADL (Perkins 1991) v Calculated for single initial vacancies v No shaking or double Auger process q Krause-Carlson correction to transition rates to take into account multiple vacancies 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

19 Propagation of the vacancies O 1,2,3 N 4,5 N 2,3 N 1 M 4,5 M 3 M 2 M 1 L 3 L 2 L 1 K q X-ray or Auger electron emission to fill vacancy q Multi step, stochastic process; Monte Carlo q Transition energies and transition probabilities are needed for every propagation step q Transition energies from Dirac-Fock atomic model v RAINE code (Band 22) No QED or Breit corrections q Transition rates from EADL (Perkins 1991) v Calculated for single initial vacancies v No shaking or double Auger process q Krause-Carlson correction to transition rates to take into account multiple vacancies q STOP: Vacancy in valence shell / no transition is possible 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

20 Fast vs. slow neutralization O 1,2,3 N 4,5 N 2,3 N 1 M 4,5 M 3 M 2 M 1 L 3 L 2 L 1 q Is the atom ISOLATED or in CONDENSED PHASE? q Condensed phase: vacancies filled from environment (Charlton and Booz 1981, Humm 1984, Howell 1992) q Auger cascade very fast: 1 14 to 1 16 s q Neutralization is a slow process (Pomplun 212) q BrIccEmis: fast neutralization and option Correct treatment: condensed physics model K EC Relaxation Internal conversion Relaxation 1.48 ns stable 3/2+ 1/ M1+E Te d 5/ I Q EC = % Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

21 131 Cs EC Auger spectrum 7 6 L 3 M 4,5 M 4,5 131 Cs EC 131 Xe Experiment: Kovalik (1998) d 5/ Cs Q EC =352 5 Counts in 7 s L 3 M 1 M 3 L 3 M 2,3 M 3 L 3 M 1 M 4,5 L 3 M 2,3 M 4,5 L 1 M 1 M 4,5 L2 M4,5 M4,5 L 3 M 3 N 4,5 L 3 M 4,5 N 4,5 L 1 M 4,5 M 4,5 L 2 M 4,5 N 4,5 stable 3/ Xe 1% Energy (ev) 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

22 131 Cs EC Auger spectrum 7 6 L 3 M 4,5 M 4,5 131 Cs EC 131 Xe Experiment: Kovalik (1998) d 5/ Cs Q EC =352 5 Calculated: BrIccEmis Counts in 7 s L 3 M 1 M 3 L 3 M 2,3 M 3 L 3 M 1 M 4,5 L 3 M 2,3 M 4,5 M4,5 M4,5 L 1 M 1 M 4,5 L2 L 3 M 3 N 4,5 L 3 M 4,5 N 4,5 L 1 M 4,5 M 4,5 L 2 M 4,5 N 4,5 stable 3/ Xe 1% Energy (ev) 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

23 131 Cs EC Auger spectrum 7 6 L 3 M 4,5 M 4,5 131 Cs EC 131 Xe Experiment: Kovalik (1998) d 5/ Cs Q EC =352 Counts in 7 s L 3 M 1 M 3 L 3 M 2,3 M 3 L 3 M 1 M 4,5 L 3 M 2,3 M 4,5 Calculated: BrIccEmis M4,5 M4,5 MIRD Eckerman & Endo (27) L 1 M 1 M 4,5 L2 L 3 M 3 N 4,5 L 3 M 4,5 N 4,5 L 1 M 4,5 M 4,5 L 2 M 4,5 N 4,5 stable 3/ Xe 1% Energy (ev) 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

24 125 I - low energy Auger electron measurements Probability [a.u.] I EC Probability [a.u.] 1 X Experiment Pronschinske (215) AU-MNN 125 I 125 I -1 V on plate: DI = 11.8 pa atomic I plate at.1 mm monolayer Energy (ev) Energy (ev) Auger spectrum: 5-channel concentric hemispherical electron energy analyser Au metal film grounded 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

25 125 I - low energy Auger electron measurements Probability [a.u.] I EC Probability [a.u.] 1 X Experiment Pronschinske (215) AU-MNN 125 I -1 V on plate: DI = 11.8 pa atomic 125 I monolayer Six fold increase in E e < 1 ev I plate at.1 mm Energy (ev) Energy (ev) Au metal film grounded Tufts University, MA, USA 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

26 125 I - low energy Auger electron measurements Probability [a.u.] I EC Probability [a.u.] Energy (ev) 1 X 2 Experiment Pronschinske (215) AU-MNN Energy (ev) 125 I atomic 125 I monolayer Au metal film Six fold increase in E e < 1 ev Line <E> [ev] E. Pomplun et al, Radiat. Res. 111 (1987) 533. Yield/decay C-K MMX Aug-MXY C-K NNX Aug-NXY Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

27 125 I - low energy Auger electron measurements 1 125I EC MIRD (Eckerman-Endo, 27) Probability [a.u.] I EC Probability [a.u.] 1 X Experiment Pronschinske (215) AU-MNN Probability Probability [1/decay] [1/decay] BrIccEmis 2 (Lee 1 3 et al. 212) Energy (ev) Energy (ev) Isolated Condensed Energy [ev] 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

28 125 I - low energy Auger electron measurements 1 125I EC MIRD (Eckerman-Endo, 27) Probability [a.u.] I EC Probability [a.u.] 1 X Experiment Pronschinske (215) 1-4 Calculated - BrIccEmis isolated atom condensed phase 1-5 Scale: x1 Probability Probability [1/decay] [1/decay] BrIccEmis 2 (Lee 1 3 et al. 212) Energy (ev) Energy (ev) Correct treatment: condensed physics model! Isolated Condensed Energy [ev] 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

29 125 I - low energy Auger electron measurements 8 Probability [a.u.] I EC Probability [a.u.] 1 X Experiment Pronschinske (215) Calculated - BrIccEmis isolated atom condensed phase Scale: x1 Counts I EC 35K CE Experiment Casey and Albridge (1969) Calculated BrIccEmis Energy (ev) Energy (ev) Correct treatment: condensed physics model! Energy [ev] W.R. Casey, R.G. Albridge, Z. Phys. 219 (1969) Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

30 125 I - low energy Auger electron measurements Probability [a.u.] I EC Probability [a.u.] 1 X Experiment Pronschinske (215) Calculated - BrIccEmis isolated atom condensed phase Scale: x1 ANU Aug Energy (ev) Energy (ev) Correct treatment: condensed physics model! W.R. Casey, R.G. Albridge, Z. Phys. 219 (1969) Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

31 Charge state distribution of fission isomers 137 Te (Z=52) Rzaca-Urban, et al, Phys. Rev. C (29) Cumulative yield [arb.u.] Detector Ionic charge, Q Fission fragments 233 U Ti Ni Collaboration: Ulli Kӧster (ILL)& Grégoire Kessedjian (LPSC) LOHENGRIN mass separator ILL reactor Thermal flux ~ n/s/cm 2 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

32 Charge state distribution of fission isomers 141 Ba (Z=56) q 55. kev isomeric state decays in flight q Auger cascade increases ionization state by ~5 units of charge Dq=5.2 FWHM=6 calculated Collaboration: Ulli Kӧster (ILL) & Grégoire Kessedjian (LPSC) 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

33 99mTc Used for ~3M medical procedures every year below L-shell BE m Tc IT decay BrIccEmis (Lee et al. 212) Auger electrons 1 photon per decays! Intensity Intensity per ev per 1 ev per decays 1 decays K-total X-rays 1 1 L-total 1 1 M-total N-total Energy [kev] ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216

34 99mTc Used for ~3M medical procedures every year ## ELECTROMAGNETIC TRANSITIONS ================== # Trans Energy[keV] Prob.[per 1 decays] G (1) 88.8(2) K (17) L (19) M (4) N (6) G (15) 7.23E-9(11) M (11) N (16) G (11).238(4) K (16) L (3) M (6) # SIMULATED TOTAL ENERGY RELEASED PER DECAY======== # Trans Energy[keV] Gamma-Rays: CE electrons: X-rays: Auger electrons:.8358 Intensity Intensity per ev per 1 ev per decays 1 decays m Tc IT decay BrIccEmis (Lee et al. 212) Auger electrons K-total X-rays 1 1 L-total 1 1 M-total N-total Energy [kev] ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216

35 99mTc Used for ~3M medical procedures every year AUGER transition types: 417 # Energy # Trans Mean[keV] 95% Conf. range Prob.[per 1 decays] Auger_Tot.2362 [.8 : ] 3.538E+2 Auger_Ktot [ : ] 2.117E+ Auger_KLL [ : ] 1.496E+ Auger_KLX [ : ] 5.733E-1 Auger_KXY [ : ] 4.77E-2 Auger_Ltot [.35 : ] 1.249E+1 CK_LLM.53 [.55 :.652] 9.476E-1 CK_LLX.1386 [.146 :.3484] 8.894E-1 Auger_LMM [ : ] 9.219E+ Auger_LMX [2.927 : ] 1.381E+ Auger_LXY [ : ] 5.45E-2 Auger_Mtot.139 [.491 :.3198] 1.818E+2 CK_MMX.139 [.339 :.1544] 7.128E+1 Auger_MXY.1616 [.623 :.3318] 1.15E+2 Auger_Ntot.13 [.4 :.355] 1.574E+2 SCK_NNN.18 [.2 :.289] 7.152E+1 CK_NNX.148 [.1 :.433] 8.592E+1 New ENSDF card(s) to hold atomic radiations. Immediately before the P/N/G/L card Only for decay data sets ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 Intensity Intensity per ev per 1 ev per decays 1 decays m Tc IT decay BrIccEmis (Lee et al. 212) Auger electrons K-total X-rays 1 1 L-total 1 1 M-total N-total Energy [kev]

36 99mTc Used for ~3M medical procedures every year X-ray transition types: 5 # Energy # Trans Mean[keV] 95% Conf. range Prob.[per 1 decay] X-ray tot [.367 : ] 8.376E+ X-ray Ktot [ : ] 7.457E+ X-ray KL [ : ] 2.153E+ X-ray KL [ : ] 4.111E+ X-ray KM [ : ] 9.982E-1 X-ray KM [ : ] 3.43E-1 X-ray KM [ : ] 6.532E-1 X-ray KN [ : ] 1.94E-1 X-ray KN [ : ] 6.8E-2 X-ray KN [ : ] 1.257E-1 X-ray Ltot [ : ] 4.869E-1 X-ray Mtot.2616 [.1727 :.476] 1.16E-1 X-ray Ntot.351 [.278 :.43] 3.34E-1 New ENSDF card(s) to hold atomic radiations. Immediately before the P/N/G/L card Only for decay data sets ICTP-IAEA ENSDF workshop, Trieste, August 216 Intensity Intensity per ev per 1 ev per decays 1 decays m Tc IT decay BrIccEmis (Lee et al. 212) Auger electrons K-total X-rays 1 1 L-total 1 1 M-total N-total Energy [kev]

37 Summary and outlook Future plans q Atomic transitions energies and rates from Grasp2K/RATIP and MCDFGME (ANU-Malmo-Lisbon collaboration) q Low energy (1 ev to 4 kev) Auger electron measurements to benchmark calculations q Condensed phase physics input to incorporate environmental effects 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

38 Collaborators Australian National University, Australia Andrew Stuchbery Marteen Vos Kalman Robertson University NSW/ADFA, Australia Heiko Timmers Argonne National Laboratory, USA Filip Kondev Project funded for by the Australian Research Council, DP Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden Per Jönsson Jörgen Ekman University Surrey, UK Alan Nichols University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal José Manuel Pires Marques Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Hooshang Nikjoo Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Alois Kovalik Аnvar Inoyatov 23-Mar-216, 14 th IWRDD

Calculation of atomic radiations in nuclear decay BrIccEmis and beyond

Calculation of atomic radiations in nuclear decay BrIccEmis and beyond T. ibèdi, B.Q. Lee, A.E. Stuchbery,.A. Robinson in collaboration with F.G. ondev (ANL) Tibor ibèdi, Dep. of Nuclear Physics, Australian