HOOPERON A STATUS REPORT AFTER THE HIGGS. with M. Abdullah, A. DiFranzo, T. Tait, A. Rajaraman, A. Wijangco

Transcription

1 HEAVY HIDDEN HOOPERON A STATUS REPORT AFTER THE HIGGS Submitted to PRD [arxiv: ] Flip Tanedo with M Abdullah, A DiFranzo, T Tait, A Rajaraman, A Wijangco Santa Fe 2014 Workshop: LHC After The Higgs 4 July / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

2 ATLAS-CONF outline ANNIHILATION DIRECT DETECTION on shell COLLIDER 2 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

3 Some assumptions Dark Matter Exists & couples to the Standard Model Ω h 2 01 pb c σ ann v Assume: Dirac DM, thermal relic See, eg Fady Bishara s talk for non-thermal example 3 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

4 How Dark Matter talks to the Standard Model sm sm sm sm sm sm ANNIHILATION DIRECT DETECTION COLLIDER Ω h 2 Exceptions: eg SIMP Miracle ( ); DMdm ( ); Agashe, Cui, et al ( ) See talk by Yanou Cui 4 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

5 Light from Dark Matter DM coupling to SM induces γ interactions Parton shower & hadronization Adapted from D Zeppenfeld PITP05 Exceptions: eg RH neutrino portal, see Ian Shoemaker s talk 5 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

6 Light from Dark Matter: Shape Matters 40 GeV DM annihilating to SM pairs E Γ 2 dnγ de Γ b Τ Μ W g Extracted from Pythia via PPPC4DMID, Cirelli et al / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

7 Where to look: Galactic Center Gal S r Ct LOT OF D M 10 kpc FER M I Also look at dwarf spheroidals: m > 10 GeV for bb ( ) NASA/JPL-Caltech/ESO/R Hurt Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon / 47 7/47

8 The γ-ray excess molec gas Goodenough & Hooper ( , ), Hooper & Linden ( ), Abazajian et al ( , , ), Boyarsky et al ( ); Gordon & Macias ( ); Daylan et al ( ) + more recent model building papers 8 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

9 The Hooperon m = 40 GeV b Overall normalization set by present annihilation rate b E b = 40 GeV fits γ spectrum 10 GeV τ also fits σ b bv = 5 (15) cm 3 s 1 γ =112 ( ) γ =126 ( ) ρ r γ (1 + r α ) γ β α Same ballpark as thermal relic σ (if s-wave) Goodenough & Hooper ( , ), Hooper & Linden ( ), Abazajian et al ( , , ), Boyarskiy et al (1012:5839); Gordon & Macias ( ); Daylan et al ( ) + more recent model building papers 9 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

10 Some Recent Hooperon models Higgs Portal: Okada & Seto , Ipek et al EFT: Huang et al ; Alves et al Coy DM: Dolan et al Simplified Models: Berlin et al ; Izaguirre et al Flavored: Agrawal, Lin, et al ; Agrawal, Gemmler, et al On-Shell Mediator: Dolan et al ; FT, Rajaraman, et al ; ; Martin et al UV Models: Kyae & Park ; Berlin et al ; Agashe, Cui, et al ; Cheung et al ; Huang et al Also: see talks by Jong-Chul Park and Tongyan Lin 10 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

11 Systematic Uncertainties Background affects signal Signal affects background FERMI Diffuse BG FERMI - molecular gas map Multiple independent analyses, but all based on FERMI diffuse BG Images adapted from Abazajian et al / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

12 Signal Affects Background A simple toy example: Total Observed Events 12 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

13 Signal Affects Background A simple toy example: Background A Background B 12 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

14 Signal Affects Background A simple toy example: Background A Signal A Background B 12 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

15 Signal Affects Background A simple toy example: Signal B Background B Background A 12 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

16 Systematic Uncertainties Background affects signal Signal affects background FERMI Diffuse BG FERMI - molecular gas map Multiple independent analyses, but all based on FERMI diffuse BG Images adapted from Abazajian et al / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

17 Millisecond Pulsar Alternative Hooper et al , ; Abazajian et al , Wharton et al , Yuan et al , Mirabal nb: Hooper et al MSP LMXB MSP Partner star accretion NASA/CXC/MWeiss LMXB morphology is spot on degenerate with DM for γ-ray excess 13 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

18 ATLAS-CONF outline ANNIHILATION DIRECT DETECTION on shell COLLIDER 14 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

19 Contact Interactions Dark Matter Heavy sm Dirac fermion b quark b = b b b DM SM interaction parameterized by a single coupling Λ 2 O = 1 Λ 2 ( Γ ) ( bγb b ) Parameterization in Goodman et al ; see Alves et al for Hooperon fit 15 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

20 Contact Interactions are not preferred Generically, contact interactions tightly constrained Require: s-wave annihilation D2 ( γ 5 ) ( qq) D4 ( γ 5 ) ( qγ 5 q) D5 ( γ µ ) ( qγ µ q) D6 ( γ µ γ 5 ) ( qγ µ q) D7 ( γ µ ) ( qγ µ γ 5 q) D8 ( γ µ γ 5 ) ( qγ µ γ 5 q) D9 ( σ µν ) ( qσ µν q) D10 ( σ µν γ 5 ) ( qσ µν q) D12 ( γ 5 ) G µν G µν D14 ( γ 5 ) G Gµν µν See analysis in Alves et al for detailed analysis 16 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

21 Contact Interactions are not preferred Generically, contact interactions tightly constrained Require: s-wave annihilation D2 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 D12 D14 ( γ 5 ) ( qq) ( γ 5 ) ( qγ 5 q) ( γ µ ) ( qγ µ q) ( γ µ γ 5 ) ( qγ µ q) ( γ µ ) ( qγ µ γ 5 q) ( γ µ γ 5 ) ( qγ µ γ 5 q) ( σ µν ) ( qσ µν q) ( σ µν γ 5 ) ( qσ µν q) ( γ 5 ) G µν G µν ( γ 5 ) G Gµν µν Mono-jet Mono-jet LUX (SI direct detection) Related to D8 Related to D5 Mono-jet, XENON100 (SD) UV completion? UV completion? Spectrum Spectrum See analysis in Alves et al for detailed analysis 16 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

22 Contact Interactions are not preferred Generically, contact interactions tightly constrained Require: s-wave annihilation D2 100 ( γ 5 ) ( qq) Mono-jet D4 Contact Hooperon ( γ 5 ) ( qγ 5 q) (target) Mono-jet D5 ( γ µ ) ( qγ µ q) LUX (SI direct detection) D6 ( γ µ γ 5 ) ( qγ µ q) Related to D8 D7 ( γ µ ) ( qγ µ γ 5 q) Related to D5 D8 ruled out ( γ µ γ 5 ) ( qγ µ γ 5 q) Mono-jet, XENON100 (SD) D9 ( σ µν ) ( qσ µν q) UV completion? D10 50 ( σ µν γ 5 ) ( qσ µν q) UV completion? D12 ( γ 5 ) G µν G µν image Spectrum adapted from D14 ( γ 10 5 ) G Gµν µν Spectrum See analysis in Alves et al for detailed analysis D2 thermal relic D4 thermal relic LHC bound 16 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

23 Contact Interactions are not preferred Generically, contact interactions tightly constrained Require: s-wave annihilation D2 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 D12 D14 ( γ 5 ) ( qq) Mono-jet 10 ( γ ) ( qγ 5 q) Mono-jet thermal relic ( γ µ ) ( qγ µ q) LUX (SI direct detection) 10 ( γ - 27 µ γ 5 ) ( qγ µ q) Related to D8 ( γ µ ) ( qγ µ γ 5 q) Related to D5 ( γ 10 µ - 29 γ 5 ) ( qγ µ γ 5 q) Mono-jet, XENON100 (SD) ( σ µν ) ( qσ µν q) UV completion? 10 ( σ µν - 31 γ 5 ) ( qσ µν q) UV completion? ruled out ( γ 5 ) G µν G µν Spectrum image adapted from Alex Wijangco ( γ 5 ) G Gµν µν Spectrum CMS D8 bound CMS D5 bound XENON100 SD (D8) bound LUX SI (D5) bound See analysis in Alves et al for detailed analysis 16 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

24 Exceptions Contact O Exceptions: 1 Majorana DM: γ µ = 0 2 Tuning of chiral couplings (eg Zl + l ) 3 Non-decoupled mediator: m med < heavy Λ 2 b λ DM b b λ SM b 17 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

25 Simplified Models Renormalizable, capture physics of mediator ( ) sm neutral Dark Matter Mediator sm λ DM λ SM Dirac fermion b quark λ DM λ SM Simplest example: Coy Dark Matter Dolan et al Systematic studies: Chicago Perimeter / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

26 Simplified Models Simplified models describe the m med < decoupling regime See Berlin et al and Izaguirre et al for a detailed survey of off-shell Simplified Hooperons See Boehm et al for a prototype Model Elastic Near Future Reach? DM Mediator Interactions Number Scattering Direct LHC 1 Dirac Fermion Spin-0 5, ff SI (q/2m ) 2 (scalar) No Maybe 1 Majorana Fermion Spin-0 5, ff SI (q/2m ) 2 (scalar) No Maybe 2 Dirac Fermion Spin-0 5, f 5 f SD (q 2 /4mnm ) 2 Never Maybe 2 Majorana Fermion Spin-0 5, f 5 f SD (q 2 /4mnm ) 2 Never Maybe 3 Dirac Fermion Spin-1 µ, b µb SI loop (vector) Yes Maybe 4 Dirac Fermion Spin-1 µ, f µ 5 SD (q/2mn) f or Never Maybe SD (q/2m ) 5 Dirac Fermion Spin-1 µ 5, µ 5 f SD 1 Yes Maybe 5 Majorana Fermion Spin-1 µ 5, f µ 5 f SD 1 Yes Maybe 6 Complex Scalar Spin-0, f 5 f SD (q/2mn) 2 No Maybe 6 Real Scalar Spin-0 2, f 5 f SD (q/2mn) 2 No Maybe 6 Complex Vector Spin-0 B µb µ, f 5 f SD (q/2mn) 2 No Maybe 6 Real Vector Spin-0 BµB µ, f 5 f SD (q/2mn) 2 No Maybe 7 Dirac Fermion Spin-0 (t-ch) (1 ± 5 )b SI loop (vector) Yes Yes 7 Dirac Fermion Spin-1 (t-ch) µ(1 ± 5 )b SI loop (vector) Yes Yes 8 Complex Vector Spin-1/2 (t-ch) X µ µ (1 ± 5 )b SI loop (vector) Yes Yes 8 Real Vector Spin-1/2 (t-ch) Xµ µ (1 ± 5 )b SI loop (vector) Yes Yes Table from / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

27 Simplified Hooperons + on-shell mediators But: the m med < heavy regime also includes m med < m ie mediator is accessible as an on-shell annihilation mode b Can be dominant mode b Separates λ DM from λ SM on shell b b Admits limit λ SM λ DM Hides indirect detection signal from direct det & collider bounds Application to Hooperon: FT et al (this talk) See also Dolan et al and Martin et al Previously: axion portal (Nomura & Thaler, ), cascade annihilation (+ Mardon, Stolarski ) 20 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

28 On-Shell Simplified Models sm neutral sm neutral Dark Matter Mediator λ DM Dirac fermion φ, V sm λ SM b quark Annihilation, σv γ-ray excess, relic abundance Constraints direct detection, colliders Requirements: m V,φ > 2m b λ DM 1 λ SM 1 21 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

29 On-Shell Simplified Options Require: s-wave annihilation: Med S (P) V (A) S (P) V (A) l-wave p (p) s (s) p (s) p (p) m 80 GeV 80 GeV 120 GeV 120 GeV Further Requirements: 2m > 2m V 3m φ for a spin-1 mediator for a spin-0 mediator 22 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

30 Dominance over off-shell on shell λ dm 2 λ dm λ sm on shell λ dm 3 4π λ dm λ sm Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 23 / 47

31 Back-of-the-Envelope Astrophysics eg from Pythia dφ(b, l) = n σv b b de γ 8πm 2 dn γ dx ρ 2 (r gal (b, l, x)) de γ los Particle Physics m DM n (40 GeV) n=2(3) for spin-1(0) λ DM 035 (125) for spin-1(0) More final states requires smaller σv ann for signal flux m sets injection energy, larger for more final states 24 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

32 Boosted mediators m Χ 120 GeV m φ 15 GeV m φ 45 GeV m φ 55 GeV m φ 60 GeV m Χ 120 GeV m φ 15 GeV m φ 45 GeV m φ 55 GeV m φ 60 GeV The boost of the on-shell mediator shifts the primary (and hence photon) spectrum Top: 3φ Bot: 2V nb similar to Kaustubh Agashe s talk m Χ 80 GeV m V 15 GeV m V 30 GeV m V 55 GeV m V 60 GeV / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

33 Range of spectra For bin data D i and model spectrum S i : ( log Di log (λ 2n ) 2 dm S i ) goodness of fit = i log(02d i ) Ẉarning: This is not a 2 fit & these are not 1σ errors 26 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

34 Best fits m V [GeV] 2V 4b Fit m φ [GeV] 3φ 6b Fit m = 75 GeV m V = 29 GeV λ DM = 027 Br(V 2b)=100% m m = 110 GeV m φ = 20 GeV λ DM = 12 m 27 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

35 ATLAS-CONF outline ANNIHILATION DIRECT DETECTION on shell COLLIDER 28 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

36 Bounds on SM interactions sm sm sm sm sm sm ANNIHILATION DIRECT DETECTION COLLIDER Ω h 2 29 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

37 Bounds on SM interactions f med on shell N N f ANNIHILATION DIRECT DETECTION COLLIDER Ω h 2 29 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

38 Indirect: Antiprotons? [cm 3 / s] PAMELA bounds Einasto MED Antiproton Flux Constraints PAMELA p + bounds: currently not constraining Maybe AMS Einasto MIN Einasto MAX AMS-02 sensitivity thermal relic adapted from but large propagation uncertainty, still lots of wiggle room See talk by Jong-Chul Park ( ) Also: recently, presents stronger bounds from p +, e +, radio / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

39 Collider: mono-b See talk by Tongyan Lin, ( ) See Daylan et al (EFT), Izaguirre et al (simplified model) Mono-object analyses: UCI ( , , ), Fermilab ( , ), others λ φ SM 02 λ V SM 06 Conservative estimate: m q/m 3 λ DM λ SM s 1 Simplified model > EFT: Graesser, Shoemaker, et al ( , ); UCI ( ); Busoni et al ( ); Dolan, et al ( ) 31 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

40 Collider: search for the mediator Prototype: gauged U(1) B, bounds from LEP (Carone, Murayama) hep-ph/ Bound λ SM 1 See also Dobrescu & Yu , Dobrescu & Frugiuele See Queiroz & Shepherd , Burgess et al for mixing bounds 32 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

41 Collider: search for the mediator Open question: what about φ γγ? eg search for lepto-phobic, gauge-phobic Higgs at LHC? 95% CL upper limit σ(pp φ γγ) [pb] s=8 TeV, γγ m φ [GeV] Selection Efficiency Courtesy of D Whiteson 2γ with p T > 20 GeV and η < / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

42 Direct Detection LUX SI , XENON100 SD Mediator coupling to SM Λ SM Γ 5 1 Γ Μ Γ Μ Γ 5 Γ Μ Γ 5 Γ Μ Γ Μ Γ 5 Γ Μ Γ 5 Γ Μ Γ Μ γ 5 γ 5 is q 4 suppressed, no bound below λ SM < 4π 34 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

43 Viability of a Thermal Relic 2 2 Hooperon: σv in right ballpark for thermal relic (s-wave) Ω h cm 3 /s σv ann ( Ω h 2) obs = n SM particles has n larger σv : dφ(b, l) = n σv ann de γ 8πm 2 dn γ dx ρ 2 (r gal (b, l, x)) de γ los m 2 n 2 (40 GeV) 2 σv ann n σ b bv So: can we still get Ω h 2 from freeze-out? 35 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

44 Vector Mediator as Thermal Relic ρ(r) = ρ r γ rα r 0 r α 0 γ β α σ b bv = (15) cm 3 s 1 γ =126 ( ) γ =112 ( ) b b Ballpark of thermal relic σ σv ann between cm 3 s 1 Vector mediator works for Dirac 36 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

45 Spin-0 Mediator as Thermal Relic Scalar mediator is more difficult, 1 σv ann = 3 σv b b 2 p-wave irreducible contributions on shell λ dm xf 4π 3 on shell Is there any way to same thermal freeze out? 37 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

46 Millisecond Pulsar Partial Alternative? Hooper et al , ; Abazajian et al , Wharton et al , Yuan et al , Mirabal nb: Hooper et al MSP LMXB MSP Partner star NASA/CXC/MWeiss accretion LMXB morphology is spot on degenerate with DM for γ-ray excess 38 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

47 ATLAS-CONF outline ANNIHILATION DIRECT DETECTION on shell COLLIDER 39 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

48 Model Building Spin-1 Mediator Prototype is gauged U(1) B, expect universal coupling to quarks Exception? ρ-like states in composite Higgs? (Contino et al ) Spin-0 Mediator L φ-sm = λ uy u ij Λ φh Qu R + λ dy d ij Λ φ H Qd R + λ lyij l Λ φ H Ll R Recent UV completion through Higgs-portal -portal: Ipek et al Dark Matter Mediator Higgs sm Exception? φ 1 φ 2 is s-wave on-shell (Nomura & Thaler ) See also Agrawal et al for flavored DM 40 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

49 Pre-conclusion: on-shell mediators med Mass [gev] Interaction Coupling spin m m mes DM SM λ dm λ sm Relic? spin γ < 008 MSP? γ 5 γ 5 < 002 spin γ µ γ µ 018 < 10 6 γ = 13 γ µ γ 5 γ µ γ 5 < 0004 γ µ γ 5 γ µ < 0006 γ µ γ µ γ 5 < 002 spin-1 assumes universal coupling to quarks, spin-0 is b-philic * est mono-b projected, all other bounds from direct detection Combined with on-shell mediators, there is a range of Hooperon masses (both lighter and heavier than usual) Framework to parametrically separate indirect signal from direct/collider bounds 41 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

50 Moving forward: Now what? FERMI analysis in progress! What to think about now? I Bounds See Jong-Chul s talk eg last week, Bringmann et al II Morphology eg black hole distortion of DM profile in dwarfs ( ) and the galactic center ( ) III Spectrum Generalize DM templates; feeds into fit 42 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

51 Spectrum Recall: signal spectrum matters for fit Background A Signal A Background B Full astrophysical fit for non-standard DM decays ( 4, 6 SM, tc) In progress, FT with Nic Canac Left image adapted from Abazajian et al / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

52 Playing with the Spectrum See FT et al , Martin et al , and FT work in progress 6g 2 [ τ τ (85%) or b b (15%) ] E 2 γdnγ/deγ E 2 γdnγ/deγ E γ [GeV] E γ [GeV] Data: b b residual, for comparison only Need to re-fit! Can bend spectra (eg interpolate between τ and b spectra) Mixture with hard spectra (leptons) can access DM masses below conventional Hooperon 44 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

53 Self-Interacting Dark Matter? This framework contains all the pieces for SIDM See talk by Ian Shoemaker E 2 dn Γ de Γ GeV cm 2 s q, m Χ 27 GeV 2b GCE 4g, m Χ 27 GeV m V = 1 GeV, preliminary only Non-trivial fit: small scale structure sets m V light and m (m V ) dn γ/de γ is more subtle near m V Λ QCD Figure from Tulin et al Work in progress with Hai-Bo Yu 45 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

54 Electron spectrum? γ spectrum from electrons is usually too hard But ( ): Inverse Compton spectrum from electrons injected 1 Myr ago from a source of E = erg for different diffusion indices 46 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

55 Conclusion Diffuse γ-ray Excess: maybe DM, maybe pulsars Comprehensive simplified model analyses for 2 SM On-shell mediators separate indirect from direct/collider searches Think about morphology and spectrum Official FERMI analysis soon! Independent of Pass 7 FERMI diffuse background used by other groups Look for: spectrum, systematic errors 47 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

56 Back-up Slides (for posting to the web) 47 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

57 Spin-1: b-philic vs universal q m V [GeV] 2V 4b Fit m V [GeV] 2V 4q Fit m = 75 GeV m V = 29 GeV λ DM = 027 Br(V 2b)=100% m m = 45 GeV m φ = 14 GeV λ DM = 18 Cascade smears spectrum m 47 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

58 Dominance over off-shell on shell λ dm 2 λ dm λ sm on shell λ dm 3 4π λ dm λ sm Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47 / 47

59 Indirect: on-shell contamination Fit Fit λ SM + λ SM + m [GeV] m [GeV] b-philic vector universal vector 47 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47

60 Indirect: on-shell contamination Fit λ SM + m [GeV] 47 / Flip Tanedo fliptanedo@uciedu Heavy Hidden Hooperon /47 47