Sta$s$cs, Systema$cs and Run Phases
|
|
- Camron Hudson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Sta$s$cs, Systema$cs and Run Phases DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst! September, 2014 Kent Paschke University of Virginia
2 α Rates, Noise Budget, and Sta$s$cal Precision o CM Acceptance Moller θ [rad] 2 mrad 23 mrad ep Noise Budget Parameter Noise (75 μa) Noise (60 μa) Sta$s$cal Width (0.5 ms) ~79 ppm ~89 ppm Target Density FluctuaXon 26 ppm 21 ppm Beam Intensity ResoluXon ppm ppm Beam PosiXon Noise 7 ppm 7 ppm Detector ResoluXon (25%) 3.1% 3.1% Electronics Noise ppm ppm Measured Width 88 ppm 95 ppm High Rate, high precision 150 cm cell, up to 85 μa 38% 70% (CM) 75 μa: 144 GHz Mollers, 159 GHz total Quiet JLab beam, high- flow target, and low- noise electronics keeps precision high A expt = p pair N N pair = (8.3x 7 ) N days A PV 1 P b 1 (1 f bkgd ) A expt A PV ~ 35 ppb 9.5% irreducible background fracxon 80% polarizaxon A expt ~ 25 ppb DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
3 Run Phases Mul$ple Run Phases Op$mizes Sta$s$cal and Systema$c Precision Hardware changes (beamline, collimaxon, electronics, detectors ) Detailed analysis Improved run planning / test planning PublicaXon of intermediate results E158 Run 1: 2001 collimator upgrade Run 2: 2002 slice bpm upgrade 1st physics publicaxon Run 3: % of total staxsxcs Qweak Commissioning: Oct 20 BCM electronics detector radiators, new collimators background detectors 1st publicaxon Run 1: Oct 20 - May 2011 Dump beamline rebuild BCM electronics upgrade Run 2: Nov May 2012 >50% of staxsxcs DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
4 Run Phases Plan for Approaching 2% Precision 1 khz Width PAC Days (prod) Stat Error (ppb) Stat Error (%) Eff % Calendar Weeks (prod.) Comm Weeks Total Weeks I II III Total Run Phase 1 Spectrometer opxcs, acceptance, alignment First look at backgrounds Test sufficiency of beam correcxon tools and analysis beam quality (asymmetry and halo) Result: near precision of SLAC- E μa, 90% polarization Run Phase 2 staxsxcal behavior of beam asymmetries, measured asymmetry quality of slow reversals (Wien, g- 2) precision on background, normalizaxon, beam correcxons, polarizaxon Result: 2.5x beyond SLAC- E158, δ(sin 2 θ W )= (stat), (stat+syst) Run Phase 3 ulxmate precision, ulxmate systemaxc uncertainty Result: δ(sin 2 θ W )= (stat), (stat+syst) DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
5 Physics Impact of Run 2 result sin 2 eff (e) LHC events E158 MOLLER (Ul$mate) MOLLER MOLLER (Run II) APV M H [GeV] DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
6 Systema$c Uncertainty Uncertainty Source Ul$mate Frac$onal Error (%) Sta$s$cal 2.0 kinemaxc normalizaxon 0.5 Beam PolarizaXon 0.4 Transverse beam polarizaxon 0.2 beam (2nd moment) 0.4 Beam (posixon/angle/energy) 0.4 Beam (intensity) 0.3 e+p (+γ) e+x (+γ) 0.4 Designed with experience with E158, Qweak, and PREX! Plans for managing systemaxc uncertainxes in normalizaxon backgrounds beam asymmetries e+p (+γ) e+p (+γ) 0.3 γ + p (π,μ,k) + X 0.3 e+al (+γ) e+al (+γ) 0.3 neutral backgrounds 0.1 Total systema$c 1.1 DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
7 A P V = me G F p 2 Kinema$c Normaliza$on 4sin 2 (3 + 2 cos 2 ) 2 Qe W Need 4sin 2 (3 + 2 cos 2 ) 2 to within 0.5% of itself Map acceptance using GEM chambers between the hybrid magnet and integraxng detector stack Acceptance 11 GeV ep Moller ep p 11 GeV ee OpXcs calibraxon using lower beam energy, sieve slit, opxcs target α θ θ [rad] CalibraXons and tracking studies will recur through all run phases UlXmately esxmated using simulaxon, benchmarked to tracking runs DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
8 Beam Asymmetries beam posixon, angle, energy variaxon with helicity causes an experimental asymmetry Injector source laser e- beam delivery (adiabaxc damping) cancellaxon with slow reversals detector symmetry correcxon calibraxon (beam modulaxon) nm in 5MeV injector factor of - 0 from adiabaxc damping factor of 2- Factor > in sensixvity % precision X position difference ± 0.53 nm 5 HAPPEX- II: Zero posixon differences RMS = 2.77 µm Y position difference ± 1.83 nm RMS = 9.50 µm HAPPEX- II: posixon difference convergence micron X angle difference ± 0.24 nrad RMS = 1.23 µrad micron Y angle difference ± 0.25 nrad RMS = 1.29 µrad micron µ rad day averages DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
9 Beam Asymmetries - 2nd order Helicity- correlated Beam Spot Size variaxon creates false asymmetry Source configura$on Bounds < - 4 from laser configuraxon must be maintained throughout run Adiaba$c Damping Good beam match keeps variaxon small Slow Reversals Laser opxcs reversals (e.g. IHWP) do not cancel expected sources of spot- size differences Helicity reversal on e - beam will be incoherent with spot- size differences Net factor ~ suppression of beam asymmetries Injector Spin Manipula$on Solenoids + 2 Wien rotaxons ~80 reversals during run phase 2&3 (weekly) PREX- II showed ISM cancella$on of posi$on differences micron g- 2 rota$on Beam energy (ΔE~0 MeV) ~few reversals during run phases 2 and 3 DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
10 Beam Polariza$on Unimpeachable credibility for 0.4% polarimetry Two independent measurements which can be cross- checked Con$nuous monitoring during produc$on (protects against drigs, precession...) Sta$s$cal power to facilitate cross- normaliza$on (get to systema$cs limit in about 1 hour) High precision opera$on at 11 GeV Compton Møller Detection of backscattered photons and recoil electrons High-Gain Optical Cavity 532 nm (green) or 64 nm (IR) Microstrip electron detector Photon calorimeter continuous measurement with high precision state-of-the-art: 0.5% (SLD), 0.8% (JLAB) laser polarization to 0.2% Independent electron/photon analyses, each expected to reach 0.4% Pure Iron at High Field Magnetized perpendicular to foil 3-4 T applied field - magnetization saturated Spin polarization, known to 0.25% 0.5% precision already claimed on Hall C polarimeter Low-current, invasive measurement Spin polarization can not be independently verified DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September, 2014
11 Beam Polariza$on - Evolu$on to 0.4% Projected Performance: Analysis improvements, beam tests, hardware evoluxon needed to improve from baseline upgrade Run Phase 1: projecxng to completed upgrades in progress, from current state- of- the- art: Compton electron - 0.8% Compton photon - 0.7% Compton correlated error: 0.2% Moller: 1% Run Phase 2: Compton electron: 0.4% Compton photon: 0.4% Compton correlated error: 0.2% Moller: 0.5% Detailed, high- precision cross- check in Run 2 Alternative: Atomic H Møller Moller polarimetry from polarized atomic hydrogen gas in an ultra-cold magnetic trap Brute force polarization Development at Mainz underway for P2 at MESA Pe =0% ± -4 high beam currents Non-invasive, continuous E. Chudakov and V. Luppov, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, v 51, n 4, Aug. 2004, possible alternative if needed to resolve controversial results in Compton and high-field Moller DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
12 Transverse Asymmetry Interference between one- and two-photon exchange electron beam polarized transverse to beam direction AT (ppm) For identical particles: magnitude of asymmetry must be odd around 90 degrees in the center of mass Potential systematic error in APV. Suppressed by - small transverse polarization - azimuthal acceptance symmetry - acceptance symmetry in c.m.s. polar angle E (GeV) 11 Measured at E158 Theory References: 1. A. O. Barut and C. Fronsdal, (1960) 2. L. L. DeRaad, Jr. and Y. J. Ng (1975) 3. Lance Dixon and Marc Schreiber:hep/ph DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
13 Transverse Beam Polariza$on Average transverse asymmetry (ppm) simulated: ~1 hour at P T =0% A T expected grand average for the simulated experimental acceptance detector number IniXal beam setup ~ 1-2 degrees Unique signature of transverse beam polarizaxon 50 ppb error on A T *P b in 4 hours: 1 degree precision Over enxre run: feedback will hold transverse polarizaxon small (<<1 degree) Rate (GHz/0.1GeV) Moller E' vertex Distributions All Open Transition Closed Run Phase 1: A T measurement Feedback technique tested Run Phases 2 and 3: RouXne feedback (GeV) E' vertex DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
14 ep Backgrounds black: Møller red: ep elas$c green: ep inelas$c ep elas$cs: 8.9% under Møller peak, asymmetry well known ep inelas$cs: <0.5% of signal but asymmetry not well known Al elas$cs: ~0.3% of signal, elasxc from target windows Radial and Azimuthal binning - measure asymmetries under the Møller peak R4, R3, R2: inelasxc contribuxon dominant R4: best measure. W 2 distribuxon matches signal region R5 at low W 2 Test using radial and azimuthal variaxons open transi$on closed DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September, 2014 R5 Azimuthal segments black: Møller red: ep elas$c green: ep inelas$c 14
15 Other Backgrounds π/μ: direct scaling from E158 suggests ~0.1% fracxon, simulaxon confirms 0.13% asymmetry ~500 ppb hyperon decay could contribute significantly direct measurement with pion detector required A}er run 3: known to within ~150ppb. GEM GEM quartz assembly centerline pion detectors luminosity monitor Neutrals: suppressed by thin quartz, lead- shielded PMT assemblies blinded tube, spectrometer- off runs Expected contribuxon ~0.1%, will be well measured Expected asymmetry negligible, will be well measured with auxiliary detectors DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
16 Background Summary Background FracXon of total signal (%) Asymmetry (ppb) correcxon (ppb) Note e+p (+γ) e+p (+γ) 8.9 ~40 ~3.6 A ep e+p (+γ) e+x (+γ) <0.5 ~300 ~1.4 Measured in azimuthal/radial dependence γ + p (π,μ,k) + X ~0.1 ~500* ~0.7 EsXmated from E158. Hyperon decay would show up here. Direct measurement in pion detector. Al elasxc (target) ~0.3 ~ simulaxon, QWeak measurement neutral backgrounds < measured with blinded tube and other auxiliary measurements DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
17 Summary of Systema$c Uncertainty Uncertainty Source Run Phase1 Frac$onal Error (%) Run Phase 2 Frac$onal Error (%) Ul$mate Frac$onal Error (%) Sta$s$cal kinemaxc normalizaxon Beam PolarizaXon Transverse beam polarizaxon beam (2nd moment) Beam (posixon/angle/energy) Beam (intensity) e+p (+γ) e+x (+γ) e+p (+γ) e+p (+γ) γ + p (π,μ,k) + X e+al (+γ) e+al (+γ) neutral backgrounds Total systema$c DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
18 Summary of Precision 60 μa, 90% polarization Run Phases Stat Error A Stat Error Q Syst Error Q Tot Error Q Stat Error sin Syst Error sin Tot Error sin I Through II Total (III) DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
19 Run Phases 1 khz Width Run Phase Scheduling PAC Days (prod) 60 μa, 90% polarization Stat Error (ppb) Stat Error (%) JLab FY = 30 weeks, usually 2 separated periods with ± 5 weeks separaxon Run Phase 1 Run Phase 2 Run Phase 3 1/3 FY running 1 full FY 2 full FY Breaks of 2-3 months (consistent with full JLab operaxon schedule) provide opportunity for analysis, modificaxons, upgrades A significant break (4 months+) is desirable, especially between Run 1 & 2 or Runs 2 & 3. More complete analysis, hardware improvements, run plan opxmizaxon Eff % Calendar Weeks (prod.) Comm Weeks Total Weeks I II III Total Scheduling flexibility to run other experiments between MOLLER run phases DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
20 Modular Experimental Design Modular design and moderate alignment tolerances provide scheduling flexibility HRS/BigBite experiments need: pivot region upstream beamline open aperture to beam dump room for HRS in forward direcxon MOLLER: modular assemblies protect crixcal alignments Target chamber collimator assemblies Hybrid Magnet assembly Alignment tolerances for posi$oning of assemblies ~ 1mm HRS snouts and target pivot Upstream Magnet, front collimators \ Collimator Assemblies Hybrid Magnet Assembly Target Chamber Modular shielding Tracking detectors IntegraXng detector assembly DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
21 Cri$cal Alignments in Fixed Assemblies Hybrid Magnet Assembly Coils in assembly, relaxve alignment preserved to simplify re- commissioning Posi$on Tolerance ~1mm Machining tolerance on acceptance defining collimator: 200 μm Upstream Magnet, front collimators Collimator DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
22 Summary Plans for achieving systema$c and sta$s$cal error goals in 3 run phases Experiment opxmized for high precision and accuracy - At design current: <90 ppm uncertainty at 960 Hz. SystemaXc uncertainxes must be correspondingly small. - Building from experience and experxse of E158, Qweak, and PREX, design for 1.1% (0.4 ppb) systemaxc uncertainty! Run phases are designed to fit into JLab annual running cycles - Fit a natural schedule for hardware and configuraxon opxmizaxon - Phased plan, modular detector design, and moderate tolerance requirements provides scheduling flexibility! First run (commissioning): result compares to SLAC- E158 precision First physics run: - SystemaXc error control at high level - high- impact physics result: 2.5x improvement over E158 Final physics run: push precision to level of collider measurements Plan shows path to full precision result in 3 years of physics running DOE Nuclear Physics MOLLER Science Review UMass, Amherst September,
Toward 0.5% Electron Beam Polarimetry. Kent Paschke University of Virginia
Toward 0.5% Electron Beam Polarimetry Kent Paschke University of Virginia Needs for 0.5% The proposed PV-DIS experiments may be systematics limited, with fractional errors approaching 0.5%. No
More informationStatus of the PREX Experiment R n through PVeS at JLab
Status of the PREX Experiment R n through PVeS at JLab Seamus Riordan University of Massachusetts, Amherst sriordan@physics.umass.edu for the PREX Collaboration June 18, 2011 Seamus Riordan NuSym11 PREX
More informationMOLLER Experiment. Many slides courtesy of K. Kumar, K. Paschke, J. Mammei, M. Dalton, etc.
MOLLER Experiment D.S. Armstrong Nov. 9 2010 Precision Tests of the Standard Model ECT* Workshop Moller scattering: intro Previous measurement: SLAC E158 MOLLER: new physics reach Experimental Concept
More informationElectron Beam Polarimetry: Status and Prospects. DIS 2005, Madison, April 2005 E. Chudakov (JLab)
Electron Beam Polarimetry: Status and Prospects DIS 2005, Madison, April 2005 E. Chudakov (JLab) Motivation: what accuracy is required for various experiments Methods in use: Optical methods Mott scattering
More informationBeam Instrumentation Challenges for Parity-Violation Experiments
Beam Instrumentation Challenges for Parity-Violation Experiments Manolis Kargiantoulakis Intense Electron Beams Workshop 2015 Cornell University Many thanks to Mark Pitt, Kent Paschke, Mark Dalton, for
More informationThe Lead Radius Experiment PREX. Dustin McNulty Idaho State University for the PREx Collaboration July 28, 2011
The Lead Radius Experiment PREX Dustin McNulty Idaho State University for the PREx Collaboration mcnulty@jlab.org July 28, 2011 The Lead Radius Experiment PREX Outline Motivation Parity Violation at JLab
More informationP.M. King Ohio University for the MOLLER Collaboration
Parity violating electron scattering at JLab: the MOLLER experiment P.M. King Ohio University for the MOLLER Collaboration SESAPS, 10 November 2016; University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA The Standard
More informationPolarimetry in Hall A
Outline E.Chudakov Moller-12 Workshop, Aug 2008 Polarimetry in Hall A 1 Polarimetry in Hall A E.Chudakov 1 1 Hall A, JLab Moller-12 Workshop, Aug 2008 Outline E.Chudakov Moller-12 Workshop, Aug 2008 Polarimetry
More informationMeasurement of Nucleon Strange Form Factors at High Q 2
Measurement of Nucleon Strange Form Factors at High Q 2 (HAPPEX III Collaboration) Rupesh Silwal 22 March, 2011 At very low Q2, GsE/M relates to the strange matrix elements of the nucleon (strange radius
More informationThe MOLLER experiment - testing the Standard Model at Jefferson Lab
The MOLLER experiment - testing the Standard Model at Jefferson Lab Dustin McNulty Idaho State University mcnulty@jlab.org for the May 30, 2012 The MOLLER experiment - testing the Standard Model at Jefferson
More informationMøller Polarimetry in Hall A and Beyond
Outline E.Chudakov EIC, Ann Arbor, Aug 2007 Møller Polarimetry: Hall A and beyond 1 Møller Polarimetry in Hall A and Beyond E.Chudakov 1 1 Hall A, JLab EIC Polarimetry Workshop, Ann Arbor, Aug 23-24, 2007
More informationAspects of The Standard Model and Beyond
Aspects of The Standard Model and Beyond Hadronic Physics Town Meeting at DNP2012 October 25, 2012 Mark Pitt Virginia Tech Parity violating electron scattering at JLab Proton s weak charge: Qweak Electron
More informationAcknowledgements: D. Armstrong, M. Dalton, K. Paschke, J. Mammei, M. Pitt, B. Waidyawansa and all my theory colleagues
Acknowledgements: D. Armstrong, M. Dalton, K. Paschke, J. Mammei, M. Pitt, B. Waidyawansa and all my theory colleagues An Experiments Krishna Kumar Stony Brook University The Electroweak Box Workshop at
More informationPREX Overview Extracting the Neutron Radius from 208 Pb
PREX Overview Extracting the Neutron Radius from 208 Pb Seamus Riordan University of Massachusetts, Amherst sriordan@physics.umass.edu March 17, 2013 Seamus Riordan CREX 2013 PREX 1/19 Outline Motivation
More informationParity Violation Experiments
Parity Violation Experiments Krishna Kumar University of Massachusetts thanks to the HAPPEX, G0 and Qweak Collaborations, D. Armstrong, E. Beise, G. Cates, E. Chudakov, D. Gaskell, C. Furget, J. Grames,
More informationBeam Polarimetry (for Future Experiments at JLab)
Outline E.Chudakov June 24, 2009, PAVI-09 Beam Polarimetry 1 Beam Polarimetry (for Future Experiments at JLab) E.Chudakov 1 1 JLab PAVI-09 Outline E.Chudakov June 24, 2009, PAVI-09 Beam Polarimetry 2 Outline
More informationA Precision Measurement of Elastic e+p Beam Normal Single Spin Asymmetry and Other Transverse Spin Measurements from Qweak
A Precision Measurement of Elastic e+p Beam Normal Single Spin Asymmetry and Other Transverse Spin Measurements from Qweak Buddhini P. Waidyawansa For the Qweak Collaboration JLab Users Group Meeting June
More informationParity Violating Electron Scattering at Jefferson Lab. Rakitha S. Beminiwattha Syracuse University
Parity Violating Electron Scattering at Jefferson Lab Rakitha S. Beminiwattha Syracuse University 1 Outline Parity Violating Electron Scattering (PVES) overview Testing the Standard Model (SM) with PVES
More informationThe P2 Experiment at MESA
The P2 Experiment at MESA Sebastian Baunack Johannes utenberg-universität Mainz Intense Electron Beams Workshop June 17-19, 2015 Cornell University External target experiments: Challenges and opportunities
More informationMøller Polarimetry for PV Experiments at 12 GeV
Outline E.Chudakov Jan 15, 2010, MOLLER Review Møller Polarimetry 1 Møller Polarimetry for PV Experiments at 12 GeV E.Chudakov 1 1 JLab MOLLER Review Outline E.Chudakov Jan 15, 2010, MOLLER Review Møller
More informationThe low Q 2 chicane and Compton polarimeter at the JLab EIC
EPJ Web of Conferences 112, 01007 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/ epjconf/ 201611201007 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016 The low Q 2 chicane and Compton polarimeter at the JLab EIC, Alexandre
More informationMøller Polarimetry on Atomic Hydrogen
E.Chudakov June 21, 2011 Møller Polarimetry on Atomic Hydrogen 1 Møller Polarimetry on Atomic Hydrogen E.Chudakov 1 1 JLab Meeting at UVA Outline E.Chudakov June 21, 2011 Møller Polarimetry on Atomic Hydrogen
More informationParity Violation Experiments & Beam Requirements
Parity Violation Experiments & Beam Requirements Riad Suleiman Center for Injectors and Sources MCC Ops Training August 05, 2009 Outline Fundamental Interactions and Conservation Rules Parity Reversal
More informationElectron Beam Polarimetry at JLab Hall C Dave Gaskell PST 2009 September 7, 2009
Electron Beam Polarimetry at JLab Hall C Dave Gaskell PST 2009 September 7, 2009 1. Møller Polarimeter 2. Compton Polarimeter 3. Summary JLab Polarimetry Techniques Three different processes used to measure
More informationMøller Polarimetry for PV Experiments at 12 GeV
Outline E.Chudakov Jan 15, 2010, MOLLER Review Møller Polarimetry 1 Møller Polarimetry for PV Experiments at 12 GeV E.Chudakov 1 1 JLab MOLLER Review Outline E.Chudakov Jan 15, 2010, MOLLER Review Møller
More informationElectron Beam Polarimetry at JLab
Electron Beam Polarimetry at JLab Experiments using polarized electrons at JLab JLab polarized beam Polarimetry at JLab: Mott polarimetry Møller polarimetry Compton polarimetry Special challenges of new
More informationAdvanced injector possible specs. Jay Benesch 10 Sept 2015
Advanced injector possible specs Jay Benesch 10 Sept 2015 Physics requirements Parity violating electron scattering (PVES) experiments will be running the majority of the time in hall A The most stringent
More informationParity-Violating Measurements of the Weak Charge of. Pb (PREX) & Ca (CREX) . and possible future measurements. R. Michaels, ICNT / MSU, Aug /26
Parity-Violating Measurements of the Weak Charge of 208 Pb (PREX) & 48 Ca (CREX) 208 Pb 48 Ca. and possible future measurements R. Michaels, ICNT / MSU, Aug 2013 1/26 Hall A at Jefferson Lab Hall A High
More informationQweak Transverse Asymmetry Measurements
Qweak Transverse Asymmetry Measurements Buddhini Waidyawansa For the Qweak Collaboration Hall C Collaboration Meeting 02-21-2014 Outline Physics of transverse asymmetries Qweak transverse data set Analysis
More informationBuilding a Tracking Detector for the P2 Experiment
Building a Tracking Detector for the P Experiment DPG Frühjahrstagung, Hamburg 016 Marco Zimmermann Institute for Nuclear Physics March 3, 016 The P Experiment: Overview The Idea Precision measurement
More informationParity-violating Electron Scattering and Strangeness in the Nucleon: Results from HAPPEX-II
Parity-violating Electron Scattering and Strangeness in the Nucleon: Results from HAPPEX-II L. J. Kaufman University of Massachusetts The HAPPEX Collaboration Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
More informationElectron Beam Polarimetry at Jefferson Lab Dave Gaskell Jefferson Lab (Hall C)
Electron Beam Polarimetry at Jefferson Lab Dave Gaskell Jefferson Lab (Hall C) CASA Beam Physics Seminar February 14, 2008 1. Motivation: Why do we care so much about polarimetry? 2. Overview of JLab polarimeters
More informationRecent results and future direction of the parity-violating electron scattering program in Hall A at Jefferson Lab
Recent results and future direction of the parity-violating electron scattering program in Hall A at Jefferson Lab, University of Virginia For the HAPPEX, PREX, PVDIS, MOLLER and SOLID Collaborations SPIN,
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 15 Apr 2016
arxiv:1604.04602v1 [nucl-ex] 15 Apr 2016 Beam Normal Single Spin Asymmetry Measurements from Q weak Buddhini P. Waidyawansa for the Q weak Collaboration C122, 12000 Jefferson Avenue, Newport News, VA 23602
More informationLow-Energy Accelerators for High Precision Measurements Sebastian Baunack
Low-Energy Accelerators for High Precision Measurements Sebastian Baunack Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz EINN 2017, Oct. 31 - Nov 4, 2017 Paphos, Cyprus 1 Outline New type of accelerators: ERL High
More informationE05-009:HAPPEx-III Status Report. Dustin McNulty UMass December 5, 2008
E05-009:HAPPEx-III Status Report Dustin McNulty UMass mcnulty@jlab.org December 5, 2008 E05-009:HAPPEx-III Status Report Outline Quick Review: Parity Violation and Strange FFs Worldwide Experimental Programs
More informationPolarimetry. POSIPOL 2011 Beijing Peter Schuler (DESY) - Polarimetry
Polarimetry Overview Compton Transmission Polarimetry at source energy Bhabha Polarimetry at 400 MeV Compton Polarimetry at 5 GeV Compton Polarimetry at full energy 1 Suitable Processes Compton Transmission
More informationPrecision Tests of the Standard Model. Yury Kolomensky UC Berkeley Physics in Collision Boston, June 29, 2004
Precision Tests of the Standard Model Yury Kolomensky UC Berkeley Physics in Collision Boston, June 29, 2004 Motivation Experiments (not covered by previous speakers ) Atomic Parity Violation Neutrino
More informationPREX and CREX. R N from Electroweak Asymmetry in Elastic Electron-Nucleus Scattering. Neutron Skin.
http://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex PREX and CREX 08 Pb Horowitz 48 Ca Neutron Skin R N from Electroweak Asymmetry in Elastic Electron-Nucleus Scattering R L 4 6 A ~ 10 PV Q ~ 10 R L PRL 108 (01) 1150
More informationText. References and Figures from: - Basdevant et al., Fundamentals in Nuclear Physics - Henley et al., Subatomic Physics
Lecture 7 Experimental Nuclear Physics PHYS 741 Text heeger@wisc.edu References and Figures from: - Basdevant et al., Fundamentals in Nuclear Physics - Henley et al., Subatomic Physics 98 Scattering Topics
More informationIntroduction Polarimeters at MAMI Analysis Future Conclusion. Polarimetry at MAMI. V. Tyukin, Inst. of Nuclear Physics, Mainz, Germany
Polarimetry at MAMI V. Tyukin, Inst. of Nuclear Physics, Mainz, Germany Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 3 MeV MIT 213 15 March 213 Contents Introduction
More informationG Ep /G Mp with an 11 GeV Electron Beam in Hall C
G Ep /G Mp with an 11 GeV Electron Beam in Hall C E.J. Brash, M.K. Jones, C.F. Perdrisat, V. Punjabi, A. Puckett, M. Khandaker and the GEp-IV Collaboration (Update to E12-09-101) Elastic EM Form Factors
More informationEIC Electron Beam Polarimetry Workshop Summary
EIC Electron Beam Polarimetry Workshop Summary W. Lorenzon Randall Laboratory of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1040, USA Abstract. A summary of the Precision Electron Beam
More informationLinear Collider Beam Instrumentation Overview
Linear Collider Beam Instrumentation Overview Linear Collider R&D Opportunities Workshop May 31 st, 2002 SLAC Eric Torrence* University of Oregon *with M.Woods and D.Cinabro BI Overview Beam Energy Polarization
More informationThe Jlab 12 GeV Upgrade
The Jlab 12 GeV Upgrade R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary 1 12 GeV Science Program The physical origins of quark confinement (GlueX, meson and baryon spectroscopy) The spin and flavor
More informationOverview on Compton Polarimetry
General Issues O spin motion & alignment tolerances O beam-beam effects & upstream vs. Downstream Compton Polarimetry Basics O beam parameters & Compton detection methods O kinematics, cross sections &
More informationPoS(Bormio 2013)024. P2 - The weak charge of the proton. D. Becker, K. Gerz. S. Baunack, K. Kumar, F. E. Maas
Institute for Nuclear Physics, University of Mainz E-mail: beckerd@kph.uni-mainz.de, gerz@kph.uni-mainz.de S. Baunack, K. Kumar, F. E. Maas In early 2012, preparations for a new high precision measurement
More informationE166: Polarized Positrons & Polarimetry
(DESY) - on behalf of the E166 Collaboration ILC: - why polarized positrons - e+ source options - undulator source scheme E166 - proof-of-principle demonstration of the undulator method - undulator basics
More information12 GeV CEBAF Beam Parameter Tables
12 GeV CEBAF Beam Parameter Tables Jay Benesch, Alex Bogacz, Arne Freyberger, Yves Roblin, Todd Satogata, Riad Suleiman and Michael Tiefenback Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 12000 Jefferson
More informationThe Q p weak Experiment: A Search for New TeV Scale Physics via a Measurement of the Proton s Weak Charge
The Q p weak Experiment: A Search for New TeV Scale Physics via a Measurement of the Proton s Weak Charge Measure: Parity-violating asymmetry in e + p elastic scattering at Q 2 ~ 0.03 GeV 2 to ~4% relative
More informationCEBAF Polarized Beam for Parity Violation Experiments in the 12 GeV era
CEBAF Polarized Beam for Parity Violation Experiments in the 12 GeV era ECT Workshop: Physics beyond the standard model and precision nucleon structure measurements with parity-violating electron scattering
More informationC-REX : Parity-Violating Measurement of the Weak Charge of
C-REX : Parity-Violating Measurement of the Weak Charge of 48 Ca to an accuracy of 0.02 fm Spokespersons: Juliette Mammei Dustin McNulty Robert Michaels that s me Kent Paschke Seamus Riordan (contact person)
More information1 Introduction. THE Q W eak EXPERIMENT: A SEARCH FOR NEW PHYSICS AT THE TeV SCALE. W. Deconinck 1, for the Q W eak Collaboration
THE Q W eak EXPERIMENT: A SEARCH FOR NEW PHYSICS AT THE TeV SCALE W. Deconinck 1, for the Q W eak Collaboration (1) College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA E-mail: wdeconinck@wm.edu Abstract The
More informationThe neutron skin in neutronrich nuclei at Jefferson Lab
The neutron skin in neutronrich nuclei at Jefferson Lab Mark Dalton, University of Virginia For the PREX and CREX Collaborations Low Energy Workshop Boston 15 March 2013 1 Weak Charge Distribution of Heavy
More informationSymmetry Tests in Nuclear Physics
Symmetry Tests in Nuclear Physics Krishna Kumar University of Massachusetts Editorial Board: Parity Violation: K. K, D. Mack, M. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Reimer, P. Souder Low Energy QCD: B. Bernstein, A. Gasparian,
More informationStatus of the PRad Experiment (E )
Status of the PRad Experiment (E12-11-106) NC A&T State University for the PRad collaboration Outline PRad Physics goals ep-scattering and the proton radius PRad experiment experimental setup development
More informationSearches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Electroweak Tests of the Standard Model. Willem T.H. van Oers UCN Workshop at RCNP April 8 9, 2010
Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model Electroweak Tests of the Standard Model Willem T.H. van Oers UCN Workshop at RCNP April 8 9, 2010 Outline Introduction The Qweak Experiment The MOLLER Experiment
More informationThe E166 Experiment: Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons
The E166 Experiment: Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons Hermann Kolanoski (Humboldt-Universität Berlin) for the E166 Collaboration ILC: - physics with polarised e + e - - undulator source
More informationProject P2 - The weak charge of the proton
Institute for Nuclear Physics, University of Mainz E-mail: beckerd@kph.uni-mainz.de K. Gerz, S. Baunack, K. S. Kumar, F. E. Maas The goal of Project P2 is to determine the electroweak mixing angle sin
More informationPrecision Polarimetry at JLab, 6 GeV Era G. B. Franklin Carnegie Mellon University
Precision Polarimetry at JLab, 6 GeV Era G. B. Franklin Carnegie Mellon University Hall A Compton Upgrade Team: M. Friend, D. Parno, F. Benmokhtar, A. Camsonne, G.B. Franklin, R. Michaels, S. Nanda, K.
More informationLepton beam polarisation for the HERA experiments ZEUS and H1
Lepton beam polarisation for the HERA experiments ZEUS and H1 Polarisation at collider machines The HERA storage ring The HERA polarimeters The collider experiments ZEUS and H1 The HERA II upgrade Data
More informationSub-percent precision Møller polarimetry in experimental Hall C
Sub-percent precision Møller polarimetry in experimental Hall C College of William and Mary E-mail: jmagee@jlab.org Modern experiments in Jefferson Lab Hall C require precise knowledge of the electron
More informationEIC Electron Beam Polarimetry Workshop Summary
EIC Electron Beam Polarimetry Workshop Summary W. Lorenzon Randall Laboratory of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1040, USA Abstract. A summary of the Precision Electron Beam
More information1. Polarimetry Strategy 2. Møller Polarimeter 3. Compton Polarimeter 4. Summary
Vladas Tvaskis (University of Manitoba) Hall C Users Meeting January 202. Polarimetry Strategy 2. Møller Polarimeter 3. Compton Polarimeter 4. Summary Q Weak requires measurement of the beam polarization
More informationFull-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC
Full-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC Vasiliy Morozov for MEIC Study Group Electron Ion Collider Users Meeting, Stony Brook University June 27, 2014 Lattice design of geometrically-matched collider
More informationHall A Compton Calorimeter G. B. Franklin Carnegie Mellon University
Hall A Compton Calorimeter G. B. Franklin Carnegie Mellon University 1. Compton Scattering Polarimetry General Considerations Complications and Systematic Errors 2. CMU Integrating DAQ Content of Data
More informationProgress Report on the A4 Compton Backscattering Polarimeter
A4 Progress Report on the A4 Compton Backscattering Polarimeter Yoshio Imai, Institut für Kernphysik, Universität Mainz 8.6.24 International Workshop on Parity Violation and Hadronic Structure, LPSC Grenoble
More informationThe JLEIC electron low Q 2 chicane and Compton polarimeter
The JLEIC electron low Q 2 chicane and Compton polarimeter INPC 2016 Alexandre Camsonne, David Gaskell, Joshua Hoskins Hall A Jefferson Laboratory September 12 th 2016 JLEIC Layout Warm Electron Collider
More informationPREX Background Simulation Update
PREX Background Simulation Update Rakitha Beminiwattha Syracuse University rakithab@jlab.org 1 Outline PREX-II Collimator Plastic Shielding for Neutrons PREX-II Background Radiation Activation Studies
More informationHigh-Precision 5-MeV Mo1 Polarimetry at the JLab Injector
High-Precision 5-MeV Mo1 Polarimetry at the JLab Injector J. M. Grames 1, C. K. Sinclair 2, R. Suleiman 1, M. Poelker 1, X. Roca-Maza 3, M.L. Stutzman 1, Md.A. Mamun 1,4, M. McHugh 1,5, D. Moser 1, J.
More informationSimulation for Proton Charge Radius (PRad) Experiment at Jefferson Lab1 Li Ye Mississippi State University For the PRad Collaboration The Proton Charg
Simulation for Proton Charge Radius (PRad) Experiment at Jefferson Lab1 Li Ye Mississippi State University For the PRad Collaboration The Proton Charge Radius Puzzle refers to 7 σ discrepancy between the
More informationElectron Polarimetry Overview
E.Chudakov IEB 2015, Cornell Electron Polarimetry Overview 1 / 35 Electron Polarimetry Overview E.Chudakov 1 1 JLab Workshop: Intense Electron Beams (IEB) June 17-20, Cornell, NY Outline E.Chudakov IEB
More informationAPEX: Goals and Strategy
APEX: Goals and Strategy Natalia Toro (Perimeter Institute) e 2 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 10-8 E141 A' Æ Standard Model a m, 5 s E774 a m,±2 s favored a e DarkLight WASA Phenix HPS 2015 KLOE MAMI APEX BaBar
More informationPREX / CREX Status. Jan 25, 2018 Bob Michaels, on behalf of the PREX collaboration. docdb
PREX / CREX Status Jan 25, 2018 Bob Michaels, on behalf of the PREX collaboration. Wiki https://prex.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/main_page docdb http://prex.jlab.org/cgi-bin/docdb/public/documentdatabase (
More informationDemands on polarized electron sources by future parity violating experiments
Demands on polarized electron sources by future parity violating experiments Jefferson Lab E-mail: dalton@jlab.org The next generation of parity-violating electron-scattering experiments at Jefferson Lab
More informationPrecision High Field Møller Polarimetry in Hall A Status Report
Precision High Field Møller Polarimetry in Hall A Status Report Jim Napolitano, Temple University Work Carried Out by Ted Berger, Ben LeRose (RPI) John LeRose (JJL Magnet Optics) and James Wilhelmi and
More informationHall-D Update. Eric Pooser. Joint Hall A/C Summer Collaboration Meeting 07/18/2015
1 Hall-D Update Joint Hall A/C Summer Collaboration Meeting 07/18/2015 Current Hall-D Physics Program 2 Slide Courtesy of E. Chudakov Hybrid & Exotic Hybrid Mesons 3 Conventional light mesons (π, K, η,
More informationM.Battaglieri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Genova - Italy. A Forward Photon Tagging Facility for CLAS12
A Forward Photon Tagging Facility for CLAS12 M.Battaglieri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Genova - Italy 1) From CEBAF at 6 GeV 2) From CEBAF at 6 GeV to CEBAF at 12 GeV add Hall D (and beam line)
More informationLarge Acceptance High Luminosity Detector at 12 GeV
Outline Large Acceptance High Luminosity Detector at 12 GeV E.Chudakov 1 1 Hall A, JLab For June 2006 Hall A Meeting Outline Outline 1 Motivation for a Large Acceptance at High Luminosity DIS Parity Violation
More information6/12 GeV CEBAF and HPS beam requirements
6/12 GeV CEBAF and HPS beam requirements Arne Freyberger Operations Department Accelerator Division JLAB May 26, 2011 APF HPS May 26, 2011 1 / 16 1 12GeV Beam Requirements 2 12GeV Design and Simulation
More informationUpdate on Development of High Current Bunched Electron Beam from Magnetized DC Photogun
Update on Development of High Current Bunched Electron Beam from Magnetized DC Photogun JLEIC Collaboration Meeting October 6, 2016 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker Magnetized Cooling JLEIC bunched magnetized
More informationFlavor Decomposition of Nucleon Spin via polarized SIDIS: JLab 12 GeV and EIC. Andrew Puckett Los Alamos National Laboratory INT 09/24/2010
Flavor Decomposition of Nucleon Spin via polarized SIDIS: JLab 12 GeV and EIC Andrew Puckett Los Alamos National Laboratory INT 09/24/2010 Outline Nucleon Structure Nucleon spin structure Flavor decomposition
More informationMeasurement Using Polarized e + /e Beams
C 3q Measurement Using Polarized e + /e Beams Xiaochao Zheng Univ. of Virginia March 7, 009 Introduction Standard Model of Electroweak Interaction Neutral Weak Coupling Constants Test of the Standard Model
More informationThe QWeak Experiment: A measurement of the proton weak charge and up-down quark weak couplings.
The QWeak xperiment: A measurement of the proton weak charge and up-down quark weak couplings. University of Manitoba -mail: mgericke@physics.umanitoba.ca In May 2012, the Q p Weak collaboration completed
More informationGEANT4 Simulation of Pion Detectors for the MOLLER Experiment
GEANT4 Simulation of Pion Detectors for the MOLLER Experiment A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Physics from the College of William and
More informationThe Compton backscattering Polarimeter of the A4 Experiment
A4 The Compton backscattering Polarimeter of the A4 Experiment Yoshio Imai Institut für Kernphysik, Universität Mainz Polarimeter Group: J. Diefenbach, Y. Imai, J. Lee, M. Sikora, S. Taylor 07.10.2004
More informationTriplet polarimeter study
Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation M. Dugger, February 2012 1 Outline Triplet production Potential detector
More informationDIS-Parity: Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Parity NonConserving Deep Inelastic Scattering
DIS-Parity: Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Parity NonConserving Deep Inelastic Scattering Paul E. Reimer Argonne National Laboratory 10 January 2003 Introduction: Weinberg-Salam Model and sin 2
More informationA4 Laser Compton polarimetry
A4 Laser Compton polarimetry progress since PAVI06 J. Diefenbach Workshop on Parity Violation 2009, Bar Harbor, Maine - 24.06.2009 Outline Principles of Laser Compton polarimetry Experimental Setup Data
More informationPoS(PSTP 2013)034. Precession Polarimetry at JLab, 6 GeV. G.B. Franklin Carnegie Mellon University
at JLab, 6 GeV Carnegie Mellon University E-mail: gbfranklin@cmu.edu The JLab Hall A Compton Polarimeter is used to measure the polarization of the electron beam as it enters the experimental hall. When
More informationRecoil Polarisation Measurements in Meson Photoproduction
Recoil Polarisation Measurements in Meson Photoproduction Polarisation Observables and Partial Wave Analysis Bad Honnef 2009 Derek Glazier, D.P. Watts University of Edinburgh Helpful for PWA At least 8
More informationThreshold photoproduction of J/y with the GlueX experiment. Lubomir Pentchev Jefferson Lab for the GlueX collaboration
Threshold photoproduction of J/y with the GlueX experiment Lubomir Pentchev Jefferson Lab for the GlueX collaboration 7 th Workshop of the APS Topical Group on Hadron Physics, Washington, DC February 1-3
More information5 MeV Mott Polarimeter at Jefferson Lab
5 MeV at Jefferson Lab The George Washington University Hampton University Graduate Studies 2012 Outline 1 Mott Scattering Single Scattering Sherman Function Scattering Asymmetry 2 Mott Schematics Polarization
More informationEICUG Working Group on Polarimetry. Elke Aschenauer BNL Dave Gaskell Jefferson lab
EICUG Working Group on Polarimetry Elke Aschenauer BNL Dave Gaskell Jefferson lab 1 Outline Charge Polarimetry Requirements and Goals Electron Polarimetry Hadron Polarimetry Working Group Plans 2 Charge
More informationE (GMp) Precision Measurement of the Proton Elastic Cross Section at High Q 2. Thir Gautam Hampton University
E12-07-108 (GMp) Precision Measurement of the Proton Elastic Cross Section at High Q 2 Thir Gautam Hampton University On behalf of the GMp Collaboration Hall A Collaboration Meeting January 18, 2017 GMp
More informationMeasuring very forward (backward) at the LHeC
Measuring very forward (backward) at the LHeC Armen Buniatyan DESY Detectors located outside of the main detector (~ 10 100m from the Interaction Point) Goals: Instantaneous luminosity Tag photo-production
More informationUpstream Polarimetry with 4-Magnet Chicane
2005 International Linear Collider Workshop Stanford, U.S.A. Upstream Polarimetry with 4-Magnet Chicane N. Meyners, V. Gharibyan, K.P. Schüler DESY, Hamburg, Germany We have extended an earlier polarimeter
More informationProton Radius Puzzle and the PRad Experiment at JLab
Proton Radius Puzzle and the PRad Experiment at JLab NC A&T State University, NC USA for the PRad collaboration Spokespersons:, H. Gao, M. Khandaker, D. Dutta Outline The Proton Radius Puzzle Recent status
More informationThe Qweak experiment: a precision measurement of the proton s weak charge
The Qweak experiment: a precision measurement of the proton s weak charge R. D. Carlini Jefferson Lab, 1000 Jefferson Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 3606, USA Abstract. The Qweak experiment [1] will conduct
More informationBeyond the Born Approximation
Beyond the Born Approximation Measuring the Two Photon Exchange Correction in Hall D Robert Paul Bennett Old Dominion University D. Adikaram, D. Rimal, P. Khetharpal, B. Raue, L. Weinstein Hall D PWG Newport
More information