OBSERVER DESIGN USING A PARTIAL NONLINEAR OBSERVER CANONICAL FORM
|
|
- Baldric Stephens
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Int J Appl Math Comput Sci, 26, Vol 16, No 3, OBSERVER DESIGN USING A PARTIAL NONLINEAR OBSERVER CANONICAL FORM KLAUS RÖBENACK,ALAN F LYNCH Technische Universität Dresden Department o Mathematics, Institute o Scientiic Computing Mommsenstr 13, D 162 Dresden, Germany klaus@roebenackde University o Alberta Department o Electrical and Computer Engineering Edmonton AB T6G 2V4, Canada alanl@ieeeorg This paper proposes two methods or nonlinear observer design which are based on a partial nonlinear observer canonical orm POCF Observability and integrability existence conditions or the new POCF are weaker than the well-established nonlinear observer canonical orm OCF, which achieves exact error linearization The proposed observers provide the global asymptotic stability o error dynamics assuming that a global Lipschitz and detectability-like condition holds Examples illustrate the advantages o the approach relative to the existing nonlinear observer design methods The advantages o the proposed method include a relatively simple design procedure which can be broadly applied Keywords: observer design, canonical orm, detectability 1 Introduction We consider the observer design problem or a SISO system ẋ = x+gx, u, y = hx 1 with smooth vector ields : R n R n, g : R n R R n, and smooth output unctions h : R n R Exact error linearization is a well-established observer design method based on an observer canonical orm OCF which yields linear time-invariant error dynamics in some state coordinates Since the initial work in Bestle and Zeitz, 1983; Krener and Isidori, 1983, many variations on and extensions to this design method have been proposed Kazantzis and Kravaris, 1998; Krener and Respondek, 1985; Krener et al, 1991; Krener and Xiao, 22, Lynch and Borto, 21; Marino and Tomei, 1995; Phelps, 1991, Respondek et al, 24; Rudolph and Zeitz, 1994; Wang and Lynch, 25;26; Xia and Gao, 1988;1989 In the single-output case, the aorementioned work relies on the assumption dim span{dh, dl h,,dl n 1 h}x =n 2 or all x in a suitable set The unction L h = h x in 2 is the Lie derivative o h along Repeated Lie derivatives are deined as L k h = L L k 1 h, k 1 with L h = h The dierential or gradient o a unction λ : R n R is denoted by dλ and has a local coordinate description dλ = λ x =λ x 1,, λ x n The condition 2 ensures a orm o observability or the unorced system Hermann and Krener, 1977, and is necessary to ensure the existence o the OCF Krener and Isidori, 1983 It is well known that OCF-based methods can be diicult to apply due to restrictive existence conditions Also, the condition 2 does not always hold globally or even on a suiciently large set to avoid a singular observer gain in many canonical orm designs In an eort to address these drawbacks, we propose an observer based on a partial nonlinear observer canonical orm POCF which requires a weaker condition dim span{dh, dl h,,dl r 1 h}x =r, 1 r<n 3 to hold or all x in a suitable set Additionally, less restrictive integrability conditions than those or an OCF will be required To ensure the convergence o the estimate error, we impose Lipschitz and detectability-like conditions Jo and Seo 22 also consider observer design with the weaker observability condition 3 They propose an
2 334 observer design based on ż = A z + γ y, u, ż = A z + y, z +γ y, u, 4a 4b y = c T z, 4c where A R r r and c R r 1 are in a dual Brunovsky orm Brunovsky, 197: 1 A =, 1 c T = 1 5 The system 4 is divided into two parts: the irst subsystem 4a is isolated rom the second one and is in an OCF On the other hand, the second subsystem 4b contains the term which allows or a nonlinear dependence on both the second subsystem state z and the output The output depends linearly on the irst subsystem state z Although the existence conditions or 4 are weaker than the OCF, in this paper we propose a POCF which exists under less restrictive conditions and is suitable or observer design Two observer designs based on POCF coordinates are proposed The irst design has an advantage o a simpler gain expression The second design leads to a simpler error convergence proo but involves a more complicated gain calculation This paper is organized as ollows: Section 2 presents the existence conditions or the POCF Section 3 presents two observers and a theorem or the global asymptotic convergence o their error dynamics Section 4 presents examples 2 Partial Nonlinear Observer Canonical Form POCF First, we investigate the existence conditions or a dieomorphism T transorming 1 into a partial nonlinear observer canonical orm POCF o index r {1,,n 1}: ż = Az+ αy, z r+1,,z n,u, y = c T z, 6a 6b with z =z 1,,z n T, and α = α 1 z α n z n is a smooth vector ield The matrix A R n n and the vector c R n 1 have the orm A A = and c T = c T, where c and A are deined in 5 K Röbenack and AF Lynch We recall the ollowing result on simultaneous rectiication: Theorem 1 Nijmeijer and van der Schat, 199, Thm 236 Let X 1,,X r be linearly independent vector ields deined on a neighbourhood o ξ R n Suppose that on a neighbourhood U R n o ξ [X i,x j ]=, 1 i, j r Then there exist coordinates x 1,,x n deined on U such that on U X i =, 1 i r x i We remark that when applying Theorem 1 later we will choose n r linearly independent vector ields X i,r+ 1 i n to X i, 1 i r such that about ξ [X i,x j ]=, 1 i, j n This choice is nonunique and aects the expressions or the system in the new coordinates The observer design method presented in Jo and Seo, 22 imposes additional constraints on the choice o X i, r +1 i n, which are not required here These additional constraints can limit the applicability o that approach In order to deine the POCF, we need to deine the so-called starting vector ield Ir<n, the matrix Q r = dh dl r 1 h 7 is called the reduced observability matrix When n = r, we call 7 the observability matrix A smooth solution v o Q r v = 1 =: e r R r 8 is called the starting vector ield Beore giving suicient conditions or the existence o the POCF 6, we deine some notation The Lie bracket o two vector ields and g is deined as [,g] = g x xg Repeated Lie brackets are deined as ad k g =[,ad k 1 g], k 1 with ad g = Theorem 2 There exists a dieomorphism T : U R n deined on a neighbourhood U o x transorming 1 into POCF 6 o index r i C1 rank Q r = r, C2 [ad i v, adj v]=, i, j r 1,
3 Observer design using a partial nonlinear observer canonical orm 335 C3 [g, ad i v] =, i r 2, in some neighbourhood o x The dieomorphism T is global i the conditions C1 C3 hold on R n and, in addition, C4 ad i v, i, j r 1 are complete vector ields Proo The proo is divided into two parts In Part A we show that there exists a change o coordinates ζ =Ψx which transorms 1 into ζ = Aζ + ηζ r,ζ r+1,,ζ n,u, y = c T ζ + βζ r+1,,ζ n, 9a 9b with a smooth vector ield η = η 1 ζ η n ζ n, a smooth map β, and ζ =ζ 1,,ζ n T In Part B we construct a second coordinate system in which β Part A: Assume that the conditions C1 C3 o Theorem 2 are satisied The condition C1 implies that 8 has a solution v deined on some neighbourhood o x R n Equation 8 can be rewritten as { L v L i or i r 2, h = 1 or i = r 1 From Isidori, 1995, Lem 412, this implies that dh v ad v ad r 1 v dl r 1 h 1 = 1 1 in a neighbourhood o x Thereore, the vector ields v, ad v,,ad r 1 v are linearly independent in some neighbourhood o x Using the condition C2 and Theorem 1, we deduce that there exists a local dieomorphism ζ =Ψx such that Ψ ad i v = ζ i+1, i r 1, 11 where Ψ = Ψ/x For clarity, the representations o,g, and h in the ζ-coordinates are denoted by ζ =Ψ x x=ψ 1 ζ, ḡζ,u=ψ gx, u x=ψ 1 ζ, hζ =hx x=ψ 1 ζ Owing to 1, we have L ad i vh = { h = ζ i+1 or i r 2, 1 or i = r 1 Thereore, the gradient o h has the orm h ζ = 1, 12 where the leading one on the right-hand-side o 12 appears in the r-th column Hence, in the ζ-coordinates the output map h has the orm given in 9b Next, we consider the drit vector ield ζ = 1 ζ + + ζ n ζ 1 ζ n Due to 11, or 1 i r 1 we have ζ i+1 =Ψ ad i v =Ψ [,ad i 1 v] =[ Ψ,Ψ ad i 1 v] =[ Ψ, =[, = n j=1 ζ i ] ζ i ] Comparing both sides o 13 yields j 13 ζ i ζ j j ζ i =or 1 j n, j = i +1, 1 i r 1, i+1 ζ i =1or 1 i r 1 This means that the Jacobian matrix o has the orm 14 1 ζ ζ = 1 15
4 336 Finally, we consider the input-dependent vector ield ḡ Because o the condition C3 and 11, or i r 2 we have This implies =Ψ [g, ad i v] =[Ψ g, Ψ ad i v] [ ] = ḡ, = ζ i+1 n j=1 ḡ j ζ i+1 ζ j ḡ j =, 1 j n, i r 2 16 ζ i+1 Hence, the Jacobian matrix o ḡ looks like ḡ ζ ζ,u= 17 From 14 and 16 or, equivalently, 15 and 17, we can conclude that the right-hand side o the transormed system has the orm 9 Part B: In this part we construct a second change o coordinates transorming 9 into 6 Let z =Φζ be a global dieomorphism deined by From 9b, we have 6b: z i = ζ i, i r, 1 i n, z r = ζ r + βζ r+1,,ζ n y = c T z The dynamics transorm into 6a with α i y, z r+1,,z n,u = η i zr βz r+1,,z n,z r+1,,z n,u, i r, 1 i n, α r y, z r+1,,z n,u = η r zr βz r+1,,z n,z r+1,,z n,u + n j=r+1 β η j ζ,u ζ j ζ=φ 1 z K Röbenack and AF Lynch Thereore, the dieomorphism T which transorms 1 into the POCF 6 is a composition o the transormations given in Part A and B: T =Φ Ψ Part A ixes the dependence o the system on the irst r coordinates without speciying the dependence on the remaining n r coordinates Part B only changes the dependence in the r-th coordinates to ensure that the output equals z r I the conditions C1 C3 hold globally, the condition C4 on the completeness o the vector ields implies the existence o a global dieomorphism Respondek, 1986 We remark that, i r = n, the conditions in Theorem 2 are the same as those o the OCF Krener and Isidori, 1983 Evidently, or r < n the proposed existence conditions are satisied by a larger class o systems than those admitting an OCF When n =2, we can only have a POCF o index r =1 In this case, only the condition C1 ie, dh must be checked since C2 and C3 are always satisied As is mentioned in the proo o Theorem 2, the condition C1 implies that a solution o 8 exists but is not unique This nonuniqueness can be used to simpliy the vector ields ad i v, 1 i r 1 Simpler expressions or these vector ields lead to a less complex observer design A particular solution o 8 is given by v = Q + r e r, where Q + r =QT r Q r 1 Q T r denotes the Moore-Penrose inverse Moore, Observer Design and Error Convergence We consider two observer designs which are based on the POCF 6 The irst design has an advantage o a simpler expression or its gain The second design requires the knowledge o the POCF coordinates to compute its gain When discussing observers and their convergence, it is convenient to introduce an alternative notation or the POCF We split 6 into two subsystems: ż 1 = A z 1 + α 1 y, z 2,u, ż 2 = α 2 y, z 2,u, y = c T z 1, where z 1 denotes the irst r components o z, and z 2 stands or the last n r components o z Similarly, α 1 denotes the irst r components o α, and α 2 signiies the last n r components o α 31 Observer Design No 1 We consider a Luenberger-like observer structure ˆx = ˆx+gˆx, u+kˆx y hˆx, 18
5 Observer design using a partial nonlinear observer canonical orm 337 where the gain vector k depends on the estimated state alone Assuming that the system 1 satisies the conditions o Theorem 2, we can express the observer 18 in the POCF coordinates ẑ1 ẑ 2 = A ẑ 1 + α 1 ŷ, ẑ 2,u α 2 ŷ, ẑ 2,u +S ẑ 1 k Sẑ y hˆx, 19 where S = T 1, S = x/z and ŷ = c T ẑ 1 We consider the choice k Sẑ = S ẑ l 2 with l =p,,p r 1 T, and below, in Section 33, we will appropriately assign the roots o det λi A lc T = p +p 1 λ+ +p r 1 λ r 1 +λ r 21 Substituting 2 into 19, we obtain ẑ 1 = A ẑ 1 + α 1 ŷ, ẑ 2,u+ly c T ẑ1, ẑ 2 = α 2 ŷ, ẑ 2,u 22a 22b The estimation error z = z ẑ o this observer is governed by z 1 =A lc T z 1 + α 1 y, z 2,u α 1 ŷ, ẑ 2,u, z 2 = α 2 y, z 2,u α 2 ŷ, ẑ 2,u 23a 23b An observer is typically implemented in the original x- coordinates and, ideally, to simpliy the design procedure, the gain k can be computed without requiring expressions or the POCF coordinates or related unctions α 1 and α 2 Since S is the inverse o T, we can rewrite 11 in the orm ad i vx =S T x e i+1, i r 1 Hence rom 2 we have a simple expression or the observer gain: kˆx =p vˆx+p 1 ad vˆx+ + p r 1 ad r 1 vˆx Observer Design No 2 I we choose the observer structure ˆx = ˆx+gˆx, u+kˆx, y, u 25 and require a cascade or triangular orm error dynamics then this implies that in the z-coordinates the observer is ẑ 1 = A ẑ 1 + α 1 y, ẑ 2,u+ly c T ẑ 1, ẑ 2 = α 2 y, ẑ 2,u, and the gain in 25 is k Sẑ,y,u 27a 27b = S ẑ αy, ẑ 2,u αŷ,ẑ 2,u+lc T z 1, 28 where the constant gain vector l is chosen below, in Section 33, to assign the roots o 21 Comparing 22 and 27, we remark that the observers dier in that the second one uses y in place o ŷ From this one might expect that the second design uses more exact system inormation and might lead to better convergence 33 Error Dynamics Convergence Next, we demonstrate the convergence o the observers 18, 24 and 25, 28 We treat the convergence o the observers in separate theorems and consider 18, 24 irst 331 Observer Design No 1 We begin with the ollowing assumptions: A1 The input u is bounded, ie, there exists a positive constant γ such that ut γ,t A2 The map α 1 is globally Lipschitz in y and z 2, uniormly in u, ie, there exist positive constants γ 1,γ 2 such that α 1 y, z 2,u α 1 ŷ, ẑ 2,u γ 1 ỹ + γ 2 z 2 or all y, ŷ R, z 2, ẑ 2 R n r, and any bounded u As in Amicucci and Monaco, 1998, we require a steadystate solution property o the system The next assumption is the uniorm robust steady-state solution property with respect to y: A3 There exist a positive deinite matrix P 2 R n r n r and positive constants γ 3,γ 4 such that or V 2 z 2 = z 2 T P 2 z 2 we have V 2 z 2 z 2 α2 y, z 2,u α 2 ŷ, ẑ 2,u =2 z 2 T P 2 α2 y, z 2,u α 2 ŷ, ẑ 2,u z 1 =A lc T z 1 + α 1 y, z 2,u α 1 y, ẑ 2,u, z 2 = α 2 y, z 2,u α 2 y, ẑ 2,u, 26a 26b γ 3 ỹ 2 γ 4 z or all y, ŷ R, z 2, ẑ 2 R n r, and any bounded u
6 338 The unction V 2 is also called an exponential-decay output-to-state stable OSS Lyapunov unction Sontag and Wang, 1997 Beore stating the convergence theorem, we introduce a lemma rom Röbenack and Lynch, 24 which is a slightly dierent orm o a result in Gauthier et al, 1992 Lemma 1 Given A and c deined in 5, consider the Lyapunov equation A T P θ+p θa + θpθ =c c T, 3 where θ is a positive number and P R r r Then there exists θ > such that the Lyapunov equation 3 has a positive deinite solution P θ > with P 2 θ P θ, θ θ 31 Proo It can directly be veriied that the i, j-th entry o P satisying 3 is given by p ij = 1i+j θ 2r i j+1 2r i j!, 1 i, j r r i! r j! 32 Moreover, this solution o 3 is unique and positive deinite Thereore, all eigenvalues o P are real and positive Due to 32, all entries o P converge to as θ Hence, the eigenvalues o P also converge to as θ and there exists θ > such that the eigenvalues o P are less than 1 or all θ θ Theorem 3 Consider the system 1 together with the observer 18 and the observer gain 24 Assume that the conditions C1 C4 hold and, under Assumptions A1 A3, there exists a vector l R r such that lim ˆxt xt = t or all initial values x and ˆx o 1 and 18, respectively Proo Our proo is based on the work Gauthier et al, 1992 Assuming that the conditions C1 C4 hold, convergence can be analysed in the POCF coordinates We have to show that the equilibrium z =o 23 is globally asymptotically stable Let P R r r be a positive deinite matrix which will be speciied later, and take the positive deinite matrix P 2 rom Assumption A3 Then the candidate Lyapunov unction with V z 1, z 2 =V 1 z 1 +V 2 z 2 V 1 z 1 = z T 1 P z 1 and V 2 z 2 = z T 2 P 2 z 2 K Röbenack and AF Lynch is positive deinite and radially unbounded The time derivative o V 1 along 23a is d dt V 1 z 1 23a = z 1 T [ A lc T T P + P A lc T ] z 1 +2 z T 1 P [ α 1 y, z 2,u α 1 ŷ, ẑ 2,u ] 33 We choose the gain vector as Hence we have l = ν 2 P 1 c with ν> 34 A lc T T P + P A lc T =AT P + PA νc c T 35 Using A2, we obtain 2 z T 1 P [ α 1 y, z 2,u α 1 ŷ, ẑ 2,u ] 2 z T 1 P [ α 1 y, z 2,u α 1 ŷ, ẑ 2,u ] 2 P z 1 α 1 y, z 2,u α 1 ŷ, ẑ 2,u 2 P z 1 γ 1 ỹ + γ 2 z 2 2γ 1 P z 1 c T z 1 +2γ 2 P z 1 z 2 36 γ1 2 z 1 T P 2 z 1 + z 1 T c c T z 1 + γ2 2 zt 1 P 2 z 1 + z 2 T z 2 37 γ1 2 + γ2 2 z 1 T P 2 z 1 + z 1 T c c T z 1 + z 2 T z 2 38 or all > Going rom 36 to 37 we have used ab δa 2 +b/δ 2, δ R\{},a,b R Combining 33, 35, and 38 results in d dt V 1 z 1 23a z 1 T A T P + PA z1 + z 2 T z 2 + z 1 T γ1 2 + γ2 2 P 2 ν 1c c T z 1 39 Using Assumption A3, a bound on the time derivative o V 2 along 23b is given by 29: d dt V 2 z 2 γ 3 ỹ 2 γ 4 z b γ 3 z T 1 c c T z 1 γ 4 z T 2 z 2 4 From 39 and 4 we collect the terms with z 2 2 : γ 4 z
7 Observer design using a partial nonlinear observer canonical orm 339 This quadratic orm is negative deinite or any,γ 4 Next, we collect the terms with z 1 occurring in 39 and 4 and obtain [ z 1 T A T P + PA ν 1 γ 3 c c T + γ 1 + γ2 ] z 2 P Take θ rom Lemma 1 and choose { } θ>max θ, γ 1 + γ2 2 and ν>γ 3 Using Lemma 1, the matrix P is the unique solution o A T P θ+p θa + θpθ =c c T Then the quadratic orm 42 can be bounded as z T 1 [ A T P + PA ν 1 γ 3 c c T + γ 1 + γ2 2 P 2] z 1 z T 1 z T 1 z T 1 [ γ 1 + γ2 2 P 2 θp ν γ 3 c c T ] z 1 [ ] γ 1 + γ2 2 P 2 θp z 1 [ ] γ 1 + γ2 2 θp P z 1, 43 where we employed 31 Since 41 and 43 are both negative deinite, we conclude that V z 1, z 2 < or z 1, z 2, 23 Thereore, V is a Lyapunov unction o 23 and the equilibrium z 1, z 2 =, is globally asymptotically stable 332 Observer Design No 2 We require Assumption A1 and the ollowing two modiied versions o Assumptions A2 and A3: A4 The map α 1 is globally Lipschitz in z 2 uniormly in y and u, ie, there exists a positive constant γ 2 > such that α 1 y, z 2,u α 1 y, ẑ 2,u γ 2 z 2 or all y R, z 2, ẑ 2 R n r, and any bounded u A5 There exist a positive deinite matrix P 2 R n r n r and a positive constant γ 4 such that or V 2 z 2 = z T 2 P 2 z 2 we have V 2 z 2 α 2 y, z 2,u α 2 y, ẑ 2,u z 2 =2 z 2 T P 2 α 2 y, z 2,u α 2 y, ẑ 2,u γ 4 z 2 2 or all y R, z 2, ẑ 2 R n r, and any bounded u 44 The convergence result or the error dynamics 26 is given by the ollowing theorem, whose proo is based on Theorem 3 Theorem 4 Consider the system 1 together with the observer 25, where the observer gain is given by 28 Assume that the conditions C1 C4 hold Under Assumptions A1, A4, and A5, there exists a vector l R r such that lim ˆxt xt = t or all initial values x and ˆx o 1 and 25, respectively Proo The proo is identical to that o Theorem 3 with γ 1 = γ 3 = Hence we require { } θ>max θ, γ2 2, and ν>2 and, as beore,,γ 4 With the values o θ and ν satisying these inequalities, we can compute l using 3 and 34 It is important to note that although the stability results in Theorem 3 and 4 are stated globally, ollowing the results in Gauthier et al, 1992 or Shim et al, 21, we can obtain semi-global stability results with weaker conditions, suicient or most practical applications In particular, we do not require a global Lipschitz assumption or a semi-global result 4 Examples 41 Synchronous Machine Neglecting damper windings, armature resistance, time derivatives o stator lux linkages and back-em in stator voltage expressions, a synchronous motor can be expressed in state space orm as ollows Birk and Zeitz, 1988; Keller, 1986; Mukhopadhyay and Malik, 1972: ẋ 1 = x 2, ẋ 2 = B 1 A 1 x 2 A 2 x 3 sin x B 2 sin2x 1, ẋ 3 = u D 1 x 3 + D 2 cos x 1, y = x 1, 45
8 34 kˆx, y = p 1 A 1 y ˆx 1 p A 1 p 1 + A 2 1 y ˆx 1 A 2ˆx 3 sin y sin ˆx 1 B 2 D 2 cos y cos ˆx 1 K Röbenack and AF Lynch sin2y sin2ˆx1 48 The measured output and the irst state component x 1 denote the rotor position, x 2 is the rotor velocity, and x 3 is the ield winding lux linkage The control u is proportional to the voltage applied to ield winding The observability matrix Q 3 x 1 = 1 A 2 x 3 cos x 1 B 2 cos2x 1 A 1 A 2 sin x 1 is not regular or x 1 πz The unique starting vector ield or Q 3 satisying 8 is vx = 1, A 2 sin x 1 which is not deined or x 1 πz Since [ad 1 v, ad 2 v], the integrability condition or the OCF is not ulilled Krener and Isidori, 1983 Further, adding an output transormation does not lead to an OCF We consider the observer design proposed in Section 31 with the index r =2 We remark that, in general, the proposed method allows or a range o choice or r The reduced observability matrix Q 2 has the orm Q 2 = 1 1 A starting vector ield satisying 8 is v = Q + 2 e 2 =, 1, T This v results in ad v =1, A 1, T We supplement this vector with the vector w 1 =,, 1 T so that the Jacobian matrix S z = 1 1 A 1 1 is nonsingular We compute the transormations x = Sz and z = T x that are linear: x 1 = z 2 x 2 = z 1 A 1 z 2 x 3 = z 3 and z 1 = A 1 x 1 + x 2, z 2 = x 1, z 3 = x 3 Applying this transormation to 45 yields ż 1 z 1 ż 2 = 1 z 2 ż 3 + z 3 B 1 A 2 z 3 sin z 2 B 2 2 sin2z 2 A 1 z 2, } u D 1 z 3 + D 2 cos z 2 {{ } αz 2,z 3,u y = z 2 46 The second subsystem has the orm ż 3 = u D 1 z 3 + D 2 cos z 2 47 This system is linear i we consider the signals u and z 2 as time-dependent inputs Its unorced dynamics have an asymptotically stable equilibrium at z 3 =or D 1 = 3222 > The observer gain 28 has the orm 48 For the simulation parameters A 1 =273, A 2 =121, B 1 =3919, B 2 = 484, D 1 =3222, D 2 =19, and u 1933 were used The initial conditions are x = 8, 1, 1 T and ˆx =,, T all variables are per unit The observer eigenvalues were placed at 1, ie, p = 1 and p 1 = 2 The simulation results are shown in Fig 1 The slow convergence o the proposed observer is due to exp D 1 t resulting rom the second subsystem 47 It is important to note that the example does not admit an OCF Krener and Isidori, 1983 or a partial nonlinear observer orm Jo and Seo, 22 Also, extended Luenberger observer design leads to very large expressions Birk and Zeitz, 1988 We remark that the observability condition 2 is only satisied locally and there are advantages to not having the observer depend on the inverse o the observability matrix as this avoids singularities in the observer gain This inverse appears in most high-gain designs and other related methods based on canonical orms Finally, the example illustrates the computationally simple nature o the design 42 Magnetic Levitation System Under standard modelling assumptions, a one degree-o-reedom mag-
9 Observer design using a partial nonlinear observer canonical orm 341 v = ξ 3,wehave [v, g]x = ξ 3 x1 ψ x 2 mx 2 Fig 1 Trajectories o the motor example netic levitation system can be modelled by x 1 x 3 Rx 1x 2 x 2 x 2 2β x= x 3 g βx2, 2β gx, u= u, 49 1 mx 2 2 y = hx =x 2 Here x 1 is the coil current, x 2 the shited rotor position, x 3 the rotor velocity Schweitzer et al, 1994, and g, m, R, β are positive constants As the rotor makes physical contact with the coil at x 2 = c>, we must have x 2 c An OCF does not exist or the system 49 This can be seen by irst transorming the system to observable orm coordinates ξ 1 = ψx 2,ξ 2 = L ξ 1 = ψ x 2 x 3,ξ 3 = L 2 ξ 2, which include an output transormation denoted by ψ Krener and Respondek, 1985 We transorm the input vector ield g into the observable orm coordinates gx = ξ x gx = x 1ψ x 2 mx 2, where g is the representation o g in the ξ =ξ 1,ξ 2,ξ 3 T coordinates Since the Jacobian matrix ξ x has the orm ξ x = ψ x 2 ψ x 2 x 3 ψ x 2, we necessarily have ξ3 x 1 or ξ x to be nonsingular Since the starting vector in observable orm coordinates is Thereore an OCF including an output transormation does not exist Krener and Respondek, 1985 We consider a transormation to the POCF o index r =2 We have v = Q + 2 e 2 =,, 1 T and ad v = x 1 /x 2, 1, T Deining the complete vector ield w 1 = x 2,, T as the last column o the Jacobian matrix S z = x 1 /x 2 x 2 1 1, we ensure S to be nonsingular or x 2 c and [v, w 1 ]=, [ad v, w 1 ]= Letting Ψ t v x denote the low o the vector ield v, wehave Ψ z1 v x = x 1 x 2 z 1, x 1 z 2 + x 2 Ψ z2 ad v x x = 2 z 2 + x 2, x 3 Ψ z3 w 1 x = x 2 z 3 + x 1 x 2 x 3 Taking the composition o these lows and letting x =,c, T, we obtain x = Sz =Ψ z1 v z = T x = x 2 c, x 1 /x 2 Ψ z2 ad v Ψz3 w 1 x = x 3 z 3 z 2 + c z 2 + c z 1, see Nijmeijer and van der Schat, 199, Thm 236 The transormation T is a dieomorphism on {x R 3 :
10 342 x 2 >c} Transorming 49 into a POCF, we obtain ż 1 z 1 ż 2 = 1 z 2 ż 3 + y = z 2 z 3 g βz2 3 m u Rc + z 2 z 3, } 2β {{ } αz 2,z 3,u We consider the second observer design described in Section 32 The second subsystem is ż 3 = u Rc + z 2z 3 2β 5 and, since z 2, 5 has an exponentially stable equilibrium at z 3 = when u =, and hence it satisies Assumption A5 Although Assumption A4 is not satisied globally, we have ensured global error convergence as the irst error dynamics subsystem is LTI driven by a decaying input, β z 1 l 1 z 1 = + 2m z2 3 ẑ3 2, z 2 1 l 2 z 2 and hence or all z 1, z 2 T R 2, z 1, z 2 T as t Simulations were perormed using estimated state eedback to implement state state eedback linearizing control which tracks a square wave-like reerence trajectory shown in Fig 2 The parameter values were identiied rom an actual physical system: g = 981 m/s 2, β = 766 kg m 3 /s 2 A 2, c =4mm, m =68 kg, R =11Ω The observer eigenvalues were taken at 5 which leads to p = and p 1 = 1 The initial conditions were taken at x = 5 A,, T The corresponding estimate error trajectories are shown in Fig 3 5 Conclusion This paper has presented two observer designs or nonlinear systems based on a new partial nonlinear observer canonical orm POCF, a detectability condition, and a Lipschitz assumption The POCF exists under weaker conditions than the well-established OCF Krener and Isidori, 1983 and the existing partial observer canonical orms Jo and Seo, 22 Two observer designs are provided The irst design has an advantage o a simple gain Pos mm Trk Err mm Vel mm/s uv A x 1 Pos error mm Vel error mm/s Current error A 2 1 K Röbenack and AF Lynch Time s Fig 2 Trajectories o the magnetic levitation example Pos Re Time s Fig 3 Estimate errors or the magnetic levitation example expression The second design leads to a simpler error convergence proo but requires a more complicated gain ormula Two examples illustrate the design method The synchronous generator example involves an observability matrix which is only locally nonsingular; it illustrates how the proposed design avoids the problems o inverting this matrix This inversion is required in many canonical orm designs and is not possible at points where the system is not observable Hence, the proposed designs can admit a wide region o operation Neither o the examples admits an OCF, as Lie bracket conditions do not hold As the proposed approach involves weaker Lie bracket conditions, it is also more broadly applicable or this reason Reerences Amicucci G L and Monaco S 1998: On nonlinear detectability J Franklin Inst 335B, Vol 6, pp
11 Observer design using a partial nonlinear observer canonical orm 343 Bestle D and Zeitz M 1983: Canonical orm observer design or non-linear time-variable systems Int J Contr, Vol 38, No 2, pp Birk J and Zeitz M 1988: Extended Luenberger observer or non-linear multivariable systems Int J Contr, Vol 47, No 6, pp Brunovsky P 197: A classiication o linear controllable systems Kybernetica, Vol 6, No 3, pp Gauthier J P, Hammouri H and Othman S 1992: A simple observer or nonlinear systems Application to bioreactors IEEE Trans Automat Contr, Vol 37, No 6, pp Hermann R and Krener A J 1977: Nonlinear controllability and observability IEEE Trans Automat Contr, Vol AC-22, No5, pp Isidori A 1995: Nonlinear Control Systems: An Introduction, 3-rd Edn London: Springer Jo N H and Seo J H 22: Observer design or non-linear systems that are not uniormly observable Int J Contr, Vol 75, No 5, pp Kazantzis N and Kravaris C 1998: Nonlinear observer design using Lyapunov s auxiliary theorem Syst Contr Lett, Vol 34, pp Keller H 1986: Entwur nichtlinearer Beobachter mittels Normalormen Düsseldor: VDI-Verlag Krener A and Xiao M 22: Nonlinear observer design in the siegel domain SIAM J Contr Optim, Vol 41, No 3, pp Krener A, Hubbard M, Karaham S, Phelps A and Maag B 1991: Poincaré s linearization method applied to the design o nonlinear compensators Proc Algebraic Computing in Control, Vol 165 o Lecture Notes in Control and Inormation Science, Berlin: Springer, pp Krener A J and Isidori A 1983: Linearization by output injection and nonlinear observers Syst Contr Lett, Vol 3, pp Krener A J and Respondek W 1985: Nonlinear observers with linearizable error dynamics SIAM J Contr Optim, Vol 23, No 2, pp Lynch A and Borto S 21: Nonlinear observers with approximately linear error dynamics: The multivariable case IEEE Trans Automat Contr, Vol 46, No 7, pp Marino R and Tomei P 1995: Nonlinear Control Design: Geometric, Adaptive and Robust London: Prentice Hall Moore E H 192: On the reciprocal o the general algebraic matrix Bull Amer Math Soc, Vol 26, pp Mukhopadhyay B K and Malik O P 1972: Optimal control o synchronous-machine excitation by quasilinearisation techniques Proc IEE, Vol 119, No 1, pp Nijmeijer H and van der Schat A J 199: Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems New York: Springer Phelps A R 1991: On constructing nonlinear observers SIAM J Contr Optim, Vol 29, No 3, pp Respondek W 1986: Global aspects o linearization, equivalence to polynomial orms and decomposition o nonlinear control systems Proc Algebraic and Geometric Methods in Nonlinear Control, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp Respondek W, Pogromsky A and Nijmeijer H 24: Time scaling or observer design with linearizable error dynamics Automatica, Vol 4, No 2, pp Röbenack K and Lynch A F 24: High-gain nonlinear observer design using the observer canonical orm J Franklin Institute, submitted Rudolph J and Zeitz M 1994: A block triangular nonlinear observer normal orm Syst Contr Lett, Vol 23, pp 1 8 Schweitzer G, Bleuler H and Traxler A 1994: Active Magnetic Bearings Zürich: VDF Shim H, Son Y I and Seo J H 21: Semi-global observer or multi-output nonlinear systems Syst Contr Lett, Vol 42, No 3, pp Sontag E D and Wang Y 1997: Output-to-state stability and detectability o nonlinear system Syst Contr Lett, Vol 29, No 5, pp Wang Y and Lynch A 25: Block triangular observer orms or nonlinear observer design Automatica, submitted Wang Y and Lynch A 26: A block triangular orm or nonlinear observer design IEEE Trans Automat Contr, to appear Xia X-H and Gao W-B 1988: Non-linear observer design by observer canonical orm Int J Contr, Vol 47, No 4, pp Xia X H and Gao W B 1989: Nonlinear observer design by observer error linearization SIAM J Contr Optim, Vol 27, No 1, pp Received: 19 April 26 Revised: 16 June 26
12
Feedback Linearization
Feedback Linearization Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey May 14, 2015 1 Introduction Consider a class o single-input-single-output (SISO) nonlinear systems o the orm ẋ = (x) + g(x)u (1) y = h(x) (2)
More informationFeedback Linearization Lectures delivered at IIT-Kanpur, TEQIP program, September 2016.
Feedback Linearization Lectures delivered at IIT-Kanpur, TEQIP program, September 216 Ravi N Banavar banavar@iitbacin September 24, 216 These notes are based on my readings o the two books Nonlinear Control
More information1 Relative degree and local normal forms
THE ZERO DYNAMICS OF A NONLINEAR SYSTEM 1 Relative degree and local normal orms The purpose o this Section is to show how single-input single-output nonlinear systems can be locally given, by means o a
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION - Vol. XIII - Nonlinear Observers - A. J. Krener
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS A. J. Krener University of California, Davis, CA, USA Keywords: nonlinear observer, state estimation, nonlinear filtering, observability, high gain observers, minimum energy estimation,
More informationThe use of differential geometry methods for linearization of nonlinear electrical circuits with multiple inputs and multiple outputs (MIMOs)
Electrical Engineering (08) 00:85 84 https://doiorg/0007/s000-08-0746-0 ORIGINAL PAPER The use o dierential geometry methods or linearization o nonlinear electrical circuits with multiple inputs and multiple
More informationLecture : Feedback Linearization
ecture : Feedbac inearization Niola Misovic, dipl ing and Pro Zoran Vuic June 29 Summary: This document ollows the lectures on eedbac linearization tought at the University o Zagreb, Faculty o Electrical
More informationRobust feedback linearization
Robust eedback linearization Hervé Guillard Henri Bourlès Laboratoire d Automatique des Arts et Métiers CNAM/ENSAM 21 rue Pinel 75013 Paris France {herveguillardhenribourles}@parisensamr Keywords: Nonlinear
More informationFeedback Linearizability of Strict Feedforward Systems
Proceedings o the 47th IEEE Conerence on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec 9-11, 28 WeB11 Feedback Linearizability o Strict Feedorward Systems Witold Respondek and Issa Amadou Tall Abstract For
More informationStrong Lyapunov Functions for Systems Satisfying the Conditions of La Salle
06 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 49, NO. 6, JUNE 004 Strong Lyapunov Functions or Systems Satisying the Conditions o La Salle Frédéric Mazenc and Dragan Ne sić Abstract We present a construction
More informationNONLINEAR CONTROL OF POWER NETWORK MODELS USING FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION
NONLINEAR CONTROL OF POWER NETWORK MODELS USING FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION Steven Ball Science Applications International Corporation Columbia, MD email: sball@nmtedu Steve Schaer Department o Mathematics
More informationA Flow-Based Approximation of Observer Error Linearization for Non-Linear Systems
A Flow-Based Approximation of Observer Error Linearization for Non-Linear Systems KLAUS RÖBENACK Institute of Control Theory Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technische Universität Dresden
More informationReduced order observer design for nonlinear systems
Applied Mathematics Letters 19 (2006) 936 941 www.elsevier.com/locate/aml Reduced order observer design for nonlinear systems V. Sundarapandian Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, SRM
More informationYURI LEVIN AND ADI BEN-ISRAEL
Pp. 1447-1457 in Progress in Analysis, Vol. Heinrich G W Begehr. Robert P Gilbert and Man Wah Wong, Editors, World Scientiic, Singapore, 003, ISBN 981-38-967-9 AN INVERSE-FREE DIRECTIONAL NEWTON METHOD
More informationFinite time observation of nonlinear time-delay systems with unknown inputs
Author manuscript, published in "NOLCOS21 (21)" Finite time observation o nonlinear time-delay systems with unknown inputs G. Zheng J.-P. Barbot, D. Boutat, T. Floquet, J.-P. Richard INRIA Lille-Nord Europe,
More informationAnalysis of the regularity, pointwise completeness and pointwise generacy of descriptor linear electrical circuits
Computer Applications in Electrical Engineering Vol. 4 Analysis o the regularity pointwise completeness pointwise generacy o descriptor linear electrical circuits Tadeusz Kaczorek Białystok University
More informationFeedback linearization and stabilization of second-order nonholonomic chained systems
Feedback linearization and stabilization o second-order nonholonomic chained systems S. S. GE, ZHENDONG SUN, T. H. LEE and MARK W. SPONG Department o Electrical Engineering Coordinated Science Lab National
More informationTime scaling for observer design with linearizable error dynamics
Available online at wwwsciencedirectcom Automatica 40 (2004) 277 285 wwwelseviercom/locate/automatica Brie paper Time scaling or observer design with linearizable error dynamics W Respondek a;, A Pogromsky
More informationLIE TRANSFORM CONSTRUCTION OF EXPONENTIAL NORMAL FORM OBSERVERS. Suba Thomas Harry G. Kwatny Bor-Chin Chang
LIE TRANSFORM CONSTRUCTION OF EXPONENTIAL NORMAL FORM OBSERVERS Suba Thomas Harry G Kwatny Bor-Chin Chang Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 1914, USA
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More informationNonlinear Discrete-Time Observer Design with Linearizable Error Dynamics
622 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 48, NO. 4, APRIL 2003 Nonlinear Discrete-Time Observer Design with Linearizable Error Dynamics MingQing Xiao, Nikolaos Kazantzis, Costas Kravaris, Arthur
More informationSTATE OBSERVERS FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEMS WITH SMOOTH/BOUNDED INPUT 1
K Y B E R N E T I K A V O L U M E 3 5 ( 1 9 9 9 ), N U M B E R 4, P A G E S 3 9 3 4 1 3 STATE OBSERVERS FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEMS WITH SMOOTH/BOUNDED INPUT 1 Alfredo Germani and Costanzo Manes It is known
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationNumerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations in Fluctuationlessness Theorem Perspective
Numerical Solution o Ordinary Dierential Equations in Fluctuationlessness Theorem Perspective NEJLA ALTAY Bahçeşehir University Faculty o Arts and Sciences Beşiktaş, İstanbul TÜRKİYE TURKEY METİN DEMİRALP
More informationTelescoping Decomposition Method for Solving First Order Nonlinear Differential Equations
Telescoping Decomposition Method or Solving First Order Nonlinear Dierential Equations 1 Mohammed Al-Reai 2 Maysem Abu-Dalu 3 Ahmed Al-Rawashdeh Abstract The Telescoping Decomposition Method TDM is a new
More informationFrom acceleration-based semi-active vibration reduction control to functional observer design
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES http://wwwmerlcom From acceleration-based semi-active vibration reduction control to unctional observer design Wang, Y; Utsunomiya, K TR18-35 March 18 Abstract
More informationL -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems
L -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems Shoudong Huang M.R. James Z.P. Jiang August 19, 2004 Accepted by Systems & Control Letters Abstract In this paper, we consider the L -bounded robust
More informationOutput Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More informationNonlinear Control Systems
Nonlinear Control Systems António Pedro Aguiar pedro@isr.ist.utl.pt 7. Feedback Linearization IST-DEEC PhD Course http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/%7epedro/ncs1/ 1 1 Feedback Linearization Given a nonlinear
More informationOn the convergence of normal forms for analytic control systems
Chapter 1 On the convergence of normal forms for analytic control systems Wei Kang Department of Mathematics, Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA 93943 wkang@nps.navy.mil Arthur J. Krener Department
More informationINRIA Rocquencourt, Le Chesnay Cedex (France) y Dept. of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC USA
Nonlinear Observer Design using Implicit System Descriptions D. von Wissel, R. Nikoukhah, S. L. Campbell y and F. Delebecque INRIA Rocquencourt, 78 Le Chesnay Cedex (France) y Dept. of Mathematics, North
More informationA nonlinear canonical form for reduced order observer design
A nonlinear canonical form for reduced order observer design Driss Boutat, Gang Zheng, Hassan Hammouri To cite this version: Driss Boutat, Gang Zheng, Hassan Hammouri. A nonlinear canonical form for reduced
More informationSWEEP METHOD IN ANALYSIS OPTIMAL CONTROL FOR RENDEZ-VOUS PROBLEMS
J. Appl. Math. & Computing Vol. 23(2007), No. 1-2, pp. 243-256 Website: http://jamc.net SWEEP METHOD IN ANALYSIS OPTIMAL CONTROL FOR RENDEZ-VOUS PROBLEMS MIHAI POPESCU Abstract. This paper deals with determining
More informationMANEUVER REGULATION, TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION, AND ZERO DYNAMICS
MANEUVER REGULATION, TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION, AND ZERO DYNAMICS Chris Nielsen,1 Manredi Maggiore,1 Department o Electrical and Computer Engineering, University o Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
More informationOutput Feedback and State Feedback. EL2620 Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Observers. Nonlinear Controllers. ẋ = f(x,u), y = h(x)
Output Feedback and State Feedback EL2620 Nonlinear Control Lecture 10 Exact feedback linearization Input-output linearization Lyapunov-based control design methods ẋ = f(x,u) y = h(x) Output feedback:
More informationSemi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback
2005 American Control Conference June 8-10, 2005. Portland, OR, USA FrC17.5 Semi-global Robust Output Regulation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using Output Feedback Weiyao Lan, Zhiyong Chen and Jie
More informationGlobal output regulation through singularities
Global output regulation through singularities Yuh Yamashita Nara Institute of Science and Techbology Graduate School of Information Science Takayama 8916-5, Ikoma, Nara 63-11, JAPAN yamas@isaist-naraacjp
More informationHigh-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 3 Regulation
High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 3 Regulation High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 3Regulation p. 1/5 Internal Model Principle d r Servo- Stabilizing u y
More informationAnti-synchronization of a new hyperchaotic system via small-gain theorem
Anti-synchronization of a new hyperchaotic system via small-gain theorem Xiao Jian( ) College of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China (Received 8 February 2010; revised
More informationStability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games
Stability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games Alberto Bressan ) and Khai T. Nguyen ) *) Department of Mathematics, Penn State University **) Department of Mathematics,
More informationSTRUCTURE MATTERS: Some Notes on High Gain Observer Design for Nonlinear Systems. Int. Conf. on Systems, Analysis and Automatic Control 2012
Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering Institute of Control Theory STRUCTURE MATTERS: Some Notes on High Gain Observer Design for Nonlinear Systems Klaus Röbenack Int. Conf. on Systems, Analysis
More informationAbstract. 1. Introduction
Chin. Ann. o Math. 19B: 4(1998),401-408. THE GROWTH THEOREM FOR STARLIKE MAPPINGS ON BOUNDED STARLIKE CIRCULAR DOMAINS** Liu Taishun* Ren Guangbin* Abstract 1 4 The authors obtain the growth and covering
More informationSeparation Theorems for a Class of Retarded Nonlinear Systems
Separation Theorems or a Class o Retarded Nonlinear Systems A. Germani C. Manes P. Pepe Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e dell Inormazione 674 Poggio di Roio L Aquila Italy e-mail: alredo.germani@univaq.it
More informationHigh gain observer for a class of implicit systems
High gain observer for a class of implicit systems Hassan HAMMOURI Laboratoire d Automatique et de Génie des Procédés, UCB-Lyon 1, 43 bd du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne, France E-mail: hammouri@lagepuniv-lyon1fr
More informationPhysics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Solution by Quadrature-1
October 14, 003 11:47:49 1 Introduction Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics Solution by Quadrature In the previous lectures, we have reduced the number o eective degrees o reedom that are needed to solve
More informationOn Convexity of Reachable Sets for Nonlinear Control Systems
Proceedings o the European Control Conerence 27 Kos, Greece, July 2-5, 27 WeC5.2 On Convexity o Reachable Sets or Nonlinear Control Systems Vadim Azhmyakov, Dietrich Flockerzi and Jörg Raisch Abstract
More informationObservability and forward-backward observability of discrete-time nonlinear systems
Observability and forward-backward observability of discrete-time nonlinear systems Francesca Albertini and Domenico D Alessandro Dipartimento di Matematica pura a applicata Universitá di Padova, 35100
More informationINVERSION IN INDIRECT OPTIMAL CONTROL
INVERSION IN INDIRECT OPTIMAL CONTROL François Chaplais, Nicolas Petit Centre Automatique et Systèmes, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, 35, rue Saint-Honoré 7735 Fontainebleau Cedex, France,
More informationControllability, Observability & Local Decompositions
ontrollability, Observability & Local Decompositions Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Lie Bracket Distributions ontrollability ontrollability Distributions
More information1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1
Appendix B Revision Problems 1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system 0 1 1 ẋ = x, x(0) =. 2 3 1 Class test, August 1998 2. Given the linear system described by 2 α 1 1 ẋ = x +
More informationControl design using Jordan controllable canonical form
Control design using Jordan controllable canonical form Krishna K Busawon School of Engineering, Ellison Building, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK email: krishnabusawon@unnacuk
More informationGlobal Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 2005 Seville, Spain, December 2-5, 2005 ThB09.4 Global Practical Output Regulation of a Class of Nonlinear
More information2. ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS. Introduction
. ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS Introduction So ar we have seen some o the methods or providing eta evaluations that appear in the literature and we have seen some o the interesting properties
More informationAPPLICATION OF INPUT STATE OF THE SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION FOR LINEARIZATION OF SELECTED ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS
Journal of ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 67 (26), NO3, 99 25 APPLICATION OF INPUT STATE OF THE SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION FOR LINEARIZATION OF SELECTED ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS Andrzej Zawadzki Sebastian Różowicz
More informationPassivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets
Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets Mohamed I. El-Hawwary and Manfredi Maggiore Abstract We investigate the stabilization of closed sets for passive nonlinear systems which are contained
More information1 The Observability Canonical Form
NONLINEAR OBSERVERS AND SEPARATION PRINCIPLE 1 The Observability Canonical Form In this Chapter we discuss the design of observers for nonlinear systems modelled by equations of the form ẋ = f(x, u) (1)
More informationOUTPUT FEEDBACK STABILIZATION FOR COMPLETELY UNIFORMLY OBSERVABLE NONLINEAR SYSTEMS. H. Shim, J. Jin, J. S. Lee and Jin H. Seo
OUTPUT FEEDBACK STABILIZATION FOR COMPLETELY UNIFORMLY OBSERVABLE NONLINEAR SYSTEMS H. Shim, J. Jin, J. S. Lee and Jin H. Seo School of Electrical Engineering, Seoul National University San 56-, Shilim-Dong,
More informationLinear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Design I
Lecture 7 Linear Quadratic Regulator LQR) Design I Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Proessor Dept. o Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute o Science - Bangalore LQR Design: Problem Objective o drive the state
More informationFluctuationlessness Theorem and its Application to Boundary Value Problems of ODEs
Fluctuationlessness Theorem and its Application to Boundary Value Problems o ODEs NEJLA ALTAY İstanbul Technical University Inormatics Institute Maslak, 34469, İstanbul TÜRKİYE TURKEY) nejla@be.itu.edu.tr
More informationObserver Design for a class of uniformly observable MIMO nonlinear systems with coupled structure
Proceedings of the 7th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Seoul, Korea, July 6-, 2008 Observer Design for a class of uniformly observable MIMO nonlinear systems with coupled
More informationNonlinear Observers for Autonomous Lipschitz Continuous Systems
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 48, NO 3, MARCH 2003 451 Nonlinear Observers for Autonomous Lipschitz Continuous Systems Gerhard Kreisselmeier and Robert Engel Abstract This paper considers
More informationSOME CHARACTERIZATIONS OF HARMONIC CONVEX FUNCTIONS
International Journal o Analysis and Applications ISSN 2291-8639 Volume 15, Number 2 2017, 179-187 DOI: 10.28924/2291-8639-15-2017-179 SOME CHARACTERIZATIONS OF HARMONIC CONVEX FUNCTIONS MUHAMMAD ASLAM
More informationDIFFERENTIAL POLYNOMIALS GENERATED BY SECOND ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Journal o Applied Analysis Vol. 14, No. 2 2008, pp. 259 271 DIFFERENTIAL POLYNOMIALS GENERATED BY SECOND ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS B. BELAÏDI and A. EL FARISSI Received December 5, 2007 and,
More informationA NOTE ON HENSEL S LEMMA IN SEVERAL VARIABLES
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 125, Number 11, November 1997, Pages 3185 3189 S 0002-9939(97)04112-9 A NOTE ON HENSEL S LEMMA IN SEVERAL VARIABLES BENJI FISHER (Communicated by
More informationSymbolic-Numeric Methods for Improving Structural Analysis of DAEs
Symbolic-Numeric Methods or Improving Structural Analysis o DAEs Guangning Tan, Nedialko S. Nedialkov, and John D. Pryce Abstract Systems o dierential-algebraic equations (DAEs) are generated routinely
More informationReceived: 30 July 2017; Accepted: 29 September 2017; Published: 8 October 2017
mathematics Article Least-Squares Solution o Linear Dierential Equations Daniele Mortari ID Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; mortari@tamu.edu; Tel.: +1-979-845-734
More informationNonlinear Control Lecture 9: Feedback Linearization
Nonlinear Control Lecture 9: Feedback Linearization Farzaneh Abdollahi Department of Electrical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Fall 2011 Farzaneh Abdollahi Nonlinear Control Lecture 9 1/75
More informationFeedback linearization control of systems with singularities: a ball-beam revisit
Chapter 1 Feedback linearization control o systems with singularities: a ball-beam revisit Fu Zhang The Mathworks, Inc zhang@mathworks.com Benito Fernndez-Rodriguez Department o Mechanical Engineering,
More informationContraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 WeB4.5 Contraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems B. B. Sharma and I. N. Kar, Member IEEE Abstract
More informationNonlinear observer normal form with output injection and extended dynamic
9th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems Toulouse, France, September 4-6, 213 FrA2.2 Nonlinear observer normal form with output injection and extended dynamic R. Tami,1 D. Boutat G. Zheng Institute
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Control of an Electric Motor
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 2, 2008, no. 52, 2557-2568 Adaptive Nonlinear Control of an Electric Motor A. Kaddouri, O. Akhrif 2, M. Ghribi and H. Le-Huy 3 Department of electrical engineering,
More informationRigorous pointwise approximations for invariant densities of non-uniformly expanding maps
Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 5, 35, 8 44 c Cambridge University Press, 4 doi:.7/etds.3.9 Rigorous pointwise approximations or invariant densities o non-uniormly expanding maps WAEL BAHSOUN, CHRISTOPHER BOSE
More informationA Simple Explanation of the Sobolev Gradient Method
A Simple Explanation o the Sobolev Gradient Method R. J. Renka July 3, 2006 Abstract We have observed that the term Sobolev gradient is used more oten than it is understood. Also, the term is oten used
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationThe Polynomial Extended Kalman Filter as an Exponential Observer for Nonlinear Discrete-Time Systems
Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec. 9-11, 2008 The Polynomial Extended Kalman Filter as an Exponential Observer for Nonlinear Discrete-Time Systems Alfredo
More informationNON-ARCHIMEDEAN BANACH SPACE. ( ( x + y
J. Korean Soc. Math. Educ. Ser. B: Pure Appl. Math. ISSN(Print 6-0657 https://doi.org/0.7468/jksmeb.08.5.3.9 ISSN(Online 87-608 Volume 5, Number 3 (August 08, Pages 9 7 ADDITIVE ρ-functional EQUATIONS
More informationHao Lei Wei Lin,1. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
UNIVERSA OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTRO OF NONINEAR SYSTEMS WITH UNKNOWN GROWTH RATE Hao ei Wei in, Dept of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 446, USA
More informationTopic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis
Topic # 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis Fall 010 16.30/31 Lyapunov Stability Analysis Very general method to prove (or disprove) stability of
More informationGlobal Weak Solution of Planetary Geostrophic Equations with Inviscid Geostrophic Balance
Global Weak Solution o Planetary Geostrophic Equations with Inviscid Geostrophic Balance Jian-Guo Liu 1, Roger Samelson 2, Cheng Wang 3 Communicated by R. Temam) Abstract. A reormulation o the planetary
More informationObservability Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Using Pseudo-Linear Transformation
9t IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems Toulouse, France, September 4-6, 2013 TC3.4 Observability Analysis o Nonlinear Systems Using Pseudo-Linear Transormation Yu Kawano Tosiyui Otsua Osaa University,
More informationRobust Residual Selection for Fault Detection
Robust Residual Selection or Fault Detection Hamed Khorasgani*, Daniel E Jung**, Gautam Biswas*, Erik Frisk**, and Mattias Krysander** Abstract A number o residual generation methods have been developed
More informationPIECEWISE linear (PL) systems which are fully parametric
Proceedings o the International MultiConerence o Engineers and Computer Scientists 4 Vol I,, March - 4, 4, Hong Kong Designs o Minimal-Order State Observer and Servo Controller or a Robot Arm Using Piecewise
More informationAn homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted pendulum
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 FrA.5 An homotopy method for exact tracking of nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: the example of the spherical inverted
More informationScattering of Solitons of Modified KdV Equation with Self-consistent Sources
Commun. Theor. Phys. Beijing, China 49 8 pp. 89 84 c Chinese Physical Society Vol. 49, No. 4, April 5, 8 Scattering o Solitons o Modiied KdV Equation with Sel-consistent Sources ZHANG Da-Jun and WU Hua
More informationOn High-Rate Cryptographic Compression Functions
On High-Rate Cryptographic Compression Functions Richard Ostertág and Martin Stanek Department o Computer Science Faculty o Mathematics, Physics and Inormatics Comenius University Mlynská dolina, 842 48
More informationA new Control Strategy for Trajectory Tracking of Fire Rescue Turntable Ladders
Proceedings o the 17th World Congress The International Federation o Automatic Control Seoul, Korea, July 6-11, 28 A new Control Strategy or Trajectory Tracking o Fire Rescue Turntable Ladders N. Zimmert,
More informationDynamic Feedback Linearization applied to Asymptotic Tracking: generalization about the Turbocharged Diesel Engine outputs choice
Dynamic Feedback Linearization applied to Asymptotic Tracking: generalization about the Turbocharged Diesel Engine outputs choice 9 American Control Conerence Hyatt Regency Riverront, St. Louis, MO, USA
More informationSOME COMMENTS ON OBSERVABILITY NORMAL FORM AND STEP-BY-STEP SLIDING MODE OBSERVER
SOME COMMENTS ON OBSERVABILITY NORMAL FORM AND STEP-BY-STEP SLIDING MODE OBSERVER G ZHENG 1, L BOUTAT-BADDAS 2, JP BARBOT 1 AND D BOUTAT 3 1 EQUIPE COMMANDE DES SYSTÈMES (ECS), ENSEA, 6 AV DU PONCEAU,
More informationNonlinear disturbance observer-based control for multi-input multi-output nonlinear systems subject to mismatching condition
Loughborough University Institutional Repository Nonlinear disturbance observer-based control or multi-input multi-output nonlinear systems subject to mismatching condition This item was submitted to Loughborough
More informationAsymptotics of integrals
December 9, Asymptotics o integrals Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.e http://www.math.umn.e/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.e/ garrett/m/v/basic asymptotics.pd]. Heuristic or the main term
More informationConvergent systems: analysis and synthesis
Convergent systems: analysis and synthesis Alexey Pavlov, Nathan van de Wouw, and Henk Nijmeijer Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, P.O.Box. 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven,
More informationOutput Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form
Output Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form Charalampos P. Bechlioulis, Achilles Theodorakopoulos 2 and George A. Rovithakis 2 Abstract The
More informationSimpler Functions for Decompositions
Simpler Functions or Decompositions Bernd Steinbach Freiberg University o Mining and Technology, Institute o Computer Science, D-09596 Freiberg, Germany Abstract. This paper deals with the synthesis o
More informationActa Mathematica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyíregyháziensis 21 (2005), ISSN
Acta Mathematica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyíregyháziensis 21 (2005), 79 7 www.emis.de/journals ISSN 176-0091 WARPED PRODUCT SUBMANIFOLDS IN GENERALIZED COMPLEX SPACE FORMS ADELA MIHAI Abstract. B.Y. Chen
More informationRank Lowering Linear Maps and Multiple Dirichlet Series Associated to GL(n, R)
Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly Volume, Number Special Issue: In honor o John H Coates, Part o 6 65, 6 Ran Lowering Linear Maps and Multiple Dirichlet Series Associated to GLn, R Introduction Dorian
More informationOn linear quadratic optimal control of linear time-varying singular systems
On linear quadratic optimal control of linear time-varying singular systems Chi-Jo Wang Department of Electrical Engineering Southern Taiwan University of Technology 1 Nan-Tai Street, Yungkung, Tainan
More informationA Universal Control Approach for a Family of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 5 Seville, Spain, December -5, 5 A Universal Control Approach for a Family of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems
More informationSupplementary material for Continuous-action planning for discounted infinite-horizon nonlinear optimal control with Lipschitz values
Supplementary material or Continuous-action planning or discounted ininite-horizon nonlinear optimal control with Lipschitz values List o main notations x, X, u, U state, state space, action, action space,
More informationQuasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
Joint 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conference Shanghai, P.R. China, December 16-18, 2009 FrA11.5 Quasi-ISS Reduced-Order Observers and Quantized Output Feedback
More informationHigher Order Averaging : periodic solutions, linear systems and an application
Higher Order Averaging : periodic solutions, linear systems and an application Hartono and A.H.P. van der Burgh Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Department of Applied Mathematical Analysis,
More informationEXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS MODELLING COMPRESSIBLE FLUID FLOW
Electronic Journal o Dierential Equations, Vol. 15 (15, No. 16, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 17-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.e or http://ejde.math.unt.e tp ejde.math.txstate.e EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO SYSTEMS
More information