WAMIT-MOSES Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study. JRME, July 2000
|
|
- Geraldine Freeman
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study JRME, Prepared by Hull Engineering Department J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 1
2 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Summary Table of Contents 1. Introduction Test Models Results and Discussion References...3 List of Tables TABLE 2.1 GEOMETRY AND NUMBER OF PANELS... 5 TABLE 3.1 NORMALIZATION... 8 List of Figures FIGURE 2.1 SIMPLE BOX... 5 FIGURE 2.3 GENERAL SHIP FORM... 6 FIGURE 2.4 TLP... 7 FIGURE 2.5 SEMI-SUBMERSIBLE (MOB)... 7 FIGURE 3.1 ADDED MASS COEFFICIENTS FOR BOX... 1 FIGURE 3.2 DAMPING COEFFICIENTS FOR BOX FIGURE 3.3 WAVE EXCITING FORCES AND MOMENTS FOR BOX FIGURE 3.4 MOTION FOR BOX FIGURE 3.5 ADDED MASS COEFFICIENTS FOR CYLINDER FIGURE 3.6 DAMPING COEFFICIENTS FOR CYLINDER FIGURE 3.7 WAVE EXCITING FORCES AND MOMENTS FOR CYLINDER FIGURE 3.8 MOTION FOR CYLINDER FIGURE 3.9 ADDED MASS COEFFICIENTS FOR SHIP FIGURE 3.1 DAMPING COEFFICIENTS FOR SHIP FIGURE 3.11 WAVE EXCITING FORCES AND MOMENTS FOR SHIP... 2 FIGURE 3.12 MOTION FOR SHIP FIGURE 3.13 ADDED MASS COEFFICIENTS FOR TLP FIGURE 3.14 DAMPING COEFFICIENTS FOR TLP FIGURE 3.15 WAVE EXCITING FORCES AND MOMENTS FOR TLP FIGURE 3.16 MOTION FOR TLP FIGURE 3.17 ADDED MASS COEFFICIENTS FOR MOB FIGURE 3.18 DAMPING COEFFICIENTS FOR MOB FIGURE 3.19 WAVE EXCITING FORCES AND MOMENTS FOR MOB FIGURE 3.2 MOTION FOR MOB J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 2
3 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Summary The global motion analysis and related installation procedures are very important tasks for floating offshore platforms. As new deep-water oil and gas production systems such as a SPAR, FPSO and TLP are introduced these tasks have become more important since the performance of these floating platforms might be decided by them. For the global motion analysis is the most widely used and well-proven 3-D diffraction and radiation computer program in the frequency domain. For the combined work such as a global motion analysis, installation simulation and fatigue analysis may be the most popular computer program in this area. Since has the same 3-D diffraction and radiation computer module one may use it as the tool for the global motion analysis. However, it may be necessary to examine the software performance before applying it to the floating production platforms. In this study the hydrodynamic analysis using and were carried out to investigate the performance of the two computer programs. Five models which can represent most of the floating platforms currently installed or under development were selected and the results were compared for a wide range of wave periods and wave heading angles. The mathematical formulation and theoretical background for the two computer programs can be found in Ref [1] and Ref [2] or and J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 3
4 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study 1. Introduction The use of to analyze the global motion and related installation procedures for floating platforms has increased since installation engineering and related work has become more complicated as new hull forms are introduced. The object of this study is to compare the hydrodynamic analysis results from and. is the most widely used 3-D computer program for the diffraction and radiation problem and is a well-proven computer program. also has the same capability and since both programs use conventional 3-D constant panel method and mathematical formulation one should have the same results. However, results have never been systematically compared with results. In order to compare the results one must choose various offshore floating structures and a wide range of wave periods. Different wave heading angles should also be considered to investigate the performance of both programs. In this study two simple geometries (rectangular box and vertical cylinder) and three offshore floating structures (ship, TLP, semi-submersible) are chosen with the proper number of panels. These five models can represent or simulate most offshore floating structures currently installed or under development such as a FPSO, SPAR, TLP and Semi-submersible. Using and, added mass and damping coefficients, wave exciting forces and moments and motions were calculated for the wide range of wave periods and heading angles. The version of each program used in this study was 5.4PC and J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 4
5 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study 2. Test Models In order to compare the effectiveness of the programs, five models were selected to cover most of the floating structures used for oil and gas production. By selecting the rectangular box, vertical cylinder, general ship form, TLP and semi-submersible type of structures one can examine the performance of the two computer programs for most floating structures currently installed or under development. For example, the box can represent a FPSO or Tanker that has a large block coefficient and the vertical cylinder can be regarded as a simplified SPAR platform. The TLP and MOB can represent a typical semi-submersible. The following table shows the basic dimension and characteristics of the five selected models, which were used in the numerical calculations. TYPE Length (meter) Beam or Diameter (meter) Draft (meter) Displacement (Metric- Tons) Center of Gravity (KG) Number of Panels Box , Cylinder , Ship , TLP , MOB , Table 2.1 Geometry and number of panels The three-dimensional mesh for each model used for both methods is shown in Figures Figure 2.1 Simple box J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 5
6 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Figure 2.2 Simple Vertical cylinder Figure 2.2 General ship form J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 6
7 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Figure 2.3 TLP Figure 2.4 Semi-Submersible (MOB) J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 7
8 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study The nodal and panel input data used for both programs ( and ) is actually the same since all geometry files were directly converted from s geometry input files. Since definition of the normal vector on the panel for the two programs is different, care must be taken when converting the geometry file to. By using the same number of panels and geometry more consistent comparison between the two programs is achieved. The wave periods used in the numerical calculation were selected from 4 seconds to 42 seconds (total 2 periods by increments of 2 seconds) which covers a wide range of waves. Three waveheading angles (head, quartering, and beam) were also studied. 3. Results and Discussion Hydrodynamic coefficients (added mass and damping coefficients), wave exciting forces and all motion response amplitude () were extracted and compared from both numerical outputs. All outputs are normalized by mass, frequency and wave amplitude. Table 3.1 shows the normalization of each parameter. All units are based on the metric system. Resulting components Units Normalized variable Added mass coefficient Mass A ij /Mass Damping coefficient Mass/Time SQRT(B ij /Mass) Wave exciting forces Tons Tons/A Wave exciting moments Tons*Meter Tons*Meter/A Linear motion Meter Meter/A Angular motion Degree Degree/A * A : Wave amplitude Table 3.1 Normalization Hydrodynamic coefficients, wave exciting forces and motion s for 45 degree wave heading are plotted in Figures Although the other two wave direction computations were completed, the results are not presented here. For all five models, results show very good agreement between two programss. This was expected since both programs use the same constant panel method. From this study the following statements can be made. 1. Results show very good agreement between the two computer programs. 2. For the magnitude near the resonance period, there are some differences. These differences near the resonance wave period are known to be normal for the different numerical methods. Near the resonance period the calculation is very sensitive so that the small numerical difference can cause relatively large differences. According to the results from this study the J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 8
9 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study differences are not that significant for the simple geometry like box, cylinder, ship and TLP. But complicate geometry like MOB has more pronounced difference than the simple geometry. 3. Both programs give very effective computing time when a moderate number of panels are used. But is more effective in the computing time when one uses the symmetry option. From this study we can conclude that the 3-D diffraction code can be used as a hydrodynamic analysis tool. The comparison with, which is a widely used and wellproven code, shows good agreement. As a further study, it is suggested to use larger number of panels for both programs to get more accurate results. J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 9
10 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Added Mass Coefficient(Surge,A11) Added Mass Coefficient(Sway,A22) 2.5E-1 2.5E+ 2.E+ 1.5E-1 1.E-1 1.5E+ 1.E+ 5.E-2 5.E-1 Added Mass Coefficient(Heave,A33) Added Mass Coefficient(Roll,A44) 1.4E+ 1.8E+1 1.2E+ 1.6E+1 1.E+ 1.4E+1 1.2E+1 8.E-1 6.E-1 1.E+1 8.E+ 4.E-1 6.E+ 4.E+ 2.E+ Added Mass Coefficient(Pitch,A55) Added Mass Coefficient(Yaw,A66) 6.E+1 8.E+1 5.5E+1 7.E+1 5.E+1 4.5E+1 4.E+1 6.E+1 5.E+1 4.E+1 3.E+1 3.5E+1 2.E+1 1.E+1 3.E+1 Figure 3.1 Added Mass Coefficients for BOX J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 1
11 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Damping Coefficient(Surge,B11) Damping Coefficient(Sway,B22) 1.E-1 9.E-1 9.E-2 8.E-1 8.E-2 7.E-2 6.E-2 5.E-2 4.E-2 3.E-2 7.E-1 6.E-1 5.E-1 4.E-1 3.E-1 2.E-2 1.E-2 1.E-1 Damping Coefficient(Heave,B33) Damping Coefficient(Roll,B44) 1.4E-1 1.E+1 1.2E-1 9.E+ 8.E+ 1.E-1 7.E+ 8.E-2 6.E-2 4.E-2 6.E+ 5.E+ 4.E+ 3.E+ 2.E-2 2.E+ 1.E+ Damping Coefficient(Pitch,B55) Damping Coefficient(Yaw,B66) 1.4E+1 5.E+1 1.2E+1 4.5E+1 4.E+1 1.E+1 3.5E+1 8.E+ 6.E+ 4.E+ 3.E+1 2.5E+1 2.E+1 1.5E+1 2.E+ 1.E+1 5.E+ Figure 3.2 Damping Coefficients for BOX J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 11
12 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Surge Wave Exciting Force Sway Wave Exciting Force 2.E+3 6.E+3 1.8E+3 1.6E+3 5.E+3 F/A 1.4E+3 1.2E+3 1.E+3 8.E+2 6.E+2 F/A 4.E+3 3.E+3 2.E+3 4.E+2 2.E+2 1.E+3 Heave Wave Exciting Force Roll Wave Exciting Moment 8.E+3 6.E+4 7.E+3 5.E+4 6.E+3 5.E+3 4.E+4 F/A 4.E+3 M/A 3.E+4 3.E+3 2.E+4 2.E+3 1.E+3 1.E+4 Pitch Wave Exciting Moment Yaw Wave Exciting Moment 1.2E+5 4.E+5 1.E+5 3.5E+5 3.E+5 8.E+4 2.5E+5 M/A 6.E+4 4.E+4 M/A 2.E+5 1.5E+5 1.E+5 2.E+4 5.E+4 Figure 3.3 Wave exciting forces and moments for BOX J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 12
13 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Surge Sway 8.E-1 8.E-1 7.E-1 7.E-1 6.E-1 6.E-1 5.E-1 4.E-1 3.E-1 5.E-1 4.E-1 3.E-1 1.E-1 1.E-1 Heave Roll 2.E+ 2.5E-1 1.8E+ 1.6E+ 1.4E+ 1.2E+ 1.E+ 8.E-1 6.E-1 1.5E-1 1.E-1 4.E-1 5.E-2 Pitch Yaw 2.5E+ 4.E-1 2.E+ 3.5E-1 3.E-1 1.5E+ 1.E+ 2.5E-1 1.5E-1 5.E-1 1.E-1 5.E-2 Figure 3.4 Motion for BOX J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 13
14 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Added Mass Coefficient(Surge,A11) Added Mass Coefficient(Sway,A22) 1.2E+ 1.2E+ 1.E+ 1.E+ 8.E-1 8.E-1 6.E-1 6.E-1 4.E-1 4.E-1 Added Mass Coefficient(Heave,A33) Added Mass Coefficient(Roll,A44) 1.E-1 1.2E+2 9.E-2 8.E-2 1.E+2 7.E-2 6.E-2 5.E-2 4.E-2 8.E+1 6.E+1 3.E-2 4.E+1 2.E-2 1.E-2 2.E+1 Added Mass Coefficient(Pitch,A55) Added Mass Coefficient(Yaw,A66) 1.2E+2 7.E-3 1.E+2 6.E-3 8.E+1 5.E-3 6.E+1 4.E+1 4.E-3 3.E-3 2.E-3 2.E+1 1.E-3 Figure 3.5 Added Mass Coefficients for CYLINDER J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 14
15 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Damping Coefficient(Surge,B11) Damping Coefficient(Sway,B22) 1.2E-1 1.2E-1 1.E-1 1.E-1 8.E-2 6.E-2 4.E-2 8.E-2 6.E-2 4.E-2 2.E-2 2.E-2 Damping Coefficient(Heave,B33) Damping Coefficient(Roll,B44) 7.E-4 1.2E+1 6.E-4 1.E+1 5.E-4 4.E-4 3.E-4 2.E-4 8.E+ 6.E+ 4.E+ 1.E-4 2.E+ Damping Coefficient(Pitch,B55) Damping Coefficient(Yaw,B66) 1.2E+1 5.E-4 4.5E-4 1.E+1 4.E-4 8.E+ 6.E+ 4.E+ 3.5E-4 3.E-4 2.5E-4 2.E-4 1.5E-4 2.E+ 1.E-4 5.E-5 Figure 3.6 Damping Coefficients for CYLINDER J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 15
16 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Surge Wave Exciting Force Sway Wave Exciting Force F/A 2.E+3 1.8E+3 1.6E+3 1.4E+3 1.2E+3 1.E+3 8.E+2 6.E+2 4.E+2 2.E+2 F/A 2.E+3 1.8E+3 1.6E+3 1.4E+3 1.2E+3 1.E+3 8.E+2 6.E+2 4.E+2 2.E+2 Heave Wave Exciting Force Roll Wave Exciting Moment 9.E+2 1.2E+5 8.E+2 7.E+2 1.E+5 6.E+2 8.E+4 F/A 5.E+2 4.E+2 M/A 6.E+4 3.E+2 4.E+4 2.E+2 1.E+2 2.E+4 Pitch Wave Exciting Moment Yaw Wave Exciting Moment 1.2E+5 7.E-3 1.E+5 6.E-3 M/A 8.E+4 6.E+4 M/A 5.E-3 4.E-3 3.E-3 4.E+4 2.E-3 2.E+4 1.E-3 Figure 3.7 Wave exciting forces and moments for CYLINDER J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 16
17 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Surge Sway 6.E-1 6.E-1 5.E-1 5.E-1 4.E-1 4.E-1 3.E-1 3.E-1 1.E-1 1.E-1 Heave Roll 1.8E+1 5.E-2 1.6E+1 1.4E+1 1.2E+1 1.E+1 8.E+ 6.E+ 4.5E-2 4.E-2 3.5E-2 3.E-2 2.5E-2 2.E-2 1.5E-2 4.E+ 1.E-2 2.E+ 5.E-3 Pitch Yaw 5.E-2 8.E-6 4.5E-2 4.E-2 3.5E-2 3.E-2 2.5E-2 2.E-2 1.5E-2 1.E-2 5.E-3 7.E-6 6.E-6 5.E-6 4.E-6 3.E-6 2.E-6 1.E-6 Figure 3.8 Motion for CYLINDER J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 17
18 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Added Mass Coefficient(Surge,A11) Added Mass Coefficient(Sway,A22) 3.5E-2 1.2E+ 3.E-2 1.E+ 2.5E-2 8.E-1 2.E-2 1.5E-2 6.E-1 1.E-2 4.E-1 5.E-3 Added Mass Coefficient(Heave,A33) Added Mass Coefficient(Roll,A44) 5.E+ 7.E+ 4.5E+ 4.E+ 6.E+ 3.5E+ 5.E+ 3.E+ 2.5E+ 2.E+ 4.E+ 3.E+ 1.5E+ 2.E+ 1.E+ 5.E-1 1.E+ Added Mass Coefficient(Pitch,A55) Added Mass Coefficient(Yaw,A66) 1.2E+2 8.E+1 1.E+2 7.E+1 6.E+1 8.E+1 6.E+1 4.E+1 5.E+1 4.E+1 3.E+1 2.E+1 2.E+1 1.E+1 Figure 3.9 Added mass coefficients for SHIP J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 18
19 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Damping Coefficient(Surge,B11) Damping Coefficient(Sway,B22) 1.E-2 6.E-1 9.E-3 8.E-3 5.E-1 7.E-3 6.E-3 5.E-3 4.E-3 3.E-3 4.E-1 3.E-1 2.E-3 1.E-3 1.E-1 Damping Coefficient(Heave,B33) Damping Coefficient(Roll,B44) 1.2E+ 3.5E+ 1.E+ 3.E+ 8.E-1 6.E-1 4.E-1 2.5E+ 2.E+ 1.5E+ 1.E+ 5.E-1-5.E-1 Damping Coefficient(Pitch,B55) Damping Coefficient(Yaw,B66) 6.E+1 6.E+1 5.E+1 5.E+1 4.E+1 3.E+1 2.E+1 4.E+1 3.E+1 2.E+1 1.E+1 1.E+1 Figure 3.1 Damping coefficients for SHIP J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 19
20 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Surge Wave Exciting Force Sway Wave Exciting Force 3.5E+2 8.E+2 F/A 3.E+2 2.5E+2 2.E+2 1.5E+2 F/A 7.E+2 6.E+2 5.E+2 4.E+2 3.E+2 1.E+2 2.E+2 5.E+1 1.E+2 Heave Wave Exciting Force Roll Wave Exciting Moment 7.E+3 6.E+3 6.E+3 5.E+3 5.E+3 4.E+3 F/A 4.E+3 3.E+3 M/A 3.E+3 2.E+3 2.E+3 1.E+3 1.E+3 Pitch Wave Exciting Moment Yaw Wave Exciting Moment 2.E+5 6.E+4 1.8E+5 1.6E+5 5.E+4 M/A 1.4E+5 1.2E+5 1.E+5 8.E+4 6.E+4 M/A 4.E+4 3.E+4 2.E+4 4.E+4 2.E+4 1.E+4-2.E+4 Figure 3.11 Wave exciting forces and moments for SHIP J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 2
21 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Surge Sway 8.E-1 8.E-1 7.E-1 7.E-1 6.E-1 6.E-1 5.E-1 4.E-1 3.E-1 5.E-1 4.E-1 3.E-1 1.E-1 1.E-1 Heave Roll 1.2E+ 1.4E+1 1.E+ 8.E-1 6.E-1 1.2E+1 1.E+1 8.E+ 6.E+ 4.E-1 4.E+ 2.E+ Pitch Yaw 8.E-1 4.5E-1 7.E-1 4.E-1 6.E-1 3.5E-1 5.E-1 4.E-1 3.E-1 1.E-1 3.E-1 2.5E-1 1.5E-1 1.E-1 5.E-2 Figure 3.12 Motion for SHIP J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 21
22 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Added Mass Coefficient(Surge,A11) Added Mass Coefficient(Sway,A22) 1.2E+ 1.2E+ 1.E+ 1.E+ 8.E-1 8.E-1 6.E-1 6.E-1 4.E-1 4.E-1 Added Mass Coefficient(Heave,A33) Added Mass Coefficient(Roll,A44) 7.E-1 4.E+1 6.E-1 3.5E+1 5.E-1 3.E+1 4.E-1 3.E-1 2.5E+1 2.E+1 1.5E+1 1.E+1 1.E-1 5.E+ Added Mass Coefficient(Pitch,A55) Added Mass Coefficient(Yaw,A66) 4.E+1 6.E+1 3.5E+1 3.E+1 5.E+1 2.5E+1 2.E+1 1.5E+1 1.E+1 4.E+1 3.E+1 2.E+1 5.E+ 1.E+1 Figure 3.13 Added mass coefficients for TLP J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 22
23 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Damping Coefficient(Surge,B11) Damping Coefficient(Sway,B22) 3.5E-1 3.5E-1 3.E-1 3.E-1 2.5E-1 2.5E-1 1.5E-1 1.E-1 1.5E-1 1.E-1 5.E-2 5.E-2 Damping Coefficient(Heave,B33) Damping Coefficient(Roll,B44) 1.4E-2 7.E+ 1.2E-2 6.E+ 1.E-2 8.E-3 6.E-3 4.E-3 5.E+ 4.E+ 3.E+ 2.E+ 2.E-3 1.E+ Damping Coefficient(Pitch,B55) Damping Coefficient(Yaw,B66) 7.E+ 3.5E+1 6.E+ 3.E+1 5.E+ 2.5E+1 4.E+ 3.E+ 2.E+ 2.E+1 1.5E+1 1.E+1 1.E+ 5.E+ Figure 3.14 Damping coefficients for TLP J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 23
24 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Surge Wave Exciting Force Sway Wave Exciting Force 9.E+2 9.E+2 8.E+2 8.E+2 7.E+2 7.E+2 F/A 6.E+2 5.E+2 4.E+2 F/A 6.E+2 5.E+2 4.E+2 3.E+2 3.E+2 2.E+2 2.E+2 1.E+2 1.E+2 Heave Wave Exciting Force Roll Wave Exciting Moment 8.E+2 1.8E+4 F/A 7.E+2 6.E+2 5.E+2 4.E+2 M/A 1.6E+4 1.4E+4 1.2E+4 1.E+4 8.E+3 3.E+2 6.E+3 2.E+2 4.E+3 1.E+2 2.E+3 Pitch Wave Exciting Moment Yaw Wave Exciting Moment 1.8E+4 1.E+ 1.6E+4 9.E-1 1.4E+4 8.E-1 1.2E+4 7.E-1 M/A 1.E+4 8.E+3 6.E+3 4.E+3 M/A 6.E-1 5.E-1 4.E-1 3.E-1 2.E+3 1.E-1 Figure 3.15 Wave exciting forces and moments for TLP J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 24
25 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Surge Sway 1.4E+ 1.4E+ 1.2E+ 1.2E+ 1.E+ 1.E+ 8.E-1 6.E-1 8.E-1 6.E-1 4.E-1 4.E-1 Heave Roll 1.E+1 9.E+ 8.E+ 7.E+ 6.E+ 5.E+ 4.E+ 3.E+ 3.E+ 2.5E+ 2.E+ 1.5E+ 1.E+ 2.E+ 1.E+ 5.E-1 Pitch Yaw 3.E+ 1.4E-5 2.5E+ 1.2E-5 2.E+ 1.E-5 1.5E+ 1.E+ 8.E-6 6.E-6 4.E-6 5.E-1 2.E-6 Figure 3.16 Motion for TLP J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 25
26 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Added Mass Coefficient(Surge,A11) Added Mass Coefficient(Sway,A22) Added Mass Coefficient(Heave,A33) Added Mass Coefficient(Roll,A44) Added Mass Coefficient(Pitch,A55) Added Mass Coefficient(Yaw,A66) Figure 3.17 Added mass coefficients for MOB J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 26
27 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Damping Coefficient(Surge,B11) Damping Coefficient(Sway,B22) Damping Coefficient(Heave,B33) Damping Coefficient(Roll,B44) Damping Coefficient(Pitch,B55) Damping Coefficient(Yaw,B66) Figure 3.18 Damping coefficients for MOB J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 27
28 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Surge Wave Exciting Force Sway Wave Exciting Force F/A 15 1 F/A Heave Wave Exciting Force Roll Wave Exciting Moment F/A M/A Pitch Wave Exciting Moment Yaw Wave Exciting Moment M/A M/A Figure 3.19 Wave exciting forces and moments for MOB J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 28
29 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study Surge Sway Heave Roll Pitch Yaw Figure 3.2 Motion for MOB J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 29
30 - Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study 4. References 1. Version5.4 : A Radiation Diffraction Panel program for Wave-Body Interaction, MIT, Version Reference Manual, Ultra Marine, J. Ray McDermott Engineering, LLC 3
Theoretical Review on Prediction of Motion Response using Diffraction Potential and Morison
Theoretical Review on Prediction of Motion Response using Diffraction Potential and Morison C.L.Siow, a, J. Koto, a,b,*, H.Yasukawa, c A.Matsuda, d D.Terada, d, C. Guedes Soares, e a) Department of Aeronautics,
More informationHEAVE DAMPING EFFECTS DUE TO CIRCULAR PLATES ATTACHED AT KEEL TO SPAR HULL
HEAVE DAMPING EFFECTS DUE TO CIRCULAR PLATES ATTACHED AT KEEL TO SPAR HULL P.Uma 1 1 M.TECH Civil Engineering Dadi Institute of Engineering and Technology College Abstract Single point Anchor Reservoir
More informationInternational Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, Issue 2, February ISSN
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, Issue, February-8 48 Structural Response of a Standalone FPSO by Swell Wave in Offshore Nigeria Abam Tamunopekere Joshua*, Akaawase
More informationSemi-Submersible Heave Response Study Using Diffraction Potential Theory with Viscous Damping Correction
Semi-Submersible Heave Response Study Using Diffraction Potential Theory with Viscous Damping Correction a) Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia b) Ocean and Aerospace Research Institute,
More informationSIMPLIFICATION BY MATHEMATIC MODEL TO SOLVE THE EXPERIMENTAL OF SLOSHING EFFECT ON THE FPSO VESSEL
European International Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 3 No. 5 June, 2014 SIMPLIFICATION BY MATHEMATIC MODEL TO SOLVE THE EXPERIMENTAL OF SLOSHING EFFECT ON THE FPSO VESSEL LuhutTumpalParulianSinaga
More informationEffect of Tethers Tension Force in the Behavior of a Tension Leg Platform Subjected to Hydrodynamic Force Amr R. El-Gamal, Ashraf Essa, Ayman Ismail
Vol:7, No:1, 13 Effect of Tethers Tension Force in the Behavior of a Tension Leg Platform Subjected to Hydrodynamic Force Amr R. El-Gamal, Ashraf Essa, Ayman Ismail International Science Index, Bioengineering
More informationDYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF OFFSHORE TENSION LEG PLATFORMS UNDER HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES
International Journal of Civil Engineering (IJCE) ISSN(P): 2278-9987; ISSN(E): 2278-9995 Vol. 3, Issue 1, Jan 214, 7-16 IASET DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF OFFSHORE TENSION LEG PLATFORMS UNDER HYDRODYNAMIC
More informationPrediction of Semi-Submersible s Motion Response by Using Diffraction Potential Theory and Heave Viscous Damping Correction
Jurnal Teknologi Full paper Prediction of Semi-Submersible s Motion Response by Using Diffraction Potential Theory and Heave Viscous Damping Correction C. L. Siow a, Jaswar Koto a,b*, Hassan Abby c, N.
More informationA Preliminary Analysis on the Statistics of about One-Year Air Gap Measurement for a Semi-submersible in South China Sea
Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth (2016) International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference Rhodes, Greece, June 26-July 1, 2016 Copyright 2016 by the International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers
More informationHull-tether-riser dynamics of deep water tension leg platforms
Fluid Structure Interaction V 15 Hull-tether-riser dynamics of deep water tension leg platforms R. Jayalekshmi 1, R. Sundaravadivelu & V. G. Idichandy 1 Department of Civil Engineering, NSS College of
More informationSeakeeping Models in the Frequency Domain
Seakeeping Models in the Frequency Domain (Module 6) Dr Tristan Perez Centre for Complex Dynamic Systems and Control (CDSC) Prof. Thor I Fossen Department of Engineering Cybernetics 18/09/2007 One-day
More informationVIOLENT WAVE TRAPPING - SOME RESULTS ON WATER PROJECTION AROUND SEMI-SUBs AND TLPs
VIOLENT WAVE TRAPPING - SOME RESULTS ON WATER PROJECTION AROUND SEMI-SUBs AND TLPs Paul H. Taylor James Grice Rodney Eatock Taylor Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford Contents Introduction
More informationClassification of offshore structures
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Classification of offshore structures A classification in degree of non-linearities and importance of dynamics. Sverre Haver, StatoilHydro, January 8 A first classification
More informationHydrodynamic Interaction of Three Floating Structures
Hydrodynamic Interaction of Three Floating Structures Muhammad Farid Abdul Halim, a, and Jaswar Koto, a,b,* a) Department of Aeronautical, Automotive and Ocean Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
More informationOverview of BV R&D activities in Marine Hydrodynamics
Overview of BV R&D activities in Marine Hydrodynamics Special attention to hydro-structure interactions Šime Malenica Bureau Veritas Marine & Offshore Division Research Department Harbin, 29th of June
More informationOn the evaluation quadratic forces on stationary bodies
On the evaluation quadratic forces on stationary bodies Chang-Ho Lee AMIT Inc., Chestnut Hill MA, USA June 9, 006 Abstract. Conservation of momentum is applied to finite fluid volume surrounding a body
More informationAnalytical Predictions of the Air Gap Response of Floating Structures
Lance Manuel Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 e-mail: lmanuel@mail.utexas.edu Bert Sweetman Steven R. Winterstein Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
More informationSeakeeping characteristics of intact and damaged ship in the Adriatic Sea
Towards Green Marine Technology and Transport Guedes Soares, Dejhalla & Pavleti (Eds) 2015 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-02887-6 Seakeeping characteristics of intact and damaged ship in
More informationINFLUENCE OF TETHER LENGTH IN THE RESPONSE BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TENSION LEG PLATFORM IN REGULAR WAVES
INFLUENCE OF TETHER LENGTH IN THE RESPONSE BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TENSION LEG PLATFOR IN REGULAR WAVES 1 Amr R. El-gamal, 2 Ashraf Essa, 1 Faculty of Engineering, Benha Univ., Egypt, 2 Associated prof., National
More informationProceedings of the ASME th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE2013 June 9-14, 2013, Nantes, France
Proceedings of the ASME 2011 32th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE2013 June 9-14, 2013, Nantes, France OMAE2013-10124 APPLYING STRIP THEORY BASED LINEAR SEAKEEPING
More informationProceedings of OMAE'02 21 st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering June 23-27, 2002, Oslo, Norway
Proceedings of OMAE'02 21 st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering June 23-27, 2002, Oslo, Norway OMAE 2002-28435 ESTIMATION OF EXTREME RESPONSE AND FATIGUE DAMAGE FOR COLLIDING
More informationDesign, Construction & Operation of LNG/LPG Ships, November, Glasgow, UK
Design, Construction & Operation of LNG/LPG Ships, 29-3 November, Glasgow, UK SLOSHING AND SWIRLING IN MEMBRANE LNG TANKS AND THEIR COUPLING EFFECTS WITH SHIP MOTION M Arai and G M Karuka, Yokohama National
More informationSEAKEEPING AND MANEUVERING Prof. Dr. S. Beji 2
SEAKEEPING AND MANEUVERING Prof. Dr. S. Beji 2 Ship Motions Ship motions in a seaway are very complicated but can be broken down into 6-degrees of freedom motions relative to 3 mutually perpendicular axes
More informationOptimal Design of FPSO Vessels
November 2, 201 Optimal Design of FPSO Vessels Ezebuchi Akandu PhD, MTech, BTech, COREN, RINA, MNSE Department of Marine Engineering, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria akandu.ezebuchi@ust.edu.ng
More informationTrajectory Tracking of a Near-Surface Torpedo using Numerical Methods
ISSN (Print) : 2347-671 An ISO 3297: 27 Certified Organization Vol.4, Special Issue 12, September 215 Trajectory Tracking of a Near-Surface Torpedo using Numerical Methods Anties K. Martin, Anubhav C.A.,
More informationEffect of Tethers Tension Force on the Behavior of Triangular Tension Leg Platform
American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture,, Vol., No. 3, 7- Available online at http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajcea//3/3 Science and Education Publishing DOI:.9/ajcea--3-3 Effect of Tethers Tension
More informationHydrodynamic analysis and modelling of ships
Hydrodynamic analysis and modelling of ships Wave loading Harry B. Bingham Section for Coastal, Maritime & Structural Eng. Department of Mechanical Engineering Technical University of Denmark DANSIS møde
More informationHydrodynamic Forces on Floating Bodies
Hydrodynamic Forces on Floating Bodies 13.42 Lecture Notes; c A.H. Techet 1. Forces on Large Structures For discussion in this section we will be considering bodies that are quite large compared to the
More informationMODELLING RECURRENCE MOTION OF A LARGE VOLUME SEMI- SUBMERSIBLE
Jurnal Mekanikal December 2012, No 35, 13-27 MODELLING RECURRENCE MOTION OF A LARGE VOLUME SEMI- SUBMERSIBLE Agoes Priyanto *, Adi Maimun and Dwi Putra Rishandi Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti
More informationFACULTY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MASTER'S THESIS. Open. Author: Thorgeir Anundsen (signature author)
FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MASTER'S THESIS Study program/specialization: Master Offshore systems, Marine and subsea technology. Spring semester, 2008 Open Author: Thorgeir Anundsen (signature author)
More informationFloating substructure flexibility of large-volume 10MW offshore wind turbine platforms in dynamic calculations
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Floating substructure flexibility of large-volume 10MW offshore wind turbine platforms in dynamic calculations To cite this article: Michael Borg
More informationCOUPLED HYDRODYNAMIC AND STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR OF SPAR BUOY FLOATING WIND TURBINES USING FAST
8 th GRACM International Congress on Computational Mechanics Volos, 1 July 15 July 015 COUPLED HYDRODYNAMIC AND TRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR O PAR BUOY LOATING WIND TURBINE UING AT Evaggelos G. Karageorgopoulos
More informationA Probabilistic Design Approach for Riser Collision based on Time- Domain Response Analysis
A Probabilistic Design Approach for Riser Collision based on Time- Domain Response Analysis B.J. Leira NTNU, Dept. Marine Structures,Trondheim, Norway T. Holmås MARINTEK, Div. of Structural Engineering,,
More informationSCALE MODEL TESTS OF A FISHING VESSEL IN ROLL MOTION PARAMETRIC RESONANCE
N. Perez Síntesis Tecnológica. V.3 Nº 1 (26) 33-37 SCALE MODEL TESTS OF A FISHING VESSEL IN ROLL MOTION PARAMETRIC RESONANCE NELSON A. PEREZ M. Instituto de Ciencias Navales y Marítimas, M.Sc, nperez@uach.cl,
More information1 POTENTIAL FLOW THEORY Formulation of the seakeeping problem
1 POTENTIAL FLOW THEORY Formulation of the seakeeping problem Objective of the Chapter: Formulation of the potential flow around the hull of a ship advancing and oscillationg in waves Results of the Chapter:
More informationShip structure dynamic analysis - effects of made assumptions on computation results
Ship structure dynamic analysis - effects of made assumptions on computation results Lech Murawski Centrum Techniki Okrętowej S. A. (Ship Design and Research Centre) ABSTRACT The paper presents identification
More informationCoupled Heave-Pitch Motions and Froude Krylov Excitation Forces
Coupled Heave-Pitch Motions and Froude Krylov Excitation Forces 13.42 Lecture Notes; Spring 2004; c A.H. Techet 1. Coupled Equation of Motion in Heave and Pitch Once we have set up the simple equation
More informationAnalysis of the DeepCwind model tests and a first attempt to simulate a semi-submersible floating wind platform with anysim
Analysis of the DeepCwind model tests and a first attempt to simulate a semi-submersible floating wind platform with anysim Final report Report No. : 24602-MSG-1 Date : 20th March 2012 M A R I N P.O. Box
More informationStudy on Motions of a Floating Body under Composite External Loads
137 Study on Motions of a Floating Body under Composite External Loads by Kunihiro Ikegami*, Member Masami Matsuura*, Member Summary In the field of marine engineering, various types of floating bodies
More informationDevelopment of formulas allowing to predict hydrodynamic responses of inland vessels operated within the range of navigation 0.6 Hs 2.
Gian Carlo Matheus Torres 6 th EMship cycle: October 2015 February 2017 Master Thesis Development of formulas allowing to predict hydrodynamic responses of inland vessels operated within the range of navigation
More informationSCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy
SCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy Research Paper January 2011 Vol.54 No.1: 26 34 Hydrodynamics in Ocean Engineering doi: 10.1007/s11433-010-4200-1 Full scale measurement for FPSO on motions
More informationSimplified formulas of heave added mass coefficients at high frequency for various two-dimensional bodies in a finite water depth
csnak, 2015 Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. (2015) 7:115~127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijnaoe-2015-0009 pissn: 2092-6782, eissn: 2092-6790 Simplified formulas of heave added mass coefficients at high frequency
More informationNUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF A FLOATING HARBOR SYSTEM AND COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS. A Thesis HEONYONG KANG
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF A FLOATING HARBOR SYSTEM AND COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS A Thesis by HEONYONG KANG Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment
More informationIJEScA. Motions Analysis of a Phinisi Ship Hull with New Strip Method. F. Mahmuddin 1, A. Fitriadhy 2 and S. Dewa 1 ABSTRACT 1.
Motions Analysis of a Phinisi Ship Hull with New Strip Method ABSTRACT F. Mahmuddin 1, A. Fitriadhy 2 and S. Dewa 1 1 Naval Architecture Department, Engineering Faculty, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
More informationReliability of Marine Structures Program
Reliability of Marine Structures Program SPAR FLOATING PLATFORM: NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON WITH DATA Alok K. Jha Supervised by Steven R. Winterstein Civil Engineering Department, Stanford University
More informationStudent name: This is a closed book examination. You are allowed 1 sheet of 8.5 x 11 paper with notes.
13.012 Marine Hydrodynamics for Ocean Engineers Fall 2004 Quiz #2 Student name: This is a closed book examination. You are allowed 1 sheet of 8.5 x 11 paper with notes. For the problems in Section A, fill
More informationA NUMERICAL IDENTIFICATION OF EXCITATION FORCE AND NONLINEAR RESTORING CHARACTERISTICS OF SHIP ROLL MOTION
ournal of Marine Science and Technology Vol. 5 No. 4 pp. 475-481 (017 475 DOI: 10.6119/MST-017-0418-1 A NUMERICAL IDENTIFICATION OF EXCITATION FORCE AND NONNEAR RESTORING CHARACTERISTICS OF SHIP ROLL MOTION
More informationNONLINEAR BEHAVIOR OF A SINGLE- POINT MOORING SYSTEM FOR FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE
NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR OF A SINGLE- POINT MOORING SYSTEM FOR FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE Ma Chong, Iijima Kazuhiro, Masahiko Fujikubo Dept. of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering OSAKA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH
More informationBilge Keel Roll Damping Combining CFD and local velocities
Bilge Keel Roll Damping Combining CFD and local velocities Delft University of Technology SBM Offshore Mark Jan van Kampen BILGE KEEL ROLL DAMPING COMBINING CFD AND LOCAL VELOCITIES by Mark Jan van Kampen
More informationOffshore Hydromechanics Module 1
Offshore Hydromechanics Module 1 Dr. ir. Pepijn de Jong 1. Intro, Hydrostatics and Stability Introduction OE4630d1 Offshore Hydromechanics Module 1 dr.ir. Pepijn de Jong Assistant Prof. at Ship Hydromechanics
More informationANALYSIS OF THE AXIAL BEHAVIOR OF A DRILLING RISER WITH A SUSPENDED MASS
Copyright 2013 by ABCM ANALYSIS OF THE AXIAL BEHAVIOR OF A DRILLING RISER WITH A SUSPENDED MASS Marcelo Anunciação Jaculli José Ricardo Pelaquim Mendes Celso Kazuyuki Morooka Dept. of Petroleum Engineering
More informationHydrodynamics: Setting the Scene*
Hydrodynamics: Setting the Scene* *a selective view Prof. Rodney Eatock Taylor and Prof. Paul Taylor University of Oxford The Lloyd s Register Educational Trust (LRET) Marine & Offshore Research Workshop
More informationROLL MOTION OF A RORO-SHIP IN IRREGULAR FOLLOWING WAVES
38 Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 9, o. 1, pp. 38-44 (2001) ROLL MOTIO OF A RORO-SHIP I IRREGULAR FOLLOWIG WAVES Jianbo Hua* and Wei-Hui Wang** Keywords: roll motion, parametric excitation,
More information2da Asamblea de la Red Global MX Capitulo
Desarrollo de Tecnología en Ingeniería Costa-Afuera para Aguas Profundas en el Golfo de Mexico 2da Asamblea de la Red Global MX Capitulo Corea 12 de Diciembre de 2017 Cristobal Santiago 1, 1 Korea Research
More informationRenewable Energy: Ocean Wave-Energy Conversion
Renewable Energy: Ocean Wave-Energy Conversion India Institute of Science Bangalore, India 17 June 2011 David R. B. Kraemer, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin Platteville USA B.S.: My background Mechanical
More informationNumerical analysis of wave-induced responses of floating bridge pontoons with bilge boxes. Master Thesis
Numerical analysis of wave-induced responses of floating bridge pontoons with bilge boxes Master Thesis Espen Kleppa June 2017 DTU Mechanical Engineering Section of Fluid Mechanics, Coastal and Maritime
More informationResponse of square tension leg platforms to hydrodynamic forces
Ocean Systems Engineering, Vol., No. (01) 000-000 1 Response of square tension leg platforms to hydrodynamic forces A.M. Abou-Rayan 1, Ayman A. Seleemah* and Amr R. El-gamal 1 1 Civil Engineering Tec.
More informationSoil Dynamics Prof. Deepankar Choudhury Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay
Soil Dynamics Prof. Deepankar Choudhury Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Module - 5 Machine Foundations Lecture - 31 EHS Theory, Vibrational Control Let us start our
More informationPublished in: Proceedings of the Twentieth (2010) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
Aalborg Universitet Performance Evaluation of an Axysimmetric Floating OWC Alves, M. A.; Costa, I. R.; Sarmento, A. J.; Chozas, Julia Fernandez Published in: Proceedings of the Twentieth (010) International
More informationEXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON HYDRODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF A NEW TYPE OF DEEP DRAFT MULTI-COLUMN FDPSO
Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 39-3 (17) 39 DOI: 1.6119/JMST-17-15-1 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON HYDRODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF A NEW TYPE OF DEEP DRAFT MULTI-COLUMN FDPSO Jia-Yang
More informationViscous Damping of Vessels Moored in Close Proximity of Another Object
Proceedings of The Fifteenth (5) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference Seoul, Korea, June 9 4, 5 Copyright 5 by The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers ISBN -885-4-8
More informationConceptual Discussion on Free Vibration Analysis of Tension Leg Platforms
Development and Applications of Oceanic Engineering (DAOE) Volume Issue, ay 3 Conceptual Discussion on Free Vibration Analysis of Tension Leg Platforms ohammad Reza Tabeshpour Center of Ecellence in Hydrodynamics
More informationEVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF CONTACT BETWEEN RISERS AND GUIDE FRAMES ON OFFSHORE SPAR PLATFORM MOTIONS. A Dissertation BON-JUN KOO
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF CONTACT BETWEEN RISERS AND GUIDE FRAMES ON OFFSHORE SPAR PLATFORM MOTIONS A Dissertation by BON-JUN KOO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in
More informationInternational Conference on Mechanics and Civil Engineering (ICMCE 2014)
International Conference on Mechanics and Civil Engineering (ICMCE 2014) Research on the Rolling Motion and Pitch Motion of Planing Boat Sheng ZHANG 1,a*, Zi-Fan WEI 2,b, Song-Lin YANG 3,c 1,2,3 Jiangsu
More informationCOMPUTATION OF ADDED MASS AND DAMPING COEFFICIENTS DUE TO A HEAVING CYLINDER
J. Appl. Math. & Computing Vol. 3(007), No. 1 -, pp. 17-140 Website: http://jamc.net COMPUTATION OF ADDED MASS AND DAMPING COEFFICIENTS DUE TO A HEAVING CYLINDER DAMBARU D BHATTA Abstract. We present the
More information1. Froude Krylov Excitation Force
.016 Hydrodynamics eading #8.016 Hydrodynamics Prof. A.H. Techet 1. Froude Krylov Ecitation Force Ultimately, if we assume the body to be sufficiently small as not to affect the pressure field due to an
More informationThe effects of second-order hydrodynamics on a semisubmersible floating offshore wind turbine
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS The effects of second-order hydrodynamics on a semisubmersible floating offshore wind turbine To cite this article: I Bayati et al 2014 J. Phys.: Conf.
More informationTime domain assessment of nonlinear coupled ship motions and sloshing in free surface tanks
Time domain assessment of nonlinear coupled ship motions and sloshing in free surface tanks 1 outline 1.Motivation & state-of-the-art 2.Simulation approach 1.SHIXDOF: nonlinear ship motion TD 6DOF 2.AQUAgpusph:
More informationWave Driven Free Surface Motion in the Gap between a Tanker and an FLNG Barge
Wave Driven Free Surface Motion in the Gap between a Tanker and an FLNG Barge L. Sun a, R. Eatock Taylor a,b and P. H. Taylor b a Centre for Offshore Research & Engineering and Department of Civil & Environmental
More informationChapter 1 INTRODUCTION
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 The Fluid. 1-2 Dimensions. 1-3 Units. 1-4 Fluid Properties. 1 1-1 The Fluid: It is the substance that deforms continuously when subjected to a shear stress. Matter Solid Fluid
More informationM. Kohlmeier 1, T. Kossel 2, B. Reil 1, and R. Rolfes 1
IEA Annex XXIII Offshore Code Comparison Collaborative (OC3) Phase IV OC3-Hywind Multibody Simulation of the Support Structure Dynamics of Floating Wind Turbines M. Kohlmeier 1, T. Kossel 2, B. Reil 1,
More informationSAFEHULL-DYNAMIC LOADING APPROACH FOR VESSELS
Guide for SafeHull- Dynamic Loading Approach for Vessels GUIDE FOR SAFEHULL-DYNAMIC LOADING APPROACH FOR VESSELS DECEMBER 2006 (Updated February 2014 see next page) American Bureau of Shipping Incorporated
More informationRamSeries - Validation Case 42
Structure subjected to wave loads Version 15.1.0 Compass Ingeniería y Sistemas http://www.compassis.com Tel.: +34 932 181 989 - Fax.: +34 933 969 746 - E: info@compassis.com - C/ Tuset 8, 7o 2a, Barcelona
More informationEXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MOTIONS OF TWO FLOATING OFFSHORE STRUCTURES IN WAVES
Brodogradnja/Shipbuilding/Open access Volume 67 Number 2, 2016 Hassan Abyn M. Rafiqul Islam Adi Maimun Amin Mahmoudi Jaswar Kato http://dx.doi.org/10.21278/brod67201 ISSN 0007-215X eissn 1845-5859 EXPERIMENTAL
More informationNumerical modelling and simulation of. floating oil storage tanks considering the. sloshing effect
Numerical modelling and simulation of floating oil storage tanks considering the sloshing effect Xiao Liu June 2017 Master Thesis Department of Marine Technology Norwegian University of Science and Technology
More informationNUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FREE STANDING HYBRID RISERS. A Thesis TIANCONG HOU
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FREE STANDING HYBRID RISERS A Thesis by TIANCONG HOU Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationA numerical DP MODULE to help design and operation for projects including DP components
DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE November 15-16, 25 Control Systems I A numerical DP MODULE to help design and operation for projects including DP components C. Le Cunff PRINCIPIA (La Ciotat, France) Return
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Aquatic Procedia 4 (2015 )
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Aquatic Procedia 4 (5 ) 49 499 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WATER RESOURCES, COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING (ICWRCOE 5) A 3D numerical wave tank study
More informationTheoretical Study on Effect of Turret Location on Dynamic Response of Moored Twin Hulls FPSO System
Theoretical Study on Effect of Turret Location on Dynamic Response of Moored Twin Hulls FPSO System Nik Mohd Khairuddin B. Nik Ismail, a, and Jaswar. Koto, a,b,* a) Department of Aeronautics, Automotive
More informationNumerical Investigation of a Tuned Heave Plate Energy-Harvesting System of a Semi-Submersible Platform
energies Article Numerical Investigation a Tuned Heave Plate Energy-Harvesting System a Semi-Submersible Platform Kun Liu 1,, *, Haizhi Liang 3 Jinping Ou 1,,4 1 School Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute
More informationDownloaded on T02:40:41Z
Title Author(s) Hydrodynamics of oscillating water column wave energy converters Sheng, Wanan; Alcorn, Raymond; Lewis, Anthony Publication date 4- Original citation Type of publication Link to publisher's
More informationFinal Exam TTK4190 Guidance and Control
Trondheim Department of engineering Cybernetics Contact person: Professor Thor I. Fossen Phone: 73 59 43 61 Cell: 91 89 73 61 Email: tif@itk.ntnu.no Final Exam TTK4190 Guidance and Control Friday May 15,
More informationApplication of the open source code Nemoh for modelling of added mass and damping in ship motion simulations
DEGREE PROJECT IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2018 Application of the open source code Nemoh for modelling of added mass and damping in ship motion simulations EMIL
More informationOTG-13. Prediction of air gap for column stabilised units. Won Ho Lee 01 February Ungraded. 01 February 2017 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER
OTG-13 Prediction of air gap for column stabilised units Won Ho Lee 1 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER Contents Air gap design requirements Purpose of OTG-13 OTG-13 vs. OTG-14 Contributions to air gap Linear analysis
More informationOCEAN WAVES AND OSCILLATING SYSTEMS
OCEAN WAVES AND OSCILLATING SYSTEMS LINEAR INTERACTIONS INCLUDING WAVE-ENERGY EXTRACTION JOHANNES FALNES Department of Physics Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THREE DIMENSIONAL FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS OF ZERO SPEED FIRST ORDER WAVE BODY INTERACTION.
DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THREE DIMENSIONAL FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS OF ZERO SPEED FIRST ORDER WAVE BODY INTERACTION A Thesis by AMITAVA GUHA Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of
More informationShip Nonlinear Rolling and Roll Angle Reconstruction Based on FIR
Open Access Library Journal Ship Nonlinear Rolling and Roll Angle Reconstruction Based on FIR Jianhui Lu 1,2*, Chunlei Zhang 2, Shaonan Chen 2, Yunxia Wu 2 1 Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering,
More informationTHE LINEAR NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE AMPLITUDE OPERATOR, BASED ON THE HYDROELASTICITY THEORY, FOR A BARGE TEST SHIP
APPIED PHYSICS MECHANICS THE INEAR NUMERICA ANAYSIS OF DISPACEMENT RESPONSE AMPITUDE OPERATOR, BASED ON THE HYDROEASTICITY THEORY, FOR A BARGE TEST SHIP EONARD DOMNIªORU 1, IVIU STOICESCU 1, DANIEA DOMNIªORU
More information( ) Chapter 3: Free Vibration of the Breakwater. 3.1 Introduction
Chapter : Free Vibration of the Breakwater. Introduction Before conducting forcing analyses on the breakwater, a free vibration study is necessary. This chapter will describe the analysis conducted to
More informationThe Floating Production, Storage and Offloading Vessel Design for Oil Field Development in Harsh Marine Environment
The Floating Production, Storage and Offloading Vessel Design for Oil Field Development in Harsh Marine Environment Ezebuchi Akandu, a,* AtillaIncecik, a and Nigel Barltrop, a a) Department of Naval Architecture,
More informationGLOBAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A FLOATING HARBOR AND A CONTAINER SHIP FOR LOADING AND OFFLOADING OPERATIONS. A Thesis SUNG HO LIM
i GLOBAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A FLOATING HARBOR AND A CONTAINER SHIP FOR LOADING AND OFFLOADING OPERATIONS A Thesis by SUNG HO LIM Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University
More informationDepartment of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Graduate Study Specialization in Ocean Engineering. Written Preliminary Examination Information
Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Graduate Study Specialization in Ocean Engineering Written Preliminary Examination Information Faculty: Professors W. Neu, O. Hughes, A. Brown, M. Allen Test
More informationNUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF DAMPING EFFECTS ON COUPLED HEAVE AND PITCH MOTION OF AN INNOVATIVE DEEP DRAFT MULTI-SPAR
Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 9, No., pp. - () NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF DAMPING EFFECTS ON COUPLED HEAVE AND PITCH MOTION OF AN INNOVATIVE DEEP DRAFT MULTI-SPAR Bin-Bin Li*, Jin-Ping
More informationDynamic behaviour of floating wind turbines
Dynamic behaviour of floating wind turbines A comparison of open water and level ice conditions MSc Offshore and Dredging Engineering Dynamic behaviour of floating wind turbines A comparison of open water
More informationStudy of the influence of the resonance changer on the longitudinal vibration of marine propulsion shafting system
Study of the influence of the resonance changer on the longitudinal vibration of marine propulsion shafting system Zhengmin Li 1, Lin He 2, Hanguo Cui 3, Jiangyang He 4, Wei Xu 5 1, 2, 4, 5 Institute of
More informationOMAE HIGH FREQUENCY LOADING AND RESPONSE OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES IN STEEP WAVES
Proceedings of the ASME 11 3th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE11 June 19-24, 11, Rotterdam, The Netherlands OMAE11-51 HIGH FREQUENCY LOADING AND RESPONSE OF OFFSHORE
More informationSeakeeping of Ships. { ζ + a } 3 ζ 3, ζ = ξ + i η (1)
Seakeeping of Ships By Professor Masashi KASHIWAGI Problem Set: No. Date: 27 January 2010 Due: 28 February 2010 By using the computer program (iem2d.f) for the boundary-element (Green function) method
More informationNotes for the Students by Marilena Greco:
Notes for the Students by Marilena Greco: In the following you find topics proposed by MARINTEK, by DNV GL and by SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture, for possible Project and Master Theses on hydrodynamic
More informationAD-AllS 410 NAVAL ACADEMY ANNAPOLIS MD DIV OF ENGINEERING AND WEAPONS F/S 13/101 COMPUTED MOTION RESPONSE OPERATORS FOR THE USCA, WHEC HAMILTON.
AD-AllS 410 NAVAL ACADEMY ANNAPOLIS MD DIV OF ENGINEERING AND WEAPONS F/S 13/101 COMPUTED MOTION RESPONSE OPERATORS FOR THE USCA, WHEC HAMILTON. (U) JAN 82 0 0 MORAN. 0 M GENTILE UNCLASSIFIED USNAEW-1-82
More informationUltimate shear strength of FPSO stiffened panels after supply vessel collision
Ultimate shear strength of FPSO stiffened panels after supply vessel collision Nicolau Antonio dos Santos Rizzo PETROBRAS Rio de Janeiro Brazil Marcelo Caire SINTEF do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brazil Carlos
More information