arxiv:physics/ v1 [math-ph] 17 May 1997

Transcription

1 arxiv:physics/975v1 [math-ph] 17 May 1997 Quasi-Exactly Solvable Time-Dependent Potentials Federico Finkel ) Departamento de Física Teórica II Universidad Complutense Madrid 84 SPAIN Abstract Niky Kamran ) The Fields Institute for Research in the Mathematical Sciences College Street Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3J1 CANADA We find exact solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for a family of quasiexactly solvable time-dependent potentials by means of non-unitary gauge transformations. PACS numbers: 3.65.Ge, 11.3.Na, 3.65.Fd ) Research supported by DCGICYT Grant # PB ) Research supported by NSERC Grant # GP1549, on sabbatical leave from the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, H3A K6, Canada. 1

2 It is well-known that Lie groups and Lie algebras play a central role in the exact solvability of the Schrödinger equation for many of the basic time-independent potentials of quantum mechanics. Indeed, every exactly solvable Hamiltonian can be realized as a Casimir operator of a finite-dimensional Lie algebra of differential operators, which is thought of as an algebra of dynamical symmetries for the problem. The energy levels of the Hamiltonian are then determined algebraically from the knowledge of the finitedimensional irreducible representations of the Lie algebra. The range of applicability of the Lie algebraic methods has recently been extended beyond the realm of exactly solvable systems to a class of potentials referred to in the literature as quasi-exactly solvable. These potentials are characterized by the property that the Schrödinger operator preserves a finite-dimensional subspace of the underlying Hilbert space, so that at least part of the energy spectrum can be determined algebraically, i.e. by diagonalizing a finite-dimensional matrix see for example [Tu], [Ush], [GKO]). The finite-dimensional invariant space is realized as an irreducible representation module for a finite-dimensional Lie algebra of first-order differential operators and the Hamiltonian is expressed as a polynomial in the generators of this Lie algebra. A quasi-exactly solvable Hamiltonian is thus not necessarily a Casimir operator for the underlying Lie algebra, which has now to be thought of as a hidden symmetry algebra. It is natural to ask to what extent the algebraic approaches that have been summarized above can be extended to physically relevant families of time-dependent potentials. In an interesting recent paper, Zhang and Li [ZL] have shown that certain classes of timedependent 1-dimensional potentials with SU1, 1) dynamical symmetry can be solved exactly by means of unitary transformations. Our purpose in this paper is to show that a similar procedure can be developed to construct physically interesting examples of quasiexactly solvable time-dependent potentials. In contrast with [ZL], it will be essential that we work with sequences of non-unitary gauge transformations. We consider the Schrödinger equation for a time-dependent potential Vx, t), ) i t ψ = Hψ, H = +Vx,t). 1) x We first observe that under a gauge transformation given by ψx,t) = Sx,t, x ) ψx,t), ) where Sx,t, ) is an invertible formal differential operator, the time-dependent Schrödinger equation 1) is mapped onto a related evolution equation of the x form where i t ψ = H ψ, 3) H = S 1 HS is 1 t S. 4) Following an ingenious idea of [ZL], we shall study time-dependent potentials for which the Hamiltonian given in eq. 1) is equivalent under a suitable gauge transformation to a differential operator of the form H = ft) H, 5)

3 where H is a time-independent differential operator. It is then straightforward to check that if φx) is an eigenfunction of H with eigenvalue λ, then ψx,t) = Sx,t, t x ) exp iλ fs)ds) φx), 6) is a solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation 1). It should be noted that in general the gauge operator S will not be unitary, so that ψx,t) given by equation ) is not necessarily square-integrable in x for all t. The only essential requirement is of course that the solutions ψx, t) of the original physical time-dependent Hamiltonian be square-integrable. Let us also remark that if φ 1 x),..., φ l x) are eigenfunctions of H with eigenvalues λ 1,...,λ l, then we obtain an l-parameter family of solutions of 1) as a linear superposition, ψx,t) = l t c j Sx,t, x ) exp iλ j fs)ds) φj x), 7) j= where the parameters c 1,...,c l are constants to be determined by the initial conditions. In particular, if H admits a countable family of eigenfunctions { φ j x), j < } such that the corresponding solutions of 1) form a complete set in L for each t, then we can obtain the general solution of 1) as an infinite sum of this type. The potentials for which we shall find explicit solutions of the Schrödinger equation1) are time-dependent generalizations of the well-known family of quasi-exactly solvable sextic anharmonic oscillator potentials [Tu], [Ush]), Wx) = ν x 6 +µνx 4 +µ 4n+3)ν)x, ν >, µ R, n N, 8) for which the first n+1 even eigenfunctions are of the form φ k x) = exp ν 4 x4 µ x) P k x ), 9) where P k is a polynomial of degree n in x. The parametrized family of time-dependent anharmonic oscillator potentials for which we shall partially solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation is given by Vx,t) = ut) 4 x 6 +βut) 3 x 4 + β 4n+3+k) 3 ut) ut)üt) ) ut) x kk 1) +, 16ut) 4 x 1) where x >, t, where n is a non-negative integer and k, β are real constants, and where ut) is an arbitrary function of t which is positive. If k is a positive integer, the last term inthe potential Vx,t)may be viewed as a centrifugal term in theradial equation for a spherically symmetric potential, with x playing the role of the radial coordinate. The domain of definition of the potential 1) may be extended to the real line if k =,1. 3

4 We now describe our solution of the Schrödinger equation 1) for the time-dependent sextic anharmonic oscillator potential 1). Let σx,t) = ut) 4 x4 βut) x +k log x, ht) = 3 ut) ut)üt) 64ut) 4 +n, vt) = 1 1) ht)+k + log ut) wx,t) = ut) t 8ut) x +4λ us)ds 11) and consider the first-order differential operators given by J = 1 x x, J = x x n, J+ = x3 x nx. 1) We remark that the differential operators J,J and J + form a Lie subalgebra of the Lie algebra of first-order differential operators on the half-line x >, which is isomorphic to sl. It admits the vector space N = {x j, j n} of even polynomials of degree less or equal to n in x as an irreducible finite-dimensional module. We shall also need the following time-dependent version of the operators 1): J = 1 x x, J = x x ht), J+ = x3 x ht)x. 13) Proposition. Let the polynomial φx) = n a j x j, 14) be an even eigenfunction with eigenvalue λ of the differential operator Then j= H = J J +J + +βj 1 n+k 1)J + β 1) n+k +. 15) ψx,t) = exp σx,t) ) exp logut) J +vt) ) exp iwx,t) ) φx) 16) is a solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation 1) for the sextic potential 1). This solution lies in L x > ) for all t. Remark. Note that the differential operator H preserves the irreducible sl -module N since it is a polynomial of degree in the generators J,J and J +. One therefore obtains polynomial eigenfunctions φx) of H by diagonalizing the linear endomorphism of N 4

5 determined by H. While the polynomial φx) is not square-integrable, the wave function ψx,t) given by 16) will be square-integrable on the positive real axis for all t. Proof. The first step in the proof is to perform the non-unitary) gauge transformation given by ψx,t) = e σx,t) ψ 1) x,t), where σx,t) is defined in 11). The transformed wave function must thus be a solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation i t ψ 1) = H 1) ψ 1), 17) where H 1) is the time-dependent Hamiltonian defined by H 1) = e σx,t) He σx,t) i σ x,t). 18) t It is straightforward to verify that the operator H 1) can be written as H 1) = 4 J J +4ut) J+ +4βut) J ht)+k 1) J +ht)+k +1)βut)+ i ut) ut)x4 + iβ ut)x. 19) The next step in our proof is to carry out the once again non-unitary gauge transformation given by ψ 1) x,t) = exp logut) J +vt) ) ψ ) x,t), ) with vt) defined by 11), which gives rise to a time-dependent Schrödinger equation for ψ ) x,t), i t ψ ) = H ) ψ ), 1) where H ) is given by H ) = 4ut) J J +4ut) J + + 4βut) i ut) ) J ht)+k 1)ut) J ut) + i ut) ut) x4 +βx i )+ht)+k +1)βut) i vt)+ ut). ḣt)log ) Finally, we perform the unitary gauge transformation given by ψ ) x,t) = exp i ut) 8ut) x) ψ 3) x,t), 3) which transforms 1) into i t ψ 3) = 4ut)H ψ 3), 4) with H given by 15). The claim now follows by applying formula 6) and by observing that ψx,t) defined by Eqs. 16) and 11) lies in L x > ) since ut) is positive for all t and k is non-negative. Q.E.D. 5

6 The algebraic solutions 16) of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation 1) with potential 1) may be written in the simpler form ψx,t) = exp σx,t) i ut) 8ut) x + 1 1) t ) k + logut) 4iλ us)ds φ ) ut)x, 5) with σx,t) and φx) given by 11) and 14), respectively. Finally, let us remark that it is still unclear wether this formalism can be applied to construct new time-dependent potentials associated to other families of quasi-exactly solvable potentials classified in [Tu]. Acknowledgements It is a pleasure to thank Artemio González-López and Miguel A. Rodríguez for helpful suggestions. References [GKO] A. González-López, N. Kamran and P.J. Olver, Real Lie algebras of differential operators and quasi-exactly solvable potentials, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A ), pp , New quasi-exactly solvable Hamiltonians in two dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys ), pp [Tu] A.V. Turbiner, Quasi-exactly solvable problems and sl) algebra, Commun. Math. Phys ), pp [Ush] A.G. Ushveridze, Quasi-exactly Solvable Models in Quantum Mechanics, Inst. of Physics Publ. Bristol, England, [ZL] S. Zhang and F. Li, Unitary transformation approach to the exact solutions of timedependent quantum systems with SU1, 1) dynamical group, J. Phys. A9 1996), pp