SEARCH FOR THE ONSET OF COLOR TRANSPARENCY ELECTROPRODUCTION ON NUCLEI. Outline
|
|
- Sabrina Golden
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SEARCH FOR THE ONSET OF COLOR TRANSPARENCY THROUGH ρ 0 ELECTROPRODUCTION ON NUCLEI Outline 1 introduction 2 Theoretical introduction 3 Experiments 4 CLAS EG2 5 Results 6 Future ρ 0 measurements at JLAB 7 Conclusions 8 Backup Lorenzo Zana The University of Edinburgh L. El Fassi, K. Hafidi, M. Holtrop, B. Mustapha W. Brooks, H. Hakobyan, CLAS collaboration June 8, 2015
2 Introduction Color Transparency is a QCD phenomenon which predicts a reduced level of interaction for reactions where the particle state is produced in a point-like configuration.
3 Introduction Color Transparency is a QCD phenomenon which predicts a reduced level of interaction for reactions where the particle state is produced in a point-like configuration. EG2 experiment using the CLAS detector at Jefferson Lab The Nuclear Transparency was measured in ρ 0 electro-production through nuclei. A signal of Color Transparency will be an increase of the Nuclear Transparency with a correspondent increase in Q 2
4 introduction Theoretical introduction Experiments CLAS EG2 Results Future ρ0 measurements at JLAB Conclusions Backup Coherence Length effect with the Glauber model An approximation of scattering through Quantum Mechanics High-Energy collision theory, by R.J. Glauber Using hadron picture for Nuclear Interaction.
5 Coherence Length effect with the Glauber model K. Ackerstaff, PRL 82, 3025 (1999) Exclusive ρ 0 electro-production, Coherence length ( l c ) effect l c = 2ν M 2 V +Q2 Cross section dependence on l c Mimics CT signal for incoherent ρ 0 production
6 introduction Theoretical introduction Experiments CLAS EG2 Results Future ρ0 measurements at JLAB Conclusions Backup QCD model and Color Transparency What is missing in the previous model? In the Glauber model, that gives a Quantum mechanical description of the interaction with matter, there is no mention of the particles to be considered as a composite system of quarks.
7 introduction Theoretical introduction Experiments CLAS EG2 Results Future ρ0 measurements at JLAB Conclusions Backup QCD model and Color Transparency What is missing in the previous model? In the Glauber model, that gives a Quantum mechanical description of the interaction with matter, there is no mention of the particles to be considered as a composite system of quarks. Glauber model No other Q 2 dependence other than the one due to the coherence length effect
8 introduction Theoretical introduction Experiments CLAS EG2 Results Future ρ0 measurements at JLAB Conclusions Backup Point like configuration What is it? High Q 2 in the reaction will select a very special configuration of the hadron wave function, where all connected quarks are close together, forming a small size color neutral configuration.
9 introduction Theoretical introduction Experiments CLAS EG2 Results Future ρ0 measurements at JLAB Conclusions Backup Point like configuration What is it? High Q 2 in the reaction will select a very special configuration of the hadron wave function, where all connected quarks are close together, forming a small size color neutral configuration. Momentum Each quark, connected to another one by hard gluon exchange carrying momentum of order Q should be found within a distance of the order of Q1
10 introduction Theoretical introduction Experiments CLAS EG2 Results Future ρ0 measurements at JLAB Conclusions Backup Point like configuration What is it? High Q 2 in the reaction will select a very special configuration of the hadron wave function, where all connected quarks are close together, forming a small size color neutral configuration. Momentum Each quark, connected to another one by hard gluon exchange carrying momentum of order Q should be found within a distance of the order of Q1 Color Transparency Such an object is unable to emit or absorb soft gluons its interaction with the other nucleons is significantly reduced
11 A lot of EXPERIMENTS since 1988 Quasi-elastic A(p,2p) [Brookhaven] Quasi-elastic A(e,ep) [ SLAC and Jlab] Di-jets diffractive dissociation. [Fermilab] Quasi-elastic D(e,ep) [Jlab - CLAS] Pion Production 4 He,( γ n p π ) [Jlab] Pion Production A(e,eπ + ) [Jlab] ρ 0 lepto production. [Fermilab, HERMES] ρ 0 lepto production & D(e,ep) [ Jlab - CLAS ]
12 OTHER EXPERIMENTS, Thomas Jefferson Lab: Hall A D. Dutta, PRC 68, (2003) Pion photo-production on 4 He, ( γ n p π ) at θ π cm = 70 at θπ cm = 90
13 Thomas Jefferson Lab: Hall C B. Clasie, PRL 99, (2007) Pion e-production on 2 H, 12 C, 27 Al, 63 Cu and 197 Au, ( γ p n π + ) T = ( Ȳ ȲMC ) A Ȳ ( ) Ȳ H MC T = A α 1, with α 0.76
14 HERA positron storage ring at DESY: HERMES A. Airapetan, PRL 90, (2003) Measurement of the Nuclear Transparency, incoherent ρ 0 prod. T A = P 0 + P 1 Q 2,with P 1 = (0.089 ± ± 0.020)GeV 2
15 Thomas Jefferson Lab: CLAS EG2 experiment Electron Beam 5GeV (50 days) & 4GeV (7days) Targets: D&Fe, D&C, D&Pb Luminosity 2x10 34 cm 2 s 1
16 Eg2 experiment target
17 Eg2 experiment target
18 Author information Reprints and permissions information is available a Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.H. (kawtar@anl.gov). introduction Theoretical introduction Experiments CLAS EG2 Results Future ρ 0 measurements at JLAB Conclusions Backup Reaction
19 Reaction Variables and kinematical cuts N Data Selection: q _ q t N 0 Q 2 = (q µ γ )2 4E e E e sin 2 ( θ 2 ) ν = E e E e t = (q µ γ pµ ρ 0 ) 2 W 2 = (q µ γ + pµ N )2 Q 2 + M 2 p + 2M p ν W > 2GeV, to avoid the resonance region t > 0.1GeV 2 to exclude coherent production off the nucleus t < 0.4GeV 2 to be in the diffractive region z = Eρ ν > 0.9 to select the elastic process
20 Mππ invariant mass, showing ρ 0 peak Kinematical cuts: Select the physics of interest Enhance the ρ 0 peak Cut a lot of data
21 Mππ invariant mass, showing ρ 0 peak Invariant mass for H 2, C and Fe
22 Extraction of the Nuclear Transparency The goal of the experiment is to determine the Nuclear Transparency T ρ0 A as a function of Q2 and l c T ρ0 A = ( N ρ 0 A L int A ) ( Nρ0 D ) L int D where L int A is the integrated luminosity for the target A L int A = nnucleons A Q int q e
23 Nuclear Transparency for Iron and Carbon l c dependence of Nuclear Transparency C 56 Fe 0.7 Nuclear Transparency ( 0.77) l c (fm) Nuclear Transparency
24 Nuclear Transparency for Iron and Carbon 12 C 56 Fe C 56 Fe ( 0.77) Nuclear Transparency 0.55 FMS Model FMS Model (CT) function of l c.the 0.45 the outer ones are stematic uncertainnormalization sysor iron (not shown btraction being the a factor 0.77 to fit Q 2 (GeV 2 ) GKM Model GKM Model (CT)
25 Nuclear Transparency for Iron and Carbon Table 1: Fitted slope parameters of the Q 2 -dependence of the nuclear transparency for carbon and iron nuclei. The results are compared with theoretical predictions of KNS [37], GKM [38] and FMS [39]. Measured Slopes Model Predictions Nucleus GeV 2 KNS GKM FMS C ± stat ± syst Fe ± stat ± syst B. Z. 261 Kopeliovich, J. Nemchik and I. Schmidt, Phys. 313 Rev. C , (2007) K. Gallmeister, 264 M. Kaskulov and U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. 316 C 83, (2011) L. Frankfurt, 267 G. A. Miller and M. Strikman, Private Communication based on Phys. Rev. C 78, (2008) but somewhat larger than the Frankfurt-Miller-Strikman (FMS) [39] calculations. While the KNS and GKM models yield an approximately linear Q 2 dependence, the FMS calculation yields a more complicated Q 2 dependence as shown in Fig. 4. The measured slope for carbon corresponds to a drop in the absorption of the ρ 0 from 37% at Q 2 = 1GeV 2 to 32% at Q 2 = 2.2 GeV 2,inreasonableagreementwiththecalculations. Despite the differences between these models in the assumed production mechanisms and SSC interaction in the nuclear medium, they all support the idea that the observed Q 2 dependence is clear evidence for the of the SSCs. Suc by future measure additional nuclei an We thank M. Sar the Fermi motion eff the outstanding effo the Physics Divisio experiment possible by the U.S. Depart Physics, under co and No. DE-FG02- CYT grants , BASAL FB082 the Italian Istituto French Centre Nat the French Comm National Research ence and Technolo the Physics Depart The Jefferson Scie Thomas Jefferson N
26 Thomas Jefferson Lab 12GeV upgrade: CLAS12 in Hall-B Up to 20 times more luminosity than CLAS Improved particle identification Access to higher masses Much larger kinematical range
27 Future ρ 0 measurements with CLAS12 at JLAB
28 Future ρ 0 measurements with CLAS12 at JLAB
29 Conclusions We see a rise in the Transparency of ρ 0 electro-production with increasing Q 2 We have different model calculations by KNS, GKS, FMS which well interpret the data.
30 Conclusions We see a rise in the Transparency of ρ 0 electro-production with increasing Q 2 We have different model calculations by KNS, GKS, FMS which well interpret the data. Approved experiment with CLAS12 at the future 12GeV upgraded Jefferson Laboratory with increased Q 2 range
31 Conclusions We see a rise in the Transparency of ρ 0 electro-production with increasing Q 2 We have different model calculations by KNS, GKS, FMS which well interpret the data. Approved experiment with CLAS12 at the future 12GeV upgraded Jefferson Laboratory with increased Q 2 range Thank you for your time
32 Backup Slides Glauber model l c effect l c effect Hermes data l c effect Hermes, EG2 data QCD model PLC definition PLC and Nuclear filtering Color Transparency Data Analysis Lengths in the reaction Kinematical cuts Diffractive region test Simulation, Background,Acceptance Extraction of the Nuclear Transparency Results FMS Model GKM Model KNS Model Comparison ρ 0 data and π data (FMS)
33 introduction Theoretical introduction Experiments CLAS EG2 Results Future ρ0 measurements at JLAB Conclusions Backup Glauber model An approximation of scattering through Quantum Mechanics High-Energy collision theory, by R.J. Glauber Using hadron picture for Nuclear Interaction.
34 Glauber model Γ γ V A ( b) = (a) (b) {}}{ A {}}{{}}{ Γ γ V N ( A [ b s j ) e i q Lz j 1 Γ VV N ( ] b s k ) θ(z k z j ) j=1 k ( j) (c) V Nucleus Nucleons
35 Glauber model Γ γ V A ( b) = (a) (b) {}}{ A {}}{{}}{ Γ γ V N ( A [ b s j ) e i q Lz j 1 Γ VV N ( ] b s k ) θ(z k z j ) j=1 k ( j) (c) * z>z j (b s j ) V V s j z j b z
36 Glauber model Γ γ V A ( b) = (a) (b) {}}{ A {}}{{}}{ Γ γ V N ( A [ b s j ) e i q Lz j 1 Γ VV N ( ] b s k ) θ(z k z j ) j=1 k ( j) (c) * z>z j (a) (b s j ) s j z j b V z V Γ γ V N ( b s j ) is the vector meson photo-production amplitude on a nucleon
37 Glauber model * Γ γ V A ( b) = (a) (b) {}}{ A {}}{{}}{ Γ γ V N ( A [ b s j ) e i q Lz j 1 Γ VV N ( ] b s k ) θ(z k z j ) j=1 z>z j (b) k ( j) (c) Considering the quantities Longitudinal and transverse to the axis z of symmetry, (b s j ) V V q L = p γ L p V L = Q2 + M 2 V 2ν s j z j b z l c = 1 q L = 2ν Q 2 +M 2 V for (z j 1 z j 2) < l c contributions will add coherently
38 Glauber model Γ γ V A ( b) = (a) (b) {}}{ A {}}{{}}{ Γ γ V N ( A [ b s j ) e i q Lz j 1 Γ VV N ( ] b s k ) θ(z k z j ) j=1 k ( j) (c) * z>z j (b) (b s j ) V V l c = 1 q L = 2ν Q 2 +M 2 V s j z j b z The γ interacts simultaneously with all the target nucleons within a distance l c
39 Glauber model * Γ γ V A ( b) = (a) (b) {}}{ A {}}{{}}{ Γ γ V N ( A [ b s j ) e i q Lz j 1 Γ VV N ( ] b s k ) θ(z k z j ) j=1 z>z j (c) k ( j) (c) small scattering ( k k ) on the nuclei with z k > z j k k ẑ = ( k k ) ẑ (b s j ) V V Γ( b) = (e iχ( b) 1) and χ VV tot = m χvv m ( b s m) s j z j b z e i m χvv m ( b s m) = m (1 Γ VV m ( b s m))
40 Glauber model Γ γ V A ( b) = (a) (b) {}}{ A {}}{{}}{ Γ γ V N ( A [ b s j ) e i q Lz j 1 Γ VV N ( ] b s k ) θ(z k z j ) j=1 k ( j) (c) * z>z j (c) (b s j ) s j z j b V z V with this easy model ( J.Hüfner et al., Phys. Lett. B383 (2996) 362) were able to parameterize the Q 2 and ν dependence of the Nuclear Transparency due to Coherence length effect
41 Glauber model (c) with this easy model ( J.Hüfner and oth., arxiv:nucl-th ) were able to parameterize the Q 2 and ν dependence of the Nuclear Transparency due to Coherence length effect
42 HERA positron storage ring at DESY: HERMES K. Ackerstaff, PRL 82, 3025 (1999) Exclusive ρ 0 electro-production, Coherence length ( l c ) effect l c = 2ν M 2 V +Q2 Cross section dependence on l c Mimics CT signal for incoherent ρ 0 production
43 HERA positron storage ring at DESY: HERMES K. Ackerstaff, PRL 82, 3025 (1999) Exclusive ρ 0 electro-production, Coherence length ( l c ) effect 2l c l c = 2ν M 2 V +Q2 Cross section dependence on l c Mimics CT signal for incoherent ρ 0 production: 1 Inter-nuclear spacing
44 HERA positron storage ring at DESY: HERMES K. Ackerstaff, PRL 82, 3025 (1999) Exclusive ρ 0 electro-production, Coherence length ( l c ) effect l c = 2ν M 2 V +Q2 Cross section dependence on l c Mimics CT signal for incoherent ρ 0 production 1 Inter-nuclear spacing (< r 2 > 1/2 0.8fm)
45 HERA positron storage ring at DESY: HERMES K. Ackerstaff, PRL 82, 3025 (1999) Exclusive ρ 0 electro-production, Coherence length ( l c ) effect l c = 2ν M 2 V +Q2 Cross section dependence on l c Mimics CT signal for incoherent ρ 0 production 2l c 1 Inter-nuclear spacing (< r 2 > 1/2 0.8fm) 2 Atom size
46 HERA positron storage ring at DESY: HERMES K. Ackerstaff, PRL 82, 3025 (1999) Exclusive ρ 0 electro-production, Coherence length ( l c ) effect l c = 2ν M 2 V +Q2 Cross section dependence on l c Mimics CT signal for incoherent ρ 0 production 1 Inter-nuclear spacing (< r 2 > 1/2 0.8fm) 2 Atom size
47 EG2 and HERMES kinematical range HERMES experiment kinematical range: 0.8GeV 2 < Q 2 < 4.5GeV 2 5GeV < ν < 24GeV
48 EG2 and HERMES kinematical range ) 2 (GeV 2 Q EG2 experiment kinematical range: 0.9GeV 2 < Q 2 < 2GeV 2 2.2GeV < ν < 3.5GeV ν (GeV)
49 EG2 and HERMES kinematical range EG2 experiment kinematical range: 0.9GeV 2 < Q 2 < 2GeV 2 2.2GeV < ν < 3.5GeV
50 EG2 experimental l c dependence? l c vs Q 2 range for Iron target
51 EG2 experimental l c dependence? l c vs Q 2 range for Iron target 1.0GeV 2 < Q 2 < 1.6GeV 2 T l c (GeV )
52 EG2 experimental l c dependence? l c vs Q 2 range for Iron target 1.0GeV 2 < Q 2 < 2.2GeV 2 T l c (GeV )
53 introduction Theoretical introduction Experiments CLAS EG2 Results Future ρ0 measurements at JLAB Conclusions Backup Point like configuration What is it? High Q 2 in the reaction will select a very special configuration of the hadron wave function, where all connected quarks are close together, forming a small size color neutral configuration.
54 introduction Theoretical introduction Experiments CLAS EG2 Results Future ρ0 measurements at JLAB Conclusions Backup Point like configuration What is it? High Q 2 in the reaction will select a very special configuration of the hadron wave function, where all connected quarks are close together, forming a small size color neutral configuration. Momentum Each quark, connected to another one by hard gluon exchange carrying momentum of order Q should be found within a distance of the order of Q1
55 introduction Theoretical introduction Experiments CLAS EG2 Results Future ρ0 measurements at JLAB Conclusions Backup Point like configuration What is it? High Q 2 in the reaction will select a very special configuration of the hadron wave function, where all connected quarks are close together, forming a small size color neutral configuration. Momentum Each quark, connected to another one by hard gluon exchange carrying momentum of order Q should be found within a distance of the order of Q1 Color Transparency Such an object is unable to emit or absorb soft gluons its interaction with the other nucleons is significantly reduced
56 Point like configuration: The distribution amplitude The distribution amplitude is (Lepage and Brodsky, PRD 22, 2157) φ(q 2, x) = Q 2 0 d 2 k T ψ(k T, x) ; (x = Longitudinal momentum fraction)
57 Point like configuration: The distribution amplitude The distribution amplitude is (Lepage and Brodsky, PRD 22, 2157) φ(q 2, x) = Q 2 0 d 2 k T ψ(k T, x) ; (x = Longitudinal momentum fraction) if we expand this expression in Fourier series φ(q 2, x) = Q 2 0 d 2 k T d 2 b T e i b T k T ψ(bt, x)
58 Point like configuration: The distribution amplitude The distribution amplitude is (Lepage and Brodsky, PRD 22, 2157) φ(q 2, x) = Q 2 0 d 2 k T ψ(k T, x) ; (x = Longitudinal momentum fraction) if we expand this expression in Fourier series φ(q 2, x) = Q 2 0 d 2 k T and assume cylindrical symmetry around k T d 2 b T e i b T k T ψ(bt, x) φ(q 2, x) = (2π) 2 db Q J 1 (Qb) ψ(b T, x) 0
59 Point like configuration: The distribution amplitude φ(q 2, x) = (2π) 2 0 db Q J 1(Qb) ψ(b T, x) 2 (Q J (Qb)) Q b
60 Point like configuration: The distribution amplitude φ(q 2, x) = (2π) 2 0 db Q J 1(Qb) ψ(b T, x) (Q J 2 (Qb)) At high Q 2 the distribution amplitude tends to evaluate the wave function at points of small transverse space separation ( b T ) Q b
61 Point like configuration: The distribution amplitude φ(q 2, x) = (2π) 2 0 db Q J 1(Qb) ψ(b T, x) (Q J 2 (Qb)) At high Q 2 the distribution amplitude tends to evaluate the wave function at points of small transverse space separation ( b T ) Short distance is a statement about a dominant integration region Q b
62 Point like configuration: The distribution amplitude φ(q 2, x) = (2π) 2 0 db Q J 1(Qb) ψ(b T, x) (Q J 2 (Qb)) At high Q 2 the distribution amplitude tends to evaluate the wave function at points of small transverse space separation ( b T ) Short distance is a statement about a dominant integration region Q b Each quark, connected to another one by hard gluon exchange carrying momentum of order Q should be found within a distance O( 1 Q )
63 Color Interaction: Simple model (P. Jain et al., PR271, 93) See P. Jain et al., Physics Report 271 (1996) 93 q x 1 PLC x 1 q b T y 1 y 1 PLC x 2 u y 2 x 2 d y 2 x u 2 y 2
64 Color Interaction: Simple model (P. Jain et al., PR271, 93) x 1 q y 1 x 1 q y 1 PLC x 1 q b T y 1 PLC PLC b T PLC x 1 q y x 2 y 2 q x 2 y 2 q x 1 q y 1 PLC b T PLC x 1 q y 1 x 1 q y 1 PLC b T PLC x 1 q y = x 2 y 2 x 2 y 2 q q K(x i, x j ) { }} { V (x 1 x 2 )V (x 1 x 2 ) V (x 1 x 2 )V (x 1 x 2) + V (x 1 x 2)V (x 1 x 2) V (x 1 x 2)V (x 1 x 2 )
65 Color Interaction: Simple model (P. Jain et al., PR271, 93) K(x i, x j ) [V (x 1 x 2) V (x 1 x 2 )] 2 for (b T = x 1 x 1 0), I have f (x 1 ) f (x 1) x 1 x 1 df dx 1 K(x i, x j ) {b T [V (x 1 x 2 )]} 2
66 Color Interaction: Simple model (P. Jain et al., PR271, 93) K(x i, x j ) [V (x 1 x 2) V (x 1 x 2 )] 2 for (b T = x 1 x 1 0), I have f (x 1 ) f (x 1) x 1 x 1 df dx 1 K(x i, x j ) {b T [V (x 1 x 2 )]} 2 K(x i, x j ) (b T ) 2
67 Finally: Color Transparency (1) At the time of the reaction, the hadron has to fluctuate to a Point Like configuration
68 Finally: Color Transparency (1) At the time of the reaction, the hadron has to fluctuate to a Point Like configuration (2) This configuration will experience a reduced interaction in the nucleus
69 Finally: Color Transparency (1) At the time of the reaction, the hadron has to fluctuate to a Point Like configuration (2) This configuration will experience a reduced interaction in the nucleus (3) A signature of Color Transparency will be an increase in nuclear transparency T A with an increase in the hardness of the reaction, driven by Q 2
70 Lengths in the reaction, order of magnitude Fluctuation q q ν Q _ q q N t N fm nucleon R 1.1 A 1/3 Carbon Iron fm
71 Lengths in the reaction, order of magnitude Formation length ρ 0 2E ρ 0 M 2 ρ 1 M2 ρ _ q q N t N fm nucleon R 1.1 A 1/3 Carbon Iron fm
72 Kinematical cuts W > 2GeV, to avoid the resonance region
73 Kinematical cuts W > 2GeV, to avoid the resonance region
74 Kinematical cuts W > 2GeV, to avoid the resonance region t > 0.1GeV 2 to exclude coherent production off the nucleus t < 0.4GeV 2 to be in the diffractive region
75 Kinematical cuts W > 2GeV, to avoid the resonance region t > 0.1GeV 2 to exclude coherent production off the nucleus t < 0.4GeV 2 to be in the diffractive region
76 Kinematical cuts W > 2GeV, to avoid the resonance region t > 0.1GeV 2 to exclude coherent production off the nucleus t < 0.4GeV 2 to be in the diffractive region z = Eρ > 0.9 to select the ν elastic process
77 Kinematical cuts W > 2GeV, to avoid the resonance region t > 0.1GeV 2 to exclude coherent production off the nucleus t < 0.4GeV 2 to be in the diffractive region z = Eρ > 0.9 to select the ν elastic process
78 Diffractive ρ 0 production Diffractive ρ 0 production. Fit to: Ae bt 10 6 (3.58 ± 0.5) 10 6 (3.67 ± 0.8) N 10 5 (3.72 ± 0.6) N C H Fe C t (GeV/c) t (GeV/c) 2 -t dependence show the rapid fall expected for incoherent diffractive ρ 0 production, consistent with CLAS data: (2.63 ± 0.44) Morrow JLAB-PHY , arxiv: PINAN11, Marrakech, 2011 Maurik Holtrop - University of New Hampshire 23 Tuesday, September 27, 11 23
79 Background Study and Simulation ρ 0 (GeV) ρ 0 REC bin 1 Liquid target χ 2 =246 for DF= As event generator used the one implemented by B. Mustapha (ANL) Tune to the Eg2 experiment configurations Radiative Effects, Fermi motion of target Possibility of using experimental cross section (D.Cassel, Physical Review D, 24 (1981)) for tuning the different contributions in our kinematics Background assumed composition: 1 γ + p = ++ + π 2 γ + p = 0 + π + 3 γ + p = p + π + + π ρ 0 (GeV) ρ 0 bin 1 Liquid target χ 2 =68 for DF=57
80 Acceptance correction In CLAS comprehensive of: Acceptance: Geometry of CLAS is not 4π Efficiency: considering together: 1 Detectors 2 Reconstruction protocol 3 Analysis
81 Acceptance correction Unexpectedly large effect of acceptance Due to: 1 tight kinematic cuts, 2 complicated detector 3 targets not at identical location (5 cm from each other)
82 Acceptance correction Iron at 4GeV T 0.54 Determined the correction 0.52 with 2 methods green: bin to bin red: bin to migration consider as systematic 0.42 error Q (GeV /c)
83 Extraction of the Nuclear Transparency The goal of the experiment is to determine the Nuclear Transparency T ρ0 A as a function of Q2 and l c T ρ0 A = ( N ρ 0 A L int A ) ( Nρ0 D ) L int D
84 Extraction of the Nuclear Transparency The goal of the experiment is to determine the Nuclear Transparency T ρ0 A as a function of Q2 and l c T ρ0 A = ( N ρ 0 A L int A ) ( Nρ0 D ) L int D where L int A is the integrated luminosity for the target A L int A = nnucleons A Q int q e
85 L. Frankfurt, G.A. Miller, M. Strikman Model L. Frankfurt, G.A. Miller, M. Strikman, arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] Glauber based calculation. Includes experimental conditions. Includes the ρ 0 decay. With of without the Color Transparency effect.
86 L. Frankfurt, G.A. Miller, M. Strikman Model dσ dt = n=0 dσn dt = T A = dσ dt A dσγ V dt = n=0 dσn dt A dσγ V dt = n=0 T n The full cross section will be given by the sum of all the possible different number of elastic re-scattering ( n in equation)
87 L. Frankfurt, G.A. Miller, M. Strikman Model dσ dt = dσ n n=0 dσ 0 dt = = T dt A = dσ dt (a) A dσγ V dt = n=0 dσn dt A dσγ V dt = n=0 Tn {}}{ V { }}{ A dσγ d 2 b dz ρ(b, z) (1 dz σ totρ(b, z )) A 1 dt (a) represents the sum of all the possible contributions for scattering a Vector meson from a γ in a target with density given by ρ(b, z ) (b) refers to the probability of not having an elastic re-scattering (1 dz σ z totρ(b, z )) from all the remaining nucleons (A 1) starting from the point z of the vector meson s creation z (b)
88 L. Frankfurt, G.A. Miller, M. Strikman Model dσ dt dσ 0 dt = dσ n n=0 = A dσγ V dt = T dt A = dσ dt d 2 b σ D eff (z z, p ρ 0) =σ tot(p ρ 0) A dσγ V dt = n=0 dz ρ(b, z)(1 z [( n 2 < kt 2 > + σ tot(p ρ 0) [ + 2σ πn ( p ρ 0 2 ) dσn dt A dσγ V dt = n=0 Tn dz σ totρ(b, z )) A 1 Q 2 + z l h (1 n2 < k 2 T > θ((z z) l h ) exp [ θ((z z) l h ) ( ( ) ] ) θ(l Q 2 h (z z)) )] Γ ρ 0 (z z) γ pρ 0 1 exp ( Γ ρ 0 (z z) γ pρ 0 ))].
89 L. Frankfurt, G.A. Miller, M. Strikman Model [( σeff D (z n 2 < kt 2 > z, p ρ 0) =σ tot(p ρ 0) [ + σ tot(p ρ 0) + 2σ πn ( p ρ 0 2 ) Q 2 + z l h (1 n2 < k 2 T > θ((z z) l h ) exp [ θ((z z) l h ) ( ( ) ] ) θ(l Q 2 h (z z)) )] Γ ρ 0 (z z) γ pρ 0 1 exp ( Γ ρ 0 (z z) γ pρ 0 ))]. Point Like Configuration interaction
90 L. Frankfurt, G.A. Miller, M. Strikman Model [( σeff D (z n 2 < kt 2 > z, p ρ 0) =σ tot(p ρ 0) [ + σ tot(p ρ 0) + 2σ πn ( p ρ 0 2 ) Q 2 + z l h (1 n2 < k 2 T > θ((z z) l h ) exp [ θ((z z) l h ) ( ( ) ] ) θ(l Q 2 h (z z)) )] Γ ρ 0 (z z) γ pρ 0 1 exp ( Γ ρ 0 (z z) γ pρ 0 ))]. PLC evolution in θ(l h (z z)) l h = 2p ρ 0/ M 2 is the formation time tot PLC z l h z
91 L. Frankfurt, G.A. Miller, M. Strikman Model [( σeff D (z n 2 < kt 2 > z, p ρ 0) =σ tot(p ρ 0) [ + σ tot(p ρ 0) + 2σ πn ( p ρ 0 2 ) Q 2 + z l h (1 n2 < k 2 T > θ((z z) l h ) exp [ θ((z z) l h ) ( ( ) ] ) θ(l Q 2 h (z z)) )] Γ ρ 0 (z z) γ pρ 0 1 exp ( Γ ρ 0 (z z) γ pρ 0 ))] PLC evolution in θ(l h (z z)) l h = 2p ρ 0/ M 2 is the formation time fm
92 L. Frankfurt, G.A. Miller, M. Strikman Model [( σeff D (z n 2 < kt 2 > z, p ρ 0) =σ tot(p ρ 0) [ + σ tot(p ρ 0) + 2σ πn ( p ρ 0 2 ) Q 2 + z l h (1 n2 < k 2 T > θ((z z) l h ) exp [ θ((z z) l h ) ( ( ) ] ) θ(l Q 2 h (z z)) )] Γ ρ 0 (z z) γ pρ 0 1 exp ( Γ ρ 0 (z z) γ pρ 0 ))]. Vector meson interaction + decay Interaction of decay product
93 GKM Model GMK Model Gallmeister, Kaskulov, Mosel. PRC 83, (2011) Coupled channel Giessen Boltzmann-Uehling- Uhlenbeck (GiBUU) transport equation. Includes rho decay and subsequent pion absorption. Includes experimental cuts and acceptance. With and without CT effects. PINAN11, Marrakech, 2011 Maurik Holtrop - University of New Hampshire 37
94 KNS Model KNS Model Kopeliovich, Nemchik, Schafer, Tarasov PRC 65 (2002) Light Cone QCD Formalism for q q-bar dipole. σ(qq) - Universal dipole cross section for q q-bar interaction with a nucleon, fit to proton structure functions over a large range of x, Q 2. LC wave function for q q-bar fluctuation of photon. LC wave function for vector meson. Parameter free (apart from initial fit). Will add the rho decay soon. PINAN11, Marrakech, 2011 Maurik Holtrop - University of New Hampshire 35
95 Comparison ρ 0 data and π data (FMS) Rho and Pion CT compared Using the same ingredients the FSM (LSM) model agrees well with both data sets.! FMS: Frankfurt, Miller and Strikman, PRC 78: , 2008 LSM: Larson, Miller and Strikman, PRC 74, (2006) PINAN11, Marrakech, 2011 Rho data FMS Model (CT) FMS Model (NO CT) 0.76 Pion data 0.74 LMS Model (CT) 0.72 LMS Model (NO CT) Q 2 (GeV/c) 2 Maurik Holtrop - University of New Hampshire 45 Tuesday, September 27, 11 45
Hadron Propagation and Color Transparency at 12 GeV
Hadron Propagation and Color Transparency at 12 GeV Dipangkar Dutta Mississippi State University Hall C Users Meeting Jan 21-22, 2016 Hall C meeting Jan 2016 D. Dutta Hadron propagation in nuclear medium
More informationHadronization with JLab 6/12 GeV
Hadronization with JLab 6/12 GeV Next generation nuclear physics with JLab12 and EIC Florida International University February 10-13th, 2016 Lamiaa El Fassi (On behalf of EG2 and CLAS Collaborations) Outline
More informationTransport Theoretical Studies of Hadron Attenuation in Nuclear DIS. Model Results Summary & Outlook
Transport Theoretical Studies of Hadron Attenuation in Nuclear DIS T. Falter, W. Cassing,, K. Gallmeister,, U. Mosel Contents: Motivation Model Results Summary & Outlook Motivation elementary en reaction
More informationNuclear Transparency in A(e,e π/k)x Status and Prospects
Nuclear Transparency in A(e,e π/k)x Status and Prospects Tanja Horn Small size configurations at high-t workshop 26 March 2011 1 Nuclear Transparency Color transparency (CT) is a phenomenon predicted by
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 17 Aug 2012
Color Transparency Gerald A. Miller Physics Department, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, Wa. 98195-1560, USA arxiv:1208.3668v1 [nucl-th] 17 Aug 2012 Abstract. Color transparency is the vanishing of nuclear
More informationPlans to measure J/ψ photoproduction on the proton with CLAS12
Plans to measure J/ψ photoproduction on the proton with CLAS12 Pawel Nadel-Turonski Jefferson Lab Nuclear Photoproduction with GlueX, April 28-29, 2016, JLab Outline Introduction J/ψ on the proton in CLAS12
More informationStudy of Color Transparency in Exclusive Vector Meson Electroproduction off Nuclei
Study of Color Transparency in Exclusive Vector Meson Electroproduction off Nuclei Kawtar Hafidi (co-spokesperson), Brahim Mustapha (co-spokesperson), John Arrington, Lamiaa El Fassi (co-spokesperson),
More informationProbing Nuclear Color States with J/Ψ and φ
Probing Nuclear Color States with J/Ψ and φ Michael Paolone Temple University Next Generation Nuclear Physics with JLab12 and the EIC FIU - Miami, Florida February 12th 2016 J/Ψ and φ experiments at a
More informationThe Neutron Structure Function from BoNuS
The Neutron Structure Function from BoNuS Stephen Bültmann 1 Physics Department, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 359, USA Abstract. The BoNuS experiment at Jefferson Lab s Hall B measured the structure
More informationColor Transparency: past, present and future
Color Transparency: past, present and future D. Dutta, 1 K. Hafidi, 2 M. Strikman 3 1 Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA 2 Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, USA
More informationThreshold Photo-production of J/5 Mesons J. Dunne Jefferson Lab
hreshold Photo-production of J/5 Mesons J. Dunne Jefferson Lab Introduction With the advent of higher energies at Jefferson Lab, the study of charmonium becomes possible. he threshold production of J/5
More informationRecent results from the STAR experiment on Vector Meson production in ultra peripheral AuAu collisions at RHIC.
Recent results from the STAR experiment on Vector Meson production in ultra peripheral AuAu collisions at RHIC. Leszek Adamczyk On behalf of STAR Collaboration September 7, 2016 RHIC AA: Au+Au, Cu+Cu,
More informationPhotoproduction of J/ψ on Nuclei
Outline E.Chudakov SRC Workshop, Jlab 2007 Photoproduction of J/ψ on Nuclei 1 Photoproduction of J/ψ on Nuclei E.Chudakov 1 1 JLab SRC Workshop, Jlab 2007 E.Chudakov SRC Workshop, Jlab 2007 Photoproduction
More informationNuclear GPDs and DVCS in Collider kinematics. Vadim Guzey. Theory Center, Jefferson Lab. Outline
Nuclear GPDs and DVCS in Collider kinematics Vadim Guzey Theory Center, Jefferson Lab Introduction Outline Nuclear PDFs Nuclear GPDs Predictions for DVCS Conclusions Introduction e(k ) Deeply Virtual Compton
More informationStudies of the hadronic component of the photon light-cone wave function using exclusive di-pion events at HERA
Submitted to the International Conference on High Energy Physics 6-22 August 2004, Beijing, China Abstract: 6-0250 Parallel Session: QCD soft interactions Studies of the hadronic component of the photon
More informationCHAPTER 2 ELECTRON-PROTON COLLISION
CHAPTER ELECTRON-PROTON COLLISION.1 Electron-proton collision at HERA The collision between electron and proton at HERA is useful to obtain the kinematical values of particle diffraction and interaction
More informationCharmonium production in antiproton-induced reactions on nuclei
Charmonium production in antiproton-induced reactions on nuclei Alexei Larionov Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany and National Research Center Kurchatov
More informationExclusive J/ψ production and gluonic structure
Exclusive J/ψ production and gluonic structure C. Weiss (JLab), Exclusive Meson Production Workshop, JLab, 22 24 Jan 25 Quarkonium size and structure Parametric: Dynamical scales Numerical: Potential models,
More informationHadron multiplicities at the HERMES experiment
A. I. Alikhanyan National Science Laboratory, Yerevan, Armenia E-mail: gevkar@mail.desy.de The HERMES collaboration has measured charge-separated pion and kaon multiplicities in semiinclusive deep-inelastic
More informationHunting for Quarks. G n M Co-conspirators: Jerry Gilfoyle for the CLAS Collaboration University of Richmond
Hunting for Quarks Jerry Gilfoyle for the CLAS Collaboration University of Richmond JLab Mission What we know and don t know. The Neutron Magnetic Form Factor Experiments with CLAS More JLab Highlights
More informationTHE NUCLEUS AS A QCD LABORATORY: HADRONIZATION, 3D TOMOGRAPHY, AND MORE
rhtjhtyhy EINN 2017 NOVEMBER 1, 2017 PAPHOS, CYPRUS THE NUCLEUS AS A QCD LABORATORY: HADRONIZATION, 3D TOMOGRAPHY, AND MORE KAWTAR HAFIDI Argonne National Laboratory is a U.S. Department of Energy laboratory
More informationThe Longitudinal Photon, Transverse Nucleon, Single-Spin Asymmetry in Exclusive Pion Production
The Longitudinal Photon, Transverse Nucleon, Single-Spin Asymmetry in Exclusive Pion Production Garth Huber SoLID Collaboration, Jefferson Lab, May 15, 2015. Complementarity of Different Reactions Deep
More informationMeasurements with Polarized Hadrons
Aug 15, 003 Lepton-Photon 003 Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Contents: Introduction: Spin of Proton Polarized Deep Inelastic Lepton-Nucleon Scattering 1.
More informationCoherent and Incoherent Nuclear Exclusive Processes
Coherent and Incoherent Nuclear Exclusive Processes Vadim Guzey Electron-Ion Collider Workshop: Electron-Nucleon Exclusive Reactions Rutgers University, March 14-15, 2010 Outline Coherent and incoherent
More informationExperimental results on nucleon structure Lecture I. National Nuclear Physics Summer School 2013
Experimental results on nucleon structure Lecture I Barbara Badelek University of Warsaw National Nuclear Physics Summer School 2013 Stony Brook University, July 15 26, 2013 Barbara Badelek (Univ. of Warsaw
More informationDeeply Virtual Compton Scattering off 4. He: New results and future perspectives
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering off 4 He: New results and future perspectives M. Hattawy (On behalf of the CLAS collaboration) 2016 JLab Users Group Workshop and Annual Meeting June 20-22, Jefferson
More informationDeep Inelastic Scattering On Nuclear Targets at
Deep Inelastic Scattering On Nuclear Targets at Beni Zihlmann NIKHEF NIKHEF Jaarvergadering p./4 Deep Inelastic Scattering Electron Scattering on H, H, 3 He, 4 N, Ne, 84 Kr NIKHEF Jaarvergadering p./4
More information3-D Imaging and the Generalized Parton Distribution Program at an Electron Ion Collider
Workshop on Precision Radiative Corrections for Next Generation Experiments 6 9 May 6, Jefferson Lab, Newport News VA 3-D Imaging and the Generalized Parton Distribution Program at an Electron Ion Collider
More informationNeutrino-Nucleus Scattering at MINERvA
1 Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at MINERvA Elba XIII Workshop: Neutrino Physics IV Tammy Walton Fermilab June 26, 2014 2 MINERvA Motivation Big Picture Enter an era of precision neutrino oscillation measurements.
More informationGlueX Capabilities for Nuclear Photoproduction
GlueX Capabilities for Nuclear Photoproduction A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Nuclear Photoproduction with GlueX April 28 29, 2016 Physics Topics with Nuclear Targets Considered for GlueX Photoproduction of vector
More informationNucleons in the Nuclear Environment
Nucleons in the Nuclear Environment "The next seven years..." John Arrington Argonne National Lab Topic: Study of nucleons (hadrons, quarks) in nuclei 1 - The EMC effect and related measurements 2 - Color
More informationNeutrino Energy Reconstruction Methods Using Electron Scattering Data. Afroditi Papadopoulou Pre-conference, EINN /29/17
Neutrino Energy Reconstruction Methods Using Electron Scattering Data Afroditi Papadopoulou Pre-conference, EINN 2017 10/29/17 Outline Nuclear Physics and Neutrino Oscillations. Outstanding Challenges
More informationALICE results on vector meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral p-pb and Pb-Pb collisions
ALICE results on vector meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral p-pb and Pb-Pb collisions Evgeny Kryshen (Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia) for the ALICE collaboration INT workshop INT-17-65W
More informationProbing Generalized Parton Distributions in Exclusive Processes with CLAS
Probing Generalized Parton Distributions in Exclusive Processes with CLAS Volker D. Burkert Jefferson Lab The nucleon: from structure to dynamics First GPD related results in DVCS and DVMP Experimental
More informationGluons at high x in Nuclei at EIC
Gluons at high x in Nuclei at EIC in collaboration with: E. Chudakov, D. Higinbotham, C. Hyde, C. Weiss Jefferson Lab DNP 2015 Fall meeting, Santa Fe, NM Outline Motivation HERA and ZEUS experience EIC
More informationExclusive processes at Jefferson Lab
PRAMANA cfl Indian Academy of Sciences Vol. 61, No. 5 journal of November 2003 physics pp. 837 846 Exclusive processes at Jefferson Lab HAIYAN GAO 1;2 1 Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham,
More informationDiffractive rho and phi production in DIS at HERA
Xavier Janssen, on behalf of H and Collaborations. Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium. E-mail: xjanssen@ulb.ac.be These proceedings report on H and results on diffractive electroproduction of ρ and
More informationTimelike Compton Scattering
Timelike Compton Scattering Tanja Horn In collaboration with: Y. Illieva, F.J. Klein, P. Nadel-Turonski, R. Paremuzyan, S. Stepanyan 12 th Int. Conference on Meson-Nucleon Physics and the Structure of
More informationTransverse Target Asymmetry in Exclusive Charged Pion Production at 12 GeV
Transverse Target Asymmetry in Exclusive Charged Pion Production at 12 GeV Dipangkar Dutta Mississippi State University (with Dave Gaskell & Garth Huber) Polarized Target Workshop: June 17-18, 2010 Outline
More informationMeasurement of the Charged Pion Form Factor to High Q 2
Measurement of the Charged Pion Form Factor to High Q 2 Dave Gaskell Jefferson Lab Hall C Users Meeting January 22, 2016 1 Outline 1. Motivation and techniques for measuring F π (Q 2 ) 2. Data àpre-jlab
More informationOpportunities in low x physics at a future Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) facility
1 Opportunities in low x physics at a future Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) facility Motivation Quantum Chromo Dynamics Proton=uud Visible Universe Galaxies, stars, people, Silent Partners: Protons & Neutrons
More informationNeutron Structure Function from BoNuS
Neutron Structure Function from BoNuS Stephen BültmannB Old Dominion University for the CLAS Collaboration The Structure of the Neutron at Large x The BoNuS Experiment in 005 First Results from the BoNuS
More informationPoS(DIS 2010)071. Diffractive electroproduction of ρ and φ mesons at H1. Xavier Janssen Universiteit Antwerpen
Diffractive electroproduction of ρ and φ mesons at Universiteit Antwerpen E-mail: xavier.janssen@ua.ac.be Diffractive electroproduction of ρ and φ mesons is measured at HERA with the detector in the elastic
More informationPerturbative origin of azimuthal anisotropy in nuclear collisions
Perturbative origin of azimuthal anisotropy in nuclear collisions Amir H. Rezaeian Uiversidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Valparaiso Sixth International Conference on Perspectives in Hadronic Physics
More informationParticle Physics with Electronic Detectors
Particle Physics with Electronic Detectors This experiment performed by the Oxford group on the 7 GeV proton synchrotron, NIMROD, at the Rutherford Laboratory in 1967 gave the first usefully accurate measurement
More informationElectron-Positron Annihilation
Evidence for Quarks The quark model originally arose from the analysis of symmetry patterns using group theory. The octets, nonets, decuplets etc. could easily be explained with coloured quarks and the
More informationσ tot (J/ψN) 3 4 mb Mark Strikman, PSU Jlab, March 26, 2011
J/ψ exclusive photoproduction off protons and nuclei near threshold Mark Strikman, PSU Application of VDM: σ V DM tot (J/ψN) 1 mb, σtot VDM (Ψ N) m2 (J/ψN) σ VDM tot J/ψ m 2 Ψ though r 2 Ψ r 2 J/ψ 4 QCD:
More informationHadron Formation Lengths: QCD Confinement in Forming Systems
Hadron Formation Lengths: QCD Confinement in Forming Systems Will Brooks Jefferson Lab Workshop on Intersections of Nuclear Physics with Neutrinos and Electrons May 5, 2006 Main Focus Space-time characteristics
More informationMeasuring Form Factors and Structure Functions With CLAS
Measuring Form Factors and Structure Functions With CLAS Jerry Gilfoyle for the CLAS Collaboration Physics Department, University of Richmond, Virginia Outline: 1. Jefferson Lab and the CLAS Detector..
More informationTina Leitner Oliver Buß, Ulrich Mosel und Luis Alvarez-Ruso
Neutrino nucleus scattering Tina Leitner Oliver Buß, Ulrich Mosel und Luis Alvarez-Ruso Institut für Theoretische Physik Universität Gießen, Germany XL. Arbeitstreffen Kernphysik, Schleching 26. Februar
More informationPhotodisintegration of Light Nuclei
Photodisintegration of Light Nuclei Yordanka Ilieva for the CLAS Collaboration Motivation Two-body photodisintegration of deuteron Two-body photodisintegration of 3 He The 7th International Workshop on
More informationHigh Energy Physics. Lecture 9. Deep Inelastic Scattering Scaling Violation. HEP Lecture 9 1
High Energy Physics Lecture 9 Deep Inelastic Scattering Scaling Violation HEP Lecture 9 1 Deep Inelastic Scattering: The reaction equation of DIS is written e+ p e+ X where X is a system of outgoing hadrons
More informationDeeply Virtual Compton Scattering off 4. He: New results and future perspectives
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering off 4 He: New results and future perspectives M. Hattawy (On behalf of the CLAS collaboration) Next generation nuclear physics with JLab12 and EIC 10-13 February 2016,
More informationLEPS Physics HOTTA, Tomoaki (RCNP, Osaka University) on behalf of the LEPS&LEPS2 collaboration
LCS2014 International Workshop LEPS Physics HOTTA, Tomoaki (RCNP, Osaka University) on behalf of the LEPS&LEPS2 collaboration Outline Overview of the LEPS&LEPS2 beamlines Recent results from LEPS Search
More informationOverview and Status of Measurements of F 3π at COMPASS
g-2 workshop Mainz: Overview and Status of Measurements of F 3π at COMPASS D. Steffen on behalf of the COMPASS collaboration 19.06.2018 sponsored by: 2 Dominik Steffen g-2 workshop Mainz 19.06.2018 Contents
More informationHelicity: Experimental Status. Matthias Grosse Perdekamp, University of Illinois
Helicity: Experimental Status Matthias Grosse Perdekamp, University of Illinois Content o The Experimental Effort o Quark and Sea Quark Helicity è DIS, SIDIS, pp è new FFs for global analysis è results
More informationHERMES Status Report
HERMES Status Report Sergey Yaschenko for the Collaboration DESY PRC, Hamburg, April 1, 008 Outline Introduction Physics Highlights from HERMES Isoscalar extraction of ΔS Model-dependent constraint on
More informationHADRONIZATION IN A NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENT. Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge-Energiefysica, NIKHEF
98 7 HADRONIZATION IN A NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENT J. J. VAN HUNEN (for the HERMES collaboration) Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge-Energiefysica, NIKHEF Postbus 41882, 1009 DB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
More informationMeasurements of charm and beauty proton structure functions F2 c c and F2 b b at HERA
Measurements of charm and beauty proton structure functions F c c and F b b at HERA Vladimir Chekelian MPI for Physics, Germany E-mail: shekeln@mail.desy.de Inclusive charm and beauty production is studied
More informationTransport studies of heavy ion collisions and antiproton-induced reactions on nuclei at FAIR energies
Transport studies of heavy ion collisions and antiproton-induced reactions on nuclei at FAIR energies A.B. Larionov Outline: 1) Motivation. 2) The GiBUU model: kinetic equations with relativistic mean
More informationMeasurements of the Proton and Kaon Form Factors via ISR at BABAR
Measurements of the Proton and Kaon Form Factors via ISR at BABAR Fabio Anulli INFN Sezione di Roma on behalf of the BABAR Collaboration HADRON 015 XVI International Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy 13
More informationRecent QCD results from ATLAS
Recent QCD results from ATLAS PASCOS 2013 Vojtech Pleskot Charles University in Prague 21.11.2013 Introduction / Outline Soft QCD: Underlying event in jet events @7TeV (2010 data) Hard double parton interactions
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 4 Nov 1998
Gluon- vs. Sea quark-shadowing N. Hammon, H. Stöcker, W. Greiner 1 arxiv:hep-ph/9811242v1 4 Nov 1998 Institut Für Theoretische Physik Robert-Mayer Str. 10 Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität 60054 Frankfurt
More informationStudy of Dimensional Scaling in Two- Body Photodisintegration of 3 He
Study of Dimensional Scaling in Two- Body Photodisintegration of 3 He Yordanka Ilieva CLAS Collaboration 2011 Fall Meeting of the APS Division on Nuclear Physics Meeting Michigan State University October
More informationStudies of hadronization in nuclei at HERMES
Studies of hadronization in nuclei at HERMES H.P. Blok (VU/NIKHEF) (on behalf of the HERMES collaboration) Why? How? What? Next? Hadronization workshop Trento, Oct. 2005 Motivation Hadronization is a non-perturbative
More informationSt anfo rd L in ear A ccele rat o r Cent e r
SLAC-PUB-7212 July 1996 NUCLEAR EFFECTS AT HERA STANLEY J. BRODSKY St anfo rd L in ear A ccele rat o r Cent e r St anfo rd University, St anfo rd, California 94 309 To appear in the Proceedings of the
More informationPhysik Department, Technische Universität München D Garching, Germany. Abstract
TUM/T39-96-19 Diffractive ρ 0 photo- and leptoproduction at high energies ) G. Niesler, G. Piller and W. Weise arxiv:hep-ph/9610302v1 9 Oct 1996 Physik Department, Technische Universität München D-85747
More informationHadron Physics with Real and Virtual Photons at JLab
Hadron Physics with Real and Virtual Photons at JLab Elton S. Smith Jefferson Lab Virtual photons shape of the nucleon Elastic scattering (form factors) Inelastic scattering (uark distributions) Exclusive
More informationTarget single- and double-spin asymmetries in DVCS off a longitudinal polarised hydrogen target at HERMES
Target single- and double-spin asymmetries in DVCS off a longitudinal polarised hydrogen target at HERMES David Mahon On behalf of the HERMES Collaboration DIS 2010 - Florence, Italy Overview Mahon DIS
More informationVector meson photoproduction in ultra-peripheral p-pb collisions measured using the ALICE detector
Vector meson photoproduction in ultra-peripheral p-pb collisions measured using the ALICE detector Jaroslav Adam On behalf of the ALICE Collaboration Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering
More informationRecent results from MINERvA
Recent results from MINERvA Jonathan Miller for the MINERvA Collaboration Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria 1 PANIC NOW Outline Introduction to MINERvA Recent important results: charged pion production
More informationSingle and double polarization asymmetries from deeply virtual exclusive π 0 electroproduction
Single and double polarization asymmetries from deeply virtual exclusive π electroproduction University of Connecticut E-mail: kenjo@jlab.org Harut Avakian, Volker Burkert et al. (CLAS collaboration) Jefferson
More informationPoS(DIFF2006)011. Vector Mesons at H1. Niklaus Berger
Institute for Particle Physics, ETH Zurich, 893 Zurich, Switzerland E-mail: nberger@phys.ethz.ch on behalf of the H collaboration The study of exclusive vector meson production at HERA sheds light on the
More informationTransversity experiment update
Transversity experiment update Hall A collaboration meeting, Jan 20 2016 Xuefei Yan Duke University E06-010 Collaboration Hall A collaboration The Incomplete Nucleon: Spin Puzzle 1 2 = 1 2 ΔΣ + L q + J
More informationOverview of recent HERMES results
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Overview of recent HERMES results To cite this article: Hrachya Marukyan and 216 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 678 1238 View the article online for updates
More information2007 Section A of examination problems on Nuclei and Particles
2007 Section A of examination problems on Nuclei and Particles 1 Section A 2 PHYS3002W1 A1. A fossil containing 1 gramme of carbon has a radioactivity of 0.03 disintegrations per second. A living organism
More informationPhysics with Tagged Forward Protons using the STAR Detector at RHIC. The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider The pp2pp Experiment STAR 2009
Physics with Tagged Forward Protons using the STAR Detector at RHIC The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider The pp2pp Experiment 2002 2003 STAR 2009 Elastic and Diffractive Processes Elastic scattering Detect
More informationStructure Functions at Very High Q 2 From HERA
Structure Functions at Very High Q 2 From HERA Christopher M. Cormack For the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxford, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom Abstract. Measurements
More informationDeep Exclusive π " Production with transversely polarized He3 using SoLID
Deep Exclusive π " Production with transversely polarized He3 using SoLID A run-group proposal with E12-10-006 Zhihong Ye, ANL On behalf of Co-Spokespeople: Garth Huber (contact), Zafar Ahmed, from Univ.
More informationNuclear effects in deep-inelastic scattering
Nuclear effects in deep-inelastic scattering Sergei Kulagin (INR, Moscow) Talk at JLab Theory Center October 8, 200 Typeset by FoilTEX Outline Brief summary of experimental evidence of nuclear effects
More informationNuclear aspects of neutrino energy reconstruction in current oscillation experiments
Nuclear aspects of neutrino energy reconstruction in current oscillation experiments Tina Leitner Oliver Buss, Luis Alvarez-Ruso, and Ulrich Mosel Institut für Theoretische Physik Universität Gießen, Germany
More informationShape and Structure of the Nucleon
Shape and Structure of the Nucleon Volker D. Burkert Jefferson Lab Science & Technology Peer Review June 25-27, 2003 8/7/2003June 25, 2003 Science & Technology Review 1 Outline: From form factors & quark
More informationNext-generation nuclear physics with JLab12 and EIC
Next-generation nuclear physics with JLab12 and EIC Topical Workshop, Florida International University, 10 13 Feb 2016 W. Brooks, R. Dupre, Ch. Hyde, M. Sargsian, C. Weiss (Organizers) Welcome! Physics
More informationW, Z and top production measurements at LHCb
1 W, Z and top production measurements at LHCb Lorenzo Sestini, on behalf of the LHCb collaboration. Universitá di Padova e INFN E-mail: lorenzo.sestini@cern.ch The LHCb experiment offers a complementary
More informationElectroproduction of hadrons in nuclei
Electroproduction o hadrons in nuclei Nicola Bianchi Bianchi@ln.inn.it Fragmentation Function modiications in the nuclear medium HERMES recent and new results Expectations rom CLAS Interpretations Workshop
More informationSPIN STRUCTURE OF THE NUCLEON AND POLARIZATION. Charles Y. Prescott Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford CA 94309
SLAC-PUB-662 September 1994 (TE) SPIN STRUCTURE OF THE NUCLEON AND POLARIZATION Charles Y. Prescott Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford CA 9439 Work supported by Department
More informationPhysics at Hadron Colliders
Physics at Hadron Colliders Part 2 Standard Model Physics Test of Quantum Chromodynamics - Jet production - W/Z production - Production of Top quarks Precision measurements -W mass - Top-quark mass QCD
More informationMeasurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the ATLAS detector
Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings 00 (07) 6 Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings Measurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the detector Sebastien Prince
More informationProduction and Searches for Cascade Baryons with CLAS
Production and Searches for Cascade Baryons with CLAS Photoproduction Cross sections Ground State Ξ (1320) Excited State Ξ 0 (1530) Search for Cascade Pentaquarks Elton S. Smith CLAS Collaboration Jefferson
More informationProbing nucleon structure by using a polarized proton beam
Workshop on Hadron Physics in China and Opportunities with 12 GeV Jlab July 31 August 1, 2009 Physics Department, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China Probing nucleon structure by using a polarized proton
More informationHall A/C collaboration Meeting June Xuefei Yan Duke University E Collaboration Hall A collaboration
Hall A SIDIS Hall A/C collaboration Meeting June 24 2016 Xuefei Yan Duke University E06-010 Collaboration Hall A collaboration The Incomplete Nucleon: Spin Puzzle [X. Ji, 1997] DIS DΣ 0.30 RHIC + DIS Dg
More informationProbing Short Range Structure Through the Tensor Asymmetry A zz
Probing Short Range Structure Through the Tensor Asymmetry A zz (TA ) at x>1 zz Elena Long Joint Hall A/C Collaboration Meeting Jefferson Lab June 6 th, 2014 1 Today s Discussion Overview of Physics Motivation
More information(Experimental) Soft Diffraction at LHC. Jan Kašpar. ISMD2017, Tlaxcala, Mexico 15 September, 2017
(Experimental) Soft Diffraction at LHC Jan Kašpar ISMD2017, Tlaxcala, Mexico 15 September, 2017 Introduction selected processes: Elastic scattering p + p p + p Single diffraction p + p p + X Double diffraction
More informationSmall angle (Low Q 2 ) GDH sum rule experiments
Small angle (Low Q 2 ) GDH sum rule experiments A. Deur Jefferson Lab. Outline: Sum rules, GDH, Bjorken, spin polarizability sum rules; Usefulness and context; Measurements (published, being analyzed,
More informationUlrich Mosel TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAAAA
Ulrich Mosel General Motivation: Interactions n Pions (from resonances and DIS) are the most dominant background to QE GiBUU : Theory and Event Simulation based on a BM solution of Kadanoff-Baym equations
More informationNUCLEAR BROADENING OF OUT OF PLANE TRANSVERSE MOMENTUM IN DI-JET PRODUCTION
NUCLEAR BROADENING OF OUT OF PLANE TRANSVERSE MOMENTUM IN DI-JET PRODUCTION arxiv:hep-ph/9407386v1 27 Jul 1994 Boris Z. Kopeliovich Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Head Post Office, P.O. Box 79, 101000
More informationExperimental Aspects of Deep-Inelastic Scattering. Kinematics, Techniques and Detectors
1 Experimental Aspects of Deep-Inelastic Scattering Kinematics, Techniques and Detectors 2 Outline DIS Structure Function Measurements DIS Kinematics DIS Collider Detectors DIS process description Dirac
More informationImpact of γ ν NN* Electrocuplings at High Q 2 and Preliminary Cross Sections off the Neutron
Impact of γ ν NN* Electrocuplings at High Q 2 and Preliminary Cross Sections off the Neutron Ralf W. Gothe Nucleon Resonances: From Photoproduction to High Photon October 12-16, 2015, ECT*, Trento, Italy
More informationSpin Structure of the Nucleon: quark spin dependence
Spin Structure of the Nucleon: quark spin dependence R. De Vita Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Electromagnetic Interactions with Nucleons and Nuclei EINN005 Milos September, 005 The discovery of
More informationOutline. Generalized Parton Distributions. Elastic Form Factors and Charge Distributions in Space. From Form Factors to Quark Spin Distributions
Outline Generalized Parton Distributions in lepton scattering and antiproton annihilation experiments Michael DürenD Universität Gießen en The structure of the proton: From form factors to uark spin distributions
More information