9.7: Identity: Symbolizations
|
|
- Theodora Kennedy
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 9.7: Identity: Symbolizations Among the many different relations, one stands out in logic: identity. Consider the following argument: George Orwell wrote George Orwell was identical to Eric Blair. Hence, Eric Blair wrote (o: Orwell; b: Blair; Wxy: x wrote y; Ixy: x is identical to y) This is obviously a valid argument, but we can t prove that it is given the rules we have so far: 1. Won 2. Iob Wbn Hence, we need to introduce identity explicitly into our system and treat it specially. We ll borrow the identity sign = from arithmetic to express the identity relation is identical to or, more succinctly, simply is. We will also use standard infix notion, that is, we will write o=b instead of =ob. Since identity statements are statements like any other, they can be used to form more complex statements. Sarah Jessica Parker is not identical with Clint Eastwood. (s: SJP; c: CE) Symbolized: ~s=c If Sarah is not Clint, then Clint is not the star of Sex and the City. (s: SJP; c: CE; t: Sex and the City; Sxy: x is the star of y) Symbolized: ~s=c ~Sct Note no parens are used when negating an identity statement.
2 Many statements can be symbolized with identity that cannot be symbolized without it! Salient examples follow: Only... English: Only Edison invented the phonograph. Logicese 1: Edison invented the phonograph, and for all x, if x invented the phonograph, then x is identical to Edison. Symbolized 1: Pe (x)(px x=e) Logicese 1I: For all x, x invented the phonograph if and only if x is e. Symbolized 1I: (x)(px x=e) The only... English: The only engineer to invent the telephone was Bell Logicese: Bell is an engineer and Bell invented the telephone and, for all x, if x is an engineer and x invented the telephone, then x is Bell. Symbolized: Eb Tb (x)((ex Tx) x=b) No... except [but other than]... English: No engineer except Bell invented the telephone. Logicese: Bell is an engineer and invented the telephone, and no engineer x other than Bell invented the telephone. Symbolized: Eb Tb ~( x)(ex ~x=b Tx) (Can also be symbolized as in The only....) All... except [but other than]... English: All philosophers other than Derrida study logic. Logicese: For all x, if x is a philosopher and x is not Derrida, then x studies logic. Symbolized: (x)((px ~x=d) Lx)
3 Superlatives English: Everest is the tallest mountain. Logicese: Everest is a mountain and, for all x, if x is a mountain and x is not Everest, then Everest is taller than x. Symbolized: Me (x)((mx ~x=e) Tex) The idea here is that, in a superlative, one says that a certain object in a certain class has more of a certain property than any other thing in the class. As seen above, other requires identity: the things other than x are the things not identical to it. At most n... English: There is at most one god. Logicese: For all x and for all y, if x is a god and y is a god, then x is identical to y. Symbolized: (x)(y)((gx Gy) x=y) English: There are at most two angels. Logicese: For all x, y, and z, if x, y, z are angels, then either x is y or y is z or x is z. Symbolized: (x)(y)(z)((ax Ay Az) (x=y v y=z v x=z)) English: At most two Democrats are conservative Logicese: For all x, y, and z, if x, y, z are all conservative Democrats, then either x is identical to y or y is identical to z or x is identical to z. Symbolized: (x)(y)(z)([(dx Cx) (Dy Cy) (Dz Cz)] (x=y v y=z v x=z)) Note that at most statements do not imply that there are any instances of the things of which there is said to be at most n. At least n... English: There is at least one god. Logicese: There exists an x such that x is a god. Symbolized: ( x)gx
4 English: There are at least two angels. Logicese: There exists an x and a y such that x and y are angels and x is not y. Symbolized: ( x)( y)(ax Ay ~x=y) English: At least two Democrats are conservative. Logicese: There exists an x and a y such that x and y are conservative Democrats and x is not y. Symbolized: ( x)( y)((dx Cx) (Dy Cy) ~x=y) Note that if we d omitted the ~x=y conjuncts in the latter two symbolizations they would only have expressed At least one statements, since it doesn t follow that x and y have to be distinct. Exactly n... English: There is exactly one god. Logicese: There exists an x such that x is a god and for all y, if y is a god, then x is y. Symbolized: ( x)(gx (y)(gy x=y)) English: There are exactly two angels. Logicese: There exists an x and a y such that x and y are angels and x is not y and for any angel z, either z is x or z is y. Symbolized: ( x)( y)[ax Ay ~x=y (z)(az (z=x v z=y))] Note that Exactly n... statements are equivalent to At least n and at most n statements. The (Definite Descriptions) The philosopher Bertrand Russell analyzed sentences of the form The A is B as essentially containing three assertions: 1. There is at least one A. 2. There is at most one A. 3. Every A is a B
5 Symbolized I: ( x)(ax) (x)(y)((ax Ay) x=y) (x)(ax Bx) We can also express Russell s idea in a single sentence: The A is B means Exactly one thing is A and that thing is B. Using the ideas above, we can express this succinctly in terms of quantifiers, variables, and identity: Symbolized II: ( x)[(ax (y)(ay x=y) Bx]
Identity. "At least one dog has fleas" is translated by an existential quantifier"
Identity Quantifiers are so-called because they say how many. So far, we've only used the quantifiers to give the crudest possible answers to the question "How many dogs have fleas?": "All," "None," "Some,"
More informationDO NOT FORGET!!! WRITE YOUR NAME HERE. Philosophy 109 Final Exam, Spring 2007 (80 points total) ~ ( x)
Page 1 of 13 DO NOT FORGET!!! WRITE YOUR NAME HERE Philosophy 109 Final Exam, Spring 2007 (80 points total) ~ ( x) Part I: Symbolization into RL: Provide symbolizations of the following sentences, using
More informationDeduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 8 Identity and Functions
Deduction by Daniel Bonevac Chapter 8 Identity and Functions Introduction 1 This chapter introduces two important extensions of Q that make it quite a bit more powerful. The first is the mathematical relation
More informationDenote John by j and Smith by s, is a bachelor by predicate letter B. The statements (1) and (2) may be written as B(j) and B(s).
PREDICATE CALCULUS Predicates Statement function Variables Free and bound variables Quantifiers Universe of discourse Logical equivalences and implications for quantified statements Theory of inference
More informationMathematical Preliminaries. Sipser pages 1-28
Mathematical Preliminaries Sipser pages 1-28 Mathematical Preliminaries This course is about the fundamental capabilities and limitations of computers. It has 3 parts 1. Automata Models of computation
More informationPredicate Calculus - Syntax
Predicate Calculus - Syntax Lila Kari University of Waterloo Predicate Calculus - Syntax CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 26 The language L pred of Predicate Calculus - Syntax L pred, the formal language
More informationINSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA CHEATHARLACH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW PREDICATE LOGIC
1 CHAPTER 7. PREDICATE LOGIC 1 INSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA CHEATHARLACH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW PREDICATE LOGIC 1 Predicate Logic 1.1 Introduction There are various arguments which cannot be dealt
More informationPhilosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2014
Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2014 Class #23 - Translation into Predicate Logic II ( 3.2) Only as a Quantifier P Only Ps are Qs is logically equivalent to all Qs are
More informationINTRODUCTION TO LOGIC. Propositional Logic. Examples of syntactic claims
Introduction INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC 2 Syntax and Semantics of Propositional Logic Volker Halbach In what follows I look at some formal languages that are much simpler than English and define validity of
More informationSYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES
SYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES Singular Sentences name Paris is beautiful (monadic) predicate (monadic) predicate letter Bp individual constant Singular Sentences Bp These are our new simple
More informationThe Limit of Humanly Knowable Mathematical Truth
The Limit of Humanly Knowable Mathematical Truth Gödel s Incompleteness Theorems, and Artificial Intelligence Santa Rosa Junior College December 12, 2015 Another title for this talk could be... An Argument
More information2. Use quantifiers to express the associative law for multiplication of real numbers.
1. Define statement function of one variable. When it will become a statement? Statement function is an expression containing symbols and an individual variable. It becomes a statement when the variable
More informationLECTURE 1. Logic and Proofs
LECTURE 1 Logic and Proofs The primary purpose of this course is to introduce you, most of whom are mathematics majors, to the most fundamental skills of a mathematician; the ability to read, write, and
More informationPredicate Logic. Predicates. Math 173 February 9, 2010
Math 173 February 9, 2010 Predicate Logic We have now seen two ways to translate English sentences into mathematical symbols. We can capture the logical form of a sentence using propositional logic: variables
More informationIntermediate Logic. First-Order Logic
Intermediate Logic Lecture Four First-Order Logic Rob Trueman rob.trueman@york.ac.uk University of York Introducing First-Order Logic First-Order Logic Introducing First-Order Logic Names Predicates Quantifiers
More informationRosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples
Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples Section 1.4 Nested Quantifiers Page references correspond to locations of Extra Examples icons in the textbook. #1. Write the
More informationIdentity. We often use the word identical to simply mean looks the same. For instance:
Identity 1. Introduction: In this lesson, we are going to learn how to express statements about identity; or, namely, we re going to learn how to say that two things are identical. We often use the word
More information1 Propositional Logic
1 Propositional Logic Required reading: Foundations of Computation. Sections 1.1 and 1.2. 1. Introduction to Logic a. Logical consequences. If you know all humans are mortal, and you know that you are
More information2-4: The Use of Quantifiers
2-4: The Use of Quantifiers The number x + 2 is an even integer is not a statement. When x is replaced by 1, 3 or 5 the resulting statement is false. However, when x is replaced by 2, 4 or 6 the resulting
More informationFormal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus
Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus Lila Kari University of Waterloo Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 42 Formal deducibility for predicate
More information1 Introduction to Predicate Resolution
1 Introduction to Predicate Resolution The resolution proof system for Predicate Logic operates, as in propositional case on sets of clauses and uses a resolution rule as the only rule of inference. The
More informationPredicate Logic. CSE 191, Class Note 02: Predicate Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo
Predicate Logic CSE 191, Class Note 02: Predicate Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo c Xin He (University at Buffalo) CSE 191 Discrete Structures 1 / 22 Outline 1 From Proposition to Predicate
More informationTRUTH TELLERS. Volker Halbach. Scandinavian Logic Symposium. Tampere
TRUTH TELLERS Volker Halbach Scandinavian Logic Symposium Tampere 25th August 2014 I m wrote two papers with Albert Visser on this and related topics: Self-Reference in Arithmetic, http://www.phil.uu.nl/preprints/lgps/number/316
More informationThis lecture: basis and dimension 4.4. Linear Independence: Suppose that V is a vector space and. r 1 x 1 + r 2 x r k x k = 0
Linear Independence: Suppose that V is a vector space and that x, x 2,, x k belong to V {x, x 2,, x k } are linearly independent if r x + r 2 x 2 + + r k x k = only for r = r 2 = = r k = The vectors x,
More informationEhrhart polynomial for lattice squares, cubes, and hypercubes
Ehrhart polynomial for lattice squares, cubes, and hypercubes Eugen J. Ionascu UWG, REU, July 10th, 2015 math@ejionascu.ro, www.ejionascu.ro 1 Abstract We are investigating the problem of constructing
More informationA Note on the Major Results of Begriffsschrift
A Note on the Major Results of Begriffsschrift Richard G. Heck, Jnr. In this note, I shall explain and outline Frege s proofs of the two major results of Begriffsschrift (Frege, 1967), Part III, Theorems
More informationQuantifiers Here is a (true) statement about real numbers: Every real number is either rational or irrational.
Quantifiers 1-17-2008 Here is a (true) statement about real numbers: Every real number is either rational or irrational. I could try to translate the statement as follows: Let P = x is a real number Q
More informationChapter 1. Logic and Proof
Chapter 1. Logic and Proof 1.1 Remark: A little over 100 years ago, it was found that some mathematical proofs contained paradoxes, and these paradoxes could be used to prove statements that were known
More informationLogic: First Order Logic
Logic: First Order Logic Raffaella Bernardi bernardi@inf.unibz.it P.zza Domenicani 3, Room 2.28 Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen http://www.inf.unibz.it/~bernardi/courses/logic06
More informationPeano Arithmetic. CSC 438F/2404F Notes (S. Cook) Fall, Goals Now
CSC 438F/2404F Notes (S. Cook) Fall, 2008 Peano Arithmetic Goals Now 1) We will introduce a standard set of axioms for the language L A. The theory generated by these axioms is denoted PA and called Peano
More informationMotivation. CS389L: Automated Logical Reasoning. Lecture 10: Overview of First-Order Theories. Signature and Axioms of First-Order Theory
Motivation CS389L: Automated Logical Reasoning Lecture 10: Overview of First-Order Theories Işıl Dillig Last few lectures: Full first-order logic In FOL, functions/predicates are uninterpreted (i.e., structure
More informationC241 Homework Assignment 4
C241 Homework Assignment 4 1. Which of the following formulas are tautologies and which are contradictions? Which of the formulas are logically equivalent to each other? (a) p (q r) (b) ( p r) (q r) (c)
More information1 Arithmetic calculations (calculator is not allowed)
1 ARITHMETIC CALCULATIONS (CALCULATOR IS NOT ALLOWED) 1 Arithmetic calculations (calculator is not allowed) 1.1 Check the result Problem 1.1. Problem 1.2. Problem 1.3. Problem 1.4. 78 5 6 + 24 3 4 99 1
More informationFormal Logic: Quantifiers, Predicates, and Validity. CS 130 Discrete Structures
Formal Logic: Quantifiers, Predicates, and Validity CS 130 Discrete Structures Variables and Statements Variables: A variable is a symbol that stands for an individual in a collection or set. For example,
More informationPropositional Logic Not Enough
Section 1.4 Propositional Logic Not Enough If we have: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Does it follow that Socrates is mortal? Can t be represented in propositional logic. Need a language that talks
More informationProving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus
Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus Lila Kari University of Waterloo Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 22 Predicate calculus - Logical consequence
More information! Predicates! Variables! Quantifiers. ! Universal Quantifier! Existential Quantifier. ! Negating Quantifiers. ! De Morgan s Laws for Quantifiers
Sec$on Summary (K. Rosen notes for Ch. 1.4, 1.5 corrected and extended by A.Borgida)! Predicates! Variables! Quantifiers! Universal Quantifier! Existential Quantifier! Negating Quantifiers! De Morgan s
More information1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers
1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers INTRODUCTION Statements x>3, x=y+3 and x + y=z are not propositions, if the variables are not specified. In this section we discuss the ways of producing propositions from
More information1 Functions of many variables.
MA213 Sathaye Notes on Multivariate Functions. 1 Functions of many variables. 1.1 Plotting. We consider functions like z = f(x, y). Unlike functions of one variable, the graph of such a function has to
More informationIntroduction to Sets and Logic (MATH 1190)
Introduction to Sets Logic () Instructor: Email: shenlili@yorku.ca Department of Mathematics Statistics York University Sept 18, 2014 Outline 1 2 Tautologies Definition A tautology is a compound proposition
More informationFull file at Chapter 1
Chapter 1 Use the following to answer questions 1-5: In the questions below determine whether the proposition is TRUE or FALSE 1. 1 + 1 = 3 if and only if 2 + 2 = 3. 2. If it is raining, then it is raining.
More informationIntroduction to Predicate Logic Part 1. Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1)
Introduction to Predicate Logic Part 1 Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1) Introduction Lecture Notes (1) and (2) provide an OVERVIEW of a standard intuitive formalization and introduction to
More informationICS141: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science I
ICS141: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science I Dept. Information & Computer Sci., Originals slides by Dr. Baek and Dr. Still, adapted by J. Stelovsky Based on slides Dr. M. P. Frank and Dr. J.L. Gross
More informationMATH 1090 Problem Set #3 Solutions March York University
York University Faculties of Science and Engineering, Arts, Atkinson MATH 1090. Problem Set #3 Solutions Section M 1. Use Resolution (possibly in combination with the Deduction Theorem, Implication as
More informationTest 1 Solutions(COT3100) (1) Prove that the following Absorption Law is correct. I.e, prove this is a tautology:
Test 1 Solutions(COT3100) Sitharam (1) Prove that the following Absorption Law is correct. I.e, prove this is a tautology: ( q (p q) (r p)) r Solution. This is Modus Tollens applied twice, with transitivity
More informationSOME VARIANTS OF LAGRANGE S FOUR SQUARES THEOREM
Acta Arith. 183(018), no. 4, 339 36. SOME VARIANTS OF LAGRANGE S FOUR SQUARES THEOREM YU-CHEN SUN AND ZHI-WEI SUN Abstract. Lagrange s four squares theorem is a classical theorem in number theory. Recently,
More informationCM10196 Topic 2: Sets, Predicates, Boolean algebras
CM10196 Topic 2: Sets, Predicates, oolean algebras Guy McCusker 1W2.1 Sets Most of the things mathematicians talk about are built out of sets. The idea of a set is a simple one: a set is just a collection
More informationMA5219 LOGIC AND FOUNDATION OF MATHEMATICS I. Lecture 1: Programs. Tin Lok Wong 13 August, 2018
MA5219 LOGIC AND FOUNDATION OF MATHEMATICS I Lecture 1: Programs Tin Lok Wong 13 August, 2018 The aim of this lecture is to characterize S N : some algorithm can tell whether n N belongs to S}. By an algorithm
More informationMATH 501: Discrete Mathematics
November 20, 203 MATH 50: Fall 203 Midterm exam Model Solutions Instructions. Please read carefully before proceeding. (a) The duration of this exam is 20 minutes. (b) Non-programmable calculators are
More informationPredicate Logic. 1 Predicate Logic Symbolization
1 Predicate Logic Symbolization innovation of predicate logic: analysis of simple statements into two parts: the subject and the predicate. E.g. 1: John is a giant. subject = John predicate =... is a giant
More informationFirst Order Logic: Syntax and Semantics
CS1081 First Order Logic: Syntax and Semantics COMP30412 Sean Bechhofer sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk Problems Propositional logic isn t very expressive As an example, consider p = Scotland won on Saturday
More informationDiscrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2014 Anant Sahai Note 1
EECS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2014 Anant Sahai Note 1 Getting Started In order to be fluent in mathematical statements, you need to understand the basic framework of the language
More informationProseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1
First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1 A Reminder of Our Plot I wish to provide some historical and intellectual context to the formal tools that logicians developed to study the
More informationCOMP 409: Logic Homework 5
COMP 409: Logic Homework 5 Note: The pages below refer to the text from the book by Enderton. 1. Exercises 1-6 on p. 78. 1. Translate into this language the English sentences listed below. If the English
More information2/2/2018. CS 103 Discrete Structures. Chapter 1. Propositional Logic. Chapter 1.1. Propositional Logic
CS 103 Discrete Structures Chapter 1 Propositional Logic Chapter 1.1 Propositional Logic 1 1.1 Propositional Logic Definition: A proposition :is a declarative sentence (that is, a sentence that declares
More informationAll psychiatrists are doctors All doctors are college graduates All psychiatrists are college graduates
Predicate Logic In what we ve discussed thus far, we haven t addressed other kinds of valid inferences: those involving quantification and predication. For example: All philosophers are wise Socrates is
More informationThis is logically equivalent to the conjunction of the positive assertion Minimal Arithmetic and Representability
16.2. MINIMAL ARITHMETIC AND REPRESENTABILITY 207 If T is a consistent theory in the language of arithmetic, we say a set S is defined in T by D(x) if for all n, if n is in S, then D(n) is a theorem of
More informationSemantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, Predicate logic
Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, 2018 Predicate logic 1. Why propositional logic is not enough? Discussion: (i) Does (1a) contradict (1b)? [Two sentences are contradictory
More informationSome Basic Logic. Henry Liu, 25 October 2010
Some Basic Logic Henry Liu, 25 October 2010 In the solution to almost every olympiad style mathematical problem, a very important part is existence of accurate proofs. Therefore, the student should be
More informationAxiomatic set theory. Chapter Why axiomatic set theory?
Chapter 1 Axiomatic set theory 1.1 Why axiomatic set theory? Essentially all mathematical theories deal with sets in one way or another. In most cases, however, the use of set theory is limited to its
More informationLECTURE 5, FRIDAY
LECTURE 5, FRIDAY 20.02.04 FRANZ LEMMERMEYER Before we start with the arithmetic of elliptic curves, let us talk a little bit about multiplicities, tangents, and singular points. 1. Tangents How do we
More informationCS70 is a course about on Discrete Mathematics for Computer Scientists. The purpose of the course is to teach you about:
CS 70 Discrete Mathematics for CS Fall 2006 Papadimitriou & Vazirani Lecture 1 Course Outline CS70 is a course about on Discrete Mathematics for Computer Scientists. The purpose of the course is to teach
More informationTRUTH TABLES LOGIC (CONTINUED) Philosophical Methods
TRUTH TABLES LOGIC (CONTINUED) Philosophical Methods Here s some Vocabulary we will be talking about in this PowerPoint. Atomic Sentences: Statements which express one proposition Connectives: These are
More informationA Simple Proof of Gödel s Incompleteness Theorems
A Simple Proof of Gödel s Incompleteness Theorems Arindama Singh, Department of Mathematics, IIT Madras, Chennai-600036 Email: asingh@iitm.ac.in 1 Introduction Gödel s incompleteness theorems are considered
More informationSection 1.3. Let I be a set. When I is used in the following context,
Section 1.3. Let I be a set. When I is used in the following context, {B i } i I, we call I the index set. The set {B i } i I is the family of sets of the form B i where i I. One could also use set builder
More information11.1 Vectors in the plane
11.1 Vectors in the plane What is a vector? It is an object having direction and length. Geometric way to represent vectors It is represented by an arrow. The direction of the arrow is the direction of
More information6. COMPLEX PREDICATES
318 Hardegree, Symbolic Logic (1) x... y...rxy (1a) x(sx & y(py Rxy)) (1b) x(px & y(sy Rxy)) (2) x... y...ryx (2a) x(sx & y(py Ryx)) (2b) x(px & y(sy Ryx)) (3) x... y...rxy (3a) x(sx y(py & Rxy)) (3b)
More informationExamples: P: it is not the case that P. P Q: P or Q P Q: P implies Q (if P then Q) Typical formula:
Logic: The Big Picture Logic is a tool for formalizing reasoning. There are lots of different logics: probabilistic logic: for reasoning about probability temporal logic: for reasoning about time (and
More information7.8E 8.1E. Question 2. Question 1
Problem Set 8: Answers Damien Rochford All the interpretations I provide are relatively informal. It s fine if you did things the informal way I did them. It s fine if you did things more formally too.
More informationUnifying Functional Interpretations
Paulo Oliva pbo@dcs.qmul.ac.uk Queen Mary, University of London, UK Dagstuhl, January 11, 2004 p.1/22 History 1958. Gödel s Dialectica interpretation Relative consistency of PA p.2/22 History 1958. Gödel
More informationLesson 3: Linear differential equations of the first order Solve each of the following differential equations by two methods.
Lesson 3: Linear differential equations of the first der Solve each of the following differential equations by two methods. Exercise 3.1. Solution. Method 1. It is clear that y + y = 3 e dx = e x is an
More informationWeb Solutions for How to Read and Do Proofs
Web Solutions for How to Read and Do Proofs An Introduction to Mathematical Thought Processes Sixth Edition Daniel Solow Department of Operations Weatherhead School of Management Case Western Reserve University
More information21.4. Engineering Applications of z-transforms. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes
Engineering Applications of z-transforms 21.4 Introduction In this Section we shall apply the basic theory of z-transforms to help us to obtain the response or output sequence for a discrete system. This
More information1. The unit vector perpendicular to both the lines. Ans:, (2)
1. The unit vector perpendicular to both the lines x 1 y 2 z 1 x 2 y 2 z 3 and 3 1 2 1 2 3 i 7j 7k i 7j 5k 99 5 3 1) 2) i 7j 5k 7i 7j k 3) 4) 5 3 99 i 7j 5k Ans:, (2) 5 3 is Solution: Consider i j k a
More informationPeano Arithmetic. by replacing the schematic letter R with a formula, then prefixing universal quantifiers to bind
Peano Arithmetic Peano Arithmetic 1 or PA is the system we get from Robinson s Arithmetic by adding the induction axiom schema: ((R(0) v (œx)(r(x) 6 R(sx))) 6 (œx)r(x)). What this means is that any sentence
More informationCS1021. Why logic? Logic about inference or argument. Start from assumptions or axioms. Make deductions according to rules of reasoning.
3: Logic Why logic? Logic about inference or argument Start from assumptions or axioms Make deductions according to rules of reasoning Logic 3-1 Why logic? (continued) If I don t buy a lottery ticket on
More informationSingle-Predicate Derivations
Single-Predicate Derivations Let s do some derivations. Start with an easy one: Practice #1: Fb, Gb Ⱶ (ꓱx)(Fx Gx) Imagine that I have a frog named Bob. The above inference might go like this: Bob is friendly.
More informationSymbolic Logic 3. For an inference to be deductively valid it is impossible for the conclusion to be false if the premises are true.
Symbolic Logic 3 Testing deductive validity with truth tables For an inference to be deductively valid it is impossible for the conclusion to be false if the premises are true. So, given that truth tables
More informationKRIPKE S THEORY OF TRUTH 1. INTRODUCTION
KRIPKE S THEORY OF TRUTH RICHARD G HECK, JR 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this note is to give a simple, easily accessible proof of the existence of the minimal fixed point, and of various maximal fixed
More informationProofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q
Chapter Proofs In this chapter we develop three methods for proving a statement. To start let s suppose the statement is of the form P Q or if P, then Q. Direct: This method typically starts with P. Then,
More informationPhil 2B03 (McMaster University Final Examination) Page 1 of 4
Phil 2B03 (McMaster University Final Examination) Page 1 of 4 1. [SL proof] (a) Prove the formal validity of the following sequent: (F & G), F H, H G H (1) (F & G) Prem (2) F H Prem (3) H G Prem (4) H
More informationDiscrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2012 Vazirani Note 1
CS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2012 Vazirani Note 1 Course Outline CS70 is a course on "Discrete Mathematics and Probability for Computer Scientists." The purpose of the course
More informationLogic. Quantifiers. (real numbers understood). x [x is rotten in Denmark]. x<x+x 2 +1
Logic One reason for studying logic is that we need a better notation than ordinary English for expressing relationships among various assertions or hypothetical states of affairs. A solid grounding in
More information26. FOIL AND MORE. 1 2t + 3xy 5x 2 = 1 + ( 2t) + 3xy + ( 5x 2 )
26. AND MRE extending the distributive law terms; identifying terms a term includes its sign n this section, the distributive law is extended to cover situations like these: a(b + c + d) = ab + ac + ad
More informationQuantifiers. P. Danziger
- 2 Quantifiers P. Danziger 1 Elementary Quantifiers (2.1) We wish to be able to use variables, such as x or n in logical statements. We do this by using the two quantifiers: 1. - There Exists 2. - For
More informationThe predicate calculus is complete
The predicate calculus is complete Hans Halvorson The first thing we need to do is to precisify the inference rules UI and EE. To this end, we will use A(c) to denote a sentence containing the name c,
More informationFirst Order Logic vs Propositional Logic CS477 Formal Software Dev Methods
First Order Logic vs Propositional Logic CS477 Formal Software Dev Methods Elsa L Gunter 2112 SC, UIUC egunter@illinois.edu http://courses.engr.illinois.edu/cs477 Slides based in part on previous lectures
More informationIntroduction to first-order logic:
Introduction to first-order logic: First-order structures and languages. Terms and formulae in first-order logic. Interpretations, truth, validity, and satisfaction. Valentin Goranko DTU Informatics September
More informationProseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 Propositional Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1
Propositional Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1 The Plot That Will Unfold I want to provide some key historical and intellectual context to the model theoretic approach to natural language semantics,
More informationPhilosophy 240 Symbolic Logic. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2015
Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2015 Class 2: Translation and Wffs ( 1.3-1.4) Marcus, Symbolic Logic, Fall 2015, Slide 1 Today P A little review (what we didn t do on
More informationLogic - recap. So far, we have seen that: Logic is a language which can be used to describe:
Logic - recap So far, we have seen that: Logic is a language which can be used to describe: Statements about the real world The simplest pieces of data in an automatic processing system such as a computer
More informationRelational Predicates and Overlapping Quantifiers, 8.6. I. Introducing Relational Predicates
Philosophy 109, Modern Logic, Queens College Russell Marcus, Instructor email: philosophy@thatmarcusfamily.org website: http://philosophy.thatmarcusfamily.org Office phone: (718) 997-5287 Relational Predicates
More information1 Differentiability at a point
Notes by David Groisser, Copyright c 2012 What does mean? These notes are intended as a supplement (not a textbook-replacement) for a class at the level of Calculus 3, but can be used in a higher-level
More informationLocal properties of plane algebraic curves
Chapter 7 Local properties of plane algebraic curves Throughout this chapter let K be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, and as usual let A (K) be embedded into P (K) by identifying
More informationMATH 307: Problem Set #3 Solutions
: Problem Set #3 Solutions Due on: May 3, 2015 Problem 1 Autonomous Equations Recall that an equilibrium solution of an autonomous equation is called stable if solutions lying on both sides of it tend
More informationBefore you get started, make sure you ve read Chapter 1, which sets the tone for the work we will begin doing here.
Chapter 2 Mathematics and Logic Before you get started, make sure you ve read Chapter 1, which sets the tone for the work we will begin doing here. 2.1 A Taste of Number Theory In this section, we will
More informationINTRODUCTION TO LOGIC 8 Identity and Definite Descriptions
8.1 Qualitative and Numerical Identity INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC 8 Identity and Definite Descriptions Volker Halbach Keith and Volker have the same car. Keith and Volker have identical cars. Keith and Volker
More informationChapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements. January 7, 2008
Chapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements January 7, 2008 Outline 1 1.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence 2 1.2 Conditional Statements 3 1.3 Valid and Invalid Arguments Central notion of deductive
More informationMathmatics 239 solutions to Homework for Chapter 2
Mathmatics 239 solutions to Homework for Chapter 2 Old version of 8.5 My compact disc player has space for 5 CDs; there are five trays numbered 1 through 5 into which I load the CDs. I own 100 CDs. a)
More information1 Predicates and Quantifiers
1 Predicates and Quantifiers We have seen how to represent properties of objects. For example, B(x) may represent that x is a student at Bryn Mawr College. Here B stands for is a student at Bryn Mawr College
More information