9.7: Identity: Symbolizations

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "9.7: Identity: Symbolizations"

Transcription

1 9.7: Identity: Symbolizations Among the many different relations, one stands out in logic: identity. Consider the following argument: George Orwell wrote George Orwell was identical to Eric Blair. Hence, Eric Blair wrote (o: Orwell; b: Blair; Wxy: x wrote y; Ixy: x is identical to y) This is obviously a valid argument, but we can t prove that it is given the rules we have so far: 1. Won 2. Iob Wbn Hence, we need to introduce identity explicitly into our system and treat it specially. We ll borrow the identity sign = from arithmetic to express the identity relation is identical to or, more succinctly, simply is. We will also use standard infix notion, that is, we will write o=b instead of =ob. Since identity statements are statements like any other, they can be used to form more complex statements. Sarah Jessica Parker is not identical with Clint Eastwood. (s: SJP; c: CE) Symbolized: ~s=c If Sarah is not Clint, then Clint is not the star of Sex and the City. (s: SJP; c: CE; t: Sex and the City; Sxy: x is the star of y) Symbolized: ~s=c ~Sct Note no parens are used when negating an identity statement.

2 Many statements can be symbolized with identity that cannot be symbolized without it! Salient examples follow: Only... English: Only Edison invented the phonograph. Logicese 1: Edison invented the phonograph, and for all x, if x invented the phonograph, then x is identical to Edison. Symbolized 1: Pe (x)(px x=e) Logicese 1I: For all x, x invented the phonograph if and only if x is e. Symbolized 1I: (x)(px x=e) The only... English: The only engineer to invent the telephone was Bell Logicese: Bell is an engineer and Bell invented the telephone and, for all x, if x is an engineer and x invented the telephone, then x is Bell. Symbolized: Eb Tb (x)((ex Tx) x=b) No... except [but other than]... English: No engineer except Bell invented the telephone. Logicese: Bell is an engineer and invented the telephone, and no engineer x other than Bell invented the telephone. Symbolized: Eb Tb ~( x)(ex ~x=b Tx) (Can also be symbolized as in The only....) All... except [but other than]... English: All philosophers other than Derrida study logic. Logicese: For all x, if x is a philosopher and x is not Derrida, then x studies logic. Symbolized: (x)((px ~x=d) Lx)

3 Superlatives English: Everest is the tallest mountain. Logicese: Everest is a mountain and, for all x, if x is a mountain and x is not Everest, then Everest is taller than x. Symbolized: Me (x)((mx ~x=e) Tex) The idea here is that, in a superlative, one says that a certain object in a certain class has more of a certain property than any other thing in the class. As seen above, other requires identity: the things other than x are the things not identical to it. At most n... English: There is at most one god. Logicese: For all x and for all y, if x is a god and y is a god, then x is identical to y. Symbolized: (x)(y)((gx Gy) x=y) English: There are at most two angels. Logicese: For all x, y, and z, if x, y, z are angels, then either x is y or y is z or x is z. Symbolized: (x)(y)(z)((ax Ay Az) (x=y v y=z v x=z)) English: At most two Democrats are conservative Logicese: For all x, y, and z, if x, y, z are all conservative Democrats, then either x is identical to y or y is identical to z or x is identical to z. Symbolized: (x)(y)(z)([(dx Cx) (Dy Cy) (Dz Cz)] (x=y v y=z v x=z)) Note that at most statements do not imply that there are any instances of the things of which there is said to be at most n. At least n... English: There is at least one god. Logicese: There exists an x such that x is a god. Symbolized: ( x)gx

4 English: There are at least two angels. Logicese: There exists an x and a y such that x and y are angels and x is not y. Symbolized: ( x)( y)(ax Ay ~x=y) English: At least two Democrats are conservative. Logicese: There exists an x and a y such that x and y are conservative Democrats and x is not y. Symbolized: ( x)( y)((dx Cx) (Dy Cy) ~x=y) Note that if we d omitted the ~x=y conjuncts in the latter two symbolizations they would only have expressed At least one statements, since it doesn t follow that x and y have to be distinct. Exactly n... English: There is exactly one god. Logicese: There exists an x such that x is a god and for all y, if y is a god, then x is y. Symbolized: ( x)(gx (y)(gy x=y)) English: There are exactly two angels. Logicese: There exists an x and a y such that x and y are angels and x is not y and for any angel z, either z is x or z is y. Symbolized: ( x)( y)[ax Ay ~x=y (z)(az (z=x v z=y))] Note that Exactly n... statements are equivalent to At least n and at most n statements. The (Definite Descriptions) The philosopher Bertrand Russell analyzed sentences of the form The A is B as essentially containing three assertions: 1. There is at least one A. 2. There is at most one A. 3. Every A is a B

5 Symbolized I: ( x)(ax) (x)(y)((ax Ay) x=y) (x)(ax Bx) We can also express Russell s idea in a single sentence: The A is B means Exactly one thing is A and that thing is B. Using the ideas above, we can express this succinctly in terms of quantifiers, variables, and identity: Symbolized II: ( x)[(ax (y)(ay x=y) Bx]

Identity. "At least one dog has fleas" is translated by an existential quantifier"

Identity. At least one dog has fleas is translated by an existential quantifier Identity Quantifiers are so-called because they say how many. So far, we've only used the quantifiers to give the crudest possible answers to the question "How many dogs have fleas?": "All," "None," "Some,"

More information

DO NOT FORGET!!! WRITE YOUR NAME HERE. Philosophy 109 Final Exam, Spring 2007 (80 points total) ~ ( x)

DO NOT FORGET!!! WRITE YOUR NAME HERE. Philosophy 109 Final Exam, Spring 2007 (80 points total) ~ ( x) Page 1 of 13 DO NOT FORGET!!! WRITE YOUR NAME HERE Philosophy 109 Final Exam, Spring 2007 (80 points total) ~ ( x) Part I: Symbolization into RL: Provide symbolizations of the following sentences, using

More information

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 8 Identity and Functions

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 8 Identity and Functions Deduction by Daniel Bonevac Chapter 8 Identity and Functions Introduction 1 This chapter introduces two important extensions of Q that make it quite a bit more powerful. The first is the mathematical relation

More information

Denote John by j and Smith by s, is a bachelor by predicate letter B. The statements (1) and (2) may be written as B(j) and B(s).

Denote John by j and Smith by s, is a bachelor by predicate letter B. The statements (1) and (2) may be written as B(j) and B(s). PREDICATE CALCULUS Predicates Statement function Variables Free and bound variables Quantifiers Universe of discourse Logical equivalences and implications for quantified statements Theory of inference

More information

Mathematical Preliminaries. Sipser pages 1-28

Mathematical Preliminaries. Sipser pages 1-28 Mathematical Preliminaries Sipser pages 1-28 Mathematical Preliminaries This course is about the fundamental capabilities and limitations of computers. It has 3 parts 1. Automata Models of computation

More information

Predicate Calculus - Syntax

Predicate Calculus - Syntax Predicate Calculus - Syntax Lila Kari University of Waterloo Predicate Calculus - Syntax CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 26 The language L pred of Predicate Calculus - Syntax L pred, the formal language

More information

INSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA CHEATHARLACH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW PREDICATE LOGIC

INSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA CHEATHARLACH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW PREDICATE LOGIC 1 CHAPTER 7. PREDICATE LOGIC 1 INSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA CHEATHARLACH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW PREDICATE LOGIC 1 Predicate Logic 1.1 Introduction There are various arguments which cannot be dealt

More information

Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2014

Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2014 Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2014 Class #23 - Translation into Predicate Logic II ( 3.2) Only as a Quantifier P Only Ps are Qs is logically equivalent to all Qs are

More information

INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC. Propositional Logic. Examples of syntactic claims

INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC. Propositional Logic. Examples of syntactic claims Introduction INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC 2 Syntax and Semantics of Propositional Logic Volker Halbach In what follows I look at some formal languages that are much simpler than English and define validity of

More information

SYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES

SYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES SYMBOLIC LOGIC UNIT 10: SINGULAR SENTENCES Singular Sentences name Paris is beautiful (monadic) predicate (monadic) predicate letter Bp individual constant Singular Sentences Bp These are our new simple

More information

The Limit of Humanly Knowable Mathematical Truth

The Limit of Humanly Knowable Mathematical Truth The Limit of Humanly Knowable Mathematical Truth Gödel s Incompleteness Theorems, and Artificial Intelligence Santa Rosa Junior College December 12, 2015 Another title for this talk could be... An Argument

More information

2. Use quantifiers to express the associative law for multiplication of real numbers.

2. Use quantifiers to express the associative law for multiplication of real numbers. 1. Define statement function of one variable. When it will become a statement? Statement function is an expression containing symbols and an individual variable. It becomes a statement when the variable

More information

LECTURE 1. Logic and Proofs

LECTURE 1. Logic and Proofs LECTURE 1 Logic and Proofs The primary purpose of this course is to introduce you, most of whom are mathematics majors, to the most fundamental skills of a mathematician; the ability to read, write, and

More information

Predicate Logic. Predicates. Math 173 February 9, 2010

Predicate Logic. Predicates. Math 173 February 9, 2010 Math 173 February 9, 2010 Predicate Logic We have now seen two ways to translate English sentences into mathematical symbols. We can capture the logical form of a sentence using propositional logic: variables

More information

Intermediate Logic. First-Order Logic

Intermediate Logic. First-Order Logic Intermediate Logic Lecture Four First-Order Logic Rob Trueman rob.trueman@york.ac.uk University of York Introducing First-Order Logic First-Order Logic Introducing First-Order Logic Names Predicates Quantifiers

More information

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples Section 1.4 Nested Quantifiers Page references correspond to locations of Extra Examples icons in the textbook. #1. Write the

More information

Identity. We often use the word identical to simply mean looks the same. For instance:

Identity. We often use the word identical to simply mean looks the same. For instance: Identity 1. Introduction: In this lesson, we are going to learn how to express statements about identity; or, namely, we re going to learn how to say that two things are identical. We often use the word

More information

1 Propositional Logic

1 Propositional Logic 1 Propositional Logic Required reading: Foundations of Computation. Sections 1.1 and 1.2. 1. Introduction to Logic a. Logical consequences. If you know all humans are mortal, and you know that you are

More information

2-4: The Use of Quantifiers

2-4: The Use of Quantifiers 2-4: The Use of Quantifiers The number x + 2 is an even integer is not a statement. When x is replaced by 1, 3 or 5 the resulting statement is false. However, when x is replaced by 2, 4 or 6 the resulting

More information

Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus

Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus Lila Kari University of Waterloo Formal (Natural) Deduction for Predicate Calculus CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 42 Formal deducibility for predicate

More information

1 Introduction to Predicate Resolution

1 Introduction to Predicate Resolution 1 Introduction to Predicate Resolution The resolution proof system for Predicate Logic operates, as in propositional case on sets of clauses and uses a resolution rule as the only rule of inference. The

More information

Predicate Logic. CSE 191, Class Note 02: Predicate Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo

Predicate Logic. CSE 191, Class Note 02: Predicate Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo Predicate Logic CSE 191, Class Note 02: Predicate Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo c Xin He (University at Buffalo) CSE 191 Discrete Structures 1 / 22 Outline 1 From Proposition to Predicate

More information

TRUTH TELLERS. Volker Halbach. Scandinavian Logic Symposium. Tampere

TRUTH TELLERS. Volker Halbach. Scandinavian Logic Symposium. Tampere TRUTH TELLERS Volker Halbach Scandinavian Logic Symposium Tampere 25th August 2014 I m wrote two papers with Albert Visser on this and related topics: Self-Reference in Arithmetic, http://www.phil.uu.nl/preprints/lgps/number/316

More information

This lecture: basis and dimension 4.4. Linear Independence: Suppose that V is a vector space and. r 1 x 1 + r 2 x r k x k = 0

This lecture: basis and dimension 4.4. Linear Independence: Suppose that V is a vector space and. r 1 x 1 + r 2 x r k x k = 0 Linear Independence: Suppose that V is a vector space and that x, x 2,, x k belong to V {x, x 2,, x k } are linearly independent if r x + r 2 x 2 + + r k x k = only for r = r 2 = = r k = The vectors x,

More information

Ehrhart polynomial for lattice squares, cubes, and hypercubes

Ehrhart polynomial for lattice squares, cubes, and hypercubes Ehrhart polynomial for lattice squares, cubes, and hypercubes Eugen J. Ionascu UWG, REU, July 10th, 2015 math@ejionascu.ro, www.ejionascu.ro 1 Abstract We are investigating the problem of constructing

More information

A Note on the Major Results of Begriffsschrift

A Note on the Major Results of Begriffsschrift A Note on the Major Results of Begriffsschrift Richard G. Heck, Jnr. In this note, I shall explain and outline Frege s proofs of the two major results of Begriffsschrift (Frege, 1967), Part III, Theorems

More information

Quantifiers Here is a (true) statement about real numbers: Every real number is either rational or irrational.

Quantifiers Here is a (true) statement about real numbers: Every real number is either rational or irrational. Quantifiers 1-17-2008 Here is a (true) statement about real numbers: Every real number is either rational or irrational. I could try to translate the statement as follows: Let P = x is a real number Q

More information

Chapter 1. Logic and Proof

Chapter 1. Logic and Proof Chapter 1. Logic and Proof 1.1 Remark: A little over 100 years ago, it was found that some mathematical proofs contained paradoxes, and these paradoxes could be used to prove statements that were known

More information

Logic: First Order Logic

Logic: First Order Logic Logic: First Order Logic Raffaella Bernardi bernardi@inf.unibz.it P.zza Domenicani 3, Room 2.28 Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen http://www.inf.unibz.it/~bernardi/courses/logic06

More information

Peano Arithmetic. CSC 438F/2404F Notes (S. Cook) Fall, Goals Now

Peano Arithmetic. CSC 438F/2404F Notes (S. Cook) Fall, Goals Now CSC 438F/2404F Notes (S. Cook) Fall, 2008 Peano Arithmetic Goals Now 1) We will introduce a standard set of axioms for the language L A. The theory generated by these axioms is denoted PA and called Peano

More information

Motivation. CS389L: Automated Logical Reasoning. Lecture 10: Overview of First-Order Theories. Signature and Axioms of First-Order Theory

Motivation. CS389L: Automated Logical Reasoning. Lecture 10: Overview of First-Order Theories. Signature and Axioms of First-Order Theory Motivation CS389L: Automated Logical Reasoning Lecture 10: Overview of First-Order Theories Işıl Dillig Last few lectures: Full first-order logic In FOL, functions/predicates are uninterpreted (i.e., structure

More information

C241 Homework Assignment 4

C241 Homework Assignment 4 C241 Homework Assignment 4 1. Which of the following formulas are tautologies and which are contradictions? Which of the formulas are logically equivalent to each other? (a) p (q r) (b) ( p r) (q r) (c)

More information

1 Arithmetic calculations (calculator is not allowed)

1 Arithmetic calculations (calculator is not allowed) 1 ARITHMETIC CALCULATIONS (CALCULATOR IS NOT ALLOWED) 1 Arithmetic calculations (calculator is not allowed) 1.1 Check the result Problem 1.1. Problem 1.2. Problem 1.3. Problem 1.4. 78 5 6 + 24 3 4 99 1

More information

Formal Logic: Quantifiers, Predicates, and Validity. CS 130 Discrete Structures

Formal Logic: Quantifiers, Predicates, and Validity. CS 130 Discrete Structures Formal Logic: Quantifiers, Predicates, and Validity CS 130 Discrete Structures Variables and Statements Variables: A variable is a symbol that stands for an individual in a collection or set. For example,

More information

Propositional Logic Not Enough

Propositional Logic Not Enough Section 1.4 Propositional Logic Not Enough If we have: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Does it follow that Socrates is mortal? Can t be represented in propositional logic. Need a language that talks

More information

Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus

Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus Lila Kari University of Waterloo Proving Arguments Valid in Predicate Calculus CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 22 Predicate calculus - Logical consequence

More information

! Predicates! Variables! Quantifiers. ! Universal Quantifier! Existential Quantifier. ! Negating Quantifiers. ! De Morgan s Laws for Quantifiers

! Predicates! Variables! Quantifiers. ! Universal Quantifier! Existential Quantifier. ! Negating Quantifiers. ! De Morgan s Laws for Quantifiers Sec$on Summary (K. Rosen notes for Ch. 1.4, 1.5 corrected and extended by A.Borgida)! Predicates! Variables! Quantifiers! Universal Quantifier! Existential Quantifier! Negating Quantifiers! De Morgan s

More information

1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers

1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers INTRODUCTION Statements x>3, x=y+3 and x + y=z are not propositions, if the variables are not specified. In this section we discuss the ways of producing propositions from

More information

1 Functions of many variables.

1 Functions of many variables. MA213 Sathaye Notes on Multivariate Functions. 1 Functions of many variables. 1.1 Plotting. We consider functions like z = f(x, y). Unlike functions of one variable, the graph of such a function has to

More information

Introduction to Sets and Logic (MATH 1190)

Introduction to Sets and Logic (MATH 1190) Introduction to Sets Logic () Instructor: Email: shenlili@yorku.ca Department of Mathematics Statistics York University Sept 18, 2014 Outline 1 2 Tautologies Definition A tautology is a compound proposition

More information

Full file at Chapter 1

Full file at   Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Use the following to answer questions 1-5: In the questions below determine whether the proposition is TRUE or FALSE 1. 1 + 1 = 3 if and only if 2 + 2 = 3. 2. If it is raining, then it is raining.

More information

Introduction to Predicate Logic Part 1. Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1)

Introduction to Predicate Logic Part 1. Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1) Introduction to Predicate Logic Part 1 Professor Anita Wasilewska Lecture Notes (1) Introduction Lecture Notes (1) and (2) provide an OVERVIEW of a standard intuitive formalization and introduction to

More information

ICS141: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science I

ICS141: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science I ICS141: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science I Dept. Information & Computer Sci., Originals slides by Dr. Baek and Dr. Still, adapted by J. Stelovsky Based on slides Dr. M. P. Frank and Dr. J.L. Gross

More information

MATH 1090 Problem Set #3 Solutions March York University

MATH 1090 Problem Set #3 Solutions March York University York University Faculties of Science and Engineering, Arts, Atkinson MATH 1090. Problem Set #3 Solutions Section M 1. Use Resolution (possibly in combination with the Deduction Theorem, Implication as

More information

Test 1 Solutions(COT3100) (1) Prove that the following Absorption Law is correct. I.e, prove this is a tautology:

Test 1 Solutions(COT3100) (1) Prove that the following Absorption Law is correct. I.e, prove this is a tautology: Test 1 Solutions(COT3100) Sitharam (1) Prove that the following Absorption Law is correct. I.e, prove this is a tautology: ( q (p q) (r p)) r Solution. This is Modus Tollens applied twice, with transitivity

More information

SOME VARIANTS OF LAGRANGE S FOUR SQUARES THEOREM

SOME VARIANTS OF LAGRANGE S FOUR SQUARES THEOREM Acta Arith. 183(018), no. 4, 339 36. SOME VARIANTS OF LAGRANGE S FOUR SQUARES THEOREM YU-CHEN SUN AND ZHI-WEI SUN Abstract. Lagrange s four squares theorem is a classical theorem in number theory. Recently,

More information

CM10196 Topic 2: Sets, Predicates, Boolean algebras

CM10196 Topic 2: Sets, Predicates, Boolean algebras CM10196 Topic 2: Sets, Predicates, oolean algebras Guy McCusker 1W2.1 Sets Most of the things mathematicians talk about are built out of sets. The idea of a set is a simple one: a set is just a collection

More information

MA5219 LOGIC AND FOUNDATION OF MATHEMATICS I. Lecture 1: Programs. Tin Lok Wong 13 August, 2018

MA5219 LOGIC AND FOUNDATION OF MATHEMATICS I. Lecture 1: Programs. Tin Lok Wong 13 August, 2018 MA5219 LOGIC AND FOUNDATION OF MATHEMATICS I Lecture 1: Programs Tin Lok Wong 13 August, 2018 The aim of this lecture is to characterize S N : some algorithm can tell whether n N belongs to S}. By an algorithm

More information

MATH 501: Discrete Mathematics

MATH 501: Discrete Mathematics November 20, 203 MATH 50: Fall 203 Midterm exam Model Solutions Instructions. Please read carefully before proceeding. (a) The duration of this exam is 20 minutes. (b) Non-programmable calculators are

More information

Predicate Logic. 1 Predicate Logic Symbolization

Predicate Logic. 1 Predicate Logic Symbolization 1 Predicate Logic Symbolization innovation of predicate logic: analysis of simple statements into two parts: the subject and the predicate. E.g. 1: John is a giant. subject = John predicate =... is a giant

More information

First Order Logic: Syntax and Semantics

First Order Logic: Syntax and Semantics CS1081 First Order Logic: Syntax and Semantics COMP30412 Sean Bechhofer sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk Problems Propositional logic isn t very expressive As an example, consider p = Scotland won on Saturday

More information

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2014 Anant Sahai Note 1

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2014 Anant Sahai Note 1 EECS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2014 Anant Sahai Note 1 Getting Started In order to be fluent in mathematical statements, you need to understand the basic framework of the language

More information

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1 First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1 A Reminder of Our Plot I wish to provide some historical and intellectual context to the formal tools that logicians developed to study the

More information

COMP 409: Logic Homework 5

COMP 409: Logic Homework 5 COMP 409: Logic Homework 5 Note: The pages below refer to the text from the book by Enderton. 1. Exercises 1-6 on p. 78. 1. Translate into this language the English sentences listed below. If the English

More information

2/2/2018. CS 103 Discrete Structures. Chapter 1. Propositional Logic. Chapter 1.1. Propositional Logic

2/2/2018. CS 103 Discrete Structures. Chapter 1. Propositional Logic. Chapter 1.1. Propositional Logic CS 103 Discrete Structures Chapter 1 Propositional Logic Chapter 1.1 Propositional Logic 1 1.1 Propositional Logic Definition: A proposition :is a declarative sentence (that is, a sentence that declares

More information

All psychiatrists are doctors All doctors are college graduates All psychiatrists are college graduates

All psychiatrists are doctors All doctors are college graduates All psychiatrists are college graduates Predicate Logic In what we ve discussed thus far, we haven t addressed other kinds of valid inferences: those involving quantification and predication. For example: All philosophers are wise Socrates is

More information

This is logically equivalent to the conjunction of the positive assertion Minimal Arithmetic and Representability

This is logically equivalent to the conjunction of the positive assertion Minimal Arithmetic and Representability 16.2. MINIMAL ARITHMETIC AND REPRESENTABILITY 207 If T is a consistent theory in the language of arithmetic, we say a set S is defined in T by D(x) if for all n, if n is in S, then D(n) is a theorem of

More information

Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, Predicate logic

Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, Predicate logic Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, 2018 Predicate logic 1. Why propositional logic is not enough? Discussion: (i) Does (1a) contradict (1b)? [Two sentences are contradictory

More information

Some Basic Logic. Henry Liu, 25 October 2010

Some Basic Logic. Henry Liu, 25 October 2010 Some Basic Logic Henry Liu, 25 October 2010 In the solution to almost every olympiad style mathematical problem, a very important part is existence of accurate proofs. Therefore, the student should be

More information

Axiomatic set theory. Chapter Why axiomatic set theory?

Axiomatic set theory. Chapter Why axiomatic set theory? Chapter 1 Axiomatic set theory 1.1 Why axiomatic set theory? Essentially all mathematical theories deal with sets in one way or another. In most cases, however, the use of set theory is limited to its

More information

LECTURE 5, FRIDAY

LECTURE 5, FRIDAY LECTURE 5, FRIDAY 20.02.04 FRANZ LEMMERMEYER Before we start with the arithmetic of elliptic curves, let us talk a little bit about multiplicities, tangents, and singular points. 1. Tangents How do we

More information

CS70 is a course about on Discrete Mathematics for Computer Scientists. The purpose of the course is to teach you about:

CS70 is a course about on Discrete Mathematics for Computer Scientists. The purpose of the course is to teach you about: CS 70 Discrete Mathematics for CS Fall 2006 Papadimitriou & Vazirani Lecture 1 Course Outline CS70 is a course about on Discrete Mathematics for Computer Scientists. The purpose of the course is to teach

More information

TRUTH TABLES LOGIC (CONTINUED) Philosophical Methods

TRUTH TABLES LOGIC (CONTINUED) Philosophical Methods TRUTH TABLES LOGIC (CONTINUED) Philosophical Methods Here s some Vocabulary we will be talking about in this PowerPoint. Atomic Sentences: Statements which express one proposition Connectives: These are

More information

A Simple Proof of Gödel s Incompleteness Theorems

A Simple Proof of Gödel s Incompleteness Theorems A Simple Proof of Gödel s Incompleteness Theorems Arindama Singh, Department of Mathematics, IIT Madras, Chennai-600036 Email: asingh@iitm.ac.in 1 Introduction Gödel s incompleteness theorems are considered

More information

Section 1.3. Let I be a set. When I is used in the following context,

Section 1.3. Let I be a set. When I is used in the following context, Section 1.3. Let I be a set. When I is used in the following context, {B i } i I, we call I the index set. The set {B i } i I is the family of sets of the form B i where i I. One could also use set builder

More information

11.1 Vectors in the plane

11.1 Vectors in the plane 11.1 Vectors in the plane What is a vector? It is an object having direction and length. Geometric way to represent vectors It is represented by an arrow. The direction of the arrow is the direction of

More information

6. COMPLEX PREDICATES

6. COMPLEX PREDICATES 318 Hardegree, Symbolic Logic (1) x... y...rxy (1a) x(sx & y(py Rxy)) (1b) x(px & y(sy Rxy)) (2) x... y...ryx (2a) x(sx & y(py Ryx)) (2b) x(px & y(sy Ryx)) (3) x... y...rxy (3a) x(sx y(py & Rxy)) (3b)

More information

Examples: P: it is not the case that P. P Q: P or Q P Q: P implies Q (if P then Q) Typical formula:

Examples: P: it is not the case that P. P Q: P or Q P Q: P implies Q (if P then Q) Typical formula: Logic: The Big Picture Logic is a tool for formalizing reasoning. There are lots of different logics: probabilistic logic: for reasoning about probability temporal logic: for reasoning about time (and

More information

7.8E 8.1E. Question 2. Question 1

7.8E 8.1E. Question 2. Question 1 Problem Set 8: Answers Damien Rochford All the interpretations I provide are relatively informal. It s fine if you did things the informal way I did them. It s fine if you did things more formally too.

More information

Unifying Functional Interpretations

Unifying Functional Interpretations Paulo Oliva pbo@dcs.qmul.ac.uk Queen Mary, University of London, UK Dagstuhl, January 11, 2004 p.1/22 History 1958. Gödel s Dialectica interpretation Relative consistency of PA p.2/22 History 1958. Gödel

More information

Lesson 3: Linear differential equations of the first order Solve each of the following differential equations by two methods.

Lesson 3: Linear differential equations of the first order Solve each of the following differential equations by two methods. Lesson 3: Linear differential equations of the first der Solve each of the following differential equations by two methods. Exercise 3.1. Solution. Method 1. It is clear that y + y = 3 e dx = e x is an

More information

Web Solutions for How to Read and Do Proofs

Web Solutions for How to Read and Do Proofs Web Solutions for How to Read and Do Proofs An Introduction to Mathematical Thought Processes Sixth Edition Daniel Solow Department of Operations Weatherhead School of Management Case Western Reserve University

More information

21.4. Engineering Applications of z-transforms. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

21.4. Engineering Applications of z-transforms. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes Engineering Applications of z-transforms 21.4 Introduction In this Section we shall apply the basic theory of z-transforms to help us to obtain the response or output sequence for a discrete system. This

More information

1. The unit vector perpendicular to both the lines. Ans:, (2)

1. The unit vector perpendicular to both the lines. Ans:, (2) 1. The unit vector perpendicular to both the lines x 1 y 2 z 1 x 2 y 2 z 3 and 3 1 2 1 2 3 i 7j 7k i 7j 5k 99 5 3 1) 2) i 7j 5k 7i 7j k 3) 4) 5 3 99 i 7j 5k Ans:, (2) 5 3 is Solution: Consider i j k a

More information

Peano Arithmetic. by replacing the schematic letter R with a formula, then prefixing universal quantifiers to bind

Peano Arithmetic. by replacing the schematic letter R with a formula, then prefixing universal quantifiers to bind Peano Arithmetic Peano Arithmetic 1 or PA is the system we get from Robinson s Arithmetic by adding the induction axiom schema: ((R(0) v (œx)(r(x) 6 R(sx))) 6 (œx)r(x)). What this means is that any sentence

More information

CS1021. Why logic? Logic about inference or argument. Start from assumptions or axioms. Make deductions according to rules of reasoning.

CS1021. Why logic? Logic about inference or argument. Start from assumptions or axioms. Make deductions according to rules of reasoning. 3: Logic Why logic? Logic about inference or argument Start from assumptions or axioms Make deductions according to rules of reasoning Logic 3-1 Why logic? (continued) If I don t buy a lottery ticket on

More information

Single-Predicate Derivations

Single-Predicate Derivations Single-Predicate Derivations Let s do some derivations. Start with an easy one: Practice #1: Fb, Gb Ⱶ (ꓱx)(Fx Gx) Imagine that I have a frog named Bob. The above inference might go like this: Bob is friendly.

More information

Symbolic Logic 3. For an inference to be deductively valid it is impossible for the conclusion to be false if the premises are true.

Symbolic Logic 3. For an inference to be deductively valid it is impossible for the conclusion to be false if the premises are true. Symbolic Logic 3 Testing deductive validity with truth tables For an inference to be deductively valid it is impossible for the conclusion to be false if the premises are true. So, given that truth tables

More information

KRIPKE S THEORY OF TRUTH 1. INTRODUCTION

KRIPKE S THEORY OF TRUTH 1. INTRODUCTION KRIPKE S THEORY OF TRUTH RICHARD G HECK, JR 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this note is to give a simple, easily accessible proof of the existence of the minimal fixed point, and of various maximal fixed

More information

Proofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q

Proofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q Chapter Proofs In this chapter we develop three methods for proving a statement. To start let s suppose the statement is of the form P Q or if P, then Q. Direct: This method typically starts with P. Then,

More information

Phil 2B03 (McMaster University Final Examination) Page 1 of 4

Phil 2B03 (McMaster University Final Examination) Page 1 of 4 Phil 2B03 (McMaster University Final Examination) Page 1 of 4 1. [SL proof] (a) Prove the formal validity of the following sequent: (F & G), F H, H G H (1) (F & G) Prem (2) F H Prem (3) H G Prem (4) H

More information

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2012 Vazirani Note 1

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2012 Vazirani Note 1 CS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2012 Vazirani Note 1 Course Outline CS70 is a course on "Discrete Mathematics and Probability for Computer Scientists." The purpose of the course

More information

Logic. Quantifiers. (real numbers understood). x [x is rotten in Denmark]. x<x+x 2 +1

Logic. Quantifiers. (real numbers understood). x [x is rotten in Denmark]. x<x+x 2 +1 Logic One reason for studying logic is that we need a better notation than ordinary English for expressing relationships among various assertions or hypothetical states of affairs. A solid grounding in

More information

26. FOIL AND MORE. 1 2t + 3xy 5x 2 = 1 + ( 2t) + 3xy + ( 5x 2 )

26. FOIL AND MORE. 1 2t + 3xy 5x 2 = 1 + ( 2t) + 3xy + ( 5x 2 ) 26. AND MRE extending the distributive law terms; identifying terms a term includes its sign n this section, the distributive law is extended to cover situations like these: a(b + c + d) = ab + ac + ad

More information

Quantifiers. P. Danziger

Quantifiers. P. Danziger - 2 Quantifiers P. Danziger 1 Elementary Quantifiers (2.1) We wish to be able to use variables, such as x or n in logical statements. We do this by using the two quantifiers: 1. - There Exists 2. - For

More information

The predicate calculus is complete

The predicate calculus is complete The predicate calculus is complete Hans Halvorson The first thing we need to do is to precisify the inference rules UI and EE. To this end, we will use A(c) to denote a sentence containing the name c,

More information

First Order Logic vs Propositional Logic CS477 Formal Software Dev Methods

First Order Logic vs Propositional Logic CS477 Formal Software Dev Methods First Order Logic vs Propositional Logic CS477 Formal Software Dev Methods Elsa L Gunter 2112 SC, UIUC egunter@illinois.edu http://courses.engr.illinois.edu/cs477 Slides based in part on previous lectures

More information

Introduction to first-order logic:

Introduction to first-order logic: Introduction to first-order logic: First-order structures and languages. Terms and formulae in first-order logic. Interpretations, truth, validity, and satisfaction. Valentin Goranko DTU Informatics September

More information

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 Propositional Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 Propositional Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1 Propositional Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1 The Plot That Will Unfold I want to provide some key historical and intellectual context to the model theoretic approach to natural language semantics,

More information

Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2015

Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2015 Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2015 Class 2: Translation and Wffs ( 1.3-1.4) Marcus, Symbolic Logic, Fall 2015, Slide 1 Today P A little review (what we didn t do on

More information

Logic - recap. So far, we have seen that: Logic is a language which can be used to describe:

Logic - recap. So far, we have seen that: Logic is a language which can be used to describe: Logic - recap So far, we have seen that: Logic is a language which can be used to describe: Statements about the real world The simplest pieces of data in an automatic processing system such as a computer

More information

Relational Predicates and Overlapping Quantifiers, 8.6. I. Introducing Relational Predicates

Relational Predicates and Overlapping Quantifiers, 8.6. I. Introducing Relational Predicates Philosophy 109, Modern Logic, Queens College Russell Marcus, Instructor email: philosophy@thatmarcusfamily.org website: http://philosophy.thatmarcusfamily.org Office phone: (718) 997-5287 Relational Predicates

More information

1 Differentiability at a point

1 Differentiability at a point Notes by David Groisser, Copyright c 2012 What does mean? These notes are intended as a supplement (not a textbook-replacement) for a class at the level of Calculus 3, but can be used in a higher-level

More information

Local properties of plane algebraic curves

Local properties of plane algebraic curves Chapter 7 Local properties of plane algebraic curves Throughout this chapter let K be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, and as usual let A (K) be embedded into P (K) by identifying

More information

MATH 307: Problem Set #3 Solutions

MATH 307: Problem Set #3 Solutions : Problem Set #3 Solutions Due on: May 3, 2015 Problem 1 Autonomous Equations Recall that an equilibrium solution of an autonomous equation is called stable if solutions lying on both sides of it tend

More information

Before you get started, make sure you ve read Chapter 1, which sets the tone for the work we will begin doing here.

Before you get started, make sure you ve read Chapter 1, which sets the tone for the work we will begin doing here. Chapter 2 Mathematics and Logic Before you get started, make sure you ve read Chapter 1, which sets the tone for the work we will begin doing here. 2.1 A Taste of Number Theory In this section, we will

More information

INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC 8 Identity and Definite Descriptions

INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC 8 Identity and Definite Descriptions 8.1 Qualitative and Numerical Identity INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC 8 Identity and Definite Descriptions Volker Halbach Keith and Volker have the same car. Keith and Volker have identical cars. Keith and Volker

More information

Chapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements. January 7, 2008

Chapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements. January 7, 2008 Chapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements January 7, 2008 Outline 1 1.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence 2 1.2 Conditional Statements 3 1.3 Valid and Invalid Arguments Central notion of deductive

More information

Mathmatics 239 solutions to Homework for Chapter 2

Mathmatics 239 solutions to Homework for Chapter 2 Mathmatics 239 solutions to Homework for Chapter 2 Old version of 8.5 My compact disc player has space for 5 CDs; there are five trays numbered 1 through 5 into which I load the CDs. I own 100 CDs. a)

More information

1 Predicates and Quantifiers

1 Predicates and Quantifiers 1 Predicates and Quantifiers We have seen how to represent properties of objects. For example, B(x) may represent that x is a student at Bryn Mawr College. Here B stands for is a student at Bryn Mawr College

More information