Chapter 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Chapter 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N)"

Transcription

1 Chapter 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) 1 Introduction Since the exactly solvable higher-dimensional quantum systems with certain central potentials are usually related to the real orthogonal group O(N) deined by orthogonal n n matrices, we shall give a brie review o some basic properties o group O(N) based on the monographs and textbooks [ ]. Beore proceeding to do so, we irst outline the development in order to make the reader recognize its importance in physics. We oten apply groups throughout mathematics and the sciences to capture the internal symmetry o other structures in the orm o automorphism groups. It is well-known that the internal symmetry o the structure is usually related to an invariant mathematical property, and a set o transormations that preserve this kind o property together with the operation o composition o transormations orm a group named a symmetry group. It should be noted that Galois theory is the historical origin o the group concept. He used groups to describe the symmetries o the equations satisied by the solutions o a polynomial equation. The solvable groups are thus named due to their prominent role in this theory. The concept o the Lie group named or mathematician Sophus Lie plays a very important role in the study o dierential equations and maniolds; they combine analysis and group theory and are thereore the proper objects or describing symmetries o analytical structures. An understanding o group theory is o importance in physics. For example, groups describe the symmetries which the physical laws seem to obey. On the other hand, physicists are very interested in group representations, especially o the Lie groups, since these representations oten point the way to the possible physical theories and they play an essential role in the algebraic method or solving quantum mechanics problems. As a common knowledge, the study o the groups is always related to the corresponding algebraic method. Up to now, the algebraic method has become the subject o interest in various ields o physics. The elegant algebraic method was irst S.-H. Dong, Wave Equations in Higher Dimensions, DOI / _2, Springer Science+Business Media B.V

2 14 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) introduced in the context o the new matrix mechanics around Since the introduction o the angular momentum in quantum mechanics, which was intimately connected with the representations o the rotation group SO(3) associated with the rotational invariance o central potentials, its importance was soon recognized and the necessary ormalism was developed principally by a number o pioneering scientists including Weyl, Racah, Wigner and others [136, ]. Until now, the algebraic method to treat the angular momentum theory can be ound in almost all textbooks o quantum mechanics. On the other hand, it oten runs parallel to the dierential equation approach due to the great scientist Schrödinger. Pauli employed algebraic method to deal with the hydrogen atom in 1926 [145] and Schrödinger also solved the same problem almost at the same time [146], but their ates were quiet dierent. This is because the standard dierential equation approach was more accessible to the physicists than the algebraic method. As a result, the algebraic approach to determine the energy levels o the hydrogen atom was largely orgotten and the algebraic techniques went into abeyance or several decades. Until the middle o 1950s, the algebraic techniques revived with the development o theories or the elementary particles since the explicit orms o the Hamiltonian or those elementary particle systems are unknown and the physicists have to make certain assumptions on their internal symmetries. Among various attempts to solve this diicult problem, the particle physicists examined some non-compact Lie algebras and hoped that they would provide a clue to the classiication o the elementary particles. Unortunately, this hope did not materialize. Nevertheless, it is ound that the Lie algebras o the compact Lie groups enable such a classiication or the elementary particles [147] and the non-compact groups are relevant or the dynamic groups in atomic physics [148] and the non-classical properties o quantum optical systems involving coherent and squeezed states as well as the beam splitting and linear directional coupling devices [ ]. It is worth pointing out that one o the reasons why the algebraic techniques were accepted very slowly and the original group theoretical and algebraic methods proposed by Pauli [145] were neglected is undoubtedly related to the abstract character and inherent complexity o group theory. Even though the proper understanding o group theory requires an intimate knowledge o the standard theory o inite groups and o the topology and maniold theory, the basic concepts o group theory are quite simple, specially when we present them in the context o physical applications. Basically, we attempt to introduce them as simple as possible so that the common reader can master the basic ideas and essence o group theory. The detailed inormation on group theory can be ound in the textbooks [ , 154]. On the other hand, during the development o algebraic method, Racah algebra techniques played an important role in physics since it enables us to treat the integration over the angular coordinates o a complex many-particle system analytically and leads to the ormulas expressed in terms o the generalized CGCs, Wigner n-j symbols, tensor spherical harmonics and/or rotation matrices. With the development o algebraic method in the late 1950s and early 1960s, the algebraic method proposed by Pauli was systematized and simpliied greatly by using the concepts o the Lie algebras. Up to now, the algebraic method has been widely applied to

3 2 Abstract Groups 15 various ields o physics such as nuclear physics [155], ield theory and particle physics [156], atomic and molecular physics [ ], quantum chemistry [161], solid state physics [162], quantum optics [149, 151, ] and others. 2 Abstract Groups We now give some basic deinitions about the abstract groups 1 based on textbooks by Weyl, Wybourne, Miller, Ma and others [136, 137, 139, 140, 169]. Deinition A group G is a set o elements {e,,g,h,k,...} together with a binary operation. This binary operation named a group multiplication is subject to the ollowing our requirements: Closure:i,g G, then g G too, Identity element: there exists an identity element e in G (a unit) such that e = e= or any G, Inverses: or every G there exists an inverse element 1 G such that 1 = 1 = e, Associative law: the identity (hk) = ( h)k is satisied or all elements,h,k G. Subgroup: a subgroup o G is a subset S G, which is itsel a group under the group multiplication deined in G, i.e.,,h S h S. Homomorphism: a homomorphism o groups G and H is a mapping rom a group G into a group H, which transorms products into products, i.e., G H. Isomorphism: an isomorphism is a homomorphism which is one-to-one and onto [169]. From the viewpoint o the abstract group theory, isomorphic groups can be identiied. In particular, isomorphic groups have identical multiplication tables. Representation: a representation o a group G is a homomorphism o the group into the group o invertible operators on a certain (most oten complex) Hilbert space V (called representation space). I the representation is to be initedimensional, it is suicient to consider homomorphisms G GL(n).TheGL(n) represents a general linear group o non-singular matrices o dimension n. Usually, the image o the group in this homomorphism is called a representation as well. Irreducible representation: an irreducible representation is a representation whose representation space contains no proper subspace invariant under the operators o the representation. Commutation relation: since a Lie algebra has an underlying vector space structure we may choose a basis set {L i } (i = 1, 2, 3,...,N) or the Lie algebra. In 1 There exist two kinds o dierent meanings o the terminology abstract group during the irst hal o the 20th century. The irst meaning was that o a group deined by our axioms given above, but the second one was that o a group deined by generators and commutation relations.

4 16 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) general, the Lie algebra can be completely deined by speciying the commutators o these basis elements: [L i,l j ]= c ij k L k, i,j,k= 1, 2, 3,...,N, (2.1) k in which the coeicients c ij k and the elements L i are the structure constants and the generators o the Lie algebra, respectively. It is worth noting that the set o operators, which commute with all elements o the Lie algebra, are called Casimir operators. We shall constraint ourselves in the ollowing parts to study some basic properties o the compact group SO(N) alongside the well-known compact so(n) Lie algebra o the generalized angular momentum theory since it shall be helpul in successive Chapters. We suggest the reader reer to the textbooks on group theory [ , 144, 154, 169] or Appendices A C or more inormation. 3 Orthogonal Group SO(N) For every positive integer N, the orthogonal group O(N) is the group o N N orthogonal matrices A satisying AA T = 1, A = A. (2.2) Because the determinant o an orthogonal matrix is either 1 or 1, and so the orthogonal group has two components. The component containing the identity 1 is the special orthogonal group SO(N). AnN-dimensional real matrix contains N 2 real parameters. The column matrices o a real orthogonal matrix are normal and orthogonal to each other. There exist N real matrix constraints or the normalization and N(N 1)/2 real constraints or the orthogonality. Thus, the number o independent real parameters or characterizing the elements o the groups SO(N) is equal to N 2 [N + N(N 1)/2]=N(N 1)/2. The group space is a doubly-connected closed region so that the SO(N) is a compact Lie group with rank N(N 1)/2. 4 Tensor Representations o the Orthogonal Group SO(N) In this section we are going to study the reduction o a tensor space o the SO(N) and calculation o the orthonormal irreducible basis tensors [139, 140]. 4.1 Tensors o the Orthogonal Group SO(N) We begin by studying the tensors o the SO(N). For a given rank n o the SO(N), we know that there are N n components with a ollowing transorm, R T c1 c n OR T c1 c n = R c1 d 1 R cn d n T d1 d n, R SO(N). (2.3) d 1 d n

5 4 Tensor Representations o the Orthogonal Group SO(N) 17 It is noted that only one nonvanishing component o a basis tensor is equal to 1, i.e., (θ a1 a n ) b1 b n = δ a1 b 1 δ an b n = (θ a1 ) b1 (θ an ) bn, (2.4) O R (θ a1 a n ) = c 1 c n (θ c1 c n )R c1 a 1 R cn a n, (2.5) rom which one may expand any tensor in such a way T b1 b n = a 1 a n T a1 a n (θ a1 a n ) b1 b n. (2.6) The tensor space is an invariant linear space both in the SO(N) and in the permutation group S n. Since the SO(N) transormation commutes with the permutation so that one can reduce the tensor space in the orthogonal groups SO(N) by the projection o the Young operators, which are conveniently used to deal with the permutation group S n. Note that there are several important characteristics or the tensors o the SO(N) group: The real and imaginary parts o a tensor o the SO(N) transorm independently in Eq. (2.3). As a result, we need only study their real tensors. There is no any dierence between a covariant tensor and a contra-variant tensor or the SO(N) transormations. The contraction o a tensor can be achieved between any two indices. Thereore, beore projecting a Young operator, the tensor space must be decomposed into a series o traceless tensor subspaces, which remain invariant in the SO(N). Denote by T the traceless tensor space o rank n. Ater projecting a Young operator, T [λ] μ = y μ [λ] T is a traceless tensor subspace with a given permutation symmetry. T [λ] μ will become a null space i the summation o the numbers o boxes in the irst two columns o the Young pattern 2 [λ] is larger than the dimension N. I the row number m o the Young pattern [λ] is larger than N/2, then the basis tensor y [λ] μ θ b1 b m c can be changed to a dual basis tensor by a totally antisymmetric tensor ɛ a1 a N, [y [λ] θ] a1 a N m c = 1 m! whose inverse transormation is given by a N m+1 a N ɛ a1 a N m a N m+1 a N y [λ] θ an a N m+1 c, (2.7) 2 A Young pattern [λ] has n boxes lined up on the top and on the let, where the jth row contains λ j boxes. For instance, the Young pattern [2, 1] is It should be noted that the number o boxes in the upper row is not less than in the lower row, and the number o boxes in the let column is not less than that in the right column. We suggest the reader reer to the permutation group S n in Appendix A or more inormation..

6 18 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) 1 (N m)! = a m+1 a N ɛ b1 b m a m+1 a N 1 m!(n m)! [y [λ] θ] an a m+1 c a 1 a N ɛ b1 b m a m+1 a N ɛ an a m+1 a m a 1 y [λ] θ a1 a m c = ( 1) N(N 1)/2 y [λ] θ b1 b m c. (2.8) Ater some algebraic manipulations, it is ound that the correspondence between two sets o basis tensors is one-to-one and the dierence between them is only in the arranged order. Thus, a traceless tensor subspace T [λ] μ is equivalent to a traceless tensor subspace T [λ ] ν, where the row number o the Young pattern [λ ] is (N m) < N/2, { [λ ] [λ], λ i = λi, i (N m), (2.9) 0, i >(N m), where m (N/2,N]. I N = 2l, i.e., the row number l o [λ] is equal to N/2, then the Young pattern [λ] is the same as its dual Young pattern, called the sel-dual Young pattern. To remove the phase actor ( 1) N(N 1)/2 = ( 1) l appearing in Eq. (2.8), we introduce a actor ( i) l in Eq. (2.7), Deine [y [λ] θ] a1 a l c = ( i)l l! y [λ] θ a1 a l c = ( i)l l! ɛ a1 a l a l+1 a 2l y [λ] θ a2l a l+1 c, (2.10) a l+1 a 2l [y [λ] θ] a2l a l+1 c. (2.11) a l+1 a 2l ɛ a1 a l a l+1 a 2l ψ ± a 1 a l c = 1 2{ y [λ] θ a1 a l c ± [y [λ] θ] a1 a l c }. (2.12) We observe that ψ a + 1 a l c keeps invariant in the dual transormation so that we call it sel-dual basis tensor. On the contrary, we call ψa 1 a l c the anti-sel-dual basis tensor because it changes its sign in dual transormation. For example, or even N = 2l we may construct the sel-dual and anti-sel-dual basis tensors as ollows: ψ ± 1 l = 1 2{ y [1 l] θ 1 l ± ( i) l y [1l] θ (2l) (l+1) }. (2.13) Thereore, when l = N/2 the representation space T [λ] μ can be divided to the sel-dual and the anti-sel-dual tensor subspaces with the same dimension. Notice that the combinations by the Young operators and the dual transormations (2.7) and (2.13) are all real except that the dual transormation (2.13) with N = 4l + 2is complex. In conclusion, the traceless tensor subspace T [λ] μ corresponds to a representation [λ] o the SO(N), where the row number l o Young pattern [λ] is less than N/2. When l = N/2 the traceless tensor subspace T [λ] μ can be decomposed into the sel- corresponding dual tensor subspace T [+λ] μ and anti-sel-dual tensor subspace T [ λ] μ

7 4 Tensor Representations o the Orthogonal Group SO(N) 19 to the representation [±λ], respectively. All irreducible representations [λ] and [±λ] are real except or [±λ] with N = 4l + 2. As ar as the orthonormal irreducible basis tensors o the SO(N), we are going to address two problems. The irst is how to decompose the standard tensor Young tableaux into a sum o the traceless basis tensors. The second is how to combine the basis tensors such that they are the common eigenunctions o H j and orthonormal to each other. The advantage o the method based on the standard tensor Young tableaux is that the basis tensors are known explicitly and the multiplicity o any weight is equivalent to the number o the standard tensor Young tableaux with the weight. For group SO(N), the key issue or inding the orthonormal irreducible basis is to ind the common eigenstates o H i and the highest weight state in an irreducible representation. For odd and even N, i.e., the groups SO(2l + 1) and SO(2l), the generators T ab o the sel-representation satisy [T ab ] cd = i(δ ac δ bd δ ad δ bc ), [T ab,t cd ]= i(δ bc T ad + δ ad T bc δ bd T ac δ ac T bd ). (2.14) The bases H i in the Cartan subalgebra can be written as H i = T (2i 1)(2i), i [1,N/2]. (2.15) As what ollows, we are going to study the irreducible basis tensors o the SO(2l + 1) and SO(2l), respectively. 4.2 Irreducible Basis Tensors o the SO(2l + 1) It is known that the Lie algebra o the SO(2l + 1) is B l. The simple roots o the SO(2l + 1) are given by [139, 140] r ν = e ν e ν+1, ν [1,l 1], r l = e l, (2.16) where r ν are the longer roots with d ν = 1 and r l is the shorter root with d l = 1/2. Based on the deinition o the Chevalley bases, which include 3l bases E ν,f ν, and H ν or the generators, E rν dν E ν, E rν dν F ν, 1 d ν l (r ν ) i H i 1 r ν H H ν, (2.17) d ν i=1

8 20 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) one is able to calculate the Chevalley bases o the SO(2l + 1) in the selrepresentation as ollows: H ν = T (2ν 1)(2ν) T (2ν+1)(2ν+2), E ν = 1 2 [T (2ν)(2ν+1) it (2ν 1)(2ν+1) it (2ν)(2ν+2) T (2ν 1)(2ν+2) ], F ν = 1 2 [T (2ν)(2ν+1) + it (2ν 1)(2ν+1) + it (2ν)(2ν+2) T (2ν 1)(2ν+2) ], H l = 2T (2l 1)(2l), E l = T (2l)(2l+1) it (2l 1)(2l+1), F l = T (2l)(2l+1) + it (2l 1)(2l+1). (2.18) Note that θ a are not the common eigenvectors o H ν. By generalizing the spherical harmonic basis vectors or the SO(3) group, we may deine the spherical harmonic basis vectors or the sel-representation o the SO(2l + 1) as ollows: ( 1) l β (θ 2β 1 + iθ 2β ), β [1,l], φ β = θ 2l+1, β = l + 1, (2.19) 1 2 (θ 4l 2β+3 iθ 4l 2β+4 ), β [l + 2, 2l + 1], which are orthonormal and complete. In the spherical harmonic basis vectors φ β, the nonvanishing matrix entries in the Chevalley bases are given by H ν φ ν = φ ν, H ν φ ν+1 = φ ν+1, H ν φ 2l ν+1 = φ 2l ν+1, H ν φ 2l ν+2 = φ 2l ν+2, H l φ l = 2φ l, H l φ l+2 = 2φ l+2, E ν φ ν+1 = φ ν, E ν φ 2l ν+2 = φ 2l ν+1, (2.20) E l φ l+1 = 2φ l, E l φ l+2 = 2φ l+1, F ν φ ν = φ ν+1, F ν φ 2l ν+1 = φ 2l ν+2, F l φ l = 2φ l+1, F l φ l+1 = 2φ l+2, where ν [1,l 1]. That is to say, the diagonal matrices o H ν and H l in the spherical harmonic basis vectors φ β are expressed as ollows: H ν = diag{0,...,0, 1, 1, 0,...,0, 1, 1, 0,...,0}, }{{}}{{}}{{} ν 1 2l 2ν 1 ν 1 H l = diag{0,...,0, 2, 0, 2, 0,...,0}. }{{}}{{} l 1 l 1 (2.21) The spherical harmonic basis tensor φ β1 β n o rank n or the SO(2l +1) becomes the direct product o n spherical harmonic basis vectors φ β1 φ βn. The standard tensor Young tableaux y [λ] ν φ β1 β n are the common eigenstates o the H ν, but generally neither orthonormal nor traceless. The eigenvalue o H ν in the standard tensor

9 4 Tensor Representations o the Orthogonal Group SO(N) 21 Young tableaux y [λ] ν φ β1 β n is equal to the number o the digits ν and (2l ν + 1) in the tableau, minus the number o (ν + 1) and (2l ν + 2). The eigenvalue o H l in the standard tensor Young tableau is equal to the number o l in the tableau, minus the number o (l + 2), and then multiplied with a actor 2. The action F ν on the standard tensor Young tableau is equal to the sum o all possible tensor Young tableaux, each o which can be obtained rom the original one through replacing one illed digit ν by the digit (ν + 1), or through replacing one illed digit (2l ν + 1) by the digit (2l ν + 2). But the action o the F l on the standard tensor Young tableau is equal to the sum, multiplied with a actor 2, o all possible tensor Young tableaux, each o which can be obtained rom the original one through replacing one illed digit l by (l + 1) or through replacing one illed (l + 1) by (l + 2). However, the actions o E ν and E l on the standard tensor Young tableau are opposite to those o F ν and F l. Even though the obtained tensor Young tableaux may be not standard, they can be transormed into the sum o the standard tensor Young tableaux by symmetry. Two standard tensor Young tableaux with dierent sets o illed digits are orthogonal to each other. For a given irreducible representation [λ] o the SO(2l + 1), where the row number o Young pattern [λ] is not larger than l, the highest weight state corresponds to the standard tensor Young tableau, in which each box in the βth row is illed with the digit β because each raising operator E ν annihilates it. The highest weight M = ν ω νm ν can be calculated rom (2.20) as ollows: M ν = λ ν λ ν+1, ν [1,l), M l = 2λ l. (2.22) The tensor representation [λ] o the SO(2l + 1) with even M l is a single-valued representation, while the representation with odd M l becomes a double-valued (spinor) representation. The standard tensor Young tableaux y [λ] ν φ β1 β n are generally not traceless, but the standard tensor Young tableau with the highest weight is traceless because it only contains φ β with β<l+ 1asshowninEq.(2.19). For example, the tensor basis θ 1 θ 1 is not traceless, but φ 1 φ 1 is traceless. Since the highest weight is simple, the highest weight state is orthogonal to any other standard tensor Young tableau in the irreducible representation. Thereore, one is able to obtain the remaining orthonormal and traceless basis tensors in the representation [λ] o the SO(2l + 1) rom the highest weight state by the lowering operators F ν based on the method o the block weight diagram. 4.3 Irreducible Basis Tensors o the SO(2l) The Lie algebra o the SO(2l) is D l and its simple roots are given by r ν = e ν e ν+1, ν [1,l 1], r l = e l 1 + e l. (2.23)

10 22 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) The lengths o all simple roots are same, d ν = 1. Similarly, based on the deinition o the Chevalley bases (2.17), we ind that its Chevalley bases in the sel-representation are same as those o the SO(2l + 1) except or ν = l, H l = T (2l 3)(2l 2) + T (2l 1)(2l), E l = 1 2 [T (2l 2)(2l 1) it (2l 3)(2l 1) + it (2l 2)(2l) + T (2l 3)(2l) ], (2.24) F l = 1 2 [T (2l 2)(2l 1) + it (2l 3)(2l 1) it (2l 2)(2l) + T (2l 3)(2l) ]. Likewise, θ a are not the common eigenvectors o the H ν. By generalizing the spherical harmonic basis vectors or the SO(4) group, we deine the spherical harmonic basis vectors or the sel-representation o the SO(2l) as ollows: φ β = ( 1) l β 1 2 (θ 2β 1 + iθ 2β ), β [1,l], 1 2 (θ 4l 2β+1 iθ 4l 2β+2 ), β [l + 1, 2l], (2.25) which are orthonormal and complete. In these basis vectors, the nonvanishing matrix entries o the Chevalley bases are given by H ν φ ν = φ ν, H ν φ ν+1 = φ ν+1, H ν φ 2l ν = φ 2l ν, H ν φ 2l ν+1 = φ 2l ν+1, H l φ l 1 = φ l 1, H l φ l = φ l, H l φ l+1 = φ l+1, H l φ l+2 = φ l+2, E ν φ ν+1 = φ ν, E ν φ 2l ν+1 = φ 2l ν, E l φ l+1 = φ l 1, E l φ l+2 = φ l, F ν φ ν = φ ν+1, F ν φ 2l ν = φ 2l ν+1, F l φ l 1 = φ l+1, F l φ l = φ l+2, (2.26) where ν [1,l 1]. As a result, the diagonal matrices o the H ν and H l in the spherical harmonic basis vectors φ β are calculated as: H ν = diag{0,...,0, 1, 1, 0,...,0, 1, 1, 0,...,0}, }{{}}{{}}{{} ν 1 2l 2ν 2 H l = diag{0,...,0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0,...,0}. }{{}}{{} l 2 l 2 ν 1 (2.27) The spherical harmonic basis tensor φ β1 β n o rank n or the SO(2l) is the direct product o n spherical harmonic basis vectors φ β1 φ βn. The standard tensor Young tableaux y ν [λ] φ β1 β n are the common eigenstates o the H ν, but in general neither orthonormal nor traceless. The eigenvalue o H ν in the standard tensor Young tableaux y [λ] ν φ β1 β n is equal to the number o the digits ν and (2l ν) in the tableau,

11 4 Tensor Representations o the Orthogonal Group SO(N) 23 minus the number o (ν + 1) and (2l ν + 1). The eigenvalue o H l in the standard tensor Young tableau is equal to the number o the digits (l 1) and l in the tableau, minus the number o (l + 1) and (l + 2). The eigenvalues orm the weight m o standard tensor Young tableau. The action o F ν on the standard tensor Young tableau is equal to the sum o all possible tensor Young tableaux, each o which can be obtained rom the original one through replacing one illed digit (2l ν) by the digit (2l ν + 1). The action o F l on the standard tensor Young tableau is equal to the sum o all possible tensor Young tableaux, each o which is obtained rom the original one through replacing one illed digit (l 1) by the digit (l + 1) or through replacing one illed l by the digit (l + 2). However, the actions o E ν and E l are opposite to those o F ν and F l. The obtained tensor Young tableaux may be not standard, but they can be transormed into the sum o the standard tensor Young tableaux by symmetry. Two standard tensor Young tableaux with dierent weights are orthogonal to each other. For a given irreducible representation [λ] or [+λ] o the SO(2l), where the row number o Young pattern [λ] is not larger than l, the highest weight state corresponds to the standard tensor Young tableau where each box in the βth row is illed with the digit β because every raising operator E ν annihilates it. In the standard tensor Young tableau with the highest weight o the representation [ λ], the box in the βth row is illed with the digit β, but the box in the lth row with the digit (l + 1). The highest weight M = ν ω νm ν is calculated rom (2.20) as M ν = λ ν λ ν+1, ν [1,l 1), M l 1 = M l = λ l 1, λ l = 0, M l 1 = λ l 1 λ l, M l = λ l 1 + λ l, or [+λ], M l 1 = λ l 1 + λ l, M l = λ l 1 λ l, or [ λ]. (2.28) The tensor representation [λ] o the SO(2l) with even (M l 1 + M l ) is a singlevalued representation. However, the representation with odd (M l 1 + M l ) is a double-valued (spinor) representation. The standard tensor Young tableaux are generally not traceless, but the standard tensor Young tableau with the highest weight is traceless because it only contains φ β with β<l+ 2. Furthermore, l and l + 1 do not appear in the tableau simultaneously as illustrated in Eq. (2.25). Since the highest weight is simple, the highest weight state is orthogonal to any other standard tensor Young tableau in the irreducible representation. Hence, we can obtain the remaining orthonormal and traceless basis tensors in the irreducible representation o the SO(2l) rom the highest weight state by the lowering operators F ν in light o the method o the block weight diagram. The multiplicity o a weight in the representation can be easily obtained by counting the number o the traceless tensor Young tableaux with this weight.

12 24 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) 4.4 Dimensions o Irreducible Tensor Representations The dimension d [λ] o the representation [λ] o the SO(N) can be calculated by hook rule [139, 140]. The dimension is expressed as a quotient, where the numerator and the denominator are denoted by the symbols Y [λ] T and Y [λ] h, respectively: d [±λ] [SO(2l)]= Y [λ] T 2Y [λ] h d [λ] [SO(N)]= Y [λ] T 2Y [λ] h, when λ l 0,, others. (2.29) The irst ormula in Eq. (2.29) corresponds to the case where the row number o the Young pattern [λ] is equal to N/2. The hook path (i, j) in the Young pattern [λ] is deined as a path which enters the Young pattern at the rightmost o the ith row, goes letward in the i row, turns downward at the j column, goes downward in the j column, and leaves rom the Young pattern at the bottom o the j column. The inverse hook path denoted by (i, j) is the same path as the hook path (i, j),but with opposite direction. The number o boxes contained in the path (i, j), aswell as in its inverse, is the hook number h ij.they [λ] h represents a tableau o the Young pattern [λ] where the box in the jth column o the ith row is illed with the hook number H ij. However, the Y [λ] T is a tableau o the Young pattern [λ] where each box is illed with the sum o the digits which are respectively illed in the same box o each tableau Y [λ] T b in the series. The notation Y [λ] T means the product o the illed digits in it, so does the notation Y [λ] [λ] h. Here, the tableaux Y T b can be obtained by the ollowing rules: Y [λ] T 0 is a tableau o the Young pattern [λ], where the box in the jth column o the ith row is illed with the digit (N + j i). Let [λ (1) ]=[λ]. Starting with [λ (1) ], deine recursively the Young pattern [λ (b) ] by removing the irst row and the irst column o the Young pattern [λ (b 1) ] until [λ (b) ] contains less two columns. I [λ (b) ] contains more than one column, deine Y [λ] T b as a tableau o the Young pattern [λ] where the boxes in the irst (b 1) row and in the irst (b 1) column are illed with 0, and the remaining part o the Young pattern is [λ (b) ]. Let [λ (b) ] have r rows. Fill the irst r boxes along the hook path (1, 1) o the Young pattern [λ (b) ], starting with the box on the rightmost, with the digits (λ (b) 1 1), (λ (b) 2 1),...,(λ (b) r 1), box by box, and ill the irst (λ (b) i 1) boxes in each inverse hook path (i, 1) o the Young pattern [λ (b) ],i [1,r] with 1. The remaining boxes are illed with 0. I several 1 are illed in the same box, the digits are summed. The sum o all illed digits in the pattern Y [λ] T b with b>0 is equal to 0.

13 4 Tensor Representations o the Orthogonal Group SO(N) Adjoint Representation o the SO(N) We are going to study the adjoint representation o the SO(N) by replacing the tensors. The N(N 1)/2 generators T ab in the sel-representation o the SO(N) construct the complete bases o N-dimensional antisymmetric matrices. Denote T cd by T A or convenience, A [1,N(N 1)/2]. Then we have Tr(T A T B ) = 2δ AB. (2.30) Based on the adjoint representation D ad (G) satisying D(R)I B D(R) 1 = I D DDB ad (R), D R SO(N), (2.31) where R is an ininitesimal element, we have N(N 1)/2 RT A R 1 = T B DBA ad (R). (2.32) B=1 The antisymmetric tensor T ab o rank 2 o the SO(N) satisies a similar relation in the SO(N) transormation R (O R T) cd = ij R ci T ij (R 1 ) jd = (RT R 1 ) cd, (2.33) where T ab like an antisymmetric matrix can be expanded by (T A ) ab as ollows: N(N 1)/2 T cd = (T A ) cd F A, F A = 1 (T A ) dc T cd, (2.34) 2 A=1 where the coeicient F A is a tensor that transorms in the SO(N) transormation R as ollows: (O R T) cd = (RT R 1 ) cd cd = A = B (O R T) cd = B (RT A R 1 ) cd F A { (T B ) cd A (T B ) cd O R F B. D ad BA (R)F A }, (2.35) Thus, in terms o the adjoint representation o the SO(N) we can transorm F A in such a way (O R F) B = A D ad BA (R)F A. (2.36) The adjoint representation o the SO(N) is equal to the antisymmetric tensor representation [1, 1] o rank 2. The adjoint representation o the SO(N) or N = 3 or N>4 is irreducible. Except or N = 2, 4, the SO(N) is a simple Lie group.

14 26 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) 4.6 Tensor Representations o the Groups O(N) It is known that the group O(N) is a mixed Lie group with two disjoint regions corresponding to det R =±1. Its invariant subgroup SO(N) has a connected group space corresponding to det R = 1. The set o elements related to the det R = 1is the coset o SO(N). The property o the O(N) can be characterized completely by the SO(N) and a representative element in the coset [139, 140]. For odd N = 2l + 1, we may choose ε = 1 as the representative element in the coset since ε is sel-inverse and commutes with every element in O(2l + 1). Thus, the representation matrix D(ε) in the irreducible representation o O(2l + 1) is a constant matrix D(ε) = c1, D(ε) 2 = 1, c=±1. (2.37) Denote by R the element in SO(2l + 1) and by R = εr the element in the coset. From each irreducible representation D [λ] (SO(2l + 1)) one obtains two induced irreducible representations D [λ]± (O(2l + 1)), D [λ]± (R) = D [λ] (R), D [λ]± (εr) =±D [λ] (R). (2.38) Two representations D [λ]± (O(2l + 1)) are inequivalent because o dierent characters o the ε in two representations. For even N = 2l,ε = 1 belongs to SO(2l). We may choose the representative element in the coset to be a diagonal matrix σ, in which the diagonal entries are 1 except or σ NN = 1. Even though σ 2 = 1, σ does not commute with some elements in O(2l). Any tensor Young tableau y [λ] ν θ β1 β n is an eigentensor o the σ with the eigenvalue 1 or 1 depending on whether the number o illed digits N in the tableau is even or odd. In the spherical harmonic basis tensors, σ interchanges the illed digits l and l + 1 in the tensor Young tableau y [λ] ν φ β1 β n. Thereore, the representation matrix D [λ] (σ ) is known. Denote by R the element in the SO(2l) and by R = σr the element in the coset. From each irreducible representation D [λ] (SO(2l)), where the row number o [λ] is less than l, we obtain two induced irreducible representations D [λ]± (O(2l)), D [λ]± (R) = D [λ] (R), D [λ]± (σ R) =±D [λ] (σ )D [λ] (R). (2.39) Likewise, two representations D [λ]± (O(2l)) are inequivalent due to the dierent characters o the σ in two representations. When l = N/2 there are two inequivalent irreducible representations D [(±)λ] o the SO(2l). Their basis tensors are given in Eq. (2.12). Since two terms in Eq. (2.12) contain dierent numbers o the subscripts N, then σ changes the tensor Young tableau in [±λ] to that in [ λ], i.e., the representation spaces o both D [±λ] (SO(2l)) correspond to an irreducible representation D [λ] o the O(2l), D [λ] (R) = D [+λ] (R) D [ λ] (R), D [λ] (σ R) = D [λ] (σ )D [λ] (R), (2.40) where the representation matrix D [λ] (σ ) is calculated by interchanging the illed digits l and (l +1) in the tensor Young tableau y [λ] ν φ β1 β n. Two representations with

15 5 Ɣ Matrix Groups 27 dierent signs o D [λ] (σ ) are equivalent since they might be related by a similarity transormation ( ) 1 0 X =. (2.41) Ɣ Matrix Groups Dirac generalized the Pauli matrices to our γ matrices, which satisy the anticommutation relations. In terms o the γ matrices, Dirac established the Dirac equation to describe the relativistic particle with spin 1/2. In the language o group theory, Dirac ound the spinor representation o the Lorentz group. In this section we irst generalize the γ matrices and ind that the set o products o the γ matrices orms the matrix group Ɣ. 5.1 Fundamental Property o Ɣ Matrix Groups First, let us review the property o the Ɣ matrix groups [88 90]. We deine N matrices γ a, which satisy the ollowing anticommutation relations {γ a,γ b }=γ a γ b + γ b γ a = 2δ ab 1, a,b [1,N]. (2.42) That is, γ 2 a = 1 and γ aγ b = γ b γ a or a b. The set o all products o the γ a matrices, in the multiplication rule o matrices, orms a group, denoted by Ɣ N.Ina product o γ a matrices, two γ b with the same subscript can be moved together and eliminated by Eq. (2.42) so that Ɣ N is a inite matrix group. We choose a aithul irreducible unitary representation o the Ɣ N as its selrepresentation. It is known rom Eq. (2.42) that γ a is unitary and hermitian, whose eigenvalue is 1 or 1. Let γ (N) = γ 1 γ 2 γ N, γ a = γ 1 a = γ a, (2.43) ( (N)) 2 γ = ( 1) N(N 1)/2 1. (2.44) For odd N, since γ (N) commutes with every γ a matrix, then it is a constant matrix according to the Schur theorem (see Appendix B): { γ (N) ±1, or N = 4l + 1, = (2.45) ±i1, or N = 4l 1. Two groups with dierent γ (4l+1) are isomorphic through a one-to-one correspondence, say γ a γ a, a [1, 4l], γ 4l+1 γ 4l+1. (2.46)

16 28 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) On the other hand, or a given γ (4l+1),theγ (4l+1) 4l+1 can be expressed as a product o other γ a matrices. As a result, all elements both in Ɣ 4l and in Ɣ 4l+1 can be expressed as the products o matrices γ a,a [1, 4l] so that they are isomorphic. In addition, since γ (4l 1) is equal to either i1 or i1, Ɣ 4l 1 is isomorphic onto a group composed o the Ɣ 4l 2 and iɣ 4l 2, Ɣ 4l+1 Ɣ 4l, Ɣ 4l 1 {Ɣ 4l 2,iƔ 4l 2 }. (2.47) 5.2 Case N = 2l Let us calculate the order g (2l) o the Ɣ 2l. Obviously, i R Ɣ 2l, then R Ɣ 2l, too. I we choose one element in each pair o elements ±R, then we obtain a set Ɣ 2l containing g(2l) /2 elements. Denote by S n a product o n dierent γ a. Since the number o dierent S n contained in the set Ɣ 2l is equal to the combinatorics o n among 2l, then we have 2l ( ) 2l g (2l) = 2 = 2(1 + 1) 2l = 2 2l+1. (2.48) n n=0 For any element S n Ɣ 2l except or ±1, we may ind a matrix γ a which is anticommutable with S n. In act, when n is even and γ appears in the product S n, one has γ a S n = S n γ a. However, when n is odd there exists at least one γ a which does not appear in the product S n so that γ a S n = S n γ a. Thereore, we ind that Tr S n = Tr(γ 2 a S n) = Tr(γ a S n γ a ) = Tr S n = 0. (2.49) That is to say, the character o the element S in the sel-representation o the Ɣ 2l is { ±d (S) = (2l), when S =±1, (2.50) 0, when S ±1, where d (2l) is the dimension o the γ a. Since the sel-representation o the Ɣ 2l is irreducible, we have 2 ( d (2l)) 2 = (S) 2 = g (2l) = 2 2l+1, d (2l) = 2 l. (2.51) S Ɣ 2l BasedonEqs.(2.43) and (2.50), we have det γ a = 1orl>1. Since γ (2l) γ (2l) is anticommutable with every γ a, one may deine γ (2l) satisies Eq. (2.42), i.e., with a actor such that γ (2l) γ (2l) = ( i) l γ (2l) = ( i) l γ 1 γ 2 γ 2l, Actually, γ (2l) can also be deined as the matrix γ 2l+1 in Ɣ 2l+1. by multiplying ( (2l)) 2 γ = 1. (2.52)

17 5 Ɣ Matrix Groups 29 The matrices in the set Ɣ 2l are linearly independent. Otherwise, there exists a linear relation S C(S)S = 0, S Ɣ 2l. By multiplying it with R 1 /d (2l) and taking the trace, one obtains any coeicient C(R) = 0. Thus, the set Ɣ 2l contains 2 2l linear independent matrices o dimension d (2l) = 2 l so that they orm a complete set o basis matrices. Any matrix M o dimension d (2l) can be expanded by S Ɣ 2l as ollows: M = S Ɣ 2l C(S)S, C(S) = 1 d (2l) Tr(S 1 M). (2.53) According to Eq. (2.42), the ±S orm a class, while 1 and 1 orm two classes, respectively. The Ɣ 2l group contains (2 2l + 1) classes. Their representation is one-dimensional. Arbitrary chosen n matrices γ a correspond to 1 and the remaining matrices γ b correspond to 1. The number o the one-dimensional nonequivalent representations is calculated as 2l n=0 ( ) 2l = 2 2l. (2.54) n The remaining irreducible representation o the Ɣ 2l must be d (2l) -dimensional, which is aithul. The γ a matrices in the representation are called the irreducible γ a matrices, which may be written as: γ 2n 1 = 1 } 1 {{} σ 1 σ 3 σ 3, }{{} n 1 l n γ 2n = 1 } 1 {{} σ 2 σ 3 σ 3, }{{} n 1 l n γ (2l) = σ 3 σ }{{} 3. l (2.55) Since γ (2l) is diagonal, the orms o Eq. (2.55) are called the reduced spinor representations. Remember that the eigenvalues ±1 are arranged in the diagonal line o the γ (2l) in mixed way. Let us mention an equivalent theorem or the γ a matrices. Theorem 2.1 Two sets o d (2l) -dimensional matrices γ a and γ a satisying the anticommutation relation (2.42), where N = 2l, are equivalent γ a = X 1 γ a X, a [1, 2l]. (2.56) The similarity transormation matrix X is determined up to a constant actor. I the determinant o the matrix X is constrained to be 1, there are d (2l) choices or the actor: exp[ i2nπ/d (2l) ], n [0,d (2l) ). (2.57)

18 30 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) 5.3 Case N = 2l + 1 Since γ (2l) and (2l) matrices γ a in Ɣ 2l, a [1, 2l], satisy the antisymmetric relation (2.42), then they can be deined to be the (2l + 1) matrices γ a in Ɣ 2l+1.Inthis deinition, γ (2l+1) in Ɣ 2l+1 is chosen as γ 2l+1 = γ (2l), γ (2l+1) = γ 1 γ 2l+1 = i l 1. (2.58) Obviously, the dimension d (2l+1) o the matrices in Ɣ 2l+1 is the same as d (2l) in Ɣ 2l, d (2l+1) = d (2l) = 2 l. (2.59) For odd N, the equivalent theorem must be modiied because the multiplication rule o elements in Ɣ 2l+1 includes Eq. (2.45). A similarity transormation cannot change the sign o γ (2l+1), i.e., the equivalent condition or two sets o γ a and γ a has to include a new condition γ = γ, in addition to those given in Theorem 2.1. I we take γ a = (γ a ) T, then we have γ (2l+1) = γ 1 γ 2l+1 = {γ 2l+1 γ 1 } T } T = ( 1) l+1{ γ (2l+1) = ( 1) l+1 γ (2l+1). (2.60) 6 Spinor Representations o the SO(N) 6.1 Covering Groups o the SO(N) BasedonasetoN irreducible unitary matrices γ a satisying the anticommutation relation (2.42), we deine γ a = N R ai γ i, R SO(N). (2.61) i=1 Since R is a real orthogonal matrix, then γ a satisy γ a γ b + γ b γ a = ij R ai R bj {γ i γ j + γ j γ i } = 2 i R ai R bi 1 Due to Eq. (2.42) and a R 1aR 2a = 0, we have = 2δ ab 1. (2.62)

19 6 Spinor Representations o the SO(N) 31 R 1c1 R 2c2 γ c1 γ c2 = 1 R 1c1 R 2c2 (γ c1 γ c2 γ c2 γ c1 ), (2.63) 2 c 1 c 2 c 1 c 2 γ 1 γ 2 γ N = R 1 c1 R NcN γ c1 γ cn c 1 c N = R 1 c1 R NcN ɛ c1 c N γ 1 γ 2 γ N c 1 c N = (det R)γ 1 γ 2 γ N = γ 1 γ 2 γ N. (2.64) From Theorem 2.1, we know that γ a and γ a are related by a unitary similarity transormation D(R) with determinant 1, D(R) 1 γ a D(R) = N R ai γ i, det D(R) = 1, (2.65) i=1 where D(R) is determined up to a constant exp[ i2nπ/d (N) ],n [0,d (N) ).In terms o the deinition o the group, the set o D(R) deined in Eq. (2.65) and operated in the multiplication rule o matrices, orms a Lie group G N. There exists a d (N) -to-one correspondence between the elements in G N and those in SO(N), and the correspondence keeps invariant in the multiplication o elements. Thereore, the G N is homomorphic to SO(N). Because the group space o the SO(N) is doublyconnected, its covering group is homomorphic to it by a two-to-one correspondence. As a result, the group space o the G N must all into several disjoint pieces, where the piece containing the identity element E orms an invariant subgroup G N o the G N.TheG N is a connected Lie group and becomes the covering group o the SO(N). Since the group space o G N is connected, based on the property o the ininitesimal elements, a discontinuous condition can be ound to pick up G N rom the G N. Let R be an ininitesimal element. We may expand R and D(R) with respect to the ininitesimal parameters ω αβ as ollows R ab = δ ab i α<β ω αβ (T αβ ) ab = δ ab ω ab, D(R) = 1 i α<β ω αβ S αβ, (2.66) where T αβ are the generators in the sel-representation o the SO(N) as given in Eq. (2.14). The S αβ are the generators in G N.FromEq.(2.65) one has [γ c,s αβ ]= d (T αβ ) cd γ d = i{δ αc γ β δ βc γ α }, (2.67) rom which we obtain S αβ = 1 4i (γ αγ β γ β γ α ). (2.68) It is easy to prove that S αβ is hermitian since D(R) is unitary.

20 32 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) Deine 3 Basedonthis,wehave { B C = (N), when N = 4l + 1, C (N), when N 4l + 1. C 1 S αβ C = (S αβ ) T = S αβ, C 1 D(R)C ={D(R 1 )} T = D(R). (2.69) (2.70) This discontinuous condition restricts the actor in D(R) such that there is a twoto-one correspondence between ±D(R) in G N and R in SO(N) through relations (2.65) and (2.70). That is to say, the G N is the covering group o SO(N), SO(N) G N, (2.71) where the G N is the undamental spinor representation denoted by D [s] (SO(N)). Thereore, the S αβ represent the spinor angular momentum operators [88 90]. The irreducible tensor representation [λ] is a single-valued representation o the SO(N), but a non-aithul representation o G N because its aithul representation is a double-valued representation o the SO(N). Since the products S n span a complete set o the d (N) -dimensional matrices, this can be decided by checking the commutation relations o the S n with the generators S αβ whether there exists a non-constant matrix commutable with all S αβ. It is ound that only γ (N) is commutable with all S αβ.theγ (2l+1) is a constant matrix so that the undamental spinor representation D [s] (SO(2l + 1)) is irreducible and selconjugate. On the contrary, since γ (2l) is not a constant matrix so that the undamental spinor representation D [s] (SO(2l)) is reducible. By a similarity transormation X,theγ (2l) can be transerred to σ 3 1 and D [s] (SO(2l)) is reduced to the direct sum o two irreducible representations X 1 D [s] (R)X = ( D [+s] ) (R) 0 0 D [ s]. (2.72) (R) Two representations D [±s] (SO(2l)) are proved inequivalent by leading to an absurdity. In act, i Z 1 D [ s] (R)Z = D [+s] (R) and Y = 1 Z, then all generators (XY ) 1 S αβ XY are commutable with σ 1 1, but their product is not commutable with it, 2 l (XY ) 1 (S 12 S 34 S (2l 1)(2l) )XY = Y 1 [X 1 γ (2l) X]Y = σ 3 1, (2.73) which results in a contradiction. 3 B N is the strong space-time relection matrix and C N is the charge conjugation matrix, which are usually used in particle physics.

21 6 Spinor Representations o the SO(N) 33 Introduce two project operators P ± [139, 140], P ± = 1 ( (2l)) 1 ± γ, P± D [s] (R) = D [s] P ±, 2 ( ) ( X P + X =, X 1 P D [s] D [+s] ) (R) 0 (R)X =, 0 0 ( ) ( ) X P X =, X 1 P 0 1 D [s] 0 0 (R)X = 0 D [ s]. (R) From the ollowing relation (2.74) (C (2l) ) 1 γ (2l) C (2l) = ( i) l (γ 1 ) T (γ 2 ) T (γ 2l ) T = ( 1) l (γ (2l) ) T, (2.75) where C (2l) and T denote the charge conjugation matrix and the transpose o the matrix, respectively, one has { C 1 D [s] D (R)P ± C = [s] (R) P ±, when N = 4l, D [s] (R) (2.76) P, when N = 4l + 2. Two non-equivalent representations D [±s] (R) are conjugate to each other when N = 4l + 2, while they are sel-conjugate when N = 4l. The dimension o the irreducible spinor representations o the SO(N) is calculated as d [s] [SO(2l + 1)]=2 l, d [±s] [SO(2l)]=2 (l 1). (2.77) 6.2 Fundamental Spinors o the SO(N) For an SO(N) transormation R, is called the undamental spinor o the SO(N) i it transorms through the undamental spinor representation D [s] (R): (O R ) ν = D νμ [s] (R) μ, O R = D [s] (R), (2.78) μ where is a column matrix with d [s] components. The Chevalley bases H ν (S), E ν (S) and F ν (S) with respect to the spinor angular momentum can be obtained rom Eqs. (2.18) and (2.24) through replacing T ab by S ab. In the chosen orms o γ a given in Eq. (2.55), the Chevalley bases or the SO(2l + 1) group are given by H ν (S) = 1 } 1 {{} 1 2 {σ σ 3 } 1 } 1 {{}, ν 1 l ν 1 H l (S) = 1 } 1 {{} σ 3, l 1 E ν (S) = 1 } 1 {{} {σ + σ } 1 } 1 {{} = F ν (S) T, ν 1 l ν 1 E l (S) = σ 3 σ }{{} 3 σ + = F l (S) T, l 1 (2.79)

22 34 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) where ν [1,l). The Chevalley bases or the SO(2l) group are the same as those or the SO(2l + 1) except or ν = l, H l (S) = } 1 1 {{} 1 2 {σ σ 3 }, l 2 E l (S) = 1 } 1 {{} {σ + σ + }=F l (S) T. l 2 (2.80) The basis spinor [m] o the SO(N) can also be expressed as a direct product o l two-dimensional basis spinors (β), [m]=(β 1,β 2,...,β l ) = (β 1 )(β 2 )...(β l ), (2.81) ( ) ( ) 1 0 (+) =, ( ) =. (2.82) 0 1 For even N, the undamental spinor space can be decomposed into two subspaces by the project operators P ±, ± = P ±, corresponding to irreducible spinor representations D [±s]. The basis spinor in the representation space o D [+s] contains even number o actors ( ), and that o D [ s] contains odd number o actors ( ).The highest weight states [M] and their highest weights M are given by (+)...(+) (+), }{{} M =[0,...,0, 1], }{{} [s] o the SO(2l + 1), l 1 l 1 (+)...(+) (+), }{{} M =[0,...,0, 0, 1], }{{} [+s] o the SO(2l), (2.83) l 1 l 2 (+)...(+) ( ), }{{} M =[0,...,0, 1, 0], }{{} [ s] o the SO(2l). l 1 l 2 The remaining basis states are calculated by the applications o lowering operators F ν (S). 6.3 Direct Products o Spinor Representations Since the spinor representation is unitary so that we have O R = D [s] (R) 1, (2.84) = μ μ μ = μν μ δ μν ν, (2.85) O R ( ) = D [s] (R) 1 D [s] (R) =, which means that keeps invariant in the SO(N) transormations and is a scalar o the SO(N). In other words, the products o μ and ν span an invariant linear space, corresponding to the direct product representation D [s] D [s] o the SO(N). In the reduction o D [s] D [s] there is an identical representation where the CGCs are δ μν. In general, one has

23 6 Spinor Representations o the SO(N) 35 O R ( γ a1 γ an ) = D [s] (R) 1 γ a1 γ an D [s] (R) = R a1 c 1 R an c n γ c1 γ cn, (2.86) c 1...c n where γ a1 γ an is an antisymmetric tensor o rank n o the SO(N) corresponding to the Young pattern [1 n ] with n N. Otherwise, the respective γ a can be moved together and eliminated. When N = 2l + 1, the γ (2l+1) is a constant matrix so that the product o (N n) matrices γ a can be changed to a product o n matrices γ a. Thus, the rank n o the tensor (2.86) is less than N/2, and the Clebsch-Gordan series is given by [s] [s] [s] [s] [0] [1] [1 2 ] [1 l ], or SO(2l + 1). (2.87) The matrix entries o product o γ a are the CGCs. The highest weight in product space is given by M =[0,...,0, 2] corresponding to representation [1 l ]. When N = 2l, according to the property o the project operators P ±, P + P = P P + = 0, P ± P ± = P ±, γ (2l) P ± =±P ±, (2.88) P γ b1 γ b2n P ± = 0, P ± γ b1 γ b2n+1 P ± = 0, the product o the (N n) matrices γ b can still be changed to a product o n matrices γ b.in = l,wehave γ 1 γ 2 γ l = ( i) l γ 2l γ 2l 1 γ l+1 γ (2l), γ 1 γ 2 γ l P ± = 1 (2.89) 2 {γ 1γ 2 γ l ± ( i) l γ 2l γ 2l 1 γ l+1 }P ±. I N = 4l,wehave [±s] [±s] [±s] [±s] [0] [1 2 ] [1 4 ] [(±1)1 2l ], (2.90) [ s] [±s] [ s] [±s] [1] [1 3 ] [1 5 ] [1 2l 1 ]. I N = 4l + 2, one has [±s] [±s] [ s] [±s] [0] [1 2 ] [1 4 ] [1 2l ], (2.91) [ ] [±s] [±s] [±s] [1] [1 3 ] [1 5 ] [(±)1 2l+1 ]. The sel-dual and anti-sel-dual representations occur in the reduction o the direct product [±s] [±s], but not in the reduction o [+s] [ s]. The highest weights are M =[0,...,0, 0, 2] in the product space [+s] [+s], M = [0,..., 0, 2, 0] in [ s] [ s], and M =[0,...,0, 1, 1] in [+s] [ s]. 6.4 Spinor Representations o Higher Ranks In the SO(3) group, D 1/2 is a undamental spinor representation. The spinor representations D j o higher ranks can be obtained by reducing the direct product o the undamental spinor representation and a tensor representation, D 1/2 D l D l+1/2 D l 1/2. (2.92)

24 36 2 Special Orthogonal Group SO(N) The spinor representations o higher ranks o the SO(N) can also be obtained in a similar way. A spinor a1...a n with the tensor indices is called a spin-tensor i it transorms in R SO(N) as ollows: (O R ) a1 a n = R a1 c 1 R an c n D [s] (R) c1 c n. (2.93) c 1 c n The tensor part o the spin-tensor can be decomposed into a direct sum o the traceless tensors with dierent ranks. Each traceless tensor subspace can be reduced by the projection o the Young operators. Thus, the reduced subspace o the traceless tensor part o the spin-tensor is denoted by a Young pattern [λ] or [±λ] where the row number o [λ] is not larger than N/2. However, this subspace o the spin-tensor corresponds to the direct product o the undamental spinor representation [s] and the irreducible tensor representation [λ] or [±λ], and it is still reducible. It is required to ind a new restriction to pick up the irreducible subspace like the subspace o D l+1/2 in Eq. (2.92) ortheso(3) group. The restriction is rom the so-called trace o the second kind o the spin-tensor which keeps invariant in the SO(N) transormations: and a1 a i 1 a i+1 a n = N γ c a1 a i 1 ca i+1 a n, (2.94) c=1 (O R ) a1 a i 1 a i+1 a n = [ ] R a1 c 1 R an c n γ c R cc D [s] (R) c1 c i 1 c c i+1 c n c 1 c n c c = [ ] R a1 c 1 R an c n D [s] (R) γ c c1 c i 1 c c i+1 c n c 1 c n c = R a1 c 1 R an c n D [s] (R) c1 c i 1 c i+1 c n. (2.95) c 1 c n The irreducible subspace o the SO(N) contained in the spin-tensor space, in addition to the projection o a Young operator, satisies the usual traceless conditions o tensors and the traceless conditions o the second kind ψ a d d c = 0, γ d ψ a d c = 0. (2.96) d The highest weight M o the irreducible representation is the highest weight in the direct product space. The irreducible representation is denoted by [s,λ] or the SO(2l + 1) { [s] [λ] [s,λ], (2.97) M =[(λ 1 λ 2 ),...,(λ l 1 λ l ), (2λ l + 1)], d

GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS

GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS Wu-Ki Tung World Scientific Philadelphia Singapore CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 PREFACE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Particle on a One-Dimensional Lattice 1.2 Representations

More information

Lecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Lecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Lecture 10 The Dirac equation WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics The Dirac equation The Dirac equation is a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation formulated by British physicist

More information

Introduction to Group Theory

Introduction to Group Theory Chapter 10 Introduction to Group Theory Since symmetries described by groups play such an important role in modern physics, we will take a little time to introduce the basic structure (as seen by a physicist)

More information

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws Chapter Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws The dynamical properties and interactions of a system of particles and fields are derived from the principle of least action, where the action is a 4-dimensional

More information

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule GROUP THEORY PRIMER New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule 1. Tensor methods for su(n) To study some aspects of representations of a

More information

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n) Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n) 1 Definition of Clifford Algebra A set of N Hermitian matrices γ 1, γ,..., γ N obeying the anti-commutator γ i, γ j } = δ ij I (1) is the basis for an algebra called

More information

The Spinor Representation

The Spinor Representation The Spinor Representation Math G4344, Spring 2012 As we have seen, the groups Spin(n) have a representation on R n given by identifying v R n as an element of the Clifford algebra C(n) and having g Spin(n)

More information

msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197

msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197 msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197 Bibliography Dirac, P. A. M., The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th Edition, (Oxford University Press, London, 1958). Feynman, R. P. and A. P. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics

More information

Representations of Lorentz Group

Representations of Lorentz Group Representations of Lorentz Group based on S-33 We defined a unitary operator that implemented a Lorentz transformation on a scalar field: How do we find the smallest (irreducible) representations of the

More information

Plan for the rest of the semester. ψ a

Plan for the rest of the semester. ψ a Plan for the rest of the semester ϕ ψ a ϕ(x) e iα(x) ϕ(x) 167 Representations of Lorentz Group based on S-33 We defined a unitary operator that implemented a Lorentz transformation on a scalar field: and

More information

Particles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights

Particles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights Particles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights Kfir Blum June, 008 Comments/corrections regarding these notes will be appreciated. My Email address is: kf ir.blum@weizmann.ac.il Contents 1

More information

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups Math G4344, Spring 2012 We ll now turn from the general theory to examine a specific class class of groups: the orthogonal groups. Recall that O(n, R) is the group of

More information

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Lecture 0: A (Brief) Introduction to Group heory (See Chapter 3.3 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Having gained some new experience with matrices, which provide us with representations of groups, and because symmetries

More information

Group Theory and the Quark Model

Group Theory and the Quark Model Version 1 Group Theory and the Quark Model Milind V Purohit (U of South Carolina) Abstract Contents 1 Introduction Symmetries and Conservation Laws Introduction Finite Groups 4 1 Subgroups, Cosets, Classes

More information

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory Department of Mathematics University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX USA Febuary, 2016 Recall Einstein s famous equation, E 2 = (Mc 2 ) 2 + (c p) 2, where c is the speed of light, M is the classical

More information

2. ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS. Introduction

2. ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS. Introduction . ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS Introduction So ar we have seen some o the methods or providing eta evaluations that appear in the literature and we have seen some o the interesting properties

More information

Foundations of Matrix Analysis

Foundations of Matrix Analysis 1 Foundations of Matrix Analysis In this chapter we recall the basic elements of linear algebra which will be employed in the remainder of the text For most of the proofs as well as for the details, the

More information

Physics 557 Lecture 5

Physics 557 Lecture 5 Physics 557 Lecture 5 Group heory: Since symmetries and the use of group theory is so much a part of recent progress in particle physics we will take a small detour to introduce the basic structure (as

More information

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra Quantum Computing Lecture 2 Review of Linear Algebra Maris Ozols Linear algebra States of a quantum system form a vector space and their transformations are described by linear operators Vector spaces

More information

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

BRST and Dirac Cohomology BRST and Dirac Cohomology Peter Woit Columbia University Dartmouth Math Dept., October 23, 2008 Peter Woit (Columbia University) BRST and Dirac Cohomology October 2008 1 / 23 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Representation

More information

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta Physics 1A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta In these notes we will discuss the problem of the coupling or addition of angular momenta. It is assumed that you have all had experience with

More information

Fulton and Harris, Representation Theory, Graduate texts in Mathematics,

Fulton and Harris, Representation Theory, Graduate texts in Mathematics, Week 14: Group theory primer 1 Useful Reading material Fulton and Harris, Representation Theory, Graduate texts in Mathematics, Springer 1 SU(N) Most of the analysis we are going to do is for SU(N). So

More information

LINEAR ALGEBRA AND iroup THEORY FOR PHYSICISTS

LINEAR ALGEBRA AND iroup THEORY FOR PHYSICISTS LINEAR ALGEBRA AND iroup THEORY FOR PHYSICISTS K.N. SRINIVASA RAO Professor of Theoretical Physics (Retd) University of Mysore, Mysore, INDIA JOHN WILEY «SONS NEW YORK CHICHESTER BRISBANE TORONTO SINGAPORE

More information

Symmetries in Physics

Symmetries in Physics Symmetries in Physics September 23, 2009 a) The Unitary Symmetry group, SU(2) b) The Group SU(3) c) SU(N) tesnors and Young Tableaux. a) The SU(2) group Physical realisation is e.g. electron spin and isospin

More information

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions Symmetries, Fields and Particles 013 Solutions Yichen Shi Easter 014 1. (a) Define the groups SU() and SO(3), and find their Lie algebras. Show that these Lie algebras, including their bracket structure,

More information

Computing Generalized Racah and Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients for U(N) groups

Computing Generalized Racah and Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients for U(N) groups Computing Generalized Racah and Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients for U(N) groups Stephen V. Gliske May 9, 006 Abstract After careful introduction and discussion of the concepts involved, procedures are developed

More information

Physics 129B, Winter 2010 Problem Set 4 Solution

Physics 129B, Winter 2010 Problem Set 4 Solution Physics 9B, Winter Problem Set 4 Solution H-J Chung March 8, Problem a Show that the SUN Lie algebra has an SUN subalgebra b The SUN Lie group consists of N N unitary matrices with unit determinant Thus,

More information

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Justin Campbell August 3, 2017 1 Representations of SU 2 and SO 3 (R) 1.1 The following observation is long overdue. Proposition

More information

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. D(g 1 g 2 ) = D(g 1 )D(g 2 ), g 1, g 2 G. and, as a consequence, (2) (3)

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. D(g 1 g 2 ) = D(g 1 )D(g 2 ), g 1, g 2 G. and, as a consequence, (2) (3) GROUP THEORY PRIMER New terms: representation, irreducible representation, completely reducible representation, unitary representation, Mashke s theorem, character, Schur s lemma, orthogonality theorem,

More information

Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1.

Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1. Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1. 1. O(n) consists of n n real matrices M satisfying M T M = I. Check that O(n) is a group. U(n) consists of n n complex matrices U satisfying U U = I. Check

More information

Attempts at relativistic QM

Attempts at relativistic QM Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and

More information

Group Theory and Its Applications in Physics

Group Theory and Its Applications in Physics T. Inui Y Tanabe Y. Onodera Group Theory and Its Applications in Physics With 72 Figures Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona Contents Sections marked with

More information

Symmetries and particle physics Exercises

Symmetries and particle physics Exercises Symmetries and particle physics Exercises Stefan Flörchinger SS 017 1 Lecture From the lecture we know that the dihedral group of order has the presentation D = a, b a = e, b = e, bab 1 = a 1. Moreover

More information

(Ref: Schensted Part II) If we have an arbitrary tensor with k indices W i 1,,i k. we can act on it 1 2 k with a permutation P = = w ia,i b,,i l

(Ref: Schensted Part II) If we have an arbitrary tensor with k indices W i 1,,i k. we can act on it 1 2 k with a permutation P = = w ia,i b,,i l Chapter S k and Tensor Representations Ref: Schensted art II) If we have an arbitrary tensor with k indices W i,,i k ) we can act on it k with a permutation = so a b l w) i,i,,i k = w ia,i b,,i l. Consider

More information

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules Math G4344, Spring 2012 We will now turn to the problem of classifying and constructing all finitedimensional representations of a complex semi-simple Lie algebra (or,

More information

Simple Lie algebras. Classification and representations. Roots and weights

Simple Lie algebras. Classification and representations. Roots and weights Chapter 3 Simple Lie algebras. Classification and representations. Roots and weights 3.1 Cartan subalgebra. Roots. Canonical form of the algebra We consider a semi-simple (i.e. with no abelian ideal) Lie

More information

G : Quantum Mechanics II

G : Quantum Mechanics II G5.666: Quantum Mechanics II Notes for Lecture 5 I. REPRESENTING STATES IN THE FULL HILBERT SPACE Given a representation of the states that span the spin Hilbert space, we now need to consider the problem

More information

Physics 251 Solution Set 4 Spring 2013

Physics 251 Solution Set 4 Spring 2013 Physics 251 Solution Set 4 Spring 2013 1. This problem concerns the Lie group SO(4) and its Lie algebra so(4). (a) Work out the Lie algebra so(4) and verify that so(4) = so(3) so(3). The defining representation

More information

Math Linear Algebra Final Exam Review Sheet

Math Linear Algebra Final Exam Review Sheet Math 15-1 Linear Algebra Final Exam Review Sheet Vector Operations Vector addition is a component-wise operation. Two vectors v and w may be added together as long as they contain the same number n of

More information

Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Chapter Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. The Lorentz Transformation of the Dirac Bispinor We will provide in the following a new formulation of the Dirac equation in the chiral representation

More information

MAT265 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU(2)

MAT265 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU(2) MAT65 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU() (Notes for MAT80 taken by Shannon Starr, October 000) There are many references for representation theory in general, and

More information

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle Chapter 1 Identical particles 1.1 Distinguishable particles The Hilbert space of N has to be a subspace H = N n=1h n. Observables Ân of the n-th particle are self-adjoint operators of the form 1 1 1 1

More information

Group Theory - QMII 2017

Group Theory - QMII 2017 Group Theory - QMII 017 Reminder Last time we said that a group element of a matrix lie group can be written as an exponent: U = e iαaxa, a = 1,..., N. We called X a the generators, we have N of them,

More information

QUANTUM MECHANIC S. Symmetries

QUANTUM MECHANIC S. Symmetries Walter Greiner Berndt Müller QUANTUM MECHANIC S Symmetries 1. Symmetries in Quantum Mechanics 1 1.1 Symmetries in Classical Physics 1 1.2 Spatial Translations in Quantum Mechanics 1 9 1.3 The Unitary

More information

The Clifford algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach (detailed version 1 ) Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 (3 June 2016). Not proofread!

The Clifford algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach (detailed version 1 ) Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 (3 June 2016). Not proofread! The Cliord algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach detailed version 1 Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 3 June 2016. Not prooread! 1. Introduction: the Cliord algebra The theory o the Cliord

More information

Elementary maths for GMT

Elementary maths for GMT Elementary maths for GMT Linear Algebra Part 2: Matrices, Elimination and Determinant m n matrices The system of m linear equations in n variables x 1, x 2,, x n a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 + + a 1n x n = b 1

More information

Notes on Lie Algebras

Notes on Lie Algebras NEW MEXICO TECH (October 23, 2010) DRAFT Notes on Lie Algebras Ivan G. Avramidi Department of Mathematics New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, NM 87801, USA E-mail: iavramid@nmt.edu 1

More information

Notes on basis changes and matrix diagonalization

Notes on basis changes and matrix diagonalization Notes on basis changes and matrix diagonalization Howard E Haber Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 April 17, 2017 1 Coordinates of vectors and matrix

More information

Lecture notes on Quantum Computing. Chapter 1 Mathematical Background

Lecture notes on Quantum Computing. Chapter 1 Mathematical Background Lecture notes on Quantum Computing Chapter 1 Mathematical Background Vector states of a quantum system with n physical states are represented by unique vectors in C n, the set of n 1 column vectors 1 For

More information

1 Fields and vector spaces

1 Fields and vector spaces 1 Fields and vector spaces In this section we revise some algebraic preliminaries and establish notation. 1.1 Division rings and fields A division ring, or skew field, is a structure F with two binary

More information

A group G is a set of discrete elements a, b, x alongwith a group operator 1, which we will denote by, with the following properties:

A group G is a set of discrete elements a, b, x alongwith a group operator 1, which we will denote by, with the following properties: 1 Why Should We Study Group Theory? Group theory can be developed, and was developed, as an abstract mathematical topic. However, we are not mathematicians. We plan to use group theory only as much as

More information

Queens College, CUNY, Department of Computer Science Numerical Methods CSCI 361 / 761 Spring 2018 Instructor: Dr. Sateesh Mane.

Queens College, CUNY, Department of Computer Science Numerical Methods CSCI 361 / 761 Spring 2018 Instructor: Dr. Sateesh Mane. Queens College, CUNY, Department of Computer Science Numerical Methods CSCI 361 / 761 Spring 2018 Instructor: Dr. Sateesh Mane c Sateesh R. Mane 2018 8 Lecture 8 8.1 Matrices July 22, 2018 We shall study

More information

Fluctuationlessness Theorem and its Application to Boundary Value Problems of ODEs

Fluctuationlessness Theorem and its Application to Boundary Value Problems of ODEs Fluctuationlessness Theorem and its Application to Boundary Value Problems o ODEs NEJLA ALTAY İstanbul Technical University Inormatics Institute Maslak, 34469, İstanbul TÜRKİYE TURKEY) nejla@be.itu.edu.tr

More information

The Homogenous Lorentz Group

The Homogenous Lorentz Group The Homogenous Lorentz Group Thomas Wening February 3, 216 Contents 1 Proper Lorentz Transforms 1 2 Four Vectors 2 3 Basic Properties of the Transformations 3 4 Connection to SL(2, C) 5 5 Generators of

More information

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: so(2n), so(2n+1), symplectic algebra sp(2n)

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: so(2n), so(2n+1), symplectic algebra sp(2n) GROUP THEORY PRIMER New terms: so(2n), so(2n+1), symplectic algebra sp(2n) 1. Some examples of semi-simple Lie algebras In the previous chapter, we developed the idea of understanding semi-simple Lie algebras

More information

Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete for Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended Abstract)

Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete for Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended Abstract) Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 270 (1) (2011) 113 119 www.elsevier.com/locate/entcs Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete or Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended bstract)

More information

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions Symmetries, Fields and Particles 03 Solutions Yichen Shi July 9, 04. a Define the groups SU and SO3, and find their Lie algebras. Show that these Lie algebras, including their bracket structure, are isomorphic.

More information

The Lorentz and Poincaré Groups in Relativistic Field Theory

The Lorentz and Poincaré Groups in Relativistic Field Theory The and s in Relativistic Field Theory Term Project Nicolás Fernández González University of California Santa Cruz June 2015 1 / 14 the Our first encounter with the group is in special relativity it composed

More information

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA Kent State University Department of Mathematical Sciences Compiled and Maintained by Donald L. White Version: August 29, 2017 CONTENTS LINEAR ALGEBRA AND

More information

1. Rotations in 3D, so(3), and su(2). * version 2.0 *

1. Rotations in 3D, so(3), and su(2). * version 2.0 * 1. Rotations in 3D, so(3, and su(2. * version 2.0 * Matthew Foster September 5, 2016 Contents 1.1 Rotation groups in 3D 1 1.1.1 SO(2 U(1........................................................ 1 1.1.2

More information

Algebra I Fall 2007

Algebra I Fall 2007 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.701 Algebra I Fall 007 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.701 007 Geometry of the Special Unitary

More information

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators.

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators. MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators. Adjoint operator and adjoint matrix Given a linear operator L on an inner product space V, the adjoint of L is a transformation

More information

Isotropic harmonic oscillator

Isotropic harmonic oscillator Isotropic harmonic oscillator 1 Isotropic harmonic oscillator The hamiltonian of the isotropic harmonic oscillator is H = h m + 1 mω r (1) = [ h d m dρ + 1 ] m ω ρ, () ρ=x,y,z a sum of three one-dimensional

More information

Mathematical Methods wk 2: Linear Operators

Mathematical Methods wk 2: Linear Operators John Magorrian, magog@thphysoxacuk These are work-in-progress notes for the second-year course on mathematical methods The most up-to-date version is available from http://www-thphysphysicsoxacuk/people/johnmagorrian/mm

More information

OHSx XM511 Linear Algebra: Solutions to Online True/False Exercises

OHSx XM511 Linear Algebra: Solutions to Online True/False Exercises This document gives the solutions to all of the online exercises for OHSx XM511. The section ( ) numbers refer to the textbook. TYPE I are True/False. Answers are in square brackets [. Lecture 02 ( 1.1)

More information

1 Matrices and vector spaces

1 Matrices and vector spaces Matrices and vector spaces. Which of the following statements about linear vector spaces are true? Where a statement is false, give a counter-example to demonstrate this. (a) Non-singular N N matrices

More information

Non-Abelian Symmetries in the Numerical Renormalization Group

Non-Abelian Symmetries in the Numerical Renormalization Group Diploma Thesis Non-Abelian Symmetries in the Numerical Renormalization Group Arne Alex October 12, 2009 Faculty of Physics Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München I declare the thesis I am submitting is

More information

Rotational motion of a rigid body spinning around a rotational axis ˆn;

Rotational motion of a rigid body spinning around a rotational axis ˆn; Physics 106a, Caltech 15 November, 2018 Lecture 14: Rotations The motion of solid bodies So far, we have been studying the motion of point particles, which are essentially just translational. Bodies with

More information

GROUP REPRESENTATION THEORY FOR PHYSICISTS

GROUP REPRESENTATION THEORY FOR PHYSICISTS GROUP REPRESENTATION THEORY FOR PHYSICISTS JIN-QUAN CHEN Vfe World Scientific wl Singapore New Jersey London Hong Kong Contents Foreword Preface Glossary v vii xix Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Elements of

More information

Lecture notes for Mathematical Physics. Joseph A. Minahan 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy Box 516, SE Uppsala, Sweden

Lecture notes for Mathematical Physics. Joseph A. Minahan 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy Box 516, SE Uppsala, Sweden Lecture notes for Mathematical Physics Joseph A. Minahan 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy Box 516, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden 1 E-mail: joseph.minahan@fysast.uu.se 1 1 Introduction This is a course

More information

Physics 221AB Spring 1997 Notes 36 Lorentz Transformations in Quantum Mechanics and the Covariance of the Dirac Equation

Physics 221AB Spring 1997 Notes 36 Lorentz Transformations in Quantum Mechanics and the Covariance of the Dirac Equation Physics 221AB Spring 1997 Notes 36 Lorentz Transformations in Quantum Mechanics and the Covariance of the Dirac Equation These notes supplement Chapter 2 of Bjorken and Drell, which concerns the covariance

More information

Quantum Field Theory III

Quantum Field Theory III Quantum Field Theory III Prof. Erick Weinberg January 19, 2011 1 Lecture 1 1.1 Structure We will start with a bit of group theory, and we will talk about spontaneous symmetry broken. Then we will talk

More information

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem Bertram Kostant, MIT Conference on Representations of Reductive Groups Salt Lake City, Utah July 10, 2013

More information

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 6: Lectures 11, 12

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 6: Lectures 11, 12 As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation Week 6: Lectures, The Dirac equation and algebra March 5, 0 The Lagrange density for the Dirac equation

More information

Matrix Lie groups. and their Lie algebras. Mahmood Alaghmandan. A project in fulfillment of the requirement for the Lie algebra course

Matrix Lie groups. and their Lie algebras. Mahmood Alaghmandan. A project in fulfillment of the requirement for the Lie algebra course Matrix Lie groups and their Lie algebras Mahmood Alaghmandan A project in fulfillment of the requirement for the Lie algebra course Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Saskatchewan March

More information

1. Matrix multiplication and Pauli Matrices: Pauli matrices are the 2 2 matrices. 1 0 i 0. 0 i

1. Matrix multiplication and Pauli Matrices: Pauli matrices are the 2 2 matrices. 1 0 i 0. 0 i Problems in basic linear algebra Science Academies Lecture Workshop at PSGRK College Coimbatore, June 22-24, 2016 Govind S. Krishnaswami, Chennai Mathematical Institute http://www.cmi.ac.in/~govind/teaching,

More information

1 Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations

1 Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations March 3, 203 6-6. Systems of Linear Equations Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations An m n matrix is an array A = a ij of the form a a n a 2 a 2n... a m a mn where each a ij is a real or complex number.

More information

Basic Concepts of Group Theory

Basic Concepts of Group Theory Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Group Theory The theory of groups and vector spaces has many important applications in a number of branches of modern theoretical physics. These include the formal theory of

More information

Review of Linear Algebra

Review of Linear Algebra Review of Linear Algebra Definitions An m n (read "m by n") matrix, is a rectangular array of entries, where m is the number of rows and n the number of columns. 2 Definitions (Con t) A is square if m=

More information

(C) The rationals and the reals as linearly ordered sets. Contents. 1 The characterizing results

(C) The rationals and the reals as linearly ordered sets. Contents. 1 The characterizing results (C) The rationals and the reals as linearly ordered sets We know that both Q and R are something special. When we think about about either o these we usually view it as a ield, or at least some kind o

More information

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics

More information

Parity P : x x, t t, (1.116a) Time reversal T : x x, t t. (1.116b)

Parity P : x x, t t, (1.116a) Time reversal T : x x, t t. (1.116b) 4 Version of February 4, 005 CHAPTER. DIRAC EQUATION (0, 0) is a scalar. (/, 0) is a left-handed spinor. (0, /) is a right-handed spinor. (/, /) is a vector. Before discussing spinors in detail, let us

More information

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of L k and S n A character of an irreducible representation of L k is a polynomial function constant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable

More information

Symmetries for fun and profit

Symmetries for fun and profit Symmetries for fun and profit Sourendu Gupta TIFR Graduate School Quantum Mechanics 1 August 28, 2008 Sourendu Gupta (TIFR Graduate School) Symmetries for fun and profit QM I 1 / 20 Outline 1 The isotropic

More information

An LMI description for the cone of Lorentz-positive maps II

An LMI description for the cone of Lorentz-positive maps II An LMI description for the cone of Lorentz-positive maps II Roland Hildebrand October 6, 2008 Abstract Let L n be the n-dimensional second order cone. A linear map from R m to R n is called positive if

More information

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations

More information

Notes on SU(3) and the Quark Model

Notes on SU(3) and the Quark Model Notes on SU() and the Quark Model Contents. SU() and the Quark Model. Raising and Lowering Operators: The Weight Diagram 4.. Triangular Weight Diagrams (I) 6.. Triangular Weight Diagrams (II) 8.. Hexagonal

More information

ELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA

ELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA ELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA K R MATTHEWS DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND First Printing, 99 Chapter LINEAR EQUATIONS Introduction to linear equations A linear equation in n unknowns x,

More information

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3.1 Identical particles As is well known, quantum mechanics implies that no measurement can be performed to distinguish particles in the same quantum state. Elementary

More information

Quantum Theory and Group Representations

Quantum Theory and Group Representations Quantum Theory and Group Representations Peter Woit Columbia University LaGuardia Community College, November 1, 2017 Queensborough Community College, November 15, 2017 Peter Woit (Columbia University)

More information

Categories and Natural Transformations

Categories and Natural Transformations Categories and Natural Transormations Ethan Jerzak 17 August 2007 1 Introduction The motivation or studying Category Theory is to ormalise the underlying similarities between a broad range o mathematical

More information

Algebraic Theory of Entanglement

Algebraic Theory of Entanglement Algebraic Theory of (arxiv: 1205.2882) 1 (in collaboration with T.R. Govindarajan, A. Queiroz and A.F. Reyes-Lega) 1 Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y. and The Institute of Mathematical

More information

Objectives. By the time the student is finished with this section of the workbook, he/she should be able

Objectives. By the time the student is finished with this section of the workbook, he/she should be able FUNCTIONS Quadratic Functions......8 Absolute Value Functions.....48 Translations o Functions..57 Radical Functions...61 Eponential Functions...7 Logarithmic Functions......8 Cubic Functions......91 Piece-Wise

More information

The Deutsch-Jozsa Problem: De-quantization and entanglement

The Deutsch-Jozsa Problem: De-quantization and entanglement The Deutsch-Jozsa Problem: De-quantization and entanglement Alastair A. Abbott Department o Computer Science University o Auckland, New Zealand May 31, 009 Abstract The Deustch-Jozsa problem is one o the

More information

Representation theory & the Hubbard model

Representation theory & the Hubbard model Representation theory & the Hubbard model Simon Mayer March 17, 2015 Outline 1. The Hubbard model 2. Representation theory of the symmetric group S n 3. Representation theory of the special unitary group

More information

Chapter 2. Linear Algebra. rather simple and learning them will eventually allow us to explain the strange results of

Chapter 2. Linear Algebra. rather simple and learning them will eventually allow us to explain the strange results of Chapter 2 Linear Algebra In this chapter, we study the formal structure that provides the background for quantum mechanics. The basic ideas of the mathematical machinery, linear algebra, are rather simple

More information

MATH 583A REVIEW SESSION #1

MATH 583A REVIEW SESSION #1 MATH 583A REVIEW SESSION #1 BOJAN DURICKOVIC 1. Vector Spaces Very quick review of the basic linear algebra concepts (see any linear algebra textbook): (finite dimensional) vector space (or linear space),

More information

The AKLT Model. Lecture 5. Amanda Young. Mathematics, UC Davis. MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/31/11

The AKLT Model. Lecture 5. Amanda Young. Mathematics, UC Davis. MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/31/11 1 The AKLT Model Lecture 5 Amanda Young Mathematics, UC Davis MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/31/11 This talk will follow pg. 26-29 of Lieb-Robinson Bounds in Quantum Many-Body Physics by B. Nachtergaele

More information

ELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA

ELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA ELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA K. R. MATTHEWS DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND Second Online Version, December 1998 Comments to the author at krm@maths.uq.edu.au Contents 1 LINEAR EQUATIONS

More information

A = 3 B = A 1 1 matrix is the same as a number or scalar, 3 = [3].

A = 3 B = A 1 1 matrix is the same as a number or scalar, 3 = [3]. Appendix : A Very Brief Linear ALgebra Review Introduction Linear Algebra, also known as matrix theory, is an important element of all branches of mathematics Very often in this course we study the shapes

More information