arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 9 Dec 2015

Transcription

1 Time-of-Flight Measurements of Single-Electron Wave Packets in Quantum-Hall Ege States arxiv: v1 [con-mat.mes-hall] 9 Dec 015 M. Kataoka, 1, N. Johnson, 1, C. Emary, 3 P. See, 1 J. P. Griffiths, 4 G.. C. Jones, 4 I. Farrer, 4, D.. Ritchie, 4 M. Pepper, an T. J.. M. Janssen 1 1 National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Roa, Teington, Milese TW11 0LW, Unite Kingom Lonon Centre for Nanotechnology, an Department of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, University College Lonon, Torrington Place, Lonon, WC1E 7JE, Unite Kingom 3 Department of Physics an Mathematics, University of Hull, Kingston-upon-Hull HU6 7RX, Unite Kingom 4 Cavenish Laboratory, University of Cambrige, J. J. Thomson venue, Cambrige C3 0HE, Unite Kingom (Date: December 10, 015) We report time-of-flight measurements on electrons travelling in quantum-hall ege states. Hot-electron wave packets are emitte one per cycle into ege states forme along a eplete sample bounary. The electron arrival time is etecte by riving a etector barrier with a square wave that acts as a shutter. y aing an etra path using a eflection barrier, we measure a elay in the arrival time, from which the ege-state velocity v is euce. We fin that v follows 1/ epenence, in goo agreement with the E rift. The ege potential is estimate from the energy-epenence of v using a harmonic approimation. Electronic analogues of funamental photonic quantumoptics eperiments, so-calle electron quantum optics, can be performe using the beams of single-electron wave packets. The emonstration of entanglement an multi-particle interference with such wave packets woul set the stage for quantum-technology applications such as quantum information processing [1]. Various theoretical proposals [ 7] an eperimental realisations [8 17] employ quantum-hall ege states [18] as electron waveguies. The group velocity an ispersion relation of ege states are important parameters for unerstaning an controlling electron wave-packet propagation. For ege-magnetoplasmons, the velocity can be euce by time-of-flight measurements with fast gate pulses [19 ]. This is ifficult with electron wave packets because gate pulses woul also affect the backgroun Fermi sea, an the eperiments in the past [14, 3] use other transporata to estimate the electron velocity. Furthermore, electron-electron interactions can cause the formation of multiple collective moes travelling aifferent velocities, leaing to fasecoherence [14, 17, 4]. In orer to perform irect measurements of the bare group velocity of electron wave packets by timeresolve methos, we nee a robust ege-state waveguie system where the interactions between the transmitte electrons an other electrons in the backgroun can be suppresse. In this Letter, we emonstrate an eperimental metho for probing the bare ege-state velocity of electrons travelling in a eplete ege of a two-imensional system. The electrons are emitte from a tunable-barrier single-electron pump [5 7] as hot single-electron wave packets ( 100 mev above the Fermi energy) [13, 8]. These electrons are injecte into an ege where the backgroun two-imensional electron gas (DEG) is eplete to avoi the influence of electron-electron interactions. The arrival time of these wave packets is etecte by an energy-selective etector barrier with a picosecon resolution [13, 16]. The travel length between the source an etector is switche by a eflection barrier. The time of flight of the etra path is measure as a elay in the arrival time at the etector [9]. The ege-state velocity is calculate from the length of the etra path an the time of flight. We fin that (a) E E F V G5 y V RF G1 V RF 1 m FIG. 1. (a) scanning electron micrograph of a evice an schematics of the measurement circuit use for time-of-flight measurements. Schematics of the lowest Lanau Level at the sample ege. The region uner the epletion gate G5 is eplete, an hence the bottom of the Lanau level is lifte above the Fermi energy E F. The electron wave packets travel at high energy states inicate by a re ot. The ashe bo represents a region where a harmonic approimation is use to euce the ege potential profile shown in Fig. 3(). Sine wave rf signal VG1 RF applie to the pump entrance gate G1 an square wave rf signal V RF applie to the etector gate. Their relative phase elay is controlle at a picosecon resolution using the internal skew control of the arbitrary waveform generator. the ege-state velocity is inversely proportional to the magnetic fiel applie perpenicular to the plane of the DEG in a goo agreement with the E rift velocity, where E is the electric fiel an is the magnetic fiel. We probe the ispersion of the ege states by controlling the electron emission energy. From the energy epenence of the velocity, we euce the ege potential profile an obtain the information on the spatial positions of the ege states. The measurements presente in this work are performe on -V t

2 -1.000E E E-10 two samples, Sample an Sample, with slightly ifferent evice parameters. Figure 1(a) shows a scanning electron micrograph of a evice with the same gate esign as Sample. oth samples are mae from Gas/lGas heterostructures with a DEG 90 nm below the surface, but the DEG carrier ensity is slightly ifferent ( m for Sample an m for Sample ). The active part of the evice is efine by shallow chemical etching an Ti/u metal eposition using electron-beam lithography. The evice comprises 5 surface gates: the pump entrance gate (G1), pump eit gate (G), etector gate (), eflection gate (G4), an epletion gate (G5). L 1 is the path length along the eflection gate an is the same for both samples (1.5 µm). L is the path length along the loop section efine by shallow etching, an is µm for Sample an 5 µm for Sample. The measurements are performe in a cryostat with the base temperature at 300 mk. Figure 1(a) also shows the measurement circuit. The rf sine (with a peak-to-peak amplitue 1 V) applie to G1 pumps electrons over the barrier forme by the c voltage V G applie on G [6]. The rf signal is repeate perioically at a frequency f = 40 MHz, proucing the pump current I P. When the evice pumps eactly one electron per cycle, I P = ef 38 p, where e is the elementary charge. In a magnetic fiel applie perpenicular to the plane of the DEG [in the irection inicate in Fig. 1(a)], the electrons emitte from the pump follow the sample bounary an enter the region where the backgroun DEG is eplete by the negative voltage V G5 on G5 (we apply 0.45 V for Sample an 0.3 V for Sample, well in ecess of the typical epletion voltage of 0. V). The bottom of the lowest Lanau level is raise above the Fermi energy E F but is kept lower than the electron emission energy as shown in Fig. 1. The electrons travel along the ege approimately 500 nm (roughly equal to the etent that G5 covers from the ege efine by shallow etching) away from the nearest DEG [as inicate by the re ot in Fig. 1]. Depening on the voltage applie to the eflection gate G4, the electron wave packets reach the etector () either through the shorter route [soli re line in Fig. 1(a)] or the longer route (ashe line). In both cases, the majority of electrons reach the etector without measurable energy loss for the magnetic fiel consiere here. Electrons that lose energy through LO-phonon emission [13, 30] are reflecte by the etector barrier an o not contribute to the etector current. The longer route as an etra lengthl 1 +L to the electron path, causing a elay in the arrival time at the etector. The electron arrival time at the etector is etecte using a time-epenent signalv RF G1 signal on the etector [13, 16]. square wave V RF with a peak-to-peak amplitue of 0 mv is applie to [16]. The etector currenti D is monitore asv DC is swept an the relative elay time betweenvg1 RF anvrf is varie with a picosecon resolution [see Fig. 1] [16]. Figures (a)- show the behaviour of the etector current for three values of taken at = 14 T with Sample. Here, /V DC tion of V DC is plotte in colour scale as a func- an. The pump current is set at the quantise V DC (a) = V /t (arb. unit) (e) () (ns) V (f) V /V DC FIG.. (a)- /V DC plotte in colour scale as a function of V DC an for three values of. Re crosses are place at the centre of the transition in the etector threshol, which inicates the peak in the electron arrival time. The ata are taken from Sample. () / plotte as a function of for two values of : V (soli line) an V (ashe line). These peaks represent the arrival-time istributions, an the time ifferenceτ between them represents the time of flight. (e) Peak arrival time plotte as a function of. Taken from Sample. (f) Peak arrival time taken from Sample. The soli line is fit to 1/. value for one electron emission per cycle (i.e. I P ef) with VG1 DC = 0.46 V an V G = 0.56 V. When the etector barrier is sufficiently low (i.e.v DC is less negative), all emitte electrons thao not suffer energy loss uring the travel from the pump enter the etector contact an contribute toi D. Therefore, I D I P as the LO phonon emission is negligble at = 14 T in these samples. When the etector barrier is sufficiently high, all electrons are blocke, an I D = 0. When the etector barrier is matche to the energy of incoming electrons, a peak in /V DC appears [13, 16]. The peak position (or the etector threshol) in V DC epens on because a square wave is applie to the etector gate an the sum V DC +VRF etermines the etector barrier height. When is small (large), electrons arrive when the square wave is negative (positive), an hence it shifts the etector threshol to more positive (negative) in V DC. The transition of the etector threshol in V DC from more positive to more negative occurs at where the square-wave transition coincies with the electron arrival at the etector. s is mae more negative, the etector transition shows splitting [Fig. ] an finally settles to larger [Figs. ]. The splitting happens as G4 splits the wave packets into the shorter an longer routes, an hence two sets of electron wave packets arrive at the etector with a time elay. The shift of the etector transition to larger occurs because the longer route causes a elay in the

3 4.800E E-09 3 arrival time. In Fig. (), / is plotte as is swept through the centre point of the etector transition marke by re crosses for the cases of = 0.48 V (soli line) in Fig. (a) an V (ashe line) in Fig.. These two curves represent the arrival-time istributions for the shorter an longer routes, an hence the time ifference τ between the two peaks is the time of flight of the etra path (L 1 + L ) taken by the longer route. The ege-state velocity in the etra path can be calculate as v = (L 1 + L )/τ. In this eample, v = 5µm/95ps = m/s. The uncertainty in the velocity measurement arises from the uncertainties in L 1 + L an τ. The value of L 1 + L is likely to be accurate only to ±10% as we can only estimate it from the evice geometry. This gives the same systematic error to all velocity estimates within the same sample, an hence ioes not affect the iscussions in the later sections qualitatively. The uncertainty in τ is more problematic. This is because the arrival time oes not just switch between two values as the ege-state path is switche. s plotte in Fig. (e), the arrival time initially changes slowly towars larger as is mae more negative. Then it starts to move through a series of small steps, seemingly in a ranom manner, until it makes a final large step. fter that, the arrival time moves graually back to smaller. This behaviour can be interprete as follows. The series of changes for 0.51 < < 0.48 V occur as the path length an the velocity of the ege state uner G4 is altere in a complicate manner ue to isorer potential. This lasts until the ege state is finally pushe out of the region uner G4 at 0.51 V, an is switche to the longer route. Then the arrival time continues to change as is mae more negative, because the velocity along G4 keeps increasing as the potential profile along G4 is mae steeper (ue to the E rift as iscusse later). For the measurements with Sample, we takeτ to be the ifference in arrival time before an after rapi changes as inicate in Fig. (e). typical uncertainty inτ estimate by this metho is±5 ps. more rigorous velocity estimate can be introuce by ecluing the contribution from the electron paths along G4. Figure (f) shows the time-of-flighata taken from Sample plotte in the same manner to Fig. (e). With Sample, the arrival time changes more rapily as is mae more negative after the electron path is switche to the longer route. s the case with Sample, this is consiere to result from a rapi change in the velocity along G4, an is the main source of the uncertainty in velocity estimates. In orer to reuce the uncertainty, we break up the time of flight into two parts, τ 1 along G4 (length L 1 ) an τ along the loop (length L ), i.e. τ = τ 1 + τ = L 1 /v 1 + L /v, where v 1() is the velocity along the path L 1(). From this, one can see τ τ = L /v in the limit v 1 /v L 1 /L. Once the electron path is eflecte, v 1 increases as is mae more negative, whereas v is unaffecte. Therefore, in the limit of large negative, the time of flight settles toτ, the time of flight aroun the loop section. It is not trivial to know eactly how v 1 changes with, but a linear relation (v 1 ) (a) v ( 10 4 m/s) v ( 10 9 m /s ) / (T -1 ) (T) E (mev) V DC () (mv) N = V G /V DC y (nm) 0 E (mev) FIG. 3. (a) Ege-state velocity v measure as a function of. Circle (triangle) ata points are taken with Sample (). The soli curves are fits to 1/. Inset: v plotte against 1/. Electron emissionenergy spectrum measure at = 14 T. v plotte as a function of relative emission energy E. Soli lines are fits to a linear relation. () Ege confinement potential φ (soli lines) estimate from the velocity measurements. The spatial positions of the ege states corresponing to the velocity measurements are inicate by symbols. fits well to the eperimental ata [soli line in Fig. (f)]. s shown in Fig. (f), τ can be estimate as the ifference between the saturate values of arrival time at the positive an negative ens of. The velocity aroun the loop section is calculate as v = L /τ. We fin that the uncertainty is reuce approimately by a factor of three using this metho. We note that we cannot apply this metho to Sample asl is too small to observe the saturation in the arrival time at the negative en in. Now, we investigate the magnetic-fiel an emissionenergy epenence of the velocity to see if the stuie egestate system is consistent with a simple, interaction-free, quantum-hall ege-state moel. Figure 3(a) shows the magnetic fiel epenence of the measure ege-state velocity for both samples [v (the velocity along the whole etra path, L 1 +L ) is plotte for Sample an v (the velocity along the loop section only, L ) for Sample ]. Clear 1/ epenence is observe for both samples own to = 5 T. This is in goo agreement with the E rift velocity, where v = E / 1/, an E is the electric fiel ue to the ege potential. For Sample, the ata point at = 5 T eviates from the 1/ epenence. This may be a sign of crossover from the skipping orbits to the E rift observe by McClure et al [3], but also this coul be simply because of a large uncertainty ue to a shorter time of flight. In orer to estimate the ege confinement potential an the spatial position of ege states, we consier the ispersion rela- -50

4 4 tion in a quasi-one-imensional channel with a harmonic approimation [31]. For the lowest branch of magneto-electric subban [3], E(k ) = ǫ 0 + hω+ 1 h k ωy m Ω, (1) wherek is the wave number in the ege-state transporirection (inirection),ǫ 0 is the lowest two-imensional subban energy, Ω = ωy +ωc, hω y is the transverse confinement energy (inyirection), hω c is the cyclotron energy, anm is the electron effective mass. From the ispersion relation an the group velocity v = 1/ h E/k, one can euce 1 m v ω y ω c ( E ǫ 0 1 hω c ), () against LO-phonon emission peaks [13] (not visible in this particular ataset) an assuming the LO phonon energy of 36 mev [33]. The electron emission energy ecreases linearly as V G is mae more positive. When V G is swept further positive, multiple (N) electrons are pumpe per cycle. Even then, we can still resolve the emission energy of the last electron emitte, as the emission energies of other electrons are well separate at lower values an can be blocke by the etector. Figure 3 plotsv measure as a function of relative emission energy E at = 14 T for both samples. s epecte, they fit well to straight lines. From this fit, we euce the ege-confinement energy hω y =.7 mev an 1.8 mev, an the bottom of the confinement potential at E = 47 mev in the limit of large magnetic fiel (ω c ω y ). From this, ω y can be euce by plottingv againste. The electron emission energy from our single-electron source can be tune over a wie range [13]. This can be use to probe the energy epenence of the ege-state velocity. Figure 3 shows the emission energy spectrum measure asv G is varie with a static etector barrier (V RF = 0) with electrons travelling along the longer route ( = 0.7 V) at = 14 T. The conversion to relative emission energy E [shown on the right vertical ais in Fig. 3 with the highest energy point use in this work set at zero] is mae by calibratingv DC an 61 mev, for Samples an, respectively. From these, we can reconstruct the ege-confinement potentialφ = m ωyy /e as shown in Fig. 3(). Here we set the potential at the bottom of the parabola as zero. From each ata point in Fig. 3, we can euce the potential energy eφ at the position of the guiing centre, average over the length of the path, by subtracting the kinetic energy 1 m v from the total (relative) energy E. We can then visualise the spatial position of the ege states as plotte in Fig. 3(). In summary, we have shown the measurements of the time of flight of electron wave packets travelling through ege states. The electrons travel in the region where the backgroun DEG is eplete an electron-electron interaction is minimise. We fin that the electron velocity is in goo agreement with the epecte E rift. From the energy epenence, we euce the ege confinement potential. Our technique provies a way of characterising the ege-state transport of single-electron wave packets with picosecon resolutions. The metho that we have evelope to transport electron wave packets in eplete eges coul provie an ieal electron waveguie system where ecoherence ue to interactions can be avoie for electron quantum optics eperiments. We woul like to thank Heung-Sun Sim an Sungguen Ryu for useful iscussions. This research was supporte by the UK Department for usiness, Innovation an Skills, NPL s Strategic Research Programme, an the UK EPSRC. masaya.kataoka@npl.co.uk Current aress: Department of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, University of Sheffiel, Mappin Street, Sheffiel S1 3JD, Unite Kingom [1] C. H. ennett an D. P. DiVincenzo, Nature 404, 47 (000). [] P. Samuelsson, E. V. Sukhorukov, an M. üttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, (004). [3] S. Ol khovskaya, J. Splettstoesser, M. Moskalets, an M. üttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, (008). [4] J. Splettstoesser, M. Moskalets, an M. üttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, (009). [5] M. Moskalets an M. üttiker, Phys. Rev. 83, (011). [6] G. Haack, M. Moskalets, J. Splettstoesser, an M. üttiker, Phys. Rev. 84, (R) (011). [7] F. attista an P. Samuelsson, Phys. Rev. 85, (01). [8] Y. Ji, Y. Chung, D. Sprinzak, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, an H. Shtrikman, Nature 4, 415 (003). [9] M. Henny, S. Oberholzer, C. Strunk, T. Heinzel, K. Ensslin, M. Hollan, an C. Schönenberger, Science 84, 96 (008). [10] G. Fève,. Mahé, J.-M. erroir, T. Kontos,. Plaçais, D. C. Glattli,. Cavanna,. Etienne, an Y. Jin, Science 316, 1169 (008). [11] E. ocquillon, F. D. Parmentier, C. Grenier, J.-M. erroir, P. Degiovanni, D. C. Glattli,. Plaçais,. Cavanna, Y. Jin, an G. Fève, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, (01). [1] E. ocquillon, V. Freulon, J.-M. erroir, P. Degiovanni,. Plaçais,. Cavanna, Y. Jin, an G. Fève, Science 339, 1054 (013). [13] J. D. Fletcher, P. See, H. Howe, M. Pepper, S. P. Giblin, J. P. Griffiths, G.. C. Jones, I. Farrer, D.. Ritchie, T. J.. M. Janssen, an M. Kataoka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, (013). [14] E. ocquillon, V. Freulon, J.-M. erroir, P. Degiovanni,. Plaçais,. Cavanna, Y. Jin an G. Fève, Nature Commun. 4, 1839 (013). [15] N. Ubbelohe, F. Hohls, V. Kashcheyevs, T. Wagner, L. Fricke,. Kästner, K. Pierz, H. W. Schumacher, an R. J. Haug, Nature Nanotech. 10, 46 (015). [16] J. Walie, P. See, V. Kashcheyevs, J. P. Griffiths, I. Farrer, G.. C. Jones, D.. Ritchie, T. J.. M. Janssen, M. Kataoka, Phys. Rev. 9, (015). [17] V. Freulon,. Marguerite, J.-M. erroir,. Plaçais,. Cavanna, Y. Jin, an G. Fève, Nature Commun. bf 6, 6854 (015). [18]. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. 5, 185 (198). [19] R. C. shoori, H. L. Stormer, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. alwin, an K. West, Phys. Rev. 45, 3894 (199). [0] N.. Zhitenev, R. J. Haug, K. v. Klitzing, an K. Eberl, Phys.

5 5 Rev. 49, 7809 (1994). [1] H. Kamata, T. Ota, K. Muraki, an T. Fujisawa, Phys. Rev. 81, (010). [] N. Kumaa, H. Kamata, an T. Fujisawa, Phys. Rev. 84, (011). [3] D. T. McClure, Y. Zhang,. Rosenow, E. M. Levenson-Falk, C. M. Marcus, L. N. Pfeiffer, an K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, (009). [4] D. Ferraro,. Roussel, C. Cabart, E. Thibierge, G. Fève, Ch. Grenier, an P. Degiovanni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, (014). [5] M. D. lumenthal,. Kaestner, L. Li, S. Giblin, T. J.. M. Janssen, M. Pepper, D. nerson, G. Jones, an D.. Ritchie, Nature Physics 3, 343 (007). [6]. Kaestner, V. Kashcheyevs, S. makawa, M. D. lumenthal, L. Li, T. J.. M. Janssen, G. Hein, K. Pierz, T. Weimann, U. Siegner, an H. W. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. 77, (008). [7]. Kaestner, V. Kashcheyevs, G. Hein, K. Pierz, U. Siegner, an H. W. Schumacher, ppl. Phys. Lett. 9, (008). [8] C. Leicht, P. Mirovsky,. Kaestner, F. Hohls, V. Kashcheyevs, E. V. Kurganova, U. Zeitler, T. Weimann, K. Pierz, an H. W. Schumacher, Semicon. Sci. Technol. 6, (011). [9] One may argue that time-of-flight measurements coul be performe by using two etector gates on the electron path, an etecting the ifference in the arrival time between the two etectors. However, in this metho, synchronising two etector signals with a picosecon resolution woul be challenging. Our metho circumvents such a timing issue by using a single etector. [30] We fin that the epletion gate can be use to suppress the energy relaation ue to LO-phonon emission [13]. With a negative voltage on G5 enough to eplete the DEG unerneath, LO-phonon scattering becomes negligible own to ( 7 8 T). Even at lower fiels where LO-phonon scattering is enhance, we can still perform velocity measurements as an enough number of electrons arrive at the etector with the original emission energy. We believe that the suppression of LOphonon emission is cause by the ecrease overlap between the initial an final states ue to shallower slope at the bottom of parabolic potential. The etails of this effect will be publishe elsewhere [34]. [31] lthough, in this approimation, the channel is confine by a harmonic potential whereas in our evice the confinement potential is only on one sie (the other ege is far away), it is still appropriate to use this approimation in high limit as the wave function becomes localise on one ege only. [3] S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cambrige University Press, 1995). [33] M. Heiblum, M. I. Nathan, D. C. Thomas, an C. M. Knoeler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 00 (1985). [34] C. Emary,. Dyson, S. Ryu, H.-S. Sim, an M. Kataoka, arxiv: (015).