arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 26 Sep 2006

Transcription

1 EPJ manuscript No. (wi be inserted by the editor) K K photoproduction from protons A. Sibirtsev 1, J. Haidenbauer 2, S. Krewad 1, U.-G. Meißner 1,2 and A.W. Thomas 3 arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 26 Sep Hemhotz-Institut für Strahen- und Kernphysik (Theorie), Universität Bonn, Nußaee 14-16, D Bonn, Germany 2 Institut für Kernphysik (Theorie), Forschungszentrum Jüich, D Jüich, Germany 3 Jefferson Lab, Jefferson Ave., Newport News, VA 23606, USA Received: date / Revised version: date Abstract. We study the contribution of the Dre mechanism driven by K + and K exchange to the reaction γn K KN. Our cacuation impements the fu KN and KN reaction ampitudes in the form of partia wave ampitudes taken from a meson-exchange mode (KN) and a partia wave anaysis ( KN), respectivey. Comparing our resuts to data of the LAMP2 coaboration we observe that the Dre mechanism aone cannot describe the arge Λ(1520) photoproduction rate observed experimentay. We argue that the discrepancy coud be due to significant contributions from K meson exchange with subsequent excitation of the Λ(1520) resonance. After adding such contributions to our mode a good agreement of the LAMP2 experiment is achieved. When appying the same mode to the recent SAPHIR data we find an exceent description of the K + p spectrum and we find evidence for a hyperon resonance with M R = 1617 ± 2 MeV and Γ R = 117 ± 4 MeV in the K p mass distribution. 1 Introduction PACS m Reativistic scattering theory Et Partia-wave anaysis Nn Regge theory, duaity, absorptive/optica modes Le Meson production Rj Baryon production Jz Kaon-baryon interactions The reaction γn K KN offers an exceent opportunity for hadronic spectroscopy. First of a, it aows access to the KN system, a channe which has received much attention recenty because the exotic Θ + (1540) pentaquark coupes to it. With regard to that issue experiments were performed at SPring 8, CEBAF and ELSA using either a free or bound target nuceon [1 4]. The KN system can serve as a source for hyperon resonance spectroscopy. In fact, the most recent data on the Λ(1520) hyperon quoted by PDG [5] were obtained by the LAMP2 group [6] from the reaction γp K + K p at photon energies 2.8 E γ 4.8 GeV. Moreover, the missing mass spectrum measured in γp K + X at E γ =11 GeV [7] indicates many Λ and Σ resonances and ceary iustrates the promising perspectives of the reaction γn K KN with respect to hyperon spectroscopy. Finay, the K K system aows one to investigate mesonic resonances with norma and exotic quantum numbers. Among those are the ight scaar mesons f 0 (980) and a 0 (980) whose nature is sti under debate [8 10]. The different baryonic and mesonic resonances that can occur in the reaction γn K KN induce a considerabe compexibiity in the overa data anaysis. In particuar, possibe kinematica refections, but aso momenta and anguar cuts of the fina state due to a imited detector acceptance might generate resonance-ike structures [11], which do not correspond to genuine physica quantities. Thus, it woud be rather usefu to construct a phenomenoogica mode that aows to contro and constrain the background as much as possibe. Thereby, it is crucia that one incudes not ony true background contributions but aso avaiabe experimenta information on aready we estabished baryonic and mesonic resonances that may contribute to the fina state. Indeed, a simiar strategy was foowed by Dre [12], Söding [13] and Krass [14] for the anaysis of the reaction γp π + π p aready a ong time ago. In particuar, Söding [13] suggested that one shoud construct a mode that incorporates the Dre mechanism using avaiabe experimenta information for πn πn eastic scattering and then appy this mode to the γn ππn reaction to search for new resonances or new phenomena [15, 16]. The principa aim of our work is to deveop a mode for the background to the reaction γn K KN by incorporating, as far as possibe, a presenty avaiabe and we estabished experimenta resuts. To be more concrete, in the present paper we consider the Dre mechanism for the reaction γn K KN. This aows us to take into account the experimenta knowedge of the reaction ampitudes in the KN and KN subsystems. Specificay, we can naturay account for the manifestation of resonances in the KN and KN channes. For the former this concerns, in particuar, the Λ(1520) resonance. The resuts of our cacuation are then compared with avaiabe experimenta data on photoproduction of the Λ(1520) and specificay with the K + p and K p invariant mass spectra reported by Barber et a. [6]. Within the ast year or so severa papers have appeared that dea with the reaction γn K KN and/or the photoproduction of the Λ(1520) hyperon [17 23]. Most of those investigations were driven by the quest for the Θ + (1540) pen-

2 2 A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad, U.-G. Meißner and A.W. Thomas: K K photoproduction from protons taquark. Though a arge variety of reaction mechanisms were considered none of those studies takes into account the Dre mechanism based on the fu KN and KN ampitudes. In fact, in some works K exchange is considered but then the KN and/or KN ampitudes are approximated by tree-eve resonance and/or t-channe meson-exchange diagrams [19, 23]. Therefore, our present paper is compementary to those other studies and, moreover, it has the potentia to provide additiona and important information on the photoproduction of the K K system. Specificay, it aows for a reiabe evauation of the background contribution due to K exchange that is present in a such photon induced reactions and thus shoud be taken into account in the anaysis of experimenta resuts. It wi be shown in our anaysis that the Dre mechanism aone is not sufficient to expain the K + p and K p invariant mass spectra measured by the LAMP2 group [6]. Specificay the atter is significanty underestimated in the region of the Λ(1520) peak. This impies that the Λ(1520) photoproduction cross section is much arger than in corresponding hadron induced reactions. We then consider K meson exchange in conjunction with the excitation of the Λ(1520) resonance as additiona reaction mechanism. Within such a scenario it is indeed possibe to achieve a satisfactory description of the arge Λ(1520) photoproduction rate as refected in the K p mass spectrum [6]. The paper is organized as foows. In Section 2 we formuate our mode to cacuate the Dre mechanism. In particuar we specify the KN and KN ampitudes that we empoy in our investigation. Section 3 presents a comparison between avaiabe data on K + p and K p invariant mass spectra from the reaction γn K KN with our resuts based on the Dre mechanism. We aso consider additiona contributions which we assume to be due to K meson exchange. In Section 4 we appy our mode to the recent SAPHIR data for γp K + K p. We demonstrate that from these data one can indeed deduce the parameters of a hyperon resonance, probaby the Λ(1600). A comparision with new data from the CLAS Coaboration is presented in Section 4. We summarize our resuts with our Concusion. 2 The Dre mechanism and the KN reaction The Dre mechanism for the reaction γn K KN is shown by the two diagrams a) and b) in Fig. 1. Ony the exchanges of charged kaons K + and K contribute to the reaction, since photons do not coupe to neutra K mesons. However, the rescattering ampitude incudes both eastic scattering and charge exchange. The ampitude for t-channe K exchange is given as [12 14] e T K M K = 2ǫ γ q p(s 2, t 2 )F(t 1 ) 1 t 1 m 2, (1) K where ǫ γ is the photon poarization vector, q 1 is the momentum of the K + meson in the γn c.m. system, t 1 is the squared fourmomentum transferred between the photon and the K + meson and T K p is the K p scattering or charge exchange ampitude, which depends on the squared invariant mass s 2 of the K p

3 A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad, U.-G. Meißner and A.W. Thomas: K K photoproduction from protons 3 expectation that the s 2 (and t 2 ) dependence of the eementary ampitudes, c.f. Eq. (1), remain argey unchanged when the reaction takes pace off-she. This expectation is supported by experience with other reactions. For exampe, one knows from meson-production reactions in N N coisions (pp ppx, x = π, η, η...) that the energy dependence of the reaction cross section is strongy dominated by the energy (s) dependence of eastic pp scattering, even though in the production reaction the reevant pp interaction in the fina state takes pace far off-she, see, e.g., Ref. [28]. In the Dre formuation a possibe resonances couped to either the KN or KN channes enter the cacuations through the KN KN or KN KN scattering or charge exchange ampitudes. Keeping in mind that the avaiabe data on hyperonresonance properties are quite uncertain [5], cacuations utiizing the experimentay avaiabe KN KN ampitudes at east aow one to incorporate the best phenomenoogica information into the treatment of the reaction γn K KN. In that respect the Dre mechanism provides consistency between the data on KN KN eastic scattering and K KN photoproduction. Simiar considerations hod for the KN system. Originay Söding [13] proposed that one parameterizes the invariant eastic ampitude (in our case T KN and T KN ) directy from the data on the tota cross section σ tot by expoiting the optica theorem, T KN (s 2, t 2 ) = 2iq 2 s2 σ tot (s 2 )exp (bt 2 ), (3) where s 2 is the KN ( KN) invariant mass squared, q 2 is the moduus of the c.m. momentum and t 2 is the squared fourmomentum transferred from the initia to the fina nuceon. Here b is the exponentia sope of the t dependence taken from the data. This approximation is, in principe, sufficient to cacuate the energy dependence of the reaction and the KN ( KN) mass distribution. However, for an appication invoving cuts on certain momenta and anges one needs the specific dependence of the KN ( KN) ampitude on those quantities and then the simpe exp (bt) ansatz is not adequate. In order to circumvent this probem Berestetsky and Pomeranchuk [29] and aso Ferrari and Seeri [30] proposed that one parameterize the invariant scattering ampitude directy from differentia eastic scattering cross section data: T KN (s 2, t 2 ) 2 = 64π s 2 q 2 2 dσ e (s 2 ) dt 2. (4) At east this approximation aows one to account for many detais of the nucear reactions and to reconstruct genera features of the underying dynamics [31 33]. However, even this form is not suitabe for the present case where two different ampitudes connected with K + and K meson exchanges, respectivey, enter the cacuation coherenty. Thus, the most consistent way is to use the partia wave decomposition of the scattering ampitude given by G(s 2, θ) = 1 [( + 1)T + (s 2 ) + T (s 2 )]P (cos θ), q 2 H(s 2, θ) = sin θ q 2 [T + (s 2 ) T (s 2 )] dp (cos θ) d cosθ, (5) where G and H are the spin-nonfip and spin-fip ampitudes [34], respectivey, P (cosθ) are the Legendre poynomias and θ is the scattering ange in the c.m. system. The partia wave ampitudes (for the KN as we as the KN systems) are defined as T ± = η± exp(2iδ ± ) 1, (6) 2i where η ± and δ ± denote the ineasticity and the phase shift, respectivey, for the tota anguar momentum J=±1/2. The reation between the invariant G and H scattering ampitudes and various scattering observabes can be found, for exampe, in Ref. [34]. An appication of the partia wave ampitudes to the anaysis of the reaction γp π + π p for the Dre mechanism contribution using the Söding mode is described in detai in Ref. [15]. Note that the partia wave decomposition is given in the isospin basis and therefore any of the fina channes of the reaction γn K KN can be cacuated. In our investigation we use the KN ampitudes from the Jüich meson-exchange mode. A detaied description of the mode is given in Refs. [35,36]. The mode yieds a satisfactory reproduction of the avaiabe experimenta information on eastic and charge exchange KN scattering incuding anguar spectra and poarization data up to an invariant mass of the KN system of s GeV. For higher energies we adopt the phenomenoogica ansatz given by Eq. (3) utiizing experimenta data compied in Ref. [37]. Let us mention in this context that the KN ampitude from the Jüich mode was used by us recenty for determining new imits for the Θ + pentaquark width from the data avaiabe for the K + d K 0 pp reaction [38] and aso for an anaysis of the DIANA experiment [39], where the Θ + pentaquark was reportedy observed in K + meson coisions with Xe nucei [40]. Therefore, as an advantage, our approach offers the possibiity for the sef-consistent incusion of the Θ + pentaquark via the KN scattering ampitude, where the atter has aready been deveoped and compared to other avaiabe data [38, 40]. The KN ampitudes are reconstructed from the resut of a mutichanne partia wave anaysis (PWA) [41] avaiabe for KN scattering for invariant coision energies 1.48 s GeV. For s GeV we adopt the K-matrix soution of Martin and Ross [42], which satisfactoriy describes a avaiabe experimenta resuts beow the energy of 1.48 GeV. The K-matrix soution incudes ony S-waves for the I=0 and I=1 channes. However, the data shown in Ref. [42] iustrate that for s 1.48 GeV the contribution from higher partia waves is sma. The usefuness of the Dre approach with respect to anayzing the data becomes obvious by first ooking at resuts for the cross section of the reactions K p K p and K p K 0 n, shown in Fig. 2. Here the experimenta information, taken from Refs. [5, 43, 44], is compared with cacuations utiizing the tota KN scattering ampitude of Ref. [41] (soid ines) with resuts that take into account ony the contribution from the D 03 partia wave (dashed ines). (We use here the standard nomencature L I 2J.) Note that the D 03 partia wave contains the (I(J P ) = 0( 3 2 )) Λ(1520) resonance with nomina mass ±1.0 MeV and fu width 15.6±1.0 MeV [5]. Whie the K p K p reaction shows amost no trace of the Λ(1520),

4 4 A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad, U.-G. Meißner and A.W. Thomas: K K photoproduction from protons in Fig. 1) as it is the case in so-caed resonance modes is definitey not reaistic, since there are significant nonresonant contributions to the scattering ampitude. In this context et us emphasize that the KN KN ampitude contains arge contributions from higher partia waves. Fig. 3 shows the anguar distribution of the K mesons in the c.m. system of the reaction K p K p reaction, which ceary manifests the increasing importance of higher partia waves with increasing invariant coision energy, s 2. With the partia-wave decomposition for the ampitudes G and H given in Eq. (5) the differentia cross section can be readiy evauated for the specific D 03 partia wave where the Λ(1520) resonance occurs: dσ d cosθ = G 2 + H 2 = T 2 (s2) q 2 2 (3 cos 2 θ+1). (7) The resuting anguar dependence, 1+3 cos 2 θ, is shown by the dashed ines in Fig. 3, arbitrariy normaized to the data. It is evident that the 1+3 cos 2 θ function aone does not describe the data at s=1520 MeV; additiona contributions, from other partia waves, are required. The soid ines in Fig. 3 represent resuts with the tota reaction ampitude, i.e. with a partia waves incuding the D 03. It is interesting to note that whie the Λ(1520) resonance remains amost undetectabe in the K p K p reaction cross section shown in Fig. 2, because of the arge background, this resonance can be we reconstructed from an anaysis of the anguar distributions. A detaied discussion Fig. 2. The K p K p and K p K 0 n cross sections as a function of the invariant coision energy. The soid ines show resuts based on the fu reaction ampitude, whie the dashed ines indicate contribution from the D 03 partia wave aone. The data are taken from Refs. [5, 43,44]. the charge-exchange reaction K p K 0 n ceary indicates a resonance structure. This difference can be understood by recaing that the reaction ampitude for the K p K p channe consists of (haf of) the sum of the I=0 and I=1 ampitudes, whie the K p K 0 n reaction is given by (haf of) their difference. Since both I=0 and I=1 ampitudes contain arge nonresonant contributions, it turns out that this nonresonant background cances to a arge extent for the K p K 0 n ampitude. Fig. 2 demonstrates quite strikingy that the contribution of the D 03 partia wave to the K p K p reaction is amost negigibe compared with the nonresonant background, whie its contribution to the charge-exchange channe is sizeabe. This observation suggests that kaon exchange (viz. the Dre mechanism) shoud not produce a pronounced Λ(1520) signa in the invariant mass of the K p system for the reaction γp K + K p but ony in the γp K + K0 n channe. Consequenty, if the reaction γp K + K p does indeed show a substantia effect of the Λ(1520) resonance, it is a strong indication that mechanisms other than the Dre mechanism dominate the reaction [6]. Fig. 2 iustrates aso that any mode cacuation of the reaction γn K KN where the empoyed KN KN ampitude is constructed from hyperon resonances aone (cf. diagram c) Fig. 3. Differentia cross section for K p scattering as a function of the K meson scattering ange in the c.m. system for different invariant coision energies, s 2. The soid ines show resuts based on the fu reaction ampitude, whie the dashed ines indicate the distribution given by 1+3cos 2 θ normaized to the data. The data are taken from Refs. [43,44].

5 A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad, U.-G. Meißner and A.W. Thomas: K K photoproduction from protons 5 tagged photon beam with an energy 2.8<E γ <4.8 GeV. Figs. 5,6 show the invariant mass spectra for the K + p and K p subsystems. Note that for the photon energy of 4.8 GeV the maxima invariant mass of the KN system ranges up to roughy 2.65 GeV. The experimenta K p mass spectrum is provided ony up to 1.65 GeV in Ref. [6], whie the data for the K + p mass distribution are given over amost the whoe avaiabe range. The dotted ines in Figs. 5,6 represent the phase space distribution dσ = λ1/2 (s, s 2, m 2 K )λ1/2 (s 2, m 2 N, m2 K ) ds π 3 s s 2 (s m 2 N ) M 2, (10) Fig. 4. Cross section of the reaction γp K + K p as a function of the photon energy. The dashed ine is the resut obtained with a constant reaction ampitude whie the soid ine shows the resut for the Dre mechanism. The symbos represent data coected in Ref. [46]. of the K meson anguar spectra at energies around the Λ(1520) resonance is given in Ref. [45]. Fig. 4 shows the cross section of the γp K + K p reaction as a function of photon energy. The circes represent experimenta information coected in Ref. [46]. The tota γp K + K p cross section is given by integration of the Chew-Low distribution [47] dσ ds 2 dt 1 = M K ++M K π 3 (s m 2 N )2 λ 1/2 (s 2, m 2 K, m2 N ) s 2, (8) where the function λ is defined by λ(x, y, z) = (x y z)2 4yz. (9) 4x The dotted ine in Fig. 4 is the resut with a constant invariant γp K + K p reaction ampitude, i.e. M=const., suitaby adjusted to the data The fu cacuation (soid ine in Fig. 4) reproduces the energy dependence of the data reasonaby we from threshod up to a photon energy of 5 GeV i.e., over the whoe energy range covered by the LAMP2 experiment. Aso in this case the absoute vaue of the mode resut was adjusted to the data, namey by tuning the cutoff mass in the form factor Eq. (2), cf. above. Indeed, the experimenta KN invariant mass spectra which we want to investigate with our mode are given without absoute normaization, so that the overa normaization is irreevant for our appication anyway. 3 Invariant KN mass spectra from the reaction γp K + K p The K + p and K p invariant mass spectra were measured by the LAMP2 Group [6] in the reaction γp K + K p with a evauated for the fixed averaged photon energy of 3.8 GeV and assuming a constant reaction ampitude, i.e. M=const. In our notation the invariant KN mass M(KN) is given by M(KN)= s 2. Since the experimenta resuts are avaiabe ony with arbitrary normaization we adjust the ampitude M to the K p background at invariant masses above the resonance structure corresponding to the Λ(1520), i.e. around 1570 MeV. The same normaization factor is then used aso in the evauation of the K + p mass spectrum. From Fig. 5 it is obvious that the phase space distribution differs from the measured mass dependence of the K + p spectrum. On the other hand the measurement exhibits arge fuctuations and therefore it is hard to say to what extent the structure of the data refects underying physics or whether it is simpy a consequence of poor statistics. Nonetheess, it appears that there is an excess of events at high K + p invariant masses. Note Fig. 5. The K + p invariant mass spectrum from the γp K + K p reaction. The dotted ine is the resut obtained with a constant reaction ampitude for the fixed photon energy 3.8 GeV. The dashed ine shows the resut for the Dre mechanism, whie the soid ine is obtained after incusion of additiona K meson exchange for Λ(1520) production. Here the photon energy is averaged over 2.8<E γ<4.8 GeV in consistency with the experiment. The data are taken from Ref. [6].

6 6 A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad, U.-G. Meißner and A.W. Thomas: K K photoproduction from protons Fig. 6. The K p invariant mass spectrum for the reaction γp K + K p. Same description of the curves as in Fig. 5. The thin soid ine indicates the contribution of a Λ(1600) P 01 resonance, discussed in Sect. 4. The circes are data taken from Ref. [6]. that the incident photon energy distribution in the experiment is proportiona to Eγ 1 and, therefore, naivey one expects more events at ow K + p masses. Fortunatey, the K p data themseves indicate a possibe expanation of that probem, namey the presence of a cean resonance structure around M(K p) =1520 MeV and probaby at around M(K p)=1620 MeV, cf. Fig. 6. One woud expect that a arge contribution at ow K p masses, ike that associated with the Λ(1520) resonance, woud be kinematicay refected in the K + p mass spectrum and cause a substantia shift to higher M(K + p) vaues in the atter. Within an anaysis based on the Dre mechanism the resonances at M(K p) = 1520 MeV and M(K p)=1620 MeV enter via the eastic K p K p scattering ampitude. Indeed the partia wave anaysis incudes the Λ(1520) J P = 3 2 and Λ(1600) J P = 2+ 1 resonances in the D03 and the P 01 partia waves, respectivey. However, the eastic scattering data depicted in Fig. 2 as we as the K p ampitude of the PWA do not show any obvious signa of those resonances, as aready pointed out earier. Therefore, we do not expect that a cacuation based on the Dre mechanism wi be abe to reproduce these resonances as observed in the K p invariant mass spectrum of the reaction γp K + K p. This is indeed the case as can be seen from our resuts for the Dre diagrams which correspond to the dashed histograms in Figs. 5 and 6. Obviousy, there is ony a sma, hardy noticeabe enhancement in the K p mass spectrum due to the Λ(1520) resonance and the same is the case aso for the Λ(1600) resonance. The Eγ 1 factor of the photon energy distribution is now incuded in the cacuation and it is obvious from Fig. 5 how the spectrum is shifted to ower K + p invariant masses because of that. Note that the resuts were normaized in such a way that we are in ine with the ow invariant-mass spectrum of the K p system and we use again the same normaization for the K p and K + p resuts. Aso, our cacuations were deveoped in ine with the Söding mode [13] in order to aow for possibe kinematic cuts and simuation of the detector acceptance of current experiments. The integration over phase space is based on the Monte-Caro method that aows one to construct an event generator. That is why the cacuations are shown as histograms. The resuts in Fig. 6 make it cear that additiona reaction mechanisms need to be considered if one wants to describe the experimenta K p invariant mass spectrum. To account for such additiona mechanisms we resort here to K meson exchange with subsequent excitation of the Λ(1520) resonance, as depicted by the diagram d) in Fig. 1. Indeed, the experimenta heicity-frame anguar distribution of the Λ(1520) decay for the reaction γp K + K p [6] strongy suggests that K exchange shoud pay an important roe. Note, however, that whie our cacuation of the Dre mechanism is consideraby constrained by experimenta information on the KN and KN ampitude and therefore can be considered as a soid background for the reaction γn K KN, this is not the case for the K exchange because there are no data on the reaction K N KN (or K N KN). Furthermore, it is possibe that many different Λ and Σ hyperon resonances are excited in the γn K KN reaction through K meson exchange. But the reevant couping constants of the K meson to the hyperon resonances are competey unknown. Thus, the best one can do is to start with the genera structure of the K exchange ampitude for hyperon resonance photoproduction and to fit the unknown parameters to the presenty avaiabe data. For reasons of simpicity we decided to take into account ony the excitation of the Λ(1520) resonance. This has the advantage that one can at east use the avaiabe data on the reaction γp K + Λ(1520) to constrain the parameters. Detais about the structure of the empoyed K exchange ampitude are given in the Appendix, together with a comparison to the γp K + Λ(1520) data. We shoud aso mention that, of course, it is ony an assumption that the needed additiona contributions come from K exchange aone. In principe, any other meson exchange coud contribute as we. And even scenarios ike those considered in Refs. [20,21], where the buk of the γp K + Λ(1520) cross section is generated by contact terms, are possibe. The soid histograms in Figs. 5 and 6 represent the K + p and K p invariant mass spectra evauated with K and K meson exchanges. The cacuation reproduces quite we the experimenta K p invariant mass spectra. Note that we do not incude the Λ(1600) resonance excitation via K meson exchange since there is no experimenta information about the energy and t-dependence of its production and aso no data on the spin density matrix. As a consequence our cacuation underestimates the K p spectrum in the corresponding invariant mass region. However, we wi come back to this issue in the next section. The incusion of K meson exchange aso improves the description of the K + p invariant mass spectrum. In particuar, we now find a noticeabe enhancement at higher invariant masses. However, we sti underestimate the K + p mass spectrum at masses above 1.8 GeV. The discrepancy might be reated to the production of other hyperon resonances with masses above

7 A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad, U.-G. Meißner and A.W. Thomas: K K photoproduction from protons GeV, i.e. in the K p invariant mass region not covered by the LAMP2 experiment [6]. If such resonances can be produced by K meson exchange they woud be seen in the K p invariant mass distribution and adding their contributions to the γp K + K p ampitude might improve the description of the K + p mass spectrum. However, at this stage and without data, this remains pure specuation. 4 Appication to the SAPHIR data As a first appication of our mode and in order to demonstrate its potentia for future anayses we present here a comparison with data on the reaction γn K KN taken recenty by the SAPHIR coaboration at ELSA (Bonn). Their study of the channe γp K + K 0 sn was among the first which reveaed evidence for the Θ + (1540) pentaquark [3]. However, the group has aso provided invariant mass spectra for the K p and K + p systems from the reaction γp K + K p [3,48] which we want to anayze now. In their experiment the photon energy range is 1.74 E γ 2.6 GeV, i.e. significanty ower than in the LAMP2 experiment. The resuts of our mode (incuding both the Dre mechanism and the K exchange contribution) are shown in Fig. 7 for the SAPHIR experiment. Since the data are without absoute normaization we readjusted our mode predictions to the maximum of the K + p invariant mass spectrum. It is obvious from Fig. 7 that the K + p mass spectrum is nicey reproduced over the whoe invariant-mass range. Moreover, at the same time (and with the same normaization) there is aso exceent agreement with the K p spectrum in the region of the Λ(1520) resonance, as we as at high invariant masses, cf. Fig. 7. However, there is some excess in the experimenta mass spectrum around 1600 MeV. If one subtracts the mode prediction from the SAPHIR data one obtains the resuts shown in Fig. 8. It is interesting to see that this difference strongy resembes a resonance signa, something one woud not have guessed easiy from the origina data in Fig. 7. Fitting this difference with a reativistic Breit-Wigner ampitude Eq. (19) yieds the vaues M R = 1617 ± 2 MeV, Γ R = 117 ± 4 MeV, (11) with a χ 2 per data point of χ 2 /N=4. The arge χ 2 /N refects the considerabe fuctuation of the data. We are incined to identify this structure with the Λ(1600) P 01 resonance [5], though we are aware that further and more carefu anayses are needed in order to substantiate such a caim, specificay because the PDG ists aso other hyperon resonances in this energy region [5], e.g. the Σ(1580) and Σ(1620). Independenty of that, we beieve that this particuar case aready demonstrates very ceary the power of a reiabe mode for the background to the reaction γn K KN in the anaysis of experimenta data. Two further short comments are in order: First, the SAPHIR coaboration is in the process of anayzing the Λ(1520) signa in their data [49] and, second, we specuate that the sharp signa on the eft side of Fig. 8 is reated to the excitation of the Λ(1405) through K exchange. This deserves further study. As a consistency check, we have added the contribution of the Λ(1600) resonance to the K p invariant mass spectrum of Fig. 7. The K + p and K p spectra for the γp K + K p reaction measured by SAPHIR Coaboration [3, 48]. Same description of curves as in Fig. 6. Ref. [6], as shown by the thin soid ine in Fig. 6. One can see that its contribution is indeed consistent with these data, however, the figure aso underines our earier statement that the data from [6] are not sufficienty precise to aow an extraction of resonance properties for invariant masses above the Λ(1520). Coming back to the K + p mass spectrum of the SAPHIR coaboration we woud ike to emphasize that its dependence on the invariant mass M(K + p) is rather smooth up to the highest vaues as can be seen in Fig. 7. Therefore, we beieve that the structures seen in the corresponding LAMP2 data, cf. Fig. 5, are most ikey fuctuations associated with ow statistics. This concerns presumaby aso events at those higher invariant masses which are not covered by the SAPHIR data. Anyway, it woud

8 8 A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad, U.-G. Meißner and A.W. Thomas: K K photoproduction from protons 5 Appication to the CLAS data Fig. 8. The difference between the SAPHIR data [3,48] for the K p invariant mass spectra of γp K + K p and our mode prediction. The soid ine indicates the fit with a reativistic Breit-Wigner function. Recenty aso the CLAS Coaboration reported [50] new resuts on the reaction γp K + K p for photon energies of 1.8 E γ 3.8 GeV. However, unfortunatey their data are not efficiency corrected [51]. Thus a direct comparision of our resuts with those data and specificay, an anaysis simiar to the one for the SAPHIR data with the aim to extract possibe contributions from hyperon resonances is not possibe at this stage. Sti we find it interesting to compare the prediction for the K p invariant mass spectrum resuting from the Dre mechanism with those data. The soid histogram in Fig. 9 shows the resut of our cacuation based on the diagrams a) and b) of Fig. 1 and taking into account additiona contributions to the Λ(1520) production due to K -exchange. The uncorrected experimenta spectra are from Ref. [50], where the two sets of data points (open and cosed squares) were obtained by using different criteria for the fina-state partice reconstruction. For the comparision we normaized both sets of the data and our cacuation at the maxima yied of the Λ(1520) resonance. Our cacuation ceary indicates that the K p mass spectra at 1.8 E γ 3.8 GeV provide an exceent too to identify possibe additiona contributions from high-mass hyperon resonances. Aso, an additiona measurement of the anguar spectra in the Gottfried-Jackson system at fixed K p masses woud provide vauabe information for the hyperon resonances spectroscopy. Thus, it wi be interesting to anayze the CLAS data within our mode once these data are efficiency corrected. Ony then concrete concusion can be made. 6 Concusion Fig. 9. The K p spectrum for the reaction γp K + K p as measured by the CLAS Coaboration [50]. The open and cosed circes show resuts obtained with different criteria for the fina-state partice reconstruction. The data are not efficiency corrected. The soid histogram is our cacuation for the photon energies 1.8 E γ 3.8 GeV. be interesting to expore this region again experimentay with much better statistics than what was avaiabe in the LAMP2 experiment. We have studied the reaction γn K KN utiizing the Dre mechanism and taking into account the fu reaction ampitudes for the KN and KN subsystems. Our resuts show that the Dre mechanism for kaon exchange aone is not sufficient to describe the avaiabe data on the K + p and K p invariant mass spectra. Thus, we have incuded K meson exchange as an additiona reaction mechanism. By assuming a arge K couping to the Λ(1520) resonance a quantitative description of the K p invariant mass spectrum can be achieved. Moreover, our mode cacuation aso yieds a good overa reproduction of the cross section data for the photoproduction of the Λ(1520) resonance, i.e of its energy and t-dependence. In the paper by Barber et a. [6] it was argued, based on the measured distribution of the Λ(1520) decay into the K p channe in the Gottfried-Jackson frame, that kaon exchange aone cannot account for the Λ(1520) production mechanism. Our investigation, utiizing the Dre mechanism and experimenta information on the KN and KN scattering ampitudes, can be considered as an independent confirmation of this concusion. The Λ(1520) excitation in photoproduction iustrates an aspect that is aso reevant for discussions concerning the Θ + pentaquark. Whie the Λ(1520) resonance remains practicay undetectabe in K p eastic scattering (see Fig. 2), the resonance is ceary visibe in the photoproduction reaction shown in Fig. 6. Evidenty, the difference between eastic scattering

9 A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad, U.-G. Meißner and A.W. Thomas: K K photoproduction from protons 9 and photoproduction must invove reaction mechanisms or channes which are not accessibe in eastic scattering such as the K meson exchange which we assumed in the present study. The situation for Θ + (1540) production might be simiar. Different reaction mechanisms/channes coud be quite seective to the Θ + excitation and, consequenty, coud be a natura reason why the pentaquark was observed in some experiments but not in others. The Λ(1520) photoproduction is an exceent exampe of such a situation. Ceary, at present, in either case the reaction mechanisms governing the photoproduction are not yet identified and, moreover, there are no reasons to beieve that they might be simiar, et aone the same. As a first appication, we have anayzed the SAPHIR data on γp pk + K and shown that our approach gives an exceent description of the K + p mass distribution for a energies and the K p mass distribution in the vicinity of the Λ(1520) resonance and for energies above 1.7 GeV. We have shown that the remaining strength can be we described by a resonance with the parameters given in Eq. (11) - this state coud be the Λ(1600) P 01 resonance of the PDG isting. Since our mode aows us to study not ony the invariant mass spectra but aso momentum and anguar distributions of the fina partices, it is aso possibe to compare the mode resuts with more excusive (i.e. differentia) data and to investigate the possibe roe of the detector acceptance and kinematica cuts in the extraction of specific resonances, ike the Θ + (1540) pentaquark, from present or future experiments [52]. Acknowedgments We woud ike to thank D. Diakonov, K. Hicks, N.N. Nikoaev, W. Schäfer and S. Stepanyan for usefu discussions. We are gratefu to J. Barth, F. Kein, M. Ostrick and W. Schwie for suppying us with the SAPHIR data and for comments. This work was partiay supported by the Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-84ER40150 under which SURA operates Jefferson Lab and by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through funds provided to the SFB/TR 16 Subnucear Structure of Matter. This research is part of the EU Integrated Infrastructure Initiative Hadron Physics Project under contract number RII3-CT A.S. acknowedges support by the COSY FFE grant No (COSY-067). A The K meson exchange contribution In this appendix we specify the K meson exchange contribution to the reaction γp K + K p used in our mode cacuation. Since the energy range where the experimenta information is avaiabe, 2.8 E γ 4.8 GeV, is aready too high for empoying effective Lagrangians [23], we resort to Regge phenomenoogy. The reaction mechanism is depicted in Fig. 1d), where we take into account ony the excitation of the Λ(1520) resonance. This has the advantage that we can use avaiabe data on the reaction γp K + Λ(1520) to constrain the free parameters. Ceary, other hyperon resonances coud contribute as we and there shoud be aso a nonresonant background for K exchange. However, it is impossibe to constrain those contributions from data and therefore we eave them out atogether. Let us first specify the ampitude for the eementary reaction γp K + Λ(1520). We use phenomenoogica heicity ampitudes for the singe t-channe meson exchange Regge poe for the process ab 12, M λ1λa λ 2λ b (s, t 1 ) = V λ1λa x (t 1 )R x (s, t 1 )V x λ 2λ b (t 1 ). (12) Here R x is the Regge propagator for the exchange of the meson x, R x (s, t 1 ) = 1+( 1)sx exp[ iπα x (t 1 )] 2 sin[πα x (t 1 )] Γ[ x α(t 1 )] [α s] αx(t1), (13) where s x and x are the spin of the exchanged meson and the spin of the owest state of the Regge trajectory, respectivey. For K meson exchange we use s K =1, K =1. The Regge trajectory α K is taken as α K = 1 + α (t m 2 K ), (14) with α =0.9 GeV 2 and m K = 892 MeV. The vertex function V is parameterized as Vx λ1λa (t 1 ) = βx λ1λa [t 1 t min ] λ1 λa /2, (15) where β x is a heicity couping constant and t min is the minima four-momentum transfer. The ast term in Eq. (15) ensures that the spin fip ampitude vanishes at forward direction. In principe each vertex shoud be dressed with a form factor, which can be determined from the t-dependence of the experimenta data. When the masses of the initia and fina partices are different, i.e. m 1 m a and m 2 m b then t min (m2 a m2 1 )(m2 b m2 2 ). (16) s Finay, the differentia cross section for the reaction ab 12 is given as dσ dt = 1 (2s a +1)(2s b +1)64πλ(s, m 2 a, m2 b ) λ i M λ1λa λ 2λ b 2,(17) where s a and s b are the spins of the initia partices and the summation is over a heicity ampitudes. Within this approach it is straightforward to incude any meson exchange and any initia and fina states. A detaied comparison between mode cacuations and data from pion and kaon induced reactions are given in Refs. [53 56]. The principa uncertainties of this mode are due to the unknown heicity coupings and possibe contributions from different exchange trajectories. The mode parameters can be fixed ony by comparison with avaiabe experimenta resuts. For instance, the energy dependence of the reaction cross section is driven by the energy dependence of the Regge propagator, which can be used for fixing the exchange trajectories. The γp K + Λ(1520) reaction cross section was measured [6, 7] and is shown in Fig. 10 as a function of the photon energy. The dotted ine shows the cross section for M λ1λa λ 2λ b =const. For K exchange the K Kγ couping constant can be determined from the K Kγ decay, but the coupings and possibe form factor at the K NΛ(1520) vertex are unknown. These

10 10 A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad, U.-G. Meißner and A.W. Thomas: K K photoproduction from protons uncertainties aow enough freedom to reproduce the absoute normaization of the data. Aso, the energy dependence of the reaction cross section, and the t-dependence of the differentia spectra and density matrix eements can be fitted simutaneousy resuting in a quite reasonabe determination of the free parameters. The dashed ine in Fig. 10 shows the resut from K meson exchange. It is in ine with the data over the photon energy range covered by the LAMP2 experiment. In this particuar fit to the data we omitted form factors at the vertices but adjusted instead the overa normaization of the tota ampitude. Let us mention though, that in principe the couping constants for each heicity ampitude shoud be different [53]. Additiona information on the reaction mechanism is contained in the t-dependence. Note that the vertex functions of the heicity ampitudes given by Eq. (15) are proportiona to ( t) n/2 with n= λ 1 λ a + λ 2 λ b being the net heicity fip. This impies that the spin fip ampitudes vanish at forward direction and increase with t. Data on the differentia cross section for γp K + Λ(1520) as a function of t, the square of the four-momentum transferred, for photon energies 2.8< E γ < 4.8 GeV [6] are presented in Fig. 11. The dashed ine is our resut without form factors. Apparenty it is in disagreement with the data. Indeed the cacuated differentia cross section increases with t, which is an unphysica dependence exhibited by the ow t Regge mode. Thus, to describe the data one needs to introduce form factors. We take those form factors to be F(t) = exp(3t) for a heicity ampitudes. Furthermore we assume that the form factors do not depend on the photon energy. This assumption is not necessariy correct because other higher-mass e meson exchanges might contribute and coud be dressed with different form factors. Aternativey one can in- Fig. 11. The γp K + Λ(1520) differentia cross section as a function of t. The curves are resuts of mode cacuations with K meson exchange without form factor (dashed) and with form factor (soid). The data are from Ref. [6]. troduce absorptive corrections [53, 57, 58] that aow one to reproduce the t-dependence phenomenoogicay. The soid ines in Figs. 10 and 11 show resuts for γp K + Λ(1520) cacuated with the incusion of the form factor F(t) = exp(3t) for each heicity ampitude in Eq. (12). Now the differentia cross section is we reproduced by the mode. However, at the same time the description of the integrated cross sections deteriorates somewhat. In order to achieve a better overa description of the experiment one coud either readjust the K meson exchange trajectory or assume that the form factor depends aso on the energy. The atter case is more natura since the data generay indicate that the sope of the t- dependence depends on energy. Experimenta resuts on the energy dependence of the sope of the t-dependence for different photoproduction reactions are reviewed in Refs. [59 61]. Anyway, for our purpose the semiquantitative description of the data on γp K + Λ(1520) as given by the soid ine is sufficient and, therefore, we refrain from exporing further options at this stage. Once the ampitude for γp K + Λ(1520) is estabished we can then construct the reaction ampitude M for γp K + K p. It is given by [62] M(s, t 1, θ, φ)= λ 2 M λ1λa λ 2λ b (s, t 1 )G 2 (s 2 )M λ2 λ cλ d (θ, φ), (18) Fig. 10. The cross section for the reaction γp K + Λ(1520). The dotted ine is the resut obtained with constant reaction ampitude. The dashed ine shows the cacuation with K meson exchange without form factor and the soid ine is the resut obtained with form factor. The soid circes show data from Ref. [6]. where M λ1λa λ 2λ b is the production heicity ampitude given by Eq. (12) and M λ2 λ cλ d is the ampitude corresponding to the decay of the resonant state 2 with heicity λ 2 into the system cd with heicities λ c and λ d, respectivey. Furthermore, G 2 is the propagator of the resonant state and s 2 is the invariant mass of the 2 cd decay products. The propagator is parametrized in

11 A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad, U.-G. Meißner and A.W. Thomas: K K photoproduction from protons 11 a Breit-Wigner form with an energy dependent width as proposed by Jackson [63], G 2 (s 2 ) = m 2 Γ( s 2 ) s 2 m im 2Γ( s 2 ), (19) where m 2 is the resonance mass and the energy variation of the width is given by Γ( [ λ 1/2 (s 2, m 2 s 2 ) = Γ c, m 2 d ) ] 2+1ρ( s2 ) 0 λ 1/2 (m 2 2, m2 c, m2 d ) ρ(m 2 ). (20) In the atter formua is the orbita anguar momentum of the 2 cd decay and Γ 0 is the width at s 2 =m 2, whie ρ( s 2 ) is a factor varying sowy with energy given by Gashow and Rosenfed as [64] ρ( s 2 ) = 1 [ X 2 + λ(s 2, m 2 c, m 2 d ) ] (21) s2 4s 2 with the parameter X=350 MeV fixed from a fit of the baryonic resonances in the context of unitary symmetry. References 1. T. Nakano et a., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, (2003) [arxiv:hepex/ ]. 2. S. Stepanyan et a., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, (2003) [arxiv:hep-ex/ ]. 3. J. Barth et a. [SAPHIR Coaboration], Phys. Lett. B 572 (2003) 127 [arxiv:hep-ex/ ]. 4. V. Kubarovsky et a., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, (2004) [arxiv:hep-ex/ ]. 5. Partice Data Group, Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004). 6. D.P. Barber et a., Z. Phys. C 7, 17 (1980). 7. A.M. Boyarski et a., Phys. Lett. 34 B, 547 (1971). 8. D.V. Bugg, Phys. Rept. 397, 257 (2004) [arxiv:hep-ex/ ]. 9. C. Amser and N.A. Törnqvist, Phys. Rept. 389, 61 (2004). 10. V. Baru et a., Phys. Lett. B 586, 53 (2004) [arxiv:hepph/ ]. 11. E. Bycking and K. Kajyntie, Partice Kinemtics, John Wiey and Sons, London (1973). 12. S.D. Dre, Rev. Mod. Phys. 33, 458 (1961). 13. P. Söding, Phys. Lett 19, 702 (1965). 14. A.S. Krass, Phys. Rev. 159, 1496 (1967). 15. J. Baam et a., Phys. Rev. D 5, 545 (1972). 16. R. Erbe et a., Phys. Rev. 175, 1669 (1968). 17. W. Roberts, Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004) [arxiv:nucth/ ]. 18. L. Roca, E. Oset, and H. Toki, arxiv:hep-ph/ Y. Oh, K. Nakayama, and T.-S.H. Lee, Phys. Rept. 423, 49 (2006) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. 20. S. Nam, A. Hosaka and H.C. Kim, Genshikaku Kenkyu 49, 53 (2005) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. 21. S. Nam, A. Hosaka and H.C. Kim, arxiv:hep-ph/ V.Yu. Grishina, L.A. Kondratyuk, W. Cassing, M. Mirazita and P. Rossi, Eur. Phys. J. A 25, 141 (2005) [arxiv:nuc-th/ ]. 23. A.I. Titov, B. Kämpfer, S. Date and Y. Ohashi, Phys. Rev. C 72, (2005) [arxiv:nuc-th/ ]. 24. E. Ferrari and F. Seeri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 387 (1961). 25. T. deforest and J. D. Waecka, Adv. Phys. 15, 1 (1966). 26. H. Haberzett, Phys. Rev. C (1997). 27. A. I. Titov, H. Ejiri, H. Haberzett, and K.Nakayama, Phys. Rev. C (2005). 28. C. Hanhart, Phys. Rept. 397, 155 (2004). 29. V.B. Berestetsky and I.Ya. Pomeranchuk, Nuc. Phys. 22, 629 (1961). 30. E. Ferrari and F. Seeri, Supp. Nuovo Cim. 26, 451 (1962). 31. A. Sibirtsev, Phys. Lett. B 359, 29 (1995). 32. A.A. Sibirtsev, Nuc. Phys. A 604, 455 (1996). 33. A. Sibirtsev, W. Cassing, and C.M. Ko, Z. Phys. A 358, 101 (1997) [arxiv:nuc-th/ ]. 34. G. Höher, in Landot-Börnstein, New Series, Vo. 9b2 ed. H. Schopper (Springer, Berin, 1983). 35. R. Büttgen, K. Hoinde, A. Müer-Groeing, J. Speth and P. Wyborny, Nuc. Phys. A 506, 586 (1990). 36. M. Hoffmann, J.W. Durso, K. Hoinde, B.C. Pearce and J. Speth, Nuc. Phys. A 593, 341 (1995). 37. V. Faminio, I.F. Graf, J.D. Hansen, W.G. Moorhead and D.R.O. Morrison, Compiation of Cross Sections, K and K + Induced reactions, Preprint CERN-HERA (1979). 38. A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad and Uf-G. Meißner, Phys. Lett. B 599, 230 (2004) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. 39. V.V. Barmin et a., Phys. Atom. Nuc. 66, 1715 (2003); Yad. Fiz. 66, 1763 (2003) [arxiv:hep-ex/ ]. 40. A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewad and Uf-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. A 23, 491 (2005) [arxiv:nuc-th/ ]. 41. G.P. Gopa et a., Nuc. Phys. B , (1977). 42. A.D Martin and G.G. Ross, Nuc. Phys. B 16, 479 (1970). 43. C.J. Adams et a., Nuc. Phys. B (1975). 44. T.S. Mast et a., Phys. Rev. D (1976). 45. M.B. Watson, M. Ferro-Luzzi and Robert D. Tripp, Phys. Rev. 131, 2248 (1963). 46. A. Badini, V. Faminio, W.G. Moorhead and D.R.O. Morrison, Landot-Börnstein, New Series, I/12b, 365 (1983). 47. G.F. Chew and F.E. Low, Phys. Rev. 113, 1640 (1959). 48. M. Ostrick, private communication; J. Barth et a., Eur. Phys. J. A 17 (2003) SAPHIR Coaboration, in preparation. 50. V. Kubarovsky et a., hep-ex/ R. de Vita and V. Kubarovsky, private communication. 52. K. Hicks, private communication. 53. A.C. Irving and R.P. Worden, Phys. Rept. 34C, 119 (1977). 54. A.B. Kaidaov and B.M. Karnakov, Sov. J. Nuc. Phys. 7, 111 (1968). 55. A.A. Zayats, Sov. J. Nuc. Phys. 16, 597 (1973). 56. A.P. Szczepaniak and M. Swat, Phys. Lett. B 516, 72 (2001) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. 57. K. Gottfried and J.D. Jackson, Nuovo Cim. 34, 736 (1964). 58. N. Levy, W. Majerotto and B.J. Read, Nuc. Phys B 55, 493 (1973). 59. A. Sibirtsev, K. Tsushima and S. Krewad, Phys. Rev. C 67, (2003) [arxiv:nuc-th/ ]. 60. A. Sibirtsev, S. Krewad and A.W. Thomas, J. Phys. G 30, 1427 (2004). 61. A. Sibirtsev, Uf-G. Meißner, and A.W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) [arxiv:hep-ph/ ]. 62. P.D.B. Coins, An introduction to Regge theory and high energy physics, Cambridge University, 112 (1977). 63. J.D. Jackson, I Nuovo Cim., 34, 1644 (1964). 64. S.L. Gashow and A.H. Rosenfed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 192 (1963).