Influence of the Stepsize on Hyers Ulam Stability of First-Order Homogeneous Linear Difference Equations
|
|
- Thomasine Chandler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 International Journal of Difference Equations ISSN , Volume 12, Number 2, pp (2017) ttp://campus.mst.edu/ijde Influence of te Stepsize on Hyers Ulam Stability of First-Order Homogeneous Linear Difference Equations Masakazu Onitsuka Okayama University of Science Department of Applied Matematics Okayama, , Japan Abstract Tis paper is concerned wit Hyers Ulam stability of te first-order linear difference equation x(t) ax(t) = 0 on Z, were a is a real number, x(t) = (x(t + ) x(t))/ and Z = k k Z for te stepsize > 0. It is well known tat tis equation is an approximation of te ordinary differential equation x ax = 0. Te obtained results are divided into te small stepsize case and te large stepsize case. Te main purpose of tis paper is to clarify te following: in te small stepsize case, te minimum of HUS constants of difference equation is te same as tat of ODE; in te large stepsize case, te minimum of HUS constants of difference equation is different from tat of ODE. To illustrate te obtained results, some applications to perturbed linear difference equations are included. Furtermore, some suitable examples are also attaced for a deeper understanding. AMS Subject Classifications: 39A06, 39A30, 34A30. Keywords: Hyers Ulam stability, HUS constant, linear difference equation. 1 Introduction Hyers Ulam stability originated from a stability problem in te field of functional equations wic was posed by Ulam [31,32] in Tis problem was solved by Hyers [9] in After tat, many researcers ave studied Hyers Ulam stability in te field of functional equations (see [1, 5, 10, 15, 19]). In 1998, Alsina and Ger [2] considered Hyers Ulam stability of te linear differential equation x x = 0. Tey proved tat if a differentiable function φ : I R satisfies φ (t) φ(t) for all t I, ten tere exists a solution x : I R of x x = 0 suc tat φ(t) x(t) 3 for all Received December 28, 2016; Accepted May 22, 2017 Communicated by Memet Ünal
2 282 Masakazu Onitsuka t I, were > 0 is a given arbitrary constant and I is a nonempty open interval of R. Later, tis result as been extended to various linear differential equations by many researcers (see [3,6,8,11 14,17,18,22,24,27 30,33]). Moreover, Hyers Ulam stability of te difference equations can be found in [4, 16, 23, 25, 26] and te references terein. In tis paper, we consider te first-order omogeneous linear difference equation on Z, were a is a real number and x(t) = x(t) ax(t) = 0 (1.1) x(t + ) x(t) and Z = k k Z for given > 0. We call te stepsize. Let T = Z I, were I is a nonempty open interval of R. We define T T \ max T if te maximum of T exists, = T oterwise. Note ere tat if a function x(t) exists on T, ten x(t) exists on T, and if a = 1/ olds, ten we no longer ave a first-order difference equation. Trougout tis paper, we assume tat T and T are nonempty sets of R, and a 1/. We say tat (1.1) as te Hyers Ulam stability on T if tere exists a constant K > 0 wit te following property: Let > 0 be a given arbitrary constant. If a function φ : T R satisfies φ(t) aφ(t) for all t T, ten tere exists a solution x : T R of (1.1) suc tat φ(t) x(t) K for all t T. We call suc K a HUS constant for (1.1) on T. From te following remark, we will treat only te case of a 0 and a 2/ in tis paper. Remark 1.1. If a = 0 or a = 2/, ten (1.1) does not ave Hyers Ulam stability on Z. For example, in te case a = 0, we consider te function φ(t) = t satisfying φ(t) = for all t T. Since x(t) c is te general solution of x(t) = 0, we ave φ(t) x(t) as t ; tat is, (1.1) does not ave Hyers Ulam stability on Z wen a = 0. In te case a = 2/, te function φ(t) = t( 1) t/ satisfies φ(t)+2φ(t)/ = for all t T. Since te general solution of x(t)+2x(t)/ = 0 is x(t) = c( 1) t/, we see tat φ(t) x(t) as t ; tat is, (1.1) does not ave Hyers Ulam stability on Z wen a = 2/. It is well known tat (1.1) is an approximation of te first-order omogeneous ordinary differential equation x ax = 0 (1.2) on I, were I is a nonempty open interval of R, and a is a non-zero real number. In fact, for te sake of simplicity, we consider (1.2) on [0, b], were b > 0 and [0, b] I. Let us divide te interval [0, b] into n parts, were n N. Letting = b/n, and using Euler s
3 Stepsize and Hyers Ulam Stability 283 metod, we get (1.1) on [0, b] since x (t) can be approximated by x(t) (see [7, pp ]). Hyers Ulam stability of (1.2) and its generalized equations on I as been studied by [11 13, 22, 24, 27, 29, 30, 33]. We say tat (1.2) as te Hyers Ulam stability on I if tere exists a constant K > 0 wit te following property: Let > 0 be a given arbitrary constant. If a differentiable function φ : I R satisfies φ (t) aφ(t) for all t I, ten tere exists a solution x : I R of (1.2) suc tat φ(t) x(t) K for all t I. We call suc K a HUS constant for (1.2) on I. Te following result is obtained by using one of te results presented by Jung [13] et al. Teorem 1.2 (See [13, 22, 24, 29]). Suppose tat a 0. Ten (1.2) as Hyers Ulam stability wit a HUS constant 1/ a on R. Furtermore, te solution x(t) of (1.2) satisfying φ(t) x(t) / a for all t R is te only one (unique), were φ(t) is a differentiable function satisfying φ (t) aφ(t) for all t R. A natural question now arises. Can we find an explicit solution corresponding to te solution x(t) of (1.2) in Teorem 1.2? Onitsuka and Soji [24] gave te answer to tis question. Te obtained result is as follows. Teorem 1.3 (See [24, Teorem 1]). Let > 0 be a given arbitrary constant. Suppose tat a differentiable function φ : I R satisfies φ (t) aφ(t) for all t I, were a 0. Ten one of te following olds: (i) if a > 0 and sup I exists, ten lim φ(t) exists were τ = sup I, and any solution t τ 0 x(t) of (1.2) wit lim φ(t) x(τ) t τ 0 < /a satisfies tat φ(t) x(t) < /a for all t I; (ii) if a > 0 and sup I does not exist, ten lim φ(t)e at exists, and tere exists exactly ( ) one solution x(t) = lim φ(t)e at e at of (1.2) suc tat φ(t) x(t) /a for all t I; (iii) if a < 0 and inf I exists, ten lim φ(t) exists were σ = inf I, and any solution t σ+0 x(t) of (1.2) wit lim φ(t) x(σ) t σ+0 < / a satisfies tat φ(t) x(t) < / a for all t I; (iv) if a < 0 and inf Idoes not exist, ten lim t φ(t)e at exists, and tere exists exactly ( ) one solution x(t) = lim t φ(t)e at e at of (1.2) suc tat φ(t) x(t) / a for all t I.
4 284 Masakazu Onitsuka Using (ii) or (iv) in Teorem 1.3, we can find an explicit solution corresponding to te solution x(t) of (1.2) in Teorem 1.2. We will recall tat (1.1) is an approximation of (1.2). In te case tat = 1, te following teorem is obtained by using a result presented by Brzdęk, Popa and Xu [4]. Teorem 1.4 (See [4, Teorem 3]). Suppose tat a 0, 1, 2 and = 1. Ten (1.1) as Hyers Ulam stability wit a HUS constant 1/ a on Z. Furtermore, te solution x(t) of (1.1) satisfying φ(t) x(t) / a for all t Z is te only one, were φ(t) is a function satisfying 1 φ(t) aφ(t) for all t Z. Comparing Teorem 1.2 wit Teorem 1.4, we see tat if a 0 and a > 1, ten te minimums of HUS constants in Teorems 1.2 and 1.4 are te same. However, if a 2 and a < 1, ten tey are different. Now, important questions arise: (Q1) Wat is te minimum of HUS constants for (1.1) on Z? (Q2) Can we find an explicit solution corresponding to te solution x(t) of (1.1) in Teorem 1.4? (Q3) How does te stepsize influence te minimum of HUS constants for (1.1) on Z? Te purpose of tis paper is to answer te above questions. Te answers to tese questions are derived in Section 4 from te following two teorems. Teorem 1.5. Let > 0 be a given arbitrary constant. Suppose tat a function φ : T R satisfies φ(t) aφ(t) for all t T, were a 0 and a > 1/. Ten one of te following olds: (i) if a > 0 and max T exists, ten any solution x(t) of (1.1) wit φ(τ) x(τ) < /a satisfies tat φ(t) x(t) < /a for all t T, were τ = max T ; (ii) if a > 0 and max T does not exist, ten lim φ(t)(a + 1) t/ exists, and tere exists exactly one solution x(t) = lim φ(t)(a + t 1) (a + 1) t of (1.1) suc tat φ(t) x(t) /a for all t T ; (iii) if 1/ < a < 0 and min T exists, ten any solution x(t) of (1.1) wit φ(σ) x(σ) < / a satisfies tat φ(t) x(t) < / a for all t T, were σ = min T ; (iv) if 1/ < a < 0 and min T does not exist, ten lim φ(t)(a + t 1) t/ exists, and tere exists exactly one solution x(t) = lim t φ(t)(a + 1) t of (1.1) suc tat φ(t) x(t) / a for all t T. (a + 1) t
5 Stepsize and Hyers Ulam Stability 285 Remark 1.6. If te stepsize > 0 is sufficiently small, ten we can coose a so tat 0 < < 1/ a ; tat is, 1/ < a olds in te case tat a is negative. From tis fact, we can conclude tat te assertions (iii) and (iv) in Teorem 1.5 are te results wen te stepsize is sufficiently small. Teorem 1.7. Let > 0 be a given arbitrary constant. Suppose tat a function φ : T R satisfies φ(t) aφ(t) for all t T, were a 2/ and a < 1/. Ten one of te following olds: (i) if 2/ < a < 1/ and min T exists, ten any solution x(t) of (1.1) wit φ(σ) x(σ) < /() satisfies tat φ(t) x(t) < /() for all t T, were σ = min T ; (ii) if 2/ < a < 1/ and min T does not exist, ten exists, and tere exists exactly one solution x(t) = lim t φ(t)(a + 1) t (a + 1) t of (1.1) suc tat φ(t) x(t) /() for all t T ; lim φ(t)(a + 1) t/ t (iii) if a < 2/ and max T exists, ten any solution x(t) of (1.1) wit φ(τ) x(τ) < / satisfies tat φ(t) x(t) < / for all t T, were τ = max T ; (iv) if a < 2/ and max T does not exist, ten lim φ(t)(a + 1) t/ exists, and tere exists exactly one solution x(t) = lim φ(t)(a + t 1) (a + 1) t of (1.1) suc tat φ(t) x(t) / for all t T. Remark 1.8. If te stepsize > 0 is suitably large, ten we can coose a so tat eiter a < 2/ or 2/ < a < 1/. From tis fact, we can conclude tat te assertions in Teorem 1.7 are te results wen te stepsize is suitably large. In te next section, we will consider small stepsize linear difference equations, and present te proof of Teorem 1.5. In Section 3, we will consider large stepsize linear difference equations, and present te proof of Teorem 1.7. Using Teorems 1.5 and 1.7, we will give te answers to questions (Q1) (Q3) in Section 4. In te final section, we will discuss te applications to perturbed linear difference equations corresponding to linear difference equation (1.1). For illustration of te obtained results, we will take some concrete examples.
6 286 Masakazu Onitsuka 2 Small Stepsize Linear Difference Equations In tis section, we consider te case of a 0 and a > 1/. First we give some preparations for te proof of Teorem 1.5. Lemma 2.1. Suppose tat a 0 and a > 1/. Let > 0 be a given arbitrary constant and let φ(t) be a real-valued function on T. Ten te inequality φ(t) aφ(t) olds for all t T if and only if te inequality olds for all t T. ( 0 φ(t) ) (a + 1) t 2(a + 1) t+ a Proof. Te statement of Lemma 2.1 is clearly true since te equality olds for all t T. ( φ(t) ) (a + 1) t a = 1 ( φ(t + ) ) ( (a + 1) φ(t) ) (a + 1) t+ a a = ( φ(t) aφ(t) + )(a + 1) t+ Proposition 2.2. Let > 0 be a given arbitrary constant. Suppose tat a function φ : T R satisfies φ(t) aφ(t) for all t T, were a 0 and a > 1/. Ten tere exist a nondecreasing function u : T R and a nonincreasing function v : T R suc tat and one of te following old: φ(t) = u(t)(a + 1) t + a = v(t)(a + 1) t a (i) if a > 0 and max T exists, ten te inequality olds for all t T, were τ = max T ; (2.1) u(t) u(τ) < v(τ) v(t) (2.2) (ii) if a > 0 and max T does not exist, ten lim u(t) and lim v(t) exist, and olds for all t T ; u(t) lim u(t) = lim v(t) v(t) (2.3)
7 Stepsize and Hyers Ulam Stability 287 (iii) if 1/ < a < 0 and min T exists, ten te inequality olds for all t T, were σ = min T ; v(t) v(σ) < u(σ) u(t) (2.4) (iv) if 1/ < a < 0 and min T does not exist, ten lim u(t) and lim v(t) exist, t t and v(t) lim v(t) = lim u(t) u(t) (2.5) t t olds for all t T. Proof. Suppose tat a 0 and a > 1/. Define te functions u(t) and v(t) as follows: ( u(t) = φ(t) ) ( (a + 1) t and v(t) = φ(t) + ) (a + 1) t a a for t T. Ten (2.1) olds, and terefore, we obtain and u(t) = v(t) 2 a t (a + 1) (2.6) < v(t) if a > 0, u(t) > v(t) if 1 < a < 0 (2.7) for t T. Using te assertion in Lemma 2.1, we ave te inequality 0 u(t) 2(a + 1) t+ for t T. Noticing tat (a + 1) t/ = a(a + 1) (t+)/ and using (2.6) and te above inequality, we get 2(a + 1) t+ v(t) 0 for t T. Terefore, we see tat u(t) is nondecreasing and v(t) is nonincreasing. First we prove assertion (i). From above-mentioned facts and te assumptions in (i), u(τ) and v(τ) become te maximum of u(t) and te minimum of v(t) on T, respectively. Tus, using (2.7), we ave (2.2), and terefore, assertion (i) is true. We next prove assertion (ii). Let s I be a fixed number. From (2.7) wit a > 0, we ave u(t) < v(s) for all t T ; tat is, u(t) is bounded above. Hence, we see tat lim u(t) exists. Using (2.6) and a > 0, we get lim u(t) = lim v(t), and terefore, (2.3) is satisfied for t T since u(t) is nondecreasing and v(t) is nonincreasing. Tus, assertion (ii) is true. Using te same arguments in te proofs of (i) and (ii), we can easily see tat assertions (iii) and (iv) are also true. Te proof is now complete.
8 288 Masakazu Onitsuka Next we will prove Teorem 1.5 by using te idea of te proof of Teorem 1.3 (see [24]). Proof of Teorem 1.5. First we prove case (i). From assertion (i) in Proposition 2.2, we can find two functions u : T R and v : T R suc tat (2.1) and (2.2) old for t T. We now consider te solution x(t) of (1.1) wit φ(τ) x(τ) < /a and a > 0, were τ = max T. Ten, tis solution is expressed as x(t) = x(τ)(a + 1) t τ for t T. Since φ(τ) x(τ) < /a and (2.1) old, we ave u(τ) < x(τ)(a + 1) τ < v(τ). Using (2.1), (2.2) and tis inequality, we get φ(t) x(t) u(τ) x(τ)(a + 1) τ t (a + 1) + a < a and φ(t) x(t) v(τ) x(τ)(a + 1) τ t (a + 1) a > a for t T. Terefore, we obtain te inequality φ(t) x(t) < /a for t T. Next we prove case (ii). From assertion (ii) in Proposition 2.2, we can find two functions u : T R and v : T R suc tat (2.1) and (2.3) old for t T. Since lim u(t) exists and (2.1) olds for t T, te function φ(t)(a + 1) t/ also as te same limiting value lim φ(t)(a + 1) t/ = lim u(t). We consider te function x(t) = lim φ(t)(a + t 1) (a + 1) t (2.8) for t T. Ten, tis function is a solution of (1.1). From (2.1) and (2.3), we ave φ(t) x(t) = u(t) lim φ(t)(a + 1) t (a + 1) t + a a and φ(t) x(t) = v(t) lim φ(t)(a + 1) t (a + 1) t a a (2.9) (2.10) for t T. Hence, we get te inequality φ(t) x(t) /a for t T. Noticing tat if we coose a constant c so tat c lim φ(t)(a + 1) t, ten te function x(t) = c(a + 1) t/ becomes a solution of (1.1), owever, it does not satisfy (2.9) or (2.10) for t sufficiently large. Tus, (2.8) is exactly one solution of (1.1) satisfying φ(t) x(t) /a for t T.
9 Stepsize and Hyers Ulam Stability 289 We will prove case (iii). From assertion (iii) in Proposition 2.2, we can find two functions u : T R and v : T R suc tat (2.1) and (2.4) old for t T. We consider te solution x(t) = x(σ)(a + 1) t σ of (1.1) wit φ(σ) x(σ) < / a and 1/ < a < 0, were σ = min T. Since φ(σ) x(σ) < / a and (2.1) old, we get v(σ) < x(σ)(a + 1) σ < u(σ). Using (2.1), (2.4) and tis inequality, we obtain φ(t) x(t) < / a for t T. Finally we prove case (iv). By means of assertion (iv) in Proposition 2.2, tere exist two functions u(t) and v(t) satisfying (2.1) and (2.5) for t T. Since lim u(t) exists t and (2.1) olds for t T, we ave lim φ(t)(a + t 1) t/ = lim u(t). Consider te t function x(t) = lim φ(t)(a + 1) t (a + 1) t, (2.11) wic becomes a solution of (1.1). From (2.1) and (2.5), we get te inequality φ(t) x(t) / a for t T. Using te same argument as in te proof of case (ii), we can conclude tat (2.11) is exactly one solution of (1.1) satisfying φ(t) x(t) / a for t T. Tis completes te proof of Teorem Large Stepsize Linear Difference Equations In tis section, we consider te case of a 2/ and a < 1/. First we give some preparations for te proof of Teorem 1.7. Lemma 3.1. Suppose tat a 2/ and a < 1/. Let > 0 be a given arbitrary constant and let φ(t) be a real-valued function on T. Ten te inequality φ(t) aφ(t) olds for all t T if and only if te inequality ) 0 ( olds for all t T. φ(t) + ( 1) t (a + 1) t Proof. Since te equality ( ) φ(t) + ( 1) t (a + 1) t ( = φ(t 1 t+ ( 1) + ) + (a + 1) = φ(t) aφ(t) + ( 1) t+ (a + 1) t+ φ(t) + ( 1) t 2 a + 1 t+ ) (a + 1) t+
10 290 Masakazu Onitsuka olds for all t T, te statement of Lemma 3.1 is clearly true. Proposition 3.2. Let > 0 be a given arbitrary constant. Suppose tat a function φ : T R satisfies φ(t) aφ(t) for all t T, were a 2/ and a < 1/. Ten tere exist a nondecreasing function u : T R and a nonincreasing function v : T R suc tat φ(t) = u(t)(a + 1) t ( 1) t t = v(t)(a + 1) t ( 1) + (3.1) and one of te following old: (i) if 2/ < a < 1/ and min T exists, ten te inequality olds for all t T, were σ = min T ; v(t) v(σ) < u(σ) u(t) (3.2) (ii) if 2/ < a < 1/ and min T does not exist, ten lim u(t) and lim v(t) t t exist, and v(t) lim v(t) = lim u(t) u(t) (3.3) t t olds for all t T ; (iii) if a < 2/ and max T exists, ten te inequality olds for all t T, were σ = min T ; u(t) u(τ) < v(τ) v(t) (3.4) (iv) if a < 2/ and max T does not exist, ten lim u(t) and lim v(t) exist, and olds for all t T. Proof. Define te functions u(t) = u(t) lim u(t) = lim v(t) v(t) (3.5) ( φ(t) + ( 1) t ) (a + 1) t and v(t) = ( φ(t) ( 1) t ) (a + 1) t
11 Stepsize and Hyers Ulam Stability 291 for t T, were a 2/ and a < 1/. Ten (3.1) and u(t) = v(t) + 2 t a + 1 (3.6) old for t T. Terefore, we ave > v(t) if 2 u(t) < a < 1, < v(t) if a < 2 (3.7) for t T. From te assertion in Lemma 3.1, we see tat 0 u(t) 2 a + 1 t+ for t T. Moreover, using equalities (3.6) and a + 1 t 1 a + 1 = a + 1 t+ = and te above inequality, we get 2 a + 1 t+ v(t) 0 ( ) 2 + a a + 1 t+, for t T. Terefore, we see tat u(t) is nondecreasing and v(t) is nonincreasing. First we prove assertion (i). Since u(t) is nondecreasing and v(t) is nonincreasing, and using (3.7) wit 2/ < a < 1/, we obtain (3.2) for t T ; tat is, assertion (i) is true. We next prove assertion (ii). Let s I be a fixed number. From (3.7) wit 2/ < a < 1/, we ave u(t) > v(s) for all t T ; tat is, u(t) is bounded below. Since u(t) is a nondecreasing function, we can conclude tat lim t 2/ < a < 1/, we get lim u(t) = lim t t u(t) exists. From (3.6) and v(t), and terefore, (3.3) is satisfied for t T since u(t) is nondecreasing and v(t) is nonincreasing. Tus, assertion (ii) is true. Using te same arguments in te proofs of (i) and (ii), we can easily see tat assertions (iii) and (iv) are also true. Te proof is now complete. We next give te proof of Teorem 1.7. Proof of Teorem 1.7. First we prove case (i). By means of assertion (i) in Proposition 3.2, we can find two functions u : T R and v : T R suc tat (3.1) and (3.2) old for t T. Consider te solution x(t) of (1.1) wit φ(σ) x(σ) < /() and 2/ < a < 1/, were σ = min T. Ten, tis solution is expressed as x(t) = x(σ)(a + 1) t σ
12 292 Masakazu Onitsuka for t T. From te initial condition φ(σ) x(σ) < /(), we ave φ(σ) < x(σ) < φ(σ) + In te case tat σ/ is odd, multiplying (3.8) by (a + 1) σ/, we get ( ) u(σ) = φ(σ) (a + 1) σ > x(σ)(a + 1) σ ( > φ(σ) + ) (a + 1) σ. (3.8) = v(σ). On te oter and, in te case tat σ/ is even, multiplying (3.8) by (a + 1) σ/, we ave ( ) v(σ) = φ(σ) (a + 1) σ Consequently, te inequality < x(σ)(a + 1) σ ( < φ(σ) + ) (a + 1) σ = u(σ). v(σ) < x(σ)(a + 1) σ < u(σ) (3.9) olds. Next, we consider te two cases: (a) t/ is odd; (b) t/ is even. In case (a), using (3.1), (3.2) and (3.9), we get and φ(t) x(t) u(σ) x(σ)(a + 1) σ t (a + 1) + φ(t) x(t) v(σ) x(σ)(a + 1) σ t (a + 1) < > for t T. On te oter and, in case (b), using (3.1), (3.2) and (3.9), we ave φ(t) x(t) u(σ) x(σ)(a + 1) σ t (a + 1) > and φ(t) x(t) v(σ) x(σ)(a + 1) σ t (a + 1) + <
13 Stepsize and Hyers Ulam Stability 293 for t T. Tus, φ(t) x(t) < /a olds for all t T. Terefore, assertion (i) is true. Next we prove case (ii). By means of assertion (ii) in Proposition 3.2, we can find two functions u : T R and v : T R suc tat (3.1) and (3.3) old for t T. Since lim t u(t) exists, (3.1) olds for t T and a + 1 < 0 is satisfied, we see tat lim t φ(t)(a + 1) t = lim t u(t). Ten te function x(t) = lim t φ(t)(a + 1) t (a + 1) t (3.10) is a solution of (1.1). We will consider te two cases: (a) t/ is odd; (b) t/ is even. In case (a), using (3.1), (3.3) and a + 1 < 0, we obtain φ(t) x(t) = u(t) lim φ(t)(a + t t 1) (a + 1) t + (3.11) and φ(t) x(t) = v(t) lim φ(t)(a + t t 1) (a + 1) t (3.12) for t T. On te oter and, in case (b), using (3.1), (3.3) and a + 1 < 0, we get φ(t) x(t) = u(t) lim φ(t)(a + t t 1) (a + 1) t (3.13) and φ(t) x(t) = v(t) lim φ(t)(a + t t 1) (a + 1) t + (3.14) for t T. Consequently, φ(t) x(t) /() olds for all t T. Noticing tat if we coose a constant c so tat c lim φ(t)(a + t t 1), ten te function x(t) = c(a + 1) t/ becomes a solution of (1.1), owever, it does not satisfy (3.11),
14 294 Masakazu Onitsuka (3.12), (3.13) or (3.14) for t sufficiently large. Tus, (3.10) is exactly one solution of (1.1) satisfying φ(t) x(t) /() for t T. Next, we prove case (iii). From assertion (iii) in Proposition 3.2, we can find two functions u : T R and v : T R suc tat (3.1) and (3.4) old for t T. Consider te solution x(t) = x(τ)(a + 1) t τ of (1.1) wit φ(τ) x(τ) < / and a < 2/, were τ = max T. Since φ(τ) x(τ) < / and (3.1) old, we get u(τ) < x(τ)(a + 1) τ < v(τ). Hence, togeter wit (3.1) and (3.4), we obtain φ(t) x(t) < / for t T. Finally we prove case (iv). By means of assertion (iv) in Proposition 3.2, tere exist two functions u(t) and v(t) satisfying (3.1) and (3.5) for t T. Since lim u(t) exists, (3.1) olds for t T and a + 1 < 0 is satisfied, we get lim φ(t)(a + 1) t/ = lim u(t). Consider te function x(t) = lim φ(t)(a + t 1) (a + 1) t, (3.15) wic becomes a solution of (1.1). From (3.1) and (3.5), we see tat φ(t) x(t) / a+2/ olds for t T. Using te same argument as in te proof of case (ii), we can conclude tat (3.15) is exactly one solution of (1.1) satisfying φ(t) x(t) / a+2/ for t T. Tis completes te proof of Teorem Influence of te Stepsize on Hyers Ulam Stability In tis section, we will present te answers to questions (Q1) (Q3), respectively. From Teorems 1.5 and 1.7, we can establis te following simple results. Corollary 4.1. If a 0 and a > 1/, ten (1.1) as Hyers Ulam stability wit a HUS constant 1/ a on T. Corollary 4.2. If a 2/ and a < 1/, ten (1.1) as Hyers Ulam stability wit a HUS constant 1/ on T. In te case tat I = R, we can state te following result from te assertions (ii) and (iv) in Teorem 1.5. Corollary 4.3. Suppose tat a 0 and a > 1/. Ten (1.1) as Hyers Ulam stability wit a HUS constant 1/ a on Z. Furtermore, te solution x(t) of (1.1) satisfying φ(t) x(t) / a for all t Z is te only one, wic written as x(t) = lim φ(t)(a + 1) t (a + 1) t
15 Stepsize and Hyers Ulam Stability 295 if a > 0 (resp., x(t) = lim φ(t)(a + 1) t/ (a + 1) t/ if 1/ < a < 0). t Remark 4.4. Let > 0 be a given arbitrary constant. We consider te nonomogeneous difference equation x(t) ax(t) = (4.1) on Z, were a is a non-zero real number. We can easily see tat te function φ(t) = c(a + 1) t/ /a for t Z is te general solution of (4.1), were c is an arbitrary constant. Since c(a + 1) t/ is a solution of (1.1), φ(t) x(t) = / a olds for all t Z. From tis fact and te assertion in Corollary 4.3, we can conclude tat 1/ a is te minimum of HUS constants for (1.1) on Z wen a 0 and a > 1/. Moreover, tis example sows tat it is not possible to weaken te condition φ(τ) x(τ) < /a in (i) of Teorem 1.5 to φ(τ) x(τ) /a, wenever φ(t) x(t) < /a olds for t T. In te case I = R, we can establis te following result from te assertions (ii) and (iv) in Teorem 1.7. Corollary 4.5. Suppose tat a 2/ and a < 1/. Ten (1.1) as Hyers Ulam stability wit a HUS constant 1/ on Z. Furtermore, te solution x(t) of (1.1) satisfying φ(t) x(t) / for all t Z is te only one, wic written as x(t) = if 2/ < a < 1/ (resp., x(t) = lim t φ(t)(a + 1) t (a + 1) t lim φ(t)(a + 1) t/ (a + 1) t/ if a < 2/). Remark 4.6. Let > 0 be a given arbitrary constant. Consider te nonomogeneous difference equation x(t) ax(t) = ( 1) t (4.2) on Z, were a 2/. Ten te function φ(t) = c(a + 1) t ( 1) t + for t Z becomes te general solution of (4.2), were c is an arbitrary constant. Since c(a + 1) t/ is a solution of (1.1), we obtain φ(t) x(t) = / for all t Z. From tis fact and te assertion in Corollary 4.5, we can conclude tat 1/ a+2/ is te minimum of HUS constants for (1.1) on Z. Moreover, tis example implies tat it is not possible to weaken te condition φ(σ) x(σ) < /() in (i) of Teorem 1.7 to φ(σ) x(σ) /(), wenever φ(t) x(t) < /() olds for t T. Let H() = 1 a + 1/ 1/ (4.3)
16 296 Masakazu Onitsuka for > 0, were a 0, 1/, 2/. From Corollaries 4.3, 4.5, Remarks 4.4 and 4.6, we see tat te minimum of HUS constants for (1.1) on Z is H(). Tis is te answer to our question (Q1) raised in Section 1. Moreover, Corollaries 4.3 and 4.5 imply te answer to question (Q2). Namely, we can find an explicit solution corresponding to te solution x(t) of (1.1) in Teorem 1.4. Te following remark is an answer to final question (Q3). Remark 4.7. In te case tat is a small stepsize or a is positive, Corollary 4.3 and Remark 4.4 mean tat te minimum of HUS constants is te same as tat of ordinary differential equation (1.2). On te oter and, in te case tat is a large stepsize, Corollary 4.5 and Remark 4.6 mean tat te minimum of HUS constants is different from tat of ordinary differential equation (1.2). Te following remark is also an answer to question (Q3). Remark 4.8. Wen restricted to te case a < 0, we can rewrite H() as 1 if 0 < < 1 H() = a a, 1 if 1 a < and 2 a for > 0. In Figure 4.1, we give te grap of H() wic depends on te stepsize. H 1 a - 1 a - 2 a Figure 4.1: Te grap of H() wen a < 0. Next we consider te case tat I is a finite interval. Using te assertions in Teorems 1.5 and 1.7, we can verify te following facts. Corollary 4.9. Suppose tat a 0 and a > 1/. Let I be a finite nonempty open interval of R and > 0 be a given arbitrary constant. If a function φ : T R satisfies φ(t) aφ(t) for all t T, ten tere exists a solution x : T R of (1.1) suc tat φ(t) x(t) < / a for all t T. Corollary Suppose tat a 2/ and a < 1/. Let I be a finite nonempty open interval of R and > 0 be a given arbitrary constant. If a function φ : T R satisfies φ(t) aφ(t) for all t T, ten tere exists a solution x : T R of (1.1) suc tat φ(t) x(t) < / for all t T.
17 Stepsize and Hyers Ulam Stability Applications: Perturbed Linear Difference Equations In tis section, we give some applications to illustrate te main results. We consider te first-order perturbed linear difference equation x(t) ax(t) = f(t, x(t)), (5.1) wic corresponding to unperturbed linear difference equation (1.1), were f(t, x) is te real-valued function on T R. Under te assumption tat max T does not exist and f(t, x) is bounded on T R, we see tat 0 < a+1 < 1 implies te uniform-ultimate boundedness; tat is, tere exists a B > 0 and, for any α > 0, tere exists an S(α) > 0 suc tat t 0 T and φ 0 < α imply tat φ(t) < B for all t t 0 + S(α) and t T, were φ(t) is a solution of (5.1) satisfying φ(t 0 ) = φ 0 and (t 0, φ 0 ) T R. If tis property olds, ten we say tat te solutions of (5.1) are uniform-ultimately bounded for bound B (see [20, 21, 34, 35]). Using Teorems 1.5 and 1.7, we can establis te following result. Corollary 5.1. Let δ > 0 be an arbitrary constant. Suppose tat max T does not exist, and tere exists an L > 0 suc tat f(t, x) L for all (t, x) T R. If 0 < a + 1 < 1, ten te solutions of (5.1) are uniform-ultimately bounded for bound LH() + δ, were H() is te minimum of HUS constants for (1.1) on Z wic given by (4.3). Proof. Let B = LH() + δ. We consider te solution φ(t) of (5.1) wit φ(t 0 ) = φ 0 and φ 0 < α, were (t 0, φ 0 ) T R and α is any positive constant. Using (iii) in Teorem 1.5 and (i) in Teorem 1.7, tere exists a solution x(t) of (1.1) wit φ 0 x(t 0 ) < LH() suc tat φ(t) x(t) < LH() for t t 0 and t T. Since x(t) = x(t 0 )(a + 1) (t t 0)/ for t T, we ave x(t) < (LH() + φ 0 ) a + 1 t t 0 < (LH() + α) a + 1 t t 0 (5.2) for t t 0. If LH() + α δ, ten φ(t) < LH() + x(t) < LH() + δ = B olds for t t 0. Next, we ave only to consider tat te case of LH() + α > δ. Let S(α) = log(δ/(lh() + α)) log a + 1 From LH() + α > δ and 0 < a + 1 < 1, we see tat > 0. (LH() + α) a + 1 t t 0 δ olds for all t t 0 + S(α). Hence, combining tis wit (5.2), we get x(t) < δ for all t t 0 + S(α). Since φ(t) x(t) < LH() olds for t T, we obtain φ(t) < B for all t t 0 + S(α). Tis completes te proof of Corollary 5.1.
18 298 Masakazu Onitsuka Remark 5.2. Let I = (0, ). Wen = 5, a = 1/3 and = 1, (4.2) is reduced to te nonomogeneous linear difference equation 5 x(t) x(t) = ( 1) t 5 (5.3) on T = 5Z (0, ). Since a + 1 = 2/3 and f(t, x) = ( 1) t/5 = 1 for all (t, x) T R, all assumptions in Corollary 5.1 are satisfied. Terefore, te solutions of (5.3) are uniform-ultimately bounded for bound Since LH() + δ = φ(t) = 15( 1) t 5 5 L + δ = 15 + δ. 3 ( ) t is a solution of (5.3) wit φ(5) = 45, it is easy to ceck tat φ(t) < 15 = LH() on 10Z (0, ). Tis means tat δ > 0 in Corollary 5.1 cannot be removed. Let δ = 3. Figure 5.1 indicates a solution of (5.3). Te starting point is (5, 45) T R. Moreover, broken lines are φ = LH() δ = 18 and φ = LH() + δ = 18, and dotted lines are φ = LH() = 15 and φ = LH() = 15, respectively ϕ t Figure 5.1: A solution of (5.3). Furtermore, we can clarify te asymptotic beavior of any solution of (5.1) by using Teorems 1.5 and 1.7. Corollary 5.3. Suppose tat a 0, 1/, 2/. Suppose also tat max T does not exist, and tere exists an L > 0 suc tat f(t, x) L for all (t, x) T R. Ten any solution φ(t) of (5.1) satisfies one of te following: (i) if a > 0 or a < 2/ ten lim φ(t)(a + 1) t/ exists;
19 Stepsize and Hyers Ulam Stability 299 (ii) if 0 < a + 1 < 1 ten lim sup φ(t) LH(), were H() is te minimum of HUS constants for (1.1) on Z wic given by (4.3). Proof. Assertion (i) is an immediate consequence from (ii) in Teorem 1.5 and (iv) in Teorem 1.7. Te proof of assertion (ii) is by contradiction. Suppose tat tere exists a solution φ(t) of (5.1) satisfying lim sup φ(t) > LH() and φ(t 0 ) = φ 0, were (t 0, φ 0 ) T R. Using (iii) in Teorem 1.5 and (i) in Teorem 1.7, tere exists a solution x(t) of (1.1) wit φ(t 0 ) x(t 0 ) < LH() suc tat φ(t) x(t) < LH() for t t 0 and t T. Since 0 < a + 1 < 1 and x(t) = x(t 0 )(a + 1) (t t0)/, we obtain lim sup φ(t) = lim sup φ(t) x(t) LH(). Tis is a contradiction. Te proof is now complete. To illustrate Corollary 5.3, we give a concrete example. Example 5.4. We consider te nonlinear difference equation x(t) + 1 x(t) = sin(t + x(t)) (5.4) 3 on T = Z (0, ), were 3, 6. By I = (0, ), te maximum of T does not exist. Moreover, since sin(t + x(t)) 1 for all (t, x) T R, we coose L = 1. Using Corollary 5.3, we see tat any solution φ(t) of (5.4) satisfies eiter of te following: lim φ(t)(1 /3) t/ exists if > 6; lim sup φ(t) 3/(6/ 1) if 0 < < 6. In Figure 5.2, we draw a solution of (5.4) wit = 8 starting from te point (8, 45) T R. Tis solution diverges, and oscillates infinitely. In Figure 5.3, we draw a solution of (5.4) wit = 5 starting from te point (5, 45) T R. Since 3/(6/ 1) = 15 wen = 5, any solution φ(t) of (5.4) wit = 5 satisfies lim sup φ(t) 15. Acknowledgements I would like to tank te referee for reading te paper. References [1] R. P. Agarwal, B. Xu and W. Zang, Stability of functional equations in single variable, J. Mat. Anal. Appl. 288 (2003), no. 2, [2] C. Alsina, R. Ger, On some inequalities and stability results related to te exponential function, J. Inequal. Appl. 2 (1998), no. 4,
20 300 Masakazu Onitsuka 2000 ϕ ϕ t t Figure 5.2: A solution of (5.4) wit = 8. Figure 5.3: A solution of (5.4) wit = 5. [3] D. Barbu, C. Buşe and A. Tabassum, Hyers Ulam stability and exponential dicotomy of linear differential periodic systems are equivalent, Electron. J. Qual. Teory Differ. Equ (2015), Paper no. 58, 12 pp. [4] J. Brzdęk, D. Popa and B. Xu, Remarks on stability of linear recurrence of iger order, Appl. Mat. Lett. 23 (2010), no. 12, [5] J. Brzdęk, K. Ciepliński and Z. Leśniak, On Ulam s type stability of te linear equation and related issues, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2014, Art. ID , 14 pp. [6] G. Coi and S.-M. Jung, Invariance of Hyers Ulam stability of linear differential equations and its applications, Adv. Difference Equ (2015), 2015:277, 14 pp. [7] S. Elaydi, An introduction to difference equations, Tird edition, Undergraduate Texts in Matematics, Springer, New York, [8] M. B. Gaemi, M. E. Gordji, E. Madjid, B. Alizade and C. Park, Hyers Ulam stability of exact second-order linear differential equations, Adv. Difference Equ (2012), 2012:36, 7 pp. [9] D. H. Hyers, On te stability of te linear functional equation, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 27 (1941), [10] D. H. Hyers, G. Isac and T. M. Rassias, Stability of functional equations in several variables, (Englis summary) Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and teir Applications, 34, Birkäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, [11] S.-M. Jung, Hyers Ulam stability of linear differential equations of first order, Appl. Mat. Lett. 17 (2004), no. 10,
21 Stepsize and Hyers Ulam Stability 301 [12] S.-M. Jung, Hyers Ulam stability of linear differential equations of first order. III, J. Mat. Anal. Appl. 311 (2005), no. 1, [13] S.-M. Jung, Hyers Ulam stability of linear differential equations of first order. II, Appl. Mat. Lett. 19 (2006), no. 9, [14] S.-M. Jung, Hyers Ulam stability of a system of first order linear differential equations wit constant coefficients, J. Mat. Anal. Appl. 320 (2006), no. 2, [15] S.-M. Jung, Hyers Ulam Rassias stability of functional equations in nonlinear analysis, Springer Optimization and Its Applications, 48. Springer, New York, [16] S.-M. Jung, Hyers Ulam stability of te first-order matrix difference equations, Adv. Difference Equ (2015), 2015:170, 13 pp. [17] Y. Li, Hyers Ulam stability of linear differential equations y = λ 2 y, Tai J. Mat. 8 (2010), no. 2, [18] Y. Li and Y. Sen, Hyers Ulam stability of linear differential equations of second order, Appl. Mat. Lett. 23 (2010), no. 3, [19] Y. Manar, E. Elqoraci and T. M. Rassias, On te generalized Hyers Ulam stability of te Pexider equation on restricted domains, Handbook of functional equations, , Springer Optim. Appl., 96, Springer, New York, [20] A. N. Micel, L. Hou and D. Liu, Stability of dynamical systems: Continuous, discontinuous, and discrete systems, Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications, Birkäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, [21] A. N. Micel, L. Hou and D. Liu, Stability of dynamical systems: On te role of monotonic and non-monotonic Lyapunov functions, Second edition, Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications, Birkäuser/Springer, Cam, [22] T. Miura, S. Miyajima and S.-E. Takaasi, A caracterization of Hyers Ulam stability of first order linear differential operators, J. Mat. Anal. Appl. 286 (2003), no. 1, [23] M. S. Mosleian and D. Popa, On te stability of te first-order linear recurrence in topological vector spaces, Nonlinear Anal. 73 (2010), no. 9, [24] M. Onitsuka and T. Soji, Hyers Ulam stability of first-order omogeneous linear differential equations wit a real-valued coefficient, Appl. Mat. Lett. 63 (2017), [25] D. Popa, Hyers Ulam stability of te linear recurrence wit constant coefficients, Adv. Difference Equ (2005), no. 2,
22 302 Masakazu Onitsuka [26] D. Popa, Hyers Ulam Rassias stability of a linear recurrence, J. Mat. Anal. Appl. 309 (2005), no. 2, [27] D. Popa and I. Raşa, On te Hyers Ulam stability of te linear differential equation, J. Mat. Anal. Appl. 381 (2011), no. 2, [28] D. Popa and I. Raşa, Hyers Ulam stability of te linear differential operator wit nonconstant coefficients, Appl. Mat. Comput. 219 (2012), no. 4, [29] S.-E. Takaasi, T. Miura and S. Miyajima, On te Hyers Ulam stability of te Banac space-valued differential equation y = λy, Bull. Korean Mat. Soc. 39 (2002), no. 2, [30] S.-E. Takaasi, H. Takagi, T. Miura and S. Miyajima, Te Hyers Ulam stability constants of first order linear differential operators, J. Mat. Anal. Appl. 296 (2004), no. 2, [31] S. M. Ulam, A collection of matematical problems, Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Matematics, no. 8 Interscience Publisers, New York-London, [32] S. M. Ulam, Problems in modern matematics, Science Editions Jon Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York [33] G. Wang, M. Zou and L. Sun, Hyers Ulam stability of linear differential equations of first order, Appl. Mat. Lett. 21 (2008), no. 10, [34] T. Yosizawa, Stability teory by Liapunov s second metod, Te Matematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, [35] T. Yosizawa, Stability teory and te existence of periodic solutions and almost periodic solutions, Applied Matematical Sciences 14, Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, 1975.
OSCILLATION OF SOLUTIONS TO NON-LINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS WITH SEVERAL ADVANCED ARGUMENTS. Sandra Pinelas and Julio G. Dix
Opuscula Mat. 37, no. 6 (2017), 887 898 ttp://dx.doi.org/10.7494/opmat.2017.37.6.887 Opuscula Matematica OSCILLATION OF SOLUTIONS TO NON-LINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS WITH SEVERAL ADVANCED ARGUMENTS Sandra
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.dg] 4 Feb 2015
CENTROID OF TRIANGLES ASSOCIATED WITH A CURVE arxiv:1502.01205v1 [mat.dg] 4 Feb 2015 Dong-Soo Kim and Dong Seo Kim Abstract. Arcimedes sowed tat te area between a parabola and any cord AB on te parabola
More informationch (for some fixed positive number c) reaching c
GSTF Journal of Matematics Statistics and Operations Researc (JMSOR) Vol. No. September 05 DOI 0.60/s4086-05-000-z Nonlinear Piecewise-defined Difference Equations wit Reciprocal and Cubic Terms Ramadan
More informationMath 161 (33) - Final exam
Name: Id #: Mat 161 (33) - Final exam Fall Quarter 2015 Wednesday December 9, 2015-10:30am to 12:30am Instructions: Prob. Points Score possible 1 25 2 25 3 25 4 25 TOTAL 75 (BEST 3) Read eac problem carefully.
More informationA SHORT INTRODUCTION TO BANACH LATTICES AND
CHAPTER A SHORT INTRODUCTION TO BANACH LATTICES AND POSITIVE OPERATORS In tis capter we give a brief introduction to Banac lattices and positive operators. Most results of tis capter can be found, e.g.,
More informationETNA Kent State University
Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis. Volume 34, pp. 14-19, 2008. Copyrigt 2008,. ISSN 1068-9613. ETNA A NOTE ON NUMERICALLY CONSISTENT INITIAL VALUES FOR HIGH INDEX DIFFERENTIAL-ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS
More informationParameter Fitted Scheme for Singularly Perturbed Delay Differential Equations
International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 2013. 11, 4: 361-373 Parameter Fitted Sceme for Singularly Perturbed Delay Differential Equations Awoke Andargiea* and Y. N. Reddyb a b Department
More informationON THE GLOBAL STABILITY OF AN SIRS EPIDEMIC MODEL WITH DISTRIBUTED DELAYS. Yukihiko Nakata. Yoichi Enatsu. Yoshiaki Muroya
Manuscript submitted to AIMS Journals Volume X, Number X, XX 2X Website: ttp://aimsciences.org pp. X XX ON THE GLOBAL STABILITY OF AN SIRS EPIDEMIC MODEL WITH DISTRIBUTED DELAYS Yukiiko Nakata Basque Center
More informationVolume 29, Issue 3. Existence of competitive equilibrium in economies with multi-member households
Volume 29, Issue 3 Existence of competitive equilibrium in economies wit multi-member ouseolds Noriisa Sato Graduate Scool of Economics, Waseda University Abstract Tis paper focuses on te existence of
More informationConvexity and Smoothness
Capter 4 Convexity and Smootness 4.1 Strict Convexity, Smootness, and Gateaux Differentiablity Definition 4.1.1. Let X be a Banac space wit a norm denoted by. A map f : X \{0} X \{0}, f f x is called a
More informationGlobal Existence of Classical Solutions for a Class Nonlinear Parabolic Equations
Global Journal of Science Frontier Researc Matematics and Decision Sciences Volume 12 Issue 8 Version 1.0 Type : Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Researc Journal Publiser: Global Journals Inc.
More informationUniversity Mathematics 2
University Matematics 2 1 Differentiability In tis section, we discuss te differentiability of functions. Definition 1.1 Differentiable function). Let f) be a function. We say tat f is differentiable at
More informationSubdifferentials of convex functions
Subdifferentials of convex functions Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Matematics, University of Toronto April 21, 2014 Wenever we speak about a vector space in tis note we mean a vector
More informationDIFFERENTIAL POLYNOMIALS GENERATED BY SECOND ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Journal o Applied Analysis Vol. 14, No. 2 2008, pp. 259 271 DIFFERENTIAL POLYNOMIALS GENERATED BY SECOND ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS B. BELAÏDI and A. EL FARISSI Received December 5, 2007 and,
More informationSome Review Problems for First Midterm Mathematics 1300, Calculus 1
Some Review Problems for First Midterm Matematics 00, Calculus. Consider te trigonometric function f(t) wose grap is sown below. Write down a possible formula for f(t). Tis function appears to be an odd,
More informationPoisson Equation in Sobolev Spaces
Poisson Equation in Sobolev Spaces OcMountain Dayligt Time. 6, 011 Today we discuss te Poisson equation in Sobolev spaces. It s existence, uniqueness, and regularity. Weak Solution. u = f in, u = g on
More informationLIMITS AND DERIVATIVES CONDITIONS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF A LIMIT
LIMITS AND DERIVATIVES Te limit of a function is defined as te value of y tat te curve approaces, as x approaces a particular value. Te limit of f (x) as x approaces a is written as f (x) approaces, as
More information1. Consider the trigonometric function f(t) whose graph is shown below. Write down a possible formula for f(t).
. Consider te trigonometric function f(t) wose grap is sown below. Write down a possible formula for f(t). Tis function appears to be an odd, periodic function tat as been sifted upwards, so we will use
More informationHYERS-ULAM STABILITY FOR SECOND-ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 011 (011), No. 80, pp. 1 5. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu HYERS-ULAM STABILITY
More informationHyers Ulam stability of first-order linear dynamic equations on time scales
Hyers Ulam stability of first-order linear dynamic equations on time scales Douglas R. Anderson Concordia College, Moorhead, Minnesota USA April 21, 2018, MAA-NCS@Mankato Introduction In 1940, Stan Ulam
More informationMAT244 - Ordinary Di erential Equations - Summer 2016 Assignment 2 Due: July 20, 2016
MAT244 - Ordinary Di erential Equations - Summer 206 Assignment 2 Due: July 20, 206 Full Name: Student #: Last First Indicate wic Tutorial Section you attend by filling in te appropriate circle: Tut 0
More informationA method for solving first order fuzzy differential equation
Available online at ttp://ijim.srbiau.ac.ir/ Int. J. Industrial Matematics (ISSN 2008-5621) Vol. 5, No. 3, 2013 Article ID IJIM-00250, 7 pages Researc Article A metod for solving first order fuzzy differential
More informationSmoothness of solutions with respect to multi-strip integral boundary conditions for nth order ordinary differential equations
396 Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, 2014, Vol. 19, No. 3, 396 412 ttp://dx.doi.org/10.15388/na.2014.3.6 Smootness of solutions wit respect to multi-strip integral boundary conditions for nt
More informationContinuity and Differentiability of the Trigonometric Functions
[Te basis for te following work will be te definition of te trigonometric functions as ratios of te sides of a triangle inscribed in a circle; in particular, te sine of an angle will be defined to be te
More informationSome Results on the Growth Analysis of Entire Functions Using their Maximum Terms and Relative L -orders
Journal of Matematical Extension Vol. 10, No. 2, (2016), 59-73 ISSN: 1735-8299 URL: ttp://www.ijmex.com Some Results on te Growt Analysis of Entire Functions Using teir Maximum Terms and Relative L -orders
More informationSolutions to the Multivariable Calculus and Linear Algebra problems on the Comprehensive Examination of January 31, 2014
Solutions to te Multivariable Calculus and Linear Algebra problems on te Compreensive Examination of January 3, 24 Tere are 9 problems ( points eac, totaling 9 points) on tis portion of te examination.
More informationContinuity and Differentiability Worksheet
Continuity and Differentiability Workseet (Be sure tat you can also do te grapical eercises from te tet- Tese were not included below! Typical problems are like problems -3, p. 6; -3, p. 7; 33-34, p. 7;
More informationULAM-HYERS-RASSIAS STABILITY OF SEMILINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH IMPULSES
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 213 (213), No. 172, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 172-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu ULAM-HYERS-RASSIAS
More informationSection 3.1: Derivatives of Polynomials and Exponential Functions
Section 3.1: Derivatives of Polynomials and Exponential Functions In previous sections we developed te concept of te derivative and derivative function. Te only issue wit our definition owever is tat it
More informationDifferentiation in higher dimensions
Capter 2 Differentiation in iger dimensions 2.1 Te Total Derivative Recall tat if f : R R is a 1-variable function, and a R, we say tat f is differentiable at x = a if and only if te ratio f(a+) f(a) tends
More informationReflection Symmetries of q-bernoulli Polynomials
Journal of Nonlinear Matematical Pysics Volume 1, Supplement 1 005, 41 4 Birtday Issue Reflection Symmetries of q-bernoulli Polynomials Boris A KUPERSHMIDT Te University of Tennessee Space Institute Tullaoma,
More informationResearch Article New Results on Multiple Solutions for Nth-Order Fuzzy Differential Equations under Generalized Differentiability
Hindawi Publising Corporation Boundary Value Problems Volume 009, Article ID 395714, 13 pages doi:10.1155/009/395714 Researc Article New Results on Multiple Solutions for Nt-Order Fuzzy Differential Equations
More informationCharacterization of reducible hexagons and fast decomposition of elementary benzenoid graphs
Discrete Applied Matematics 156 (2008) 1711 1724 www.elsevier.com/locate/dam Caracterization of reducible exagons and fast decomposition of elementary benzenoid graps Andrej Taranenko, Aleksander Vesel
More informationFunction Composition and Chain Rules
Function Composition and s James K. Peterson Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Matematical Sciences Clemson University Marc 8, 2017 Outline 1 Function Composition and Continuity 2 Function
More informationApproximation of the Viability Kernel
Approximation of te Viability Kernel Patrick Saint-Pierre CEREMADE, Université Paris-Daupine Place du Marécal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris cedex 16 26 october 1990 Abstract We study recursive inclusions
More informationNUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION. James T. Smith San Francisco State University. In calculus classes, you compute derivatives algebraically: for example,
NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION James T Smit San Francisco State University In calculus classes, you compute derivatives algebraically: for example, f( x) = x + x f ( x) = x x Tis tecnique requires your knowing
More informationAMS 147 Computational Methods and Applications Lecture 09 Copyright by Hongyun Wang, UCSC. Exact value. Effect of round-off error.
Lecture 09 Copyrigt by Hongyun Wang, UCSC Recap: Te total error in numerical differentiation fl( f ( x + fl( f ( x E T ( = f ( x Numerical result from a computer Exact value = e + f x+ Discretization error
More information1 The concept of limits (p.217 p.229, p.242 p.249, p.255 p.256) 1.1 Limits Consider the function determined by the formula 3. x since at this point
MA00 Capter 6 Calculus and Basic Linear Algebra I Limits, Continuity and Differentiability Te concept of its (p.7 p.9, p.4 p.49, p.55 p.56). Limits Consider te function determined by te formula f Note
More informationQuasiperiodic phenomena in the Van der Pol - Mathieu equation
Quasiperiodic penomena in te Van der Pol - Matieu equation F. Veerman and F. Verulst Department of Matematics, Utrect University P.O. Box 80.010, 3508 TA Utrect Te Neterlands April 8, 009 Abstract Te Van
More informationREGULARITY OF SOLUTIONS OF PARTIAL NEUTRAL FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUNDED DELAY
Proyecciones Vol. 21, N o 1, pp. 65-95, May 22. Universidad Católica del Norte Antofagasta - Cile REGULARITY OF SOLUTIONS OF PARTIAL NEUTRAL FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUNDED DELAY EDUARDO
More informationExam 1 Review Solutions
Exam Review Solutions Please also review te old quizzes, and be sure tat you understand te omework problems. General notes: () Always give an algebraic reason for your answer (graps are not sufficient),
More informationDIGRAPHS FROM POWERS MODULO p
DIGRAPHS FROM POWERS MODULO p Caroline Luceta Box 111 GCC, 100 Campus Drive, Grove City PA 1617 USA Eli Miller PO Box 410, Sumneytown, PA 18084 USA Clifford Reiter Department of Matematics, Lafayette College,
More information4. The slope of the line 2x 7y = 8 is (a) 2/7 (b) 7/2 (c) 2 (d) 2/7 (e) None of these.
Mat 11. Test Form N Fall 016 Name. Instructions. Te first eleven problems are wort points eac. Te last six problems are wort 5 points eac. For te last six problems, you must use relevant metods of algebra
More information4.2 - Richardson Extrapolation
. - Ricardson Extrapolation. Small-O Notation: Recall tat te big-o notation used to define te rate of convergence in Section.: Definition Let x n n converge to a number x. Suppose tat n n is a sequence
More informationOn convexity of polynomial paths and generalized majorizations
On convexity of polynomial pats and generalized majorizations Marija Dodig Centro de Estruturas Lineares e Combinatórias, CELC, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto 2, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal
More informationExistence of Ulam Stability for Iterative Fractional Differential Equations Based on Fractional Entropy
Entropy 215, 17, 3172-3181; doi:1.339/e1753172 OPEN ACCESS entropy ISSN 199-43 www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy Article Existence of Ulam Stability for Iterative Fractional Differential Equations Based on
More informationPhysically Based Modeling: Principles and Practice Implicit Methods for Differential Equations
Pysically Based Modeling: Principles and Practice Implicit Metods for Differential Equations David Baraff Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University Please note: Tis document is 997 by David Baraff
More informationHow to Find the Derivative of a Function: Calculus 1
Introduction How to Find te Derivative of a Function: Calculus 1 Calculus is not an easy matematics course Te fact tat you ave enrolled in suc a difficult subject indicates tat you are interested in te
More informationBlanca Bujanda, Juan Carlos Jorge NEW EFFICIENT TIME INTEGRATORS FOR NON-LINEAR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS
Opuscula Matematica Vol. 26 No. 3 26 Blanca Bujanda, Juan Carlos Jorge NEW EFFICIENT TIME INTEGRATORS FOR NON-LINEAR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS Abstract. In tis work a new numerical metod is constructed for time-integrating
More informationContinuity. Example 1
Continuity MATH 1003 Calculus and Linear Algebra (Lecture 13.5) Maoseng Xiong Department of Matematics, HKUST A function f : (a, b) R is continuous at a point c (a, b) if 1. x c f (x) exists, 2. f (c)
More informationStrongly continuous semigroups
Capter 2 Strongly continuous semigroups Te main application of te teory developed in tis capter is related to PDE systems. Tese systems can provide te strong continuity properties only. 2.1 Closed operators
More information232 Calculus and Structures
3 Calculus and Structures CHAPTER 17 JUSTIFICATION OF THE AREA AND SLOPE METHODS FOR EVALUATING BEAMS Calculus and Structures 33 Copyrigt Capter 17 JUSTIFICATION OF THE AREA AND SLOPE METHODS 17.1 THE
More informationGELFAND S PROOF OF WIENER S THEOREM
GELFAND S PROOF OF WIENER S THEOREM S. H. KULKARNI 1. Introduction Te following teorem was proved by te famous matematician Norbert Wiener. Wiener s proof can be found in is book [5]. Teorem 1.1. (Wiener
More informationThe Zeckendorf representation and the Golden Sequence
University of Wollongong Researc Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences - Papers: Part A Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 1991 Te Zeckendorf representation and te Golden
More informationMath 1210 Midterm 1 January 31st, 2014
Mat 110 Midterm 1 January 1st, 01 Tis exam consists of sections, A and B. Section A is conceptual, wereas section B is more computational. Te value of every question is indicated at te beginning of it.
More informationMore on generalized inverses of partitioned matrices with Banachiewicz-Schur forms
More on generalized inverses of partitioned matrices wit anaciewicz-scur forms Yongge Tian a,, Yosio Takane b a Cina Economics and Management cademy, Central University of Finance and Economics, eijing,
More informationConvexity and Smoothness
Capter 4 Convexity and Smootness 4. Strict Convexity, Smootness, and Gateaux Di erentiablity Definition 4... Let X be a Banac space wit a norm denoted by k k. A map f : X \{0}!X \{0}, f 7! f x is called
More informationLecture XVII. Abstract We introduce the concept of directional derivative of a scalar function and discuss its relation with the gradient operator.
Lecture XVII Abstract We introduce te concept of directional derivative of a scalar function and discuss its relation wit te gradient operator. Directional derivative and gradient Te directional derivative
More informationA VARIATIONAL METHOD FOR CLASS OF PARABOLIC PDES
A VARIATIONAL METHOD FOR CLASS OF PARABOLIC PDES ALESSIO FIGALLI, WILFRID GANGBO, AND TURKAY YOLCU Abstract. In tis manuscript we extend De Giorgi s interpolation metod to a class of parabolic equations
More informationClick here to see an animation of the derivative
Differentiation Massoud Malek Derivative Te concept of derivative is at te core of Calculus; It is a very powerful tool for understanding te beavior of matematical functions. It allows us to optimize functions,
More information1 2 x Solution. The function f x is only defined when x 0, so we will assume that x 0 for the remainder of the solution. f x. f x h f x.
Problem. Let f x x. Using te definition of te derivative prove tat f x x Solution. Te function f x is only defined wen x 0, so we will assume tat x 0 for te remainder of te solution. By te definition of
More informationCombining functions: algebraic methods
Combining functions: algebraic metods Functions can be added, subtracted, multiplied, divided, and raised to a power, just like numbers or algebra expressions. If f(x) = x 2 and g(x) = x + 2, clearly f(x)
More informationThe Derivative as a Function
Section 2.2 Te Derivative as a Function 200 Kiryl Tsiscanka Te Derivative as a Function DEFINITION: Te derivative of a function f at a number a, denoted by f (a), is if tis limit exists. f (a) f(a + )
More informationSECTION 3.2: DERIVATIVE FUNCTIONS and DIFFERENTIABILITY
(Section 3.2: Derivative Functions and Differentiability) 3.2.1 SECTION 3.2: DERIVATIVE FUNCTIONS and DIFFERENTIABILITY LEARNING OBJECTIVES Know, understand, and apply te Limit Definition of te Derivative
More information2.8 The Derivative as a Function
.8 Te Derivative as a Function Typically, we can find te derivative of a function f at many points of its domain: Definition. Suppose tat f is a function wic is differentiable at every point of an open
More informationSemigroups of Operators
Lecture 11 Semigroups of Operators In tis Lecture we gater a few notions on one-parameter semigroups of linear operators, confining to te essential tools tat are needed in te sequel. As usual, X is a real
More informationPOLYNOMIAL AND SPLINE ESTIMATORS OF THE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION WITH PRESCRIBED ACCURACY
APPLICATIONES MATHEMATICAE 36, (29), pp. 2 Zbigniew Ciesielski (Sopot) Ryszard Zieliński (Warszawa) POLYNOMIAL AND SPLINE ESTIMATORS OF THE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION WITH PRESCRIBED ACCURACY Abstract. Dvoretzky
More informationSolution. Solution. f (x) = (cos x)2 cos(2x) 2 sin(2x) 2 cos x ( sin x) (cos x) 4. f (π/4) = ( 2/2) ( 2/2) ( 2/2) ( 2/2) 4.
December 09, 20 Calculus PracticeTest s Name: (4 points) Find te absolute extrema of f(x) = x 3 0 on te interval [0, 4] Te derivative of f(x) is f (x) = 3x 2, wic is zero only at x = 0 Tus we only need
More informationNumerical Experiments Using MATLAB: Superconvergence of Nonconforming Finite Element Approximation for Second-Order Elliptic Problems
Applied Matematics, 06, 7, 74-8 ttp://wwwscirporg/journal/am ISSN Online: 5-7393 ISSN Print: 5-7385 Numerical Experiments Using MATLAB: Superconvergence of Nonconforming Finite Element Approximation for
More information2.3 Algebraic approach to limits
CHAPTER 2. LIMITS 32 2.3 Algebraic approac to its Now we start to learn ow to find its algebraically. Tis starts wit te simplest possible its, and ten builds tese up to more complicated examples. Fact.
More informationNUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION
NUMERICAL IFFERENTIATION FIRST ERIVATIVES Te simplest difference formulas are based on using a straigt line to interpolate te given data; tey use two data pints to estimate te derivative. We assume tat
More informationERROR BOUNDS FOR THE METHODS OF GLIMM, GODUNOV AND LEVEQUE BRADLEY J. LUCIER*
EO BOUNDS FO THE METHODS OF GLIMM, GODUNOV AND LEVEQUE BADLEY J. LUCIE* Abstract. Te expected error in L ) attimet for Glimm s sceme wen applied to a scalar conservation law is bounded by + 2 ) ) /2 T
More informationSection 2.7 Derivatives and Rates of Change Part II Section 2.8 The Derivative as a Function. at the point a, to be. = at time t = a is
Mat 180 www.timetodare.com Section.7 Derivatives and Rates of Cange Part II Section.8 Te Derivative as a Function Derivatives ( ) In te previous section we defined te slope of te tangent to a curve wit
More informationChapter 2. Limits and Continuity 16( ) 16( 9) = = 001. Section 2.1 Rates of Change and Limits (pp ) Quick Review 2.1
Capter Limits and Continuity Section. Rates of Cange and Limits (pp. 969) Quick Review..... f ( ) ( ) ( ) 0 ( ) f ( ) f ( ) sin π sin π 0 f ( ). < < < 6. < c c < < c 7. < < < < < 8. 9. 0. c < d d < c
More informationThe derivative function
Roberto s Notes on Differential Calculus Capter : Definition of derivative Section Te derivative function Wat you need to know already: f is at a point on its grap and ow to compute it. Wat te derivative
More informationNew Fourth Order Quartic Spline Method for Solving Second Order Boundary Value Problems
MATEMATIKA, 2015, Volume 31, Number 2, 149 157 c UTM Centre for Industrial Applied Matematics New Fourt Order Quartic Spline Metod for Solving Second Order Boundary Value Problems 1 Osama Ala yed, 2 Te
More informationConsider a function f we ll specify which assumptions we need to make about it in a minute. Let us reformulate the integral. 1 f(x) dx.
Capter 2 Integrals as sums and derivatives as differences We now switc to te simplest metods for integrating or differentiating a function from its function samples. A careful study of Taylor expansions
More informationINJECTIVE AND PROJECTIVE PROPERTIES OF REPRESENTATIONS OF QUIVERS WITH n EDGES. Sangwon Park
Korean J. Mat. 16 (2008), No. 3, pp. 323 334 INJECTIVE AND PROJECTIVE PROPERTIES OF REPRESENTATIONS OF QUIVERS WITH n EDGES Sanwon Park Abstract. We define injective and projective representations of quivers
More informationThe general solution of a quadratic functional equation and Ulam stability
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 8 (05), 60 69 Research Article The general solution of a quadratic functional equation and Ulam stability Yaoyao Lan a,b,, Yonghong Shen c a College
More informationNumerical Differentiation
Numerical Differentiation Finite Difference Formulas for te first derivative (Using Taylor Expansion tecnique) (section 8.3.) Suppose tat f() = g() is a function of te variable, and tat as 0 te function
More informationLyapunov characterization of input-to-state stability for semilinear control systems over Banach spaces
Lyapunov caracterization of input-to-state stability for semilinear control systems over Banac spaces Andrii Mironcenko a, Fabian Wirt a a Faculty of Computer Science and Matematics, University of Passau,
More informationGeneric maximum nullity of a graph
Generic maximum nullity of a grap Leslie Hogben Bryan Sader Marc 5, 2008 Abstract For a grap G of order n, te maximum nullity of G is defined to be te largest possible nullity over all real symmetric n
More information3.1 Extreme Values of a Function
.1 Etreme Values of a Function Section.1 Notes Page 1 One application of te derivative is finding minimum and maimum values off a grap. In precalculus we were only able to do tis wit quadratics by find
More informationNumerical Solution to Parabolic PDE Using Implicit Finite Difference Approach
Numerical Solution to arabolic DE Using Implicit Finite Difference Approac Jon Amoa-Mensa, Francis Oene Boateng, Kwame Bonsu Department of Matematics and Statistics, Sunyani Tecnical University, Sunyani,
More information(a) At what number x = a does f have a removable discontinuity? What value f(a) should be assigned to f at x = a in order to make f continuous at a?
Solutions to Test 1 Fall 016 1pt 1. Te grap of a function f(x) is sown at rigt below. Part I. State te value of eac limit. If a limit is infinite, state weter it is or. If a limit does not exist (but is
More informationMA455 Manifolds Solutions 1 May 2008
MA455 Manifolds Solutions 1 May 2008 1. (i) Given real numbers a < b, find a diffeomorpism (a, b) R. Solution: For example first map (a, b) to (0, π/2) and ten map (0, π/2) diffeomorpically to R using
More informationCopyright 2012 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future
Copyrigt 212 IEEE. Personal use of tis material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all oter uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republising tis material for
More informationDedicated to the 70th birthday of Professor Lin Qun
Journal of Computational Matematics, Vol.4, No.3, 6, 4 44. ACCELERATION METHODS OF NONLINEAR ITERATION FOR NONLINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS Guang-wei Yuan Xu-deng Hang Laboratory of Computational Pysics,
More informationMATH 155A FALL 13 PRACTICE MIDTERM 1 SOLUTIONS. needs to be non-zero, thus x 1. Also 1 +
MATH 55A FALL 3 PRACTICE MIDTERM SOLUTIONS Question Find te domain of te following functions (a) f(x) = x3 5 x +x 6 (b) g(x) = x+ + x+ (c) f(x) = 5 x + x 0 (a) We need x + x 6 = (x + 3)(x ) 0 Hence Dom(f)
More informationOverlapping domain decomposition methods for elliptic quasi-variational inequalities related to impulse control problem with mixed boundary conditions
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Mat. Sci.) Vol. 121, No. 4, November 2011, pp. 481 493. c Indian Academy of Sciences Overlapping domain decomposition metods for elliptic quasi-variational inequalities related
More informationNumerical Solution of One Dimensional Nonlinear Longitudinal Oscillations in a Class of Generalized Functions
Proc. of te 8t WSEAS Int. Conf. on Matematical Metods and Computational Tecniques in Electrical Engineering, Bucarest, October 16-17, 2006 219 Numerical Solution of One Dimensional Nonlinear Longitudinal
More informationFunctions of the Complex Variable z
Capter 2 Functions of te Complex Variable z Introduction We wis to examine te notion of a function of z were z is a complex variable. To be sure, a complex variable can be viewed as noting but a pair of
More informationChapter 2 Limits and Continuity
4 Section. Capter Limits and Continuity Section. Rates of Cange and Limits (pp. 6) Quick Review.. f () ( ) () 4 0. f () 4( ) 4. f () sin sin 0 4. f (). 4 4 4 6. c c c 7. 8. c d d c d d c d c 9. 8 ( )(
More informationMath Spring 2013 Solutions to Assignment # 3 Completion Date: Wednesday May 15, (1/z) 2 (1/z 1) 2 = lim
Mat 311 - Spring 013 Solutions to Assignment # 3 Completion Date: Wednesday May 15, 013 Question 1. [p 56, #10 (a)] 4z Use te teorem of Sec. 17 to sow tat z (z 1) = 4. We ave z 4z (z 1) = z 0 4 (1/z) (1/z
More informationTHE IDEA OF DIFFERENTIABILITY FOR FUNCTIONS OF SEVERAL VARIABLES Math 225
THE IDEA OF DIFFERENTIABILITY FOR FUNCTIONS OF SEVERAL VARIABLES Mat 225 As we ave seen, te definition of derivative for a Mat 111 function g : R R and for acurveγ : R E n are te same, except for interpretation:
More informationBrazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 29, no. 1, March, Ensemble and their Parameter Dierentiation. A. K. Rajagopal. Naval Research Laboratory,
Brazilian Journal of Pysics, vol. 29, no. 1, Marc, 1999 61 Fractional Powers of Operators of sallis Ensemble and teir Parameter Dierentiation A. K. Rajagopal Naval Researc Laboratory, Wasington D. C. 2375-532,
More informationFINITE DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATIONS FOR NONLINEAR FIRST ORDER PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE ACTA MATHEMATICA, FASCICULUS XL 2002 FINITE DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATIONS FOR NONLINEAR FIRST ORDER PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS by Anna Baranowska Zdzis law Kamont Abstract. Classical
More informationAn Elementary Proof of a Generalization of Bernoulli s Formula
Revision: August 7, 009 An Elementary Proof of a Generalization of Bernoulli s Formula Kevin J. McGown Harold R. Pars Department of Matematics Department of Matematics University of California at San Diego
More informationMVT and Rolle s Theorem
AP Calculus CHAPTER 4 WORKSHEET APPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENTIATION MVT and Rolle s Teorem Name Seat # Date UNLESS INDICATED, DO NOT USE YOUR CALCULATOR FOR ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS In problems 1 and, state
More informationWeak Solutions for Nonlinear Parabolic Equations with Variable Exponents
Communications in Matematics 25 217) 55 7 Copyrigt c 217 Te University of Ostrava 55 Weak Solutions for Nonlinear Parabolic Equations wit Variable Exponents Lingeswaran Sangerganes, Arumugam Gurusamy,
More information