Strong polyhedral approximation of simple jump sets
|
|
- Julie Palmer
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Strong poyhedra approximation of simpe jump sets Tuomo Vakonen Abstract We prove a strong approximation resut for functions u W 1, (Ω \ J), where J is the union of finitey many Lipschitz graphs satisfying some further technica assumptions. We approximate J by a poyhedra set in such a manner that a reguarisation term η(div j u i ), (i = 0, 1, 2,...), is convergent. The boundedness of this reguarisation functiona itsef, introduced in [T. Vakonen: Transport equation and image interpoation with SBD veocity fieds, (2011)] ensures the convergence in tota variation of the jump part Div j u i of the distributiona divergence. Mathematics subject cassification: 26B30, 49Q20, 74R10. Keywords: bounded variation, approximation, discontinuities. 1. Introduction Let u SBV(Ω) be a specia function of bounded variation on the domain Ω R m. We woud ike to approximate u by a sequence of functions {u i } i=0 such that ui is reasonaby smooth in Ω \ Ĵui, (i = 0, 1, 2,...), and Ĵu i is a poyhedra (m 1)-dimensiona set, containing the jump set J ui. As the novety of our resuts, we woud ike convergence from a reguarisation term η(div j u i ), introduced in [11]. The boundedness of this term ensures that if Div j u i Div j u and Div j u i λ, then λ = Div j u. The notation Div j u here stands for the jump part of the distributiona divergence Div u, whie the absoutey continuous part wi be denoted by div u. Why do we want this kind of strong approximation property? In [11] we studied an extension of the transport equation invoving jump sources and sinks. With u = (1, b) the veocity fied and I the space-time data being transported, it can be stated as Div(Iu) I div u τ Div j u = 0 (1.1) for some τ defined on the jump set of u, modeing the sources and sinks. To show the stabiity of (1.1) with {I i } i=0 converging weaky in BV(Ω) and {ui } i=0 converging as in the SBV/SBD compactness theorems [3, 4], we needed to further assume that Div j u i (Ω) Div j u (Ω). To use (1.1) as a constraint in an optimisation probem (specificay, image interpoation), we thus had to introduce the reguarisation term η(div j u i ) ensuring this convergence. One possibiity for the definition is ) η(µ) := ( µ (Ω) 2 m µ(x + [0, 2 ] m ) dx, (µ M(Ω)). (1.2) R m =0 Roughy η(µ) < says that on average the differences 2 m ( µ (x + [0, 2 ] m ) µ(x + [0, 2 ] m ) ) go to zero as the scae 2 becomes smaer. Thus on sma sets µ is cose to µ. Institute for Mathematics and Scientific Computing, Kar-Franzens University of Graz, Austria. E-mai: tuomo.vakonen@iki.fi. This work has been financiay supported by the SFB research program Mathematica Optimization and Appications in Biomedica Sciences of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF). 1
2 The probem then becomes: can we, at east in principe, numericay sove probems invoving such reguarisation terms? That is, can we in particuar construct a sequence of discretisations of u such that η(div j u i ) η(div j u) aong with the standard convergences u i u and u i u in L 2, D j u i D j u weaky*, and H m 1 (J u i) H m 1 (J u )? In the present work, we intend to provide a partia answer. Specificay, we restrict our attention to functions u W 1, (Ω \ Ĵu), where Ĵu is the union of finitey many Lipschitz graphs with bounded variation gradient mapping, satisfying further technica conditions, given in Definition 5.1 beow. Assuming these conditions, we show that u can be approximated by functions u i W 1, (Ω \ Ĵui) with Ĵui poyhedra and satisfying Definition 5.1. Some of our proof techniques resembe those of the SBD approximation theorem of Chamboe [6, 7]. In SBV a counterpart approximation theorem is proved by quite different techniques by Cortesani and Toader [8]. Their resut provides argey simiar convergence properties as ours, but is missing the crucia convergence of η(div j u i ). Of course, the cass of functions that we are abe to study at the moment is significanty smaer. Finay, we aso study anisotropic approximation with Ĵu i restricted to ie on transations of the coordinate panes. We have organised this paper as foows. First, in Section 2, we introduce notation and some other we-known toos. In section 3 we study the functiona η, and estimates for bounding it. As a consequence we aso obtain some new SBV compactness resuts. In Section 4 we provide a series of further technica emmas of genera nature, needed to prove the approximation theorem. In the subsequent Section 5 we then introduce in detai the space where the approximated function u ies in, and provide further technica emmas regarding the covering of the boundary of the jump set by cubes. Our main approximation theorem is then stated and proved in Section 6. Finay, we study anisotropic approximation in Section Preiminaries 2.1. Sets and functions We denote the unit sphere in R m by S m 1, whie the open ba of radius ρ centred at x R m we denote by B(x, ρ). The boundary of a set A is denoted A, and the cosure by c A. For ν R m, the hyperpane orthogona to ν we denote by ν := {z R m ν, z = 0}. P ν denotes the projection onto the subspace spanned by ν, and P ν the projection onto ν. We denote by {e 1,..., e m } the standard basis of R m. The k-dimensiona Jacobian of a inear map L : R k R m, (k m), is defined as J k [L] := det(l L). A set Γ R m is a caed a Lipschitz d-graph (of Lipschitz factor L), if there exist a unit vector z Γ, an open set V Γ on a d-dimensiona subspace of z Γ, and a Lipschitz map g Γ : V Γ R m of Lipschitz factor at most L, such that Γ = {y R m g Γ (v) = y, v = P z Γ y V Γ }. We say that Γ is poyhedra if g Γ is piecewise affine and V Γ is a poyhedra set, i.e., consists of finitey many simpices. If g Γ is further affine, we say that Γ is affine. We define the boundary as Γ := g Γ ( V Γ ). Remark 2.1. Consider the situation d = m 1. If Γ is the graph of f : U R m 1 R, then g Γ (v) = (x, f(x)) for v = (x, 0) V Γ = U {0}. More generay, if V Γ zγ for some z Γ R m, and f : V Γ R is Lipschitz map, then g Γ (v) = v + z Γ f(v) defines a Lipschitz graph. Conversey, if Γ is a Lipschitz graph per the above definition, then defining f Γ (v) := g Γ (v), z Γ for v V Γ, we obtain the more conventiona description Γ = {v + f Γ (v)z Γ v V Γ }. For our purposes it is more convenient to work with the map g Γ, however. 2
3 2.2. Measures The space of (signed) Radon measures on an open set Ω is denoted M(Ω). If V is a vector space, then the space of V -vaued Radon measures on Ω is denoted M(Ω; V ). The k-dimensiona Hausdorff measure, on any given ambient space R m, (k m), is denoted by H k, whie L m denotes the Lebesgue measure on R m. For a measure µ and a measurabe set A, we denote by µ A the restriction measure defined by (µ A)(B) := µ(a B). The tota variation measure of µ is denoted µ. For a Bore map u : Ω R we denote µ(u) := Ω u dµ. A measure µ M(Ω) is said to be Ahfors-reguar (in dimension d), if there exists M (0, ) such that M 1 r d µ (B(x, r)) Mr d for a r > 0 and x supp µ. If ony the first or the second inequaity hods, then µ is said to be, respectivey, ower or upper Ahfors-reguar. We wi often refer to the foowing standard resut on weak* convergence. (See, e.g., [2, Proposition 1.62]). Proposition 2.1. Let µ i M(Ω), (i = 0, 1, 2,...), be such that µ i µ M(Ω), and µ i λ M(Ω). If E is a reativey compact µ-measurabe set such that λ( E) = 0, then µ i (E) µ(e). More generay, et u : Ω R be any compacty supported Bore function, and denote by E f the set of its discontinuity points. Then, if λ(e f ) = 0, we have Ω u dµi Ω u dµ Functions of bounded variation A function u : Ω R K on a bounded open set Ω R m, is said to be of bounded variation (see, e.g., [3] for a more thorough introduction), denoted u BV(Ω; R K ), if u L 1 (Ω; R K ), and the distributiona gradient Du is a Radon measure. We define the norm u BV(Ω;R K ) := u L 1 (Ω;R K ) + Du (Ω). Given a sequence {u i } i=1 BV(Ω; RK ), strong convergence to u BV(Ω; R K ) is defined as strong L 1 convergence u i u L 1 (Ω;R K ) 0 together with convergence of the tota variation u u i (Ω) 0. Weak convergence is defined as u i u strongy in L 1 (Ω; R K ) aong with Du i Du weaky* in M(Ω; R K m ). We denote by S u the approximate discontinuity set, i.e., the compement of the set where the Lebesgue imit ũ exists. The atter is, of course, defined by 1 im ρ 0 ρ m ũ(x) u(y) dy = 0. B(x,ρ) The distributiona gradient can be decomposed as Du = ul m + D j u + D c u, where the density u of the absoutey continuous part of Du equas (a.e.) the approximate differentia of u. The jump part D j u may be represented as D j u = (u + u ) ν Ju H m 1 J u, (2.1) where x is in the jump set J u S u of u if for some ν := ν Ju (x) there exist two distinct one-sided traces u ± (x) defined as satisfying 1 im ρ 0 ρ m u ± (x) u(y) dy = 0, (2.2) B ± (x,ρ,ν) 3
4 where B ± (x, ρ, ν) := {y B(x, ρ) ± y x, ν 0}. It turns out that J u is countaby H m 1 - rectifiabe, and ν is (a.e.) the norma to J u. Moreover, H m 1 (S u \ J u ) = 0. The remaining Cantor part D c u vanishes on any Bore set σ-finite with respect to H m 1. The space SBV(Ω; R K ) of specia functions of bounded variation is defined as those u BV(Ω; R K ) with D c u = 0. There we have the foowing compactness resut. Theorem 2.1 (SBV compactness [1]). Let Ω R m be open and bounded. Suppose ψ : [0, ) [0, ) is non-decreasing with im t ψ(t)/t =. Suppose {u i } i=0 SBV(Ω; RK ) with ( ) sup i u i L 1 + ψ( u i ) dx + D j u i (Ω) + H m 1 (J u i) <. Ω Then there exists u SBV(Ω; R K ) and a subsequence of {u i } i=0, unreabeed, such that D j u i u i u strongy in L 1 (Ω; R K ), u i u weaky in L 1 (Ω; R K m ), D j u weaky* in M(Ω; R K m ), and H m 1 (J u ) im inf i Hm 1 (J u i). We wi aso be working with functions that are of bounded variation on a subspace. That is, et z S m 1, and V z be open and bounded. We then denote u BV(V ; R K ) if u R z BV(Rz 1 V ; R K ), where R z R m (m 1) is an orthonorma basis matrix for z. We et u BV(V ;R K ) := u R z BV(R 1 z V ;R K ). We define the Soboev spaces W n,p (V ; R K ), (n 0, 1 p ), anaogousy. We are aso interested in the case when u has not just scaar or simpe vector vaues, but u = g L 1 (V ; R K z ). Then the definition becomes that u BV(V ; R K z ) if [x u(r z (x))r z ] BV(Rz 1 V ; R K (m 1) ) with u BV(V ;R K z ) := x u(r z (x))r z BV(R 1 z V ;R K (m 1) ) Poincaré-type inequaities We wi ater need some Poincaré-type inequaities, which we study now. The foowing proposition can be found in, e.g., [12, Theorem ]. Proposition 2.2. Let Ω R d be a connected domain with Lipschitz boundary, and µ a positive Radon measure on R d, that is upper Ahfors reguar with constant M in dimension d 1, and satisfies supp µ c Ω. Then there exists a constant C 1 = C 1 (Ω), such that for each u BV(Ω), we have M u µ(u)/µ(ω) L 1 (Ω) C 1 µ(c Ω) Du (Ω). Coroary 2.1. Suppose Ω = B(0, r) in Proposition 2.2. Then there exists a constant C 2 = C 2 (d), independent of r, such that u µ(u)/µ(ω) L 1 (Ω) r 2d 1 M C 2 Du (Ω), (u BV(Ω)). (2.3) µ(c Ω) Suppose, in particuar, that µ = L d Ω Ω with µ(u) = 0 and L d (Ω ) ρr d. Then, for a constant C 3 = C 3 (d), we have u L 1 (Ω) r d ρ (1 d)/d C 3 Du (Ω). (2.4) 4
5 Proof. We appy Proposition 2.2 on the domain B(0, 1) with u 1 (x) := u(rx) and µ 1 (A) := µ(ra), yieding A change of variabes gives and u 1 µ 1 (u 1 )/µ 1 (B(0, 1)) L 1 (B(0,1)) C 2 M µ1 µ(c B(0, 1)) Du 1 (B(0, 1)). Du 1 (B(0, 1)) = Du (B(0, r)), u 1 µ 1 (u 1 )/µ 1 (B(0, 1)) L 1 (B(0,1)) = r d u µ(u)/µ(b(0, r)) L 1 (B(0,r)) as µ 1 (u 1 ) = µ(u) and µ 1 (B(0, 1)) = µ(b(0, r)). Observing that the upper Ahfors constant M µ1 for µ 1 is at most Mr d 1, we get (2.3). As for the second resut, we just have to approximate M. Eementary manipuations give µ(b(x, s)) min{ω d s d, L d (Ω )} Ms d 1 for ω d the voume of the unit ba in R d, and M defined by Inserting this into (2.3) gives (2.4). M/L d (Ω ) = ( ω d /L d (Ω ) ) (d 1)/d (ρ 1 ω d ) (d 1)/d r 1 d. 3. Reguarisation of tota variation 3.1. Convergence of tota variation measures We now study a condition ensuring the convergence of the tota variation µ i (Ω) subject to the weak* convergence of the measures µ i, (i = 0, 1, 2,...). Improving a resut first presented in [11], we show in Theorem 3.1 beow that if {f } =0 is a normaised nested sequence of functions per Definition 3.1 beow, then it suffices to bound η(µ i ) := =0 η (µ i ), where η (µ i ) := µ i (Ω) µ i (τ x f ) dx. Here we empoy the notation τ x f(y) := f(y x). In the next subsection we wi then study an upper bound on η. Definition 3.1. Let f : R m R, ( = 0, 1, 2,...), be bounded Bore functions with compact support that are continuous in R m \ S f. (That is, the approximate discontinuity set is the discontinuity set.) Let aso {ν } =0 M(Rm ), ν (R m ) = 1. The sequence {(f, ν )} =0 is then said to form a nested sequence of functions if f (x) = f +1 (x y) dν (y) (a.e.). The sequence is said to be normaised if f 0 and f dx = 1. The sequence is said to be reguar, if it is normaised, and there exist constants α > 0 and β > 0, and a sequence h 0, im r 0 min{h, r} = 0, (3.1) =0 such that αh m χ B(0,βh ) f α 1 h m χ B(0,h ). Exampe 3.1. Exampes incude f = χ [ 1/2,1/2] m in R m, and f(t) = max{0, min{1 + t, 1 t}} in R (as we as simiar but more compicated shape functions in R m ). Reguarity hods in these cases, and in the more genera typica case f (x) := h m f(x/h ) for h 0 and some f αχ B(0,β) with compact support and f dx = 1. 5
6 Theorem 3.1. Let Ω R m be an open and bounded set, and {(f, ν )} =0 a normaised nested sequence of functions. Define η(µ) := =0 η (µ), where η (µ) := µ (Ω) µ(τ x f ) dx, (µ M(Ω)). (3.2) Suppose {µ i } i=0 M(Ω) weaky* converges to µ M(Ω) with sup i µ i (Ω)+η(µ i ) <. If aso µ i λ, then λ = µ. Moreover, each of the functionas η and η, ( = 0, 1, 2,...), is ower-semicontinuous with respect to the weak* convergence of {µ i } i=0. Provided that the weak* convergences hod in M(Rm ), then aso η (µ i ) η (µ), ( = 0, 1, 2,...). Proof. Let us suppose first that µ i µ and µ i λ weaky* in M(R m ) rather than just M(Ω). We denote by E f the discontinuity set of f, whie S f stands for the approximate discontinuity set. Fubini s theorem and the fact that S f is an L m -negigibe Bore set, impy that λ(s τxf ) dx = 0. This shows that λ(s τxf ) = 0 for a.e. x R m. Since, by assumption E f S f, it foows that λ(e τxf ) = 0, so that by Proposition 2.1 we have µ i (τ x f ) µ(τ x f ) for a.e. x R m. Likewise µ i (τ x f ) λ(τ x f ) for a.e. x R m. Since sup i µ i (Ω) <, and Ω is bounded, an appication of the dominated convergence theorem now yieds im µ i (τ x f ) dx = µ(τ x f ) dx. (3.3) i We stress that (3.3) hods because of the convergence µ i λ in M(R m ) and λ(e τxf ) = 0. If we can show that, as caimed, λ = µ, it foows immediatey from (3.3) and the definition (3.2) that η (µ i ) η (µ), showing that part of the caim of the emma. Moreover, since the tota variation µ i (Ω) is ower-semicontinuous with respect to weak* convergence, it foows from (3.3) that each η is ower-semicontinuous with respect to the simutaneous weak* convergence of {(µ i, µ i )} i=0. Consequenty aso η is ower-semicontinuous with respect to the simutaneous convergence (by Fatou s emma). However, assuming that { µ i } i=0 does not converge, et us take a subsequence {µin } n=0 such that η(µ in ) α := im inf i η(µ i ). Since sup i µ i (Ω) <, we may move to a further subsequence, unreabeed, such that aso µ in λ for some λ M(Ω). Since sti η(µ in ) α, we deduce from the ower semicontinuity with respect to the simutaneous weak* convergence that α η(µ). This competes the proof of the caim that η is ower-semicontinuous with respect to weak* convergence of {µ i } i=0 aone. Returning to the proof of λ = µ, observe that thanks to the fact that {(f, ν )} i=0 is a nested sequence of functions, {η (µ)} =0 forms a decreasing sequence (for any µ M(Ω)). Indeed, as f (x) = f+1 (x y) dν (y) and ν (R m ) = 1 with ν 0, we have µ(τ x f ) dx = µ(τ x+y f +1 ) dν (y) dx µ(τ x+y f +1 ) dν (y) dx = µ(τ x+y f +1 ) dx dν (y) = µ(τ x f +1 ) dx after a change of variabes in the ast step to eiminate y. Minding the definition (3.2), it foows from here that η (µ) η +1 (µ). To show λ = µ, that is µ i µ, we ony have to show µ i (Ω) µ (Ω). To see the atter, we choose an arbitrary ɛ > 0, and write µ (Ω) µ i (Ω) = η (µ) η (µ i ) + µ(τ x f ) µ i (τ x f ) dx. (3.4) Next we observe from the aready proved ower semi-continuity of η and the bound sup i η(µ i ) =: K < that η(µ) K as we. Therefore, recaing that {η (µ)} =1 and {η (µ i )} =1 for i = 0, 1,... are 6
7 decreasing sequences, as shown above, it foows that by taking j arge enough, we can ascertain that sup{η (µ), η (µ 1 ), η (µ 2 ),...} ɛ. (Note that η 0!) Empoying this observation in (3.4), we find that µ (Ω) µ i (Ω) 2ɛ + µ(τ x f ) µ i (τ x f ) dx for any arge enough j and a i. The integra term tends to zero as i by (3.3). Therefore, we have im µ i (Ω) µ (Ω) 3ɛ. i Since ɛ > 0 was arbitrary, this concudes the proof under the assumption that the weak* convergences are in M(R m ). If this assumption does not hod, we may sti switch to a subsequence for which µ i k µ and µ i k λ weaky* in M(R m ). Then the above reasoning shows that µ = λ. But, since Ω is open, necessariy µ Ω = µ and λ Ω = λ. This impies λ = µ. By the reasoning above, η (µ i k) η ( µ). Hence an appication of the triange inequaity gives η (µ) = η ( µ Ω) η ( µ) = im k η (µ i k ). As this bound hods for every subsequence, we deduce that each η, ( = 0, 1, 2,...), is owersemicontinuous, and consequenty η as we. This concudes the proof. Remark 3.1. Since, by assumption, f dx = 1, we may aternativey write η (µ) = R m µ (τ x f ) µ(τ x f ) dx. We wi occasionay refer to the foowing eementary properties that foow from the triange inequaity and the fact that supp f B(0, h ). Lemma 3.1. Let {(f, ν )} =0 be a reguar nested sequence of functions and A Rm a Bore set. (i) We have (ii) If {λ x } x R m M(Ω), then η (µ A) + η (µ R m \ A) η (µ) η (µ A) + 2 µ (R m \ A). A λ x (τ x f ) dx λ x (A + B(0, h )) (τ x f ) A bound on geometrica compexity We now introduce a quantification of the geometrica compexity of a measure or set. It bears some resembance to definitions of uniform rectifiabiity, as studied by David and Semmes [9]. That notion, however, does not provide the reguarity we need, as it aows considerabe dense packing of the set, merey measuring ocay the deviation from a Lipschitz surface in a geometric sense. Our notion, by contrast, measures the deviation in the sense of measure. Definition 3.2. Let Ω R m open and bounded, and {(f, ν )} =0 a reguar nested sequence of functions per Definition 3.1. Let µ M(Ω) be a radon measure, d m 1 and L, M [0, ). We denote µ Sp d (Ω, L, M) if the foowing hod. 1. µ is upper Ahfors-reguar in dimension d with constant M. 2. There exist famiies G = {G } =0, G = {Γ x x Rm } of d-dimensiona Lipschitz graphs Γ x, of Lipschitz factor at most L, satisfying Sp(µ; G) := Sp (µ; G ) <, where Sp (µ; G ) := µ O x \ Γx (τ x f ) dx, (3.5) R m =0 with the notation O x := x + supp f. 7
8 (a) A simpe set with Sp(Γ) = (b) A compex set with Sp(Γ) < Figure 1: Exampes of sets satisfying and faiing the condition of Definition 3.2. Definition 3.3. We aso set Sp(µ) := inf G Sp(µ; G), and Sp (µ) := inf G Sp(µ; G ), where the infimum is taken over a famiies of the type specified above. Definition 3.4. For a bounded set E R m, we denote E Sp d (Ω, L, M) if H d E Sp d (Ω, L, M), and set Sp (E; G) = Sp (H d E; G), etc. Definition 3.5. For the Lipschitz graphs Γ x V x := V Γ x, g x := g Γ x, and zx := z Γ x. from Definition 3.2, we use the shorthand notations Remark 3.2. Even quite simpe sets may fai to satisfy this condition, as Exampe 3.2 beow demonstrates. This poses the question whether this is a reasonabe concept. As an eement of justification, in Exampe 3.3 we provide an exampe of a somewhat compex set that satisfies the condition. After that, in Proposition 3.1, we show that the condition impies rectifiabiity. Exampe 3.2. Let us choose h := 2 and f h (x) = h 2 χ Q (x/h) for Q := [ 1/2, 1/2] 2. We then set Γ 1 = [0, 1] {0} and Γ 2 = {(x, g(x)) x [0, 1]} for g(x) = e 1/x, and study µ := H 1 (Γ 1 Γ 2 ) on R 2. See Figure 1(a) for a sketch. Suppose h (0, 1) and et A h := (h /2, h /2) + {(x, y) x [0, 1 h], g(x + h) h, y [g(x + h) h, 0]}. Then, whenever (x, y) A h, both Consequenty, by the definition of f h, we find that If we set we then have H 1 (Γ i ((x, y) + hq)) h, (i = 1, 2). (H 1 Γ i )(τ (x,y) f h ) h 1, (i = 1, 2; (x, y) A h ). G i := {(Γ 1 Γ 2 \ Γ i ) ((x, y) + h Q) (x, y) R 2 }, h 1 L 2 (A h ) (H 1 Γ i )(τ (x,y) f h ) d(x, y) Sp (µ; G i ). A h We want to show that A h has too arge measure for condition (3.5) to be satisfied, that is h 1 L 2 (A h ) does not sum to a finite quantity (for any sequence h 0). For sma enough h, we have A h {(x, y) x 0, g(x + h) h/2, y [ h/2, 0]}. 8
9 Since g 1 (h) = 1/ og h, we thus have (for sma enough h) We observe g 1 h 1 L 2 (A h ) h 1 (h/2) h h/2 dx = ( 1/ og(h/2) h)/2. ( 1/ og(h /2) h ) = =0 Therefore =0 Sp (µ; G i ) =, (i = 1, 2). 0 (1/( + 1) 2 ) =. Finay, we observe that there do not exist famiies G, ( = 0, 1, 2,...), of Lipschitz graphs covering (Γ 1 Γ 2 ) ((x, y) + hq) with bounded constant, so ony Γ 1 or Γ 2 can be covered, as has been done above. To see this, one observes that for the Lipschitz constant to be bounded, there must exist α > 0 such that any Lipschitz graph Γ covering a part Γ 1 has z Γ, (1, 0) α. But then either z Γ is a tangent vector to Γ 2, or Γ 2 is occuded by Γ 1 when ooking in the direction of z. Thus µ fais (3.5). Exampe 3.3. Let r i := 2 i, and Γ i := {1 r i } [0, r i ], (i = 0, 1, 2,...). Set then R := i=0 Γ i, as sketched in Figure 1(b). We caim that R satisfies (3.5) with respect to f (x) = h 2 χ Q (x/h ), where Q := [ 1/2, 1/2] 2. Indeed, at every (x, y) R 2, et us choose Γ (x,y) as Γ i ((x, y) + h Q) for the smaest i such that 1 r i x h /2. A we then have to do is to cacuate Z i, := H 1 (Γ i \ Γ (x,y) )(τ (x,y) f ) d(x, y), (i = 0, 1, 2,...). (3.6) =0 The term H 1 (Γ i \ Γ (x,y) )(τ (x,y) f ) is non-zero ony when x + h /2 1 r i and x h /2 1 r i 1. Minding that r i 1 r i = r i, it foows that x is on an interva of ength h r i, and h r i. For fixed x we may thus cacuate that This gives the estimate y+h (H 1 Γ i )(τ (x,y) f ) dy = h 2 χ [0,ri ](t) dt dy r i /h. y Z i, { (h r i )r i /h, h r i, 0, otherwise, for the contribution (3.6) of Γ i, (i = 0, 1, 2,...), to (3.5). But h r i means i og 2 h, so summing the contributions of Γ i for i og 2 h, we obtain Sp (µ) Z i, i=0 i og 2 h (h r i )r i /h i og 2 h r i 2h. Thus (3.5) hods when =0 h <. Moreover, it is possibe to show that R is Ahfors-reguar in dimension 1, the maximum for the constant M for the upper bound being given at (1, 0). Proposition 3.1. Suppose Ω R m is open and bounded, and µ M(Ω) satisfies (3.5). Then µ is concentrated on a countaby d-rectifiabe set J. If µ Sp d (Ω, L, M), i.e., µ is aso upper Ahfors-reguar, then µ is d-rectifiabe, µ H d J. Proof. Let G be as in Definition 3.2. Let K be a compact set containing supp µ + B(0, h 0 ). To construct rectifiabe approximations of supp µ, we need a partiay discrete approximation of the Lebesgue integra over K. Denoting by α and β the reguarity constants for {f } =0 from Definition 3.1, we set A := B(0, βh ). With fixed for the moment, we then appy the Besicovitch covering theorem on 9
10 the famiy {x + A x K} to obtain an at most countabe (actuay finite) set G, such that for a dimensiona constant c m, we have χ K ξ G τ ξ χ A c m. It foows that L m c 1 m ξ G L m (ξ + A ). (3.7) Moreover, from the reguarity condition for f, there exists a constant C 4 > 0 dependent on α, β, and m aone, such that τ ξ f h m ατ ξ χ A h m αχ K C 4 /L m (A )χ K. (3.8) ξ G ξ G Now, with this preiminary setup taken care of, et us for any given y A set J y := x G +y Γx. Then J y is Hd -rectifiabe and we may, using (3.7) and (3.8), approximate Sp (µ; G ) = µ O x \ Γx (τ x f ) dx c 1 m µ O x \ Γx (τ x f ) dy c 1 m A x y+g A x y+g µ Ω \ J y (τ x f ) dy C 4 c m L m µ Ω \ J y (A ) A C 4 µ (Ω \ J y c m L m (A ) ) dy. A We thus deduce that there is a choice of y A with Setting J := j=0 J y Sp (µ; G )c m C 1 µ (Ω \ J y )., it foows from observing µ (Ω \ J y ) µ (Ω \ J) (τ y χ K ) dy and etting that µ (Ω \ J) = 0. Since J is H d -rectifiabe, this gives the first caim of the proposition. If µ is upper Ahfors-reguar in dimension d, we then have µ H d J. We concude that µ is rectifiabe. We finish this subsection by showing ower-semicontinuity of the functiona µ Sp(µ) + µ (Ω), and, consequenty, a cosure property of bounded sets in the space Sp d (Ω, L, M). Proposition 3.2. Let Ω R m be open and bounded. Suppose {µ i } i=0 Spd (Ω, L, M) with sup Sp(µ i ) + µ i (Ω) <. i=0,1,2,... Then any weak* imit µ of (a subsequence of) {µ i } i=0 satisfies µ Spd (Ω, L, M) and Sp(µ) + µ (Ω) im inf i Sp(µi ) + µ i (Ω). 10
11 Proof. Let ɛ > 0 be arbitrary. Let G i = {G i} =0, Gi = {Γx,i x R m }, be such that Then it suffices to show that Sp(µ i ; G i ) Sp(µ i ) + ɛ, (i = 0, 1, 2,...). Sp(µ; G) + µ (Ω) im inf i for some G = {G } =0, G = {Γ x x Rm }. We use the shorthand notation z x,i := z Γ x,i, and g x,i Sp(µi ; G i ) + µ i (Ω) := g Γ x,i. We may assume that V Γ x,i = P B(x, h z x,i ). This is because we may (see, e.g., [10]) extend g x,i increasing the Lipschitz constant. from V Γ x,i to the whoe space (z x,i ), without We may, moreover, assume that µ i µ M(Ω), and µ i λ M(Ω), where λ µ. The caim of the proposition now foows by an appication of Fatou s inequaity in (3.5), if we show for a = 0, 1, 2,... and amost a x R m that im inf µ i O x \ i Γx,i (τ x f ) µ O x \ Γx (τ x f ) (3.9) for some Lipschitz graph Γ x with constant at most L. Indeed, with = 0, 1, 2,... and x Rm fixed, we may for each i = 0, 1, 2,..., define a Lipschitz map g i : B(0, h ) R m 1 Γ x of constant at most L by g i (v) = g x,i (x + R z x,iv) with R z R m (m 1) the basis matrix of z. Then, since Lipschitz maps of bounded constant are compact in the topoogy of pointwise convergence, we define Γ x as the image of the pointwise imit g of a subsequence of {g i } i=0. Rotating the domain of g back on z with z a imit of a further subsequence of {z x,i } i=0 wi show that Γx is a Lipschitz graph. Let us then write µ i O x \ Γx,i (τ x f ) = µ i (τ x f ) µ i Γ x,i (τ x f ). (3.10) For amost a x R m, we have (as foows from, e.g., [2, Proposition 1.62]) Moreover, we have µ i (τ x f ) λ(τ x f ). (3.11) λ(τ x f ) = (λ O x \ Γx )(τ xf ) + (λ Γ x )(τ xf ) µ O x \ Γx (τ x f ) + (λ Γ x )(τ xf ). (3.12) On the other hand, any weak* imit λ of (a subsequence of) µ i Γ x,i satisfies λ λ Γ x. Moreover, for a.e. x R m, we have µ i Γ x,i (τ x f ) λ(τ x f ). Thus, minding (3.10) (3.12), we deduce im inf µ i O x \ ( µ i Γx,i i (τx f ) = im inf (τx f ) µ i Γ x,i ) i (τx f ) µ O x \ Γx (τ x f ) + (λ Γ x )(τ xf ) im sup µ i Γ x,i (τ x f ) i µ O x \ Γx,i (τ x f ) + (λ Γ x )(τ xf ) λ(τ x f ) µ O x \ Γx (τ x f ) for a.e. x R m. But this is (3.9). Since upper Ahfors reguarity ceary hods for µ with constant M by the ower semi-continuity of µ (B(x, r)) with respect to weak* convergence, we may concude the proof. 11
12 3.3. Bounds for η We now intend to derive bounds on η(µ) for measures µ Sp d (Ω, L, M). Throughout we assume that exacty the same reguar nested sequence of functions {(f, ν )} =0 is empoyed in the definition of Sp(µ; G) and η(µ). We begin with a technica definition. We need a concept of bounded variation on a famiy of Lipschitz surfaces. With this notion we can imit variations in the intensity of a rectifiabe measure µ, whie bounds on Sp(µ; G) imit variations in the geometry. Both bounds together then bound η(µ). Definition 3.6. Suppose θ is a Bore function on a countaby H d -rectifiabe set J R m, and G a famiy of Lipschitz d-graphs. We then set θ BV(G) := sup Γ i θ g Γi BV(VΓi ), where the supremum is taken over a finite disjoint sub-coections {Γ 1,..., Γ N } G, (N 1). We now state the bounding resut. We reca that α and {h } =0 denote reguarity constants for the maps {f } =0 from Definition 3.1. Condition (3.13) beow is required for uniform constants in Poincaré inequaities; it can triviay be satisfied by extending the domains V x of the Lipschitz graphs Γ x to the whoe space (z x), as can be done according to [10]. Proposition 3.3. Let Ω R m be open and bounded. Suppose µ = θh d J Sp d (Ω, L, M) with Sp(µ; G) < for the coections G = {G } =0, G = {Γ x x Rm }, of Lipschitz graphs of constant at most L. Suppose, moreover, that Then Γ x B(x, h ), and P z x Γx = P z x B(x, h ), ( = 0, 1, 2,... ; x R m ). (3.13) η (µ) C 5 h d θ BV(G ) + Sp (µ; G ) (3.14) for some constant C 5 = C 5 (L, m, d, α). In particuar, if =0 hd <, then ( η(µ) C 6 sup θ BV(G ) + Sp(µ; G) ) for C 6 = C 6 (L, m, d, α, h d ). =0,1,2,... Proof. Let {0, 1, 2,...} be fixed. By writing θ = θ + θ, where θ ± 0, we deduce η (µ) = µ (τ x f ) µ(τ x f ) dx { } = 2 min θ + τ x f dh d, θ τ x f dh d dx. J J (3.15) Writing J = (J Γ x ) (J \ Γx ), we get { } η (µ)/2 min θ + τ x f dh d, θ τ x f dh d dx + µ O x Γ x Γ x \ Γx (τ x f ) dx. (3.16) Since the minimum is non-zero ony if both θ + O x 0 and θ O x 0, ony points x in the set Z := {x R m 0 conv θ(γ x ), Γx B(x, h ) } 12
13 contribute to the first integra in (3.16). Appying (3.5), we thus obtain { } η (µ)/2 min θ + τ x f dh d, θ τ x f dh d dx + Sp (µ; G ) Z Γ x Γ x { } α 1 h m min θ + dh d, θ dh d dx + Sp (µ; G ). Z Γ x Γ x (3.17) In the fina step we have used the reguarity of {f } =0, i.e., f α 1 h m χ B(0,h ). Next we set B := B(0, (2L + 4)h ), and appy the Besicovitch covering theorem on the famiy {B + x x Z }. With c m a constant dependent on the dimension m aone, we thus find finite coections F 1,..., F cm Z satisfying x F i τ x χ B 1, (i = 1,..., c m ), and x F τ x χ B χ Z with F := c m i=1 F i. Appying the cover F + B of Z in (3.17), and denoting Γ x (θ) = Γ θ dh d, we x may write η (µ)/2 α 1 h m min{γ x (θ+ ), Γ x (θ )} dy + Sp (µ; G ) B x (F +y) Z C (3.18) 7 L m min{γ x (B ) (θ+ ), Γ x (θ )} dy + Sp (µ; G ) B x (F +y) Z for some constant C 7 = C 7 (α, m, L). By the definition of F as c m i=1 F i, it foows that to bound η (µ), it suffices to show that there exists C 8 = C 8 (d, L) such that min{γ x (θ+ ), Γ x (θ )} C 8 h d θ BV(G ) (3.19) x (F i +y) Z for L m -a.e. y B and a i {1,..., c m }. To begin the proof of (3.19), we observe that J d ( g x(v)) C 9 for some C 9 = C 9 (m, d, L). This is due to the continuity of J d and the bound g x (v) L. Thus the area formua yieds Γ x (θ± ) = θ ± dh d = (θ ± g x )J d( g x ) dv C 9 θ ± g x dv. (3.20) Γ x V x V x Let us momentariy fix x Z, and set V = V x, θ ± = θ ± g x, z = zx, and θ = θ g x. We intend to appy Coroary 2.1. Towards this end, we set µ (±) := L d (V \ supp θ ). Then µ (+) (V ) + µ ( ) (V ) L d (V ), so minding (3.13), we have max{µ (+) (V ), µ ( ) (V )} L d (V )/2 = L d (P z B(x, h ))/2 = h d Ld (B(0, 1))/2. Since µ (±) ( θ ± ) = 0, we may appy Coroary 2.1 to get either θ + L 1 (V ) h d C 10 θ + BV(V ) or θ L 1 (V ) h d C 10 θ BV(V ) for a constant C 10 = C 10 (d). As θ ± BV(V ) θ BV(V ), by the definition of θ ±, this gives min{ θ + L 1 (V ), θ L 1 (V )} h d C 10 θ BV(V ). That is min{ θ + g x L 1 (V x ), θ g x L 1 (V x ) } h d C 10 θ g x BV(V x ). (3.21) Next, we observe that with a {0, 1, 2,...}, i {1,..., c m }, and y B fixed, the graphs {Γ x x (y + F i Z )} are disjoint. This foows from the bas x + B, (x y + F i ), being disjoint 13
14 by construction, and from Γ x x + B = B(x, (2L + 4)h ). The atter hods due to assumption (3.13) and g x having Lipschitz factor at most L. Combining (3.21) with (3.20) thus finay yieds min{γ x (θ+ ), Γ x (θ )} C 9 C 10 h d θ g x BV(V x) x (F i+y) Z x (F i+y) Z (3.22) C 9 C 10 h d θ BV(G ). To concude the proof of the proposition, we ony have to observe that (3.22) yieds (3.19). Remark 3.3. Let {( f, ν )} =0 be another nested sequence of functions that satisfies f C f for some C > 0. Then in (3.16) we coud approximate µ O x \ Γx (τ x f ) dx C µ O x \ Γx (τ x f ) dx C Sp (µ; G ), where Sp denotes the functiona Sp obtained with the sequence {( f, ν )} =0. Thus it woud, at the expense of additiona technica compexity that we want to avoid, be possibe to express our resuts for different sequences of nested functions for the definitions of η and Sp Compactness in SBV(Ω; R K ) We finish this section by providing some compactness resuts in SBV(Ω; R K ) foowing immediatey from the resuts above. They can be usefu in appications for proving cosure properties. We need to work with vector-vaued measures µ M(Ω; R K m ). The resuts above on Sp(µ) can readiy be extended to this situation with no changes in proofs or definitions, but for concreteness we work through the foowing definition. Definition 3.7. For µ = (µ i,n ) [Sp m 1 (Ω, L, M)] K m, we denote Sp(µ) = K i=1 m n=1 Sp(µ i,j). Our main compactness resut is then as foows. The difference to the we-estabished Theorem 2.1 is that we repace H m 1 (J u i) by Sp(D j u i ). Theorem 3.2. Let Ω R m be open and bounded, and {u i } i=0 SBV(Ω; RK ). Suppose ψ : [0, ) [0, ) is non-decreasing with im t ψ(t)/t =. If each D j u i [Sp m 1 (Ω, L, M)] K m, (i = 0, 1, 2,...), and sup u i L 1 (Ω) + i ψ( u i (x)) dx + D j u i (Ω) + Sp(D j u i ) <, (3.23) there then exists u SBV(Ω; R K ) with D j u [Sp m 1 (Ω, L, M)] K m and a subsequence, unreabeed, such that u i u strongy in L 1 (Ω; R K ), (3.24) u i u weaky in L 1 (Ω; R K m ), (3.25) D j u i D j u weaky* in M(Ω; R K m ), and (3.26) Sp(D j u) im inf i Sp(Dj u i ). (3.27) Proof. Let us denote by K the supremum on the eft side of (3.23). We then deduce from (3.23) that sup u i L 1 (Ω) + Du i (Ω) <. i Moving to a subsequence, unreabeed, we may thus assume that u i u weaky in [BV(Ω)] k for some u BV(Ω; R K ). This gives (3.24). Moreover, because { u i } i=0 is an equi-integrabe famiy, 14
15 we have the existence of some w L 1 (Ω; R K m ), such that for a further unreabeed subsequence, u i w weaky in L 1 (Ω; R K m ). Sti, seecting another subsequence, we find from Proposition 3.2 that D j u i λ for some λ [Sp m 1 (Ω, L, M)] K m with Sp(λ) im inf i Sp(D j u i ). Minding that u i L m + D j u i = Du i and Du i Du by the weak convergence of {u i } i=0 in BV(Ω; RK ), we therefore have wl m + λ = Du = ul m + D j u + D c u. (3.28) Since λ [Sp m 1 (Ω, L, M)] K m, Proposition 3.1 shows that the measure λ is concentrated on a H m 1 rectifiabe set J. This gives w = u, showing (3.25). According to [2], the Cantor part D c u vanishes on any Bore set B that is σ-finite with respect to H m 1. In particuar D c u J = 0. Hence, by (3.28), λ = D j u and D c u = 0. This shows that u SBV(Ω; R K ) as we as (3.26) and (3.27), thus competing the proof. We now state a coroary that be used to prove the cosedness of equations ike (1.1). Specificay, we show stronger convergence for T D j u i with T : R K m R a bounded inear operator by bounding η(t D j u i ). When K = m, choosing T = Tr as the trace operator, we get the convergence in tota variation of the jump part Div j u i := Tr D j u i of the distributiona divergence, appearing in (1.1) and more precisey given by Div j u i (ϕ) = (Tr D j u i )(ϕ) = Here e 1,..., e m is the standard basis of R m. m e n, D j u i (ϕ)e n, (ϕ C c (Ω)). n=1 Coroary 3.1. Let Ω R m be open and bounded, and {u i } i=0 SBV(Ω; RK ). Suppose ψ : [0, ) [0, ) is non-decreasing with im t ψ(t)/t =, and T : R K m R a bounded inear operator. If each D j u i [Sp m 1 (Ω, L, M)] K m, (i = 0, 1, 2,...), and sup u i L 1 (Ω) + i ψ( u i (x)) dx + D j u i (Ω) + Sp(D j u i ) + η(t D j u i ) <, (3.29) then there exists u SBV(Ω; R K ) with D j u [Sp m 1 (Ω, L, M)] K m, and a subsequence, unreabeed, such that (3.24) (3.27) hod aong with T D j u i T D j u weaky* in M(Ω), and (3.30) T D j u i (Ω) T D j u (Ω). (3.31) Proof. Theorem 3.2 shows that (3.24) (3.27) hod. As an immediate consequence, we aso get (3.30). Now (3.31) foows from Theorem Technica resuts We now prove a coupe of genera technica resuts that we wi be needing in the proof of the approximation theorem. We begin with a resut on graph approximation, for which we need the foowing eementary emma. Lemma 4.1. Let Γ R m be a Lipschitz (m 1)-graph with norma fied ν Γ. Then for the inear operator A Γ defined by (ν Γ g Γ )(v) = A Γ g Γ (v)/ A Γ g Γ (v), (a.e. v V Γ ), A Γ G = (I H Γ G )z Γ, 15
16 with H Γ : z Γ Rm the injection operator and G : z Γ Rm an arbitrary inear operator. Moreover A Γ 1, (4.1) and the map defined by has Lipschitz factor Lip(F Γ ) = 1. F Γ (G) := A Γ G/ max{1, A Γ G } Proof. For some f Γ : zγ R we have g Γ(v) = H Γ v + f Γ (v)z Γ and g Γ (v) = H Γ + z Γ f Γ (v). We have HΓ z Γ = 0 and HΓ g Γ (v) = HΓH Γ + HΓz Γ f(v) = HΓH Γ = I, so that for any v zγ, v V Γ, we get (I H Γ ( g Γ (v)) )z Γ, g Γ (v)v = 0. Since the tangent cone T Γ (g Γ (v)) = g Γ (v)z Γ a.e., this says that ν Γ (g Γ (v)) = (I H Γ( g Γ (v)) )z Γ (I H Γ ( g Γ (v)) )z Γ = A Γ g Γ (v) A Γ g Γ (v), (a.e. v V Γ). (4.2) Thanks to H Γ z Γ = 0, we deduce that A Γ z Γ H Γ G z Γ = z Γ 2 + H Γ G z Γ 2 z Γ = 1, with G : z Γ Rm an arbitrary inear operator of norm G = 1. Finay, thanks to F Γ G A Γ G, we have F Γ G 1 F Γ G 2 A Γ G 1 A Γ G 2 = H Γ (G 1 G 2 ) z Γ G 1 G 2, so that F Γ is Lipschitz with factor Lip(F Γ ) = 1. Lemma 4.2. Let Γ R m be a Lipschitz (m 1)-graph with Γ int Ẑ and Hm 1 ( Ẑ Γ) = 0 for a cosed set Ẑ. Let {sk } k=0 (0, s) with sk 0, (k ). Suppose that g Γ BV(V Γ ; R m zγ ). Then we can find poyhedra Lipschitz graphs {Γ k } k=0 of factor at most L = L (Γ), satisfying Γ k Ẑ, z Γ k = z Γ, V Γ k V Γ, (k = 0, 1, 2,...), and We aso have the convergences Γ k Γ \ Ẑ + B(0, sk /2). (4.3) H m 1 Γ k H m 1 Γ \ Ẑ weaky* in M(Rm ), (k ), (4.4) ν Γ kh m 1 Γ k ν Γ H m 1 Γ \ Ẑ weaky* in M(Rm ; S m 1 ), (k ). (4.5) Regarding the maps {g Γ k} k=0, we have g Γ k BV(V Γ k; Rm z Γ ) with g Γ k g Γ L (V Γ k ;R m ) s k /2, (4.6) ν Γ k g Γ k ν Γ g Γ L 1 (V Γ k ;R m ) s k, and (4.7) ν Γ k g Γ k BV(VΓ k ;R m ) g Γ k BV(VΓ k ;R m zγ ) C ) 11( gγ L 1 (V Γ ;R m ) + g Γ BV(VΓ ;R m zγ ) (4.8) for some constant C 11 = C 11 (m). 16
17 Proof. Suppose we construct Γ k := g Γ k(ṽ k ) \ Ẑ for some g Γ k : z Γ Rm of Lipschitz factor at most L, and poyhedra Ṽ k V Γ with Γ g Γ (Ṽ k ) Ẑ. Then z Γ k = z Γ and V Γ k = g 1 (Γ k ) Γ Ṽ k with k Γ k Ẑ hoding. Moreover, (4.3) foows if we show (4.6). Since g Γ k(v) 1, (v Ṽ k ), we deduce from Lemma 4.1 that ν Γ k g Γ k = F Γ k g Γ k for the Lipschitz function F Γ k. Since g Γ k(x) 1 and F Γk (G) 1 for a x, G, we find that ν Γ k g Γ k L 1 (V Γ k ;R m ) = F Γ k g Γ k L 1 (V Γ k ;R m ) g Γ k L 1 (V Γ k ;R m ). If g Γ k BV(V Γ k; R m z Γ ), it thus foows from the BV chain rue and Lip(F Γ k) = 1 that ν Γ k g Γ k BV(V Γ k; R m ) with ν Γ k g Γ k BV(VΓ k ;R m ) = F Γ k g Γ k BV(VΓ k ;R m ) = F Γ k g Γ k R zγ BV(R 1 z Λ V Γ k ;R m ) x g Γ k(r zγ x)r zγ BV(R 1 z Λ V Γ k ;R m (m 1) ) = g Γ k BV(VΓ k ;R m z Γ ). From the Lipschitz property of F Γ k, we aso deduce that ν Γ k g Γ k ν Γ g Γ L 1 (V Γ k ;R m ) = F Γ k g Γ k F Γ g Γ L 1 (V Γ k ;R m ) Thus (4.7) and (4.8) foow from showing g Γ k g Γ L 1 (V Γ k ;R m z Γ ). g Γ k BV(VΓ k ;R m z Γ ) C 11( gγ L 1 (V Γ ;R m ) + g Γ BV(VΓ ;R m z Γ ) ), (4.9) and, respectivey, g Γ k g Γ L 1 (V Γ k ;R m z Γ ) sk. (4.10) Next we want to show that (4.4), (4.5) foow if we show (4.6) and (4.10). Indeed, et ϕ Cc (R m ) and define U := Rz 1 Γ Ṽ k, as we as g = g Γ R zγ and g k = g Γ k R zγ, where we reca that R z : R m 1 z is the basis matrix of z. Then the area formua gives g Γ k (Ṽ k ) ϕ dh m 1 ϕ dh m 1 g Γ (Ṽ k ) = U ϕ( g k (x))j m 1 ( g k (x)) dx ϕ( g(x))j m 1 ( g(x)) dx. U Empoying the fact that the map (x, y) xy is Lipschitz on bounded sets, it foows that g Γ k (Ṽ k ) ϕ dh m 1 ϕ dh m 1 ϕ( g k (x))j m 1 ( g k (x)) ϕ( g(x))j m 1 ( g(x)) dx g Γ (Ṽ k ) U ( C 12 ϕ( g k (x)) ϕ( g(x)) dx + J m 1 ( g k (x)) J m 1 ( g(x)) ) dx (4.11) U for some constant C 12 = C 12 (ϕ, L ). Minding (4.6), the first integra of (4.11) goes to zero because ϕ Cc (R m ) is uniformy continuous. For the second integra, we observe from (4.10) that g k converges to g in L 1, which we reca to impy amost uniform convergence for a subsequence. That is, after possiby switching to an unreabeed subsequence, for every ɛ > 0 there exists a measurabe subset E Ω with L m (Ω\E) < ɛ, and g k g uniformy on E. By the uniform Lipschitz continuity of {g k } k=0, the vaues of gk moreover ie in a bounded set. With these observations it now easiy U 17
18 foows that the second integra of (4.11) aso tends to zero. Thus the eft hand side of (4.11) tends to zero. We have therefore shown that H m 1 g Γ k(ṽ k ) H m 1 g Γ (V Γ ). By assumption H m 1 (Γ Ẑ) = 0, so that by Proposition 2.1 Minding the construction of Γ k, we have both H m 1 g Γ k(ṽ k ) \ Ẑ H m 1 g Γ (V Γ ) \ Ẑ. (4.12) H m 1 Γ k = H m 1 g Γ k(ṽ k ) \ Ẑ and Hm 1 g Γ (V Γ ) \ Ẑ = Hm 1 Γ \ Ẑ. (4.13) The convergence (4.4) now foows from (4.12) and (4.13). Since (4.5) can be shown in a simiar fashion with the hep of (4.7), we skip the detais. It remains to construct g Γ k and V Γ k such that (4.6), (4.9), and (4.10) hod. To begin with, et {T } =0, be a sequence of uniform trianguations of zγ, each a subdivision of the previous with edge ength approaching zero as. We then et Ṽ := {T T T V Γ }. For sufficienty arge, we have Γ \ Ẑ g Γ(Ṽ) and g Γ ( Ṽ) int Ẑ. Since g Γ BV(V Γ ; R m z Γ ), we may by moification approximate g Γ on Ṽ by smooth functions g ɛ, satisfying for sufficienty sma ɛ > 0 estimates of the type (4.6), (4.10) aong with g ɛ ( Ṽ k ) int Ẑ and g ɛ BV( Ṽ k ;R m z Γ ) g Γ BV(VΓ ;R m z Γ ). Moreover, the Lipschitz factor of g ɛ is bounded by that of g Γ. As a consequence of this approximation, we may assume that g Γ W 1, (V Γ ; R m ) W 2,1 (V Γ ; R m ). (4.14) For each = 0, 1, 2,..., we denote by {x,n } M n=1 the noda points of the trianguation T. Define ϕ,n such that it is affine on each T and supp ϕ,n K,n := T. We then define g k : Ṽ k R m as g k := M (k) n=1 T T :x,n T ϕ (k),n g(x (k),n ), (k = 0, 1, 2,...) for some (k) k. That is, g k is the Lagrange interpoation of g on T (k). Minding that we have without oss of generaity assumed (4.14), choosing (k) is sufficienty arge, we observe that g k satisfies for some constant C 13 = C 13 (m, T 1 ) the standard finite eement estimates (see, e.g., [5]) g k W 1, (Ṽ k ;R m ) C 13 g Γ W 1, (V Γ ;R m ), g k g Γ L (Ṽ k ;R m ) sk /2, and g k g Γ L 1 (Ṽ k ;R m m ) sk /4, (k = 0, 1, 2,...). In particuar, g k has Lipschitz factor at most L (Γ) = C 13 g Γ W 1, (V Γ ;R m ), and (4.6), (4.10) are satisfied. Finay, to show (4.9), we observe that g k BV(VΓ k ;R m z Γ ) C 14 g Γ W 2,1 (V Γ ;R m ), (k = 0, 1, 2,...), (4.15) 18
19 for some constant C 14 = C 14 (m, T 1 ). For piecewise affine shape functions, this does not foow from standard resuts due to insufficient reguarity. If we use smooth (or W 2,1 ) shape functions, we however get by standard resuts (see [5, Theorem ]) that g k BV(VΓ k ;R m z Γ ) gk W 2,1 (V Γ k ;R m ) C 14 g Γ W 2,1 (V Γ ;R m ), (k = 0, 1, 2,...). Thus, to get (4.15), we can simpy approximate the piecewise affine shape functions by smooth shape functions on the same trianguation T k and pass to the imit. (To construct such smooth shape functions, for each ϕ = ϕ,n with support K = K,n, we may take a sequence of functions {ψ i } i=0 such that ψ i 1 on {x K dist( K, x) > 1/i}, and ψ i 0 on {x K dist( K, x) < 2/i}. As smooth approximations of ϕ supported on K, we take we take ϕ i := (ρ 1/(2i) Rz 1 Λ ) (ψ i ϕ), (i = 0, 1, 2,...). Here {ρ ɛ } ɛ>0 are the standard moifiers on R m 1 = Rz 1 Λ zγ.) Lemma 4.3. Let F be a finite coection of maps ψ C 1 (c Ω R m R m S m 1 ). Denote T ψ u := ψ(, u +, u, ν Ju )H m 1 J u, (ψ F). (4.16) Suppose that F incudes the functions ψ ν i : (x, u +, u, ν) ν i, and ψ ± i : (x, u +, u, ν) (u ± ) i for i {1,..., m}. Let {v, w 0, w 1, w 2,...} SBV(Ω; R K ) L M (Ω; RK ) satisfy sup H m 1 (J w k) <, (4.17) k sup η(t ψ w k ) <, (ψ F), (4.18) k ν Jw k Hm 1 J w k ν Jv H m 1 J v weaky* in M(Ω; S m 1 ), and, (4.19) (w k ) ± H m 1 J w k v ± H m 1 J v weaky* in M(Ω; R m ). (4.20) Then, after possiby moving to an unreabeed subsequence, we have T ψ w k T ψ v and T ψ w k T ψ v for a ψ F. Proof. Let ψ F. The function ψ is bounded on the compact set c Ω c B(0, M) c B(0, M) S m 1 ), so that, minding w k L (Ω;R m ) M, the sequence {T ψ w k } k=0 is aso bounded in M(Ω). Therefore, after possiby moving to a subsequence, we may assume the measures {T ψ w k } k=0 to converge weaky* to some ω ψ M(Ω), and the measures { T ψ w k } k=0 to converge weaky* to some λ ψ M(Ω). By (4.18) and Theorem 3.1 it foows that λ ψ = ω ψ. The question remains, whether ω ψ = T ψ v. Indeed, it foows from the weak* convergences (4.19) and (4.20) that ω ψ = T ψ v for ψ = ψi ν, ψ± i, (i = 1,..., m). In particuar for µ u := (u +, u, ν Ju )H m 1 J u M(Ω; R m R m S m 1 ). Minding that ν Ju (x) = 1, we may now write for f Cc ( ψ f (x, a, b, z) := f(x)ψ x, µ w k µ v and µ w k (Ω) µ v (Ω). (4.21) a z, (Ω) and b z, z z ) z that Ω f(x) dt ψ u(x) = = Ω Ω =: Ω f(x)ψ ( x, u + (x), u (x), ν Ju (x) ) dh m 1 J u f(x) ψ( x, u + (x), u (x), ν Ju (x) ) ( u + (x), u (x), ν Ju (x) ) d µ u (x). ( ) ψ f x, dµk d µ k d µ u (x). 19
20 The function ψ f is continuous, because ψ is C 1, ν Ju (x) = 1, and 1/ z(x) = (u + (x), u (x), ν Ju (x)) / ν Ju (x) = (u + (x), u (x), ν Ju (x)) 2M It therefore foows from the Reshetnyak continuity theorem (see, e.g., [3, Theorem 2.39]) and (4.21) that T ψ w k T ψ v. Hence µ ψ = T ψ v. Next we prove a trace resut. Proposition 4.1. Let V R m 1 be an open and bounded, f : V R Lipschitz continuous of factor L, and ϱ > 0. Define Ω := {(x, s) V R s f(x) + ( ϱ, ϱ)}, and g(x) := (x, f(x)). Suppose u W 1, (Ω). Then u has a trace u Γ on Γ := g(v ), and u Γ g W 1, (V ) with u Γ g W 1, (V ) C 15 u W 1, (Ω) (4.22) for some constant C 15 = C 15 (L, m). Proof. The existence of a trace u Γ L 1 (Γ) foows from standard resuts. We just have show that u Γ g is Lipschitz on V. Let us set U := V ( ϱ, ϱ) and v(x, s) := u(x, f(x) + s) = u( g(x, s)) ((x, s) U), where g(x, s) := g(x) + (0, s). We have ( g(x) g(x, s) = 0 as we as so that ceary v W 1, (U) with the bound for some constant C 16 = C 16 (L, m). ) + ( ) 0 0, ((x, s) U), 0 1 v(x, s) = g(x, s) u( g(x, s)), v W 1, (U) C 16 u W 1, (Ω) (4.23) Since u is (Lipschitz) continuous, as is v, we observe that u Γ g = v 0 := v(, 0). But ceary, sti by continuity, Lipschitz continuity is preserved by traces on affine sets, in particuar on V {0}. We therefore obtain v 0 W 1, (V ) v W 1, (U). (4.24) Combining (4.23), (4.24) shows (4.22). Proposition 4.2. Let V R m 1 be an open and bounded, f : V R Lipschitz continuous of factor L, and ϱ > 0. Define Ω := {(x, s) V R s f(x) + ( ϱ, ϱ)}, Ω ± := {(x, s) V R s f(x) + (0, ±ϱ)}, and g(x) := (x, f(x)). Let Γ := g(v ). Suppose u W 1, (Ω\Γ) with H m 1 ({x Γ u + (x) u (x)}) = 0. Then there exist extensions v (±) W 1, (Ω) of u Ω ±, satisfying v (±) L (Ω) u L (Ω ± ) and v (±) W 1, (Ω) C 17 u W 1, (Ω ± ) (4.25) for some C 17 = C 17 (L, m, u). Moreover L m ({x Ω v (+) (x) = v ( ) (x)} = 0. (4.26) 20
21 Proof. From Proposition 4.1, we deduce that u ± g W 1, (V ) C 15 u W 1, (Ω) for C 15 = C 15 (L, m). Let q 0, q 1 : R + R + be the saw-tooth functions that osciate between the vaues 0 and 1 at sope q 0 = q 1 = 2 u L (Ω), with initia vaues q 0 (0) = 0 and q 1 (0) = 1. Let p(x) := g(p (0,1) (x)) be the projection of x on Γ (aong z Γ = (1, 0)). Then the functions u ± p are Lipschitz with factor at most L u L (Ω ± ;R m ). Consequenty, defining v (±) (x) = { u(x), x Ω ±, q 1 ( x p(x) )u ± (p(x)) + q 0 ( x p(x) )u (p(x)), x Ω, and minding that u ± and q 0, q 1 are bounded, we find that v ± are Lipschitz and (4.25) hods for some C 17 = C 17 (L, m, u). Moreover, we deduce (4.26) thanks to H m 1 ({x Γ u + (x) u (x)}) = 0 and L 1 ({s f(x) + ( δ, δ) v (+) (x, s) = v ( ) (x, s)}), (a.e. x V ). The atter foows from the fact that by construction the functions x q i ( x p(x) ), (i = 0, 1,), osciate faster than u on ines {y} R, (y V ). Remark 4.1. The property (4.26) together with preserving the L bound in (4.25) are the reason for not using standard Soboev or Lipschitz (cf. [10]) extension resuts. Remark 4.2. Both Proposition 4.1 and Proposition 4.2 can easiy by a rotation argument be extended to domains Ω = g Γ (V Γ ) + z Γ ( ϱ, ϱ) defined by a genera Lipschitz graph Γ. 5. The space and boundary covers We now introduce the space A(Ω; R K ) of functions admissibe for the approximation theorem stated in the next section. Definition 5.1. Given an open set Ω R m with Lipschitz boundary, we denote by A(Ω; R K ) the set of functions u : Ω R K that are in W 1, (Ω\J; R K ) for a (with respect to Ω) compact set J = Ĵu Ω satisfying the foowing: (i) H m 1 (J \ J u ) = 0. (ii) J = N i=1 Λ i, where Λ i is a Lipschitz (m 1)-graph of constant at most L. (iii) Λ i Λ n Λ i Λ n and Λ i Ω Λ i. with Λ i := g Λi ( V Λi ), (i, n = 1,..., N; i n), (iv) J Sp m 1 (Ω, L, M) for some M (0, ). (v) Each V Λi, (i = 1,..., N) has Lipschitz boundary. (vi) g Λi BV(V Λi ; R m zλ i ), (i = 1,..., N). We wi henceforth use the shorthand notation V i := V Λi, g i := g Λi, and z i := z Λi. Remark 5.1. Observe that if {u i } i=0 A(Ω; RK ) with the same constants L, M, i.e., Ĵ u i Sp m 1 (Ω, L, M), and if sup u i W i 1, (Ω\Ĵu i ) + Hm 1 (Ĵui) + Sp(Ĵui) <, then it foows from Theorem 3.2 and Proposition 3.2 that there exists u SBV(Ω; R K ) with Ĵ u Sp m 1 (Ω, L, M) such that the convergences (3.24) (3.27) hod for a subsequence. Simiar cosure properties for sets within the space A(Ω; R K ) itsef woud depend on further imiting the compexity and number of the graphs {Λ i } N i=1. 21
22 In the remainder of this section we provide a series of technica emmas studying the covering of N i=1 Λ i by cubes on a grid. We begin by definitions reated to the cover. Definition 5.2. We denote rq := [0, r] m and rq 0 := [0, r) m for r > 0. Definition 5.3. Suppose Z = X + rq for some set X y + rz m with r > 0 and y Q 0. We then say that E Z is a face of Z if for some ξ X the set E ξ is a face of rq, i.e., for some i = 1,..., m and θ {0, 1}, we have E = ξ + r{x Q x, e i = θ}. Definition 5.4. Suppose J = N i=1 Λ i is as in Definition 5.1. Denote J := N i=1 Λ i. Then for r > 0 and y Q 0, we et F r := {ξ rz m (ξ + 2rQ) J }, F y r := ry + F r, Z y r := F y r + rq. and The sets Z y r, (y Q 0 ), are the covers of the boundary we are interested in. We now show a bound on the size of the cover, and then an average density estimate for sets in the neighbourhood of this famiy of covers. Then we wi prove further emmas. Lemma 5.1. Let J be as in Definition 5.1. There then exists a constant C 18 = C 18 (J) such that for each r > 0 and i = 1,..., N there are K Cr 2 m open bas B 1,..., B K of diameter at most r with V Λi K k=1 B k. Proof. This is a consequence of the Lipschitz boundary property Definition 5.1(v). We take an open cover U 1,..., U M of V Λi such that V Λi U n is a Lipschitz graph (in the (m 1)-dimensiona space zλ i ) for each n = 1,..., M. Each of the sets V Λi U n, may, as a Lipschitz graph of dimension m 2, triviay be covered by C i,n r 2 m open bas of diameter at most r, for some C i,n = C i,n (J). Lemma 5.2. # F r C 19 r 2 m for C 19 = C 19 (J). Proof. One simpy considers the cover of V i by K Cr 2 m bas B 1,... B K of diameter r from Lemma 5.1. Since g i is Lipschitz of factor at most L, covering the images g i (B n ) by squares rq + ξ with ξ rz m produces the caim. Lemma 5.3. Let J be as in Definition 5.1 and J = N i=1 Λ i for Lipschitz (m 1)-graphs {Λ i }N i=1. Then there exists a constant C 20 = C 20 (J, N, m) such that for every r > 0 and h (0, r], we have the bound H m 1( J (Zr y + B(0, h)) \ Z y ) r dy C20 h. (5.1) Q 0 Proof. As χ F y r +rq(x) = ξ F r χ ξ+ry+rq (x) for L m -a.e. y Q 0, we begin by cacuating χ F y r +rq(x) dy = Q 0 Q 0 χ ξ+ry+rq (x) dy = r m ξ F r ξ F r rq 0 χ ξ+y+rq (x) dy. Using χ F y r +rq+b(0,h)(x) ξ F r χ ξ+ry+rq+b(0,h) (x), we simiary get the inequaity Q 0 χ F y r +rq+b(0,h)(x) dy r m ξ F r rq 0 χ ξ+y+rq+b(0,h) (x) dy. 22
Mat 1501 lecture notes, penultimate installment
Mat 1501 ecture notes, penutimate instament 1. bounded variation: functions of a singe variabe optiona) I beieve that we wi not actuay use the materia in this section the point is mainy to motivate the
More informationBASIC NOTIONS AND RESULTS IN TOPOLOGY. 1. Metric spaces. Sets with finite diameter are called bounded sets. For x X and r > 0 the set
BASIC NOTIONS AND RESULTS IN TOPOLOGY 1. Metric spaces A metric on a set X is a map d : X X R + with the properties: d(x, y) 0 and d(x, y) = 0 x = y, d(x, y) = d(y, x), d(x, y) d(x, z) + d(z, y), for a
More informationWeek 6 Lectures, Math 6451, Tanveer
Fourier Series Week 6 Lectures, Math 645, Tanveer In the context of separation of variabe to find soutions of PDEs, we encountered or and in other cases f(x = f(x = a 0 + f(x = a 0 + b n sin nπx { a n
More informationRestricted weak type on maximal linear and multilinear integral maps.
Restricted weak type on maxima inear and mutiinear integra maps. Oscar Basco Abstract It is shown that mutiinear operators of the form T (f 1,..., f k )(x) = R K(x, y n 1,..., y k )f 1 (y 1 )...f k (y
More informationBourgain s Theorem. Computational and Metric Geometry. Instructor: Yury Makarychev. d(s 1, s 2 ).
Bourgain s Theorem Computationa and Metric Geometry Instructor: Yury Makarychev 1 Notation Given a metric space (X, d) and S X, the distance from x X to S equas d(x, S) = inf d(x, s). s S The distance
More information6 Wave Equation on an Interval: Separation of Variables
6 Wave Equation on an Interva: Separation of Variabes 6.1 Dirichet Boundary Conditions Ref: Strauss, Chapter 4 We now use the separation of variabes technique to study the wave equation on a finite interva.
More informationProblem set 6 The Perron Frobenius theorem.
Probem set 6 The Perron Frobenius theorem. Math 22a4 Oct 2 204, Due Oct.28 In a future probem set I want to discuss some criteria which aow us to concude that that the ground state of a sef-adjoint operator
More informationCS229 Lecture notes. Andrew Ng
CS229 Lecture notes Andrew Ng Part IX The EM agorithm In the previous set of notes, we taked about the EM agorithm as appied to fitting a mixture of Gaussians. In this set of notes, we give a broader view
More informationCoupling of LWR and phase transition models at boundary
Couping of LW and phase transition modes at boundary Mauro Garaveo Dipartimento di Matematica e Appicazioni, Università di Miano Bicocca, via. Cozzi 53, 20125 Miano Itay. Benedetto Piccoi Department of
More information4 Separation of Variables
4 Separation of Variabes In this chapter we describe a cassica technique for constructing forma soutions to inear boundary vaue probems. The soution of three cassica (paraboic, hyperboic and eiptic) PDE
More informationCourse 2BA1, Section 11: Periodic Functions and Fourier Series
Course BA, 8 9 Section : Periodic Functions and Fourier Series David R. Wikins Copyright c David R. Wikins 9 Contents Periodic Functions and Fourier Series 74. Fourier Series of Even and Odd Functions...........
More informationHomework 5 Solutions
Stat 310B/Math 230B Theory of Probabiity Homework 5 Soutions Andrea Montanari Due on 2/19/2014 Exercise [5.3.20] 1. We caim that n 2 [ E[h F n ] = 2 n i=1 A i,n h(u)du ] I Ai,n (t). (1) Indeed, integrabiity
More informationLecture Notes 4: Fourier Series and PDE s
Lecture Notes 4: Fourier Series and PDE s 1. Periodic Functions A function fx defined on R is caed a periodic function if there exists a number T > such that fx + T = fx, x R. 1.1 The smaest number T for
More informationA UNIVERSAL METRIC FOR THE CANONICAL BUNDLE OF A HOLOMORPHIC FAMILY OF PROJECTIVE ALGEBRAIC MANIFOLDS
A UNIERSAL METRIC FOR THE CANONICAL BUNDLE OF A HOLOMORPHIC FAMILY OF PROJECTIE ALGEBRAIC MANIFOLDS DROR AROLIN Dedicated to M Saah Baouendi on the occasion of his 60th birthday 1 Introduction In his ceebrated
More information$, (2.1) n="# #. (2.2)
Chapter. Eectrostatic II Notes: Most of the materia presented in this chapter is taken from Jackson, Chap.,, and 4, and Di Bartoo, Chap... Mathematica Considerations.. The Fourier series and the Fourier
More informationNOISE-INDUCED STABILIZATION OF STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
NOISE-INDUCED STABILIZATION OF STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS TONY ALLEN, EMILY GEBHARDT, AND ADAM KLUBALL 3 ADVISOR: DR. TIFFANY KOLBA 4 Abstract. The phenomenon of noise-induced stabiization occurs
More informationMATH 172: MOTIVATION FOR FOURIER SERIES: SEPARATION OF VARIABLES
MATH 172: MOTIVATION FOR FOURIER SERIES: SEPARATION OF VARIABLES Separation of variabes is a method to sove certain PDEs which have a warped product structure. First, on R n, a inear PDE of order m is
More informationQUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF FINITE-DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATIONS OF FREE-DISCONTINUITY PROBLEMS
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF FINITE-DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATIONS OF FREE-DISCONTINUITY PROBLEMS ANNIKA BACH, ANDREA BRAIDES, AND CATERINA IDA ZEPPIERI Abstract. Motivated by appications to image reconstruction,
More information2M2. Fourier Series Prof Bill Lionheart
M. Fourier Series Prof Bi Lionheart 1. The Fourier series of the periodic function f(x) with period has the form f(x) = a 0 + ( a n cos πnx + b n sin πnx ). Here the rea numbers a n, b n are caed the Fourier
More informationMARKOV CHAINS AND MARKOV DECISION THEORY. Contents
MARKOV CHAINS AND MARKOV DECISION THEORY ARINDRIMA DATTA Abstract. In this paper, we begin with a forma introduction to probabiity and expain the concept of random variabes and stochastic processes. After
More informationSeparation of Variables and a Spherical Shell with Surface Charge
Separation of Variabes and a Spherica She with Surface Charge In cass we worked out the eectrostatic potentia due to a spherica she of radius R with a surface charge density σθ = σ cos θ. This cacuation
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.fa] 23 Aug 2018
An Exact Upper Bound on the L p Lebesgue Constant and The -Rényi Entropy Power Inequaity for Integer Vaued Random Variabes arxiv:808.0773v [math.fa] 3 Aug 08 Peng Xu, Mokshay Madiman, James Mebourne Abstract
More informationu(x) s.t. px w x 0 Denote the solution to this problem by ˆx(p, x). In order to obtain ˆx we may simply solve the standard problem max x 0
Bocconi University PhD in Economics - Microeconomics I Prof M Messner Probem Set 4 - Soution Probem : If an individua has an endowment instead of a monetary income his weath depends on price eves In particuar,
More informationSection 6: Magnetostatics
agnetic fieds in matter Section 6: agnetostatics In the previous sections we assumed that the current density J is a known function of coordinates. In the presence of matter this is not aways true. The
More informationA Brief Introduction to Markov Chains and Hidden Markov Models
A Brief Introduction to Markov Chains and Hidden Markov Modes Aen B MacKenzie Notes for December 1, 3, &8, 2015 Discrete-Time Markov Chains You may reca that when we first introduced random processes,
More information4 1-D Boundary Value Problems Heat Equation
4 -D Boundary Vaue Probems Heat Equation The main purpose of this chapter is to study boundary vaue probems for the heat equation on a finite rod a x b. u t (x, t = ku xx (x, t, a < x < b, t > u(x, = ϕ(x
More informationC. Fourier Sine Series Overview
12 PHILIP D. LOEWEN C. Fourier Sine Series Overview Let some constant > be given. The symboic form of the FSS Eigenvaue probem combines an ordinary differentia equation (ODE) on the interva (, ) with a
More informationSome Measures for Asymmetry of Distributions
Some Measures for Asymmetry of Distributions Georgi N. Boshnakov First version: 31 January 2006 Research Report No. 5, 2006, Probabiity and Statistics Group Schoo of Mathematics, The University of Manchester
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.pr] 6 Oct 2017
EQUICONTINUOUS FAMILIES OF MARKOV OPERATORS IN VIEW OF ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY SANDER C. HILLE, TOMASZ SZAREK, AND MARIA A. ZIEMLAŃSKA arxiv:1710.02352v1 [math.pr] 6 Oct 2017 Abstract. Reation between equicontinuity
More informationPhysics 505 Fall 2007 Homework Assignment #5 Solutions. Textbook problems: Ch. 3: 3.13, 3.17, 3.26, 3.27
Physics 55 Fa 7 Homework Assignment #5 Soutions Textook proems: Ch. 3: 3.3, 3.7, 3.6, 3.7 3.3 Sove for the potentia in Proem 3., using the appropriate Green function otained in the text, and verify that
More informationSmoothness equivalence properties of univariate subdivision schemes and their projection analogues
Numerische Mathematik manuscript No. (wi be inserted by the editor) Smoothness equivaence properties of univariate subdivision schemes and their projection anaogues Phiipp Grohs TU Graz Institute of Geometry
More informationFourier Series. 10 (D3.9) Find the Cesàro sum of the series. 11 (D3.9) Let a and b be real numbers. Under what conditions does a series of the form
Exercises Fourier Anaysis MMG70, Autumn 007 The exercises are taken from: Version: Monday October, 007 DXY Section XY of H F Davis, Fourier Series and orthogona functions EÖ Some exercises from earier
More informationAnother Class of Admissible Perturbations of Special Expressions
Int. Journa of Math. Anaysis, Vo. 8, 014, no. 1, 1-8 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.1988/ijma.014.31187 Another Cass of Admissibe Perturbations of Specia Expressions Jerico B. Bacani
More informationAkaike Information Criterion for ANOVA Model with a Simple Order Restriction
Akaike Information Criterion for ANOVA Mode with a Simpe Order Restriction Yu Inatsu * Department of Mathematics, Graduate Schoo of Science, Hiroshima University ABSTRACT In this paper, we consider Akaike
More informationDistributed average consensus: Beyond the realm of linearity
Distributed average consensus: Beyond the ream of inearity Usman A. Khan, Soummya Kar, and José M. F. Moura Department of Eectrica and Computer Engineering Carnegie Meon University 5 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh,
More informationFRIEZE GROUPS IN R 2
FRIEZE GROUPS IN R 2 MAXWELL STOLARSKI Abstract. Focusing on the Eucidean pane under the Pythagorean Metric, our goa is to cassify the frieze groups, discrete subgroups of the set of isometries of the
More informationMath 124B January 17, 2012
Math 124B January 17, 212 Viktor Grigoryan 3 Fu Fourier series We saw in previous ectures how the Dirichet and Neumann boundary conditions ead to respectivey sine and cosine Fourier series of the initia
More informationLemma 1. Suppose K S is a compact subset and I α is a covering of K. There is a finite subcollection {I j } such that
2 Singuar Integras We start with a very usefu covering emma. Lemma. Suppose K S is a compact subset and I α is a covering of K. There is a finite subcoection {I j } such that. {I j } are disjoint. 2. The
More informationHigher dimensional PDEs and multidimensional eigenvalue problems
Higher dimensiona PEs and mutidimensiona eigenvaue probems 1 Probems with three independent variabes Consider the prototypica equations u t = u (iffusion) u tt = u (W ave) u zz = u (Lapace) where u = u
More informationFoliations and Global Inversion
Foiations and Goba Inversion E. Cabra Bareira Department of Mathematics Trinity University San Antonio, TX 78212 ebareir@trinity.edu January 2008 Abstract We consider topoogica conditions under which a
More informationLecture Note 3: Stationary Iterative Methods
MATH 5330: Computationa Methods of Linear Agebra Lecture Note 3: Stationary Iterative Methods Xianyi Zeng Department of Mathematica Sciences, UTEP Stationary Iterative Methods The Gaussian eimination (or
More informationSEMINAR 2. PENDULUMS. V = mgl cos θ. (2) L = T V = 1 2 ml2 θ2 + mgl cos θ, (3) d dt ml2 θ2 + mgl sin θ = 0, (4) θ + g l
Probem 7. Simpe Penduum SEMINAR. PENDULUMS A simpe penduum means a mass m suspended by a string weightess rigid rod of ength so that it can swing in a pane. The y-axis is directed down, x-axis is directed
More informationHomogeneity properties of subadditive functions
Annaes Mathematicae et Informaticae 32 2005 pp. 89 20. Homogeneity properties of subadditive functions Pá Burai and Árpád Száz Institute of Mathematics, University of Debrecen e-mai: buraip@math.kte.hu
More informationTHE REACHABILITY CONES OF ESSENTIALLY NONNEGATIVE MATRICES
THE REACHABILITY CONES OF ESSENTIALLY NONNEGATIVE MATRICES by Michae Neumann Department of Mathematics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 3009 and Ronad J. Stern Department of Mathematics, Concordia
More informationANALOG OF HEAT EQUATION FOR GAUSSIAN MEASURE OF A BALL IN HILBERT SPACE GYULA PAP
ANALOG OF HEAT EQUATION FOR GAUSSIAN MEASURE OF A BALL IN HILBERT SPACE GYULA PAP ABSTRACT. If µ is a Gaussian measure on a Hibert space with mean a and covariance operator T, and r is a} fixed positive
More information14 Separation of Variables Method
14 Separation of Variabes Method Consider, for exampe, the Dirichet probem u t = Du xx < x u(x, ) = f(x) < x < u(, t) = = u(, t) t > Let u(x, t) = T (t)φ(x); now substitute into the equation: dt
More informationPHYS 110B - HW #1 Fall 2005, Solutions by David Pace Equations referenced as Eq. # are from Griffiths Problem statements are paraphrased
PHYS 110B - HW #1 Fa 2005, Soutions by David Pace Equations referenced as Eq. # are from Griffiths Probem statements are paraphrased [1.] Probem 6.8 from Griffiths A ong cyinder has radius R and a magnetization
More informationDo Schools Matter for High Math Achievement? Evidence from the American Mathematics Competitions Glenn Ellison and Ashley Swanson Online Appendix
VOL. NO. DO SCHOOLS MATTER FOR HIGH MATH ACHIEVEMENT? 43 Do Schoos Matter for High Math Achievement? Evidence from the American Mathematics Competitions Genn Eison and Ashey Swanson Onine Appendix Appendix
More informationGauss Law. 2. Gauss s Law: connects charge and field 3. Applications of Gauss s Law
Gauss Law 1. Review on 1) Couomb s Law (charge and force) 2) Eectric Fied (fied and force) 2. Gauss s Law: connects charge and fied 3. Appications of Gauss s Law Couomb s Law and Eectric Fied Couomb s
More informationPartial permutation decoding for MacDonald codes
Partia permutation decoding for MacDonad codes J.D. Key Department of Mathematics and Appied Mathematics University of the Western Cape 7535 Bevie, South Africa P. Seneviratne Department of Mathematics
More informationMA 201: Partial Differential Equations Lecture - 10
MA 201: Partia Differentia Equations Lecture - 10 Separation of Variabes, One dimensiona Wave Equation Initia Boundary Vaue Probem (IBVP) Reca: A physica probem governed by a PDE may contain both boundary
More informationThe Group Structure on a Smooth Tropical Cubic
The Group Structure on a Smooth Tropica Cubic Ethan Lake Apri 20, 2015 Abstract Just as in in cassica agebraic geometry, it is possibe to define a group aw on a smooth tropica cubic curve. In this note,
More informationCompletion. is dense in H. If V is complete, then U(V) = H.
Competion Theorem 1 (Competion) If ( V V ) is any inner product space then there exists a Hibert space ( H H ) and a map U : V H such that (i) U is 1 1 (ii) U is inear (iii) UxUy H xy V for a xy V (iv)
More informationThe arc is the only chainable continuum admitting a mean
The arc is the ony chainabe continuum admitting a mean Aejandro Ianes and Hugo Vianueva September 4, 26 Abstract Let X be a metric continuum. A mean on X is a continuous function : X X! X such that for
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 17 Dec 2018
On the Extrema Maximum Agreement Subtree Probem arxiv:1812.06951v1 [math.o] 17 Dec 2018 Aexey Markin Department of omputer Science, Iowa State University, USA amarkin@iastate.edu Abstract Given two phyogenetic
More information221B Lecture Notes Notes on Spherical Bessel Functions
Definitions B Lecture Notes Notes on Spherica Besse Functions We woud ike to sove the free Schrödinger equation [ h d r R(r) = h k R(r). () m r dr r m R(r) is the radia wave function ψ( x) = R(r)Y m (θ,
More informationMore Scattering: the Partial Wave Expansion
More Scattering: the Partia Wave Expansion Michae Fower /7/8 Pane Waves and Partia Waves We are considering the soution to Schrödinger s equation for scattering of an incoming pane wave in the z-direction
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 12 May 2013
EMBEDDING CYCLES IN FINITE PLANES FELIX LAZEBNIK, KEITH E. MELLINGER, AND SCAR VEGA arxiv:1305.2646v1 [math.c] 12 May 2013 Abstract. We define and study embeddings of cyces in finite affine and projective
More informationVolume 13, MAIN ARTICLES
Voume 13, 2009 1 MAIN ARTICLES THE BASIC BVPs OF THE THEORY OF ELASTIC BINARY MIXTURES FOR A HALF-PLANE WITH CURVILINEAR CUTS Bitsadze L. I. Vekua Institute of Appied Mathematics of Iv. Javakhishvii Tbiisi
More informationCHAPTER 2 AN INTRODUCTION TO WAVELET ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 2 AN INTRODUCTION TO WAVELET ANALYSIS [This chapter is based on the ectures of Professor D.V. Pai, Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technoogy Bombay, Powai, Mumbai - 400 076, India.]
More informationASummaryofGaussianProcesses Coryn A.L. Bailer-Jones
ASummaryofGaussianProcesses Coryn A.L. Baier-Jones Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge caj@mrao.cam.ac.uk Introduction A genera prediction probem can be posed as foows. We consider that the variabe
More informationKing Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
King Fahd University of Petroeum & Mineras DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES Technica Report Series TR 369 December 6 Genera decay of soutions of a viscoeastic equation Saim A. Messaoudi DHAHRAN 3161
More informationLecture 17 - The Secrets we have Swept Under the Rug
Lecture 17 - The Secrets we have Swept Under the Rug Today s ectures examines some of the uirky features of eectrostatics that we have negected up unti this point A Puzze... Let s go back to the basics
More informationFOURIER SERIES ON ANY INTERVAL
FOURIER SERIES ON ANY INTERVAL Overview We have spent considerabe time earning how to compute Fourier series for functions that have a period of 2p on the interva (-p,p). We have aso seen how Fourier series
More informationFFTs in Graphics and Vision. Spherical Convolution and Axial Symmetry Detection
FFTs in Graphics and Vision Spherica Convoution and Axia Symmetry Detection Outine Math Review Symmetry Genera Convoution Spherica Convoution Axia Symmetry Detection Math Review Symmetry: Given a unitary
More informationXSAT of linear CNF formulas
XSAT of inear CN formuas Bernd R. Schuh Dr. Bernd Schuh, D-50968 Kön, Germany; bernd.schuh@netcoogne.de eywords: compexity, XSAT, exact inear formua, -reguarity, -uniformity, NPcompeteness Abstract. Open
More informationWave Equation Dirichlet Boundary Conditions
Wave Equation Dirichet Boundary Conditions u tt x, t = c u xx x, t, < x 1 u, t =, u, t = ux, = fx u t x, = gx Look for simpe soutions in the form ux, t = XxT t Substituting into 13 and dividing
More informationMath 124B January 31, 2012
Math 124B January 31, 212 Viktor Grigoryan 7 Inhomogeneous boundary vaue probems Having studied the theory of Fourier series, with which we successfuy soved boundary vaue probems for the homogeneous heat
More informationThe distribution of the number of nodes in the relative interior of the typical I-segment in homogeneous planar anisotropic STIT Tessellations
Comment.Math.Univ.Caroin. 51,3(21) 53 512 53 The distribution of the number of nodes in the reative interior of the typica I-segment in homogeneous panar anisotropic STIT Tesseations Christoph Thäe Abstract.
More informationRadiation Fields. Lecture 12
Radiation Fieds Lecture 12 1 Mutipoe expansion Separate Maxwe s equations into two sets of equations, each set separatey invoving either the eectric or the magnetic fied. After remova of the time dependence
More informationAssignment 7 Due Tuessday, March 29, 2016
Math 45 / AMCS 55 Dr. DeTurck Assignment 7 Due Tuessday, March 9, 6 Topics for this week Convergence of Fourier series; Lapace s equation and harmonic functions: basic properties, compuations on rectanges
More informationarxiv: v3 [math.ca] 8 Nov 2018
RESTRICTIONS OF HIGHER DERIVATIVES OF THE FOURIER TRANSFORM MICHAEL GOLDBERG AND DMITRIY STOLYAROV arxiv:1809.04159v3 [math.ca] 8 Nov 018 Abstract. We consider severa probems reated to the restriction
More informationOn Non-Optimally Expanding Sets in Grassmann Graphs
ectronic Cooquium on Computationa Compexity, Report No. 94 (07) On Non-Optimay xpanding Sets in Grassmann Graphs Irit Dinur Subhash Khot Guy Kinder Dor Minzer Mui Safra Abstract The paper investigates
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.pr] 30 Nov 2017
REGULARIZATIO OF O-ORMAL MATRICES BY GAUSSIA OISE - THE BADED TOEPLITZ AD TWISTED TOEPLITZ CASES AIRBA BASAK, ELLIOT PAQUETTE, AD OFER ZEITOUI arxiv:7242v [mathpr] 3 ov 27 Abstract We consider the spectrum
More informationHAMILTON DECOMPOSITIONS OF ONE-ENDED CAYLEY GRAPHS
HAMILTON DECOMPOSITIONS OF ONE-ENDED CAYLEY GRAPHS JOSHUA ERDE, FLORIAN LEHNER, AND MAX PITZ Abstract. We prove that any one-ended, ocay finite Cayey graph with non-torsion generators admits a decomposition
More informationThe Binary Space Partitioning-Tree Process Supplementary Material
The inary Space Partitioning-Tree Process Suppementary Materia Xuhui Fan in Li Scott. Sisson Schoo of omputer Science Fudan University ibin@fudan.edu.cn Schoo of Mathematics and Statistics University of
More informationStrauss PDEs 2e: Section Exercise 2 Page 1 of 12. For problem (1), complete the calculation of the series in case j(t) = 0 and h(t) = e t.
Strauss PDEs e: Section 5.6 - Exercise Page 1 of 1 Exercise For probem (1, compete the cacuation of the series in case j(t = and h(t = e t. Soution With j(t = and h(t = e t, probem (1 on page 147 becomes
More informationMONOCHROMATIC LOOSE PATHS IN MULTICOLORED k-uniform CLIQUES
MONOCHROMATIC LOOSE PATHS IN MULTICOLORED k-uniform CLIQUES ANDRZEJ DUDEK AND ANDRZEJ RUCIŃSKI Abstract. For positive integers k and, a k-uniform hypergraph is caed a oose path of ength, and denoted by
More informationMIXING AUTOMORPHISMS OF COMPACT GROUPS AND A THEOREM OF SCHLICKEWEI
MIXING AUTOMORPHISMS OF COMPACT GROUPS AND A THEOREM OF SCHLICKEWEI KLAUS SCHMIDT AND TOM WARD Abstract. We prove that every mixing Z d -action by automorphisms of a compact, connected, abeian group is
More informationPhysics 235 Chapter 8. Chapter 8 Central-Force Motion
Physics 35 Chapter 8 Chapter 8 Centra-Force Motion In this Chapter we wi use the theory we have discussed in Chapter 6 and 7 and appy it to very important probems in physics, in which we study the motion
More informationCLT FOR FLUCTUATIONS OF LINEAR STATISTICS IN THE SINE-BETA PROCESS
CLT FOR FLUCTUATIONS OF LINEAR STATISTICS IN THE SINE-BETA PROCESS THOMAS LEBLÉ Abstract. We prove, for any β > 0, a centra imit theorem for the fuctuations of inear statistics in the Sine β process, which
More informationK a,k minors in graphs of bounded tree-width *
K a,k minors in graphs of bounded tree-width * Thomas Böhme Institut für Mathematik Technische Universität Imenau Imenau, Germany E-mai: tboehme@theoinf.tu-imenau.de and John Maharry Department of Mathematics
More informationNotes: Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Jackson, Chap. 2, 3, and 4, and Di Bartolo, Chap. 2. 2π nx i a. ( ) = G n.
Chapter. Eectrostatic II Notes: Most of the materia presented in this chapter is taken from Jackson, Chap.,, and 4, and Di Bartoo, Chap... Mathematica Considerations.. The Fourier series and the Fourier
More informationAlgorithms to solve massively under-defined systems of multivariate quadratic equations
Agorithms to sove massivey under-defined systems of mutivariate quadratic equations Yasufumi Hashimoto Abstract It is we known that the probem to sove a set of randomy chosen mutivariate quadratic equations
More informationB. Brown, M. Griebel, F.Y. Kuo and I.H. Sloan
Wegeerstraße 6 53115 Bonn Germany phone +49 8 73-347 fax +49 8 73-757 www.ins.uni-bonn.de B. Brown, M. Griebe, F.Y. Kuo and I.H. Soan On the expected uniform error of geometric Brownian motion approximated
More informationRate-Distortion Theory of Finite Point Processes
Rate-Distortion Theory of Finite Point Processes Günther Koiander, Dominic Schuhmacher, and Franz Hawatsch, Feow, IEEE Abstract We study the compression of data in the case where the usefu information
More informationWAVELET LINEAR ESTIMATION FOR DERIVATIVES OF A DENSITY FROM OBSERVATIONS OF MIXTURES WITH VARYING MIXING PROPORTIONS. B. L. S.
Indian J. Pure App. Math., 41(1): 275-291, February 2010 c Indian Nationa Science Academy WAVELET LINEAR ESTIMATION FOR DERIVATIVES OF A DENSITY FROM OBSERVATIONS OF MIXTURES WITH VARYING MIXING PROPORTIONS
More informationThe ordered set of principal congruences of a countable lattice
The ordered set of principa congruences of a countabe attice Gábor Czédi To the memory of András P. Huhn Abstract. For a attice L, et Princ(L) denote the ordered set of principa congruences of L. In a
More informationPattern Frequency Sequences and Internal Zeros
Advances in Appied Mathematics 28, 395 420 (2002 doi:10.1006/aama.2001.0789, avaiabe onine at http://www.ideaibrary.com on Pattern Frequency Sequences and Interna Zeros Mikós Bóna Department of Mathematics,
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v3 6 Jan 1995
arxiv:quant-ph/9501001v3 6 Jan 1995 Critique of proposed imit to space time measurement, based on Wigner s cocks and mirrors L. Diósi and B. Lukács KFKI Research Institute for Partice and Nucear Physics
More informationUNIFORM CONVERGENCE OF MULTIPLIER CONVERGENT SERIES
royecciones Vo. 26, N o 1, pp. 27-35, May 2007. Universidad Catóica de Norte Antofagasta - Chie UNIFORM CONVERGENCE OF MULTILIER CONVERGENT SERIES CHARLES SWARTZ NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY Received :
More informationPhysics 506 Winter 2006 Homework Assignment #6 Solutions
Physics 506 Winter 006 Homework Assignment #6 Soutions Textbook probems: Ch. 10: 10., 10.3, 10.7, 10.10 10. Eectromagnetic radiation with eiptic poarization, described (in the notation of Section 7. by
More informationPhysics 505 Fall Homework Assignment #4 Solutions
Physics 505 Fa 2005 Homework Assignment #4 Soutions Textbook probems: Ch. 3: 3.4, 3.6, 3.9, 3.0 3.4 The surface of a hoow conducting sphere of inner radius a is divided into an even number of equa segments
More informationORTHOGONAL MULTI-WAVELETS FROM MATRIX FACTORIZATION
J. Korean Math. Soc. 46 2009, No. 2, pp. 281 294 ORHOGONAL MLI-WAVELES FROM MARIX FACORIZAION Hongying Xiao Abstract. Accuracy of the scaing function is very crucia in waveet theory, or correspondingy,
More informationPhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
. Two points A and B ie on a smooth horizonta tabe with AB = a. One end of a ight eastic spring, of natura ength a and moduus of easticity mg, is attached to A. The other end of the spring is attached
More informationDavid Eigen. MA112 Final Paper. May 10, 2002
David Eigen MA112 Fina Paper May 1, 22 The Schrodinger equation describes the position of an eectron as a wave. The wave function Ψ(t, x is interpreted as a probabiity density for the position of the eectron.
More informationResearch Article Numerical Range of Two Operators in Semi-Inner Product Spaces
Abstract and Appied Anaysis Voume 01, Artice ID 846396, 13 pages doi:10.1155/01/846396 Research Artice Numerica Range of Two Operators in Semi-Inner Product Spaces N. K. Sahu, 1 C. Nahak, 1 and S. Nanda
More informationChapter 5. Wave equation. 5.1 Physical derivation
Chapter 5 Wave equation In this chapter, we discuss the wave equation u tt a 2 u = f, (5.1) where a > is a constant. We wi discover that soutions of the wave equation behave in a different way comparing
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL TO INNOVATED SCALABLE EFFICIENT ESTIMATION IN ULTRA-LARGE GAUSSIAN GRAPHICAL MODELS
ISEE 1 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL TO INNOVATED SCALABLE EFFICIENT ESTIMATION IN ULTRA-LARGE GAUSSIAN GRAPHICAL MODELS By Yingying Fan and Jinchi Lv University of Southern Caifornia This Suppementary Materia
More informationAnalysis of Emerson s Multiple Model Interpolation Estimation Algorithms: The MIMO Case
Technica Report PC-04-00 Anaysis of Emerson s Mutipe Mode Interpoation Estimation Agorithms: The MIMO Case João P. Hespanha Dae E. Seborg University of Caifornia, Santa Barbara February 0, 004 Anaysis
More information