arxiv:nlin/ v4 [nlin.si] 6 Feb 2005

Transcription

1 Integrable Maings Related to the Extended Discrete KP Hierarchy ANDREI K. SVININ Institute of System Dynamics and Control Theory, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 1233, Iruts, Russia arxiv:nlin/ v4 [nlin.si] 6 Feb 2005 Abstract. We investigate self-similar solutions of the extended discrete KP hierarchy. It is shown that corresonding ansatzes lead to urely discrete equations with deendence on some number of arameters together with equations governing deformations with resect to these arameters. Some examles are rovided. In articular it is shown that well nown discrete first Painlevé equation (dp I and its hierarchy arises as self-similar reduction of Volterra lattice hierarchy which in turn can be treated as reduction of the extended discrete KP hierarchy. It is written down equations which naturally generalize dp I. It is shown that these discrete systems describe Bäclund transformations of Noumi-Yamada systems of tye A (1. We also 2(n 1 consider Miura transformations relating different infinite- and finite-field integrable maings. Simlest examle of this ind of Miura transformations is given. Keywords: extended discrete KP hierarchy, self-similar solutions, discrete Painlevé equations 1. Introduction In Refs. [14], [15] we exhibit and investigate two-arameter class of invariant submanifolds of Darboux-KP (DKP chain which is in fact the chain of coies of (differential KP hierarchy glued together by Darboux ma. The DKP chain is formulated in terms of formal Laurent series h(i = z + =2 h (iz +1, a(i = z + =1 a (iz +1 : i Z} and reads as [7] h(i = H ( (i, a(i = a(i(h ( (i + 1 H ( (i with H ( (i : 1} (with fixed value of i being the currents calculated at the oint h(i [2]. Restriction on invariant submanifold S n l is defined by condition z l n+1 a [n] (i H + (i, i Z where H + (i =< 1,H (1 (i,h (2 (i,... > and a [] (i s are Faà di Bruno discrete iterates defined by recurrence relation a [+1] (i = a(ia [] (i with a [0] (i 1. As was shown in Refs. [14], [15], the restriction of DKP (1 This wor was suorted by INTAS grant and RFBR grant c 2008 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.1

2 2 ANDREI K. SVININ chain on S n 0 leads to linear discrete systems (see also [12] and with the air of discrete oerators Q r (n Ψ = zr Ψ (2 z (n 1 (n Ψ = (Q n (n +Ψ, (3 Q r (n Λr + 1 q (n,r z (n 1 Λ r n and (Q n (n + Λ n + =1 q (n,n z (n 1 Λ ( n whose coefficients q (n,r = q (n,r (i uniquely defined as olynomials in coordinates a (i with the hel of the relation z r = a [r] (i+z n 1 q (n,r 1 (ia [r n] (i+z 2(n 1 q (n,r 2 (ia [r 2n] (i+..., r Z. The consistency condition of (2 and (3 reads as Lax equation and can be rewritten in exlicit form (n q (n,r z (n 1 (n Q r (n = [(Qn (n +,Q r (n ] (4 (i = Q (n,r, + (i = q(n,r (i + n q(n,r + + (i q s (n,n (i q (n,r s+ (i + ( sn q s (n,n (i + r ( s + n q (n,r s+ (i. (5 Lax equations (4 naturally contains, for n = 1, equations of the discrete KP hierarchy and we call them the extended discrete KP hierarchy [12], [14], [15]. The formula (5 is roved to be a container for many differentialdifference systems [15] (see, also [11], [13] but to derive them from (5 one needs to tae into account urely algebraic relations q (n,r 1+r 2 (i = q (n,r 1 1 (i+ q (n,r 1 s (i q (n,r 2 s (i+r 1 sn+q (n,r 2 (i+r 1 letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.2

3 Integrable Maings 3 = q (n,r 1 2 (i + q (n,r 2 s (i q (n,r 1 s (i + r 2 sn + q (n,r 1 (i + r 2 (6 which are coded in ermutability oerator relation Q r 1+r 2 (n = Q r 1 (n Qr 2 (n = Qr 2 (n Qr 1 (n. It is quite obvious that equations (5 admit reductions with the hel of simle conditions q (n,r (i 0, l + 1, l 1. which are also consistent with the algebraic relations (6. As was shown in [14], [15], this reductions can be roerly described in geometric setting as double intersections of invariant manifolds of DKP chain: S n,r,l = S0 n Sln r l 1. For examle, the restriction of the DKP chain on S 2,1,1 yields Volterra lattice hierarchy. Our rincial goal in this Letter is to investigate self-similar solutions of equations (5 sulemented by (6. In Section 2, we erform auxiliary calculations aiming to select some quantities which do not deend on evolution arameters if solution q (n,r (i} of the extended discrete KP hierarchy, or more exactly its subhierarchy corresonding to multi-time t (n, is invariant with resect to suitable scaling transformation. In Section 3, we show that self-similar ansatzes yield a large class of urely discrete systems sulemented by equations governing deformations of arameters entering these systems. In Section 4, we consider the simlest examle corresonding to Volterra lattice hierarchy and deduce dp I and some discrete equations which can be treated as higher members in dp I hierarchy. We recover there nown relationshi between dp I and fourth Painlevé equation (P IV. In Section 5, we show one-comonent discrete equations naturally generalizing dp I in a sense that they govern Bäclund transformation for higher order generalizations of P IV. Section 6 is devoted to constructing some class of Miura transformations relating different discrete equations. We rovide the reader by simle examles of such transformations. 2. Auxiliary calculations To reare a ground for further investigations, we need in following technical statement Proosition 2.1. By virtue of relations (6 with r 1 = n, r 2 = sn and = + s, the relation Q,s (n,n (i = Q (n,sn s, (i. (7 letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.3

4 4 ANDREI K. SVININ with arbitrary, s N is identity. Proof. By direct calculations. The formula (7, by definition of Q (n,r,, can be rewritten in the form (n s In articular, we have (n q (n,n q (n,n (i = (n (i = (n q (n,sn s (i,,s N. (8 ( n q (n,n 1 (i = (n q (n,1 1 (i + s 1 = Q (n,1 1, (i + s 1. Each Q (n,1 1, (i is uniquely exressed as a olynomial of q (i q (n,1 (i. So, we can suose that there exists the olynomials ξ (n (i in q (i such that q (n,n (i = ξ (n (i + s 1, 1 (9 and consequently (n ξ (n (i = (n For examle, we can write down the following: q 1 (i = Q (n,1 1, (i. (10 ξ (n 1 (i = q 1 (i, ξ (n 2 (i = q 2 (i + q 2 (i + n + q 1 (i n q 1 (i + s. Unfortunately we cannot by now to write down the olynomials ξ (n 3 (i, ξ (n 4 (i,... in exlicit form for arbitrary n, but we believe that one can do it for arbitrary concrete values of n. From (8 we have the following Proosition 2.2. By virtue of equations of motion of the extended discrete KP hierarchy, (n s ξ (n (i = (n Fixing any integer 2, let us define i = ξ (n s (i, s, 1. t (n ξ(n (i. =1 letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.4

5 Integrable Maings 5 Taing into account the above conjecture, we obtain s (n i = sξ (n s (i + t (n (n s =1 ξ (n (i = sξ (n s (i + = s + =1 t (n (n =1 ξ(n s (i } t (n (n ξ s (n (i, s = 1,...,. (11 In what follows, we are going to investigate some class of self-similar solutions of extended discrete KP hierarchy and the latter auxiliary formula is of great imortance from the oint of view of constructing urely discrete systems to which lead corresonding ansatzes. 3. Self-similar solutions and integrable maings It is evident, that linear systems (2 and (3 and its consistency relations (5 and (6 are invariant under grou of dilations q (n,r (i ǫ q (n,r (i, t l ǫ l t l, z ǫz, Ψ i ǫ i Ψ i. In what follows we consider deendence only on finite number of evolution arameters t (n 1,...,t(n. Invariants of this grou are T l = t (n l (t (n l = 1,..., 1, ξ = (t(n 1/ z, l/, ψ i = z i Ψ i, x (n,r (i = (t (n / q (n,r (i. From this one gets the ansatzes for self-similar solutions q (n,r (i = 1 /x(n,r (t (n (i, Ψ i = z i ψ i (ξ;t 1,...,T 1. (12 Here x (n,r (i s are suosed to be unnown functions of T 1,...,T 1. Direct substitution of (12 into (5 gives and Y (n,r, Tl x (n,r (i = X (n,r,l (i, l = 1,..., 1 (13 (i = x (n,r (i + T 1 X (n,r,1 (i + 2T 2X (n,r (i +...,2 letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.5

6 6 ANDREI K. SVININ +( 1T 1 X (n,r, 1 (i + X(n,r, (i = 0, l = 1,..., 1. (14 Here X (n,r,l (i s are rhs s of (5 where q (n,r (i s are relaced by x (n,r (i s. Moreover, we must tae into account algebraic relations x (n,r 1+r 2 (i = x (n,r 1 1 (i+ x (n,r 1 s (i x (n,r 2 s (i+r 1 sn+x (n,r 2 (i+r 1 = x (n,r 1 2 (i + x (n,r 2 s (i x (n,r 1 s (i + r 2 sn + x (n,r 1 (i + r 2 (15 which follows from (6. Corresonding auxiliary linear equations are transformed to the following form: where Tl ψ = (X ln (n +ψ, l = 1,..., 1, ξψ ξ = T 1 (X(n n + + 2T 2 (X(n 2n ( 1T 1 (X ( 1n } (n + + (X n (n + ψ, X r (n ξλr + 1 X r (n ψ = ξψ, ξ 1 x (n,r Λ r n, r Z. Let us now observe that if q (n,r (i} reresent self-similar solution than by virtue of (11 the quantities i do not deend on t (n 1,...,t(n. Moreover, one can write 1 i (i = T ζ (n (i + ζ(n (i, =1 with ζ (n (i = (t(n /n ξ (n (i. So, one can state that i (i in these circumstances do not deend on arameters T 1,...,T 1. Simlest situation in which one can easily to derive ure discrete equations from (14 sulemented by deformation equations in a nice form is when r = 1 and = 2. Equations (14 are secified in this case as 1 Y (n,1,2 (i = x (i + T 1 X (n,1,1 (i + X (n,1,2 (i = 0. (16 1 In what follows, x (i x (n,1 (i letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.6

7 Integrable Maings 7 In addition, one must tae into account deformation equations T1 x (i = X (n,1,1 (i = x +1(i + n x +1 (i ( n +x (i x 1 (i + s 1 x 1 (i + s n. (17 Proosition 3.1. The relations (16 read as infinite-field maing i = T 1 x 1 (i + x 1 (i n x 1 (i + s + x 2 (i + x 2 (i + n, (18 ( X (i = x (i + n i+s 1 i+s n +x +1 (i + n x +1 (i ( ( T 1 + T x 1 (i + s 1 x 1 (i + s ( + 1n +x +2 (i + 2n x +2 (i = 0, 1 (19 with i s being arbitrary constants. Proof. The roosition is roved by straightforward calculations. In what follows we use the formula (9 with = 1,2, where q (i s are relaced by x (i s. We have X (n,1 (,1 (i = x +1(i+n x +1 (i+x (i x (n,n 1 (i x (n,n 1 (i + 1 n ( n = x +1 (i + n x +1 (i + x (i ξ (n 1 (i + s 1 ξ (n 1 (i + s n, (20 X (n,1,2 (i = x +2(i + 2n + x (n,2n 1 (ix +1 (i + n + x (n,2n 2 (ix (i x +2 (i x (n,2n 1 (i + 1 ( + 1nx +1 (i x (n,2n 2 (i + 1 nx (i letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.7

8 8 ANDREI K. SVININ = x +2 (i+2n+x +1 (i+n x +2 (i x +1 (i 2 2 x 1 (i+s 1+x (i x 1 (i+s ( +1n x (i ξ (n 2 (i+s 1 ξ (n 2 (i+s n. (21 One can easily chec that substituting (20 and (21 into (16 gives (19 with i given by (18. Moreover, it is already roved that i s do not deend on t (n 1,...,t(n and therefore on T 1,...,T 1. It is obvious that the system (18 and (19 admits as well as equations (17 reduction with the hel of simle condition x (i 0, > l, l 1. Then l-th equation in (19 is secified as x l (i l + n } i+s 1 i+s ln = 0. Since it is suosed that x l (i 0 then the constants i to be subjects of constraint are forced l + i+s 1 n i+s ln = dp I and its hierarchy Let us consider, as a simlest examle, the case corresonding to Volterra lattice hierarchy, that is n = 2, r = 1, l = 1. Tae = 2. The equations (16 and (17 are written down as follows: x i = x i (x i+1 x i 1, / T 1, (22 x i + T 1 x i x (2,2 1 (i x (2,2 } 1 (i 1 + x i x (2,4 2 (i x (2,4 } 2 (i 1 = 0. (23 Here we denote x i = x (2,1 1 (i. Using (7 one calculates x (2,2 1 (i = x i + x i+1, x (2,4 2 (i = x i (x i 1 + x i + x i+1 + x i+1 (x i + x i+1 + x i+2. letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.8

9 Integrable Maings 9 Taing into account these relations, the equation (23 turns into One can rewrite (24 as T 1 x i + x i (x i 1 + x i + x i+1 = α (2 i, ( α (2 i+1 α(2 i 1 = 0. x i 1 + x i + x i+1 = T 1 + α(2 i, (25 x i where α (2 i s are some constants forced to be subjects of the quasieriodicity constraint: α (2 i+2 = α(2 i 1. One can immediately to write down the solution of this equation: α (2 i = α 1 2 i + β( 1i, where α and β are some comlex constants. Provided these conditions, (25 is dp I [4]. Observe that evolution equation (22 with (25 turns into x i = 2x ix i+1 + x 2 i + T 1x i α (2 i. It can be easily checed that together with (25 this lattice is equivalent to the air of ordinary first-order differential equations w 1 = 2w 1w 2 + w T 1w 1 + a, w 2 = 2w 1w 2 w 2 2 T 1w 2 b with discrete symmetry transformation (cf. [6] w 1 = w 2, w 2 = w 1 w 2 T 1 b w 2, a = b, b = a + 1, (26 where w 1 x i, w 2 = x i+1, a α (2 i, b α (2 i+1 for some fixed (but arbitrary value i = i 0. In turn the system (26 is equivalent to second-order equation w = (w 2 2w + 3 ( T 2 w3 + 2T 1 w a 2b + 1 w a2 2w, w w 1 with corresonding symmetry transformation w = w w 2 T 1 w a, a = b, b = a w In fact this is P IV with Bäclund transformation [6]. By rescaling T 1 2T1, w w/ 2 it can be turned to following canonical form: w = (w 2 2w w3 + 4T 1 w 2 + 2(T1 2 + a 2b + 1w 2a2 w (27 letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.9

10 10 ANDREI K. SVININ w = w w 2 2T 1 w 2a, a = b, b = a w As a result, we obtain the well-nown relationshi between dp I (25 and P IV (27 (see, for examle [5]. Remar 4.1. The equations (26 can be interreted as self-similar reduction of Levi system [8] with the hel of the ansatz v 1t2 = ( v 1 + v v 1v 2, v 2t2 = (v 2 + v v 1v 2 v = 1 (2t 2 1/2 w (T 1, = 1,2. Let us discuss now the higher members in dp I hierarchy. To construct them, one needs to consider the cases = 3,4 and so on, that is x i + T 1 x i x (2,2 1 (i x (2,2 1 (i 1 } + 2T 2 x i +x i x (2,6 3 (i x (2,6 x i + T 1 x i x (2,2 1 (i x (2,2 1 (i 1 +3T 3 x i x (2,6 3 (i x (2,6 2 (i 1 We have calculated, to wit the following } x (2,4 2 (i x (2,4 2 (i 1 } = 0, (28 2 (i 1 } + 2T 2 x i x (2,4 2 (i x (2,4 } 2 (i 1 } + x (2,8 4 (i x (2,8 } 4 (i 1 = 0. (29 with ζ (2 3 (i = x i x (2,6 3 (i = ζ (2 3 (i + ζ(2 3 (i + 1 ζ (2 2 } (i 1 + ζ(2 2 (i + ζ(2 2 (i x i 1x i+1 and with x (2,8 4 (i = ζ (2 4 (i + ζ(2 4 (i + 1 ζ (2 4 (i = x i ζ (2 3 (i 1 +ζ (2 3 (i + ζ(2 3 (i x i 1x i+1 (x i 2 + x i 1 + x i + x i+1 + x i+2 Substituting the latter formulas into (28 and (29 we get the higher members in dp I hierarchy in the form T 1 x i + 2T 2 ζ (2 2 (i + ζ(2 3 (i = α(2 i, }. letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.10

11 Integrable Maings 11 T 1 x i + 2T 2 ζ (2 2 (i + 3T 3ζ (2 3 (i + ζ(2 4 (i = α(2 i, with corresonding constants α (2 i being subjected to the constraint 1 + α (2 i+1 α(2 i 1 = 0. These results entirely corresond to that of the wor [3]. 5. Generalizations of dp I Let us consider one-field reductions of the system given by equations (18 and (19 when n is arbitrary. The analogues of the equations (22 and (23 in this case are x i = x i We tae into account that x (n,n 1 (i = ( x i+s x i s, (30 x i + T 1 x i x (n,n 1 (i x (n,n } 1 (i + 1 n +x i x (n,2n 2 (i x (n,2n } 2 (i + 1 n = 0. (31 x i+s 1, x (n,2n 2 (i = Then the equation (31 can be cast into the form 2 x i+s 1 x i+s1 +s n 1. s 1 =1 T 1 x i + x i (x i+1 n x i+n 1 = i, 1 + n 1 i+s One can write the solution of (32 as i = α i s = 0. (32 1 (n 1n i + βωi (33 with arbitrary constants α, β C and ω = n 1 = ex(2π 1/n. So, one concludes that in this case self-similar ansatz leads to equation x i+1 n x i+n 1 = T 1 + α(n i, (34 x i where the constants i s are given by (33. letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.11

12 12 ANDREI K. SVININ Standard analysis of singularity confinement shows that this roerty for (34 is valid rovided that i+n α(n i = i+2n 1 α(n i+n 1. (35 but one can show that this equation do not contradict to (32, but it is more general. Indeed, it follows from (32 that 1 = n i+s+n 1 n i+s = n i+s+n 2 i+s 1. (36 Second equality in (36 can be rewritten in the form s=2 i+s+n 1 + α(n = n i+n + s=3 n 2 i+2n 1 n 1 i+s+n 2 α(n i i+s α(n i+n 1 s=2 i+s 1. From the latter one obtains (35. Finally, let us show that equations (30, (32 and (34 are equivalent to higher order Painlevé equation of tye A (1 l [10] with l = 2(n 1, i.e. higher order generalization of P IV. Following the line of revious section, one can observe that equations (30, (32 and (34 are equivalent to the system w = w ( 2 w +n 1 = w +n 1 (2 ( = 1,...,n 1 w +s + w + T 1 + a, sulemented by Bäclund transformation w +s 1 + w +n 1 + T 1 a +n 1 2(n 1 w = w +1, = 1,...,2n 3, w 2(n 1 = w s a n T 1, w n a = a +1, = 1,...,2n 3, a 2(n 1 = a s n 2 a n+s + 1. (37 (38 Here we identify w = x i+ 1 and a = i+ 1. To write down the equations (37 in symmetric form one need to introduce new variables f 0,f 1,...,f 2(n 1 } by f 2 = w, f 2 1 = w +n 1 ( = 1,...,n 1, f 0 = 2(n 1 w s + T 1. letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.12

13 Integrable Maings 13 It is evident that 2(n 1 s=0 f s = T 1. By straightforward calculations one can chec that the system (37 cast into following symmetric form f = f ( r=1 f +2r 1 r=1 f +2r + c ( = 0,...,2(n 1 (39 where subscrits are suosed to be an elements of Z/(2n 1Z. The constants c s are related with a s by the relations c 2 = a, c 2 1 = a +n 1, = 1,...,n 1, c 0 = a s a s+n 1 + 1, 2(n 1 s=0 c s = 1. The system (39 is nothing but Noumi-Yamada system of A (1 l tye with l = 2(n 1. As for Bäclund transformation (38, one can verify that it coinsides with an element T = s 1 π 2 of the extended affine Weil grou W =< π,s 0,...,s 2(n 1 > [10]. For the sae of comletness, let us rovide the reader by suitable information on some reresentation of affine Weil grou of tye A (1 l which is useful for constructing of Bäclund transformations of P IV and P V and its generalizations. The action of automohisms s 0,...,s l } on the field of rational functions in variables c 0,...,c l } and f 0,...,f l } can be defined as follows [10]: s (c = c, s (c l = c l + c (l = ± 1,s (c l = c l (l, ± 1, s (f = f, s (f l = f l ± c f (l = ± 1,s (f l = f l (l, ± 1. One also defines an automorhism π by the rules π(c = c +1 and π(f = f +1. It is nown by [9] that this set of automorhisms define a reresentation of the extended affine Weil grou W and reresents a collection of Bäclund transformations of the system ( Miura transformations We showed in Ref. [15] that symmetry transformation a(i z 1 a [] (i g : h(i h(i on the sace of DKP chain solutions is a suitable basis for constructing of some class of lattice Miura transformations. In the language letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.13

14 14 ANDREI K. SVININ of invariant submanifolds we have g (S0 n Sn 0 and g (S n,r,l S n,r,l. In terms of coordinate q s (n,r (i one can use simle relation q s (n,r (i = q s (n,r (i but to get lattice Miura transformation in the form q (n,r (i = F(q s (n,r (i} one needs to mae use algebraic relations (6. For examle, Miura transformation g 2 (S0 2 S1 0 reads = q (2,1 1 (2i + q (2,1 q (1,1 (i = q (2,2 (2i (6 s (2i q (2,1 s (2i 2s q(2,1 (2i + 1. (40 We believe that this aroach can be alied for constructing Miura transformations relating different integrable maings. Let us show the simlest examle. Denote y (i = x (1,1 (i and β i = α (1 i. The equations (18 and (19 defining integrable maing in this case are secified as β i = T 1 y 1 (i + y 2 1 (i + y 2(i + y 2 (i + 1, (41 Y (i = y (i( + β i β i +1 + y +1 (i + 1(T 1 + y 1 (i + y 1 (i + 1 y +1 (i(t 1 + y 1 (i + y 1 (i + 1 +y +2 (i + 2 y +2 (i = 0, 1. (42 Denote x (i = x (2,1 (i and α i = α (2 i. Infinite-field discrete system in the case n = 2 is α i = T 1 x 1 (i+x 1 (i(x 1 (i 1+x 1 (i+x 1 (i+1+x 2 (i+x 2 (i+2, (43 X (i = x (i( + α i + α i+1 α i 2+1 α i 2+2 +x +1 (i + 2(T 1 + x 1 (i + x 1 (i x 1 (i x 1 (i + 3 x +1 (i(t 1 + x 1 (i x 1 (i 2 + x 1 (i x 1 (i x +2 (i + 4 x +2 (i = 0, 1. (44 Restriction of the latter system on S 2,1,1 gives dp I (25, while the restriction of the system (41 and (42 on S 1,1,2 yields two-field system β i = T 1 y 1 (i + y 2 1 (i + y 2(i + y 2 (i + 1, letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.14

15 Integrable Maings 15 y 1 (i+y 2 (i+1(t 1 +y 1 (i+y 1 (i+1 y 2 (i(t 1 +y 1 (i 1+y 1 (i = 0, ( β i β i 1 = 0. One can easily write down Miura transformation relating infinitefield maings given by airs of equations (41, (42 and (43, (44, resectively, by relacing q (1,1 1 (i y (i and q (2,1 1 (i x (i in (40, to wit 1 y (i = x (2i + x s (2i x s (2i 2s x (2i + 1. (46 Moreover we have β i = α 2i + α 2i+1. By straightforward but tedious calculations one can chec that substituting (46 into (42 gives 1 Y (i (46 = X (2i + X s (2i X s (2i 2s X (2i + 1 = 0. As for transformation g 2 (S 2,1,1 S 1,1,2 relating dp I with the system (45, we have it in the form y 1 (i = x(2i + x(2i + 1, y 2 (i = x(2i 1x(2i, β i = α 2i + α 2i Concluding remars We showed that in the simlest case corresonding to the restriction of dynamics on hase-sace of the DKP chain on invariant submanifold S n,1,1 one derives one-field discrete dynamical system governing Bäclund transformation of Noumi-Yamada system of A (1 2(n 1 tye which is a natural higher-order generalization of P IV. As is nown higher-order generalizations of P V corresond to affine Weil grous of tye A (1 l with odd l. On the other hand, these generalizations are also described by Veselov- Shabat eriodic dressing chains r i + r i+1 = r2 i r2 i+1 + α i, r i+n = r i, α i+n = α i with odd N 3 for P IV and with even N 4 for P V, resectively [16], [1]. So, in a sense P IV and P V go in arallel in these two settings. We can exect that our aroach also covers P V and its higher-order generalizations, but to save the sace we leave this question for subsequent ublications. letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.15

16 16 ANDREI K. SVININ Acnowledgement I am grateful to the anonymous referee for bringing to my attention Refs. [9] and [10] and for a number of remars which enabled the resentation of the Letter to be imroved. References 1. Adler, V.E.: Nonlinear chains and Painlevé equations, Physica D, 73 (1994, Casati, P., Falqui, G., Magri, F. and Pedroni, M.: The KP theory revisited I, II, III, IV, SISSA rerints 1996, ref. SISSA/2-5/96/FM. 3. Cresswell, C. and Joshi, N: The discrete Painlevé I hierarchy, In: Symmetries and Integrability of Difference Equations, Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. (Caunterbury, UK, July 1-5, 1996, Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Notes Ser. V. 255, Eds. P.A. Clarson et al. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. ( , solv-int/ Grammaticos, B., Ramani, A. and Paageorgiou, V.: Do integrable maing have the Painlevé roerty?, Phys. Rev. Lett., 67 (1991, Grammaticos, B. and Ramani, A.: From continuous Painlevé IV to the asymmetric discrete Painlevé I, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 31 (1998, Groma, V.I.: On arametric families of solutions of Painlevé equations, Differential equations, 14 (1979, Magri, F., Pedroni, M. and Zubelli J.P.: On the geometry of Darboux transformations for the KP hierarchy and its connection with the discrete KP hierarchy, Commun. Math. Phys., 188 (1997, Marihin, V.G., Shabat, A.B., Boiti, M. and Peminelli, F.: Self-similar solutions of equations of the nonlinear Schrödinger tye, JETP, 90 (2000, Noumi, M. and Yamada, Y.: Affine Weil grous, discrete dynamical systems and Painlevé equations, Commun. Math. Phys., 199 (1998, Noumi, M. and Yamada, Y.: Higher order Painlevé equations of tye A (1 l, Funcial. Evac., 41 (1998, Svinin, A.K.: A class of integrable lattices and KP hierarchy, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 34 (2001, Svinin, A.K.: Extension of the discrete KP hierarchy, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 35 ( Svinin, A.K.: Integrable chains and hierarchies of differential evolution equations, Theor. Math. Phys., 130 (2002, Svinin, A.K.: Extended discrete KP hierarchy and its reductions from a geometric viewoint, Lett. Math. Phys., 61 (2002, Svinin, A.K.: Invariant submanifolds of the Darboux-Kadomtsev-Petviashvili chain and an extension of the discrete Kadomtsev-Petviashili hierarchy, Theor. Math. Phys., 141 (2004, Veselov, A.P. and Shabat, A.B.: Dressing chains and the sectral theory of the Schrödinger oerator, Funct. Anal. Al., 27 (1993, letter7.tex; 8/02/2008; 19:57;.16