arxiv:physics/ v3 22 Dec 1996

Transcription

1 A one-map two-lok approah to teahing relativity in introdutory physis P. Fraundorf Department of Physis & Astronomy University of Missouri-StL, St. Louis MO 632 (January 7, 2002) arxiv:physis/960 v3 22 De 996 This paper presents some ideas whih might assist teahers inorporating speial relativity into an introdutory physis urriulum. One an define the proper-time/veloity pair, as well as the oordinate-time/veloity pair, of a traveler using only distanes measured with respet to a single map frame. When this is done, the relativisti equations for momentum, energy, onstant aeleration, and fore take on forms strikingly similar to their Newtonian ounterparts. Thus highshool and ollege students not ready for Lorentz transforms may solve relativisti versions of any single-frame Newtonian problems they have mastered. We further show that multiframe alulations (like the veloity-addition rule) aquire simpliity and/or utility not found using oordinate veloity alone. From physis-960 (xxx.lanl, NM, 996) p, 0.40.Gm, b I. INTRODUCTION Sine the 920 s, it has been known that lassial Newtonian laws depart from a desription of reality, as veloity approahes the speed of light. This divergene between Newtonian and relativisti physis was one of the most remarkable disoveries of this entury. Yet, more than 70 years later, most Amerian high shools and olleges teah introdutory students Newtonian dynamis, but then fail to teah students how to solve those same problems relativistially. When relativity is disussed at all, it often entails only a rather abstrat introdution to Lorentz transforms, relegated to the bak of a hapter (or the bak of a book). This is in part due to the fats that: (i) Newton s laws work so well in routine appliation, and (ii) introdutions to speial relativity (often patterned after Einstein s introdutions to the subjet) fous on disovery-philosophy rather than appliations. Caution, and inertia assoiated with old habits, may play a role as well. It is nonetheless unfortunate beause teahing Newtonian solutions without relativisti ones at best leaves the student s eduation out-of-date, and deprives them of experienes whih might spark an interest in further physis eduation. At worst, partial treatments may replae what is missing with misoneptions about the omplexity, irrelevane, and/or the limitations of relativity in the study, for example, of simple things like uniform aeleration. Efforts to link relativisti onepts to lassial ones have been with us from the beginning. For example, the observation that relativisti objets behave at high speed as though their inertial mass inreases in the p = m v expression, led to the definition (used in many early textbooks ) of relativisti mass m mγ. Suh efforts are worthwhile beause they an: (A) potentially allow the introdution of relativity onepts at an earlier stage in the eduation proess by building upon alreadymastered lassial relationships, and (B) find what is fundamentally true in both lassial and relativisti approahes. The onepts of transverse (m ) and longitudinal (m mγ 3 ) masses have similarly been used 2 to preserve relations of the form F x = ma x for fores perpendiular and parallel, respetively, to the veloity diretion. Unfortunately for these relativisti masses, no deeper sense has emerged in whih the mass of a traveling objet either hanges, or has diretional dependene. Suh masses allow familiar relationships to be used in keeping trak of non-lassial behaviors (item A above), but do not (item B above) provide frame-invariant insights or make other relationships simpler as well. Hene majority aeptane of their use seems further away now 3 than it did several deades ago 4. A more subtle trend in the literature has been toward the definition of a quantity alled proper veloity 5,6, whih an be written as w γ v. We use the symbol w here beause it is not in ommon use elsewhere in relativity texts, and beause w resembles γv from a distane. This quantity also allows the momentum expression above to be written in lassial form as a mass times a veloity, i.e. as p = m w. Hene it serves one of the type A goals served by m above. However, it remains an interesting but homeless quantity in the present literature. In other words, proper-veloity differs fundamentally from the familiar oordinate-veloity, and unlike the latter has not in textbooks been linked to a partiular referene frame. After all, it uses distane measured in an inertial frame but time measured on the loks of a moving and possibly aelerated observer. However, there is also something deeply physial about proper-veloity. Unlike oordinate-veloity, it is a synhrony-free 7,8 (i.e. loal-lok only) means of quantifying motion. Moreover, A. Ungar has reently made the ase 9 that proper veloities, and not oordinate veloities, make up the gyrogroup analog to the veloity group in lassial physis. If so, then, is it possible that introdutory students might gain deeper physial insight via its use?

2 The answer is yes. We show here that proper-veloity, when introdued as part of a one-map two-lok set of time/veloity variables, allows us to introdue relativisti momentum, time-dilation, and frame-invariant relativisti aeleration/fore into the lassroom without invoking disussion of multiple inertial frames or the abstrat mathematis of Lorentz transformation (item A above). Moreover, through use of proper-veloity many relationships (inluding those like veloity-addition, whih require multiple frames or more than one map ) are made simpler and sometimes more useful. When one simplifiation brings with it many others, this suggests that item B insights may be involved as well. The three setions to follow deal with the basi, aeleration-related, and multi-map appliations of this two-lok approah by first developing the equations, and then disussing lassroom appliations. II. A TRAVELER, ONE MAP, AND TWO CLOCKS One may argue that a fundamental break between lassial and relativisti kinematis involves the observation that time passes differently for moving observers, than it does for stationary ones. In typial texts, disussion of this fat involves disussion of separate traveler and map (e.g. primed and unprimed) inertial referene frames, perhaps inluding Lorentz transforms between them, even though the traveler may be aelerated and hanging referene frames onstantly! This is not needed. Instead, we define two time variables when desribing the motion of a single objet (or traveler ) with respet to a single inertial oordinate frame (or map ). These time variables are the map or oordinate-time t, and the traveler or proper-time τ. However, only one measurement of distanes will be onsidered, namely that assoiated with the inertial referene frame or map. It follows from above that two veloities will arise as well, namely the oordinate-veloity v d x /, and proper-veloity w d x /. The first veloity measures map-distane traveled per unit map time, while the latter measures map-distane traveled per unit traveler time. Eah of these veloities an be alulated from the other by knowing the veloity-dependene of the traveler s speed of map-time γ /, sine it is easy to see from the definitions above that: w = γ v. () Beause all displaements dx are defined with respet to our map frame, proper-veloity is not simply a oordinate-veloity measured with respet to a different map. However, it does have a well-defined home, in fat with many brothers and sisters who live there as well. This family is omprised of the veloities reported by the infinite number of moving observers who might hoose to desribe the motion of our traveler, with their own lok on the map of their ommon home frame of referene 0. One might all the members of this family non-oordinate veloities, to distinguish them from the oordinate-veloity measured by an inertial observer who stays put in the frame of the map. The ardinal rule for all suh veloities is: everyone measures displaements from the vantage point of the home frame (e.g. on a opy of a referene-frame map in their own vehile s glove ompartment). Thus proper veloity w is that partiular non-oordinate veloity whih reports the rate at whih a given traveler s position on the referene map hanges, per unit time on the lok of the traveler. A. Developing the basi equations A number of useful relationships for the above traveler s speed of map-time γ, inluding it s familiar relationship to oordinate-veloity, follow simply from the nature of the flat spaetime metri. Their derivation is outlined in Appendix A. For students not ready for fourvetors, however, one an simply quote Einstein s predition that spaetime is tied together so that instead of γ =, one has γ = / (v/) 2 = E/m 2, where E is Einstein s relativisti energy and is the speed of light. By solving eqn. for w(v), and putting the inverted solution v(w) into the expression for γ above, the following string of useful relationships follow immediately: γ o ( w = ( ) = + v 2 ) 2 = E m 2 = + K m 2. (2) Here of ourse K is the kineti energy of motion, equal lassially to 2 mv2. Beause equation 2 allows one to relate veloities to energy, an important part of relativisti dynamis is in hand as well. Another important part of relativisti dynamis, mentioned in the introdution, takes on familiar form sine momentum at any speed is p = m w = mγ v. (3) This relation has important sientifi onsequenes as well. It shows that momentum like proper veloity has no upper limit, and that oordinate veloity beomes irrelevant to traking momentum at high speeds (sine for w, v and hene p γ). All of the equations in this setion are summarized for referene and omparison in Table I. B. Basi lassroom appliations One of the simplest exerises a student might perform is to show that, as proper veloity w goes to infinity, the 2

3 oordinate-veloity v never gets larger than speed limit. This an be done by simply solving equation for v as a funtion of w. Sine student intuition should argue strongly against map-distane per unit traveler time beoming infinite, an upper limit on oordinate-veloity v may thus from the beginning seem a very reasonable onsequene. In typial introdutory ourses, this upper limit on oordinate-veloity is not something students are given a hane to prove for themselves. Students an also show, for themselves at this point, that lassial kinematis follows when all speeds involved obey v, sine this implies that γ (f. Table I). Given these tools to desribe the motion of an objet with respet to single map frame, another type of relativisti problem within range is that of time dilation. From the very definition of γ as a traveler s speed of map-time, and the veloity relations whih show that γ, it is easy for a student to see that the traveler s lok will always run slower than map time. Hene if the traveler holds a fixed speed for a finite time, one has from equation 2 that traveler time is dilated (spread out over a larger interval) relative to oordinate time, by the relation t = γ τ τ (4) Thus time-dilation problems an be addressed. This is one of several skills that this strategy an offer to students taking only introdutory physis, an item A benefit aording to the introdution. A pratial awareness of the non-global nature of time thus does not require readiness for the abstration of Lorentz transforms. Convenient units for oordinate-veloity are [lightyears per map-year] or []. Convenient units for properveloity, by omparison, are [lightyears per traveler year] or [ly/tyr]. When proper-veloity reahes [ly/tyr], oordinate-veloity is + = []. Thus w = [ly/tyr] is a natural dividing line between lassial and relativisti regimes. In the absene of an abbreviation with mnemoni value for [ly/tyr], students sometimes all it a roddenberry [rb], perhaps beause in english this name evokes onnetions to hotrodding (high-speed), berries (minimal units for fruit), and a siene fition series whih ignores the lightspeed limit to whih oordinate-veloity adheres. It is also worth pointing out to students that, when measuring times in years, and distanes in light years, one earth gravity of aeleration is onveniently g.03 [ly/yr 2 ]. We show here that the major differene between lassial and two-lok relativity involves the dependene of kineti energy K on veloity. Instead of 2 mv2, one has m 2 ( + ( ) w 2 ) whih by Taylor expansion in w goes as 2 mw2 when w. Although the relativisti expression is more ompliated, it is not prohibitive for introdutory students, espeially sine they an first alulate the physially interesting speed of map-time γ, and then figure K = m 2 (γ ). If they are given restenergy equivalents for a number of ommon masses (e.g. for eletrons m e 2 5keV ), this might make alulation of relativisti energies even less painful than in the lassial ase! Conerning momenta, one might imagine from its definition that proper-veloity w is the important speed to a relativisti traveler trying to get somewhere on a map (say for example to Chiago) with minimum traveler time. Equation 3 shows that it is also a more interesting speed from the point of view of law enforement offiials wishing to minimize fatalities on futuristi highways where relativisti speeds are an option. Proper veloity tells us what is physially important, sine it is proportional to the momentum available in the ollision. If we want to ask how long it will take an ambulane to get to the sene of an aident, then of ourse oordinate veloity may be the key. Given that proper veloity is the most diret link to physially important quantities like traveler-time and momentum, it is not surprising that a press unfamiliar with this quantity does not attend exitedly, for example, to new settings of the land speed reord for fastest aelerated partile. New progress hanges the value of v, the only veloity they are prepared to talk about, in the 7th or 8th deimal plae. The story of inreasing proper veloity, thus, goes untold to a publi whose imagination might be aptured thereby. Thus proper-veloities for single 50GeV eletrons in the LEP2 aelerator at CERN might be approahing w = γv = E v 50GeV m 2 5keV 0 5 [lightyears per traveler year], while the eduated lay publi (omprised of those who have had no more than an introdutory physis ourse) is under a vague impression that the lightspeed limit rules out major progress along these lines. III. ACCELERATION AND FORCE WITH ONE MAP AND TWO CLOCKS. The foregoing relations introdue, in ontext of a single inertial frame and without Lorentz transforms, many of the kinematial and dynamial relations of speial relativity taught in introdutory ourses, in modern physis ourses, and perhaps even in some relativity ourses. In this setion, we over less familiar territory, namely the equations of relativisti aeleration. Fores if defined simply as rates of momentum-hange in speial relativity have no frame-invariant formulation. That is, different map frames will see different fores ating on a given traveler. Moreover, solving problems with oordinate 3- vetor aeleration alone an be very messy, indeed. Beause of this, relativisti aeleration is seldom disussed in introdutory ourses. Can relativisti equations for onstant aeleration, instead, be ast in familiar form? The answer is yes: a frame-invariant 3-vetor aeleration, with simple integrals, arises naturally in one-map two-lok relativity. Although the development of the (3+)D equations is tedious, we show that this 3

4 aeleration bears a familiar relationship to the frameindependent rate of momentum hange (i.e. the fore) felt by an aelerated traveler. A. Developing the aeleration equations. By examining the frame-invariant salar produt of the aeleration 4-vetor, one an show (as we do in the Appendix) that a proper aeleration α for our traveler, whih is the same to all inertial observers and thus frame-invariant, an be written in terms of omponents for the lassial aeleration vetor a by: α = γ 3 γ a, where a d 2 x 2. (5) This is remarkable, given that a is so strongly framedependent! Here the transverse time-speed γ is defined as / (v /) 2, where v is the omponent of oordinate veloity v perpendiular to the diretion of oordinate aeleration a. In this setion generally, in fat, subsripts and refer to parallel and perpendiular omponent-diretions relative to the diretion of this frame-invariant aeleration 3-vetor α, and not (for example) relative to oordinate veloity v. Before onsidering integrals of the motion for onstant proper aeleration α, let s review the lassial integrals of motion for onstant aeleration a. These an be written as a v / t 2 (v2 )/ x. The first of these is assoiated with onservation of momentum in the absene of aeleration, and the seond with the workenergy theorem. These may look more familiar in the form v f v i +a t, and v f 2 v2 i +2a x. Given that oordinate veloity has an upper limit at the speed of light, it is easy to imagine why holding oordinate aeleration onstant in relativisti situations requires fores whih hange even from the traveler s point of view, and is not possible at all for t > ( v i )/a. Provided that proper time τ, proper veloity w, and time-speed γ an be used as variables, three simple integrals of the proper aeleration an be obtained by a proedure whih works for integrating other non-oordinate veloity/time expressions as well 0. The resulting integrals are summarized in ompat form, like those above, as α = γ w t = η τ = 2 γ. (6) γ x Here the integral with respet to proper time τ has been simplified by further defining the hyperboli veloity angle or rapidity η sinh [w /] = tanh [v /]. Note that both v and the transverse time-speed γ are onstants, and hene both proper veloity, and longitudinal momentum p mw, hange at a uniform rate when proper aeleration is held onstant. If motion is only in the diretion of aeleration, γ is, and p/ t = mα in the lassial tradition. In lassial kinematis, the rate at whih traveler energy E inreases with time is frame-dependent, but the rate at whih momentum p inreases is invariant. In speial relativity, these rates (when figured with respet to proper time) relate to eah other as time and spae omponents, respetively, of the aeleration 4-vetor. Both are frame-dependent at high speed. However, we an define proper fore separately as the fore felt by an aelerated objet. We show in the Appendix that this is simply F m α. That is, all aelerated objets feel a frame-invariant 3-vetor fore F in the diretion of their aeleration. The magnitude of this fore an be alulated from any inertial frame, by multiplying the rate of momentum hange in the aeleration diretion times γ, or by multiplying mass times the proper aeleration α. The lassial relation F dp/ mdv/ = md 2 x/ 2 = ma then beomes: dp F = γ = mγ dw d(γv ) = mγ = m γ3 dv γ = m γ3 d 2 x γ 2 = m γ3 γ a = mα (7) Even though the rate of momentum hange joins the rate of energy hange in beoming frame-dependent at high speed, Newton s 2nd Law for 3-vetors thus retains a frame-invariant form. Although they depend on the observer s inertial frame, it is instrutive to write out the omponents of momentum and energy rate-of-hange in terms of proper fore magnitude F. The lassial equation relating rates of momentum hange to fore is d p / F ma i, where i is the unit vetor in the diretion of aeleration. This beomes d p [( = F γ ) ( i γ v + v ) ] i. (8) Note that if there are non-zero omponents of veloity in diretions both parallel and perpendiular to the diretion of aeleration, then momentum hanges are seen to have a omponent perpendiular to the aeleration diretion, as well as parallel to it. These transverse momentum hanges result beause transverse proper veloity w = γv (and hene momentum p ) hanges when traveler γ hanges, even though v is staying onstant. As mentioned above, the rate at whih traveler energy inreases with time lassially depends on traveler veloity through the relation de/ F v m( a v ). Relativistially, this beomes γ de = F v = m ( α v ). (9) Hene the rate of traveler energy inrease is in form very similar to that in the lassial ase. Similarly, the lassial relationship between work, fore, and impulse an be summarized with the relation de/dx F dp /. Relativistially, this beomes 4

5 de dp = F = γ γ dx. (0) One again, save for some hanges in saling assoiated with the transverse time-speed onstant γ, the form of the lassial relationship between work, fore, and impulse is preserved in the relativisti ase. Sine these simple onnetions are a result, and not the reason, for our introdution of proper time/veloity in ontext of a single inertial frame, we suspet that they provide insight into relations that are true both lassially and relativistially, and thus are benefits of type B disussed in the introdution. The development above is of ourse too ompliated for an introdutory lass. However, for the ase of unidiretional motion, and onstant aeleration from rest, the Newtonian equations have exat relativisti analogs exept for the hanged funtional dependene of kineti energy on veloity. These equations are summarized in Table II. B. Classroom appliations of relativisti aeleration and fore. In order to visualize the relationships defined by equation 6, it is helpful to plot for the (+)D or γ = ase all veloities and times versus x in dimensionless form from a ommon origin on a single graph (i.e. as v/, ατ/, w/ = αt/, and γ versus αx/ 2 ). As shown in Fig., v/ is asymptoti to, ατ/ is exponential for large arguments, w/ = αt/ are hyperboli, and also tangent to a linear γ for large arguments. The equations underlying this plot, from 6 for γ = and oordinates sharing a ommon origin, an be written simply as: αx 2 + = + = γ = ( ) 2 αt [ ατ = osh ( v ) 2 = ] ( w ) 2. + () This universal aeleration plot, adapted to the relevant range of variables, an be used to illustrate the solution of, and possibly to graphially solve, any onstant aeleration problem. Similar plots an be onstruted for more ompliated trips (e.g. aelerated twin-paradox adventures) and for the (3+)D ase as well 0. With plots of this sort, high shool students an solve relativisti aeleration problems with no equations at all! For example, onsider onstant aeleration from rest at α = [earth gravity] [ly/yr 2 ] over a distane of 4 [lightyears]. One an read diretly from Fig. by drawing a line up from 4 on the x-axis that γ 5, final proper-speed w 4.8 [ly/tyr], map-time t 4.8 [yr], proper-time elapsed τ 2.3 [yr], and final oordinatespeed v []. Problems with most initial value sets an be solved similarly, without equations, on suh a plot with help from a straight edge and a bit of trial and error. Of ourse, the range of variables involved must be refleted in the ranges of the plot. For this reason, it may also prove helpful to replot Fig. on a logarithmi sale. As you an see here, in the lassial limit when w << [ly/tyr], all variables exept γ (dimensionless times and veloities alike) take on the same value as a funtion of distane traveled from rest! For a numerial example, imagine trying to predit how far one might travel by aelerating at one earth gravity for a fixed traveler-time, and then turning your thrusters around and deelerating for the same travelertime until you are one more at rest in your starting or map frame. To be speifi, onsider the 4.2 properyear first half of suh a trip all the way to the Andromeda galaxy 2, one of the most distant (and largest) objets visible to the naked eye. From equation 6, the maximum (final) rapidity is simply η = ατ/ = 4.7. Hene the final proper veloity is w = sinh(ατ/) = ly/tyr. From equation 2 this means that γ = + (w/)2 =.2 0 6, and the oordinate veloity v = w/ + (w/) 2 = ly/yr. Going bak to equation 6, this means that oordinate time elapsed is t = w/α =. 0 6 years, and distane traveled x = (γ ) 2 /α =. 0 6 ly. Few might imagine, from typial intro-physis treatments of relativity, that one ould travel over a million lightyears in less than 5 years on the traveler s lok! From equation 5, the oordinate aeleration falls from gee at the start of the leg to a = α/γ 3 = gee at maximum speed. The fores, energies, and momenta of ourse depend on the spaeraft s mass. At any given point along the trajetory from the equations above, F is of ourse just mα, de/dx is γ F = F, dp/ is F/γ = F, and de/ is γ F v = F v. Note that all exept the last of these are onstant if mass is onstant, albeit dependent on the referene frame hosen. However, the 4-vetor omponents dp/ and de/ are not onstant at all, showing in another way the pervasive frame-dependenes mentioned above. The foregoing solution may seem routine, as well it should be. It is not. Note that it was implemented using distanes measured (and onepts defined) in ontext of a single map frame. Moreover, the 3-vetor fores and aelerations used and alulated have frame-invariant omponents, i.e. those partiular parameters are orret in ontext of all inertial frames. The mass of the ship in the problem above may vary with time. For example, if the spaeraft is propelled by ejeting partiles at veloity u opposite to the aeleration diretion, the fore felt in the frame of the traveler will be simply mα = udm/. Hene in terms of traveler time the mass obeys m = m o exp[ ατ/u]. In terms of oordinate time, the differential equation beomes mα = uγdm/. This an be solved to get the solution derived with signifiantly more trouble in the 5

6 referene above 2. IV. PROBLEMS INVOLVING MORE THAN ONE MAP. The foregoing setions treat alulations made possible, and analogies with lassial forms whih result, if one introdues the proper time/veloity variables in the ontext of a single map frame. What happens when multiple map-frames are required? In partiular, are the Lorentz transform and other multi-map relations similarly simplified or extended? The answer is yes, although our insights in this area are limited sine the fous of this paper is introdutory physis, and not speial relativity. A. Development of multi-map equations The Lorentz transform itself is simplified with the help of proper veloity, in that it an be written in the symmetri matrix form: t x y z = γ ± w 0 0 ± w γ t x y. (2) z This seems to be an improvement over the asymmetri equations normally used, but of ourse requires a bit of matrix and 4-vetor notation that your students may not be ready to exploit. The expression for length ontration, namely L = L o /γ, is not hanged at all. The developments above do suggest that the onept of proper length L o, as the length of a yardstik in the frame in whih it is at rest, may have broader use as well. The relativisti Doppler effet expression, given as f = f o { + (v/)}/{ (v/)} in terms of oordinate veloity, also simplifies to f = f o /{γ (w/)}. The lassial expression for the Doppler effeted frequeny of a wave of veloity v wave from a moving soure of frequeny f o is, for omparison, f = f o /{ (v/v wave )}. The most notieable effet of proper veloity, on the multi-map relationships onsidered here, involves simplifiation and symmetrization of the veloity addition rule. The rule for adding oordinate veloities v and v to get relative oordinate veloity v, namely v = (v + v )/( + v v / 2 ) and v v with subsripts referring to omponent orientation with respet to the diretion of v, is inherently ompliated. Moreover, for high speed alulations, the answer is usually uninteresting sine large oordinate veloities always add up to something very near to. By omparison, if one adds proper veloities w = γ v and w = γ v to get relative proper veloity w, one finds simply that the oordinate veloity fators add while the γ-fators multiply, i.e. w = γ γ ( v + v ),with w = w. (3) Note that the omponents transverse to the diretion of v are unhanged. These equations are summarized for the unidiretional motion ase in Table III. B. Classroom appliations involving more than one map-frame. Physially more interesting questions an be answered with equation 3 than with the oordinate veloity addition rule ommonly given to students. For example, one might ask what the speed reord is for relative proper veloity between two objets aelerated by man. For the world reord in this partile-based demolition derby, onsider olliding two beams from an aelerator able to produe partiles of known energy for impat onto a stationary target. From Table I for olliding 50GeV eletrons in the LEP2 aelerator at CERN, γ and γ are E/m 2 50GeV/5keV 0 5, v and v are essentially, and w and w are hene 0 5. Upon ollision, equation 3 tells us that the relative proper speed w is (0 5 ) 2 ( + ) = Investment in a ollider thus buys a fator of 2γ = inrease in the momentum (and energy) of ollision. Compared to the ost of building a 0P ev aelerator for the equivalent effet on a stationary target, the ollider is a bargain indeed! V. CONCLUSIONS. We show in this paper that a one-map two-lok approah, using both proper and oordinate veloities, lets students takle time dilation as well as momentum and energy onservation problems without having to first master onepts whih arise when onsidering more than one inertial frame (like Lorentz transforms, length ontration, and frame-dependent simultaneity). The ardinal rule to follow when doing this is simple: All distanes must be defined with respet to a map drawn from the vantage point of a single inertial referene frame. We show further that a frame-invariant proper aeleration 3-vetor has three simple integrals of the motion in terms of these variables. Hene students an speak of the proper aeleration and fore 3-vetors for an objet in map-independent terms, and solve relativisti onstant aeleration problems muh as they now do for nonrelativisti problems in introdutory ourses. We have provided some examples of the use of these equations for high shool and ollege introdutory physis lasses, as well as summaries of equations for the simple unidiretional motion ase (Tables I, II, and III). In the proess, one an see that the approah does more than superfiially preserve lassial forms. Not just one, but many, lassial expressions take on relativisti form with only minor hange. In addition, interesting physis is aessible to students more quikly with the equations 6

7 that result. The relativisti addition rule for proper veloities is a speial ase of the latter in point. Hene we argue that the trend in the pedagogial literature, away from relativisti masses and toward use of proper time and veloity in ombination, may be a robust one whih provides: (B) deeper insight, as well as (A) more value from lessons first-taught. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My thanks for input relevant to this paper from G. Keefe, W. A. Shurliff, E. F. Taylor, and A. A. Ungar. The work has benefited indiretly from support by the U.S. Department of Energy, the Missouri Researh Board, as well as Monsanto and MEMC Eletroni Materials Companies. It has benefited most, however, from the interest and support of students at UM-St. Louis. APPENDIX A: THE 4-VECTOR PERSPECTIVE This appendix provides a more elegant view of matters disussed in the body of this paper by using spaetime 4-vetors not used there, along with some promised derivations. We postulate first that: (i) displaements between events in spae and time may be desribed by a displaement 4-vetor X for whih the time omponent may be put into distane-units by multiplying by the speed of light ; (ii) subtrating the sum of squares of spae-related omponents of any 4-vetor from the time omponent squared yields a salar dot-produt whih is frame-invariant, i.e. whih has a value whih is the same for all inertial observers; and (iii) translational momentum and energy, two physial quantities whih are onserved in the absene of external intervention, are omponents of the momentum-energy 4-vetor P m dx, where m is the objet s rest mass and τ is the frame-invariant displaement in time-units along its trajetory. From above, the 4-vetor displaement between two events in spae-time is desribed in terms of the position and time oordinate values for those two events, and an be written as: X t x y. z (A) Here the usual -notation is used to represent the value of final minus initial. The dot-produt of the displaement 4-vetor is defined as the square of the frameinvariant proper-time interval between those two events. In other words, ( τ) 2 X X = ( t) 2 ( x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ). (A2) Sine this dot-produt an be positive or negative, proper time intervals an be real (time-like) or imaginary (spaelike). It is easy to rearrange this equation for the ase when the displaement is infinitesimal, to onfirm the first two equalities in equation 2 via: γ = + ( ) 2 dx = ( ). (A3) dx 2 The momentum-energy 4-vetor, as mentioned above, is then written using γ and the omponents of proper veloity w d x as: E γ w P mu = m x w = p x y p y. (A4) w z p z Here we ve also taken the liberty to use a veloity 4- vetor U dx/. The equality in equation 2 between γ and E/m 2 follows immediately. The frame-invariant dot-produt of this 4-vetor, times squared, yields the familiar relativisti relation between total energy E, momentum p, and frame-invariant rest mass-energy m 2 : 2 P P = ( m 2) 2 = E 2 (p) 2. (A5) = dx. If we define kineti energy as the differene between rest mass-energy and total energy using K E m 2, then the last equality in equation 2 follows as well. Another useful relation whih follows is the relation between infinitesimal unertainties, namely de dp Lastly, the fore-power 4-vetor may be defined as the proper time derivative of the momentum-energy 4-vetor, i.e.: F dp ma = m dγ dw x dw y dw z = de dp x dp y dp z. (A6) Here we ve taken the liberty to define aeleration 4- vetor A d 2 X/ 2 as well. The dot-produt of the fore-power 4-vetor is always negative. It may therefore be used to define the frameinvariant proper aeleration α, by writing: F F (mα) 2 = ( de ) 2 ( dp ) 2. (A7) We still must show that this frame-invariant proper aeleration has the magnitude speified in the text (eqn. 5). To relate proper aeleration α to oordinate aeleration a d v d2 x, note first that dγ 2 = γ4 v a, that dw = γ4 a, and that dw = γ 3 v a. Putting these results into the dot-produt expression for the fourth term γ 2 in A6 and simplifying yields α 2 = γ6 a 2 as required. γ 2 v 7

8 As mentioned in the text, power is lassially framedependent, but frame-dependene for the omponents of momentum hange only asserts itself at high speed. This is best illustrated by writing out the fore 4-vetor omponents for a trajetory with onstant proper aeleration, in terms of frame-invariant proper time/aeleration variables τ and α. If we onsider separately the momentum-hange omponents parallel and perpendiular to the unhanging and frame-independent aeleration 3-vetor α, one gets F = de dp dp 0 = mα γ sinh [ ατ + η ] o osh [ ατ + η ] o sinh [ ατ + η ], o 0 γ v (A8) where η o is simply the initial value for η sinh [ w ]. The fore responsible for motion, as distint from the frame-dependent rates of momentum hange desribed above, is that seen by the aelerated objet itself. As equation A8 shows for τ, v and η o set to zero, this is nothing more than F m α. Thus some utility for the rapidity/proper time integral of the equations of onstant proper aeleration (3rd term in eqn. 6) is illustrated as well. e.g. A. P. Frenh, Speial Relativity (W. W. Norton, NY, 968), p e.g. F. J. Blatt, Modern Physis (MGraw-Hill, NY, 992). 3 C. G. Adler, Does mass really depend on veloity, dad?, Amer. J. Physis 55 (987) H. Goldstein, Classial Mehanis, 7th printing (Addison- Wesley, Reading MA, 965), p Sears and Brehme, Introdution to the Theory of Relativity (Addison-Wesley, NY, 968). 6 W. A. Shurliff, Speial Relativity: The Central Ideas (9 Appleton St., Cambridge MA 0238, 996). 7 J. A. Winnie, Speial relativity without one-way veloity assumptions, Part I and II, Philos. Si. 37 (970) 8-99 and A. A. Ungar, Formalism to deal with Reihenbah s speial theory of relativity, Found. Phys. 2 (99) A. A. Ungar, Gyrogroup axioms for the abstrat Thomas preession and their use in relativisti physis and hyperboli geometry, Found. Phys. submitted (996). 0 P. Fraundorf, Non-oordinate time/veloity pairs in speial relativity, gr-q/ (xxx.lanl.gov arhive, NM, 996). E. Taylor and J. A. Wheeler, Spaetime Physis, st edition (W. H. Freeman, San Franiso, 963). 2 C. Lagoute and E. Davoust, The interstellar traveler, Am. J. Phys. 63 (995) 22. 8

9 Equation\ Version: lassial ( ) two-lok relativity speed of map-time γ γ = ( v ) = + ( w 2 time dilation none t = γ τ oordinate veloity v d x v d x = w +( w ) 2 proper veloity same as oordinate w d x = γ v momentum p m v p = m w kineti energy K 2 mv2 p2 K = m 2 (γ ) E m 2 2m total energy m 2 + K not onsidered E = γm 2 = (p) 2 + (m 2 ) 2 TABLE I. Equations involving veloities, times, momentum and energy, in lassial and two-lok relativisti form. ) 2 Equation\ Version: lassial ( ) two-lok relativity oordinate aeleration a dv a dv felt or proper aeleration same as oordinate α = dw = γ3 a p momentum integral at v p = αt = w m m K work-energy integral ax m 2 v2 K = αx = m 2 (γ ) proper-time integral same as momentum ατ = sinh ( ) w fore, work & impulse F ma de = dp F = mα = de = dp dx dx TABLE II. Unidiretional motion equations involving onstant aeleration from rest, and 2nd law dynamis, in lassial and two-lok relativisti form. Equation\ Version: lassial ( ) two-lok relativity frame transformation x x ± vt; t t x = γx ± wt; t = γt ± wx/ 2 length ontration none L = L o/γ moving-soure Doppler-shift f fsoure ±v/v wave (any wave) f = fsoure γ±w/ (light) veloity addition v a v ab + v b w a γ abγ b(v ab + v b) TABLE III. Unidiretional motion equations involving distanes measured using more than one map-frame, in lassial and two-lok relativisti form. 9

10 6 4 p-veloity & map-time veloities (e.g. v/) & times (e.g. at/) gamma oordinate veloity traveler time dimensionless position (ax/^2) FIG.. The variables involved in (+)D onstant aeleration 0