arxiv:hep-th/ v1 27 Apr 1997
|
|
- Ashley Wells
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HUB-EP-97/5 HD-HEP-97/4 arxiv:hep-th/97494v 7 Apr 997 he wo-loop Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian in Dimensional Renormaliation D. Fliegner a, M.Reuter b, M. G. Schmidt a, C. Schubert c a Institut für heoretische Physik, Universität Heidelberg Philosophenweg 6, D-69 Heidelberg, Germany b Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-63 Hamburg, Germany c Institut für Physik, Humboldt Universität u Berlin Invalidenstr., D-5 Berlin, Germany Abstract We clarify a discrepancy between two previous calculations of the two-loop QED Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian, both performed in proper-time regulariation, by calculating this quantity in dimensional regulariation. address D.FliegnerhPhys.Uni-Heidelberg.De address M.G.SchmidthPhys.Uni-Heidelberg.De address schubert@qft.physik.hu-berlin.de Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
2 One of the earliest results in quantum electrodynamics was Euler and Heisenberg s calculation of the one-loop effective Lagrangian induced by an electron loop for an electromagnetic background field with constant field strength tensor F µν. Written in Schwinger s proper-time representation, this Lagrangian reads L () spin F = (ea)(eb) 8π 3 e m tan(ea)tanh(eb). () Here a and b may be expressed in terms of the two invariants of the electromagnetic field, a = E B + (E B ) + 4(E B) b = (E B ) + (E B ) + 4(E B). () Schwinger also supplied the corresponding result for scalar quantum electrodynamics, L () scal F = (ea)(eb) 6π 3 e m sin(ea)sinh(eb). (3) Even the first radiative correction to the Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian, due to the exchange of one internal photon in the electron loop, has been obtained many years ago by Ritus 3 in terms of a two-parameter integral. Dittrich and one of the authors 4 later obtained a similar but simpler integral representation for the same quantity. hey also verified the agreement of both representations in the strong field limit. In a recent publication 5 three of the present authors showed that this type of calculation can be considerably simplified using the worldline path integral variant 6, 7, 8, 9,,, of the Bern-Kosower formalism 3, 4. his third calculation led to exactly the same parameter integral for the regularied effective Lagrangian as the Dittrich-Reuter calculation, however in a more elegant way. All three calculations were performed in four dimensions, proper-time regulariation, and on-shell renormaliation. his choice of regulariation keeps the integrations simple, but at the two-loop level makes it already somewhat nontrivial to achieve a consistent on-shell renormaliation. he difficulty is due to the non-universal nature of the proper-time cutoff, and somewhat similar to the problems encountered in multiloop Feynman diagrams calculations performed with a naive momentum space cutoff (see 5 and references therein). In fact, the calculation in 5 was incomplete in so far as we were not able there to determine the finite part of the one-loop mass displacement appropriate to the present calculational scheme. Moreover, as a byproduct of this investigation we found that the formulas obtained by Ritus and Dittrich-Reuter for the renormalied effective Lagrangians are incompatible as they stand, and for the very same reason; if at all, they can be identified only after a certain finite mass renormaliation. One had to conclude that in (at least) one of the two previous calculations the physical renormalied electron mass had been misidentified (the strong field limit checked in 4 is not sensitive to this discrepancy). In the present letter, we clarify this matter by recalculating this effective Lagrangian in dimensional regulariation. his paper should thus be seen as supplementing 5, and the reader is referred to that publication for some of the details of the formalism used here.
3 As usual in applications of the string-inspired technique to QED, our calculation of the two-loop Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian for spinor QED will yield the corresponding Lagrangian for scalar QED as a partial result. We therefore consider the scalar QED case first. In scalar QED, our starting point is the following worldline path integral representation for the bare dimensionally regularied two-loop Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian 5, 9,, L () scal A = e y()=y() Γ( D ) Dy 4π D e m dτ a ẏ(τ a ) ẏ(τ b ) exp (y(τ a ) y(τ b ) ) D dτ b dτ( 4ẏ + ieẏ µ A µ (x + y)). (4) Here denotes the usual Schwinger proper-time parameter for the scalar circulating in the loop. he path integral Dy is to be performed over the space of all closed loops in D - dimensional spacetime, with an arbitrary but fixed center of mass x, and traversed in the fixed proper-time. he parameters τ a,b parametrie the end-points of the photon exchanged in the scalar loop. his form of the photon insertion corresponds to Feynman gauge. We use euclidean conventions both on the worldline and in spacetime. his representation of the effective action in terms of a first-quantied path integral goes essentially back to Feynman 6, except that we have dimensionally continued it to D dimensions. It is useful to take the background field A in Fock-Schwinger gauge centered at the loop center of mass x 7, where one has A µ (x + y) = yν F νµ. Exponentiating the denominator of the photon insertion using a proper-time parameter, one arrives at L () scal e m F = e Dy ẏ a ẏ b exp d (4π ) D dτ a dτ b ( dτ 4ẏ + i eyµ F µν ẏ ν) (y a y b ) 4. (5) he new path integral is gaussian, so that its evaluation amounts to a single Wick contraction of ẏ a ẏ b. his leads to 5 L () scal F = e (4π) D det e m D sin(ef) det ef C ab d dτ a dτ b ẏ a ẏ b. (6) Of the (Lorent) determinant factors appearing here, the first one yields just the one-loop Euler-Heisenberg-Schwinger integrand eq. (3). It represents the dependence of the path integral determinant on the external field 7, while the second determinant factor represents its dependence on the photon insertion. he Wick contraction is given by 5 ẏ a ẏ b = tr G + ( G Baa G )( G ĠBbb) C, (7) ab
4 where ( ef G B (τ,τ ) = (ef) sin(ef) e iefġb + iefġb ) is the bosonic one-loop worldline Green s function modified by the constant field 5, 7, 8, 9, and C ab G Baa G G Bba + G Bbb. G B generalies the ordinary worldline Green s function G B, G B (τ i,τ j ) = τ i τ j (τ i τ j ). (9) We will often abbreviate G B G B (τ,τ ) etc., and a dot always denotes a derivative with respect to the first variable, e.g. Ġ B = sign(τ τ ) (τ τ ). Performing a partial integration with respect to τ a on the first term in eq. (7) one can derive the alternative parameter integral (8) L () scal F = e (4π) D det { e m D sin(ef) det trġtr ef G C ab C ab d dτ a dτ b ( G Baa G + tr )( G ĠBbb) } C. () ab For our present purpose, we can restrict ourselves to the pure magnetic field case. his field we take along the -axis, so that F = B, F = B are the only non-vanishing components of the dimensionally continued field strength tensor. We also introduce the following abbreviations, γ eb ( + G ) γ ( + G ) and the dependent Green s function G, G Ġ = sinh(ġ) sinh() cosh() cosh(ġab) sinh() = G 3 G + O( 4 ) () = Ġ 3 ĠG + O( 4 ) () (compare eq. (8)). With these definitions, we can then rewrite the various traces and determinants appearing in eqs. (6), () as 3
5 det sin(ef) ef ( C ab) tr G trġtr G C ab ( tr G aa Ġab)( G ab G bb ) C ab = sinh() γ D γ = Dδ(τ a τ b ) (D ) 4 cosh(ġ) sinh() = (D )Ġ + Ġ (D )Ġγ + Ġγ = (D )Ġ γ Ġ + 4 G γ. (3) he term involving δ(τ a τ b ), stemming from G, can be omitted, since it will not contribute in dimensional regulariation (it corresponds to a massless tadpole insertion in field theory). Inserting these expressions into either eq. (6) or eq. (), one finds that the resulting integrals suffer from two kinds of divergences:. An overall divergence of the scalar proper-time integral at the lower integration limit.. Divergences of dτ a dτ b at the point τ a = τ b where the photon end points become coincident. he first one must be removed by one- and two-loop photon wave function renormaliation, the second one by the one-loop renormaliation of the scalar mass. It turns out that this program is easier to carry out on a certain linear combination of eqs. (6) and (), namely L () scal B = D D eq.(6) + eq.() (4) D (A similar simplification can be achieved by taking the photon insertion in Landau gauge, though the resulting parameter integrals are not identical). Moreover, we rescale to the unit circle, τ a,b = u a,b, = ˆ, and use translation invariance in τ to set τ b =. hus in the following we have G = u a ( u a ),Ġ = u a. he resulting integral we write L () scal B = e (4π) D e m D d ˆ du a I(,u a, ˆ,D) (5) where the rescaled integrand I(,u a, ˆ,D) depends on only through. In contrast to the calculation in proper-time regulariation, the ˆ integration is nontrivial in dimensional regulariation. It will therefore be easier to extract all subdivergences before performing this integral. An analysis of the divergence structure shows that the integrand can be rewritten in the following way, K(,u a,d) d ˆ I(,u a, ˆ,D) = K (,u a,d) + f(,d)g D + O( 4,G D ) (6) 4
6 with K (,u a,d) = 4 D D D G f(,d) = D D(D ) + (D )(D 4)G D + ( D + 8D 4)G D 3D(D ) 4D 3 (D 4) + (8 4D) sinh() cosh() 8 sinh () = O( 4 ). (7) K consists of the terms constant and quadratic in, which are the only ones causing a divergence at =. he second term is O( 4 ), so that its integral already converges at =, however it diverges at u a =,. After splitting off these two terms, the integral over the remainder is already finite, so that one can set D = 4 in its explicit computation. For D = 4 the ˆ - integral becomes elementary, and yields { ln(g /G K(,u a,4) = A ) sinh() (G G ) + A ln(g /G ) (G G ) } A + (G )(G G ) + A 3 (G )(G G ) A = 3 G tanh() A = 4 G + (Ġ Ġ ab), A = 4 G + Ġ (Ġ Ġ ) A 3 = Ġ(Ġ Ġ ). (8) he divergences will now be removed by mass and photon wave function renormaliation, m = m + δm e = e Z 3 B = B Z 3. (9) So far we have worked in the bare regularied theory, so that all our previous formulas should, for the following, be considered written in terms of m,e,b instead of m,e,b (note that this leaves unaffected). Since we aim at a direct comparison with previous calculations, the renormaliation will be done using on-shell rather than minimal subtraction. In on-shell subtraction, the photon wave function renormaliation has the effect of simply removing the - part of K, and the remaining - independent term can, of course, be also discarded. he removal of the divergence caused by the second term in eq. (6) takes more effort, and the mere possibility requires a little conspiration. Let us denote the corresponding contribution to the effective Lagrangian by G scal (,D). For this term the u a - integration factors out, yielding 5
7 du a G D ( = B D, D ) = O(ǫ) () ǫ where B denotes the Euler Beta-function. o proceed further, it is essential to note that the function f(,d) can be related to the integrand of the scalar one-loop Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian, eq. (3). In dimensional regulariation, and with the two terms lowest order in subtracted out via one-loop photon wave function renormaliation, this Lagrangian reads On the other hand, we can rewrite L () scal B = e m (4π) D sinh() + 6. () f(,d) = 8 D D(D ) D + d { } D sinh() + 6. () By a partial integration over, we can therefore reexpress e m D f(,d) = 8 D { m D(D ) + D 4 e m D e m 3 D sinh() + 6 sinh() + 6 } (there are no boundary terms since f() = O( 4 )). At the two-loop level, the effect of mass renormaliation consists in the following shift produced by the one-loop mass displacement δm, δl () scal B = δm m (3) L () scal B. (4) δm is generated by the UV divergence of the one-loop scalar self energy in scalar QED. his quantity we have to take from standard field theory. In dimensional regulariation one has δm = α m 6 4π ǫ + 7 3γ ln(4π) 3ln(m ) + O(ǫ). (5) Here ǫ = D 4, and γ denotes the Euler-Mascheroni constant. Expanding eqs. (), (3), and (4) in ǫ one finds that, up to terms of order O(ǫ), G scal (,D) = δm L () α m scal B + m (4π) 3 3γ 3ln(m ) + 3 m + 9 e m sinh() + 6. (6) Note that this differs by a sign from δm as used in 9. Here this denotes the mass displacement itself, there the corresponding counterterm. In comparing with 3, 4, 5, note that there this constant had been denoted by ln(γ). 6
8 Note that the whole divergence of G scal (,D) for D 4 has now been absorbed into δm. Our final answer for the two-loop contribution to the finite renormalied scalar QED Euler-Heisenberg thus becomes scal B = α (4π) 3 L () + α (4π) 3m 3 e m e m du a K(,u a,4) K (,u a,4) f(,4) G sinh() + 6 3γ 3ln(m ) + 3 m + 9 As far as is known to the present authors, the only previous calculation of the two-loop Euler- Heisenberg for scalar QED is the one in,. he parameter integral given there is rather different from ours, and we have not succeeded in directly identifying both representations. However, we have used MAPLE to expand both formulas in a aylor expansion in B up to order O(B ), and found exact agreement for the coefficients. Let us just give the first few terms in this expansion, L () αm4 scal B = (4π) ( B B cr )4 559 ( B B cr ) (7) ( B )8 936 ( B ) B cr 36 B cr (8) he expansion parameter has been rewritten in terms of B cr m e G. he corresponding calculation for spinor QED is completely analogous. In the worldline superfield formalism of 5, 9,, the formulas (6), (7) generalie to the following integral representation for the two-loop effective action induced by the spinor loop, L () spin F = ( )(4π) D( e tan(ef) D a y a D b y b det ef = tr D a D b Ĝ ab + ) e m D det Ĉab d dτ a dτ b D a y a D b y b, dθ a dθ b D a (Ĝaa Ĝab)D b (Ĝab Ĝbb) Ĉab. (9) he Ĝ appearing here is the constant field worldline superpropagator, Ĝ(τ,θ ;τ,θ ) G B (τ,τ ) + θ θ G F (τ,τ ) (3) which besides the bosonic propagator eq. (8) also contains a fermionic piece, G F (τ,τ ) = sign(τ τ ) e iefġb cos(ef). (3) Our superfield conventions are D = θ θ τ, dθθ =. Performing the Grassmann integrations, and removing G by partial integration over τ a, we obtain the equivalent of eq. (), 7
9 L () spin F = (4π) D e det e m D tan(ef) ( ef C ab ( G Baa +tr Ġ)( d dτ a dτ b ) { Ġ trġtr C ab G ĠBbb + G Faa ) + G Fab G Fab G Faa G Fbb C ab G Fab trg Fab tr C ab }. (3) Note that this formula reduces to eq. (), if one replaces tan(ef) by sin(ef), and deletes all the G F, as well as the global factor of (which accounts for the difference in statistics and degrees of freedom between the spin and spin loops). Contrary to the scalar QED case, here the partially integrated integral is already a suitable starting point for renormaliation (for more on this point see chapter 7 of 5). Specialiing to the magnetic field case, it is again easy to calculate the Lorent determinants and traces. After rescaling to the unit circle, one obtains a parameter integral L () spin B = (4π) D e he extraction of the subdivergences yields e m D d ˆ du a J(,u a, ˆ,D). (33) with L(,u a,d) L (,u a,d) = 4(D )G D 4 3D g(,d) = 4 3 d ˆ J(,u a, ˆ,D) = L (,u a,d) + g(,d)g D + O( 4,G D ) (34) D D (D )(D 4)G D + (D )(D 7)G D 6 sinh () + 3(D ) coth() (D 4) 3D = O( 4 ). L is again removed by photon wave function renormaliation. Denoting the contribution of the second term by G spin (,D), we note that the u a - integral is the same as in the scalar QED case, eq. (). Using the following identity analogous to eq. (), (35) g(,d) = 8 D D D + d { } D tanh() 3 (36) we partially integrate the remaining integral over. he ǫ - part of G spin is then again found to be just right for absorbing the shift induced by the one-loop mass displacement, α δm = m 6 4π ǫ + 4 3γ ln(4π) 3ln(m ) + O(ǫ). (37) Up to terms of order ǫ one obtains 8
10 G spin (,D) = δm m L() spin B + m α (4π) 3 e m tanh() 3 γ + ln(m ) m 8. (38) Our final result for the on-shell renormalied two-loop spinor QED Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian is L () spin B = α (4π) 3 α (4π) 3m 3 e m e m du a L(,u a,4) L (,u a,4) g(,4) G tanh() 3 8 γ ln(m ) + m (39) with { ln(g /G L(,u a,4) = B ) } tanh() (G G + B ) G (G G ) + B 3 G (G G ) ( ) B = 4 coth() tanh() G 4G B = ĠĠ + (8tanh() 4coth())G B 3 = 4G ĠĠ 4 tanh()g + L (,u a,4) = + G g(, 4) = 6 sinh() + coth(). (4) Comparing with the previous results by Ritus and Dittrich-Reuter, we have again not succeeded in a direct identification with the more complicated parameter integral given by Ritus 3. However, as in the scalar QED case we have verified agreement between both formulas up to the order of O(B ) in the weak-field expansion in B. he first few coefficients are L () αm4 spin B = (4π) ( B )4 9 B cr 5 ( B B cr ) ( B ) ( B ) (4) B cr 575 B cr On the other hand, our formula almost allows for a term by term identification with the result of Dittrich-Reuter 4, as given in eqs. (7.),(7.) there. his requires a rotation to Minkowskian proper-time, is, a transformation of variables from u a to v := Ġ, the use of trigonometric identities, and another partial integration over for the last two terms in eq. (39). he only discrepancy arises in the constant 8, which reads in the Dittrich-Reuter formula. Since this constant can be adjusted by a change of the finite constant appearing in δm, we conclude that the two previous results for this effective Lagrangian differ precisely by a finite 9
11 mass renormaliation. Moreover, it is clear that Ritus formula is the one which correctly identifies the physical electron mass. Finally, let us mention that the one-loop Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian, and perhaps even its two-loop correction considered here, may possibly be measured in optical experiments in the near future 3. Acknowledgements: C.S. would like to thank O. arasov for discussions, and A.A. Vladimirov for correspondence.
12 References W. Heisenberg, H. Euler, Z. Phys. 38 (936) 74. J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 8 (95) V. I. Ritus, Sov. Phys. JEP 4 (975) W. Dittrich and M. Reuter, Effective Lagrangians in Quantum Electrodynamics, Springer M. Reuter, M.G. Schmidt and C. Schubert, IASSNS-HEP-96/9 (hep-th/969), Ann. Phys. (in press). 6 M. J. Strassler, Nucl. Phys. B385 (99) M. G. Schmidt, C. Schubert, Phys. Lett. B38 (993) 438 (hep-th/93955). 8 M. G. Schmidt, C. Schubert, Phys. Lett. B33 (994) 69 (hep-th/94358). 9 M. G. Schmidt, C. Schubert, Phys. Rev. D53 (996) 5 (hep-th/94). K. Daikouji, M. Shino, Y. Sumino, Phys. Rev. D53 (996) 4598 (hep-ph/958377). K. Roland, H. Sato, Nucl. Phys. B 48 (996) 99 (hep-th/9645). C. Schubert, Lectures given at the XXXVI Cracow School of heoretical Physics, Act. Phys. Pol. B 7 (996) 3965 (hep-th/968). 3 Z. Bern, D. A. Kosower, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (99) 669; Nucl. Phys. B379 (99) Z. Bern, D. C. Dunbar, Nucl. Phys. B379 (99) A.A. Vladimirov, eor. Mat. Fi. 36 (978) 7. 6 R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 8 (95) S. L. Adler and C. Schubert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (996) 695 (hep-th/96535). 8 D. Cangemi, E. D Hoker, G. Dunne, Phys. Rev. D5 (995) 53 (hep-th/9493). 9 R. Shaisultanov, Phys. Lett. B 378 (996) 354 (hep-th/954). V. I. Ritus, Zh. Eksp. eor. Fi. 73 (977) 87 Sov. Phys. JEP 46 (977) 43. S. L. Lebedev, FIAN No. 54, Moscow 98 (unpublished). A. M. Polyakov, Gauge Fields and Strings, Harwood D. Bakalov et al., Nucl. Phys. B35 (Proc. Suppl.) (994) 8; D. Bakalov, INFN/AE-94/7 (unpublished).
An Improved Heat Kernel Expansion From Wordline Path Integrals
DESY 94 221 HD THEP 94 26 An Improved Heat Kernel Expansion From Wordline Path Integrals D. Fliegner, P. Haberl, M.G. Schmidt Institut für Theoretische Physik Universität Heidelberg Philosophenweg 16 D-6912
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 18 Mar 1998
arxiv:hep-th/983144v1 18 Mar 1998 The effective two-loop Euler-Heisenberg action for ar and spinor QED in a general constant background field Boris Körs Michael G. Schmidt Institut für Theoretische Physik
More informationhep-th/ Mar 94
DESY- HD-THEP-94-7 hep-th/yymmnnn Worldline Green Functions for Multiloop Diagrams Michael G. Schmidt Theoretical Physics Division, CERN CH { 111 Geneva 3 and hep-th/943158 5 Mar 94 Institut fur Theoretische
More informationContact interactions in string theory and a reformulation of QED
Contact interactions in string theory and a reformulation of QED James Edwards QFT Seminar November 2014 Based on arxiv:1409.4948 [hep-th] and arxiv:1410.3288 [hep-th] Outline Introduction Worldline formalism
More informationQED in the Worldline Formalism 1
QED in the Worldline Formalism 1 Christian Schubert arxiv:hep-ph/11331v1 7 Nov Instituto de Física y Matemáticas, Universidad Michoacana, Morelia, Michoacán, México and California Institute for Physics
More informationLoop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51
Loop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51 Similarly, the exact Dirac propagator can be written as: Let s consider the theory of a pseudoscalar field and a Dirac field: the only couplings allowed
More informationRegularization Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama
Regularization Physics 3A, Spring 7, Hitoshi Murayama Introduction In quantum field theories, we encounter many apparent divergences. Of course all physical quantities are finite, and therefore divergences
More informationHeisenberg-Euler effective lagrangians
Heisenberg-Euler effective lagrangians Appunti per il corso di Fisica eorica 7/8 3.5.8 Fiorenzo Bastianelli We derive here effective lagrangians for the electromagnetic field induced by a loop of charged
More informationSpinning strings and QED
Spinning strings and QED James Edwards Oxford Particles and Fields Seminar January 2015 Based on arxiv:1409.4948 [hep-th] and arxiv:1410.3288 [hep-th] Outline Introduction Various relationships between
More informationTWO-LOOP SELF-DUAL QED
UMSNH-PHYS-02-11 TWO-LOOP SELF-DUAL QED Gerald V. Dunne, 1 Christian Schubert 2 1 Department of Physics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3046, USA 2 Instituto de Física y Matemáticas, Universidad
More informationMaxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density
Maxwell s equations based on S-54 Our next task is to find a quantum field theory description of spin-1 particles, e.g. photons. Classical electrodynamics is governed by Maxwell s equations: electric field
More informationREVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II
Quantum Field Theory II PHYS-P 622 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory Chapters: 13, 14, 16-21, 26-28, 51, 52, 61-68, 44, 53, 69-74, 30-32, 84-86, 75,
More informationQuantum Field Theory II
Quantum Field Theory II PHYS-P 622 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory Chapters: 13, 14, 16-21, 26-28, 51, 52, 61-68, 44, 53, 69-74, 30-32, 84-86, 75,
More informationReview of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10
Review of scalar field theory Srednicki 5, 9, 10 2 The LSZ reduction formula based on S-5 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate
More informationBeta functions in quantum electrodynamics
Beta functions in quantum electrodynamics based on S-66 Let s calculate the beta function in QED: the dictionary: Note! following the usual procedure: we find: or equivalently: For a theory with N Dirac
More informationThe Ward Identity from the Background Field Dependence of the Effective Action
HD-THEP-96-0 The Ward Identity from the Bacground Field Dependence of the Effective Action F. Freire and C. Wetterich 2 Institut für Theoretische Physi, Universität Heidelberg, Philosophenweg 6, D-6920
More informationOn particle production by classical backgrounds
On particle production by classical backgrounds arxiv:hep-th/0103251v2 30 Mar 2001 Hrvoje Nikolić Theoretical Physics Division, Rudjer Bošković Institute, P.O.B. 180, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia hrvoje@faust.irb.hr
More informationLecture 8: 1-loop closed string vacuum amplitude
Lecture 8: 1-loop closed string vacuum amplitude José D. Edelstein University of Santiago de Compostela STRING THEORY Santiago de Compostela, March 5, 2013 José D. Edelstein (USC) Lecture 8: 1-loop vacuum
More informationVacuum Birefringence in Strong Magnetic Fields
Vacuum Birefringence in Strong Magnetic Fields Walter Dittrich and Holger Gies Institut für theoretische Physik, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany Abstract Table of
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 10 Oct 2017
Tadpole diagrams in constant electromagnetic fields Felix Karbstein 1,2, 1 Helmholtz-Institut Jena, Fröbelstieg 3, 07743 Jena, Germany 2 Theoretisch-Physikalisches Institut, Abbe Center of Photonics, arxiv:1709.03819v2
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 30 Dec 2015
June 3, 8 Derivation of functional equations for Feynman integrals from algebraic relations arxiv:5.94v [hep-ph] 3 Dec 5 O.V. Tarasov II. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Hamburg, Luruper
More informationThe path integral for photons
The path integral for photons based on S-57 We will discuss the path integral for photons and the photon propagator more carefully using the Lorentz gauge: as in the case of scalar field we Fourier-transform
More informationChiral Symmetry in the String Representation of the Large N QCD
Chiral Symmetry in the String Representation of the Large N QCD Vikram Vyas Scientific Resource Centre The Ajit Foundation, Jaipur, India Email: visquare@satyam.net.in Abstract We use the worldline representation
More informationAxial Vector Amplitudes, Second Order Fermions, and Standard Model Photon Neutrino Processes
PROCEEDINGS Axial Vector Amplitudes, Second Order Fermions, and Standard Model Photon Neutrino Processes Laboratoire d Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique Théorique LAPTH, Chemin de Bellevue, BP 11, F-74941 Annecy-le-Vieux
More informationVacuum Energy and Effective Potentials
Vacuum Energy and Effective Potentials Quantum field theories have badly divergent vacuum energies. In perturbation theory, the leading term is the net zero-point energy E zeropoint = particle species
More informationGeneral amplitude of the n vertex one-loop process in a strong magnetic field
Yaroslavl State University Preprint YARU-HE-0/09 hep-ph/01009 arxiv:hep-ph/01009v 1 Mar 003 General amplitude of the n vertex one-loop process in a strong magnetic field A. V. Kuznetsov, N. V. Mikheev,
More informationQuantum Field Theory 2 nd Edition
Quantum Field Theory 2 nd Edition FRANZ MANDL and GRAHAM SHAW School of Physics & Astromony, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK WILEY A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Publication Contents Preface
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 15 Dec 1995
UAB-FT-379 PLY-MS-95-08 THE PHYSICAL PROPAGATOR OF A SLOWLY MOVING CHARGE arxiv:hep-th/951118v1 15 Dec 1995 Emili Bagan 1 *, Martin Lavelle and David McMullan 3 1 Physics Department Bldg. 510A Brookhaven
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 11 Dec 1995
NIKHEF/95-067 hep-th/9512068 Fermions and world-line supersymmetry arxiv:hep-th/9512068v1 11 Dec 1995 J.W. van Holten NIKHEF/FOM, Amsterdam NL December 11, 1995 Abstract The world-line path-integral representation
More informationReview and Preview. We are testing QED beyond the leading order of perturbation theory. We encounter... IR divergences from soft photons;
Chapter 9 : Radiative Corrections 9.1 Second order corrections of QED 9. Photon self energy 9.3 Electron self energy 9.4 External line renormalization 9.5 Vertex modification 9.6 Applications 9.7 Infrared
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 29 May 2000
Photon-Photon Interaction in a Photon Gas Markus H. Thoma Theory Division, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland and Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany arxiv:hep-ph/0005282v1
More informationQuantum Field Theory. and the Standard Model. !H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS MATTHEW D. SCHWARTZ. Harvard University
Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model MATTHEW D. Harvard University SCHWARTZ!H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS t Contents v Preface page xv Part I Field theory 1 1 Microscopic theory of radiation 3 1.1
More informationRecursive graphical construction of Feynman diagrams and their weights in Ginzburg Landau theory
Physica A 3 2002 141 152 www.elsevier.com/locate/physa Recursive graphical construction of Feynman diagrams and their weights in Ginzburg Landau theory H. Kleinert a;, A. Pelster a, B. VandenBossche a;b
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 18 Nov 1996
TTP96-55 1 MPI/PhT/96-122 hep-ph/9611354 November 1996 arxiv:hep-ph/9611354v1 18 Nov 1996 AUTOMATIC COMPUTATION OF THREE-LOOP TWO-POINT FUNCTIONS IN LARGE MOMENTUM EXPANSION K.G. Chetyrkin a,b, R. Harlander
More informationbe stationary under variations in A, we obtain Maxwell s equations in the form ν J ν = 0. (7.5)
Chapter 7 A Synopsis of QED We will here sketch the outlines of quantum electrodynamics, the theory of electrons and photons, and indicate how a calculation of an important physical quantity can be carried
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 20 Jul 2004
IUHET-473 arxiv:hep-th/040717v1 0 Jul 004 Gauge Invariance and the Pauli-Villars Regulator in Lorentz- and CPT-Violating Electrodynamics B. Altschul 1 Department of Physics Indiana University Bloomington,
More informationLight-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics
Light-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics David G. Robertson Department of Physics, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 Abstract Light-cone quantization of (3+1)-dimensional electrodynamics is
More informationFive-loop renormalization group functions of O(n)-symmetric φ 4 -theory and ǫ-expansions of critical exponents up to ǫ 5
arxiv:hep-th/9503230v1 1 Apr 1995 Five-loop renormalization group functions of O(n)-symmetric φ 4 -theory and ǫ-expansions of critical exponents up to ǫ 5 H. Kleinert, J. Neu and V. Schulte-Frohlinde Institut
More informationManifestly diffeomorphism invariant classical Exact Renormalization Group
Manifestly diffeomorphism invariant classical Exact Renormalization Group Anthony W. H. Preston University of Southampton Supervised by Prof. Tim R. Morris Talk prepared for Asymptotic Safety seminar,
More informationDR.RUPNATHJI( DR.RUPAK NATH )
11 Perturbation Theory and Feynman Diagrams We now turn our attention to interacting quantum field theories. All of the results that we will derive in this section apply equally to both relativistic and
More informationTwo-loop Remainder Functions in N = 4 SYM
Two-loop Remainder Functions in N = 4 SYM Claude Duhr Institut für theoretische Physik, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Paulistr. 27, CH-8093, Switzerland E-mail: duhrc@itp.phys.ethz.ch 1 Introduction Over the last
More informationRenormalization of the Yukawa Theory Physics 230A (Spring 2007), Hitoshi Murayama
Renormalization of the Yukawa Theory Physics 23A (Spring 27), Hitoshi Murayama We solve Problem.2 in Peskin Schroeder. The Lagrangian density is L 2 ( µφ) 2 2 m2 φ 2 + ψ(i M)ψ ig ψγ 5 ψφ. () The action
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-th] 10 Dec 2015
arxiv:52.03203v [hep-th] 0 Dec 205 Influence of an Electric Field on the Propagation of a Photon in a Magnetic field V.M. Katkov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia e-mail:
More information6.1 Quadratic Casimir Invariants
7 Version of May 6, 5 CHAPTER 6. QUANTUM CHROMODYNAMICS Mesons, then are described by a wavefunction and baryons by Φ = q a q a, (6.3) Ψ = ǫ abc q a q b q c. (6.4) This resolves the old paradox that ground
More informationTheory of Elementary Particles homework VIII (June 04)
Theory of Elementary Particles homework VIII June 4) At the head of your report, please write your name, student ID number and a list of problems that you worked on in a report like II-1, II-3, IV- ).
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 7 Feb 1992
CP N 1 MODEL WITH A CHERN-SIMONS TERM arxiv:hep-th/9202026v1 7 Feb 1992 G. Ferretti and S.G. Rajeev Research Institute for Theoretical Physics Siltavuorenpenger 20 C SF-00170 Helsinki, Finland Abstract
More informationUnitarity, Dispersion Relations, Cutkosky s Cutting Rules
Unitarity, Dispersion Relations, Cutkosky s Cutting Rules 04.06.0 For more information about unitarity, dispersion relations, and Cutkosky s cutting rules, consult Peskin& Schröder, or rather Le Bellac.
More informationScattering Amplitudes
Scattering Amplitudes LECTURE 1 Jaroslav Trnka Center for Quantum Mathematics and Physics (QMAP), UC Davis ICTP Summer School, June 2017 Particle experiments: our probe to fundamental laws of Nature Theorist
More information8.821 String Theory Fall 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 8.81 String Theory Fall 008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 8.81 F008 Lecture 1: Boundary of AdS;
More informationTadpole Summation by Dyson-Schwinger Equations
MS-TPI-96-4 hep-th/963145 Tadpole Summation by Dyson-Schwinger Equations arxiv:hep-th/963145v1 18 Mar 1996 Jens Küster and Gernot Münster Institut für Theoretische Physik I, Universität Münster Wilhelm-Klemm-Str.
More informationQuantum Fields in Curved Spacetime
Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime Lecture 3 Finn Larsen Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics Yerevan, August 22, 2016. Recap AdS 3 is an instructive application of quantum fields in curved space. The
More informationQuantum Field Theory. Kerson Huang. Second, Revised, and Enlarged Edition WILEY- VCH. From Operators to Path Integrals
Kerson Huang Quantum Field Theory From Operators to Path Integrals Second, Revised, and Enlarged Edition WILEY- VCH WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA I vh Contents Preface XIII 1 Introducing Quantum Fields
More informationPhysics 411 Lecture 22. E&M and Sources. Lecture 22. Physics 411 Classical Mechanics II
Physics 411 Lecture 22 E&M and Sources Lecture 22 Physics 411 Classical Mechanics II October 24th, 2007 E&M is a good place to begin talking about sources, since we already know the answer from Maxwell
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 30 Oct 2002
DESY 02-179 hep-ph/0210426 Calculating two- and three-body decays with FeynArts and FormCalc Michael Klasen arxiv:hep-ph/0210426v1 30 Oct 2002 II. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Hamburg,
More informationSmooth Wilson Loops and Yangian Symmetry in Planar N = 4 SYM
Smooth Wilson Loops and Yangian Symmetry in Planar N = 4 SYM ITP, Niklas Beisert Workshop on Hidden symmetries and integrability methods in super Yang Mills theories and their dual string theories Centre
More informationHelicity/Chirality. Helicities of (ultra-relativistic) massless particles are (approximately) conserved Right-handed
Helicity/Chirality Helicities of (ultra-relativistic) massless particles are (approximately) conserved Right-handed Left-handed Conservation of chiral charge is a property of massless Dirac theory (classically)
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 2 Jul 1998
α-representation for QCD Richard Hong Tuan arxiv:hep-th/9807021v1 2 Jul 1998 Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Hautes Energies 1 Université de Paris XI, Bâtiment 210, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France Abstract
More informationSummary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:
The LSZ reduction formula based on S-5 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate scattering amplitude. Summary of free theory:
More informationWeek 11 Reading material from the books
Week 11 Reading material from the books Polchinski, Chapter 6, chapter 10 Becker, Becker, Schwartz, Chapter 3, 4 Green, Schwartz, Witten, chapter 7 Normalization conventions. In general, the most convenient
More informationOne-loop renormalization in a toy model of Hořava-Lifshitz gravity
1/0 Università di Roma TRE, Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik One-loop renormalization in a toy model of Hořava-Lifshitz gravity Based on (hep-th:1311.653) with Dario Benedetti Filippo Guarnieri
More informationQuantum Field Theory II
Quantum Field Theory II T. Nguyen PHY 391 Independent Study Term Paper Prof. S.G. Rajeev University of Rochester April 2, 218 1 Introduction The purpose of this independent study is to familiarize ourselves
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 6 Jan 2004
hep-th/0310063 January 2004 arxiv:hep-th/0310063v2 6 Jan 2004 The group approach to AdS space propagators: A fast algorithm Thorsten Leonhardt, Werner Rühl Fachbereich Physik, TU Kaiserslautern Postfach
More information752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian
752 Final April 16, 2010 Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The standard model Lagrangian L SM = L Y M + L W D + L Y u + L H The rst term, the Yang Mills
More informationG. 't HOOFT and M. VELTMAN Institute for Theoretical Physics*, University of Utrecht, Netherlands
Nuclear Physics B153 (1979) 365-401 North-Holland Publishing Company SCALAR ONE-LOOP INTEGRALS G. 't HOOFT and M. VELTMAN Institute for Theoretical Physics*, University of Utrecht, Netherlands Received
More informationInfluence of an Electric Field on the Propagation of a Photon in a Magnetic field
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Influence of an Electric Field on the Propagation of a Photon in a Magnetic field To cite this article: V M Katkov 06 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 73 0003
More information8.821 F2008 Lecture 12: Boundary of AdS; Poincaré patch; wave equation in AdS
8.821 F2008 Lecture 12: Boundary of AdS; Poincaré patch; wave equation in AdS Lecturer: McGreevy Scribe: Francesco D Eramo October 16, 2008 Today: 1. the boundary of AdS 2. Poincaré patch 3. motivate boundary
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 9 Jun 1997
DTP/97/44 RAL TR 97-027 hep-ph/9706297 arxiv:hep-ph/9706297v1 9 Jun 1997 The One-loop QCD Corrections for γ q qgg J. M. Campbell, E. W. N. Glover Physics Department, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE,
More informationThe boundary state from open string fields. Yuji Okawa University of Tokyo, Komaba. March 9, 2009 at Nagoya
The boundary state from open string fields Yuji Okawa University of Tokyo, Komaba March 9, 2009 at Nagoya Based on arxiv:0810.1737 in collaboration with Kiermaier and Zwiebach (MIT) 1 1. Introduction Quantum
More informationPhysics 217 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Fall u(p,λ) by any method of your choosing.
Physics 27 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Fall 206. The helicity spinor u(p, λ satisfies u(p,λu(p,λ = 2m. ( In parts (a and (b, you may assume that m 0. (a Evaluate u(p,λ by any method of your choosing. Using the
More informationXV Mexican Workshop on Particles and Fields
XV Mexican Workshop on Particles and Fields Constructing Scalar-Photon Three Point Vertex in Massless Quenched Scalar QED Dra. Yajaira Concha Sánchez, Michoacana University, México 2-6 November 2015 Mazatlán,
More information2P + E = 3V 3 + 4V 4 (S.2) D = 4 E
PHY 396 L. Solutions for homework set #19. Problem 1a): Let us start with the superficial degree of divergence. Scalar QED is a purely bosonic theory where all propagators behave as 1/q at large momenta.
More informationTENTATIVE SYLLABUS INTRODUCTION
Physics 615: Overview of QFT Fall 2010 TENTATIVE SYLLABUS This is a tentative schedule of what we will cover in the course. It is subject to change, often without notice. These will occur in response to
More informationChapter 13. Local Symmetry
Chapter 13 Local Symmetry So far, we have discussed symmetries of the quantum mechanical states. A state is a global (non-local) object describing an amplitude everywhere in space. In relativistic physics,
More informationThe Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local Gauge Transformations Dynamics of Field Ten
Lecture 4 QCD as a Gauge Theory Adnan Bashir, IFM, UMSNH, Mexico August 2013 Hermosillo Sonora The Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 31 Jan 2018
Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Polarization and dilepton angular distribution in pion-nucleon collisions Miklós Zétényi Enrico Speranza Bengt Friman Received: date / Accepted: date
More informationRADIATIVE CORRECTIONS TO THE STEFAN-BOLTZMANN LAW. FINN RAVNDAL a. Institute of Physics, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS TO THE STEFAN-BOLTZMANN LAW FINN RAVNDAL a Institute of Physics, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway Abstract Photons in blackbody radiation have non-zero interactions due to
More informationGauge theories on a five-dimensional orbifold
arxiv:hep-lat/0509071v1 21 Sep 2005 and Burkhard Bunk Institut für Physik, Humboldt Universität, Newtonstr. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany E-mail: knechtli@physik.hu-berlin.de, bunk@physik.hu-berlin.de Nikos
More information4 4 and perturbation theory
and perturbation theory We now consider interacting theories. A simple case is the interacting scalar field, with a interaction. This corresponds to a -body contact repulsive interaction between scalar
More informationarxiv:gr-qc/ v1 22 Jul 1994
A COMPARISON OF TWO QUANTIZATION PROCEDURES FOR LINEAL GRAVITY Eric Benedict arxiv:gr-qc/9407035v1 22 Jul 1994 Department of Physics Boston University 590 Commonwealth Avenue Boston, Massachusets 02215
More informationString inspired representations of photon/gluon amplitudes
MaPhy-AvH/212-8 String inspired representations of photon/gluon amplitudes Naser Ahmadiniaz a,b, Christian Schubert a,b,c, Victor M. Villanueva a a Instituto de Física y Matemáticas Universidad Michoacana
More informationEvaluation of Triangle Diagrams
Evaluation of Triangle Diagrams R. Abe, T. Fujita, N. Kanda, H. Kato, and H. Tsuda Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan E-mail: csru11002@g.nihon-u.ac.jp
More informationKonishi Anomaly. 32π 2 ǫκλµν F κλ F µν. (5)
Konishi Anomaly Consider the SQED with massless charged fields A and B. Classically, it has an axial symmetry A e +iϕ A, B e +iϕ B and hence a conserved axial current J ax = Ae +2gV A + B e 2gV B, () D
More informationUniversality check of the overlap fermions in the Schrödinger functional
Universality check of the overlap fermions in the Schrödinger functional Humboldt Universitaet zu Berlin Newtonstr. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: takeda@physik.hu-berlin.de HU-EP-8/29 SFB/CPP-8-57
More informationAbstract. I insert a few omitted expressions and correct detected misprints in my book [1].
ADVANCED TOPICS IN QUANTUM FIELD THEORY: ERRATA M. SHIFMAN William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA shifman@umn.edu Abstract I insert a few omitted
More informationFinite Temperature Field Theory
Finite Temperature Field Theory Dietrich Bödeker, Universität Bielefeld 1. Thermodynamics (better: thermo-statics) (a) Imaginary time formalism (b) free energy: scalar particles, resummation i. pedestrian
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 998971 Allowed tools: mathematical tables 1. Spin zero. Consider a real, scalar field
More informationSchwinger s formula and the axial Ward identity for chirality production
Schwinger s formula and the axial Ward identity for chirality production Patrick Copinger, Kenji Fukushima, and Shi Pu New Frontiers in QCD 2018 June 18, 2018 Outline 1 Background Motivation: Chiral Magnetic
More informationHelicity/Chirality. Helicities of (ultra-relativistic) massless particles are (approximately) conserved Right-handed
Helicity/Chirality Helicities of (ultra-relativistic) massless particles are (approximately) conserved Right-handed Left-handed Conservation of chiral charge is a property of massless Dirac theory (classically)
More information10 Thermal field theory
0 Thermal field theory 0. Overview Introduction The Green functions we have considered so far were all defined as expectation value of products of fields in a pure state, the vacuum in the absence of real
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 2 Oct 2000
hep-th/0008045 YITP-00-44 Dimensional regularization of nonlinear sigma models on a finite time interval F. Bastianelli a, O. Corradini b and P. van Nieuwenhuizen b3 arxiv:hep-th/0008045v Oct 000 a Dipartimento
More informationMaxwell s equations. based on S-54. electric field charge density. current density
Maxwell s equations based on S-54 Our next task is to find a quantum field theory description of spin-1 particles, e.g. photons. Classical electrodynamics is governed by Maxwell s equations: electric field
More information1 Running and matching of the QED coupling constant
Quantum Field Theory-II UZH and ETH, FS-6 Assistants: A. Greljo, D. Marzocca, J. Shapiro http://www.physik.uzh.ch/lectures/qft/ Problem Set n. 8 Prof. G. Isidori Due: -5-6 Running and matching of the QED
More information0 T (L int (x 1 )...L int (x n )) = i
LORENTZ INVARIANT RENORMALIZATION IN CAUSAL PERTURBATION THEORY K. BRESSER, G. PINTER AND D. PRANGE II. Institut für Theoretische Physik Universität Hamburg Luruper Chaussee 149 22761 Hamburg Germany e-mail:
More informationHamiltonian Flow in Coulomb Gauge Yang-Mills Theory
Hamiltonian Flow in Coulomb Gauge Yang-Mills Theory Universität Tübingen Institut für Theoretische Physi Auf der Morgenstelle 4 D-7076 Tübingen Germany E-mail: hugo.reinhardt@uni-tuebingen.de Marus Leder
More informationIs N=8 Supergravity Finite?
Is N=8 Supergravity Finite? Z. Bern, L.D., R. Roiban, hep-th/0611086 Z. Bern, J.J. Carrasco, L.D., H. Johansson, D. Kosower, R. Roiban, hep-th/0702112 U.C.S.B. High Energy and Gravity Seminar April 26,
More information8.821 F2008 Lecture 18: Wilson Loops
8.821 F2008 Lecture 18: Wilson Loops Lecturer: McGreevy Scribe: Koushik Balasubramanian Decemebr 28, 2008 1 Minimum Surfaces The expectation value of Wilson loop operators W [C] in the CFT can be computed
More informationDiscrete symmetry breaking and restoration at finite temperature in 3D Gross-Neveu model
1 Discrete symmetry breaking and restoration at finite temperature in 3D Gross-Neveu model arxiv:hep-th/981199v1 11 Nov 1998 Bang-Rong Zhou Department of Physics, Graduate School at Beijing University
More informationJuly 2, SISSA Entrance Examination. PhD in Theoretical Particle Physics Academic Year 2018/2019. olve two among the three problems presented.
July, 018 SISSA Entrance Examination PhD in Theoretical Particle Physics Academic Year 018/019 S olve two among the three problems presented. Problem I Consider a theory described by the Lagrangian density
More information8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II
Lecture 6 8.34 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II Fall 8.34 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II MIT OpenCourseWare Lecture Notes Hong Liu, Fall α(μ) Lecture 6 5.3.3: Beta-Functions of Quantum Electrodynamics
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 21 May 1996
ITP-SB-96-24 BRX-TH-395 USITP-96-07 hep-th/xxyyzzz arxiv:hep-th/960549v 2 May 996 Effective Kähler Potentials M.T. Grisaru Physics Department Brandeis University Waltham, MA 02254, USA M. Roče and R. von
More information