Bias in Dynamic Panel Models under Time Series Misspeci cation
|
|
- Caroline Carr
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Bias in Dynamic Panel Models under Time Series Misseci cation Yoonseok Lee August 2 Abstract We consider within-grou estimation of higher-order autoregressive anel models with exogenous regressors and xed e ects, where the lag order is ossibly misseci ed. Even when disregarding the misseci cation bias, the xed-e ect bias formula is quite different from the correctly seci ed case though its asymtotic order remain the same under the stationarity. We suggest some bias reduction methods under the ossible misseci cation. Keywords: Bias, dynamic anel, xed e ects, misseci cation, bias reduction. JEL Classi cations: C23, C33 An earlier version of this aer is the art of my dissertation at Yale University and it was circulated as A General Aroach to Bias Correction in Dynamic Panels under Time Series Misseci cation. I thank Peter Phillis, Donald Andrews, Yuichi Kitamura and seminar articiants at Cornell, MSU, Texas A&M, SUNY-Binghamton, Yale, 25 Inter University Conference at Princeton, 27 Midwest Econometrics Grou Meeting, and Conference in Honor of Peter C. B. Phillis. I also would like to thank an anonymous referee and coeditors for their detailed and constructive comments. All errors are solely mine. Address: Deartment of Economics, University of Michigan, 6 Taan Street, Ann Arbor, MI yoolee@umich.edu.
2 Introduction Since the in uential aers by Nerlove (967) and Nickell (98), nite samle autoregressive bias in xed-e ect dynamic anel models has been well understood and many bias reduction methods were roosed in the context of within-grou estimators (e.g., Kiviet, 995; Hahn and Kuersteiner, 22; Alvarez and Arellano, 23; Bun and Carree, 25; and Phillis and Sul, 27 to name a few). Dynamic anel studies have long relied on the rst-order autoregressive structure, which is indeed unavoidable esecially when the length of the time series (T ) is small. As longer anel data become available, however, it is more natural to consider higher order dynamics when rst-order models are susected to be misseci ed. This aer evaluates the e ects of this tye of misseci cation articularly on the xed-e ect bias in the dynamic anel regressions. Seci cally, we extend the bias formula of Nickell (98) to the case that the dynamics follow general autoregressive forms with exogenous regressors, ARX(), but the lag order could be misseci ed. We also develo NT -normalized limit distribution of the withingrou estimator that allows for lag order misseci cation, when both N (the cross section samle size) and T get large at the same rate. Besides the order misseci cation bias and the xed-e ect bias, the analytical results reveal an additional bias, which is generated from combining order misseci cation and incidental arameters roblem (Neyman and Scott, 948). The additional bias is, however, still of the same order of magnitude as the standard xed-e ect bias (i.e., O(=T )) and thus it is ossible to develo a bias reduction method. Though attemts to adjust for the bias using formulae that correct for rst-order dynamics could be wrong and even exacerbate the bias under such misseci cation, it is found that we can reduce the xed-e ect bias robustly to the lag order misseci cation using the enalized likelihood function aroach (e.g., Hahn and Kuersteiner, 24; Arellano and Hahn, 26; Bester and Hansen, 27) or the model selection based aroach (e.g., Lee, 26). 2 The Model We consider a anel rocess fy i;t g generated from the homogeneous th-order univariate autoregressive model with exogenous regressors X i;t 2 R r (i.e., (ARX ())) given by y i;t = i + X jy i;t j + X i;t + u i;t for i = ; ; N and t = ; ; T, () j=
3 where the lag order is assumed to be nite. We let the initial values (y i; ; y i; ; ; y i; + ) be observed for all i. We rst assume the following conditions. Assumtion E (i) fu i;t g is i.i.d. across i and t; (ii) E (u i;t i ) = E (u i;t X i;s ) =, Eu 2 i;t = 2 with < 2 < and Eu 8 i;t < for all i, s and t; (iii) fx i;tg is i.i.d. across i and strictly stationary in t for each i; (iv) jje(x i;t Xi;t )jj <. Assumtion S P j= j jj < and all roots of the characteristic equation P j= jz j = lie outside the unit circle. Assumtion E imlies weak (or sequential) exogeneity in y i;t but strict exogeneity in X i;t. It still allows for non-zero correlation between the unobserved individual e ect i and X i;t. Note that X i;t could be serially correlated; but we assume that X i;t and the higher order lags of y i;t cature all the ersistence and thus the error term does not have any serial correlation. Assuming indeendence of u i;t over t makes the exressions simle. We also exclude cross sectional deendence in u i;t. Finally note that the eighth moment condition is required to derive joint asymtotic CLT in the later section. We eliminate xed e ects i by subtracting the individual samle average over time (i.e., within-grou transformation) from equation () to obtain y i;t = X j= jy i;t j + X i;t + u i;t, (2) where for any variable w i;t we de ne w i;t j = w i;t j w i; j and w i; j = (=T ) P T s= w i;s j for j = ; ; ;. The formula (2) readily transforms into the rst-order -dimensional vector autoregressive rocess with exogenous regressors given by Y i;t = AY i;t + BX i;t + U i;t, (3) where Y i;t j = (y i;t j ; y i;t j ; ; y i;t j + ) for j = ;, and A = " () I ; with () = ( ; 2 ; ; ) and I k being the identity matrix of rank k. We also let As noted in Bhansali (98) and Kunitomo and Yamamoto (985), we can consider the in nite case given suitable de nitions of the in nite dimensional autoregressive coe cient matrix A and the choice matrices e and J q. This is the case of estimating an aroximate ARX ( T ) model with T!, where 3 T =T! and T =2 P j=+ jjj! as T! (e.g., Bhansali, 978). See Lee (26) for further discussions. 2 #
4 U i;t = e u i;t and B = e, where e is the column vector with one in the rst element and zeros elsewhere. Note that, from (3), Assumtion S is equivalent to det [I Az] 6= for all jzj, or that each eigenvalue of A has modulus less than one. It thus guarantees that the sequence fa j g is absolutely summable and P j= Aj = (I A) exists. Hence, if we de ne vector linear rocesses V i;t = P j= Aj U i;t j and Z i;t = P j= Aj BX i;t j with U i;t = e u i;t, then both V i;t and Z i;t exist in the mean square sense and we can rewrite (3) as Yi;t = Z i;t + V i;t. Moreover, if we let j = E(V i;t Vi;t+j ) for j = ; ;, we have j = A j, where = 2 P j= Aj e e A j. For later convenience we also introduce the long-run covariance matrix of V i;t as = P j= j = + +, where = P j= j and = P j= j = P j= j. Assumtions E and S guarantee that exists. In most cases, the true lag order of the underlying autoregressive rocess fy i;t g in () is unknown. Hence we consider the situation that fy i;t g is tted to an ARX (q) rocess instead of ARX (), where q. 2 By stacking cross section observations rst and then time series observations, (3) can be rewritten as Y = Y A + X B + U, from which the within-grou estimators in this case are de ned as b (; q) = J qy Q X Y J q J q Y Q X Y e (4) b = X X X Y e Y J q b (; q), (5) where Q X = I NT X (X X ) X, b (; q) = (b ;q ; b ;q2 ; ; b ;qq ) and b ;qr for r = ; 2; ; q is the within-grou estimator for the coe cient of y i;t r when ARX () rocess is tted to ARX (q). The q choice matrix J q is de ned as J q = [I q ; ] if q < ; J q = I if q =. We further assume the invertibility of JY Q X Y J and X X, which is imlied by the following condition. Assumtion R (i) For given, Y Q X Y is a full column rank matrix; (ii) X is a full column rank matrix and it does not include time-invariant variables; (iii) q <. 3 Bias Formulae When the number of lags is not correctly chosen, and esecially when the data is tted to a lower order ARX model, the within-grou estimators in (4) and (5) are exected to 2 The case of q > is less interesting since there is no variable omission bias. In this case, we simly let (; q) = (() ; q ). An interesting examle is when (; q) = (; ) without exogenous regressors X i;t (i.e., y i;t = i + u i;t is the data generating model). In this case, for the within-grou estimator b(; ) = P N P T i= t= u i;t u i;t= P N P T 2 i= t= u i;t, we can derive that lim N! b(; ) = =T. 3
5 have variable omission bias on to of the standard xed-e ect bias. Seci cally, we let b = Y Q X Y =NT, b = Y Q X Y =NT, = + lim N! Z Q X Z =NT and = + lim N! Z Q X Z A =NT. Then, using the identity C = (I C (C C ))C for symmetric invertible matrices C and C, we can rewrite (4) as b (; q) Jq () = (; q) Jq () + fb (; q) (; q)g (6) = n (; q) Jq () + (Jq J q ) Jq( b )e (Jq b J q ) [Jq( b b (b (; q)) + b 2 (b (; q)), )J q ](J q o J q ) Jq b e where (; q) = (Jq J q ) Jq e = ( ;q ; ;q2 ; ; ;qq ) is the theoretical arameter value from the ARX(q) tting. For examle, (; ) = ; is the rst-order autocorrelation coe cient of y i;t for the ure autoregressive case. In addition, since we can rewrite (3) as J qy i;t = J qaj q J qy i;t b = + J qbx i;t + J qu i;t, (5) can be decomosed as n X X X Y J q Jq () (; q) o (7) n + X X o X Y J q ( (; q) b (; q)) + o () b ( b ) + b 2 ( b ) + o (). by letting (X X ) X U e = o () from the strict exogeneity. Note that in these two bias exressions (6) and (7), b (b (; q)) and b ( b ) are the variable omission biases, which cannot be eliminated unless the model is correctly seci ed. This art of bias, therefore, should be took care of by roer lag order selection methods (e.g., Lee, 26, 2b). On the other hand, b 2 (b(; q)) and b 2 ( b ) are the biases from the within-grou transformation. In this section, we will show that the second art of the biases have di erent exressions from the standard xed-e ect bias formula and they indeed have additional terms olluted by the misseci cation. b 2 (b(; q)) and b 2 ( b ) are, however, shown to be still O (=T ), which will be disaear as T!, whereas the misseci cation biases b (b(; q)) and b ( b ) do not vanish even when N; T!. The main interest here is, therefore, in the biases b 2 (b(; q)) and b 2 ( b ), which are manageable, instead of the entire biases b(; q) J q() and b. 3 This is the case when 3 The theoretical arameters (; q) indeed corresond to the autocorrelation coe cients of y i;t u to the qth-order, which are not model seci c. Thus, the results in this aer could be alternatively seen as the bias in estimating autocorrelations in xed-e ects models. The bias from the theoretical arameter value is also studied in the standard time series literature under misseci cation (e.g., Bhansali, 98; Kunitomo and Yamamoto, 985). 4
6 the researcher is only able to run the ARX(q) regression (with q < ) due to the lack of enough time eriods or simly believes ARX(q) is true; but she tries to nd the bias formula from the arameters in ARX(q) in order to correct the xed-e ect bias. A leading examle is tting AR() rocess using nite number of lags. The main lesson should be that the standard bias formula for the within-grou estimator is no longer valid even around the theoretical arameter values (i.e., even we disregard the misseci cation bias) and thus the standard bias correction methods would not work roerly in this case. 3. Nickell bias We rst examine the asymtotic bias of the within-grou estimator when N tends to in nity but T is xed. Even in the case of correct seci cation, the standard within-grou estimator in AR () xed-e ects models is not consistent for large N (e.g., Nerlove, 967; Nickell, 98). As well described in Phillis and Sul (27), such autoregressive bias arises from the correlation of the error and the lagged deendent variables after the unknown mean is estimated to be removed. Not surrisingly, such bias becomes more comlicated when the lag order is not correctly seci ed. The rst theorem generalizes the Nickell bias to the case of ossible time series misseci cation. Theorem Let fy i;t g be generated from () and S X = lim N! Z Q X Z =NT exists. Under Assumtions E, R and S, lim (b (; q) (; q)) = (I q R q; ) R q;2 (8) N! (I q R q; ) R q; R q; D X q J q(s X A + )e, where D X q = (J q( + S X )J q ), R q; = D X q J qg J q, R q; = D X q J qg e and R q;2 = D X q J qg 2 e. Exressions of G, G 2 and G 2 are as (A.3), (A.4) and (A.5) in Aendix. The rst term of the bias (8) is mainly from the nonzero correlation between Yi;t and, and the second term is mainly from order misseci cation (more recisely, from the U i;t combination of endogeneity and order misseci cation). It can be easily veri ed that the asymtotic bias of b (; q) around (; q) becomes negligible as T grows. The bias exression of (5) follows easily from (7) and (8). If there is no exogenous regressors, the exression for lim N! (b (; q) as (; q)) remains the same without S X term, which can be aroximated 2 T D qjq (I A) e T D qjq I J q D q Jq A e + O T 2 5 (9)
7 for large T, where D q = (J q J q ). Remark When q =, (9) could be further reduced to 2` X (T ) (T ) k! k! + O k= T 2, () P where ` = = k= k and!k = P j= j+k with j being the autocovariances of y i;t : For a articular examle with (; q) = (2; ), the asymtotic bias can be obtained as T 2 ( + 22) ( + ) T 2 22 using the Yule-Walker equation, where = 2 =( ( + ) + O T 2 () 22 ) is the rst-order autocorrelation coe cient of y i;t in AR(2), which indeed corresonds to the theoretical coe cient (2; ) = 2;. 4 If = q =, then 22 = and () is equivalent to the bias exression of Nickell (98), which could be also seen in () by letting k = for k 2 since = =. Note that since the true arameters satisfy j 22 j <, < and 22 2 < under the Assumtion S (e.g., Marmol, 995), it can be veri ed that the rst art of the bias exression () is always negative, whereas the direction of the second art deends on the sign of 22. On the other hand, the sum of these two terms, (=(T 2))((+ 22 )=( 22 )) ( + ), is always negative under the stationarity so that both the direction and the asymtotic order of the xed-e ect bias of the AR() coe cient b(2; ) about the rst-order autocorrelation coe cient = (2; ) still remains the same as the standard (correctly seci ed) case. 5 Another nding is that the absolute value of the bias () increases with ositive 22. In articular, the second art of the bias, which is mainly from the misseci cation, exlodes as 22 gets close to unity even when 2 =. Similar henomenon was also discussed by Kunitomo and Yamamoto (985) in the time series context. 3.2 Noncentrality in the asymtotic distribution We now consider the asymtotic distribution of the within-grou estimator when both N and T are large. Hahn and Kuersteiner (22), Alvarez and Arellano (23), and Lee (2a) 4 In an indeendent work by Okui (28), it is also shown that the within-grou estimator of the anel AR() coe cient converges to the rst-order autocorrelation coe cient as N! and T! even under dynamic misseci cation. This nding is a articular examle of Theorem since b (; ) (; )! as N! and T!, where (; ) should be the rst-order autocorrelation coe cient for any by construction. 5 Based on a number of simulation studies, we exect that the direction of the bias () still remains negative even for 3. 6
8 consider a similar case, where the asymtotic ratio of N to T is a nite constant. More recisely, we assume the following condition. Assumtion NT lim N;T! N=T =, where < <. Under Assumtion NT, the standard NT -normalized within-grou estimator has nondegenerating asymtotic bias, which is roortional to the limiting samle size ratio,. As in Theorem, however, the asymtotic bias could increase when the dynamic seci cation is incorrect. We also assume the following initial condition. Assumtion I (i) Y i; iid( i (I A) e + E(Z i;t ); + var(z i;t )) for each i, where var(z i;t ) < ; (ii) (=N) P N i= 2 i = O (). The initial condition in Assumtion I is standard in time series models when studying stationary autoregressive rocess. Since we assume large T, we use this initial condition without loss of generality as the initial values become less imortant for longer stationary anels. Theorem 2 We assume that lim T! S X = lim N;T! Z Q X Z =NT > and it exists. Under Assumtions E, R, S, I and NT, NT (b (; q) (; q))!d N ( X q ; 2 D X q ) (2) as N; T! jointly, where X q = 2 D X q Jq(I A) e +D X q JqA e D X q (JqJ q )D X q Jq( + lim T! S X A )e and D X q = (Jq( + lim T! S X )J q ). The asymtotic distribution of (5) follows easily from (7) and (2). Theorem 2 shows that the asymtotic bias deends on the samle size ratio,, and thus large T does not attenuate the bias unless is zero. If there is no exogenous regressors, the exression reduces to NT (b (; q) (; q))!d N q ; 2 D q (3) with q = 2 D q Jq (I A) e Dq Jq(I J q D q Jq )A e, where the rst comonent mainly contributes to the well-known negative bias from the within-grou transformation, which always underestimates (; q) even when the number of lags is correctly chosen. As discussed in Alvarez and Arellano (23), we can further derive that NT (b (; q) [ (; q) (=T ) q ])! d N ; 2 D q using a higher order exansion of the 7
9 bias term (e.g., Lee, 26) rovided that N=T 3!. The asymtotic distribution under the correct time series seci cation (e.g., Hahn and Kuersteiner, 22) is a secial case of (3) by letting = q, which is NT (b () ())! d N ( 2 ( ) e ; 2 ). In articular, when =, we have NT (b () ())! d N ( ( + ()); () 2 ). 4 Bias Reductions Theorems and 2 show that the within-grou estimators have additional bias even around the theoretical arameter values when the lag order is not correctly chosen. Therefore, most existing bias corrections would not work roerly because the correction formulae assume correct model seci cation. In fact, attemts to adjust for the bias using formulae that correct for AR() dynamics would be wrong and may even exacerbate the bias when the true lag order is larger than one. For examle, we consider estimating AR() anel regression with Hahn and Kuersteiner (22) s tye bias correction when the true data generating rocess is AR(2): e(2; ) = ((T + )=T )b(2; ) + (=T ), where b (2; ) is the within-grou estimator. From () and using (2; ) =, however, e(2; ) (2; ) = (b(2; ) (2; )) + (=T )(b(2; ) + )! (=T ) ( + ) (2 22 =( 22 )) + O(=T 2 ) as N!, where the leading bias term can be zero only when 22 = (i.e., AR() is indeed the true data generating rocess) under the stationarity. Unfortunately, the direction and the size of the bias after the correction would vary deending on the unknown arameter value 22. Note that this result is even without considering the ure misseci cation bias (i.e., (2; ) 2 ), which will add additional bias toward the true arameter value e(2; ) 2. This examle manifests that a recise dynamic seci cation is imortant articularly when we attemt to correct the xed-e ect bias. A reasonable aroach is to conduct model selection before any bias corrections as suggested in Lee (26). 6 By doing so, the additional bias terms from the misseci cation will disaear asymtotically and we can focus on eliminating the ure xed-e ect bias using the bias formulae derived. Additional bene t of this aroach is that the bias correction works not only toward the theoretical arameter but also toward the true arameter since the ure misseci cation bias (e.g., b (b (; q)) in (6)) will disaear from the model selection stage. Alternatively, articularly when we are interested in bias correction toward the theo- 6 Also see Lee (2b) for a modi ed lag order selection criterion develoed for the AR() dynamic anel models with xed e ects. It is imortant to note that we cannot use the standard information-based lag order selection criteria (e.g., AIC, BIC) in this case. Intuitively, this is because the ML estimator and the KL information criterion could be inconsistent for small T in the resence of incidental arameters (e.g., the xed e ects). 8
10 retical arameter, we can address it, even under ossible lag order misseci cation, using the enalized likelihood function aroach (e.g., Hahn and Kuersteiner, 24; Arellano and Hahn, 26; Bester and Hansen, 27). Though the original formulae were develoed under the correct model seci cation, we can use this bias correction aroach robustly to the dynamic order misseci cation since they are formulated using the HAC estimator for the variance of the scores. Note that any lag order misseci cation yields erroneous serial correlation in the error term (or in the scores in general). More recisely, we can derive the enalty term in this context as 2 2 T X n i= X m `= m X minft;t +`g t=maxf;`+g u i;tu i;t ` (4) for some truncation arameter m satisfying m=t =2!, which is based on the HAC estimator for the long-run variance of u i;t and thus indeed allows for general forms of serial correlations in u i;t. Note that Bester and Hansen (27) suggest to use small m in ractice (e.g., m = for AR() model) but we need to use large m as in the standard HAC estimation to cover general forms of serial correlations from ossible order misseci cations. Tables I and II summarize some Monte Carlo simulation results showing how the bias reductions work even under the lag order misseci cation. The true model is AR(2) without exogenous regressors but it is tted to AR(). The true coe cients are 2 = 22 = :4 or :4. The theoretical arameter value 2; = (2; ) is the rst-order autocorrelation coe cient in the given AR(2) rocess (about :67 and :29, resectively), which is calculated using the true arameter values. i are randomly drawn from U ( :5; :5) and u i;t from N (; ). b 2; is the within-grou estimator before bias correction; e AR() 2; is the Hahn- Kuersteiner s bias-corrected estimator assuming AR() is correct; e P 2; L is the bias-corrected ML estimator from the enalized likelihood using (4) with m being the smallest integer larger than T =4, which is suosed to be robust to order misseci cation; e = e (b( ) lim N! [b ( ; ) ( ; )]) and e ; = b 2; lim N! (b ( ; ) ( ; )) are the bias-corrected estimators using the bias formula (8) and assuming the selected lag order is true, where is chosen as Lee (26 or 2b). 7 Table I tabulates the biases from the theoretical arameter values, which are b 2 (b (; q)) in (6), whereas Table II tabulates the biases from the true arameter values, which thus include the misseci cation biases (i.e., b (b (; q)) + b 2 (b (; q)) in (6)). The values are obtained from averaging over relications. 7 In other words, e is the rst element of the standard bias-corrected within-grou estimator of correctly seci ed AR( ); e ; is the bias-corrected estimator of AR() but the correction formula (8) assumes is true. Both cases believe is correctly chosen but the target arameters are di erent. 9
11 Table I: Bias from the theoretical arameter and RMSE of bias corrected estimates (N=25 ; ercentage of biases to the target arameter values are in the arentheses) 2; T b 2; 2; e AR() 2; 2; e P 2; L 2; e ; 2; bias (%) rmse bias (%) rmse bias (%) rmse bias (%) rmse (53.6) (37.2) (4.5) (4.5) (25.5).7 -.(6.5).2 -.(6.6).2 -.6(5.9) (2.) (7.3) (7.4) (6.3) (5.8) (3.4) (3.) (2.7) (2.) (.2) (.) (.9) (8.9).28.32(.2) (2.8) (2.) (4.3).5.6 (5.5) (2.7). -.2 (.5) (2.).8.8 (2.9). -.3 (.9).6. (.) (.).5.4 (.5).6. (.).4. (.) (.4).3.2 (.7).3. (.).3. (.).3 Table II: Bias from the true arameter and RMSE of bias corrected estimates (N=25 ; ercentage of biases to the target arameter values are in the arentheses) 2 T b 2; 2 e AR() 2; 2 e P 2; L 2 e 2 bias (%) rmse bias (%) rmse bias (%) rmse bias (%) rmse (22.7).94.8 (4.6) (.8) (4.4) (24.2).98.57(39.).57.56(39.) (3.8) (46.6).87.28(54.5).28.27(54.3) (5.3) (57.) (6.) (6.5) (2.2) (63.) (64.8) (64.9) (.6) (22.3).9.46(36.6).47.6(26.6) (5.9) (25.5).2.3(32.5).3.7(26.7) (.2).3 5.9(27.).9.23(3.7).23.2(27.9) (.4).9.(27.9).2.9(29.6).9.5(28.7).5 -. (.2) (28.3).3.6(29.).6.5(28.7).5. (.).4 The result tells several imortant oints. First, for the original atterns of the xed-e ect bias, Table I shows that the direction of the bias is always negative (under the stationarity) and it decreases as T gets large, which corresonds to the analytical ndings in the main theorems, whereas Table II shows it is not the case when the misseci cation bias is also considered. Second, the standard bias correction (e AR() 2; ) could exacerbate the overall bias deending on the arameter values though it reduces the bias from 2; to some degree in most cases (Table I). It is mainly because the Hahn-Kuersteiner s bias correction term is ositive unless b 2; < (which is a rare case under the stationarity) and it would o set the negative xed-e ect bias. The correction, however, could increase the bias when the
12 correction size is too large comaring to the xed-e ect bias. Third, the enalized likelihood based aroach (e P L 2;) well reduces the bias from the theoretical arameter value robustly to the order misseci cation (Table I) and it is comarable to the model-selection-embedded rocedure (e ;). In addition to the robustness, the enalized likelihood based aroach never increases the mean square error, which tells the bias correction barely increases the samle variance. However, e P 2; L as well as e AR() 2; does not work roerly toward the true arameter 2 (Table II), which is well exected since these two rocedures are not designed to correct the ure misseci cation bias (e.g., b (b (; q)) in (6)). In comarison, the correction method involving model selection (e and e ;) outstands for most of the cases (both for 2; and 2 ) and the erformance imroves as T increases, which would be mainly because that the correct selection robability of the lag order selection rocedure imroves with T. 5 Concluding Remarks This aer calls into question the simle ARX () structure in dynamic anels with xed e ects. When the lag orders are unknown, the rst-order models are most likely misseci ed. In such cases, attemts to adjust for the bias using formulae that correct for ARX () models would be wrong and may even exacerbate the bias. To address these concerns, we undertake an in-deth investigation of the asymtotic bias of the within-grou estimator, where the bias formulae are derived under ossible lag order misseci cation. It should be noted that, therefore, the main focus of this aer is di erent from develoing bias correction methods that is robust to the serial correlations in the error (e.g., Hahn and Kuersteiner, 24). It is closely related with Solon (984), who considers autocorrelation estimators of the serially correlated error term, but deriving exlicit bias formulae of the autoregressive arameters is new. For dynamic anel regression, instrumental variables estimation after rst di erencing (e.g., Arellano and Bond, 99) is an alternative aroach, which does not require any bias correction. However, the instruments are found from the lagged values of the deendent variable with resuming that the error term does not have serial correlations. With lag order misseci cation, however, the regression error could imose serial correlation and thus the instruments could be no longer valid, which incurs inconsistency of the estimator. This aer emhasizes the lag order misseci cation in the linear model. When the linearity is in doubt, however, we could consider the nonarametric aroach as Lee (2a), in which a roer bias correction is also develoed for nonlinear models.
13 Aendix: Mathematical roofs For V i;t = P j= Aj U i;t j, we rst derive the following lemmas. See Lee (29) for the roof. Lemma A Under Assumtions E and S, lim NT N! lim NT N! NX TX i= t= NX TX i= t= V i;t U i;t = 2 T (I A) (I H T ) M, V i;t V i;t = T (I A) (I H T A) T f(i A) (I H T ) A g, where M = e e and H T = (I A) I A T =T. Lemma A2 Under Assumtions E, S, I and NT, NT N X TX i= t= vec Vi;t Ui;t!d N 2 vec((i A) M); 2 (M ) as N; T! jointly, where = EV i;t V i;t = 2 P j= Aj MA j. Proof of Theorem imlies that Recall that Y = Y A + X B + U = Z + V. Lemma A lim b = lim N! N!NT Z Q X Z + lim N!NT V V = S X + G, (A.) lim b = lim N! N!NT Y Q X Y A + lim N!NT V U = S X A + G G 2, (A.2) from the strict exogeneity of X i;t, where G = h (I A) (I H T A) + f(i A) (I H T ) A g i, (A.3) T G = h (I A) (I H T A) + fa (I A) (I H T )g i, (A.4) T G 2 = 2 T (I A) (I H T ) M. (A.5) 2
14 Note that = A. Then, from (6), the bias exression for b (; q) follows as lim (b (; q) N! (; q)) = Jq(S X + )J q J q (G + G 2 ) e + I q Jq(S X + )J q J q G J q J q (S X + )J q J q G J q Jq(S X + )J q Jq S X A + G G 2 e = (R q; + R q;2 ) + (I q R q; ) R q; Jq(S X + )J q J q (S X + )A e R q; R q;2 n = (I q R q; ) R q;2 (I q R q; ) R q; R q; Jq(S o X + )J q J q (S X + )A e since J q(s X + )J q J qg J q = (Iq J q(s X + )J q J q G J q ) J q(s X + )J q and by letting R q; = J q(s X + )J q J q G J q, R q; = J q(s X + )J q J q G e and R q;2 = J q(s X + )J q J q G 2 e. Proof of Theorem 2 NT ( b First note that r N ) = T T (by jx )A + Y Q X U, NT in which the rst term satis es N=T T ( b )A! A as N; T! from (A.) and Lemma B2 in Lee (29). For the second term, we have Y Q X U = Z Q X U + V Q X U CN;T + CN;T 2. NT NT NT It can be veri ed that vec(cn;t )! d N ; 2 M lim N;T! (Z Q X Z =NT ) as N; T! rovided lim N;T! (Z Q X Z =NT ) is nonzero and exists. However, since X X =NT = O (), X U = NT = O () and V X =NT = o () from the strict exogeneity, we have CN;T 2 = V V U X X X X U = V NT NT NT U + o (). NT NT Lemma A2 imlies that, therefore, vec(c 2 N;T )! d N ( 2 vec((i A) M); 2 (M )) as N; T!. In sum, we have NT vec( b )! d N ; 2 M ( + lim N;T! (Z Q X Z =NT )), where = vec( 2 (I A) M + A ) since CN;T and C2 N;T are uncorrelated. Further note that as shown in Lee (29), lim T! S X = lim N;T! Z Q X Z =NT (i.e., equivalence between the sequential and the joint robability limits; e.g., Phillis and Moon, 999). 3
15 Therefore, from (6), for a random vector W N ( ( 2 (I A) M + A )e ; 2 ( + lim T! S X )), we can conclude that (using (A.), (A.2) and Lemma B2 in Lee (29)) NT (b (; q) = (J q (; q)) J q ) J qf NT ( b (Jq b J q ) [Jq N=T T ( b! d (J q( + lim T! S X)J q ) J qw + (J q( + lim T! S X)J q ) [J q = d N ( X q ; 2 D X q ) as N; T!, )e g )J q ](J q J q ) Jq b e Jq ](J q( + lim T! S X)J q ) J q( + lim T! S XA )e where D X q = lim T! D X q = (J q( + lim T! S X )J q ) and X q = D X q J q( 2 (I A) M + A )e References D X q (J qj q )D X q J q( + lim T! S X A )e. [] Alvarez, J. and M. Arellano (23). The time series and cross-section asymtotics of dynamic anel data estimators, Econometrica, 7, [2] Arellano, M. and S. Bond (99). Some tests of seci cation for anel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an alication of emloyment equations, Review of Economics Studies, 58, [3] Arellano, M. and J. Hahn (26). A likelihood-based aroximate solution to the incidental arameter roblem in dynamic nonlinear models with multile e ects, CEMFI Working Paer: No. 63. [4] Bester, C.A. and C. Hansen (27). A Penalty Function Aroach to Bias Reduction in Nonlinear Panel Models with Fixed E ects, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, forthcoming. [5] Bhansali, R.J. (978). Linear rediction by autoregressive model tting in the time domain, Annals of Statistics, 6, [6] Bhansali, R.J. (98). E ects of not knowing the order of an autoregressive rocess on the mean squared error of rediction I, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, [7] Bun, M.J.G. and M.A. Carree (25). Bias-corrected Estimation in Dynamic Panel Data Models, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 23, 2-2. [8] Hahn, J. and G. Kuersteiner (22). Asymtotically unbiased inference for a dynamic anel model with xed e ects, Econometrica, 7,
16 [9] Hahn, J. and G. Kuersteiner (24). Bias reduction for dynamic nonlinear anel models with xed e ects, unublished manuscrit, UCLA. [] Kiviet, J.F. (995). On bias, inconsistency, and e ciency of various estimators in dynamic anel models, Journal of Econometrics, 68, [] Kunitomo, N. and T. Yamamoto (985). Proerties of redictors in misseci ed autoregressive time series models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 8, [2] Lee, Y. (26). Nonarametric Aroaches to Dynamic Panel Modelling and Bias Correction, Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University. [3] Lee, Y. (29). Sulementary Aendix to Bias in Dynamic Panel Models under Time Series Misseci cation, available on www-ersonal.umich.edu=~yoolee =research.html. [4] Lee, Y. (2a). Nonarametric Estimation of dynamic anel models with xed e ects, unublished manuscrit, University of Michigan. [5] Lee, Y. (2b). Model selection in the resence of incidental arameters, unublished manuscrit, University of Michigan. [6] Marmol, F. (995). The stationarity conditions for an AR(2) rocess and Schur s theorem, Econometric Theory,, [7] Nerlove, M. (967). Exerimental evidence on the estimation of dynamic economic relations from a time series of cross-sections, Economic Studies Quarterly, 8, [8] Neyman, J. and E. Scott (948). Consistent estimates based on artially consistent observations, Econometrica, 6, -32. [9] Nickell, S. (98). Biases in dynamic models with xed e ects, Econometrica, 49, [2] Okui, R. (28). Panel AR() estimators under misseci cation, Economics Letters,, [2] Phillis, P.C.B. and H.R. Moon (999). Linear Regression Limit Theory for Nonstationary Panel Data, Econometrica, 67, 57-. [22] Phillis, P.C.B. and D. Sul (27). Bias in Dynamic Panel Estimation with Fixed E ects, Incidental Trends and Cross Section Deendence, Journal of Econometrics, 37, [23] Solon, G. (984). Estimating autocorrelations in xed-e ects models, NBER Technical Working Paer No.32. 5
Estimating Time-Series Models
Estimating ime-series Models he Box-Jenkins methodology for tting a model to a scalar time series fx t g consists of ve stes:. Decide on the order of di erencing d that is needed to roduce a stationary
More informationChapter 3. GMM: Selected Topics
Chater 3. GMM: Selected oics Contents Otimal Instruments. he issue of interest..............................2 Otimal Instruments under the i:i:d: assumtion..............2. he basic result............................2.2
More informationElements of Asymptotic Theory. James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley
Elements of Asymtotic Theory James L. Powell Deartment of Economics University of California, Berkeley Objectives of Asymtotic Theory While exact results are available for, say, the distribution of the
More informationHeteroskedasticity, Autocorrelation, and Spatial Correlation Robust Inference in Linear Panel Models with Fixed-E ects
Heteroskedasticity, Autocorrelation, and Satial Correlation Robust Inference in Linear Panel Models with Fixed-E ects Timothy J. Vogelsang Deartments of Economics, Michigan State University December 28,
More informationEstimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with xed e ects
Estimation of satial autoregressive anel data models with xed e ects Lung-fei Lee Deartment of Economics Ohio State University l eeecon.ohio-state.edu Jihai Yu Deartment of Economics University of Kentucky
More informationThe power performance of fixed-t panel unit root tests allowing for structural breaks in their deterministic components
ATHES UIVERSITY OF ECOOMICS AD BUSIESS DEPARTMET OF ECOOMICS WORKIG PAPER SERIES 23-203 The ower erformance of fixed-t anel unit root tests allowing for structural breaks in their deterministic comonents
More informationJohan Lyhagen Department of Information Science, Uppsala University. Abstract
Why not use standard anel unit root test for testing PPP Johan Lyhagen Deartment of Information Science, Usala University Abstract In this aer we show the consequences of alying a anel unit root test that
More informationNotes on Instrumental Variables Methods
Notes on Instrumental Variables Methods Michele Pellizzari IGIER-Bocconi, IZA and frdb 1 The Instrumental Variable Estimator Instrumental variable estimation is the classical solution to the roblem of
More informationChapter 2. Dynamic panel data models
Chapter 2. Dynamic panel data models School of Economics and Management - University of Geneva Christophe Hurlin, Université of Orléans University of Orléans April 2018 C. Hurlin (University of Orléans)
More informationDebt, In ation and Growth
Debt, In ation and Growth Robust Estimation of Long-Run E ects in Dynamic Panel Data Models Alexander Chudik a, Kamiar Mohaddes by, M. Hashem Pesaran c, and Mehdi Raissi d a Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas,
More informationTime Series Models and Inference. James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley
Time Series Models and Inference James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley Overview In contrast to the classical linear regression model, in which the components of the
More informationAdaptive Estimation of the Regression Discontinuity Model
Adative Estimation of the Regression Discontinuity Model Yixiao Sun Deartment of Economics Univeristy of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 9293-58 Feburary 25 Email: yisun@ucsd.edu; Tel: 858-534-4692
More informationOn the asymptotic sizes of subset Anderson-Rubin and Lagrange multiplier tests in linear instrumental variables regression
On the asymtotic sizes of subset Anderson-Rubin and Lagrange multilier tests in linear instrumental variables regression Patrik Guggenberger Frank Kleibergeny Sohocles Mavroeidisz Linchun Chen\ June 22
More informationEstimating the Number of Common Factors in Serially Dependent Approximate Factor Models
Estimating the Number of Common Factors in Serially Dependent Approximate Factor Models Ryan Greenaway-McGrevy y Bureau of Economic Analysis Chirok Han Korea University February 7, 202 Donggyu Sul University
More informationTesting Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels
esting Weak Cross-Sectional Deendence in Large Panels M. Hashem Pesaran University of Southern California, and rinity College, Cambridge January, 3 Abstract his aer considers testing the hyothesis that
More informationEstimation of the large covariance matrix with two-step monotone missing data
Estimation of the large covariance matrix with two-ste monotone missing data Masashi Hyodo, Nobumichi Shutoh 2, Takashi Seo, and Tatjana Pavlenko 3 Deartment of Mathematical Information Science, Tokyo
More informationExercises Econometric Models
Exercises Econometric Models. Let u t be a scalar random variable such that E(u t j I t ) =, t = ; ; ::::, where I t is the (stochastic) information set available at time t. Show that under the hyothesis
More informationBenoît MULKAY Université de Montpellier. January Preliminary, Do not quote!
Bivariate Probit Estimation for Panel Data: a two-ste Gauss-Hermite Quadrature Aroach with an alication to roduct and rocess innovations for France Benoît MULKAY Université de Montellier January 05 Preliminary,
More informationA Simple Panel Stationarity Test in the Presence of Cross-Sectional Dependence
A Simle Panel Stationarity est in the Presence of Cross-Sectional Deendence Kaddour Hadri Eiji Kurozumi 2 Queen s University Management School Deartment of Economics Queen s University Hitotsubashi University
More informationAsymptotic F Test in a GMM Framework with Cross Sectional Dependence
Asymtotic F Test in a GMM Framework with Cross Sectional Deendence Yixiao Sun Deartment of Economics University of California, San Diego Min Seong Kim y Deartment of Economics Ryerson University First
More informationMAKING WALD TESTS WORK FOR. Juan J. Dolado CEMFI. Casado del Alisal, Madrid. and. Helmut Lutkepohl. Humboldt Universitat zu Berlin
November 3, 1994 MAKING WALD TESTS WORK FOR COINTEGRATED VAR SYSTEMS Juan J. Dolado CEMFI Casado del Alisal, 5 28014 Madrid and Helmut Lutkeohl Humboldt Universitat zu Berlin Sandauer Strasse 1 10178 Berlin,
More informationOn GMM Estimation and Inference with Bootstrap Bias-Correction in Linear Panel Data Models
On GMM Estimation and Inference with Bootstrap Bias-Correction in Linear Panel Data Models Takashi Yamagata y Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, Heslington, York, UK January
More informationGMM-based inference in the AR(1) panel data model for parameter values where local identi cation fails
GMM-based inference in the AR() panel data model for parameter values where local identi cation fails Edith Madsen entre for Applied Microeconometrics (AM) Department of Economics, University of openhagen,
More informationQML estimation of spatial dynamic panel data models with time varying spatial weights matrices
QML estimation of satial dynamic anel data models with time varying satial weights matrices Lung-fei Lee Deartment of Economics Ohio State University Jihai Yu Guanghua School of Management eking University
More informationElements of Asymptotic Theory. James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley
Elements of Asymtotic Theory James L. Powell Deartment of Economics University of California, Berkeley Objectives of Asymtotic Theory While exact results are available for, say, the distribution of the
More informationA Comparison between Biased and Unbiased Estimators in Ordinary Least Squares Regression
Journal of Modern Alied Statistical Methods Volume Issue Article 7 --03 A Comarison between Biased and Unbiased Estimators in Ordinary Least Squares Regression Ghadban Khalaf King Khalid University, Saudi
More informationarxiv: v2 [stat.me] 3 Nov 2014
onarametric Stein-tye Shrinkage Covariance Matrix Estimators in High-Dimensional Settings Anestis Touloumis Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 0RE, U.K. Anestis.Touloumis@cruk.cam.ac.uk
More informationUsing the Divergence Information Criterion for the Determination of the Order of an Autoregressive Process
Using the Divergence Information Criterion for the Determination of the Order of an Autoregressive Process P. Mantalos a1, K. Mattheou b, A. Karagrigoriou b a.deartment of Statistics University of Lund
More informationLECTURE 7 NOTES. x n. d x if. E [g(x n )] E [g(x)]
LECTURE 7 NOTES 1. Convergence of random variables. Before delving into the large samle roerties of the MLE, we review some concets from large samle theory. 1. Convergence in robability: x n x if, for
More informationLower Confidence Bound for Process-Yield Index S pk with Autocorrelated Process Data
Quality Technology & Quantitative Management Vol. 1, No.,. 51-65, 15 QTQM IAQM 15 Lower onfidence Bound for Process-Yield Index with Autocorrelated Process Data Fu-Kwun Wang * and Yeneneh Tamirat Deartment
More informationPerformance of lag length selection criteria in three different situations
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Performance of lag length selection criteria in three different situations Zahid Asghar and Irum Abid Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad Aril 2007 Online at htts://mra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/40042/
More informationCHAPTER-II Control Charts for Fraction Nonconforming using m-of-m Runs Rules
CHAPTER-II Control Charts for Fraction Nonconforming using m-of-m Runs Rules. Introduction: The is widely used in industry to monitor the number of fraction nonconforming units. A nonconforming unit is
More informationPartial Identification in Triangular Systems of Equations with Binary Dependent Variables
Partial Identification in Triangular Systems of Equations with Binary Deendent Variables Azeem M. Shaikh Deartment of Economics University of Chicago amshaikh@uchicago.edu Edward J. Vytlacil Deartment
More informationGeneral Linear Model Introduction, Classes of Linear models and Estimation
Stat 740 General Linear Model Introduction, Classes of Linear models and Estimation An aim of scientific enquiry: To describe or to discover relationshis among events (variables) in the controlled (laboratory)
More informationGMM estimation of spatial panels
MRA Munich ersonal ReEc Archive GMM estimation of spatial panels Francesco Moscone and Elisa Tosetti Brunel University 7. April 009 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/637/ MRA aper No. 637, posted
More informationE cient Estimation and Inference for Di erence-in-di erence Regressions with Persistent Errors
E cient Estimation and Inference for Di erence-in-di erence Regressions with Persistent Errors Ryan Greenaway-McGrevy Bureau of Economic Analysis Chirok Han Korea University January 2014 Donggyu Sul Univeristy
More informationStatics and dynamics: some elementary concepts
1 Statics and dynamics: some elementary concets Dynamics is the study of the movement through time of variables such as heartbeat, temerature, secies oulation, voltage, roduction, emloyment, rices and
More informationCombining Logistic Regression with Kriging for Mapping the Risk of Occurrence of Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)
Combining Logistic Regression with Kriging for Maing the Risk of Occurrence of Unexloded Ordnance (UXO) H. Saito (), P. Goovaerts (), S. A. McKenna (2) Environmental and Water Resources Engineering, Deartment
More informationCommon Correlated Effects Estimation of Heterogeneous Dynamic Panel Data Models with Weakly Exogenous Regressors *
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paer o. 46 htt://www.dallasfed.org/assets/documents/institute/waers/203/046.df Common Correlated Effects Estimation of
More informationIterative Bias Correction Procedures Revisited: A Small Scale Monte Carlo Study
Discussion Paper: 2015/02 Iterative Bias Correction Procedures Revisited: A Small Scale Monte Carlo Study Artūras Juodis www.ase.uva.nl/uva-econometrics Amsterdam School of Economics Roetersstraat 11 1018
More informationScaling Multiple Point Statistics for Non-Stationary Geostatistical Modeling
Scaling Multile Point Statistics or Non-Stationary Geostatistical Modeling Julián M. Ortiz, Steven Lyster and Clayton V. Deutsch Centre or Comutational Geostatistics Deartment o Civil & Environmental Engineering
More informationThe following document is intended for online publication only (authors webpage).
The following document is intended for online ublication only (authors webage). Sulement to Identi cation and stimation of Distributional Imacts of Interventions Using Changes in Inequality Measures, Part
More informationTesting Weak Convergence Based on HAR Covariance Matrix Estimators
Testing Weak Convergence Based on HAR Covariance atrix Estimators Jianning Kong y, Peter C. B. Phillips z, Donggyu Sul x August 4, 207 Abstract The weak convergence tests based on heteroskedasticity autocorrelation
More informationTowards understanding the Lorenz curve using the Uniform distribution. Chris J. Stephens. Newcastle City Council, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Towards understanding the Lorenz curve using the Uniform distribution Chris J. Stehens Newcastle City Council, Newcastle uon Tyne, UK (For the Gini-Lorenz Conference, University of Siena, Italy, May 2005)
More informationE cient Semiparametric Estimation of Quantile Treatment E ects
E cient Semiarametric Estimation of Quantile Treatment E ects Sergio Firo y First Draft: ovember 2002 This Draft: January 2004 Abstract This aer resents calculations of semiarametric e ciency bounds for
More informationA New Asymmetric Interaction Ridge (AIR) Regression Method
A New Asymmetric Interaction Ridge (AIR) Regression Method by Kristofer Månsson, Ghazi Shukur, and Pär Sölander The Swedish Retail Institute, HUI Research, Stockholm, Sweden. Deartment of Economics and
More informationute measures of uncertainty called standard errors for these b j estimates and the resulting forecasts if certain conditions are satis- ed. Note the e
Regression with Time Series Errors David A. Dickey, North Carolina State University Abstract: The basic assumtions of regression are reviewed. Grahical and statistical methods for checking the assumtions
More informationBOOTSTRAP FOR PANEL DATA MODELS
BOOSRAP FOR PAEL DAA MODELS Bertrand HOUKAOUO Université de Montréal, CIREQ July 3, 2008 Preliminary, do not quote without ermission. Astract his aer considers ootstra methods for anel data models with
More informationA Simle Panel Stationarity itle Cross-Sectional Deendence est in Author(s) Hadri, Kaddour; Kurozumi, Eiji Citation Issue 00-06 Date ye echnical Reort ext Version ublisher URL htt://hdl.handle.net/0086/8605
More informationParametric Inference on Strong Dependence
Parametric Inference on Strong Dependence Peter M. Robinson London School of Economics Based on joint work with Javier Hualde: Javier Hualde and Peter M. Robinson: Gaussian Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Estimation
More informationEstimation of Dynamic Nonlinear Random E ects Models with Unbalanced Panels.
Estimation of Dynamic Nonlinear Random E ects Models with Unbalanced Panels. Pedro Albarran y Raquel Carrasco z Jesus M. Carro x June 2014 Preliminary and Incomplete Abstract This paper presents and evaluates
More informationNotes on Time Series Modeling
Notes on Time Series Modeling Garey Ramey University of California, San Diego January 17 1 Stationary processes De nition A stochastic process is any set of random variables y t indexed by t T : fy t g
More informationLecture Notes on Measurement Error
Steve Pischke Spring 2000 Lecture Notes on Measurement Error These notes summarize a variety of simple results on measurement error which I nd useful. They also provide some references where more complete
More informationA multiple testing approach to the regularisation of large sample correlation matrices
A multile testing aroach to the regularisation of large samle correlation matrices Natalia Bailey Queen Mary, University of London M. Hashem Pesaran University of Southern California, USA, and rinity College,
More informationLikelihood Ratio Based Test for the Exogeneity and the Relevance of Instrumental Variables
Likelihood Ratio Based est for the Exogeneity and the Relevance of Instrumental Variables Dukpa Kim y Yoonseok Lee z September [under revision] Abstract his paper develops a test for the exogeneity and
More informationState Estimation with ARMarkov Models
Deartment of Mechanical and Aerosace Engineering Technical Reort No. 3046, October 1998. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. State Estimation with ARMarkov Models Ryoung K. Lim 1 Columbia University,
More information#A64 INTEGERS 18 (2018) APPLYING MODULAR ARITHMETIC TO DIOPHANTINE EQUATIONS
#A64 INTEGERS 18 (2018) APPLYING MODULAR ARITHMETIC TO DIOPHANTINE EQUATIONS Ramy F. Taki ElDin Physics and Engineering Mathematics Deartment, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egyt
More informationGMM based inference for panel data models
GMM based inference for panel data models Maurice J.G. Bun and Frank Kleibergen y this version: 24 February 2010 JEL-code: C13; C23 Keywords: dynamic panel data model, Generalized Method of Moments, weak
More informationTesting for Regime Switching: A Comment
Testing for Regime Switching: A Comment Andrew V. Carter Department of Statistics University of California, Santa Barbara Douglas G. Steigerwald Department of Economics University of California Santa Barbara
More informationAn Improved Calibration Method for a Chopped Pyrgeometer
96 JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 17 An Imroved Calibration Method for a Choed Pyrgeometer FRIEDRICH FERGG OtoLab, Ingenieurbüro, Munich, Germany PETER WENDLING Deutsches Forschungszentrum
More informationSemiparametric Estimation of Markov Decision Processes with Continuous State Space
Semiarametric Estimation of Markov Decision Processes with Continuous State Sace Sorawoot Srisuma and Oliver Linton London School of Economics and Political Science he Suntory Centre Suntory and oyota
More informationConsistent Estimation of the Number of Dynamic Factors in a Large N and T Panel
Consistent Estimation of the Number of Dynamic Factors in a Large N and T Panel Dante AMENGUAL Deartment of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (amengual@rinceton.edu) Mark W. WATSON Woodrow
More informationAsymptotically Optimal Simulation Allocation under Dependent Sampling
Asymtotically Otimal Simulation Allocation under Deendent Samling Xiaoing Xiong The Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-1815, USA, xiaoingx@yahoo.com Sandee
More informationECONOMETRICS FIELD EXAM Michigan State University May 9, 2008
ECONOMETRICS FIELD EXAM Michigan State University May 9, 2008 Instructions: Answer all four (4) questions. Point totals for each question are given in parenthesis; there are 00 points possible. Within
More informationTime Series Nonparametric Regression Using Asymmetric Kernels with an Application to Estimation of Scalar Diffusion Processes
ime Series Nonarametric Regression Using Asymmetric Kernels with an Alication to Estimation of Scalar Diffusion Processes Nikolay Gosodinov y Concordia University and CIREQ Masayuki Hirukawa z Northern
More informationMATH 829: Introduction to Data Mining and Analysis Consistency of Linear Regression
1/9 MATH 829: Introduction to Data Mining and Analysis Consistency of Linear Regression Dominique Guillot Deartments of Mathematical Sciences University of Delaware February 15, 2016 Distribution of regression
More information4. Score normalization technical details We now discuss the technical details of the score normalization method.
SMT SCORING SYSTEM This document describes the scoring system for the Stanford Math Tournament We begin by giving an overview of the changes to scoring and a non-technical descrition of the scoring rules
More informationIntroduction Model secication tests are a central theme in the econometric literature. The majority of the aroaches fall into two categories. In the r
Reversed Score and Likelihood Ratio Tests Geert Dhaene Universiteit Gent and ORE Olivier Scaillet Universite atholique de Louvain January 2 Abstract Two extensions of a model in the resence of an alternative
More informationNumerical Linear Algebra
Numerical Linear Algebra Numerous alications in statistics, articularly in the fitting of linear models. Notation and conventions: Elements of a matrix A are denoted by a ij, where i indexes the rows and
More informationEstimation of Separable Representations in Psychophysical Experiments
Estimation of Searable Reresentations in Psychohysical Exeriments Michele Bernasconi (mbernasconi@eco.uninsubria.it) Christine Choirat (cchoirat@eco.uninsubria.it) Raffaello Seri (rseri@eco.uninsubria.it)
More informationA New Approach to Robust Inference in Cointegration
A New Approach to Robust Inference in Cointegration Sainan Jin Guanghua School of Management, Peking University Peter C. B. Phillips Cowles Foundation, Yale University, University of Auckland & University
More informationSome Recent Developments in Spatial Panel Data Models
Some Recent Developments in Spatial Panel Data Models Lung-fei Lee Department of Economics Ohio State University l ee@econ.ohio-state.edu Jihai Yu Department of Economics University of Kentucky jihai.yu@uky.edu
More informationON THE LEAST SIGNIFICANT p ADIC DIGITS OF CERTAIN LUCAS NUMBERS
#A13 INTEGERS 14 (014) ON THE LEAST SIGNIFICANT ADIC DIGITS OF CERTAIN LUCAS NUMBERS Tamás Lengyel Deartment of Mathematics, Occidental College, Los Angeles, California lengyel@oxy.edu Received: 6/13/13,
More informationDiscussion Paper No.247. Heterogeneous Agents Model of Asset Price with Time Delays. Akio Matsumoto Chuo University
Discussion Paer No.247 Heterogeneous Agents Model of Asset Price with Time Delays Akio Matsumoto Chuo University Ferenc Szidarovszky University of Pécs February 2015 INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH Chuo
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.data-an] 26 Oct 2012
Constraints on Yield Parameters in Extended Maximum Likelihood Fits Till Moritz Karbach a, Maximilian Schlu b a TU Dortmund, Germany, moritz.karbach@cern.ch b TU Dortmund, Germany, maximilian.schlu@cern.ch
More informationSIGNALING IN CONTESTS. Tomer Ifergane and Aner Sela. Discussion Paper No November 2017
SIGNALING IN CONTESTS Tomer Ifergane and Aner Sela Discussion Paer No. 17-08 November 017 Monaster Center for Economic Research Ben-Gurion University of the Negev P.O. Box 653 Beer Sheva, Israel Fax: 97-8-647941
More informationThe Properties of Pure Diagonal Bilinear Models
American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 016, 6(4): 139-144 DOI: 10.593/j.ajms.0160604.01 The roerties of ure Diagonal Bilinear Models C. O. Omekara Deartment of Statistics, Michael Okara University
More informationASYMPTOTIC RESULTS OF A HIGH DIMENSIONAL MANOVA TEST AND POWER COMPARISON WHEN THE DIMENSION IS LARGE COMPARED TO THE SAMPLE SIZE
J Jaan Statist Soc Vol 34 No 2004 9 26 ASYMPTOTIC RESULTS OF A HIGH DIMENSIONAL MANOVA TEST AND POWER COMPARISON WHEN THE DIMENSION IS LARGE COMPARED TO THE SAMPLE SIZE Yasunori Fujikoshi*, Tetsuto Himeno
More informationPositive decomposition of transfer functions with multiple poles
Positive decomosition of transfer functions with multile oles Béla Nagy 1, Máté Matolcsi 2, and Márta Szilvási 1 Deartment of Analysis, Technical University of Budaest (BME), H-1111, Budaest, Egry J. u.
More informationOn a Markov Game with Incomplete Information
On a Markov Game with Incomlete Information Johannes Hörner, Dinah Rosenberg y, Eilon Solan z and Nicolas Vieille x{ January 24, 26 Abstract We consider an examle of a Markov game with lack of information
More informationECONOMETRICS II (ECO 2401S) University of Toronto. Department of Economics. Spring 2013 Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria
ECONOMETRICS II (ECO 2401S) University of Toronto. Department of Economics. Spring 2013 Instructor: Victor Aguirregabiria SOLUTION TO FINAL EXAM Friday, April 12, 2013. From 9:00-12:00 (3 hours) INSTRUCTIONS:
More informationSupplementary Materials for Robust Estimation of the False Discovery Rate
Sulementary Materials for Robust Estimation of the False Discovery Rate Stan Pounds and Cheng Cheng This sulemental contains roofs regarding theoretical roerties of the roosed method (Section S1), rovides
More informationCambridge-INET Institute
Faculty of Economics Cambridge-INET Institute Cambridge-INET Working Paer Series No: 4/3 Cambridge Working Paer in Economics: 45 THE CROSS-QUANTILOGRAM: MEASURING QUANTILE DEPENDENCE AND TESTING DIRECTIONAL
More informationBias Correction Methods for Dynamic Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Bias Correction Methods for Dynamic Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects Mohamed R. Abonazel Department of Applied Statistics and Econometrics, Institute of Statistical
More informationSpectral Analysis by Stationary Time Series Modeling
Chater 6 Sectral Analysis by Stationary Time Series Modeling Choosing a arametric model among all the existing models is by itself a difficult roblem. Generally, this is a riori information about the signal
More informationOn the optimal weighting matrix for the GMM system estimator in dynamic panel data models
Discussion Paper: 007/08 On the optimal weighting matrix for the GMM system estimator in dynamic panel data models Jan F Kiviet wwwfeeuvanl/ke/uva-econometrics Amsterdam School of Economics Department
More informationDepartment of Economics Seminar Series. Yoonseok Lee University of Michigan. Model Selection in the Presence of Incidental Parameters
Department of Economics Seminar Series Yoonseok Lee University of Michigan Model Selection in the Presence of Incidental Parameters Friday, January 25, 2013 9:30 a.m. S110 Memorial Union Model Selection
More informationAN EXTENDED YULE-WALKER METHOD FOR ESTIMATING A VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIVE MODEL WITH MIXED-FREQUENCY DATA *
AN EXTENDED YULE-WALKER METHOD FOR ESTIMATING A VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIVE MODEL WITH MIXED-FREQUENCY DATA * Baoline Chen Deartment of Economics Rutgers University-Camden Camden, NJ 0802 e-mail:baoline@crabrutgersedu
More informationHow to Estimate Expected Shortfall When Probabilities Are Known with Interval or Fuzzy Uncertainty
How to Estimate Exected Shortfall When Probabilities Are Known with Interval or Fuzzy Uncertainty Christian Servin Information Technology Deartment El Paso Community College El Paso, TX 7995, USA cservin@gmail.com
More informationAn Improved Generalized Estimation Procedure of Current Population Mean in Two-Occasion Successive Sampling
Journal of Modern Alied Statistical Methods Volume 15 Issue Article 14 11-1-016 An Imroved Generalized Estimation Procedure of Current Poulation Mean in Two-Occasion Successive Samling G. N. Singh Indian
More informationarxiv:cond-mat/ v2 25 Sep 2002
Energy fluctuations at the multicritical oint in two-dimensional sin glasses arxiv:cond-mat/0207694 v2 25 Se 2002 1. Introduction Hidetoshi Nishimori, Cyril Falvo and Yukiyasu Ozeki Deartment of Physics,
More informationAI*IA 2003 Fusion of Multiple Pattern Classifiers PART III
AI*IA 23 Fusion of Multile Pattern Classifiers PART III AI*IA 23 Tutorial on Fusion of Multile Pattern Classifiers by F. Roli 49 Methods for fusing multile classifiers Methods for fusing multile classifiers
More informationColin Cameron: Brief Asymptotic Theory for 240A
Colin Cameron: Brief Asymtotic Theory for 240A For 240A we o not go in to great etail. Key OLS results are in Section an 4. The theorems cite in sections 2 an 3 are those from Aenix A of Cameron an Trivei
More informationResearch Note REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN MARKOV CHAIN * A. Y. ALAMUTI AND M. R. MESHKANI **
Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transaction A, Vol 3, No A3 Printed in The Islamic Reublic of Iran, 26 Shiraz University Research Note REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN MARKOV HAIN * A Y ALAMUTI AND M R
More informationAn estimate of the long-run covariance matrix, Ω, is necessary to calculate asymptotic
Chapter 6 ESTIMATION OF THE LONG-RUN COVARIANCE MATRIX An estimate of the long-run covariance matrix, Ω, is necessary to calculate asymptotic standard errors for the OLS and linear IV estimators presented
More informationECON 4130 Supplementary Exercises 1-4
HG Set. 0 ECON 430 Sulementary Exercises - 4 Exercise Quantiles (ercentiles). Let X be a continuous random variable (rv.) with df f( x ) and cdf F( x ). For 0< < we define -th quantile (or 00-th ercentile),
More informationLet s Fix It: Fixed-b Asymptotics versus Small-b Asymptotics in Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Robust Inference
Let s Fix It: Fixed-b Asymtotics versus Small-b Asymtotics in Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Robust Inference Yixiao Sun Deartment of Economics, University of California, San Diego June 5, 3 Abstract
More informationCOMMUNICATION BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS 1
COMMUNICATION BTWN SHARHOLDRS 1 A B. O A : A D Lemma B.1. U to µ Z r 2 σ2 Z + σ2 X 2r ω 2 an additive constant that does not deend on a or θ, the agents ayoffs can be written as: 2r rθa ω2 + θ µ Y rcov
More informationLECTURE 12 UNIT ROOT, WEAK CONVERGENCE, FUNCTIONAL CLT
MARCH 29, 26 LECTURE 2 UNIT ROOT, WEAK CONVERGENCE, FUNCTIONAL CLT (Davidson (2), Chapter 4; Phillips Lectures on Unit Roots, Cointegration and Nonstationarity; White (999), Chapter 7) Unit root processes
More information16.2. Infinite Series. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes
Infinite Series 6.2 Introduction We extend the concet of a finite series, met in Section 6., to the situation in which the number of terms increase without bound. We define what is meant by an infinite
More information