6.2 Mean value theorem and maximum principles

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "6.2 Mean value theorem and maximum principles"

Transcription

1 Hence g = u x iu y is analytic. Since is simply connected, R g(z) dz =forany closed path =) g has an integral function, G = g in. Call G = U + iv. For analytic functions d G = d G. Hence dz dx g = d dz G = U x + iv x CR = U x iu y =) U x = u x, U y = u y, i.e. r(u u) =andu = u+ constant. WededucethatV is a harmonic conjugate of u. Remark. Especially the conjugate exists in discs where u is harmonic =) locally the conjugate always exists. Let us then look at sets of uniqueness for harmonic functions. Theorem 6.3. Let u be harmonic in and let u =in an open subset of. Then u =in. Proof. Let be open with u =. Denoteg = u x iu y, whence g is analytic in and g = =) g in =) u is a constant. Theorem 6.4. Every harmonic function is C 1 -di erentiable. Proof. Immediate consequence of Theorem 6. applied locally. Theorem 6.5. Let f : 7! be analytic and let u : 7! R be harmonic. Then u f : 7! R is harmonic. Proof. Let z and assume z B, where B is a ball. Pick a harmonic conjugate v : B 7! R of u B. Then u+iv is analytic in B. Especially, g f = u f +iv f is analytic in f 1 (B) =) u f is harmonic in f 1 (B) =) claim. 6. Mean value theorem and maximum principles Theorem 6.6. (Mean value theorem) If u : 7! R is harmonic, then u satisfies the mean value property (MVP), i.e., for any B(z,r) u(z) = 1 u(z + re it )dt Proof. FT1 =) analytic functions satisfy MVT. Find a conjugate v of u in B B(z,r), B a ball. Apply MVT on u + iv =) Take real parts. u(z)+iv(z) = 1 (u + iv)(z + re it )dt 8

2 Proof. Another method, based directly on the definition of harmonic functions: Define a(r) = 1 u(z + re it )dt = 1 u(z + rx)ds x =1 d Enough to show that a is constant, i.e. a. Compute by the divergence theorem dr ( R A dn = R r A da = R V V a (r) = 1 ru(z + rx) x ds = 1 ru(x) n ds r x = 1 div(ru)da = 1 u da = r r B(z,r) Remember that div ru = r ru = u. B(z,r) Definition. Let u : 7! R. Then u satisfies the sub mean value property (SubMVP) is u is continuous in 8z 9 r = r (z) > sothat if r<r and B(z,r). u(z) apple 1 u(z + re it )dt Theorem 6.7. (A local maximum principle) maximum at z, then u is constant. Let u be harmonic in. Ifu has a local Proof. Assume that u(z) apple u(z )forz B(z, ). By the MVP (Theorem 6.6), for <r< we have = 1 u(z ) u(z + re it dt Since the integrand is continuous, we must have u(z + re it )=u(z ) 8 t, i.e. u = u(z ) As r< was arbitrary, u = u(z )inb(z, ), whence u = u(z )in by unique continuation. Definition. If C is a domain we 1 for the boundary with regard to C. In other 1 if is 1 [ {1} if is unbounded. Next we obtain a stronger maximum principle. 81

3 Theorem 6.8. (A strong maximum pronciple) Let u satisfy the SubMVP in the domain. Then 1. If u takes its supremum in (i.e. u(z )=sup z u(z) for some z ), then u is constant.. Assume that lim sup z! u(z) apple M<1 for 1. Then u apple M in and equality at one point implies that u is a constant 1. Proof. 1. Assume u(z 1 )=S := sup z u(z). Denote A = {z : u(z) =S}. Now A 6= ; and A is closed (in ) since A = u 1 ({S}). If we show that A is open, connectedness of implies that A =, whichiswhatwewanttoshow. Takez A, let r = r (z) > sothat by the SubMVP if < <r 1 u(z ) u(z + e it ) dt Again by continuity we deduce u = u(z )=S ), and since < <r is arbitrary we get B(z,r) A, whence A is open.. Observe that it is enough to check S apple M, then the claim follows from part 1. Pick a sequence (z n )withu(z n ) n!1! S. We may assume that z n! z 1. If z 1, thenu(z 1 )=S. By part 1. u is constant, whence trivially S apple M. If z we have directly from the assumption S = lim u(z n ) apple lim sup u(z) apple M n!1 z!z 1 Corollary 6.9. Let u : 7! R be harmonic and assume that lim sup u(z) apple M for all 1. Then u apple M in, and equality can occur only if u is a constant. Corollary 6.1. (The minimum principle) As in Corollary 6.9, let lim inf z! u(z) M for 1. Then u M in and equality at any point implies that u is constant. 1 Recall that lim sup z! u(z) :=lim r! (sup zb(,r)\ u(z)) if is finite, and lim sup z!1 u(z) := lim R!1 (sup z{ z >R}\ u(z)) 8

4 Corollary (A uniqueness theorem) If u and v are harmonic in and lim u(z) =lim v(z) z! z! (finite limits) for 1, then u = v in. Proof. Apply the minimum and maximum principle on u v. Example. By Corollary 6.11, if u vanishes on the boundary of the domain, then u vanishes in the whole domain. 6.3 The Poisson formula The following theorem is of fundamental importance (especially together with the inverse result, Theorem 6.14 below). Theorem 6.1. Assume that u is harmonic on D = B(, 1) (i.e. u is harmonic in a neighbourhood of ). Then, if z = re it D, we have 8 R 1 1 z u(w) dw z w >< R 1 1 z u(z) = u(e i )d z e i >: R 1 1 r 1+r r cos(t ) u(ei )d, where all the formulas are the same (just di erent ways to write the same integral). Remark. That the last two integrals are indentical is seen by the cosini theorem of elementary geometry, or just by computing z e i = re it e i = re it e i re it e it e =1+r i(t ) i( t) + e r =1+r r cos(t ) Proof. Fix z D. Consider the analytic function '(w) = z w 1 zw Clearly ' is analytic in a neighbourhood of D, and it is injective, with inverse ' 1 = '. One checks easily (see the computation in the beginning of proof of Theorem 4.6) that '(D) =D and '(@D) =@D. If w = '( ew), we may compute for that ' ( ew) = z z 1 (1 z ew) 83

5 whence dw = d ew ' ( ew) = d ew 1 z 1 zw = d ew 1 z, since ew =1. z ew Consider the function h(w) = u('(w)) on D. By Theorem 6.5 h is harmonic in a neighbourhood of D, so the mean value property yields that u(z) =h() = 1 h(w) dw = 1 u('(w)) dw = 1 ew =1 u( ew) 1 z d ew z ew Definition. The kernel in the above theorem is called the Poisson kernel, anditis denoted e.g. by K(z,w) = 1 1 z z w (z,w@d) or K(z, ) = 1 1 z e i w (z,e We collect the fundamental properties of the Poisson kernel in a lemma. Lemma Poisson kernel satisfies: (P1) K (P) R K(z,w) dw =18z D (P3) Fix and >. Then there is > such that if z D and with then K(z,w) <. z w < and w w > (P4) For fixed the function z 7! K(z,w) is harmonic in. Proof. 1. This is evident.. This follows by applying Theorem 6.1 on the constant function u Choose := 3 /(andassumethat < 1). Then if w w > and z w <, first of all z w < / sothatthetriangleinequalityyields w z > w w w z > 84

6 Moreover Put together 1 z =(1+ z )(1 z ) apple K(z,w) = 1 1 z z w apple ( ) apple <. 4. Observe that Re w + z w z =Re(w + z)( w z) w z =Re apple 1 z wz zw + = 1 z w z w z w z since wz zw =iim wz. Thus we have shown that K(z,w) = 1 Re w + z w z Especially, z 7! K(z,w) is harmonic as the real part of the analytic function 1 w + z w z. We are now ready to prove an important converse to Theorem 6.1: Theorem Assume that f 7! R is continuous. Define u in u(z) = f(w)k(z,w)dw as Then 1. u is harmonic in D. lim z! u(z) =f( ) for 3. u extends continuously to D with = f Proof. By continuity, f apple M Fix Let " > begiven. Then,by uniform continuity of f, there is > sothat apple " and f(w ) f(w) < " if w w < ) (6.) Apply (P3) to pick so that (P3) is valid with above and chosen. Assume that z w < so that the conclusion of (P3) is valid. In order to estimate u(z) f(w ) 85

7 compute u(z) f(w ) (P ) = (f(w) f(w )) K(z,w)dw (P 1) apple w w + f(w) f(w) f(w ) K(z,w) dw f(w ) K(z,w) dw w w < (6.) apple M K(z,w) dw + " K(z,w) dw w w w w < (P 3),(P ) apple M + " apple (4 M +1)" This proves the. claim since " > wasarbitrary. ByaneasyExercise,. implies 3. Finally, by smoothness we may di erentiate under the integral, which yields u = in D by (P4). Remark. Word by word the same proof yields a Poisson formula for C + = {z : y>}, or R n+1 +. One just verifies the properties (P1)-(P4) for the corresponding kernel. Remark. In a general case disc B(a, R) thepoissonformulaisobtainedbyalinear change of variables (z 7! a + R ). We get u(z) = 1 R w a =R R z a u(w) dw = 1 w z R z a Re i z + a u(a + Rei )d As a corollary we obtain a general existence and uniqueness result for the solution of the Dirichlet problem in a disc: Theorem Let B = B(a, r) be a disc and let f C(@B). Then there is a unique harmonic function u on B such that u extends continuously to B with = f Proof. Existence is immediate from Theorem 6.14 (see also above remark). If there are two solutions u 1 and u, then lim z! u 1 (z) =lim z! u (z) =f( ) foreachboundary whence u 1 = u by Corollary Consequences of the Poisson formula Recall the SubMVP from page

8 Definition. If u is continuous in the domain we say that u satisfies the mean value property (MVP) if u(z) = 1 u(z + re i )d whenever B(z,r). If this holds only for small enough radii r < r (z), where r (z) > foreachz, thenwesaythatusatisfiesthe weak MVP. We know that harmonic function satisfy the MVP. The converse is also true, and allows to define harmonicity by just assuming u to be continuous and have the (weak) MVP: Theorem Let u :! R be continuous. Then u is harmonic if and only if it satisfies the MVP in (or equivalently, it satisfies the weak MVP in ). Proof. Assume that u satisfies the weak MVP in. TakeB(z,r) with r<r (z) and define v(z) = u(z + rw)k((z z )/r, w) dw for z B = B(z,r), and v(z) =u(z) on@b. Then v is harmonic in B. Moreover, v u and u v satisfy the weak MVP, whence the SubMVP, and they thus obey the strong maximum principle and minimum principle (Theorem 6.8) in B. Especially, since v = u we deduce that v = u in B, which shows that u is harmonic in B. Since z was arbitrary, the claim follows. The following result deals with inessential singularities of harmonic functions. The idea of the proof is important by itself! Theorem Let u be harmonic and bounded in the punctured disc B(z,r) \{z }. Then u extends to a harmonic function in B(z,r). Proof. Choose <R<r. Call B = B(z,R). Use Poisson formula (6.1) to define a continuous function v on B such that = and v is harmonic inside B. The Theorem follows as soon as we show that u = v in B. Choose " > andconsiderthefunction z z h = u v + " log R Then h is harmonic in B(z,R) \{z } and lim sup z! h( ) = ( z = R 1 = z By the strong maximum principle (Corollary 6.9) we have h inb(z,r) \{z }. Especially, for all " > u(z) apple v(z) log z R Letting! weobtainuapplev. A symmetric argument yields v apple u. 87

9 6.5 Harnack type results Theorem 6.18 (Harnack s inequality). Let u be harmonic and u Then, if r<rwe have on B(z,R). R r R + r u(z ) apple u(z) apple R + r R r u(z ) (Harnack s inequality) for z B(z,r). Proof. By a linear change of variables z 7! z + Rz we may assume that R =1,z =. Observe that the Poisson kernel satisfies 1 1 z max K(z,w) apple ( w z ) = 1 min K(z,w) 1 1 z (1 + z ) = 1 1 z (1 z ) = 1+ z 1 z 1 z 1+ z Hence, by the Poisson formula we may compute if u is harmonic in D: u(z) = u(w)k(z,w) dw (6.3) apple 1+ z u(w) dw 1 z = 1+ z 1 z u() 1 (6.3) (6.4) If u is not harmonic in! 1., but just in D, apply the above to u( z) ( < 1) and let The left hand side inequality is proven in a similar manner using (6.3). Remark. The inequalities in 6.18 are optimal (exercise). Theorem 6.19 (Harnack s principle). Let u n be a increasing sequence of harmonic functions in a domain, whence the limit u(z) = limu(z) exists everywhere. Then n!1 one of these applies: 1. u = 1 identically.. u is harmonic in and u n! u locally uniformly. Before proving the Theorem, let us observe a useful fact. Lemma 6.. If u n is harmonic in for each n, u n! u locally uniformly as n!1, then u is also harmonic in. Proof. The MVP is clearly preserved in local uniform limits, and the claim follows from Theorem Recall that local uniform convergence implies uniform convergence over any compact set. 88

10 Proof. (Theorem 6.19) Wemayassumeu n u 1 ). Denote u n (otherwiseconsiderthesequence A = {z : u(z) =1}, A 1 = {z : u(z) < 1} By connectedness it is enough to show that both A and A 1 are open. Let z A. Choose R>sothatB(z,R). Then if z B(z, R ). Harnack s inequality yields u n (z) R z z R + z z u n(z ) R R/ R + R/ u n(z )= 1 3 u n(z ) Letting n!1we obtain z A, hence A is open. Similarly one check that A 1 is open. By connectedness one of these sets is whole. Assume that u<1. In order to prove local uniform convergence, pick any z and select again B(z,R). Since u n (z ) n!1! u(z ), if > wemaychoosen so that Then by Harnack s inequality in B(z, R ) apple u m (z ) u n (z ) < if m>n n u m (z) u n (z) apple R + R R R (u n (z ) u n (z )) apple 3 since u m u n inb(z, R ). Letting n!1we obtain apple u(z) u n (z) apple 3 for n n and z B which yields the local uniform convergence. Finally, the limit function is harmonic by Lemma Reflexion principle z, R Definition. C is symmetric with regard to R if z () z. Wedenote + = {z, Im z>}, = {z, Im z<} =) = + [ [ ( \ R) (disjoint union) Because is connected, a symmetric domain always intersects R (why?). Lemma 6.1. If u C( ) and u satisfies the weak MVP, i.e. then u is harmonic. u(z) = 1 u(z + re it )dt, 89 r < r (z)

11 Proof. The proof of Theorem 6.16 applies as such. Theorem 6. (Schwarz reflexion principle). Assume that is symmetric with regard to R. If u is harmonic in + and lim z! u(z) =8z \ R, then u extends to a harmonic function in by the formula 8 >< u(z), z + h(z) =, z \ R >: u( z), z Proof. Clearly h is continuous. Obviously, h satisfies the weak MVP at each point z + [ (choose r (z) sosmallthatthecirclebelongto \ R). If z R \, choose first r > sothatb(z,r ). Thenif<r<r, we have by the symmetry in the definition that =h(z )= 1 h(z + re it )dt The harmonicity of h now follows from Lemma Applications to analytic functions Theorem 6.3. Let be a symmetric domain with regard to R. Let f = u + iv : + 7! C be analytic and assume that lim z! v(z) =for all \ R. Then there is an analytic extension of f to such that f( z) =f(z) 8 z. Proof. The imaginary part v is harmonic and satisfies the conditions of Theorem 6.. Thus we may extend v to whole (the extension is still denotes by v) so that v( z) = v(z) 8 z. Let us first show that for any z R \ and a disc B := B(z,r) there is a local extension of f from B + to B. Let U be a conjugate function of v in B = B(z,r). Then U = u + c in B + (why?), where c is a constant. Thus, by adjusting U by a constant and by denoting g = U + iv, we have that g is analytic in B with g B + = f. Moreover, as Im g = v B =onb \ R we see that the function g(z) g( z) isanalyticinb and it vanishes on B \ R. Hence g(z) = g( z) in B, so that g provides the local extension to B with the desired symmetry property. Choose for each a \ R r = r(a) sothatb(a, r(a)) and let g a denote the extension to B(a, r(a)) constructed above. Define 8 >< f(z), z + g(z) = lim w!z >: f(z), z R \ f( z), z Then g is well-defined and analytic at any a. Namely, for a/ R this is evident, and if a R \, weconsiderb := B(a, r(a)) and the extension g a defined above, and obtain by definition that g B = g a and hence g is analytic at a. 9

12 Remark. Reflexion with regard to circles can be analogously defined (exercise). This time one sets z f = f(z) z f(z) in case of the unit circle. If reflexion point in the circle is denoted by z? = have f(z? )=f(z)?, and of course the needed assumption of f is that f(z)! 1as z! 1in +. z z,we As out last application to analytic functions, let us discuss the following surprising rigidity for conformal maps of non-simply connected domains. Theorem 6.4. Denote A(r, R) ={R : r< z <R}. A(r,R ) are conformally equivalent if and only if i.e. the annuli are similar to each other! R 1 r 1 = R r The annuli A(r 1,R 1 ) and Proof. We may clearly assume r 1 = r = 1. Assume that f : A(1,R 1 ) 7! A(1,R )isa conformal bijection. Denote S p R ). Then f 1 (S) iscompactina(1,r 1 ), so for small enough > A(1, 1+ ) \ f 1 (S) =;. Hence f(a(1, 1+ )) A(1, p R ) [ A( p R,R ), and since f(a(1, 1+ )) is connected we must have that either f(a(1, 1+ )) A(1, p R )orf(a(1, 1+ )) A( p R,R ). We may assume that f(a(1, 1+ )) A(1, p R ) (6.5) since if this is not the case we may replace f(z) by R f(z). If z n! 1 +, we must have f(z n )! 1or f(z n )! R since f(z n ) cannot have any limit point in A(1, p R ), and by (6.5) we actually have f(z n )! 1. Similarly, f(z n )! R if z n! R + 1 (Exercise: why cannot now f(z n )! 1if z n! R + 1?). Consider the harmonic function (recall Theorem 6.5) u(z) =log f(z) a log z where a = log R log R 1. By what we just proved, u(z) z!! 1 ). Corollary 6.11 yields that u ina(1,r 1 ). We obtain that f(z) = z a in A(1,R 1 ) Pick any z A(1,R 1 ), and denote by z a some branch of exp(a log z) inasmall neighbourhood of z. Then f(z) =1locally =) f(z) =cz a in that neighbourhood z a 91

13 ( c =1). Butweknowthatz a has an analytic branch in the annulus A(1,R 1 )ifand only if a. Thus f(z) =cz a for some a. This is injective only if a = ±1. Since the inner circles correspond to each others, a =1, c =1. Butthenf(z) =e i z,and R = R 1. Remark. The proof shows that the conformal self-maps of the annulus are f(z) =cz or f(z) =c R 1 z with c =1. Another proof could be obtained by extending f to a conformal self-map of C (=) f(z) =az + b) byrepeatedreflexionovertheboundarycircle(seeremark on page 91). 9

14 Chapter 7 Dirichlet s problem 7.1 Subharmonic functions Definition. Let C be a domain. A function u : 7! R is subharmonic in if it satisfies the SubMVP in, i.e.itiscontinuousand u(z) apple 1 for <r<r = r (z), r (z) <d(z,@ ). u(z + re it )dt Remark. Instead of continuity, one could only require a weaker upper semicontinuity property. This is important in the general theory of subharmonicity. However, for our purposes continuous subharmonic functions su ce. Definition. u is superharmonic if u is subharmonic. Theorem 7.1. Assume that u and v are subharmonic in. Then also are subharmonic on if a, b. au + bv, max(u, v) Proof. That one may multiply by positive constants is evident. Assume that both u and v satisfy the SubMVP at z for radii r<r,andz. Bysymmetry,mayassume that u(z) apple v(z). Then, for r<r max(u, v)(z) =v(z) apple 1 v(z + re it )dt apple M max(u, v)(z + re it )dt Theorem 7. (Global maximum principle). If u is subharmonic in and u attains its supremum at z, then u is constant. 93

15 Theorem 7.3 (Strong maximum principle). If u is subharmonic in and lim sup u(z) apple M<1 z! 1 then u apple M in and equality at one point implies that u is constant in. Proof. Both Theorems 7. and 7.3 are direct consequences of Theorem 6.8. Remark. Recall that 1 is the boundary of with regard to C. The local maximum principle is not valid: a subharmonic function may be constant locally without reducing to a constant. E.g. since linear function is harmonic, u is subharmonic, where (use Theorem 7.1). u(x, y) =max( 1 x, 1,x 1) The following is an important characterisation of subharmonic functions: Theorem 7.4. Let u : 7! R be continuous. Then u is subharmonic if and only if the following condition holds: whenever is a subdomain, v : 7! R is harmonic, then the di erence u v obtains its supremum in if and only if u v is constant. (other words, subharmonic functions are those who obey the (global)maximum principle even after you add modify them by adding an arbitrary harmonic function.) Proof. If u is subharmonic in, then for any harmonic v in, v is harmonic, whence by Thm 7.1 u v is subharmonic in. The validity of the condition follows now from Theorem 7.. Conversely, assume u is continuous and the condition holds. Assume B(z,r). Let v be the harmonic function in B(z,r) that is continuous in B(z,r)andsatisfies = We claim that u apple v in B(z,r). If not, then u v takes its maximum on B(z,r)at an inside point B(z,r), whence the condition of the theorem (applied to v on B(z,r)) implies that v u is constant, i.e. v = u in B(z,r). Thus in any case u apple v. Especially, we have u(z ) apple v(z )= 1 Hence u is subharmonic. v(z + re it )dt = 1 94 u(z + re it )dt

16 Corollary 7.5. If u : 7! R is subharmonic, then u(z) apple 1 u(z + re it )dt for all balls B(z,r) Proof. This follows from the latter part of the proof of Theorem 7.4. Corollary 7.6. Let be a domain, u subharmonic in and v harmonic in. Assume that lim sup u(z) apple lim inf v(z) 1 z! z! Then u apple v in. Proof. Now u v is subharmonic. Use Theorem 7.3. Theorem 7.7. Let, C be domains. Assume that f :! is a conformal bijection and u is subharmonic in. Then u f is subharmonic in. Proof. Exercise. Theorem 7.8. Assume that u C ( ). Then u is subharmonic if and only if u in. Proof. Denote for fixed z, ) a(r) = 1 Previously we computed that a (r) = 1 r u(z + re it )dt z z <r u da. If u, then this shows that a is increasing. Especially, u() = lim r! + a(r) apple a(r), so that u is subharmonic. In turn, if u(z ) < forsomez, thenbycontinuity u<inasmallneighbourhoodofz, whence d a<forsmallr, andu() >a(r) dr for small enough r, andu is not subharmonic. Example. If u is C and convex in C, then (because u is convex in all directions) u xx and u yy =) u =) u is subharmonic. Actually, the mere convexity (with no C assumptions) implies that u is subharmonic. z is subharmonic for all R in C\{}! (Compute u) It is not at all convex if (, 1). It is also subharmonic in whole C if >. 1}, con- max(log z, ) is subharmonic in whole C (log z is harmonic in { z stant is always subharmonic, then use Theorem 7.1). 95

17 7. The Poisson modification Let u be subharmonic in, B = B(z,r). We may solve the Dirichlet problem in B with the boundary values by applying the Poisson formula. Thus, let h be harmonic in B, continuous in B and = Definition. In the above situation, the function ( u(z), z \ B u B (z) = h(z), z B is the Poisson modification of u in the disc B. Theorem 7.9. The Poisson modification u B (of a subharmonic function u) is subharmonic and u B u. Proof. Since h is continuous in the closed set B, andu in \ B, it is clear that u B is continuous. Moreover, it is clearly subharmonic at any point z \ B (since u is) or z B (as h is harmonic). In addition, by Corollary 7.6 h u in B, so u B u. Then, if we have (let r<d(z,@ )) u B (z) =u(z) apple 1 so u B is also subharmonic at any u(z + re it )dt apple 1 u B (z + re it )dt Theorem 7.1. Locally uniform limits of subharmonic functions are subharmonic. Proof. Exercise. 7.3 Perron families Theorem Let A 6= ; be a family of harmonic functions in the domain. Assume that A fulfills the condition: If u, v A, then there is w A so that w max(u, v) Then the function h(z) =sup ua u(z), z is either harmonic or it is identically 1 in. Proof. Let us fix z. Wemaypickasequence(u n )froma so that h(z )= lim n!1 u n (z ) By the assumed property of A we may define inductively a sequence ũ n from A so that 96

8 8 THE RIEMANN MAPPING THEOREM. 8.1 Simply Connected Surfaces

8 8 THE RIEMANN MAPPING THEOREM. 8.1 Simply Connected Surfaces 8 8 THE RIEMANN MAPPING THEOREM 8.1 Simply Connected Surfaces Our aim is to prove the Riemann Mapping Theorem which states that every simply connected Riemann surface R is conformally equivalent to D,

More information

11 COMPLEX ANALYSIS IN C. 1.1 Holomorphic Functions

11 COMPLEX ANALYSIS IN C. 1.1 Holomorphic Functions 11 COMPLEX ANALYSIS IN C 1.1 Holomorphic Functions A domain Ω in the complex plane C is a connected, open subset of C. Let z o Ω and f a map f : Ω C. We say that f is real differentiable at z o if there

More information

carries the circle w 1 onto the circle z R and sends w = 0 to z = a. The function u(s(w)) is harmonic in the unit circle w 1 and we obtain

carries the circle w 1 onto the circle z R and sends w = 0 to z = a. The function u(s(w)) is harmonic in the unit circle w 1 and we obtain 4. Poisson formula In fact we can write down a formula for the values of u in the interior using only the values on the boundary, in the case when E is a closed disk. First note that (3.5) determines the

More information

Key to Complex Analysis Homework 1 Spring 2012 (Thanks to Da Zheng for providing the tex-file)

Key to Complex Analysis Homework 1 Spring 2012 (Thanks to Da Zheng for providing the tex-file) Key to Complex Analysis Homework 1 Spring 212 (Thanks to Da Zheng for providing the tex-file) February 9, 212 16. Prove: If u is a complex-valued harmonic function, then the real and the imaginary parts

More information

Review of complex analysis in one variable

Review of complex analysis in one variable CHAPTER 130 Review of complex analysis in one variable This gives a brief review of some of the basic results in complex analysis. In particular, it outlines the background in single variable complex analysis

More information

ENTRY POTENTIAL THEORY. [ENTRY POTENTIAL THEORY] Authors: Oliver Knill: jan 2003 Literature: T. Ransford, Potential theory in the complex plane.

ENTRY POTENTIAL THEORY. [ENTRY POTENTIAL THEORY] Authors: Oliver Knill: jan 2003 Literature: T. Ransford, Potential theory in the complex plane. ENTRY POTENTIAL THEORY [ENTRY POTENTIAL THEORY] Authors: Oliver Knill: jan 2003 Literature: T. Ransford, Potential theory in the complex plane. Analytic [Analytic] Let D C be an open set. A continuous

More information

Theorem [Mean Value Theorem for Harmonic Functions] Let u be harmonic on D(z 0, R). Then for any r (0, R), u(z 0 ) = 1 z z 0 r

Theorem [Mean Value Theorem for Harmonic Functions] Let u be harmonic on D(z 0, R). Then for any r (0, R), u(z 0 ) = 1 z z 0 r 2. A harmonic conjugate always exists locally: if u is a harmonic function in an open set U, then for any disk D(z 0, r) U, there is f, which is analytic in D(z 0, r) and satisfies that Re f u. Since such

More information

Complex Variables Notes for Math 703. Updated Fall Anton R. Schep

Complex Variables Notes for Math 703. Updated Fall Anton R. Schep Complex Variables Notes for Math 703. Updated Fall 20 Anton R. Schep CHAPTER Holomorphic (or Analytic) Functions. Definitions and elementary properties In complex analysis we study functions f : S C,

More information

Part IB Complex Analysis

Part IB Complex Analysis Part IB Complex Analysis Theorems Based on lectures by I. Smith Notes taken by Dexter Chua Lent 2016 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often significantly) after

More information

u( x) = g( y) ds y ( 1 ) U solves u = 0 in U; u = 0 on U. ( 3)

u( x) = g( y) ds y ( 1 ) U solves u = 0 in U; u = 0 on U. ( 3) M ath 5 2 7 Fall 2 0 0 9 L ecture 4 ( S ep. 6, 2 0 0 9 ) Properties and Estimates of Laplace s and Poisson s Equations In our last lecture we derived the formulas for the solutions of Poisson s equation

More information

MA3111S COMPLEX ANALYSIS I

MA3111S COMPLEX ANALYSIS I MA3111S COMPLEX ANALYSIS I 1. The Algebra of Complex Numbers A complex number is an expression of the form a + ib, where a and b are real numbers. a is called the real part of a + ib and b the imaginary

More information

Complex Analysis review notes for weeks 1-6

Complex Analysis review notes for weeks 1-6 Complex Analysis review notes for weeks -6 Peter Milley Semester 2, 2007 In what follows, unless stated otherwise a domain is a connected open set. Generally we do not include the boundary of the set,

More information

Some lecture notes for Math 6050E: PDEs, Fall 2016

Some lecture notes for Math 6050E: PDEs, Fall 2016 Some lecture notes for Math 65E: PDEs, Fall 216 Tianling Jin December 1, 216 1 Variational methods We discuss an example of the use of variational methods in obtaining existence of solutions. Theorem 1.1.

More information

MATH 566 LECTURE NOTES 1: HARMONIC FUNCTIONS

MATH 566 LECTURE NOTES 1: HARMONIC FUNCTIONS MATH 566 LECTURE NOTES 1: HARMONIC FUNCTIONS TSOGTGEREL GANTUMUR 1. The mean value property In this set of notes, we consider real-valued functions on two-dimensional domains, although it is straightforward

More information

Laplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas

Laplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas Chapter 1 Laplace s Equation Let be an open set in R n. A function u C 2 () is called harmonic in if it satisfies Laplace s equation n (1.1) u := D ii u = 0 in. i=1 A function u C 2 () is called subharmonic

More information

Complex Analysis Qual Sheet

Complex Analysis Qual Sheet Complex Analysis Qual Sheet Robert Won Tricks and traps. traps. Basically all complex analysis qualifying exams are collections of tricks and - Jim Agler Useful facts. e z = 2. sin z = n=0 3. cos z = z

More information

Part IB. Further Analysis. Year

Part IB. Further Analysis. Year Year 2004 2003 2002 2001 10 2004 2/I/4E Let τ be the topology on N consisting of the empty set and all sets X N such that N \ X is finite. Let σ be the usual topology on R, and let ρ be the topology on

More information

Qualifying Exam Complex Analysis (Math 530) January 2019

Qualifying Exam Complex Analysis (Math 530) January 2019 Qualifying Exam Complex Analysis (Math 53) January 219 1. Let D be a domain. A function f : D C is antiholomorphic if for every z D the limit f(z + h) f(z) lim h h exists. Write f(z) = f(x + iy) = u(x,

More information

Maths 212: Homework Solutions

Maths 212: Homework Solutions Maths 212: Homework Solutions 1. The definition of A ensures that x π for all x A, so π is an upper bound of A. To show it is the least upper bound, suppose x < π and consider two cases. If x < 1, then

More information

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE Department of Mathematics MA4247 Complex Analysis II Lecture Notes Part II

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE Department of Mathematics MA4247 Complex Analysis II Lecture Notes Part II NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE Department of Mathematics MA4247 Complex Analysis II Lecture Notes Part II Chapter 2 Further properties of analytic functions 21 Local/Global behavior of analytic functions;

More information

Notes on Complex Analysis

Notes on Complex Analysis Michael Papadimitrakis Notes on Complex Analysis Department of Mathematics University of Crete Contents The complex plane.. The complex plane...................................2 Argument and polar representation.........................

More information

F (z) =f(z). f(z) = a n (z z 0 ) n. F (z) = a n (z z 0 ) n

F (z) =f(z). f(z) = a n (z z 0 ) n. F (z) = a n (z z 0 ) n 6 Chapter 2. CAUCHY S THEOREM AND ITS APPLICATIONS Theorem 5.6 (Schwarz reflection principle) Suppose that f is a holomorphic function in Ω + that extends continuously to I and such that f is real-valued

More information

Part IB. Complex Analysis. Year

Part IB. Complex Analysis. Year Part IB Complex Analysis Year 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2018 Paper 1, Section I 2A Complex Analysis or Complex Methods 7 (a) Show that w = log(z) is a conformal

More information

arxiv: v3 [math.cv] 4 Mar 2014

arxiv: v3 [math.cv] 4 Mar 2014 ON HARMONIC FUNCTIONS AND THE HYPERBOLIC METRIC arxiv:1307.4006v3 [math.cv] 4 Mar 2014 MARIJAN MARKOVIĆ Abstract. Motivated by some recent results of Kalaj and Vuorinen (Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 2012),

More information

COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 2014

COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 2014 COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 24 Homework 4 Solutions Exercise Do and hand in exercise, Chapter 3, p. 4. Solution. The exercise states: Show that if a

More information

MORE CONSEQUENCES OF CAUCHY S THEOREM

MORE CONSEQUENCES OF CAUCHY S THEOREM MOE CONSEQUENCES OF CAUCHY S THEOEM Contents. The Mean Value Property and the Maximum-Modulus Principle 2. Morera s Theorem and some applications 3 3. The Schwarz eflection Principle 6 We have stated Cauchy

More information

CONVEXITY OF INTEGRAL MEANS OF SUBHARMONIC FUNCTIONS

CONVEXITY OF INTEGRAL MEANS OF SUBHARMONIC FUNCTIONS PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAIN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 60, October 1976 CONVEXITY OF INTEGRAL MEANS OF SUBHARMONIC FUNCTIONS JANG-MEI G. WU' Abstract. We study the convexity of integral means of subharmonic

More information

f (n) (z 0 ) Theorem [Morera s Theorem] Suppose f is continuous on a domain U, and satisfies that for any closed curve γ in U, γ

f (n) (z 0 ) Theorem [Morera s Theorem] Suppose f is continuous on a domain U, and satisfies that for any closed curve γ in U, γ Remarks. 1. So far we have seen that holomorphic is equivalent to analytic. Thus, if f is complex differentiable in an open set, then it is infinitely many times complex differentiable in that set. This

More information

A TALE OF TWO CONFORMALLY INVARIANT METRICS

A TALE OF TWO CONFORMALLY INVARIANT METRICS A TALE OF TWO CONFORMALLY INVARIANT METRICS H. S. BEAR AND WAYNE SMITH Abstract. The Harnack metric is a conformally invariant metric defined in quite general domains that coincides with the hyperbolic

More information

= 2 x y 2. (1)

= 2 x y 2. (1) COMPLEX ANALYSIS PART 5: HARMONIC FUNCTIONS A Let me start by asking you a question. Suppose that f is an analytic function so that the CR-equation f/ z = 0 is satisfied. Let us write u and v for the real

More information

3. 4. Uniformly normal families and generalisations

3. 4. Uniformly normal families and generalisations Summer School Normal Families in Complex Analysis Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg May 22 29, 2015 3. 4. Uniformly normal families and generalisations Aimo Hinkkanen University of Illinois at Urbana

More information

Plurisubharmonic Functions and Pseudoconvex Domains

Plurisubharmonic Functions and Pseudoconvex Domains Plurisubharmonic Functions and Pseudoconvex Domains Thomas Jackson June 8, 218 1 Introduction The purpose of this project is to give a brief background of basic complex analysis in several complex variables

More information

Complex Analysis, Stein and Shakarchi Meromorphic Functions and the Logarithm

Complex Analysis, Stein and Shakarchi Meromorphic Functions and the Logarithm Complex Analysis, Stein and Shakarchi Chapter 3 Meromorphic Functions and the Logarithm Yung-Hsiang Huang 217.11.5 Exercises 1. From the identity sin πz = eiπz e iπz 2i, it s easy to show its zeros are

More information

Complex Analysis. Travis Dirle. December 4, 2016

Complex Analysis. Travis Dirle. December 4, 2016 Complex Analysis 2 Complex Analysis Travis Dirle December 4, 2016 2 Contents 1 Complex Numbers and Functions 1 2 Power Series 3 3 Analytic Functions 7 4 Logarithms and Branches 13 5 Complex Integration

More information

Complex Analysis Important Concepts

Complex Analysis Important Concepts Complex Analysis Important Concepts Travis Askham April 1, 2012 Contents 1 Complex Differentiation 2 1.1 Definition and Characterization.............................. 2 1.2 Examples..........................................

More information

Math 185 Fall 2015, Sample Final Exam Solutions

Math 185 Fall 2015, Sample Final Exam Solutions Math 185 Fall 2015, Sample Final Exam Solutions Nikhil Srivastava December 12, 2015 1. True or false: (a) If f is analytic in the annulus A = {z : 1 < z < 2} then there exist functions g and h such that

More information

v( x) u( y) dy for any r > 0, B r ( x) Ω, or equivalently u( w) ds for any r > 0, B r ( x) Ω, or ( not really) equivalently if v exists, v 0.

v( x) u( y) dy for any r > 0, B r ( x) Ω, or equivalently u( w) ds for any r > 0, B r ( x) Ω, or ( not really) equivalently if v exists, v 0. Sep. 26 The Perron Method In this lecture we show that one can show existence of solutions using maximum principle alone.. The Perron method. Recall in the last lecture we have shown the existence of solutions

More information

Rudin Real and Complex Analysis - Harmonic Functions

Rudin Real and Complex Analysis - Harmonic Functions Rudin Real and Complex Analysis - Harmonic Functions Aaron Lou December 2018 1 Notes 1.1 The Cauchy-Riemann Equations 11.1: The Operators and Suppose f is a complex function defined in a plane open set

More information

THE GREEN FUNCTION. Contents

THE GREEN FUNCTION. Contents THE GREEN FUNCTION CRISTIAN E. GUTIÉRREZ NOVEMBER 5, 203 Contents. Third Green s formula 2. The Green function 2.. Estimates of the Green function near the pole 2 2.2. Symmetry of the Green function 3

More information

An Introduction to Complex Analysis and Geometry John P. D Angelo, Pure and Applied Undergraduate Texts Volume 12, American Mathematical Society, 2010

An Introduction to Complex Analysis and Geometry John P. D Angelo, Pure and Applied Undergraduate Texts Volume 12, American Mathematical Society, 2010 An Introduction to Complex Analysis and Geometry John P. D Angelo, Pure and Applied Undergraduate Texts Volume 12, American Mathematical Society, 2010 John P. D Angelo, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana IL 61801.

More information

III. Consequences of Cauchy s Theorem

III. Consequences of Cauchy s Theorem MTH6 Complex Analysis 2009-0 Lecture Notes c Shaun Bullett 2009 III. Consequences of Cauchy s Theorem. Cauchy s formulae. Cauchy s Integral Formula Let f be holomorphic on and everywhere inside a simple

More information

COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 2014

COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 2014 COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 204 Cauchy and Runge Under the Same Roof. These notes can be used as an alternative to Section 5.5 of Chapter 2 in the textbook. They assume the theorem on winding numbers of the

More information

INTEGRATION WORKSHOP 2004 COMPLEX ANALYSIS EXERCISES

INTEGRATION WORKSHOP 2004 COMPLEX ANALYSIS EXERCISES INTEGRATION WORKSHOP 2004 COMPLEX ANALYSIS EXERCISES PHILIP FOTH 1. Cauchy s Formula and Cauchy s Theorem 1. Suppose that γ is a piecewise smooth positively ( counterclockwise ) oriented simple closed

More information

SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES. 1. Introduction

SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES. 1. Introduction SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES GILES AUCHMUTY Abstract. This paper describes sharp inequalities for the trace of Sobolev functions on the boundary of a bounded region R N. The inequalities bound (semi-)norms

More information

Riemann Mapping Theorem (4/10-4/15)

Riemann Mapping Theorem (4/10-4/15) Math 752 Spring 2015 Riemann Mapping Theorem (4/10-4/15) Definition 1. A class F of continuous functions defined on an open set G is called a normal family if every sequence of elements in F contains a

More information

Composition operators: the essential norm and norm-attaining

Composition operators: the essential norm and norm-attaining Composition operators: the essential norm and norm-attaining Mikael Lindström Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Oulu Valencia, April, 2011 The purpose of this talk is to first discuss the

More information

Hartogs Theorem: separate analyticity implies joint Paul Garrett garrett/

Hartogs Theorem: separate analyticity implies joint Paul Garrett  garrett/ (February 9, 25) Hartogs Theorem: separate analyticity implies joint Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ (The present proof of this old result roughly follows the proof

More information

The Uniformization Theorem

The Uniformization Theorem The Uniformization Theorem JWR Tuesday December 11, 2001, 9:03 AM The proof given here is a loose translation of [3]. There is another proof of the Uniformization Theorem in [2] where it is called the

More information

5.3 The Upper Half Plane

5.3 The Upper Half Plane Remark. Combining Schwarz Lemma with the map g α, we can obtain some inequalities of analytic maps f : D D. For example, if z D and w = f(z) D, then the composition h := g w f g z satisfies the condition

More information

The shortest route between two truths in the real domain passes through the complex domain. J. Hadamard

The shortest route between two truths in the real domain passes through the complex domain. J. Hadamard Chapter 6 Harmonic Functions The shortest route between two truths in the real domain passes through the complex domain. J. Hadamard 6.1 Definition and Basic Properties We will now spend a chapter on certain

More information

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Spring 2018 Professor: Jared Speck

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Spring 2018 Professor: Jared Speck MATH 8.52 COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # 6 8.52 Introduction to PDEs, Spring 208 Professor: Jared Speck Class Meeting # 6: Laplace s and Poisson s Equations We will now study the Laplace and Poisson equations

More information

C4.8 Complex Analysis: conformal maps and geometry. D. Belyaev

C4.8 Complex Analysis: conformal maps and geometry. D. Belyaev C4.8 Complex Analysis: conformal maps and geometry D. Belyaev November 4, 2016 2 Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 About this text............................ 5 1.2 Preliminaries............................

More information

1. The COMPLEX PLANE AND ELEMENTARY FUNCTIONS: Complex numbers; stereographic projection; simple and multiple connectivity, elementary functions.

1. The COMPLEX PLANE AND ELEMENTARY FUNCTIONS: Complex numbers; stereographic projection; simple and multiple connectivity, elementary functions. Complex Analysis Qualifying Examination 1 The COMPLEX PLANE AND ELEMENTARY FUNCTIONS: Complex numbers; stereographic projection; simple and multiple connectivity, elementary functions 2 ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS:

More information

Conformal maps. Lent 2019 COMPLEX METHODS G. Taylor. A star means optional and not necessarily harder.

Conformal maps. Lent 2019 COMPLEX METHODS G. Taylor. A star means optional and not necessarily harder. Lent 29 COMPLEX METHODS G. Taylor A star means optional and not necessarily harder. Conformal maps. (i) Let f(z) = az + b, with ad bc. Where in C is f conformal? cz + d (ii) Let f(z) = z +. What are the

More information

SPRING 2006 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION SOLUTIONS

SPRING 2006 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION SOLUTIONS SPRING 006 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION SOLUTIONS 1A. Let G be the subgroup of the free abelian group Z 4 consisting of all integer vectors (x, y, z, w) such that x + 3y + 5z + 7w = 0. (a) Determine a linearly

More information

Metric Space Topology (Spring 2016) Selected Homework Solutions. HW1 Q1.2. Suppose that d is a metric on a set X. Prove that the inequality d(x, y)

Metric Space Topology (Spring 2016) Selected Homework Solutions. HW1 Q1.2. Suppose that d is a metric on a set X. Prove that the inequality d(x, y) Metric Space Topology (Spring 2016) Selected Homework Solutions HW1 Q1.2. Suppose that d is a metric on a set X. Prove that the inequality d(x, y) d(z, w) d(x, z) + d(y, w) holds for all w, x, y, z X.

More information

Considering our result for the sum and product of analytic functions, this means that for (a 0, a 1,..., a N ) C N+1, the polynomial.

Considering our result for the sum and product of analytic functions, this means that for (a 0, a 1,..., a N ) C N+1, the polynomial. Lecture 3 Usual complex functions MATH-GA 245.00 Complex Variables Polynomials. Construction f : z z is analytic on all of C since its real and imaginary parts satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann relations and

More information

Solutions to Complex Analysis Prelims Ben Strasser

Solutions to Complex Analysis Prelims Ben Strasser Solutions to Complex Analysis Prelims Ben Strasser In preparation for the complex analysis prelim, I typed up solutions to some old exams. This document includes complete solutions to both exams in 23,

More information

The uniformization theorem

The uniformization theorem 1 The uniformization theorem Thurston s basic insight in all four of the theorems discussed in this book is that either the topology of the problem induces an appropriate geometry or there is an understandable

More information

Quasi-conformal maps and Beltrami equation

Quasi-conformal maps and Beltrami equation Chapter 7 Quasi-conformal maps and Beltrami equation 7. Linear distortion Assume that f(x + iy) =u(x + iy)+iv(x + iy) be a (real) linear map from C C that is orientation preserving. Let z = x + iy and

More information

Conformal Mappings. Chapter Schwarz Lemma

Conformal Mappings. Chapter Schwarz Lemma Chapter 5 Conformal Mappings In this chapter we study analytic isomorphisms. An analytic isomorphism is also called a conformal map. We say that f is an analytic isomorphism of U with V if f is an analytic

More information

THE RESIDUE THEOREM. f(z) dz = 2πi res z=z0 f(z). C

THE RESIDUE THEOREM. f(z) dz = 2πi res z=z0 f(z). C THE RESIDUE THEOREM ontents 1. The Residue Formula 1 2. Applications and corollaries of the residue formula 2 3. ontour integration over more general curves 5 4. Defining the logarithm 7 Now that we have

More information

Solutions to Exercises 6.1

Solutions to Exercises 6.1 34 Chapter 6 Conformal Mappings Solutions to Exercises 6.. An analytic function fz is conformal where f z. If fz = z + e z, then f z =e z z + z. We have f z = z z += z =. Thus f is conformal at all z.

More information

Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley. GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Fall Semester 2016

Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley. GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Fall Semester 2016 Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley YOUR 1 OR 2 DIGIT EXAM NUMBER GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Fall Semester 2016 1. Please write your 1- or 2-digit exam number on

More information

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Fall 2011 Professor: Jared Speck

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Fall 2011 Professor: Jared Speck MATH 8.52 COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # 6 8.52 Introduction to PDEs, Fall 20 Professor: Jared Speck Class Meeting # 6: Laplace s and Poisson s Equations We will now study the Laplace and Poisson equations

More information

Math Homework 2

Math Homework 2 Math 73 Homework Due: September 8, 6 Suppose that f is holomorphic in a region Ω, ie an open connected set Prove that in any of the following cases (a) R(f) is constant; (b) I(f) is constant; (c) f is

More information

LENGTH AND AREA ESTIMATES OF THE DERIVATIVES OF BOUNDED HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

LENGTH AND AREA ESTIMATES OF THE DERIVATIVES OF BOUNDED HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS proceedings of the american mathematical society Volume KK, Number I. May 1983 LENGTH AND AREA ESTIMATES OF THE DERIVATIVES OF BOUNDED HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS SHINJI YAMASHITA Abstract. MacGregor [1] and

More information

MAT665:ANALYTIC FUNCTION THEORY

MAT665:ANALYTIC FUNCTION THEORY MAT665:ANALYTIC FUNCTION THEORY DR. RITU AGARWAL MALAVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JAIPUR Contents 1. About 2 2. Complex Numbers 2 3. Fundamental inequalities 2 4. Continuously differentiable functions

More information

Proof. We indicate by α, β (finite or not) the end-points of I and call

Proof. We indicate by α, β (finite or not) the end-points of I and call C.6 Continuous functions Pag. 111 Proof of Corollary 4.25 Corollary 4.25 Let f be continuous on the interval I and suppose it admits non-zero its (finite or infinite) that are different in sign for x tending

More information

Part IB Complex Analysis

Part IB Complex Analysis Part IB Complex Analysis Theorems with proof Based on lectures by I. Smith Notes taken by Dexter Chua Lent 206 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often significantly)

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 28 Jun 2008

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 28 Jun 2008 Limit Surfaces of Riemann Examples David Hoffman, Wayne Rossman arxiv:0806.467v [math.dg] 28 Jun 2008 Introduction The only connected minimal surfaces foliated by circles and lines are domains on one of

More information

Physics 307. Mathematical Physics. Luis Anchordoqui. Wednesday, August 31, 16

Physics 307. Mathematical Physics. Luis Anchordoqui. Wednesday, August 31, 16 Physics 307 Mathematical Physics Luis Anchordoqui 1 Bibliography L. A. Anchordoqui and T. C. Paul, ``Mathematical Models of Physics Problems (Nova Publishers, 2013) G. F. D. Duff and D. Naylor, ``Differential

More information

(b) If f L p (R), with 1 < p, then Mf L p (R) and. Mf L p (R) C(p) f L p (R) with C(p) depending only on p.

(b) If f L p (R), with 1 < p, then Mf L p (R) and. Mf L p (R) C(p) f L p (R) with C(p) depending only on p. Lecture 3: Carleson Measures via Harmonic Analysis Much of the argument from this section is taken from the book by Garnett, []. The interested reader can also see variants of this argument in the book

More information

HARMONIC FUNCTIONS. x 2 + 2

HARMONIC FUNCTIONS. x 2 + 2 HARMONIC FUNCTIONS DR. RITU AGARWAL MALAVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JAIPUR Contents 1. Harmonic functions 1 1.1. Use of Harmonic mappings 1 1.2. Harmonic functions and holomorphicity 2 1.3. Harmonic

More information

Schwarz lemma and automorphisms of the disk

Schwarz lemma and automorphisms of the disk Chapter 2 Schwarz lemma and automorphisms of the disk 2.1 Schwarz lemma We denote the disk of radius 1 about 0 by the notation D, that is, D = {z C : z < 1}. Given θ R the rotation of angle θ about 0,

More information

Topological properties

Topological properties CHAPTER 4 Topological properties 1. Connectedness Definitions and examples Basic properties Connected components Connected versus path connected, again 2. Compactness Definition and first examples Topological

More information

Mapping problems and harmonic univalent mappings

Mapping problems and harmonic univalent mappings Mapping problems and harmonic univalent mappings Antti Rasila Helsinki University of Technology antti.rasila@tkk.fi (Mainly based on P. Duren s book Harmonic mappings in the plane) Helsinki Analysis Seminar,

More information

Subharmonic functions

Subharmonic functions Subharmonic functions N.A. 07 Upper semicontinuous functions. Let (X, d) be a metric space. A function f : X R { } is upper semicontinuous (u.s.c.) if lim inf f(y) f(x) x X. y x A function g is lower semicontinuous

More information

The result above is known as the Riemann mapping theorem. We will prove it using basic theory of normal families. We start this lecture with that.

The result above is known as the Riemann mapping theorem. We will prove it using basic theory of normal families. We start this lecture with that. Lecture 15 The Riemann mapping theorem Variables MATH-GA 2451.1 Complex The point of this lecture is to prove that the unit disk can be mapped conformally onto any simply connected open set in the plane,

More information

CHAPTER 2. CONFORMAL MAPPINGS 58

CHAPTER 2. CONFORMAL MAPPINGS 58 CHAPTER 2. CONFORMAL MAPPINGS 58 We prove that a strong form of converse of the above statement also holds. Please note we could apply the Theorem 1.11.3 to prove the theorem. But we prefer to apply the

More information

HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 6

HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 6 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 6 DUE 15 MARCH, 2016 1) Suppose f, g : A R are uniformly continuous on A. Show that f + g is uniformly continuous on A. Solution First we note: In order to show that f + g is uniformly

More information

Multivariable Calculus

Multivariable Calculus 2 Multivariable Calculus 2.1 Limits and Continuity Problem 2.1.1 (Fa94) Let the function f : R n R n satisfy the following two conditions: (i) f (K ) is compact whenever K is a compact subset of R n. (ii)

More information

Global minimization. Chapter Upper and lower bounds

Global minimization. Chapter Upper and lower bounds Chapter 1 Global minimization The issues related to the behavior of global minimization problems along a sequence of functionals F are by now well understood, and mainly rely on the concept of -limit.

More information

Chapter 4: Open mapping theorem, removable singularities

Chapter 4: Open mapping theorem, removable singularities Chapter 4: Open mapping theorem, removable singularities Course 44, 2003 04 February 9, 2004 Theorem 4. (Laurent expansion) Let f : G C be analytic on an open G C be open that contains a nonempty annulus

More information

Introductory Complex Analysis

Introductory Complex Analysis Introductory Complex Analysis Course No. 100 312 Spring 2007 Michael Stoll Contents Acknowledgments 2 1. Basics 2 2. Complex Differentiability and Holomorphic Functions 3 3. Power Series and the Abel Limit

More information

Riemann surfaces. 3.1 Definitions

Riemann surfaces. 3.1 Definitions 3 Riemann surfaces In this chapter we define and give the first properties of Riemann surfaces. These are the holomorphic counterpart of the (real) differential manifolds. We will see how the Fuchsian

More information

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE. Department of Mathematics. MA4247 Complex Analysis II. Lecture Notes Part IV

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE. Department of Mathematics. MA4247 Complex Analysis II. Lecture Notes Part IV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE Department of Mathematics MA4247 Complex Analysis II Lecture Notes Part IV Chapter 2. Further properties of analytic/holomorphic functions (continued) 2.4. The Open mapping

More information

The Uniformization Theorem. Donald E. Marshall

The Uniformization Theorem. Donald E. Marshall The Uniformization Theorem Donald E. Marshall The Koebe uniformization theorem is a generalization of the Riemann mapping Theorem. It says that a simply connected Riemann surface is conformally equivalent

More information

ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS. 1 cos(nx) lim. n 2 x 2. g n (x) = 1 cos(nx) n 2 x 2. x 2.

ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS. 1 cos(nx) lim. n 2 x 2. g n (x) = 1 cos(nx) n 2 x 2. x 2. ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 27: SOLUTIONS Problem. Determine, with justification, the it cos(nx) n 2 x 2 dx. Solution. For an integer n >, define g n : (, ) R by Also define g : (, ) R by g(x) = g n

More information

Math The Laplacian. 1 Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution

Math The Laplacian. 1 Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution Math. 209 The Laplacian Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution Let be a bounded open set in R n, n 2, with smooth boundary. The fact that the boundary is smooth means that at each point x the external

More information

2 Complex Functions and the Cauchy-Riemann Equations

2 Complex Functions and the Cauchy-Riemann Equations 2 Complex Functions and the Cauchy-Riemann Equations 2.1 Complex functions In one-variable calculus, we study functions f(x) of a real variable x. Likewise, in complex analysis, we study functions f(z)

More information

4 Uniform convergence

4 Uniform convergence 4 Uniform convergence In the last few sections we have seen several functions which have been defined via series or integrals. We now want to develop tools that will allow us to show that these functions

More information

INTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYTIC GEOMETRY

INTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYTIC GEOMETRY INTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYTIC GEOMETRY KRZYSZTOF KURDYKA 1. Analytic functions in several variables 1.1. Summable families. Let (E, ) be a normed space over the field R or C, dim E

More information

Thus, X is connected by Problem 4. Case 3: X = (a, b]. This case is analogous to Case 2. Case 4: X = (a, b). Choose ε < b a

Thus, X is connected by Problem 4. Case 3: X = (a, b]. This case is analogous to Case 2. Case 4: X = (a, b). Choose ε < b a Solutions to Homework #6 1. Complete the proof of the backwards direction of Theorem 12.2 from class (which asserts the any interval in R is connected). Solution: Let X R be a closed interval. Case 1:

More information

Functions of a Complex Variable and Integral Transforms

Functions of a Complex Variable and Integral Transforms Functions of a Complex Variable and Integral Transforms Department of Mathematics Zhou Lingjun Textbook Functions of Complex Analysis with Applications to Engineering and Science, 3rd Edition. A. D. Snider

More information

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY MA205 Complex Analysis Autumn 2012

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY MA205 Complex Analysis Autumn 2012 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY MA205 Complex Analysis Autumn 2012 September 5, 2012 Mapping Properties Lecture 13 We shall once again return to the study of general behaviour of holomorphic functions

More information

The Dirichlet s P rinciple. In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation:

The Dirichlet s P rinciple. In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation: Oct. 1 The Dirichlet s P rinciple In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation: 1. Dirichlet s Principle. u = in, u = g on. ( 1 ) If we multiply

More information

are harmonic functions so by superposition

are harmonic functions so by superposition J. Rauch Applied Complex Analysis The Dirichlet Problem Abstract. We solve, by simple formula, the Dirichlet Problem in a half space with step function boundary data. Uniqueness is proved by complex variable

More information

MATH 185: COMPLEX ANALYSIS FALL 2009/10 PROBLEM SET 9 SOLUTIONS. and g b (z) = eπz/2 1

MATH 185: COMPLEX ANALYSIS FALL 2009/10 PROBLEM SET 9 SOLUTIONS. and g b (z) = eπz/2 1 MATH 85: COMPLEX ANALYSIS FALL 2009/0 PROBLEM SET 9 SOLUTIONS. Consider the functions defined y g a (z) = eiπz/2 e iπz/2 + Show that g a maps the set to D(0, ) while g maps the set and g (z) = eπz/2 e

More information

Complex Analysis Problems

Complex Analysis Problems Complex Analysis Problems transcribed from the originals by William J. DeMeo October 2, 2008 Contents 99 November 2 2 2 200 November 26 4 3 2006 November 3 6 4 2007 April 6 7 5 2007 November 6 8 99 NOVEMBER

More information