arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 1 Feb 2018

Transcription

1 AFFINE FACTORABLE SURFACES IN ISOTROPIC SPACES arxiv: v [math.dg] Feb 08 MUHITTIN EVREN AYDIN AYLA ERDUR MAHMUT ERGUT 3 Abstract. In this paper we study the problem of finding the affine factorable surfaces in a 3 dimensional isotropic space with prescribed Gaussian K) and mean H) curvature. Because the absolute figure two different types of these surfaces appear by permutation of coordinates. We firstly classify the affine factorable surfaces of type with K H constants. Afterwards we provide the affine factorable surfaces of type with K = const. and H = 0. In addition in a particular case the affine factorable surfaces of type with H = const. were obtained.. Introduction Let R 3 be a 3-dimensional Euclidean space with usual coordinates xyz) and wxy) : R R be a smooth real-valued function of variables. Then its graph given by z = wxy) is a smooth surface with an atlas that consists of only the following patch r : R R 3 xy) xywxy)). Notice also that every surface in R 3 is locally a part of the graph z = wxy) if its normal is not parallel to the xy plane. Otherwise the regularity assures that it is a part of the graph x = wyz) or y = wxz). See [9 p. 9]. These graphs are also called Monge surfaces [ p. 30]. Because our target is to solve prescribed Gaussian K) and mean H) curvature type equations in a 3-dimensional isotropic space I 3 it is naturally reasonable to focus on graph surfaces. By separation of variables we study the graphs z = wxy) = f x)f y) so-called factorable or homothetical surface for smooth functions f f of single variable. Many results on the factorable surfaces in other 3-dimensional spaces were made so far see [ ]. This kind of surfaces also appear as invariant surfaces in the 3-dimensional space H R which is one of eight homogeneous geometries of Thurston. More clearly a certain type of translation surfaces in H R is the graph of y = f x)f y) see [35 p. 547]. For further details we refer to [ ]. Recently Zong Xiao Liu [39] defined affine factorable surfaces in R 3 as the graphs z = f x)f y +ax) a R a 0. They obtained these surfaces with K = 0 and H = const. It is clear that this class of surfaces is more general than the factorable surfaces. In this paper the problem of determining the affine factorable surfaces in I 3 with K H constants is considered. By permutation of the coordinates because the absolute figure of I 3 two different types of these surfaces appear i.e. the graphs of z = f x)f y +ax) and x = f y +az)f z) called affine factorable surface of 000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 53A35 53A40 53B5. Key words and phrases. Isotropic space affine factorable surface mean curvature Gaussian curvature.

2 MUHITTIN EVREN AYDIN AYLA ERDUR MAHMUT ERGUT 3 type and respectively. Point out also that such surfaces reduce to the factorable surfaces in I 3 when a = 0. In this manner our first concern is to obtain the affine factorable surfaces of type with KH constants. And then we present some results relating to the affine factorable surfaces of type with K = const. and H = 0. Furthermore in a particular case the affine factorable surfaces of type with H = const. were found.. Preliminaries In this section we provide some fundamental properties of isotropic geometry from [5]-[0][]-[5][ ]. For basics of Cayley-Klein geometries see also [5 6 34]. Let x 0 : x : x : x 3 ) denote the homogenous coordinates in a real 3-dimensional projectivespace P R 3). A3-dimensional isotropic space I 3 is a Cayley-Kleinspace definedin P R 3) in whichthe absolutefigureconsistofanabsolute plane ω andtwo absolute lines l l in ω. Thosearerespectivelygivenby x 0 = 0and x 0 = x ±ix = 0. The intersection point of these complex-conjugate lines is called absolute point 0 : 0 : 0 : ). The group of motions of I 3 is given by the 6 parameter group.) xyz) xỹ z) : x = θ +xcosθ ysinθ ỹ = θ +xsinθ +ycosθ z = θ 3 +θ 4 x+θ 5 y +z where xyz) denote the affine coordinates and θθ...θ 5 R. The isotropic metric induced by the absolute figure is given by ds = dx +dy. Due to the absolute figure there are two types of the lines and the planes: The isotropic lines and planes which are parallel to z axis and others called nonisotropic lines and planes. As an example the equation ax+by+cz = d determines a non-isotropic isotropic) plane if c 0 c = 0) abcd R. Let us consider an admissible surface without isotropic tangent planes). Then it parameterizes ruv) = xuv)yuv)zuv)) where x u y v x v y u 0 x u = x u because the admissibility. Notice that the admissible surfaces are regular too. Denote g and h the first and the second fundamental forms respectively. Then the components of g are calculated by the induced metric from I 3. The unit normal vector is 00) because it is orthogonal to all non-isotropic vectors. The components of h are given by h = detr uur u r v ) detg h = detr uvr u r v ) detg h = detr vvr u r v ) detg where r uu = r u u etc. Therefore the isotropic Gaussian or relative) and mean curvature are respectively defined by K = deth detg H = g h g h +g h detg where g ij ij = ) denotes the component of g. For convenience we call these Gaussian and mean curvatures. By a flat minimal) surface we mean a surface with vanishing Gaussian mean) curvature.

3 AFFINE FACTORABLE SURFACES IN ISOTROPIC SPACES 3 In the particular case that the surface is the graph z = wxy) parameterized rxy) = xywxy)) the Gaussian and mean curvatures turn to.) K = w xx w yy wxy H = w xx +w yy. Accordingly; ifone is the graphx = uyz) parameterizedryz) = wyz)yz) then these curvatures are formulated by.3) K = w yyw zz w yz w 4 z where the admissibility assures w z 0. H = w z w yy w y w z w yz + +w y w 3 z 3. Affine factorable surfaces of type ) wzz An affine factorable surface of type in I 3 is a graph surface given by z = wxy) = f x)f y +ax)a 0. Let us put u = x and u = y + ax in order to avoid confusion while solving prescribed curvature type equations. By.) we get the Gaussian curvature as 3.) K = f f f f f f ) where f = df du and f = df du and so on. Notice that the roles of f and f in 3.) is symmetric and thus it is sufficient to perform the cases depending on f. Theorem 3.. Let an affine factorable surface of type in I 3 have constant Gaussian curvature K 0. Then for c c c 3 R one of the following happens: i) wxy) = c f y +ax); ii) wxy) = c e cx+c3y+ax) ; iii) wxy) = c x c y +ax) c c c ; iv) K 0 0) wxy) = K 0 xy +ax). Proof. We have two cases: 3.) ) Case K 0 = 0. By 3.) the item i) of the theorem is obivous. If f f const. 3.) implies f f 0. Thereby 3.) can be rewritten as f f f = c ) = f ) f f where c R c 0. If c = after solving 3.) we obtain f u ) = c expc 3 u ) f u ) = c 4 expc 5 u ) c...c 5 R. This proves the item ii) of the theorem. Otherwise i.e. c by solving 3.) we derive [ ) ] c c c c f u ) = [ c )c 6 u +c 7 )] f u ) = c 8 u +c 9 ) c for c 6...c 9 R. This is the proof of the item iii) of the theorem. ) Case K ) yields f f const. We have two cases:

4 4 MUHITTIN EVREN AYDIN AYLA ERDUR MAHMUT ERGUT 3 a) Case f = c u + c c c R c 0. By 3.) we get K 0 = c f ) or K0 f u ) = u +c 3 c 3 R c which proves the item iv) of the theorem. b) Case f 0. By symmetry we have f 0. Dividing 3.) with f f f ) follows ) ) 3.3) K 0 f f f = f f f f ) ) f f. The partial derivative of 3.3) with respect to u gives ) ) ) 3.4) K 0 +f ) f f f f f = 0. }{{}}{{} ω ω Because f const. 3.4) concludes ω = ω = 0 namely f f = c and f f = c f ) c c R c c 0. Comparing last two equations leads to f = 0 which is not our case. From.) the mean curvature follows 3.5) H = +a ) f f +af f +f f. Theorem 3.. Let an affine factorable surface of type in I 3 be minimal. Then for c c c 3 R either i) it is a non-isotropic plane; or ii) wxy) = e cx [c sin c +a y +ax) ) )] +c 3 cos c +a y +ax). Proof. If f is a constant function then 3.5) immediately yields the item i) of the theorem. Suppose that f f 0. If f = c u +c c c R c 0 3.5) follows the following polynomial equation on f ac f +[ +a ) f ] f = 0 which concludes f = 0. This is not our case. Then we deduce f f 0 and 3.5) can be divided by f f as follows: 3.6) a = +a ) ) ) ) ) f f f f f f + f f The partial derivative of 3.6) with respect to u gives 3.7) +a ) ) ) f f f f + f f = 0. We have two cases:

5 AFFINE FACTORABLE SURFACES IN ISOTROPIC SPACES 5 ) Case f = c f c R c 0. That is a solution for 3.7) and thus 3.6) writes ) ) 3.8) a = +a f f c f +c f which is a homogenous linear second-order ODE with constant coefficients. The characteristic equation of 3.8) has complex roots c +a a±i) so the solution of 3.8) turns ) ) c c 3.9) f u ) = c cos +a u +c 3 sin +a u. Considering 3.9) with the assumption of Case gives the item ii) of the theorem. ) Case f /f ) 0. The symmetry yields f /f ) 0. Furthermore 3.7) leads to f = c f c R c 0 and substituting it into 3.6) gives 3.0) a f f = c +a ) f f + f f. The fact that the left side of 3.0) is a function of the variable u gives a contradiction. Theorem 3.3. Let an affine factorable surface of type in I 3 have nonzero constant mean curvature H 0. Then we have either i) wxy) = H0 +a y +ax) or ii) wxy) = H0 a xy +ax). Proof. We get two cases: ) Casef = 0.Then3.5)provestheitem i)ofthetheorem. Iff = c u +c c c R c 0 then by 3.5) we get a polynomial equation on f H 0 +ac f + [ +a ) f ] f = 0 which implies f = 0 and thus it turns to f = H 0 ac. This proves the item ii) of the theorem. ) Casef 0.Thesymmetryconcludesf 0.Then3.5)canberearranged as 3.) H 0 = +a ) f p ṗ +ap p +f p ṗ 3.) 3.3) where p i = dfi du i and ṗ i = dpi H 0 f p = +a ) df i = f i f i f p. 3.) can be divided by f p as ) +a p +ṗ. f ) p ṗ The partial derivative of 3.) with respect to f leads to ) ) H0 d = +a ) ) ) d f p ṗ + p. f df p df p f f

6 6 MUHITTIN EVREN AYDIN AYLA ERDUR MAHMUT ERGUT 3 If p = c 3 f c 3 R c 3 0 then the right-hand side of 3.3) becomes zero which ) is no possible. Thereby 3.3) can be rewritten by dividing d f df p as H 0 f ) ) d df p ) d f df p }{{} ω }{{} ω = +a ) p ṗ f }{{} ω 3 + p ) d f df p }{{} ω 4 which implies ω i = const. i =...4 for every pair f f ). However this is a contradiction due to ω = f const. 4. Affine factorable surfaces of type An affine factorable surface of type in I 3 is a graph surface given by z = wxy) = f y +az)f z) a 0. Put u = y +az and u = z. From.3) the Gaussian curvature follows 4.) K = f f f f f f ) af f +f f )4 where f = df du and f = df du. Notice that the regularity refers to af f +f f 0. Theorem 4.. Let an affine factorable surface of type in I 3 have constant Gaussian curvature K 0. Then it is flat i.e. K 0 = 0 and for c c c 3 R one of the following occurs: i) wyz) = c f y +az) f z 0; ii) wyz) = c e cy+az)+c3z ; iii) wyz) = c y +az) c z c c c. Proof. If K 0 = 0 in 4.) then the proofs of the items i)ii)iii) are similar with these of Theorem 3.. The contd of the proof is by contradiction. Suppose that K 0 0 and hence f f must be non-constants. Afterwards we use the property that the roles of f f are symmetric in 4.). If f = c u +c c c R c 0 then 4.) turns to a polynomial equation on f ξ u )+ξ u )f +ξ 3 u )f +ξ 4u )f 3 +ξ 5u )f 4 = 0 where ξ u ) = K 0 a 4 c 4 f4 +c f ) ξ u ) = 4K 0 a 3 c 3 ff 3 ξ 3 u ) = 6K 0 a c f f ) ξ 3 u ) = 4K 0 ac f f )3 ξ 5 u ) = K 0 f )4. The fact that each coefficient must vanish contradicts with f const. Thereby we conclude f f 0. Next put ω = f f ω = f ) ω 3 = f ω 4 = f in 4.). After taking partial derivative of 4.) with respect to u one can be rewritten as 4.) µ f f +µ f f f µ 3 f f ) µ 4 f ) 3 = 0

7 AFFINE FACTORABLE SURFACES IN ISOTROPIC SPACES 7 where 4.3) µ = aω ω 3 4ω ω 3 ) µ = ω ω 4 4ω ω 4 µ 3 = aω ω 3 +4ω ω 3) µ 4 = ω ω 4 +4ω ω 4 for ω i = dωi du i =...4. By dividing 4.) with f f we deduce f f ) f ) ) f 4.4) f µ +µ = µ f 3 +µ f 4. f To solve 4.4) we have to distinguish several cases: ) Case f f = c 0 c R. Substituting it into 4.) leads to the polynomial equation on f 4.5) c f f f ) ) K 0 af +c f ) 4 f = 0 4.6) 4.7) where the coefficient af +c f must vanish because K 0 0. This however contradicts with the regularity. ) Case µ i = 0 i =...4. Because µ 3 = 0 we conclude 6f ) f = 0 which is not our case. 3) Case µ +µ f f ) follows f f = µ 3 f f f +µ 4 f ) µ +µ f f. The partial derivative of 4.6) with respect to u gives a polynomial equation on f f and the fact that eachcoefficient must vanish yields the following system: µ µ 4 µ µ 4 = 0 µ µ 3 µ µ 3 +µ µ 4 µ µ 4 = 0 µ µ 3 µ µ 3 = 0. By 4.7) we deduce that µ 3 = c µ µ 4 = c µ c c R and 4.8) c c )µ µ µ µ ) = 0. We have to consider two cases: a) c = c. Put c = c = c and thus c must be nonzero due to the assumption of Case 3. Then 4.4) leads to f f = c f f which implies f = c 3 f c c 3 R c 3 0. Note that c due to Case. Hence 4.) turns to 4.9) c 3 K 0 fc = cf f f )) af f +c 3 f f c)4. The partial derivative of 4.9) with respect to f concludes ac )f cc 3 f f c = 0

8 8 MUHITTIN EVREN AYDIN AYLA ERDUR MAHMUT ERGUT 3 which yields c = and c 3 f f = 0. This however is not possible. b) c c. It follows from 4.8) that µ = c 4 µ c 4 R. On the other hand pluggingω = ω 3 ω 4 andω 3 = ω 4 intotheequationµ 3 c µ = 0 yields 4.0) 6 c )ω 3 ω 3 c ω 3 ω 3 ω 4 +4c ω 3 ) ω 4 = 0. Dividing 4.0) with ω 3 ω 4 ω 3 gives 4.) 6 c ) ω 3 ω c 3 ω 4 ω 3 +4c ω 3 ω 3 = 0. Taking an integration of 4.) leads to 4.) ω 3 = c 5 ω 4 6 c c 3ω4 c 5 R c 5 0 or 4.3) ω = c 5 ω 4 3ω Moreover µ c 4 µ = 0 implies or 6 c 4. ω ω 4 aω 3 c 4ω 4 aω 3 c 4 ω 4 = 0 4.4) ω = c 6 aω 3 c 4 ω 4 ) 4 c 6 R c 6 0. Comparing 4.3) and 4.4) leads to 4.5) ω 3 = ) 4 c5 c 6 c 4 ω 4 ω 3 c 4 a Revisiting 4.) and taking its integration follows 4.6) ω 3 = c 7 ω 6 c 4 +c 8 c 7 c 8 R c 7 0. After equalizing 4.5) and 4.6) we obtain an equation of the form c 6+c c 4ω4 c5 c 6 ) ω 3 c 4 a c5 c 6. ) 4 ω 3 c 4 +c 8 c 4ω 4 a = 0 which gives a contradiction because ω 4 = f is an arbitrary nonconstant function. By.3) the mean curvature is 4.7) H = f f ) f f f f ) f f +f f ) f f +f f +af f +a f f af f +f f )3. Theorem 4.. There does not exist a minimal affine factorable surface of type in I 3 except non-isotropic planes.

9 AFFINE FACTORABLE SURFACES IN ISOTROPIC SPACES 9 Proof. The proof is by contradiction. 4.7) follows 4.8) f f ) f f f f ) f f +f f ) f f +f f +af f +a f f = 0. Iff orf isaconstantthen4.8)deducesthatthesurfaceisanon-isotropicplane. Assume that f f are non-constant. If f = 0 then 4.8) gives a polynomial equation on f : [ ] af f + f f ) f f f ) f +f f = 0 which is no possible because af f 0. The symmetry implies f 0. Henceforth we deal with the case f f 0. Dividing 4.8) with f f ) f f leads to ) ) f f + ff f 4.9) ) f + f ) f ) + f f ) ) ) ) +a f f f f )+a f =. f f ) f ) The partial derivative of 4.9) with respect to u and u yields ) ) f ) ) +a f }{{ ) f f }}{{ ) f f f f }}{{}}{{} ω 4.0) ω ω 3 ω 4 ) ) +a f = 0 f f }{{ ) f }}{{ ) } ω 5 ω 6 where ω ω 6 0 because f f 0. To solve 4.0) we consider two cases: ) Case ω 3 = 0. It follows f f = c c R c 0. Then ω = c ω 5 = c f 4 and hence 4.0) reduces to the following polynomial equation on f f 4 ω +a c ω 6 = 0 which is no possible because ω 6 0. ) Case ω 3 0. After dividing 4.0) with ω ω 6 we write 4.) µ u )+aµ u )µ 3 u )+a µ 4 u ) = 0 where µ = ω ω 6 µ = ω 3 ω µ 3 = ω 4 ω 6 µ 4 = ω 5 ω. Notice also that µ i i =...4 in 4.) must be constant for every pair u u ). Therefore being µ and µ 4 are constants lead to respectively 4.) f = c +c f ) 4.3) and f f f ) c3 = f f +c 4 f

10 0 MUHITTIN EVREN AYDIN AYLA ERDUR MAHMUT ERGUT 3 where c...c 4 R c 0 because ω 3 0. Put p = df du and ṗ = dp in 4.) and 4.3). The derivative of 4.) with respect to f gives f f c +c p 4.4) ṗ = ) c c p ). Nevertheless plugging 4.) into 4.3) leads to 4.5) ṗ = c 3 +c 4 p c +c p. Equalizing 4.4) and 4.5) refers to the polynomial equation on p ξ +ξ p +ξ 3 p4 +ξ 4 p6 = 0 in which the following coefficients ξ = c 3 c c 3 ξ = 3c c c c 4 +c c 3 ξ 3 = 3c c +c c 4 ξ 4 = c 3 df = must vanish. Being ξ = ξ 4 = 0 implies c = c 4 = 0 and thus from 4.) and 4.4) we get f = c f = c f. Considering these ones into 4.7) leads to the polynomial equation on f [ 4.6) c f f f f )] f 3 +[ f +ac f +a c f ] f = 0 in which the fact that coefficients must vanish yields f +ac f = 0. This however contradicts with the regularity. Lemma 4.. Let an affine factorable surface of type in I 3 have nonzero constant mean curvature H 0. If f or f is a linear function then we have 4.7) wyz) = c H0 y +az c R. Proof. If f = c c R then 4.7) follows 4.8) H 0 c = f f )3. Solving 4.8) concludes f u ) = H 0 c 4H 0 c u +c +c 3 for c c 3 R. This proves the hypothesis of the lemma. If f = c 4 0 c 4 R then 4.7) reduces to [ ] H 0 ac 4 f +f f )3 = ac 4 f + c 4 f f c 4 f ) f +f f which is a polynomial equation on f. It is easy to see that the the coefficient of the term of degree 3 is f ) 3 which cannot vanish. This completes the proves.

11 AFFINE FACTORABLE SURFACES IN ISOTROPIC SPACES 5. Conclusions The results of the present paper and [ 3] relating to the affine) factorable surfaces in I 3 with KH constants are summed up in Table which categorizes those surfaces. Notice also that without emposing conditions finding the affine factorable surfaces of type with H = const. 0 is still an open problem. References [] M. E. Aydin A.O. Ogrenmis Homothetical and translation hypersurfaces with constant curvature in the isotropic space In: Proceedings of the Balkan Society of Geometers 3 05) -0. [] M.E. Aydin M. Ergut Isotropic geometry of graph surfaces associated with product production functions in economics Tamkang J. Math. 474) 06) [3] M.E. Aydin Constant curvature factorable surfaces in 3-dimensional isotropic space J. Korean Math. Soc. 55) 08) [4] M. Bekkar B. Senoussi Factorable surfaces in the three-dimensional Euclidean and Lorentzian spaces satisfying r i = λ i r i J. Geom. 03 0) 7 9. [5] B. Y. Chen S. Decu L. Verstraelen Notes on isotropic geometry of production models Kragujevac J. Math. 8) 04) [6] L.C.B. Da Silva Rotation minimizing frames and spherical curves in simply isotropic and semi-isotropic 3-spaces arxiv: v. [7] L.C.B. Da Silva The geometry of Gauss map and shape operator in simply isotropic and pseudo-isotropic spaces arxiv:80.087v. [8] S. Decu L. Verstraelen A note on the isotropical geometry of production surfaces Kragujevac J. Math. 37) 03) 7 0. [9] B. Divjak The n-dimensional simply isotropic space Zbornik radova 996) [0] Z. Erjavec B. Divjak D. Horvat The general solutions of Frenet s system in the equiform geometry of the Galilean pseudo-galilean simple isotropic and double isotropic space Int. Math. Forum. 6) 0) [] A. Gray Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces with Mathematica CRC Press LLC 998. [] W. Goemans I. Van de Woestyne Translation and homothetical lightlike hypersurfaces of semi-euclidean space Kuwait J. Sci. Eng. 38 A) 0) [3] J. Inoguchi R. Lopez M.I. Munteanu Minimal translation surfaces in the Heisenberg group Nil 3 Geom. Dedicata 6 0) -3. [4] L. Jiu H. Sun On minimal homothetical hypersurfaces Colloq. Math ) [5] D. Klawitter Clifford Algebras: Geometric Modelling and Chain Geometries with Application in Kinematics Springer Spektrum 05. [6] H. Liu Y. Yu Affine translation surfaces in Euclidean 3-space In: Proceedings of the Japan Academy Ser. A Mathematical Sciences vol. 89 pp. 3 Ser. A 03). [7] R. Lopez M.I. Munteanu Minimal translation surfaces in Sol 3 J. Math. Soc. Japan 643) 0) [8] R. Lopez M. Moruz Translation and homothetical surfaces in Euclidean space with constant curvature J. Korean Math. Soc. 53) 05) [9] R. Lopez Minimal translation surfaces in hyperbolic space Beitr. Algebra Geom. 5) 0) 05-. [0] R. Lopez Separation of variables in equation of mean curvature type Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A Math. 465) 06) [] H. Meng H. Liu Factorable surfaces in Minkowski space Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 46) 009) [] Z. Milin-Sipus Translation surfaces of constant curvatures in a simply isotropic space Period. Math. Hung ) [3] Z. Milin-Sipus B. Divjak Curves in n dimensional k isotropic space Glasnik Matematicki 3353) 998) [4] Z. Milin-Sipus B. Divjak Involutes and evolutes in n dimensional simply isotropic space Zbornik radova 3) 999) 7-79.

12 MUHITTIN EVREN AYDIN AYLA ERDUR MAHMUT ERGUT 3 Properties FS of type FS of type AFS of type AFS of type z = c f u ); x = c f u ); z = c f y); x = c f z); K = 0 z = c e cx+c3y ; x = c e cy+c3z z = c e cx+c3u) ; x = c e cu+c3z ; ; z = c x c y c c. x = c y c z c c. z = c x c c c u x = c u c z c u = y +ax. u = y +az. H = 0 K = K 0 0 z = K 0 xy. Non-isotropic planes; z = c xy; z =c e cx +c 3 e cx ) c 4 cosc y)+c 5 sinc y)). H = H 0 0 z = H0 c y x =± Non-isotropic planes; x = ytanc z); x = cy z. x = ±z ; K0 y x = cfz) y z = c f z H 0 K0 c df. Non-isotropic planes; z =e cx [c sinc 3 u ) +c 4 cosc 5 u )] u = y +ax. x = K 0 xy +ax). z = H0 +a y +ax) ; z = H0 a xy +ax). c Non-isotropic planes. Non-existence. In the particular case f or f is linear x = H0 c y +az. In general case not yet known. Table. Factorable surfaces FS) and affine factorable surfaces AFS) in I 3 with KH constants.

13 AFFINE FACTORABLE SURFACES IN ISOTROPIC SPACES 3 [5] A.O. Ogrenmis Rotational surfaces in isotropic spaces satisfying Weingarten conditions Open Physics 49) 06) -5. [6] A. Onishchick R. Sulanke Projective and Cayley-Klein Geometries Springer 006. [7] H. Pottmann P. Grohs N.J. Mitra Laguerre minimal surfaces isotropic geometry and linear elasticity Adv. Comput. Math ) [8] H. Pottmann K. Opitz Curvature analysis and visualization for functions defined on Euclidean spaces or surfaces Comput. Aided Geom. Design 994) [9] A. Pressley Elementary Differential Geometry Springer-Verlag London 0. [30] H. Sachs Isotrope Geometrie des Raumes Vieweg Verlag Braunschweig 990. [3] K. Strubecker Uber die isotropen Gegenstucke der Minimalflache von Scherk J. Reine Angew. Math ) -5. [3] W. Thurston Three-dimensional geometry and topology Princenton Math. Ser. 35 Princenton Univ. Press Princenton NJ 997). [33] I. Van de Woestyne Minimal homothetical hypersurfaces of a semi-euclidean space Results. Math ) [34] I. M. Yaglom A simple non-euclidean Geometry and Its Physical Basis An elementary account of Galilean geometry and the Galilean principle of relativity Heidelberg Science Library. Translated from the Russian by Abe Shenitzer. With the editorial assistance of Basil Gordon. Springer-Verlag New York-Heidelberg 979. [35] D. W. Yoon Minimal translation surfaces in H R Taiwanese J. Math. 75) 03) [36] D. W. Yoon J. W. Lee Translation invariant surfaces in the 3-dimensional Heisenberg group Bull. Iranian Math. Soc. 406) 04) [37] D. W. Yoon C. W. Lee M.K. Karacan Some translation surfaces in the 3-dimensional Heisenberg group Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 504) 03) [38] Y. Yu and H. Liu The factorable minimal surfaces In: Proceedings of The Eleventh International Workshop on Diff. Geom. 007) [39] P. Zong L. Xiao H.L. Liu Affine factorable surfaces in three-dimensional Euclidean space Acta Math. Sinica Chinese Serie 58) 05) Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science Firat University Elazig 300 Turkey 3 Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science and Art Namik Kemal University Tekirdag 5900 Turkey address: meaydin@firat.edu.tr aerdur@nku.edu.tr mergut@nku.edu.tr