arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 31 Mar 2003

Transcription

1 Generation of Entangled N-Photon States in a Two-Mode Jaynes Cummings Model C. Wildfeuer and D. H. Schiller achbereich Physik Universität Siegen D-5768 Siegen Germany We describe a mathematical solution for the generation of entangled N-photon states in two field modes. A simple and compact solution is presented for a two-mode Jaynes Cummings model by combining the two field modes in a way that only one of the two resulting quasi-modes enters in the interaction term. The formalism developed is then applied to calculate various generation probabilities analytically. We show that entanglement starting from an initial field and an atom in one defined state may be obtained in a single step. We also show that entanglement may be built up in the case of an empty cavity and excited atoms whose final states are detected as well as in the case when the final states of the initially excited atoms are not detected. arxiv:quant-ph/38v 3 Mar 3 PACS numbers: 4.5.Dv 3.65.Ud 3.65.d Keywords: Nonclassical states of the electromagnetic field; entanglement generation; two-mode Jaynes Cummings model; algebraic solution. I. INTRODUCTION Entangled states are one of the building blocks in quantum information processing and non-locality tests []. They can be used in the case of the electromagnetic field to improve the sensitivity of interferometric measurements [ 3 4 5] and may help to overcome the classical Rayleigh diffraction limit in quantum optical lithography [6]. A feasible way to generate such states is given by the atom-field interaction in the framework of one- or two-mode Jaynes Cummings JC models [7 8 9 ]. Here we consider the generation of entangled two-mode field states by different schemes inspired partly by Refs. [7 8 3]. We let two-level atoms interact one at a time with two degenerate modes of a lossless cavity. Solving the corresponding JC model algebraically by an SU transformation we discuss the generation of entangled N-photon states of the general form = N k= c N k N kk which comprises the maximally entangled Bell states Ψ ± N = N± N. The field states are defined in terms of the usual two-mode ock states n n := n n with n n photons in mode one two. The two modes have the same energy and are in resonance with the two-level atom. We solve the model algebraically by combining the two field modes into two quasimodes of which only one enters in the interaction term yielding an effective one-mode JC model [4]. Using its known solution and the transformation between mode and quasi-mode ock states the generation probabilities of the entangled states are found for three different schemes. II. ALGEBRAIC SOLUTION O THE TWO-MODE JAYNES-CUMMINGS MODEL The JC Hamiltonian for resonant interaction of a two-level atom e g with two field modes a a in the dipole and rotating wave approximation is given by H = H H int where H H int σz = ω = a a a a σ g a g a σ g a g a 3. 4 Here σ z := e e g g σ := e g σ := g e and = e e g g are operators for the two-level atom g i is the coupling constant of the ith mode with the atom and ω is the photon energy. We introduce the quasi-mode operators A = γ a γ a A = γ a γ a 5 where γ i := g i /g and g := g g. Equation 5 defines an SU transformation of the mode operators a a leaving the commutation relations and the number-sum operator a a a a = A A A A invariant. The transformed Hamiltonian then reads H H int σz = ω = g σ A σ A 6 A A A A 7 representing a JC Hamiltonian for the quasi-mode A decoupled from the non-interacting quasi-mode A. Since H int depends only on quasi-mode one and [H H int ] = the time evolution operator Ut = exp ih int t/ in the interaction picture is the same as for a one-mode JC model. Expanding U in the atom basis{ e g} Electronic address: wildfeuer@physik.uni-siegen.de U = U ee e e U ge g e U eg e g U gg g g 8

2 the matrix elements U ab t are given by [5] sin τ A U ee = cos τ A A U ge = A A i A A sin τ A A U eg = A U gg = cos τ A i A A A where τ := gt is the dimensionless interaction time. The model can be solved in the usual way in terms of quasi-mode ock states defined as the common eigenstates of A A and A A. The complete solution is then found by giving the relation between the quasi-mode and the mode ock states. The quasi-mode operators A i A i i = obey the same algebra as the mode operators a i a i so that two-quasi-mode ock states denoted by a double-ket can be defined by 9 n n := A n A n. n!n! To find the transformation between the two-mode ock states n n and the two-quasi-mode ock states n n we use Schwinger s oscillator model [6] and introduce angular momentum states m and m where = n n / and m = n n /. In cases where it is not obvious we shall write a subindex S on the state vectors to indicate the Schwinger angular momentum basis e.g. = S. Inserting Eq. 5 into Eq. and identifying the two vacua and we obtain m m γ a γ a γ a γ a m :=. m! m! Expanding the products rearranging the terms [7] and using the definition of the ock basis n n in terms of a and a we obtain the important relation between the quasi-mode and the mode ock bases m = m = D ϕϑχ m m = D ϕϑχ m. m = Here D ϕϑχ = exp[ im ϕ mχ]d ϑ are the Wigner D-matrix elements of the SU group [6 7] with arguments determined by ϕ = ϕ ϕ χ = ϕ ϕ cosϑ/ := γ sinϑ/ := γ and γ i = γ i expiϕ i. It follows that the mode and quasi-mode ock states belonging to the same total number of photons n n = are related by an irreducible rotation matrix of weight and with Euler angles determined solely by the interaction constants. The action of U ab on the field states is easily calculated in the quasi-mode ock basis U ee τ m = cos τ m m U ge τ m = isin τ m m U eg τ m = isin τ m m U gg τ m = cos τ m m 3 showing that U ee and U gg do not change the number of quasiphotons whereas U ge U eg act as creation annihilation operators of quasi-mode one. Using Eq. and Eq. we find for the action on the usual ock states U ee τ m = U ge τ m = U eg τ m = U gg τ m = C τ m m = S τ m m = S τ m m = C τ m 4 m = where we have introduced the following coefficients C τ = cos τ ν D m νd νm ν= S S τ = i τ = i ν= ν= sin τ ν D D m ν νm sin τ ν D D m ν νm C τ = cos τ ν D m νd νm. 5 ν= Given the above equations we now have all the ingredients to calculate the time evolution of the density operator according to ρt= UtρU t. III. GENERATION O ENTANGLEMENT IN ONE STEP We start with the calculation of the probability to find at time τ the field state in Eq. assuming an initial field state ξ and an atom entering the cavity in either the excited or ground state. The analytical calculation is straightforward. The initial field state is expanded according to ξ= n = n = b n n n n = = m= b m m 6

3 3 where the primed summation symbol indicates a sum over integer and half integer values of. The expansion coefficients with respect to the ock and Schwinger basis are related by b m m = b m. The state is given in the Schwinger basis by Ö ± ½ ½¼ ¼½ ½½ ¾¼ ¼¾ = N/ m= N c N N m m S 7 with density operator ρ ΨN =. rom the timeevolved initial states U e;ξ = U ee e;ξu ge g;ξ U g;ξ = U eg e;ξu gg g;ξ we obtain the reduced density operator of the field by tracing out the atomic degrees of freedom: ρ a t = tr A Ut a;ξ a;ξ U t a=e or g. The probability to find at time t follows from ρ a = trρ a tρ and is given by ρ e N/ N/ = b N m c N C N m= N m = N m τ N / N/ b N m c N S N m τ 8 m= N m = N for the initial atom-field state e;ξ and by ρ g N/ N/ = b N m c N C N m= N m = N m τ N/ N/ b N m c N S N m τ m= N m = N 9 for the initial state g;ξ. It follows that in order to obtain nonvanishing probabilities at time τ the initial field state must contain at least one of the ock states from the set { N N... N} { N N... N } if the atom is initially in the excited state or from the set { N N... N} { N N... N } if it is in the ground state. or N= the set of contributing atom-field states according to Eq. is and according to Eq. { e; e;} { e;} { g; g;} { g; g; g;} Ø ¼¼ ½¼ ¼½ IG. : Parametric plot of the generation probabilities ρ Ψ solid and ρ Ψ dashed as function of time τ = gt for different initial atom-field states shown at the right. We illustrate the probabilities for the generation of Ψ ± = ± / in ig. where we have taken g = g ϕ = ϕ = real coupling constants. The states shown on the right are ust the initial atom-field states from Eqs. and 3. The interesting case is e; where the state Ψ is produced periodically with probability one at the times τ n = n//π for n=... Next we consider the creation of various Bell states Eq. resulting from the initial atom-field state e;n = e; N N. We obtain from Eq. 8 the entangled N-photon S field states Ψ ± N with probabilities ρ e Ψ ± N = C N N Nτ±C N N N τ 4 as well as the entangled N -photon states Ψ ± N with probabilities ρ e Ψ ± = N S N N Nτ±S N N Nτ. 5 In the case of Eqs. 5 the Bell states Ψ ± N have no overlap with the initial field state N. The probabilities at time τ however may come close to one for some particular values of the coupling constants and interaction time. In this case we may say that Ψ ± N have been generated in a single step or single shot. This property of the two-mode JC model can be understood if we think of the atom reemitting photons into and reabsorbing photons from the two modes many times during the interaction time τ. IV. CONDITIONAL GENERATION Next we present a conditional scheme for the generation of N-photon entangled states starting with an empty cavity [7 8]. The scheme implies sending consecutively atoms in the excited state through a two-mode cavity and detecting them in the ground state. We start with an initial atom-field state e; = e; S and let the first atom interact for a time τ. By using Eq. 3 we obtain the state Uτ e; S = cosτ e; S isinτ g; S.

4 4 Detecting the atom in the ground state leaves the field in the state χ = K isinτ S where K = sinτ expiα is a normalization constant. By choosing the phase α appropriately the factor entering the normalized state may be set equal to one yielding the state S. Proceeding this way the field state obtained after N conditional steps is simply given by χ N = N N N S = D N N ϕϑχ N kk 6 k= k N where we have used Eq. and ock-state notation on the r.h.s. This is precisely a state of the form given in Eq. with coefficients determined by the Wigner rotation matrix elements. Since these elements depend solely on the coupling constants the generated entangled state is sensitive to their magnitudes and phases. The state in Eq. 6 corresponds to the quasi-mode ock state N implying that each conditional step generates one photon in quasi-mode one. The generation probabilities of the states and Ψ ± N after N conditional steps are given by χ N = Ψ ± N χ N = N/ m= N c N N m D m N 7 N N ± D N. 8 D N N N We shall show that the probability to detect the atoms N times consecutively in the ground state is a rapidly decaying function of N. But as discussed below it is not essential to rely on this assumption. Actually it is sufficient to detect them in a sequence of n N steps N times in the ground state. V. NON-CONDITIONAL GENERATION In the following we consider a non-conditional scheme. We start with an empty cavity and send a sequence of excited atoms through it without detecting their final states. The reduced density operator of the field after the passage of the first atom interaction time τ is given by ρ τ = cos τ S sin τ S and serves as the initial field configuration for the second excited atom. Proceeding this way the reduced density operator of the field after n steps turns out to be of the form ρ n {τ n}= n/ = where the coefficients p n p n {τ n } S 9 are given recursively by p n = cos τ n p n p n = cos τ n p n sin τ n p n p n n/ = sin n τ n n p n / 3 for / n / and p =. The argument {τ n } stands for all interaction times τ...τ n of the n steps. Equation 9 which is obviously true for n = and n = see Eq. 3 can be proven by induction. The coefficients p n in Eq. 9 are the probabilities to find the field after n non-conditional steps in the quasi-mode state S. In particular p n = cos τ cos τ... cos n τ n n and p n/ = sin τ sin τ...sin τ n n correspond to the cases where in n steps the initially excited atoms emerge n times in the excited and ground state respectively. The intermediate p n s correspond to the cases where the n atoms emerge times in the ground state and n times in the excited state irrespective of the order of appearance. The coefficient p n consists of a sum of n terms each of which corresponds to a particular sequence of g s and e s contributing respectively a sine squared and cosine squared factor. There are altogether n terms in Eq. 9. All this is easily seen by giving ρ ρ as an example: = cos τ cos τ S cos τ sin τ sin τ cos τ S sin τ sin τ S. 3 Here the four terms correspond to the final state sequences ee eg ge and gg. The states and Ψ ± N are generated in a nonconditional n-step process with probabilities ρ ΨN = p n N ρ Ψ ±N N/ m= N = pn N D N N N ± D N c N N m D m N 3 33 N N which are the conditional probabilities found before multiplied by the probability p n N/. Here the interaction times must be chosen such that p n N/ which amounts to control the n parametersτ...τ n. The state can be generated in a minimum number of n=n steps with probability p N N/ which however is a rapidly decaying function of N. In the non-conditional scheme all field states S = for = /...n/ are produced Eq. 9. On the contrary in the conditional scheme only the entangled N- photon state N Eq. 6 is generated if in n steps N atoms are detected in the ground state. To produce it is therefore not crucial that the atoms have been detected N times consecutively in their ground state. Any sequence of ground and excited states containing N times the ground state will do it. inally we note that there is a particular choice of the interaction time of the lth atom given by τ l = π/ l for which both the conditional and non-conditional scheme give with probability one the same entangled state N in Eq. 6.

5 5 VI. CONCLUSION To conclude we have solved the two-mode JC model algebraically by reducing it to an effective one quasi-mode JC model. The mode and quasi-mode picture are unitarily related by an SU transformation. The solution found is used to discuss three different schemes for the generation of entangled states of the two field modes. To generate entangled N-photon states in a single step the initial state must contain at least N photons and an excited atom. Starting from the vacuum we need at least n N steps to produce pure mixed field states in the conditional non-conditional scheme presented. Acknowledgments C.W. acknowledges helpful discussions with H.D. Dahmen and thanks R.J. Glauber and H. Walther for their interest and encouragement expressed at ICAP. [] D. Bouwmeester A. Ekert and A. Zeilinger Eds. The Physics of Quantum Information Springer Verlag Berlin. [] B. Yurke S.L. McCall and J.R. Klauder Phys. Rev. A [3] M. Hillery and L. Mlodinow Phys. Rev. A [4] C. Brif and A. Mann Phys. Rev. A [5] J.P. Dowling Phys. Rev. A [6] A.N. Boto P. Kok D.S. Abrams S.L. Braunstein C.P. Williams and J.P. Dowling Phys. Rev. Lett [7] B. Deb G. Gangopadhyay and D.S. Ray Phys. Rev. A [8] M. Ikram S.-Y. Zhu and M.S. Zubairy Opt. Commun [9] A. Rauschenbeutel P. Bertet S. Osnaghi G. Nogues M. Brune J.M. Raimond and S. Haroche Phys. Rev. A [] E. Solano G.S. Agarwal and H. Walther quant-ph/7. [] J. iurášek Phys. Rev. A [] R.G. Unanyan and M. leischhauer Phys. Rev. A [3] K. Vogel V.M. Akulin and W.P. Schleich Phys. Rev. Lett [4] A. Quattropani Phys. kondens. Materie ; S.M. Dutra and P.L. Knight Phys. Rev. A ; G. Benivegna and A. Messina J. Phys. A 7 L ; J. Mod. Optics [5] M.O. Scully and M.S. Zubairy Quantum Optics Cambridge University Press. [6] J.J. Sakurai Modern Quantum Mechanics Addison-Wesley Reading Massachusetts 994. [7] E.P. Wigner Group Theory Academic Press New York 97.