arxiv:hep-th/ v1 4 Nov 1999

Transcription

1 Large Gauge Ward Identity arxiv:hep-th/991108v1 4 Nov 1999 Ahok Da Department o Phyic and Atronomy, Univerity o Rocheter, Rocheter, NY 1467 Gerald Dunne Department o Phyic, Technion - Irael Intitute o Technology, Haia 3000, Irael J. Frenkel Intituto de Fíica, Univeridade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP , Brazil. Abtract We tudy the quetion o the Ward identity or large gauge invariance in 0+1 dimenional theorie. We derive the relevant Ward identitie or a ingle lavor ermion and a ingle lavor complex calar ield interacting with an Abelian gauge ield. Thee identitie are nonlinear. The Ward identity or any other complicated theory can be derived rom thee baic et o identitie. However, the tructure o the Ward identity change ince thee are nonlinear identitie. In particular, we work out the large gauge Ward identity or a uperymmetric theory involving a ingle lavor o ermion a well a a complex calar ield. Contrary to the eective action or the individual theorie, the olution o the Ward identity in the uperymmetric theory involve an ininity o Fourier component mode. We comment on which eature o thi analyi are likely/unlikely to generalize to the + 1 dimenional theory. permanent addre: Department o Phyic, Univerity o Connecticut, Storr, CT

2 1 Introduction: The quetion o large gauge invariance at inite temperature ha been a very intereting one or everal year now [1]. It i well known that the Chern-Simon action in an odd dimenional non- Abelian gauge theory i not invariant under large gauge tranormation []. Rather, it hit by a contant proportional to the topological winding number aociated with the large gauge tranormation. To be peciic, conider the three dimenional Chern-Simon action S CS = M d 3 xtrǫ µνλ A µ ν A λ + g 3 A νa λ ) 1) where A µ i a matrix valued gauge ield in ome repreentation o the gauge algebra. Then, under a gauge tranormation A µ U 1 A µ U + 1 g U 1 µ U the Chern-Simon action change a S CS S CS 4πM g πw ) where W i the winding number o the gauge tranormation deined to be W = 1 4π d 3 xtrǫ µνλ µ UU 1 ν UU 1 λ UU 1 3) The winding number i a topological number integer) and unle the gauge tranormation belong to the trivial topology cla, it i clear that the Chern-Simon action will not be gauge invariant. However, i the coeicient o the Chern-Simon term i quantized in unit o g 4π, then the path integral, which involve expis CS ), will be invariant and we can deine a conitent quantum theory []. Chern-Simon action can be induced radiatively, with a perturbatively calculable coeicient. For example, or maive ermion interacting with a gauge ield at zero temperature, radiative correction due to the ermion induce a Chern-Simon term with a coeicient 1 g in unit o 4π or every lavor) [3]. Taking into account the intrinic global anomaly [4], the eective action i in act invariant. Alternatively, we can imply conider an even number o ermion lavor. Thee radiative correction at inite temperature are even more intereting. At one loop, in the tatic limit, they induce a Chern-Simon term with a temperature dependent coeicient [5] uch that M M g 8π m m tanh β m where β i the invere temperature in unit o the Boltzmann contant). Thi i now a continuou unction o temperature and, conequently, it can no longer be quantized in unit o g 4π even or an even number o ermion lavor. It would appear, thereore, that large gauge invariance would be lot at inite temperature which i quite myteriou ince gauge invariance ha no direct relation with temperature. 4)

3 An intereting poible reolution to thi puzzle come rom a tudy o the Chern-Simon theory in 0+1 dimenion [6] which ha all the eature o the +1 dimenional theory and yet i much impler o that the theory can be exactly olved. It wa oberved there that, at inite temperature, the radiative correction give rie to an ininite number o non-extenive term beide the induced Chern-Simon term and that the eective action due to radiative correction can be exactly ummed in a cloed orm. Thi ha to be contrated with the cae at zero temperature, where the only nontrivial radiative correction wa the Chern-Simon term. Furthermore, it wa oberved that the ummed eective action at inite temperature i invariant under large gauge tranormation once the tree level coeicient i quantized and we have an even number o ermion lavor. Thi i, indeed, quite intereting ince it point out that even when the Chern-Simon term itel may violate large gauge invariance, there may be other term in the eective action which can compenate to make the total eective action gauge invariant. Thi mechanim extend [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 1] to +1 dimenional Abelian theorie or a retricted cla o tatic background A µ = A 0 t), A x)). However, thi i not the ull anwer, ince or thee background and or their trivial non-abelian generalization) the large gauge tranormation in act have zero winding number - the hit in the Chern-Simon action come rom a total derivative term, not rom the winding number piece. Furthermore, uch background only addre the tatic limit, while the non-tatic limit i known to be very dierent [13, 14]. O coure, calculation are more diicult in the +1 dimenional theory and one doe not expect to be able to um all the term in the eective action o thi theory. Thereore, to tudy the problem o large gauge invariance in thi theory, we mut develop a ytematic procedure. The natural idea, o coure, would be to write a Ward identity or large gauge invariance, which relate dierent amplitude and, thereore, can be perturbatively checked even i the complete eective action i diicult to evaluate. It i with thi in mind that we have choen to tudy the quetion o the Ward identity or large gauge tranormation in the dimenion. Clearly, the derivation o the Ward identity or gauge tranormation which are topologically nontrivial i hard, but, at leat, in dimenion, we have the exact eective action in cloed orm and, thereore, uch theorie provide a natural tarting point. In thi paper, we carry out uch a tudy in detail. In ection, we recapitulate briely all the relevant act known rom the tudie in the dimenional theorie. In ection 3, we try to derive the relevant Ward identity or a ingle lavor ermion theory rom the eective action, directly by brute orce. A we will how, thi i quite hard ince the Ward identitie are extremely nonlinear. An alternate method i to look at the Ward identitie in term o the exponential o the eective action which we do in ection 4. Thee identitie are linear and eaier to handle. O coure, the nonlinearity creep in when we tranorm back to the eective action.) The nonlinearity o thee identitie bring in many intereting eature which we are not ued to. Thu, or example, unlike the Ward identitie or mall gauge invariance, here the identitie do not obey uperpoition. Conequently, i a theory ha two ditinct ector, the um o the eective action coming rom the two ector doe not have the ame tructure o the identity a atiied by the individual contribution. We point out all uch eature and preent a brie concluion in ection 5 pointing out which eature are likely/unlikely to extend to the + 1 dimenional theory. 3

4 Recapitulation o Reult: We irt recapitulate all the relevant reult known rom tudie in dimenional theorie. Recall that the theory o maive ermion with N lavor interacting with an Abelian gauge ield including a Chern-Simon term i decribed by the action We aume m > 0 or implicity.) S ermion = dtψi t m A)ψ κ dt A 5) where we have uppreed the lavor index or the ermion and we note that the lat term i the Chern-Simon term in dimenion. It i worth emphaizing that even though the gauge ield here i Abelian, thi theory ha all the propertie o a +1 dimenional non-abelian theory. Under a gauge tranormation, ψ e iλ ψ, A A+ t λ, the ermion action i invariant, but the complete action change: S ermion S ermion κπn 6) where N i the appropriate winding number and it i clear that the tree level coeicient κ o the Chern-Simon term mut be quantized or the theory to be conitent. The ma term or the ermion break charge conjugation invariance and, conequently, the radiative correction due to the ermion generate a Chern-Simon term at inite temperature modiying the coeicient a κ κ N tanh βm Thi i analogou to the behavior in the +1 dimenional theory. In particular, we note that, at zero temperature β ) with an even number o lavor, thi i compatible with the quantization o the coeicient o Chern-Simon term, but it poe a problem at inite temperature uggeting that gauge invariancce may be violated i the temperature i nonzero. 7) In thi cae, o coure, the eective action can be exactly evaluated and ha the orm [6, 15] Γ = Γ N ) κa = in log coh βm+ia) coh βm = in log co a +itanh βm in a κa ) κa 8) where we have deined We have normalized the eective action o that it vanihe or A = 0.) a = dtat) 9) There are everal thing to note rom the orm o thi eective action. Firt, thi i a non-extenive action involve power o an integrated quantity). Non-extenive action do not arie at zero temperature rom requirement o locality, but locality i not necearily repected at inite temperature. In act, it i eaily een rom mall gauge invariance that, in thi theory, i higher order term do not vanih, the eective action mut be non-extenive. For example, let u note [15] that 4

5 i we have a quadratic term in the eective action, o the orm S q = 1 dt1 dt At 1 )Ft 1 t )At ), then invariance under mall gauge tranormation would require δs q = dt 1 dt t1 λft 1 t )At ) = dt 1 dt λ t1 Ft 1 t )At ) = 0 10) whoe general olution i F = contant. I the contant i nonzero, the quadratic action become non-extenive a quadratic unction o a). Thu, one o the important eature o thi theory i that Γ N ) and, thereore, Γ i a unction o a. Thi imple eature i unlikely to generalize to the + 1 dimenional theory. In act, it i already known [16] that thi doe not hold even in dimenion becaue the Ward identitie or mall gauge invariance are not retrictive enough. Another eature to note i that, under a large gauge tranormation, or which a a+πn, 11) the eective action coming rom the radiative correction due to the ermion tranorm a Γ N ) a) Γ N ) a+πn) = Γ N ) a)+πn N 1) o that the theory continue to be well deined or an even number o ermion lavor. That i, even though the coeicient o the Chern-Simon term i no longer quantized at inite temperature, the noninvariance o thi term i completely compenated or by all the higher order term in the eective action. In act, the mot important thing to oberve in thi connection i that the inhomogeneou tranormation o the ermion eective action i independent o temperature, a we hould expect ince gauge tranormation are not related to temperature. In dimenion, we alo know the reult or the eective action o a maive, complex calar ield interacting with the Abelian gauge ield [17]. Conider the theory with action ) S calar = dt t ia)φ t +ia)φ m φ φ κ dt A 13) where, we have again uppreed the number o lavor or implicity. The ma term in thi theory doe not break parity and, conequently, there i no Chern-Simon term generated. In act, at zero temperature, the radiative correction due to the calar ield identically vanihe which ollow rom a combination o invariance under mall gauge tranormation and the abence o parity violation. Nonethele, at inite temperature, the eective action coming rom the calar ield i nontrivial and ha the orm Γ N ) = in log = in log βm+ia) inh inh βm ia) inh βm ) cohβm coa) inh βm/) = in log co a βm a ) +coth in We ee that even though there i no Chern-Simon term, we would have run into the problem o large gauge invariance had we done a perturbative calculation and looked at the quadratic term 14) 5

6 alone. The eective action, once again, i non-extenive and i a unction o a, namely, Γ = Γ a). Furthermore, under a large gauge tranormation, Γ N ) a) Γ N ) a+πn) = Γ N ) a) 15) Namely, the action i invariant independent o the temperature. Finally, conider a imple uperymmetric model in dimenion, with action [17] S uper = dt + ) t ia)φ t +ia)φ m φ φ+ψi t m A)ψ 1 dt A+ θ) + i ) λ+ξ) λ+ ξ) κ dt A 16) Here, in addition to the uual calar and ermionic ield with identical number o lavor, we alo have a tuckelberg multiplet o ield. The eective action or thi theory i quite imple where we recognize that Γ = Γ N ) uya)+ 1 dt A+ θ) + i ) λ+ξ) λ+ ξ) κ dt A 17) Γ N ) uya) = Γ N ) a)+γ N ) a) = in log inh βm co a +itanh βm in a ) cohβm coa) 18) and the tranormation propertie ollow rom our earlier dicuion. With thee baic, we are now ready to get into the quetion o the Ward identity or large gauge invariance. 3 Ward Identity Hard Way): To begin with, let u conider the model or a ingle lavor) maive ermion interacting with an Abelian gauge ield. The Lagrangian i trivially obtained rom eq. 5). Let u denote by Γ 1) the eective action which reult rom integrating out the ermion. From the general argument o the lat ection, we know that thi eective action will be a unction o a uch that under a large gauge tranormation a) Γ1) a+πn) = Γ1) a)+πn 19) Γ 1) The Taylor expanion o thi relation give n=1m=0 a m πn) n m!n! n+m Γ 1) n+m = πn 0) 6

7 Thi i an ininite number o contraint which can alo be rewritten in the orm πn) n n Γ 1) n! n = πn a m m! n=1 πn) n n=1 n! n+m Γ 1) n+m = 0 or m > 0 1) Solving thi et o equation i tediou, but with a little bit o work, we can determine that the implet relation which will atiy the ininity o relation ha the orm Thi i, however, not the mot general relation a we will dicu later in the cae o the uperymmetric theory.) Γ 1) = i 1 4 Γ1) ) Thi relation a well a the one ollowing rom it) can be checked explicitly or the irt ew low order amplitude o the theory [15, 18] and, conequently, eq. ) can be thought o a the Ward identity or large gauge invariance or better yet, the Mater equation rom which all the relevant relation can be obtained by taking urther derivative with repect to a). Thi relate higher point unction to lower one a we would expect a Ward identity to do and mut hold at zero a well a nonzero temperature. However, unlike conventional Ward identitie aociated with mall gauge invariance, we note that thi relation i nonlinear. In ome ene, thi i to be expected or large gauge tranormation and we comment on the conequence o thi eature later. We note rom the explicit orm o the eective action determined earlier ee eq. 8) or N = 1) that eq. ) indeed hold or the ingle lavor ermion theory. Let u alo note here that all the higher point unction can be determined rom the Ward identity in eq. ) in term o the one point unction which ha to be calculated rom the theory and i known to be [15, 18] Γ 1) = 1 tanh βm It ollow rom thi uing the identity in eq. )) that, at zero temperature, the two point and all other higher point unction vanih. In act, rom the Ward identity ), we can determine the orm o the eective action to be recall that Γ a = 0) = 0) Γ 1) a) = ilog co a Γ1) +i 3) in a 4) Namely, the eective action can be completely determined rom the knowledge o the one point unction which, o coure, coincide with the exact calculation. It i clear, however, that thi way o deriving the Ward identity i extremely hard and, in particular, i the theory i complicated remember that o ar we have only conidered a ingle lavor o maive ermion), then, it may be much more diicult to determine the Ward identity. 7

8 4 Simple Derivation o the Ward Identity: To ind a impler way o deriving the large gauge Ward identity, let u deine Γa) = ilogwa) 5) where the upper ign i or a ermion theory while the lower one correpond to a calar theory. Namely, we are intereted in looking at the exponential o the eective action i.e. up to a actor o i, W i the baic determinant that would arie rom integrating out a particular ield). Once again, we will retrict ourelve to a ingle lavor maive ermion or a ingle lavor maive complex calar ince any other theory can be obtained rom thee baic component. The advantage o tudying Wa) a oppoed to the eective action lie in the act that, in order or Γa) to have the right tranormation propertie under a large gauge tranormation ee eq. 1),14)), Wa) imply ha to be quai-periodic. Conequently, rom the tudy o harmonic ocillator a well a Floquet theory), we ee that Wa) ha to atiy a imple equation o the orm Wa) +ν Wa) = g 6) where ν and g are parameter to be determined rom the theory. In particular, let u note that the contant g can depend on parameter o the theory uch a temperature wherea we expect the parameter ν, alo known a the characteritic exponent, to be independent o temperature and equal to an odd hal integer or a ermionic mode or an integer or a calar mode. However, all thee propertie hould automatically reult rom the tructure o the theory. Let u alo note here that the relation 6) i imply the equation or a orced ocillator whoe olution ha the general orm Wa) = g ν +Acoνa+δ) = g ν +α 1coνa+α inνa 7) The contant α 1 and α appearing in the olution can again be determined rom the theory. Namely, rom the relation between Wa) and Γa), we recognize that we can identiy ν α 1 = W Γ ) ) = i Γ να = W = ±i Γ 8) From the general propertie o the calar and ermion theorie we have dicued, we intuitively expect g = 0 and α, = 0. However, thee hould really ollow rom the tructure o the theory and they do, a we will how hortly. The identity 6) i a linear relation a oppoed to the Ward identity ) in term o the eective action, and hold both or a ermionic a well a a calar mode. In act, rewriting thi in term o the eective action uing eq. 5)), we have ) Γa) Γa) ) = ±i ν ige iγa) 9) 8

9 Thi i reminicent o the identity in eq. ), but i not identical. So, let u invetigate thi a little bit more in detail, irt or a ermionic mode. In thi cae, we know that the ermion ma term break parity and, conequently, the radiative correction would generate a Chern-Simon term, namely, in thi theory, we expect the one-point unction to be nonzero. Conequently, by taking derivative o eq. 9) a well a remembering that Γa = 0) = 0), we determine ν 1) ) = g 1) Γ1) 3i Γ 1) Γ1) = i Γ 1) 1 + Γ1) 3 Γ 1) Γ 1) 3 Thi i quite intereting, or it ay that the two parameter in eq. 6) or 9) can be determined rom a perturbative calculation. Let u note here ome o the perturbative reult in thi theory [15, 18], namely, Γ 1) Γ 1) 3 Γ 1) 3 = 1 tanh βm = i 4 echβm = 1 4 tanh βm echβm Uing thee, we immediately determine rom eq. 30) that 30) 31) ν 1) ) = 1 4, g1) = 0 3) o that the equation 9) coincide with ) or a ingle ermion lavor. Furthermore, we determine now rom eq. 8) The two ign in o α 1), α 1) 1, = 1, α1), = ±i tanh βm 33) imply correpond to the two poible ign o ν1). With thi then, we can olve or Wa) in the ingle lavor ermion theory and we have independent o the ign o ν 1) ) W 1) a) = co a +i tanh βm in a 34) which can be compared with eq. 8). For a calar theory, however, we know that the ma term doe not break parity. Conequently, we do not expect a Chern-Simon term to be generated imply rom ymmetry argument. In act, 9

10 in the calar theory with parity a a ymmetry, there cannot be any odd term in a) in the eective action. Conequently, taking derivative o eq. 9) and keeping thi in mind, we obtain ν 1) ) = 3i Γ 1) Γ 1) ) 1 4 Γ 1) 4 g 1) = i Γ 1) Γ 1) ) 1 4 Γ 1) 4 Once again, we ee that the two parameter in the Ward identity can be determined rom the irt two nontrivial amplitude o the theory. For the calar theory, the neceary nontrivial amplitude can be eaily computed[17]. Calculationally, the calar theory coincide with two ermionic theorie with mae o oppoite ign i we neglect the negative ign aociated with ermion loop. The amplitude can alo be determined rom the explicit orm o the eective action in eq. 14).) It ollow rom thi that Γ 1) 4 Γ 1) 4 = i inh βm/) i = inh 1+ βm/) ν 1) ) = 1, g 1) = ) 3 inh βm/) coh βm inh βm/) Thi i indeed conitent with our expectation. Furthermore, we now determine rom eq. 8) o that we can write Thi can be compared with eq. 14). α 1) 1, = 1 inh βm/), W 1) a) = cohβm coa) inh βm/) 35) 36) 37) α1), = 0 38) 39) Thu, we ee that the Ward identitie or the ingle lavor ermion and calar theorie are given, in term o the eective action, repectively by Γ 1) = i 1 4 Γ1) Γ 1) = i 1 ) 1) Γ + icohβm inh βm/) eiγ 1) 40) A we have already pointed out, thee are nonlinear identitie and, thereore, uperpoition doe not hold. In act, even i we are conidering only ermion or calar) o N lavor, the identity 10

11 modiie in a nontrivial manner which can be derived by imply noting that W 1) = e ±i/n )Γ N ) ), namely, Γ N ) = in ΓN ) N Γ N ) = in 1 1 N ΓN ) in cohβm + inh βm/) e i Γ N ) N 41) Incidentally, let u note that although the Ward identity i linear in Wa), or N lavor W N ) i a product o W 1), not a um, and o uperpoition i lot. It i clear, thereore, that while the Ward identity i imple or the baic ermion and calar mode, or arbitrary combination o thee mode, the identity i bound to be much more complicated. However, we can till derive the Ward identity rom the baic identitie or a ingle lavor ermion and calar theory. Thu, a a imple example, let u conider the uperymmetric theory dicued in ection ee eq )) or a ingle lavor. In thi cae, we have imply a um o a ermionic and a complex boonic degree o reedom, and deining where Γ 1) uy a) = ilogw1) uy a) 4) a) W uya) 1) = W1) W 1) a) we ee that we can no longer write a ingle identity or W 1) uya). Rather, we will have a coupled et o identitie, one o which, ay the one or the ermion will be decoupled. 43) On the other hand, ince the ermion equation i uncoupled and can be olved ee eq. 34)), we can ue the olution to write a ingle identity or W uya) 1) and, thereore, Γ 1) uya): i Γ 1) uy + Γ 1) uy ) 3 4 = tanh βm+ia ) Γ1) uy cohβmcoh βm e iγ1) uy 44) inh βm βm+ia) coh Thi i very dierent rom eq. ) and yet atiie the ininite et o contraint in eq. 1). Let u note here that the invariance propertie o Γ 1) uya) i the ame a that or a ingle lavor ermion theory.) Thu, a we had mentioned earlier, the identity or a baic ingle lavor theory i impler. The identitie ollowing rom eq. 44) can be perturbatively checked. In act, the identity can even be olved in the ollowing way. Conider eq. 44). Uing the method o Fourier decompoition, it 11

12 i een ater ome algebra that the olution to eq. 44) ha the orm W 1) uya) = 1 e βm ) k=0 e kβm [ cok + 1 )a+itanh βm ink + 1 )a ] 45) It i intereting that even or thi imple model, which contain jut a ingle lavor o ermion and a complex calar, Wa) become a um over ininitely many ditinct Fourier mode a oppoed to the cae o either a ingle ermion or a ingle complex calar where Wa) involve only a ingle Fourier component. Let u note here that, although W uya) 1) in eq. 45) appear dierent rom that in eq. 18), the erie in 45) can, in act, be ummed [19] and coincide with the reult in 18) or a ingle lavor. 5 Concluion: In thi paper, we have ytematically tudied the quetion o large gauge invariance, in the dimenional Chern-Simon theory. The eective action, in dimenion, are unction o a = dtat) which i a conequence o Ward identitie or mall gauge invariance and make the derivation o the large gauge identitie relatively imple. Thi i a eature that we do not expect to generalize to + 1 dimenion, except or pecial tatic background. Explicitly, we have derived the large gauge Ward identitie or a ingle lavor ermion theory a well a a ingle lavor complex calar theory interacting with an Abelian gauge ield. Thee identitie are imple, but nonlinear. The Ward identity or any other theory can be derived rom them and i, in general, more complicated becaue o the nonlinear nature o the identitie. In particular, we have hown that the olution o the Ward identity or a ingle lavor ermion theory or a ingle lavor complex calar theory involve a ingle characteritic index and i imple while or a more complex theory even or a um o jut a ingle ermion and a ingle calar), it involve a um over an ininity o Fourier mode. Thi i a eature which we believe would generalize to +1 dimenion. Acknowledgment Thi work wa upported in part by the U.S. Dept. o Energy Grant DE-FG 0-91ER40685, NSF-INT a well a CNPq. GD acknowledge the upport o the DOE under grant DE- FG0-9ER , and thank the Technion Phyic Department or it hopitality. Reerence 1

13 [1] G. Dunne, Apect o Chern-Simon Theorie, in Topological Apect o Low Dimenional Sytem, Le Houche Summer School, July [] S. Deer, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton, Ann. Phy ) 37. [3] A. N. Redlich, Phy. Rev. D9 1984) 366. [4] E. Witten, Phy. Lett. 117B 198) 34. [5] K. Babu, A. Da and P. Panigrahi, Phy. Rev. D ) 375; E. Poppitz, Phy. Lett. B5 1990) 417; I. Aitchion, C. Foco and J. Zuk, Phy. Rev. D ) 5895; I. Aitchion and J. Zuk, Ann. Phy ) 77. [6] G. Dunne, K. Lee and C. Lu, Phy. Rev. Lett ) [7] S. Deer, L. Griguolo and D. Seminara, Phy. Rev. Lett ) 1976; S. Deer, L. Griguolo and D. Seminara, Phy. Rev. D ) 7444; S. Deer, L. Griguolo and D. Seminara, Comm. Math. Phy ) 443. [8] C. Foco, G. Roini and F. Schaponik, Phy. Rev. Lett ) 1980, Erratum), ibid ) 496; C. Foco, G. Roini and F. Schaponik, Phy. Rev. D ) 6547; C. Foco, G. Roini and F. Schaponik, Phy. Rev. D ) [9] I. Aitchion and C. Foco, Phy. Rev. D ) [10] R. González-Felipe, Phy. Lett. B ) 114. [11] L.L. Salcedo, hep-th/ [1] M. Hott and G. Metika, hep-ph/ [13] Y-C. Kao and M-F. Yang, Phy. Rev. D ) 730. [14] A. Da and G. Dunne, Phy.Rev. D ) [15] A. Da and G. Dunne, Phy. Rev. D ) 503. [16] A. Da and A.J. da Silva, Phy. Rev. D ) [17] J. Barcelo-Neto and A. Da, Phy. Rev. D ) [18] J. Barcelo-Neto and A. Da, Phy. Rev. D ) [19] I.S. Gradhteyn and I.M. Ryzik, Table o Integral, Academic Pre1965), ee, e.g., ormula