Green s functions in N-body quantum mechanics A mathematical perspective

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Green s functions in N-body quantum mechanics A mathematical perspective"

Transcription

1 Green s functions in N-body quantum mechanics A mathematical perspective Eric CANCES Ecole des Ponts and INRIA, Paris, France Aussois, June 19th, 2015

2 Outline of the course 2 1 Linear operators 2 Electronic Hamiltonians 3 One-body Green s function and self-energy 4 The dynamically screened Coulomb operator W 5 Hedin s equations and the GW approximation A1 Fourier transform A2 Causal functions, Hilbert transform and Kramers-Kronig relations

3 1 - Linear operators References: EB Davies, Linear operators and their spectra, Cambridge University Press 2007 B Helffer, Spectral theory and its applications, Cambridge University Press 2013 M Reed and B Simon, Modern methods in mathematical physics, Vol 1, 2nd edition, Academic Press 1980 Notation: in this section, H denotes a separable complex Hilbert space, its scalar product, and the associated norm

4 1 - Linear operators 4 The finite dimensional case (H = C d ) The spectrum of a matrix A C d d is the finite set σ(a) = { z C (z A) C d d non-invertible }

5 1 - Linear operators 4 The finite dimensional case (H = C d ) The spectrum of a matrix A C d d is the finite set σ(a) = { z C (z A) C d d non-invertible } As C d is finite dimensional, (z A) non-invertible (z A) non-injective: σ(a) = { z C x C d \ {0} st Ax = zx } = {eigenvalues of A}

6 1 - Linear operators 4 The finite dimensional case (H = C d ) The spectrum of a matrix A C d d is the finite set σ(a) = { z C (z A) C d d non-invertible } As C d is finite dimensional, (z A) non-invertible (z A) non-injective: σ(a) = { z C x C d \ {0} st Ax = zx } = {eigenvalues of A} A matrix A C d d is called hermitian if A = A (ie A ij = A ji, 1 i, j d)

7 1 - Linear operators 4 The finite dimensional case (H = C d ) The spectrum of a matrix A C d d is the finite set σ(a) = { z C (z A) C d d non-invertible } As C d is finite dimensional, (z A) non-invertible (z A) non-injective: σ(a) = { z C x C d \ {0} st Ax = zx } = {eigenvalues of A} A matrix A C d d is called hermitian if A = A (ie A ij = A ji, 1 i, j d) Key properties of hermitian matrices: the spectrum of a hermitian matrix is real: σ(a) R;

8 1 - Linear operators 4 The finite dimensional case (H = C d ) The spectrum of a matrix A C d d is the finite set σ(a) = { z C (z A) C d d non-invertible } As C d is finite dimensional, (z A) non-invertible (z A) non-injective: σ(a) = { z C x C d \ {0} st Ax = zx } = {eigenvalues of A} A matrix A C d d is called hermitian if A = A (ie A ij = A ji, 1 i, j d) Key properties of hermitian matrices: the spectrum of a hermitian matrix is real: σ(a) R; any hermitian matrix A can be diagonalized in an orthonormal basis: d A = λ i x i x i, λ i σ(a) R, x i R d, x i x j = δ ij, Ax i = λ i x i ; i=1

9 1 - Linear operators 4 The finite dimensional case (H = C d ) The spectrum of a matrix A C d d is the finite set σ(a) = { z C (z A) C d d non-invertible } As C d is finite dimensional, (z A) non-invertible (z A) non-injective: σ(a) = { z C x C d \ {0} st Ax = zx } = {eigenvalues of A} A matrix A C d d is called hermitian if A = A (ie A ij = A ji, 1 i, j d) Key properties of hermitian matrices: the spectrum of a hermitian matrix is real: σ(a) R; any hermitian matrix A can be diagonalized in an orthonormal basis: d A = λ i x i x i, λ i σ(a) R, x i R d, x i x j = δ ij, Ax i = λ i x i ; i=1 there exists a functional calculus for hermitian matrices

10 1 - Linear operators 5 Functional calculus for hermitian matrices Let A be a hermitian matrix of C d d such that d A = λ i x i x i, λ i σ(a) R, x i C d, x i x j = δ ij, Ax i = λ i x i i=1

11 1 - Linear operators 5 Functional calculus for hermitian matrices Let A be a hermitian matrix of C d d such that d A = λ i x i x i, λ i σ(a) R, x i C d, x i x j = δ ij, Ax i = λ i x i i=1 For any f : R C, the matrix d f(a) := f(λ i )x i x i is independent of the choice of the spectral decomposition of A i=1

12 1 - Linear operators 5 Functional calculus for hermitian matrices Let A be a hermitian matrix of C d d such that d A = λ i x i x i, λ i σ(a) R, x i C d, x i x j = δ ij, Ax i = λ i x i i=1 For any f : R C, the matrix d f(a) := f(λ i )x i x i i=1 is independent of the choice of the spectral decomposition of A Functional calculus can be extended to self-adjoint operators in Hilbert spaces Functional calculus is extremely useful in quantum physics, eg to define the propagator e ith associated with a Hamiltonian H; 1 the density matrix of a fermionic system at temperature 1 + e (H ε F)/(k B T ) T and chemical potential (Fermi level) ε F

13 1 - Linear operators 6 Bounded linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition-Theorem (bounded linear operator) A bounded operator on H is a linear map A : H H such that Au A := u < sup u H\{0}

14 1 - Linear operators 6 Bounded linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition-Theorem (bounded linear operator) A bounded operator on H is a linear map A : H H such that Au A := u < sup u H\{0} The set B(H) of the bounded operators on H is a non-commutative algebra and is a norm on B(H)

15 1 - Linear operators 6 Bounded linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition-Theorem (bounded linear operator) A bounded operator on H is a linear map A : H H such that Au A := u < sup u H\{0} The set B(H) of the bounded operators on H is a non-commutative algebra and is a norm on B(H) Remark A bounded linear operator is uniquely defined by the values of the sesquilinear form H H (u, v) u Av C

16 1 - Linear operators 6 Bounded linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition-Theorem (bounded linear operator) A bounded operator on H is a linear map A : H H such that Au A := u < sup u H\{0} The set B(H) of the bounded operators on H is a non-commutative algebra and is a norm on B(H) Remark A bounded linear operator is uniquely defined by the values of the sesquilinear form H H (u, v) u Av C Definition-Theorem (adjoint of a bounded linear operator) Let A B(H) The operator A B(H) defined by is called the adjoint of A (u, v) H H, u A v = Au v,

17 1 - Linear operators 6 Bounded linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition-Theorem (bounded linear operator) A bounded operator on H is a linear map A : H H such that Au A := u < sup u H\{0} The set B(H) of the bounded operators on H is a non-commutative algebra and is a norm on B(H) Remark A bounded linear operator is uniquely defined by the values of the sesquilinear form H H (u, v) u Av C Definition-Theorem (adjoint of a bounded linear operator) Let A B(H) The operator A B(H) defined by (u, v) H H, u A v = Au v, is called the adjoint of A The operator A is called self-adjoint if A = A

18 1 - Linear operators 6 Bounded linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition-Theorem (bounded linear operator) A bounded operator on H is a linear map A : H H such that Au A := u < sup u H\{0} The set B(H) of the bounded operators on H is a non-commutative algebra and is a norm on B(H) Remark A bounded linear operator is uniquely defined by the values of the sesquilinear form H H (u, v) u Av C Definition-Theorem (adjoint of a bounded linear operator) Let A B(H) The operator A B(H) defined by (u, v) H H, u A v = Au v, is called the adjoint of A The operator A is called self-adjoint if A = A Endowed with its norm and the operation, B(H) is a C -algebra

19 1 - Linear operators 7 (Non necessarily bounded) linear operators on Hilbert spaces

20 1 - Linear operators 7 (Non necessarily bounded) linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition (linear operator) A linear operator on H is a linear map A : D(A) H, where D(A) is a subspace of H called the domain of A

21 1 - Linear operators 7 (Non necessarily bounded) linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition (linear operator) A linear operator on H is a linear map A : D(A) H, where D(A) is a subspace of H called the domain of A Note that bounded linear operators are particular linear operators

22 1 - Linear operators 7 (Non necessarily bounded) linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition (linear operator) A linear operator on H is a linear map A : D(A) H, where D(A) is a subspace of H called the domain of A Note that bounded linear operators are particular linear operators Definition (extensions of operators) Let A 1 and A 2 be operators on H A 2 is called an extension of A 1 if D(A 1 ) D(A 2 ) and if u D(A 1 ), A 2 u = A 1 u

23 1 - Linear operators 7 (Non necessarily bounded) linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition (linear operator) A linear operator on H is a linear map A : D(A) H, where D(A) is a subspace of H called the domain of A Note that bounded linear operators are particular linear operators Definition (extensions of operators) Let A 1 and A 2 be operators on H A 2 is called an extension of A 1 if D(A 1 ) D(A 2 ) and if u D(A 1 ), A 2 u = A 1 u Definition (unbounded linear operator) An operator A on H which does not possess a bounded extension is called an unbounded operator on H

24 1 - Linear operators 7 (Non necessarily bounded) linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition (linear operator) A linear operator on H is a linear map A : D(A) H, where D(A) is a subspace of H called the domain of A Note that bounded linear operators are particular linear operators Definition (extensions of operators) Let A 1 and A 2 be operators on H A 2 is called an extension of A 1 if D(A 1 ) D(A 2 ) and if u D(A 1 ), A 2 u = A 1 u Definition (unbounded linear operator) An operator A on H which does not possess a bounded extension is called an unbounded operator on H Definition (symmetric operator) A linear operator A on H with dense domain D(A) is called symmetric if (u, v) D(A) D(A), Au v = u Av

25 1 - Linear operators 7 (Non necessarily bounded) linear operators on Hilbert spaces Definition (linear operator) A linear operator on H is a linear map A : D(A) H, where D(A) is a subspace of H called the domain of A Note that bounded linear operators are particular linear operators Definition (extensions of operators) Let A 1 and A 2 be operators on H A 2 is called an extension of A 1 if D(A 1 ) D(A 2 ) and if u D(A 1 ), A 2 u = A 1 u Definition (unbounded linear operator) An operator A on H which does not possess a bounded extension is called an unbounded operator on H Definition (symmetric operator) A linear operator A on H with dense domain D(A) is called symmetric if (u, v) D(A) D(A), Au v = u Av Symmetric operators are not very interesting Only self-adjoint operators represent physical observables and have nice mathematical properties: real spectrum; spectral decomposition and functional calculus

26 1 - Linear operators 8 Definition (adjoint of a linear operator with dense domain) Let A be a linear operator on H with dense domain D(A), and D(A ) the vector space defined as D(A ) = {v H w v H st u D(A), Au v = u w v } The linear operator A on H, with domain D(A ), defined by v D(A ), A v = w v, (if w v exists, it is unique since D(A) is dense) is called the adjoint of A

27 1 - Linear operators 8 Definition (adjoint of a linear operator with dense domain) Let A be a linear operator on H with dense domain D(A), and D(A ) the vector space defined as D(A ) = {v H w v H st u D(A), Au v = u w v } The linear operator A on H, with domain D(A ), defined by v D(A ), A v = w v, (if w v exists, it is unique since D(A) is dense) is called the adjoint of A (This definition agrees with the one on Slide 6 for bounded operators)

28 1 - Linear operators 8 Definition (adjoint of a linear operator with dense domain) Let A be a linear operator on H with dense domain D(A), and D(A ) the vector space defined as D(A ) = {v H w v H st u D(A), Au v = u w v } The linear operator A on H, with domain D(A ), defined by v D(A ), A v = w v, (if w v exists, it is unique since D(A) is dense) is called the adjoint of A (This definition agrees with the one on Slide 6 for bounded operators) Definition (self-adjoint operator) A linear operator A with dense domain is called self-adjoint if A = A (that is if A symmetric and D(A ) = D(A))

29 1 - Linear operators 8 Definition (adjoint of a linear operator with dense domain) Let A be a linear operator on H with dense domain D(A), and D(A ) the vector space defined as D(A ) = {v H w v H st u D(A), Au v = u w v } The linear operator A on H, with domain D(A ), defined by v D(A ), A v = w v, (if w v exists, it is unique since D(A) is dense) is called the adjoint of A (This definition agrees with the one on Slide 6 for bounded operators) Definition (self-adjoint operator) A linear operator A with dense domain is called self-adjoint if A = A (that is if A symmetric and D(A ) = D(A)) Case of bounded operators: symmetric self-adjoint

30 1 - Linear operators 8 Definition (adjoint of a linear operator with dense domain) Let A be a linear operator on H with dense domain D(A), and D(A ) the vector space defined as D(A ) = {v H w v H st u D(A), Au v = u w v } The linear operator A on H, with domain D(A ), defined by v D(A ), A v = w v, (if w v exists, it is unique since D(A) is dense) is called the adjoint of A (This definition agrees with the one on Slide 6 for bounded operators) Definition (self-adjoint operator) A linear operator A with dense domain is called self-adjoint if A = A (that is if A symmetric and D(A ) = D(A)) Case of bounded operators: symmetric self-adjoint Case of unbounded operators: symmetric (easy to check) self-adjoint (sometimes difficult to check)

31 1 - Linear operators 9 Some unbounded self-adjoint operators arising in quantum mechanics position operator along the j axis: H = L 2 (R d ), D( r j ) = { u L 2 (R d ) r j u L 2 (R d ) }, ( r j φ)(r) = r j φ(r); momentum operator along the j axis: H = L 2 (R d ), D( p j ) = { u L 2 (R d ) rj u L 2 (R d ) }, ( p j φ)(r) = i rj φ(r); kinetic energy operator: H = L 2 (R d ), D(T ) = H 2 (R d ) := { u L 2 (R d ) u L 2 (R d ) }, T = 1 2 ; Schrödinger operators in 3D: let V L 2 unif (R3, R) (V (r) = Z r OK) H = L 2 (R 3 ), D(H) = H 2 (R 3 ), H = V

32 1 - Linear operators 10 Linear operators and Green s functions

33 1 - Linear operators 10 Linear operators and Green s functions Kernel of a linear operator on L 2 (R d ) Let A be a linear operator on L 2 (R d ) with domain D(A) The kernel of A, if it exists, is the distribution A(x, x ) such that φ D(A), (Aφ)(x) = " A(x, x ) φ(x ) dx " R d

34 1 - Linear operators 10 Linear operators and Green s functions Kernel of a linear operator on L 2 (R d ) Let A be a linear operator on L 2 (R d ) with domain D(A) The kernel of A, if it exists, is the distribution A(x, x ) such that φ D(A), (Aφ)(x) = " A(x, x ) φ(x ) dx " R d Schwartz kernel theorem 66: all "well-behaved" operators have kernels

35 1 - Linear operators 10 Linear operators and Green s functions Kernel of a linear operator on L 2 (R d ) Let A be a linear operator on L 2 (R d ) with domain D(A) The kernel of A, if it exists, is the distribution A(x, x ) such that φ D(A), (Aφ)(x) = " A(x, x ) φ(x ) dx " R d Schwartz kernel theorem 66: all "well-behaved" operators have kernels Green s function of a linear operator on L 2 (R d ) If A is invertible, the kernel G(x, x ) of A 1, if it exists, is called the Green s function of A The solution u to the equation Au = f then is u(x) = " G(x, x ) f(x ) dx " for aa x R d R d

36 1 - Linear operators 10 Linear operators and Green s functions Kernel of a linear operator on L 2 (R d ) Let A be a linear operator on L 2 (R d ) with domain D(A) The kernel of A, if it exists, is the distribution A(x, x ) such that φ D(A), (Aφ)(x) = " A(x, x ) φ(x ) dx " R d Schwartz kernel theorem 66: all "well-behaved" operators have kernels Green s function of a linear operator on L 2 (R d ) If A is invertible, the kernel G(x, x ) of A 1, if it exists, is called the Green s function of A The solution u to the equation Au = f then is u(x) = " G(x, x ) f(x ) dx " for aa x R d R d Remark: the Green s functions used in many-body perturbation theory are related to, but are not exactly, this kind of Green s functions

37 1 - Linear operators 11 Definition-Theorem (spectrum of a linear operator) Let A be a closed 1 linear operator on H The open set ρ(a) = {z C (z A) : D(A) H invertible} is called the resolvent set of A 1 The operator A is called closed if its graph Γ(A) := {(u, Au), u D(A)} is a closed subspace of H H

38 1 - Linear operators 11 Definition-Theorem (spectrum of a linear operator) Let A be a closed 1 linear operator on H The open set ρ(a) = {z C (z A) : D(A) H invertible} is called the resolvent set of A The analytic function ρ(a) z R z (A) := (z A) 1 B(H) is called the resolvent of A It holds R z (A) R z (A) = (z z)r z (A)R z (A) 1 The operator A is called closed if its graph Γ(A) := {(u, Au), u D(A)} is a closed subspace of H H

39 1 - Linear operators 11 Definition-Theorem (spectrum of a linear operator) Let A be a closed 1 linear operator on H The open set ρ(a) = {z C (z A) : D(A) H invertible} is called the resolvent set of A The analytic function ρ(a) z R z (A) := (z A) 1 B(H) is called the resolvent of A It holds R z (A) R z (A) = (z z)r z (A)R z (A) The closed set σ(a) = C \ ρ(a) is called the spectrum of A 1 The operator A is called closed if its graph Γ(A) := {(u, Au), u D(A)} is a closed subspace of H H

40 1 - Linear operators 11 Definition-Theorem (spectrum of a linear operator) Let A be a closed 1 linear operator on H The open set ρ(a) = {z C (z A) : D(A) H invertible} is called the resolvent set of A The analytic function ρ(a) z R z (A) := (z A) 1 B(H) is called the resolvent of A It holds R z (A) R z (A) = (z z)r z (A)R z (A) The closed set σ(a) = C \ ρ(a) is called the spectrum of A If A is self-adjoint, then σ(a) R 1 The operator A is called closed if its graph Γ(A) := {(u, Au), u D(A)} is a closed subspace of H H

41 1 - Linear operators 11 Definition-Theorem (spectrum of a linear operator) Let A be a closed 1 linear operator on H The open set ρ(a) = {z C (z A) : D(A) H invertible} is called the resolvent set of A The analytic function ρ(a) z R z (A) := (z A) 1 B(H) is called the resolvent of A It holds R z (A) R z (A) = (z z)r z (A)R z (A) The closed set σ(a) = C \ ρ(a) is called the spectrum of A If A is self-adjoint, then σ(a) R and it holds σ(a) = σ p (A) σ c (A), where σ p (A) and σ c (A) are respectively the point spectrum and the continuous spectrum of A defined as σ p (A) = {z C (z A) : D(A) H non-injective} = {eigenvalues of A} σ c (A) = {z C (z A) : D(A) H injective but non surjective} 1 The operator A is called closed if its graph Γ(A) := {(u, Au), u D(A)} is a closed subspace of H H

42 1 - Linear operators 12 On the physical meaning of point and continuous spectra

43 1 - Linear operators 12 On the physical meaning of point and continuous spectra Theorem (RAGE, Ruelle 69, Amrein and Georgescu 73, Enss 78) Let H be a locally compact self-adjoint operator on L 2 (R d ) [Ex: the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom satisfies these assumptions]

44 1 - Linear operators 12 On the physical meaning of point and continuous spectra Theorem (RAGE, Ruelle 69, Amrein and Georgescu 73, Enss 78) Let H be a locally compact self-adjoint operator on L 2 (R d ) [Ex: the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom satisfies these assumptions] Let H p = Span {eigenvectors of H} and H c = H p [Ex: for the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom, dim(h p ) = dim(h c ) = ]

45 1 - Linear operators 12 On the physical meaning of point and continuous spectra Theorem (RAGE, Ruelle 69, Amrein and Georgescu 73, Enss 78) Let H be a locally compact self-adjoint operator on L 2 (R d ) [Ex: the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom satisfies these assumptions] Let H p = Span {eigenvectors of H} and H c = H p [Ex: for the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom, dim(h p ) = dim(h c ) = ] Let χ BR be the characteristic function of the ball B R = { r R d r < R }

46 1 - Linear operators 12 On the physical meaning of point and continuous spectra Theorem (RAGE, Ruelle 69, Amrein and Georgescu 73, Enss 78) Let H be a locally compact self-adjoint operator on L 2 (R d ) [Ex: the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom satisfies these assumptions] Let H p = Span {eigenvectors of H} and H c = H p [Ex: for the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom, dim(h p ) = dim(h c ) = ] Let χ BR be the characteristic function of the ball B R = { r R d r < R } Then (φ 0 H p ) ε > 0, R > 0, t 0, (1 χbr )e ith φ 0 2 L 2 ε; (φ 0 H c ) R > 0, lim T + 1 T T 0 χ BR e ith φ 0 2 L 2 dt = 0

47 1 - Linear operators 12 On the physical meaning of point and continuous spectra Theorem (RAGE, Ruelle 69, Amrein and Georgescu 73, Enss 78) Let H be a locally compact self-adjoint operator on L 2 (R d ) [Ex: the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom satisfies these assumptions] Let H p = Span {eigenvectors of H} and H c = H p [Ex: for the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom, dim(h p ) = dim(h c ) = ] Let χ BR be the characteristic function of the ball B R = { r R d r < R } Then (φ 0 H p ) ε > 0, R > 0, t 0, (1 χbr )e ith φ 0 2 L 2 ε; (φ 0 H c ) R > 0, lim T + H p : set of bound states, 1 T T 0 χ BR e ith φ 0 2 L 2 dt = 0 H c : set of diffusive states

48 1 - Linear operators 13 Diagonalizable self-adjoint operators and Dirac s bra-ket notation Let A be a self-adjoint operator that can be diagonalized in an orthonormal basis (e n ) n N (this is not the case for many useful self-adjoint operators!) Dirac s bra-ket notation: A = n N λ n e n e n, λ n R, e m e n = δ mn

49 1 - Linear operators 13 Diagonalizable self-adjoint operators and Dirac s bra-ket notation Let A be a self-adjoint operator that can be diagonalized in an orthonormal basis (e n ) n N (this is not the case for many useful self-adjoint operators!) Dirac s bra-ket notation: A = n N λ n e n e n, λ n R, e m e n = δ mn Then, the operator A is bounded if and only if A = sup n λ n < ;

50 1 - Linear operators 13 Diagonalizable self-adjoint operators and Dirac s bra-ket notation Let A be a self-adjoint operator that can be diagonalized in an orthonormal basis (e n ) n N (this is not the case for many useful self-adjoint operators!) Dirac s bra-ket notation: A = n N λ n e n e n, λ n R, e m e n = δ mn Then, the operator A is bounded if and only if A = sup n λ n < ; D(A) = { u = n N u n e n n N (1 + λ n 2 ) u n 2 < } ;

51 1 - Linear operators 13 Diagonalizable self-adjoint operators and Dirac s bra-ket notation Let A be a self-adjoint operator that can be diagonalized in an orthonormal basis (e n ) n N (this is not the case for many useful self-adjoint operators!) Dirac s bra-ket notation: A = n N λ n e n e n, λ n R, e m e n = δ mn Then, the operator A is bounded if and only if A = sup n λ n < ; D(A) = { u = n N u n e n n N (1 + λ n 2 ) u n 2 < } ; σ p (A) = {λ n } n N and σ c (A) = { accumulation points of {λ n } n N } \σp (A);

52 1 - Linear operators 13 Diagonalizable self-adjoint operators and Dirac s bra-ket notation Let A be a self-adjoint operator that can be diagonalized in an orthonormal basis (e n ) n N (this is not the case for many useful self-adjoint operators!) Dirac s bra-ket notation: A = n N λ n e n e n, λ n R, e m e n = δ mn Then, the operator A is bounded if and only if A = sup n λ n < ; D(A) = { u = n N u n e n n N (1 + λ n 2 ) u n 2 < } ; σ p (A) = {λ n } n N and σ c (A) = { accumulation points of {λ n } n N } \σp (A); H p = H and H c = {0} (no diffusive states);

53 1 - Linear operators 13 Diagonalizable self-adjoint operators and Dirac s bra-ket notation Let A be a self-adjoint operator that can be diagonalized in an orthonormal basis (e n ) n N (this is not the case for many useful self-adjoint operators!) Dirac s bra-ket notation: A = n N λ n e n e n, λ n R, e m e n = δ mn Then, the operator A is bounded if and only if A = sup n λ n < ; D(A) = { u = n N u n e n n N (1 + λ n 2 ) u n 2 < } ; σ p (A) = {λ n } n N and σ c (A) = { accumulation points of {λ n } n N } \σp (A); H p = H and H c = {0} (no diffusive states); functional calculus for diagonalizable self-adjoint operators: for all f : R C, the operator f(a) defined by { } D(f(A)) = u = u n e n + f(λ n ) n N n N(1 2 ) u n 2 <, f(a) = f(λ n ) e n e n n N is independent of the choice of the spectral decomposition of A

54 1 - Linear operators 14 Theorem (functional calculus for bounded functions) Let B(R, C) be the -algebra of bounded C-valued Borel functions on R and let A be a selfadjoint operator on H Then there exists a unique map satisfies the following properties: Φ A : B(R, C) f f(a) B(H) 1 Φ A is a homomorphism of -algebras: (αf + βg)(a) = αf(a) + βg(a), (fg)(a) = f(a)g(a), f(a) = f(a) ; 2 f(a) sup f(x) ; x R 3 if f n (x) x pointwise and f n (x) x for all n and all x R, then u D(A), f n (A)u Au in H; 4 if f n (x) f(x) pointwise and sup n sup x R f n (x) <, then u H, f n (A)u f(a)u in H; In addition, if u H is such that Au = λu, then f(a)u = f(λ)u

55 1 - Linear operators 15 Theorem (spectral projections and functional calculus - general case -) Let A be a self-adjoint operator on H For all λ R, the bounded operator P A λ := 1 ],λ](a), where 1 ],λ] ( ) is the characteristic function of ], λ], is an orthogonal projection Spectral decomposition of A: for all u D(A) and v H, it holds v Au = λ d v Pλ A u, which we denote by A = λ dpλ A R Functional calculus: let f be a (not necessarily bounded) C-valued Borel function on R The operator f(a) can be defined by { } D(f(A)) := u H f(λ) 2 d u Pλ A u < and (u, v) D(f(A)) H, v f(a)u := R R R f(λ) v P A dλu

56 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians

57 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 17 Electronic problem for a given nuclear configuration {R k } 1 k M Ex: water molecule H 2 O M = 3, N = 10, z 1 = 8, z 2 = 1, z 3 = 1 v ext (r) = M k=1 z k r R k 1 2 N ri + i=1 N v ext (r i ) + i=1 1 i<j N 1 Ψ(r 1,, r N ) = E Ψ(r 1,, r N ) r i r j Ψ(r 1,, r N ) 2 probability density of observing electron 1 at r 1, electron 2 at r 2, p S N, Ψ(r p(1),, r p(n) ) = ε(p)ψ(r 1,, r N ), (Pauli principle)

58 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 17 Electronic problem for a given nuclear configuration {R k } 1 k M Ex: water molecule H 2 O M = 3, N = 10, z 1 = 8, z 2 = 1, z 3 = 1 v ext (r) = M k=1 z k r R k 1 2 N ri + i=1 N v ext (r i ) + i=1 1 i<j N 1 Ψ(r 1,, r N ) = E Ψ(r 1,, r N ) r i r j Ψ(r 1,, r N ) 2 probability density of observing electron 1 at r 1, electron 2 at r 2, Ψ H N = N H1, H 1 = L 2 (R 3, C)

59 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 17 Electronic problem for a given nuclear configuration {R k } 1 k M Ex: water molecule H 2 O M = 3, N = 10, z 1 = 8, z 2 = 1, z 3 = 1 v ext (r) = M k=1 z k r R k 1 2 N ri + i=1 N v ext (r i ) + i=1 1 i<j N 1 Ψ(r 1,, r N ) = E Ψ(r 1,, r N ) r i r j Ψ(r 1,, r N ) 2 probability density of observing electron 1 at r 1, electron 2 at r 2, Ψ H N = N H1, H 1 = L 2 (R 3, C 2 ) with spin

60 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 17 Electronic problem for a given nuclear configuration {R k } 1 k M Ex: water molecule H 2 O M = 3, N = 10, z 1 = 8, z 2 = 1, z 3 = 1 v ext (r) = M k=1 z k r R k 1 2 N ri + i=1 N v ext (r i ) + i=1 1 i<j N 1 Ψ(r 1,, r N ) = E Ψ(r 1,, r N ) r i r j Ψ(r 1,, r N ) 2 probability density of observing electron 1 at r 1, electron 2 at r 2, N Ψ H N = H1, H 1 = L 2 (R 3, C) Theorem (Kato 51) The operator H N := 1 N N ri + v ext (r i )+ 2 i=1 i=1 with domain D(H N ) := H N H 2 (R 3N ) is self-adjoint on H N 1 i<j N 1 r i r j

61 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 18 Theorem (spectrum of H N ) 1 HVZ theorem (Hunziger 66, van Winten 60, Zhislin 60) σ c (H N ) = [Σ N, + ) with Σ N = min σ(h N 1 ) 0 and Σ N < 0 iff N 2 2 Bound states of neutral molecules and positive ions (Zhislin 61) M If N Z := z k, then H N has an infinite number of bound states k=1 Ground state Excited states Ε N 0 Σ N Continuous spectrum 3 Bound states of negative ions (Yafaev 72) If N Z + 1, then H N has at most a finite number of bound states

62 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 19 Assumptions 1 Non-degeneracy of the N-particle ground state EN 0 is a simple eigenvalue of H N, H N Ψ 0 N = ENΨ 0 0 N, Ψ 0 N = 1 2 Stability of the N-particle system 2EN 0 < EN EN 1 0

63 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 20 Photoemission spectroscopy (PES) hν E kin E k N 1 E0 N = hν E kin System with N electrons System with N 1 electrons Ε 0 N Σ N σ(h N ) Ε k N 1 Σ N 1 σ(h N 1 )

64 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 21 Inverse photoemission spectroscopy (IPES) E kin hν E 0 N Ek N+1 = hν E kin System with N electrons System with N + 1 electrons 0 Ε N Σ N σ(h N ) k Ε N+1 Σ N+1 σ(h N+1 )

65 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 22 Goal: compute the excitation energies E k N+1 E0 N and Ek N 1 E0 N Wavefunction methods: scales from N 6 b (CISD) to N b! (full CI) Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT): lots of problems (especially for extended systems)

66 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 22 Goal: compute the excitation energies E k N+1 E0 N and Ek N 1 E0 N Wavefunction methods: scales from N 6 b (CISD) to N b! (full CI) Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT): lots of problems (especially for extended systems) GW: decent to very good results (especially for extended systems) Electronic excitations for perfect crystals (N + )

67 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 23 Electronic ground state density ρ 0 N(r) = N Ψ 0 N(r, r 2,, r N ) 2 dr 2 dr N R 3(N 1) One-body electronic ground state density matrix γn(r, 0 r ) = N Ψ 0 N(r, r 2,, r N ) Ψ 0 N(r, r 2,, r N ) dr 2 dr N R 3(N 1) One-body Green s function G(r, r, t t ) = i Ψ N 0 T (Ψ H (r, t)ψ H (r, t )) Ψ N 0

68 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 23 Electronic ground state density ρ 0 N(r) = N Ψ 0 N(r, r 2,, r N ) 2 dr 2 dr N R 3(N 1) One-body electronic ground state density matrix γn(r, 0 r ) = N Ψ 0 N(r, r 2,, r N ) Ψ 0 N(r, r 2,, r N ) dr 2 dr N R 3(N 1) One-body Green s function G(r, r, t t ) = i Ψ N 0 T (Ψ H (r, t)ψ H (r, t )) Ψ N 0 No concept of wavefunction for infinite systems (such as perfect crystals)

69 2 - Electronic Hamiltonians 23 Electronic ground state density ρ 0 N(r) = N Ψ 0 N(r, r 2,, r N ) 2 dr 2 dr N R 3(N 1) One-body electronic ground state density matrix γn(r, 0 r ) = N Ψ 0 N(r, r 2,, r N ) Ψ 0 N(r, r 2,, r N ) dr 2 dr N R 3(N 1) One-body Green s function G(r, r, t t ) = i Ψ N 0 T (Ψ H (r, t)ψ H (r, t )) Ψ N 0 No concept of wavefunction for infinite systems (such as perfect crystals) Thermodynamic limit problem (for periodic crystals): L E 0 ZL 3? L 3 L E0 per, ρ 0 ZL 3 (r)? L ρ0 per(r) γ 0 ZL 3 (r, r )? L γ0 per(r, r ), G(r, r?, t) G per(r, r, t) L

70 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy Let X be a Banach space (typically X = B(H 1 )) Fourier transform: let f L 1 (R t, X) ω R, [Ff](ω) = f(ω) = + f(t) e iωt dt

71 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy Let X be a Banach space (typically X = B(H 1 )) Fourier transform: let f L 1 (R t, X) ω R, [Ff](ω) = f(ω) = + f(t) e iωt dt Laplace transform of causal functions: let f L (R t, X) st f(t) = 0 for t < 0 z U = {z C I(z) > 0}, [Lf](z) = + f(t) e izt dt = + 0 f(t) e izt dt

72 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy Let X be a Banach space (typically X = B(H 1 )) Fourier transform: let f L 1 (R t, X) ω R, [Ff](ω) = f(ω) = + f(t) e iωt dt Laplace transform of causal functions: let f L (R t, X) st f(t) = 0 for t < 0 z U = {z C I(z) > 0}, [Lf](z) = + f(t) e izt dt = + 0 f(t) e izt dt Laplace transform of anti-causal functions: let f L (R t, X) st f(t) = 0 for t > 0 z = {z C I(z) < 0}, [Lf](z) = + f(t) e izt dt = 0 f(t) e izt dt

73 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy Let X be a Banach space (typically X = B(H 1 )) Fourier transform: let f L 1 (R t, X) ω R, [Ff](ω) = f(ω) = + f(t) e iωt dt Laplace transform of causal functions: let f L (R t, X) st f(t) = 0 for t < 0 z U = {z C I(z) > 0}, [Lf](z) = + f(t) e izt dt = + 0 f(t) e izt dt Laplace transform of anti-causal functions: let f L (R t, X) st f(t) = 0 for t > 0 z = {z C I(z) < 0}, [Lf](z) = + f(t) e izt dt = 0 f(t) e izt dt The Fourier and Laplace transforms can be extended to some distribution spaces (extension of the Fourier transform to the space of tempered distributions)

74 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 25 Second quantization formalism (for fermions) Fock space F := + N=0 H N, H 0 = C, H 1 = L 2 (R 3, C), H N = Creation and annihilation operators N H1 a A(H 1, B(F)), a B(H 1, B(F)), a(φ) = a(φ) = φ, φ H 1, a(φ) HN : H N H N 1, a (φ) HN : H N H N+1, a (φ) = (a(φ)), Ψ N H N, (a(φ)ψ N )(r 1,, r N 1 ) = N φ(r) Ψ N (r, r 1,, r N 1 ) dr R 3 Canonical commutation relations (CCR) φ, ψ H 1, a(φ)a(ψ) + a(ψ) a(φ) = φ ψ Id F

75 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 26 Particle Green s function Time representation: G p L (R t, B(H 1 )) defined by t R, (f, g) H 1 H 1, g G p (t) f = iθ(t) Ψ N 0 a(g)e it(h N+1 E N 0 ) a (f) Ψ N 0 E kin hν System with N electrons System with N + 1 electrons

76 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 26 Particle Green s function Time representation: G p L (R t, B(H 1 )) defined by t R, (f, g) H 1 H 1, g G p (t) f = iθ(t) Ψ N 0 a(g)e it(h N+1 E0 N) a (f) Ψ N 0 Frequency representation (Fourier transform) Ĝ p (ω) = (FG p )(ω), Ĝ p H 1 (R ω, B(H 1 ))

77 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 26 Particle Green s function Time representation: G p L (R t, B(H 1 )) defined by t R, (f, g) H 1 H 1, g G p (t) f = iθ(t) Ψ N 0 a(g)e it(h N+1 E0 N) a (f) Ψ N 0 Frequency representation (Fourier transform) Ĝ p (ω) = (FG p )(ω), Ĝ p H 1 (R ω, B(H 1 )) Complex plane representation (analytic continuation of the Laplace transform) G p (z) = A + (z (H N+1 E 0 N)) 1 A + where A + : H 1 H N+1 f a (f) Ψ 0 N The singularities of z G p (z) are contained in σ(h N+1 E 0 N ) 0 0 N+1 N E E

78 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 27 Hole Green s function Time representation: G h L (R t, B(H 1 )) defined by t R, (f, g) H 1 H 1, g G h (t) f = iθ( t) Ψ N 0 a (g)e it(h N 1 E N 0 ) a(f) Ψ N 0 hν E kin System with N electrons System with N 1 electrons

79 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 27 Hole Green s function Time representation: G h L (R t, B(H 1 )) defined by t R, (f, g) H 1 H 1, g G h (t) f = iθ( t) Ψ N 0 a (g)e it(h N 1 E0 N) a(f) Ψ N 0 Frequency representation (Fourier transform) Ĝ h (ω) = (FG h )(ω), Ĝ h H 1 (R ω, B(H 1 )) Complex plane representation (analytic continuation of the Laplace transform) G h (z) = A (z (E 0 N H N 1 )) 1 A where A : H 1 H N 1 f a(f) Ψ 0 N The singularities of z G h (z) are contained in σ(e 0 N H N 1) 0 N E E 0 N 1

80 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 28 Properties of the particle and hole Green s functions Spectral functions (operator-valued measures on R ω ) b B(R ω ), A p (b) = π 1 IĜp(b) A h (b) = +π 1 IĜh(b) A(b) = A p (b) + A h (b)

81 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 28 Properties of the particle and hole Green s functions Spectral functions (operator-valued measures on R ω ) b B(R ω ), A p (b) = π 1 IĜp(b) = A + 1 b (H N+1 E 0 N)A + 0, A h (b) = +π 1 IĜh(b) = A 1 b (E 0 N H N 1 )A 0, A(b) = A p (b) + A h (b) 0

82 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 28 Properties of the particle and hole Green s functions Spectral functions (operator-valued measures on R ω ) b B(R ω ), A p (b) = π 1 IĜp(b) = A + 1 b (H N+1 E 0 N)A + 0, A h (b) = +π 1 IĜh(b) = A 1 b (E 0 N H N 1 )A 0, A(b) = A p (b) + A h (b) 0 Sum rule: Supp(A h ) σ(e 0 N H N 1 ), Supp(A p ) σ(h N+1 E 0 N) A p (R) = A + A + = 1 γ 0 N, A h (R) = A A = γ 0 N, A(R) = 1

83 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 28 Properties of the particle and hole Green s functions Spectral functions (operator-valued measures on R ω ) b B(R ω ), A p (b) = π 1 IĜp(b) = A + 1 b (H N+1 E 0 N)A + 0, A h (b) = +π 1 IĜh(b) = A 1 b (E 0 N H N 1 )A 0, A(b) = A p (b) + A h (b) 0 Supp(A h ) σ(en 0 H N 1 ), Supp(A p ) σ(h N+1 EN) 0 Sum rule: A p (R) = A + A + = 1 γn, 0 A h (R) = A A = γn, 0 A(R) = 1 It holds γn 0 = ig h(0 )

84 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 28 Properties of the particle and hole Green s functions Spectral functions (operator-valued measures on R ω ) b B(R ω ), A p (b) = π 1 IĜp(b) = A + 1 b (H N+1 E 0 N)A + 0, A h (b) = +π 1 IĜh(b) = A 1 b (E 0 N H N 1 )A 0, A(b) = A p (b) + A h (b) 0 Sum rule: Supp(A h ) σ(e 0 N H N 1 ), Supp(A p ) σ(h N+1 E 0 N) A p (R) = A + A + = 1 γ 0 N, A h (R) = A A = γ 0 N, A(R) = 1 It holds γ 0 N = ig h(0 ) Galitskii-Migdal formula E 0 N = 1 2 Tr H 1 (( d dτ i ( 1 )) 2 + v ext G h (τ) τ=0 )

85 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 29 Green s functions of non-interacting systems System of non-interacting electrons subjected to an effective potential V N ( H 0,N = 1 ) 2 r i + V (r i ) on H N, h 1 = V on H 1 i=1

86 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 29 Green s functions of non-interacting systems System of non-interacting electrons subjected to an effective potential V N ( H 0,N = 1 ) 2 r i + V (r i ) on H N, h 1 = V on H 1 i=1 Ground state of non-interacting systems Φ 0 N = φ 1 φ N, γ 0 0,N = 1 ],µ0 ](h 1 ) = N φ i φ i i=1

87 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 29 Green s functions of non-interacting systems System of non-interacting electrons subjected to an effective potential V N ( H 0,N = 1 ) 2 r i + V (r i ) on H N, h 1 = V on H 1 i=1 Ground state of non-interacting systems Φ 0 N = φ 1 φ N, γ 0 0,N = 1 ],µ0 ](h 1 ) = N φ i φ i i=1 Particle and hole Green s functions G 0,p (z) = (1 γ 0 0,N)(z h 1 ) 1 (1 γ 0 0,N), G0,h (z) = γ 0 0,N(z h 1 ) 1 γ 0 0,N

88 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 29 Green s functions of non-interacting systems System of non-interacting electrons subjected to an effective potential V N ( H 0,N = 1 ) 2 r i + V (r i ) on H N, h 1 = V on H 1 i=1 Ground state of non-interacting systems Φ 0 N = φ 1 φ N, γ 0 0,N = 1 ],µ0 ](h 1 ) = N φ i φ i i=1 Particle and hole Green s functions G 0,p (z) = (1 γ 0 0,N)(z h 1 ) 1 (1 γ 0 0,N), G0,h (z) = γ 0 0,N(z h 1 ) 1 γ 0 0,N Time-ordered Green s function for interacting and non-interacting systems G = G p + G h, G 0 = G 0,p + G 0,h

89 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 29 Green s functions of non-interacting systems System of non-interacting electrons subjected to an effective potential V N ( H 0,N = 1 ) 2 r i + V (r i ) on H N, h 1 = V on H 1 i=1 Ground state of non-interacting systems Φ 0 N = φ 1 φ N, γ 0 0,N = 1 ],µ0 ](h 1 ) = N φ i φ i i=1 Particle and hole Green s functions G 0,p (z) = (1 γ 0 0,N)(z h 1 ) 1 (1 γ 0 0,N), G0,h (z) = γ 0 0,N(z h 1 ) 1 γ 0 0,N, Time-ordered Green s function for interacting and non-interacting systems G = G p + G h, G 0 = G 0,p + G 0,h G0 (z) = (z h 1 ) 1 (resolvent of h 1 at z)

90 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 30 Dynamical Hamiltonian Non-interacting systems: G 0 (z) = (z h 1 ) 1 Interacting systems: G(z) = (z H(z)) 1, H(z) : dynamical Hamiltonian

91 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 30 Dynamical Hamiltonian Non-interacting systems: G 0 (z) = (z h 1 ) 1 Interacting systems: G(z) = (z H(z)) 1, H(z) : dynamical Hamiltonian Proposition Let z C \ R The dynamical Hamiltonian is a well-defined closed unbounded operator on H 1 with dense domain D(z) H 2 (R 3 )

92 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 30 Dynamical Hamiltonian Non-interacting systems: G 0 (z) = (z h 1 ) 1 Interacting systems: G(z) = (z H(z)) 1, H(z) : dynamical Hamiltonian Proposition Let z C \ R The dynamical Hamiltonian is a well-defined closed unbounded operator on H 1 with dense domain D(z) H 2 (R 3 ) Self-energy operator z C\R, Σ(z) := ( G0 (z)) 1 1 ( G(z))

93 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 30 Dynamical Hamiltonian Non-interacting systems: G 0 (z) = (z h 1 ) 1 Interacting systems: G(z) = (z H(z)) 1, H(z) : dynamical Hamiltonian Proposition Let z C \ R The dynamical Hamiltonian is a well-defined closed unbounded operator on H 1 with dense domain D(z) H 2 (R 3 ) Self-energy operator z C\R, Σ(z) := ( G0 (z)) 1 ( G(z)) 1 G(z) = G 0 (z)+ G 0 (z) Σ(z) G(z) (Dyson equation)

94 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 30 Dynamical Hamiltonian Non-interacting systems: G 0 (z) = (z h 1 ) 1 Interacting systems: G(z) = (z H(z)) 1, H(z) : dynamical Hamiltonian Proposition Let z C \ R The dynamical Hamiltonian is a well-defined closed unbounded operator on H 1 with dense domain D(z) H 2 (R 3 ) Self-energy operator z C\R, Σ(z) := ( G0 (z)) 1 ( G(z)) 1 H(z) = h 1 + Σ(z)

95 3 - One-body Green s function and self-energy 30 Dynamical Hamiltonian Non-interacting systems: G 0 (z) = (z h 1 ) 1 Interacting systems: G(z) = (z H(z)) 1, H(z) : dynamical Hamiltonian Proposition Let z C \ R The dynamical Hamiltonian is a well-defined closed unbounded operator on H 1 with dense domain D(z) H 2 (R 3 ) Self-energy operator z C\R, Σ(z) := ( G0 (z)) 1 ( G(z)) 1 H(z) = h 1 + Σ(z) Road map: 1 construct a non-interacting Green s function G 0 (using eg the Kohn-Sham LDA Hamiltonian); 2 construct an approximation Σ app (z) of the self-energy operator; 3 seek the singularities of G app (z) := (z (h 1 + Σ app (z))) 1

96 4 - The dynamically screened Coulomb operator W

97 4 - The dynamically screened Coulomb operator W 32 The (bare) Coulomb operator v c In the vacuum and neglecting relativistic effects, the electrostatic potential created by a time-dependent charge distribution ρ at point r and time t is 1 [V ρ](r, t) = R 3 r r ρ(r, t) dr V (τ) = v c δ 0 (τ), v c ρ(k) = 4π k 2 ρ(k)

98 4 - The dynamically screened Coulomb operator W 32 The (bare) Coulomb operator v c In the vacuum and neglecting relativistic effects, the electrostatic potential created by a time-dependent charge distribution ρ at point r and time t is 1 [V ρ](r, t) = R 3 r r ρ(r, t) dr V (τ) = v c δ 0 (τ), v c ρ(k) = 4π k 2 ρ(k) Screening: in the presence of the molecular system, the perturbation of the electrostatic potential created at point r and time t by a time-dependent external charge distribution δρ, is given, in the linear response regime, by δv (r, t) = t W + (r, r, t t ) δρ(r, t ) dt

99 4 - The dynamically screened Coulomb operator W 32 The (bare) Coulomb operator v c In the vacuum and neglecting relativistic effects, the electrostatic potential created by a time-dependent charge distribution ρ at point r and time t is 1 [V ρ](r, t) = R 3 r r ρ(r, t) dr V (τ) = v c δ 0 (τ), v c ρ(k) = 4π k 2 ρ(k) Screening: in the presence of the molecular system, the perturbation of the electrostatic potential created at point r and time t by a time-dependent external charge distribution δρ, is given, in the linear response regime, by δv (r, t) = t W + (r, r, t t ) δρ(r, t ) dt The dynamically screened Coulomb operator is defined by τ R, W (τ) = Θ(τ)W + (τ) + Θ( τ)w + ( τ) = v 1/2 c (δ(τ) χ sym (τ))v 1/2 c

100 4 - The dynamically screened Coulomb operator W 32 The (bare) Coulomb operator v c In the vacuum and neglecting relativistic effects, the electrostatic potential created by a time-dependent charge distribution ρ at point r and time t is 1 [V ρ](r, t) = R 3 r r ρ(r, t) dr V (τ) = v c δ 0 (τ), v c ρ(k) = 4π k 2 ρ(k) Screening: in the presence of the molecular system, the perturbation of the electrostatic potential created at point r and time t by a time-dependent external charge distribution δρ, is given, in the linear response regime, by δv (r, t) = t W + (r, r, t t ) δρ(r, t ) dt The dynamically screened Coulomb operator is defined by τ R, W (τ) = Θ(τ)W + (τ) + Θ( τ)w + ( τ) = vc 1/2 (δ(τ) χ }{{} sym (τ))v1/2 c L (R, B(L 2 (R 3 )))

101 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation

102 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation Notation Kernel of a space-time operator A A((r 1, t 1 ), (r 2, t 2 )) A(12) If A is a time-translation invariant space-time operator A(12 + ) = A((r 1, t 1 ), (r 2, t + 2 )) = lim t t + 2 A((r 1, t 1 ), (r 2, t)) = [A((t 1 t 2 ) )](r 1, r 2 )

103 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation 34 Hedin s equations (Hedin 65) Dyson equation G(12) = G 0 (12) + d(34)g 0 (13)Σ(34)G(42) The Hedin-Lundqvist Equations The Dyson eq: G (12) = G (0) (12) + d (34) G (0) (13) Σ (34) G (42) [H I] Self-energy Σ(12) = i d(34)g(13)w (41 + )Γ(32; 4) Self-energy: Σ (12) = i d (34) W (1 + 3) G(14)Γ (42; 3) [H II] Screened interaction W (12) = v c (12) + d(34)v c (13)P (34)W (42) Irreducible polarization P (12) = i d(34)g(13)g(41 + )Γ(34; 2) Screened interaction: W (12) = v(12) + d (34) W (13) P (34) v(42) Irred Polarisation: P (12) = i d (34) G(23)G(42)Γ (34; 1) [H IV] [H III] Vertex function: Γ (12; 3) = δ (12) δ (13) + d (4567) δσ(12) G(46)G(75)Γ (67; 3) [H V] δg(45) Vertex function Γ(12; 3) = δ(12)δ(13) + d(4567) δσ(12) G(46)G(75)Γ(67; 3) δg(45) 51

104 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation 35 GW approximation (Hedin 65) Dyson equation G(12) = G 0 (12) + d(34)g 0 (13)Σ(34)G(42) The Hedin-Lundqvist Equations The Dyson eq: G (12) = G (0) (12) + d (34) G (0) (13) Σ (34) G (42) [H I] Self-energy Σ(12) = i d(34)g(13)w (41 + )Γ(32; 4) Self-energy: Σ (12) = i d (34) W (1 + 3) G(14)Γ (42; 3) [H II] Screened interaction W (12) = v c (12) + d(34)v c (13)P (34)W (42) Irreducible polarization P (12) = i d(34)g(13)g(41 + )Γ(34; 2) Screened interaction: W (12) = v(12) + d (34) W (13) P (34) v(42) Irred Polarisation: P (12) = i d (34) G(23)G(42)Γ (34; 1) [H IV] [H III] Vertex function: Γ (12; 3) = δ (12) δ (13) + d (4567) δσ(12) G(46)G(75)Γ (67; 3) [H V] δg(45) Vertex function Γ(12; 3) = δ(12)δ(13) + d(4567) δσ(12) G(46)G(75)Γ(67; 3) δg(45) }{{} Neglect this term 51

105 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation 36 GW equations (Hedin 65) Dyson equation G app (12) = G 0 (12) + Self-energy d(34)g 0 (13)Σ app (34)G app (42) Σ app (12) = ig app (12)W app (21 + ) Screened interaction W app (12) = v c (12) + d(34)v c (13)P app (34)W app (42) Irreducible polarization P app (12) = ig app (12)G app (21)

106 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation 37 GW equations in a mixed time-frequency representation Dyson equation Ĝ app (ω) = Ĝ0(ω) + Ĝ0(ω) Σ app (ω)ĝapp (ω) Self-energy Σ app (τ) = ig app (0 ) v c δ 0 (τ) + G app (τ) Wc app ( τ) Screened interaction [ ( ] 1 Ŵc app (ω) = 1 v c P (ω)) app 1 Irreducible polarization P app (τ) = ig app (τ) G app ( τ) v c Hadamard product of two operators: (A B)(r 1, r 2 ) = A(r 1, r 2 )B(r 2, r 1 )

107 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation 38 GW equations on imaginary axes Dyson equation G app (µ + iω) = G 0 (µ + iω) + G 0 (µ + iω) Σ app (µ + iω) G app (µ + iω) Self-energy Σ app (µ+iω) = γ 0,LDA N v c 1 2π Screened interaction W app c (iω) = + [ ( 1 v c P app (iω)) 1 1 ] G app (µ+i(ω ω )) Irreducible polarization P app (iω) = 1 + G app (µ + iω ) 2π G app (µ + i(ω ω)) dω v c W app c (iω ) dω µ 0 0 E N N 1 0 E N+1 N 0 E E G(z) E 1 E 0 N N W (z)

108 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation 39 GW flowchart Kohn Sham LDA G 0 0,LDA γ N G app Σ app P app W app The existence of a solution to these equations is an open problem

109 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation 40 G 0 W 0 method Kohn Sham LDA G 0 0,LDA γ N G app 00 RPA Σ 0 P 0 W 0 Theorem (EC, Gontier, Stoltz 15) The G 0 W 0 method is well defined

110 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation 41 Self-consistent GW 0 method Kohn Sham LDA G 0 0,LDA γ N G app RPA Σ app P 0 W 0

111 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation 41 Self-consistent GW 0 method Kohn Sham LDA G 0 0,LDA γ N G app RPA Σ app xλ P 0 W 0 Theorem (EC, Gontier, Stoltz 15) The self-consistent GW 0 method is well defined in the perturbative regime (λ small enough)

112 5 - Hedin s equations and the GW approximation 42 Summary of the current mathematical results EC, D Gontier and G Stoltz, A mathematical analysis of the GW method for computing electronic excited state energies of molecules, arxiv The fundamental objects (G, G 0, Σ, P, W ) involved in the GW formalism are mathematically well-defined Some of their properties (sum rules, signs, Galitskii-Migdal formula) have been rigorously established The G 0 W 0 version of the GW approach is well defined The self-consistent GW 0 method is well-defined in the perturbation regime Work in progress Analysis of the partially self-consistent GW method (self-consistency on the eigenvalues only) Analysis of the fully self-consistent GW method Infinite systems (periodic crystals, disordered materials) Numerical algorithms

113 A1 - Fourier transform

114 A1 - Fourier transform 44 Definition (Schwartz space) A function φ : R C of class C is called rapidly decreasing if for all p N, N p (φ) := max max sup φ 0 k p 0 l p tkdl t R dt (t) l < The vector space of all C rapidly decreasing functions from R to C is denoted by S(R) and is called the Schwartz space Gaussian functions and gaussian-polynomial functions are in S(R) Definition (convergence in S(R)) A sequence (φ n ) n N of functions of S(R) converges in S(R) to φ S(R) if p N, N p (φ n φ) n + 0

115 A1 - Fourier transform 45 Definition (Fourier transform in S(R)) The Fourier transform of a function φ S(R) is the function denoted by φ or Fφ and defined by + ω R, φ(ω) = Fφ(ω) := φ(t) e iωt dt Remark Other sign and normalization conventions are also commonly used in the physics and mathematical literatures Theorem (some properties of S(R)) The Schwartz space S(R) is stable by 1 translation, scaling, complex conjugation; 2 derivation and multiplication by polynomials; 3 Fourier transform ( p N, C p R + st φ S(R), N p ( φ) C p N p+2 (φ)) Besides, the Fourier transform defines a sequentially bicontinuous linear map from S(R) onto itself, with inverse F 1 defined by ψ S(R), t R, [F 1 ψ](t) = 1 2π + ψ(ω) e iωt dω

116 A1 - Fourier transform 46 Definition (tempered distributions) We denote by S (R) the vector space of the linear forms u : S(R) C satisfying the following continuity property : there exists p N and C R + such that φ S(R), u, φ CN p (φ) (1) Theorem (canonical embedding of L p (R) in S (R)) Let 1 p + and f L p (R) Then, the linear form u f : S(R) C defined by φ S(R), u f, φ := + f(t)φ(t) dt is a tempered distribution, and if f 1 and f 2 are both in L p (R) and such that u f1 = u f2, then f 1 = f 2 We can therefore, with no ambiguity, denote f instead of u f : f L p (R) S (R) and φ S(R), f, φ := + f(t)φ(t) dt

117 A1 - Fourier transform 47 Definition-Theorem (basic operations on S (R)) 1 Let u S (R) The derivative of u is the element of S (R) denote by du dt and defined by φ S(R), du dφ, φ = u, dt dt 2 Let u S (R) and p : R C a polynomial function The product pu is the element of S (R) defined by φ S(R), pu, φ = u, pφ 3 Let u S (R) The Fourier transform of u is the element of S (R) denoted by û or Fu and defined by φ S(R), û, φ = u, φ Crucial point: the above definitions are consistent with the usual definitions for "nice" functions (ex: û(ω) = + u(t)e iωt dt for all u L 1 (R)) Exercise: define the translation, scaling, and complex conjugation operations on S (R)

118 A1 - Fourier transform 48 Definition (convergence in S (R)) A sequence (u n ) n N of elements of S (R) converges in S (R) to u S (R) if and only if φ S(R), u n, φ n + u, φ Theorem (some properties of the Fourier transform on S (R)) 1 Let u S (R) Then ( ) du F = iωû(ω) dt and F (tu(t)) = i dû dω (ω) 2 The Fourier transform is a sequentially bicontinuous linear map from S (R) onto itself, with inverse F 1 defined by φ S(R), F 1 u, φ S,S = u, F 1 φ S,S Exercise: compute the Fourier transform of a translated tempered distribution, of a scaled tempered distribution, and of the complex conjugate of a tempered distribution

The following definition is fundamental.

The following definition is fundamental. 1. Some Basics from Linear Algebra With these notes, I will try and clarify certain topics that I only quickly mention in class. First and foremost, I will assume that you are familiar with many basic

More information

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS Introduction Quantum theory of angular momentum Quantum theory of a particle in a central potential - Hydrogen atom - Three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator (a model of

More information

1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016

1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016 1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 W2016 1.1 Homework 1. Due Wednesday, October 7, 2015 Notation 1.1 Let U be any set, g be a positive function on U, Y be a normed space. For any f : U Y let

More information

GW quasiparticle energies

GW quasiparticle energies Chapter 4 GW quasiparticle energies Density functional theory provides a good description of ground state properties by mapping the problem of interacting electrons onto a KS system of independent particles

More information

Hilbert space methods for quantum mechanics. S. Richard

Hilbert space methods for quantum mechanics. S. Richard Hilbert space methods for quantum mechanics S. Richard Spring Semester 2016 2 Contents 1 Hilbert space and bounded linear operators 5 1.1 Hilbert space................................ 5 1.2 Vector-valued

More information

Recitation 1 (Sep. 15, 2017)

Recitation 1 (Sep. 15, 2017) Lecture 1 8.321 Quantum Theory I, Fall 2017 1 Recitation 1 (Sep. 15, 2017) 1.1 Simultaneous Diagonalization In the last lecture, we discussed the situations in which two operators can be simultaneously

More information

The GW approximation

The GW approximation The GW approximation Matteo Gatti European Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility (ETSF) LSI - Ecole Polytechnique & Synchrotron SOLEIL - France matteo.gatti@polytechnique.fr - http://etsf.polytechnique.fr

More information

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics 1 The postulates of quantum mechanics The postulates of quantum mechanics were derived after a long process of trial and error. These postulates provide a connection between the physical world and the

More information

A Brief Introduction to Functional Analysis

A Brief Introduction to Functional Analysis A Brief Introduction to Functional Analysis Sungwook Lee Department of Mathematics University of Southern Mississippi sunglee@usm.edu July 5, 2007 Definition 1. An algebra A is a vector space over C with

More information

Mathematical representations of quantum states

Mathematical representations of quantum states Mathematical representations of quantum states Eric CANCES Ecole des Ponts and INRIA, Paris, France IPAM, Los Angeles, Septembre 13-16, 2016 Outline of the tutorial 2 1. Quantum states of many-particle

More information

Many-Body Perturbation Theory. Lucia Reining, Fabien Bruneval

Many-Body Perturbation Theory. Lucia Reining, Fabien Bruneval , Fabien Bruneval Laboratoire des Solides Irradiés Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau - France European Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility (ETSF) Belfast, 27.6.2007 Outline 1 Reminder 2 Perturbation Theory

More information

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Justin Campbell August 3, 2017 1 Representations of SU 2 and SO 3 (R) 1.1 The following observation is long overdue. Proposition

More information

QUANTUM FIELD THEORY: THE WIGHTMAN AXIOMS AND THE HAAG-KASTLER AXIOMS

QUANTUM FIELD THEORY: THE WIGHTMAN AXIOMS AND THE HAAG-KASTLER AXIOMS QUANTUM FIELD THEORY: THE WIGHTMAN AXIOMS AND THE HAAG-KASTLER AXIOMS LOUIS-HADRIEN ROBERT The aim of the Quantum field theory is to offer a compromise between quantum mechanics and relativity. The fact

More information

Analysis Preliminary Exam Workshop: Hilbert Spaces

Analysis Preliminary Exam Workshop: Hilbert Spaces Analysis Preliminary Exam Workshop: Hilbert Spaces 1. Hilbert spaces A Hilbert space H is a complete real or complex inner product space. Consider complex Hilbert spaces for definiteness. If (, ) : H H

More information

Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians: Energy, Momentum, and the Quantum Free Particle

Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians: Energy, Momentum, and the Quantum Free Particle Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians: Energy, Momentum, and the Quantum Free Particle Peter Woit Department of Mathematics, Columbia University woit@math.columbia.edu November 28, 2012 We ll now turn to

More information

Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem

Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem Tom Phelan Semester 2 2009 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide the reader with a self-contained derivation of the celebrated Lidskii Trace

More information

Lecture 2: Linear operators

Lecture 2: Linear operators Lecture 2: Linear operators Rajat Mittal IIT Kanpur The mathematical formulation of Quantum computing requires vector spaces and linear operators So, we need to be comfortable with linear algebra to study

More information

Ir O D = D = ( ) Section 2.6 Example 1. (Bottom of page 119) dim(v ) = dim(l(v, W )) = dim(v ) dim(f ) = dim(v )

Ir O D = D = ( ) Section 2.6 Example 1. (Bottom of page 119) dim(v ) = dim(l(v, W )) = dim(v ) dim(f ) = dim(v ) Section 3.2 Theorem 3.6. Let A be an m n matrix of rank r. Then r m, r n, and, by means of a finite number of elementary row and column operations, A can be transformed into the matrix ( ) Ir O D = 1 O

More information

1 Infinite-Dimensional Vector Spaces

1 Infinite-Dimensional Vector Spaces Theoretical Physics Notes 4: Linear Operators In this installment of the notes, we move from linear operators in a finitedimensional vector space (which can be represented as matrices) to linear operators

More information

Hilbert Spaces. Hilbert space is a vector space with some extra structure. We start with formal (axiomatic) definition of a vector space.

Hilbert Spaces. Hilbert space is a vector space with some extra structure. We start with formal (axiomatic) definition of a vector space. Hilbert Spaces Hilbert space is a vector space with some extra structure. We start with formal (axiomatic) definition of a vector space. Vector Space. Vector space, ν, over the field of complex numbers,

More information

C.6 Adjoints for Operators on Hilbert Spaces

C.6 Adjoints for Operators on Hilbert Spaces C.6 Adjoints for Operators on Hilbert Spaces 317 Additional Problems C.11. Let E R be measurable. Given 1 p and a measurable weight function w: E (0, ), the weighted L p space L p s (R) consists of all

More information

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i. Quantum Mechanics Solutions 1. (a) If H has an orthonormal basis consisting of the eigenvectors { v i } of A with eigenvalues λ i C, then A can be written in terms of its spectral decomposition as A =

More information

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Lecture 5 Hartree-Fock Theory WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Particle-number representation: General formalism The simplest starting point for a many-body state is a system of

More information

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of L k and S n A character of an irreducible representation of L k is a polynomial function constant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable

More information

Mean-Field Limits for Large Particle Systems Lecture 2: From Schrödinger to Hartree

Mean-Field Limits for Large Particle Systems Lecture 2: From Schrödinger to Hartree for Large Particle Systems Lecture 2: From Schrödinger to Hartree CMLS, École polytechnique & CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay FRUMAM, Marseilles, March 13-15th 2017 A CRASH COURSE ON QUANTUM N-PARTICLE DYNAMICS

More information

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR SYMMETRIC OPERATORS WITH COMPACT RESOLVENT

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR SYMMETRIC OPERATORS WITH COMPACT RESOLVENT SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR SYMMETRIC OPERATORS WITH COMPACT RESOLVENT Abstract. These are the letcure notes prepared for the workshop on Functional Analysis and Operator Algebras to be held at NIT-Karnataka,

More information

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation 1 Content of the course Quantum Field Theory by M. Srednicki, Part 1. Combining QM and relativity We are going to keep all axioms of QM: 1. states are vectors (or rather rays) in Hilbert space.. observables

More information

SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF JACOBI MATRICES OF CERTAIN BIRTH AND DEATH PROCESSES

SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF JACOBI MATRICES OF CERTAIN BIRTH AND DEATH PROCESSES J. OPERATOR THEORY 56:2(2006), 377 390 Copyright by THETA, 2006 SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF JACOBI MATRICES OF CERTAIN BIRTH AND DEATH PROCESSES JAOUAD SAHBANI Communicated by Şerban Strătilă ABSTRACT. We show

More information

SPECTRAL THEORY EVAN JENKINS

SPECTRAL THEORY EVAN JENKINS SPECTRAL THEORY EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from two lectures given in MATH 27200, Basic Functional Analysis, at the University of Chicago in March 2010. The proof of the spectral theorem for

More information

G : Quantum Mechanics II

G : Quantum Mechanics II G5.666: Quantum Mechanics II Notes for Lecture 5 I. REPRESENTING STATES IN THE FULL HILBERT SPACE Given a representation of the states that span the spin Hilbert space, we now need to consider the problem

More information

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra Quantum Computing Lecture 2 Review of Linear Algebra Maris Ozols Linear algebra States of a quantum system form a vector space and their transformations are described by linear operators Vector spaces

More information

Definition and basic properties of heat kernels I, An introduction

Definition and basic properties of heat kernels I, An introduction Definition and basic properties of heat kernels I, An introduction Zhiqin Lu, Department of Mathematics, UC Irvine, Irvine CA 92697 April 23, 2010 In this lecture, we will answer the following questions:

More information

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory C. David Sherrill School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology June 2002 Last Revised: June 2003 1 Introduction The purpose of these

More information

Paradigms of Probabilistic Modelling

Paradigms of Probabilistic Modelling Paradigms of Probabilistic Modelling Hermann G. Matthies Brunswick, Germany wire@tu-bs.de http://www.wire.tu-bs.de abstract RV-measure.tex,v 4.5 2017/07/06 01:56:46 hgm Exp Overview 2 1. Motivation challenges

More information

Anderson Localization on the Sierpinski Gasket

Anderson Localization on the Sierpinski Gasket Anderson Localization on the Sierpinski Gasket G. Mograby 1 M. Zhang 2 1 Department of Physics Technical University of Berlin, Germany 2 Department of Mathematics Jacobs University, Germany 5th Cornell

More information

Lecture notes on Quantum Computing. Chapter 1 Mathematical Background

Lecture notes on Quantum Computing. Chapter 1 Mathematical Background Lecture notes on Quantum Computing Chapter 1 Mathematical Background Vector states of a quantum system with n physical states are represented by unique vectors in C n, the set of n 1 column vectors 1 For

More information

5.4 Given the basis e 1, e 2 write the matrices that represent the unitary transformations corresponding to the following changes of basis:

5.4 Given the basis e 1, e 2 write the matrices that represent the unitary transformations corresponding to the following changes of basis: 5 Representations 5.3 Given a three-dimensional Hilbert space, consider the two observables ξ and η that, with respect to the basis 1, 2, 3, arerepresentedby the matrices: ξ ξ 1 0 0 0 ξ 1 0 0 0 ξ 3, ξ

More information

Chapter 7. Canonical Forms. 7.1 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

Chapter 7. Canonical Forms. 7.1 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Chapter 7 Canonical Forms 7.1 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Definition 7.1.1. Let V be a vector space over the field F and let T be a linear operator on V. An eigenvalue of T is a scalar λ F such that there

More information

Lecture 1: The Equilibrium Green Function Method

Lecture 1: The Equilibrium Green Function Method Lecture 1: The Equilibrium Green Function Method Mark Jarrell April 27, 2011 Contents 1 Why Green functions? 2 2 Different types of Green functions 4 2.1 Retarded, advanced, time ordered and Matsubara

More information

Algebra Exam Topics. Updated August 2017

Algebra Exam Topics. Updated August 2017 Algebra Exam Topics Updated August 2017 Starting Fall 2017, the Masters Algebra Exam will have 14 questions. Of these students will answer the first 8 questions from Topics 1, 2, and 3. They then have

More information

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS G. RAMESH Contents Introduction 1 1. Bounded Operators 1 1.3. Examples 3 2. Compact Operators 5 2.1. Properties 6 3. The Spectral Theorem 9 3.3. Self-adjoint

More information

Definite versus Indefinite Linear Algebra. Christian Mehl Institut für Mathematik TU Berlin Germany. 10th SIAM Conference on Applied Linear Algebra

Definite versus Indefinite Linear Algebra. Christian Mehl Institut für Mathematik TU Berlin Germany. 10th SIAM Conference on Applied Linear Algebra Definite versus Indefinite Linear Algebra Christian Mehl Institut für Mathematik TU Berlin Germany 10th SIAM Conference on Applied Linear Algebra Monterey Bay Seaside, October 26-29, 2009 Indefinite Linear

More information

Fermionic coherent states in infinite dimensions

Fermionic coherent states in infinite dimensions Fermionic coherent states in infinite dimensions Robert Oeckl Centro de Ciencias Matemáticas Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Morelia, Mexico Coherent States and their Applications CIRM, Marseille,

More information

Finite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product

Finite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product Chapter 4 Hilbert Spaces 4.1 Inner Product Spaces Inner Product Space. A complex vector space E is called an inner product space (or a pre-hilbert space, or a unitary space) if there is a mapping (, )

More information

Chapter 7: Bounded Operators in Hilbert Spaces

Chapter 7: Bounded Operators in Hilbert Spaces Chapter 7: Bounded Operators in Hilbert Spaces I-Liang Chern Department of Applied Mathematics National Chiao Tung University and Department of Mathematics National Taiwan University Fall, 2013 1 / 84

More information

Non-relativistic Quantum Electrodynamics

Non-relativistic Quantum Electrodynamics Rigorous Aspects of Relaxation to the Ground State Institut für Analysis, Dynamik und Modellierung October 25, 2010 Overview 1 Definition of the model Second quantization Non-relativistic QED 2 Existence

More information

LECTURE 7. k=1 (, v k)u k. Moreover r

LECTURE 7. k=1 (, v k)u k. Moreover r LECTURE 7 Finite rank operators Definition. T is said to be of rank r (r < ) if dim T(H) = r. The class of operators of rank r is denoted by K r and K := r K r. Theorem 1. T K r iff T K r. Proof. Let T

More information

Attempts at relativistic QM

Attempts at relativistic QM Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and

More information

LINEAR ALGEBRA BOOT CAMP WEEK 4: THE SPECTRAL THEOREM

LINEAR ALGEBRA BOOT CAMP WEEK 4: THE SPECTRAL THEOREM LINEAR ALGEBRA BOOT CAMP WEEK 4: THE SPECTRAL THEOREM Unless otherwise stated, all vector spaces in this worksheet are finite dimensional and the scalar field F is R or C. Definition 1. A linear operator

More information

Semi-Classical Theory of Radiative Transitions

Semi-Classical Theory of Radiative Transitions Semi-Classical Theory of Radiative Transitions Massimo Ricotti ricotti@astro.umd.edu University of Maryland Semi-Classical Theory of Radiative Transitions p.1/13 Atomic Structure (recap) Time-dependent

More information

CHAPTER X THE SPECTRAL THEOREM OF GELFAND

CHAPTER X THE SPECTRAL THEOREM OF GELFAND CHAPTER X THE SPECTRAL THEOREM OF GELFAND DEFINITION A Banach algebra is a complex Banach space A on which there is defined an associative multiplication for which: (1) x (y + z) = x y + x z and (y + z)

More information

1 Mathematical preliminaries

1 Mathematical preliminaries 1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical

More information

Consider a system of n ODEs. parameter t, periodic with period T, Let Φ t to be the fundamental matrix of this system, satisfying the following:

Consider a system of n ODEs. parameter t, periodic with period T, Let Φ t to be the fundamental matrix of this system, satisfying the following: Consider a system of n ODEs d ψ t = A t ψ t, dt ψ: R M n 1 C where A: R M n n C is a continuous, (n n) matrix-valued function of real parameter t, periodic with period T, t R k Z A t + kt = A t. Let Φ

More information

Ch 125a Problem Set 1

Ch 125a Problem Set 1 Ch 5a Problem Set Due Monday, Oct 5, 05, am Problem : Bra-ket notation (Dirac notation) Bra-ket notation is a standard and convenient way to describe quantum state vectors For example, φ is an abstract

More information

Mathematical Introduction

Mathematical Introduction Chapter 1 Mathematical Introduction HW #1: 164, 165, 166, 181, 182, 183, 1811, 1812, 114 11 Linear Vector Spaces: Basics 111 Field A collection F of elements a,b etc (also called numbers or scalars) with

More information

UNBOUNDED OPERATORS ON HILBERT SPACES. Let X and Y be normed linear spaces, and suppose A : X Y is a linear map.

UNBOUNDED OPERATORS ON HILBERT SPACES. Let X and Y be normed linear spaces, and suppose A : X Y is a linear map. UNBOUNDED OPERATORS ON HILBERT SPACES EFTON PARK Let X and Y be normed linear spaces, and suppose A : X Y is a linear map. Define { } Ax A op = sup x : x 0 = { Ax : x 1} = { Ax : x = 1} If A

More information

Mathematical foundations - linear algebra

Mathematical foundations - linear algebra Mathematical foundations - linear algebra Andrea Passerini passerini@disi.unitn.it Machine Learning Vector space Definition (over reals) A set X is called a vector space over IR if addition and scalar

More information

A Brief Outline of Math 355

A Brief Outline of Math 355 A Brief Outline of Math 355 Lecture 1 The geometry of linear equations; elimination with matrices A system of m linear equations with n unknowns can be thought of geometrically as m hyperplanes intersecting

More information

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Quantum Mechanics Solutions Quantum Mechanics Solutions (a (i f A and B are Hermitian, since (AB = B A = BA, operator AB is Hermitian if and only if A and B commute So, we know that [A,B] = 0, which means that the Hilbert space H

More information

Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 1

Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 1 Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 1 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University February 1, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 1 February 1, 2017 1 / 13

More information

1. Foundations of Numerics from Advanced Mathematics. Linear Algebra

1. Foundations of Numerics from Advanced Mathematics. Linear Algebra Foundations of Numerics from Advanced Mathematics Linear Algebra Linear Algebra, October 23, 22 Linear Algebra Mathematical Structures a mathematical structure consists of one or several sets and one or

More information

Algebraic Theory of Entanglement

Algebraic Theory of Entanglement Algebraic Theory of (arxiv: 1205.2882) 1 (in collaboration with T.R. Govindarajan, A. Queiroz and A.F. Reyes-Lega) 1 Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y. and The Institute of Mathematical

More information

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms (February 24, 2017) 08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2016-17/08a-ops

More information

TD 1: Hilbert Spaces and Applications

TD 1: Hilbert Spaces and Applications Université Paris-Dauphine Functional Analysis and PDEs Master MMD-MA 2017/2018 Generalities TD 1: Hilbert Spaces and Applications Exercise 1 (Generalized Parallelogram law). Let (H,, ) be a Hilbert space.

More information

APPENDIX A. Background Mathematics. A.1 Linear Algebra. Vector algebra. Let x denote the n-dimensional column vector with components x 1 x 2.

APPENDIX A. Background Mathematics. A.1 Linear Algebra. Vector algebra. Let x denote the n-dimensional column vector with components x 1 x 2. APPENDIX A Background Mathematics A. Linear Algebra A.. Vector algebra Let x denote the n-dimensional column vector with components 0 x x 2 B C @. A x n Definition 6 (scalar product). The scalar product

More information

x 3y 2z = 6 1.2) 2x 4y 3z = 8 3x + 6y + 8z = 5 x + 3y 2z + 5t = 4 1.5) 2x + 8y z + 9t = 9 3x + 5y 12z + 17t = 7

x 3y 2z = 6 1.2) 2x 4y 3z = 8 3x + 6y + 8z = 5 x + 3y 2z + 5t = 4 1.5) 2x + 8y z + 9t = 9 3x + 5y 12z + 17t = 7 Linear Algebra and its Applications-Lab 1 1) Use Gaussian elimination to solve the following systems x 1 + x 2 2x 3 + 4x 4 = 5 1.1) 2x 1 + 2x 2 3x 3 + x 4 = 3 3x 1 + 3x 2 4x 3 2x 4 = 1 x + y + 2z = 4 1.4)

More information

Composition Operators on Hilbert Spaces of Analytic Functions

Composition Operators on Hilbert Spaces of Analytic Functions Composition Operators on Hilbert Spaces of Analytic Functions Carl C. Cowen IUPUI (Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis) and Purdue University First International Conference on Mathematics

More information

Recall that any inner product space V has an associated norm defined by

Recall that any inner product space V has an associated norm defined by Hilbert Spaces Recall that any inner product space V has an associated norm defined by v = v v. Thus an inner product space can be viewed as a special kind of normed vector space. In particular every inner

More information

November 18, 2013 ANALYTIC FUNCTIONAL CALCULUS

November 18, 2013 ANALYTIC FUNCTIONAL CALCULUS November 8, 203 ANALYTIC FUNCTIONAL CALCULUS RODICA D. COSTIN Contents. The spectral projection theorem. Functional calculus 2.. The spectral projection theorem for self-adjoint matrices 2.2. The spectral

More information

Introduction to Quantum Spin Systems

Introduction to Quantum Spin Systems 1 Introduction to Quantum Spin Systems Lecture 2 Sven Bachmann (standing in for Bruno Nachtergaele) Mathematics, UC Davis MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/10/11 2 Basic Setup For concreteness, consider

More information

C/CS/Phys 191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 11

C/CS/Phys 191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 11 C/CS/Phys 191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 11 In this and the next lecture we summarize the essential physical and mathematical aspects of quantum mechanics relevant to

More information

Some Introductory Notes on Quantum Computing

Some Introductory Notes on Quantum Computing Some Introductory Notes on Quantum Computing Markus G. Kuhn http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge 2000-04-07 1 Quantum Computing Notation Quantum Computing is best

More information

Errata Applied Analysis

Errata Applied Analysis Errata Applied Analysis p. 9: line 2 from the bottom: 2 instead of 2. p. 10: Last sentence should read: The lim sup of a sequence whose terms are bounded from above is finite or, and the lim inf of a sequence

More information

2 Resolvents and Green s Functions

2 Resolvents and Green s Functions Course Notes Solving the Schrödinger Equation: Resolvents 057 F. Porter Revision 09 F. Porter Introduction Once a system is well-specified, the problem posed in non-relativistic quantum mechanics is to

More information

Self-adjoint extensions of symmetric operators

Self-adjoint extensions of symmetric operators Self-adjoint extensions of symmetric operators Simon Wozny Proseminar on Linear Algebra WS216/217 Universität Konstanz Abstract In this handout we will first look at some basics about unbounded operators.

More information

1. General Vector Spaces

1. General Vector Spaces 1.1. Vector space axioms. 1. General Vector Spaces Definition 1.1. Let V be a nonempty set of objects on which the operations of addition and scalar multiplication are defined. By addition we mean a rule

More information

The GW Approximation. Manish Jain 1. July 8, Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 1/36

The GW Approximation. Manish Jain 1. July 8, Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 1/36 1/36 The GW Approximation Manish Jain 1 Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science Bangalore July 8, 2014 Ground-state properties 2/36 Properties that are intrinsic to a system with all its electrons

More information

Kernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels

Kernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels Kernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels 2. Positive Definite Kernel and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space Kenji Fukumizu The Institute of Statistical Mathematics. Graduate University

More information

Preface Introduction to the electron liquid

Preface Introduction to the electron liquid Table of Preface page xvii 1 Introduction to the electron liquid 1 1.1 A tale of many electrons 1 1.2 Where the electrons roam: physical realizations of the electron liquid 5 1.2.1 Three dimensions 5 1.2.2

More information

Functional Analysis Review

Functional Analysis Review Outline 9.520: Statistical Learning Theory and Applications February 8, 2010 Outline 1 2 3 4 Vector Space Outline A vector space is a set V with binary operations +: V V V and : R V V such that for all

More information

MATHEMATICS 217 NOTES

MATHEMATICS 217 NOTES MATHEMATICS 27 NOTES PART I THE JORDAN CANONICAL FORM The characteristic polynomial of an n n matrix A is the polynomial χ A (λ) = det(λi A), a monic polynomial of degree n; a monic polynomial in the variable

More information

QUASI-UNIFORMLY POSITIVE OPERATORS IN KREIN SPACE. Denitizable operators in Krein spaces have spectral properties similar to those

QUASI-UNIFORMLY POSITIVE OPERATORS IN KREIN SPACE. Denitizable operators in Krein spaces have spectral properties similar to those QUASI-UNIFORMLY POSITIVE OPERATORS IN KREIN SPACE BRANKO CURGUS and BRANKO NAJMAN Denitizable operators in Krein spaces have spectral properties similar to those of selfadjoint operators in Hilbert spaces.

More information

MATH 583A REVIEW SESSION #1

MATH 583A REVIEW SESSION #1 MATH 583A REVIEW SESSION #1 BOJAN DURICKOVIC 1. Vector Spaces Very quick review of the basic linear algebra concepts (see any linear algebra textbook): (finite dimensional) vector space (or linear space),

More information

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability... Functional Analysis Franck Sueur 2018-2019 Contents 1 Metric spaces 1 1.1 Definitions........................................ 1 1.2 Completeness...................................... 3 1.3 Compactness......................................

More information

Foundations of Matrix Analysis

Foundations of Matrix Analysis 1 Foundations of Matrix Analysis In this chapter we recall the basic elements of linear algebra which will be employed in the remainder of the text For most of the proofs as well as for the details, the

More information

Section 4: The Quantum Scalar Field

Section 4: The Quantum Scalar Field Physics 8.323 Section 4: The Quantum Scalar Field February 2012 c 2012 W. Taylor 8.323 Section 4: Quantum scalar field 1 / 19 4.1 Canonical Quantization Free scalar field equation (Klein-Gordon) ( µ µ

More information

Compact symetric bilinear forms

Compact symetric bilinear forms Compact symetric bilinear forms Mihai Mathematics Department UC Santa Barbara IWOTA 2006 IWOTA 2006 Compact forms [1] joint work with: J. Danciger (Stanford) S. Garcia (Pomona

More information

Fredholm Theory. April 25, 2018

Fredholm Theory. April 25, 2018 Fredholm Theory April 25, 208 Roughly speaking, Fredholm theory consists of the study of operators of the form I + A where A is compact. From this point on, we will also refer to I + A as Fredholm operators.

More information

10.1. The spectrum of an operator. Lemma If A < 1 then I A is invertible with bounded inverse

10.1. The spectrum of an operator. Lemma If A < 1 then I A is invertible with bounded inverse 10. Spectral theory For operators on finite dimensional vectors spaces, we can often find a basis of eigenvectors (which we use to diagonalize the matrix). If the operator is symmetric, this is always

More information

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

BRST and Dirac Cohomology BRST and Dirac Cohomology Peter Woit Columbia University Dartmouth Math Dept., October 23, 2008 Peter Woit (Columbia University) BRST and Dirac Cohomology October 2008 1 / 23 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Representation

More information

Functional Analysis I

Functional Analysis I Functional Analysis I Course Notes by Stefan Richter Transcribed and Annotated by Gregory Zitelli Polar Decomposition Definition. An operator W B(H) is called a partial isometry if W x = X for all x (ker

More information

Neutral Electronic Excitations:

Neutral Electronic Excitations: Neutral Electronic Excitations: a Many-body approach to the optical absorption spectra Claudio Attaccalite http://abineel.grenoble.cnrs.fr/ Second Les Houches school in computational physics: ab-initio

More information

BASIC ALGORITHMS IN LINEAR ALGEBRA. Matrices and Applications of Gaussian Elimination. A 2 x. A T m x. A 1 x A T 1. A m x

BASIC ALGORITHMS IN LINEAR ALGEBRA. Matrices and Applications of Gaussian Elimination. A 2 x. A T m x. A 1 x A T 1. A m x BASIC ALGORITHMS IN LINEAR ALGEBRA STEVEN DALE CUTKOSKY Matrices and Applications of Gaussian Elimination Systems of Equations Suppose that A is an n n matrix with coefficents in a field F, and x = (x,,

More information

Dmitry Pelinovsky Department of Mathematics, McMaster University, Canada

Dmitry Pelinovsky Department of Mathematics, McMaster University, Canada Spectrum of the linearized NLS problem Dmitry Pelinovsky Department of Mathematics, McMaster University, Canada Collaboration: Marina Chugunova (McMaster, Canada) Scipio Cuccagna (Modena and Reggio Emilia,

More information

Representation Theory

Representation Theory Representation Theory Representations Let G be a group and V a vector space over a field k. A representation of G on V is a group homomorphism ρ : G Aut(V ). The degree (or dimension) of ρ is just dim

More information

Linear Algebra using Dirac Notation: Pt. 2

Linear Algebra using Dirac Notation: Pt. 2 Linear Algebra using Dirac Notation: Pt. 2 PHYS 476Q - Southern Illinois University February 6, 2018 PHYS 476Q - Southern Illinois University Linear Algebra using Dirac Notation: Pt. 2 February 6, 2018

More information

THE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS

THE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS THE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS OGNJEN MILATOVIC Abstract. We consider H V = M +V, where (M, g) is a Riemannian manifold (not necessarily

More information

Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak

Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak 1 Noetherian rings Let R be a ring. A (right) R -module M is called noetherian if it satisfies the maximum condition for its submodules. In other words, if M 1... M i M i+1...

More information

Notes on Banach Algebras and Functional Calculus

Notes on Banach Algebras and Functional Calculus Notes on Banach Algebras and Functional Calculus April 23, 2014 1 The Gelfand-Naimark theorem (proved on Feb 7) Theorem 1. If A is a commutative C -algebra and M is the maximal ideal space, of A then the

More information

Mathematical Analysis of a Generalized Chiral Quark Soliton Model

Mathematical Analysis of a Generalized Chiral Quark Soliton Model Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications Vol. 2 (2006), Paper 018, 12 pages Mathematical Analysis of a Generalized Chiral Quark Soliton Model Asao ARAI Department of Mathematics,

More information