Recent Advances on Transonic Aeroelasticity
|
|
- Leon Freeman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Recent Advances on Transonic Aeroelasticity Wolfgang Luber EADS European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company ICNPAA 2010 Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil; June 29th July 3rd 2010 EADS 2008 All rights reserved
2 Overview Introduction, Background Requirements on modern Aeroelastic Tools Correction Methods applied in Aeroelasticity Measurements of unsteady pressure Aerodynamic PVDF Foils Aeroelastic Simulation Tool Small disturbance Euler method Conclusion ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 2
3 Background Application of classical aerodynamic and aeroelastic tools in the design, development and clearance of military aircraft projects by German Military Aircraft Industry EWR Entwicklungsring (Heinkel, Junkers, Messerschmitt, Bölkow) MBB Messerschmitt Bölow Blohm Dasa Deutsche Aerospace, Daimler Benz Aerospace, EADS-MAS European Aerospace, Defence and Space Company Military Air Systems ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 3
4 Application of classical Aeroelastic Tools VJ-101 VAK 191 AIRBUS A300 B F-104 Starfighter CCV Tornado X-31 Eurofighter F-4 Phantom EADS 2010 All rights reserved June/July 2010 MIG-29 ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 4
5 Aeroelastic Requirements Steady aerodynamic requirement Steady aerodynamic loads of total rigid aircraft and components are required to be generated for sub-trans- and supersonic Mach number ranges, angle-of-attack ranges with/without control surface deflections. Requirement for Static Aeroelasticity Steady aerodynamic loads of total non-rigid aircraft and components are required to be generated for sub-trans- and supersonic Mach number ranges, angle-of-attack ranges with/without control surface deflections at several attitudes using the normal mode shapes or the flexibility matrix. Requirement for unsteady rigid control surface aerodynamics and rigid body motions Unsteady aerodynamic loads of total rigid aircraft and components are required to be generated for subtrans- and supersonic Mach number ranges, angle-of-attack ranges with/without dynamic control surface deflections or rigid body motions. Requirement for unsteady aerodynamics of flexible modes Unsteady aerodynamic loads of total flexible aircraft and components are required to be generated for sub-trans- and supersonic Mach number ranges, angle-of-attack ranges for dynamic modal mode deflections. ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 5
6 Aeroelastic Requirements Requirement for classical Flutter prediction Baseline flutter analysis predictions (p-k method) are required based on the generalized unsteady aerodynamic forces extracted from the simulations and the generalized mass, damping and stiffness matrices. Requirement for flutter simulation Allowance should be made for flutter simulation in the time-domain in the sub-trans- and supersonic Mach number range at moderate incidence for modal mode shapes, generalized masses and stiffnesses of the total aircraft. Requirement for dynamic gust loads Gust loads from simulations for sub-trans- and supersonic Mach number at incidence for modal mode shapes, generalized masses and stiffnesses of total aircraft are required. Requirement for Aero-servo-elasticity Transfer functions of rates and accelerations at the FCS sensor positions due to prescribed control surface inputs should be predicted in sub-trans- and supersonic flow at moderate incidence for the flexible total A/C (using normal mode shapes, generalized masses and stiffnesses). ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 6
7 Aeroelastic Requirements Aero-servo-elastic Stability FCS open loop transfer functions due to control surface inputs should be predicted for aero-servoelastic stability investigation in sub-trans- and supersonic flow at moderate incidence for the flexible total A/C (using normal mode shapes, generalized mass and stiffness) including FCS feedback description. Closed loop flutter analysis to investigate flutter with effects of the flight control system shall be installed ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 7
8 Overview Introduction, Background Requirements on modern Aeroelastic Tools Correction Methods applied in Aeroelasticity Measurements of unsteady pressure Aerodynamic PVDF Foils Aeroelastic Simulation Tool Small disturbance Euler method Conclusion ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 8
9 Correction Methods MULTIPLICATIVE CORRECTION METHOD ' '' ' '' ( c + i c ) = ( c + i c ) p p corr p p theo ( c p / α ) exp ( c p / α ) theo steady ENHANCED A/C STABILISATION AN MANEUVRABILITY ADDITIVE CORRECTION METHOD ' '' ' '' p p ( cp i cp ) ( cp i cp ) ' '' + = + + ( α + i α ) mode xx corr theo c α exp, α 0 c α theo steady ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 9
10 Clean and external Store A/C Normal Modes Clean Aircraft Aircraft with I/B & O/B store Carriage ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 10
11 Damping vs Flutterspeed Mach = 0.9 Clean Aircraft Mach = 0.95 External Store A/C ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 11
12 AGARD FE-Model and Geometry NACA 64A004 Profil 11x11 Grid points 121 Plate elements 8 Elementes are fixed ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 12
13 AGARD Comparison with Reference Model two modes Mode 1: Lagrange: Hz AGARD Report: Hz Mode 2: Lagrange: Hz AGARD Report: Hz ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 13
14 AGARD CFD-Model Grid system Grid points 5 Blocks optimized for Euler-Calcs ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 14
15 Flutteranalysis AGARD Time Consumption 1 Coupling step 200 to 360 Seconds (75% of CFD-Solution) Generation of time series with 300 Steps Average 4 time series are needed to enclose the dynamic pressure of the flutter point with ±25 N/m 2 7 points are required for each flutter slope Total Time of a flutter analysis (pure CPU time without pre and post processing): 10 Days ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 15
16 Flutter onset AGARD (4) Flutter Frequency Ratio 0.80 Flutter Frequency Ratio ω F / ω α AGARD Report Lagrange/Doublet Lattice Iterate Lee-Rausch, Batina 1993 Farhat, Lesoinne Machzahl ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 16
17 Flutter Case: M=0.901, α=0.0 ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 17
18 Flutter Case: M=0.901, α=0.0 ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 18
19 Overview Introduction, Background Requirements on modern Aeroelastic Tools Correction Methods applied in Aeroelasticity Measurements of unsteady pressure Aerodynamic PVDF Foils Aeroelastic Simulation Tool Small disturbance Euler method Conclusion ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 19
20 Aircraft Components affected by Buffet AIRBRAKE FIN EQUIPMENT ENGINE PILOT REAR FUSELAGE FRONT FUSELAGE EXTERNAL STORES WINGS ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 20
21 Aerodynamic Loads on Airbrake ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 21
22 Application of Buffet Vibrations & Dynamic Loads STRUCTURAL DESIGN Predicted dynamic buffet loads are applied for the design of the following components Fin Structural Design not covered by tuned gust analysis Rear / Center Fuselage structural design Wing Buffet covered by tuned gust analysis EQUIPMENT DESIGN AND QUALIFICATION Predicted and flight measured buffet vibrations are applied for the vibration qualification of equipment in front / center / rear fuselage and avionic bay PILOT DISCOMFORT Predicted buffet vibrations are used to assess the pilot comfort ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 22
23 Prediction and Validation of Buffeting ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 23
24 PVDF Polyvenylidenfluorid ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 24
25 Location of unsteady pressure measuring ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 25
26 Polyvenyliden Fluorid Sensor Array Application from Prof. W. Nitsche, TU Berlin ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 26
27 Trainer Model in NLR Transonic Windtunnel ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 27
28 Location unsteady pressure measuring points Location of the port pressure pick ups MP1 MP12 Location of starboard pressure pick ups MP13 MP24 ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 28
29 PSD of pressure MP8 at 37.5 degrees 10 6 PSD Sp[Pa 2 / Hz ] PS [Pa 2 ] 2.4x x x x x Variance [Pa 2 ] f [Hz] Time History f [Hz] Pa t [sec] Power spectrum variance and time history ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 29
30 PSD of pressure coefficient vs AoA α = 0 α = 5 α = 10 α = 12 α = 14 α = 15 α = 16 α = 18 α = 20 α = 21 α = 22 α = 23 α = 24 α = 25 α = 26 α = 27 α = 28 α = 29 α = k = f l µ /U PSD (amplitude of spectrum) of pressure coefficient P1 as function of angle of attack ; Sensor position P1 U = 40 m/s, Re lµ = 0.68 x ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 30
31 Comparison of pressure pick ups: NLR and TUM 0.3 [ ] c P rms MP12 MP6 MP8 MP1 MP11 MP2 MP M = 0.5 P2 P c P rms of buffet pressures α [ ] Comparisons of c prms values of signals at P1 and P2 (TUM TEST) TO MP1, MP2, MP6, MP9, MP8, MP11, MP12 (NLR TEST) Mach = 0.5 ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 31
32 Comparison of MP8 and MP9: NLR and TUM P1 MP9 MP Comparison rms values P1 and MP9/MP8 α rms M0.5 Comparison of c p rms from TUM test signal P1 with NLR test signals MP8 and MP9 Mach = 0.5 ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 32
33 Conclusion From the result of the comparison of the two different measurements it can be concluded that the PVDF foil technique is adequate for the application of the buffet prediction. This could be demonstrated through the validation of PVDF measured unsteady buffet pressures. Furthermore it is concluded that the application of PVDF buffet pressure measurement technique leads to strong cost reductions compared to the classical approach during the design and certification of military aircraft structures including buffet dynamic loads. This is due to the fact that for the PVDF measurement the existing aerodynamic wind tunnel model for the derivation of stationary aerodynamic coefficients can be applied and it is not necessary to built an additional wind tunnel model for buffet as in case of the classical method. ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 33
34 Overview Introduction, Background Requirements on modern Aeroelastic Tools Correction Methods applied in Aeroelasticity Measurements of unsteady pressure Aerodynamic PVDF Foils Aeroelastic Simulation Tool Small disturbance Euler method Conclusion ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 34
35 Aeroelastic Simulation System Fundamental equations: ( ρ) ( ρ φ ) + ( ρ φ ) + ( ρ φ ) = 0 t + x x y y z z Nonlinear potential theory Isentropy assumption Clebsch Potential Correction (prediction of weak shocks) No friction and rotation Application: Analysis of flutter in time and frequency domain prediction of deformations prediction of steady/unsteady pressure distributions Dynamic Response, dynamic loads, gust loads ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 35
36 X Z Y cpt Ma = 0.93 α = 2.2 δ ib = 0.0 δ ob = -5.0 ε = 0.0 η FP = 0.0 ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 36
37 WING SECTION 04 y/(b/2) = 36.7 % C P [-] WING SECTION 06 y/(b/2) = 49.8 % AESIM lo side AESIM up side EXP Data lo side EXP Data up side C P * x/c [-] Ma = 0.93 α = 2.2 δ ib = 0.0 δ ob = -5.0 ε = 0.0 η FP = 0.0 C P [-] AESIM lo side AESIM up side EXP Data lo side EXP Data up side C P * x/c [-] ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 37
38 WING SECTION 38 y/(b/2) = 54 % flex lo side flex up side rigid lo side rigid up side C P * -0.4 C P [-] H = sea level x/c [-] Ma = 0.80 α = 2.20 δ ib = 1.85 δ ob = 1.85 ε = -5.0 η FP = -3.0 C P [-] WING SECTION 43 y/(b/2) = 84 % x/c [-] flex lo side flex up side rigid lo side rigid up side C P * ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 38
39 CANARD SECTION 30 y/(b/2) = 43 % flex lo side flex up side rigid lo side rigid up side C P * -0.2 C P [-] CANARD SECTION 34 y/(b/2) = 95 % x/c [-] flex lo side flex up side rigid lo side rigid up side C P * H = sea level Ma = 0.80 α = 2.20 δ ib = 1.85 δ ob = 1.85 ε = -5.0 η FP = -3.0 C P [-] x/c [-] ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 39
40 X Z Y cp Ma = 1.2 α = 4.1 δ ib = 0.95 δ ob = 0.95 ε = 0.0 η FP = 0.0 ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 40
41 WING SECTION 06 y/b = 49.8 % C P [-] AESIM lo side AESIM up side exp. data (ob pyl) lo side exp. data (ob pyl) up side x/c [-] Ma = 1.2 α = 4.1 δ ib = 0.95 δ ob = 0.95 ε = 0.0 η FP = 0.0 C P [-] WING SECTION 08 y/b = 60.8 % AESIM lo side AESIM up side exp. data (ob pyl) lo side exp. data (ob pyl) up side x/c [-] ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 41
42 WING SECTION 38 y/(b/2) = 54 % flex lo side flex up side rigid lo side rigid up side -0.3 C P [-] WING SECTION 40 y/(b/2) = 68 % x/c [-] flex lo side flex up side rigid lo side rigid up side H = 7783 ft Ma = 1.20 α = 5.00 δ ib = 3.33 δ ob = 3.33 ε = 0 η FP = 0 C P [-] x/c [-] ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 42
43 0.6 LIFT DISTRIBUTION WING C A (y) [-] Ca (y) rigid Ca (y) elastic 0.1 fuselage 0.6 LIFT DISTRIBUTION CANARD inboard flap outboard flap y/(b/2) [-] Ca (y) rigid Ca (y) elastic H = 7783 ft Ma = 1.20 α = 5.00 δ ib = 3.33 δ ob = 3.33 ε = 0 η FP = 0 C A (y) [-] fuselage y/(b/2) [-] ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 43
44 Demonstration of AESIM Code - Validation Mode 3 ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 44
45 Demonstration of AESIM Code - Validation Stability and Control Derivatives ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 45
46 UPPER PART LIFTING SURFACE LOWER PART FULL POTENTIAL LIFTING SURFACE Real Imag Amp Phs FULL POTENTIAL Unsteady pressures Mode 8, Ma=0.8,57Hz ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 46
47 Validation of flutter analysis AESIM Full Potential, new grid, Ma =0.8, α= KTS EAS VEAS [KTS] VEAS [KTS] Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4 Mode 5 Mode 6 Mode 7 Mode 8 Mode 9 Mode 10 Zero Damping Line Damping [%] Frequency [Hz] ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 47
48 Demonstration of AESIM Code - Validation AESIM-BASIC Gust Example 1-cos gust Aerodynamic and Elastic Loading in Selected Cuts due to Gust ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 48
49 Conclusions Actual Status The industrial validation process for improved aeroelastic tool AESIM based on industrial requirements as proposed with the present contribution has been performed for the example of a modern fighter aircraft configuration Almost all industrial minimum and partly nominal general and validation requirements could be demonstrated to be met for the present simulations using AESIM with full potential code in the subsonic, transonic and supersonic region at low to medium incidences In detail the validation of steady aerodynamic and steady aeroelastic simulations of a rigid and flexible wing and of complete rigid and flexible aircraft has been carried out successfully. Validations of unsteady aerodynamic simulations of wing and total aircraft with oscillating control surfaces and simulations of unsteady aerodynamics of normal modes have been performed. Flutter and gust simulations had been validated using results from classical tools. ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 49
50 Conclusions Actual Status Additional effort is needed for the improvement of flutter and gust simulations. Improvements of MIMO technique, reduced order models have to be investigated. Improved aerodynamic prediction capability (AESIM FP) including correction methods from wind tunnel experiments is needed in subsonic, transonic and supersonic region for medium incidence for static aeroelasticity, dynamic load and classical flutter prediction and aeroservoelasticity combined with affordable turn around times for high number of configuration ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 50
51 Overview Introduction, Background Requirements on modern Aeroelastic Tools Correction Methods applied in Aeroelasticity Measurements of unsteady pressure Aerodynamic PVDF Foils Aeroelastic Simulation Tool Small disturbance Euler method Conclusion ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 51
52 Overview Introduction Small disturbance Euler method Calculation of Generalized Aerodynamic Forces (GAFs) CFD Models and steady state results Linear flutter analysis: theory Structural dynamics, GAFs and flutter results Conclusion ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 52
53 Introduction Industrial flutter analysis process is mainly based on aerodynamic forces computed by classical potential methods Nonlinear aerodynamics requested, but with an acceptable computing time Development of the small disturbance Euler method AER-SDEu at the Institute of Aerodynamics of the TUM Direct computation of the unsteady flow quantities for harmonic oscillations Computation of the GAF matrices: Integration in flutter analysis process ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 53
54 Small Disturbance Euler Method AER-SDEu based on the full nonlinear Euler solver AER-Eu Cell centered Finite Volume Method Flux-difference scheme (Roe) with 2nd order spatial accuracy Implicit time integration (LU-SSOR) Pseudo time marching procedure for steady and formal steady computations Dual-time stepping for time-accurate computations Assumptions for AER-SDEu: For small disturbances of the flow the unsteady flow quantities can be decomposed into a time invariant mean part and a time dependent part Time linearization of the Euler equations about a mean state Harmonic oscillation of the considered structure Flow quantities respond harmonically with amplitude and phase shift ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 54
55 Small disturbance Euler method Coordinate vector of deformed grid x( ξ, η, ς, t) = x( ξ, η, ς ) + xˆ( ξ, η, ς ) e ikτ Arbitrary flow quantity (complex amplitude) φ( ξ, η, ζ, τ) = φ( ξ, η, ζ ) + φˆ( ξ, η, ζ ) e ikτ Only first harmonic is considered (neglecting of higher harmonics) Introducing these assumptions into the Euler equations yields the small disturbance Euler equations An unsteady problem is reduced to a formal steady problem for the perturbation part ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 55
56 Small disturbance Euler method Time Domain AER-Eu Steady state solution AER-Eu AER-SDEu Unsteady flow quantities (several cycles): c p (τ) Frequency Domain Fourier Analysis 1 st Harmonic of perturbed flow quantities: Re ĉp, Im ĉp 1 st Harmonic of perturbed flow quantities: Re ĉp, Im ĉ p Reduction of computational time (at least by an order of magnitude) with AER-SDEu Nonlinearities of a steady state solution are introduced into the AER-SDEu computation ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 56
57 Computation of the GAF matrices The AER-SDEu method requires as input: Computational grid in reference position Computational grid in the deflected position Steady state solution generated by the nonlinear method AER-Eu: c p The AER-SDEu method provides as output (e.g.): ĉ p The GAF matrix can now be computed as (for fixed k red and Ma ): GAF ˆ ij = cp i uj ds + S S c p u j ds ˆ i c p ds Steady state pressure coefficient Surface vector of reference position u j ĉ pi dŝi Disturbance part due to eigenmode i Vector of deflection of eigenmode j Disturbed surface vector of eigenmode i ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 57
58 CFD-Models and steady state results The integration of AER-SDEu into the aeroelastic analysis process is demonstrated for two models: AGARD-Wing (weakened model 3) Fuselage-Cropped-Delta-Wing (FCDW) ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 58
59 AGARD-Wing Computations performed for 4 Mach numbers (Ma = 0.499, 0.678, 0.901, 0.954), 6 reduced frequencies and 5 eigenmodes Geometric properties: Taper ratio: Aspect ratio: Sweep (1/4-Line): airfoil: λ = 0.66 Λ = 1.65 φ 0.25 = 45 NACA 65A004 CFD-mesh properties: Grid topology: Block dimension (cells): Surface cells (wing): Off-Body-Distance: Farfield distance (x/y/z) 1-Block C-H c r 10c r /10c r /11c r c r - root chord ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 59
60 AGARD-Wing Steady state result at Ma = (transonic case), AoA = 0 Weak shock on wing inner section (e.g. at η = 0.25) ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 60
61 FCDW Generic aeroelastic model built by EADS DS - MAS, DLR, Dassault Aviation, ONERA, Alenia Computations performed for 5 Mach numbers (Ma = 0.5, 0.7, 0.852, 0.875, 0.921), 6 reduced frequencies and 4 eigenmodes CFD-mesh properties: Grid topology: Block dimension (cells): Surface cells (fuselage): Surface cells (wing): Off-Body-Distance: Farfield distance (x/y/z) 2-Block H-O c r 10c r /10c r /10c r ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 61
62 FCDW Steady state results for various Mach numbers at AoA = 2 Sonic isosurface (Ma = 1.0) Ma = FCDW upper side U ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 62
63 FCDW Steady pressure distribution at Ma = 0.852, AoA = 2 Strong shock on wing upper side Experiment shows also strong shock on wing lower side in contrast to the computation Contour plot wing upper side ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 63
64 Linear flutter analysis: theory Computation of the normal modes with the dynamic equation Eigenvectors X 1, X 2, written as columns in the modal matrix Φ M X & + K X = Displacements vector X written in the modal basis Φ = Generalization of the mass- and stiffness matrix X = Φ q Linear flutter equation in the modal basis M gen = Φ T MΦ 0 [ K] X 1 X 2 K gen = Φ T KΦ p L ref V 2 Mgen + K gen q GAF( Ma, p) q( p) = 0 ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 64
65 Linear flutter analysis: theory 0,2 V-g curve Flutter point (zero damping): Damping [-] 0,0-0, V FP, ρ FP q FP ω FP -0,4 Velocity [m/s] Frequency [Hz] V-f curve Flutter Speed Index Flutter Frequency Ratio q FP q ω ω ref FP ref Velocity [m/s] ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 65
66 AGARD-Wing 445.6: normal modes ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 66
67 AGARD-Wing 445.6: GAFs GAF-Matrix at Ma = (high subsonic) for bending (mode 1) and torsion (mode 2) GAF-Matrix at Ma = (transonic) for bending (mode 1) and torsion (mode 2) ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 67
68 AGARD-Wing 445.6: flutter results As expected, good correlation in Flutter Speed Index between AER-SDEu and Potential Theory in the subsonic domain Transonic dip detected for AER-SDEu Excellent correlation between AER-SDEu and experiment in Flutter Speed Index for all Ma Satisfying correlation in Flutter Frequency Ratio between AER-SDEu and experiment for all Ma AER-SDEu GAFs integration validated * D.E. Raveh, Y. Levy and M. Karpel, Efficient Aeroelastic Analysis Using Computational Unsteady Aerodynamics, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2001, pp ** X. Chen, G.-C. Zha, M.-T. Xang, Numerical Simulation of 3D-Wing Flutter With Fully Coupled Fluid- Structural Interaction, 44th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting And Exhibit, 9-12 Jan. 2006, Reno, NV. ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 68
69 FCDW: normal modes The measurement showed strong nonlinearities at this mode! Only theoretical comparison of the flutter results possible ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 69
70 FCDW: GAFs GAF-Matrix at Ma = 0.7 (high subsonic) for bending (mode 1) and torsion (mode 3) GAF-Matrix at Ma = (transonic) for bending (mode 1) and torsion (mode 3) ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 70
71 FCDW: flutter results Up to Ma =0.7, good correlation between AER- SDEu and Potential Theory Strong transonic dip observed by AER-SDEu Strong discrepancy to the experimental results for Ma =0.875 and Ma =0.921 (nonlinearities in the structure not reproduced in the FE-model) ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 71
72 Conclusion GAFs successfully and robustly extracted from a small disturbance Euler method (AER-SDEu) Same matrix-format for GAFs out of Potential Theory as for small disturbance GAFs direct integration in the linear flutter analysis without loss of quality Good correlation with linear flutter predictions out of the Potential Theory in the subsonic domain High quality of linear flutter predictions in the transonic domain, because of the consideration of an aerodynamic nonlinear steady-state (AGARD-Wing 445.6) AER-SDEu: reduction of computational time by an order of magnitude (with respect to a fully nonlinear time-matching computation) Successful integration of AER-SDEu in the linear flutter analysis ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 72
73 Thank You Acknowledgements: I wish to acknowledge the contribution of Technical University of Munich, DLR, the NLR and the Colleagues of EADS MAS. ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 73
74 F S T FFAST FUTURE FAST AEROELASTIC SIMULATION TECHNOLOGIES FUTURE FAST AEROELASTIC SIMULATION TECHNOLOGIES FFAST Future Fast Aeroelastic Simulation Technologies European Research Project, Running time 3 years Kick off meeting in January 2010 ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 74
75 FFAST Background: Reduced-Order Modelling Goal: produce a much lower dimensional system having the same input/output characteristics as the original full order model far less evaluation time and storage can be used as an efficient surrogate to the original, replace the aerodynamics in coupled aeroelastic simulations, or develop a simpler & faster controller suitable for real time applications input Physics and geometry CFD System of n ODEs ROM Reduced system of r << n ODEs output Wide range of validity Restricted range of validity Reduced basis: POD modes Wind-tunnel experiment Large-scale model, high-fidelity CFD data Low-dim. description of largescale system dynamics ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 75
76 End of presentation ICNPAA-2010, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil - W. Luber - 76
Aerodynamic Resonance in Transonic Airfoil Flow. J. Nitzsche, R. H. M. Giepman. Institute of Aeroelasticity, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Göttingen
Aerodynamic Resonance in Transonic Airfoil Flow J. Nitzsche, R. H. M. Giepman Institute of Aeroelasticity, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Göttingen Source: A. Šoda, PhD thesis, 2006 Slide 2/39 Introduction
More informationGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)
German Aerospace Center (DLR) AEROGUST M30 Progress Meeting 23-24 November 2017, Bordeaux Presented by P. Bekemeryer / J. Nitzsche With contributions of C. Kaiser 1, S. Görtz 2, R. Heinrich 2, J. Nitzsche
More informationA HARMONIC BALANCE APPROACH FOR MODELING THREE-DIMENSIONAL NONLINEAR UNSTEADY AERODYNAMICS AND AEROELASTICITY
' - ' Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition November 17-22, 22, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA IMECE-22-3232 A HARMONIC ALANCE APPROACH FOR MODELING THREE-DIMENSIONAL
More informationAeroelastic Gust Response
Aeroelastic Gust Response Civil Transport Aircraft - xxx Presented By: Fausto Gill Di Vincenzo 04-06-2012 What is Aeroelasticity? Aeroelasticity studies the effect of aerodynamic loads on flexible structures,
More informationDYNAMIC RESPONSE OF AN AIRPLANE ELASTIC STRUCTURE IN TRANSONIC FLOW
DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF AN AIRPLANE ELASTIC STRUCTURE IN TRANSONIC FLOW S. Kuzmina*, F. Ishmuratov*, O. Karas*, A.Chizhov* * Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI), Zhukovsky, Russia Keywords: aeroelasticity,
More informationTransonic Flutter Prediction of Supersonic Jet Trainer with Various External Store Configurations
Transonic Flutter Prediction of Supersonic Jet Trainer with Various External Store Configurations In Lee * Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, 305-701, Korea Hyuk-Jun Kwon Agency
More informationFREQUENCY DOMAIN FLUTTER ANALYSIS OF AIRCRAFT WING IN SUBSONIC FLOW
FREQUENCY DOMAIN FLUTTER ANALYSIS OF AIRCRAFT WING IN SUBSONIC FLOW Ms.K.Niranjana 1, Mr.A.Daniel Antony 2 1 UG Student, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Karunya University, (India) 2 Assistant professor,
More informationEffects of Stores on Aircraft Structure
Wolfgang G. LUBER wgl-dynamics 81735 Munich GERMANY +49-172 832 9241 wolfgang.luber@live.de ABSTRACT The approach to prove structural integrity of military combat aircraft with external stores focus on
More informationReduced reliance on wind tunnel data
Reduced reliance on wind tunnel data The recreation of the industrial gust loads process, using CFD in place of experimental data Investigation of the underlying assumptions of the current industrial gust
More informationPROGRESS IN THE PREDICTION OF AEROSERVOELASTIC INSTABILITIES ON LARGE CIVIL TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT
ICAS 2000 CONGRESS PROGRESS IN THE PREDICTION OF AEROSERVOELASTIC INSTABILITIES ON LARGE CIVIL TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT M.LACABANNE, A.LAPORTE AEROSPATIALE MATRA AIRBUS, 31060 Toulouse Cedex 03, France Abstract
More informationLimit Cycle Oscillations of a Typical Airfoil in Transonic Flow
Limit Cycle Oscillations of a Typical Airfoil in Transonic Flow Denis B. Kholodar, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO 88 Earl H. Dowell, Jeffrey P. Thomas, and Kenneth C. Hall Duke University,
More informationCOMPUTATION OF CASCADE FLUTTER WITH A COUPLED AERODYNAMIC AND STRUCTURAL MODEL
COMPUTATION OF CASCADE FLUTTER WITH A COUPLED AERODYNAMIC AND STRUCTURAL MODEL M. SADEGHI AND F. LIU Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3975,
More informationNonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of a Wing with Control Surface Freeplay
Copyright c 7 ICCES ICCES, vol., no.3, pp.75-8, 7 Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of a with Control Surface Freeplay K.S. Kim 1,J.H.Yoo,J.S.Bae 3 and I. Lee 1 Summary In this paper, nonlinear aeroelastic
More informationAeroelastic Analysis of Engine Nacelle Strake Considering Geometric Nonlinear Behavior
Aeroelastic Analysis of Engine Nacelle Strake Considering Geometric Nonlinear Behavior N. Manoj Abstract The aeroelastic behavior of engine nacelle strake when subjected to unsteady aerodynamic flows is
More informationReduced order model of three-dimensional Euler equations using proper orthogonal decomposition basis
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 24 (2) (2010) 601~608 www.springerlink.com/content/1738-494x DOI 10.1007/s12206-010-0106-0 Reduced order model of three-dimensional Euler equations using proper
More informationImprovement of flight regarding safety and comfort
Prediction of the aeroelastic behavior An application to wind-tunnel models Mickaël Roucou Royal Institute of Technology KTH - Stockholm, Sweden Department of Aerospace and Vehicle Engineering Email: roucou@kth.se
More informationWind Tunnel Experiments of Stall Flutter with Structural Nonlinearity
Wind Tunnel Experiments of Stall Flutter with Structural Nonlinearity Ahmad Faris R.Razaami School of Aerospace Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA Norizham Abdul Razak School of Aerospace
More informationCONTROL LAW DESIGN IN A COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY ENVIRONMENT
CONTROL LAW DESIGN IN A COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY ENVIRONMENT Jerry R. Newsom Harry H. Robertshaw Rakesh K. Kapania NASA LaRC Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Hampton, VA Blacksburg, VA Blacksburg, VA 757-864-65
More informationDynamic Response of an Aircraft to Atmospheric Turbulence Cissy Thomas Civil Engineering Dept, M.G university
Dynamic Response of an Aircraft to Atmospheric Turbulence Cissy Thomas Civil Engineering Dept, M.G university cissyvp@gmail.com Jancy Rose K Scientist/Engineer,VSSC, Thiruvananthapuram, India R Neetha
More informationAeroelasticity. Lecture 9: Supersonic Aeroelasticity. G. Dimitriadis. AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 9
Aeroelasticity Lecture 9: Supersonic Aeroelasticity G. Dimitriadis AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 9 1 Introduction All the material presented up to now concerned incompressible
More informationANN BASED ROM FOR THE PREDICTION OF UNSTEADY AEROELASTIC INSTABILITIES
IFASD-29- ANN BASED FOR THE PREDICTION OF UNSTEADY AEROELASTIC INSTABILITIES Abdul Rampurawala 1, Ken Badcock 1, and Simao Marques 1 Keywords. ANN,, Flutter, 1 Department of Engineering, University of
More informationTHE ANALYSIS OF LAMINATE LAY-UP EFFECT ON THE FLUTTER SPEED OF COMPOSITE STABILIZERS
THE ANALYSIS OF LAMINATE LAY-UP EFFECT ON THE FLUTTER SPEED OF COMPOSITE STABILIZERS Mirko DINULOVIĆ*, Boško RAŠUO* and Branimir KRSTIĆ** * University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, **
More informationSimulation of Aeroelastic System with Aerodynamic Nonlinearity
Simulation of Aeroelastic System with Aerodynamic Nonlinearity Muhamad Khairil Hafizi Mohd Zorkipli School of Aerospace Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA Norizham Abdul Razak School
More informationREPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 74-188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
More informationMULTIDISCPLINARY OPTIMIZATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF FLUTTER OF AN AIRCRAFT WING WITH UNDERWING STORE IN TRANSONIC REGIME
MULTIDISCPLINARY OPTIMIZATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF FLUTTER OF AN AIRCRAFT WING WITH UNDERWING STORE IN TRANSONIC REGIME A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
More informationTowards Reduced Order Modeling (ROM) for Gust Simulations
Towards Reduced Order Modeling (ROM) for Gust Simulations S. Görtz, M. Ripepi DLR, Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology, Braunschweig, Germany Deutscher Luft und Raumfahrtkongress 2017 5. 7. September
More informationSCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy. A nonlinear POD reduced order model for limit cycle oscillation prediction
SCIENCE CHINA Physics Mechanics & Astronomy Research Paper July 1 Vol.53 No.7: 135 133 doi: 1.17/s11433-1-413- A nonlinear POD reduced order model for limit cycle oscillation prediction CHEN Gang * LI
More informationDrag Computation (1)
Drag Computation (1) Why drag so concerned Its effects on aircraft performances On the Concorde, one count drag increase ( C D =.0001) requires two passengers, out of the 90 ~ 100 passenger capacity, be
More informationAn Investigation of the Sensitivity of F-16 Fighter Flutter Onset and Limit Cycle Oscillations to Uncertainties
An Investigation of the Sensitivity of F-16 Fighter Flutter Onset and Limit Cycle Oscillations to Uncertainties Jeffrey P. Thomas, Earl H. Dowell, and Kenneth C. Hall Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
More informationFlight-Dynamics, Flutter, and Active-Flutter-Suppression Analyses of a Flexible Flying-Wing Research Drone
Flight-Dynamics, Flutter, and Active-Flutter-Suppression Analyses of a Flexible Flying-Wing Research Drone Dr. David K. Schmidt dschmidt@uccs.edu Professor Emeritus University of Colorado Principal D.K.
More informationAeroelastic Wind Tunnel Testing of Very Flexible High-Aspect-Ratio Wings
Aeroelastic Wind Tunnel Testing of Very Flexible High-Aspect-Ratio Wings Justin Jaworski Workshop on Recent Advances in Aeroelasticity, Experiment and Theory July 2, 2010 Problem and Scope High altitude
More informationActive Flutter Control using an Adjoint Method
44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 9-12 January 26, Reno, Nevada AIAA 26-844 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 9 12 Jan, 26. Active Flutter Control using an
More informationVirtual Aeroelastic Flight Testing for the F-16 Fighter with Stores
Virtual Aeroelastic Flight Testing for the F-16 Fighter with Stores Jeffrey P. Thomas, Earl H. Dowell, and Kenneth C. Hall Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 0300 and Charles M. Denegri Jr. U.S. Air Force
More informationOPTIMIZATION OF TAPERED WING STRUCTURE WITH AEROELASTIC CONSTRAINT
ICAS 000 CONGRESS OPTIMIZATION OF TAPERED WING STRUCTURE WITH AEROELASTIC CONSTRAINT Harijono Djojodihardjo, I Wayan Tjatra, Ismojo Harjanto 3 Computational Aeroelastic Group, Aerospace Engineering Department
More informationUsing Automatic Differentiation to Create a Nonlinear Reduced Order Model Aeroelastic Solver
Using Automatic Differentiation to Create a Nonlinear Reduced Order Model Aeroelastic Solver Jeffrey P. Thomas, Earl H. Dowell, and Kenneth C. Hall Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 0300 A novel nonlinear
More informationLINEARISED FREQUENCY DOMAIN GUST ANALYSIS OF LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFT
ECCOMAS Congress 2016 VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, G. Stefanou, V. Plevris (eds.) Crete Island, Greece, 5 10 June
More informationMethod of unsteady aerodynamic forces approximation for aeroservoelastic interactions
Method of unsteady aerodynamic forces approximation for aeroservoelastic interactions Iulian Cotoi Ecole de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre Dame O., Montréal, QC, Canada, H3C1K3 Ruxandra M. Botez Ecole
More information02 Introduction to Structural Dynamics & Aeroelasticity
02 Introduction to Structural Dynamics & Aeroelasticity Vibraciones y Aeroelasticidad Dpto. de Vehículos Aeroespaciales P. García-Fogeda Núñez & F. Arévalo Lozano ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIERÍA
More informationSome effects of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability
47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 5-8 January 29, Orlando, Florida AIAA 29-839 Some effects of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability
More informationDesigning Active Control Laws in a Computational Aeroelasticity Environment. Jerry R. Newsom. Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering
Designing Active Control Laws in a Computational Aeroelasticity Environment Jerry R. Newsom Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment
More informationParallel Computation of Forced Vibration for A Compressor Cascade
44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 9-2 January 26, Reno, Nevada AIAA 26-628 AIAA Paper 26-628 Parallel Computation of Forced Vibration for A Compressor Cascade Zongjun Hu and Gecheng Zha
More informationTransonic Aeroelasticity: Theoretical and Computational Challenges
Transonic Aeroelasticity: Theoretical and Computational Challenges Oddvar O. Bendiksen Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, CA Aeroelasticity Workshop
More informationAIRBRAKE INDUCED FIN BUFFET LOADS ON FIGHTER AIRCRAFT
25 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES AIRBRAKE INDUCED FIN BUFFET LOADS ON FIGHTER AIRCRAFT Christian Breitsamter Institute of Aerodynamics, Technische Universität München Boltzmannstrasse
More informationStructural Nonlinear Flutter Characteristics Analysis for an Actuator-fin System with Dynamic Stiffness
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 4 (11) 59-599 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chinese Journal of Aeronautics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cja Structural Nonlinear Flutter Characteristics
More informationEfficient Modelling of a Nonlinear Gust Loads Process for Uncertainty Quantification of Highly Flexible Aircraft
Efficient Modelling of a Nonlinear Gust Loads Process for Uncertainty Quantification of Highly Flexible Aircraft SciTech, 8 th -12 th January 2018 Kissimmee, Florida Robert Cook, Chris Wales, Ann Gaitonde,
More informationAn Investigation of the Attainable Efficiency of Flight at Mach One or Just Beyond
An Investigation of the Attainable Efficiency of Flight at Mach One or Just Beyond Antony Jameson Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV AIAA Paper 2007-0037
More informationA Harmonic Balance Approach for Large-Scale Problems in Nonlinear Structural Dynamics
A Harmonic Balance Approach for Large-Scale Problems in Nonlinear Structural Dynamics Allen R, PhD Candidate Peter J Attar, Assistant Professor University of Oklahoma Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering
More informationA NONLINEAR HARMONIC BALANCE METHOD FOR THE CFD CODE OVERFLOW 2
IFASD-2009-050 A NONLINEAR HARMONIC BALANCE METHOD FOR THE CFD CODE OVERFLOW 2 Chad H. Custer 1, Jeffrey P. Thomas 2, Earl H. Dowell 3, and Kenneth C. Hall 4 Duke University Mechanical Engineering & Materials
More informationCORRELATION OF FIN BUFFET PRESSURES ON AN F/A-18 WITH SCALED WIND-TUNNEL MEASUREMENTS. Industry Test
CORRELATION OF FIN BUFFET PRESSURES ON AN F/A-8 WITH SCALED WIND-TUNNEL MEASUREMENTS Robert W. Moses Aeroelasticity Branch NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA Gautam H. Shah Vehicle Dynamics Branch
More informationImplementing a Partitioned Algorithm for Fluid-Structure Interaction of Flexible Flapping Wings within Overture
10 th Symposimum on Overset Composite Grids and Solution Technology, NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California, USA 1 Implementing a Partitioned Algorithm for Fluid-Structure Interaction of Flexible
More informationEXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DYNAMIC STABILITY DERIVATIVES FOR A FIGHTER MODEL
24 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DYNAMIC STABILITY DERIVATIVES FOR A FIGHTER MODEL MR Soltani*, Ali R Davari** *Associate Professor, **PhD Student
More informationAero-Propulsive-Elastic Modeling Using OpenVSP
Aero-Propulsive-Elastic Modeling Using OpenVSP August 8, 213 Kevin W. Reynolds Intelligent Systems Division, Code TI NASA Ames Research Center Our Introduction To OpenVSP Overview! Motivation and Background!
More informationImproved System Identification for Aeroservoelastic Predictions
Master's Thesis Defense Improved System Identification for Aeroservoelastic Predictions Presented by Charles Robert O'Neill School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Oklahoma State University Time
More informationINFLUENCE OF GUST MODELLING ON FREE-FLIGHT AEROFOILS
International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics IFASD 2017 25-28 June 2017 Como, Italy INFLUENCE OF GUST MODELLING ON FREE-FLIGHT AEROFOILS Reik Thormann 1, Giampaolo Pagliuca 1, Sebastian
More informationX-31 Vector Aircraft, Low Speed Stability & Control, Comparisons of Wind Tunnel Data & Theory (Focus on Linear & Panel Codes)
39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference 22-25 June 2009, San Antonio, Texas AIAA 2009-3898 27 th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 22-25 June. 2009, San Antonio, TX, USA X-31 Vector Aircraft, Low Speed
More informationAPPLICATION OF SPACE-TIME MAPPING ANALYSIS METHOD TO UNSTEADY NONLINEAR GUST-AIRFOIL INTERACTION PROBLEM
AIAA 2003-3693 APPLICATION OF SPACE-TIME MAPPING ANALYSIS METHOD TO UNSTEADY NONLINEAR GUST-AIRFOIL INTERACTION PROBLEM Vladimir V. Golubev* and Axel Rohde Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona
More informationFLUTTER PREDICTION IN THE TRANSONIC FLIGHT REGIME WITH THE γ-re θ TRANSITION MODEL
11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM XI) 5th European Conference on Computational Mechanics (ECCM V) 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECFD VI) E. Oñate, J. Oliver
More informationThe future of non-linear modelling of aeroelastic gust interaction
The future of non-linear modelling of aeroelastic gust interaction C. J. A. Wales, C. Valente, R. G. Cook, A. L. Gaitonde, D. P. Jones, J. E. Cooper University of Bristol AVIATION, 25 29 June 2018 Hyatt
More informationUnconstrained flight and stability analysis of a flexible rocket using a detailed finite-element based procedure
Computational Ballistics II 357 Unconstrained flight and stability analysis of a flexible rocket using a detailed finite-element based procedure D. J. McTavish, D. R. Greatrix & K. Davidson Ryerson University,
More information1942. Effects of motion-induced aerodynamic force on the performance of active buffeting control
1942. Effects of motion-induced aerodynamic force on the performance of active buffeting control Jie Sun 1, Min Li 2 School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and
More informationAerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics Principal Investigator: Mike Bragg, Eric Loth Post Doc s: Andy Broeren, Sam Lee Graduate Students: Holly Gurbachi(CRI), Tim Hutchison, Devesh Pokhariyal, Ryan Oltman,
More informationSolution of Linear Systems in Fourier-Based Methods for Aircraft Applications
Solution of Linear Systems in Fourier-Based Methods for Aircraft Applications A. McCracken, A. Da Ronch, S. Timme, K. J. Badcock School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GH, United
More informationPRESENTED AT ICAS 2008 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA SEPTEMBER 2008
PRESENTED AT ICAS 2008 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA SEPTEMBER 2008 NONLINEAR AEROELASTICITY OF CURRENT AND FUTURE AEROSPACE VEHICLES Earl Dowell, Kenneth Hall, Robert Kielb, Deman Tang, and Jeffrey Thomas Duke University
More informationHigh-Fidelity Computational Simulation of Nonlinear Fluid- Structure Interaction Problems
Aerodynamic Issues of Unmanned Air Vehicles Fluid-Structure Interaction High-Fidelity Computational Simulation of Nonlinear Fluid- Structure Interaction Problems Raymond E. Gordnier Computational Sciences
More informationAIRFRAME NOISE MODELING APPROPRIATE FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION
AIRFRAME NOISE MODELING APPROPRIATE FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION AIAA-2004-0689 Serhat Hosder, Joseph A. Schetz, Bernard Grossman and William H. Mason Virginia Tech Work sponsored by NASA
More information1264. Identification of second-order kernels in aerodynamics
1264. Identification of second-order kernels in aerodynamics Yunhai Wang 1, Jinglong Han 2, Zhang Bin 3 1, 2 State Key Lab of Mechanics and Control for Mechanical Structures Nanjing University of Aeronautics
More information41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit January 6 9, 2003/Reno, NV
AIAA 3 267 Calculation of Unsteady Transonic Flow by an Euler Method with Small Perturbation Boundary Conditions C. Gao, S. Luo, F. Liu Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of
More informationEVALUATION OF TRANSONIC BUFFETING ONSET BOUNDARY ESTIMATED BY TRAILING EDGE PRESSURE DIVERGENCE AND RMS DATA OF WING VIBRATION
EVALUATION OF TRANSONIC BUFFETING ONSET BOUNDARY ESTIMATED BY TRAILING EDGE PRESSURE DIVERGENCE AND RMS DATA OF WING VIBRATION Rodrigo Sorbilli C. de Sousa, Roberto da Motta Girardi Roberto Gil Annes da
More informationCFD ANALYSIS OF AERODYNAMIC HEATING FOR HYFLEX HIGH ENTHALPY FLOW TESTS AND FLIGHT CONDITIONS
24 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES CFD ANALYSIS OF AERODYNAMIC HEATING FOR HYFLEX HIGH ENTHALPY FLOW TESTS AND FLIGHT CONDITIONS Keiichi Murakami*, Yukimitsu Yamamoto*, Olivier Rouzand**
More informationResearch Article Aeroelastic Analysis of Wings in the Transonic Regime: Planform s Influence on the Dynamic Instability
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering Volume 2016, Article ID 3563684, 13 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3563684 Research Article Aeroelastic Analysis of Wings in the Transonic Regime: Planform
More informationAerodynamics Gust Response Prediction
Aerodynamics Gust Response Prediction Alexis RIGALDO Department of Aerospace and Vehicle Engineering Royal Institute of Technology - SE 114 15 Stockholm, Sweden E-Mail:rigaldo@kth.se Thesis performed within
More informationApplication of Dual Time Stepping to Fully Implicit Runge Kutta Schemes for Unsteady Flow Calculations
Application of Dual Time Stepping to Fully Implicit Runge Kutta Schemes for Unsteady Flow Calculations Antony Jameson Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305
More informationMixing-Plane Method for Flutter Computation in Multi-stage Turbomachines
47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 5-8 January 2009, Orlando, Florida AIAA 2009-862 Mixing-Plane Method for Flutter Computation in Multi-stage
More informationComputation of cascade flutter by uncoupled and coupled methods
International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 8, November 25, 559 569 Computation of cascade flutter by uncoupled and coupled methods MANI SADEGHI and FENG LIU* Department of Mechanical
More informationUncertainty Quantification in Gust Loads Analysis of a Highly Flexible Aircraft Wing
Uncertainty Quantification in Gust Loads Analysis of a Highly Flexible Aircraft Wing IFASD 2017 25 th - 28 th June 2017, Como R. G. Cook, C. Wales, A. L. Gaitonde, D. P. Jones and Jonathan Cooper University
More informationAEROELASTIC DESIGN OF VERSATILE THERMAL INSULATION (VTI) PANELS
Italian Association of Aeronautics and Astronautics XXII Conference Napoli, 9-12 September 2013 AEROELASTIC DESIGN OF VERSATILE THERMAL INSULATION (VTI) PANELS E. Carrera 1, E. Zappino 1, A. Ferrarese
More informationInvestigation potential flow about swept back wing using panel method
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Volume 7, Issue 4, 2016 pp.317-326 Journal homepage: www.ijee.ieefoundation.org Investigation potential flow about swept back wing using panel method Wakkas
More informationAN ENHANCED CORRECTION FACTOR TECHNIQUE FOR AERODYNAMIC INFLUENCE COEFFICIENT METHODS
AN ENHANCED CORRECTION ACTOR TECHNIQUE OR AERODYNAMIC INLUENCE COEICIENT METHODS Ioan Jadic, Dayton Hartley and Jagannath Giri Raytheon Aircraft Company, Wichita, Kansas 67-85 Phone: 36-676-436 E-mail:
More informationCHARACTERIZATION OF THE NONLINEAR AEROELASTIC BEHAVIOR OF AN AIRFOIL WITH FREEPLAY AND AERODYNAMIC NONLINEARITY
Abstract CHARACTERIZATION OF THE NONLINEAR AEROELASTIC BEHAVIOR OF AN AIRFOIL WITH FREEPLAY AND AERODYNAMIC NONLINEARITY Michael Candon, Robert Carrese, Hideaki Ogawa, Pier Marzocca School of Engineering
More informationFIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSON SOUND AND VIBRATION DECEMBER15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE,SOUTHAUSTRALIA
FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSON SOUND AND VIBRATION DECEMBER15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE,SOUTHAUSTRALIA Aeroelastic Response Of A Three Degree Of Freedom Wing-Aileron System With Structural Non-Linearity S. A.
More informationOptimization Framework for Design of Morphing Wings
Optimization Framework for Design of Morphing Wings Jian Yang, Raj Nangia & Jonathan Cooper Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, UK & John Simpson Fraunhofer IBP, Germany AIAA Aviation
More informationA method for identification of non-linear multi-degree-of-freedom systems
87 A method for identification of non-linear multi-degree-of-freedom systems G Dimitriadis and J E Cooper School of Engineering, Aerospace Division, The University of Manchester Abstract: System identification
More informationFlight Dynamics and Control. Lecture 3: Longitudinal stability Derivatives G. Dimitriadis University of Liege
Flight Dynamics and Control Lecture 3: Longitudinal stability Derivatives G. Dimitriadis University of Liege Previously on AERO0003-1 We developed linearized equations of motion Longitudinal direction
More informationNon-Synchronous Vibrations of Turbomachinery Airfoils
Non-Synchronous Vibrations of Turbomachinery Airfoils 600 500 NSV Frequency,!, hz 400 300 200 F.R. Flutter 100 SFV 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Rotor Speed,!, RPM Kenneth C. Hall,
More informationCompressible Potential Flow: The Full Potential Equation. Copyright 2009 Narayanan Komerath
Compressible Potential Flow: The Full Potential Equation 1 Introduction Recall that for incompressible flow conditions, velocity is not large enough to cause density changes, so density is known. Thus
More informationExperimental Study on Flow Control Characteristics of Synthetic Jets over a Blended Wing Body Configuration
Experimental Study on Flow Control Characteristics of Synthetic Jets over a Blended Wing Body Configuration Byunghyun Lee 1), Minhee Kim 1), Chongam Kim 1), Taewhan Cho 2), Seol Lim 3), and Kyoung Jin
More informationPotential of Aeroelastic Tailoring to Improve Flutter Stability of Turbomachinery Compressor Blades
Paper ID: ETC0-0 Proceedings of th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid dynamics & Thermodynamics ETC, April -, 0; Stockholm, Sweden Potential of Aeroelastic Tailoring to Improve Flutter Stability
More informationResolving the dependence on free-stream values for the k-omega turbulence model
Resolving the dependence on free-stream values for the k-omega turbulence model J.C. Kok Resolving the dependence on free-stream values for the k-omega turbulence model J.C. Kok This report is based on
More informationAir Loads. Airfoil Geometry. Upper surface. Lower surface
AE1 Jha Loads-1 Air Loads Airfoil Geometry z LE circle (radius) Chord line Upper surface thickness Zt camber Zc Zl Zu Lower surface TE thickness Camber line line joining the midpoints between upper and
More informationFluid-Structure Interaction Problems using SU2 and External Finite-Element Solvers
Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems using SU2 and External Finite-Element Solvers R. Sanchez 1, D. Thomas 2, R. Palacios 1, V. Terrapon 2 1 Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London 2 Department
More informationComputation of Dynamic Derivatives Using CFD
Computation of Dynamic Derivatives Using CFD A. Da Ronch, D. Vallespin, M. Ghoreyshi, and K.J. Badcock, Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK L69 3BX, United Kingdom This paper
More informationFlight Vehicle Terminology
Flight Vehicle Terminology 1.0 Axes Systems There are 3 axes systems which can be used in Aeronautics, Aerodynamics & Flight Mechanics: Ground Axes G(x 0, y 0, z 0 ) Body Axes G(x, y, z) Aerodynamic Axes
More informationREDUCED-ORDER MODELING OF UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC LOADS USING RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NEURAL NETWORKS
DocumentID: 340013 REDUCED-ORDER MODELING OF UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC LOADS USING RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NEURAL NETWORKS M. Winter *, C. Breitsamter Institute of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Technische
More informationExperimental Aerodynamics. Experimental Aerodynamics
Lecture 3: Vortex shedding and buffeting G. Dimitriadis Buffeting! All structures exposed to a wind have the tendency to vibrate.! These vibrations are normally of small amplitude and have stochastic character!
More informationAeroelasticity. Lecture 7: Practical Aircraft Aeroelasticity. G. Dimitriadis. AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 7
Aeroelasticity Lecture 7: Practical Aircraft Aeroelasticity G. Dimitriadis AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 7 1 Non-sinusoidal motion Theodorsen analysis requires that
More informationAEROELASTIC SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION USING TRANSONIC CFD DATA FOR A 3D WING
AEROELASTIC SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION USING TRANSONIC CFD DATA FOR A 3D WING G.A. Vio, J.E. Cooper, G. Dimitriadis School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester
More informationGiven the water behaves as shown above, which direction will the cylinder rotate?
water stream fixed but free to rotate Given the water behaves as shown above, which direction will the cylinder rotate? ) Clockwise 2) Counter-clockwise 3) Not enough information F y U 0 U F x V=0 V=0
More informationDefinitions. Temperature: Property of the atmosphere (τ). Function of altitude. Pressure: Property of the atmosphere (p). Function of altitude.
Definitions Chapter 3 Standard atmosphere: A model of the atmosphere based on the aerostatic equation, the perfect gas law, an assumed temperature distribution, and standard sea level conditions. Temperature:
More informationUniversity of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research
Castellani, M., Cooper, J. E., & Lemmens, Y. (217). Nonlinear Static Aeroelasticity of High Aspect Ratio Wing Aircraft by FEM and Multibody Methods. Journal of Aircraft, 54(2), 548-56. https://doi.org/1.2514/1.c33825
More informationUniversity of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available): /6.
Bagheri, A. K., Jones, D. P., & Gaitonde, A. L. (2016). Linear frequency domain reduced order modelling of aerofoil gust response. In 46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics
More information