An Investigation of the Sensitivity of F-16 Fighter Flutter Onset and Limit Cycle Oscillations to Uncertainties
|
|
- Brian Fowler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 An Investigation of the Sensitivity of F-16 Fighter Flutter Onset and Limit Cycle Oscillations to Uncertainties Jeffrey P. Thomas, Earl H. Dowell, and Kenneth C. Hall Duke University, Durham, NC and Charles M. Denegri Jr. U.S. Air Force SEEK EAGLE Office, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida A computational investigation of flutter onset and limit cycle oscillations of the F-16 fighter using a nonlinear frequency-domain harmonic-balance approach is presented. In this latest study, we examine the sensitivity of computed aeroelastic behavior to characteristics and parameters of the structural and fluid dynamic model. Three different F-16 weapons and stores configurations are considered. Results indicate that the flutter onset Mach number is very sensitive to the structural natural frequencies, and, more specifically, the difference between the natural frequencies, of the first two antisymmetric structural mode shapes. Wing mean angle-of-attack is also shown to be very important. The results presented herein may prove useful and provide insight to other researchers modeling F- 16 fighter aeroelastic behavior, and who also may be observing large sensitivities in their computational solutions. I. Introduction This paper is a follow-on to the research efforts reported in Thomas, Dowell and Hall 1,2 where the harmonic balance (HB) technique for modeling nonlinear unsteady aerodynamics (see Hall et al. 3 and Thomas, Dowell, and Hall 4 6 ) is used to determine the limit cycle oscillation (LCO) behavior of the F-16 fighter aircraft. The goal of the present investigation is to study the sensitivity of F-16 LCO behavior to characteristics and parameters of the structural and fluid dynamic models. In recent years, a number of researchers have begun modeling the flutter onset and limit cycle oscillation behavior of the F-16 fighter. e.g. Denegri and Dubben 7 9 have been active in doublet-lattice methods for flutter onset and transonic small-disturbance methods for flutter onset and limit cycle oscillation prediction. Parker and Maple 10 have recently studied the effects viscosity and modeling external stores for computed F-16 limit cycle oscillations. Lieu et al. 11 have recently been active in developing reduced order models for F-16 flutter analysis. Pranata et al. 12 have recently used a time-domain coupled computational fluid dynamic (CFD) and modal based structural method for modeling limit cycle oscillation response of the F-16. II. Configurations Table 1 shows the weapons and stores arrangements for the three different F-16 fighter configurations examined in this paper. Note that configuration number one has no AIM-9P missiles. We studied configuration number one in our two recent papers that detail the use of the HB method for modeling flutter onset Research Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Senior Member AIAA. William Holland Hall Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, and Dean Emeritus, School of Engineering, Honorary Fellow AIAA. Julian Francis Abele Professor and Department Chairperson, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Associate Fellow AIAA. Lead Flutter Engineer, Engineering Division, Certification Division, 205 West D Avenue, Suite 348. Senior Member AIAA. 1 of 8
2 Stn. Configuration 1 Configuration 2 Configuration 3 1 LAU-129 launcher AIM-9L missile/lau-129 launcher LAU-129 launcher 2 AIM-9P missile/lau-129 launcher AIM-9L missile/lau-129 launcher AIM-120 missile/lau-129 launcher 3 Air-to-ground missile Air-to-ground missile General-purpose bomb 4 Empty 370-gal fuel tank Half-full 370-gal fuel tank Quarter-full 370-gal fuel tank 5 Empty station Empty station Empty station 6 Empty 370-gal fuel tank Half-full 370-gal fuel tank Quarter-full 370-gal fuel tank 7 Air-to-ground missile Air-to-ground missile General-purpose bomb 8 AIM-9P missile/lau-129 launcher AIM-9L missile/lau-129 launcher AIM-120 missile/lau-129 launcher 9 LAU-129 launcher AIM-9L missile/lau-129 launcher LAU-129 launcher Table 1. Configurations and LCO response of the F-16 (Thomas, Dowell and Hall 1,2 ). Some of the main conclusions reached in those two papers include: As consistent with flight test, the F-16 flutters antisymmetrically, and as such, only the antisymmetric structural modes need to be included in the aeroelastic computational model. The flutter onset and finite amplitude LCO response aeroelastic mode shapes are dominated by the wing first bending and first twisting mode shapes. As such, one can obtain well converged computation aeroelastic solutions using just these two structural mode shapes in the structural model portion of the aeroelastic solver. The computed flutter onset conditions are very sensitive to the wingtip geometry. In our present analysis, we are only modeling the F-16 wing. In an attempt to roughly model the presence of the wingtip launchers, we extended the wing tips by six inches. We found this leads to a significant reduction in the computed flutter onset Mach number at a constant altitude. Namely, from M 0.9 to M 0.7 at 2000 feet altitude. Thus, accounting for wingtip external stores in the computational fluid dynamic model appears to be very important. Including viscous effects in the computational fluid model is crucial for computing finite amplitude limit cycle oscillations. Mode Configuration 1 Configuration 2 Configuration 3 First Antisymmetric Bending (f 1ab ) Hz Hz Hz First Antisymmetric Twisting (f 1at ) Hz Hz Hz Second Antisymmetric Bending (f 2ab ) Hz Hz Hz Second Antisymmetric Twisting (f 2at ) Hz Hz Hz f 1at f 1ab Hz Hz Hz Table 2. F-16 Fighter Configuration Natural Frequencies (via NASTRAN) Table 2 shows the computed (via NASTRAN) structural natural frequencies for the first and second, antisymmetric, bending and twisting structural mode shapes for the three F-16 fighter configurations studied in this paper. Note the small difference in natural frequencies (< 1 Hz) between the first antisymmetric bending and first antisymmetric twisting mode shapes. III. Flutter Onset Table 3 shows the trend in computed flutter onset Mach number and frequency with respect to changes in the natural frequencies of the first two antisymmetric mode shapes (modes two and four of the finite element structural model) for F-16 configuration number one. Shown in the first row of Table 3 are the computed 2 of 8
3 Mode 2 Mode 4 Flutter Onset f 2 (Hz) f 4 (Hz) Mach f (Hz) Baseline Modified Modified Modified Modified Modified Table 3. Sensitivity of Computed F-16 Flutter Onset Mach Number and Frequency to Structural Natural Frequencies at 2000 feet Altitude and a Mean Angle-of-Attack of ᾱ 0 = 1.5 degrees. flutter onset results for the baseline (nominal) computational structural and fluid dynamic models for the F-16 configuration. The second and third columns list the natural frequencies of the first two antisymmetric mode shapes (f 2 and f 4 ). Columns four and five show the computed flutter onset Mach number and frequency, respectively, in this case for an altitude of 2000 feet and a wing mean angle-of-attack of ᾱ 0 = 1.5 degrees. For the nominal configuration computational model, this results in a flutter onset Mach number of M = and a flutter onset frequency of f = Hz. Flight test experiments indicate that flutter onset occurs at a Mach number of approximately M = 0.85 with a frequency of approximately f = 8.1 Hz. Here we investigate the sensitivity of the flutter onset solution to apparently small changes in the structural model, i.e. sensitivities to the structural natural frequencies. Rows two through six of Table 3 show the computed flutter onset conditions for five different modifications of the structural frequencies. The first three modifications are reductions in the natural frequency of the second antisymmetric mode shape (mode four). i.e. 0.05, 0.10, and 0.20 Hz, respectively. As can be seen, the flutter onset Mach number changes significantly as a result of these modifications to the mode four natural frequency. Each 0.05 Hz reduction in the mode four natural frequency causes approximately a 0.05 reduction in the flutter onset Mach number. We believe this is an important finding and an indication that an extremely accurate structural model is necessary in order to obtain computed flutter onset and LCO results which correlate well with flight test. This may also explain, at least in part, the reported sensitivity from one aircraft to another in regards to flutter onset and LCO response. It can also be seen that the flutter onset frequency is roughly the arithmetic mean of the natural frequencies of modes two and four. For the first three modifications to the structural natural frequency of mode four, it can be seen that the flutter onset frequency is still somewhat high compared to the flight test value of approximately f = 8.1 Hz. Thus as a fourth modification, the natural frequencies of both modes two and four are reduced by 0.3 Hz. This results in a flutter onset natural frequency of f = Hz, which is much closer to flight test, however the flutter onset Mach number of M = is still somewhat high compared to flight test. So as a fifth modification, we reduce the natural frequency of mode two by 0.3 Hz and the natural frequency of mode four by 0.35 Hz. This results in a flutter onset frequency of f = Hz and a flutter onset Mach number of M = , both quantities are now very close to the flight test values. A. Flutter Onset Altitude Figure 1 shows the computed flutter onset altitudes for the three different F-16 fighter configurations. There is much scatter in the flight test data in regards to flutter onset altitude versus Mach number, and thus clear flutter onset conditions are difficult to discern. However, it can be noted from available flight test data that configuration number one has the tendency experience flutter onset in the Mach number range of 0.75 M 0.85 for altitudes of 2000, 5000, and feet, with there being a general trend for flutter onset to occur at a slightly higher Mach number with increasing altitude. Also for altitudes of 2000, 5000, and feet, configuration number two has the tendency to experience flutter onset in the Mach number range of 0.70 M 0.80, and configuration number three has the tendency to experience flutter onset in the Mach number range of 0.50 M As can be seen from Fig. 1, the computed flutter onset altitudes for configurations two and three are much lower than observed in flight test. We believe one 3 of 8
4 Flutter Onset Altitude, h x 10 3 (feet) Configuration #1 Configuration #3 Configuration # Figure 1. Computed F-16 Fighter Flutter Onset Altitude. of the main reasons for the discrepancies is due to the fact that geometric details of the wingtip launcher and missile are absent in the CFD portion of our aeroelastic model. In fact, Fig. 2 shows the computed flutter onset altitudes for F-16 fighter configuration number two with a six inch extension of the wing tip to approximately account for the presence of the wingtip launcher and missile. Notice the dramatic change in flutter onset altitude. Thus the details of the wingtip geometry appear to be very important for predicting flutter onset. Figure 3 shows the computed flutter onset altitudes for configurations one and three for three different angles-of-attack. As can be seen, computed flutter onset Mach number at fixed altitude can change by nearly 0.1 Mach for only a single degree of mean angle-of-attack change. Thus accurately accounting for mean angle-of-attack, say by solving the six degree-of-freedom (DOF) aircraft trimmed flight dynamic equations, may be important for precise flutter onset results. Finally, Fig. 4 shows the computed flutter onset altitudes for configurations one and three for two different alterations in the first antisymmetric twisting structural mode shape frequency. As can be seen, computed flutter onset Mach number at fixed altitude can also change by nearly 0.1 Mach for only a 0.10 Hz change in structural natural frequencies. Thus an accurate structural model may important for precise flutter onset computations. Furthermore, this may explain the wide variation in flutter onset behavior among various F-16s with identical weapons and stores configurations. B. Limit Cycle Oscillations Figure 5 shows the computed and flight test LCO response of the F-16 forward wingtip launcher accelerometer versus Mach number for an altitude of 2000 feet and a mean angle-of-attack of ᾱ 0 = 1.5 degrees. In this case, we consider the baseline configuration, and the modification number five configuration, as per Table 3, where we have reduced the natural frequency of mode two by 0.3 Hz and mode four by 0.35 Hz. As can be seen, with these very small changes in the natural frequencies of the structural modes, the computational results for the limit cycle oscillation response are in much better agreement with the flight test data. Both the flutter/lco onset Mach number and subsequent LCO response amplitude for increasing Mach numbers 4 of 8
5 Flutter Onset Altitude, h x 10 3 (feet) Configuration #2 with Tip Extension Configuration # Figure 2. Computed F-16 Fighter Flutter Onset Altitude. 20 Flutter Onset Altitude, h x 10 3 (feet) Configuration #1 α 0 =2.0 o, 1.5 o, 1.0 o Configuration # Figure 3. Computed F-16 Fighter Flutter Onset Altitude Angle of Attack Effect. 5 of 8
6 20 Flutter Onset Altitude, h x 10 3 (feet) f 1at = 0.10 Hz f 1at = 0.05 Hz Configuration #1 f 1at = 0.10 Hz f 1at = 0.05 Hz Configuration # Figure 4. Computed F-16 Fighter Flutter Onset Altitude Structural Frequency Effect Wing Tip Launcher LCO Response, g Flight Test Modified Structrual Frequencies Nominal Structrual Frequencies Figure 5. Computed and Flight Test F-16 Forward Wingtip Launcher Accelerometer LCO Response Level Versus Mach Number for an Altitude of 2000 feet and a Mean Angle-of-Attack of ᾱ 0 = 1.5 degrees. 6 of 8
7 correlate better with the flight test data than for the baseline computational configuration. Amplitude Phase (deg) Mach g Response ξ 4 /ξ 2 ξ 4 /ξ 2 ξ 4 /ξ (0.400,-4.30) (0.418,-4.18) (0.702,-3.57) (0.585,-2.95) (0.470,-2.41) (0.375,-1.98) (0.336,-1.82) Table 4. LCO Response, 2000 Feet Case, Nominal Structural Frequencies. Amplitude Phase (deg) Mach g Response ξ 4 /ξ 2 ξ 4 /ξ 2 ξ 4 /ξ (1.536,-5.72) (1.483,-5.70) (0.978,-5.31) (0.315,-4.54) (0.099,-3.53) (0.363,-2.92) (0.260,-2.51) (0.078,-1.91) (0.050,-1.66) Table 5. LCO Response, 2000 Feet Case, Alternate Structural Frequencies. Tables 4 and 5 show the computed g response levels for the results shown in Fig. 5 along with the amplitude and phase relation between the first antisymmetric twisting mode and first antisymmetric bending mode. Note how the phase angle is nearly -90 degrees. This means the node line of the wing will be moving substantially during a cycle of wing motion at flutter onset and for the finite amplitude LCO conditions. IV. Conclusions F-16 flutter onset and LCO response is very sensitive to model input parameters. Wing tip geometry, as well as small changes in angle-of-attack and structural mode natural frequencies can greatly influence the aeroelastic solutions. Computational models of ever increasing fidelity appear to be required for precise flutter onset and LCO response computations. V. Acknowledgments This work is being supported by AFOSR grant, Theoretical Predictions of Limit Cycle Oscillations for Flight Flutter Testing. The program manager is Dr. Neal Glassman and the key technical point of contact in the SEEK EAGLE office at Eglin AFB is Dr. Charles Denegri. References 1 Thomas, J. P., Dowell, E. H., Hall, K. C., and Charles M. Denegri, J., Further Invesitgation of Modeling Limit Cycle Oscillation Behavior of the F-16 Fighter Using a Harmonic Balance Approach, AIAA Paper , Presented at the 46th 7 of 8
8 AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials (SDM) Conference, Austin, TX. 2 Thomas, J. P., Dowell, E. H., Hall, K. C., and Charles M. Denegri, J., Modeling Limit Cycle Oscillation Behavior of the F-16 Fighter Using a Harmonic Balance Approach, AIAA Paper , Presented at the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials (SDM) Conference, Palm Springs, CA. 3 Hall, K. C., Thomas, J. P., and Clark, W. S., Computation of Unsteady Nonlinear Flows in Cascades Using a Harmonic Balance Technique, AIAA Journal, Vol. 40, No. 5, May 2002, pp Thomas, J. P., Dowell, E. H., and Hall, K. C., Nonlinear Inviscid Aerodynamic Effects on Transonic Divergence, Flutter and Limit Cycle Oscillations, AIAA Journal, Vol. 40, No. 4, April 2002, pp Thomas, J. P., Dowell, E. H., and Hall, K. C., Modeling Viscous Transonic Limit Cycle Oscillation Behavior Using a Harmonic Balance Approach, AIAA Paper Thomas, J. P., Dowell, E. H., and Hall, K. C., A Harmonic Balance Approach for Modeling Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity, ASME Paper IMECE Charles M. Denegri, J. and Dubben, J. A., F-16 Limit Cycle Oscillation Analysis Using Transonic Small-disturbance Theory, AIAA Paper , Presented at the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials (SDM) Conference, Austin, TX. 8 Charles M. Denegri, J. and Dubben, J. A., In-Flight Wing Deformation Characteristics During Limit Cycle Oscillations, AIAA Paper Charles M. Denegri, J., Limit Cycle Oscillation Flight Test Results of a Fighter with External Stores, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2000, pp Parker, G. H. and Maple, R. C., The Role of Viscosity in Store-Induced Limit-Cycle Oscillation, AIAA Paper , Presented at the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials (SDM) Conference, Austin, TX. 11 Lieu, T. and Farhat, C., Adaptation of Pod-Based Aeroelastic ROMs for Varying Mach Number and Angle of Attack: Application to a Complete F-16 Configuration, AIAA Paper , U.S Air Force T&E Days, Nashville, TN. 12 Prananta, B. B., Kok, J. C., Spekreijse, S. P., Hounjet, M. H. L., and Meijer, J. J., Simulation of Limit Cycle Oscillation of Fighter Aircraft at Moderate Angle of Attack, Tech. Rep. NRL-TP , National Aerospace Laboratory NRL, of 8
Virtual Aeroelastic Flight Testing for the F-16 Fighter with Stores
Virtual Aeroelastic Flight Testing for the F-16 Fighter with Stores Jeffrey P. Thomas, Earl H. Dowell, and Kenneth C. Hall Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 0300 and Charles M. Denegri Jr. U.S. Air Force
More informationPRESENTED AT ICAS 2008 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA SEPTEMBER 2008
PRESENTED AT ICAS 2008 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA SEPTEMBER 2008 NONLINEAR AEROELASTICITY OF CURRENT AND FUTURE AEROSPACE VEHICLES Earl Dowell, Kenneth Hall, Robert Kielb, Deman Tang, and Jeffrey Thomas Duke University
More informationUsing Automatic Differentiation to Create a Nonlinear Reduced Order Model Aeroelastic Solver
Using Automatic Differentiation to Create a Nonlinear Reduced Order Model Aeroelastic Solver Jeffrey P. Thomas, Earl H. Dowell, and Kenneth C. Hall Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 0300 A novel nonlinear
More informationA HARMONIC BALANCE APPROACH FOR MODELING THREE-DIMENSIONAL NONLINEAR UNSTEADY AERODYNAMICS AND AEROELASTICITY
' - ' Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition November 17-22, 22, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA IMECE-22-3232 A HARMONIC ALANCE APPROACH FOR MODELING THREE-DIMENSIONAL
More informationLimit Cycle Oscillations of a Typical Airfoil in Transonic Flow
Limit Cycle Oscillations of a Typical Airfoil in Transonic Flow Denis B. Kholodar, United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO 88 Earl H. Dowell, Jeffrey P. Thomas, and Kenneth C. Hall Duke University,
More informationAeroelastic Limit Cycle Oscillations in High Performance Aircraft
Earl Hugh Dowell Duke University Durham, North Carolina United States dowell@mail.ee.duke.edu ABSTRACT An overview is presented of limit cycle oscillations (LCO) that occur due to the nonlinear aeroelastic
More informationTransonic Flutter Prediction of Supersonic Jet Trainer with Various External Store Configurations
Transonic Flutter Prediction of Supersonic Jet Trainer with Various External Store Configurations In Lee * Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, 305-701, Korea Hyuk-Jun Kwon Agency
More informationUnsteady Flow Computation Using a Harmonic Balance Approach Implemented about the OVERFLOW 2 Flow Solver
9th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference // June 22-25, 2009, San Antonio, Texas Unsteady Flow Computation Using a Harmonic Balance Approach Implemented about the OVERFLOW 2 Flow Solver Jeffrey
More informationA NONLINEAR HARMONIC BALANCE METHOD FOR THE CFD CODE OVERFLOW 2
IFASD-2009-050 A NONLINEAR HARMONIC BALANCE METHOD FOR THE CFD CODE OVERFLOW 2 Chad H. Custer 1, Jeffrey P. Thomas 2, Earl H. Dowell 3, and Kenneth C. Hall 4 Duke University Mechanical Engineering & Materials
More informationUsing Automatic Differentiation to Create a Nonlinear Reduced Order Model of a Computational Fluid Dynamic Solver
Using Automatic Differentiation to Create a Nonlinear Reduced Order Model of a Computational Fluid Dynamic Solver Jeffrey P. Thomas, Earl H. Dowell, and Kenneth C. Hall Duke University, Durham, NC 2778
More informationNON-LINEAR BEHAVIOUR OF A WING DUE TO UNDERWING STORES
NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOUR OF A WING DUE TO UNDERWING STORES G.A. Vio,, D.S. Stanley, School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 6, Australia gareth.vio@sydney.edu.au;
More informationNonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of a Wing with Control Surface Freeplay
Copyright c 7 ICCES ICCES, vol., no.3, pp.75-8, 7 Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis of a with Control Surface Freeplay K.S. Kim 1,J.H.Yoo,J.S.Bae 3 and I. Lee 1 Summary In this paper, nonlinear aeroelastic
More informationDYNAMIC RESPONSE OF AN AIRPLANE ELASTIC STRUCTURE IN TRANSONIC FLOW
DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF AN AIRPLANE ELASTIC STRUCTURE IN TRANSONIC FLOW S. Kuzmina*, F. Ishmuratov*, O. Karas*, A.Chizhov* * Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI), Zhukovsky, Russia Keywords: aeroelasticity,
More informationAeroelastic Wind Tunnel Testing of Very Flexible High-Aspect-Ratio Wings
Aeroelastic Wind Tunnel Testing of Very Flexible High-Aspect-Ratio Wings Justin Jaworski Workshop on Recent Advances in Aeroelasticity, Experiment and Theory July 2, 2010 Problem and Scope High altitude
More informationAeroelastic Analysis of Engine Nacelle Strake Considering Geometric Nonlinear Behavior
Aeroelastic Analysis of Engine Nacelle Strake Considering Geometric Nonlinear Behavior N. Manoj Abstract The aeroelastic behavior of engine nacelle strake when subjected to unsteady aerodynamic flows is
More informationON THE NONLINEAR DYNAMICS APPROACH OF MODELING THE BIFURCATION FOR TRANSONIC LIMIT CYCLE FLUTTER
ICAS CONGRESS ON THE NONLINEAR DYNAMICS APPROACH OF MODELING THE BIFURCATION FOR TRANSONIC LIMIT CYCLE FLUTTER H. Matsushita *, T. Miyata *, L. E. Christiansen **, T. Lehn-Schiøler **, and E. Mosekilde
More informationAeroelasticity. Lecture 9: Supersonic Aeroelasticity. G. Dimitriadis. AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 9
Aeroelasticity Lecture 9: Supersonic Aeroelasticity G. Dimitriadis AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 9 1 Introduction All the material presented up to now concerned incompressible
More informationSCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy. A nonlinear POD reduced order model for limit cycle oscillation prediction
SCIENCE CHINA Physics Mechanics & Astronomy Research Paper July 1 Vol.53 No.7: 135 133 doi: 1.17/s11433-1-413- A nonlinear POD reduced order model for limit cycle oscillation prediction CHEN Gang * LI
More informationAeroelastic Gust Response
Aeroelastic Gust Response Civil Transport Aircraft - xxx Presented By: Fausto Gill Di Vincenzo 04-06-2012 What is Aeroelasticity? Aeroelasticity studies the effect of aerodynamic loads on flexible structures,
More informationGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)
German Aerospace Center (DLR) AEROGUST M30 Progress Meeting 23-24 November 2017, Bordeaux Presented by P. Bekemeryer / J. Nitzsche With contributions of C. Kaiser 1, S. Görtz 2, R. Heinrich 2, J. Nitzsche
More informationCombined Local Global Variability and Uncertainty in the Aeroservoelasticity of Composite Aircraft
Combined Local Global Variability and Uncertainty in the Aeroservoelasticity of Composite Aircraft Presented by Dr. Eli Livne Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics University of Washington Contributors
More informationCHARACTERIZATION OF THE NONLINEAR AEROELASTIC BEHAVIOR OF AN AIRFOIL WITH FREEPLAY AND AERODYNAMIC NONLINEARITY
Abstract CHARACTERIZATION OF THE NONLINEAR AEROELASTIC BEHAVIOR OF AN AIRFOIL WITH FREEPLAY AND AERODYNAMIC NONLINEARITY Michael Candon, Robert Carrese, Hideaki Ogawa, Pier Marzocca School of Engineering
More informationIN recent years an increase in computational power has allowed
AIAA JOURNAL Vol. 44, No. 8, August 006 Reduced Order Nonlinear System Identification Methodology Peter J. Attar Computational Sciences Branch, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433-793 and Earl
More informationAero-Propulsive-Elastic Modeling Using OpenVSP
Aero-Propulsive-Elastic Modeling Using OpenVSP August 8, 213 Kevin W. Reynolds Intelligent Systems Division, Code TI NASA Ames Research Center Our Introduction To OpenVSP Overview! Motivation and Background!
More informationANN BASED ROM FOR THE PREDICTION OF UNSTEADY AEROELASTIC INSTABILITIES
IFASD-29- ANN BASED FOR THE PREDICTION OF UNSTEADY AEROELASTIC INSTABILITIES Abdul Rampurawala 1, Ken Badcock 1, and Simao Marques 1 Keywords. ANN,, Flutter, 1 Department of Engineering, University of
More informationOPTIMIZATION OF TAPERED WING STRUCTURE WITH AEROELASTIC CONSTRAINT
ICAS 000 CONGRESS OPTIMIZATION OF TAPERED WING STRUCTURE WITH AEROELASTIC CONSTRAINT Harijono Djojodihardjo, I Wayan Tjatra, Ismojo Harjanto 3 Computational Aeroelastic Group, Aerospace Engineering Department
More informationReduced reliance on wind tunnel data
Reduced reliance on wind tunnel data The recreation of the industrial gust loads process, using CFD in place of experimental data Investigation of the underlying assumptions of the current industrial gust
More informationCONTROL LAW DESIGN IN A COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY ENVIRONMENT
CONTROL LAW DESIGN IN A COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY ENVIRONMENT Jerry R. Newsom Harry H. Robertshaw Rakesh K. Kapania NASA LaRC Virginia Tech Virginia Tech Hampton, VA Blacksburg, VA Blacksburg, VA 757-864-65
More informationMULTIDISCPLINARY OPTIMIZATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF FLUTTER OF AN AIRCRAFT WING WITH UNDERWING STORE IN TRANSONIC REGIME
MULTIDISCPLINARY OPTIMIZATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF FLUTTER OF AN AIRCRAFT WING WITH UNDERWING STORE IN TRANSONIC REGIME A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
More informationFREQUENCY DOMAIN FLUTTER ANALYSIS OF AIRCRAFT WING IN SUBSONIC FLOW
FREQUENCY DOMAIN FLUTTER ANALYSIS OF AIRCRAFT WING IN SUBSONIC FLOW Ms.K.Niranjana 1, Mr.A.Daniel Antony 2 1 UG Student, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Karunya University, (India) 2 Assistant professor,
More information19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007
19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007 AN APPROACH FOR CHARACTERIZING THE AERODYNAMICS/STRUCTURE COUPLING AT THE AIRCRAFT DESIGN STAGE IN THE PRESENCE OF STRUCTURAL NONLINEARITIES
More informationStabilization of Explicit Flow Solvers Using a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Technique
50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 09-12 January 2012, Nashville, Tennessee AIAA 2012-1096 Stabilization of Explicit Flow Solvers Using a Proper
More informationNumerical Implementation of a Frequency-Domain Panel Method for Flutter Prediction of a 3D Wing
Numerical Implementation of a Frequency-Domain Panel Method for Flutter Prediction of a 3D Wing Eduardo Manuel Pizarro Gomes Pepe pizarropepe@tecnico.ulisboa.pt Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa, Portugal
More informationTransonic Aeroelasticity: Theoretical and Computational Challenges
Transonic Aeroelasticity: Theoretical and Computational Challenges Oddvar O. Bendiksen Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, CA Aeroelasticity Workshop
More informationSolution of Linear Systems in Fourier-Based Methods for Aircraft Applications
Solution of Linear Systems in Fourier-Based Methods for Aircraft Applications A. McCracken, A. Da Ronch, S. Timme, K. J. Badcock School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GH, United
More informationNumerical Researches on Aeroelastic Problem of a Rotor due to IGV/Fan Interaction
47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 5-8 January 9, Orlando, Florida AIAA 9-865 Numerical Researches on Aeroelastic Problem of a Rotor due to IGV/Fan
More informationMixing-Plane Method for Flutter Computation in Multi-stage Turbomachines
47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 5-8 January 2009, Orlando, Florida AIAA 2009-862 Mixing-Plane Method for Flutter Computation in Multi-stage
More informationWind Tunnel Experiments of Stall Flutter with Structural Nonlinearity
Wind Tunnel Experiments of Stall Flutter with Structural Nonlinearity Ahmad Faris R.Razaami School of Aerospace Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA Norizham Abdul Razak School of Aerospace
More informationNon-Synchronous Vibrations of Turbomachinery Airfoils
Non-Synchronous Vibrations of Turbomachinery Airfoils 600 500 NSV Frequency,!, hz 400 300 200 F.R. Flutter 100 SFV 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Rotor Speed,!, RPM Kenneth C. Hall,
More informationAERODYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF A CANARD GUIDED ARTILLERY PROJECTILE
45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 8-11 January 27, Reno, Nevada AIAA 27-672 AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF A CANARD GUIDED ARTILLERY PROJECTILE Wei-Jen Su 1, Curtis Wilson 2, Tony Farina
More informationEXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DYNAMIC STABILITY DERIVATIVES FOR A FIGHTER MODEL
24 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DYNAMIC STABILITY DERIVATIVES FOR A FIGHTER MODEL MR Soltani*, Ali R Davari** *Associate Professor, **PhD Student
More informationTHE ANALYSIS OF LAMINATE LAY-UP EFFECT ON THE FLUTTER SPEED OF COMPOSITE STABILIZERS
THE ANALYSIS OF LAMINATE LAY-UP EFFECT ON THE FLUTTER SPEED OF COMPOSITE STABILIZERS Mirko DINULOVIĆ*, Boško RAŠUO* and Branimir KRSTIĆ** * University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, **
More informationREPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 74-188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
More informationCurriculum Vita. a. Contact Information. b. Research Interest. c. Education. d. Professional Experience. Liping Liu, Ph.D. Assistant Professor
a. Contact Information Curriculum Vita Liping Liu, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Mathematics The University of Texas Pan American 1201 W. University Drive Edinburg, Texas 78541-2999 Phone: (956)
More informationPROGRESS IN THE PREDICTION OF AEROSERVOELASTIC INSTABILITIES ON LARGE CIVIL TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT
ICAS 2000 CONGRESS PROGRESS IN THE PREDICTION OF AEROSERVOELASTIC INSTABILITIES ON LARGE CIVIL TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT M.LACABANNE, A.LAPORTE AEROSPATIALE MATRA AIRBUS, 31060 Toulouse Cedex 03, France Abstract
More informationSome effects of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability
47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 5-8 January 29, Orlando, Florida AIAA 29-839 Some effects of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability
More informationActive Flutter Control using an Adjoint Method
44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 9-12 January 26, Reno, Nevada AIAA 26-844 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 9 12 Jan, 26. Active Flutter Control using an
More informationEstimation of Unsteady Loading for Sting Mounted Wind Tunnel Models
52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 19th 4-7 April 2011, Denver, Colorado AIAA 2011-1941 Estimation of Unsteady Loading for Sting Mounted Wind Tunnel
More informationIntroduction to Aerospace Engineering
4. Basic Fluid (Aero) Dynamics Introduction to Aerospace Engineering Here, we will try and look at a few basic ideas from the complicated field of fluid dynamics. The general area includes studies of incompressible,
More informationUnsteady Subsonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of Wing in Fold Motion
Technical Paper DOI:10.5139/IJASS.2011.12.1.63 Unsteady Subsonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of Wing in Fold Motion Yoo-Yeon Jung* School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University,
More informationImprovement of flight regarding safety and comfort
Prediction of the aeroelastic behavior An application to wind-tunnel models Mickaël Roucou Royal Institute of Technology KTH - Stockholm, Sweden Department of Aerospace and Vehicle Engineering Email: roucou@kth.se
More informationApplications of Harmonic Balance Method in Periodic Flows Gregor Cvijetić and Inno Gatin
Applications of Harmonic Balance Method in Periodic Flows Gregor Cvijetić and Inno Gatin Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Zagreb 10000, Croatia, gregor.cvijetic@gmail.com The Harmonic
More informationCORRELATION OF FIN BUFFET PRESSURES ON AN F/A-18 WITH SCALED WIND-TUNNEL MEASUREMENTS. Industry Test
CORRELATION OF FIN BUFFET PRESSURES ON AN F/A-8 WITH SCALED WIND-TUNNEL MEASUREMENTS Robert W. Moses Aeroelasticity Branch NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA Gautam H. Shah Vehicle Dynamics Branch
More informationPotential of Aeroelastic Tailoring to Improve Flutter Stability of Turbomachinery Compressor Blades
Paper ID: ETC0-0 Proceedings of th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid dynamics & Thermodynamics ETC, April -, 0; Stockholm, Sweden Potential of Aeroelastic Tailoring to Improve Flutter Stability
More informationDrag Computation (1)
Drag Computation (1) Why drag so concerned Its effects on aircraft performances On the Concorde, one count drag increase ( C D =.0001) requires two passengers, out of the 90 ~ 100 passenger capacity, be
More informationA Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos Method For Uncertainty Propagation in CFD Simulations
An Extended Abstract submitted for the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada January 26 Preferred Session Topic: Uncertainty quantification and stochastic methods for CFD A Non-Intrusive
More informationFLUTTER PREDICTION OF A SWEPT BACK PLATE USING EXPERIMENTAL MODAL PARAMETERS
Symposium on Applied Aerodynamics and Design of Aerospace Vehicle (SAROD 2011) November 16-18, 2011, Bangalore, India FLUTTER PREDICTION OF A SWEPT BACK PLATE USING EXPERIMENTAL MODAL PARAMETERS A.C.Pankaj*,
More informationReduced order model of three-dimensional Euler equations using proper orthogonal decomposition basis
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 24 (2) (2010) 601~608 www.springerlink.com/content/1738-494x DOI 10.1007/s12206-010-0106-0 Reduced order model of three-dimensional Euler equations using proper
More informationFlight-Dynamics, Flutter, and Active-Flutter-Suppression Analyses of a Flexible Flying-Wing Research Drone
Flight-Dynamics, Flutter, and Active-Flutter-Suppression Analyses of a Flexible Flying-Wing Research Drone Dr. David K. Schmidt dschmidt@uccs.edu Professor Emeritus University of Colorado Principal D.K.
More informationStrain-Based Analysis for Geometrically Nonlinear Beams: A Modal Approach
53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference2th AI 23-26 April 212, Honolulu, Hawaii AIAA 212-1713 Strain-Based Analysis for Geometrically Nonlinear Beams: A
More informationStudy of Preliminary Configuration Design of F-35 using simple CFD
Study of Preliminary Configuration Design of F-35 using simple CFD http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/research/x35/pics.shtml David Hall Sangeon Chun David Andrews Center of Gravity Estimation.5873 Conventional
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF AN EFFICIENT DESIGN METHOD FOR NON-SYNCHRONOUS VIBRATIONS
DEVELOPMENT OF AN EFFICIENT DESIGN METHOD FOR NON-SYNCHRONOUS VIBRATIONS by Meredith Anne Spiker Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Duke University Date: Approved: Robert E. Kielb,
More information44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference April 7 10, 2003/Norfolk, Virginia
AIAA -55 Nonlinear Flutter Aspects of the Flexible HSC Semispan odel uhammad R. Hajj Department of Engineering Science and echanics, C Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia,
More informationREDUCED ORDER MODELLING OF GUST ANALYSIS USING COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
ECCOMAS Congress 2016 VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, G. Stefanou, V. Plevris (eds.) Crete Island, Greece, 5 10 June
More informationComparative Analysis of Computational Methods for Limit-Cycle Oscillations
47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, May 1-4, 26 Newport, Rhode Island Comparative Analysis of Computational Methods for Limit-Cycle Oscillations Arathi
More informationSimulation of Aeroelastic System with Aerodynamic Nonlinearity
Simulation of Aeroelastic System with Aerodynamic Nonlinearity Muhamad Khairil Hafizi Mohd Zorkipli School of Aerospace Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA Norizham Abdul Razak School
More informationSIMULATION OF UNSTEADY TURBOMACHINERY FLOWS USING AN IMPLICITLY COUPLED NONLINEAR HARMONIC BALANCE METHOD
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2011 GT2011 June 6-10, 2011, ancouver, Canada GT2011-46367 SIMULATION OF UNSTEADY TURBOMACHINERY FLOWS USING AN IMPLICITLY COUPLED NONLINEAR HARMONIC BALANCE METHOD Jonathan
More informationLYAPUNOV-BASED CONTROL OF LIMIT CYCLE OSCILLATIONS IN UNCERTAIN AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS
LYAPUNOV-BASED CONTROL OF LIMIT CYCLE OSCILLATIONS IN UNCERTAIN AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS By BRENDAN BIALY A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF
More informationDynamic Response of an Aircraft to Atmospheric Turbulence Cissy Thomas Civil Engineering Dept, M.G university
Dynamic Response of an Aircraft to Atmospheric Turbulence Cissy Thomas Civil Engineering Dept, M.G university cissyvp@gmail.com Jancy Rose K Scientist/Engineer,VSSC, Thiruvananthapuram, India R Neetha
More informationAEROELASTIC SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION USING TRANSONIC CFD DATA FOR A 3D WING
AEROELASTIC SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION USING TRANSONIC CFD DATA FOR A 3D WING G.A. Vio, J.E. Cooper, G. Dimitriadis School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester
More informationTransonic Aeroelastic Stability Analysis Using a Kriging Based Schur Complement Formulation
Transonic Aeroelastic Stability Analysis Using a Kriging Based Schur Complement Formulation S. Timme, S. Marques and K. J. Badcock CFD Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L63 3GH, United Kingdom
More informationFIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSON SOUND AND VIBRATION DECEMBER15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE,SOUTHAUSTRALIA
FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSON SOUND AND VIBRATION DECEMBER15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE,SOUTHAUSTRALIA Aeroelastic Response Of A Three Degree Of Freedom Wing-Aileron System With Structural Non-Linearity S. A.
More informationCOMPUTATION OF CASCADE FLUTTER WITH A COUPLED AERODYNAMIC AND STRUCTURAL MODEL
COMPUTATION OF CASCADE FLUTTER WITH A COUPLED AERODYNAMIC AND STRUCTURAL MODEL M. SADEGHI AND F. LIU Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3975,
More informationAeroelastic Analysis Of Membrane Wings
Aeroelastic Analysis Of Membrane Wings Soumitra P. Banerjee and Mayuresh J. Patil Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 46-3 The physics of flapping is very important
More information02 Introduction to Structural Dynamics & Aeroelasticity
02 Introduction to Structural Dynamics & Aeroelasticity Vibraciones y Aeroelasticidad Dpto. de Vehículos Aeroespaciales P. García-Fogeda Núñez & F. Arévalo Lozano ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIERÍA
More informationLinear and Non-Linear Transonic Flow Behaviour of the Goland + wing
Linear and Non-Linear Transonic Flow Behaviour of the Goland + wing Gareth A. Vio, Grigorios Dimitriadis, Jonathan E. Cooper, and Kenneth J. Badcock Department of Engineering, The University of Liverpool
More informationReduced-Order Modeling of Hypersonic Vehicle Unsteady Aerodynamics. I. Introduction
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2-5 August 2010, Toronto, Ontario Canada AIAA 2010-8127 Reduced-Order Modeling of Hypersonic Vehicle Unsteady Aerodynamics Torstens Skujins Carlos E. S.
More informationSENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE FACTORS AFFECTING FORCE GENERATION BY WING FLAPPING MOTION
Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition IMECE2013 November 15-21, 2013, San Diego, California, USA IMECE2013-65472 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE FACTORS
More informationHigh-Fidelity Computational Simulation of Nonlinear Fluid- Structure Interaction Problems
Aerodynamic Issues of Unmanned Air Vehicles Fluid-Structure Interaction High-Fidelity Computational Simulation of Nonlinear Fluid- Structure Interaction Problems Raymond E. Gordnier Computational Sciences
More informationLINEARISED FREQUENCY DOMAIN GUST ANALYSIS OF LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFT
ECCOMAS Congress 2016 VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, G. Stefanou, V. Plevris (eds.) Crete Island, Greece, 5 10 June
More informationA pragmatic approach to including complex natural modes of vibration in aeroelastic analysis
A pragmatic approach to including complex natural modes of vibration in aeroelastic analysis International Aerospace Symposium of South Africa 14 to 16 September, 215 Stellenbosch, South Africa Louw van
More informationTARGETING POD EFFECTS ON WEAPONS RELEASE FROM THE F-18C HORNET
6 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES TARGETING POD EFFECTS ON WEAPONS RELEASE FROM THE F-18C HORNET William H. Godiksen III*, Eric N. Hallberg* *US Naval Academy Keywords: store separation,
More informationCoupled Mode Flutter for Advanced Turbofans. Stephen Thomas Clark. Department of Mechanical Engineering Duke University. Date: March 19, 2010
Coupled Mode Flutter for Advanced Turbofans by Stephen Thomas Clark Department of Mechanical Engineering Duke University Date: March 19, 2010 Approved: Dr. Robert E. Kielb, Supervisor Dr. Earl H. Dowell
More informationResearch Article Aeroelastic Analysis of Wings in the Transonic Regime: Planform s Influence on the Dynamic Instability
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering Volume 2016, Article ID 3563684, 13 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3563684 Research Article Aeroelastic Analysis of Wings in the Transonic Regime: Planform
More informationHIGH altitude, long endurance (HALE) aircraft offer capabilities found nowhere else in the spectrum of
52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 19th 4-7 April 211, Denver, Colorado AIAA 211-1914 High-fidelity Aeroelastic Analysis of Very Flexible Aircraft
More informationPrediction of Aircraft s Longitudinal Motion Based on Aerodynamic Coefficients and Derivatives by Surrogate Model Approach
Journal of Mechanics Engineering and Automation 4 (2014) 584-594 D DAVID PUBLISHING Prediction of Aircraft s Longitudinal Motion Based on Aerodynamic Coefficients and Derivatives by Surrogate Model Approach
More informationEfficient Modelling of a Nonlinear Gust Loads Process for Uncertainty Quantification of Highly Flexible Aircraft
Efficient Modelling of a Nonlinear Gust Loads Process for Uncertainty Quantification of Highly Flexible Aircraft SciTech, 8 th -12 th January 2018 Kissimmee, Florida Robert Cook, Chris Wales, Ann Gaitonde,
More informationUniversity of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available): /6.
Castellani, M., Cooper, J. E., & Lemmens, Y. (216). Nonlinear Static Aeroelasticity of High Aspect Ratio Wing Aircraft by FEM and Multibody Methods. In 15th Dynamics Specialists Conference [(AIAA 216-1573]
More informationTRANSONIC AERODYNAMIC AND SCALING ISSUES FOR LATTICE FIN PROJECTILES TESTED IN A BALLISTICS RANGE
EB01 19th International Symposium of Ballistics, 7 11 May 2001, Interlaken, Switzerland TRANSONIC AERODYNAMIC AND SCALING ISSUES FOR LATTICE FIN PROJECTILES TESTED IN A BALLISTICS RANGE Gregg Abate1, Gerald
More informationAeroelasticity. Lecture 7: Practical Aircraft Aeroelasticity. G. Dimitriadis. AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 7
Aeroelasticity Lecture 7: Practical Aircraft Aeroelasticity G. Dimitriadis AERO0032-1, Aeroelasticity and Experimental Aerodynamics, Lecture 7 1 Non-sinusoidal motion Theodorsen analysis requires that
More informationStructural Nonlinear Flutter Characteristics Analysis for an Actuator-fin System with Dynamic Stiffness
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 4 (11) 59-599 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chinese Journal of Aeronautics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cja Structural Nonlinear Flutter Characteristics
More informationA CFD Approach to Modeling Spacecraft Fuel Slosh
47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 5-8 January 2009, Orlando, Florida AIAA 2009-366 A CFD Approach to Modeling Spacecraft Fuel Slosh Introduction:
More informationAerodynamic Resonance in Transonic Airfoil Flow. J. Nitzsche, R. H. M. Giepman. Institute of Aeroelasticity, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Göttingen
Aerodynamic Resonance in Transonic Airfoil Flow J. Nitzsche, R. H. M. Giepman Institute of Aeroelasticity, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Göttingen Source: A. Šoda, PhD thesis, 2006 Slide 2/39 Introduction
More information1264. Identification of second-order kernels in aerodynamics
1264. Identification of second-order kernels in aerodynamics Yunhai Wang 1, Jinglong Han 2, Zhang Bin 3 1, 2 State Key Lab of Mechanics and Control for Mechanical Structures Nanjing University of Aeronautics
More informationComparative Analysis of Computational Methods for Limit-Cycle Oscillations
47th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, May 1-4, 26 Newport, Rhode Island Comparative Analysis of Computational Methods for Limit-Cycle Oscillations Arathi K. Gopinath, Stanford
More information41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit January 6 9, 2003/Reno, NV
AIAA 3 267 Calculation of Unsteady Transonic Flow by an Euler Method with Small Perturbation Boundary Conditions C. Gao, S. Luo, F. Liu Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of
More informationDRAG PREDICTION AND VALIDATION OF STANDARD M549, 155mm PROJECTILE
DRAG PREDICTION AND VALIDATION OF STANDARD M549, 155mm PROJECTILE 1 Kiran Torangatti, 2 Dr.Basawaraj 1 Research Scholar, Department of Aerospace Propulsion and Technology, VTU-CPGS Bangalore -560018,Karnataka,
More informationUniversity of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research
Castellani, M., Cooper, J. E., & Lemmens, Y. (217). Nonlinear Static Aeroelasticity of High Aspect Ratio Wing Aircraft by FEM and Multibody Methods. Journal of Aircraft, 54(2), 548-56. https://doi.org/1.2514/1.c33825
More informationTransonic Aerodynamics Wind Tunnel Testing Considerations. W.H. Mason Configuration Aerodynamics Class
Transonic Aerodynamics Wind Tunnel Testing Considerations W.H. Mason Configuration Aerodynamics Class Transonic Aerodynamics History Pre WWII propeller tip speeds limited airplane speed Props did encounter
More informationComputation of cascade flutter by uncoupled and coupled methods
International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 8, November 25, 559 569 Computation of cascade flutter by uncoupled and coupled methods MANI SADEGHI and FENG LIU* Department of Mechanical
More information