Superconducting DM. Alexander Vikman. arxiv: CEICO, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences

Transcription

1 Superconducting DM arxiv: Alexander Vikman CEICO, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences

2 Main Idea and Motivation I

3 Main Idea and Motivation I Observed cosmological magnetic fields

4 Main Idea and Motivation I Observed cosmological magnetic fields B G Neronov, Vovk (2010)

5 Main Idea and Motivation I Observed cosmological magnetic fields B G Neronov, Vovk (2010) Can some cosmological medium support these magnetic fields?

6 Main Idea and Motivation I Observed cosmological magnetic fields B G Neronov, Vovk (2010) Can some cosmological medium support these magnetic fields? Type II superconductor can be the medium

7 Main Idea and Motivation I Observed cosmological magnetic fields B G Neronov, Vovk (2010) Can some cosmological medium support these magnetic fields? Type II superconductor can be the medium DM (or its part) can be the cosmological medium accommodating magnetic fields in form of the Abrikosov vortices / strings

8 Main Idea and Motivation II

9 Main Idea and Motivation II Dark Sector can have many vector /gauge fields

10 Main Idea and Motivation II Dark Sector can have many vector /gauge fields Can some cosmological medium screen these fields?

11 Main Idea and Motivation II Dark Sector can have many vector /gauge fields Can some cosmological medium screen these fields? Type I superconductor can be the medium

12 Main Idea and Motivation II Dark Sector can have many vector /gauge fields Can some cosmological medium screen these fields? Type I superconductor can be the medium DM (or its part) can be a cosmological medium screening these unobserved vector fields

13 Irrotational Dust, linear DM Z (@') 2! S [, ',g]= d 4 x p g 2 M 4 1,

14 Irrotational Dust, linear DM Z (@') 2! S [, ',g]= d 4 x p g 2 M 4 1, T µ = u µ u

15 Irrotational Dust, linear DM Z (@') 2! S [, ',g]= d 4 x p g 2 M 4 1, T µ = u µ u u µ µ' M 2

16 Velocity Potential Redefinition Z (@') 2! S [, ',g]= d 4 x p g 2 M 4 1,

17 Velocity Potential Redefinition Z (@') 2! S [, ',g]= d 4 x p g 2 M 4 1, M! M (') =µf ('/µ)

18 Velocity Potential Redefinition Z (@') 2! S [, ',g]= d 4 x p g 2 M 4 1, M! M (') =µf ('/µ) '! M (')! µ

19 Velocity Potential Redefinition Z (@') 2! S [, ',g]= d 4 x p g 2 M 4 1, M! M (') =µf ('/µ) '! M (')! µ d = d' f 2 ('/µ)

20 Complex U(1) charged Velocity Potential Z S = d 4 x p g 2 (@') 2 M 4 1!

21 Complex U(1) charged Velocity Potential Z S = d 4 x p g 2 '! (', ') (@') 2 M 4 1!

22 Complex U(1) charged Velocity Potential Z S = d 4 x p g 2 '! (', ') (@') 2 M 4 1!

23 Complex U(1) charged Velocity Potential Z S = d 4 x p g 2 '! (', ') (@') 2 M 4 1! S ' = Z d 4 x p g 2 D µ ' 2 M 4 1!,

24 Complex U(1) charged Velocity Potential Z S = d 4 x p g 2 '! (', ') (@') 2 M 4 1! S ' = Z d 4 x p g 2 D µ ' 2 M 4 1!, D µ = r µ + iqa µ

25 Complex U(1) charged Velocity Potential Z S = d 4 x p g 2 '! (', ') (@') 2 M 4 1! S ' = Z d 4 x p g 2 D µ ' 2 M 4 1!, D µ = r µ + iqa µ '! e iq ', A µ! A µ µ.

26 No shift-symmetry Different mass functions

27 No shift-symmetry Different mass functions Z D µ ' 2! S ' = d 4 x p g 2 M 4 1,

28 No shift-symmetry Different mass functions Z D µ ' 2! S ' = d 4 x p g 2 M 4 1, M (' ')

29 Mimetic Substitution Chamseddine Mukhanov(2013) for real scalars

30 Mimetic Substitution Chamseddine Mukhanov(2013) for real scalars g µ = h D 'D ' M 4 h µ

31 Mimetic Substitution Chamseddine Mukhanov(2013) for real scalars g µ = h D 'D ' M 4 h µ new degenerate higher derivative and Weyl-invariant, U(1) charged, gauge-invariant Scalar-Vector-Tensor theory.

32 Mimetic Substitution Chamseddine Mukhanov(2013) for real scalars g µ = h D 'D ' M 4 h µ new degenerate higher derivative and Weyl-invariant, U(1) charged, gauge-invariant Scalar-Vector-Tensor theory. Not covered by Horndeski(1980) or (2018)or Heisenberg (2014)constructions!

33 Current and Energy-Momentum

34 Current and Energy-Momentum J µ = 1 S ' p g A µ = iq 2M 4 'D µ ' 'D µ '

35 Current and Energy-Momentum J µ = 1 S ' p g A µ = iq 2M 4 'D µ ' 'D µ '

36 Current and Energy-Momentum J µ = 1 S ' p g A µ = iq 2M 4 'D µ ' 'D µ ' r µ F µ = J

37 Current and Energy-Momentum J µ = 1 S ' p g A µ = iq 2M 4 'D µ ' 'D µ ' r µ F µ = J T µ = 2 p g S ' g µ = 2M 4 D µ'd ' + D µ 'D '

38 Current and Energy-Momentum J µ = 1 S ' p g A µ = iq 2M 4 'D µ ' 'D µ ' r µ F µ = J T µ = 2 p g S ' g µ = 2M 4 D µ'd ' + D µ 'D '

39 Gauge invariant variables (', ',A µ )! (,,G µ )

40 Gauge invariant variables (', ',A µ )! (,,G µ ) ' = e iq, G µ = A µ µ

41 Gauge invariant variables (', ',A µ )! (,,G µ ) ' = e iq, G µ = A µ µ '! e iq ', A µ! A µ µ.

42 Higgs Phase without potential J µ = m 2 G G µ

43 Higgs Phase without potential J µ = m 2 G G µ m 2 G = M 4 q2 2

44 Higgs Phase without potential J µ = m 2 G G µ m 2 G = M 4 q2 2

45 Higgs Phase without potential J µ = m 2 G G µ m 2 G = M 4 q2 2 c.f. Chameleon screening for scalars, Khoury, Weltman (2003)

46 Different mass functions

47 Different mass functions M ( )= p µ, results in m 2 G = q 2 µ 2

48 Different mass functions M ( )= p µ, results in m 2 G = q 2 µ 2 J = q2 µ 2 G

49 Different mass functions M ( )= p µ, results in m 2 G = q 2 µ 2 J = q2 µ 2 G J = e2 n s mc G London equation, (1935)

50 Different mass functions M ( )= p µ, results in m 2 G = q 2 µ 2 J = q2 µ 2 G J = e2 n s mc G London equation, (1935) M ( )= q M µ

51 Is it still dust?

52 Is it still dust? D µ ' 2 =(@ µ ) 2 + q 2 2 G µ G µ = M 4

53 Is it still dust? D µ ' 2 =(@ µ ) 2 + q 2 2 G µ G µ = M 4 u µ = q,µ (@ ) 2

54 Is it still dust? D µ ' 2 =(@ µ ) 2 + q 2 2 G µ G µ = M 4 u µ = q,µ (@ ) 2 T µ = u µ u + m 2 G G µ G u µ u G G

55 Is it still dust? D µ ' 2 =(@ µ ) 2 + q 2 2 G µ G µ = M 4 u µ = q,µ (@ ) 2 m 2 G = M 4 q2 2 T µ = u µ u + m 2 G G µ G u µ u G G

56 Is it still dust? D µ ' 2 =(@ µ ) 2 + q 2 2 G µ G µ = M 4 u µ = q,µ (@ ) 2 m 2 G = M 4 q2 2 T µ = u µ u + m 2 G G µ G u µ u G G a µ = u r u µ ' q2 2µ 2 r? µ G G

57 Is it still dust? D µ ' 2 =(@ µ ) 2 + q 2 2 G µ G µ = M 4 u µ = q,µ (@ ) 2 m 2 G = M 4 q2 2 T µ = u µ u + m 2 G G µ G u µ u G G a µ = u r u µ ' q2 2µ 2 r? µ G G r F 2 a µ ' 1 2 m2 Gr? µ m 2 G

58 Photon mass bounds

59 Photon mass bounds m < ev the Proca mass, from astrophysics, galactic plasma Yamaguchi (1959); Chibisov (1976)

60 Photon mass bounds m < ev the Proca mass, from astrophysics, galactic plasma Yamaguchi (1959); Chibisov (1976) m the Proca mass, from laboratory, torque on a magnetised ring < ev Lakes (1998); Luo et al.(2003)

61 Photon mass bounds m < ev the Proca mass, from astrophysics, galactic plasma Yamaguchi (1959); Chibisov (1976) m the Proca mass, from laboratory, torque on a magnetised ring < ev Lakes (1998); Luo et al.(2003) the Proca mass, from laboratory Coulomb s law m ev Williams et al. (1971)

62 Photon mass bounds m < ev the Proca mass, from astrophysics, galactic plasma Yamaguchi (1959); Chibisov (1976) m the Proca mass, from laboratory, torque on a magnetised ring < ev Lakes (1998); Luo et al.(2003) the Proca mass, from laboratory Coulomb s law m ev Williams et al. (1971) Adelberger, Dvali, Gruzinov (2003)

63 Photon mass bounds m < ev the Proca mass, from astrophysics, galactic plasma Yamaguchi (1959); Chibisov (1976) m the Proca mass, from laboratory, torque on a magnetised ring < ev Lakes (1998); Luo et al.(2003) the Proca mass, from laboratory Coulomb s law m ev Williams et al. (1971) Adelberger, Dvali, Gruzinov (2003) Dark Photon mass bounds

64 Photon mass bounds m < ev the Proca mass, from astrophysics, galactic plasma Yamaguchi (1959); Chibisov (1976) m the Proca mass, from laboratory, torque on a magnetised ring < ev Lakes (1998); Luo et al.(2003) the Proca mass, from laboratory Coulomb s law m ev Williams et al. (1971) Adelberger, Dvali, Gruzinov (2003) Dark Photon mass bounds ev. m D ev Cardoso et al. (2018) the Proca mass, super radiance, observed stability of the inner disk of stellar-mass black holes

65 m = q r 3 SDM 8 HM Pl µ

66 m = q r 3 SDM 8 HM Pl µ Coulomb s law bound m ev

67 m = q r 3 SDM 8 HM Pl µ Coulomb s law bound m ev µ = q r 3 SDM 8 HM Pl m & q r 3 SDM 8 1 GeV

68 Decay of perturbations q 2 2 M 4 G µ G µ q 2 2 M 4 0 G µ G µ

69 Conclusions

70 Conclusions Fluid-like DM superconductor on cosmological scales

71 Conclusions Fluid-like DM superconductor on cosmological scales DM can screen unwanted hidden vectors fields

72 Conclusions Fluid-like DM superconductor on cosmological scales DM can screen unwanted hidden vectors fields New large class of degenerate higher-derivative Weyl-and gauge-invariant scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski

73 Conclusions Fluid-like DM superconductor on cosmological scales DM can screen unwanted hidden vectors fields New large class of degenerate higher-derivative Weyl-and gauge-invariant scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski Thanks a lot for attention!